+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating_HFJ_v8

Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating_HFJ_v8

Date post: 15-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: fletcher-loder
View: 69 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
9
Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating Hydraulic Fracturing Journal Page 1 of 9 Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating Authors: Larry Albert and Gregg Frasure, Allied-Horizontal Wireline Services INTRODUCTION This paper will present a new concept (FocusShot) in perforating gun design tailored specifically for fracturing operations (Sites, US Patent 9,145,763 B1). Current perforating guns shoot jets perpendicular to the gun body (and casing), thus creating holes in the casing and tunnels through the cemented annulus and formation, Figure 1. These perforating tunnels are usually evenly spaced along the axis of the casing and can be phased in many configurations, the most popular being 0°, 0-180° and 60°. FocusShot configures the gun assembly so that shaped charges displaced from center are oriented back to the mid-point of the perforating gun assembly (orientation angle increases as displacement increases), thus converging the explosive energy and the perforating tunnels on a single plane at the center of the perforated interval, Figure 2. With the exception of modifying the charge carrier to hold charges at an angle, the converging FocusShot gun-string uses the same components as a conventional perforating assembly. The converging shot configuration works with most gun sizes, lengths, shot densities and can be run in 0°, 0-180° and 60° phasing. In this paper, we will review the background for horizontal well perforating, review the design and testing of the FocusShot technology and then present field test results that demonstrate the value for Frac optimization. BACKGROUND Perforating cemented casings with explosive shaped charges has been employed for decades. Over the past fifty years, the technology has advanced and developed in response to industry demands for different products to solve reservoir and completion design issues. The concept of explosive shaped charge perforating originated in World War II with the bazooka design. Figure 1 – Conventional Perforating Figure 2 – FocusShot (Converging) Perforating
Transcript
Page 1: Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating_HFJ_v8

Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating Hydraulic Fracturing Journal Page 1 of 9

ImprovedFracEfficiencyUsingFocusShotPerforating

Authors:LarryAlbertandGreggFrasure,Allied-HorizontalWirelineServices

INTRODUCTION

Thispaperwillpresentanewconcept(FocusShot)inperforatinggundesigntailoredspecificallyforfracturingoperations(Sites,USPatent9,145,763B1).Currentperforatinggunsshootjetsperpendiculartothegunbody(andcasing),thuscreatingholesinthecasingandtunnelsthroughthecementedannulusandformation,Figure1.Theseperforatingtunnelsareusuallyevenlyspacedalongtheaxisofthecasingandcanbephasedinmanyconfigurations,themostpopularbeing0°,0-180°and60°.FocusShotconfiguresthegunassemblysothatshapedchargesdisplacedfromcenterareorientedbacktothemid-pointoftheperforatinggunassembly(orientationangleincreasesasdisplacementincreases),thusconvergingtheexplosiveenergyandtheperforatingtunnelsonasingleplaneatthecenteroftheperforatedinterval,Figure2.Withtheexceptionofmodifyingthechargecarriertoholdchargesatanangle,theconvergingFocusShotgun-stringusesthesamecomponentsasaconventionalperforatingassembly.Theconvergingshotconfigurationworkswithmostgunsizes,lengths,shotdensitiesandcanberunin0°,0-180°and60°phasing.Inthispaper,wewillreviewthebackgroundforhorizontalwellperforating,reviewthedesignandtestingoftheFocusShottechnologyandthenpresentfieldtestresultsthatdemonstratethevalueforFracoptimization.

BACKGROUND

Perforatingcementedcasingswithexplosiveshapedchargeshasbeenemployedfordecades.

Overthepastfiftyyears,thetechnologyhasadvancedanddevelopedinresponsetoindustrydemandsfordifferentproductstosolvereservoirandcompletiondesignissues.TheconceptofexplosiveshapedchargeperforatingoriginatedinWorldWarIIwiththebazookadesign.

Figure1–ConventionalPerforating

Figure2–FocusShot(Converging)Perforating

Page 2: Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating_HFJ_v8

Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating Hydraulic Fracturing Journal Page 2 of 9

Anexplosiveshapedchargeutilizespowderedexplosivescompressedbehindametalliner(powderedorsolid)intoacase,Figure3.Whentheshapedchargeisdetonated,theexplosioncausesthemetallinertocollapsefromthecenterandflowatextremelyhighvelocitiesperpendiculartothechargecasesurface.Thisjetofhighvelocitymetalcreatesahole(perforation)intheguncarrier,casing,cementannulusandtunnelsintotherockformation.Perforatinggunsaredesignedtocarrymultipleshapedchargesconfiguredinvariableshotdensitiesandphasingdependentupontheapplication.Thedesignoftheshapedchargewilldeterminethediameteroftheentryholeinthecasing,depthofpenetrationintotherockformationandshapeoftheperforationtunnel.

PERFORATINGFORFRACTURING

Muchhasbeenwrittenaboutperforatingforfracturingoptimization(Willingham,etal.1993)includingtheselectionofEHD(entryholediameter),phasing(azimuthaldistributionofchargesaroundthecarrier),shotdensity(perforationsperfoot)andlengthofperforationinterval(cluster)(vandeKetterij,dePater1997).Ithasbeenproventhatperforationdesignhasasubstantialimpactonfracturingefficiencyandperformance(BehrmannandNolte1998).Theperforationsaretheconduitforthefracturingfluidtoexitthesteelcasingandapplypressuretotherockformation.Theidealperforationwouldhavesufficientfrictionandpressuredroptoinsurefluidisevenlydistributedtoeachperforationinthecluster/stage,andcreatetheleastamountoftortuosityinthefracturepath.TheseidealperforationswouldallowtheimmediateinitiationofasingletransversefractureatthePreferredFracturePlane(PFP)ateachperforationclusterwithinastage,Figure4.Itisundesirableformultiplefracturestobe

initiatedintheproximityoftheperforationinterval(cluster),orforaxialfracturingtooccur(Daneshy2014).Multiplefracturesand/or,axialfracturingcanrobenergyfromthefluid,reducefracturewidth,reducethelengthofthefractureandrestricttheplacementofproppantintotheformation.Restrictionsonfluidflowoutsideoftheperforationcanresultinascreen-out.Thiswastrueforverticalwells,butisprovingtobeevenmorecriticalforhorizontalwellcompletions.Foroptimalhorizontalwellcompletions,weprefersingletransversefracturesinitiatedateachclusterwithinthestage,withmaximumlength,Figure5.

Previouswork(Daneshy1973,2009,2014)demonstratedthatthestateofstressina

Figure3–ExplosiveShapedCharge

Figure4–TransverseFracture

Page 3: Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating_HFJ_v8

Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating Hydraulic Fracturing Journal Page 3 of 9

boreholeprovidesanaturaltendencyforlongitudinal(axial)fractureinitiation.AccordingtoDaneshy,thisisageometricaleffectandindependentofin-situstressorientation.Becauselongitudinalfracturesarenotperpendiculartotheminimumhorizontalstress,theyneedhigherinitialpressuretoextend.Conventionalperforatingadoptedfromverticalwellcompletionsdoesnotpromotetransversefractureinitiationregardlessofspacingbetweenperforations,orphasingaroundthecasing.Theaxialdistributionofperpendicularperforationtunnelscancreatemultiplefracturesandnarrowpathswithconsiderableturbulenceatthewellbore,resultinginhighwellborepressure.Theresultcanbereducedfracturelengths,higherpumppressures,obstructedproppantpathatthewellboreandpotentialforscreen-outs.

AccordingtoDaneshy(2009),abettermethodforperforatingwouldbetoalignallperforationsineachclusterinasingleplaneperpendiculartotheboreholeaxis,Figure6.Figure6(a)showsa

spiralpeforatingpatterncreatedbya60°phasegunassembly.Figure6(b)showsthoseperforationscollapsedtoasingleplane.Unfortunately,withaperforatinggunassemblyitisimpossibletoaligntheshapedchargesto

perforatethecasingonasingleplane.Explosiveshapedchargesmustbeaxiallydisplacedalongtheguncarrierduetospacelimitationsinsidethegunbodyandtoeliminateexplosiveinterference,thusexplosiveshapedchargeperforationsareaxiallydisplacedalongthecasingcircumference.Whileitisimpossibletoalignalltheexplosiveshapedchargestoasingleplaneinsideaperforatinggunbody,analternativewasproposed(Sites2012).Bychangingtheanglefortheperforatingchargesinsidethegunbodytoorienteachoftheperforationsbacktothecenterofthegunassemby,theperforationenergyandtunnelscanbeconvergedtoasingleplane,Figure7.Theperforatingtunnelswillconvergeatadistancefromthecasingdependinguponshaped

Figure5–StageFracturing

Figure6–PerforationGeometry

Figure7–FocusShot60°Phasing

Page 4: Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating_HFJ_v8

Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating Hydraulic Fracturing Journal Page 4 of 9

geometricorientationandtargetpenetration(i.e.deeppenetratingchargessetatahigheralignmentanglewillconvergedeeperintothereservoirrock).

DEVELOPMENTANDBALLISTICTESTING

Totesttheperformanceoftheconverging(FocusShot)concept,aseriesofballistictestswereperformedinconcretetargetsatashapedchargeperforatingtestingfacility.Thetestsweredesignedtoevaluategunstability,chargeperformance(interference),targetpenetration,casingintegrityandperforationexitholediameters.Thetestwassetuptoshootaseriesofoneandtwoft.long,3.125in.ODperforatinggunsloadedwithstandardshapedchargesalignedatvaryingangles,Figure8,intofiveft.

diameterflowerpotconcretetargetswith4.5in.ODcasingcentered,Figure9.TheFocusShot(converging)configurationwastestedagainstconventionalloadanddownshot,Figure10.

Figure8–FocusShotLoad

Figure10–BallisticsTest

Figure9–ConcreteFlowerpotTarget

Page 5: Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating_HFJ_v8

Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating Hydraulic Fracturing Journal Page 5 of 9

ItwasnotedduringandafterthetestdetonationsthattheconcretetargetsintheFocusShotconfigurationsweremorecompletelybrokenatintersectionoftheperforationtunnels,indicatingthepoweroftheconvergingenergy.

Infigure11theconvergingperforationtunnelscanbetracedinthetesttargetfromthecasingexitpointtotheedgeoftheremainingtarget.

Table1summarizestheresultsofthetests.Allshotswerethroughthetargetsanditwasnotedthataschargeangleincreased,sodidEHD.

Figure11–FocusShot(Converging)TestTarget

Table1–FocusShotTestData

Page 6: Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating_HFJ_v8

Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating Hydraulic Fracturing Journal Page 6 of 9

FIELDTESTRESULTS

AfieldtestwassetuptoevaluateconventionalversusFocusShotonaMarcellusprojectinPennsylvania.Thiswasahorizontalwellpadwithtwo~4,050ft.laterals;750ft.spaced;~5,100ft.TVD;drilledinthesamenortheastdirection.Thefracdesign(water,proppant,chemicals)andstagelengthwerecomparablebetweenwells.Eachstagewasperforatedwith5clustersusing3.125in.6spf(12holes)60°phasedperforatinggunswithstandard“goodHole”charges.TheConventionalwellwasperforatedwithconventionalgunsandtheFocusShotwithconverging.Ingeneral,theFocusShotwelltreatedwithlowerpressureandhighersandvolumes.

Figure12comparestwoofthestagesforpressure,rateandproppantconcentration.WiththeFocusShotperforations,thepressurebuild-upindicatestheprobablecreationofasingletransversefracture.Atpumprates>90bpm(barrelsperminute)thepressureremainedconstantasproppantconcentrationswereincreasedwellabovethetargetlevel.TheConventionalwellshowsanerratichigh-pressureresponse,likelyindicatingtheproductionofmultipleand/oraxialfractures.The90bpmtargetpumpratecouldnotbeachievedandproppantconcentrationwaswellshortofthetarget.Inthisstage,proppantdisplacementwascurtailedandfellwellshortofdesign.TheaveragetreatingpressurefortheFocusShotwellwas-6%,or340psilower,Figure13,thantheConventionalwell.

AnX-Y-Zplot,Figure14,comparesallstagesformaximumpressure(Yaxis),sandvolume(Xaxis)andfrictionreducervolume(Zaxis).Mostofthe

FocusShotstagestrendtothelowerrightportionofthegraph(lowertreatingpressuresandhighersandvolumes).ThesetreatmentprofileswouldsuggestthattheFocusShotperforationsweremoreeffectiveintheinitiationofsingletransversefracturesatclusterdepthsandallowedhighersandvolumestopumpatlowerpressures(acharacteristicofidealperforations).

Betterfracturingtreatmentsshouldresultinbetterproduction.Thefirst31daysonthetwowellsshowsapproximately9%betterproductionfromtheFocusShotwell,Figure15.

Figure12–StageFracturingData

Page 7: Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating_HFJ_v8

Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating Hydraulic Fracturing Journal Page 7 of 9

Figure13–AverageTreatingPressureperWellandMaximumTreatingPressureperStage

*FRVol.=BubbleSize

Figure14–MaximumPressurevs.SandVolumeandFrictionReducer

Page 8: Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating_HFJ_v8

Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating Hydraulic Fracturing Journal Page 8 of 9

SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS

Anewperforatingtechniquehasbeendevelopedforhorizontalwellcompletions.Thisperforatingdesignutilizesangledshapedchargeconfigurationstoconvergeperforationtunnelsandenergyatthecenteroftheperforatinggun/cluster.Thistechniqueconvergestheperforatingtunnelsonasingleplaneperpendiculartothecasingaxisatafixeddistancefromthecasingoutsidediameter.Itisproposedthatconvergingperforatingwillbemoreeffectivefortheinitiationoftransversefracturesatthecenteroftheperforationclusters.Ifthenewdesigncanreducethepropensityforperforationstocreateaxialandmultiplefractures,thenmoreeffectivestimulationsandbetterproductionwillresult.

FieldtestresultsindicatethatFocusShotisaneffectivemethodtoperforatehorizontalwellstooptimizefracturingandimproveproduction.FocusShothasthepotentialtoreducetreatingpressuresandincreaseproppantdeliverytothereservoir.Todate,therehavebeenseveralhundredFocusShotstagescompletedinMarcellus,Utica,Woodford,HuntonandEagleFordwellswithoutasingleoccurrenceofascreen-out.

REFERENCES:

1. Behrmann,L.A.,andNolte,K.G.(1998):PerforatingRequirementsforFractureStimulations,SPE39453,presentedatInternationalSymposiumonFormationDamageinLafayette,LA,February18-19,1998.

2. Daneshy,A.A.(1973):AStudyofInclinedHydraulicFractures,SPEJournal,Vol.13,Number2,April1973,pp.61-68.

3. Daneshy,A.A.(2009):Horizontal-WellFracturing:WhyIsItDifferent?,SPEJournal,Vol.1,Number3,September2009,pp.30-35

4. Daneshy,A.A.(2014):FractureInitiationandExtensioninCementedCasedHorizontalWells,HydraulicFracturingJournal,July2014,pp.16-22.

5. Sites,J.(2015):UnitedStatesPatent9,145,763B1,filedMay15,2012,issuedSeptember29,2015

6. vandeKetterij,R.G.,anddePater,C.J.(1997):ImpactofPerforationsonHydraulicFractureTortuosity,SPE56193,presentedatEuropeanFormationDamageConferenceinTheHague,June2-3,1997.

Figure15–31DaysProduction(BOE)

Page 9: Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating_HFJ_v8

Improved Frac Efficiency Using FocusShot Perforating Hydraulic Fracturing Journal Page 9 of 9

7. Willingham,J.D.,Tan,H.C.andNorman,L.R.(1993):PerforationFrictionPressureofFracturingFluidSlurries,SPE25891,presentedatRockyMountainRegional/LowPermeabilityReservoirsSymposiuminDenver,CO,April12-14,1993.

BIOGRAPHY:

Larry Albert is a BSc graduate of Oklahoma City University. He joined Gearhart Industries in January 1977 as an open-hole field engineer. After Halliburton acquired Gearhart in 1988, he held key management assignments at corporate and field locations around the globe. Prior to leaving Halliburton, he was Senior Director of Wireline Operations. In May 2010, Allied Wireline Services was formed and he served as President and CEO until Allied merged with Horizontal Wireline in 2014. He is currently Vice-Chairman and member of the Board for Allied-Horizontal Wireline Services, one of the largest independent wireline services companies.

Larry has been a member of SPWLA since 1977 and has held officer level positions in chapters around the globe. As a member of SPE since 1984, he has published technical papers and been an active speaker and contributor. He is also a member of API, AADE and AESC.

Gregg Frasure joined Welltec in 2005 as a Field Engineer. He spent 8 years with Welltec holding various positions in operations and sales. Prior to leaving Welltec, Gregg was Account Manager for the GOM helping drive opportunities in the riserless sub-sea intervention market. In 2013, he joined Superior Energy Services in Business Development. In 2014, he joined Horizontal Wireline Services as Sales Manager, after merging with Allied Wireline he became VP of Northern Sales.

Gregg is a member of SPE and has published two technical papers on wireline deployed intervention technologies. He is a graduate of Texas Tech University.


Recommended