Date post: | 23-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | stanley-willis |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Improving Communication in Improving Communication in the Emergency Department: the Emergency Department:
The 5 Cs Model of ConsultationThe 5 Cs Model of ConsultationEducational SoundbitesCORD Academic Assembly 2011San Diego , CA
Chad Kessler, MD, [email protected]
15 Minute Plan of Attack Identification of a problem Communication and consultation background What’s the big idea? The 5 Cs of Consultation Impact to the field Questions and comments
Identification of a Problem
Lack of formal training in undergraduate or graduate medical education
Background: Clinical Communication for safe patient care
Medical errors Delays in treatment and care
Hand-offs and consultations
Lack of standardized process or modelJCAHO. Sentinel Event Alert. Delays in treatment. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/SEA_26.pdf. 2002; 26. Accessed Oct 1, 2010. Cheung DS, Kelly JJ, Beach C, et al. Improving handoffs in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Feb; 55(2):171-80. Beach C, Croskerry P, Shapiro M. Profiles in Patient Safety: Emergency Care Transitions. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10(4):364-367.
Education: ACGME Core Competencies
Patient Care Medical Knowledge Practice-Based Learning and Improvement Interpersonal and Communication Skills Professionalism Systems-Based Practice
ACGME: Outcome Project, General Competencies. http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compmin.asp. Accessed Sep 15, 2010.
What’s the Big Idea?
Qualitative analysis of consultation Monster literature search
Kessler C, Kutka B, Badillo C. Consultation in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Analysis and Review of the Consultative Process. In Press. The Journal of Emergency Medicine.
Data from Study: Skills for successful Consultation
Theme Sub-themesNumber of
CommentsClassic Example
Organizational Skills 1) Focused questions and
answers
2) Concise and coherent
presentations
3) Promptness
4) Adequate preparation
41 (43%) “…knowing specifically what you
want from a consultant as well as
anticipating what they will need to
give their assessment, speaking
briefly and getting to the point
quickly.”
Interpersonal and
Communication Skills
1) Politeness
2) Willingness to help
3) Clear communication
26 (27%) “…prompt, pleasant and treated us
as equals.”
Medical Knowledge 1) Accurate history
2) Investigating the problem
3) Ownership of patient
28 (30%) Taking “ownership of the patient.”
5 Cs Checklist AssessmentFive C’s Checklist Item Done Not DoneContact Introduction of consulting and consultant physicians. Building of relationship.
- States name- States rank and service- Identifies supervising attending- Identifies name of consultant physician
____________________
____________________
Communicate Give a concise story and ask focused questions.
- Presents a concise story- Presents an accurate recount of information/case detail- Speaks clearly
_______________
_______________
Core Question Have a specific question or request of the consultant. Decide on reasonable timeframe for consultation.
- Specifies need for consultation- Specifies timeframe for consultation
__________
__________
Collaboration A result of the discussion between the ED physician and the consultant, including any alteration of management or testing
- Is open to and incorporates consultant’s recommendations
_____ _____
Closing the LoopEnsure that both parties are on the same page regarding the plan and maintain proper communication about any changes in the patient’s status.
- Reviews and repeats patient care plan- Thanks consultant for consultation
__________
__________
Reliability Inter-item reliability of GRS (Chronbach’s alpha)
Rater 1 0.9 Rater 2 0.89 Rater 3 0.87
Inter-rater reliability for GRS 0.71 Inter-rater reliability for checklist 0.94 Correlation (pearson) between GRS and checklist
(n=43, p<0.0001) Surgery cases r=0.59 Psychiatry cases r=0.71
Main Results
Intervention group had significantly higher GRS scores (4.1 vs. 3.5, F(1,39)=33.5, p<0.0001) and Checklist Scores (10.7 vs. 7.0, F(1,39)=196, p<0.0001).
No natural progression in consulting skills with increasing PGY level
Impact to the Field
An effective, standardized model of consultation; the 5 Cs
Assessment of difficult to measure/quantify ACGME core competencies
Wide-spread education for under-graduate and graduate medical learners
Stepping it Up From simulated setting to clinical setting Demonstrate improvement in process
measures and patient outcomes Improve communication and relationships Improve patient safety Decrease resource utilization
Electronic Medical Records Beyond Emergency Medicine
Sug/quest/ments