+ All Categories
Home > Documents > In collaboration with:

In collaboration with:

Date post: 19-Mar-2016
Category:
Upload: stormy
View: 20 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
In collaboration with:. A. Hatzes, H. Lehmann & A.Gamarova (TLS, Germany) E. Rodriguez (IAA, Spain) E. Olson (Univ. of Illinois, USA) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
60
Precise spectroscopy and asteroseismology of Algol- type and roAp stars Mkrtichian D. ARCSEC, Sejong Univ., Korea/ Odessa Nat. Univ., Ukraine In collaboration with: A. Hatzes, H. Lehmann & A.Gamarova (TLS, Germany) E. Rodriguez (IAA, Spain) E. Olson (Univ. of Illinois, USA) S.-L. Kim (KAO, Korea) C. Kim (Chonbuk Uni., Korea) A. Kusakin (GAISH, Russia/Kazakhstan) A. Kanaan (Brasil)
Transcript
Page 1: In collaboration with:

Precise spectroscopy and asteroseismology of Algol-type and

roAp stars

Mkrtichian D. ARCSEC, Sejong Univ., Korea/ Odessa Nat. Univ., Ukraine

In collaboration with:

A. Hatzes, H. Lehmann & A.Gamarova (TLS, Germany)E. Rodriguez (IAA, Spain)E. Olson (Univ. of Illinois, USA)S.-L. Kim (KAO, Korea)C. Kim (Chonbuk Uni., Korea)A. Kusakin (GAISH, Russia/Kazakhstan)A. Kanaan (Brasil)

Page 2: In collaboration with:

Solar and stellar seismology: what is practical difference in the observations?

We can not yet optically resolvethe discs of distant main sequence stars!

• For the case of the Sun it is possible to measure the intensity or Doppler shifts signals from selected parts of solar disc (~”) i.e. measure the spatial information about NRP (Spatial filters - Hill (1978), Christensen-Dalsgaard & Gough (1982)

• For slowly rotating stars information is disk-averaged.

Page 3: In collaboration with:

The range of detectable modes in Sun : l,m<1000in stars: l,m<4

The basic problem of observational asteroseismology that should be solved is:

NRP mode – detection and identification problem

All existing mode-identification methods for stars are based on information about the contributions from different parts of optically unresolved stellar disk extracted somehow from the disk-integrated light, line-profile, or radial velocity variations.

The power of each of method for NRP mode identification is determinedby how precisely it can select these spatial contributions in practice.

Page 4: In collaboration with:

“Star as a Sun” observations are possible?

In my talk (on Algols and roAp stars) I will show that:

• using pecularities inherent to different types of pulsating stars it is possible to gain 2-D (l,m) and 3-D spatial information about NRPs

• using NRPs it is possible to gain new information about of physics, evolution, rotation

and atmospheric structure of these stars

Page 5: In collaboration with:

Pulsations in Algols:new methods of studies

Definition of a new group of oEA (oscillating EA) stars:

"The A-F spectral type mass-accreting Main Seguence pulsating stars in a semi-detached Algol-type systems» (Mkrtichian et al. 2002)

Remarkable peculiarity of oEA stars is co-existence of pulsation and accretion!

Page 6: In collaboration with:

F1VK 3 IV

Orbital Separation Unites

Primary (oEA)Secondary

Gas stream Circumstellar envelopeGas stream-star impact zone

2D hydrodynamic simulations

Structure of gas flow and envelope in Algol-type binary

Page 7: In collaboration with:

List of oEA stars

________________________________________________________________________________________

System Sp P (orb) P (puls) Reference

(days) (min) _________________________________________________________________________________________

Y Cam A7+K1 IV 3.3055 95.7, 78.8 Kim et al. (2002a)

AB Cas A3+K0IV 1.3669 83.93 Rodriguez et al. (1998)

RZ Cas A3V+KOIV 1.1953 22.43, 25.44 Mkrtichian et al. (2002)

R CMA F1V +G2-K2IV 3.864 68.5 Mkrtichian & Gamarova (2000)

AS Eri A3V+K0III 2.6642 24.39, 23.01, 23.34 Mkrtichian et al. (2003, in press)

TW Dra A6+K0IV 3.922 80 Kusakin et al. (2001)

RX Hya A8+K5 2.2816 74.26 Kim et al. (2002b)

AB Per A5+G9IV 7.1602 282.02 Kim et al. (2002c)

(results of 3 years of cooperation)

Page 8: In collaboration with:

Instability strip for oEA stars:

Being in the past ZAMS stars that have started their evolution in a detached binary system, and later have undergone fast evolution during a rapid mass-transfer phase when the former massive and rapidly evolving component overfills it’s Roche lobe and mass-transfer has started.

During the Rapid Mass Transfer/ Accretion phase evolutions the gainers move to the domain of higher mass and luminosity stars and sit in the H-R diagram closer to the ZAMS.

-

RMT

SMT

MS

Dotted line: An example of evol. of 1.8 M(sun) mass-accreting component in binary system

Page 9: In collaboration with:

oEA stars are not the normal MS Delta Scuti stars:

Basic differences of oEA stars with respect to the Delta Scuti-type stars and

Delta Scuti stars in detached binaries:

• Previous evolutionary life: they are remnants of rapid mass-transfer phase in close binaries.

• They are still accreting the mass and are in thermal inbalance.• They are evolving along (!!) the MS

In this sense they are attractive for asteroseismic studies.

Page 10: In collaboration with:

Eclipse NRP mode-identificationspatial structure of NRPs:

l,m quantum numbers

l=6, m=0 modes

l,m =6,3 l,m =6,6 modes modes

Page 11: In collaboration with:

Eclipses provides the unique possibility for mode –identification using the transit effects on NRP amplitudes and phases.

The geometry of the eclipse is accurately known from the solution of photometric light curve and RVs.

The secondary star acts as geometric periodic spatial filter (PSF) with a timely variable shape that produces specific pulsation amplitude and phase changes of NRP depending on the mode’s l,m,n quantum numbers and the geometry of eclipse in binary system .

Main adjustable parameters in modelling are mode quantum numbers, l,m, and the surface pulsation amplitude of the mode

l=4, m=0 oEA star

Page 12: In collaboration with:

The Modeling of eclipse effects:

• Fig.1. Theoretical modeling for system RZ Cas. The extracted pure pulsational light curve was simulated for prograde NRP mode l=3, m=-3. Above the graph the different phases of eclipse are shown.

Page 13: In collaboration with:

Mode identification in the oEA star AB Cas:modelling

Considered pulsation characteristics:• Gain factor is the ratio of the observed pulsation amplitudes during the eclipse of

pulsating component to the amplitude outside the eclipse: • Pulsational phase shift :

tmax - the time moment of observed maximum;t0 - predicted by the pulsation ephemeris time of maximum;Ppuls - the observed pulsation period.

out

mleclipseml A

Ag ,

,)(

pulsPtt 0max

l=1, m=+1 mode

Page 14: In collaboration with:

Mode identification in the oEA star AB Cas:observations

Page 15: In collaboration with:

Important Result from NRP modelling and observations:

• Amplitude and phase variability during eclipse phases are the sensitive indicators of the spatial structure (l,m) of modes and helps to discriminate the NRP modes.

• Amplitudes of some modes (l,m,n) are photometrically invisible or have small amplitudes in out-of eclipse orbital phases. During Min I they may increase their apparent pulsation amplitudes (the gain factor).

• The ascending branches of Min I are affected by effects of gas-stream and envelope attenuation on NRPs. By these reasons the descending branches of Min I are the more optimal for comparison with the results of NRP modelling.

Page 16: In collaboration with:

What new tools does asteroseismology bring to the studies of binaries?

Spin Rotation of components and asynchronicity problem:

Theory predicts synchronization of components in binary systems, but there are many asynchronized Algols

Page 17: In collaboration with:

Asynchronism in Algols is due to angular momentum transfer during high accretion transfer-rate episodes?

and/or it is apparent and caused by accretion stream that spin up of the surface layers (differential rotation)?

Mass-loss

Mass-loss

2-D hydrodynamic simulations,Nazarenko &Mkrtichian (in prep)

Mass accretion

Page 18: In collaboration with:

Hypothesis I.

Asynchronous Algols are young Algols (t<106 years) that recently finished RMT phase and just settled on the slow

mass-transfer phase.They are not yet synchronized .

Problems:• We can not estimate from observations ages of

Algols (as it is possible for normal stars using evolutionary tracks)

Page 19: In collaboration with:

Hypothesis II: The asynchronism that is determined on <v sin i> is

overestimated and is due equator-on visibility of all Algols and strong accretion driven differential rotation of very

surface layers or is effect of the rapidly-rotating optically thick quasi-stationary accretion disk or equatorial bulge

Problems:• We could not measure spectroscopically differential rotation or

internal rotation of prime component, the spectral lines are the superposition of atmospheric and envelope absorption and emission lines

Page 20: In collaboration with:

Hypothesis III.

Asynchronism is due to rapid mass-transfer episodes during SMT phase and high rates of angular momentum transfer.

Problems:• We have not good photometric or spectroscopic methods to

prove the existence of rapid mass-transfer episodes• Analysis of the orbital period O-C variations

is not good tool for study of angular momentum transfer .

Page 21: In collaboration with:

For check the theories of asynchronicity and evolution

we need new methods in:

• Accurate mass accretion rate determinations and observational detection of high-mass transfer/accretion episodes forced by the magnetic activity of secondary companion.

• Accurate determination of rotation periods of components

• Detection and measurement of accretion driven differential rotation of surface layers

• Ages of Algols on a slow mass-transfer phase

Page 22: In collaboration with:

New asteroseismic tools for studies of Algols (Mkrtichian et al., 2002)

• Rotational NRP mode splitting is an accurate tool for asynchronicity measurements (see AS Eri)

• Difference in NRP mode splitting of low and high-degree modes gives the information about the accretion driven strong differential rotation of surface layers

(to be detected)

• Accretion driven pulsation period changes may be used for determination of mean accretion rate (to be detected).

• The high-rate accretion episodes result in a puls. period jumps and/or rapid modal pattern changes ? (is probably detected)

Page 23: In collaboration with:

Pulsation period changes with increasing the mass of star:

• P=Q M-0.5 R 1.5

• R ~M α α≈ 0.55 for ZAMS stars M>M(sun)• P~QM 1.5α- 0.5

• dP/dt 1/P=dQ/Q + 0.325 dM/dt 1/M for idealized case the pulsation period should increase

with a increasing the mass of star (what is expected for MS stars)

But response of mass-accreting star is non-linearand for given (M,R) depends on mass-accretion rate (Ulrich &Burger 1976, Kippenhahn &Meyer-Hofmeister (1977)

Page 24: In collaboration with:

Expected accretion driven pulsation period changes (based on evol. binary models of De Greve 1993)

M-R relations for gainers in evolutionary models of 3.0+1.8 and 3.0 + 2.7 Algol primaries, evol. models of De Greve, (1993).

Accretion driven mass (upper panel) changes in a 3 evolutionary model of De Greve (1993) and calculated pulsation period changes of the fundamental radial mode (bottom panel) (Mkrtichian, 2003 submitted)

Page 25: In collaboration with:

• Negative (10-5 -10-7) at end of Fast Mass Transfer phase • Negative (10-7 –9) at beginning of Slow MT phase • Close to zero at middle of Slow MT phase • Positive at late stages of Slow MT phase

dP(puls)/dt vs dM/dt for slow mass-transfer phase for 2.7 gainer

Episodes of high-mass tranfer rates due to magnetic activity of secondary late-type star could be dectected as pulsation period jumps or changes of modal pattern in the pulsations.

Theoretical dM/dt - dP(puls) / dt relations could be found for slow mass-transfer phase for gainers using the evol. models. Accretion rate estimations could be found from pulsation period (O-C) variability

The accretion-driven pulsation period changes dP/dt expected in gainers will be (Mkrtichian et al. 2002):

Page 26: In collaboration with:

Asteroseismic Rotation Period and Asynchronicity determination in AS Eri

2000 yr multisite Euro-Asian (Spain -Kazakhstan-Korea) campaign (PI, Mkrtichian)

Discovered as a rapid pulsator (P=24 min) in 1999 yr (Gamarova Mkrtichian & Kusakin, 2000)

Pulsation light curves (extracted)

Page 27: In collaboration with:

AS Eri pulsation spectrum

f1 = 59.0311±0.0001 c/d (l, m, n) = (2 or 1, -2 or -1, 5)

f2 = 62.5633 c/d (l, m, n) = (2, -2, 6)

f3 = 61.6732 c/d (l, m, n) = (2, 0, 6)

f2-f3=0.8898 2F(asyn)P(orb)= 2P(rot) = -mP(rot)

P(orb) = 2.664152 days

v sin i 35 km/s ; i= 82.98

R=1. 57 R

F(asyn) 1.175 (spectroscopic)

F(asyn) =1. 185 (asteroseismic)

P(rot) 2.27 d (spectroscopic)

P(rot) = 2.2477 d (asteroseismic)

Mode identification:l=2,m=0 and m=-2 mode splitting

Page 28: In collaboration with:

Accuracy of seismic estimations of rotation, asynchronism and accretion:

• The seismic estimations of rotation periods and asynchronism of primary oEA star are as accurate as the measured pulsation periods. For a several month long duration observations the accuracy is of order values of 10 –5 .

• This means that we have a very precise tool for the study of of rotation periods in the primary components of Algols and hence asynchronicity and a precise estimation of mass-accretion rates.

Page 29: In collaboration with:

1997-2001 yr studies of key object - RZ Cas system (A3V+K0IV)

Multi-site campaigns:

• 1997/1998 (ph.) Japan (PI, Ohshima)• 1999 (ph.) USA, Spain, Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Korea (PI, E. Rodriguez)• 2000 (ph.) Spain, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Korea (PI, D. Mkrtichian)• 2001 (spe.+ ph.) USA, Spain, Germany, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Korea (PI, D. Mkrtichian)

Discovery of pulsations - Ohshima et al. 1998, 2001

P=22.4 min, semi-amplitude 0.01mag

Page 30: In collaboration with:

The 2-D hydrodynamic simulations of mass-transfer in RZ Cas eclipsing binary

(Nazarenko & Mkrtichian, in prep.)

K0 IV A3 V

= 0.9

= 1.1

Orbital separation units

Mass transfer rate ~ 10 –8 /yr

Hydrodinamic code, based on Large Particles Method (Belotserkovsky & Davidov (1982)

Page 31: In collaboration with:

RZ Cas: pulsation story• 1997/1998 – monoperiodic oscillations 64.19 c/d, semi-amplitude ~0.01 mag• 1998/1999 – same as for 1997/1998• 1999-Oct. 24, 2000 same as for 1997/1998/1999

First, exciting results of 2001 multisite photometric campaign :

a) the amplitude of pulsations decreases in order values(!) ( from 0.01 to 0.001 mag !!)

b) the pulsation spectrum become multiperiodic(!) with at least 3 excited periods including the older one

c) the amplitudes of all modes become variable (!) .

Page 32: In collaboration with:

RZ Cas NRP modal spectrum and its variability

2001 photometric campaign:

The DFT amplitude spectrum of combined Mt. Laguna and Sierra Nevada Obs. photometry: The low amplitude (<0.0015 mag) peaks between f= 30 - 64.2 c/d (48 -22 min) are well visible.

1997-2000 2001

MonoperiodicOscillationsΔm=8-9 mmag

No signal above 0.6 mmag

1999 Sierra-Nevada Obs. Photometry(Rodriguez et al, in prep.)

Low amplitude multi-periodic oscillations

Page 33: In collaboration with:

The reasons of a such drastic changes in RZ Cas ?Facts:

• Delta Scuti stars do not show such a abrupt amplitude and modal pattern changes

• Main difference between oEA and DSCT stars is a mass-accretion process

• The KOIV rapidly-rotating component of RZ Cas was found to be a flare star (two 0.6 mag flares registered in 1996 and 2001). Magnetic activity?

Page 34: In collaboration with:

K0 IV A3 V

Orbital separation units

L1 point

I

Are there active regions onthe surface of cool star?

Rapid pulsatorand accretor

Page 35: In collaboration with:

The reasons of a such drastic changes in RZ Cas ?The rapid mass-accretion hypothesis:

• Did the characteristics of the pulsations in the primary result from a rapid mass-transfer/accretion episode in 2000/2001, possibly resulting from magnetic activity on the secondary, rapidly rotating K0 IV companion?

• ...... Other reasons?

Independent observational check of the increase of the mass-transfer rate in Nov. 2000/2001:

• It should be a strong, transient circumstellar envelope around the primary in 2001 (spectral and photometric manifestations?)!

• It should be jump or change (increase) in the orbital period (O-C diagram)!

Page 36: In collaboration with:

Yes!!! O-C diagram of RZ Cas show period jump on +1 sec since Nov.-Dec. 2000,

K. Tikkanen (private com. , March 2003) http://www.student.oulu.fi/~ktikkane/AST/RZCAS.html

Nov./ Dec. 2000

O-C (min)

Orbital cycles

Page 37: In collaboration with:

RZ Cas: (Seismic) Life Story in 2000/2001:

November-December 2000:1. The abrupt mass-transfer episode occur due to the magnetic activity

secondary K0 IV star. 2. The prime component have accreted at least 50% of transferred mass

(and change its internal resonance properties?)3. Due to angular momentum transfer and loss during the episode the

orbital period of binary system become longer on 1 sec!!!!

December 2000-September 2001:

1. The internal resonance properties of A3 V component were changed?2. The mode selection mechanism started to search for new combinations

of pulsation modes close to the resonance?!3. The dominant mono-periodic oscillation was shifted on multi-periodic

and the amplitude of dominant mode drops to 0.001 mag

Page 38: In collaboration with:

2001 year spectrocopic time-series observations of RZ Cas (Lehmann & Mkrtichian (A&A, submitted)

N=970 spectra (R=40,000, S/N~200 ) in 12 nights in October at the 2.0m tel. of TLS Tautenburg.

The complete orbital period was covered 3 times, time sampling ~200 sec. Accuracy of of RVs 110 m/s for primary, 1.5 km/sec for secondary:

New accurate RV orbit and masses of components were obtained :

m1sin3 i=1.85 +/- 0.02 M

m2sin3 i=0.656 +/- 0.006 M

m1 / m2 =2.814 +/- 0.009

Anomalous rotation effect (Schlezinger-Rossiter-McLaughlin effect) in primary component

Page 39: In collaboration with:

The anomalous Schlesinger-Rossiter effect can be explained by different limb-darkening at phases (0.9 - 1.0) and

(1.0-1.1) of Min I that is due to attenuation effect of a asymmetric circumstellar envelope.

Cross- section of gas-density distribution (in 2D hydrodynamic simulations) through primaries environment at orbital phase 0.75. The integrated total number of particles seen from phase 0.25 is about 10-20 times lower than the number seen from phase 0.75.

Page 40: In collaboration with:

During Sept./Oct. 2001 orbital modulation of pulsational RV amplitudes of both modes was detected

Phase diagram for the amplitudes of f1=64.19c/d (solid line) and f2=56.6 c/d modes.

Page 41: In collaboration with:

The pulsation amplitudes of both modes are maximal at orbital phase ~ 1.1, and goes to minimum at phases 0.6-0.9

K0 IV A3 V

= 0.9

= 1.1

Orbital separation units

-

Page 42: In collaboration with:

Gas stream and assymetric envelope asa spatial filter for NRP in RZ Cas

• Large amplitude of puls. RV orbital modulation reflect the sectoral l=|m| nature of NRPs having the maximal amplitudes in equatorial zone.

• Shape a amplitude modulation gives a information about density variations of gas-envelope.

• It is max. at phases 0.9 and min. at 0.1 both in agreement with 2-D hydrodynamic

simulations.

Page 43: In collaboration with:

Conclusions on Algols

• The Min I eclipse effects on NRP amplitudes and phases helps us find unique and accurate solutions for (l,m) mode

identification. This makes oEA stars very attractive objects for asteroseismic studies of their internal structure.

• Multisite and space-based studies of NRP modal spectra should provide precise measurement of the rotation periods of stars, accretion driven differential rotation, and asynchronism at essentially higher accuracy levels then was done so far.

• Long-term study of pulsation period changes in oEA stars give us understanding of Algols ages and the possibility of accurate asteroseismic determination of mass-accretion rates.

• oEA stars are the unique laboratories of stellar physics and asteroseismology.

Page 44: In collaboration with:

Precise spectroscopy of roAp stars.

Some well known facts about roAp stars:• Strong chemical anomalies (up to +4.0 dex), spotty

distributions of elements (see maps in Hatzes, 1990)• Strong (~kilogauss) dipole magnetic fields• Excited high-overtone low amplitude (<5 mmag), low degree

dipole(?) p-modes (5-15 min), pulsation axis coincides with magnetic axis (Kurtz, 1990)• Oblique pulsator model (Kurtz & Shibahashi, 1986)

Page 45: In collaboration with:

Periodic spatial filter (PSF) concept for NRP mode detection (2-D concept)

(Mkrtichian 1994, Solar Physics, 152, p.275)

“roAp star as a Sun” observations:

Si abundance spots

Si pseudo-mask

Cr pseudo-mask

Page 46: In collaboration with:

Modelling of sensitivity functions of PSFsassociated with the surface abundance spots

(Mkrtichian, Hatzes & Panchuk 2000)

NRP Sensitivity function for Cr spotswith different overabundances

Intensity of Cr lines

Inside spot

Outside spot

Page 47: In collaboration with:

Oblique pulsator model (HR 3831) with a polar abundance spots

• RV amplitude and phase modulation for NRPs depends from geometry , coordinates and overabundances in spots

• NRP (l,m=3-10) mode detection using spectral lines of overabundant elements 10-100 times more sensitive than photometric detection

• The PSF technique is capable of the detection of l =3-10 NRP modes in roAp.

Page 48: In collaboration with:

Project “Asteroseismology with spatial resolution”Start: 1997

First results of project: Used telescopes: 2.7m and 2.1m McDonald Obs.(USA), 6.0m tel. SAO(Russia) Stars observed with iodine absorption cell : γEqu, HR 1217…..Detected of RV pulsations in roAp stars: 33 Lib, HD134214, HD 122970, 10Aql

Results on HR1217 and 33 Lib should be given now in details:

PIs: A. Hatzes (Mc Donald Obs.) & Mkrtichian (Odessa Univ.).

Page 49: In collaboration with:

HR1217- “broad-band” RV data:Dec. 1997-Febr. 1998 (2.7m tel. Mc Donald Obs., USA)

Page 50: In collaboration with:

First results on HR1217:

• Detection of two new excited equidistant modes, total number of detected modes N=9

New modes

“Enigmatic” mode

Page 51: In collaboration with:

HR 1217 echelle-diagram of p-mode spectrum

“Enigmatic” mode

Echelle-diagram of l=1-4 p-modespectrum of the model L from Gautschy et al. (1998)

Page 52: In collaboration with:

Rotational amplitude and phase modulation

Page 53: In collaboration with:

Conclusions on HR1217:

• 9 frequencies in the p-mode spectrum: 8 are equidistant• f7 frequency is probably relate to l=4 mode• Amplitude modulation of f2 and f4 mode is in agreement with

oblique pulsator model.• Phase modulation is in disagreement with simple oblique

pulsator model

Page 54: In collaboration with:

roAp star 33Lib: Detection of atmospheric standing waves and acoustic node

Method of vertical atmospheric sounding: RV Doppler shift measurements of lines formed at different depths

Transformation scale EW-log τ

Page 55: In collaboration with:

We use line-by-line analysis of Doppler shifts

Nd III line RVs

Page 56: In collaboration with:

The histogram of pulsation phases

Page 57: In collaboration with:

Two oppositely pulsating layers: Week Nd II lines: log tau < -4.0 Strong NdIII lines: log tau >> -4.5

Page 58: In collaboration with:

Schematic of acoustic cross-section

Reflecting layer in upper atmosphere?

Lower atmosphere

Formation of Nd III lines

Formation of week lines

Page 59: In collaboration with:

33 Lib: Acoustic cross-section of lower atmosphere

Standing + running wave components?

Page 60: In collaboration with:

Conclusions: on 33 Lib

• This is a first application of acoustic cross-section methods (2-D +3 rd Dimension). The time coverage is short (2 hours), accuracy of phases is not high

• We found the oppositely pulsating layers in lower and upper atmosphere and acoustic node above log tau> -4.5.

• NdIII lines are formed at superficial layers that support the prediction from diffusion theory


Recommended