+ All Categories
Home > Documents > In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from...

In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from...

Date post: 15-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
18
Transcript
Page 1: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)
Page 2: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Most of this data comes from FEDs.

In FEDs, you determine the contact information

you want public.

It is HIGHLY Recommended that your photo be current. Contact

FAPD to update your photo.

Page 3: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

You choose whether to

designate and show your

most impactful

pubs or FEDs to show auto

show last published item first.

This data is public. Keep in mind that potential

collaborators, reviewers, and the general public will see this

data.

Page 4: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

This data comes from a

variety of databases, which are

“owned” by a variety of PSOM and

Penn Medicine

Health System Offices.

Section One

Section Two

Section Three

Page 5: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Sect

ion

One

Responsible Office/Database§ FEDS§ Office of Medical Affairs Credentialing § Penn Medicine Marketing

It is HIGHLY Recommended that your photo be current.

Even if you are an avid researcher and PI, if you see patients, you should be designated here as

“Physician.” This is your health system profile, not your faculty

profile.

Page 6: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Section Two

Responsible Office / Database§ FEDs§ Office of Medical Affairs Credentialing § National Research Health (Press Ganey)

This section should accurately reflect your work as a clinician.

Page 7: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Sect

ion

Thre

e

Responsible Office/Database§ FEDs§ Office of Medical Affairs Credentialing

Keeping FEDs up to date is important for both your faculty and your health system profile.

Page 8: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Cont

act

Web

Upda

tes@

emai

l.cho

p.ed

u Send your UPDATED CV to [email protected] in mind that the CHOP web and marketing group DO NOT have access to university administrative programs. They are relying on you to provide them the correct data.

Your provost approved faculty title can be found in FEDs in the field: Penn Med Faculty APPTS. This is the title that should be used on the CHOP profile site.

Page 9: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

This is Rebecca’s faculty title.

Page 10: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

You may be able to make changes to these sites via your Department Faculty Coordinator.

Review your web presence on Division, Institute, Center, and Lab

sites. Don’t let out of date professional descriptions linger

online.

Page 11: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)
Page 12: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Extramural Consultants are individuals in your field with whom you have not directly collaborated

who, during your review for promotion, are asked to provide an

unbiased and impartial assessment of your scholarship, reputation and standing in your specific area of

expertise.

Page 13: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Extramural Consultants will receive• your CV• your Personal Statement• 3-4 (maximum) reprints you select

This is all they will receive. While we do not direct Extramural Consultants to ”google” faculty candidates for promotion, of course they might do so.

Page 14: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)
Page 15: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Academic Clinician Track Reputation

Rank Description Primary Evaluation & Example Indicators*Reputation

@ Associate Professor

Reputation at this rank should reflect recognition at the primary practice site as a superior clinician and teacher with impactful contribution to the AOC.

§ Clinical EvaluationsØ List of 15 faculty peers must net 7

evaluations + chair or chief evaluationØ Chair’s rec letter attestation

§ Peer ReferencesØ 7 references from faculty at or above

proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

§ ProfessionalismØ Chair’s rec letter attestation

*See handout for details: pages 1-3; 6.Link: https://www.med.upenn.edu/flpd/metrics-for-promotion-(academic-clinician).html

Page 16: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Academic Clinician Track Reputation

Rank Description Primary Evaluation & Example Indicators*Reputation @ Professor

Reputation at this rank should reflect recognition beyond the primary practice site as a superior clinician and teacher with impactful contribution to the AOC.

§ Clinical EvaluationsØ List of 15 faculty peers must net 7

evaluations + chair or chief evaluationØ Chair’s rec letter attestation

§ Peer ReferencesØ 7 references from faculty at or above

proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Ø 3 from outside primary practice site§ Professionalism

Ø Chair’s rec letter attestation*See handout for details: pages 4-5; 6.Link: https://www.med.upenn.edu/flpd/metrics-for-promotion-(academic-clinician).html

Page 17: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Publishing

Invited Talks

Expanding Networks

Collaborations

Scholarship

Page 18: In FEDs, you determine · ØChair’s rec letter attestation §Peer References Ø7 references from faculty at or above proposed rank (review of teaching, AOC, overall reputation)

Recommended