Date post: | 27-Oct-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | devon-sach |
View: | 885 times |
Download: | 14 times |
In-flight landing DistancesNew tools to assess landing performance
Version 2.0 August 2012
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
REASON FOR REVISION
• The Runway Condition Assessment Matrix is revised to take into account comments we received since April 2012:- Its general layout is reviewed to differentiate the Runway Surface Conditions from the
Related Landing Performance- A slide is added to further highlight that assessed landing performance must not be
better that the one related to the Runway Surface Conditions (only the most conservative landing performance must be retained)
• The in-flight landing distances are EASA approved since mid of July 2012 (FAA approval is ongoing). Temporary Revision of the AFM have been dispatched to enable operational use of the in-flight landing distances.
• A slide is added to highlight that multiple in-flight failure (from different aircraft systems) are not considered (further information will be available soon on AirbusWorld in the World In-Service Experience (WISE) knowledge Base).
• Clarify that the MMEL landing penalty factors must be also applied to the In-Flight Landing Distances without or with failure.
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
OBJECTIVES
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
BACKGROUND1
WHAT IS NEW?2
CONTENTS
WHERE AND WHEN?5
FLYSMART WITH AIRBUS4
FACTORED LANDING DISTANCE3
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
BACKGROUND1
WHAT IS NEW?2
CONTENTS
WHERE AND WHEN?5
FLYSMART WITH AIRBUS4
FACTORED LANDING DISTANCE3
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
BACKGROUND
• A third of major accidents of large commercial transport aircraft are runway excursions
• Many involve difficulties for the flight crew to realistically assess the landing performance
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
BACKGROUND
• Currently, Actual Landing Distance (ALD) is the reference to determine in flight landing performance
• ALD are defined by regulations and based on flight tests.
Thus, ALD are not representative of daily operations
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
BACKGROUND
• Following runway excursions, the FAA mandated the TALPA/ARC*to find a strong industry consensus.
• The purpose was to elaborate common tools to better assess the in-flight landing performance
* Takeoff and Landing Performance Assessment / Aviation Rulemaking Committee
All users need to share a common performance reference
Dispatchers Airports Pilots
???
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
BACKGROUND
• Following runway excursions, the FAA mandated the TALPA/ARC*to find a strong industry consensus.
• The purpose was to elaborate common tools to better assess the in-flight landing performance
• The committee submitted:
- The Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM)
- Landing distances figures more representative of daily operations
• The references to be used for dispatch are unchanged
* Takeoff and Landing Performance Assessment / Aviation Rulemaking Committee
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
CONTENTS
• The Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM)• The in-flight landing performance without failure• The in-flight landing performance with failure• Standard Operating Procedures• Master Minimum Equipment List
BACKGROUND1
WHAT IS NEW?2
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
CONTENTS
• The Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM)• The in-flight landing performance without failure• The in-flight landing performance with failure• Standard Operating Procedures• Master Minimum Equipment List
BACKGROUND1
WHAT IS NEW?2
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - Runway Condition Assessment Matrix
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
IN FLIGHT PERFORMANCE
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - Runway Condition Assessment Matrix
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
Runway Condition Assessment Matrixfor Landing
The purpose is to provide all users with an unique reference to share:- The Runway Surface Conditions
- The recommended Maximum Crosswind- The Related Landing Performance
- Additional information
* Pilot Report of Braking Action ** Estimated Surface Friction
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - Runway Condition Assessment Matrix
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
Runway Condition Assessment Matrixfor Landing
The purpose is to provide all users with an unique reference to share:- The Runway Surface Conditions
- The recommended Maximum Crosswind- The Related Landing Performance
- Additional information
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - Runway Condition Assessment Matrix
• How to use the Runway Condition Assessment Matrix - 1st example
Use all existing information to assess the landing performance
2 mm of Slush
With the Runway State / Contaminant only:
Use directly the Performance Code/Level and associated Maximum Crosswind
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - Runway Condition Assessment Matrix
• How to use the Runway Condition Assessment Matrix - 2nd example Damp
Use all existing information to assess the landing performance
With both the Runway State / Contaminant
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - Runway Condition Assessment Matrix
• How to use the Runway Condition Assessment Matrix - 2nd example Good to Medium
Use all existing information to assess the landing performance
With both the Runway State / Contaminant and a Report
Damp
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - Runway Condition Assessment Matrix
• How to use the Runway Condition Assessment Matrix - 2nd example
Use all existing information to assess the landing performance
With both the Runway State / Contaminant and a Report
Damp
Use the MOST CONSERVATIVEPerformance Code/Level and associated Maximum Crosswind
Good to Medium
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
CONTENTS
• The Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM)• The in-flight landing performance without failure• The in-flight landing performance with failure• Standard Operating Procedures• Master Minimum Equipment List
BACKGROUND1
WHAT IS NEW?2
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - LANDING DISTANCE WITHOUT FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
IN FLIGHT PERFORMANCE
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - LANDING DISTANCE WITHOUT FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
LANDING DISTANCE - DRY
LANDING DISTANCE - GOOD
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - LANDING DISTANCE WITHOUT FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
LANDING DISTANCE - MEDIUM TO POORLANDING DISTANCE – GOOD TO MEDIUM
LANDING DISTANCE - MEDIUM LANDING DISTANCE - POOR
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - LANDING DISTANCE WITHOUT FAILURE
Braking Action
Landing Configurations
Braking Modes(Manual or Auto brake)
The REF DIST(Provided at fixed landing weight)
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - LANDING DISTANCE WITHOUT FAILURE
The REF DIST considers: Sea Level, ISA, no wind,no slope, no engine reverse thrust, manual landing,VAPP = VLS
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - LANDING DISTANCE WITHOUT FAILURE
Braking Action
Landing Configurations
Braking Modes(Manual or Auto brake)
Additional corrections(Overweight procedure, Autoland)
Corrections(Weight, SPD, ALT, WIND…)
The REF DIST(Provided at fixed landing weight)
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – VAPP WITHOUT FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
IN FLIGHT PERFORMANCE
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – VAPP WITHOUT FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
+
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – VAPP WITHOUT FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
If APPR COR > 1/3 Headwind:- Ground Speed increase- SPD = APPR COR
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – VAPP WITHOUT FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
If APPR COR = 1/3 Headwind:- No Ground Speed increase- No SPD correction
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – VAPP WITHOUT FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
CAUTION
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITHOUT FAILURE
Landing data
• Aircraft A330 • Runway Condition 2 mm of Slush• Report Good to Medium• Runway Slope 1% UP• Wind / OAT 12 kt headwind / - 5°C• Airport pressure altitude Sea Level• Estimated Landing Weight 170 t• Landing configuration CONF FULL• A/THR ON• A/BRK MED• Credit for all thrust reversers
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITHOUT FAILURE
Step 1Identify the
Braking Action
Step 3Calculate the
Landing Distance
Step 2Determine the
VAPP
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITHOUT FAILURE
• Step 1 - Identify the Braking Action
Runway Condition: 2 mm of Slush
2 mm of Slush
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITHOUT FAILURE
• Step 1 - Identify the Braking Action
Runway Condition: 2 mm of SlushReport: Good to Medium
2 mm of Slush Good to Medium
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITHOUT FAILURE
• Step 2 - Determine the VAPP
5kt
4kt
VLS (FULL, 170T) = 132kt
APPR COR (A/THR) = 5kt
VAPP = 137kt
SPD = APPR COR = 5kt
Estimated Landing Weight : 170 tLanding configuration: CONF FULLA/THR: ON - Wind / OAT: 12 kt headwind / - 5°C
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITHOUT FAILURE
REF DIST (190T) = 1980 m
• Step 3 - Calculate the Landing Distance
REV correction = - 60 x 2 = - 120 m
WEIGHT correction (170T) = - 70 x 2 = - 140 mSPD correction (SPD = 5kt) = + 100 m
Landing Distance = 1820 m WIND correction (12kt headwind): NO CORRECTION
ALT correction (Sea Level): NO CORRECTION
TEMP correction (ΔISA = -20°C): NO CORRECTION
SLOPE correction (1% UP): NO CORRECTION
From step 1: Good to MediumFrom step 2: VAPP = 137kt and SPD = 5ktCONF FULL, LW = 170T and A/BRK: MED
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
CONTENTS
• The Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM)• The in-flight landing performance without failure• The in-flight landing performance with failure• Standard Operating Procedures• Master Minimum Equipment List
BACKGROUND1
WHAT IS NEW?2
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - LANDING DISTANCE WITH FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
IN FLIGHT PERFORMANCE
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - LANDING DISTANCE WITH FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
DRY
GOOD
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - LANDING DISTANCE WITH FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
ELECTRICAL SYSTEMELECTRICAL SYSTEM
MEDIUM TO POOR
POOR
GOOD TO MEDIUM
MEDIUM
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - LANDING DISTANCE WITH FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
DRY
FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM
etc.
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – LANDING DISTANCE WITH FAILURE
Failure titles
Braking Actions
The REF DIST(Provided at fixed landing weight)
FLAPS lever positions and ΔVREF
Aircraft System
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – LANDING DISTANCE WITH FAILURE
The REF DIST considers: Sea Level, ISA, no wind,no slope, no engine reverse thrust, manual landing,VAPP = VREF + ΔVREF
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – LANDING DISTANCE WITH FAILURE
Corrections(Weight, SPD, ALT, WIND…)
Failure titles
Braking Actions
The REF DIST(Provided at fixed landing weight)
FLAPS lever positions and ΔVREF
Aircraft System
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – LANDING DISTANCE WITH FAILURE
Corrections(Weight, SPD, ALT, WIND…)
Failure titles
Braking Actions
The REF DIST(Provided at fixed landing weight)
FLAPS lever positions and ΔVREF
Aircraft System
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – VAPP WITH FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
IN FLIGHT PERFORMANCE
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – VAPP WITH FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
++
+
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – VAPP WITH FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
If APPR COR > 1/3 Headwind:- Ground Speed increase- SPD = APPR COR
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – VAPP WITH FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
If APPR COR = 1/3 Headwind:- No Ground Speed increase- No SPD correction
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – VAPP WITH FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? – VAPP WITH FAILURE
OP
SD
ATA
OE
B
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
Landing data
• Aircraft A330 • Runway Condition Compacted snow• Report Good• Wind / OAT 12 kt headwind / - 15°C• Airport pressure altitude 1000ft• Estimated Landing Weight 190 t• A/THR ON• In-Flight failure ENG 1 SHUTDOWN (no damage)• Credit for all available thrust reversers
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
Step 1Identify the
Braking Action
Step 3Calculate the
Landing Distance
Step 2Determine the
VAPP
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
• Step 1 - Identify the Braking Action
Runway Condition: Compacted Snow OAT: -15°C
Compacted SnowOAT = -15°C
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
• Step 1 - Identify the Braking Action
Runway Condition: Compacted Snow OAT: -15°CReport: Good
Compacted SnowOAT = -15°C Good
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
• Step 1 - Identify the Braking Action
Runway Condition: Compacted Snow OAT: -15°CReport: Good
Compacted SnowOAT = -15°C Good
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
• Step 2 - Determine the VAPP
Estimated Landing Weight : 190 tA/THR: ONWind / OAT: 12 kt headwind / - 15°C
VREF (190T) = 140kt
ΔVREF = 5kt
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
• Step 2 - Determine the VAPP
APPR COR (A/THR) = 5kt
VAPP = 150kt
SPD = APPR COR = 5kt
5kt
4kt
VREF (190T) = 140kt
ΔVREF = 5kt
Estimated Landing Weight : 190 tA/THR: ONWind / OAT: 12 kt headwind / - 15°C
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
• Step 3 - Calculate the Landing Distance
REF DIST (190T) = 2080 mWeight correction (190T): NO CORRECTION
SPD correction (SPD = 5kt) = + 120 mALT correction (1000ft) = + 80 x 1 = + 80 mREV correction = - 70 x 1 = - 70 m
Landing Distance = 2210 m
From step 1: Good to MediumFrom step 2: VAPP = 150kt and SPD = 5ktEstimated Landing Weight : 190 t
FLAPS LEVER for LDG: CONF 3
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
CONTENTS
• The Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM)• The in-flight landing performance without failure• The in-flight landing performance with failure• Standard Operating Procedures• Master Minimum Equipment List
BACKGROUND1
WHAT IS NEW?2
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - STANDARD OPS PROCEDURES
GE
NE
RAL
INFL
TP
ER
FO
PS
DAT
AO
EB
GE
NE
RAL
GE
NE
RAL
NORMAL PROCEDURES
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - STANDARD OPS PROCEDURES
GE
NE
RAL
INFL
TP
ER
FO
PS
DAT
AO
EB
GE
NE
RAL
GE
NE
RAL DESCENT PREPARATION
LDG ELEV …………………………………………………… CHECKLANDING PERFORMANCE ………….…………………. CONFIRMFMGS ……………………………………………………… PREPAREAPPR BRIEFING …………………………………...…… PERFORMAUTO BRK ……………………………………..………….. AS RQRD
LANDING DATA ……………………………………………PREPARE
FMGS ……………………………………………………… PREPARE
DESCENT CLEARANCE …………………………………. OBTAINANTI ICE ………………………………………………….. AS RQRD
PF PNF
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
CONTENTS
• The Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM)• The in-flight landing performance without failure• The in-flight landing performance with failure• Standard Operating Procedures• Master Minimum Equipment List
BACKGROUND1
WHAT IS NEW?2
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
• MEL item(s) that impact(s) the landing performance must also be taken into account in-flight.
…
Landing Distance (MEL 27-64-01A) = Landing Distance (without or with failure) x 1.02
Landing performance computationMultiply the landing distances by 1.02
WHAT IS NEW? - MASTER MINIMUM EQUIPMENT LIST
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
BACKGROUND1
WHAT IS NEW?2
CONTENTS
WHERE AND WHEN?5
FLYSMART WITH AIRBUS4
FACTORED LANDING DISTANCE3
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
ADDITIONAL SAFETY MARGIN
• In-flight landing distance considers fixed flight parameters, without margin
• To cover variability in flying techniques and unexpected conditions at landing the flight crew should apply an appropriate margin to the in-flight landing distances
• Airbus recommends to add a margin of 15% to the in-flight landing distance (except in emergency)
Factored Landing Distance = In-flight Landing Distance x 1.15
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
ADDITIONAL SAFETY MARGIN
• In-flight landing distance considers fixed flight parameters, without margin
• To cover variability in flying techniques and unexpected conditions at landing the flight crew should apply an appropriate margin to the in-flight landing distances
• Airbus recommends to add a margin of 15% to the in-flight landing distance (except in emergency)
Factored Landing Distance = In-flight Landing Distance x 1.15
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
BACKGROUND1
WHAT IS NEW?2
CONTENTS
WHERE AND WHEN?5
FLYSMART WITH AIRBUS4
FACTORED LANDING DISTANCE3
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
Landing data
• Aircraft A330 • Runway Condition Compacted snow• Report Good• Wind / OAT 12 kt headwind / - 15°C• Airport pressure altitude 1000ft• Estimated Landing Weight 190 t• A/THR ON• In-Flight failure ENG 1 SHUTDOWN (no damage)• Credit for all available thrust reversers
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
FLYSMART WITH AIRBUS – EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
IN-FLIGHT
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
FLYSMART WITH AIRBUS – EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
Most fields remain similar to previousFlysmart with Airbus version
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
FLYSMART WITH AIRBUS – EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
Selection of the Braking Action
Most fields remain similar to previousFlysmart with Airbus version
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
FLYSMART WITH AIRBUS – EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
Selection of the Braking Action
Most fields remain similar to previousFlysmart with Airbus version
Selection of the A/THR ON
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
FLYSMART WITH AIRBUS – EXAMPLE WITH FAILURE
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
BACKGROUND1
WHAT IS NEW?2
CONTENTS
WHERE AND WHEN?5
FLYSMART WITH AIRBUS4
FACTORED LANDING DISTANCE3
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
WHAT IS NEW? - SUMMARY
• The aim of the TALPA/ARC* was to elaborate common tools to better assess the in-flight landing performance
* Takeoff and Landing Performance Assessment / Aviation Rulemaking Committee
The Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM)
The in-flight landing performance without failure
The in-flight landing performance with failure
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
FCOM IMPACTS - REVISION MAY 2012
GEN General
DSC Aircraft Systems
PRO Procedures
LIM Limitations
OEB Operations Engineering Bulletins
FCB Flight Crew Bulletins
NOR Normal Procedures
SUP Supplementary Procedures
PER Performance
ABN Abnormal and Emergency Procedures
SPO Special Operations
All references* to the landing distance penalty factors are removed
* Reference to the tables of landing distance penalty factors and the tables are removed
LDG Landing
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
FCOM IMPACTS - REVISION MAY 2012
GEN General
DSC Aircraft Systems
PRO Procedures
LIM Limitations
OEB Operations Engineering Bulletins
FCB Flight Crew Bulletins
NOR Normal Procedures
SUP Supplementary Procedures
PER Performance
ABN Abnormal and Emergency Procedures
SPO Special Operations
Descent Preparation updated
LDG Landing
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
FCOM IMPACTS - REVISION MAY 2012
GEN General
DSC Aircraft Systems
PRO Procedures
LIM Limitations
OEB Operations Engineering Bulletins
FCB Flight Crew Bulletins
NOR Normal Procedures
SUP Supplementary Procedures
PER Performance
ABN Abnormal and Emergency Procedures
SPO Special Operations
Introduction of:Definitions,Runway Condition Assessment Matrix
LDG Landing
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
QRH IMPACTS - REVISION MAY 2012GEN GeneralABN Abnormal and Emergency ProceduresNP Normal ProceduresFPE In-Flight Performance
SPD Speeds
IFL In-Flight LandingFPF Fuel Penalty Factors
MAT Runway Condition Assessment Matrix
VAP VAPP Determination
LD Landing Distance – Normal Operations
VAF VAPP Determination with Failure
24 Landing Distance with Electric System Failure
27 Landing Distance with Flight Control System Failure
34 Landing Distance with Navigation System Failure
36 Landing Distance with Bleed System Failure
70 Landing Distance with Engine System Failure
OEI One Engine InoperativeAEO All Engines OperativeCAB Flight Without Cabin PressurizationOPD Operating Data
OPS Operational DataOEBPROC Operations Engineering Bulletins
XX ….
All references to the landing distance penalty factors are removed
“Summaries” provide reference to the Landing Distance tables
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
QRH IMPACTS - REVISION MAY 2012GEN GeneralABN Abnormal and Emergency ProceduresNP Normal ProceduresFPE In-Flight Performance
SPD Speeds
IFL In-Flight LandingFPF Fuel Penalty Factors
MAT Runway Condition Assessment Matrix
VAP VAPP Determination
LD Landing Distance – Normal Operations
VAF VAPP Determination with Failure
24 Landing Distance with Electric System Failure
27 Landing Distance with Flight Control System Failure
34 Landing Distance with Navigation System Failure
36 Landing Distance with Bleed System Failure
70 Landing Distance with Engine System Failure
OEI One Engine InoperativeAEO All Engines OperativeCAB Flight Without Cabin PressurizationOPD Operating Data
OPS Operational DataOEBPROC Operations Engineering Bulletins
XX ….
Descent Preparation updated
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
QRH IMPACTS - REVISION MAY 2012GEN GeneralABN Abnormal and Emergency ProceduresNP Normal ProceduresFPE In-Flight Performance
SPD Speeds
IFL In-Flight LandingFPF Fuel Penalty Factors
MAT Runway Condition Assessment Matrix
VAP VAPP Determination
LD Landing Distance – Normal Operations
VAF VAPP Determination with Failure
24 Landing Distance with Electric System Failure
27 Landing Distance with Flight Control System Failure
34 Landing Distance with Navigation System Failure
36 Landing Distance with Bleed System Failure
70 Landing Distance with Engine System Failure
OEI One Engine InoperativeAEO All Engines OperativeCAB Flight Without Cabin PressurizationOPD Operating Data
OPS Operational DataOEBPROC Operations Engineering Bulletins
XX ….
Introduction of the new landing performance assessment tools
Tables of Actual Landing Distances are removed
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
FCTM IMPACTS - REVISION MAY 2012NO Normal Operations
Cruise
Landing PerformanceApproach PreparationApproach Briefing
SI-090 Landing PerformanceGeneralNormal Operations
VAPP Determination without FailureLanding Distance without FailureExample
Abnormal OperationsVAPP Determination with FailureLanding Distance with FailureExample
SI Supplementary Information
Descent Preparation
Descent
Guidelines on how to assess landing performance
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
FCTM IMPACTS - REVISION MAY 2012NO Normal Operations
Cruise
Landing PerformanceApproach PreparationApproach Briefing
SI-090 Landing PerformanceGeneralNormal Operations
VAPP Determination without FailureLanding Distance without FailureExample
Abnormal OperationsVAPP Determination with FailureLanding Distance with FailureExample
SI Supplementary Information
Descent Preparation
Descent
“How to use” and examples
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
AFM IMPACTS – TEMPORARY REVISION JULY 2012
Abnormal Procedures
Approval Data
General
Limitations
Emergency Procedures
Normal Procedures
Performance
Appendices and Supplements
Master Configuration Deviation List
Supplementary Performance
Reference to relevant file that enables landing distance computation is added
Landing distances with failure supersede the landing distance penalty factors
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
MMEL IMPACTS - REVISION JULY 2012How to Use
MMEL Entries
MMEL Items
MMEL Operational Procedures
Clarify that landing distance penalty factors apply on:- Required Landing Distance (at dispatch)- In-Flight Landing Distance (in-flight)
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
CONCLUSION
• Airbus provides the operators with the tools to better assess the landing performance
May 2012 revision
• Information and autonomous learning material already available to customers on Airbus World portal
Training to assess In-Flight Landing Performance
• The landing module enables the In-Flight Landing Performance assessment
FlySmart with Airbus
Page 87
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S. No intellectual property rights are granted by thedelivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not beused for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supportinggrounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof.AIRBUS, its logo, A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A321, A330, A340, A350, A380, A400M are registered trademarks.