Action: Define an In-process review (IPR)

Condition: You are a recruiting leader

with the requirement to understand the

components of an IPR. You have access

to USAREC Manual (UM) 3-02, Field

Manual (FM) 6-22, and access to the

internal production outlook Leader Zone.

Standard: Define a daily IPR used

effectively, while incorporating the use

of Leader Zone as a validation tool, and

maintaining a high focus on

performance standards and operational

effectiveness.

An IPR is:

• A Quality Control Checkpoint

• Focused on performance standards

• Formal w/Informal Methods

› Outline

Personnel

Present Mission

Projections

Processing

Prospecting

Recruiting Operations Plan

Future Soldier Training Program

Supports Leadership Imperative

Goal

› Encouragement

› Enable

› Direction

Communication

Systematic Review

Modification› Behavior

› Performance

Scheduled Regularly

Centered on Recruiting Functions

Conducted› Telephone

› Face-to-Face

Mutual Trust

Review› MAP

› Leads and Prospecting Analysis (LPA)

› Processing Data

› Future Soldier Roster

Discussion Points

Uniformity› Prepared

› Develops Patterns of Thinking

› Fosters Successful Habits

Personnel

› Review Strength Issues Are there any health or other Soldier Family issues?

How many recruiters are in the foxhole to accomplish

the plan?

Has all monthly counseling been completed?

How can we increase efficiency?

How can we increase their effectiveness?

› Administration Topics

Soldier Development

Pay, Awards, NCOER’s

Mission Posture› What is this PL’s mission?

› Where does the unit stand on the mission?

› When will the unit make the mission?

› Are there any obstacles or potential obstacles that could affect the mission?

› What courses of action (COAs) have been developed to overcome these obstacles?

› Who is shipping to the training base this week or this month?

› Are there any issues that may prevent their shipping?

› Are there any pending Future Soldier losses?

Projections› Who is projected and when are they scheduled

to enlist?› Is the application complete?› Has the packet been forwarded within

prescribed time lines?› Does the applicant require special testing

(medical or administrative)?› What might keep this applicant from enlisting or

commissioning?› Did the station commander interview (“hot

seat”) this person?› Which applicant is closest to enlisting?› Which applicant is next closest?

Processing

› Who is testing and when?

› How many testers should there be?

› What is the expected processing time line for these testers?

› What COA has been developed to ensure

success in this area?

Prospecting

› Based on yesterday’s prospecting plan,

what was supposed to happen?

› What results were expected and what was achieved?

› Did results meet or exceed MAP goals?

› What is the COA to correct any shortfalls?

› What is your plan to correct any shortfalls?

ROP

› What needs to change?

› How are we going to do it?

› Do we need additional resources to execute the new COA?

› What are we going to measure?

› What will be our early warning indicators?

› Who will be responsible for this step?

Future Soldiers› Are there any Future Soldiers shipping this month and who

are they?

› When are they shipping?

› Have recruiters completed their quality assurance checks?

› Have required documents been placed in the ship packets?

› Have all Future Soldiers received an initial orientation?

› Do all Future Soldiers have an Army Knowledge Online account?

› How many referrals did Future Soldiers deliver last week?

› What Future Soldier training or event is planned in this PL?

Mission Posture

Processing

Prospecting

Prospecting

Prospecting

Questions?