+ All Categories
Home > Documents > IN THIS ISSUE - Statesidestatelink.stateside.com/Attachments/28325_Maryland Register.pdf · (SG,...

IN THIS ISSUE - Statesidestatelink.stateside.com/Attachments/28325_Maryland Register.pdf · (SG,...

Date post: 02-May-2018
Category:
Upload: hoangkien
View: 224 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
56
IN THIS ISSUE Regulatory Review and Evaluation Regulations Errata Special Documents General Notices Volume 41 • Issue 24 • Pages 1417—1464 Pursuant to State Government Article, §7-206, Annotated Code of Maryland, this issue contains all previously unpublished documents required to be published, and filed on or before November 7, 2014, 5 p.m. Pursuant to State Government Article, §7-206, Annotated Code of Maryland, I hereby certify that this issue contains all documents required to be codified as of November 7, 2014. Brian Morris Acting Administrator, Division of State Documents Office of the Secretary of State Issue Date: December 1, 2014
Transcript

IN THIS ISSUE

Regulatory Review and Evaluation Regulations Errata Special Documents General Notices

Volume 41 • Issue 24 • Pages 1417—1464

Pursuant to State Government Article, §7-206, Annotated Code of Maryland, this issue contains all previously unpublished documents required to be published, and filed on or before November 7, 2014, 5 p.m. Pursuant to State Government Article, §7-206, Annotated Code of Maryland, I hereby certify that this issue contains all documents required to be codified as of November 7, 2014.

Brian Morris Acting Administrator, Division of State Documents

Office of the Secretary of State

Issue Date: December 1, 2014

Information About the Maryland Register and COMAR MARYLAND REGISTER

The Maryland Register is an official State publication published

every other week throughout the year. A cumulative index is

published quarterly.

The Maryland Register is the temporary supplement to the Code of

Maryland Regulations. Any change to the text of regulations

published in COMAR, whether by adoption, amendment, repeal, or

emergency action, must first be published in the Register.

The following information is also published regularly in the

Register:

• Governor’s Executive Orders

• Attorney General’s Opinions in full text

• Open Meetings Compliance Board Opinions in full text

• State Ethics Commission Opinions in full text

• Court Rules

• District Court Administrative Memoranda

• Courts of Appeal Hearing Calendars

• Agency Hearing and Meeting Notices

• Synopses of Bills Introduced and Enacted by the General

Assembly

• Other documents considered to be in the public interest

CITATION TO THE MARYLAND REGISTER The Maryland Register is cited by volume, issue, page number, and

date. Example:

• 19:8 Md. R. 815—817 (April 17, 1992) refers to Volume 19, Issue

8, pages 815—817 of the Maryland Register issued on April 17,

1992.

CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS (COMAR) COMAR is the official compilation of all regulations issued by

agencies of the State of Maryland. The Maryland Register is

COMAR’s temporary supplement, printing all changes to regulations

as soon as they occur. At least once annually, the changes to

regulations printed in the Maryland Register are incorporated into

COMAR by means of permanent supplements.

CITATION TO COMAR REGULATIONS COMAR regulations are cited by title number, subtitle number,

chapter number, and regulation number. Example: COMAR

10.08.01.03 refers to Title 10, Subtitle 08, Chapter 01, Regulation 03.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Incorporation by reference is a legal device by which a document is

made part of COMAR simply by referring to it. While the text of an

incorporated document does not appear in COMAR, the provisions of

the incorporated document are as fully enforceable as any other

COMAR regulation. Each regulation that proposes to incorporate a

document is identified in the Maryland Register by an Editor’s Note.

The Cumulative Table of COMAR Regulations Adopted, Amended

or Repealed, found online, also identifies each regulation

incorporating a document. Documents incorporated by reference are

available for inspection in various depository libraries located

throughout the State and at the Division of State Documents. These

depositories are listed in the first issue of the Maryland Register

published each year. For further information, call 410-974-2486.

HOW TO RESEARCH REGULATIONS An Administrative History at the end of every COMAR chapter gives

information about past changes to regulations. To determine if there have

been any subsequent changes, check the ‘‘Cumulative Table of COMAR

Regulations Adopted, Amended, or Repealed’’ which is found online at

www.dsd.state.md.us/CumulativeIndex.pdf. This table lists the regulations

in numerical order, by their COMAR number, followed by the citation to

the Maryland Register in which the change occurred. The Maryland

Register serves as a temporary supplement to COMAR, and the two

publications must always be used together. A Research Guide for Maryland

Regulations is available. For further information, call 410-260-3876.

SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION For subscription forms for the Maryland Register and COMAR, see

the back pages of the Maryland Register. Single issues of the

Maryland Register are $15.00 per issue.

CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN THE REGULATION-MAKING PROCESS

Maryland citizens and other interested persons may participate in

the process by which administrative regulations are adopted,

amended, or repealed, and may also initiate the process by which the

validity and applicability of regulations is determined. Listed below

are some of the ways in which citizens may participate (references

are to State Government Article (SG),

Annotated Code of Maryland):

• By submitting data or views on proposed regulations either orally

or in writing, to the proposing agency (see ‘‘Opportunity for Public

Comment’’ at the beginning of all regulations appearing in the

Proposed Action on Regulations section of the Maryland Register).

(See SG, §10-112)

• By petitioning an agency to adopt, amend, or repeal regulations.

The agency must respond to the petition. (See SG §10-123)

• By petitioning an agency to issue a declaratory ruling with respect

to how any regulation, order, or statute enforced by the agency

applies. (SG, Title 10, Subtitle 3)

• By petitioning the circuit court for a declaratory judgment

on the validity of a regulation when it appears that the regulation

interferes with or impairs the legal rights or privileges of the

petitioner. (SG, §10-125)

• By inspecting a certified copy of any document filed with the

Division of State Documents for publication in the Maryland

Register. (See SG, §7-213)

Maryland Register (ISSN 0360-2834). Postmaster: Send address changes and other mail to: Maryland Register, State House, Annapolis, Maryland

21401. Tel. 410-260-3876; Fax 410-280-5647. Published biweekly, with

cumulative indexes published quarterly, by the State of Maryland, Division of

State Documents, State House, Annapolis, Maryland 21401. The subscription

rate for the Maryland Register is $225 per year (first class mail). All

subscriptions post-paid to points in the U.S. periodicals postage paid at Annapolis, Maryland and additional mailing offices.

Martin O’Malley, Governor; John P. McDonough, Secretary of State;

Brian Morris, Acting Administrator; Gail S. Klakring, Senior Editor; Mary D. MacDonald, Editor, Maryland Register and COMAR; Elizabeth Ramsey,

Editor, COMAR Online, and Subscription Manager; Tami Cathell, Help

Desk, COMAR and Maryland Register Online. Front cover: State House, Annapolis, MD, built 1772—79.

Illustrations by Carolyn Anderson, Dept. of General Services

Note: All products purchased are for individual use only. Resale or other compensated transfer of the information in printed or electronic form is a prohibited commercial purpose (see State Government Article, §7-206.2, Annotated Code of Maryland). By purchasing a product, the buyer agrees that the purchase is for individual use only and will not sell or give the product to another individual or entity.

Contents 1419

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Closing Dates for the Maryland Register Schedule of Closing Dates and Issue Dates for the

Maryland Register .................................................................. 1421

COMAR Research Aids Table of Pending Proposals ........................................................ 1422

Index of COMAR Titles Affected in This Issue COMAR Title Number and Name Page

03 Comptroller of the Treasury .................................. 1426, 1429

08 Department of Natural Resources ................................... 1429

09 Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation ........... 1426

10 Department of Health and Mental Hygiene .......... 1427, 1431

12 Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services .... 1428

15 Department of Agriculture .............................................. 1432

17 Department of Budget and Management ........................ 1439

18 Department of Assessments and Taxation ...................... 1442

20 Public Service Commission ............................................ 1443

26 Department of the Environment ...................................... 1443

36 Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control

Agency ......................................................................... 1454

PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES Individuals with disabilities who desire assistance in using the

publications and services of the Division of State Documents are

encouraged to call (410) 974-2486, or (800) 633-9657, or FAX to

(410) 974-2546, or through Maryland Relay.

Regulatory Review and Evaluation

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Notice of Opportunity for Public Inspection and

Comment ...................................................................... 1425

Final Action on Regulations

03 COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX

Alcoholic Beverage Trade Practices ................................ 1426 Alcoholic Beverage Trade Practices ................................ 1426 Alcoholic Beverage Trade Practices ................................ 1426

09 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING, AND REGULATION

COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL REGULATION Foreclosure Procedures for Residential Property ............. 1426

10 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE MEDICAL CARE PROGRAMS

Nursing Facility Services ................................................. 1427 Home and Community-Based Options Waiver ................ 1427

ADULT HEALTH Cosmetic Surgical Facilities ............................................ 1427

MENTAL HYGIENE REGULATIONS Fee Schedule — Mental Health Services — Community-

Based Programs and Individual Practitioners ............... 1427 BOARD OF NURSING

Code of Ethics.................................................................. 1428 BOARD OF NURSING — CERTIFIED NURSING

ASSISTANTS Certified Nursing Assistants/Certified Medication

Technicians (CNA/CMT) — Code of Ethics ................ 1428

BOARD OF NURSING — ELECTROLOGY PRACTICE

COMMITTEE Standards of Practice and Conduct .................................. 1428

12 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

CORRECTIONAL TRAINING COMMISSION General Regulations ........................................................ 1428 Electronic Control Device Training ................................. 1428

Proposed Action on Regulations

03 COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX

Alcoholic Beverages ........................................................ 1429 08 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Wildlands in Maryland .................................................... 1429

10 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE MEDICAL CARE PROGRAMS

Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment

(EPSDT) Services ......................................................... 1431 15 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION Nutrient Management Certification and Licensing .......... 1432 Agricultural Operation Nutrient Management Plan

Requirements ................................................................ 1432 Content and Criteria for a Nutrient Management Plan

Developed for an Agricultural Operation ..................... 1432 17 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS State Employees’ Health Benefits ................................... 1439

18 DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS

Filings .............................................................................. 1442 20 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

APPLICATIONS CONCERNING THE CONSTRUCTION OR

MODIFICATION OF GENERATING STATIONS AND

OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES General ............................................................................ 1443

26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT AIR QUALITY

Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes ... 1443 Low Emissions Vehicle Program .................................... 1447 Control of NOx Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric

Generating Units........................................................... 1449 36 MARYLAND STATE LOTTERY AND GAMING CONTROL AGENCY

GENERAL PROVISIONS General ............................................................................ 1454

GAMING PROVISIONS Video Lottery Operation License .................................... 1455

VIDEO LOTTERY TERMINALS Video Lottery Terminal Technical Standards .................. 1455

TABLE GAMES Table Game Equipment ................................................... 1455 Table Game Procedures ................................................... 1457

Errata

COMAR 10.32.06 ............................................................... 1458

Contents 1420

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Special Documents

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT PROPOSED CALENDAR YEAR 2015 STANDARD

PERMIT APPLICATION TURNAROUND TIMES ...... 1459 SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION 1459

Commission Meeting — Correction ............................ 1459 MARYLAND HEALTH CARE COMMISSION 1460

Number of Chronic Hospital Beds and Patient Days and

Percent Occupancy, by Facility: Maryland, FY 2013 ....... 1460

General Notices

BOARD OF ARCHITECTS Public Meeting ................................................................. 1461

ATHLETIC COMMISSION Public Meeting ................................................................. 1461

BOARD OF COSMETOLOGISTS Public Meeting ................................................................. 1461

GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF CRIME CONTROL AND

PREVENTION Public Meeting ................................................................. 1461

CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION ADVISORY BOARD Public Meeting ................................................................. 1461

OFFICE OF THE DEAF AND HARD OF

HEARING/MARYLAND ADVISORY COUNCIL ON THE

DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING Public Meeting ................................................................. 1461

ELEVATOR SAFETY REVIEW BOARD Public Meeting ................................................................. 1461

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES BOARD Special Test Document .................................................... 1461

BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS Public Meeting ................................................................. 1461

STATE BOARD OF STATIONARY ENGINEERS Public Meeting ................................................................. 1461

DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT/AIR AND

RADIATION MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION Public Hearing on Regulations ........................................ 1461

FIRE PREVENTION COMMISSION Public Meeting ................................................................. 1462

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE Public Meeting ................................................................. 1462

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL

HYGIENE/OFFICE OF HEALTH SERVICES Public Notice for Free-Standing Ambulatory Surgical

Centers .......................................................................... 1462 Maryland Medicaid Dental Fee Schedule Update ............ 1462

BOARD OF HEATING, VENTILATION, AIR-

CONDITIONING, AND REFRIGERATION

CONTRACTORS (HVACR) Public Meeting ................................................................. 1462

MARYLAND STATEWIDE INDEPENDENT LIVING

COUNCIL Public Meeting ................................................................. 1462

FACILITIES ADVISORY BOARD — JUVENILE SERVICES Public Meeting ................................................................. 1462

STATE ADVISORY BOARD FOR JUVENILE SERVICES No Meeting Notice .......................................................... 1462

STATE ADVISORY BOARD FOR JUVENILE SERVICES —

GIRLS SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE Public Meeting ................................................................. 1462

MARYLAND STATE LOTTERY AND GAMING CONTROL

COMMISSION Public Meeting ................................................................ 1462

MARYLAND HEALTH CARE COMMISSION Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463

MARYLAND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FUND Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES/FISHERIES

SERVICE Public Notice ................................................................... 1463

BOARD OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY PRACTICE Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463

BOARD OF PLUMBING Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463

BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICAL EXAMINERS Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463 Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463 Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463

STATE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON QUALITY CARE AT

THE END OF LIFE Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463

RACING COMMISSION Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463

REAL ESTATE COMMISSION Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463 Public Hearing ................................................................. 1463

BOARD OF REVENUE ESTIMATES Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463

NORTHEAST MARYLAND WASTE DISPOSAL

AUTHORITY Public Meetings Notice Procedure .................................. 1463

BOARD OF WATERWORKS AND WASTE SYSTEMS

OPERATORS Public Meeting ................................................................ 1463

COMAR Online The Code of Maryland Regulations is available at

www.dsd.state.md.us as a free service of the Office of the

Secretary of State, Division of State Documents. The full text

of regulations is available and searchable. Note, however, that

the printed COMAR continues to be the only official and

enforceable version of COMAR.

The Maryland Register is also available at

www.dsd.state.md.us.

For additional information, visit www.sos.state.md.us,

Division of State Documents, or call us at (410) 974-2486 or 1

(800) 633-9657.

Contents 1421

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Availability of Monthly List of Maryland Documents

The Maryland Department of Legislative Services

receives copies of all publications issued by State officers and

agencies. The Department prepares and distributes, for a fee, a

list of these publications under the title ‘‘Maryland

Documents’’. This list is published monthly, and contains

bibliographic information concerning regular and special

reports, bulletins, serials, periodicals, catalogues, and a variety

of other State publications. ‘‘Maryland Documents’’ also

includes local publications.

Anyone wishing to receive ‘‘Maryland Documents’’

should write to: Legislative Sales, Maryland Department of

Legislative Services, 90 State Circle, Annapolis, MD 21401.

CLOSING DATES AND ISSUE DATES through JULY 24, 2015

Issue Date

Emergency

and Proposed

Regulations

5 p.m.*

Final Regulations

10:30 a.m. Notices, etc. 10:30 a.m.

December 12 November 24 December 3 December 1

December 26** December 5 December 15 December 11

January 9 December 22 December 30 December 29

January 23 January 5 January 14 January 12

February 6** January 16 January 28 January 26

February 20 February 2 February 11 February 9

March 6** February 13 February 25 February 23

March 20 March 2 March 11 March 9

April 3 March 16 March 25 March 23

April 17 March 30 April 8 April 6

May 1 April 13 April 22 April 20

May 15 April 27 May 6 May 4

May 29** May 11 May 19 May 15

June 12** May 21 June 3 June 1

June 26 June 8 June 17 June 15

July 10 June 22 July 1 June 29

July 24 July 6 July 15 July 13

* Due date for documents containing 8 to 18 pages — 48 hours

before date shown; due date for documents exceeding 18 pages — 1

week before date shown

NOTE: ALL DOCUMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED IN TIMES NEW ROMAN, 9 POINT, SINGLE-SPACED FORMAT. THE REVISED PAGE COUNT REFLECTS THIS FORMATTING.

** Note closing date changes

*** Note issue date and closing date changes

The regular closing date for Proposals and Emergencies is Monday.

1422

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Cumulative Table of COMAR Regulations Adopted, Amended, or Repealed

This table, previously printed in the Maryland Register lists the regulations, by COMAR title, that have been adopted, amended, or repealed in

the Maryland Register since the regulations were originally published or last supplemented in the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR).

The table is no longer printed here but may be found on the Division of State Documents website at www.dsd.state.md.us.

Table of Pending Proposals The table below lists proposed changes to COMAR regulations. The proposed changes are listed by their COMAR number, followed by a

citation to that issue of the Maryland Register in which the proposal appeared. Errata pertaining to proposed regulations are listed, followed by

“(err)”. Regulations referencing a document incorporated by reference are followed by “(ibr)”. None of the proposals listed in this table have

been adopted. A list of adopted proposals appears in the Cumulative Table of COMAR Regulations Adopted, Amended, or Repealed.

01 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT

01.04.04.01—.06 • 41:23 Md. R. 1378 (11-14-14)

03 COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY

03.02.01.20 • 41:24 Md. R. 1429 (12-1-14) 03.06.01.44 • 40:26 Md. R. 2167 (12-27-13)

05 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

05.02.01.02,.02-1,.03,.04 • 41:20 Md. R. 1118 (10-3-14) (ibr) 05.02.07.04,.05 • 41:20 Md. R. 1119 (10-3-14) (ibr) 05.05.01.01—.34 • 41:20 Md. R. 1120 (10-3-14) 05.05.02.02,.04,.06,.08,.11,.14,.17 • 41:20 Md. R. 1120 (10-3-14) 05.05.05.02—.08,.12—.14,.16,.18,.24 • 41:20 Md. R. 1120 (10-3-14) 05.05.07.01—.31 • 41:20 Md. R. 1120 (10-3-14) 05.05.08.01—.28 • 41:20 Md. R. 1120 (10-3-14) 05.12.01.02—.07,.09—.11,.14—.16, .18—.22 • 41:20 Md. R. 1135 (10-3-14)

05.13.01.03,.05—.08,.16—.19 • 41:20 Md. R. 1141 (10-3-14)

07 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

07.03.07.02,.03,.09,.12 • 41:18 Md. R. 1014 (9-5-14)

08 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

08.01.02.02,.04—.06 • 41:24 Md. R. 1429 (12-1-14) 08.01.03.01—.07,.10—.12 • 41:20 Md. R. 1143 (10-3-14) 08.02.04.03 • 41:20 Md. R. 1147 (10-3-14) 08.02.05.24 • 41:23 Md. R. 1379 (11-14-14) 08.02.11.01,.04,.06 • 41:21 Md. R. 1264 (10-17-14) 08.02.21.03 • 41:21 Md. R. 1266 (10-17-14) 08.03.04.02 • 41:21 Md. R. 1268 (10-17-14) 08.03.09.11 • 41:21 Md. R. 1268 (10-17-14) 08.18.32.01—.03 • 41:21 Md. R. 1269 (10-17-14)

08.18.34.01,.02 • 41:21 Md. R. 1269 (10-17-14)

08.18.33.03 • 41:23 Md. R. 1381 (11-14-14) 08.18.36.01,.02 • 41:23 Md. R. 1382 (11-14-14)

09 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING, AND REGULATION

09.08.03.03 • 41:3 Md. R. 210 (2-7-14) 09.10.03.02 • 41:23 Md. R. 1383 (11-14-14) 09.11.02.02 • 41:19 Md. R. 1085 (9-19-14) 09.12.81.01-1,.02-1 • 41:7 Md. R. 425 (4-4-14)

09.13.06.02—.10,.12 • 41:21 Md. R. 1270 (10-17-14) 09.21.02.03 • 41:19 Md. R. 1085 (9-19-14) 09.28.04.01—.11 • 41:14 Md. R. 813 (7-11-14)

10 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE

Subtitles 01—08 (1st volume)

10.01.18.01—.08 • 41:22 Md. R. 1322 (10-31-14)

Subtitle 09 (2nd volume) 10.09.02.07 • 41:20 Md. R. 1148 (10-3-14) (ibr) 10.09.23.06 • 41:24 Md. R. 1431 (12-1-14) 10.09.36.03 • 41:23 Md. R. 1384 (11-14-14) 10.09.41.02,.06—.09,.12,.13 • 41:23 Md. R. 1384 (11-14-14) 10.09.49.01—.07,.11,.12 • 41:20 Md. R. 1148 (10-3-14) 10.09.59.01—.14 • 41:20 Md. R. 1150 (10-3-14) 10.09.60.01—.24 • 41:23 Md. R. 1386 (11-14-14) 10.09.62.01 • 41:23 Md. R. 1386 (11-14-14) 10.09.63.01—.03,.05,.06 • 41:23 Md. R. 1386 (11-14-14) 10.09.64.05—.07,.10 • 41:23 Md. R. 1386 (11-14-14) 10.09.65.01,.02,.04,.05,.08,.10,.11,.11-1,.11-2,.12,.14,.15, .19-5,.20,.21 • 41:23 Md. R. 1386 (11-14-14) 10.09.65.19 • 41:23 Md. R. 1395 (11-14-14) 10.09.66.02,.04,.05,.07, • 41:23 Md. R. 1386 (11-14-14)

10.09.67.01,.04,.12,.26—.28 • 41:23 Md. R. 1386 (11-14-14)

PENDING PROPOSALS 1423

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

10.09.70.01—.10 • 41:20 Md. R. 1153 (10-3-14) 10.09.80.01—.12 • 41:20 Md. R. 1158 (10-3-14) 10.09.91.01—.09 • 41:20 Md. R. 1162 (10-3-14)

Subtitles 10 — 22 (3rd Volume)

10.11.02.01—.09 • 41:22 Md. R. 1325 (10-31-14) 10.13.01.02—.06 • 41:11 Md. R. 614 (5-30-14) 10.19.07.01—.03 • 41:22 Md. R. 1328 (10-31-14) 10.22.14.03,.05—.11 • 41:21 Md. R. 1272 (10-17-14) Subtitles 23 — 36 (4th Volume)

10.27.27.02 • 41:18 Md. R. 1022 (9-5-14) 10.32.06 • 41:24 Md. R. 1458 (12-1-14) (err) 10.32.06.04,.07 • 41:20 Md. R. 1164 (10-3-14) 10.32.10.04,.05,.05-1,.05-2 • 41:20 Md. R. 1166 (10-3-14)

Subtitles 37—61 (5th Volume) 10.38.12.01—.04 • 41:19 Md. R. 1090 (9-19-14) 10.44.34.01—.05 • 41:9 Md. R. 531 (5-2-14)

10.61.01.03,.05,.06 • 41:18 Md. R. 1023 (9-5-14)

11 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Subtitles 01—10

11.03.01.01-1,.12 • 41:20 Md. R. 1168 (10-3-14) (ibr) 11.03.01.13 • 40:26 Md. R. 2195 (12-27-13)

11.05.02.02 • 41:20 Md. R. 1168 (10-3-14) 11.05.03.02—.05,.07—.09,.12,.14 • 41:20 Md. R. 1168 (10-3-14) 11.05.07.03 • 41:20 Md. R. 1168 (10-3-14)

12 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

12.01.01.04—.12 • 41:7 Md. R. 426 (4-4-14) 12.04.01.07,.17 • 41:11 Md. R. 621 (5-30-14) 12.04.05.02 • 41:19 Md. R. 1091 (9-19-14) 12.10.01.09 • 41:8 Md. R. 484 (4-18-14) 12.15.01.15,.19 • 41:12 Md. R. 693 (6-13-14) 12.15.06.01—.04 • 41:12 Md. R. 693 (6-13-14)

13A STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

13A.01.02.06 • 41:20 Md. R. 1172 (10-3-14) 13A.03.05.01,.03—.05 • 41:23 Md. R. 1399 (11-14-14) 13A.04.08.01 • 41:23 Md. R. 1400 (11-14-14) 13A.04.09.01 • 41:21 Md. R. 1275 (10-17-14) 13A.12.01.01—.13 • 41:11 Md. R. 624 (5-30-14)

13A.12.03.02,.08 • 41:22 Md. R. 1329 (10-31-14)

14 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES 14.22.01.03,.08—.10 • 41:23 Md. R. 1402 (11-14-14) 14.25.01.01 • 41:21 Md. R. 1276 (10-17-14) 14.25.02.01,.04,.08,.11,.13,.15,.18 • 41:21 Md. R. 1276 (10-17-14) 14.25.03.01—.05 • 41:21 Md. R. 1276 (10-17-14) 14.26.07.01—.03 • 41:13 Md. R. 773 (6-27-14) 14.36.01.01—.16 • 41:18 Md. R. 1031 (9-5-14) 14.36.02.01—.11 • 41:18 Md. R. 1031 (9-5-14) 14.36.03.01—.06 • 41:18 Md. R. 1031 (9-5-14) 14.36.04.01—.08 • 41:18 Md. R. 1031 (9-5-14)

15 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

15.20.04.11 • 41:24 Md. R. 1432 (12-1-14) 15.20.07.02 • 41:24 Md. R. 1432 (12-1-14) 15.20.08.01,.03,.05—.12 • 41:24 Md. R. 1432 (12-1-14) 15.20.11.01—.10 • 41:21 Md. R. 1280 (10-17-14)

17 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

17.04.07.02,.04,.06 • 41:23 Md. R. 1403 (11-14-14)

17.04.13.03,.03-1,.04,.06 • 41:24 Md. R. 1439 (12-1-14)

18 DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION 18.03.02.01 • 41:24 Md. R. 1442 (12-1-14)

19A STATE ETHICS COMMISSION

19A.01.03.11 • 41:22 Md. R. 1330 (10-31-14) 19A.03.01.03,.04 • 41:22 Md. R. 1330 (10-31-14) 19A.03.02 • 41:22 Md. R. 1330 (10-31-14) 19A.03.03.01 • 41:22 Md. R. 1330 (10-31-14)

19A.03.04.01—.04 • 41:22 Md. R. 1330 (10-31-14) 19A.04.03.04 • 41:22 Md. R. 1332 (10-31-14) 19A.05.03.02,.03 • 41:22 Md. R. 1332 (10-31-14) 19A.05.04.01,.02 • 41:22 Md. R. 1332 (10-31-14) 19A.07.01.03,.04 • 41:22 Md. R. 1333 (10-31-14)

19A.07.01.18 • 41:22 Md. R. 1334 (10-31-14)

20 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 20.79.01.02 • 41:24 Md. R. 1443 (12-1-14)

21 STATE PROCUREMENT REGULATIONS

21.11.14.04 • 41:14 Md. R. 857 (7-11-14)

24 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

24.05.26.03 • 41:20 Md. R. 1173 (10-3-14)

26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Subtitles 01—07 (Part 1)

26.03.13.04 • 41:22 Md. R. 1334 (10-31-14) 26.04.04.01—.39 • 41:18 Md. R. 1037 (9-5-14) (ibr) 26.04.05.01—.03• 40:25 Md. R. 2105 (12-13-13) 26.04.11.01—.16 • 41:1 Md. R. 47 (1-10-14)

Subtitles 08—12 (Part 2)

26.08.02.09 • 41:10 Md. R. 575 (5-16-14) 26.08.04.01 • 41:10 Md. R. 575 (5-16-14)

26.12.01.01 • 41:22 Md. R. 1336 (10-31-14) (ibr)

26.12.02.03 • 41:22 Md. R. 1336 (10-31-14)

Subtitles 13—18 (Part 3)

26.11.19.26,.26-1 • 41:24 Md. R. 1443 (12-1-14) 26.11.34.02 • 41:24 Md. R. 1447 (12-1-14) (ibr) 26.11.38.01—.06 • 41:24 Md. R. 1449 (12-1-14)

PENDING PROPOSALS 1424

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

26.14.02.02,.02-1,.02-2,.02-3,.02-4, .02-5 • 41:22 Md. R. 1337 (10-31-14) (ibr) 26.17.06.01,.04—.09 • 40:22 Md. R. 1887 (11-1-13) (ibr)

41:19 Md. R. 1092 (9-19-14) (ibr)

27 CRITICAL AREA COMMISSION FOR THE CHESAPEAKE AND ATLANTIC COASTAL BAYS

27.01.01.01 • 41:21 Md. R. 1286 (10-17-14)

27.02.01.01 • 41:21 Md. R. 1286 (10-17-14)

27.02.05.01—.03-3 • 41:21 Md. R. 1286 (10-17-14)

31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION 31.03.05.01—.15 • 41:3 Md. R. 256 (2-7-14) 31.08.14.01,.02 • 40:20 Md. R. 1729 (10-4-13)

33 STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

33.13.17.01—.05 • 41:22 Md. R. 1340 (10-31-14) 33.14.02.06 • 41:16 Md. R. 955 (8-8-14)

34 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

34.04.07.01—.08 • 41:23 Md. R. 1404 (11-14-14)

36 MARYLAND STATE LOTTERY AND GAMING

CONTROL AGENCY

36.01.01.04 • 41:24 Md. R. 1454 (12-1-14) 36.03.03.07 • 41:24 Md. R. 1455 (12-1-14) 36.04.01.20 • 41:24 Md. R. 1455 (12-1-14) 36.05.02.16 • 41:24 Md. R. 1455 (12-1-14) 36.05.03.03,.05,.23 • 41:24 Md. R. 1457 (12-1-14) 36.05.05.06 • 41:20 Md. R. 1173 (10-3-14) 36.06.01.01—.03 • 41:12 Md. R. 723 (6-13-14)

36.06.02.01,.02 • 41:12 Md. R. 723 (6-13-14) 36.06.03.01—.09 • 41:12 Md. R. 723 (6-13-14) 36.06.04.01—.04 • 41:12 Md. R. 723 (6-13-14) 36.06.05.01—.06 • 41:12 Md. R. 723 (6-13-14) 36.06.06.01 • 41:12 Md. R. 723 (6-13-14)

1425

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Regulatory Review and Evaluation Regulations promulgated under the Administrative Procedure Act will undergo a review by the promulgating agency in accordance with the

Regulatory Review and Evaluation Act (State Government Article, §§10-130 — 10-139; COMAR 01.01.2003.20). This review will be

documented in an evaluation report which will be submitted to the General Assembly’s Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and

Legislative Review. The evaluation reports have been spread over an 8-year period (see COMAR 01.01.2003.20 for the schedule). Notice that

an evaluation report is available for public inspection and comment will be published in this section of the Maryland Register.

Title 15 DEPARTMENT OF

AGRICULTURE Notice of Opportunity for Public Inspection and Comment

In accordance with the Regulatory Review and Evaluation Act,

State Government Article, §§10-130 ― 10-139, Annotated Code of

Maryland, the Department of Agriculture is currently reviewing and

evaluating all regulations codified under the following subtitles of

COMAR Title 15:

Subtitles 01 ― 08 Subtitle 01 Office of the Secretary

Subtitle 02 Board of Review

Subtitle 03 Weights and Measures

Subtitle 04 Maryland Egg Law

Subtitle 05 Pesticide Use Control

Subtitle 06 Plant Pest Control

Subtitle 07 Apiary Inspection

Subtitle 08 Turf and Seed

The purpose of the review and evaluation is to determine whether

existing regulations continue to accomplish the purposes for which

they were adopted, clarify ambiguous or unclear language, and repeal

obsolete or duplicative provisions.

Pursuant to its work plan, MDA will evaluate the need to retain,

amend, or repeal regulations based on whether the regulations are:

Still necessary to the public interest;

Drafted in a clear and understandable manner;

Still supported by statutory authority and judicial opinions

and consistent with federal regulations and other State

regulations;

Still effective in accomplishing the intended purpose of the

regulations; and

Obsolete, duplicative, or otherwise appropriate for

amendment or repeal.

The Department of Agriculture would like to provide interested

parties with an opportunity to participate in the review and evaluation

process by submitting comments on these regulations. All parties

interested in participating in this process may submit comments by

mail to Tonia Martin, Regulations Coordinator, Department of

Agriculture, 50 Harry S. Truman Parkway, Annapolis, MD 21401,

by fax to (410) 841-5914, or by email to [email protected].

Comments must be received no later than December 31, 2014.

Parties may contact the Department at (410) 841-5883 with questions

regarding this process. [14-24-22]

1426

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Final Action on Regulations

Symbol Key • Roman type indicates text already existing at the time of the proposed action.

• Italic type indicates new text added at the time of proposed action.

• Single underline, italic indicates new text added at the time of final action.

• Single underline, roman indicates existing text added at the time of final action.

• [[Double brackets]] indicate text deleted at the time of final action.

Title 03 COMPTROLLER OF THE

TREASURY Subtitle 02 ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO

TAX 03.02.05 Alcoholic Beverage Trade Practices

Authority: Article 2B, §§16-301 and 16-302, Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Final Action [14-265-F]

On November 17, 2014, the Comptroller of Maryland adopted

amendments to Regulation .04 under COMAR 03.02.05 Alcoholic Beverage Trade Practices. This action, which was proposed for

adoption in 41:18 Md. R. 1012 (September 5, 2014), has been

adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: December 11, 2014.

PETER FRANCHOT

Comptroller

Subtitle 02 ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX

03.02.05 Alcoholic Beverage Trade Practices Authority: Article 2B, §§16-301 and 16-302, Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Final Action [14-267-F]

On November 17, 2014, the Comptroller of Maryland adopted

amendments to Regulation .10 under COMAR 03.02.05 Alcoholic Beverage Trade Practices. This action, which was proposed for

adoption in 41:18 Md. R. 1013 (September 5, 2014), has been

adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: December 11, 2014.

PETER FRANCHOT

Comptroller

Subtitle 02 ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX

03.02.05 Alcoholic Beverage Trade Practices Authority: Article 2B, §§16-301 and 16-302, Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Final Action [14-266-F]

On November 17, 2014, the Comptroller of Maryland adopted

amendments to Regulation .12 under COMAR 03.02.05 Alcoholic Beverage Trade Practices. This action, which was proposed for

adoption in 41:18 Md. R. 1013—1014 (September 5, 2014), has been

adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: December 11, 2014.

PETER FRANCHOT

Comptroller

Title 09 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

LICENSING, AND REGULATION

Subtitle 03 COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL REGULATION

09.03.12 Foreclosure Procedures for Residential Property Authority: Real Property Article, §7-105.1, Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Final Action [14-275-F]

On November 13, 2014, the Commissioner of Financial

Regulation adopted amendments to Regulations .01 and .02 under

COMAR 09.03.12 Foreclosure Procedures for Residential Property. This action, which was proposed for adoption in 41:19

Md. R. 1084—1085 (September 19, 2014), has been adopted with the

nonsubstantive changes shown below.

Effective Date: December 11, 2014.

Attorney General's Certification In accordance with State Government Article, §10-113, Annotated

Code of Maryland, the Attorney General certifies that the following

changes do not differ substantively from the proposed text. The

nature of the changes and the basis for this conclusion are as follows:

The proposed Notice of Foreclosure Action for owner-occupied

properties (Appendix H-1) where the secured party has filed a

preliminary loss mitigation affidavit stated that the borrower had 25

days to request foreclosure mediation after receipt of a final loss

FINAL ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1427

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

mitigation affidavit. This statement has been changed because the law

gives a borrower 25 days from the mailing date of the loss mitigation

affidavit to request foreclosure mediation. This change is

nonsubstantive because it brings the form into compliance with the

enabling statute. A clean copy of the revised form is being published;

no other forms have been changed.

NOTE: The form referenced in this final appears at the end of the Final Action on Regulations section of this issue of the Maryland Register.

GORDON COOLEY

Acting Commissioner of Financial Regulation

Title 10 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

AND MENTAL HYGIENE Subtitle 09 MEDICAL CARE

PROGRAMS 10.09.10 Nursing Facility Services

Authority: Health-General Article, §§2-104(b), 15-103, and 15-105,

Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Final Action [14-222-F]

On November 17, 2014, the Secretary of Health and Mental

Hygiene adopted amendments to Regulations .07, .07-1, and .17

under COMAR 10.09.10 Nursing Facility Services. This action,

which was proposed for adoption in 41:15 Md. R. 907—908 (July 25,

2014), has been adopted with the nonsubstantive changes shown

below.

Effective Date: December 11, 2014.

Attorney General's Certification In accordance with State Government Article, §10-113, Annotated

Code of Maryland, the Attorney General certifies that the following

changes do not differ substantively from the proposed text. The

nature of the changes and the basis for this conclusion are as follows:

Regulation .17V: Removed unnecessary deletion.

Regulation .17W: Removed unnecessary deletion.

Regulation .17X: Deleted §X to remain consistent with current

practice.

.17 Selected Costs — Not Allowable. The following costs are not allowable in establishing interim and

final per diem payment rates:

A.—U. (proposed text unchanged)

V. A percentage of the legal, accounting, and other professional

expenses related to an appeal as described in §U of this regulation,

based upon the proportion of additional reimbursement denied to the

total additional reimbursement sought on appeal, if a facility prevails

on some but not all issues raised in the appeal or action; [[[]]and [[]]] W. Any charges assessed by the Department for recovery of

overpayments[[;and

X. Costs incurred for legal services relating to establishing

Medical Assistance Program financial eligibility for nursing facility

services or obtaining representation or guardianship of nursing

facility residents or their property]].

JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.

Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene

Subtitle 09 MEDICAL CARE PROGRAMS

10.09.54 Home and Community-Based Options Waiver

Authority: Health-General Article, §§2-104(6), 15-103, 15-105, and 15-132,

Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Final Action [14-258-F]

On November 17, 2014, the Secretary of Health and Mental

Hygiene adopted new Regulations .10-1 and .18-1 and amendments

to Regulation .21 under COMAR 10.09.54 Home and Community-Based Options Waiver. This action, which was proposed for

adoption in 41:18 Md. R. 1021—1022 (September 5, 2014), has been

adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: December 11, 2014.

JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.

Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene

Subtitle 12 ADULT HEALTH 10.12.03 Cosmetic Surgical Facilities

Authority: Health-General Article, Title 19, Subtitle 3C, Annotated Code of

Maryland

Notice of Final Action [14-273-F]

On November 10, 2014, the Secretary of Health and Mental

Hygiene adopted new Regulations .01—.12 under a new chapter,

COMAR 10.12.03 Cosmetic Surgical Facilities. This action,

which was proposed for adoption in 41:19 Md. R. 1086—1090

(September 19, 2014), has been adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: July 1, 2015.

JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.

Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene

Subtitle 21 MENTAL HYGIENE REGULATIONS

10.21.25 Fee Schedule — Mental Health Services — Community-Based Programs and Individual Practitioners

Authority: Health-General Article, §§10-901, 15-103, and 15-105; Title 16,

Subtitles 1 and 2; Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Final Action [14-210-F]

On November 10, 2014, the Secretary of Health and Mental

Hygiene adopted amendments to Regulation .09 under COMAR 10.21.25 Fee Schedule — Mental Health Services — Community-Based Programs and Individual Practitioners. This action, which

was proposed for adoption in 41:14 Md. R. 833 (July 11, 2014), has

been adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: December 11, 2014.

JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.

Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene

FINAL ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1428

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Notice of Final Action [14-197-F]

On November 17, 2014, the Secretary of Health and Mental

Hygiene adopted:

(1) Amendments to Regulations .01 and .02 under COMAR 10.27.19 Code of Ethics;

(2) Amendments to Regulations .01 and .02 under COMAR 10.39.07 Certified Nursing Assistants/Certified Medication Technicians (CNA/CMT) — Code of Ethics; and

(3) New Regulation .01, the recodification of existing

Regulations .01 and .03 to be Regulations .02 and .04, and

amendment to and the recodification of existing Regulation .02 to be

Regulation .03 under COMAR 10.53.05 Standards of Practice and Conduct.

This action, which was proposed for adoption in 41:14 Md. R.

833—836 (July 11, 2014), has been adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: December 11, 2014.

JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.

Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene

Title 12 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC

SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

Subtitle 10 CORRECTIONAL TRAINING COMMISSION

12.10.01 General Regulations Authority: Correctional Services Article, §8-208, Annotated Code of

Maryland

Notice of Final Action [14-259-F]

On October 22, 2014, the Secretary of Public Safety and

Correctional Services, in cooperation with the Correctional Training

Commission, adopted amendments to Regulation .02 under COMAR 12.10.01 General Regulations. This action, which was proposed for

adoption in 41:18 Md. R. 1025—1026 (September 5, 2014), has been

adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: December 11, 2014.

GREGG L. HERSHBERGER

Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services

Subtitle 10 CORRECTIONAL TRAINING COMMISSION

12.10.05 Electronic Control Device Training Authority: Correctional Services Article, §2-109; Public Safety Article, §3-

207; Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Final Action [14-169-F]

On October 22, 2014, the Secretary of Public Safety and

Correctional Services, in cooperation with the Correctional Training

Commission, adopted amendments to Regulation .02 under COMAR 12.10.05 Electronic Control Devices Training. This action, which

was proposed for adoption in 41:12 Md. R. 693 (June 13, 2014), has

been adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: December 11, 2014.

GREGG L. HERSHBERGER

Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services

1429

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Proposed Action on Regulations

Title 03 COMPTROLLER OF THE

TREASURY Subtitle 02 ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO

TAX 03.02.01 Alcoholic Beverages

Authority: Article 2B, §2-101, 16-301, 16-302, and 16-303; Tax-General

Article §2-103; Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-353-P]

The Comptroller of the Treasury proposes to amend Regulation

.20 under COMAR 03.02.01 Alcoholic Beverages.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to include the definition of a

warehouseman and further clarify the regulation.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact The proposed action has no economic impact.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to Sukanya Mukherjee, Staff Attorney,

Comptroller of Maryland, 80 Calvert St. Annapolis, MD 21404, or

call 410-260-7494, or email to [email protected].

Comments will be accepted through December 31, 2014. A public

hearing has not been scheduled.

.20 Come to Rest. A. Definitions.

(1)—(3) (text unchanged)

(4) “Warehouseman” means a person who is an employee of

the wholesaler and listed on the regular salary list or payroll of the

wholesaler.

B.—C. (text unchanged)

D. Come to Rest Compliance Requirement. The person driving the

delivery vehicle and delivering the alcoholic beverage shall record

the delivery location, date, and time and have it verified, by

signature, upon delivery by the warehouseman. The warehouseman

shall record the loading location, date, and time the alcoholic

beverages are placed in a vehicle for delivery to a retailer and also

shall record the identification information of the delivery vehicle. The

driver of the retail delivery vehicle shall verify, by signature, the

information recorded by the warehouseman upon loading of the

alcoholic beverages.

PETER FRANCHOT

Comptroller

Title 08 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL

RESOURCES Subtitle 01 OFFICE OF THE

SECRETARY 08.01.02 Wildlands in Maryland Authority: Natural Resources Article, §5-1203, Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-341-P]

The Secretary of Natural Resources proposes to amend

Regulations .02 and .04 — .06 under COMAR 08.01.02 Wildlands in Maryland.

For information concerning citizen participation in the regulation-making process, see inside front cover.

Symbol Key • Roman type indicates existing text of regulation.

• Italic type indicates proposed new text.

• [Single brackets] indicate text proposed for deletion.

Promulgation of Regulations An agency wishing to adopt, amend, or repeal regulations must first publish in the Maryland Register a notice of proposed action, a

statement of purpose, a comparison to federal standards, an estimate of economic impact, an economic impact on small businesses, a notice

giving the public an opportunity to comment on the proposal, and the text of the proposed regulations. The opportunity for public comment

must be held open for at least 30 days after the proposal is published in the Maryland Register.

Following publication of the proposal in the Maryland Register, 45 days must pass before the agency may take final action on the

proposal. When final action is taken, the agency must publish a notice in the Maryland Register. Final action takes effect 10 days after the

notice is published, unless the agency specifies a later date. An agency may make changes in the text of a proposal. If the changes are not

substantive, these changes are included in the notice of final action and published in the Maryland Register. If the changes are substantive,

the agency must repropose the regulations, showing the changes that were made to the originally proposed text.

Proposed action on regulations may be withdrawn by the proposing agency any time before final action is taken. When an agency

proposes action on regulations, but does not take final action within 1 year, the proposal is automatically withdrawn by operation of law,

and a notice of withdrawal is published in the Maryland Register.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1430

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to implement Natural Resources

Article, §5-1203, Annotated Code of Maryland, which became

effective October 1, 2014. The proposed action clarifies the statute by

placing all wildlands and their restrictions into an easy to read,

organized location. Specifically, land was added to fourteen existing

wildland areas, nine new wildland areas were added, and special

provisions for several of the new wildland areas were identified.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact The proposed action has no economic impact.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to John F. Wilson, Associate Director,

Stewardship, Land Acquisition and Planning, E-4, 580 Taylor

Avenue, Annapolis, MD 21401, or call 410-260-8412, or email to

[email protected], or fax to 410-260-8404. Comments will

be accepted through December 31, 2014. A public hearing has not

been scheduled.

.02 State Wildlands System. A. (text unchanged)

B. Types of Wildlands.

(1) “Type [I] 1 wildland” means a primitive area which by its

size and location is in effect untouched by urban civilization and can

offer the experience of solitude and self-reliance. Type [I] 1

wildlands are usually lands located at higher elevations that protect

watersheds and are ecologically vulnerable to human interferences.

(2) “Type [II] 2 wildland” means a unit of importance for

natural sciences and ecology with outstanding value for education,

research, and appreciation of natural processes. Preservation of the

desired natural condition is the prevailing purpose of the Type [II] 2

wildlands.

(3) “Type [III] 3 wildland” means an area which is not of

ecological or primitive stature but which has the appearance of being

in an untouched natural state.

C. (text unchanged)

D. Name, Location, and Acreage of State Wildlands.

(1) There are presently [27] 38 State-owned areas administered

by the Department identified as State wildlands.

_________________________________________

(2) The general location, types, and acreage of State-owned wildlands are as follows:

Type Project Acreage Location County

Type 1

Big Savage Mountain [2691] 2879 acres Savage River SF Garrett

Bear Pen 1517 acres Savage River SF Garrett

Middle Fork [1916] 2932 acres Savage River SF Garrett

High Rock 650 acres Savage River SF Garrett

Maple Run [2760] 5125 acres Green Ridge SF Allegany

Cunningham Falls [3452] 4397 acres Cunningham Falls SF Frederick

Savage Ravines 2789 acres Savage River SF Garrett

Dan’s Mountain 4047 acres Dan’s Mountain WMA Allegany

Upper White Rock 300 acres Garrett SF Garrett

Backbone Mountain 1706 acres Potomac SF/Savage River SF Garrett

Maple Lick Run 600 acres Potomac SF Garrett

Puzzley Run 457 acres Savage River SF Garrett

Type [II] 2

Deep Run [1260] 1416 acres Green Ridge SF Allegany

Potomac Bends [2034] 2645 acres Green Ridge SF Allegany

Rocky Gap 943 acres Rocky Gap SP Allegany

Sideling Hill [922] 1555 acres Sideling Hill WMA Allegany/

Washington

Islands of the Potomac [670] 790 acres Islands of the Potomac WMA Frederick/Montgomery

Black Marsh 667 acres North Point SP Baltimore

Gunpowder Falls 792 acres Gunpowder Falls SP Baltimore

Patuxent River 1579 acres Patuxent River SP Howard/

Montgomery

Soldiers Delight [1526] 1798 acres Soldiers Delight NEA Baltimore

Morgan Run 499 acres Morgan Run NEA Carroll

Panther Branch 735 acres Gunpowder Falls SP Baltimore

Sweathouse Branch 1073 acres Gunpowder Falls SP Baltimore

Mingo Branch/Bush Cabin Run 1272 acres Gunpowder Falls SP Baltimore

Belt Woods 610 acres Belt Woods NEA Prince George’s

Calvert Cliffs 1079 acres Calvert Cliffs SP Calvert

St. Mary’s River 1445 acres St. Mary’s River SP St. Mary’s

Mattawoman [1605] 2993 acres Mattawoman NEA Charles

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1431

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

[Ilylwild] Idylwild 570 acres Idylwild WMA Caroline

Pocomoke River [2481] 3029 acres Pocomoke SF/SP Worcester

Cypress Swamp [1784] 2090 acres Pocomoke SF Worcester

Cedar Island 2880 acres Cedar Island WMA Somerset

South Savage 2079 acres Savage River SF Garrett

Janes Island 3125 acres Janes Island SP Somerset

Parker’s Creek 1756 acres Parker’s Creek WMA Calvert

Zekiah Swamp 443 acres Zekiah Swamp NEA Charles

Chapman 694 acres Chapman SP Charles

Type [III] 3 (None At This Time)

Total acreage of wildlands = [39412] 65,956 acres Key: SP = State Park WMA = Wildlife Management Area SF = State Forest NEA = Natural

Environment Area

_________________________________________

.04 Permitted Activities—Select Units of the State Wildlands Preservation System.

A. The uses and activities in §§B—[J] N of this regulation are

permitted only in the wildlands specified.

B.—I. (text unchanged)

J. Cypress Swamp Wildlands.

(1) Activities related to the maintenance of existing public

drainage within Cypress Swamp wildland are permitted if all local

and State requirements for review, permit, and approval are followed.

(2) The existing stand of planted pine trees in Parcel 5

identified in Natural Resources Article, §5-1203(c)(2), Annotated

Code of Maryland, may be harvested by the Department using

mechanical or motorized equipment, and the area then reforested or

allowed to naturally revert to a forested condition.

K. Mattawoman Wildland. With prior approval of the Maryland

Historical Trust and after an internal Departmental review, the

Department may authorize:

(1) Archaeological inventories, studies, and research that

involve surface examination or limited substrate sampling;

(2) Salvage and excavation of archaeological sites; and

(3) Stabilization and restoration of historic structures existing

as of October 1, 2014.

L. Parker’s Creek Wildland. In order to preserve, maintain, study,

research, and educate the public about the unique ecological features

and rare habitats in the Parker’s Creek Wildland area, within

Parker’s Creek Wildland the Department may:

(1) Retain, maintain, remove, or replace existing structures,

trails, parking areas, and roads using mechanical or motorized

equipment;

(2) Remove, replace, or dispose of non-native species using

mechanical or motorized equipment;

(3) Erect fencing, gates, or signs in order to protect or identify

unique natural or historical elements;

(4) Construct and maintain not more than two viewing

platforms adjacent to hiking trails for public observation;

(5) Construct and maintain a footbridge across Parker’s Creek

at the historical crossing found at the southern terminus of Old

Parker’s Creek Road; and

(6) Continue to authorize agricultural management activities

on the Goldstein Bay Farm for so long as an agricultural lease is in

effect.

M. Chapman Wildland. With prior approval of the Maryland

Historical Trust and after an internal Departmental review, the

Department may authorize:

(1) Archaeological inventories, studies, and research that

involve surface examination or limited substrate sampling;

(2) Salvage and excavation of archaeological sites; and

(3) Stabilization and restoration of historic structures existing

as of October 1, 2014.

N. Dan’s Mountain Wildland. In Dan’s Mountain Wildland area

the Department may:

(1) Establish and maintain roads and trails to provide access

for wildlife-dependent recreation;

(2) Improve and manage habitat for early-succession wildlife;

and

(3) Take all other actions necessary to manage the area in a

way that fulfills the purposes of the 1966 Federal Aid in Fish and

Wildlife Restoration Act grant from the Department of the Interior

that partially funded acquisition of the area.

.05 Prohibited Activities—State Wildlands Preservation System. A. Except when expressly permitted under Regulation [.02 or ].03

or .04 of this chapter, the uses and activities in §§B—G of this

regulation are prohibited in a wildland.

B.—G. (text unchanged)

.06 Restricted and Conditional Activities—State Wildlands Preservation System.

A. Except when expressly permitted under Regulation [.02 or ].03

or .04 of this chapter, the uses and activities listed in §§B—J of this

regulation are restricted.

B.—J. (text unchanged)

JOSEPH P. GILL

Secretary of Natural Resources

Title 10 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

AND MENTAL HYGIENE Subtitle 09 MEDICAL CARE

PROGRAMS 10.09.23 Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis

and Treatment (EPSDT) Services Authority: Health-General Article, §§2-104(b), Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-340-P]

The Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene proposes to amend

Regulation .06 under COMAR 10.09.23 Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) Services.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to clarify which services require

preauthorization.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1432

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact The proposed action has no economic impact.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to Michele Phinney, Director, Office of

Regulation and Policy Coordination, Department of Health and

Mental Hygiene, 201 West Preston Street, Room 512, Baltimore, MD

21201, or call 410-767-6499; TTY:800-735-2258, or email to

[email protected], or fax to 410-767-6483. Comments will

be accepted through December 31, 2014. A public hearing has not

been scheduled.

.06 Preauthorization. Preauthorization is required for:

A.—D. (text unchanged)

E. Residential treatment services, as specified in COMAR

10.09.29.06; [and] F. Therapeutic behavioral services, as specified in COMAR

10.09.34.05[.]; and

G. Intermediate Care Facilities, as specified in COMAR

10.47.02.09.

JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.

Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene

Title 15 DEPARTMENT OF

AGRICULTURE Subtitle 20 SOIL AND WATER

CONSERVATION Notice of Proposed Action

[14-354-P]

The Secretary of Agriculture proposes to:

(1) Amend Regulation .11 under COMAR 15.20.04 Nutrient Management Certification and Licensing;

(2) Amend Regulation .02 under COMAR 15.20.07 Agricultural Operation Nutrient Management Plan Requirements; and

(3) Amend Regulations .01, .03, and .05, repeal existing

Regulations .06 and .07, and adopt new Regulations .06 ― .12 under

COMAR 15.20.08 Content and Criteria for a Nutrient Management Plan Developed for an Agricultural Operation.

At this time, the proposal to amend Regulation .11 under

COMAR 15.20.04 Nutrient Management Certification and Licensing, Regulation .02 under COMAR 15.20.07 Agricultural Operation Nutrient Management Plan Requirements, and

Regulation .05 under COMAR 15.20.08 Content and Criteria for a Nutrient Management Plan Developed for an Agricultural Operation, as published in 40:21 Md. R. 1840—1843 (October 18,

2013) is being withdrawn.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to add Supplement No. 8 (November,

2014) to the Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, which is

incorporated by reference under COMAR 15.20.07.02 Supplement

No. 8 (November, 2014) and includes modification to the method for

determining nutrient recommendations, specifically the method for

the determination of phosphorus as the limiting nutrient by

transitioning to the use of the Phosphorus Management Tool. This

action subsequently impacts COMAR 15.20.04.11 and 15.20.08.05

by defining the method and elements for determining required

nutrient recommendations in a nutrient management plan.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact I. Summary of Economic Impact. The proposed regulation will

affect certain farms with high phosphorus levels in the soil.

Additional management will be required on farms based on the risk

of phosphorus loss from the field. Generally, farmers will be required

to reduce or eliminate the application of additional phosphorus to

their fields. In cases where organic sources of nutrients, such as

animal manures containing both phosphorus and nitrogen, have been

applied, farmers will be required to purchase inorganic commercial

fertilizer to provide the nitrogen previously provided by manure.

These newly restricted animal manures will need to be transported to

other farms to acreage that can appropriately utilize the manure in

accordance with new requirements.

Revenue (R+/R-)

II. Types of Economic Impact.

Expenditure

(E+/E-) Magnitude

A. On issuing agency: NONE

B. On other State agencies: NONE

C. On local governments: NONE

Benefit (+)

Cost (-) Magnitude

D. On regulated industries

or trade groups: (-) $22.5 million

E. On other industries or

trade groups: (+) $10.1 million

NONE

F. Direct and indirect

effects on public: (+) $100 million

NONE

III. Assumptions. (Identified by Impact Letter and Number from

Section II.)

D. The proposed regulation will affect certain farms with high

phosphorus levels in the soil. The proposal amends an existing risk

assessment tool, known as the Phosphorus Site Index (PSI), used to

determine the potential for phosphorus loss from the field. The new

Phosphorus Management Tool (PMT), developed by scientists at the

University of Maryland, is suggested to have the greatest potential

impact on soils with high soil phosphorus in areas where ground

water is closest to the surface.

Additional management will be required on farms based on the

risk of phosphorus loss from the field. Generally, farmers will be

required to reduce or eliminate the application of additional

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1433

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

phosphorus to their fields. In cases where organic sources of

nutrients, such as animal manures containing both phosphorus and

nitrogen, have been applied, farmers will be required to purchase

inorganic commercial fertilizer to provide the nitrogen previously

provided by manure. These newly restricted animal manures will

need to be transported to other farms to acreage that can

appropriately utilize the manure in accordance with new

requirements.

The Department commissioned a report by the Business Economic

and Community Network (BEACON) at Salisbury University to

analyze the costs and benefits associated with the implementation of

the PMT. Under the direction of Dr. Memo Diriker, a stakeholder

advisory group provided extensive detail on agricultural management

and operational cost information. A range of macro level cost

variables were considered for factors affected by the PMT, including

agriculture, land values, recreation, water-based activities, crop

fertilizer, manure transportation and handling, infrastructure,

community costs, and others.

The BEACON study considered three implementation scenarios,

including the six-year phase-in approach proposed by the regulation.

The six year scenario assumed incentives and program support of $79

million to offset farm-related costs and support the deployment of

alternative technologies related to manure utilization. Current state

and federal funding provide $58 million of support and $21 million is

assumed to be new funding, with $15.5 million of the new funding

provided from state sources.

Cost variables were considered over a range of cost, given certain

unknown factors, producing a range of net aggregate costs. The net

aggregate cost for the six-year scenario at the 50th percentile is $22.5

million. According to the report, this number represents macro level

PMT implementation costs minus subsidies.

While the BEACON study considered both macro and micro

(farm-scale) impacts, Dr. Diriker explains that specific farm-scale

costs cannot calculated until more specific detail regarding

requirements are provided and certain experience is realized to

inform further analysis. While certain farms will realize additional

operating costs due to manure transportation and handling and

replacement commercial fertilizer, other farms will likely realize

lower operating costs through the use of relocated manure as a source

of crop nutrients. The study developed a farm-scale template that can

be activated to more specifically estimate individual farm impacts

once additional information is available.

E. Assuming 228,000 tons of additional poultry litter to require

relocation to other farms for land application, an average cost of $14

per ton for transportation costs, and existing level of Manure

Transport Program activity is maintained, total public expenditures

for manure transport will exceed $4.6 million annually. These

subsidies translate into additional economic activity for contractors

providing these services to farmers. Additionally, infrastructure

expansion costs for manure transportation and loading equipment,

plus additional spreading equipment for commercial fertilizer is

estimated to generate $5.5 million in sales for vendors of such new

equipment.

F. The public will benefit from the proposal through improved

water quality and environmental conditions in local rivers and

streams. The quality of life of Marylanders will improve by virtue of

healthy local water bodies and additional measures toward a restored

Chesapeake Bay.

The BEACON study included consideration of environmental and

social benefits that might be derived from implementing the PMT.

The final report cites an October 2014 Chesapeake Bay Foundation

(CBF) report, The Economic Benefits of Cleaning Up the

Chesapeake Bay. The CBF report attributes $4.6 billion of annual

economic benefit to Maryland as result of meeting Bay restoration

goals. BEACON estimates $100 million of statewide economic

benefits associated with implementing the PMT on the Eastern Shore.

However the BEACON report cites, “While significant, this

statewide MACRO-Level benefit estimate attributable to the

implementation of the PMT on the

Eastern Shore cannot be directly compared to the farm-level costs of

implementation estimated in the three scenarios. Most of the

MACRO-Level benefit estimates involve value enhancements and

potential cost savings. They are not financial resources that can be

used to defray the farmers’ PMT implementation costs.”

A copy of A Scenario Analysis of the Potential Costs of

Implementing the Phosphorus Management Tool on the Eastern

Shore of Maryland, BEACON at Salisbury University, November

2014, is available on the Department’s website at

http://mda.maryland.gov/Documents/pmt-analysis.pdf.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has a meaningful economic impact on small

business. An analysis of this economic impact follows.

The proposed regulation will affect certain farms with high

phosphorus levels in the soil. The proposal amends an existing risk

assessment tool, known as the Phosphorus Site Index (PSI), used to

determine the potential for phosphorus loss from the field. The new

Phosphorus Management Tool (PMT), developed by scientists at the

University of Maryland, is suggested to have the greatest potential

impact on soils with high soil phosphorus in areas where ground

water is closest to the surface.

Additional management will be required on farms based on the

risk of phosphorus loss from the field. Generally, farmers will be

required to reduce or eliminate the application of additional

phosphorus to their fields. In cases where organic sources of

nutrients, such as animal manures containing both phosphorus and

nitrogen, have been applied, farmers will be required to purchase

inorganic commercial fertilizer to provide the nitrogen previously

provided by manure. These newly restricted animal manures will

need to be transported to other farms to acreage that can

appropriately utilize the manure in accordance with new

requirements.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to Earl F. Hance, Secretary, Maryland

Department of Agriculture, 50 Harry S. Truman Parkway Suite 303,

Annapolis, Maryland 21401, or call 410-841-5881, or email to

[email protected], or fax to 410-841-5914. Comments will

be accepted through December 31, 2014. A public hearing has not

been scheduled.

15.20.04 Nutrient Management Certification and Licensing

Authority: Agriculture Article, §§8-801—8-806, Annotated Code of Maryland

.11 Record-Keeping and Reporting Requirements. A. (text unchanged)

B. Information Concerning the Phosphorus Management Tool.

(1) As provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, a

license holder or a certified consultant who is not operating under a

license shall file a report with the Department that includes

information relating to nutrient management plans developed for

operations which have soils with a phosphorus fertility index value of

150 or above.

(2) The report shall include information that the Department

determines necessary to evaluate the implementation of the

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1434

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Phosphorus Management Tool, as provided in the Maryland Nutrient

Management Manual, Section II-C2.

(3) The report shall be filed on a form developed by the

Department in accordance with a schedule determined by the

Department.

(4) The Department shall maintain the confidentiality of

information provided in the report as required by Agriculture Article

§ 8-801.1(b), Annotated Code of Maryland.

[B.] C. (text unchanged)

15.20.07 Agricultural Operation Nutrient Management Plan Requirements

Authority: Agriculture Article, §§8-801—8-806, Annotated Code of Maryland

.02 Incorporation by Reference. The performance and technical standards provided in this subtitle

are found in the Department of Agriculture’s Maryland Nutrient

Management Manual (November 1999), Supplement No. 1

(September 2000), Supplement No. 2 (November 2001), Supplement

No. 3 (September 2004), Supplement No. 4 (November 2005), [and] Supplement No. 5 (November 2006), Supplement No. 6 (May 2009),

[and] Supplement No. 7 (May 2012), and Supplement No. 8

(November 2014), which are incorporated by reference.

15.20.08 Content and Criteria for a Nutrient Management Plan Developed for an Agricultural Operation

Authority: Agriculture Article, §§8-801—8-806, Annotated Code of Maryland

.01 Scope. A.—C. (text unchanged)

D. This chapter also describes the transition from the Phosphorus

Site Index to the Phosphorus Management Tool as a means to

identify potential risk of phosphorus loss from farms. Like the

Phosphorus Site Index, the Phosphorus Management Tool will be

employed when a soil sample analysis shows a phosphorus fertility

index value (“P FIV”) of 150 or greater. As shown in the chart in

Regulation .10 of this chapter, the Phosphorus Management Tool will

be phased-in over a 6-year period. Farms that have excess soil

phosphorus will be placed in one of three tiers, as determined by the

particular operation’s average phosphorus fertility index value.

Farms with an average P FIV of 450 and greater will be the first

operations required to begin implementing the Phosphorus

Management Tool, but will be given a longer time-frame to fully

implement it. Farms with an average P FIV, respectively, of (1) 150

and greater but less than 300, and (2) 300 and greater but less than

450) will be required to begin implementing the Phosphorus

Management Tool later but will be given less time to complete this

transition.

.03 Definitions. A. (text unchanged)

B. Terms Defined.

(1)—(3) (text unchanged)

(4) “Average Soil Phosphorus Fertility Index Value” or

“Average Soil P FIV” means a value:

(a) Determined for an agricultural operation by averaging

the P FIV of all fields or management units within the operation that

have a P FIV greater than 150 (calculated by adding together the P

FIV of each field or management unit within the operation that has a

P FIV greater than 150 and dividing this sum by number of any such

fields or management units); and

(b) Established not later than June 30, 2016, using soil tests

not more than 3 years old.

[(4)] (5)—[(29)] (30) (text unchanged)

(31) “Phosphorus Management Tool” means the new

procedure developed by the University of Maryland, approved by the

Department, and described in the Maryland Nutrient Management

Manual, Section II-C, that:

(a) Uses characteristics of soils, landforms, and

management practices to identify potential risk of phosphorus losses

from soils to waters; and

(b) Shall be phased-in between 2016 and 2021, ultimately

replacing the Phosphorus Site Index.

[(30)] (32) “Phosphorus [site index] Site Index” means the

original procedure developed by the University of Maryland,

approved by the Department, and described in the Maryland Nutrient

Management Manual, Section II-C, that:

(a)—(b) (text unchanged)

(33) “Phosphorus Transition Management Phase I” means the

first of two management phases that farms with a soil P FIV of 150

or greater shall employ when transitioning from use of the

Phosphorus Site Index to the Phosphorus Management Tool as a

means to determine the application of additional phosphorus that:

(a) Consists of three risk categories determined by a

calculation of the Phosphorus Management Tool; and

(b) Includes a schedule for implementation based on the

average soil P FIV for the operation.

(34) “Phosphorus Transition Management Phase II” means the

second of two management phases that farms with a soil P FIV of

150 or greater shall employ when transitioning from the use of the

Phosphorus Site Index to the Phosphorus Management Tool as a

means to determine the application of additional phosphorus that:

(a) Consists of three risk categories determined by a

calculation of the Phosphorus Management Tool; and

(b) Includes a schedule for implementation based on the

average soil P FIV for the operation.

[(31)] (35)—[(36)] (40) (text unchanged)

(41) “Tier A operations” means those farms that have an

average soil P FIV of 150 or greater but less than 300.

(42) “Tier B operations” means those farms that have an

average soil P FIV of 300 or greater but less than 450.

(43) “Tier C operations” means those farms that have an

average soil P FIV of 450 or greater.

[(37)] (44)—[(39)] (46) (text unchanged)

.05 Nutrient Management—Required Plan Recommendations. A.—D. (text unchanged)

E. Determination of Limiting Nutrient.

(1)—(2) (text unchanged)

(3) If the soil sample analysis results show a phosphorus

fertility index value (FIV) of less than 150, nutrient recommendations

may [use] be based on nitrogen plant needs as the limiting factor in

accordance with the recommendations described in the Maryland

Nutrient Management Manual, Section 1-B.

(4) Phosphorus Criteria for Tier A Operations.

[(a) If the soil sample analysis results show a phosphorus

fertility index value (FIV) of 150 or greater, a phosphorus site index

or other phosphorus risk assessment method acceptable to the

Department, as provided in the Maryland Nutrient Management

Manual, Section II-B, shall be used to determine the potential risk of

phosphorus loss due to site characteristics.

(b) If the risk for potential movement of phosphorus from

the site is low according to the phosphorus site index, nutrient

recommendations by the consultant or certified farm operator may

use nitrogen plant needs as the limiting factor.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1435

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

(c) If the risk for potential movement of phosphorus from

the site is medium according to the phosphorus site index:

(i) Nutrient rates shall be based on nitrogen plant needs

as the limiting factor no more than 1 out of every 3 years. Phosphorus

rates the other 2 years shall be limited to the expected amount

removed from the field by the crop or plant harvest, or the amount

indicated by soil testing in accordance with the recommendations

described in the Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section I-

B, whichever is greater; or

(ii) Nutrient recommendations may use nitrogen plant

needs as the limiting factor if BMPs are implemented by the operator

and address site or management characteristics to reduce the risk of

phosphorus loss to low.

(d) If the risk for potential movement of phosphorus from

the site is high according to the phosphorus site index:

(i) Phosphorus rates shall be limited to the expected

amount removed from the field by the crop or plant harvest, or the

amount indicated by soil testing, in accordance with the

recommendations described in the Maryland Nutrient Management

Manual, Section I-B; or

(ii) If BMPs are implemented by the operator, and

address site or management characteristics to reduce the risk of

phosphorus loss to medium, nutrient rates may be based on nitrogen

plant needs as the limiting factor not more than 1 out of every 3

years. Phosphorus rates the other 2 years shall be limited to the

expected amount removed from the field by the crop or plant harvest,

or the amount indicated by soil testing or in accordance with

recommendations described in the Maryland Nutrient Management

Manual, Section I-B, whichever is greater.

(e) If the risk for potential movement of phosphorus from

the site is very high according to the phosphorus site index:

(i) No additional phosphorus may be applied; or

(ii) If BMPs are implemented by the operator, and

address site or management characteristics to reduce the risk of

phosphorus loss to high, recommended rates of application of

phosphorus shall be limited to the expected amount removed from the

field by the crop or plant harvest, or the amount indicated by soil

testing in accordance with recommendations described in the

Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section I-B.

(5) Before the deadlines set forth in COMAR 15.20.07.03

for the development of a phosphorus-based plan, a certified nutrient

management consultant or certified farm operator may use:

(a) The requirements of §E(1)—(3) of this regulation as a

planning tool to determine if future management changes are

indicated by the P index, and if development of a phased-in approach

to a phosphorus-based plan should be recommended; or

(b) §E(1)—(3) of this regulation as a guide to determine

nutrient management recommendations.] (a) Except for nutrient management plans developed in

accordance with §(e) of this subsection, the certified consultant shall:

(i) Provide the operator information outlining the

changes in the management of the operation that will be required

when the Phosphorus Management Tool becomes effective;

(ii) Calculate the Average Soil Phosphorus Fertility

Index Value for the operation; and

(iii) Report the Average Soil Phosphorus Fertility Index

Value for the operation to the Department on a form provided by the

Department no later than September 1, 2016.

(b) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation before July 1, 2018 shall:

(i) Be developed using both the Phosphorus Site Index

and the Phosphorus Management Tool, as provided in the Maryland

Nutrient Management Manual, Section II-C; and

(ii) Use the Phosphorus Site Index set forth in Regulation

.06 of this chapter to determine phosphorus applications.

(c) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019 shall use the

Phosphorus Transition Management Phase 1 set forth in Regulation

.07 of this chapter to determine phosphorus applications.

(d) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation between July 1, 2019 and June 30, 2020 shall use the

Phosphorus Transition Management Phase 2 set forth in Regulation

.08 of this chapter to determine phosphorus applications.

(e) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation after July 1, 2020 shall use the Phosphorus

Management Tool set forth in Regulation .09 of this chapter to

determine phosphorus applications.

(5) Phosphorus Criteria for Tier B Operations.

(a) Except for nutrient management plans developed in

accordance with §(e) of this subsection, the certified consultant shall:

(i) Provide the operator information outlining the

changes in the management of the operation that shall be required

when the Phosphorus Management Tool becomes effective;

(ii) Calculate the Average Soil Phosphorus Fertility

Index Value for the operation; and

(iii) Report the Average Soil Phosphorus Fertility Index

Value for the operation to the Department on a form provided by the

Department not later than September 1, 2016.

(b) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation before July 1, 2017 shall use the Phosphorus Site

Index set forth in Regulation .06 of this chapter to determine

phosphorus applications.

(c) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018 shall use the

Phosphorus Transition Management Phase 1 set forth in Regulation

.07 of this chapter to determine phosphorus applications.

(d) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020 shall use the

Phosphorus Transition Management Phase 2 set forth in Regulation

.08 of this chapter to determine phosphorus applications.

(e) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation after July 1, 2020 shall use the Phosphorus

Management Tool set forth in Regulation .09 of this chapter to

determine phosphorus applications.

(6) Phosphorus Criteria for Tier C Operations.

(a) Except for nutrient management plans developed in

accordance with §(e) of this subsection, the certified consultant shall:

(i) Provide the operator information outlining the

changes in the management of the operation that will be required

when the Phosphorus Management Tool becomes effective;

(ii) Calculate the Average Soil Phosphorus Fertility

Index Value for the operation; and

(iii) Report the Average Soil Phosphorus Fertility Index

Value for the operation to the Department on a form provided by the

Department not later than September 1, 2016.

(b) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation prior to July 1, 2016 shall use the Phosphorus Site

Index set forth in Regulation .06 of this chapter to determine

phosphorus applications.

(c) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2018 shall use the

Phosphorus Transition Management Phase 1 set forth in Regulation

.07 of this chapter to determine phosphorus applications.

(d) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020 shall use the

Phosphorus Transition Management Phase 2 set forth in Regulation

.08 of this chapter to determine phosphorus applications.

(e) Nutrient management plans developed for

implementation after July 1, 2020 shall use the Phosphorus

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1436

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Management Tool set forth in Regulation .09 of this chapter to

determine phosphorus applications.

F.—I. (text unchanged)

.06 Nutrient Management—Phosphorus Site Index.

A. If the soil sample analysis results show a phosphorus fertility

index value of 150 or greater, the Phosphorus Site Index, as provided

in the Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section II-C1, shall

be used to determine the potential risk of phosphorus loss due to site

characteristics.

B. Low Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss. If the risk for potential

loss of phosphorus from the site is low according to the Phosphorus

Site Index, nutrient recommendations by the consultant or certified

farm operator may use nitrogen plant needs as the limiting factor.

C. Medium Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss.

(1) Except as provided in §C(2) of this regulation, if the risk for

potential loss of phosphorus from the site is medium according to the

Phosphorus Site Index, nutrient rates shall be based on nitrogen

plant needs as the limiting factor not more than one out of every 3

years. Phosphorus rates for the other 2 years shall be limited to the

expected amount removed from the field by the planned crop or plant

rotation immediately following the phosphorus application, not to

exceed two crops, or the amount indicated by soil testing in

accordance with the recommendations described in the Maryland

Nutrient Management Manual, Section I-B, whichever is greater.

(2) Nutrient recommendations may use nitrogen plant needs as

the limiting factor if BMPs are implemented by the operator before

or during the application of additional phosphorus that address site

or management characteristics which, according to the outcome of a

recalculation using the Phosphorus Site Index, reduce the risk of

phosphorus loss to low.

D. High Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss.

(1) Except as provided in §D(2) of this regulation, if the risk for

potential loss of phosphorus from the site is high according to the

Phosphorus Site Index, phosphorus rates shall be limited to the

expected amount removed from the field by the planned crop or plant

rotation immediately following the phosphorus application, not to

exceed two crops, or the amount indicated by soil testing, in

accordance with the recommendations described in the Maryland

Nutrient Management Manual, Section I-B, whichever is greater.

(2) If BMPs are implemented by the operator before or during

the application of additional phosphorus that address site or

management characteristics which, according to the outcome of a

recalculation using the Phosphorus Site Index, reduce the risk of

phosphorus loss to medium, nutrient rates may be based on nitrogen

plant needs as the limiting factor not more than one out of every 3

years. Phosphorus rates for the other 2 years shall be limited to the

expected amount removed from the field by the planned crop or plant

rotation immediately following the phosphorus application, not to

exceed two crops, or the amount indicated by soil testing or in

accordance with recommendations described in the Maryland

Nutrient Management Manual, Section I-B, whichever is greater.

E. Very High Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss.

(1) Except as provided in §E(2) of this regulation, if the risk for

potential loss of phosphorus from the site is very high according to

the Phosphorus Site Index, no additional phosphorus may be applied.

(2) If BMPs are implemented by the operator before or during

the application of additional phosphorus that address site or

management characteristics which, according to the outcome of a

recalculation using the Phosphorus Site Index, reduce the risk of

phosphorus loss to high, recommended rates of application of

phosphorus shall be limited to the expected amount removed from the

field by the crop or plant harvest, or the amount indicated by soil

testing in accordance with recommendations described in the

Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section I-B, whichever is

greater.

(3) The operator shall consider the implementation of

management practices and technologies that are effective in lowering

the risk of phosphorus loss, based on research and demonstration of

the University of Maryland, or other land grant university, or by the

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources

Conservation Service, National Planning Procedures Handbook and

practice standards adopted for Maryland.

.07 Nutrient Management—Phosphorus Transition Management

Phase I.

A. If the soil sample analysis results show a phosphorus fertility

index value of 150 or greater, the Phosphorus Management Tool, as

provided in the Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section II-

C2, shall be used to determine the potential risk of phosphorus loss

due to site characteristics.

B. Low Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss.

(1) If the risk for potential loss of phosphorus from the site is

low according to the Phosphorus Management Tool, nutrient

recommendations by the consultant or certified farm operator may

use nitrogen plant needs as the limiting factor.

(2) Nutrient applications shall not exceed the amount of

phosphorus removed by the planned crop over a 3-year period.

C. Medium Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss.

(1) Except as provided in §C(2) of this regulation, if the risk for

potential loss of phosphorus from the site is medium according to the

Phosphorus Management Tool, total phosphorus applications related

to crops anticipated to be planted in a 3-year period shall not exceed

the amount of phosphorus removed by the planned crops over the 3-

year period, or the amount indicated by soil testing, in accordance

with the recommendations described in the Maryland Nutrient

Management Manual, Section I-B , whichever is greater.

(2) If BMPs are implemented by the operator before or during

the application of additional phosphorus that address site or

management characteristics which, according to the outcome of a

recalculation using the Phosphorus Management Tool, reduce the

risk of phosphorus loss to low, nutrient rates may be established as

provided by §B of this regulation.

D. High Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss.

(1) Except as provided in §D(2) of this regulation, if the risk for

potential loss of phosphorus from the site is high according to the

Phosphorus Management Tool, phosphorus rates shall be limited to

the expected amount removed from the field by the planned crop or

plant rotation immediately following the phosphorus application, not

to exceed two crops, or the amount indicated by soil testing, in

accordance with the recommendations described in the Maryland

Nutrient Management Manual, Section I-B , whichever is greater.

(2) If BMPs are implemented by the operator before or during

the application of additional phosphorus that address site or

management characteristics which, according to the outcome of a

recalculation using the Phosphorus Management Tool, reduce the

risk of phosphorus loss to medium, nutrient rates may be established

as provided by §C of this regulation.

(3) The operator shall consider the implementation of

management practices and technologies that are effective in lowering

the risk of phosphorus loss, based on research and demonstration of

the University of Maryland, or other land grant university, or by the

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources

Conservation Service, National Planning Procedures Handbook and

practice standards adopted for Maryland.

.08 Nutrient Management—Phosphorus Transition Management

Phase II.

A. If the soil sample analysis results show a phosphorus fertility

index value of 150 or greater, the Phosphorus Management Tool, as

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1437

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

provided in the Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section II-

C2, shall be used to determine the potential risk of phosphorus loss

due to site characteristics.

B. Low Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss. If the risk for potential

loss of phosphorus from the site is low according to the Phosphorus

Management Tool, total phosphorus applications related to crops

anticipated to be planted in a 3-year period shall not exceed the

amount of phosphorus removed by the planned crops over the 3-year

period, or the amount indicated by soil testing, in accordance with

the recommendations described in the Maryland Nutrient

Management Manual, Section I-B , whichever is greater.

C. Medium Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss.

(1) Except as provided in §C(2) of this regulation, if the risk for

potential loss of phosphorus from the site is medium according to the

Phosphorus Management Tool, total phosphorus applications related

to crops anticipated to be planted in a 2-year period shall not exceed

the amount of phosphorus removed by the planned crops over the 2-

year period, or the amount indicated by soil testing, in accordance

with the recommendations described in the Maryland Nutrient

Management Manual, Section I-B , whichever is greater.

(2) If BMPs are implemented by the operator before or during

the application of additional phosphorus that address site or

management characteristics which, according to the outcome of a

recalculation using the Phosphorus Management Tool, reduce the

risk of phosphorus loss to low, nutrient rates may be established as

provided by §B of this regulation.

D. High Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss.

(1) Except as provided in §D(3) and (4) of this regulation, if the

risk for potential loss of phosphorus from the site is high according

to the Phosphorus Management Tool, phosphorus rates shall be

limited to 50 percent of the expected amount removed from the field

by the planned crop or plant rotation immediately following the

phosphorus application, not to exceed two crops, or the amount

indicated by soil testing, in accordance with the recommendations

described in the Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section I-B

, whichever is greater.

(2) If limits of technology of available application equipment

prevent application at 50 percent of the expected amount removed

from the field by the crop or plant harvest immediately following the

phosphorus application, phosphorus rates shall be limited to the

expected amount removed from the field by the crop or plant harvest

immediately following the phosphorus application, or the amount

indicated by soil testing, in accordance with the recommendations

described in the Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section I-B

, whichever is greater.

(3) If BMPs are implemented by the operator before or during

the application of additional phosphorus, that address site or

management characteristics which, according to the outcome of a

recalculation using the Phosphorus Management Tool, reduce the

risk of phosphorus loss to medium, nutrient rates may be established

as provided by §C of this regulation.

(4) If the crop to be produced is certified as organic pursuant

to the requirements of the federal Organic Foods Production Act, 7

U.S.C. §6501 et seq., including implementing federal regulations, as

amended, recommended rates of application of phosphorus shall be

limited to the expected amount removed from the field by the planned

crop or plant rotation immediately following the phosphorus

application, or the amount indicated by soil testing in accordance

with recommendations described in the Maryland Nutrient

Management Manual, Section I-B, whichever is greater.

(5) The operator shall consider the implementation of

management practices and technologies that are effective in lowering

the risk of phosphorus loss, based on research and demonstration of

the University of Maryland, or other land grant university, or by the

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources

Conservation Service, National Planning Procedures Handbook and

practice standards adopted for Maryland.

.09 Nutrient Management—Phosphorus Management Tool.

A. If the soil sample analysis results show a phosphorus fertility

index value of 150 or greater, the Phosphorus Management Tool, as

provided in the Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section II-

C2, shall be used to determine the potential risk of phosphorus loss

due to site characteristics.

B. Low Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss. If the risk for potential

loss of phosphorus from the site is low according to the Phosphorus

Management Tool, total phosphorus applications related to crops

anticipated to be planted in a 3-year period shall not exceed the

amount of phosphorus removed by the planned crops over the 3-year

period.

C. Medium Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss.

(1) Except as provided in §C(2) of this regulation, if the risk for

potential loss of phosphorus from the site is medium according to the

Phosphorus Management Tool, phosphorus rates shall be limited to

the expected amount removed from the field by the crop or plant

rotation immediately following the phosphorus application, not to

exceed two crops, or the amount indicated by soil testing, in

accordance with the recommendations described in the Maryland

Nutrient Management Manual, Section I-B , whichever is greater.

(2) If BMPs are implemented by the operator before or during

the application of additional phosphorus that address site or

management characteristics which, according to the outcome of a

recalculation using the Phosphorus Management Tool, reduce the

risk of phosphorus loss to low, nutrient rates may be established as

provided by §B of this regulation.

D. High Risk of Potential Phosphorus Loss.

(1) Except as provided in §D(2)—(6) of this regulation, if the

risk for potential loss of phosphorus from the site is high according

to the Phosphorus Management Tool, no additional phosphorus may

be applied.

(2) If BMPs are implemented by the operator before or during

the application of additional phosphorus that address site or

management characteristics which, according to the outcome of a

recalculation using the Phosphorus Management Tool, reduce the

risk of phosphorus loss to medium, nutrient rates may be established

as provided by §C of this regulation.

(3) If the crop to be produced is certified as organic pursuant

to the requirements of the federal Organic Foods Production Act, 7

U.S.C. § 6501 et seq., including implementing federal regulations, as

amended, recommended rates of application of phosphorus shall be

limited to the expected amount removed from the field by the planned

crop or plant rotation immediately following the phosphorus

application, not to exceed two crops, or the amount indicated by soil

testing in accordance with recommendations described in the

Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section I-B, whichever is

greater.

(4) Except when subject to cold and wet growing conditions,

crops determined to be deficient in phosphorus, as demonstrated by a

representative tissue analysis by an accredited laboratory, may

receive an application of phosphorus not to exceed 25 percent of the

expected amount removed from the field by the crop or plant harvest

immediately following the phosphorus application.

(5) Vegetable and tobacco crops with a recommended

phosphorus application rate of 40pounds or more at optimum or

excessive fertility levels as provided in the Maryland Nutrient

Management Manual, Section I-B, may receive a phosphorus

application at planting not to exceed 25 percent of the expected

amount removed from the field by the crop or plant harvest

immediately following the phosphorus application.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1438

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

(6) Agricultural operations implementing technologies to

reduce the phosphorus content of animal manures by at least 75

percent shall limit phosphorus application rates to 50 percent of the

expected amount removed from the field by the planned crop or plant

rotation immediately following the phosphorus application, not to

exceed two crops.

(7) The operator shall consider the implementation of

management practices and technologies that are effective in lowering

the risk of phosphorus loss, based on research and demonstration of

the University of Maryland, or other land grant university, or by the

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources

Conservation Service, National Planning Procedures Handbook and

practice standards adopted for Maryland.

.10 Summary Schedule — Transition from Phosphorus Site Index

to Phosphorus Management Tool.

SIX-YEAR TRANSITION SCHEDULE

Crop Year (July 1—June 30, following year)

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Average P FIV

>450 (Tier C

Operations)

PSI TM1 TM1 TM2 TM2 PMT

Average P FIV

300-450 (Tier B

Operations)

PSI PSI TM1 TM2 TM2 PMT

Average P FIV

150-299 (Tier A

Operations)

PSI PSI PSI TM1 TM2 PMT

PSI—Phosphorus

Site Index

TM1—Transition

Management Phase 1

TM2—Transition

Management Phase 2

PMT—Phosphorus

Management Tool

.11 Nutrient Management for Container or Out-of-Ground

Agricultural Production — Additional Required Plan

Content.

A. A certified nutrient management consultant or certified farm

operator shall prepare, and an operator of container or out-of-

ground agricultural production shall conform to the requirements of

§§B—H of this regulation, in addition to applicable requirements

described in this chapter, when developing and implementing a

nutrient management plan.

B. Plan Elements. A plan shall contain a summary of planned

plant production applicable to the site, including:

(1) A listing of plants to be grown by name, species, and variety

and cultivar or both; however, if more than 20 different kinds of

plants are grown, general plant categories may be used, such as

herbaceous, deciduous shrub, coniferous evergreen, broadleaf

evergreen, or trees;

(2) The estimated greatest number of plants, units, or

containers that will be in production at any one time during a

calendar year and the month this will occur;

(3) The estimated percentages of plants, units, or containers in

the following container size categories:

(a) Less than 1 gallon (less than 2,492 cubic centimeters

container volume),

(b) From 1 to 3 gallons (2,492 to 12,164 cubic centimeters),

(c) Greater than 3 gallons and less than 15 gallons (more

than 12,164, but less than 45,376 cubic centimeters), or

(d) 15 gallons or greater (45,376 cubic centimeters or

more);

(4) An inventory, which may include projected changes during

the life of the plan, taken by the operator for any purpose within 12

months of completion of the plan, which shall meet the requirements

of §B(1), (2), and (3) of this regulation, if the inventory is

representative of planned production during the period covered by a

nutrient management plan;

(5) Total growing area under the plan, which may include

projected changes in growing area planned to take place during the

life of the plan.

C. Summary of Nutrient Recommendations. A plan shall contain

summary information on the total amount of primary nutrients

recommended for each calendar year covered by the plan, including:

(1) The estimated total amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and

potash;

(2) A listing of all sources of nutrients;

(3) The estimated amounts of each source of nutrients to be

applied for each quarter of the year; and

(4) A listing or description of the application method or

methods for each nutrient.

D. Assessment of Environmental Risk. A nutrient management

plan shall contain an assessment of the risk of nutrient losses to

surface water, using the Environmental Risk Assessment for out-of-

ground production provided in the Maryland Nutrient Management

Manual, Section II-D.

E. General Management Recommendations. A plan shall contain

general recommendations to ensure efficient application of nutrients,

including:

(1) The calibration of equipment;

(2) The timing and application methods for water and

nutrients;

(3) Management options to maximize the efficient use of water;

(4) Any operator management options to reduce nutrient

losses; and

(5) Any other best management practices that may be

applicable as provided in the Maryland Nutrient Management

Manual, Section II-E.

F. Specific Management Recommendations. A consultant or

certified farm operator shall recommend growing area or section-

specific management techniques to improve water use efficiency and

minimize nutrient losses, including the following:

(1) Grouping plants to improve water and nutrient usage;

(2) Monitoring water and nutrient needs of plants;

(3) Increasing the percentage of water and nutrients entering

the plant root zone;

(4) Reducing the amount of leachate or runoff; and

(5) Reducing or containing the flow of water from growing

areas.

G. Program for Monitoring Runoff. A nutrient management plan

shall include recommendations to monitor runoff, as required in

Regulation .12C of this chapter, including recommendations on

methods, frequency, and locations of monitoring.

H. Plan Maintenance. A plan shall contain information to

maintain and update the plan. General comments about plan

maintenance may be summarized, but shall include:

(1) The length of time the plan is effective, not to exceed 3

years; and

(2) Identification of changes in the agricultural operation that

would require the original plan to be modified or updated, including

a:

(a) Change in area managed of 20 percent or greater, or 5

acres, whichever is less, or

(b) Substantial change in a production plan or method.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1439

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

.12 Nutrient Management—Required Plan Recommendations for

Container or Out-of-Ground Production.

A. Nutrient Recommendations. A certified nutrient management

consultant or certified farm operator shall evaluate production cycles

and methods and make nutrient recommendations based on at least

one of the following:

(1) The label recommendations on fertilizer products for the

plants being grown or similar plants;

(2) The recommendations of the University of Maryland

Cooperative Extension for the specific plants being grown or for

similar plants;

(3) The recommendation from other state universities for the

specific plants being grown or for similar plants;

(4) The data from research done by accredited universities on

the specific plants being grown or similar plants;

(5) The general nutrition guidelines for similar plants; or

(6) Any generally accepted growing practices for plants under

comparable growing conditions.

B. Management Recommendations.

(1) A consultant or certified farm operator shall use the

Environmental Risk Assessment for out-of-ground production, as

provided in the Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section II-

D, to identify the potential risk to the environment of nutrient

movement from out-of-ground growing areas.

(2) For growing areas where there is zero or low risk of

nutrient movement from the site, recommendations shall be made to

maintain this zero or low level of risk.

(3) For growing areas where there is medium risk of nutrient

movement:

(a) Management recommendations shall be made to minimize

the risk of nutrients moving to, or reaching, surface waters; and

(b) The consultant or certified farm operator shall

recommend that the operator or other person responsible for

irrigation and nutrient management attend Department-approved

training on best management practices for out-of-ground production

to minimize nutrient losses.

(4) For growing areas where there is high risk of nutrient

movement:

(a) Management recommendations shall be made for

individual growing areas, as well as for the operation as a whole, to

reduce the risk of nutrients moving to, or reaching, surface waters;

(b) The consultant or certified farm operator shall

recommend that the operator or other person responsible for

irrigation and nutrient management attend Department-approved

training on best management practices for out-of-ground production

that teaches how to minimize nutrient losses; and

(c) Only controlled release fertilizer shall be recommended

for use until management changes reduce the risk of nutrient loss to

medium.

(5) In recommending field or management unit practices to

reduce or minimize nutrient losses, a consultant or certified farm

operator shall consider the following:

(a) The appropriate nutrient application methods;

(b) Nutrient application timing; and

(c) Any plant nutrient needs.

(6) Timing of nutrient application shall be as close to plant

nutrient uptake as possible, except in the case of controlled release

fertilizer, which may be applied at any time.

C. Recommendations for Monitoring Runoff. Unless an operation

is assessed as zero risk for nutrient loss from the site, as provided in

the Maryland Nutrient Management Manual, Section II-D, the

nutrient management consultant shall recommend a monitoring

program, including the following:

(1) The periods for monitoring when plant nutrients can

reasonably be expected to be available;

(2) The locations immediately next to growing areas or areas

where runoff or overflow from collection basins enters surface water,

municipal stormwater, or drainage inlets; and

(3) The frequency of sampling for nutrients:

(a) Where the risk of nutrient movement from any growing

area is low, monitoring shall include samples for testing a minimum

of two different times during each growing season or cycle from each

location; and

(b) Where the risk of impacting surface water is medium or

high, monitoring recommendations shall be conducted monthly when

nutrients are being applied.

D. Methods of Sampling and Testing. Samples may be analyzed by

the operator or consultant on-site using calibrated electrical

conductivity (EC) or nutrient meters. To evaluate the accuracy of on-

site test results, at least two samples per year shall be split, with one

part being sent to an independent laboratory for analysis.

EARL F. HANCE

Secretary of Agriculture

Title 17 DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET

AND MANAGEMENT Subtitle 04 PERSONNEL SERVICES

AND BENEFITS 17.04.13 State Employees’ Health Benefits

Authority: State Personnel and Pensions Article, Title 2, Subtitle 5, Title 4,

Subtitle 1, §4-106, and Title 8, Subtitle 1, Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-348-P]

The Secretary of Budget and Management proposes to amend

Regulations .03, .03-1, and .04 and repeal existing Regulation .06

under COMAR 17.04.13 State Employees’ Health Benefits.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to amend the regulations in

accordance with the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care

Act Play or Pay Mandate that requires employers with more than 50

employees to offer affordable coverage that meets the minimum

value indicated by the law to all employees working 30 or more hours

per week or an average of 130 hours per month beginning January 1,

2015. In addition to aligning benefit eligibility rules with this federal

mandate, the purpose is to make technical updates and corrections

relating to expiring regulations.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is a corresponding federal standard to this proposed action,

but the proposed action is not more restrictive or stringent.

Estimate of Economic Impact I. Summary of Economic Impact. This change will result in

additional costs to the State Employee and Retiree Health and

Welfare Benefits Program in the form of additional employer

contributions (subsidy) for individuals now eligible for benefits

subsidy. Subsidy dollars will be collected from applicable agencies in

the same manner as current health benefits subsidies.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1440

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Revenue (R+/R-)

II. Types of Economic Impact. Expenditure

(E+/E-) Magnitude

A. On issuing agency: (E+) $8,000,000

B. On other State agencies: NONE

C. On local governments: NONE

Benefit (+)

Cost (-) Magnitude

D. On regulated industries or

trade groups: NONE

E. On other industries or trade

groups: NONE

F. Direct and indirect effects on

public: NONE

III. Assumptions. (Identified by Impact Letter and Number from

Section II.)

A. Estimated cost of the 75 percent subsidy for medical and

prescription coverage for contractual employees.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to Anne Timmons, Director, Employee

Benefits Division, Department of Budget and Management, 301 W.

Preston Street, 5th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21201, or call 410 767-

4710, or email to [email protected], or fax to 410 333-

7122. Comments will be accepted through December 31, 2014. A

public hearing has not been scheduled.

.03 Eligibility for Coverage and Subsidy. A. Eligible Persons. The following persons are eligible for

Program coverage, with the exception of those persons listed in §B of

this regulation:

(1) Employees whose coverage is required by law, full-time

employees, and part-time employees as defined by State Personnel

and Pensions Article, §7-701, Annotated Code of Maryland, who are

[in permanent positions and] regularly paid salary or wages through

an official State payroll center, including but not limited to:

(a)—(b) (text unchanged)

(c) The institutions of the University System of Maryland,

including graduate assistants, and the Far East and European

Divisions of the University of Maryland;

(2)—(5) (text unchanged)

(6) Designated beneficiaries of deceased persons listed in

§A(1)—(5), (7), and (8) of this regulation in accordance with State

Personnel and Pensions Article, §§2-507, 2-508 and 2-509,

Annotated Code of Maryland, with the following limitations:

(a) (text unchanged)

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision in this regulation, a

surviving spouse or surviving child must meet the requirements to be

a dependent eligible for coverage as provided in [§A(8)] §A(9) of this

regulation;

(7) Retired employees who began State service on or before

June 30, 2011, or who began State service on or after July 1, 2011

and are retirees of the Judges’ Retirement System, and who qualify in

accordance with §§A(7)(a) and (b) of this regulation. Neither service

as a faculty member, teacher, or staff member for a community

college or a local board of education prior or subsequent to State

service, nor membership in the Teachers’ Pension or Retirement

Systems, shall in itself disqualify a former State employee who is

otherwise eligible under §A(7)of this regulation. The only retired

employees eligible for benefits under §A(7) of this regulation are

those [and] who:

(a)—(b) (text unchanged)

(8) Retired employees who began State service on or after July

1, 2011, and who qualify in accordance with §§8(a) and (b) of this

regulation. Neither service as a faculty member, teacher, or staff

member for a community college or a local board of education prior

or subsequent to State service, nor membership in the Teachers’

Pension or Retirement Systems, shall in itself disqualify a former

State employee who is otherwise eligible under §A(8) of this

regulation. The only retired employees eligible for benefits under

§A(8) of this regulation are those [and] who:

(a)—(b) (text unchanged)

(9) Dependents of eligible persons listed in §A(1)—(5), (7),

(8), (10), and (11) of this regulation who are one of the following:

(a) A spouse of an employee or retired employee; or

(b) A dependent child of an employee or retired employee,

as identified in this chapter[;]. [(c) Until December 31, 2014, the domestic partner of the

employee or retired employee, as the term domestic partner, is

defined in this chapter, if the domestic partner was enrolled on June

30, 2013. The domestic partner is eligible for coverage only in those

benefits plans and options identified by the Secretary on an annual

basis, which may include only:

(i) Health benefits plans and options that are both State

self-funded and not subject to regulation;

(ii) Stand-alone dental or vision benefits plans which are

not subject to Insurance Article, §15-403.2, Annotated Code of

Maryland, and COMAR 31.10.35;

(iii) Life insurance; and

(iv) Personal, accidental death and dismemberment

insurance; or

(d) Until December 31, 2014, the dependent child of a

domestic partner, as the term, dependent child of a domestic partner,

is defined in this chapter, if the domestic partner or the dependent

child of the domestic partner was enrolled on June 30, 2013. The

dependent child of a domestic partner is eligible for coverage only in

those benefits plans and options identified by the Secretary on an

annual basis, which may include only:

(i) Health benefits plans and options that are both State

self-funded and not subject to regulation;

(ii) Stand-alone dental or vision benefits plans which are

not subject to Insurance Article, §15-403.2, Annotated Code of

Maryland, and COMAR 31.10.35;

(iii) Life insurance; and

(iv) Personal, accidental death and dismemberment

insurance;] (10) [Part-time employees] Employees working less than 50

percent of a normal workweek and their designated beneficiaries, in

accordance with Regulation [.04B(2)] .04B(3) of this chapter; and

(11) Contractual employees[,] regularly working at least 30

hours per week, or an average of 130 hours per month [including

those contractual employees as defined in COMAR 17.04.03.13 and

similar contractual employees in State personnel systems other than

the State Personnel Management System], in accordance with 26

USC § 4980(H) and Regulation .04B(2) of this chapter.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1441

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

[B. Ineligible Persons. The following persons are ineligible for

Program coverage:

(1) Temporary extra employees as described in COMAR

17.04.03.12;

(2) Emergency employees as described in State Personnel and

Pensions Article, §2-509, Annotated Code of Maryland; and

(3) Dependents as provided in §C of this regulation.] [C.] B. Ineligible Dependents.

(1) Dependents of persons who are ineligible [in accordance

with §B(1)—(3) of this regulation] are likewise ineligible for

coverage.

(2)—(3) (text unchanged)

[D.] C. Subsidy.

(1)—(3) (text unchanged)

(4) Contractual employees regularly working more than 30

hours per week, or more than an average of 130 hours per month,

shall be provided a State subsidy of 75 percent of the premium cost

for medical and prescription drug coverage. A measurement period

may be necessary to establish the employee’s eligibility for the State

subsidy.

(5) Employees working less than 50 percent of the workweek

and contractual employees working less than 30 hours per week or

130 hours per month shall not be provided a State subsidy.

.03-1 Satellite Organizations and Local Governments—Eligibility for Coverage and Subsidy.

A. The employees of the following entities are eligible to

participate in the Program upon the application of the entity, provided

that, at the discretion of the Secretary, such participation does not

impede, undermine, or conflict with the Program’s federal

compliance obligations or governmental and cafeteria plan status:

(1)—(2) (text unchanged)

B. Each entity identified in §A of this regulation shall permit the

spouses and dependent children of its employees to be eligible for

coverage but may elect[:] whether and to what extent to provide a

subsidy for the participation in the Program of its employees and

their dependents.

[(1) Whether and to what extent to provide a subsidy for the

participation in the Program of its employees and their dependents; and

(2) Whether the domestic partner of an entity’s employee or the

dependent children of a domestic partner of an entity’s employee are

eligible for coverage in the Program, as follows:

(a) A domestic partner is eligible for dependent coverage

only if the domestic partner was enrolled on June 30, 2013;

(b) A dependent child of a domestic partner is eligible for

dependent coverage only if the domestic partner or dependent child

of a domestic partner was enrolled on June 30, 2013; and

(c) Domestic partners and dependent children of a domestic

partner are ineligible for dependent coverage after December 31, 2014.]

.04 Effective Dates for Eligible Persons. A. Eligibility. [Each] Generally, each employee is eligible for

coverage on the first scheduled working day. Each retired employee

is eligible for coverage on the first day of retirement or the first day

of election in accordance with §B(1)(a) of this regulation.

Dependents of covered employees or retired employees are eligible

on the date the employee or retired employee becomes eligible. Later

acquired dependents become eligible on the date they become

dependents of a covered employee or retired employee. Eligibility for

the State subsidy may come at a date separate from and subsequent

to eligibility for coverage in general.

B. Coverage.

(1) Eligible Employees Listed in Regulation .03A(1)—(8) of

this Chapter.

(a)—(b) (text unchanged)

(c) A newborn child may be covered from birth when

maternity benefits are provided [to any female member]. However,

the employee shall make application within 60 days from the date of

the child’s birth to convert to an appropriate membership to provide

coverage for the newborn child. Coverage for the newborn shall be

effective [for the coverage period applicable to the health insurance

deduction made following] on the date of birth provided the

[employee’s submittal of] employee submits the completed

application and payroll deduction authorization form within 60 days

of the date of birth. However, if, due to an untimely application

retroactive coverage is necessary back to the date of birth, the

employee shall contact the Health Benefits Administrator and shall

submit any necessary payment with the completed application and

payroll deduction authorization form. Coverage may be purchased

pre-tax on a prospective basis only in accordance with the State

cafeteria plan adopted by the Department of Budget and Management

in accordance with federal tax law.

(2) [Part-Time and] Contractual Employees [Listed in

Regulation .03A(11) of this chapter.] Working More than 30 Hours

per Week or 130 Hours per Month.

[(a) A part-time or contractual employee may apply for

coverage for the employee and eligible dependents within 60 days of

employment by submitting to the appointing authority an application

for the coverage desired, or shall wait for the annual open enrollment

period. The part-time or contractual employee shall pay the total cost

of the premium in accordance with the direct billing procedures of

the Department of Budget and Management, and may not receive a

State subsidy. Coverage shall be effective the next available monthly

billing cycle for premium payment following the submittal of the

application to the appointing authority and receipt of payment.

(b) A part-time or contractual employee may obtain

coverage for later acquired or newly eligible dependents by

submitting to the appointing authority an application for the coverage

desired within 60 days of the qualifying event, or shall wait for the

annual open enrollment period. Coverage for that dependent shall be

the date of the next available monthly billing cycle for premium

payment following the submittal of the application to the appointing

authority and receipt of payment.] (a) An eligible contractual employee working more than 30

hours per week, or an average of 130 hours per month, as determined

after any necessary measurement period, shall apply for coverage for

himself and eligible dependents within 60 days of eligibility by

submitting to the appointing authority an application for the

coverage desired, or shall wait for the annual open enrollment period

unless otherwise indicated in §C of this regulation. The eligible

contractual employee working more than 30 hours per week, or an

average of 130 hours per month, shall be provided a State subsidy

equal to 75 percent of the premium for elected medical and

prescription drug coverage. The employee shall pay 25 percent of the

total cost of the premium in accordance with the direct billing

procedures of the Department of Budget and Management. For all

other coverage elected, the employee shall pay the total cost of the

premium in accordance with the direct billing procedures of the

Department of Budget and Management, and may not receive a State

subsidy. Coverage shall be effective the next available monthly

billing cycle for premium payment following the submittal of the

application to the appointing authority and receipt of payment.

(b) Coverage for later acquired or newly eligible dependents

of a covered contractual employee is obtained by submitting to the

appointing authority an application within 60 days of the change in

status. Coverage for that dependent shall be effective the next

available monthly billing cycle for premium payment following the

submittal of the application to the appointing authority and receipt of

payment. Coverage on a post-tax basis may be purchased

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1442

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

retroactively to the date the contractual employee’s dependent or

dependents became eligible for coverage.

(c) A newborn child may be covered from birth when

maternity benefits are provided. However, the employee shall make

application within 60 days from the date of the child’s birth to

convert to an appropriate membership to provide coverage for the

newborn child. Coverage for the newborn shall be effective [for the

date of the next available monthly billing cycle for premium payment

following] as of the child’s date of birth provided the [submittal of] employee submits the completed application and makes any necessary

payments within 60 days of the date of birth. [to the appointing

authority and receipt of payment.] However, if retroactive coverage is

necessary due to an untimely application, the [part-time or] contractual employee shall contact the Health Benefits Administrator

and make any necessary payments to effect such retroactive

coverage.

(3) Permanent Employees Working Less than 50 Percent of the

Workweek and Contractual Employees Working Less than 30 Hours

per Week.

(a) An eligible permanent employee working less than 50

percent of the workweek or contractual employee working less than

30 hours per week or 130 hours per month may apply for coverage

for the employee and eligible dependents within 60 days of

employment by submitting to the appointing authority an application

for the coverage desired, or shall wait for the annual open enrollment

period. Such employees shall pay the total cost of the premium in

accordance with the direct billing procedures of the Department of

Budget and Management, and may not receive a State subsidy.

Coverage shall be effective the next available monthly billing cycle

for premium payment following the submittal of the application to the

appointing authority and receipt of payment.

(b) An eligible permanent employee working less than 50

percent of the workweek or contractual employee working less than

30 hours per week or 130 hours per month may obtain coverage for

later acquired or newly eligible dependents by submitting to the

appointing authority an application for the coverage desired within

60 days of the qualifying event, or shall wait for the annual open

enrollment period. Coverage for that dependent shall be the date of

the next available monthly billing cycle for premium payment

following the submittal of the application to the appointing authority

and receipt of payment.

(c) A newborn child may be covered from birth when

maternity benefits are provided. However, the employee shall make

application within 60 days from the date of the child’s birth to

convert to an appropriate membership to provide coverage for the

newborn child. Coverage for the newborn shall be effective as of the

date of birth provided the employee submits a completed application

and makes any necessary payment within 60 days of the date of birth.

However, if retroactive coverage is necessary due to an untimely

application, the part-time or contractual employee shall contact the

Health Benefits Administrator and make any necessary payments to

effect such retroactive coverage.

C. (text unchanged)

T. ELOISE FOSTER

Secretary of Budget and Management

Title 18 DEPARTMENT OF

ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION

Subtitle 03 PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS

18.03.02 Filings Authority: Tax-Property Article, §§ 2-201, 2-202, and 11-101, Annotated

Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-350-P]

The Director of the State Department of Assessments and

Taxation proposes to amend Regulation .01 under COMAR 18.03.02 Filings.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to remove any current obligation of

the Department to furnish annual report forms, to provide for

electronic filing of those forms with the Department, and to accept

electronic signatures on those forms.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact The proposed action has no economic impact.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to Michael Griffin, Associate Director,

SDAT, 301 W. Preston Street, Room 808, Baltimore, MD 21201 , or

call 410-767-1249, or email to [email protected], or fax

to 410-333-5873. Comments will be accepted through December 31,

2014. A public hearing has not been scheduled.

.01 Annual Report. Annual reports required to be filed with the State Department of

Assessments and Taxation, pursuant to the provisions of Tax-

Property Article, §11-101, Annotated Code of Maryland, shall be

submitted to the Department [annually on forms printed and

furnished by the Department for that purpose. Any person who

prefers to file the annual report by submitting a machine copy or

photocopy instead of the printed form furnished by the Department

may do so provided the machine copy or photocopy is on paper of

similar size, color, and texture as the form for the appropriate year

supplied by the Department] on a form generated by the Department,

a substantially similar form or through an approved online filing

system. The signature of the person signing the report shall be an

original [and not a photocopy of the signature] or electronic

signature acceptable to the Department under Commercial Law

Article, §21-117, Annotated Code of Maryland.

ROBERT E. YOUNG

Director

State Department of Assessments and Taxation

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1443

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Title 20 PUBLIC SERVICE

COMMISSION Subtitle 79 APPLICATIONS

CONCERNING THE CONSTRUCTION OR MODIFICATION OF

GENERATING STATIONS AND OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES

20.79.01 General Authority: Public Utilities Article, §§2-113, 2-121 and 7-205—7-208,

Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-346-P]

The Public Service Commission proposes to amend Regulation

.02 under COMAR 20.79.01 Applications Concerning the

Construction or Modification of Generating Stations and

Overhead Transmission Lines. This action was considered at a

scheduled rule making meeting on October 1, 2014.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to revise the definition of generating

station.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact The proposed action has no economic impact.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to David J. Collins, Executive Secretary,

Public Service Commission, 6 St. Paul Street, Baltimore, Maryland

21202, or call 410-767-8067, or fax to 410-333-6495. Comments will

be accepted through December 31, 2014. A public hearing has not

been scheduled.

.02 Definitions. A. (text unchanged)

B. Terms Defined.

(1)—(10) (text unchanged)

(11) Generating Station.

(a) (text unchanged)

(b) “Generating station” does not include an integral plant or

unit less than or equal to [1500]2,000 kilowatts if it is installed with

equipment that prevents the flow of electricity to the electric system

during time periods when the electric system is out of service.

(12)—(21) (text unchanged)

DAVID J. COLLINS

Executive Secretary

Public Service Commission

Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE

ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 11 AIR QUALITY

26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes

Authority: Environment Article, §§1-101, 1-404, 2-101—2-103, 2-301—2-

303, 10-102, and 10-103, Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-352-P]

The Secretary of the Environment proposes to amend Regulation

.26 and adopt new Regulation .26-1 under COMAR 26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to adopt the requirements of the

EPA’s Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for Fiberglass Boat

Manufacturing. The new regulation COMAR 26.11.19.26-1, Control

of Volatile Organic Compounds from Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing,

adopts the EPA’s Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG)

requirements. EPA develops CTGs as guidance on control

requirements for various source categories. States can follow the

CTGs or adopt more restrictive standards. MDE proposes to adopt

new volatile organic compound (VOC) limits, standards for

application methods, and work practice requirements which are

consistent with the most recent CTG recommendations applicable to

fiberglass boat manufacturing. The new regulation affects

manufacturers of fiberglass boats. Also COMAR 26.11.19.26 Control

of Volatile Organic Compounds from Reinforced Plastic

Manufacturing is amended to exempt fiberglass boat manufacturing.

This amendment and new regulation will be submitted to the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a revision to the

Maryland’s State Implementation Plan (SIP).

Background

The EPA first published an assessment of VOC emissions from

fiberglass boat manufacturing in 1990. This assessment evaluated

VOC emissions from fiberglass boat manufacturing and potential

control options. The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants for Boat Manufacturing, 40 CFR part 63, subpart VVVV

(2001 NESHAP) were promulgated in 2001. Emission standards

under the 2001 NESHAP were for organic hazardous air pollutants

(HAPs) based on low-HAP resins and gel coats and low-emitting

resin application technology. In September 2008, the EPA published

a new CTG for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials. The CTG

was developed based on the 1990 VOC assessment, the 2001

NESHAP, existing state VOC emission reduction approaches such as

California, and in consideration of information obtained since the

issuance of the 2001 NESHAP.

Requirements

Resins containing styrene and gel coats containing both styrene

and methyl methacrylate (MMA) are the main contributors of VOC

emissions at fiberglass boat manufacturing facilities. The proposed

standards are designed to reduce VOC emissions during fiberglass

boat manufacturing operations. Not all the VOCs in the materials

used are emitted to the atmosphere, as some of the VOCs are used in

cross linking reactions of polymers and are retained in the finished

material. Thus, an overall reduction of VOC content in production

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1444

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

materials reduces potential emissions from extraneous VOCs during

the manufacturing process.

Cleaning activities other than surface preparation also occur at

facilities engaged in fiberglass boat manufacturing. Cleaning

materials are used to remove residue or other unwanted materials

from equipment related to manufacturing operations such as molds

and prototypes, as well as the cleaning of application equipment,

transfer lines and other ancillary equipment. These cleaning materials

are typically mixtures of VOC containing solvents. The proposed

regulation includes emission control requirements for cleaning

materials consistent with those in the CTG.

Expected Emissions Reductions

The proposed regulation sets standards for fiberglass boat

manufacturing operations. Emissions of VOCs from fiberglass boat

manufacturing operations are expected to be reduced by

approximately 40 percent nationally. Maryland only has one known

source that may, on occasion, assemble fiberglass boats from pre-

manufactured hulls and decks. Therefore Maryland VOC emission

benefits will be negligible. The coatings industry already has

products available to meet VOC standards contained in the CTG and

proposed regulation. The maximum benefit from VOC reductions

will be provided during the ozone season when VOCs readily

combine with NOx to form the pollutant ground level ozone.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is a corresponding federal standard to this proposed action,

but the proposed action is not more restrictive or stringent.

Estimate of Economic Impact I. Summary of Economic Impact. The proposed new regulation

adopts the requirements of the CTG for fiberglass boat

manufacturing. EPA estimated the economic impact of this regulation

on a national level at a cost effectiveness approximately $4,200/ton

of VOC controlled. The standards and requirements of the CTG have

already been implemented in other states and as a result cost of

production of compliant materials has come down from initial phase

of implementation. As the CTGs are implemented nationally, the

costs of compliant materials are expected to be reduced further. Due

to the limited number of affected sources, the economic impact in

MD will be small.

Revenue (R+/R-)

II. Types of Economic Impact. Expenditure

(E+/E-) Magnitude

A. On issuing agency: NONE

B. On other State agencies: NONE

C. On local governments: NONE

Benefit (+)

Cost (-) Magnitude

D. On regulated industries or trade

groups: (-) Minimal

E. On other industries or trade

groups: NONE

F. Direct and indirect effects on

public: NONE

III. Assumptions. (Identified by Impact Letter and Number from

Section II.)

D. Minimal

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment The Department of the Environment will hold a public hearing on

the proposed action on January 7, 2015 at 10 a.m. at the Department

of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, 1st Floor

Conference Rooms, Baltimore, Maryland 21230-1720. Interested

persons are invited to attend and express their views. Comments may

be sent to Mr. Randy Mosier, Chief of the Regulation Division, Air

and Radiation Management Administration, Department of the

Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 730, Baltimore,

Maryland 21230-1720, or emailed to [email protected].

Comments must be received not later than January 7, 2015, or be

submitted at the hearing. For more information, call Randy Mosier at

(410) 537-4488.

Copies of the proposed action and supporting documents are

available for review at the following locations:

• The Department of the Environment’s website at:

http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/regulations/air/Pages/req

comments.aspx

• The Air and Radiation Management Administration Office in

Baltimore; and

• The regional offices of the Department in Cumberland and

Salisbury.

Anyone needing special accommodations at the public hearing

should contact the Department’s Fair Practices Office at (410) 537-

3964. TTY users may contact the Department through the Maryland

Relay Service at 1-800-735-2258.

.26 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reinforced Plastic Manufacturing.

A. Applicability.

(1)—(2) (text unchanged)

(3) The requirements in this regulation do not apply to any

fiberglass boat manufacturing facility as defined in Regulation .26-

1B(5) of this chapter.

B.—D. (text unchanged)

.26-1Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from

Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing.

A. Applicability.

(1) This regulation applies to any fiberglass boat

manufacturing facility where the total actual VOC emissions, before

add-on controls, from all fiberglass boat manufacturing is 15 pounds

or more per day as determined on a monthly average.

(2) VOC emissions from polyester resins, tooling resins and gel

coats, ancillary parts production, touch-up, clean-up, and repair are

to be included in determining VOC emissions pursuant to §(A)(1) of

this regulation.

B. Definitions. In this regulation, the following terms have the

meanings indicated:

(1) Atomized Resin Application.

(a) “Atomized resin application” means a resin application

technology in which the resin leaves the application equipment and

breaks into droplets or an aerosol as it travels from the application

equipment to the surface of the part.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1445

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

(b) “Atomized resin application” includes, but is not limited

to, resin spray guns and resin chopper spray guns.

(2) Clear Gel Coat.

(a) “Clear gel coat” means a gel coat that is clear or

translucent such that underlying colors are visible.

(b) “Clear gel coat” does not include tooling gel coats used

to build or repair molds.

(3) Closed Molding.

(a) “Closed molding” means any molding process that has

the following characteristics:

(i) Pressure is used to distribute the resin through the

reinforcing fabric placed between two mold surfaces to either

saturate the fabric or fill the mold cavity; and

(ii) Clamping pressure, fluid pressure, atmospheric

pressure, or vacuum pressure are applied either alone or in

combination.

(b) “Closed molding” includes, but is not limited to,

compression molding with sheet molding compound, infusion

molding, resin injection molding (RIM), vacuum assisted resin

transfer molding (VARTM), resin transfer molding (RTM), and

vacuum assisted compression molding.

(c) “Closed molding” does not include:

(i) Processes in which a closed mold is used only to

compact saturated fabric or remove air or excess resin from the

fabric (such as in vacuum bagging); or

(ii) Open molding steps such as application of a gel coat

or skin coat layer by conventional open molding prior to a closed

molding process.

(4) “Fiberglass boat” means any type of vessel, other than a

seaplane, that can be used for transportation on the water, in which

either the hull or deck is built from a composite material consisting of

a polyester resin or other thermosetting resin matrix reinforced with

fiberglass (glass fibers), inert filler or other reinforcing materials

such as fibers of carbon or aramid.

(5) Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Facility.

(a) “Fiberglass boat manufacturing facility” means a

facility that manufactures hulls or decks of fiberglass boats,

assembles fiberglass boats from premanufactured hulls and decks, or

builds molds to make hulls or decks of fiberglass boats.

(b) “Fiberglass boat manufacturing facility” does not

include a facility which:

(i) Manufactures ancillary parts for fiberglass boats

(such as hatches, seats, or lockers) or boat trailers; and

(ii) Does not manufacture hulls or decks of fiberglass

boats, assemble fiberglass boats from premanufactured hulls and

decks, or build molds for fiberglass boat hulls or decks.

(6) “Filled resin” means a resin to which an inert material has

been added to change viscosity, density, shrinkage, or other physical

properties.

(7) “Gel coat” means a thermosetting resin surface coating

containing styrene (Chemical Abstract Service (CAS No. 100–42–5))

or methyl methacrylate (CAS No. 80–62–6) that:

(a) Provides a cosmetic enhancement or improves resistance

to degradation from exposure to the elements;

(b) Does not contain any reinforcing fibers; and

(c) Is applied directly to mold surfaces or to a finished

laminate.

(8) “Mold” means the cavity or surface into or on which gel

coat, resin, and fibers are placed and from which finished fiberglass

parts take their form.

(9) “Monomer” means a low molecular weight organic

compound that reacts with itself or other similar compounds to

produce a polymer such as a polyester or vinylester resin.

(10) Nonatomized Resin Application.

(a) “Nonatomized resin application” means any application

technology in which the resin is not broken into droplets or an

aerosol as it travels from the application equipment to the surface of

the part.

(b) “Nonatomized resin application” includes, but is not

limited to, flowcoaters, chopper flowcoaters, pressure fed resin

rollers, resin impregnators, and hand application by paint brush or

paint roller.

(11) “Non-monomer” means any low molecular weight organic

compound that does not react with itself or other similar compounds

to produce a polymer and is assumed to be emitted fully as a VOC

into the atmosphere.

(12) “Non-VOC cleanup material” means a material that:

(a) Is used to clean products, tools, process equipment, and

other equipment used in the manufacture of fiberglass boats; and

(b) Either contains less than 5 percent VOC by weight or

has a VOC composite vapor pressure of organic compounds not

exceeding 0.74 pound per square inch.

(13) Open Molding and Gel Coat Operations.

(a) “Open molding and gel coat operation” means any

process in which the reinforcing fibers and resin are placed in the

mold and are open to the surrounding air while the reinforcing fibers

are saturated with resin.

(b) “Open molding and gel coat operation” includes

operations in which a vacuum bag or similar cover is used to

compress an uncured laminate to remove air bubbles or excess resin,

or to achieve a bond between a core material and a laminate.

(14) Pigmented Gel Coat.

(a) “Pigmented gel coat” means an opaque gel coat.

(b) “Pigmented gel coat” does not include tooling gel coats

used to build or repair molds.

(15) Production Resin.

(a) “Production resin” means any resin used to

manufacture parts for sale.

(b) “Production resin” does not include tooling resins used

to build or repair molds, or assembly adhesives.

(16) “Pure, 100-percent, vinylester resin used for skin coats”

means resins containing only vinylester resin and does not include

any resin containing blends of vinylester and polyester resins.

(17) “Resin and gel coat mixing operation” means any

operation in which a resin or gel coat is combined with additives that

include, but are not limited to, fillers, promoters, or catalysts, and

includes operations making putties or polyputties used to assemble

parts of fiberglass boats and to fill gaps between parts.

(18) “Skin coat” means a layer of resin and fibers applied over

a gel coat to protect the gel coat from being deformed by an

additional laminate layer or layers.

(19) “Tooling” means the production of molding tools such as

shapes, matrixes, molds, or other instruments and utensils that are

used during manufacturing of fiberglass boats.

(20) “Tooling resin” means, for the purposes of §C(1) of this

regulation, the resin used to build or repair molds (also known as

tools) or prototypes (also known as plugs) from which molds will be

made.

(21) “Tooling gel coat” means, for the purposes of §C(1) of

this regulation, the gel coat used to build or repair molds (also

known as tools) or prototypes (also known as plugs) from which

molds will be made.

(22) “Total VOC Content (percent by weight)” means the sum

of the monomer content (percent by weight) determined according to

§D(1) of this regulation and of the weight percent of the non-

monomer VOC determined by §D(3) of this regulation.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1446

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

(23) Vacuum Bagging.

(a) “Vacuum bagging” means any molding technique in

which the reinforcing fabric is saturated with resin and then covered

with a flexible sheet that is sealed to the edge of the mold and where

a vacuum is applied under the sheet to compress the laminate,

remove excess resin, or remove trapped air from the laminate during

curing.

(b) “Vacuum bagging” does not include closed molding.

(24) “Vinylester resin” means a thermosetting resin containing

esters of acrylic or methacrylic acids and having double-bond and

ester linkage sites only at the ends of the resin molecules.

C. Requirements.

(1) A person who owns or operates a fiberglass boat

manufacturing facility subject to this regulation:

(a) May not cause or permit the discharge into the

atmosphere of any VOC from resin and gel coat operations in excess

of the following standards, except as provided in §C(3) of this

regulation:

Operation Application

Method

Total Monomer

Content

(percent by

weight)

Total VOC

Content

(percent by

weight)

Production

resin

Atomized resin

application

(spray)

28 33

Production

resin

Nonatomized

resin application

35 40

Pigmented

gel coat

Atomized or

nonatomized

resin application

33 38

Clear gel

coat

Atomized or

nonatomized

resin application

48 53

Tooling resin Atomized resin

application

(spray)

30 35

Tooling resin Nonatomized

resin application

39 44

Tooling gel

coat

Atomized or

nonatomized

resin application

40 45

(b) Notwithstanding §C(3)(a) and (b) of this regulation,

shall use nonatomizing resin application equipment when applying

production resins (including skin coat resins) pursuant to §C(3)(a) of

this regulation and pure,100-percent vinylester resins pursuant to

§C(3)(b) of this regulation;

(c) May not cause or permit the discharge into the

atmosphere of any VOC from any resin and gel coat mixing

operation unless all mixing containers with a capacity equal to or

greater than 208 liters (55 gallons), including those used for on-site

mixing of putties and polyputties, have a cover with no visible gaps in

place at all times except when material is being manually added to or

removed from the container, or when mixing or pumping equipment

is being placed in or removed from the container; and

(d) Shall only use non-VOC cleanup materials.

(2) Alternative Compliance Option. In lieu of meeting the

standards of §C(1)(a) of this regulation, a person who owns or

operates a fiberglass boat manufacturing facility subject to this

regulation may cause or permit the discharge into the atmosphere of

any VOC from filled resins provided that such emissions do not

exceed the following non-monomer VOC content and as-applied

monomer VOC emission rates calculated using the equation in §D(3)

of this regulation:

Type of Filled resin Monomer rate in kg

monomer VOC per

megagram of filled

resin as applied

Non-monomer VOC

content limit of

unfilled resin

Production 46 5 percent

Tooling 54 5 percent

(3) Exemptions. The standards in §C(1)(a) of this regulation do

not apply to:

(a) Production resins (including skin coat resins) that meet

specifications for use in military vessels or must be approved by the

U.S. Coast Guard for use in the construction of lifeboats, rescue

boats, and other life-saving appliances approved under 46 CFR

Chapter I, Subchapter Q, or the construction of small passenger

vessels as regulated by 46 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter T;

(b) Pure, 100-percent vinylester resins used for skin coats

where the total quantity of such resins used is less than or equal to 5

percent by weight of all resin used at a fiberglass boat manufacturing

facility on a 12-month rolling average basis, as reported in §§E(5)—

(7) of this regulation;

(c) Production and tooling resins, and pigmented, clear, and

tooling gel coats, which are used for touch up and repair of parts or

molds and which are used in quantities less than or equal to 1

percent by weight of all resin used at a fiberglass boat manufacturing

facility on a 12-month rolling average basis, as reported in §E(1) of

this regulation;

(d) Resins used in closed molding;

(e) Polyester resins used for tooling or touch-up and repair

during a manufacturing process that is not fiberglass boat

manufacturing;

(f) Coatings applied to fiberglass boats; and

(g) Adhesives used in the assembly of fiberglass boats.

D. Test Methods and Compliance Procedures.

(1) A person who owns or operates a fiberglass boat

manufacturing facility subject to this regulation shall determine the

monomer VOC content of any resin or gel coat applied at the facility

using:

(a) SCAQMD Method 312-91, Determination of Percent

Monomer in Polyester Resins, revised April 1996; or

(b) Manufacturer’s formulation data.

(2) In the event of a conflict between the monomer VOC content

of any resin or gel coat indicated by the manufacturer’s formulation

data and the results of a test using the method referenced in §D(1)(a)

of this regulation, the test results shall be used for the purpose of

determining compliance with this regulation.

(3) A person meeting the alternative emission rates in §C(2) of

this regulation shall compute the as-applied monomer VOC emission

rate for the filled production resin or tooling resin, in kilograms

monomer VOC per megagram of filled material, using the following

equation:

PVF = PVu times (100 – Filler pct)

100

Where:

PVF is the as-applied monomer VOC emission rate for the filled

production resin or tooling resin, kilograms monomer VOC per

megagram of filled material.

PVu is the monomer VOC emission rate for the neat (unfilled)

resin, before filler is added, as calculated using the formulas in the

table in §D(4) of this regulation.

Filler pct is the weight-percent of filler in the as-applied filled

resin system.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1447

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

(4) The monomer VOC emission rate for the neat (unfilled)

resin, before filler is added, PVu, shall be calculated using the

formulas in the following table:

Monomer VOC Emission Rate Formulas for Open Molding and Gel

Coat Operations

Material Application Method Formula to calculate

the monomer VOC

emission

rate1

Production resin or

tooling resin

Atomized resin

application

0.014 x (Resin

VOC%)2.425

Atomized resin

application, plus

vacuum bagging

with roll-out

0.01185 x (Resin

VOC%)2.425

Atomized resin

application, plus

vacuum bagging

without roll-out

0.00945 x (Resin

VOC%)2.425

Nonatomized resin

application

0.014 x (Resin

VOC%)2.425

Nonatomized resin

application plus

vacuum bagging

with roll-out

0.0110 x (Resin

VOC%)2.275

Nonatomized resin

application plus

vacuum bagging

without roll-out

0.0076 x (Resin

VOC%)2.275

Pigmented gel coat,

clear gel coat,

tooling gel coat

All methods 0.445 x (Gel coat

VOC%)1.675

1 Where the resin VOC percent is the monomer VOC content as

supplied, expressed as a weight-percent value between 0 and 100

percent.

(5) A person meeting the alternative emission rates in §C(2) of

this regulation shall demonstrate the as-applied non-monomer VOC

content of resins and gel coats using the test method prescribed in

COMAR 26.11.19.02D(1), and for this purpose, resins and gel coats

shall be considered coatings.

(6) For the purpose of demonstrating that a cleanup material is

a non-VOC cleanup material, a person shall:

(a) Perform a test using the method prescribed in COMAR

26.11.19.02D(1), where the cleanup material shall be considered a

coating; and

(b) Determine the composite vapor pressure of organic-

compounds in a cleanup material using the calculation prescribed in

COMAR 26.11.19.02E(3).

E. Record Keeping. A person who owns or operates a fiberglass

boat manufacturing facility subject to this regulation shall maintain

for not less than 3 years, and shall make available to the Department

upon request, records that provide the following information:

(1) A description of each polyester or vinylester resin material

used including:

(a) The manufacturer’s name;

(b) The type (e.g. production resin, production gel coat,

tooling resin, tooling gel coat);

(c) The amount of each of the polyester or vinylester resin

materials used;

(d) The weight (in percent) of monomer for each polyester

resin materials and filler or fillers used;

(e) The weight percent of VOC that is not monomer or the

total weight percent of the VOC content; and

(f) The type of application method used with each resin;

(2) On a quarterly basis, the total weight and the monomer

content and VOC content of each polyester and vinylester resin

material;

(3) On a quarterly basis, the total weight and the monomer

content and VOC content of each polyester and vinylester resin

material used under the exemption of §C(3)(a) of this regulation,

including a description or identification (military specifications, 46

CFR Subchapter Q, or 46 CFR subchapter T) of the exemption;

(4) On a monthly basis, the total weight, monomer content, and

VOC content of each polyester and vinylester resin material used for

closed molding under the exemption of §C(3)(d) of this regulation;

(5) On a monthly basis, the total weight, monomer content, and

VOC content of each pure,100-percent vinylester resins used under

the exemption of §C(3)(b) of this regulation;

(6) On a monthly basis the total weight of all resins used;

(7) On a monthly basis the total weight of pure, 100-percent

vinylester resins used under the exemption of §C(3)(b) of this

regulation over the preceding 12 months divided by total weight of

all resins used over the preceding 12 months;

(8) On a daily basis, the total weight, monomer content, and

VOC content of each resin used for touch up and repair of parts or

molds under the exemption of §C(3)(c) of this regulation;

(9) For filled resins for which compliance is demonstrated

under alternative compliance option of §C(2) of this regulation:

(a) The total weight and non-monomer VOC content of each

polyester and vinylester resin material used; and

(b) The monomer emission rate computed in accordance

with §D(3) of this regulation in kg monomer VOC per megagram of

filled resin as applied; and

(10) On a monthly basis the total clean-up materials used.

ROBERT M. SUMMERS, Ph.D.

Secretary of the Environment

Subtitle 11 AIR QUALITY 26.11.34 Low Emissions Vehicle Program Authority: Environment Article, §§1-404, 2-102, 2-103, 2-301, 2-1102, and 2-

1103, Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-351-P-I]

The Secretary of the Environment proposes to amend Regulation

.02 under COMAR 26.11.34 Low Emissions Vehicle Program.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to update the Incorporation by

Reference documents to reflect the changes made to the California

regulations since their last update.

These amendments will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) as a revision to Maryland’s State

Implementation Plan (SIP).

Background

Vehicles sold in the United States must be certified under one of

two certification programs: the federal program (Tier 2) or the

California program (the Clean Car Program). Section 177 of the

Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 states the ability to adopt the

California program in lieu of the federal program as long as the

adopted state program is identical to the California program and the

state allows 2 model years lead time from adoption to

implementation.

The Maryland Clean Cars Act of 2007 required the Maryland

Department of the Environment (MDE) to adopt regulations

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1448

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

implementing the California Clean Car Program (also referred to as

the California Low Emissions Vehicle Program (Cal LEV) in

Maryland. Maryland’s implementing regulations adopted, through

incorporation by reference, the applicable California regulations. The

Cal LEV program is a dynamic, changing program in which many of

the relevant California regulations are continuously updated. To

retain California’s standards, Maryland must remain consistent with

their regulations, hence when California updates its regulations,

Maryland must reflect these changes by amending our regulations.

The proposed changes are in effect in California as well as some

of the other states that have adopted the Cal LEV program. The only

regulatory change in this proposed action is to the ZEV portion of the

regulation. It will have minimal, if any, impact on the cost or

implementation of the program in Maryland. Reference updates to the

incorporated by reference documents have also been included.

Sources Affected and Location

These amendments apply to automobile manufacturers that

produce new motor vehicles for sale in Maryland. All vehicle types

that have a gross vehicle weight rating of less than 14,000 pounds are

affected.

Requirements

These amendments update Maryland’s program requirements to be

consistent with California’s program requirements. This action is

necessary since many of the California regulations that are

incorporated into the Maryland regulation have been updated. These

individual regulatory changes can be grouped into 3 areas:

•Adjustments to the optional Section 177 state compliance path

(OCP).

•Maintain a minimum ZEV credit requirement for

manufacturers for each model year.

•Amend the fast refueling definition for determining ZEV

types.

These changes are described in greater detail in the Technical

Support Document for this action. The biggest change that will affect

Maryland is the elimination of certain credits from being used to

meet the OCP requirements. Manufacturers will only be allowed to

meet the requirements from credits generated by vehicles actually

placed in the state, which was the original intent of the OCP as

negotiated with the manufacturers.

Expected Emissions Reductions

The changes to the ZEV portion of the regulation may have a

small positive impact on the benefits, as it is designed to ensure more

ZEVs are actually delivered to the Section 177 States in order to

comply with the OCP. The emissions impact is expected to be

minimal though, as the manufacturer fleet average emission

requirement remains the same.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact I. Summary of Economic Impact. Minimal additional burden or

cost is expected as a result of these amendments. The changes to the

OCP, and maintaining a minimum ZEV credit requirement will

require manufacturers to introduce more actual ZEVs to Maryland

and the other Section 177 states. However, provisions to allow

pooling across states and from the east and west regions from

different model years will give manufacturers greater flexibility to

meet the regulatory requirements in a way that is best for their

business situation.

These amendments will have no economic impact on the

Department. They also will have no impact on the Motor Vehicle

Administration’s registration, data management, and dealer oversight

activities related to this program.

Revenue

(R+/R-)

II. Types of Economic Impact.

Expenditure

(E+/E-) Magnitude

A. On issuing agency: NONE

B. On other State agencies: NONE

C. On local governments: NONE

Benefit (+)

Cost (-) Magnitude

D. On regulated industries or

trade groups: (+) Minimal

E. On other industries or

trade groups: NONE

F. Direct and indirect effects on public:

(1) Cost to Consumers (+) Minimal

(2) Health/Environmental

Benefits (+) Indeterminable

III. Assumptions. (Identified by Impact Letter and Number from

Section II.)

D. These amendments should have no impact on Maryland

dealers. The increase in ZEVs that will result from this amendment

will be minimal, and enable the dealers to provide consumers with

more of the most advanced and fuel efficient technology vehicles

available.

F(1). The economic impact to Maryland consumers is minimal as

there are no significant changes to the vehicle requirements.

F(2). Indirectly, the implementation of this program will benefit

the public by helping to improve Maryland’s air quality and will

result in fewer negative health effects on the general public from air

pollution.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment The Department of the Environment will hold a public hearing on

the proposed action on January 7, 2015 at 10 a.m. at the Department

of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, 1st Floor

Conference Rooms, Baltimore, Maryland 21230-1720. Interested

persons are invited to attend and express their views. Comments may

be sent to Mr. Randy Mosier, Chief of the Regulation Division, Air

and Radiation Management Administration, Department of the

Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 730, Baltimore,

Maryland 21230-1720, or email to [email protected].

Comments must be received not later than January 7, 2015, or be

submitted at the hearing. For more information, call Randy Mosier at

(410) 537-4488.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1449

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Copies of the proposed action and supporting documents are

available for review at the following locations:

• The Department of the Environment’s website at:

http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/regulations/air/Pages/req

comments.aspx

• The Air and Radiation Management Administration; and

• Regional offices of the Department in Cumberland and

Salisbury.

Anyone needing special accommodations at the public hearing

should contact the Department’s Fair Practices Office at (410) 537-

3964.

TTY users may contact the Department through the Maryland

Relay Service at 1-800-735-2258.

Editor’s Note on Incorporation by Reference

Pursuant to State Government Article, §7-207, Annotated Code of

Maryland, the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 13 Motor

Vehicles, Division 3 Air Resources Board, Chapters 1, 2, 3, and 4.4

has been declared a document generally available to the public and

appropriate for incorporation by reference. For this reason, it will not

be printed in the Maryland Register or the Code of Maryland

Regulations (COMAR). Copies of this document are filed in special

public depositories located throughout the State. A list of these

depositories was published in 41:1 Md. R. 9 (January 10, 2014), and

is available online at www.dsd.state.md.us. The document may also

be inspected at the office of the Division of State Documents, 16

Francis Street, Annapolis, Maryland 21401.

.02 Incorporation by Reference. A. (text unchanged)

B. Documents Incorporated.

(1)—(8) (text unchanged)

(9) Title 13, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division 3,

Chapter 1, Article 2, §1962.1 Zero-Emission Vehicle Standards for

2009 through 2017 Model Year Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks,

and Medium-Duty Vehicles, as effective [December 31, 2012] July

10, 2014.

(10) Title 13, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division

3, Chapter 1, Article 2, §1962.2 Zero-Emission Vehicle Standards for

2018 and Subsequent Model Year Passenger Cars, Light-Duty

Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles, as effective [December 31,

2012] July 10, 2014.

(11)─(33) (text unchanged)

(34) Title 13, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division

3, Chapter 2, Article 2.1, §2111 Applicability, as effective [August

16, 2009] December 8, 2010.

(35) ─(45) (text unchanged)

(46) Title 13, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division

3, Chapter 2, Article 2.2, §2122 General Provisions, as effective

[January 4, 2008] December 8, 2010.

(47) ─(59) (text unchanged)

(60) Title 13, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division

3, Chapter 2, Article 2.3, §2136 General Provisions, as effective

[January 4, 2008] December 8, 2010.

(61) ─(64) (text unchanged)

(65) Title 13, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division

3, Chapter 2, Article 2.4, §2141 General Provisions, as effective

[January 4, 2008] December 8, 2010.

(66) ─(78) (text unchanged)

(79) Title 13, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Division

3, Chapter 4.4, §2235 Requirements, as effective August [7] 8, 2012.

ROBERT M. SUMMERS, PH.D.

Secretary of the Environment

Subtitle 11 AIR QUALITY 26.11.38 Control of NOx Emissions from Coal-

Fired Electric Generating Units

Authority: Environment Article, §§1-404, 2-103, and 2-301—2-303,

Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-349-P]

The Secretary of the Environment proposes to adopt new

Regulations .01—.06 under a new chapter, COMAR 26.11.38 Control of NOx Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to establish new nitrogen oxides

(NOx) emission standards and additional monitoring and reporting

requirements for coal-fired electric generating units in Maryland. The

new standards for coal-fired electric generating units in Maryland and

resulting reductions in NOx emissions are needed to achieve

attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)

for ozone and will satisfy the requirements of §182 of the federal

Clean Air Act.

This action will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) for approval as part of Maryland’s State

Implementation Plan.

Background

In 2012, portions of Maryland were designated as nonattainment

for the 75 parts per billion (ppb) ozone NAAQS. Ozone is produced

when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx)

react in the presence of heat and sunlight. The Department has found

through a research partnership with the University of Maryland that

NOx reductions are more effective at reducing ozone levels than VOC

reductions.

Under the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., sources

in ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate and above are

subject to a NOx Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT)

requirement.

Section 182 of the Clean Air Act requires the Maryland

Department of the Environment (MDE) to review and revise NOx

RACT requirements in the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP)

as necessary to achieve compliance with new more stringent ambient

air quality standards. EPA defines RACT as the lowest emissions

limitation (e.g., on a part per million or pound per million Btu basis)

that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of

control technology (e.g., installation and operation of low-NOx

burners) that is reasonably available considering technological and

economic feasibility. In reviewing existing NOx RACT requirements

for adequacy, the Department considers technological advances, the

stringency of the revised ozone standard and whether new sources

subject to RACT requirements are present in the nonattainment area.

Maryland’s RACT SIP for the new 75 ppb ozone standard must

examine existing controls on major sources of NOx to determine

whether additional controls are economical and technically feasible.

In 2015, MDE is also required to submit an ozone attainment SIP

that includes emission reduction strategies designed to achieve

compliance with the 75 ppb ozone standard by 2018. Reductions in

NOx emissions from coal-fired electric generating units on high

electricity demand days during the ozone season are necessary to

achieve compliance with the 75 ppb standard and will also be

necessary to achieve compliance with the more stringent ozone

standard EPA is expected to propose in December 2014. The

measures required by this proposed action to reduce NOx emissions

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1450

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

will address peak day NOx emissions as well as satisfy the

requirement to update the NOx RACT standard.

To comply with the Maryland Healthy Air Act (or HAA), all

active coal-fired electric generating units installed NOx reduction

technologies that utilize chemical reductants to lower NOx emissions.

These technologies included selective catalytic reduction (SCR),

selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR), and selective alternative

catalytic reduction (SACR). Implementation of the Healthy Air Act

resulted in significant reductions in NOx emissions through the

establishment of separate annual and ozone season mass emission

limitations or caps on the affected coal-fired units. The HAA allows

system-wide averaging to demonstrate compliance with the emission

limits, i.e., compliance is demonstrated so long as total NOx

emissions from all units in a system do not exceed the aggregate

tonnage limit for all units in the “system”—defined as all units under

the same ownership. At this time, there are two “systems” in

Maryland: (1) the Raven Power Finance LLC (Raven Power) System

comprised of Brandon Shores Units 1 and 2, H. A. Wagner Units 2

and 3, and C. P. Crane Units 1 and 2; and (2) the NRG Energy, Inc.

(NRG) system comprised of Morgantown Units 1 and 2, Chalk Point

Units 1 and 2, and Dickerson Units 1, 2 and 3.

Previously owners of the plants now owned by Raven Power and

NRG installed SCR, SNCR or SACR on units subject to the Healthy

Air Act. The ability to average emissions across a system provided

flexibility to install the most advanced controls (SCR) at some units,

and controls with lower NOx emission removal efficiency (SACR and

SNCR) at the remaining units. “Baseload” units were equipped with

SCR while “load following” units were predominantly equipped with

SNCR or SACR. Overall, the operation of the combination of

controls yielded a 75 percent reduction in NOx emissions from 2002

levels. The mass emission caps driving this reduction were

established based on historic comparatively high utilization rates for

the units.

In recent years the utilization of coal plants has changed

dramatically on a national level, as well as in Maryland. The sharp

decline in natural gas prices, rising cost of coal, and reduced demand

for electricity are all contributing to a substantial reduction in the

utilization of coal-fired plants. With increasing frequency, these

older, less efficient plants operate primarily during periods of peak

demand. This reduction in operation results in lower system-wide

annual and ozone season NOx emissions, thereby allowing the units

to operate at higher emission rates, while remaining below the HAA

emission caps.

The Department found, through its recent review of 2007 through

2013 emissions data from Maryland coal-fired units equipped with

SCRs, SNCRs and SACRs many of the coal-fired units were not

consistently operating their previously installed controls to optimize

emission reductions—particularly during ozone season periods of

high electricity demand when ozone levels are highest. In fact, during

the most recent years, average ozone season NOx emission rates for

certain units were increasing. This practice has resulted in high NOx

emissions on days when emission reductions are most needed to

avoid exceedances of the ozone standard.

This proposed regulation, when effective, will result in immediate

reductions in ozone season NOx emissions from these sources, which

are needed to achieve and maintain compliance with the 75 ppb

ozone standard. In the longer term additional reductions will come

primarily from seven units that are not equipped with SCR controls

and are high NOx emitters when called upon to run — Chalk Point

Unit 2; Wagner Unit 2; Crane Units 1 and 2; and Dickerson Units 1,

2, and 3.

Affected Sources

This action impacts coal-fired electric generating units (EGUs) in

Maryland, which account for more than 80 percent of the State’s

power plant NOx emissions. Affected EGUs include: Brandon Shores

(Units 1 and 2); C.P. Crane (Units 1 and 2), H.A. Wagner (Units 2

and 3) plants; Chalk Point (Units 1 and 2), Morgantown (Units 1 and

2), Dickerson (Units 1, 2 and 3); and AESWarrior Run.

Requirements

This action is part of a broader strategy to further reduce NOx

emissions from coal-fired EGUs in the State by requiring owners and

operators of affected EGUs to comply with the following measures:

•No later than 45 days after the effective date of this regulation,

submit a plan to MDE, for approval by MDE and EPA, that

demonstrates how the unit will operate installed pollution control

technology and combustion controls to minimize emissions;

•Beginning May 1, 2015, and during the entire ozone season

whenever the unit is combusting coal, operate and optimize the use of

all installed pollution and combustion controls consistent with the

technological limitations, manufacturers’ specifications, good

engineering, maintenance practices, and air pollution control

practices to minimize emissions (as defined in 40 C.F.R. § 60.11(d));

•Demonstrate compliance by meeting a system-wide NOx

emission rate of 0.15 lbs/MMBtu as a 30-day rolling average during

the ozone season. A unit that is located at an electric generating

facility that is the only facility in Maryland directly, or indirectly

owned, operated or controlled by the owner, operator or controller of

the facility is exempt from the obligation to meet this NOx emission

rate;

•Continue to meet the ozone season and annual NOx reduction

requirements set forth in COMAR 26.11.27;

•Meet a NOx emission rate of 0.10 lbs/MMBtu as a 24-hour

block average on an annual basis if the unit is a fluidized bed

combustor;

•No later than June 1, 2020, the owner or operator of C.P.

Crane Units 1 and 2, Chalk Point Unit 2, Dickerson Units 1, 2, and 3

and H.A. Wagner Unit 2 must comply with one the following three

options:

(i) install and operate a selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

control system during the ozone season and meet a NOx emission rate

of 0.09 lbs/MMBtu, as determined on a 30-day rolling average during

the ozone season;

(ii) permanently retire the unit; or

(iii) switch the unit’s fuel from coal to natural gas.

•Demonstrate compliance with the requirements and emission

rates in the regulation in accordance with the prescribed procedures.

Projected Emissions Reductions

The Department projects that implementation of Regulation .03

requirements will result in an estimated daily NOx emission reduction

of 25 percent and 9 tons from average levels of 36 tons/day during

the period from 2011 through 2013 as long as the two current systems

remain intact. Additional emission reductions should be realized on

peak days as the NOx emission rate restrictions will achieve better

performance from units that traditionally are operated only upon high

electricity demand days. A more accurate estimate of daily reductions

can be made after compliance plans from the affected sources are

approved by the Department. The estimated daily NOx emission

reduction due to implementation of Regulation .04 in 2020 ranges

from 30 to 36 percent below the aggregate potential to emit with a

maximum reduction of 17 tons/day.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is a corresponding federal standard to this proposed action,

but the proposed action is not more restrictive or stringent.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1451

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Estimate of Economic Impact I. Summary of Economic Impact. As described above, the new

regulation provides three options from which affected sources may

choose to achieve compliance with the 2020 requirements. Affected

sources have 5 years to analyze compliance options and projected

changes in energy markets to select the most cost-effective

compliance option. The flexible regulatory approach and 5-year lead

time makes it difficult at this time to quantify future costs.

Implementation of these regulations will result in reduced ozone

levels thereby reducing the adverse health impacts experienced by

many Marylanders caused by exposure to high levels of ozone. These

benefits include a lower incidence of hospitalizations, respiratory

illnesses, and restricted activity days. Health benefits are influenced

by many factors and monetizing benefits is difficult. Ozone season

economic benefits from reduced incidents ranges from $60,000—

$300,000,000 (in 2010 dollars).

All of Maryland’s coal-fired EGUs are currently equipped with

either the most efficient or second most efficient available NOx

control technology, SCR and SNCR or SACR, respectively.

Compliance with the 2015 requirements will require all coal-fired

units to operate and optimize existing pollution and combustion

controls to minimize NOx emissions during the ozone season. The

cost of optimizing operation of the existing control technologies

(SCR and SNCR and SACR) annually for each affected unit

individually is estimated to be in the range of $430,000 to $4,300,000

for each affected unit.

As noted above, compliance with the 2020 requirements can be

achieved through one of three options. Under the first option for 2020

compliance, units currently equipped with SNCR or SACR control

technologies could remove and replace those technologies with the

more advanced SCR technology. Installation of state-of-the-art SCR

controls on a unit can cost up to $200,000,000. The performance and

removal efficiency of the controls at a specific unit can depend in part

on how much the unit operates. We note that in 2012 Securities and

Exchange Commission filings, the previous owners of the units now

owned by NRG indicated their intent to install SCR technology at

Chalk Point Unit 2 and Dickerson Units 1, 2 and 3.

Under the second compliance option, affected units could convert

to cleaner burning natural gas. The installed cost of a natural gas

combined cycle unit is approximately $1,000,000 per megawatt of

capacity. The regulation provides a significant 5-year compliance

lead time. This is particularly important for the natural gas option, as

the utilization of natural gas is projected to significantly increase due

to the dynamics of the energy market. The availability of natural gas,

site specific constraints and market fuel prices will factor into

decisions about selection of this option.

The third compliance option is retirement of the unit(s). Many of

the units subject to this regulation were built in the 1950s and are

much less efficient than modern units. Some of these units may

simply be reaching the end of their ability to efficiently produce

energy and the costs associated with fuel switching or installation and

operation of advanced NOx controls would reduce the unit’s

profitability.

There will be no expected impact on the Department, other State

agencies, or local governments as a result of this action.

Revenue (R+/R-)

II. Types of Economic Impact.

Expenditure

(E+/E-) Magnitude

A. On issuing agency: (E+) Minimal

B. On other State

agencies: NONE Minimal

C. On local

governments: NONE Minimal

Benefit (+)

Cost (-) Magnitude

D. On regulated industries or trade groups:

Compliance Costs (-) $430,000—

$300,000,000

E. On other industries or trade groups:

MD Contractors (+) Indeterminate

F. Direct and indirect effects on public:

(1) Health Benefits (+) $60,000—

$300,000,000

(2) Electricity

Rates (-) Indeterminate

III. Assumptions. (Identified by Impact Letter and Number from

Section II.)

A. The Department maintains both a compliance and permitting

program for major sources as required by the Clean Air Act. These

programs will implement these regulations.

B. There are no anticipated tasks or compliance activities required

of other State agencies due to these regulations.

C. There are no anticipated tasks or compliance activities required

of local government due to these regulations.

D. It is difficult to determine the precise costs to regulated entities

associated with implementation of this action because there can be of

a number of site-specific requirements and variables associated with

the cost of installation and operation of pollution control equipment

or installation of new equipment at specific plants. Companies must

optimize their existing control equipment to meet the 2015

requirements. The annual operating and maintenance cost for a single

unit can range from $430,000 to $4,300,000. Optimization of the

operation of the existing controls many push annual operating and

maintenance costs toward the high end of the estimates or even add

some additional costs but the exact additional cost if any cannot be

determined at this time. Companies can choose from three options to

meet 2020 requirements. Raven Power and NRG submitted cost

analyses for the replacement of existing SNCR/SACR control

technology with SCR control technology for certain units. Capital

cost estimates for this change in technology on an individual unit

range from $40,000,000 to $200,000,000. Operating and maintenance

costs range from $430,000 to $4,300,000 (in 2014 dollars).

Additionally, the regulations allow fuel switching to natural gas.

Current publications and review of recently built facilities that have

installed natural gas boilers indicates the cost of installation to be

approximately $1,000,000 per megawatt of capacity. Therefore an

anticipated range of cost for installing a natural gas boiler is

$25,000,000 to $300,000,000 (in 2014 dollars). In the case of a unit

retirement, the company will lose revenue and may face

decommissioning costs. Therefore the Department anticipates costs

will range from $430,000 to $300,000,000 for any of the options.

E. Installation of SCR technology or natural gas-fired boilers is

usually performed by specially trained tradesmen. Maryland

contractors and equipment manufacturers may see an increase in

demand for services; however, the magnitude of the increase that

may result is indeterminate.

F(1). Health benefits are influenced by many factors and

monetizing benefits is difficult. Implementation of these regulations

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1452

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

will result in a reduction of incidents in which Marylanders

experience adverse health effects, including hospitalizations,

illnesses, restricted activity days and other effects caused by air

pollution and exposure to ground level ozone. Ozone season

economic benefits from reduced incidents ranges from $60,000 to

$300,000,000 (in 2010 dollars).

F(2). Commercial and consumer electricity rates are influenced by

many factors. The costs associated with implementation of this action

may be one factor that influences these rates, but the magnitude of

that influence is difficult to quantify when considered along with

other factors that significantly affect electric rates.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment The Department of the Environment will hold a public hearing on

the proposed action on January 7, 2015 at 11 a.m. at the Department

of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, 1st Floor

Conference Rooms, Baltimore, Maryland 21230-1720. Interested

persons are invited to attend and express their views. Comments may

be sent to Mr. Randy Mosier, Chief of the Regulation Division, Air

and Radiation Management Administration, Department of the

Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 730, Baltimore,

Maryland 21230-1720, or email to [email protected].

Comments must be received no later than January 7, 2015, or be

submitted at the hearing. For more information, call Randy Mosier at

(410) 537-4488.

Copies of the proposed action and supporting documents are

available for review at the following locations:

• The Department of the Environment’s website at:

http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/regulations/air/Pages/req

comments.aspx

• The Air and Radiation Management Administration; and

• Regional offices of the Department in Cumberland and

Salisbury.

Anyone needing special accommodations at the public hearing

should contact the Department’s Fair Practices Office at (410) 537-

3964.

TTY users may contact the Department through the Maryland

Relay Service at 1-800-735-2258.

.01 Definitions.

A. In this chapter, the following terms have the meanings

indicated.

B. Terms Defined.

(1) “Affected electric generating unit” means any one of the

following coal-fired electric generating units:

(a) Brandon Shores Units 1 and 2;

(b) C.P. Crane Units 1 and 2;

(c) Chalk Point Units 1 and 2;

(d) Dickerson Units 1, 2, and 3;

(e) H.A. Wagner Units 2 and 3;

(f) Morgantown Units 1 and 2; and

(g) Warrior Run.

(2) “Operating day” means a 24-hour period beginning

midnight of one day and ending the following midnight, or an

alternative 24-hour period approved by the Department, during

which time an installation is operating, consuming fuel, or causing

emissions.

(3) “Ozone season” means the period beginning May 1 of any

given year and ending September 30 of the same year.

(4) System.

(a) “System” means all affected electric generating units

within the State of Maryland subject to this chapter that are owned,

operated, or controlled by the same person and are located:

(i) In the same ozone nonattainment area as specified in

40 CFR Part 81; or

(ii) Outside any designated ozone nonattainment area as

specified in 40 CFR 81.

(b) A system must include at least two affected electric

generating units.

(5) “System operating day” means any day in which an electric

generating unit in a system operates.

(6) “30-day rolling average emission rate” means a value in

lbs/MMBtu calculated by:

(a) Summing the total pounds of pollutant emitted from the

unit during the current operating day and the previous 29 operating

days;

(b) Summing the total heat input to the unit in MMBtu

during the current operating day and the previous 29 operating days;

and

(c) Dividing the total number of pounds of pollutant emitted

during the 30 operating days by the total heat input during the 30

operating days.

(7) “30-day system-wide rolling average emission rate” means

a value in lbs/MMBtu calculated by:

(a) Summing the total pounds of pollutant emitted from the

system during the current system operating day and the previous 29

system operating days;

(b) Summing the total heat input to the system in MMBtu

during the current system operating day and the previous 29 system

operating days; and

(c) Dividing the total number of pounds of pollutant emitted

during the 30 system operating days by the total heat input during the

30 system operating days.

(8) “24-hour block average emission rate” means a value in

lbs/MMBtu calculated by:

(a) Summing the total pounds of pollutant emitted from the

unit during 24 hours between midnight of one day and ending the

following midnight;

(b) Summing the total heat input to the unit in MMBtu

during 24 hours between midnight of one day and ending the

following midnight; and

(c) Dividing the total number of pounds of pollutant emitted

during 24 hours between midnight of one day and ending the

following midnight by the total heat input during 24 hours between

midnight of one day and ending the following midnight.

.02 Applicability.

The provisions of this chapter apply to an affected electric

generating unit as that term is defined in Regulation .01B of this

chapter.

.03 2015 NOx Emission Control Requirements.

A. Daily NOx Reduction Requirements During the Ozone Season.

(1) Not later than 45 days after the effective date of this

regulation, the owner or operator of an affected electric generating

unit shall submit a plan to the Department and EPA for approval that

demonstrates how each affected electric generating unit (“the unit”)

shall operate installed pollution control technology and combustion

controls to meet the requirements of §A(2) of this regulation. The

plan shall summarize the data that will be collected to demonstrate

compliance with §A(2) of this regulation. The plan shall cover all

modes of operation, including but not limited to normal operations,

start-up, shut-down and low capacity operations.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1453

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

(2) Beginning on May 1, 2015, for each operating day during

the ozone season, the owner or operator of an affected electric

generating unit shall minimize NOx emissions by operating and

optimizing the use of all installed pollution control technology and

combustion controls consistent with the technological limitations,

manufacturers’ specifications, good engineering and maintenance

practices, and good air pollution control practices for minimizing

emissions, as defined in 40 C.F.R. § 60.11(d), for such equipment and

the unit at all times the unit is in operation while burning any coal.

B. Ozone Season NOx Reduction Requirements.

(1) Except as provided in §B(3) of this regulation, the owner or

operator of an affected electric generating unit may not exceed a NOx

30-day system-wide rolling average emission rate of 0.15 lbs/MMBtu

during the ozone season.

(2) The owner or operator of an affected electric generating

unit subject to the provisions of this regulation shall continue to meet

the ozone season NOx reduction requirements in COMAR 26.11.27.

(3) Ownership of Single Electric Generating Facility.

(a) An affected electric generating unit is not subject to

§B(1) of this regulation if the unit is located at an electric generating

facility that is the only facility in Maryland directly or indirectly

owned, operated or controlled by the owner, operator or controller of

the facility.

(b) For the purposes of Regulation .03B(3) of this chapter,

the owner includes parent companies, affiliates and subsidiaries of

the owner.

C. Annual NOx Reduction Requirements. The owner or operator of

an affected electric generating unit subject to the provisions of this

regulation shall continue to meet the annual NOx reduction

requirements in COMAR 26.11.27.

D. NOx Emission Requirements for Affected Electric Generating

Units Equipped with Fluidized Bed Combustors.

(1) The owner or operator of an affected electric generating

unit equipped with a fluidized bed combustor is not subject to the

requirements of §§A, B(1), B(2) and C of this regulation.

(2) The owner or operator of an affected electric generating

unit equipped with a fluidized bed combustor may not exceed a NOx

24-hour block average emission rate of 0.10 lbs/MMBtu.

.04 Additional NOx Emission Control Requirements Beginning

June 1, 2020.

A. This regulation applies to C.P. Crane units 1 and 2, Chalk

Point unit 2, Dickerson units 1, 2, and 3 and H.A. Wagner unit 2.

B. General Requirements. The owner or operator of the affected

electric generating units subject to this regulation shall choose from

the following:

(1) Not later than June 1, 2020:

(a) Install and operate a selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

control system; and

(b) Meet a NOx emission rate of 0.09 lbs/MMBtu, as

determined on a 30-day rolling average during the ozone season;

(2) Not later than June 1, 2020, permanently retire the unit; or

(3) Not later than June 1, 2020, switch fuel from coal to natural

gas for the unit.

.05 Compliance Demonstration Requirements.

A. Procedures for Demonstrating Compliance with Regulation

.03(A) of this Chapter.

(1) An affected electric generating unit shall demonstrate, to

the Department’s satisfaction, compliance with Regulation .03(A)(2)

of this chapter, using the information collected and maintained in

accordance with Regulation .03(A)(1) of this chapter and any

additional documentation available to and maintained by the affected

electric generating unit.

(2) An affected electric generating unit shall not be required to

submit a unit-specific report consistent with §A(3) of this regulation

where the unit emits at levels that are at or below the following rates:

Affected Unit 24-Hour Block Average

NOx Emissions

in lbs/MMBtu

Brandon Shores

Unit 1 0.08

Unit 2

< 650 MWg

≥ 650 MWg

0.07

0.15

C.P. Crane

Unit 1 0.30

Unit 2 0.28

Chalk Point

Unit 1 only 0.07

Unit 2 only 0.33

Units 1 and 2 combined 0.20

Dickerson

Unit 1 only 0.24

Unit 2 only 0.24

Unit 3 only 0.24

Two or more Units combined 0.24

H.A. Wagner

Unit 2 0.34

Unit 3 0.07

Morgantown

Unit 1 0.07

Unit 2 0.07

(3) The owner or operator of an affected electric generating

unit subject to Regulation .03(A)(2) of this chapter shall submit a

unit-specific report for each day the unit exceeds its NOx emission

rate of §A(2) of this regulation, which shall include the following

information for the entire operating day:

(a) Hours of operation for the unit;

(b) Hourly averages of operating temperature of installed

pollution control technology;

(c) Hourly averages of heat input (MMBtu/hr);

(d) Hourly averages of output (MWh);

(e) Hourly averages of Ammonia or urea flow rates;

(f) Hourly averages of NOx emissions data (lbs/MMBtu and

tons);

(g) Malfunction data;

(h) The technical and operational reason the rate was

exceeded, such as:

(i) Operator error;

(ii) Technical events beyond the control of the owner or

operator (e.g. acts of God, malfunctions); or

(iii) Dispatch requirements that mandate unplanned

operation (e.g. start-ups and shut-downs, idling and operation at low

voltage or low capacity);

(i) A written narrative describing any actions taken to

reduce emission rates; and

(j) Other information that the Department determines is

necessary to evaluate the data or to ensure that compliance is

achieved.

(4) An exceedance of the emissions rate of §A(2) of this

regulation including but not limited to start-up and shut-down, days

when the unit was directed by the electric grid operator to operate at

low capacity or to operate pursuant to any emergency generation

operations required by the electric grid operator, including

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1454

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

necessary testing for such emergency operations or to have otherwise

occurred during operations which are deemed consistent with the

unit’s technological limitations, manufacturers’ specifications, good

engineering and maintenance practices, and good air pollution

control practices for minimizing emissions, shall not be considered a

violation of Regulation .03A(2) of this chapter provided that the

provisions of the approved plan as required in Regulation.03A(1) of

this chapter are met.

B. Procedures for Demonstrating Compliance with NOx Emission

Rates of this Chapter.

(1) Compliance with the NOx emission rate limitations in

Regulations .03B(1), .03D(2), .04B(1)(b) and .05A(2) of this chapter

shall be demonstrated with a continuous emission monitoring system

that is installed, operated, and certified in accordance with 40 CFR

Part 75.

(2) For Regulation .03B(1) of this chapter, in order to calculate

the 30-day system-wide rolling average emission rates, if 29 system

operating days are not available from the current ozone season,

system operating days from the previous ozone season shall be used.

(3) For Regulation .04B(1) of this chapter, in order to calculate

the 30-day rolling average emission rates, if 29 operating days are

not available from the current ozone season, operating days from the

previous ozone season shall be used.

.06 Reporting Requirements.

A. Reporting Schedule.

(1) Beginning 30 days after the first month of the ozone season

following the effective date of this chapter, each affected electric

generating unit subject to the requirements of this chapter shall

submit a monthly report to the Department detailing the status of

compliance with this chapter during the ozone season.

(2) Each subsequent monthly report shall be submitted to the

Department not later than 30 days following the end of the calendar

month during the ozone season.

B. Monthly Reports During Ozone Season. Monthly reports during

the ozone season shall include:

(1) Daily pass or fail of the NOx emission rates of Regulation

.05A(2) of this chapter.

(2) The reporting information as required under Regulation

.05A(3) of this chapter.

(3) The 30-day system-wide rolling average emission rate for

each affected electric generating unit to demonstrate compliance with

Regulation .03B(1) of this chapter; and

(4) Beginning June 1, 2020, the daily 30-day rolling average

heat input calculated in lbs/MMBtu to demonstrate compliance with

the requirements of Regulation .04B(1)(b) of this chapter.

ROBERT M. SUMMERS, Ph.D.

Secretary of the Environment

Title 36 MARYLAND STATE

LOTTERY AND GAMING CONTROL AGENCY

Subtitle 01 GENERAL PROVISIONS 36.01.01 General Authority: State Government Article, §§9-110(a) and 9-111(a)(7), Annotated

Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-345-P]

The Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency proposes to

amend Regulation .04 under COMAR 36.01.01 General. This action

was considered at the Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control

Commission open meeting held on September 25, 2014, notice of

which was given pursuant to State Government Article, §10-506(c),

Annotated Code of Maryland.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to incorporate provisions that better

refine the requirements of the agency.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact The proposed action has no economic impact.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to James B. Butler, Director of Legislative

and Policy Affairs, Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency,

1800 Washington Blvd., Suite 330, Baltimore, MD 21230, or call

(410) 230-8781, or email to [email protected], or fax to (410)

230-8727. Comments will be accepted through December 31, 2014.

A public hearing has not been scheduled.

.04 Lottery and Gaming Control Director. A. (text unchanged)

B. Powers of Director.

(1)—(3) (text unchanged) (4) With the approval of the Commission, the Director may:

(a) (text unchanged)

(b) Enter into private sector cooperative marketing project

agreements as provided for in State Finance and Procurement Article,

§11-203[(a)(1)(xiv)], Annotated Code of Maryland.

(5)—(11) (text unchanged)

STEPHEN L. MARTINO

Director

Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Agency

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1455

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Subtitle 03 GAMING PROVISIONS 36.03.03 Video Lottery Operation License

Authority: State Government Article, §9-1A-24(f), Annotated Code of

Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-344-P]

The Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency proposes to

amend Regulation .07 under COMAR 36.03.03 Video Lottery Operation License. This action was considered at the Maryland

State Lottery and Gaming Control Commission open meeting held on

September 25, 2014, notice of which was given pursuant to State

Government Article, §10-506(c), Annotated Code of Maryland.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to incorporate provisions that refine

the withdrawal limits on automated teller machines at casinos.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact The proposed action has no economic impact.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to James B. Butler, Director of Legislative

and Policy Affairs, Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency,

1800 Washington Blvd, Suite 330, Baltimore, MD 21230, or call

(410) 230-8780, or email to [email protected], or fax to (410)

230-8727. Comments will be accepted through December 31, 2014.

A public hearing has not been scheduled.

.07 Automated Teller Machines. A. (text unchanged)

B. Withdrawal Limits. [The] Exclusive of transaction fees or

surcharges, the maximum amount that a player may withdraw from

an account by using an automated teller machine located on the

gaming floor [shall be:] is [(1) No more than $250 per transaction; and

(2) No] no more than [$1,000] $2,500 per gaming day.

C. (text unchanged)

STEPHEN L. MARTINO

Director

Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Agency

Subtitle 04 VIDEO LOTTERY TERMINALS

36.04.01 Video Lottery Terminal Technical Standards

Authority: State Government Article, §§9-1A-02(b) and 9-1A-04(d),

Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-343-P]

The Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency proposes to

amend Regulation .20 under COMAR 36.04.01 Video Lottery

Terminal Technical Standards. This action was considered at the

Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Commission open

meeting held on September 25, 2014, notice of which was given

pursuant to State Government Article, §10-506(c), Annotated Code

of Maryland.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is incorporate provisions that better

refine the requirements and procedures for VLT operations.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact The proposed action has no economic impact.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to James B. Butler, Director of Legislative

and Policy Affairs, Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency,

1800 Washington Blvd, Suite 330, Baltimore, MD 21230, or call

(410) 230-8781, or email to [email protected], or fax to (410)

230-8727. Comments will be accepted through December 31, 2014.

A public hearing has not been scheduled.

.20 Video Lottery Terminal Entry Logs. A. (text unchanged)

B. A maintenance log shall be:

(1) (text unchanged)

(2) Maintained in a book with bound numbered pages that

cannot be readily removed, or in a functional equivalent that has

been reviewed and approved by the Commission:

(3)—(4) (text unchanged)

C. (text unchanged)

STEPHEN L. MARTINO

Director

Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Agency

Subtitle 05 TABLE GAMES 36.05.02 Table Game Equipment

Authority: State Government Article, §§9-1A-02(b) and 9-1A-04(d),

Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-342-P]

The Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency proposes to

amend Regulation .16 under COMAR 36.05.02 Table Game Equipment. This action was considered at the Maryland State

Lottery and Gaming Control Commission open meeting held on

September 25, 2014, notice of which was given pursuant to State

Government Article, § 10-506(c), Annotated Code of Maryland.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to incorporate provisions that better

clarify the duties and responsibilities of a table games supervisor.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact The proposed action has no economic impact.

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1456

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to James B. Butler, Director of Legislative

and Policy Affairs, Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency,

1800 Washington Blvd, Suite 330, Baltimore, MD 21230, or call

(410) 230-8781, or email to [email protected], or fax to (410)

230-8727. Comments will be accepted through December 31, 2014.

A public hearing has not been scheduled.

.16 Cards — Receipt, Storage, Inspection, and Removal. A. (text unchanged)

B. Storage. The Commission-approved storage area must have two

separate locks, to which access shall be controlled as follows:

(1) – (2) (text unchanged)

(3) If the facility operator has a separate [Poker] poker storage

area, an employee below a [poker shift manager] poker supervisor in

the organizational hierarchy may not have access to the gaming

operations department key to the poker storage area.

C. Distribution.

(1) (text unchanged)

(2) The floorperson or above and the security department

employee who removed the decks shall distribute sufficient decks to

the pit managers or above and, if applicable, to the [poker shift

manager] poker supervisor.

(3) (text unchanged)

(4) Decks of cards in the pit stand shall be placed in a locked

compartment, the keys to which shall be in the possession of the pit

managers or above or the [poker shift manager] poker supervisor or

above.

D. Inspection.

(1) If the decks are to be inspected at open gaming tables under

§F of this regulation, the pit manager or above shall distribute the

decks to the dealer at each table or the [poker shift manager] poker

supervisor shall transport the decks to the poker pit stand for

subsequent distribution to the dealer at each poker table either

directly by the [poker shift manager] poker supervisor or through the

floorperson assigned to supervise the dealer.

(2) If the decks are to be preinspected and preshuffled at a

closed gaming table as permitted under §R of this regulation, the pit

manager or above or [Poker shift manager] poker supervisor shall

deliver the decks to the dealer and the floorperson or above at the

closed gaming table where the preinspection and preshuffling shall be

performed.

(3)—(4) (text unchanged)

E. Removal.

(1) If the decks of cards to be used for poker are removed from

the poker storage area, the [poker shift manager] poker supervisor or

above and a security department employee shall, at times as may be

necessary, remove the appropriate number of decks from the [Poker] poker storage area and distribute the decks under §D(1), (2) or (3) of

this regulation.

(2) The number of decks distributed must include extra decks

that shall be placed in the pit stand for the card reserve.

(3) Decks of cards in the pit stand shall be placed in a locked

compartment, the keys to which shall be in the possession of the

[poker shift manager] poker supervisor or above.

F. (text unchanged)

G. Unsuitable or Missing Card. If, while inspecting the cards in

accordance with §F of this regulation, the dealer finds that a card is

unsuitable for use, a card is missing from the deck or an extra card is

found, the following procedures shall be observed:

(1) A supervisor or above or a [poker shift manager] poker

supervisor shall bring a replacement deck of cards or card from the

card reserve in the pit stand.

(2) (text unchanged)

(3) The pit manager or above or a [poker shift manager] poker

supervisor shall maintain the envelope or container in a secure place

within the pit until collection by a security department employee.

H. (text unchanged)

I. Damaged Cards.

(1) (text unchanged)

(2) If after inspection, the floorperson or above determines that

the card is damaged and needs to be replaced, the floorperson shall

notify the pit manager or above or the [poker shift manager] poker

supervisor.

(3) The pit manager or above or the [poker shift manager] poker supervisor shall:

(a)—(g) (text unchanged)

(4) At least once each gaming day, the replacement decks of

cards shall be collected and placed in an envelope or container and

sealed. A label shall be attached to each envelope or container which

identifies the deck as a replacement deck and signed by the pit

manager or above or the [poker shift manager] poker supervisor.

(5) The pit manager or above or the [poker shift manager] poker supervisor shall maintain the sealed envelopes or containers in

a secure place within the pit until collection by a security department

employee in accordance with §M of this regulation.

(6) (text unchanged)

J. Decks of cards that were used for play shall be put into

envelopes or containers when removed from active use at the table.

(1) (text unchanged)

(2) The [poker shift manager] poker supervisor or pit manager

or above shall maintain the sealed envelopes or containers in a secure

place within the pit until collection by a security department

employee.

K.—M. (text unchanged)

N. When the envelopes or containers of used cards and reserve

cards with broken seals are returned to the security department, the

cards shall be inspected for tampering, marks, alterations, missing or

additional cards, or anything that might indicate unfair play:

(1)—(4) (text unchanged)

(5) Upon completion of the inspection procedures required

under §N(2) of this regulation, each deck of cards used in [Poker] poker that is determined suitable for continued use shall be placed in

sequential order, repackaged and returned to the approved or poker

storage area for subsequent use.

(6)—(9) (text unchanged)

O.—P. (text unchanged)

Q. Reused Deck.

(1) If a deck of plastic cards has been determined to not be

suitable for reuse by the individual performing the inspection

procedures required under subsection §N(3) of this regulation, the

deck shall be placed in a sealed envelope or container with a label

attached which identifies the date and time the deck was placed in the

envelope or container and that shall be signed by the [Poker shift

manager] poker supervisor or floorperson.

(2) (text unchanged)

R. If a facility operator elects to preinspect and preshuffle cards at

a closed gaming table prior to the delivery of the cards to an open

gaming table, a dealer and supervised by a floorperson or above with

no concurrent supervisory responsibility for open gaming tables shall

perform the procedures required under this section.

(1)—(10) (text unchanged)

PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 1457

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

(11) The sealed containers of cards shall be transported by:

(a) A pit manager or above or [poker shift manager] poker

supervisor to the gaming pit of the gaming tables where the cards will

be utilized and locked in the pit stand; or

(b) An assistant table games shift manager or above and a

security department employee to the approved storage area or [Poker] poker storage area where the cards shall be placed back into the card

inventory and segregated from cards that have not been preinspected

and preshuffled.

(12)—(15) (text unchanged)

S. (text unchanged)

STEPHEN L. MARTINO

Director

Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Agency

Subtitle 05 TABLE GAMES 36.05.03 Table Game Procedures

Authority: State Government Article, §§9-1A-02(b) and 9-1A-04(d),

Annotated Code of Maryland

Notice of Proposed Action [14-347-P]

The Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Agency proposes

to amend Regulations .03, .05, and .23 under COMAR 36.05.03 Table Game Procedures. This action was considered at the

Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Commission open

meeting held on September 25, 2014, notice of which was given

pursuant to State Government Article, §10-506(c), Annotated Code

of Maryland.

Statement of Purpose The purpose of this action is to incorporate provisions that better

refine the procedures for table game operations.

Comparison to Federal Standards There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.

Estimate of Economic Impact The proposed action has no economic impact.

Economic Impact on Small Businesses The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small

businesses.

Impact on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.

Opportunity for Public Comment Comments may be sent to James B. Butler, Director of Legislative

and Policy Affairs, Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency,

1800 Washington Blvd, Suite 330, Baltimore, MD 21230, or call

(410) 230-8781, or email to [email protected], or fax to (410)

230-8727. Comments will be accepted through December 31, 2014.

A public hearing has not been scheduled.

.03 Procedures for Opening a Table Game. A.—E. (text unchanged)

F. If there is a discrepancy between the amount of gaming chips

and plaques counted and the amount of the gaming chips and plaques

recorded on the duplicate copy of the Table Inventory Slip:

(1) (text unchanged)

(2) In the presence of the floorperson or above [and a security

department employee], the dealer or boxperson assigned to the table

shall recount the table inventory and complete a new Table Inventory

Slip reflecting the results of the dealer’s or boxperson’s recount of

the table inventory;

(3)—(5) (text unchanged)

G.—H. (text unchanged)

.05 Removing a Value Chip, Coin, or Plaque from a Gaming Table.

A.—O. (text unchanged)

P. Signatures on the drop box, acknowledgement and chip bank

copies of a Credit Slip attesting to the accuracy of the information

contained on the Credit Slip shall be required of the specified

employees at the specified times:

(1) The chip bank cashier, upon [preparation] receipt of the

value chips from the table;

(2)—(4) (text unchanged)

Q.—R. (text unchanged)

.23 Table Game Payouts. A.—D. (text unchanged)

E. A facility operator’s internal controls shall include:

(1)—(8) (text unchanged)

(9) Procedures utilized to issue a manual table game payout

document which:

(a)—(c) (text unchanged)

(d) Require manual table game payout books[, wiz

machines,] or their functional equivalent to be maintained in a

secured locked cabinet; and

(e) Require the key to the cabinet in §E(9)(d) of this

regulation to be:

(i) Controlled by the security department or the

[accounting] table games department in a manual key box or an

automated key tracking system; and

(ii) (text unchanged)

STEPHEN L. MARTINO

Director

Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Agency

1458

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Errata

COMAR 10.32.06 At 41:20 Md. R. 1165 (October 3, 2014), col. 1, line 16 from the

top:

For: be accepted through November 3, 2013. A public hearing

has not

Read: be accepted through November 3, 2014. A public hearing

has not

[14-24-32]

1459

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

Special Documents

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

PROPOSED CALENDAR YEAR 2015 STANDARD PERMIT APPLICATION

TURNAROUND TIMES As required by Section 1-607(A)(2) of the Environment Article,

the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) is seeking

comment on the proposed standard turnaround times for all types of

permit applications. For further information, please contact Mr.

Andrew Gosden in MDE’s MDEStat Office at 410-537-4158.

Details about the proposed changes and the full list of proposed

turnaround times are available on MDE’s web site,

www.mde.state.md.us.

MDE reviews and adjusts these turnaround times annually to give

permit applicants current information regarding the processing time.

Please note the following important points about these standard

times:

(1) These standards refer to the time between MDE’s receipt of a

complete permit application and MDE’s issuance or denial of

the permit, excluding delays caused by factors beyond MDE’s

control. Many applications are incomplete when they first

arrive at MDE. The appropriate MDE permit writer can

provide guidance on how to ensure that an application is

complete when submitted.

(2) In most permitting programs, each application has unique

characteristics that influence its processing time. For each

program listed, the standard time represents the time in which

90% of applications can be processed. Many applications will

require less time; a few will require more time due to unusual

circumstances.

Paper copies of the proposed times are available on request.

Requests, comments, and questions can be directed to Mr. Andrew

Gosden at [email protected]; by phone at 410-537-4158; via

postal mail to MDE/OS, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 745,

Baltimore, MD 21230-1720; or by fax to 410-537-3888. Comments

will be accepted until December 28, 2014.

[14-24-42]

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

Commission Meeting — Correction

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

SUMMARY: The Susquehanna River Basin Commission published

a document in the Federal Register of November 10, 2014,

concerning its regular business meeting on December 5, 2014, in

Annapolis, Maryland. The location of the meeting has been changed

and the new location is contained in the Addresses section of this

notice. Also an agenda item has been added to be addressed at the

business meeting and is contained in the Supplementary Information

section of this notice.

DATE: December 5, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Miller Senate Office Building, President’s Conference

Room, 11 Bladen Street, Annapolis, Md. 21401. (The recommended

parking and transportation option is to park at the Navy-Marine

Corps Memorial Stadium and take the Annapolis Transit Trolley

Shuttle from there — for all available parking options, see

http://www.downtownannapolis.org/_pages/transport/tr_parking.htm.)

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason E. Oyler,

Regulatory Counsel, telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax:

(717) 238-2436.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting will

include actions or presentations on the following items:

(1) informational presentation of interest to the Lower Susquehanna

Subbasin area; (2) resolution concerning FY-2016 federal funding of

the Susquehanna Flood Forecast and Warning System and National

Streamflow Information Program; (3) rulemaking action to clarify the

water uses involved in hydrocarbon development that are subject to

the consumptive use regulations, as implemented by the Approval By

Rule program; (4) resolution concerning delegation of authority;

(5) ratification/approval of contracts/grants; (6) regulatory

compliance matters for Lion Brewery, LHP Management, and

Southwestern Energy Company; (7) transfer of approval (Docket No.

20081222) from Sunbury Generation LP to Hummel Station LLC;

(8) Future Power PA, LLC request for waiver of 18 CFR §§806.3 and

806.4; and (9) Regulatory Program projects.

The rulemaking item listed for Commission action was the subject of

a public hearing conducted by the Commission on November 6,

2014, and identified in the notice for such hearing, which was

published in 79 FR 57850, September 26, 2014. Projects listed for

Commission action are those that were the subject of a public hearing

conducted by the Commission on November 6, 2014, and identified

in the notice for such hearing, which was published in 79 FR 61683,

October 14, 2014.

Opportunity to Appear and Comment:

Interested parties are invited to attend the business meeting and

encouraged to review the Commission’s Public Meeting Rules of

Conduct, which are posted on the Commission’s website,

www.srbc.net. As identified in the public hearing notices referenced

above, written comments on the rulemaking item and Regulatory

Program projects that were the subject of public hearings, and are

listed for action at the business meeting, are subject to a comment

deadline of November 17, 2014. Written comments pertaining to any

other matters listed for action at the business meeting may be mailed

to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front

Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110-1788, or submitted

electronically through

http://www.srbc.net/pubinfo/publicparticipation.htm. Any such

comments mailed or electronically submitted must be received by the

Commission on or before November 26, 2014, to be considered.

AUTHORITY: Pub. L. 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR Parts

806, 807, and 808.

Dated: November 10, 2014.

STEPHANIE L. RICHARDSON

Secretary to the Commission

[14-24-45]

SPECIAL DOCUMENTS 1460

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

MARYLAND HEALTH CARE COMMISSION Number of Chronic Hospital Beds and Patient Days

and Percent Occupancy, by Facility: Maryland, FY 2013

Jurisdiction/Facility Number of Licensed Beds

Number of Patient Days

Occupancy (%)

Baltimore City UM Rehabilitation & Orthopedic Institute1 52 14,187 75.22% Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center2 76 20,970 75.6% Levindale Hebrew Geriatric Center & Hospital 100 33,960 93.04% UM Medical Center Midtown Campus3

80 17,803 62.69%

Prince George’s County Laurel Regional Hospital4

46 7,658 45.61%

SUBTOTAL: Private Chronic Hospitals 354 94,578 73.72% Washington County

Western Maryland Hospital Center5

60 6,016 27.47%

Wicomico County Deer’s Head Hospital Center6

66 3,915 16.25%

SUBTOTAL: State-operated Chronic Hospitals7 126 9,931 21.59% STATEWIDE TOTAL8

480

104,509

59.97%

Sources: Maryland Health Care Commission. The number of licensed chronic hospital beds maintained in the Commission’s inventory is

based on the Commission’s Certificate of Need files and licensing information provided by the Office of Health Care Quality. The number of

FY 2013 patient days for the private chronic hospitals is obtained from the Financial Data Base, as reported by private chronic hospitals to the

Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC), as of October 7, 2014. The number of FY 2013 patient days for the two state-operated

chronic hospitals is obtained from the Hospital Management Information System (HMIS), as maintained by the Maryland Department of Health

and Mental Hygiene.

Notes: The number of beds reflects the number of licensed chronic hospital beds at each facility as of June 30, 2013 (the end of the 2013 fiscal

year reporting period). Occupancy is calculated based on licensed beds.

[14-24-36]

1 University of Maryland Rehabilitation and Orthopedic Institute’s (formerly Kernan Hospital) 52 chronic hospital beds include

16 dually licensed chronic/rehabilitation beds. UM Rehabilitation & Orthopedic Institute added 12 chronic hospital beds; these

beds were relocated from University Specialty Hospital, July 11, 2012. 2 Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center’s 20,970 patient days is the combined number of patient days for the separately

licensed 76 special hospital-chronic beds and nine special hospital-rehabilitation beds. 3 University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus (formerly Maryland General Hospital) established an 80-bed chronic

hospital unit. These 80 chronic hospital beds were relocated from University Specialty Hospital (“USH”) on July 11, 2012. 4 Gladys Spellman Specialty Hospital and Nursing Center relocated its 46 licensed chronic hospital beds to Laurel Regional

Hospital, effective June 30, 2011. 5Western Maryland Hospital Center’s occupancy, based on its 30 budgeted chronic hospital beds, would be 54.94 percent.

6 Deer’s Head Hospital Center’s chronic hospital occupancy, based on its 14 budgeted chronic hospital beds, would be 76.61

percent. 7 The occupancy for the two State-operated chronic hospitals, based on the total 44 budgeted chronic hospital beds, would be

61.84 percent. 8 The statewide chronic hospital occupancy based on the 354 licensed beds at the five private facilities plus the 44 budgeted beds

at the two state-operated facilities would be 72.4 percent.

1461

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

General Notices

Notice of ADA Compliance The State of Maryland is committed to ensuring that individuals with disabilities are able to fully participate in public meetings. Anyone

planning to attend a meeting announced below who wishes to receive auxiliary aids, services, or accommodations is invited to contact the

agency representative at least 48 hours in advance, at the telephone number listed in the notice or through Maryland Relay.

BOARD OF ARCHITECTS

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 15, 2014, 10

a.m.

Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl. Conf.

Rm., Baltimore, MD

Add'l. Info: The Board will take final

action to adopt amendments to COMAR

09.21.02.03 to allow the use of digital

signatures.

Contact: Pamela J. Edwards (410) 230-

6262

[14-24-31]

ATHLETIC COMMISSION

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 17, 2014, 2 —

4 p.m.

Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl. Conf.

Rm., Baltimore, MD

Contact: Patrick Pannella (410) 230-6223

[14-24-27]

BOARD OF COSMETOLOGISTS

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: January 5, 2015, 10 a.m.

— 4:30 p.m.

Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl. Conf.

Rm., Baltimore, MD

Contact: Sheryl Leach (410) 230-6195

[14-24-08]

GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF CRIME

CONTROL AND PREVENTION

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: January 15, 2015, 1 — 3

p.m.

Place: All meetings will be located at the

Howard Co. Police Dept., Main

Headquarters, 3410 Courthouse Dr.,

Ellicott City, MD, unless otherwise

specified in advance.

Add'l. Info: Children’s Justice Act

Committee Meetings

Contact: Jessica Wheeler (410) 821-2824

[14-24-12]

CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION

ADVISORY BOARD

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 15, 2014, 1 —

3 p.m.

Place: Judicial Training Center, 2009-D

Commerce Park Dr., Annapolis, MD

Contact: Robyn Lyles (410) 585-3185

[14-24-23]

OFFICE OF THE DEAF AND HARD OF

HEARING/MARYLAND ADVISORY

COUNCIL ON THE DEAF AND HARD

OF HEARING

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 11, 2014, 1:30

— 4:30 p.m.

Place: CSSD, 2606 Rolling Rd., Ste. 301,

Windsor Mill, MD

Contact: Lisa Kornberg (410) 767-6290

[14-24-39]

ELEVATOR SAFETY REVIEW BOARD

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 19, 2014, 10

a.m. — 12 p.m.

Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 2nd Fl. Conf.

Rm., Baltimore, MD

Contact: Raquel M. Meyers (410) 230-

6379 [14-24-09]

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

BOARD

Subject: Special Test Document

Date and Time: December 9, 2014, 9 —

11 a.m.; part of the meeting may include a

closed session.

Place: 653 W. Pratt Street, Ste. 212,

Baltimore, MD

Add'l. Info: The State Emergency Medical

Services Board (EMS Board) meets

regularly on the 2nd Tuesday of each

month.

Contact: Leandrea Gilliam (410) 706-4449

[14-24-10]

BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL

ENGINEERS

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 11, 2014, 9

a.m.

Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl. Conf.

Rm., Baltimore, MD

Contact: Pamela J. Edwards (410) 230-

6262 [14-24-30]

STATE BOARD OF STATIONARY

ENGINEERS

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: January 20, 2015, 10 a.m.

— 12 a.m.

Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl. Conf.

Rm., Baltimore, MD

Contact: Gae Herzberger (410) 230-6163

[14-24-24]

DEPARTMENT OF THE

ENVIRONMENT/AIR AND

RADIATION MANAGEMENT

ADMINISTRATION

Subject: Public Hearing on Regulations

Date and Time: January 7, 2015, 10 —

10:30 a.m.

Place: 1800 Washington Blvd., 1st Fl.

Conf. Rms., Baltimore, MD

Add'l. Info: The Department of the

Environment will hold a public hearing

concerning the State's intention to submit a

negative declaration for the Environmental

Protection Agency's (EPA) Control

Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for

Automobile and Light-Duty Truck

Assembly Coatings (EPA-453/R-08-006).

As an alternative to adopting a reasonably

available control technologies (RACT)

rule, a state or local agency may adopt a

negative declaration documenting that it

has no stationary sources or emitting

facilities to which the CTG is applicable.

The CTG applies to automobile and light-

duty truck assembly coating operations.

The source category includes the coatings

that are applied to new automobile or new

light-duty truck bodies, or body parts for

new automobiles or new light-duty trucks.

These coatings are applied at automobile or

light-duty truck assembly plants. The large

majority of these coatings are specifically

formulated, marketed and sold for this

purpose. There are no automobile or light-

duty truck assembly facilities in the State

and none are expected in the near future.

The public hearing will be held on January

7, 2015, at 10 a.m. at the Department of the

Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard,

1st Floor Conference Rooms, Baltimore,

Maryland 21230-1720. Interested persons are

invited to attend and express their views.

Comments may be sent to Randy Mosier,

Chief, Regulations Development Division,

Air and Radiation Management

Administration, Department of the

Environment, 1800 Washington

Boulevard, Suite 730, Baltimore,

Maryland 21230-1720, or emailed to

[email protected]. Comments

must be received not later than January 7,

2015, or be submitted at the hearing.

Copies of the proposed action and

supporting documents are available for

review at the following locations:

• The Department of the Environment's

website at:

GENERAL NOTICES 1462

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/r

egulations/air/Pages/reqcomments.aspx

• The Air and Radiation Management

Administration; and

• Regional offices of the Department in

Cumberland and Salisbury.

Anyone needing special

accommodations at the public hearing

should contact the Department's Fair

Practices Office at (410) 537-3964. TTY

users may contact the Department through

the Maryland Relay Service at 1-800-735-

2258.

Contact: Carolyn A. Jones (410) 537-4210

[14-24-38]

FIRE PREVENTION COMMISSION

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 18, 2014, 9:30

a.m.

Place: Laurel Municipal Center, 8103

Sandy Spring Rd., Council Chambers,

Laurel, MD

Add'l. Info: Portions of the meeting may

be held in closed session. If public schools

in Prince George's County are CLOSED

due to inclement weather, the meeting and

any appeals will be rescheduled.

Contact: Heidi Ritchie (877) 890-0199

[14-24-26]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

MENTAL HYGIENE

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 9, 2014, 10

a.m. — 1 p.m.

Place: Anne Arundel Co. Dept. of

Recreation and Parks, Kinder

Center/Harvest Hall, 10001 Kinder Farm

Park Rd., Millersville, MD

Contact: Linda Rudie (410) 767-8419

[14-24-35]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

MENTAL HYGIENE/OFFICE OF

HEALTH SERVICES

Subject: Public Notice for Free-Standing

Ambulatory Surgical Centers

Add'l. Info: Free-Standing Medicare-

Certified Ambulatory Surgical Centers

For dates of service beginning

December 1, 2014, the Maryland Medical

Assistance reimbursement rates for covered

dental services provided in a free-standing

Medicare-certified ambulatory surgical

center (ASC) are as follows: for covered

dental services that have a reimbursement

amount of $1,000 through $2,999.99, the

ASC facility fee will be $600; for covered

dental services with a reimbursement

amount of $3,000 through $4,999.99, the

ASC facility fee will be $1,250; for

covered dental services with a

reimbursement amount of $5,000 through

$7,999.99, the ASC facility fee will be

$2,500; and for covered dental services

with a reimbursement amount of $8,000

and over, the ASC facility fee will be

$3,000.

Copies of the proposed changes are

available for public review at the local

health department in each county and

Baltimore City. Written comments may be

sent to Michael Cimmino, Office of Health

Services, DHMH, 201 W. Preston St.,

Room 128E, Baltimore, MD 21201, or

call at 410-767-0579 or email to

[email protected].

Contact: Michael Cimmino (410) 767-

0579

[14-24-40]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

MENTAL HYGIENE/OFFICE OF

HEALTH SERVICES

Subject: Maryland Medicaid Dental Fee

Schedule Update

Add'l. Info: Maryland Medicaid Dental

Fee Schedule Update

The Secretary of Health and Mental

Hygiene proposes to amend COMAR

10.09.05.07 in order to increase Medicaid

reimbursement for dental services in

accordance with the State budget

appropriation for Fiscal Year 2015. The

new fee schedule is effective January 1,

2015.

Copies of the proposed changes are

available for public review at the local

health department in each county and

Baltimore City. Written comments may be

sent to Michael Cimmino, Office of Health

Services, Department of Health and Mental

Hygiene, 201 W. Preston St., Rm. 128E,

Baltimore, MD 21201, or fax to 410-333-

5154.

Contact: Michael Cimmino (410) 767-

0579

[14-24-43]

BOARD OF HEATING, VENTILATION,

AIR-CONDITIONING, AND

REFRIGERATION CONTRACTORS

(HVACR)

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 10, 2014, 10:30

a.m. — 12 p.m.

Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl. Conf.

Rm., Baltimore, MD

Contact: Robin Bailey (410) 230-6160

[14-24-13]

MARYLAND STATEWIDE

INDEPENDENT LIVING COUNCIL

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 19, 2014, 12 —

3 p.m.

Place: Workforce and Technology Center,

2301 Argonne Dr., Rm. T-130, Baltimore,

MD

Add'l. Info: For more information please

call Denise Thomas at (240) 638-0074 or

email [email protected].

Contact: Denise Thomas (240) 638-0074

[14-24-01]

FACILITIES ADVISORY BOARD —

JUVENILE SERVICES

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 11, 2014, 4:30

— 6 p.m.

Place: Alfred D. Noyes Center, 9925

Blackwell Rd., Rockville, MD

Add'l. Info: Noyes Center Facility

Advisory Board Meeting

Contact: Antoinette McLeod (301) 315-

1610

[14-24-05]

STATE ADVISORY BOARD FOR

JUVENILE SERVICES

Subject: No Meeting Notice

Date and Time: December 15, 2014, 2 —

4 p.m.

Place: DJS Annapolis Office, 49 Old

Solomons Island Rd., Annapolis, MD

Add'l. Info: This meeting is canceled.

Contact: Tim Gilbert (410) 230-3488

[14-24-14]

STATE ADVISORY BOARD FOR

JUVENILE SERVICES — GIRLS

SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 8, 2014, 1 — 3

p.m.

Place: Dept. of Juvenile Services, 120 W.

Fayette St., 5th Fl., Baltimore, MD

Contact: Tim Gilbert (410) 230-3488

[14-24-33]

MARYLAND STATE LOTTERY AND

GAMING CONTROL COMMISSION

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 16, 2014, 10

a.m. — 12 p.m.

Place: Montgomery Park Business Center,

1800 Washington Blvd., Ste. 330,

Baltimore, MD

Contact: Marie A. Torosino (410) 230-

8790

[14-24-37]

GENERAL NOTICES 1463

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 41, ISSUE 24, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2014

MARYLAND HEALTH CARE

COMMISSION

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 18, 2014, 1

p.m.

Place: Maryland Health Care Commission,

4160 Patterson Ave., Conf. Rm. 100,

Baltimore, MD

Contact: Valerie Wooding (410) 764-3460

[14-24-11]

MARYLAND AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE FUND

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 18, 2014, 9

a.m. — 12 p.m.

Place: Gaylord National Resort and

Convention Center, 201 Waterfront St.,

National Harbor, MD

Contact: Susan Leese (410) 269-8626

[14-24-34]

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL

RESOURCES/FISHERIES SERVICE

Subject: Public Notice

Add'l. Info: Commercial Striped Bass

Common Pool Season Modification

The Secretary of Maryland Department of

Natural Resources, pursuant to COMAR

08.02.15.12H, announces the re-opening of

the 2014 commercial striped bass common

pool hook and line fishery on Tuesday,

November 11, 2014, one hour before

sunrise, with a catch limit of 450

lbs/permittee/week and 900 lbs/vessel/day.

The common pool fishery will close on

Thursday, November 13th, 2014, one hour

before sunset. A re-opening will be

announced by public notice.

Contact: Jacob Holtz (410) 260-8262

[14-24-41]

BOARD OF OCCUPATIONAL

THERAPY PRACTICE

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 19, 2014, 8:30

a.m. — 2 p.m.

Place: Spring Grove Hospital Center, 55

Wade Ave., Catonsville, MD

Add'l. Info: Health Occupations Article,

Title 10, Annotated Code of Maryland, and

COMAR 10.46 amendments, additions,

and revisions, including fee changes, may

be discussed/voted on. Budget information

may also be discussed. It may be necessary

to go into executive session. Sign language

interpreters and/or appropriate

accommodations for qualified individuals

with disabilities will be provided upon

request. Please call 1 (800) 735-2255.

Contact: Marilyn Pinkney (410) 402-8556

[14-24-02]

BOARD OF PLUMBING

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 18, 2014, 10

a.m. — 12:30 p.m.

Place: 500 North Calvert St., Rm. 302,

Baltimore, MD

Contact: Robin Bailey (410) 230-6160

[14-24-18]

BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICAL

EXAMINERS

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 11, 2014, 1

p.m.

Place: 4201 Patterson Ave., Rm. 110,

Baltimore, MD

Contact: Sheri Henderson (410) 764-4785

[14-24-15]

BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICAL

EXAMINERS

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: January 8, 2015, 1 p.m.

Place: 4201 Patterson Ave., Rm. 110,

Baltimore, MD

Contact: Sheri Henderson (410) 764-4785

[14-24-16]

BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICAL

EXAMINERS

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: February 12, 2015, 1 p.m.

Place: 4201 Patterson Ave., Rm. 110,

Baltimore, MD

Contact: Sheri Henderson (410) 764-4785

[14-24-17]

STATE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON

QUALITY CARE AT THE END OF

LIFE

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: January 16, 2015, 10 a.m.

— 12 p.m.

Place: Department of Aging, 301 W.

Preston St., Rm. 1007, Baltimore, MD

Contact: Paul Ballard (410) 767-6918

[14-24-25]

RACING COMMISSION

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 16, 2014, 12:30

— 1 p.m.

Place: Laurel Park, Laurel, MD

Contact: J. Michael Hopkins (410) 296-

2682

[14-24-06]

REAL ESTATE COMMISSION

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 17, 2014, 10:30

a.m.

Place: Dept. of Labor, Licensing, and

Regulation, 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl.,

Baltimore, MD

Contact: Charlene Faison (410) 230-6199

[14-24-19]

REAL ESTATE COMMISSION

Subject: Public Hearing

Date and Time: December 17, 2014, 12:30

p.m.

Place: Dept. of Labor, Licensing, and

Regulation, 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl.,

Baltimore, MD

Contact: Charlene Faison (410) 230-6199

[14-24-20]

BOARD OF REVENUE ESTIMATES

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: December 15, 2014, 3 —

4 p.m.

Place: Louis L. Goldstein Treasury Bldg.,

Comptroller of Maryland, Annapolis, MD

Add'l. Info: Board of Revenue Estimates

Board Report Meeting

Contact: Kynara Fogan (410) 260-7450

[14-24-44]

NORTHEAST MARYLAND WASTE

DISPOSAL AUTHORITY

Subject: Public Meetings Notice Procedure

Add'l. Info: The Authority gives notice of

meetings by posting a notice on its website

under the section entitled "Press

Releases/Notices" and at the entrance of its

offices. Notice is hereby given that the

Authority's website address is nmwda.org;

its offices are located at Tower II, Suite

402, 100 S. Charles Street, Baltimore,

Maryland 21201. Notice is also hereby

given that portions of Authority meetings

may be held in closed session.

Contact: M. Catherine Coble (410) 333-

2730

[14-24-28]

BOARD OF WATERWORKS AND

WASTE SYSTEMS OPERATORS

Subject: Public Meeting

Date and Time: January 15, 2015, 10 a.m.

— 4 p.m.

Place: Howard Co. Bureau of Utilities,

8270 Old Montgomery Rd., Columbia, MD

Add'l. Info: A portion of this meeting may

be held in closed session.

Contact: Pat Kratochvil (410) 537-3167

[14-24-29]

Updated on 9-5-2014

COMAR IN PDF — ORDER FORM Titles Agency Name Price1 Subscription2 Quantity Total

Complete set of COMAR PDF format $1,000 $500 _____ _____

Title 01 Executive Department $35 $24 _____ _____

Title 02 Office of the Attorney General $22 $13 _____ _____

Title 03 Comptroller of the Treasury $30 $20 _____ _____

Title 04 General Services $16 $10 _____ _____

Title 05 Housing and Community Development $78 $50 _____ _____

Title 07 Human Resources $80 $53 _____ _____

Title 08 Natural Resources $78 $51 _____ _____

Title 09 Labor, Licensing and Regulation $89 $60 _____ _____

Title 10 Health & Mental Hygiene (All parts) ** $272 $180 _____ _____

Title 10 Part 1 ** $48 $32 _____ _____

Title 10 Part 2 ** $75 $50 _____ _____

Title 10 Part 3 ** $75 $50 _____ _____

Title 10 Part 4 ** $50 $35 _____ _____

Title 10 Part 5 ** $69 $50 _____ _____

Title 11 Transportation (All parts) ** $106 $75 _____ _____

Title 11 Part 1 (Transportation) ** $42 $25 _____ _____

Title 11 Parts 2 & 3 (MVA)** $74 $50 _____ _____

Title 12 Public Safety and Correctional Services $67 $43 _____ _____

Title 13A Board of Education $63 $42 _____ _____

Title 13B Higher Education Commission $25 $15 _____ _____

Title 14 Independent Agencies $80 $53 _____ _____

Title 15 Agriculture $48 $30 _____ _____

Title 16 Juvenile Service $23 $15 _____ _____

Title 17 Budget and Management $28 $16 _____ _____

Title 18 Assessments and Taxation $20 $12 _____ _____

Title 19A State Ethics Commission $24 $14 _____ _____

Title 20 Public Service Commission $49 $32 _____ _____

Title 21 State Procurement Regulations $48 $30 _____ _____

Title 22 State Retirement and Pension System $22 $13 _____ _____

Title 23 Board of Public Works $18 $11 _____ _____

Title 24 Business and Economic Development $34 $20 _____ _____

Title 25 State Treasurer $16 $9 _____ _____

Title 26 Environment (All parts) ** $189 $125 _____ _____

Title 26 Part 1 ** $54 $35 _____ _____

Title 26 Part 2 ** $83 $52 _____ _____

Title 26 Part 3 ** $57 $38 _____ _____

Title 26 Part 4 ** $37 $24 _____ _____

Title 27 Critical Area Comm. for the Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays $18 $10 _____ _____

Title 28 Office of Administrative Hearings $16 $9 _____ _____

Title 29 State Police $30 $18 _____ _____

Title 30 MD Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems $25 $17 _____ _____

Title 31 Maryland Insurance Administration $68 $45 _____ _____

Title 32 Aging $25 $15 _____ _____

Title 33 State Board of Elections $42 $25 _____ _____

Title 34 Planning $31 $18 _____ _____

Title 35 Veterans Affairs $16 $9 _____ _____

Title 36 Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Agency - Pending $48 $30 _____ _____

Individual Binders (COMAR PDF’s binders not included) $15 S & H $9.00 _____ _____

Total: _____

Prices are for single user license only ~ Multi-user licenses are available. Please call 410-260-3876 for pricing information. 1 Price is per copy of each Title

2 Annual Subscription (optional) - Receive updated information quarterly. ~ If ordered, subscription quantities MUST match Title

quantities.

** See the following pages for description of contents

Updated on 9-5-2014

COMAR IN PRINT — ORDER FORM (8 ½ x 11 format) Titles Agency Name Price1 Subscription2 Quantity Total

Complete set of COMAR (includes binders) $1,425 $700 _____ _____

Title 01 Executive Department $47 $30 _____ _____

Title 02 Office of the Attorney General $31 $20 _____ _____

Title 03 Comptroller of the Treasury $41 $25 _____ _____

Title 04 General Services $23 $12 _____ _____

Title 05 Housing and Community Development $103 $70 _____ _____

Title 07 Human Resources $104 $70 _____ _____

Title 08 Natural Resources $102 $70 _____ _____

Title 09 Labor, Licensing and Regulation $116 $75 _____ _____

Title 10 Health & Mental Hygiene (All Parts)** $350 $230 _____ _____

Title 10 Part 1 ** $65 $40 _____ _____

Title 10 Part 2 ** $99 $70 _____ _____

Title 10 Part 3 ** $99 $70 _____ _____

Title 10 Part 4 ** $69 $42 _____ _____

Title 10 Part 5 ** $91 $62 _____ _____

Title 11 Transportation (All parts) ** $137 $85 _____ _____

Title 11 Part 1 (Transportation)** $55 $35 _____ _____

Title 11 Parts 2 & 3 (MVA) ** $102 $70 _____ _____

Title 12 Public Safety and Correctional Services $86 $55 _____ _____

Title 13A Board of Education $83 $60 _____ _____

Title 13B Higher Education Commission $34 $20 _____ _____

Title 14 Independent Agencies $103 $70 _____ _____

Title 15 Agriculture $63 $40 _____ _____

Title 16 Juvenile Service $32 $20 _____ _____

Title 17 Budget and Management $38 $25 _____ _____

Title 18 Assessments and Taxation $28 $18 _____ _____

Title 19A State Ethics Commission $33 $20 _____ _____

Title 20 Public Service Commission $64 $42 _____ _____

Title 21 State Procurement Regulations $65 $42 _____ _____

Title 22 State Retirement and Pension System $33 $18 _____ _____

Title 23 Board of Public Works $26 $15 _____ _____

Title 24 Business and Economic Development $47 $25 _____ _____

Title 25 State Treasurer $23 $12 _____ _____

Title 26 Environment (All parts) ** $241 $160 _____ _____

Title 26 Part 1 ** $72 $42 _____ _____

Title 26 Part 2 ** $109 $72 _____ _____

Title 26 Part 3 ** $76 $50 _____ _____

Title 26 Part 4 ** $51 $30 _____ _____

Title 27 Critical Area Comm. for the Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays $26 $15 _____ _____

Title 28 Office of Administrative Hearings $23 $12 _____ _____

Title 29 State Police $40 $22 _____ _____

Title 30 MD Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems $34 $20 _____ _____

Title 31 Maryland Insurance Administration $90 $62 _____ _____

Title 32 Aging $34 $18 _____ _____

Title 33 State Board of Elections $57 $35 _____ _____

Title 34 Planning $42 $25 _____ _____

Title 35 Veterans Affairs $23 $12 _____ _____

Title 36 Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Agency - Pending $65 $43 _____ _____

Binders $15 S & H $9.00 _____ _____

Shipping & Handling Total: _________ Order Total: _____ 1 Price is per copy of each Title Binder included with purchase of Title

2 Annual Subscription (optional) - Receive updated information bi-annually ~ If ordered, subscription quantities MUST match Title quantities.

** See the following pages for description of contents

Note: COMAR prices are subject to change. Check

the date on the lower right hand corner of this form.

If the form is more than two months old, call the

COMAR Subscription Manager (410-260-3876) to

confirm prices. Fees are not refundable.

Shipping/Handling Publication Total Shipping

$ 0-50 $15

$ 51-150 $20

$ 151-300 $25

$ 301-400 $35

$400 + please call Subscription Department.

State agencies using courier, may omit S&H

Updated on 9-5-2014

COMAR ORDER INFORMATION SHEET

Date ____________________________ Subscriber I.D. _____________________________

Name________________________________________________________________________

Company_____________________________________________________________________

Address______________________________________________________________________

City______________________________State____________Zip_________________________

Tel.___________________________________ Fax___________________________________

Email: _______________________________________________________________________

_______ Check enclosed, made payable to “Division of State Documents”

_______ Visa/Master Card/American Express/Discover card payment:

Acct.#_______________________________________________________ Exp.____________

Signature ________________________________________Tel:_____________________________

Return form & payment to: Office of the Secretary of State, Division of State Documents ~

State House ~ Annapolis, MD 21401 ~ Tel: 410-260-3876 ~ 800-633-9657 ext. 3876 ~ Fax: 410-280-5647

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS Publication / Handbook Print

Price S & H Quantity Total

Control of Ionizing Radiation (including supplements up to 24) $163 $12 _____ _____

Control of Ionizing Radiation Supplement 23 ONLY $17 $0 _____ _____

Control of Ionizing Radiation Supplement 24 ONLY $15 $0 _____ _____

Forest Conservation Law $20 $9 _____ _____

Forest Conservation Technical Manual 3rd

Edition, 1997 $25 $9 _____ _____

Preventive Maintenance Handbook (PM Handbook) (grey cover) $15 $5 _____ _____

Vehicle Inspection Handbook (Feb 2012) $48 $9 _____ _____

Total _____

If more than one quantity, shipping charges may vary, please call 410-260-3876 for pricing information.

SUPPLEMENT UPDATE SCHEDULES PDF QUARTERLY UPDATES PRINT SEMI-ANNUAL UPDATES

After March 30th After June 30

th

After June 30th After December 31

st

After September 30th

After December 31st

PDF – A replacement title(s) in its entirety will be sent in electronic format.

PRINT – Entire chapters affected will be sent for replacement and insertion into COMAR title book(s).

Maryland Register Archive Order Form

The Division of State Documents has created pdf files of all the Maryland Register issues since 1974. The issues from 1974—2003 are scanned images in pdf format of the actual Register and, as such, are not searchable, while the issues beginning with 2004 are searchable text in pdf format.

Single issues of the Maryland Register from 1974—present

_____ $10 Per issue of the Register from 1974—present via emailed pdf file. Please specify Issue(s): _______________________________________ _____ $15 Per issue of the Maryland Register from 1974—present via mailed hard-copy Please specify Issue(s): _______________________________________ An archival library of all Maryland Register issues from 1974—2013: _____ $375 2 DVDs (1974 — 2013) _____ $50 One year of the Maryland Register from 1974—2003 (unsearchable):

Please specify Year(s): ______________________________ _____ $100 A single year of issues from 2004 forward will be available in January of the

year following their publication. These will be searchable, on CD. Please specify: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Note: All products purchased are for individual use only. Resale or other compensated transfer of the information in printed or electronic form is a prohibited commercial purpose (see State Government Article, §7-206.2, Annotated Code of Maryland).

By purchasing a product, the buyer agrees that the purchase is for individual use only and will not sell or give the product to another individual or entity.

Please order by faxing the completed form to: Fax: 410-280-5647

By mailing it to: Division of State Documents State House Annapolis, MD 21401 By email to:

[email protected] By calling: 410-260-3876

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Business/Firm: ___________________________________________

Name: __________________________________________________

Billing Address: __________________________________________

_______________________________________________________

City, State, Zip ___________________________________________

Tel: _______________________Fax:_________________________

Recipient’s Email:_________________________________________

1/2014

(Please circle payment choice and complete the order form)

Money Order or Check # ____________ Amount: $___________ or

VISA, MasterCard, American Express, Discover ~ Amount: $______________

Card # ______________________________________________________ Card Exp. Date: ____________

Signature: __________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Date: ________________________ Subscriber Id.# ______________

2013

Maryland Register

Print and E-Version Order Form

The Maryland Register is a biweekly publication containing proposed, emergency, and final

administrative regulations as well as other State government information. The Register serves as

the temporary supplement to the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR). Any change to the text

of regulations published in COMAR, whether by adoption, amendment, repeal, or emergency

action, must first be published in the Register.

See separate Order Form for the Maryland Register Archive Issues from 1974 — 2013.

_____ $225 A single year of print 1st Class Mail Delivery.

_____ $190 A single-user annual eSubscription, which would provide a searchable pdf text

file of each issue, emailed directly to one recipient’s email address.

_____ $130 Per additional user, per account subscription. Call 410-260-3876 for details.

Note: All products purchased are for individual use only. Resale or other compensated transfer of the information in printed or electronic form is a prohibited commercial purpose (see State Government Article, §7-206.2, Annotated Code of Maryland).

By purchasing a product, the buyer agrees that the purchase is for individual use only and will not sell or give the product to another individual or entity.

Please order by faxing the

completed form to:

Fax: 410-280-5647

By mailing it to:

Division of State Documents

State House

Annapolis, MD 21401

By email to:

[email protected]

By calling: 410-260-3876

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Business/Firm: ___________________________________________

Name: __________________________________________________

Billing Address: __________________________________________

_______________________________________________________

City, State, Zip ___________________________________________

Tel: _______________________Fax:_________________________

Recipient’s Email:_________________________________________

Last updated on 1/2013

(Please circle payment choice and complete the order form)

Money Order or Check # ____________ Amount: $___________ or

VISA, MasterCard, American Express, Discover ~ Amount: $______________

Card # ______________________________________________________ Card Exp. Date: ____________

Signature: __________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Date: ________________________

Subscriber Id.# ______________

Fees are not refundable.

Date: ______________

DHMH Pamphlets ORDER FORM Name: _________________________________________________________________________________

Firm Name: _____________________________________________________________________________

Address: __________________________________________________ P. O. Box: __________________

City: _____________________________________ State: ________ Zip Code: ___________________

Phone: ____________________________________ Fax: ________________________________________

Email: _________________________________________________________________________________

Codification # Pamphlet Title Price / # COMAR 10.05 Freestanding Ambulatory Care Facilities — August 2013 ...................................... * $10 × ____

COMAR 10.07.01 Acute General Hospitals and Special Hospitals — Nov 2014 .................................... $10 × ____

COMAR 10.07.02 Comprehensive Care Facilities and Extended Care Facilities — May 2014 ............... $15 × ____

COMAR 10.07.03 Nursing Staff Agencies — Feb 2008 ........................................................................... $ 9 × ____

COMAR 10.07.05 Residential Service Agencies — June 2014 ................................................................ $11 × ____

COMAR 10.07.06 Hospital Patient Safety Program — Apr 2004 ............................................................ $ 8 × ____

COMAR 10.07.07 Nursing Referral Service Agencies — Dec 2006 ........................................................ $ 8 × ____

COMAR 10.07.09 Residents’ Bill of Rights: Comprehensive Care Facilities

and Extended Care Facilities — Mar 2010 ........................................................... $ 9 × ____

COMAR 10.07.10 Home Health Agencies — Aug 2002 .......................................................................... $ 8 × ____

COMAR 10.07.11 Health Maintenance Organizations — Aug 2010 ........................................................ $10 × ____

COMAR 10.07.14 Assisted Living Programs — August 2013 ................................................................. $15 × ____

COMAR 10.07.21 Hospice Care Programs — Sep 1998 .......................................................................... $ 9 × ____

COMAR 10.10 Laboratory Regulations — June 2013 ......................................................................... $15 × ____

COMAR 10.12.04 Day Care for the Elderly and Adults with a Medical Disability — Jan 2014 ............. $ 9 × ____

COMAR 10.15.03 Food Service Facilities — May 2014 .......................................................................... $15 × ____

COMAR 10.21 Mental Hygiene Regulations — May 2014 ................................................................. $27 × ____

COMAR 10.22 Developmental Disabilities — May 2014 ................................................................... $20 × ____

COMAR 10.47 Alcohol And Drug Abuse Administration — May 2014 ............................................ $15 × ____

COMAR 10.51 Forensic Laboratories — May 2014 ............................................................................ $15 × ____

TOTAL: $__________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Payment Method, _____ Check enclosed, made payable to: “The Division of State Documents”

Choose/Check one: _____ VISA / Master Card / American Express / Discover card payment:

Acct.# _______________________________________________________ Exp. Date: _____________

Signature: ______________________________________________ Tel: _________________________

Return form and payment to: Office of the Secretary of State

Division of State Documents ~ State House ~ Annapolis, MD 21401

Tel: 410-260-3876 ~ 800-633-9657 ~ Fax: 410-280-5647

Note: COMAR prices change frequently. Check the date

on the lower right hand corner of this form. If the form is

more than 2 months old, call the Subscription Manager

(410-260-3876) to confirm prices.

11/2014

* Price of pamphlets includes shipping.


Recommended