+ All Categories
Home > Documents > In vitro development of reconstructed ibex (Capra ibex) embryos by nuclear transfer using goat...

In vitro development of reconstructed ibex (Capra ibex) embryos by nuclear transfer using goat...

Date post: 12-Sep-2016
Category:
Upload: liang-wang
View: 218 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
7
Small Ruminant Research 73 (2007) 135–141 In vitro development of reconstructed ibex (Capra ibex) embryos by nuclear transfer using goat (Capra hircus) oocytes Liang Wang a,c,d , Tao Peng b , Hai Zhu b , Zili Lv b , Tingting Liu b , Zhiqiang Shuai b , Hong Gao b , Tao Cai b , Xu Cao b , Hanqing Wang a,a Key Laboratory for Nature Medicine of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianshui Road 342#, Lanzhou 730000, China b Xinjiang Goldcattle Bio. Inc., Xiaoyun Road 15#, Economic & Technology Development Zone, Urumqi 830026, Xinjiang, China c Xinjiang Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing South Road 40#, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, China d Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuquan Road 19A, Beijing 100039, China Received 11 July 2006; received in revised form 20 December 2006; accepted 21 December 2006 Available online 9 February 2007 Abstract The ibex (Capra ibex) is currently listed as a priority protected animal by the Chinese government. Due to the limited availability of ibex oocytes, the objective of this study was to explore the feasibility of using domestic goat (Capra hircus) cytoplasts to reprogram nuclei from ibex donor fibroblasts in interspecies nuclear transfer (iSCNT). An effort was thus made to produce ibex embryos via iSCNT. The trial was performed using three treatment groups. The embryo cleavage rates on day 3 of in vitro culture and the blastocyst development rates on day 7 were recorded. In Treatment A, the female ibex fibroblasts were used as donor cells and of the fused cell-cytoplast couplets, 68% cleaved and 11% reached the blastocyst stage. In Treatment B, domestic adult dairy doe fibroblasts were used as donor cells and as comparison of homologous nuclear transfer (NT). Of fused cell-cytoplast couplets, 76% cleaved and 31% reached the blastocyst stage. In Treatment C, the development of parthenogenetic goat oocytes was used as the control and 90% of the embryos cleaved and 43% reached the blastocyst stage. No significant difference was found between treatment groups A and B in embryo cleavage rate, but a significant difference (P < 0.01) was recorded between treatment groups A and B in the blastocyst production rate. There was a significant difference (P < 0.01) between Treatment C and Treatment A/B in embryo cleavage rate and blastocyst production rate. The results indicated that although both cleavage rate (68%) and blastocyst yield (11%) of iSCNT embryos derived from female ibex fibroblasts (Treatment A) were lower than those of nuclear transfer embryos (Treatment B) and parthenogenetic development embryos (Treatment C). The domestic goat (C. hircus) cytoplasts supported the mitotic cleavage of ibex karyoplasts and were capable of reprogramming the nucleus to achieve a blastocyst stage embryo in exotic Capra which has the potential of alleviating species on the endangered list. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Ibex; Interspecies; Nuclear transfer; Embryo Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 991 3750767; fax: +86 991 3716067. E-mail address: [email protected] (H. Wang). 1. Introduction The ibex is a member of the genus Capra, a wild mountain goat with large recurved horns. In China, it is only found in the four provinces Xinjiang, Gansu, Nimengu and Qinhai—the total population being less 0921-4488/$ – see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.12.009
Transcript

A

oreaad7ttAe((mC©

K

f

0

Small Ruminant Research 73 (2007) 135–141

In vitro development of reconstructed ibex (Capra ibex) embryosby nuclear transfer using goat (Capra hircus) oocytes

Liang Wang a,c,d, Tao Peng b, Hai Zhu b, Zili Lv b, Tingting Liu b,Zhiqiang Shuai b, Hong Gao b, Tao Cai b, Xu Cao b, Hanqing Wang a,∗

a Key Laboratory for Nature Medicine of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianshui Road 342#, Lanzhou 730000, China

b Xinjiang Goldcattle Bio. Inc., Xiaoyun Road 15#, Economic & Technology Development Zone, Urumqi 830026, Xinjiang, Chinac Xinjiang Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing South Road 40#, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, China

d Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuquan Road 19A, Beijing 100039, China

Received 11 July 2006; received in revised form 20 December 2006; accepted 21 December 2006Available online 9 February 2007

bstract

The ibex (Capra ibex) is currently listed as a priority protected animal by the Chinese government. Due to the limited availabilityf ibex oocytes, the objective of this study was to explore the feasibility of using domestic goat (Capra hircus) cytoplasts toeprogram nuclei from ibex donor fibroblasts in interspecies nuclear transfer (iSCNT). An effort was thus made to produce ibexmbryos via iSCNT. The trial was performed using three treatment groups. The embryo cleavage rates on day 3 of in vitro culturend the blastocyst development rates on day 7 were recorded. In Treatment A, the female ibex fibroblasts were used as donor cellsnd of the fused cell-cytoplast couplets, 68% cleaved and 11% reached the blastocyst stage. In Treatment B, domestic adult dairyoe fibroblasts were used as donor cells and as comparison of homologous nuclear transfer (NT). Of fused cell-cytoplast couplets,6% cleaved and 31% reached the blastocyst stage. In Treatment C, the development of parthenogenetic goat oocytes was used ashe control and 90% of the embryos cleaved and 43% reached the blastocyst stage. No significant difference was found betweenreatment groups A and B in embryo cleavage rate, but a significant difference (P < 0.01) was recorded between treatment groups

and B in the blastocyst production rate. There was a significant difference (P < 0.01) between Treatment C and Treatment A/B inmbryo cleavage rate and blastocyst production rate. The results indicated that although both cleavage rate (68%) and blastocyst yield11%) of iSCNT embryos derived from female ibex fibroblasts (Treatment A) were lower than those of nuclear transfer embryos

Treatment B) and parthenogenetic development embryos (Treatment C). The domestic goat (C. hircus) cytoplasts supported theitotic cleavage of ibex karyoplasts and were capable of reprogramming the nucleus to achieve a blastocyst stage embryo in exoticapra which has the potential of alleviating species on the endangered list.2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

eywords: Ibex; Interspecies; Nuclear transfer; Embryo

d

∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 991 3750767;ax: +86 991 3716067.

E-mail address: [email protected] (H. Wang).

921-4488/$ – see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.oi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.12.009

1. Introduction

The ibex is a member of the genus Capra, a wildmountain goat with large recurved horns. In China, itis only found in the four provinces Xinjiang, Gansu,Nimengu and Qinhai—the total population being less

nant Re

136 L. Wang et al. / Small Rumi

than 40,000 animals. Although the ibex is not listed inthe endangered categories of the IUCN 2004 Red List forThreatened Species, in 1988 it was listed as a first-classprotected animal by the Chinese government. Today,because of hunting and habitat degradation, the ibex’ssurvival is seriously threatened. They are now few andfacing extinction (China Species Information System,2005).

The loss of biodiversity in animals due to extinc-tion is receiving increasing attention in many countries(Corley-Smith and Brandhorst, 1999; Holt et al., 2004).Advanced reproductive technologies such as the cryop-reservation of gametes/embryos, in vitro fertilization,artificial insemination, embryo transfer and somatic cellnuclear transfer (NT) are being applied in attemptsto conserve and manage endangered species. Due tothe lack of oocytes and surrogate animals, interspeciesomatic cell nuclear transfer (iSCNT) is being exten-sively applied in reconstructed embryo research (Lanzaet al., 2000; Jiang et al., 2005). Investigations have beenaimed at determining whether oocytes from domesticspecies can support embryonic and fetal development,regulated by a somatic nucleus derived from differentspecie (Dominko et al., 1999).

Recently, studies have shown that oocyte cytoplastsfrom cattle and sheep support the reprogramming ofsomatic cell nuclei from other species (Dominko et al.,1999; White et al., 1999; Bui et al., 2002; Li et al., 2002;Lee et al., 2003; Sansinena et al., 2003, 2005). With theaid of iSCNT a live mouflon offspring has been producedusing enucleated domestic sheep (Ovis aries) oocytes ascytoplasts and granulosa cells collected from a mouflon(Ovis orientalis musimon) as donor (Loi et al., 2001).

The objective of the present study was to explorethe feasibility of using the domestic goat (Capra hir-cus) cytoplast to reprogram the nuclei from ibex donorfibroblasts in an effort to produce ibex embryos follow-ing iSCNT.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Preparation of ibex and domestic goat donorfibroblasts

Adult fibroblasts were isolated from skin samplestaken from the ear of a 3-year-old ibex (52 kg BW,Urumqi Zoo, Urumuqi, Xinjiang, China) and a 3-year-old domestic dairy goat (57 kg BW). Primary cultures

were obtained by mincing the dermal tissue into smallcubes of 0.5–1 mm3 using a sterile curved scissors in apetri dish (Becton Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ, USA).The culture medium consisted of DMEM/F12 (Gibco,

search 73 (2007) 135–141

Grand Island, NY, USA), with 20% fetal bovine serum(FBS, Gbico) and 100 IU/ml penicillin-streptomycin(P/S, SIGMA, St. Louis, MO, USA). Prior to culture, thetissue cubes were washed by centrifuging in the culturemedium, the supernatant was discarded and fresh cul-ture medium was added to the tubes. This process wasrepeated three times, after which the tissue cubes weretransferred to a filter cap tissue culture flask (25 cm2)(Nalge Nunc, USA) and 3 ml fresh culture medium wasadded. All cultures were incubated at 38.5 ◦C using 5%CO2 in a humidified atmosphere.

After developing fibroblasts were observed (3–5days) around the cubes, half of the culture mediumwas replaced with fresh medium. The medium was thenreplaced every 2 days until a fibroblast cell layer hadbeen established (7–10 days). The confluent cells weretrypsinized (Gibco), counted in a hemocytometer, andre-seeded at a density of 100,000 cells, in a filter captissue culture flask (25 cm2). After two sub-cultures,cultured cells were exposed to a cryoprotectant solu-tion consisting of DMEM/F-12, 20% (v/v) FBS, 10%(v/v) dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma) and frozenin aliquots of approximately 1,000,000 cells/ml of cry-oprotectant in CryoTubesTM (Nunc, Fisher ScientificPittsburgh, PA, USA). To prepare the adult fibroblastsas donors for NT, the cells were thawed and cultured.

2.2. Preparation of recipient cytoplasts

Fresh domestic goat oocytes were collected froman abattoir (Urumqi, Xinjiang, China) and oocytessurrounded by at least three layers of granulosa cellswere selected for in vitro maturation (IVM) culture.Maturation medium (TCM-199, Gibco) was enrichedwith 10% FBS, 5 �g/ml FSH (Sigma), 5 �g/ml LH(Sigma), 1 �g/ml E2 (Sigma), 0.3 mM sodium pyruvate(Sigma), 100 �M cysteamine (Sigma) and 100 IU/mlP/S. IVM was carried out in a humidified atmosphereof 5% CO2 at 39 ◦C for 24 h. After 21–22 h of in vitromaturation, the cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs)from domestic goats were treated for 3–5 min in TCMcontaining 0.3–0.5 mg/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma),followed by gentle pipetting to remove the cumuluscells. Mature, metaphase-II oocytes were selected,based on the visualization of a first polar body, andrandomly assigned to three treatment groups. TreatmentA consisted of enucleation and reconstruction withadult ibex fibroblasts (Fig. 1), Treatment C was a

control for pathogenic division, while Treatment B wasa comparison of the homologous NT.

After incubation with 10 �g/ml Hoechst 33342 for15 min at 38.5 ◦C for staining the metaphase plate, the

L. Wang et al. / Small Ruminant Re

ocamvaanmk1fi

2

a

Fi

Fig. 1. Adult ibex fibroblasts used in the experiment.

ocytes in M2 medium (Sigma) containing 7.5 �g/mlytochalasin B (Sigma) at 35 ◦C were manipulated usingn inverted microscope (Nikon) fitted with a Narishigeicromanipulation station. The metaphase plate was

isualized under a short UV light exposure (3–5 s),nd the metaphase spindle and polar body with a smallmount of surrounding cytoplasm was removed byegative pressure applied to a beveled 15 �m diametericropipette (Fig. 2). Once enucleated, cytoplasts were

ept in modified TCM (TCM-199 supplemented with0% FBS and 100 IU/ml P/S) and allowed to recoverrom the cytochalasin B treatment for 30 min in thencubator.

.3. Nuclear transfer

In Treatments A and B the donor cells from ibexnd domestic adult dairy goat were third generation

ig. 2. Goat oocytes derived from abattoir enucleated during the exper-ment.

search 73 (2007) 135–141 137

fibroblasts. Donor cells were starved (0.5% FBS) for3–5 days to induce quiescence, prior to NT procedures(Campbell et al., 1996a,b). Reconstruction was per-formed in groups of 20 cytoplasts in a 100 �l dropletof M2 medium containing 7.5 �g/ml cytochalasin B. Asingle adult ibex fibroblast (Treatment A) or a singleadult dairy goat fibroblast (Treatment B) was insertedinto the perivitelline space of an enucleated oocyte.Fusion of karyoplast–cytoplast couplets was carried outin a Voltain Model EP-1 Cell fusion/Activation Sys-tem (Cryologic, Australia). Couplets were manuallyaligned between the electrodes of a 0.5 mm gap fusionchamber overlaid with fusion buffer (0.28 M mannitol,0.5 mM MgSO4·7H2O, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM HEPESand 1 mg/ml of BSA (Fraction V, Sigma)). The coupletswere then electrofused by two consecutive DC pulses(1.4 kV/cm for 20 �s).

Couplets were microscopically evaluated for fusionafter 0.5 h. The fused couplets were collected. Theoocytes that were randomly allocated to the partheno-genetic activation treatment group (Treatment C) wereplaced in the fusion chamber and pulsed twice(1.4 kV/cm for 20 �s) to initiate activation. The embryosfrom the treatment groups A and B were reprogrammedin IVM medium in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2at 38.5 ◦C for 4 h.

2.4. Chemical activation of reconstructed embryos

After the 4 h reprogramming of the embryos for Treat-ments A and B in IVM medium, chemical activation ofall treatment groups was performed by incubation in IVCmedium (Choi et al., 2002) of 7% (v/v) ethanol for 7 minat room temperature (IVC medium: SOF medium sup-plemented with 2% (v/v) basal medium Eagle (BME)essential amino acids (Sigma), 1% (v/v) minimum essen-tial medium (MEM) nonessential amino acids, 1 mMglutamine, 6 mg/ml BSA (fatty acids free) and 0.5 mg/mlmyoinositol), followed by 2.5–4 h of culture in IVCmedium containing 2 mM 6-dimethylaminoputine (6-DMAP).

2.5. In vitro culture of reconstructed embryos

The activated embryos were cultured in 500 �l IVCmedium, overlaid with 500 �l mineral oil (Sigma,embryo tested) at 38.5 ◦C and a 5% CO2, 5% O2 and90% N humidified atmosphere. Embryos were evalu-

2ated for cleavage after 3 days of culture and the mediumwas replaced every 2 days. After 2 days of culture thecleavage embryos were transferred and cultured in SOFmedium supplemented with 2% (v/v) BME essential

138 L. Wang et al. / Small Ruminant Re

Fig. 3. Interspecies NT ibex blastocysts.

amino acids, 1% (v/v) MEM non-essential amino acids,1 mM glutamine, 6 mg/ml BSA (fatty acids free) and 5%FBS. Blastocysts from all three treatment groups (Fig. 3)were selected after 7 days in culture (fusion = day 0) andthe data were statistically analyzed.

2.6. Statistical analysis

The proportion of oocytes undergoing cleavage(cleavage rate after 3 days of culture) and developingto blastocysts after 7 days of culture in each treatmentgroup were compared using Chi-square analysis. Proba-bility values <0.05 were considered as being statisticallysignificant (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1992).

3. Results

The development of interspecies embryos recon-structed with female ibex fibroblasts (Treatment A),NT embryos reconstructed with domestic adult dairygoat fibroblasts (Treatment B), and the parthenogenet-

Table 1Development of interspecies NT embryos reconstructed with female adult ibgoat fibroblasts and the parthenogenic controls

Treatment group(fibroblasts)

No. of MII1

(oocytes)No. (%)(enucleated)

No. ((reco

A (ibex fibroblasts) 861 832 (97) 790 (B (goat fibroblasts) 205 193 (94) 185(9C (parthenogenic) 190 – –

Values with different superscripts (a and b) differ significantly (P < 0.05). Val1 MII = metaphase-II spindle.

search 73 (2007) 135–141

ically activated oocytes (Treatment C) are summarizedin Table 1. The percentage of oocytes cleaved anddeveloping to blastocysts in Treatment C (control) wassignificantly higher than those of embryos reconstructedin Treatments A and B (P < 0.01). Out of a total of190 parthenogenetically activated oocytes, 90% of theembryos cleaved within 72 h and 43% reached the blas-tocyst stage by 168 h of IVC. In Treatment A, 832oocytes were enucleated of which 95% were successfullyreconstructed and 86% subsequently fused followingtwo electrical pulses. Of the fused couplets, 68% ofthe embryos cleaved within 72 h and 11% reached theblastocyst stage by 168 h of IVC. In Treantment B, 205oocytes were enucleated into cytoplasts, 96% of whichwere reconstructed and 81% subsequently fused follow-ing two electrical pulses. Of the fused couplets, 76% ofthe embryos cleaved within 72 h and 31% reached theblastocyst stage by 168 h of IVC. No significant differ-ence between treatment groups A and B was recordedregarding embryo cleavage rate (68% versus 76%), butthere was a significant difference (P < 0.01) in blastocystproduction rate (11% versus 31%).

4. Discussion

Interspecies nuclear transfer is a powerful tool for theprotection of endangered species from extinction, andsome exciting successes have been attained (Dominko etal., 1999; Lanza et al., 2000; Loi et al., 2001). However,a number of problems associated with this technol-ogy still remain and its efficiency until now is verylow—less than 1% of the cloned embryos develop intoviable offspring (Han et al., 2003). Most of the rea-sons for this extremely high failure rate are unknown.In nuclear transfer experiments, many factors may affectthe results—the donor cell being one of the most impor-

tant. Suitable donor cells must not only have healthycell membranes, but also good compatibility with therecipient oocytes. Some reports have shown that donorcells with high cell passage numbers result in lower

ex fibroblasts, NT embryos reconstructed with domestic adult dairy

%)nstructed)

No. (%)(fused)

No. (%)(cleaved)

No. (%)(blastocysts)

95) 678 (86) 461 (68)aA 76 (11)A

6) 150 (81) 114 (76)aA 46 (31)B

190 (100) 171 (90)B 82 (43)C

ues with different superscripts (A–C) differ significantly (P < 0.01).

nant Re

ftaetaiaclaaeecrtiote

wdbyifl(ta(becHwvS

ibetm(lagtD

L. Wang et al. / Small Rumi

usion rates and lower blastocyst development rates inhe reconstructed embryos (Wilmut et al., 1997; Kato etl., 1998; Hill et al., 2000; Roh et al., 2000; Bhuiyant al., 2004). The possible explanation is that long-erm in vitro culture alters the donor cell metabolismnd unbalanced regulation of imprinted genes may benduced, thus affecting nuclear remodeling (Walker etl., 1996). In fact, the donor cells of most successfullyloned animals come from early-passage G0/G1 fibrob-asts (Cibelli et al., 1998; Baguisi et al., 1999; Wells etl., 1999; Onishi et al., 2000). Contrary opinions havelso been expressed (Wakayama et al., 1999; Kubotat al., 2000). The key factor being whether the differ-ntiated nucleus of donor cells from different speciesan be reprogrammed successfully. Only the completeeprogramming of the nucleus can smoothly conducthe development of reconstructed embryos in vitro andn vivo, particularly when the species of donor kary-plasts and recipient cytoplasts are far apart in theiraxonomic classification (Dominko et al., 1999; Lanzat al., 2000).

In this study, the donor cells for the iSCNT and the NTere third generation fibroblasts. The iSCNT embryoserived from the ibex fibroblasts could develop to thelastocyst stage, but both cleavage rate and blastocystield of iSCNT embryos (68 and 11%) derived from thebex fibroblasts and NT embryos (76 and 31%) derivedrom the domestic goat fibroblasts were significantlyower than those of parthenogenetic developed embryos90 and 43%). This indicates incompatibilities betweenhe new components synthesized by the donor nucleusnd the components left over in the recipient cytoplasmDominko et al., 1999). In this case, the donor cells maye insufficiently reprogrammed in recipient oocytes (Lut al., 2005). Other possible reasons are that when enu-leation was performed by labeling the oocyte DNA withoechst 33342 (Smith, 1993). Cell membrane integrityas damaged and exposure to UV light decreased theiability of the reconstructed embryo (Yang et al., 1990;mith, 1993).

In interspecies cloned animals, the recipient oocytes another important factor, since the dominant distri-ution of mtDNA is from recipient oocytes (Steinbornt al., 2002; Takeda et al., 2003). To some extent,he reprogramming of the donor cell nucleus is deter-

ined by the cell cycle stage of the recipient cytoplasmDominko et al., 1999). Studies have indicated that fol-owing electrofusion, if the reconstructed embryos with

MII cytoplast and G0/G1 somatic nucleus are repro-

rammed in IVM medium for an extended period ofime, benefits later development (Wakayama et al., 1998;ominko et al., 1999). Similar results were obtained

search 73 (2007) 135–141 139

in this study. In normal embryos, the earliest stagesof embryogenesis are regulated by maternally inher-ited gene products stored within the oocyte cytoplasm.The progress in the development of embryogenesis isfinally determined by whether or not the embryonicgenes are activated at species-specific developmentalstages (Telford et al., 1990). The same events occur inIVC of iSCNT embryos. Thus whether the maternal-to-embryonic transition occurs smoothly in the recipientcytoplasm is determined by whether the differentiatednucleus of donor cells from different species can bereprogrammed successfully or not.

In comparison with the NT embryos derived fromdomestic goat fibroblasts, the iSCNT embryos derivedfrom ibex fibroblasts had a much lower blastocystrate (11% versus 31%). The ibex fibroblasts were lessefficient than the domestic goat fibroblasts in nucleartransfer embryo development. One reason may be thedifference in donor cell types as donor cells may differin their ability to reprogram recipient oocytes (Saikhunet al., 2002). The more distantly related the species, themore difficult is the maternal-to-embryonic transition(Wells et al., 1999). The nuclear–cytoplasmic interac-tion may be perturbed, leading to difficulty in activatingthe genes of the donor cell (Gurdon, 1986).

Interestingly, interspecies NT studies have madeimportant contributions in iSCNT embryo developmentand endangered animal clones and interspecies NT hasbeen reported live offspring in the gaur (Lanza et al.,2000) and the mouflon (Loi et al., 2001).

In the present study, iSCNT embryos derived fromibex fibroblasts reached the blastocyst stage of devel-opment and a blastocyst development rate of 11%was attained. This demonstrated that the domesticgoat cytoplast supported mitotic cleavage of the ibexkaryoplast and was capable of reprogramming thenucleus to achieve a blastocyst stage embryo in exoticCapra.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Urumqi Zoo, Xin-jiang, China for providing the adult Siberian ibex eartissue samples. This study was financially supported byXinjiang Goldcattle Bio. Inc.

References

Baguisi, A., Behboodi, E., Melican, D.T., Pollock, J.S., Destrempes,M.M., Cammuso, C., Williams, J.L., Nims, S.D., Porter, C.A.,Midura, P., Palacios, M.J., Ayres, S.L., Denniston, R.S., Hayes,M.L., Ziomek, C.A., Meade, H.M., Godke, R.A., Gavin, W.G.,

nant Re

140 L. Wang et al. / Small Rumi

Overstrom, E.W., Echelard, Y., 1999. Production of goats bysomatic cell nuclear transfer. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 456–461.

Bhuiyan, M.M.U., Cho, J., Jang, G., Park, E., Kang, S., Lee, B., Hwang,W., 2004. Effect transfection and passage number of ear fabrob-lasts on in vitro development of bovine transgenic nuclear transferembryos. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 66, 257–261.

Bui, L.C., Vignon, X., Campion, E., Laloy, E., Lavergne, y., Ty, L.V.,Nguyen, B.X., Renard, J.P., 2002. Use of interspecies nuclear trans-fer to study the early embryonic development and nuclear activitiesof the endangered species Pseudoryx nghetinhensis (Saola). The-riogenology 57, 427 (abstract).

Campbell, K.H.S., Loi, P., Otaegui, P.J., Wilmut, I., 1996a. Cell cycleco-ordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Rev. Reprod.1, 40–46.

Campbell, K.H.S., McWhir, J., Ritchie, W.A., Wilmut, I., 1996b. Sheepcloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380,64–66.

China Species Information System, 2005. www.chinabiodiversity.com.

Choi, Y.H., Lee, B.C., Lim, J.M., Kang, S.K., Hwang, W.S., 2002.Optimization of culture medium for cloned bovine embryos andits influence on pregnancy and delivery outcome. Theriogenology58, 1187–1197.

Cibelli, J.B., Stice, S.L., Golueke, P.J., Kane, J.J., Jerry, J., Blackwell,C., Abel Ponce de Leon, F., Robl, J.M., 1998. Cloned transgeniccalves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts. Science 280,1256–1258.

Corley-Smith, G.E., Brandhorst, B.P., 1999. Preservation of endan-gered species and populations: a role for genome banking, somaticcell cloning and androgenesis? Mol. Reprod. Dev. 53, 363–367.

Dominko, T., Mitalipova, M., Haley, B., Beyhan, Z., Memili, E.,McKusick, B., First, N.L., 1999. Bovine oocyte cytoplasm supportsdevelopment of embryos produced by nuclear transfer of somaticcell nuclei from various mammalian species. Biol. Reprod. 60,1496–1502.

Gurdon, J.B., 1986. Nuclear transplantation in eggs and oocytes. J.Cell Sci. Suppl. 4, 287–318.

Han, Y.M., Kang, Y.K., Koo, D.B., Lee, K.K., 2003. Nuclear repro-gramming of cloned embryos produced in vitro. Theriogenology59, 33–44.

Hill, J.R., Winger, Q.A., Long, C.R., Looney, C.R., Thompson, J.A.,Westhusin, M.E., 2000. Development rates of male bovine nucleartransfer embryos derived from adult and fetal cells. Biol. Reprod.62, 1135–1140.

Holt, W.V., Pickard, A.R., Prather, R.S., 2004. Wildlife conservationand reproduction cloning. Reproduction 127, 317–324.

Jiang, Y., Chen, T., Nan, C.L., Ouyang, Y.C., Sun, Q.Y., 2005. In vitroculture and mtDNA fate of ibex-rabbit nuclear transfer embryos.Zygote 13, 233–240.

Kato, Y., Tani, T., Sotomaru, Y., Kurokawa, K., Kato, J., Doguchi, H.,Yasue, H., Tsunoda, Y., 1998. Eight calves cloned from somaticcells of a single adult. Science 282, 2095–2098.

Kubota, C., Yamakuchi, H., Todoroki, J., Mizoshita, K., Tabara, N.,Barber, M., 2000. Six cloned calves produced from adult fiboblastcells after long-term culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97,990–995.

Lanza, R.P., Cibelli, J.B., Diaz, F., Moraes, C.T., Farin, P.W., Farin,C.E., 2000. Cloning of an endangered species (Bos gaurus) usinginterspecies nuclear transfer. Cloning 2, 79–90.

Lee, B., Wirtu, G.G., Damiani, P., Pope, E., Dresser, B.L., Hwang, W.,2003. Blastocyst development after intergeneric nuclear transfer of

search 73 (2007) 135–141

ountain bongo antilope somatic cells into bovine oocytes. CloningStem Cells 5, 25–33.

Li, G.P., Seidel Jr., G.E., Squires, E.L., 2002. Interspecies cloning usingfresh, stored and dead equine and bovine somatic cells as donornuclei and bovine cytoplasts. Theriogenology 57, 432 (abstract).

Loi, P., Ptak, G., Barboni, B., Fulka, J., Cappai, P., Clinton, M., 2001.Genetic rescue of an endangered mammal by crossspecies nucleartransfer using post-mortem somatic cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19,962–964.

Lu, F.H., Shi, D.H., Wei, J.W., Yang, S.F., Wei, Y.M., 2005. Develop-ment of embryos reconstructed by interspecies nuclear transfer ofadult fibroblasts between buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and cattle (Bosindicus). Theriogenology 64, 1309–1319.

Onishi, A., Lwamoto, M., Akita, T., Mikawa, S., Takeda, K., Awata,T., Hanada, H., Perry, A.C.F., 2000. Pig cloning by microinjectionof fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science 289, 1188–1190.

Roh, S., Shim, H., Hwang, W.S., Yoon, J.T., 2000. In vitro developmentof green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic bovine embryos afternuclear transfer using different cell cycles and passage of fetalfibroblasts. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 12, 1–6.

Saikhun, J., Pavasuthipaisit, K., Jaruansuwan, M., Kitiyanant, Y., 2002.Xenonuclear transplantation of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fetaland adult somatic cell nuclei into bovine (Bos indicus) oocytecytoplasm and their subsequent development. Theriogenology 57,1829–1837.

Sansinena, M., Taylor, P., Taylor, S., Denniston, R.S., Godke, R.A.,2003. Production of interspecies nuclear transfer embryos usingmale and female llama (Lama glama) cell lines. Theriogenology59, 287 (abstract).

Sansinena, M.J., Hylan, D., Hebert, K., Denniston, R.S., Godke, R.A.,2005. Banteng (Bos javanicus) embryos and pregnancies pro-duced by interspecies nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 63, 1081–1091.

SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. SAS User’s Guide: Statisics, 1992.Smith, L.C., 1993. Membrane and intracellular effects of ultravio-

let irradiation with Hoechst 33342 on bovine secondary oocytesmatured in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 99, 39–44.

Steinborn, R., Schinogl, P., Wells, D.N., Bergthaler, A., Muller, M.,Brern, G., 2002. Coexistence of Bos taurus and B. indicus mito-chondrial DNAs in nuclear transfer-derived somatic cattle clones.Genetics 162, 823–829.

Takeda, K., Akagi, S., Kaneyama, K., Kojima, T., Takahashi, S., Imai,H., 2003. Proliferation of donor mitochondrial DNA in nucleartransfer calves (Bos taurus) derived from cumulus cells. Mol.Reprod. Dev. 64, 429–437.

Telford, N.A., Watson, A.J., Schultz, G.A., 1990. Transition fromthe maternal to embryonic control in early mammalian develop-ment: a comparison of several species. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 26, 90–100.

Walker, S.K., Hartwich, K.M., Seamark, R.F., 1996. The productionof unusually large offspring following embryo manipulation: con-cepts and challenges. Theriogenology 45, 111–120.

Wakayama, T., Perry, A.C.F., Zuccotti, M., Johnson, K.R., Yanagi-machi, R., 1998. Full-term development of mice from enucleatedoocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 394, 369–374.

Wakayama, T., Rodriguez, I., Perry, A.C.F., Yanagimachi, R., Mon-

baerts, P., 1999. Mice cloned from embryonic stem cells. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 14984–14989.

Wells, D.N., Misica, P.M., Tervit, H.R., 1999. Production of clonedcalves following nuclear transfer with cultured adult mural granu-lose cells. Biol. Reprod. 60, 996–1005.

nant Re

W

W

Potential of hypertonic medium treatment for embryo microma-

L. Wang et al. / Small Rumi

hite, K.L., Bunch, T.D., Mitalipov, S., Reed, W.A., 1999. Establish-ment of pregnancy after the transfer of nuclear transfer embryos

produced from the of Argali nuclei into domestic sheep enucleatedoocytes. Cloning 1, 47–54.

ilmut, I., Schnicke, A.J., McWhir, J., Kind, A.J., Campbell, K.H.,1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammaliancells. Nature 385, 810–813.

search 73 (2007) 135–141 141

Yang, X., Zhang, L., Kovacs, A., Tobback, C., Foote, R.H., 1990.

nipulation: II. Assessment of nuclear transplantation methodology,isolation, sub-zona insertion and electrofusion of blastomeres tointact or functionally enucleated oocytes in rabbits. Mol. Reprod.Dev. 27, 118–129.


Recommended