+ All Categories
Home > Documents > INCIDENCE OF IMMUNE RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS IN …

INCIDENCE OF IMMUNE RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS IN …

Date post: 10-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
17
INCIDENCE OF IMMUNE RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS IN PATIENTS ≥ 70 YEARS OLD TREATED WITH ANTI-PD-(L)1 THERAPY C. Baldini * 1 , P. Martin Romano 1 , AL. Voisin 2 , FX. Danlos 1 , S.Champiat 1 , S. Laghouati 2 , M. Kfouri 1 , H. Vincent 3 , S. Postel-Vinay 1 , A. Varga 1 , V. Ribrag 1 , B.Besse 3 , E. Angevin 1 , A. Hollebecque 1 , O. Lambotte 4 , JM Michot 1 , JC. Soria 5 , C. Massard 1 , A. Marabelle 1 1 Gustave Roussy, Dug Development Department (DITEP), Villejuif, France; 2 Unité de Pharmacovigilance, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Drug Development Department (DITEP), Villejuif, F- 94805; 3 Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Drug Development Department (DITEP), Villejuif, F-94805; 4 Medecine Interne, Hôpital Kremlin Bicêtre, Kremlin Bicêtre, France, 5 Medimmune, Gaithersburg, United States
Transcript

INCIDENCE OF IMMUNE RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS IN PATIENTS ≥ 70 YEARS OLD

TREATED WITH ANTI-PD-(L)1 THERAPY

C. Baldini* 1, P. Martin Romano1, AL. Voisin2, FX. Danlos1, S.Champiat1, S. Laghouati2, M. Kfouri1, H. Vincent3, S. Postel-Vinay1, A. Varga1, V. Ribrag1,

B.Besse3, E. Angevin1, A. Hollebecque1, O. Lambotte4, JM Michot1, JC. Soria5, C. Massard1, A. Marabelle1

1Gustave Roussy, Dug Development Department (DITEP), Villejuif, France;2Unité de Pharmacovigilance, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Drug Development Department (DITEP), Villejuif, F-

94805; 3Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Drug Development Department (DITEP), Villejuif, F-94805; 4Medecine Interne, Hôpital Kremlin Bicêtre, Kremlin Bicêtre, France, 5Medimmune, Gaithersburg, United States

Disclosure

I have the following the conflict(s) of interest to declare:

BMS, Roche, Sanofi, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Sandoz, Celgene, Astellas, Hospira, AbbVie, Merck, Janssen

• Broad spectrum of activity• Fewer toxicities• Interesting option in older patients

Background

Borghaei et al. NEJM 2015

Background

2012

2050

1/3 patients ≥ 75 years old 1/2 patients

≥ 75 years old

Silver tsunami is coming

Kendal WS. Cancer 2009French National Cancer Institute 2014

• Impact of the increasing number of auto-antibodies with aging ?

Background

• Impact of immunosenescence on efficacy ?

Inflammation

Immune agingEfficient immune response, diversity

Nagele EP et al. Plos One 2013Candore et al. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2002Ferrara et al ESMO 2018

• Evaluate the incidence of immune related adverse events inpatients aged 70 years old or above compared to their youngercounterparts

• Compare median time to toxicity between the two groups

• Compare survival between the 2 groups

Objectives

615 patients treated by anti PD-(L)1

REISAMIC database

Methods

≥ 70 years old (OP) 191 patients

< 70 years old (YP) 424 patients

165 irAEs ≥ grade 2

June 2014 October 2017

“Registre des

Effets

Indésirables

Sévères des

Anticorps

Monoclonaux

Immunomodulateurs en

Cancérologie”

REISAMIC database

Prospective enrollment of patients

• Incidence of irAEs of

grade ≥ 2

• Comparison between

patients aged ≥ 70 and

< 70 years old using

Chi-squared test

• PFS and OS calculated

using Kaplan Meier

Method

Results – Baseline characteristics

< 70 years oldn = 424

70 years oldn =191

GenderMaleFemale

230 (56%)182 (44%)

117 (61%)74 (39%)

Median age 59 (16 – 69) 77 (70 – 93)

Tumor typeMelanomaNSCLC

SCCAdenocarcinomaOther

RCCUrothelialHNSCCMerkel

206 (50%)177 (43%)45 (11%)

119 (29%)13 (3%)10 (2%)9 (2%)

2 (<1%)3 (<1%)

127 (63%)52 (27%)22 (12%)29 (15%)1 (<1%)

07 (4%)

1 (<1%)2 (1%)

Median number of previous lines

1 (0-10) 1 (0-10)

Median ECOG Performans status

1 (0-4) 1 (0-4)

dNLR > 3 242 (59%) 128 (67%)

Patients

< 70 years oldn = 424

70 years oldn =191

Median time under treatment (months)

20.8 (15.7 – 28.4) 23.3 (13.9 – 28.3)

Previous ICIAnti CTLA4Anti PD(L)-1

58 (14%)33 (8%)

19 (10%)9 (5%)

Corticosteroids use> 20mg

107 (26%)79 (74%)

30 (16%)25 (83%)

Anti PD-1NivolumabPembrolizumab

Anti PD-L1AvelumabAtezolizumab

217 (53%)185 (45%)

2 (<1%)8 (2%)

68 (36%)114 (60%)

2 (1%)7 (4%)

Results – Baseline characteristics

Treatments

Incidence of irAEs

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

< 70 ≥ 70

irAEs ≥ grade 2according to age

irAEs ≥ grade 2 no irAEs or grade 1

Nu

mb

er

of

pat

ien

tsirAEs 95% CI p

<70 (YP) 0.25 0.21- 0.29 0.035

≥ 70 (OP) 0.33 0.26 - 0.40

25% 33%

Type of irAEs

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Skin

Lung

Liver

GI

Endocrine

Pancreas

Other

Type of toxicities according to age

< 70

≥ 70

Proportion of patients (%)

Corticosteroids use:29% in OP32% in YP

Median time under corticosteroids:124 days for OP131 days for YP

Time to irAEs

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 > 6

Kinetics of toxicities according to age

≥ 70

< 70

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

atie

nts

(%

)

Time in months

Similar median time to toxicity : 10 weeks in YP and 6 weeks in OP p=0.13

Reasons for stopping anti PD-(L)1

Toxicity

Progressive disease

Complete response/remission

Other

Reasons for stopping anti PD-(L)1

Toxicity

Progressive disease

Complete response/remission

other

Reasons for stopping therapy

YPs OPs

14%7%

Survival – PFS according to irAEs and age

Number at risk

No IrAEsIrAEs

433165

8593

4050

109

10

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

0 10 20 30 40

IrAEsNo IrAEs

0 10 20 30 40

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

Number at riskYPOP

408189

11464

6426

136

01

OP

YP

irAEs Median PFS: NR (95%CI 24.5 – NR) No irAEs Median PFS : 5 m (95%CI 4 – 5.55)

p < 0.0001

OP Median PFS : 8 m (95%CI 5.9 – 15.7)YP Median PFS: 6 m (95%CI 5.5 – 6.9)

p=0.12

Number at risk

No IrAEsIrAEs

12663

2836

1115

33

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

0 10 20 30 40

IrAEsNo IrAEs

10

irAEs Median PFS: 23 m (95%CI 15.7 – NR) No irAEs Median PFS : 5 m (95%CI 3.9 – 6.4)

p < 0.0001

IrAEs Age

OS according to irAEs and age

No IrAEsIrAEs

438165

110104

4155

912

10

IrAEsNo IrAEs

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

0 10 20 30 40Number at risk

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

0 10 20 30 40

OP

YP

Number at riskYPOP

14470

6531

156

01

424191

irAEs Median OS : 36 m (95%CI 23.9 – NR)No irAEs Median OS: 6 m (95%CI 5.3 – 7.1);

p < 0.0001

OP Median OS : 12 m (95%CI 8.5 – 21.3)YP Median OS: 9 m (95%CI 7.1 – 10.2);

p=0.07

IrAEs Age

• Strength: Prospective real life data analysis

• Anti-PD(L)1 immunotherapies are an acceptable treatment option for OPs, by being aware that immune related adverse events are more frequent in this population.

• Further dedicated studies are warranted to explore prospectively immune-related safety in OPs and correlation with geriatricparameters.

• Main limitation: no geriatric data available in the database

• Impact: Older patients should be monitored closely as they may be at risk of increased significant immune-related toxicity compared to their younger counterparts.

Conclusions

Ackowledgements

Patients and their families

✓ Dr Massard✓ Dr Marabelle✓ Pr Soria✓ Dr Martin-Romano✓ Dr Varga✓ Dr Champiat✓ Dr Michot✓ Dr Hollebecque✓ Dr Angevin✓ Dr Postel Vinay✓ Pr Lambotte✓ Pr Besse✓ Dr Vincent✓ Dr Voisin✓ Dr Laghouati

[email protected]


Recommended