8
Markup Summary
Subject: Text BoxPage Label: 1Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
Add "PCD File No. PPR-17-037 and VR-17-009"
dsdlaforce (14)
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 1Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
Attached the NRCS soils map
Subject: Cloud+Page Label: 1Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
Include the document noted on the plat youreceived from the clerk. The plat copy PCD has orthe title work does not reflect the handwrittennotes.
Subject: Text BoxPage Label: 1Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
Add a section discussing conformity with theFisher's Canyon DBPS.Is there concerns regarding bank stabilizationsince the property is at the outside bend?
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 2Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
Identify the drainage basin (Fisher's Canyon).
Subject: Cloud+Page Label: 2Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
1. Revise the reference to Table 3-1 in Appendix Lof the Engineering Criteria Manual.2. Add the calculation for the 67% imperviousness.3. Per ECM Appendix L Part 1 Section 3.13a, abasin drainage fee will be assessed based uponthe new impervious acreage if no such fee hasbeen previously paid. This means the fee is basedon the 67% imperviousness * acre*basin rate.
Subject: Text BoxPage Label: 2Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
Add a section regarding the County's 4-stepprocess identified in Appendix I Section I.7.2.
Subject: Cloud+Page Label: 2Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
Revise to El Paso County
Add "PCD File No. PPR-17-037 and VR-17-009"
Attached theNRCS soils map
Include the document noted on the plat you received from the clerk. The plat copyPCD has or the title work does not reflect the handwritten notes.
Add a section discussingconformity with the Fisher'sCanyon DBPS.Is there concerns regardingbank stabilization since theproperty is at the outside bend?
Identify the drainage basin (Fisher's Canyon).
1. Revise the reference to Table 3-1 in Appendix L of the Engineering CriteriaManual.2. Add the calculation for the 67% imperviousness.3. Per ECM Appendix L Part 1 Section 3.13a, a basin drainage fee will be assessedbased upon the new impervious acreage if no such fee has been previously paid. This means the fee is based on the 67% imperviousness * acre*basin rate.
Add a section regarding theCounty's 4-step processidentified in Appendix I SectionI.7.2.
Revise to El PasoCounty
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 2Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
1. Being less than an acre is insufficientjustification. Provide a statement answering thefollowing question. Is the site tributary to sensitivewaters (see Table I-5) or classified as a potentialhigh risk? If the answer to both is "No", then noadditional BMPs are required.
2. Either include flood control detention or justifywhy 100yr flood control detention is not required.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 2Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
Discuss and analyze the emergency overflow path. It appears that the emergency overflow path forStratmoor South Subdivision goes through theproposed lots. A drainage easement should beprovided for the emergency overflow.
Subject: Text BoxPage Label: 6Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
Label the Finished Floor Elevation for bothbuildings.
Subject: Cloud+Page Label: 6Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
Will there be retaining wall at this location? Showthe proposed grading. You may need to conductchannel analysis to ensure the bank is stabilizedsince this appears to be the outside bend ofFisher's Canyon.
Contact the Floodplain Administration to ensure noadditional requirements.
Subject: Cloud+Page Label: 6Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
1. Show the direction of the outgoing storm drain.
2. This is a low point of the Stratmoor Southsubdivision. The original drainage report analyzedthe area based on the 50-year storm frequency. Inthe event the inlet is blocked the emergency flowpath for a 100-year storm is likely to runoff throughthese lots and the proposed building will likely beimpacted. Provide analysis for the 100-year stormand 100-year emergency overflow. A 100yr andemergency overflow path through the lots mayneed to be defined and placed within a drainageeasement.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 6Lock: LockedAuthor: dsdlaforce
Delineate the 100yr WSEL and the FEMAFloodplain boundary.
1. Being less than an acre is insufficient justification. Provide a statement answering the following question. Isthe site tributary to sensitive waters (see Table I-5) orclassified as a potential high risk? If the answer to both is"No", then no additional BMPs are required.
2. Either include flood control detention or justify why 100yrflood control detention is not required.
Discuss and analyze the emergency overflowpath. It appears that the emergency overflowpath for Stratmoor South Subdivision goesthrough the proposed lots. A drainageeasement should be provided for theemergency overflow.
Label theFinishedFloorElevationfor bothbuildings.
Will there be retaining wall at thislocation? Show the proposedgrading. You may need to conductchannel analysis to ensure thebank is stabilized since thisappears to be the outside bend ofFisher's Canyon.
Contact the FloodplainAdministration to ensure noadditional requirements.
1. Show the direction of the outgoing storm drain.
2. This is a low point of the Stratmoor South subdivision. Theoriginal drainage report analyzed the area based on the50-year storm frequency. In the event the inlet is blocked theemergency flow path for a 100-year storm is likely to runoffthrough these lots and the proposed building will likely beimpacted. Provide analysis for the 100-year storm and100-year emergency overflow. A 100yr and emergencyoverflow path through the lots may need to be defined andplaced within a drainage easement.
Delineate the100yr WSEL andthe FEMAFloodplainboundary.
