+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Inclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal...

Inclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal...

Date post: 07-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 11 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
6
RESEARCH ARTICLE Inclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ischaemic model for preclinical studies He ́ ctor Ferna ́ ndez-Susavila, Ramo ́ n Iglesias-Rey, Antonio Dopico-Lo ́ pez, Marı ́ a Pe ́ rez-Mato, Toma ́ s Sobrino, Jose ́ Castillo and Francisco Campos ABSTRACT Proper occlusion of the medial cerebral artery, as determined by laser Doppler monitoring, during cerebral ischaemia in rat models is an important inclusion criterion in experimental studies. However, successful occlusion of the artery does not always guarantee a reproducible infarct volume, which is crucial for validating the efficacy of new protective drugs. In a rat intraluminal ischaemic model, laser Doppler monitoring alone was compared with laser Doppler monitoring in combination with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Twenty-eight animals showed successful occlusion and reperfusion determined with Doppler monitoring, with an infarct size at 24 h of 16.7±11.5% (determined as ischaemic damage with respect to the ipsilateral hemisphere volume). However, when arterial occlusion and infarct damage were analysed in these animals using MRA and DWI, respectively, 15 animals were excluded and only 13 animals were included, with an infarct size at 24 h of 21.6±6.1%, showing a variability in the infarct size significantly lower (P<0.05, F-test) than that obtained with Doppler monitoring alone. We also observed that blocking of the pterygopalatine artery (a maxillary artery that is usually occluded in the intraluminal ischaemic model) was not relevant for this model, at least in terms of infarct variability. These results show that laser Doppler monitoring is a necessary procedure, but not sufficient to guarantee a reproducible infarct volume, in a rat ischaemic model. Therefore, laser Doppler monitoring in combination with DWI and MRA represents a reliable inclusion protocol during ischaemic surgery for the analysis of new protective drugs. KEY WORDS: Animal model, Cerebral ischaemia, Inclusion criteria, Laser Doppler, MR angiography, MRI INTRODUCTION The Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) criteria have been updated periodically since their creation, with the purpose of improving the quality of preclinical studies on acute stroke therapies (Saver et al., 2013; Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable, 1991). One of the most crucial STAIR recommendations is the monitoring of cerebral blood flow (CBF) using laser Doppler during surgery to guarantee proper medial cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion (MCAo) and reproducible infarct size, usually determined at 24 h through magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) or histological techniques (Saver et al., 2013; Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable, 1991). In addition, in preclinical studies focusing on protective strategies for the acute phase of stroke (<12 h), Doppler flow monitoring represents the gold standard inclusion criterion used before treatment administration. Indeed, many researchers have demonstrated the efficacy of protective drugs based on Doppler flow monitoring, with all animals included in the study showing a reduction in CBF during a MCAo >70% or 80% from the basal levels. However, it is well known that the cerebral collateral circulation can supply blood to the ischaemic region that is difficult to register with the Doppler probe, and increases the internal variability of the experimental groups (Cuccione et al., 2016). In this study, we intended to analyse, for the first time, the use of laser Doppler monitoring alone and in combination with diffusion- weighted imaging (DWI) and MR angiography (MRA) during MCAo, and to determine the infarct size variability at 24 h in both protocols. RESULTS In this study, two different experimental inclusion protocols were compared: (1) inclusion of animals based on laser Doppler monitoring: animals with CBF reduction >70% and complete reperfusion (>60%) after MCAo determined only with laser Doppler monitoring; (2) inclusion of animals based on laser Doppler and MRI (DWI and MRA) monitoring during MCAo: animals with CBF reduction >70% determined with laser Doppler monitoring, DWI hemispheric infarct volume between 25% and 45% (indicated as the percentage of ischaemic damage with respect to the ipsilateral hemisphere volume), MRA of the MCAo, and complete reperfusion after MCAo. In both inclusion protocols, the relevance of occlusion of the pterygopalatine artery (PPA) was also tested. A total of 34 animals were included (Fig. 1). Initially, six animals were excluded because of bleeding and spontaneous death during surgery. On the basis of Doppler monitoring, the remaining animals (n=28) had successful MCAo (>70% with respect to the basal level) and reperfusion (>60%), 60 min after occlusion. However, when these 28 animals were analysed by MRA during arterial occlusion, five were excluded because both the MCA and the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) had been occluded (Fig. 2). Moreover, when DWI was performed on the remaining 23 animals, 10 animals were excluded because the infarcted regions were out of the established range (25- 45%) (Fig. 3). The DWI volume of these 13 finally included animals was 33.7±6.6%. Analysis of the ischaemic damage determined at 24 h showed that the infarct size in those animals included following the criterion of laser Doppler alone was 16.7± 11.5% (variability 69%), whereas in those animals included based Received 7 March 2017; Accepted 2 October 2017 Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) H.F.-S, 0000-0003-1972-9902; F.C., 0000-0001-8665-1039 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. 1433 © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Disease Models & Mechanisms (2017) 10, 1433-1438 doi:10.1242/dmm.029868 Disease Models & Mechanisms
Transcript
Page 1: Inclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ...dmm.biologists.org/content/dmm/10/12/1433.full.pdfInclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ischaemic model for preclinical

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Inclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ischaemic modelfor preclinical studiesHector Fernandez-Susavila, Ramon Iglesias-Rey, Antonio Dopico-Lopez, Marıa Perez-Mato,Tomas Sobrino, Jose Castillo and Francisco Campos

ABSTRACTProper occlusion of the medial cerebral artery, as determined by laserDoppler monitoring, during cerebral ischaemia in rat models is animportant inclusion criterion in experimental studies. However,successful occlusion of the artery does not always guarantee areproducible infarct volume,which is crucial for validating the efficacyofnew protective drugs. In a rat intraluminal ischaemic model, laserDoppler monitoring alonewas comparedwith laser Doppler monitoringin combination with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) anddiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Twenty-eight animals showedsuccessful occlusion and reperfusion determined with Dopplermonitoring, with an infarct size at 24 h of 16.7±11.5% (determined asischaemic damage with respect to the ipsilateral hemisphere volume).However, when arterial occlusion and infarct damagewere analysed inthese animals using MRA and DWI, respectively, 15 animals wereexcluded and only 13 animalswere included, with an infarct size at 24 hof 21.6±6.1%, showing a variability in the infarct size significantly lower(P<0.05, F-test) than that obtained with Doppler monitoring alone. Wealso observed that blocking of the pterygopalatine artery (a maxillaryartery that is usually occluded in the intraluminal ischaemicmodel) wasnot relevant for this model, at least in terms of infarct variability. Theseresults show that laser Doppler monitoring is a necessary procedure,but not sufficient to guarantee a reproducible infarct volume, in a ratischaemic model. Therefore, laser Doppler monitoring in combinationwith DWI and MRA represents a reliable inclusion protocol duringischaemic surgery for the analysis of new protective drugs.

KEY WORDS: Animal model, Cerebral ischaemia, Inclusion criteria,Laser Doppler, MR angiography, MRI

INTRODUCTIONThe Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR)criteria have been updated periodically since their creation, withthe purpose of improving the quality of preclinical studies on acutestroke therapies (Saver et al., 2013; Stroke Therapy AcademicIndustry Roundtable, 1991). One of the most crucial STAIRrecommendations is the monitoring of cerebral blood flow (CBF)using laser Doppler during surgery to guarantee proper medial

cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion (MCAo) and reproducible infarctsize, usually determined at 24 h through magnetic resonance (MR)imaging (MRI) or histological techniques (Saver et al., 2013; StrokeTherapy Academic Industry Roundtable, 1991). In addition, inpreclinical studies focusing on protective strategies for the acutephase of stroke (<12 h), Doppler flow monitoring represents thegold standard inclusion criterion used before treatmentadministration. Indeed, many researchers have demonstrated theefficacy of protective drugs based on Doppler flowmonitoring, withall animals included in the study showing a reduction in CBF duringa MCAo >70% or 80% from the basal levels. However, it is wellknown that the cerebral collateral circulation can supply blood to theischaemic region that is difficult to register with the Doppler probe,and increases the internal variability of the experimental groups(Cuccione et al., 2016).

In this study, we intended to analyse, for the first time, the use oflaser Doppler monitoring alone and in combination with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and MR angiography (MRA) duringMCAo, and to determine the infarct size variability at 24 h in bothprotocols.

RESULTSIn this study, two different experimental inclusion protocols werecompared: (1) inclusion of animals based on laser Dopplermonitoring: animals with CBF reduction >70% and completereperfusion (>60%) after MCAo determined only with laserDoppler monitoring; (2) inclusion of animals based on laserDoppler and MRI (DWI and MRA) monitoring during MCAo:animals with CBF reduction >70% determined with laser Dopplermonitoring, DWI hemispheric infarct volume between 25% and45% (indicated as the percentage of ischaemic damage with respectto the ipsilateral hemisphere volume), MRA of the MCAo, andcomplete reperfusion after MCAo. In both inclusion protocols, therelevance of occlusion of the pterygopalatine artery (PPA) was alsotested.

A total of 34 animals were included (Fig. 1). Initially, six animalswere excluded because of bleeding and spontaneous death duringsurgery. On the basis of Doppler monitoring, the remaining animals(n=28) had successful MCAo (>70%with respect to the basal level)and reperfusion (>60%), 60 min after occlusion. However, whenthese 28 animals were analysed by MRA during arterial occlusion,five were excluded because both the MCA and the anterior cerebralartery (ACA) had been occluded (Fig. 2). Moreover, when DWI wasperformed on the remaining 23 animals, 10 animals were excludedbecause the infarcted regions were out of the established range (25-45%) (Fig. 3). The DWI volume of these 13 finally includedanimals was 33.7±6.6%. Analysis of the ischaemic damagedetermined at 24 h showed that the infarct size in those animalsincluded following the criterion of laser Doppler alone was 16.7±11.5% (variability 69%), whereas in those animals included basedReceived 7 March 2017; Accepted 2 October 2017

Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, University Clinical Hospital ofSantiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela(IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

*Author for correspondence ([email protected])

H.F.-S, 0000-0003-1972-9902; F.C., 0000-0001-8665-1039

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use,distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

1433

© 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Disease Models & Mechanisms (2017) 10, 1433-1438 doi:10.1242/dmm.029868

Disea

seModels&Mechan

isms

Page 2: Inclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ...dmm.biologists.org/content/dmm/10/12/1433.full.pdfInclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ischaemic model for preclinical

on the criterion of Doppler monitoring in combination with MRIanalysis, the infarct size was 21.6±6.1% with a lower variability(28%) (P<0.05, F-test).To validate whether PPA occlusion during ischaemic surgery

could affect the previously observed infarct variability, the sameprocedure was performed. A total of 12 animals were initiallyincluded (Fig. 1). Two animals were excluded owing to complicationsduring surgery and the other 10 passed the Doppler criteria. Whenthe MRI protocol was performed on these animals, one animal wasdiscarded in the angiographic analysis because the MCA and ACAwere occluded, and one other animal was excluded because theinfarct size was lower than the established DWI threshold. Theaverage DWI volume in the included animals was 34.7±5.4% (n=8).

The infarct size determined 24 h later in those animals that passedthe Doppler criteria was 18.9±9.6% (variability 51%); however,in those animals subjected to both Doppler and MRI inclusioncriteria, the infarct size was 21.7±5.6%, with a variability (26%)significantly lower (P<0.05, F-test).

The data obtained from this study also show that if we perform apower analysis to determine the number of animals per grouprequired to predict a 30% reduction in lesion volume between thecontrol group and a treated group, with this new inclusion protocol,fewer animals per group are needed (Table 1). Results are shown ifwe assume a power of 0.8, a significance level of 0.05, and predict a30% reduction in lesion volume between the control group andtreated group.

Fig. 1. Protocol diagram summarizing the number of animals included, with exclusions per group, for final analysis. Two experimental groups werecompared: (A) animals evaluated with only laser Doppler monitoring; (B) animals evaluated with laser Doppler monitoring, MR angiography and DWI. The twogroupswere compared in animals with andwithout occlusion of the pterygopalatine artery. (C) Infarct volume determined 24 h after ischaemia for the two inclusionprotocols used in rats with and without pterygopalatine artery occlusion. Data are expressed as mean±s.d. Student’s t-test was used to compare the differencesbetween the means, and F-test was used to compare differences in variability. Means were similar for both inclusion protocols, while the variability wassignificantly reduced with the new inclusion protocol suggested (*P<0.05).

1434

RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2017) 10, 1433-1438 doi:10.1242/dmm.029868

Disea

seModels&Mechan

isms

Page 3: Inclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ...dmm.biologists.org/content/dmm/10/12/1433.full.pdfInclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ischaemic model for preclinical

DISCUSSIONAs shown by a recent publication about the limitations oftranslational stroke research (Dirnagl, 2016), an update of theinclusion criteria in ischaemic animal models, as described in thisstudy, is needed to guarantee the efficacy of new protective drugs forthe acute phase of stroke. Here, we propose a new inclusion protocolfor the intraluminal ischaemic rat model, based on the combinationof laser Doppler monitoring and MRI. This protocol alsodemonstrates that laser Doppler monitoring is needed to confirmMCAo during surgery; however, it does not guarantee areproducible infarct size at 24 h, which is critical for theevaluation of drugs. Thus, animals with an identical arterialocclusion rate (<70% with respect to the basal flow) and similarrecovery flow (>60%) after reperfusion, as determined by laserDoppler monitoring, presented a variability of 69%, whereas thoseselected on the basis of the combination of laser Doppler and MRImonitoring showed a variability of 28%.Other studies have previously addressed the usefulness of laser

Doppler for predicting infarct volume and outcome in MCAomodels of stroke (Hedna et al., 2015; Reith et al., 1994; Taninishiet al., 2015). This study does not intend to suggest that laser Dopplermonitoring is not a useful inclusion criterion. Indeed, laser Doppleris a useful tool for monitoring MCAo; however, because laserDoppler has a low sensitivity for measuring the collateral circulation(Cuccione et al., 2016), it cannot be used to exclude animals withextreme infarct sizes as DWI can. In addition, laser Dopplermonitoring allows the detection of the MCAo when the filamentreaches the circle of Willis. However, once the MCA is occluded, itbecomes almost impossible with this technique to detect whetherthe ACA circulation is being altered, which is a crucial issue forobtaining reproducible ischaemic sizes. In this regard, angiographicimaging allows the exclusion of those ischaemic animals in whichthe MCA and ACA are occluded, reducing the variability of theinfarct size at 24 h.The PPA is a maxillary artery that supplies blood to the deep

structures of the face and, in some surgical protocols for ischaemiainduction, this artery is occluded to avoid the accidental intubationof this vessel with the intraluminal suture. However, this procedure

can significantly influence the MCAo model and cannot be ignored(Cuccione et al., 2016). Therefore, this variable was also included inthe experimental groups. In our analysis, we observed that PPAblocking during surgery is not relevant for this model, at least interms of infarct variability.

It could be hypothesized that histological analysis of theischaemic region is necessary to confirm the MRI measurementof infarct size 24 h after ischaemia. In this regard, it is now wellestablished that MRI is the gold standard method for imaging and aneffective in vivo alternative to histological evaluation for estimatingtreatment effects based on the extent of infarction (Milidonis et al.,2015). In addition, infarct analysis at 24 h was chosen because thisrepresents one of the most common time points used in preclinicalstudies to validate the efficacy of protective treatments in the acutephase of stroke (O’Collins et al., 2011). However, we admit that theshort time point used (24 h) and the lack of histological analysis arelimitations of this study, as we were not able to detect haemorrhagiclesions, or to examine the long-term evolution of the ischaemiclesion and its impact on neurological functions.

Like all protocols, the use of MRI in combination with laserDoppler monitoring as an animal inclusion criterion in experimentalischaemic studies has disadvantages and advantages. Because theanimal has to be moved after MCAo from the bench to the MRsystem (see Materials and Methods), one of the most importantlimitations in implementing this protocol is that the MRI facilitymust be close to the surgery bench to keep the animals underanaesthetized conditions, and to reduce the movement of thefilament located in the artery as much as possible. This setup is notcommon in many research centres, and the situation becomes worsewhen the MRI facility is in a different building from the surgeryfacilities. We have also established an arbitrary inclusion interval(between 25% and 45%) for DWI hemispheric infarct volume thatcould be a topic for discussion. We established this threshold basedon previous studies (Argibay et al., 2017; Campos et al., 2011;Pérez-Mato et al., 2014; Vieites-Prado et al., 2016) in which thesame inclusion protocol was used, and in which DWI volumes<25% during MCAo were associated with small subcorticalischaemia or no ischaemia at 24 h, and DWI volumes >45% were

Fig. 2. The main aspects of the angiography technique. (A) The cerebrovascular anatomy of the rat. (B) Coronal projection of a MR angiography image of ahealthy rat. The ACA and MCA can be observed in the MR angiography projection (right) and in the axial image (middle). (C) Ischaemic animal with theMCA and the ACA occluded. (D) Ischaemic animal with only the MCA occluded. In the laser Doppler recording, animals with only the MCA occluded and animalswith both the MCA and ACA occluded showed the same cerebral blood flow profile during arterial occlusion and reperfusion. ACA, anterior cerebral artery;ACAo, anterior cerebral artery occlusion; CCA, common carotid artery; CCAo, common carotid artery occlusion; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MCAo, middlecerebral artery occlusion; PT, pterygopalatine artery.

1435

RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2017) 10, 1433-1438 doi:10.1242/dmm.029868

Disea

seModels&Mechan

isms

Page 4: Inclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ...dmm.biologists.org/content/dmm/10/12/1433.full.pdfInclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ischaemic model for preclinical

associated with a malignant infarct that affected all hemispheres andresulted in a high mortality rate. Finally, this study was performed inSprague-Dawley rats because this is the most common strain used instudies on cerebral ischaemia; however, we are aware that thisprotocol should be validated in other strains and species of rat, aswell as in a permanent MCAo model. Despite these limitations, wewould like to highlight that this new inclusion protocol allowsreducing the infarct size variability 24 h after ischaemia, which iscrucial for calculating required group sizes for detecting asignificant reduction in lesion volume between a control groupand a tested group. In fact, using the data obtained in this study, ourpower analysis shows that fewer animals per group are required todemonstrate a 30% reduction in lesion volume following this newprotocol compared with the traditional one. In addition, thisprotocol also permits determining basal ischaemic lesions in theincluded animals before treatment administration, which, in

combination with the ischaemic size determined after treatment,enhances the quality and reliability of the results.

In brief, we can conclude that laser Doppler monitoring is anecessary procedure, but not sufficient to guarantee a reproducibleinfarct volume, in the rat ischaemic model. Laser Dopplermonitoring in combination with DWI and MRA represents areliable inclusion protocol during ischaemic surgery for the analysisof new protective drugs focused on the acute phase of stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODSAnimalsAll experimental protocols were approved by the local Animal CareCommittee according to the guidelines established by the European Union(86/609/CEE, 2003/65/CE, and 2010/63/EU) and following the AnimalResearch: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines foranimal experiments. Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 280 gand 330 g were used (aged 11-12 weeks). The animals were housed

Fig. 3. Representative ADC maps (obtained from DWI) of animals included or excluded in the study. (A) ADC maps of an animal excluded owing to abaseline lesion volume <25% of the ipsilateral hemisphere. DWI results, from which the ADC maps were obtained, are shown above. (B) ADC maps of anincluded animal with a baseline lesion volume within the accepted range (25-45% of the ipsilateral hemisphere). (C) ADC maps of an animal excluded owing to abaseline lesion volume >45% of the ipsilateral hemisphere. In the laser Doppler recording (below), animals with different DWI volumes presented the samecerebral blood flow profile during arterial occlusion and reperfusion.

Table 1. Results of a power analysis conducted to calculate required group sizes for detecting a significant reduction in lesion volume between acontrol group (standard or new protocol) and a treated group

ProtocolInfarct volume(mean±s.d.) Power

Significancelevel

Anticipateddifference

Predictedgroup size

Animals evaluated with only laser Doppler monitoring (standard protocol) 16.7±11.5% 0.8 0.05 30% 37Animals evaluated with laser Doppler monitoring and MRI (new protocol) 21.6±6.1% 0.8 0.05 30% 14

For each approach, equal variance is assumed between the control and test groups.

1436

RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2017) 10, 1433-1438 doi:10.1242/dmm.029868

Disea

seModels&Mechan

isms

Page 5: Inclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ...dmm.biologists.org/content/dmm/10/12/1433.full.pdfInclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ischaemic model for preclinical

individually at an environmental temperature of 23°C, with 40% relativehumidity and a 12 h light-dark cycle, and were given free access to food andwater.

Rat model of cerebral ischaemia and MRIAll surgical procedures were performed under sevoflurane anaesthesia (6%induction and 4% maintenance in a mixture of 70% NO2 and 30% O2).Rectal temperature was maintained at 37±0.5°C in all animals duringsurgery, by using a thermostat-controlled electric pad (Neos Biotec,Pamplona, Spain). The head of the animals was placed on a porexpanplate to avoid direct contact between the pad and the head. Transient focalischaemia (60 min) was induced through intraluminal MCAo, followingmethods described previously (Howells et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2014). Allsurgeries were performed by one researcher (>2 years’ experience) in thetransient intraluminal filament MCAo model.

Occlusion was performed using commercially available sutures withsilicone-rubber-coated heads (350 µm diameter and 1.5 mm length; Doccol,Sharon, MA, USA). CBF was monitored with a Periflux 5000 laser Dopplerperfusion monitor (Perimed AB, Järfälla, Sweden) by placing the Dopplerprobe (model 411, Perimed AB) under the temporal muscle at the parietalbone surface, near the sagittal crest. Twenty-five minutes after arterialocclusion had been achieved, as indicated by Doppler signal reduction (CBFreduction >70%), each animal was carefully and immediately (within<1 min) moved from the surgical bench to the MR system for ischaemiclesion assessment using DWI. In combination with DWI, MRA wasperformed to ensure that the artery remained occluded throughout the MRprocedure and to confirm the occlusion of only the MCA. The animals werethen returned to the surgical bench and the Doppler probe was repositioned.Reperfusion was performed 60 min after occlusion onset. Animals with noreperfusion or with prolonged reperfusion (>10 min until achievement of atleast 60% of the baseline CBF) after filament removal were not included.Ischaemic damage was confirmed and determined 24 h after ischaemia byusing MR T2-weighted images. The transient intraluminal filament MCAomodel was used because it represents the most common model used in thefield of stroke experiments (Cuccione et al., 2016).

Experimental groupsTwo different experimental inclusion protocols were compared: (1) inclusionof animals with CBF reduction >70% and complete reperfusion after MCAodetermined only with laser Doppler monitoring; (2) inclusion of animals withCBF reduction >70% determined with laser Doppler monitoring, DWIhemispheric infarct volume between 25% and 45% (indicated as percentageof ischaemic damage with respect to the ipsilateral hemisphere volume),MRA of the MCAo, and complete reperfusion after MCAo.

Both inclusion protocols were also compared in animals with occludedPPA.

MRIAll studies were conducted on a 9.4-T horizontal bore magnet (BrukerBioSpin, Ettlingen, Germany) with 440 mT/m gradients and a combinationof a linear birdcage resonator (70 mm in diameter) for signal transmissionand a 2×2 surface coil array for signal detection. MRI postprocessing wasperformed with ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).

Basal ischaemic lesion during MCAo was determined by counting pixelswith apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values below a threshold in theipsilateral brain hemisphere. The values of ADC in the healthy rat brainnormally do not fall below 0.55×10−3 mm2/s; therefore, this thresholdprovides a convenient means of segmenting abnormal tissue (Reith et al.,1995). ADC maps were obtained from diffusion-weighted images by usinga spin echo echo-planar imaging sequence with the following acquisitionparameters: echo time (TE)=26.91 ms; repetition time (TR)=4 s; spectralbandwidth (SW)=200 kHz; 7 b-values of 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200, 1600 and2000 s/mm2; flip angle (FA)=90°; number of averages (NA)=4; 14consecutive slices of 1 mm; field of view (FOV)=24×16 mm2 (withsaturation bands to suppress signals outside this FOV); matrix size=96×64(isotropic in-plane resolution of 250 μm/pixel×250 μm/pixel); and with fatsuppression option.

To evaluate the status of MCAo in a noninvasive manner, time-of-flight(TOF) MRAwas performed. The TOF-MRA scan was performed with a 3D-Flash sequencewith TE=2.5 ms, TR=15 ms, FA=20°, NA=2, SW=98 kHz, 1slice of 14 mm, FOV=30.72×30.72×14 mm3 (with saturation bands tosuppress signals outside this FOV), matrix size=256×256×58 (resolution of120 μm/pixel×120 μm/pixel×241 μm/pixel), and implemented without fatsuppression option. DWI and TOF-MRA images were simultaneouslyacquired during MCAo (30±5 min after occlusion).

Ischaemic lesionswere determined 24 h after ischaemia fromT2maps. Thesemaps were calculated from T2-weighted images by using a multi-slice multi-echo sequence with TE=9 ms, TR=3 s, 16 echoes with 9 ms echo spacing,FA=180°, NA=2, SW=75 kHz, 14 slices of 1 mm, FOV=19.2×19.2 mm2 (withsaturation bands to suppress signals outside this FOV), matrix size=192×192(isotropic in-plane resolution of 100 μm/pixel×100 μm/pixel), and implementedwithout fat suppression option. Infarct size was indicated as the percentage ofischaemic damage with respect to the ipsilateral hemisphere volume, correctedfor brain oedema. Image evaluations were performed by a researcher blinded tothe experimental conditions.

Statistical analysisAll data are expressed as mean±s.d. The data were analysed using GraphPadPrism v.6.05 for Windows (GraphPad). The criterion for statisticalsignificance was P<0.05. Data were first examined to assess distributionusing the D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test. Parametric datacomparing two means (MRI T2 scan) were compared using Student’s t-test.Variability of datawas assessed using the F-test for parametric data (MRI T2scan). Sample size was calculated using EPIDAT software (http://www.sergas.es/Saude-publica/EPIDAT-4-2).

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Author contributionsConceptualization: F.C.; Methodology: H.F.-S., R.I.-R., A.D.-L.; Software: R.I.-R.;Validation: H.F.-S.; Investigation: A.D.-L., M.P.-M., F.C.; Resources: M.P.-M., J.C.,F.C.; Data curation: A.D.-L., F.C.; Writing - original draft: H.F.-S., T.S.; Writing -review & editing: T.S., J.C., F.C.; Visualization: T.S.; Supervision: F.C.; Projectadministration: J.C., F.C.; Funding acquisition: F.C.

FundingThis work was supported by the National Research Foundation [PI13/00292, PI14/01879; CP12/03121 to T.S.M.; CP14/00154 to F.C.P.].

ReferencesArgibay, B., Trekker, J., Himmelreich, U., Beiras, A., Topete, A., Taboada, P.,

Perez-Mato, M., Vieites-Prado, A., Iglesias-Rey, R., Rivas, J. et al. (2017).Intraarterial route increases the risk of cerebral lesions after mesenchymal celladministration in animal model of ischemia. Sci. Rep. 7, 40758.

Campos, F., Sobrino, T., Ramos-Cabrer, P., Argibay, B., Agulla, J., Perez-Mato,M., Rodrıguez-Gonzalez, R., Brea, D. and Castillo, J. (2011). Neuroprotectionby glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase in ischemic stroke: an experimentalstudy. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 31, 1378-1386.

Cuccione, E., Padovano, G., Versace, A., Ferrarese, C. and Beretta, S. (2016).Cerebral collateral circulation in experimental ischemic stroke. Exp. Transl. StrokeMed. 8, 2.

Dirnagl, U. (2016). Thomas willis lecture: is translational stroke research broken,and if so, how can we fix it? Stroke 47, 2148-2153.

Hedna, V. S., Ansari, S., Shahjouei, S., Cai, P. Y., Ahmad, A. S., Mocco, J. andQureshi, A. I. (2015). Validity of laser doppler flowmetry in predicting outcome inmurine intraluminal middle cerebral artery occlusion stroke. J. Vasc. Interv.Neurol. 8, 74-82.

Howells, D. W., Porritt, M. J., Rewell, S. S. J., O’Collins, V., Sena, E. S., van derWorp, H. B., Traystman, R. J. and Macleod, M. R. (2010). Different strokes fordifferent folks: the rich diversity of animal models of focal cerebral ischemia.J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 30, 1412-1431.

Lee, S., Lee, M., Hong, Y., Won, J., Lee, Y., Kang, S.-G., Chang, K.-T. and Hong,Y. (2014). Middle cerebral artery occlusionmethods in rat versusmousemodels oftransient focal cerebral ischemic stroke. Neural Regen. Res. 9, 757-758.

Milidonis, X., Marshall, I., Macleod, M. R. and Sena, E. S. (2015). Magneticresonance imaging in experimental stroke and comparison with histology:systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 46, 843-851.

O’Collins, V. E., Macleod,M. R., Cox, S. F., Van Raay, L., Aleksoska, E., Donnan,G. A. and Howells, D. W. (2011). Preclinical drug evaluation for combination

1437

RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2017) 10, 1433-1438 doi:10.1242/dmm.029868

Disea

seModels&Mechan

isms

Page 6: Inclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ...dmm.biologists.org/content/dmm/10/12/1433.full.pdfInclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ischaemic model for preclinical

therapy in acute stroke using systematic review, meta-analysis, and subsequentexperimental testing. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 31, 962-975.

Perez-Mato, M., Ramos-Cabrer, P., Sobrino, T., Blanco, M., Ruban, A.,Mirelman, D., Menendez, P., Castillo, J. and Campos, F. (2014). Humanrecombinant glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase 1 (got1) supplemented withoxaloacetate induces a protective effect after cerebral ischemia.Cell Death Dis. 5,e992.

Reith, W., Forsting, M., Weber, J., Stingele, R., Hacke, W. and Sartor, K. (1994).Laser Doppler flowmetry of focal ischaemia and reperfusion in deep brainstructures in rats. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 131, 151-156.

Reith, W., Hasegawa, Y., Latour, L. L., Dardzinski, B. J., Sotak, C. H. and Fisher,M. (1995). Multislice diffusion mapping for 3-d evolution of cerebral ischemia in arat stroke model. Neurology 45, 172-177.

Saver, J. L., Jovin, T. G., Smith, W. S., Albers, G. W., Baron, J.-C., Boltze, J.,Broderick, J. P., Davis, L. A., Demchuk, A. M., DeSena, S. et al. (2013). Stroke

treatment academic industry roundtable: Research priorities in the assessment ofneurothrombectomy devices. Stroke 44, 3596-3360.

Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable. (1999). Recommendations forstandards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drugdevelopment. Stroke 30, 2752-2758.

Taninishi, H., Jung, J. Y., Izutsu, M., Wang, Z., Sheng, H. and Warner, D. S.(2015). A blinded randomized assessment of laser Doppler flowmetry efficacy instandardizing outcome from intraluminal filament MCAO in the rat. J. Neurosci.Methods 15, 111-120.

Vieites-Prado, A., Iglesias-Rey, R., Fernandez-Susavila, H., da Silva-Candal, A.,Rodrıguez-Castro, E., Grohn, O. H. J., Wellmann, S., Sobrino, T., Castillo, J.and Campos, F. (2016). Protective effects and magnetic resonance imagingtemperature mapping of systemic and focal hypothermia in cerebral ischemia.Stroke 47, 2386-2396.

1438

RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2017) 10, 1433-1438 doi:10.1242/dmm.029868

Disea

seModels&Mechan

isms


Recommended