Inclusive Design
Niamh Gleeson & Aaron Doyle
Fuel Friend & what it is…Incl. diagram of product
Overview
Introduction Definition of Inclusive Design Reason for the chosen area/product
Background Research User Groups
Problems
Solutions
Literature Application to Everyday Life
IntroductionEveryday products for everyday people
“Inclusive design applies an understanding of customer diversity to the design of mainstream products to better satisfy the needs of more people” (Inclusive Design Toolkit, 2011).
Inclusive Factors Inclusion of potentially isolated groups
Those with literacy difficulties Help to counteract possible everyday stressors,
e.g. finances/budgetsEconomic downturn Mental health & anxiety
Background Research
Use of Qualitative research methods in initial stages of research Questionnaire Phone Interview
Proposed Research Methods Interviews – passenger perspective Focus Group – Local Literacy Groups -NALA Survey, e.g. on the types of icons used
Design of Questionnaire - NALA
PersonaPaddy is in his early 70’s and has basic literacy skills, he left school and started work at 15 on the home farm. He has difficulty in understanding large amounts of text. He’s able to medicate the animals, due to his father showing him ways of measuring the dosage without reading the bottle. Paddy has difficulty with small print and often asks his neighbour to read out new information on his medication. He often puts this information into iconic format or symbols, so that he can easily understand it.Due to difficulties in the agricultural sector and his age, Paddy finds it hard to walk across the fields on a daily basis, however he also finds the price of diesel costly and is reluctant to use the tractor when travelling through the fields.He has adapted to using a Smartphone, as it enables him to learn and understand information through icons.Fuel Friend can assist Paddy with many daily stressors, like helping him budget for fuel he uses prior to undertaking his daily routine and keeping a log of it. It would also allow him to gain more understanding of minimalist text when using icons.
The Experts’ OpinionsNational Adult Literacy Agency
Difficulties with literacy groups Fluctuating Profile
Difficult to include everyoneVarying degrees of literacy difficulties“One Size Does Not Fit All”
Not all members have reading and writing difficulties
Advice Keep text to a minimum The use of generic icons very beneficial to those with
literacy difficulties Easier to understand
Focus Research around Specific Areas Targeting hard to reach groups in the local area e.g. men
and older adults Assists in breaking the participation barrier for these
groups WWW.WRITEON.IE
Evaluated annually This Approach could be taken toward Fuel Friend –
utmost benefit to users
The Experts’ Opinions
Focus Group Gain User Perspective Help break barriers into participation
Call out/Assist participants with questions Keep test to a minimum – interactive questionnaire
Proposed Research Methods Interviews – passenger perspective Focus Group – Local Literacy Groups -NALA Survey, e.g. on the types of icons used
NALA
NALA Research Findings
IALS (1997) Study showed in Ireland 1 in 4 working adults had problems with
the simplest of literacy tasks 500,000 were found to be at or below literacy 1 of a 5 level scale e.g.
print on medicine packaging Another 30% of Irish adults were at level 2, meaning they could cope
with very simple material Public shocked at these findings Only official document of literacy trends in Ireland Follow up of research opted out of by government Government did however opt in to PIAAC in 2000 Fuel Friend can help break barriers to allow these isolated groups
become more included and involved when creating new technologies
NALA Research Findings
PIAAC (Profile of adult literacy learners in Ireland 2000 – 2009)
Almost 200% increase in the number of literacy participants over the period 2000-2008 (17,150 to 49,962).
Proportion of participants with Level 1 literacy has dropped slightly
Proportion of early school leavers (>16 years) dropped slightly.
Comparison of VECs’ referral networks and marketing strategies to participant profile to help establish best practices moving forward.
Apply principles of Fuel Friend research e.g. Marketing strategies; benefits of using generic icons in communication
Previous Research & Designs
GasBuddy: An android application that finds cheap fuel prices from a database of petrol stations. More than 22million people have downloaded it. Has a corresponding website and frequent updates.
Previous Research and Designs
Logo on above slide is clean and crisp with good contrast of colour. Screenshot(right) is easy to read and navigate.
GasBuddy does not however have a future- orientated function. The product we areproposing does.
Gas Hog, Gas Cubby, FuelFinder, iGasUp,TripTik, Waze, Route4me, & c. all offersimilar uses, but, again, none to date havehad a future-orientated function.
*Research Findings
User Group & Trends
Word Cloud
Psychological Literature
Research suggests that economic circumstances are negatively associated with individual’s mental health and well-being.
Zivin, Paczkowski and Galea (2010) • Economic downturn and population mental
health• Results consistently demonstrated that
economic crises are negatively associated with population mental health.
Fuel Friend Alleviates stressors Prior budgetary planning Inputted information retained in a diary format
Easily retrieved
Support from other research which suggests that the area of financial satisfaction is very important to people
Vera-Toscano, Ateca-Amestoy and Serrano-Del-Rosal (2006) reviewed research on Financial Satisfaction (FS) Results showed that it provided
strong arguments that FS is a specific domain of satisfaction with life.
Again Fuel Friend can help users gain satisfaction from forward planning and budgeting, while also alleviating stress factors
Diagrams of Data
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 140
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Vehicles per Household
Participant Number
Num
ber
of V
ehic
les
Diagrams of Data
Petrol61%
Diesel39%
Diesel vs. Petrol
Further Research
Hallmark, Sperry and Mudgal (2011) Fuel economy of hybrid-electric school buses Found significant difference in the hybrid school
buses vs. control buses Implications of study:
Very little information about actual on-road fuel consumption or costs is available
Hybrid bus much more costly than conventional bus (initially)
Fuel Friend Acts as a intervention for costs Suggests most economic route Budgeting and forward planning
Potential Issues with Design
o Bad colour contrasto Accidental plagiarismo Unnecessary and/or over use of semioticso Not inclusive enougho Usability (complexity)o Navigation issues
Feasibility of Design
Constant and quick updates to ever changing fuel costs Vehicle database Detailed maps and routes
References
Hallmark, S., Sperry, B., & Mudgal, A. (2011). In-Use Fuel Economy of Hybrid-Electric School Buses in Iowa. In Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association: 61, 504 –
510.
Inclusive Design Toolkit. (2011).
Retrieved from: http://www.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com/betterdesign2/whatis/whatis.html#p30
Vera-Toscano, E., Ateca-Amestoy V., & Serrano-Del-Rosal, R. (2006). “Building Financial Satisfaction.” In Social Indicators Research: 77 (2), 211-243.
Zivin, K., Paczkowski, M., & Galea, S. (2011). “Economic downturns and population mental health: research findings, gaps, challenges and priorities.” In Psychological
Medicine: 41, 1343-1348.