Incomplete transformation of bainite in
microalloyed high strength low alloy steels
The 155th ISIJ meeting (2008.3.28)
International organized session
“Effects of alloying elements on
microstructure formation in steels
and other materials”
T. Furuhara, K. Takahashi, G. Miyamoto
Inst. Mater. Res., Tohoku Univ., Japan
Industrial importance of bainitic steel - example
Welded structural steels
but increase in the amount of MA
e.g., Bridge, Building, Vessel, Pipeline etc.
Transformation during fast cooling
from coarse g grains
Formation of Martensite/Austenite (MA) constituent
Degradation of toughness
Nb bearing steel - Incomplete transformation of bainite
Microalloying (B, Mo, Nb) for increasing in hardenability
• Decrease in carbon content down to less than 0.1mass%
for better weldability
• Use of bainitic structure to obtain high strength
Transformation stasis (Incomplete transformation)
Fe-0.19C-1.81Mo(mass%)
Reynolds, Li, Shui, Aaronson : Met. Trans. A. 1990
Mo segregation at g/a interfaceExplanation of the transformation
stasis below the bay by SD(L)E
100
0
Restriction of ferrite
growth by SD(L)E
Interphase boundary
carbide precipitation
Sympathetic nucleation
of degenerate ferrite
Cease of
sympathetic nucleation
Log t
Aust
enit
e tr
ansf
orm
ed (
%)
(Reynolds et al : Met. Trans. A. 1990)
(Humphery et al: MMTA, 2004.)
Bainite transformation in Si-added steels
Bhadeshia, Edmonds: Met. Trans., 10A(1979), 895.
Enrichment of carbon up to T0’
→ Loss of driving force for
displacive transformationSuppression of Fe3C precipitation in g
→ Enrichment of carbon in g
Increase of retained g TRIP
Incomplete
transformation
γstable
(C-rich)
γunstable
BF
Carbide
(Tsuzaki, Maki: Netsushori, 32(1992),70.)
(Experimental)
Fe-(0.05, 0.15)C-1.5Mn -0.2Si-(0, 0.030)Nb (mass%)
Fe-(0.05, 0.15)C-1.5Mn -(0, 0.5)Mo - (0, 0.001)B
Materials & Heat treatment
Isothermal holding : 723 ~ 973 K ~86.4ks
Isothermal holding : 773 ~ 873 K ~ 1036.8 ks
Microstructure observation : OM, SEM, TEM
Measurement of phase fraction : Point counting method
To clarify effects of microalloying (Nb, Mo, B) on
transformation behavior of Fe-low C-1.5Mn steels
(Objective)
Effect of Nb addition
Isothermal transformation (OM) PF : Polygonal Ferrite
B : Bainite
M : MartensiteP :Pearlite
MA :Martensite-Austenite constituent
Fe-0.15C-1.5Mn (Nb free alloy)
0.03%Nb added alloy
973K 823K 773K
973K 823K 773K
Fe-0.15C-1.5Mn-(0, 0.03Nb) , transformed at 773K
Nb free 0.03%Nb added
Bainite transformation with cementite precipitation
No difference in the transformation kinetics with Nb addition
Fe-0.15C-1.5Mn-(0, 0.03Nb), transformed at 853K
stasis
Nb free 0.03%Nb added
Transformation stasis appears by Nb addition.
(Formation of carbide-free bainitic ferrite)
BF
MA
1μm
P
BFα
α
Fe-0.15C-1.5Mn-0.03Nb transformed at 853K for 10.8ks (TEM)
θ
BF
BF : Bainitic Ferrite
θ: Cementiteα : Ferrite
P :Pearlite
MA :Martensite-Austenite constituent
Dislocation-free ferrites of new
orientations containing q forms
after the stasis.
Nb free 0.03%Nb
Fe-0.05C-1.5Mn alloys, transformed at 853K
A higher BF fraction at the stasis
for a lower C content
Fe-1.5Mn-C (para)
phase diagram
○: Initial C content
●: C contents estimated
at the stasis by
a lever rule
NPLE
Mechanism for transformation stasis with Nb addition
T0’ : Upper limit of BF formation
Ae3
Carbon %
Te
mp
era
ture
Initial carbon content
T0’
773K : No differnce with Nb addition
853K : Stasis with Nb addition
853K
773K
Acm
θ
B
c
c
c
c
BF
BF
BF
γ
• BF formation
• C enrichment
in g
Diffusional
decomposition
Suppression by Nb
Stasis
BF
BF
BF
θ
No stasis
θ
BF
BF
BF
γ γ
BF
BF
BF
773K 853K
Suppression of ferrite transformation with Nb addition
On nucleation
Decrease in g grain bounday energy with Nb segregation
On growth
Solute drag effect by Nb
Pinning by Nb(C,N) precipitation
(M. Suehiro, Z. -K. Liu, J. Ågren:Acta Mater., 44 (1996), 4241)
Decrease in diffusion coefficient of carbon(S. Nanba, H. Morimoto, G. Anami, T. Towada:
Kobe steel Eng. Rep., 47 (1997), 8)
(M. Enomoto, N. Nojiri, Y. Sato:Mater. Trans., JIM, 35 (1994), 859)
Decrease in BF/g bounday energy with Nb segregation
Effect of (B, Mo) addition
Base 10s
10mm
P
BF
M(A)
Base 10.8ks
P
BF
α
MA
1 10 102
103
104
105
1060
20
40
60
80
100
Time (s)
Fra
ction o
f auste
nite
transfo
rmed (
vol.%
)
B-added
Base
(B,Mo)-
added
Mo-added
10mm
Isothermal transformation at 873K (OM)
Mo-added 0.6ks Mo-added 259.3ks
BF
α
BF
M(A)
M(A)
10mm 20mm
BF: Bainitic Ferrite, α: Ferrite MA: Martensite-Austenite constituent
P: Pearlite M(A): Mertensite(untransformed austenite)
Addition of Mo
Suppression of diffusional
transformation
Negligible amount of
carbide after the stasis
BF: Bainitic Ferrite θ: Cementite Martensite-Austenite constituent
M(A): Martensite (untransformed austenite) P: Pearlite DP: Degenerate Pearlite
10mm 10mm 10mm
Mo-added 10s
Before stasis
Mo-added 86.4ks
During stasis
Mo-added 1036.8ks
After stasisM(A)
BF
MA
carbide
P
BF
MA
P
BF
θ
Base 10s Base 0.6ks
10mm 10mm
BF
P
θ
BFDP
MA
DP
Time (s)
Fra
ction o
f auste
nite
transfo
rmed (
vol.%
)
B-addedBase
1 10 102
103
104
105
106
0
20
40
60
80
100
Mo-added
(B,Mo)-added
Isothermal transformation at 823K (OM)
M(A)
TEM microstructure transformed at 823K
Mo-added alloy
(B,Mo)-added alloy
BF: Bainitic Ferrite MA: Martensite-Austenite constituent α: Ferrite θ: Cementite M23C6 carbide
500nm
1mm 500nm
(B,Mo)-added alloy
αMA
BF
BF
α
BF
M23C6
BF
BF
BF
M23C6
10.8 ks (during staisis) 1036.8 ks (after stasis)
θuntransformed austenite
During the stasis
→ remainig as interlath MA
After the stasis
→ decomposing to ferrite+carbide
<diffusional transformation>
Fast transformation kinetics
without much difference
Isothermal transformation at 773K (SEM)
BF: Bainitic Ferrite MA: Martensite-Austenite constituent θ: Cementite DP: Degenerate Pearlite
Time(s)
Fra
ction o
f auste
nite
transfo
rmed (
vol.%
)
B-added
Base
Mo-added
(B,Mo)-added
1 10 102
103
104
105
0
20
40
60
80
100
B-added 60s (B,Mo)-added 60s
BF
10mm
interlathθ
DP
interlath θ
MA
5mm
intralathθ
intralathθ
BF
Bainite transformation
with θ precipitation
No transformation stasis
T0’(⊿G=100Kj/mol)
T0’(⊿G=200Kj/mol)T0’(⊿G=300Kj/mol)
T0’(⊿G=400Kj/mol)T0’(⊿G=500Kj/mol)
Fraction of transformation at 823K
■0.15%C-(B,Mo)-added alloy
60%
■0.05%C-(B,Mo)-added alloy
92%
Evaluation %C from the lever rule
α γ
0.0236 0.358
para-α T0‘ content
0.0226 0.348
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
773
873
973
1073
%C
Tem
pera
ture
(K
)
para-Ae3
T0
NPLE-γ
Fe-C-1.5mass%Mn (para)
Time (s)
Fra
ction o
f auste
nite
transfo
rmed (
vol.%
)
B-addedBase
Mo-added
(B,Mo)-added
1 10 102 103 104 105 1060
20
40
60
80
100
Fe-0.15C-1.5Mn(-100ppmB-0.5Mo)
Incomplete transformation by
Mo addition
1 10 102
103
104
105
106
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time (s)
Fra
ction o
f auste
nite
transfo
rmed (
vol.%
)B-added
Base Mo-added
(B,Mo)-added
823K
873K
Restart by a formation at 873K
by M23C6 precipitation at 823K
873K,823K:Carbide-free BF formation
→ Stasis
773K:Bainite transformation
with cementite (no stasis)
(Summary)
1. A transformation stasis in upper bainite transformation
appears in Mn-containing low-alloy low-carbon steels
microalloyed with Nb and Mo.
2. Dislocation-free ferrites of which orientations are often
different from those of adjacent BFs form with carbide
precipitation after the stasis.
3. Mo or Nb in solution suppress the nucleation of ferrite
at BF/g interphase boundary in a temperature range
where the incomplete transformation of bainite occurs.