+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing - Clinical Chemistry

Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing - Clinical Chemistry

Date post: 11-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
9
Identity DiaSorin RIA (1.86 + 0.88x) DiaSorin LIAISON (-0.80 + 0.87x) ADVIA Centaur (-1.80 + 0.98x) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 LC/MS/MS (ng/mL) Immunoassay (ng/mL) Scatter Plot with Deming Fit Vitamin D testing volumes continue to grow, making it one of the most commonly requested assays. Current testing methods for vitamin D include manual immunoassays, automated immunoassays, and direct detection methods (liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) and high performance liquid chromatography). Automated assays are typically the best choice for many laboratories. When considering an automated vitamin D testing solution, clinical concordance to LC/MS/MS and other key questions must be considered: Will the test measure total 25(OH) vitamin D? Labs need to provide accurate assessment of vitamin D status through the equimolar measurement of total 25(OH) vitamin D—the sum of 25(OH) vitamin D 2 and 25(OH) vitamin D 3 . 1-3 How will this test improve the turnaround time to clinicians? Effective workflow management of high-volume testing includes fast turnaround time, minimal labor, and high instrument throughput. 3 The additional ability to test in-house can significantly improve turnaround time. How does the test provide reproducible results? Laboratories have reported discrepancies between assays. In one lab, 60% of the results from an immunoassay method indicated insufficiency; compared to only 30% by LC/MS/MS. 3 Another laboratory had similar discrepancies for sample classification: 80% of samples had levels below 32 ng/mL by immunoassay, but only 46% of samples by LC/MS/MS. 3 In the absence of an international standard for vitamin D, it is important that assays be traceable to LC/MS/MS. French and Australian Method Comparison Studies Demonstrate Concordance between the Siemens ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total Assay and LC/MS/MS Two independent method comparison studies evaluated concordance to LC/MS/MS by comparing the ADVIA Centaur ® Vitamin D Total assay to LC/MS/MS, DiaSorin 25-OH Vitamin D radioimmunoassay, and DiaSorin LIAISON 25-OH Vitamin D TOTAL assays. The data were evaluated by Deming regression and Pearson correlation coefficient analyses. French method comparison study results 113 samples with known DiaSorin 25-OH Vitamin D radioimmunoassay (DiaSorin RIA) values were sent for ADVIA Centaur measurement at Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics (Tarrytown, NY, USA), DiaSorin LIAISON 25-OH Vitamin D TOTAL assay (DiaSorin LIAISON) measurement at the Research and Development Institute, Calabasas, CA, USA, and to a U.S. accredited laboratory for LC/MS/MS. Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing Requires Accurate Results and Improved Workflow New Vitamin D Total Test from Siemens Demonstrates Concordance with LC/MS/MS The ADVIA Centaur and DiaSorin RIA demonstrated good agreement with LC/MS/MS: Pearson correlation coefficients, 0.92 and 0.94, and Deming regressions, -1.80 ng/mL + 0.98x and 1.86 ng/mL + 0.88x, respectively (Table 1 and Figure 1). The DiaSorin LIAISON assay demonstrated a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.77 and a Deming regression of -0.8 ng/mL + 0.87x (Table 1 and Figure 1). Order No. A91DX-9187-A1-4A00 | 07-2012 | All rights reserved | © 2012 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. To learn more about the Siemens ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total assay, please visit www.siemens.com/vitamindtotal Advertisement ADVIA Centaur and all associated marks are trademarks of Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. All other trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Table 1. Pearson correlation coefficient and Deming regression results by method compared to LC/MS/MS. Method ADVIA Centaur XP DiaSorin RIA DiaSorin LIAISON Pearson correlation coefficient (r) 0.92 0.94 0.77 Slope 0.98 0.88 0.87 Intercept (ng/mL) -1.80 1.86 -0.80 N 113 113 113 Table 2. Summary of clinically relevant discordant results by assay type compared to LC/MS/MS. All results are reported in nmol/L. Deficiency, <50 nmol/L; insufficiency, 50–75 nmol/L; sufficiency, 75–250 nmol/L; toxicity, >375–500 nmol/L. Samples highlighted below had a >40% difference in value from LC/MS/MS. Sample ADVIA Centaur XP DiaSorin LIAISON LC/MS/MS 1 47.6 120.0 52.5 2 32.3 71.6 57.5 3 55.7 114.0 65.0 4 57.2 107.0 70.0 5 47.5 125.0 72.5 6 77.7 30.8 75.0 7 53.7 131.0 77.5 References: 1. Wallace AM, Gibson S, de la Hunty A, Lamberg-Allardt C, Ashwell M. Measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the clinical laboratory: current procedures, performance characteristics and limitations. Steroids 2010 July;75(7):477-88. 2. Hollis BW. Measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin D in a clinical environment: challenges and needs. Am J Clin Nutr 2008 August;88(2):507S-10S. 3. Rollins G. Vitamin D testing— what ’s the right answer? Labs grapple with confusing analytics, evidence. Clin Lab News 2009 July;35(7):1-9. Australian method comparison study results The ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total assay and DiaSorin LIAISON 25-OH Vitamin D TOTAL assay were compared using 188 samples in Australia. Discordant samples (n = 60) with enough sample volume were sent for LC/MS/MS analysis in the U.S. In comparison to LC/MS/MS for the 60 discordant samples, the ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated a Deming regression of -0.58 ng/mL + 0.77x and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.92. The DiaSorin LIAISON assay demonstrated a Deming regression of -13.94 ng/mL + 1.91x and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.84. Of the 60 samples, some samples (n = 7) had yielded divergent results by different immunoassay methods such that the patient’s reported total 25(OH) vitamin D status (deficient, insufficient, or sufficient) varied according to the method used. New Vitamin D Total test from Siemens provides highly accurate, reproducible results in 18 minutes Vitamin D test volumes continue to grow rapidly, requiring laboratories to adopt a robust solution to meet their vitamin D testing needs. When laboratories consider implementing a new methodology, it is important to include clinical concordance to LC/MS/MS as an acceptable evaluation criteria to ensure correct assessment of vitamin D status—deficiency, insufficiency, sufficiency, or toxicity. In two studies, vitamin D results from Siemens’ ADVIA Centaur systems demonstrated concordance to LC/MS/MS. Additionally, the Siemens’ Vitamin D Total assay can be run on a routine analyzer with results in 18 minutes. Figure 1. Deming regression by method compared to LC/MS/MS (n = 113).
Transcript
Page 1: Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing - Clinical Chemistry

Identity

DiaSorin RIA (1.86 + 0.88x)

DiaSorin LIAISON (-0.80 + 0.87x)

ADVIA Centaur (-1.80 + 0.98x)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

LC/MS/MS (ng/mL)

Imm

un

oa

ssa

y (

ng

/mL

)

Scatter Plot with Deming Fit

Vitamin D testing volumes continue to grow,

making it one of the most commonly requested

assays. Current testing methods for vitamin D

include manual immunoassays, automated

immunoassays, and direct detection methods

(liquid chromatography tandem mass

spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) and high performance

liquid chromatography). Automated assays are

typically the best choice for many laboratories.

When considering an automated vitamin D testing

solution, clinical concordance to LC/MS/MS and

other key questions must be considered:

Will the test measure total 25(OH) vitamin D?

Labs need to provide accurate assessment

of vitamin D status through the equimolar

measurement of total 25(OH) vitamin D—the

sum of 25(OH) vitamin D2 and 25(OH) vitamin D3.1-3

How will this test improve the turnaround

time to clinicians? Effective workflow

management of high-volume testing includes

fast turnaround time, minimal labor, and high

instrument throughput.3 The additional ability

to test in-house can significantly improve

turnaround time.

How does the test provide reproducible

results? Laboratories have reported

discrepancies between assays. In one lab,

60% of the results from an immunoassay

method indicated insufficiency; compared

to only 30% by LC/MS/MS.3 Another laboratory

had similar discrepancies for sample classification:

80% of samples had levels below 32 ng/mL

by immunoassay, but only 46% of samples by

LC/MS/MS.3 In the absence of an international

standard for vitamin D, it is important that

assays be traceable to LC/MS/MS.

French and Australian Method Comparison

Studies Demonstrate Concordance between

the Siemens ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total

Assay and LC/MS/MS

Two independent method comparison studies

evaluated concordance to LC/MS/MS by

comparing the ADVIA Centaur® Vitamin D Total

assay to LC/MS/MS, DiaSorin 25-OH Vitamin D

radioimmunoassay, and DiaSorin LIAISON

25-OH Vitamin D TOTAL assays. The data were

evaluated by Deming regression and Pearson

correlation coefficient analyses.

French method comparison study results

113 samples with known DiaSorin 25-OH Vitamin D

radioimmunoassay (DiaSorin RIA) values were

sent for ADVIA Centaur measurement at Siemens

Healthcare Diagnostics (Tarrytown, NY, USA),

DiaSorin LIAISON 25-OH Vitamin D TOTAL assay

(DiaSorin LIAISON) measurement at the Research

and Development Institute, Calabasas, CA, USA,

and to a U.S. accredited laboratory for LC/MS/MS.

Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing

Requires Accurate Results and Improved Workflow

New Vitamin D Total Test from Siemens Demonstrates Concordance with LC/MS/MS

The ADVIA Centaur and DiaSorin RIA demonstrated

good agreement with LC/MS/MS: Pearson

correlation coefficients, 0.92 and 0.94, and

Deming regressions, -1.80 ng/mL + 0.98x

and 1.86 ng/mL + 0.88x, respectively (Table 1

and Figure 1).

The DiaSorin LIAISON assay demonstrated a

Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.77 and

a Deming regression of -0.8 ng/mL + 0.87x

(Table 1 and Figure 1).

Order No. A91DX-9187-A1-4A00 | 07-2012 | All rights reserved | © 2012 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.

To learn more about the Siemens ADVIA

Centaur Vitamin D Total assay, please visit

www.siemens.com/vitamindtotal

Advertisement

ADVIA Centaur and all associated marks are trademarks of

Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. All other trademarks and

brands are the property of their respective owners.

Table 1. Pearson correlation coefficient and Deming

regression results by method compared to LC/MS/MS.

Method

ADVIA

Centaur

XP

DiaSorin

RIA

DiaSorin

LIAISON

Pearson

correlation

coefficient (r)

0.92 0.94 0.77

Slope 0.98 0.88 0.87

Intercept

(ng/mL)

-1.80 1.86 -0.80

N 113 113 113

Table 2. Summary of clinically relevant discordant results

by assay type compared to LC/MS/MS. All results are

reported in nmol/L. Deficiency, <50 nmol/L; insufficiency,

50–75 nmol/L; sufficiency, 75–250 nmol/L; toxicity,

>375–500 nmol/L. Samples highlighted below had a

>40% difference in value from LC/MS/MS.

Sample

ADVIA

Centaur

XP

DiaSorin

LIAISON LC/MS/MS

1 47.6 120.0 52.5

2 32.3 71.6 57.5

3 55.7 114.0 65.0

4 57.2 107.0 70.0

5 47.5 125.0 72.5

6 77.7 30.8 75.0

7 53.7 131.0 77.5

References:

1. Wallace AM, Gibson S, de la Hunty A, Lamberg-Allardt C, Ashwell M.

Measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the clinical laboratory:

current procedures, performance characteristics and limitations.

Steroids 2010 July;75(7):477-88.

2. Hollis BW. Measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin D in a clinical

environment: challenges and needs. Am J Clin Nutr

2008 August;88(2):507S-10S.

3. Rollins G. Vitamin D testing—what’s the right answer? Labs

grapple with confusing analytics, evidence. Clin Lab News

2009 July;35(7):1-9.

Australian method comparison study results

The ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total assay and

DiaSorin LIAISON 25-OH Vitamin D TOTAL assay

were compared using 188 samples in Australia.

Discordant samples (n = 60) with enough sample

volume were sent for LC/MS/MS analysis in the

U.S. In comparison to LC/MS/MS for the 60

discordant samples, the ADVIA Centaur assay

demonstrated a Deming regression of -0.58 ng/mL

+ 0.77x and a Pearson correlation coefficient of

0.92. The DiaSorin LIAISON assay demonstrated

a Deming regression of -13.94 ng/mL + 1.91x and

a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.84. Of the

60 samples, some samples (n = 7) had yielded

divergent results by different immunoassay

methods such that the patient’s reported total

25(OH) vitamin D status (deficient, insufficient, or

sufficient) varied according to the method used.

New Vitamin D Total test from Siemens

provides highly accurate, reproducible

results in 18 minutes

Vitamin D test volumes continue to grow rapidly,

requiring laboratories to adopt a robust solution to

meet their vitamin D testing needs. When

laboratories consider implementing a new

methodology, it is important to include clinical

concordance to LC/MS/MS as an acceptable

evaluation criteria to ensure correct assessment

of vitamin D status—deficiency, insufficiency,

sufficiency, or toxicity.

In two studies, vitamin D results from Siemens’

ADVIA Centaur systems demonstrated

concordance to LC/MS/MS. Additionally, the

Siemens’ Vitamin D Total assay can be run on

a routine analyzer with results in 18 minutes.

Figure 1. Deming regression by method compared to

LC/MS/MS (n = 113).

Page 2: Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing - Clinical Chemistry

Presents a Webinar

TO REGISTERGo to www.aacc.org and under “Events” select “Conference and Event Calendar”

and choose this webinar. Once on the webinar page, click “Register” to register online or print a registration form.

Managing the Challenges of Biological Variation

Lab statistics aren’t sexy, but performing the right calculations to produce clinically appropriate and correctly interpreted test results can be life-altering for patients. For example, using statistics to adjust for biological variation in serial troponin results can mean the diff erence between a patient being diagnosed with an AMI and getting the appropriate care, or that same patient being sent home with a “missed” acute cardiac episode, putting them at further risk of a second adverse event.

Program Faculty:Alan H.B. Wu, PhD, DABCC, Chief of Clinical Chemistry and Toxicology, San Francisco General Hospital; Professor of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA

Roy Gerona, PhD, Research Scientist, Department of Laboratory Medicine, San Francisco General Hospi-tal and the University of California, San Francisco, CA

This program is approved by AACC for 1.5 Category 1 ACCENT credit hours.

Learn how to incorporate data on biological variation into your QC program. Register today!

Wednesday, September 19, 2012 ~ 2:00-3:30 pm Eastern U.S. Time

As cardiac markers and other laboratory assays improve and are better able to detect very low analyte concentrations, calculating and understanding the impact of biological variation on test results is imperative for labs.

Attend this program and know:How to incorporate data on biological variation into your quality control goals The eff ects of biological variation on test precision and accuracyTips for selecting and applying QC rules that will help you meet your QC goalsHow biological variation can infl uence the results of common laboratory testsStrategies for measuring reference change values (RCVs) and reducing RCVs that are too high

Page 3: Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing - Clinical Chemistry

© 2012 AB SCIEX. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. The trademarks mentioned herein are the property of AB SCIEX Pte. Ltd. or their respective owners.

Everything depends on having a partner you can trustRELY ON AB SCIEX FOR PROVEN LC/MS/MS SOLUTIONS

PUSHING THE LIMITS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH

The limitations of conventional techniques are accelerating the adoption of

mass spectrometry as a smart alternative for scores of clinical research

applications involving trace level quantitation of multiple compounds such as

endocrines, biomarkers, drugs of abuse and many more.

If you’re ready to break through, look no further than the industry leader.

With 25-years of experience delivering high-performance systems, software, and

support, AB SCIEX is a partner you can trust to integrate easy-to-use mass spec

technology into your lab’s day-to-day research routine. Save time, cut costs,

and solve analytical issues with greater confidence and better results.

Isn’t it time to break through the limits?

For more information, visit www.absciex.com/clinical-jcc

Page 4: Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing - Clinical Chemistry

Information for Authors

Clinical Chemistry is published by the American Association forClinical Chemistry (AACC). The journal welcomes contributions oforiginal information, experimental or theoretical, that advance thescience of clinical chemistry. Submissions should adhere to the “Uni-form Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Jour-nals” (http://www.icmje.org/).

Manuscript Review. Manuscripts are evaluated by anonymouspeer reviewers. Authors are usually notified of the disposition of amanuscript within three to four weeks of its receipt. Equal consider-ation is given to manuscripts in English from any country, whetheror not the author is a member of the AACC.

Copyright. Manuscripts are considered with the understand-ing that each author has participated in the work and assumes re-sponsibility for the content; that the authors have disclosed any po-tential conflicts of interest; that the same information has not beenand will not be submitted for concurrent review, nor published else-where (other than as an abstract, preliminary report, or poster citedin the manuscript); that unique materials necessary to reproducethe results are available to readers; and that if the manuscript is ac-cepted, copyright will be transferred to the publisher. To conveythese assurances, all authors must sign the copyright form providedat acceptance.

Unpublished Work. When citing unpublished work or opin-ions of others, provide a permission letter from them.

Manuscript Preparation. Text: Most common word-processing software formats are accepted; Microsoft Word is pre-ferred. Use 12-point font, 1-inch margins, and double spacingthroughout. Do not use headers or footers, but do number the pages,starting with the title page as page 1. For guidance on manuscriptpreparation and style, consult our Information for Authors at http://www.clinchem.org/site/info_ar/info_authors.xhtml.

Images: The acceptable image file formats for print publicationare TIFF (tagged image file format) and EPS (encapsulated post-script) both at 600 dpi resolution. The figures must be submitted asindependent files, not embedded within a word processing docu-ment. Microsoft PowerPoint (PPT) files are also acceptable, but eachfile must have embedded fonts and only one image per slide, one slideper file. Verify that symbols and lettering will be legible when reducedto publication size. Figures should be redesigned or recreated if theydo not appear sharp and clear on paper. Authors are advised to useour online Digital Expert evaluation tool to test print figures beforesubmitting them.

The author will be required to bear the full cost of the prepara-tion and publication of color illustrations, invited contributions ex-cepted. The charge for the first color figure is $1500. Subsequentcolor figures or parts of figures are $500 each.

Tables: Tables should be created in a common word-processingformat. Spreadsheet-generated or embedded image tables should berecreated in the word-processing document and included with thetext of the manuscript.

Submission and Tracking of Manuscripts. Submit and trackstatus of manuscripts at http://submit.clinchem.org.

The complete Information for Authors is available at http://www.clinchem.org/site/info_ar/info_authors.xhtml.

Clinical Chemistry (ISSN 0009-9147) is published monthly by theAmerican Association for Clinical Chemistry, 1850 K Street, NW,Suite 625, Washington, DC 20006.

© 2012 The American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Editorial Office Address. For additional information about manu-script submission and reviewing, contact the editorial office.Telephone 202.420.7678; fax 202.833.4576; e-mail [email protected]. Address for regular mail or courier: ClinicalChemistry, 1850 K Street, NW, Suite 625, Washington, DC 20006.

Subscriptions: Contact the AACC Subscriptions Department at1850 K Street, NW, Suite 625, Washington, DC 20006. Telephone800.892.1400 or 202.857.0717; fax 202.887.5093; or websites http://www.clinchem.org or http://www.aacc.org. Annual 2012 rates: Printand online institutional subscription USA $1,193, elsewhere $1,377.Individual subscription USA $361, elsewhere $558. Airmail deliveryoutside USA is an additional $290. Online only (no print) institu-tional subscription $799; individual subscription $242. Individualsubscriptions are for personal use and not to be used in a library.

Reprints: Reprint order forms are mailed to authors with theirpage proofs. Reprints can also be ordered at any time by contactingthe Cadmus Reprint Department. Telephone 1.866.487.5625 or410.943.3728; fax 877.705.1373. Minimum reprint order is 100copies.

Back Issues: Selected complete back volumes and single copies ofcurrent and back issues are available from AACC. Contact the Sub-scription Department for pricing.

Missing Copies: Claims will not be allowed (a) unless we are notifiedwithin 3 months after the issue date for domestic and Canadian sub-scribers, or 6 months after the issue date for foreign subscribers; (b) ifnotice of a recent change of address has not been received; or (c) if thereason for claim is ‘missing from files’. For claims to be processed, thesubscriber’s number and exact name and address as they appear onthe mailing label must be included in correspondence.

Abstracting and Indexing Services: Clinical Chemistry is covered byAbstracts Express, Analytical Abstracts, Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS,Chemical Abstracts Service, Current Awareness in BiologicalSciences, Current Clinical Cancer, Current Contents/Life Sciences,Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, Index Medicus, MEDLINE, ReferenceUpdate, Research Alert, Science Citation Index, Sociedad Ibe-roamericana de Informacion Cientıfica (SIIC) Data Bases, andSciSearch.

Disclaimers: Manuscripts published in Clinical Chemistry reflect theindividual views of their authors and, in the absence of a statement tothe contrary, not the views of the institutions with which the authorsare affiliated. The contents of advertisements or articles are not to beconstrued as official statements, evaluations, or endorsements by theEditor or the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Advertising Inquiries: Contact Scherago International, Inc., 525Washington Blvd., Suite 3310, Jersey City, NJ 07310. Telephone201.653.4777; fax 201.653.5205; e-mail [email protected]; Internethttp://www.scherago.com.

Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Clinical Chemistry.All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Photo-copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the USCopyright Law is authorized by the American Association for Clini-cal Chemistry, for internal or personal use, provided that (a) the feeis paid directly to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rose-wood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; or (b) a photocopy license has beengranted by the CCC. Fees are subject to change. This consent does notextend to other kinds of copying, such as for general or externaldistribution, resale, advertising, promotional purposes, or for creat-ing new collective works; for these purposes, contact the Director ofPublications, AACC, 1850 K Street, NW, Suite 625, Washington, DC20006. Telephone 202.857.0717; fax 202.833.4568, e-mail [email protected].

Periodicals postage paid at Washington, DC and at additional mail-ing offices. POSTMASTER: send address changes to Clinical Chem-istry, 1850 K Street, NW, Suite 625, Washington, DC 20006.

AACC OfficersGreg Miller, PresidentRobert H. Christenson, President-ElectAnn M. Gronowski, Past PresidentElizabeth L. Frank, SecretaryD. Robert Dufour, Treasurer

AACC Board of DirectorsDavid G. GrenachePatricia M. JonesSteven C. KazmierczakDavid D. KochLori J. SokollGregory J. Tsongalis

4A

Page 5: Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing - Clinical Chemistry

Quick Guide toSubmission

For additional article types and detailed instructions, please see our Information for Authors athttp://www.clinchem.org/site/info_ar/info_authors.xhtml.

Type of Submission*WordLimit

Structured (S) orUnstructured (U)

Abstract: Word Limit

MaximumNumber ofReferences

Total Number ofTables/Figures

Article 3,500 S: 250 40 6

Brief Communication 1,500 S: 250 20 1 each

Citation Classics 600 Nonapplicable 6 Nonapplicable

Clinical Case StudyCase descriptionCase discussion3–5 questions and up to 5 pointsto remember

5001,000 Nonapplicable 10 2

Clinical Case Study Commentary 300 Nonapplicable Nonapplicable Nonapplicable

Editorial 1,500 Nonapplicable 15 Nonapplicable

Letters to the Editor / Reply 750 Nonapplicable 5 1

Mini-Review 3,500 S: 250 40 4

Opinion 1,500 Nonapplicable 15 1

Perspective 1,500 Nonapplicable 5 1

Q&A 3,500 Nonapplicable Nonapplicable Nonapplicable

Review 5,000 S: 250 75 6

What Is Your Guess?Case description3 questionsCase discussion

75

75Nonapplicable 5 1

�This chart represents common types of submissions to Clinical Chemistry.

Manuscript Formatting▫ Double-spaced text, 1-inch margin, 12-point font size in Arial, Helvetica, or Times New Roman▫ Numbered pages with references numbered sequentially in main text▫ Title page listing title, authors (first name, middle initial, last name), each author’s affiliation during

the study, corresponding author’s contact information, running title, keywords, list of any previouspresentation of manuscript, and any disclaimers

▫ Reference list formatted according to Information for Authors with Journal abbreviations in the reference listchecked against the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/)

▫ SI units used throughout manuscript according to Information for Authors

Metadata (to be entered online)▫ A valid and unique e-mail for each author▫ Authors’ current institution, address, telephone, and fax▫ Author Disclosure Forms and Contribution Forms to be completed by each author before submission.

Copyright Transfer Agreement to be completed by each author after acceptance.▫ Clinical Chemistry manuscript number of any companion papers (if applicable)

Compliance with Guidelines▫ A MIQE checklist is required for all studies using quantitative real-time PCR experiments; a STARD checklist

is required for all studies or trials of the diagnostic accuracy or performance of a diagnostic test; a CONSORTdiagram is required for all randomized and Phase III trials; a MIAME checklist is required for all studies thatpresent data for microarray experiments.

▫ All studies involving human study participants must indicate that they are in compliance with theDeclaration of Helsinki ethical principles for medical research involving human study participants.A statement must be included in the text that Institutional Review Board approval was obtained andwritten informed consent obtained from study participants.

Permissions▫ Written permission from the copyright holder is required to reproduce any copyrighted material

Page 6: Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing - Clinical Chemistry

Presents a Webinar

Th e Lab’s Changing Role in Measuring Anticoagulants

In recent years, new anticoagulant drugs have been introduced into clinical practice, expanding the number of therapies available to treat conditions such as atrial fi brillation, recurrent venous thrombosis, and acute coronary syndrome. Since the adoption of these drugs has changed clinical practice, it is also changing the role labs play in assessing and monitoring patients who are taking anticoagulants.

Of particular concern are surgery patients. Lab testing may be necessary to determine if a patient is taking an anticoagulant prior to surgery, or to identify which anticoagulant a patient is using. In cases where a patient is already taking an anticoagulant, transitioning to a diff erent anticoagulation therapy prior to surgery may be indicated, and lab testing plays a role in that process as well.

This program is approved by AACC for 1.0 Category 1 ACCENT credit hours.

Wednesday, September 5, 2012 ~ 2:00-3:00 pm Eastern U.S. Time

TO REGISTERGo to www.aacc.org and under “Events”, select “Conferences and Events”

and then choose this webinar.

Learn more about the lab’s role in measuring and monitoring anticoagulants. Register today!

Program Faculty:Michael Laposata, MD, PhD, Edward and Nancy Fody Professor, Executive Vice Chair of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology and Professor of Medicine at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Pathologist-in-Chief, Vanderbilt University Hospital, Nashville, TN

Target Audience: Clinical laboratory directors, managers and lead tech-nologists; hematologists; pathologists; and IVD industry professionals who are involved in testing for or monitoring anticoagulants.

Attend this program and know: How anticoagulants—both old and new—are currently being used by clinicians to treat various conditions and diseasesThe physiological mechanics of how each anticoagulant aff ects the coagulation cascadeWhat assays should be used to monitor various anticoagulantsRecommended treatment, monitoring and testing algorithms for traditional anticoagulants such as warfarin and heparinHow newer anticoagulants such as Dabigatran and Rivaroxiban work, and what their addition to the list of FDA-approved anticoagulation therapies means for laboratorians

Page 7: Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing - Clinical Chemistry

An International Conference��Featuring outstanding leaders in the fi eld of cardiovascular medicine

��Two days focusing on all major areas of cardiovascular disease: prevention, diagnosis, management

��Meet and hear from leading cardiac specialists and investigators in clinical practice and the research arena.

Explore Leading-Edge Topics��International trends in CVD

��Biomarkers in the prevention of CVD

��Genomics, proteomics and biomarkers of CVD

��Biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of CVD

Meet and Hear from World-Renowned Presenters��Fred Apple, PhD ��Robert Gerszten, MD ��Torbjørn Omland, MD, PhD University of Minnesota School of Medicine Harvard Medical School Akershus University Hospital

��Phillip Barter, MD ��Peter Libby, MD ��Kári Stefánsson, MD University of Sydney Harvard Medical School DeCode Genetics ��Jacques Genest, MD ��David Morrow, MD ��K. Srinath Reddy, MD McGill University Health Center Harvard Medical School Public Health Foundation of India

This program is offered under the auspices of the IFCC and is co-sponsored by the Asian Pacifi c Federation of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Indonesian Heart Association, Japan Atherosclerosis Society, Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry, Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine, Singapore Association of Clinical Biochemists, Singapore Cardiac Society, and Taiwan Society of Cardiology.

Generous corporate funding for this program has been received from the Committee of Cardiovascular Pharmacology of the Chinese Pharmacological Society, Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc., Randox Cardiology, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthcare.

1850 K STREET, NW, SUITE 625 • WASHINGTON, DC 20006 • 800-892-1400 or 202-857-0717 • FAX: 202-887-5093 • AACC.org

BIOMARKERS OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASEOctober 1–2, 2012 | Singapore

Developed by Clinical Chemistry

Register now ataacc.org/events

or contactCustomer Service [email protected]

Page 8: Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing - Clinical Chemistry

Presents a Webinar

TO REGISTERGo to www.aacc.org and under “Events” select “Conference and Event Calendar.”

Developing a Quality Control Plan Based on Risk Management

Valerie Ng, MD, PhD, Immediate Past Chief, ACMC Medical Staff ; Chair, Laboratory Medicine & Pathology; Director, Clinical Laboratory, Alameda County Medical Center/Highland General Hospital, Oakland, CA

James H Nichols, PhD, Professor of Pathology, Tufts University School of Medicine; Medical Director, Clinical Chemistry, Baystate Health, Springfi eld, MA; Chairholder, CLSI EP23 Document Development Committee

Curtis Parvin, PhD, Manager, Advanced Statistical Research, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Plano, TX

This program is approved by AACC for 1.5 Category 1 ACCENT credit hours, and is supported by Bio-Rad Laboratories.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012 ~ 2:00-3:30 pm Eastern U.S. Time

Clinical labs now have a new option for quality control (QC) compliance programs based on risk n rismanagement principles.

Risk management principles can improve laboratories’ QC programs by evaluating regulatoryrequirements, information provided by the manufacturer, information pertaining to the laboratory environment, and medical requirements for the test result. The result is a QC plan designed specifi -cally for the particular combination of measuring system, laboratory environment, and clinicalapplication.

In this program you will hear from CLSI guideline developers and world leaders in the fi eld of QC. Through case studies they will share with you how they have implemented eff ective QC plans us-ing risk management principles to improve the practice and safety of laboratory medicine.

After attending you will be able to:Describe the CLSI document EP23 and understand risk management’s role in QC Develop a QC plan for moderate complexity POCT and central lab-based testsIdentify benchmarks for monitoring the eff ectiveness of a QC plan after implementationUse EP23 to refi ne an existing QC plan for a testing process not performing up to expectations

Page 9: Increasing Demand for Vitamin D Testing - Clinical Chemistry

For more information or to register, please visit the AACC web site at www.aacc.org.

September 6-7, 2012Chicago, IL

Presents a Conference

Mass spectrometry is fast becoming the analytical method of choice for many clinical assays. Attend this conference to fi nd out if mass spec has a place in your lab, and learn about clinical applications where it is now being routinely used.

Our leading lab experts will show you:Advantages and challenges of mass specKeys to implementing mass spec tools in the clinical labNew guidelines for MS method development and validationPros and cons of mass spec vs. immunoassay

In addition, conference faculty will examine some of the applications already in use in the clinical lab, including:

LC-MS for drug analysisTDMSteroid and vitamin D analyses

…and off er a look at emerging applications in microbiology, molecular diagnostics and protein quantitation.

Mass Spectrometry in the Clinical Lab: Best Practices and Current Applications

Don’t miss this

informative

program! Early bird

registration ends

August 16.

AACC would like to thank Agilent Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientifi c, and Waters Corp. for their support of this event.


Recommended