Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia
Report Prepared for
Southern Arc Minerals Inc.
Report Prepared by
SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.
2CS032.000
August 23, 2013
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page i
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia
Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Suite 1680 – 200 Burrard Street Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6C 3L6 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.southernarcminerals.com Tel: +1.604.676.5241 Fax: +1.604.676.5246
SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. Suite 2200-1066 West Hastings Street Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6E 3X2
e-mail: [email protected] website: www.srk.com Tel: +1.604.681.4196 Fax: +1.604.687.5532
SRK Project Number 2CS032.000
Effective date: July 11, 2013 Signature date: August 23, 2013 Authored by:
Gilles Arseneau, P. Geo.
Associate Consultant
Peer Reviewed by:
Marek Nowak, P. Eng.
Principal Geostatistician
Cover: View of Montong Botek Hill with Porphyry Mineralisation, West Lombok Project, Indonesia.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page ii
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Important Notice This report was prepared as a National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report for Southern Arc
Minerals Inc. (Southern Arc or the company) by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (SRK). The quality of
information, conclusions, and estimates contained herein is consistent with the level of effort
involved in SRK‟s services, based on: i) information available at the time of preparation, ii) data
supplied by outside sources, and iii) the assumptions, conditions, and qualifications set forth in this
report. This report is intended for use by Southern Arc subject to the terms and conditions of its
contract with SRK and relevant securities legislation. The contract permits Southern Arc to file this
report as a Technical Report with Canadian securities regulatory authorities pursuant to National
Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Except for the purposes legislated
under provincial securities law, any other uses of this report by any third party is at that party‟s sole
risk. The responsibility for this disclosure remains with Southern Arc. The user of this document
should ensure that this is the most recent Technical Report for the property as it is not valid if a new
Technical Report has been issued.
Copyright This report is protected by copyright vested in SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. It may not be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever to any person without the written
permission of the copyright holder, other than in accordance with stock exchange and other
regulatory authority requirements.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page iii
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Executive Summary
Introduction
SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (SRK) has been retained by Southern Arc Minerals Inc. (Southern Arc
or the company) to prepare a technical report summarizing the mineral resources for the West
Lombok Project. The mineral resource estimate is to form the first time disclosure of mineral
resources by Southern Arc for the West Lombok Property.
SRK‟s scope of work for the West Lombok Property included the construction of mineral resource
models for the Raja, Bising and Tibu Serai epithermal gold mineralisation, and the Selodong
porphyry copper gold mineralisation and the preparation of an independent technical report in
compliance with National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 guidelines.
The mineral resource statement reported herein is a collaborative effort between Southern Arc and
SRK personnel. The exploration database was compiled and maintained by Southern Arc, and was
audited by SRK. The geological model and outlines for the gold mineralisation were constructed by
SRK from a two-dimensional geological interpretation provided by Southern Arc. In the opinion of
SRK, the geological model is a reasonable representation of the distribution of the targeted
mineralisation at the current level of sampling. The mineral resource statement reported herein was
presented to Southern Arc in a memorandum report on July 11, 2013. In accordance with National
Instrument 43-101 guidelines, Dr. Arseneau visited the West Lombok Property on December 6
through 9, 2011 and on April 23 to 26, 2013 accompanied by Andrew Rowe Executive Vice
President and Chief Geologist of Southern Arc.
Property Description and Ownership
The West Lombok Property hosts an early stage gold and copper exploration project located in
Indonesia. It is located on the southwest corner of the Island of Lombok and covers a northwest
trending mineralized corridor that extends for approximately 13 by 7 kilometres. Southern Arc
Minerals Inc., through Indotan Lombok Pte. Ltd., holds a 90% interest in PT. Indotan Lombok Barat
Bangkit (“PT ILBB”), an Indonesian approved foreign investment company (Penanaman Modal Asing
or PMA Company that holds a 100% interest in the West Lombok Property. The remaining 10%
interest of PT ILBB is held by the West Lombok Regency Government as a free-carry loan
arrangement.
Geology and Mineralisation
The geology of the West Lombok Property is characterized by an island-arc volcano-sedimentary
succession of Late-Oligocene to Quaternary age. The southern parts of Lombok Island are overlain
by Late Oligocene to Middle Miocene, low potassium calc-alkaline to weakly alkaline andesitic
volcanic and interbedded volcaniclastic rocks, associated low potassium intermediate intrusions and
shallow marine sedimentary rocks and limestone.
The West Lombok Property covers a northwest trending structural corridor of mineralisation and
alteration hosting three main prospects: the Pelangan epithermal gold prospect, the Mencanggah
epithermal/porphyry district, and the Selodong porphyry intrusive complex. The Raja resource area
is situated within the Pelangan Prospect, the Bising and Tibu Serai resource areas are within the
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page iv
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Mencanggah Prospect and the Selodong porphyry copper-gold deposit is within the Selodong
Prospect area.
Exploration Status
A total of 210 BLEG, 210 stream sediments, 6 rock chips and 14 rock float samples were collected in
the Pelangan-Mencanggah area. Geological mapping traverses were conducted using tape and
compass surveys over a 35 square kilometre area.
Drilling has been carried out on the Mencanggah Prospect area by Southern Arc and on the
Selodong and Pelangan Prospect areas by Newmont and Southern Arc. Drilling by Southern Arc
was carried out using up to ten drill rigs. A total of 47,750 m have been drilled in 253 holes on the
property.
SRK is of the opinion that the drilling programs carried out by Southern Arc on the West Lombok
property are sufficient and adequately spaced for use in the estimation of mineral resources for the
Pelangan, Mencanggah and Selodong prospect areas.
Mineral Resource Estimates
The mineral resource model prepared by SRK considers 253 of the core boreholes drilled by
Southern Arc and previous owners of the property during the period of 2005 to 2013. Of these, 99
drill holes intersected the mineralised zones and are included in the resource estimate: 36 drill holes
totalling 5,787 m were included in the Raja resource model, 22 drill holes totalling 3,830 m were
included in the Bising model, 10 holes totalling 1,370 m were included in the Tibu Serai model and
31 holes totalling 11,012 m were included in the Selodong model. The resource estimation work was
completed by Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P.Geo. (APEGBC #23474) an appropriate “independent qualified
person” as this term is defined in National Instrument 43-101. The effective date of the resource
statement is June 29, 2013.
Mineral resources were estimated for four separate deposits by Ordinary Kriging using Gemcom
block modelling software in three separate models. The Raja, Bising and Tibu Serai block model
used 10 x 10 x 5 m blocks and the Selodong model used a 10 x 10 x 10 m block. Grade estimates
were based on capped, 1 m composited assay data for Raja, 1.5 m composited data for Bising and
Tibu Serai and 3 m composites for the Selodong. Gold capping levels were set at 30 g/t for the Raja
model, 5 g/t for the Bising and Tibu Serai models and 4 g/t for the Selodong model. All blocks in all
models were classified as inferred mineral resources. Mineral resources for Bising and Tibu Serai
were estimated in the same block model.
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The
estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title,
taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other relevant issues. The quantity and grade of reported
inferred resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature. There has been insufficient exploration
to define these inferred resources as an indicated or measured mineral resource. It is uncertain if
further exploration will result in upgrading them to an indicated or measured mineral resource
category.
The mineral resources were estimated using current Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and
Petroleum (CIM) standards, definitions and guidelines. SRK considers that major portions of the
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page v
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
mineralisation at the West Lombok Property may be amenable for open pit extraction. In order to
determine the quantities of material offering “reasonable prospects for economic extraction” by an
open pit, SRK used a pit optimizer and reasonable mining assumptions to evaluate the proportions
of the block model that could be “reasonably expected” to be mined from an open pit. The mineral
resources for the West Lombok Property are summarised in Table i below:
Table i: Mineral Resource Statement*, West Lombok Project, Indonesia, SRK Consulting, July 11, 2013.
Deposit Class Tonnage
(tonnes)
Grade
Cap Au (g/t)
Contained Metal
Au (Oz)
Grade
Cap Ag
(g/t)
Contained Metal Ag
(Oz)
Grade
Cu (%)
Contained Metal
Cu (lbs)
Raja Inferred 3,898,000 2.63 329,700 14 1,821,000 ND ND
Bising Inferred 6,908,000 0.88 195,550 ND ND ND ND
Tibu Serai Inferred 977,000 1.36 42,570 ND ND ND ND
Selodong Inferred 66,750,000 0.43 922,800
ND ND 0.27 397,324,000
* Reported at a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t gold equivalent inside a Whittle pit shell for Raja, a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off for Bising and Tibu Serai and a 0.25 copper equivalent for Selodong. Gold equivalent is calculated using US$1500 per ounce of gold and US$25 per ounce of silver and 100% metal recoveries are assumed for both metals. Copper equivalent is calculated using US$1500 per ounce of gold and US$3.56 per pound of copper and 100% metal recoveries are assumed for both metals. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. All numbers have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Gold was capped at 30 g/t for Raja, 5 g/t for Bising and Tibu Serai and 4 g/t for Selodong. No capping was applied to copper.
Conclusion and Recommendations
The West Lombok Property hosts at least four separate mineral deposits within a 10 km strike
length. Both epithermal gold and porphyry copper-gold deposits have been identified and a large
portion of the property still remains to be explored in detail. All deposits identified so far are still open
along strike and at depth and additional drilling could discover additional mineralisation, especially at
Raja where the possibility of finding mineralisation that could be amenable to underground mining
seems very good.
The West Lombok Property contains several other mineral occurrences and only a small portion of
the favourable ground has been drill tested to date. SRK is of the opinion that the untested mineral
occurrences represent a great opportunity to locate additional mineralisation on the West Lombok
Property.
SRK recommends that Southern Arc continue to explore the West Lombok Property. Specifically,
SRK recommends:
At Raja, further 2,625 m of drilling is required to upgrade the resource status and to extend resources down-plunge of open high-grade shoots;
A further 1,385 m of drilling is required on Bising to infill the upper high-grade parts of the structure and test open extensions along strike and down dip;
At Tibu Serai, where the current resource zone is only drilled on a 250 m long zone of MSB, further drilling is required to test open extensions down dip and along strike;
Metallurgical sampling and testing at Raja and Bising Deposits;
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page vi
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Scout drilling to test the Lala structure located some 350 m east of, and parallel to the Raja deposit. Here numerous high-grade rock chip samples have been collected along an 800 metre strike zone;
Scout drilling is warranted at several other targets with high-grade rock chip sampling at Mencanggah, including the 2-km long Mahoni zone;
Selective ground IP geophysics is recommended to focus porphyry drill testing on the higher priority porphyry targets;
SRK estimates that the first exploration phase at Raja will cost approximately $766,000.Contingent
on positive results from the first phase of drilling, SRK recommends an additional $421,000 in
exploration expenditures and an additional $800,000 of scout drilling for a total exploration
commitment of approximately $2 million.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page vii
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Table of Contents
Important Notice ................................................................................................................ ii
Copyright ........................................................................................................................... ii
Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... iii Introduction ............................................................................................................................... iii Property Description and Ownership ......................................................................................... iii Geology and Mineralisation ....................................................................................................... iii Exploration Status .................................................................................................................... iv Mineral Resource Estimates .................................................................................................... iv Conclusion and Recommendations ........................................................................................... v
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ vii
List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... x
List of Figures ................................................................................................................... xi
1 Introduction and Terms of Reference ...................................................................... 13 1.1 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Work Program................................................................................................................ 14 1.3 Basis of Technical Report .............................................................................................. 14 1.4 Qualifications of SRK and SRK Team ............................................................................ 14 1.5 Site Visit......................................................................................................................... 15 1.6 Acknowledgement ......................................................................................................... 15 1.7 Declaration .................................................................................................................... 15
2 Reliance on Other Experts ........................................................................................ 17
3 Property Description and Location .......................................................................... 18 3.1 Mineral Tenure............................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Underlying Agreements ................................................................................................. 20 3.3 Permits and Authorization .............................................................................................. 20 3.4 Environmental Considerations ....................................................................................... 20 3.5 Mining Rights in Indonesia ............................................................................................. 23
4 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography ........ 24 4.1 Accessibility ................................................................................................................... 24 4.2 Local Resources and Infrastructure ............................................................................... 24 4.3 Climate .......................................................................................................................... 24 4.4 Physiography ................................................................................................................. 24
5 History ........................................................................................................................ 26
6 Geological Setting and Mineralisation ..................................................................... 27 6.1 Regional Geology .......................................................................................................... 27 6.2 Property Geology ........................................................................................................... 28 6.3 Mineralisation ................................................................................................................ 31
6.3.1 Pelangan Prospect ............................................................................................................. 31 6.3.2 Mencanggah Prospect ....................................................................................................... 32 6.3.3 Selodong Prospect ............................................................................................................. 34
7 Deposit Types ............................................................................................................ 35 7.1.1 Porphyry style mineralisation ............................................................................................. 35 7.1.2 Epithermal gold mineralisation ........................................................................................... 35
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page viii
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
8 Exploration ................................................................................................................. 36 8.1 Pelangan Prospect ........................................................................................................ 36 8.2 Mencanggah Prospect ................................................................................................... 44 8.3 Selodong Prospect ........................................................................................................ 48
9 Drilling ........................................................................................................................ 52 9.1 Pelangan Epithermal Prospect ....................................................................................... 52
9.1.1 Pelangan Drilling Results ................................................................................................... 53 9.2 Mencanggah Prospect ................................................................................................... 58
9.2.1 Mencanggah Drilling Results ............................................................................................. 59 9.3 Selodong Prospect ........................................................................................................ 61
9.3.1 Selodong Drill Results........................................................................................................ 62 9.4 SRK Comments ............................................................................................................. 65
10 Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security .......................................................... 66 10.1 Surface Mapping Samples ............................................................................................. 66 10.2 Drilling Samples Preparation and Analyses ................................................................... 67 10.3 Specific Gravity Data ..................................................................................................... 68 10.4 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Programs .......................................................... 69 10.5 SRK Comments ............................................................................................................. 70
11 Data Verification ........................................................................................................ 71 11.1 Verifications by Southern Arc ......................................................................................... 71 11.2 Verifications by SRK ...................................................................................................... 71
11.2.1 Site visit .............................................................................................................................. 71 11.2.2 Verifications of analytical quality control data .................................................................... 71
12 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing ........................................................ 73
13 Mineral Resource Estimates ..................................................................................... 74 13.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 74 13.2 Resource Estimation Procedures ................................................................................... 74 13.3 Resource Database ....................................................................................................... 75 13.4 Solid Body Modelling ..................................................................................................... 75
13.4.1 Raja Deposit – Pelangan Prospect .................................................................................... 75 13.4.2 Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits – Mencanggah Prospect ................................................. 76 13.4.3 Selodong Deposit – Selodong Prospect ............................................................................ 77
13.5 Compositing ................................................................................................................... 78 13.5.1 Raja Deposit – Pelangan Prospect .................................................................................... 78 13.5.2 Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits – Mencanggah Prospect ................................................. 79 13.5.3 Selodong Deposit – Selodong Prospect ............................................................................ 79
13.6 Evaluation of Outliers ..................................................................................................... 80 13.6.1 Raja Deposit – Pelangan Prospect .................................................................................... 80 13.6.2 Bising and Tibu Serai deposits – Mencanggah Prospect .................................................. 80 13.6.3 Selodong Deposit – Selodong Prospect ............................................................................ 81
13.7 Statistical Analysis and Variography .............................................................................. 81 13.7.1 Raja Deposit – Pelangan Prospect .................................................................................... 81 13.7.2 Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits – Mencanggah Prospect ................................................. 82 13.7.3 Selodong Deposit – Selodong Prospect ............................................................................ 82
13.8 Block Model and Grade Estimation ................................................................................ 84 13.8.1 Grade models .................................................................................................................... 86 13.8.2 Bulk density model ............................................................................................................. 86
13.9 Model Validation and Sensitivity .................................................................................... 87 13.9.1 Validation of Raja model .................................................................................................... 87 13.9.2 Validation of Bising – Tibu Serai model ............................................................................. 88 13.9.3 Validation of Selodong Model ............................................................................................ 90
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page ix
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
13.10 Mineral Resource Classification ..................................................................................... 94 13.11 Mineral Resource Statement .......................................................................................... 95 13.12 Grade Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................................. 97
14 Adjacent Properties ................................................................................................. 101
15 Other Relevant Data and Information .................................................................... 102
16 Interpretation and Conclusions.............................................................................. 103
17 Recommendations .................................................................................................. 105 17.1 Pelangan ..................................................................................................................... 105 17.2 Mencanggah ................................................................................................................ 107
18 Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................. 109
19 References ............................................................................................................... 110
20 Date and Signature Page ........................................................................................ 111
APPENDIX A .................................................................................................................. 113
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page x
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
List of Tables
Table 13.1: Comparison of sample length and average gold grade for Raja Deposit .................................... 79
Table 13.2: Comparison of sample lengths and average gold grade for the Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits ............................................................................................................................................ 79
Table 13.3: Comparison of sample lengths and average gold grade for the Selodong Deposit ..................... 80
Table 13.4: Capping Level for Raja Deposit .................................................................................................... 80
Table 13.5: Statistics for gold assays and gold composites – Raja Deposit .................................................. 82
Table 13.6: Basic statistics for assays and composited data – Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits .................... 82
Table 13.7: Basic statistics for gold and copper assays and composites – Selodong Deposit ....................... 83
Table 13.8: Au and Cu exponential correlogram parameters by deposit ........................................................ 84
Table 13.9: Block model setup parameters ..................................................................................................... 85
Table 13.10: Search parameters by deposit and metal ................................................................................... 86
Table 13.11: Bulk density used for resource estimation .................................................................................. 87
Table 13.12: Assumptions considered for conceptual open pit optimization .................................................. 95
Table 13.13: Mineral Resource Statement*, Raja Deposit, West Lombok Project, Indonesia, SRK Consulting, July 13, 2013 ................................................................................................................. 96
Table 13.14: Mineral Resource Statement*, Bising Deposit, West Lombok Project, Indonesia, SRK Consulting, July 13, 2013 ................................................................................................................. 96
Table 13.15: Mineral Resource Statement*, Tibu Serai Deposit, West Lombok Project, Indonesia, SRK Consulting, July 13, 2013 ......................................................................................................... 96
Table 13.16: Mineral Resource Statement*, Selodong Deposit, West Lombok Project, Indonesia, SRK Consulting, July 13, 2013. ................................................................................................................ 96
Table 13.17: Global block model quantities and grade estimates*, Raja Deposit, West Lombok Project, at various cut-off grades ...................................................................................................... 97
Table 13.18: Global block model quantities and grade estimates*, Bising Deposit, West Lombok Project, at various cut-off grades ...................................................................................................... 97
Table 13.19: Global block model quantities and grade estimates*, Tibu Serai Deposit, West Lombok Project, at various cut-off grades ...................................................................................................... 97
Table 13.20: Global block model quantities and grade estimates*, Selodong Deposit, West Lombok Project, at various cut-off grades ...................................................................................................... 98
Table 17.1 Proposed drilling for Raja Deposit ............................................................................................... 105
Table 17.2 Proposed Phase 3 drill holes for Bising Deposit ......................................................................... 107
Table 17.3 Estimated cost for the exploration program proposed for the West Lombok Project .................. 107
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page xi
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
List of Figures
Figure 3.1: Property location map ................................................................................................................... 18
Figure 3.2: Property access and claim boundaries ......................................................................................... 19
Figure 3.3: Southern Arc West Lombok mineral tenure map .......................................................................... 22
Figure 4.1: Typical landscape in the project area ............................................................................................ 25
Figure 6.1: Regional geology setting ............................................................................................................... 28
Figure 6.2: Idealized stratigraphic column of Southwest Lombok Island ........................................................ 29
Figure 6.3: Location of mineral prospects ....................................................................................................... 33
Figure 8.1: Results of the CSAMT survey in the Pelangan Prospect .............................................................. 38
Figure 8.2: Results of BLEG sampling program in Pelangan-Mencanggah Prospect areas .......................... 39
Figure 8.3: Surface sampling results for the Raja Deposit, Pelangan Prospect ............................................. 41
Figure 8.4: Surface sampling results for the Jati and Tanjung targets, Pelangan Prospect ........................... 43
Figure 8.5: Surface sampling results for the Kayu Putih target, Pelangan Prospect ...................................... 43
Figure 8.6: Surface sampling results for the Simba target, Pelangan Prospect.............................................. 44
Figure 8.7: Surface rock samples collected from the Mencanggah Prospect ................................................. 45
Figure 8.8: Surface samples from the Bising and Tibu Serai deposits, Mencanggah Prospect ..................... 47
Figure 8.9: Surface sampling for the Waterfall target, Mencanggah Prospect................................................ 48
Figure 8.10: Surface sampling for the Selodong Prospect .............................................................................. 49
Figure 9.1: Significant drill intercepts from the Pelangan Prospect, Raja MSB target .................................... 55
Figure 9.2: Typical cross section of the Kayu Putih target, Pelangan Prospect.............................................. 57
Figure 9.3: Photo of artisanal mining excavation areas on Bising Deposit ..................................................... 58
Figure 9.4: Drill results from the Waterfall area ............................................................................................... 59
Figure 9.5: Longitudinal section of the Bising deposit showing drill hole intersections ................................... 60
Figure 9.6: Drill results from the Tibu Serai Deposit ........................................................................................ 61
Figure 9.7: Drill results for the Selodong Prospect ........................................................................................... 62
Figure 9.8: Drill results for the Lepangan Geres target ................................................................................... 64
Figure 10.1: Statistical data for bulk density measurements ........................................................................... 69
Figure 13.1: Planveiw of Raja wireframes ....................................................................................................... 76
Figure 13.2: Planview of Bising and Tibu Serai wireframes (Note: Grid is 500 by 500 m) ............................. 77
Figure 13.3: Planview of Selodong wireframes (Note: Grid is 500 by 500 m)................................................. 78
Figure 13.4: Capping level for Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits ....................................................................... 81
Figure 13.5: Plan view of the three block model areas on the West Lombok Project (Note: Grid is 2 km x 2 km) .............................................................................................................................................. 85
Figure 13.6: Comparison of block grades and composite grades, block model Level 58 (110 m above sea level) (Note: Grid is 200 x 200 m) .............................................................................................. 87
Figure 13.7: Metal content of Ordinary Kriged and Inverse Distance Squared models at various grade cut-offs .............................................................................................................................................. 88
Figure 13.8: Plan view of Bising Deposit comparing block and composite gold grades, block model Level 25 (345 m above sea level) (Note: Grid is 200 x 200 m) ........................................................ 89
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page xii
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Figure 13.9: Comparison of well-informed blocks for Bising (a) and Tibu Serai (b) ........................................ 89
Figure 13.10: Swath plot of composite and block grades for Bising ............................................................... 90
Figure 13.11: Swath plot of composite and block grades for Tibu Serai ......................................................... 90
Figure 13.12: Plan view of Selodong model comparing copper equivalent block grades and corresponding composite grades, block model Level 22 (25 m above sea level)( Note: Grid is 200 x 200 m) ................................................................................................................................. 91
Figure 13.13: Comparison of well-informed blocks with composite gold grades for Selodong model (Note: Refer to Figure 13.3 for Selodong mineralised domain location) .......................................... 92
Figure 13.14: Comparison of well-informed blocks with composite copper grades for Selodong model ........ 92
Figure 13.15: Swath plots for gold grades for Selodong for domain 400 (a) and domain 401 (b) .................. 93
Figure 13.16: Swath plots for copper grades for Selodong for domain 400 (a) and domain 401 (b) .............. 94
Figure 13.17: Grade tonnage curve for the Raja Deposit, West Lombok Project ........................................... 98
Figure 13.18: Grade tonnage curve for the Bising Deposit, West Lombok Project ......................................... 99
Figure 13.19: Grade tonnage curve for the Tibu Serai Deposit, West Lombok Project .................................. 99
Figure 13.20: Grade tonnage curve for the Selodong Deposit, West Lombok Project ................................. 100
Figure 16.1: Classification of mineral resources and mineral reserves ......................................................... 103
Figure 17.1 Planview of proposed Phase 3A and 3B drilling for Raja Deposit ............................................. 106
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 13
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
1 Introduction and Terms of Reference The West Lombok Property hosts an early stage gold and copper exploration project located in
Indonesia. It is located on the west side of the Island of Lombok and covers a mineralised corridor
that extends for approximately 13 kilometres (km) by 7 km. Southern Arc Minerals Inc. (Southern Arc
or the Company) through its wholly owned Singapore subsidiary Indotan Lombok Pte. Ltd. holds a
90% interest in PT. Indotan Lombok Barat Bangkit, an Indonesian approved foreign investment
company (Penanaman Modal Asing or PMA company) that holds a 100% interest in the West
Lombok Property. The remaining 10% interest is held by the West Lombok Regency Government as
a free-carry loan arrangement.
In November 2011 and in April 2013, Southern Arc commissioned SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.
(SRK) to visit the property and prepare a geological and mineral resource model for the West
Lombok Project. The services rendered between April 2013 and June 2013 lead to the preparation of
the mineral resource statement reported herein that was disclosed publically by Southern Arc in a
news release on July 11, 2013.
This technical report documents a mineral resource statement for the West Lombok Project prepared
by SRK. It was prepared following the guidelines of the Canadian Securities Administrators‟ National
Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1. The mineral resource statement reported herein was
prepared in conformity with generally accepted CIM “Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral
Reserves Best Practice Guidelines.”
This technical report summarises the technical information available on the West Lombok Property
and demonstrates that the West Lombok Project clearly merits additional exploration expenditures.
An exploration work program is recommended comprising diamond core drilling and geological and
mineral resource modelling to better define the identified mineral resource and to upgrade the
resource classification.
1.1 Scope of Work
The scope of work, as defined in a letter of engagement executed in November 2011 between
Southern Arc and SRK, includes the construction of a mineral resource model for the Raja, Bising
and Tibu Serai epithermal gold mineralisation and the Selodong porphyry copper gold mineralisation
and the preparation of an independent technical report in compliance with National Instrument 43-
101 and Form 43-101F1 guidelines. This work typically involves the assessment of the following
aspects of this project:
Topography, landscape, access;
Regional and local geology;
Exploration history;
Audit of exploration work carried out on the project;
Geological modelling;
Mineral resource estimation and validation;
Preparation of a mineral resource statement; and
Recommendations for additional work.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 14
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
1.2 Work Program
The mineral resource statement reported herein is a collaborative effort between Southern Arc and
SRK personnel. The exploration database was compiled and maintained by Southern Arc, and was
audited by SRK. The geological model and outlines for the gold mineralisation were constructed by
SRK from a two-dimensional geological interpretation provided by Southern Arc. In the opinion of
SRK, the geological model is a reasonable representation of the distribution of the targeted
mineralisation at the current level of sampling. The geostatistical analysis, variography and grade
models were completed by SRK during the months of April and June, 2013. The mineral resource
statement reported herein was presented to Southern Arc in a memorandum report on July 11, 2013
and disclosed publicly in a news release dated July 11, 2013.
The mineral resource statement reported herein was prepared in conformity with generally accepted
CIM “Exploration Best Practices” and “Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves Best
Practices” guidelines. This technical report was prepared following the guidelines of the Canadian
Securities Administrators‟ National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1.
The technical report was assembled in SRK‟s Vancouver office during the months of May and July,
2013.
1.3 Basis of Technical Report
This report is based on information collected by SRK during site visits performed between December
6 to 9, 2011 and April 23 to 26, 2013 and on additional information provided by Southern Arc
throughout the course of SRK‟s investigations. Other information was obtained from the public
domain. SRK has no reason to doubt the reliability of the information provided by Southern Arc. This
technical report is based on the following sources of information:
Discussions with Southern Arc personnel;
Inspection of the West Lombok Project area, including outcrop and drill core;
Review of exploration data collected by Southern Arc; and
Additional information from public domain sources.
1.4 Qualifications of SRK and SRK Team
The SRK Group comprises over 1,650 professionals, offering expertise in a wide range of resource
engineering disciplines. The SRK Group‟s independence is ensured by the fact that it holds no equity
in any project and that its ownership rests solely with its staff. This fact permits SRK to provide its
clients with conflict-free and objective recommendations on crucial judgment issues. SRK has a
demonstrated track record in undertaking independent assessments of Mineral Resources and
Mineral Reserves, project evaluations and audits, technical reports and independent feasibility
evaluations to bankable standards on behalf of exploration and mining companies and financial
institutions worldwide. The SRK Group has also worked with a large number of major international
mining companies and their projects, providing mining industry consultancy service inputs.
The resource evaluation work and the compilation of this technical report were completed by Dr.
Gilles Arseneau, P. Geo (APEGBC). By virtue of his education, membership to a recognized
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 15
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
professional association and relevant work experience, Dr. Arseneau is an independent Qualified
Person as this term is defined by National Instrument 43-101.
Marek Nowak, P. Eng. (APEGBC), a Principal Geostatistician with SRK, reviewed drafts of this
technical report prior to their delivery to Southern Arc as per SRK internal quality management
procedures. Mr. Nowak did not visit the project.
1.5 Site Visit
In accordance with National Instrument 43-101 guidelines, Dr. Arseneau visited the West Lombok
project on December 6 through 9, 2011 and on April 23 to 26, 2013 accompanied by Andrew Rowe,
Executive Vice President and Chief Geologist of Southern Arc.
The purpose of the site visit was to review the digitalization of the exploration database and
validation procedures, review exploration procedures, define geological modelling procedures,
examine drill core, interview project personnel, and to collect all relevant information for the
preparation of a mineral resource model and the compilation of a technical report. During the visit,
particular attention was given to the treatment and validation of drilling data.
The site visit was also aimed at investigating the geological and structural controls on the distribution
of the gold mineralisation in order to aid the construction of three dimensional gold mineralisation
domains.
SRK was given full access to relevant data and conducted interviews of Southern Arc personnel to
obtain information on the past exploration work, and to understand procedures used to collect,
record, store and analyze historical and current exploration data.
1.6 Acknowledgement
SRK would like to acknowledge the support and collaboration provided by Southern Arc personnel
for this assignment. Their collaboration was greatly appreciated and instrumental to the success of
this project.
1.7 Declaration
SRK‟s opinion contained herein and effective July 11, 2013, is based on information collected by
SRK throughout the course of SRK‟s investigations, which in turn reflect various technical and
economic conditions at the time of writing. Given the nature of the mining business, these conditions
can change significantly over relatively short periods of time. Consequently, actual results may be
significantly more or less favourable.
This report may include technical information that requires subsequent calculations to derive sub-
totals, totals and weighted averages. Such calculations inherently involve a degree of rounding and
consequently introduce a margin of error. Where these occur, SRK does not consider them to be
material.
SRK is not an insider, associate or an affiliate of Southern Arc, and neither SRK nor any affiliate has
acted as advisor to Southern Arc, its subsidiaries or its affiliates in connection with this project. The
results of the technical review by SRK are not dependent on any prior agreements concerning the
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 16
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
conclusions to be reached, nor are there any undisclosed understandings concerning any future
business dealings.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 17
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
2 Reliance on Other Experts SRK has not performed an independent verification of land title and tenure information as
summarised in Section 3 of this report. SRK did not verify the legality of any underlying agreement(s)
that may exist concerning the permits or other agreement(s) between third parties, but has relied on
the basis of the „Clear and Clean Certificate’. The Clear and Clean Certificate was signed and issued
by the Director General of Minerals and Coal on the 23rd
March 2013 and proves the company and
license is in good standing with regards to the following criteria;
No overlapping claims
Valid IUP, mining / exploration business license
An approved exploration program and budget
Approval to commence feasibility study
Approval of work program by the Regency Government Environmental Agency
License payments are in order
Royalty structure is approved
A copy and translation of the certificate is provided in Appendix A. The reliance applies solely to the
legal status of the rights disclosed in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 below
SRK was informed by Southern Arc that there are no known litigations potentially affecting the West
Lombok Project.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 18
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
3 Property Description and Location The West Lombok Property covers a northwest trending structural corridor of mineralisation and
alteration hosting three main prospects: the Pelangan epithermal gold prospect, the Mencanggah
epithermal/porphyry district, and the Selodong porphyry intrusive complex. The Raja resource area
is situated within the Pelangan prospect, the Bising and Tibu Serai resource areas are within the
Mencanggah prospect and the Selodong porphyry copper-gold deposit is within the Selodong
prospect area (Figure 3.1). Exploration of the West Lombok Property is controlled under an Izin
Usaha Pertambangan (IUP) Mining Business Licence encompassing 10,088 hectares (ha). The
property boundaries were located using a differential global positional system (DGPS) instrument
along with locations of all known mineralised outcrops, historical workings such as drill collars, drill
pads, trenches and access in order to tie them into the WGS 84 co-ordinate system used by
Southern Arc.
(Source Southern Arc, 2010)
Figure 3.1: Property location map
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 19
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
The property is centered at 116°00‟04” longitude and -8°48‟25” latitude, approximately 6 km
southwest of Sekotong or 30 km southwest (straight map distance) of Mataram City in Lombok, the
capital of West Nusa Tengara Province, Indonesia (Figure 3.2).
(Source Southern Arc, 2012)
Figure 3.2: Property access and claim boundaries
3.1 Mineral Tenure
The property was initially explored under a Contract of Work application (CoW) that was granted in-
principle approval on July 21, 1998 by the Central Department of Mines and Energy. In 2011, the
CoW was converted to an IUP that encompasses 10,088 ha. The IUP, issued in January 2011, is
valid for five years. The IUP permits the company to pursue exploration activities up to the
conclusion of a feasibility study. This period may be extended with approval of the Indonesian
Government. On approval of a feasibility study, the company can automatically transition the IUP
into the exploitation stage, with the right to conduct mining production on this property for 20 years
with the potential for two further 10-year extension periods. In addition to the IUP, the Ministry of
Forestry Pinjam Pakai permit required for exploration activities within areas designated as production
forest was issued in November 2012. On the West Lombok property, 1.1% of the area is designated
protected forest (no open-pit mining), 55.1% is designated production forest (open-pit mining
allowed) and 43.8% has no forestry designation (no restriction on mining activities).
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 20
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
3.2 Underlying Agreements
Southern Arc acquired its original interest in the West Lombok property in 2005 by paying $57,100
and issuing 8,050,000 common shares to Sunda Mining Corporation (Sunda) and by paying
$126,000 and issuing 700,000 common shares to Indotan Inc. (Indotan). The Company also granted
two 0.5% net smelting royalties (NSR) to two individuals related to Sunda and a 1% NSR to Indotan
Inc. on approximately 8% of the current West Lombok Property, which excludes Block 1 described in
Figure 3.3.
This area was previously held by PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara (Newmont or PT NNT), a subsidiary
of Newmont Mining Corporation. In August 2005, Southern Arc entered into an agreement with
Newmont regarding a property (Block 1) that now forms the western portion of the West Lombok
Property and is included in the West Lombok IUP (Figure 3.3). The acquisition was completed
through a relinquishment by Newmont of the Block 1 area. The terms of the agreement include
granting Newmont a 2% NSR on any mineral production from the Block 1 area and a right of first
refusal should the company wish to introduce a new partner into any development within the area
originally covered by Block 1. The company has the right to repurchase this 2% NSR at any time for
US$1 million.
Southern Arc has given a free-carry interest for 10% of the West Lombok Project to the local
Regency Government as per a cooperation agreement signed in December 2010, ensuring
government support for the project and long-term benefits for local communities as the project
advances. Southern Arc believes that having the local Regency Government as an equity partner
creates a synergistic and mutually beneficial environment for advancement of the project. This
relationship ensures it is in the local government‟s interest to support the company‟s activities and
that local communities will receive benefits directly from Southern Arc‟s success at the project. The
Regency interest is loan-carried through to a production scenario, whereby debt and equity
contribution are paid back through dividends or other financial means.
3.3 Permits and Authorization
In order to carry out exploration and reported drilling programs Southern Arc has satisfied all
government permitting requirements which include;
IUP, (mining and exploration permit) granted for 5 years on the 5 January 2011.
Clear and Clean Certificate, indicating no overlapping claims and that all IUP associated
permitting and statutory responsibilities are in order.
UKL-UPL approval by the regency environmental department of the forward exploration plan.
Pinjam-Pakai or borrow / use permit required for work to be carried out in forest designated areas
granted on the 31st October 2012.
3.4 Environmental Considerations
Since receiving its West Lombok IUP in January 2011, Southern Arc has proactively engaged with
local communities to discuss its exploration and development plans and to address questions and
concerns. The company offers employment and training programs and undertakes an extensive
CSR program through its fully-funded foundation, with an emphasis on education, community health,
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 21
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
environmental protection and economic empowerment of local communities. In 2012, Southern Arc
granted six micro-credit loans to local village members to support entrepreneurial initiatives.
In 2009 Southern Arc requested the University of Mataram in consultation with the biology faculty of
the University Gadjah Madah to produce a baseline study of mercury contamination caused by
artisanal gold mining and processing within the IUP. The study was completed in 2009 and
documented mercury contamination in gold processing areas and background levels in
uncontaminated areas. The findings of this report were made public and presented to the Regency
government in 2010.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 22
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Southern Arc, 2012)
Figure 3.3: Southern Arc West Lombok mineral tenure map
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 23
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
3.5 Mining Rights in Indonesia
The following is taken with modifications from Norton Rose Fulbright website:
http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/64444/new-indonesian-mining-
regulations .
On 21 February 2012, the Indonesian Government issued Regulation No. 24 of 2012 on Amendment
to Government Regulation No. 23 of 2010 on Mineral and Coal Mining Business Activities
(Regulation No. 24). Regulation No. 24 increases the divestment requirement to Indonesian interests
for Foreign Investment Companies (PMA Companies) holding an IUP, from 20% to 51%. The new
divestment requirement commences after five years of commercial production, and is as follows:
20% in the sixth year;
30% in the seventh year;
37% in the eighth year;
44% in the ninth year; and
51% in the 10th year
Regulation No.7/2012 issued by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources on 6 February 2012
will prohibit the export of unprocessed raw materials or ore by IUP holders. At this point, there
appears to be confusion as to the commencement date of the prohibition, with some government
officials saying May 2012, while others have indicated 2014.
Mineral raw materials will have to be processed in Indonesia, rather than being exported in a raw
state. This regulation is intended to develop the country‟s downstream mining industry, increase
domestic revenues, and ensure availability of refined products for domestic use. Sanctions for failure
to comply include suspension of activities and/or permit revocation.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 24
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
4 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
4.1 Accessibility
The property area can be reached by road, approximately two hours‟ drive by vehicle from the
provincial capital Mataram. Domestic airlines provide a daily service to Mataram (1,100 km east of
Jakarta) either direct from Jakarta or transiting via Surabaya, or Denpasar. Alternatively, regular
daily sea ferries connect Lombok and its island neighbors of Bali and Sumbawa. Within the prospect
access is limited to a series of unpaved roads and foot-tracks that network across the area.
4.2 Local Resources and Infrastructure
Local infrastructure was sufficient to meet the majority of the company‟s logistical requirements
during the duration of the exploration program. Supplies or required services were sourced from the
administrative center of Mataram. There seems to be adequate supply of unskilled labour in the
immediate area of the property. Skilled labour for mining could be sourced from Indonesia and by
training the local population.
4.3 Climate
The area has a typical tropical wet climate and is subject to the seasonal influence of the northwest
monsoon from November to March, and drier southeast trade winds from June to September.
Rainfall in the mountain ranges to the north is between 1725-3500 mm per year and decreases
significantly to the coast with values of 1110 to 1850 mm per year being recorded. Daily
temperatures range from 26 to 31°C, which reduce to a low of 22 to 24°C overnight. Relative
humidity is also uniformly high, ranging from 80 to 100%.
4.4 Physiography
The prospect area comprises semi rugged terrain with incised valleys trending predominantly north
to northeast and northwest, reflecting the regional structural control. Elevations rarely exceed 350 m
reflecting the long period of uplift and erosion of the Miocene aged volcanic sequence (Figure 4.1).
As a result of population density and logging in the 1990s, the majority of hill slopes are denuded of
forestry and have been planted with cash crops such as rice and maize, along with lesser sweet
potato and bean crops. Two Community Forest (HTR) areas of 1,495 ha have been granted by the
Regency government within the forestry „pinjam pakai‟ permit area (refer to Figure 3.2). Southern Arc
would require permit holder approval prior to any drilling in these areas.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 25
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Figure 4.1: Typical landscape in the project area
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 26
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
5 History PT. Aneka Tambang, in conjunction with CV. Tanone Jaya, evaluated the area in 1978 but only base
metal mineralisation of limited economic potential was identified.
Following the withdrawal of Aneka Tambang, the area was incorporated by a local village
cooperative into three KP (mining license) areas DU.59-61 comprising 6,000 ha. Technical
assistance was requested from the Technical Directorate of the central Mines Department. Between
1981 and 1984 the Technical Directorate undertook ground geophysical (magnetics, IP/resistivity),
surface geochemical and geological surveys and a limited shallow diamond drilling program in the
KP areas. Surface sampling returned assay values including 3.2g/t Au, 430g/t Ag, 2.2% Cu, 15.23%
Pb and 30.9% Zn, whilst drilling encountered only narrow sub economic intersections (Rontek,
1985).
The entire SIPP area once formed part of the original 4th generation CoW area held by PT. Newmont
Nusa Tenggara‟s (PT NNT). PT NNT carried out an extensive stream sediment sampling program
that was followed up with a Bulk Leach Extractable Gold (BLEG) sampling program. The
geochemical sampling programs were followed up with ground magnetic and geological mapping
surveys which highlighted several porphyry targets in the Selodong area. Drilling by PT NNT
commenced in 1996 with 52 drill holes totalling 7,956 m. PT NNT abandoned the property in 1996 to
focus its efforts on the Batu Hajau deposit.
Southern Arc acquired the property in 2005 and initiated exploration on the property in 2006.
Exploration activity to date has included extensive geological and geochemistry mapping to establish
the presence of epithermal mineralisation and surface alteration, the collection of more than 4,500
surface channel samples across the property and 47,750 m of drilling at all three prospects.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 27
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
6 Geological Setting and Mineralisation The island of Lombok is located in the central part of the tectonically active, east-west trending
Sunda-Banda magmatic arc that marks the convergence of three major tectonic plates (Hamilton
1979).
The geology of the West Lombok Property is characterized by an island-arc volcano-sedimentary
succession of Late-Oligocene to Quaternary age. A series of eroded, overlapping predominantly
andesitic volcanic centers and intermediate intrusive rocks make up the Tertiary arc. Intrusive rocks
include diorite, dacite, diatreme breccia and tonalite, the latter related to porphyry mineralisation at
Newmont‟s Batu Hijau mine and Elang deposit on the neighboring island of Sumbawa.
6.1 Regional Geology
The island of Lombok is located in the central part of the tectonically active, east-west trending
Sunda-Banda magmatic arc that marks the convergence of three major tectonic plates (Hamilton
1979).
The southern parts of Lombok Island are overlain by Late Oligocene to Middle Miocene, low
potassium calc-alkaline to weakly alkaline andesitic volcanic and interbedded volcaniclastic rocks,
associated low potassium intermediate intrusions and shallow marine sedimentary rocks and
limestone (Garwin, 2002). Overlying dacitic rocks are locally mapped in the region and mainly
occupy higher topography. The youngest rocks in the region are products of Recent and Quaternary
volcanism and are generally located in the north of the island, and have not been a focus of
exploration because of the limited exposure of the hydrothermal systems by erosion (Figure 6.1).
A series of eroded overlapping volcanic centres with associated fringing sediments make up the
Tertiary arc, and are represented by a thick pile of andesitic pyroclastics, flows, intermediate
intrusives, shallow marine sediments and limestones. The sequence is exposed over the south of
Lombok, with elevations up to 500 m. Tertiary rocks are also evident in the north of Lombok where
they are thought to form the basement rocks to more recent volcanism. Intrusive rocks are
commonly exposed in an east-west belt in southern Lombok. Older intrusives are commonly diorites
and microdiorites and occur as dykes and stocks intruding the volcanics and sediments. Later
tonalite intrusions are spatially and temporally related to the main porphyry Cu-Au mineralisation,
whereas older dioritic intrusions and stocks are related to earlier similar mineralisation types but
commonly lower grades (0.2% to 0.4% Cu). Diatreme dome breccia complexes have been mapped
peripheral to dacite porphyry intrusives. Dacitic pyroclastic rocks unconformably overly the andesitic
sequence. A thick blanket of volcaniclastic rocks (debris flow sequence) are locally preserved in
areas of structural complexity.
Based on a north-south compressive regime since the Late Miocene, regional structures comprise
north-south extensional faults, east-west trending reverse or thrust faults and folds, and a conjugate
strike-slip fault set with north-north westerly and north-north easterly trends. This structural regime is
thought to have arisen through counter-clockwise rotation of the regional maximum horizontal stress,
between the Middle Miocene and Pliocene, resulting in reactivation of a sinistral strike-slip
movement along the north-northeast trending structural zones. This regime of sinistral wrenching in
turn would have led, in blocks affected by this deformation, to the development of north-northwest
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 28
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
trending tensional faults/fractures, east-northeast trending reverse or thrust faults and secondary
conjugate strike-slip fault systems (Pieters, 2004).
(Source Campbell, 2010)
Figure 6.1: Regional geology setting
6.2 Property Geology
The IUP area covers the majority of prospective Oligo-Miocene andesitic volcano-sedimentary
succession and sub-volcanic intrusive rocks located in an east-west belt across the southern part of
Lombok. Mapping by Southern Arc has located a series of epithermal and porphyry style targets
along this belt.
Based on historical and geological mapping by Southern Arc (Campbell, 2010), the stratigraphic
units encountered on the property can be described as follows. The Pangulung Formation (Tomp) is
the oldest rock unit exposed in the study area. It was previously termed the “Old Andesite Formation”
by Van Bemmelen, 1949. The Formation comprises breccia, lava and tuff with limestone lenses
which are host to sulphide mineralisation. Inter-fingered with the Formation are alternating quartz
sandstone, claystone and breccia lithologies of the Kawangan Formation (Tomk). Previous authors
assume that these lithologies were formed on the flanks or proximal to the Oligo-Miocene volcanic
arc chain. Mid Miocene intrusions (Tmi), the source of hydrothermal alteration and mineralisation,
include porphyritic andesite, hornblende diorite, quartz diorite, feldspar porphyry, tonalite and
intrusive diatreme breccia in the appropriate chronological order (Clode and Pratama, 2002). Outliers
of late Miocene limestone and arenite (Ekas Formation – Tme) are found as capping topographical
highs, or in coastal areas along the western and eastern license boundaries. Plio-Pleistocene
alternating calcareous breccia and lava of the Kalipalung Formation (TQp) predominate in the
northern margins of the IUP. Holocene sedimentation (Qa) has resulted in the deposition of alluvial,
littoral and coral reef deposits on coastal and lowland plains. Fanglomerate outwash plains and
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 29
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
localised gravity flow deposits are noted along river terraces and coastal areas. Figure 6.2 shows an
idealised stratigraphic column of Southwest Lombok Island.
(Source Campbell, 2010)
Figure 6.2: Idealized stratigraphic column of Southwest Lombok Island
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 30
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Andesitic Volcanics (Tomp)
These early Oligocene-late Miocene lithologies are encountered over most of South Lombok, and
form a thick “basement” pile of ash to lapilli sized pyroclastics, lava flows and debris flows to fluidized
breccias of andesitic composition. These lithologies often exhibit weak lower greenschist facies
metamorphism, together with intercalated meta-volcanics/sediments, hornfels and garnet-
magnetite±biotite skarns.
Volcanic Sediments (Tomk)
These sediments consist of bedded shallow marine tuffaceous sandstone, siltstone, polymictic lithic
breccias and epiclastic tuffs. Minor intercalations of carbonates occur locally. Miocene-aged
Foraminifera have been described from the tuffaceous sediments, suggesting a possible Miocene
back-arc basin environment. Both volcanic and metavolcanic equivalents often inter-finger with
Tomp lithologies.
Diorite Porphyry Intrusives (Tmi)
These occur as north to north-northwest and east to northeast structurally controlled stocks which
intrude the Tertiary basement. The diorites consist of fine to medium grained (up to 3mm)
plagioclase and hornblende phenocrysts in a finer grained matrix. This unit is the main host to the
main porphyry Cu-Au mineralisation within the Selodong Intrusive Complex.
Feldspar Porphyry Intrusives (Tmi)
These occur as north to north-northwest and east to northeast structurally controlled stocks and
dykes (5-30 m width) which intrude the Tertiary basement. This lithology consists of coarse grained
zoned feldspar phenocrysts (up to 7mm) and minor hornblende and quartz phenocrysts in a finer
grained groundmass.
Plagioclase-Hornblende Andesite Intrusive (Tmi)
Mapped as both stock and dyke intrusive bodies that outline N to NNW and ENE structural elements.
Phyric textured with plagioclase and hornblende phenocrysts (up to 3mm) in a finer grained
groundmass.
Quartz Diorite Porphyry Intrusives (Tmi)
North to northwest structurally controlled stocks, which cross-cut earlier intrusive phases and
Tertiary basement. Intrusives consist of coarse to fine grained (up to 5mm) hornblende, plagioclase
and quartz phenocrysts in a finer grained matrix.
Magmatic Intrusive Breccia (Tmi)
Surrounds remnants of stockwork Cu-Au porphyries at Montong Botek and Lapangan Geres,
coinciding with circular features as defined by remote sensing studies. Monomictic to polymictic
clast-supported to locally milled and fluidized breccias with clasts (Tomp, Tomk and Tmi) from
centimetres to tens of metres in size, in a matrix of crystalline igneous material.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 31
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Hornblende Diorite Porphyry Intrusives (Tmi)
These occur as dykes and small stocks (1-100 m thickness) within the Oligo-Miocene volcanics and
associated sediments. They consist of medium and coarse grained (up to 5mm) hornblende and
plagioclase phenocrysts in a finer grained groundmass.
Dacite Porphyry Intrusives (Tmi)
These occur as dyke, plugs and sill like bodies intruding the Tertiary volcano-sedimentary pile. They
consist of medium to coarse grained (up to 5 mm) plagioclase, quartz and mafic phenocrysts in a
finer grained groundmass.
Dacite Volcanics (Tmv)
This sequence consists of ash to lapilli sized pyroclastics and occasional interbedded dacitic/rhyolitic
lavas. Exposures are limited to isolated outliers, capping higher topographic relief, where they
unconformably overlie andesitic volcanics and dioritic intrusives or limestone.
Epiclastic Breccia
This sequence of bedded and massive debris flow exhibit inverse graded bases. The dominant
clastics are andesitic and basaltic lavas, diorite and rare dacite. This unit primarily occurs as isolated
outcrops along the southern coast of Lombok Island.
Tertiary Limestone (Tme)
This generally massive bedded limestone may contain coralline coral fragments, calcareous
volcaniclastic sandstone intercalations and occasional chert and silicified horizons. It generally
occurs unconformably on, or as lenses within, the andesitic volcanic rocks.
Quaternary Deposits (Qa)
This unit consists of unconsolidated gravels, sand, silt, mud, air fall volcanic ash and organic
elements. Alluvium includes river sediments, estuarine deposits in the various bays and estuaries
with tidal flats, sand beaches and mangrove swamps.
6.3 Mineralisation
Mineralisation on the property has been separated into three main prospect areas, from North to
South, the Pelangan, the Mencanggah and the Selodong Prospects. Each prospect consists of
several mineral targets or deposits, many of which have been the subject of exploration by diamond
drilling.
6.3.1 Pelangan Prospect
The Pelangan Prospect covers an area approximately 4 x 5 km in the northwest part of the property
(Figure 6.3). The prospect comprises four main epithermal gold targets including Tanjung-Jati, Kayu
Putih, Raja and Lala. Southern Arc has completed 13,233 m of drilling in 99 holes on the Pelangan
Prospect. Phase 1 drilling was completed in 2007, together with semi-detailed geological mapping
and outcrop channel sampling of sub-parallel vein structures. Phase 2 drilling began in 2010 and
was focused on identifying and defining high-grade shoots within large continuous structures. Drilling
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 32
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
showed that mineralised breccia bodies ranged in true width between 3 m and 20 m. Phase 2 drilling
confirmed high-grade events typical of epithermal boiling zones at both the Central Raja and
Tanjung Lode structures and identified three high-grade shoots.
6.3.2 Mencanggah Prospect
The Mencanggah Prospect comprises a large cluster of west-northwest to north-trending, gold-
bearing epithermal mineralised structural breccias concentrated in a 6.5 x 4.5 km area in the centre
of the property, with the potential to host copper-gold porphyry mineralisation at depth. Channel
sampling indicates that these breccia bodies range in true width between 3 m and 66 m. The Bising,
Tibu Serai and Waterfall targets have been drill tested and show encouraging results. Surface
channel samples at the Tibu Serai target have returned the highest-grade mineralisation on the
property to date. Southern Arc has completed 14,380 m of drilling in 69 holes on the Mencanggah
Prospect. Drilling has demonstrated that gold mineralisation is associated with quartz veining
associated with wider mineralised structural breccia zones.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 33
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Southern Arc, 2012)
Figure 6.3: Location of mineral prospects
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 34
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
6.3.3 Selodong Prospect
The Selodong Prospect is situated in the southern part of the West Lombok Property. Drilling in the
Selodong porphyry copper-gold target was first carried out by Newmont in 2005 when they drilled a
total of 52 holes targeting porphyry copper mineralisation. Southern Arc added an additional 33
holes in the Selodong area between September of 2008 and October 2012 for 20,046 m. These
holes tested seven of the 14 porphyry copper-gold targets, with the majority intersecting broad zones
(126.45 m to 855.11 m) of significant copper-gold mineralisation. Drilling identified copper gold
porphyry style mineralisation associated with altered diorite intrusions. Typical porphyry alteration
assemblages are generally zoned outward from higher grade mineralised cores, though these
assemblages are often obscured by variations of incipient-weak through to intense post-
mineralisation overprinting and post-mineral brecciation. Secondary biotite was identified in core
logging and has been confirmed by petrological studies along with the presence of K feldspar.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 35
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
7 Deposit Types There are at least two different deposit types present on the West Lombok Property; porphyry
copper-gold and epithermal gold mineralisation have been identified thus far.
7.1.1 Porphyry style mineralisation
Porphyry mineralisation was discovered at Selodong in 1992 by PT NNT. Surface mapping and
sampling defined several areas of anomalous Cu-Au mineralisation.
Copper-gold mineralisation is associated with late Miocene diorite intrusive rocks emplaced into Late
Oligocene to Middle Miocene low-K calc-alkaline to alkaline andesitic volcanic and subvolcanic
intermediate intrusive rocks. The two main types of mineralisation found in the property include
diorite hosted porphyry Cu-Au and related high to intermediate-sulphidation epithermal Au-Ag
mineralisation hosted in mineralised structural breccias. Mineralisation is almost exclusively
associated with quartz-sulphide stockwork veining and adjacent sulphide disseminations in the
potassic altered diorite. Two phases of diorite have been identified hosting stockwork mineralisation
with an earlier, more intensely altered, mineralised and veined quartz diorite.
Hypogene minerals include pyrite, magnetite and chalcopyrite along with minor bornite, chalcocite,
and sphalerite. Secondary minerals include malachite, azurite and chrysocolla, limonite, hematite,
and jarosite. Chalcopyrite is the dominant copper sulphide species, with bornite occurrences
generally more localised with notable zones of higher concentrations. No significant increases in
concentrations of bornite were noted with depth or along strike based on the current density of
drilling. Pyrite and magnetite are the most common minerals, with pyrite becoming more common
outwards from higher grade mineralisation. Magnetite is abundant throughout the mineralised
system and is associated with the potassic assemblage and porphyry mineralisation.
7.1.2 Epithermal gold mineralisation
The term “mineralised structural breccia” (“MSB”) has been applied by Southern Arc to describe
steeply-dipping, tabular silica-rich bodies that are associated with advanced-argillic alteration of the
adjacent host-rocks at the Pelangan and Mencanggah prospects (Figure 6.3). The silica bodies
range in thickness from a few meters up to 30 m and extend more than 1000 m along strike at
Pelangan and are up to 100 m wide and form zones more than 1000 m long at Mencanggah.
The down-dip extent of the bodies exceeds 300 m, as indicated by the surface trace of the bodies
and drill results at Pelangan. The silica bodies contain variable amounts of fine-grained massive
quartz, dickite, alunite, diaspore, pyrophyllite and pyrite/marcasite (converted to goethite and
hematite near-surface) and display breccia textures locally. Minor amounts of enargite and covellite
also occur in the silica-pyrite matrix (Allen, 1990). Gangue minerals include quartz chalcedony and
clay minerals.
Drill results show that these quartz veins form zones that are typically 5 - 20 m wide and contain
significant Au and Ag and anomalous As, Bi, Cu, Pb, Sb and Te; particularly where the quartz veins
are associated with fine-grained sulphide bands.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 36
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
8 Exploration Following the incorporation of the ex-Newmont Block I in December 2005, Southern Arc received a
substantial geological database (including half drill core) generated from exploration activities
conducted in the Pelangan-Mencanggah-Selodong area during 1987-96.
8.1 Pelangan Prospect
A preliminary reconnaissance exploration program in the area was undertaken by Southern Arc in
November-December 2003. Field activities focused mainly on channel and rock chip sampling of
potentially mineralised outcrop exposures, but where outcrops were not exposed, samples of talus
scree were collected. A number of rock chip (RC) and rock float/talus scree (RF) samples were
collected along the eastern margin of the Pelangan epithermal system. Evidence of both low and
high sulphidation epithermal mineralisation was defined, with vein measurements analogous to the
Pelangan north-northwest trends. Low to moderate geochemistry was reported with values including
RC: 0.10-0.45 g/t Au, 1-17 Ag, and 0.06-0.28% As, while RF equivalents reported values of 0.03-
1.10 g/t Au, 1-65 g/t Ag, 3-160 g/t Sb and 6-227 g/t Mo, respectively.
A total of 210 BLEG, 210 stream sediments, 6 rock chips and 14 rock float samples (including
duplicates and check samples) were collected in the Pelangan-Mencanggah area and submitted for
analysis.
Ground traverses were conducted using tape and compass surveys tied into previously established
base lines along major ridge lines, along with global positional system (GPS) units for ground
control. Later detailed surface evaluation programs involved the usage of DGPS for mapping and
infill sampling along the MSBs. Mapping of lithologies and alteration facies follow the common
conventions of hydrothermal system definitions and nomenclature adopted by most workers
worldwide, and was further supplemented by the collection of petrological samples dispatched to
SKM - New Zealand. Rock chip and channel samples were collected on a routine basis during
preliminary stream and ridge traverses. A large variety of host rocks were also assayed in order to
determine the possibility of any bulk-tonnage potential, as well as to gain a geochemical signature of
the prospect as a whole.
Where previous Newmont rock channel cuts were identified, duplicate sections were collected.
Results from this duplication work provided good correlation with that of previous Newmont sampling
and thus both data sets were subsequently combined. In all, a total of 4,101 channel (CH) and chip-
channel samples (RC), together with 147 float samples (RF) collected from mineralised and altered
rock exposures/talus throughout the property (including duplicates and check samples) were
submitted for analysis.
In order to define the linear signature as well as establish some depth potential of resistive (silica
tabular bodies) zones, the company conducted a ground controlled Source Audio frequency
Magnetotelluric (CSAMT) survey over parts of the Kayu Putih, Tanjung and Raja targets in 2006.
Three survey grids at 50 m line spacings were established at differing orientations (090°, 315° and
335°) over the Kayu Putih, Tanjung, Raja-Ratu and Lala target areas. Survey recording stations
were established at 18 m horizontal intervals. The CSAMT survey was undertaken by geophysical
contractor PT. Elliot Geophysics and commenced mid-August 2006. Electrical and mechanical
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 37
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
problems combined with heavy seasonal thunderstorms plagued the survey, which was abandoned
in the third week of December with 40 lines totaling 24.3 km completed.
In general, near surface resistors correlate reasonably well with mapped MSB bodies; however, with
depth resistors tend to migrate northwards and westward and are most likely associated with
andesite and diorite intrusions (Figure 8.1). The more northerly northwest trending MSB are
indicated as resistors on the shallower plan sections, although they seem to die out to the east.
Aeromagnetic data confirms a northwest to southeast direction, but very likely responses are due to
andesite intrusions. The more southerly east-west striking MSB zone has good correlation in the
upper elevations; whilst further to the southwest strong resistors are noted, although no MSBs have
previously been mapped.
Results from BLEG geochemistry (Figure 8.2) confirmed the presence of elevated Au-Ag anomalies
throughout the Pelangan-Mencanggah Prospect areas. Priority 1 targets (>15ppb Au ± >75ppb Ag)
were identified from known MSB bodies Kayu Putih, Ratu, Raja, Lala, Simba, Gawah Bongor, Tibu
Serai & Waterfall/Mahoni. Priority 2 targets (3-15ppb Au ± 40-75ppb Ag) were attributed to
mineralised subsidiary structures as is the case at Mendorot (Lala East and recently defined
porphyry mineralisation), Simba West (Batu Putih porphyry trend), whilst others in the eastern parts
of the prospect area are along strike of the Blongas-Lapangan Geres porphyry corridor, reflecting the
combination of porphyry Cu-Au and later overprinting MSB styles of mineralisation. Low level BLEG
copper values (15-34 ppm) highlight porphyry mineralisation from the Blongas-Lapangan Geres
porphyry corridor and possibly the Mendorot-Gawah Bongor area. Stream sediment gold
geochemistry, in general, mimicked that of corresponding BLEG anomalies.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 38
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Campbell, 2010)
Figure 8.1: Results of the CSAMT survey in the Pelangan Prospect
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 39
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Campbell, 2010)
Figure 8.2: Results of BLEG sampling program in Pelangan-Mencanggah Prospect areas
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 40
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Geological mapping and sampling at Pelangan and Mencanggah has covered an area of 35 km2.
Detailed mapping using tape and compass (Pelangan) and DGPS (Mencanggah) was carried out
along creeks, ridgelines, and foot trails throughout the prospects, with the DGPS simultaneously
recording elevation for contour maps. Factual and interpretative geology, sample location and assay
maps were produced at 1:50,000, 1:10,000 and 1:5000 scales.
The company‟s work identified extensions to the known MSB targets and defined new targets
including Lala, Tibu Serai, Telekur, Talat Talat, and the Gunayang-Mahoni trend. Due to thick
secondary re-growth after logging, all drainages were systematically opened and outcrops cleaned
to gain better exposure of alteration, lithology, structure and any stockwork densities.
Surface mapping and later shallow scout drilling at Pelangan have defined extensive, structurally
controlled, epithermal gold-bearing breccia zones, occurring over an area of 3 x 2 km. Five major
zones (Raja, Kayu Putih, Tanjung-Jati, Lala and Ratu) comprising an aggregate strike length of
approximately 4.6 km have been defined. Channel sampling in conjunction with continuous rock chip
sampling (1-5 m widths) was used extensively to complement geologic mapping to establish priority
drill-test targets. The amount of costeaning was limited due to time constraints and negative
environmental impact on local cash cropping areas.
Raja: The Raja MSB comprises a 1.7 km long north-northwest trending mineralised, linear breccia
zone which has been subdivided into north, central and southern zones (Figure 8.3). The north-
northwest trend of Raja is a secondary structure related to the dominant 320° orientation which hosts
numerous mineralised breccias and porphyry occurrences within the property. At surface the Raja
MSB exhibits a „pinch and swell‟ character with zones up to 20 m wide.
North Raja: Outcrop samples (n=13) averaged 1.31 g/t Au and 22.7 g/t Ag, with maximums of
6.02 g/t Au and 98.0 g/t Ag. Limited trenching returned significant intercepts of 4.0 m @ 2.34 g/t Au
and 14.3 g/t Au (including 1.0 m @ 5.60 g/t Au and 29 g/t Ag) and 5.0 m @ 1.99 Au and 12.5 g/t Ag.
Central Raja: Systematic outcrop sampling (n=125) of prominent bluffs on the north side of the main
river averaged 2.17 g/t Au and 16.4 g/t Ag, with values ranging from <0.005 to 23.77 g/t Au and 1-
170 g/t Ag. In higher elevated areas to the south (South Raja) gold and silver values (n=38) declined
to an average of 0.84 g/t Au and 11.9 g/t Ag, with values to a peak of 6.17 g/t Au and 79 g/t Ag.
Ratu: Encouraging results were received from sub-outcrop samples (n=70, ranging from <0.005 to
34.1 g/t Au and <1 to 16.4 g/t Ag). Narrow mineralised drill intercepts suggest that Au-Ag
mineralisation is related to “horse-tail” splay structures developed between the Raja and Tanjung
MSBs.
Lala: First-pass mapping has been completed over the Lala MSB which parallels the Raja MSB
350 m to the east. Mapping has defined a series of mineralised structures oriented between north-
northwest and east-west over a 1.6 km strike length. Mineralised exposures comprise outcrops up to
15 m in width in the southern zone but generally are limited to discontinuous sub-crops to the central
and northern zones. Assay results from 314 rock-chip samples collected show consistently elevated
grades along the length of the structure, with an average grade of 1.29 g/t Au, 16 g/t Ag and 34 g/t
Mo. Variation in assay values range from 0.01-55.0 g/t Au, 1-178 g/t Ag and 4-365 g/t Mo.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 41
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Campbell, 2010)
Figure 8.3: Surface sampling results for the Raja Deposit, Pelangan Prospect
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 42
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
The Lala structure intersects a large diorite intrusive at the southern end where corresponding Mo +
Cu values are elevated (Batu Seni). This is of significance to exploration as potasically altered diorite
has been cored at South Raja and intense CSAMT anomalies occur between the southern parts of
the Lala and Raja MSBs.
Tanjung-Jati: The Tanjung-Jati MSB comprises a 1.5 km long northwest trending structure divided by
a central split/jog to form Jati to the west and Tanjung to the east. The northwest trend of Tanjung-
Jati parallels the dominant regional 320° orientation (Figure 8.4). Individual breccia zones exhibit a
„pinch and swell‟ character with zones up to 20 m wide. Outcrop sampling was somewhat
intermittent, due to discontinuous rock exposures and subdued topography in places. The 71
samples collected ranged from 0.01-31.1 g/t Au and 1-184 g/t Ag, averaging 1.93 g/t Au and 8.3 g/t
Ag.
Kayu Putih: The Kayu Putih MSB comprises two intersecting mineralised structures with east-west
and northwest trends, over an area of 800 by 400 m (Figure 8.5). The east-west oriented structure is
inferred to be hosted within „en-echelon ramp-structures‟, which can be associated with high-grade
mineralisation. Results of outcrop sampling (n=188) highlight the higher grade potential of the
eastern half of the east-west MSB structure and the southeast end of the 320° trending structure.
Average grades within these areas (n=122) are 10.36 g/t Au and 10.5 g/t Ag, with values ranging
from 0.03-303 g/t Au and 1-98 g/t Ag. Channel samples collected in the vicinity of visible gold
identified in outcrop exposures returned intercepts of 6.8 m @ 22.43 g/t Au, 0.9 m @ 34.6 g/t Au and
2.7 m @ 7.1 g/t Au and 21 g/t Ag. Higher grade zones coincide with cross-cutting gold-silver telluride
bearing quartz veins with localised hydrothermal brecciation that overprint earlier structurally-
controlled “silica ledges”. Outside of the higher grade zones, veining is sporadic and thus assay
values (n=66) decline to an average of 0.62 g/t Au and 10.3 g/t Ag.
Simba: The Simba vein system is traceable along strike for 1.6 km striking between north and
northwest and dipping between 60° to 75° southwest. Vein outcrops are typically “pinch and swell”
and vary between 1 and 30 m wide with individual lenses between 30 to 150 m long. Vein swells
appear to be associated with north-south structural intersections and vein junctions. Vein zones are
characterized by irregular breccias with locally developed banding of fine to medium-grained
saccharoidal quartz, drusy cavities, and localised vuggy textures. Strong silicification is developed
peripheral to veins for up to several meters within the host rock. Thirty one continuous rock chip
samples were collected along outcrops and residual PT NNT trenches, but results from these largely
failed to replicate grades seen in PT NNT trench samples (Figure 8.6).
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 43
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Campbell, 2010)
Figure 8.4: Surface sampling results for the Jati and Tanjung targets, Pelangan Prospect
(Source Campbell, 2010)
Figure 8.5: Surface sampling results for the Kayu Putih target, Pelangan Prospect
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 44
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Campbell, 2010)
Figure 8.6: Surface sampling results for the Simba target, Pelangan Prospect
8.2 Mencanggah Prospect
Channel sampling was used extensively at Mencanggah to complement geologic mapping and
establish prioritized MSB targets. A total of 1,191 rock chips and channel samples were collected
during mapping. Sample assay results are outlined in Figure 8.7.
Channel samples were collected using a combination of hammer and chisel and portable rock saw.
Channel sampling intervals along strike of the MSBs range from 25 to 100 m. Channel sample
widths generally range from 1 to 5 m depending on exposure and down to a minimum of 10 cm for
individual vein character samples.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 45
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Rowe, 2008)
Figure 8.7: Surface rock samples collected from the Mencanggah Prospect
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 46
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
The Bising target forms a prominent hill in the western part of the prospect comprising a west-
northwest trending MSB body approximately 700 m long by up to 100 m at the widest point
(Figure 8.8). Historical sampling by PT NNT indicated the significance of the structure with results
including 228.0 g/t Au from a 2.0 m channel sample. Southern Arc sampling along the Bising
structure confirmed the localised high-grades at surface with results including:
2.0 m @ 38.96 g/t Au
2.0 m @ 17.45 g/t Au
66.0 m @ 1.09 g/t Au (incl. 3.0 m @ 8.6 g/t Au)
5.0 m @ 5.52 g/t Au
The 365 channel samples collected at Bising returned an average grade of 1.17 g/t Au with a peak
result from a 1.0 m channel of 71 g/t Au. Silver values are generally subdued with an average result
of 1.55 g/t Ag and peak of 22.0 g/t Ag.
The Tibu Serai target occurring in the northern section of the prospect covers a broad 1,300 by
600 m area comprising more than 12 individual MSBs, (TS1 to TS12) (Figure 8.9). Individual MSBs
strike northwest to north-northwest with maximum length of 1,000 m and width up to 20 m. Southern
Arc surface sampling confirmed localised zones of high-grade mineralisation at Tibu Serai including
the following highlights:
TS3: 2.5 m @ 6.12 g/t Au
TS3: 7.1 m @ 53.53 g/t Au
TS6: 3.0 m @ 2.52 g/t Au
TS9: 2.0 m @ 3.59 g/t Au
TS9: 1.1 m @ 12.0 g/t Au
From the 417 channel samples collected at Tibu Serai the average gold grade is 1.79 g/t Au with a
peak value of 116.0 g/t Au. Silver is again subdued with an average grade of 1.3 g/t Ag with a peak
value of 21.0 g/t Ag.
The Waterfall target occurs in the southwest of the prospect area forming a 750 m long northwest
trending sigmoidal-loop structure, in places up to 40 m wide (Figure 8.9). Though relatively lower
gold grades have been encountered at this target, quartz vein textures and the inferred presence of
adularia are indicative of high levels of exposure. The potential therefore exists for an epithermal
system with potentially un-exposed higher grade zones in close proximity. SA sampling has
confirmed consistent lower grade anomalism along the structure with results including:
8.0 m @1.42 g/t Au
2.0 m @ 1.41 g/t Au
One hundred and eighty seven channel samples collected at Waterfall returned an average grade of
0.35 g/t Au with a peak assay of 2.89 g/t Au. Silver grades are low with an average result of 4 g/t Ag
and a peak value of 42.0 g/t Ag.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 47
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Character sampling at Mencanggah suggested at least two mineralizing events that contributed
metal deposition in the prospect areas. Gold assay values from silica pyrite advanced-argillic altered
volcanic ranges from 0.05 g/t Au to 0.50 g/t Au, whereas later banded quartz veining and
hydrothermal breccias formed by what appears to be the same generation of quartz range from
0.1 g/t Au to 250.0 g/t Au.
(Source Rowe, 2008)
Figure 8.8: Surface samples from the Bising and Tibu Serai deposits, Mencanggah Prospect
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 48
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Rowe, 2008)
Figure 8.9: Surface sampling for the Waterfall target, Mencanggah Prospect
8.3 Selodong Prospect
Evaluation of the PT NNT database along with the available drill core resulted in the definition of
fifteen priority targets which included the previously drill tested targets of Montong Botek, Blongas I
and II, Belikat and Kekalik (Figure 8.10). The other ten targets were ranked based on follow up
detailed DGPS mapping and sampling. The Kedaro and Lepangan Geres targets were subsequently
drill tested. Along with surface mapping and sampling to enhance and verify the existing data set,
Southern Arc undertook 3D modelling of the Newmont ground magnetic data by GRS - Australia and
selected petrographic analysis of drill core from Montong Botek and Blongas II by SKM - New
Zealand.
Previous PT NNT data were verified in the field where possible through duplication of geochemical
samples, ground truthing of geological traverses and drill collars. All PT NNT drill collars were re-
located and DGPS surveyed to UTM-WGS84 as the earlier PT NNT work programs were based on a
local grid. Based on this rectification, all PT NNT data sets were converted to UTM.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 49
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Rowe, 2008)
Figure 8.10: Surface sampling for the Selodong Prospect
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 50
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Ground traverses were conducted between June 2007 and May 2008 within the 7 x 3 km area of the
Selodong Prospect area. Detailed mapping using DGPS carried out along creeks, ridgelines, and
foot trails throughout the Selodong Intrusive Complex (SIC) simultaneously recorded elevation to
produce digital elevation and geological maps at 1:5000 scale. The distribution of lithological units
and alteration facies generally agreed with Newmont‟s original mapping. Apart from the well-exposed
mineralised quartz diorite outcrops at Montong Botek and along one of the creeks at Blongas II,
porphyry mineralisation in general is very poorly exposed at Selodong due to weathering
characteristics and the labile nature of highly altered porphyry mineralisation. Due to thick secondary
re-growth after logging, all drainages were systematically opened and outcrops cleaned to gain
better exposure of alteration, lithology, structure and any stockwork / fracture densities. Mapping
identified mineralisation and alteration types, defined the approximate limits of post-mineral
brecciation around Montong Botek and Kekalik and the dimensions of post-mineral hornblend diorite
dikes and elucidated some of the major structure controls on mineral and post-mineral events.
Southern Arc ground traverses further developed the significance of the Kedaro target to drilling.
Deposits of porphyry mineralisation were extended a further 7 km northwards, along the Montong
Botek porphyry trend, to Lepangan Geres and Gawa Bongor; another new porphyry style
mineralised area located a further 7.6 km to the north. Detailed mapping has identified the main
controls of porphyry mineralisation at Selodong and shown key porphyry hosting structures
extending outside of Selodong the north and northwest.
Porphyry mineralisation is generally not well exposed due to the labile nature of alteration mineral
assemblages and therefore anomalous samples give a positive sign of mineralisation rather than an
indicative grade. It should also be considered that Lepangan Geres has proportionately more
sampling as this was a new discovery and had not been sampled by the previous operator. Targets
such as Blongas II and Montong Botek have not been as heavily sampled because of previous
surface work and drilling by PT NNT.
A total of 1,082 surface outcrop rock chip and channel samples were collected and analysed for
gold, copper and molybdenum. Normal tropical weathering conditions have resulted in oxidation of
copper sulphides to shallow levels (generally 5 to 20 m below surface), resulting in subdued surface
copper-geochemistry. Gold is intimately associated with copper mineralisation and, being relatively
less mobile at surface, is a better indicator of mineralisation in this instance. At concentrations > 0.15
g/t Au and in the presence of quartz-stockwork and well developed fracturing, gold was considered a
good indicator at Selodong for porphyry mineralisation. Accordingly, a 0.1 g/t Au cut-off has been
applied for the following summary of rock-channel statistics.
Montong Botek: Mineralised stockwork is discontinuously exposed along a 350 x 250 m north-south
elongate zone with the main high grade pod of mineralisation located at the southern end. Forty five
out of 68 5 m channel samples gave an average result of 0.2 g/t Au and 232 ppm Cu with maximum
values of 0.69 g/t Au and 753 ppm Cu.
Blongas I and II: Covers a north-south elongate zone of 940 x 240 m. A total of 104 1 - 3 m wide
channel samples were collected from generally sparse outcrops. Fifty two out of 104 channel
samples returned an average of 0.1 g/t Au and 232 ppm Cu with maximum values of 0.33 g/t and
834 ppm, respectively.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 51
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Kekalik: Alteration and anomalous geochemistry covers a broad area of approximately 700 x 600 m.
From 154 samples, 117 gave average values of 0.1 g/t Au and 228 ppm Cu with maximum values of
0.85 g/t and 2910 ppm, respectively.
Belikat: covering an area of approximately 740 x 640 m, reported average results from 65 out of 195
samples of 0.2 g/t Au and 873 ppm Cu with maximum values of 2.21 g/t and 14100 ppm,
respectively.
Kedaro: 66 out of 153 samples collected averaged 0.2 g/t Au and 303 ppm Cu with maximum results
of 2.21 g/t and 1350 ppm, respectively.
Lepangan Geres: a total of 407 rock samples have been collected within an approximate 600 x
300 m altered area. 231 returned an average grade of 0.2 g/t Au and 303 ppm Cu with maximum
values of 1.3 g/t and 3760 ppm, respectively.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 52
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
9 Drilling Drilling has been carried out on the Pelangan and Mencanggah Prospect areas by Southern Arc and
on the Selodong Prospect by Newmont and Southern Arc. Drilling by Southern Arc was carried out
using up to seven drill rigs. The rigs are man portable, and have the capacity to drill PQ size
(85 mm), HQ size (63.5 mm) and NQ size (47.6 mm). Two of them can drill PQ to 130 m, HQ core to
350 m, and NQ to 650 m; the larger one can drill PQ to 200 m, HQ core to 550 m, and NQ to
1000 m. Triple tube drilling is used to maximize core recovery. Southern Arc indicates that the larger
core is drilled as much as possible.
The diamond drilling programmes were carried out by Indonesian drilling contractors PT Antero
Indodrill (2006 To 2008) and PT Promincon (2010 to 2013) under contracts to Southern Arc. Each
drill rig was operated by two direct employees of the drilling contractors, up to six local laborers, and
a field assistant employed by Southern Arc. The field assistant supervised the drilling, with additional
oversight from time to time during the day from site geologists. Down hole surveys of magnetic
azimuth and drill hole dip are made every 50 m using an Eastman single shot camera. Obvious
incorrect readings (affected by magnetic rocks or poor operator implementation) were discarded.
Collar locations are picked up by a contract surveyor using a differential GPS unit with a claimed
accuracy of ±1 cm. The DGPS base station is located at the West Lombok camp.
The core was transported daily from the rig site to the West Lombok exploration camp. A core
logging shed has been established under a thatched roof cover and partly in the open air. The core
area was reasonably orderly at the time of the site visit; a whiteboard is used to keep track of the
core trays on the racks and the current drilling.
On arrival at the camp, the core is washed and photographed. Two high resolution digital
photographs are taken of each core tray. The core photography setup is sufficient for the purpose of
routine recording of the core and the collection of geotechnical data. Clear core tray labeling is used
in the core photography and photos are reviewed by the site geologist to assure good photo quality.
Core logging was based on a Core Logging Manual prepared by Southern Arc. The manual is very
comprehensive and is based on the recording of all geological and geotechnical characteristics of
the drill hole sample using a coded input. The manual provides very detailed instructions on the data
that needs to be recorded as well as some training on the method of acquiring the data. Core logging
is carried out by local Indonesia geologists with oversight provided by Southern Arc senior geological
staff.
9.1 Pelangan Epithermal Prospect
Southern Arc‟s first phase of diamond drilling employed a small man-portable drill rig capable of
drilling to depths of 60 m HQ and 110 m NQ, designed, built, and supplied by PT. Antero Indodrill, a
Bogor-based drilling company. A network of tracks was constructed linking the drill pads, whilst core
logging/sampling/storage facilities were established in the northern part of the prospect area. The
program began with the collaring of the first hole, designated KDG-01, on June 28, 2006 and was
completed at the termination of RDG-14 on February 10, 2007. A total of 51 diamond drill holes were
completed for 3,762.05 m at an average recovery rate of 95.6% along the Kayu Putih, Raja-Ratu and
Tanjung-Jati MSBs as part of the first phase of drilling. All holes were drilled perpendicular to the
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 53
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
main MSB structures at inclinations of -55° to -60°. Drilling has tested an aggregate strike of
approximately 3.5 km at intervals between 50 and 150 m.
A second phase of drilling was carried out on the Pelangan area between 2008 and 2012 focusing
on higher grade shoot defined from the first drilling campaign. Southern Arc completed an additional
9561 metres of drilling in 48 holes at the Pelangan Prospect..
The majority of holes were drilled well past the MSB targets to explore for any parallel mineralisation
in the immediate footwall rock zone. Initially the entire half-core of each hole, regardless of
alteration/mineralisation, was sampled. This practice was subsequently changed to sampling only
zones of moderate to intense quartz veining, intense silicic altered zones, and the immediate
peripheries of those zones. A total of 5,703 half drill core samples were taken and dispatched to ITS
laboratory for analysis of Au, Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn, Mo, Sb, Se, Te and Bi.
9.1.1 Pelangan Drilling Results
In general, targeted down-dip extensions of surface mineralisation were intersected with, aside from
southern Kayu Putih, comparable gold-silver values. In the case of southern Kayu Putih, drill
intercept grades (KDG-01 to KDG-05) are often a magnitude lower than surface outcrops,
suggestive of surface supergene effects. The main silica bodies/quartz veins were interpreted to be
largely vertical to sub-vertical, with a steep west-southwest dip; the most commonly recorded
attitude. A moderate to intense intermediate argillic (illite-smectite, kaolinite and dickite) altered
selvedge of varying widths (metres to 10s of metres) is a common feature on both the hanging wall
and footwall edges of the silica bodies/veins. This is often accompanied by strong differential
shearing resulting in strongly broken core (and slightly lower recoveries at the vein edges), both
leading to some uncertainty in determining vein attitudes.
The following are general observations of drilling results.
Raja MSB
Shallow drilling along the central and southern zones of the Raja MSB has confirmed continuity of
gold mineralisation within a 600 m strike length between drill holes QDG06 and RDG07. In this zone,
aggregated drill intersections of 128.4 m reported an average grade of 3.42 g/t Au and 19 g/t Ag,
over a vertical extent of 159.6 m (Figure 9.1). Higher grade zones are characterized by:
Quartz veins with fine-grained sulphide and telluride-mineral bands, swirls and clots located in
general along silica body/vein margins.
Low Au/Ag ratio of generally less than 5, elevated Te, Bi and Se values. Au and Te levels
appear to decline significantly at elevations higher than 275 m above sea level. Au/Ag ratios < 5
are typically ascribed in epithermal models and are inferred to lie near up-flow fluid zones; hence
prime targets for drill targeting.
Structural intersection of cross-cutting east to northeast and northwest traverse/tensional
fracture/fault zones with the main silica bodies / quartz vein systems.
All drill holes were cored at angles between 55° to 60° and spaced at intervals between 50 to 150 m
along strike, confirming a vertical to sub-vertical dip on the structure. Most of the mineralisation was
intercepted below the base of surface oxidation.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 54
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Drill sections suggest that orientations of quartz vein systems consistently dip 70°-90° to the
southwest; however, at Raja North (RDG013, RDG014 & QD006) a possible sub-vertical northeast
dip is inferred. Deflections in strike and dip of silica bodies/quartz veining are attributed to
reactivation of pre-existing east-northeast trending, transverse fault / fracture zones. In a number of
sections, vein systems are interpreted to bifurcate and coalesce at depth; however, peripheral
veining is also another option.
The program has confirmed the presence of extensive, near surface gold mineralisation within the
central and southern parts of the Raja MSB. Drilling intercepts are of a comparable magnitude to
earlier surface outcrop sampling.
Rock lithologies logged throughout the 14 drill holes show a consistent volcaniclastic sequence of
polymictic volcanic lithic breccia with local intercalations of volcanic sandstone and well-bedded
siltstone, later intruded by diorite, andesite and feldspar porphyry stocks and dykes (5 - 30 m wide).
Differences between individual holes are ascribed to lateral facies differences in volcaniclastics,
along with effects of post-mineralisation faulting.
As noted from petrology studies of drill core (RDG09 and 11), the occurrence of K-silicate and high-
temperature propylitic alteration assemblages, together with the presence of hydrothermal magnetite
in diorite and volcanic lithic breccia, evidences any early hot phase (>260°C) with clear magmatic
affinities. This early hot phase was later followed by cooler (190-240°C) acid to intermediate fluids,
evidenced by illite-smectite, kaolinite and dickite alteration (White, 1998).
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 55
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Southern Arc, 2012)
Figure 9.1: Significant drill intercepts from the Pelangan Prospect, Raja MSB target
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 56
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Ratu MSB
The five drill holes (QDG01-05) completed in this area targeted extensions below high-grade surface
rock-float/subcrop, but failed to intersect any major mineralised structures. The large volume of
locally high-grade material is now believed to be derived from the Tanjung MSB. Narrow mineralised
drill intercepts (QDG04: 1.4 m @ 4.9 g/t Au and 4.25 m @ 2.10 g/t Au/10.4 g/t Ag) are interpreted as
“horse-tail” splay structures developed between the Raja and Tanjung MSBs.
Tanjung-Jati MSB
Zones of potentially significant gold mineralisation have been intersected in 8 of 13 drill holes along
the 1.5 km strike length of the Tanjung-Jati MSB. Shallow drilling has confirmed continuity of
mineralisation to depths of around 50 m with locally high-grade intercepts. Like Raja, higher grade
zones are associated with quartz veins with fine-grained sulphide and telluride-mineral bands along
silica bodies and vein margins.
All drill holes to date have been cored at angles between 55° to 60°, and spaced at intervals
between 50 to 230 m along strike, confirming a vertical to sub-vertical dip of the structural breccias.
A change in dip direction between drill holes TDG07 and JDG01 most likely marks the effects of
movement of precursor east-northeasterly trending, transverse fault and fracture zones. In a number
of sections, vein systems are interpreted to bifurcate and coalesce at depth; however, peripheral
veining is also another option. Most of the mineralisation has been intercepted below the base of
surface oxidation and is generally comparable in magnitude to previous outcrop sampling.
Kayu Putih MSB
Encouraging gold-silver intersections were reported in 9 of the 17 holes drilled within the Kayu Putih
MSB area. Holes were drilled on a north-south grid orientation at intervals of 50-100 m, with
inclinations of -55° to -60°. The deepest mineralised intercept occurs at 59 m vertically below
surface, whilst the majority of intersections occur below the base of complete oxidation. Dips of the
intersected silica bodies / quartz vein structures vary between 60° to 90° northwards and are inferred
to bifurcate in a number of interpreted cross sections (Figure 9.2).
Drill results confirm the presence of near surface high-grade zones within the southeastern portion of
the mineralised structure. A 450 m long strike zone between drill holes KDG02 and KDG12 shows
the best potential for continuous high grade mineralisation. Within this zone, density of sulphide and
telluride bearing quartz veins is directly proportional to gold ± silver grades. Such vein types are
found predominantly along the margins of the silica body/ quartz vein system. Resistivity mapping
confirms the north-northwest migration of the structure with depth. Scissor holes (KD06 & 07)
confirm the northerly dip of the mineralised structure, effectively drilling down-dip in the intermediate
argillic alteration envelope.
Outside of the higher grade zone drill intersections reflect the predominance of silica ledges derived
from the early advanced argillic / potassic alteration event. Typically, drill intercepts are less than
0.2 g/t Au, but where sporadic quartz veins and breccias are encountered, values up to 3.52 g/t Au
and 41 g/t Ag (KDG09 and KDG14) are reported.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 57
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Campbell, 2010)
Figure 9.2: Typical cross section of the Kayu Putih target, Pelangan Prospect
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 58
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
9.2 Mencanggah Prospect
Phase 1 exploration at the Mencanggah Prospect was carried out in 2011. Initial drilling activities
focused on the Waterfall target, where Southern Arc completed 27 holes for a total of 6,634 m of
drilling, with 17 of the 27 holes encountering gold mineralisation. Southern Arc then concentrated its
efforts on the Bising target. A total of 8 holes were drilled during the first phase of drilling and 16
holes during the second phase of drilling.
Drilling on the Bising target led to the identification of a continuous mineralised lens that is the focus
of extensive mining activity by artisanal miners (Figure 9.3).
(photo by SRK)
Figure 9.3: Photo of artisanal mining excavation areas on Bising Deposit
The extensive width, up to 60 m width in surface outcrop of the main Bising epithermal body is
inferred to result from the intersection of geological structures: a major west-northwest trending fault
intersected by several north-northwest trending faults, the latter of which form the dominant gold
mineralised trend in the West Lombok district.
Additional drilling was carried out on the Mencanggah Prospect at Tibu Serai, an area located
approximately 1 km north of Bising. Southern Arc drilled 16 holes totalling 2,397 m on the Tibu Serai
Deposit.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 59
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
9.2.1 Mencanggah Drilling Results
Waterfall
Drilling at Waterfall below outcrops of banded and brecciated quartz veins intersected multiple
mineralised veins, some with encouraging gold mineralisation. Drilling tested a 2 km strike length of
the breccia zone and, of the 17 holes that encountered gold mineralisation, the best intersections
were found in holes MCG001 and MCG016. Drill hole MCG001 intersected 2.3 m grading 4 g/t gold
and hole MCG016 intersected 4.75 m grading 15.6 g/t gold 375 m north west of hole MCG001.
Follow-up drilling on the Waterfall returned mixed results with several holes returning only minor
mineralisation. Figure 9.4 summarises the drill results for the Waterfall area.
Figure 9.4: Drill results from the Waterfall area
Bising
Drilling at Bising focused on defining the vertical extent of the wide epithermal breccia body identified
in surface outcrops. The drilling demonstrated the consistency and width of mineralisation in the area
for over a 500 m strike length, with a large proportion of the drill holes intersecting wide intervals
averaging greater than 1 g/t gold mineralisation. Some of the more significant results include 53 m
grading 0.68 g/t gold in hole MCC057, 51 m grading 1.5 g/t gold in hole MCC028 and 26 m grading
1.22 g/t gold in hole MCC061. Figure 9.5 summarises the drill intersections for the Bising deposit.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 60
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(source Southern Arc New release, 2013)
Figure 9.5: Longitudinal section of the Bising deposit showing drill hole intersections
Tibu Serai
Eight of the initial nine holes drilled at Tibu Serai intersected gold mineralisation within a 220 m strike
length centred on MCG055 (Figure 9.6). Two holes drilled 40 m northwest and southeast of MCG055
confirmed continuity of high gold grades along an 80 m strike length at similar elevations. MCG058,
located 40 m northwest, intersected 6.90 m @ 5.65 g/t gold, while MCG060, located 40 m southeast
of MCG055, intersected 5.10 m @ 5.29 g/t gold.
MCG061 intersected mineralisation 60 m vertically below MCG055 (26.30 m @ 1.22 g/t gold
including 8.00 m @ 3.21 g/t gold), indicating continuity of mineralisation at depth. MCG067, located
approximately 120 southeast of MCG055, intersected high-grade mineralisation (4.50 m @ 7.79 g/t
gold) within a second shoot zone that remains open to the southeast.
Drilling has also intersected a parallel vein zone exposed 200 m to the southeast of MCG067
(Figure 9.4). A narrow high-grade intersection in MCG058 (0.70 m @ 13.50 g/t gold and 2.3 g/t
silver) well above the targeted mineralisation is interpreted to represent the strike extension of this
parallel vein zone.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 61
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Southern Arc, 2013)
Figure 9.6: Drill results from the Tibu Serai Deposit
9.3 Selodong Prospect
Historical Newmont drilling on the porphyry targets comprised 52 drill holes for a total of 7,956.5 m.
Forty eight shallow (150 m maximum) drill holes were completed with a man-portable Jakro Rig, and
four deeper holes (600 m) were drilled by a helicopter assisted Longyear 44 drill rig. Core drilling
was conducted using wire line recovery methods with PQ, HQ and NQ triple tube equipment. Core
recoveries were calculated for all core intervals; in general between 1.0 and 3.0 m, with bulk
samples up to a maximum of 27.7 m. Sampling comprised of splitting half the core with a diamond
saw, whilst half was retained. No detailed information is available on procedures followed.
Between April 2007 and September 2008, Southern Arc completed 30 drill holes for a total of
17,859.3 m of drilling and 8,576 half core geochemical samples. The drilling program was designed
on evaluation of the extensive PT NNT geological database. A five drill hole program was designed
initially to validate and extend the mineralisation previously drilled by PT NNT at Montong Botek and
Blongas II. Positive results were received from SLD001 to SLD005. Based on these results,
indications of other porphyry deposits from Newmont data and detailed mapping by the company
within the Selodong area, an additional seven targets were tested.
Sampling intervals were predominantly based on 2 m intervals and varied between 1-3 m based on
geological contacts. A total of 8,576 half core samples were collected including 279 standards and
135 blanks. Standards were inserted randomly within the sample stream and blanks were placed
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 62
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
within or immediately below highly mineralised zones to check for contamination during lab-assay
procedures. Samples were dispatched to ITS laboratory for analysis of Au, Cu, Zn, Ag, and Mo.
9.3.1 Selodong Drill Results
Drilling at Selodong focused on six discreet porphyry targets, Montong Botek, Blongass II, Kekalik,
Belikat, Kedaro and Lepangan Geres. At Montong Botek, Southern Arc has partially defined an
open-ended north-south elongate Cu-Au mineralised zone of 450 m long by up to 200 m wide. This
north-south trending mineralised zone lies within an area defined by SA drill holes SLD011, SLD013,
and SLD023 in the north and shallow Newmont drill holes PSG012 to PSG014 and PSG017 to the
south. SLD029 effectively closed off vertical extensions below high grade mineralisation in SLD001-
003 by post mineral brecciation. Some of the more significant drill intersections at Montong Botek
include 168 m grading 0.51% copper and 0.84 g/t gold in hole SLD001 and 855 m grading 0.10%
copper and 0.22 g/t gold in hole SLD023. Figure 9.7 summarises the significant drill intersections for
the Selodong Prospect including the drilling for the Montong Botek area.
(Source Southern Arc, 2013)
Figure 9.7: Drill results for the Selodong Prospect
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 63
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
At Blongas II, Southern Arc drilled a total of eight holes that defined a north trending mineralised
dyke over a 900 m strike length but of relatively narrow width (50 to 200 m). Best results for
Blongas II include 407 m grading 0.25% copper and 0.45 g/t gold in hole SLD 004 and 406 m
grading 0.23% copper and 0.29 g/t gold in hole SLD005. Results for the other Blongas II drilling are
summarised in Figure 9.7.
Drill holes SLD009 and SLD010 were collared in the Kekalik target area to test below outcrops of
diorite intrusive with variable porphyry-style quartz stockwork veining. Hole SLD010 was collared
196 m west of SLD009 to test western portions of the same general target. Both drill holes
encountered porphyry Cu-Au style mineralisation and associated hydrothermal alteration, but Cu-Au
grades were relatively lower because of late-stage phyllic overprinting. Hole SLD009 reported only a
low grade gold intercept of 70.80 m at 0.18 g/t gold and holes SLD010 returned 32 m grading
0.16 g/t gold.
Two holes were targeted at Kedaro: SLD019 and SLD 027. Hole SLD 019 intersected 126 m grading
0.16% copper and 0.23 g/t gold. SLD027 was drilled 115 m south of SLD019; the previous drill hole
at Kedaro. The drill hole was positioned to test for potentially higher-grade mineralised extensions of
SLD019 and to see if significant mineralisation was associated with the large irregular 400 x 200 m
magnetic anomaly located immediately west of the drill collar.
SLD027 was drilled westward of SLD019 and encountered variably altered and weakly to non-
mineralised quartz micro-diorite. The Kedaro target remains interesting as mineralisation remains
largely unexposed at surface and localised zones of elevated surface geochemistry with supporting
magnetic anomaly occur along an 800 m plus along a northwest trend.
Three holes were targeted at the Lepangan Geres target (Figure 9.8). SLD021 was drilled near the
center of the main diorite porphyry body and intersected 142 m grading 0.07% copper and 0.14 g/t
gold. SLD025 was located 160 m north of SLD021 and drilled westward at an inclination of -70
degrees to a depth of 550.1 m. From surface to a depth of 196 m, variably phyllic over-printed and
weakly mineralised micro-diorite was encountered. This zone returned the only significant
mineralisation within the hole (Figure 9.8). Hole SLD028 did not encounter any significant
mineralisation.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 64
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Southern Arc, 2013)
Figure 9.8: Drill results for the Lepangan Geres target
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 65
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
9.4 SRK Comments
SRK is of the opinion that the drilling programs carried out by Southern Arc on the West Lombok
property are sufficient and adequately spaced for use in the estimation of mineral resources for the
Pelangan, Mencanggah and Selodong prospect areas.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 66
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
10 Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security
10.1 Surface Mapping Samples
For flocculated BLEG samples, moss aggregates, over-bank deposits and boulder cavities are
sampled vertically and the resulting material is wet-sieved through a minus 30 mesh sieve into a 10
litre plastic container. No water is allowed to escape from the plastic container and once a
substantial amount of sediment has been collected, an amount of flocculant (Magnofloc E30) is
mixed with the watery sediment until suspended clay material binds and aggregates together,
leaving clear water above the sedimentary mass. Water is decanted off and the sediment is placed
into a large calico bag, bound and squeezed to remove excess water. The sample is then double-
bagged using a large plastic bag. Samples are dried in the sun for a period of 5 to 7 days and then
shipped to the ITS prep laboratory. Average sample weight was 4 to 5 kg of dry weight. For every 25
sample sites there was a random duplicate sample collected at one site. An average sample density
of one BLEG site per 1.4 km² was achieved during the sampling program.
Because of the large sample size in BLEG sampling and the involvement and consistency of four
experienced survey crews, it is considered that results reported have a high degree of accuracy,
quality and reliability. Supporting this opinion is that the highest reported BLEG assay values
emanate from known mineralised prospect areas.
Minus 80# stream sediment samples were split off from the BLEG sample during sample prep at the
ITS laboratory.
For rock samples from potentially mineralised outcrop exposures, along with float from hill talus and
streams, standard sampling procedures involved first removal of any obvious surface crustiform
weathering and/or organic matter, followed by the collection of a representative sample of the
inferred mineralised rock material. For continuous 1 to 3 m outcrop samples, samples were oriented
perpendicular to any obvious mineralised structure. Any obvious surface crustiform weathering
and/or organic matter was first removed, followed by a continuous channel of HQ/NQ core
proportions using either a rock chisel and hammer, or Stihl TS50 rock saw. Emphasis was placed on
collecting a uniform representative sample over the channel width to avoid sample bias. Where vein
samples were sampled these were either:
a. sampled as a single continuous channel sample from one vein margin to the other, or
b. sampled as a chip sample because of vein width less than 15 to 20 cm, or
c. sampled as a continuous chip sample of 3 to 5 m to ascertain potential grades in preliminary
ground traverses.
Samples were described, numbered with relevant rock code (CH=channel, RC=rock chip or RF=rock
float), bagged with relevant sample tickets and temporarily stored at the company base camp. Hand
specimens of all samples were retained for future reference. Separate check samples from Gannet
and Windrift Australia along with blanks were submitted in a random fashion to approximate one
check sample per 25 rock samples collected.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 67
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
10.2 Drilling Samples Preparation and Analyses
The core sample intervals are marked directly on the core with a fibre-tip marker, and the sample
numbers assigned by the geologist are marked on red core blocks. The core is then cut in half with a
diamond core saw. The orientation of the cut of each piece is chosen as the most convenient by the
operator and a random half added to the sample and the saw is cleaned with water between
samples to minimize contamination. Both halves of the sawed core are replaced in the core box and
the sample is collected for bagging at a sample station controlled by the geologist.
The core halves for the sample are placed in a numbered calico bag, and pre-printed waterproof
sample tags are inserted. The sample details are filled out into the sample book and these are cross-
checked by the geologist against the sample logging sheet. Standards are inserted at a rate of one
in twenty prior to bagging and blank material is inserted after mineralised samples (at a rate of about
1 in 40). The dispatch of samples is tracked on a whiteboard at the core shed. Samples are packed
into polyweave bags and sealed with numbered security tags before dispatch from the exploration
camp. The samples are driven by company employees to Southern Arc‟s Mataram logistics base for
shipping to the PT Intertek Utama Services (Intertek) laboratory in Sumbawa Besar for assay. A
report on sample condition, along with a note of any inconsistencies, is emailed by Intertek to the
company upon arrival of the sample at the laboratory.
Core trays from the entire exploration program are stored in a locked rattan, timber and thatch shed
at the exploration base. The shed is well organized and tidy, and the core trays are clearly marked
and stored in a logical order.
Excess sample pulp from the sample preparation (approximately 10 kg for each sample) is stored in
plastic bags at the Intertek sample preparation facility at Sumbawa Besar. Excess pulp from the
packet submitted to the Jakarta laboratory is stored onsite in a dedicated warehouse. This contains
material from all of Intertek‟s clients, and the materials are stored in an orderly fashion.
The core is marked for sampling by the logging geologist; the visual assessment of the grade zone is
used to break sample intervals.
The samples are prepared at the Intertek laboratory in the city of Sumbawa Besar, on the island of
Sumbawa, with assaying done at the Jakarta laboratory. The Jakarta laboratory is ISO 17025
accredited and employs a Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) for sample tracking,
quality control and reporting. Upon arriving at Intertek the samples are treated as follows:
1. The samples are received;
2. The sample numbers are checked against accompanying paperwork; any discrepancies are
communicated to client before any processing begins;
3. The sample delivery form is completed;
4. The samples are weighed on a balance with a maximum capacity of 20 kg ±0.01 kg;
5. The sample weight form is completed;
6. The standards inserted by the client are identified and weighed separately on a small digital
balance to 0.1 g;
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 68
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
7. The samples are loaded on a trolley with blanks (crushed volcanic rock) and dried in an electric
fan forced oven for twelve hours at 105°C; the oven has an electronic temperature control;
8. The samples are crushed in a jaw crusher to ~2mm; the blank material is run through a crusher
after each sample and a compressed air hose is also used to clean the equipment. Each
Southern Arc sample typically takes 10 minutes to crush;
9. The sample tag is retrieved from the calico bag and placed in a numbered Kraft packet;
10. The crushed sample is placed in a numbered clear plastic bag;
11. The entire sample is pulverized in ~2kg batches in LM2 mills; typically each 2kg charge is milled
for 6 minutes. The target P95 is 75μm;
12. A blank wash is milled after each sample;
13. 1 in 20 samples is tested for grind size. 50 g is weighed out and sieved, with the oversize
weighed;
14. The milled sample is rolled 20 times on a mixing bench;
15. The sample is returned to the plastic bag;
16. The sample is split through a 24 slot riffle splitter; a sample split of 200g-250g is required, and
this usually takes about a sixfold splitting;
17. The sample splits are put into numbered Kraft packets and the previously identified standards
are replaced into the sample sequence. These are identified as standards on the packet;
18. The sample splits are packed into cardboard boxes and sent to the Jakarta assay laboratory;
and
19. The remaining pulverized samples are stored at the laboratory.
Gold is analysed by standard fire assay technique. Copper and silver were analysed by Intertek‟s
GAO2 method which consists of digestion of the sample in hydrochloric/perchloric solution
(HCl/HClO4) followed by an atomic absorption spectroscopy (ASS) analysis.
10.3 Specific Gravity Data
Specific gravity data were routinely collected by Southern Arc. All measurements were taken on core
samples using the simple water immersion technique. While this technique is adequate, it is less
than ideal for porous material. SRK recommends that Southern Arc should seal their core samples
with wax prior to carrying out the density measurements to assure that any rock porosity is properly
accounted for.
There are 1,408 bulk density measurements in the assay database provided by Southern Arc; 404
samples were collected from the Mencanggah Prospect, 141 from Pelangan and 863 from the
Selodong area. Of the data provided, only one sample was deemed invalid and removed from the
database prior to resource estimation. Figure 10.1 summarises the basic statistical data of the bulk
density collected.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 69
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Figure 10.1: Statistical data for bulk density measurements
10.4 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Programs
Intertek quality control includes repeat assaying, use of blanks and a series of 23 different standard
reference materials (SRMs) for individual elements. Standards are commercially prepared and
purchased from Gannet Holdings Pty Ltd, Geostats and Canmet in Australia. Blanks and samples
are inserted randomly into batches of 50, comprising 45 samples, 1 blank, 2 duplicate pulp samples
and 2 standards. Duplicate samples are selected randomly from the samples submitted and assayed
at the end of the batch, numbered with the same number as that of the original sample. A dedicated
Laboratory Quality Manager analyzes the QA/QC performance of the laboratory, with results
reported to clients on an as-requested basis. Final results are reviewed by expatriate management
who certify that all relevant QA/QC procedures have been followed. Intertek participates in both an
internal and external inter-laboratory round robin assaying exercises.
The company employs a QA/QC program through the systematic use of standards and blanks and
the normal chain of custody measures during sample transport. The company has used up to 29
different commercial standards produced by Geostats Pty Ltd and Gannet Holdings Pty Ltd,
purchased through Intertek Perth. Recommended assay values ± confidence intervals are provided
on standards received. A total of 499 gold standards, 105 copper standards and 381 blanks have
been used in drilling programs. On average, 1 standard has been inserted into the sample stream
every 31 samples and 1 blank inserted on average every 63 samples. Standards are placed
randomly within the sample stream, whilst blanks are inserted non-randomly either within or
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 70
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
immediately below visually-inferred mineralised zones. “Blank” material comprises fresh basaltic-
andesite lava collected from tertiary lava flows at the foot of Mt. Rinjani, with the highest Au result
recorded from this material being 0.04 ppm Au within equipment reading detection error.
10.5 SRK Comments
SRK reviewed the QA/QC data and noticed that few samples fell outside of the acceptable failure
limits. Of the 499 gold standards submitted, SRK noted three standards outside of the acceptable
limits, and at least two of these appear to be mislabeled standards. Three of the 105 copper
standards fell outside of the acceptable limits and should be investigated. SRK is of the opinion that
the sample handling and shipping is in keeping with best industry practices and adequate for this
type of deposit and mineralisation. A review of the blank samples submitted did not reveal any
serious contamination issues with sample preparation.
In the opinion of SRK, the sampling preparation, security and analytical procedures used by
Southern Arc are consistent with generally accepted industry best practices and are therefore
adequate.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 71
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
11 Data Verification
11.1 Verifications by Southern Arc
Because exploration is still at an early stage, only limited independent verification of analytical
results has been undertaken to date. A total of 195 Selodong drill core pulps previous assayed by
ITS Intertek were submitted to SGS / Indoassay (Balikpapan) for re-assay, by the same methods as
the Intertek assay (fire assay for Au and acid digest/ASS for Cu). Indoassay Balikpapan is part of the
SGS Group which, like ITS Intertek, provides inspection, testing, certification and verification
services worldwide. Similarly, they are ISO accredited and employ relevant LIMS for sample
tracking, quality control and reporting.
Comparison of assay results shows very similar means and medians for the two laboratories for both
elements, although the maxima for Au are very different and the Indoassay Au assays are somewhat
less variable. SRK considers that the results of re-assays are reasonably similar, although some
large differences were noted and those should be addressed by repeating the re-assay program with
additional pulps.
A total of 140 Pelangan drill core pulps previously assayed by ITS Intertek were submitted to
Kalassay Laboratory (KAL) domiciled at 10 Elmsfield Road, Perth, WA 6056, Australia. Kalassay is
part of the Inspectorate Group which, like ITS Intertek, provides inspection, testing, certification and
verification services worldwide. Similarly, they are ISO accredited and employ relevant LIMS for
sample tracking, quality control and reporting.
Comparison of assay results show ITS gold and silver assays are less than corresponding KAL
values by an average of 9% and 19%, respectively. The latter is attributed to differing finishing
methodology for silver analysis (AAS versus ICP-MS methodology), while the former is within
accepted industry tolerances.
11.2 Verifications by SRK
11.2.1 Site visit
SRK carried out two site visits: the first visit was from December 6 to 9, 2011, with the follow up visit
from April 23 to 26, 2013. During the site visit, SRK examined the drill sites and logging and
sampling procedures, examined the geology in the field, and re-logged several drill holes from each
of the prospect areas. Mineralisation and alteration were noted in drill core and SRK observed
several artisanal miners operating in the Bising and Tibu Serai areas during both site visits.
11.2.2 Verifications of analytical quality control data
SRK reviewed the sample database and noted that a wide range of sample lengths exists in the
database from 0.15 m to 3.8 m with the bulk of the samples (68%) being between 0.5 m and 1.5 m in
lengths. SRK recognizes that shorter sample lengths are often necessary in early stage exploration
for epithermal deposits but recommends that Southern Arc try to standardize sample lengths as
much as possible and avoid taking samples longer than 2 m whenever possible.
SRK validated the digital database by checking for inconsistencies in naming conventions, analytical
units, duplicate entries, length, distance values, or sample intervals less than or equal to zero, blank
or zero-value assays, out-of-sequence intervals, intervals or distances greater than the reported drill
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 72
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
hole length, inappropriate collar locations, and missing interval and coordinate fields. A few minor
inconsistencies were noted and corrected by SRK. No other significant validation errors were noted
in the supplied database.
SRK compared the digital assay database provided by Southern Arc against original assay
certificates provided by Intertek and found no significant data entry errors. In all, SRK validated 85%
of the assay database and found no significant errors.
SRK reviewed the QA/QC data and sampling program and found the data and programs to be
acceptable for the purpose of resource estimation.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 73
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
12 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing There have been no metallurgical samples collected for testing from the West Lombok Property so
far. SRK recommends that samples be collected for basic metallurgical testing during the next phase
of drilling on the property.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 74
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
13 Mineral Resource Estimates
13.1 Introduction
The Mineral Resource Statement presented herein represents the first mineral resource evaluation
prepared for the West Lombok Project in accordance with the Canadian Securities Administrators‟
National Instrument 43-101.
The mineral resource model prepared by SRK considers 253 core boreholes drilled by Southern Arc
and Newmont during the period of 2007 to 2013. The drilling covers three discreet prospect areas:
85 drill holes cover the Selodong porphyry copper-gold Prospect, 89 holes cover the Pelangan
epithermal gold Prospect and 67 holes cover the Mencanggah epithermal gold Prospect. Of these,
99 drill holes intersected the mineralised zones considered for resource estimation; 36 drill holes
totalling 5,787 m were included in the Raja resource model, 22 drill holes totalling 3,830 m were
included in the Bising model, 10 holes totalling 1,370 m were included in the Tibu Serai model and
31 holes totalling 11,012 m were included in the Selodong model. The resource estimation work was
completed by Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P.Geo (APEGBC) an appropriate “independent qualified person”
as this term is defined in National Instrument 43-101. The effective date of the resource statement is
July 13, 2013.
This section describes the resource estimation methodology and summarises the key assumptions
considered by SRK. In the opinion of SRK, the resource evaluation reported herein is a reasonable
representation of the global copper and gold mineral resources found in the West Lombok Project at
the current level of sampling. The mineral resources have been estimated in conformity with
generally accepted CIM “Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves Best Practices”
guidelines and are reported in accordance with the Canadian Securities Administrators‟ National
Instrument 43-101. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated
economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted
into mineral reserve.
The database used to estimate the West Lombok Project mineral resources was audited by SRK.
SRK is of the opinion that the current drilling information is sufficiently reliable to interpret with
confidence the boundaries for epithermal gold and porphyry copper mineralisation and that the
assay data are sufficiently reliable to support mineral resource estimation.
Gemcom GEMSTM
Version 6.5 was used to construct the geological solids, prepare assay data for
geostatistical analysis, construct the block model, estimate metal grades and tabulate mineral
resources. The Geostatistical Software SAGE2001TM
was used for geostatistical analysis and
variography.
13.2 Resource Estimation Procedures
The resource evaluation methodology involved the following procedures:
Database compilation and verification;
Construction of wireframe models for the boundaries of the vein-hosted gold and porphyry
copper mineralisation;
Definition of resource domains;
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 75
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Data conditioning (compositing and capping) for geostatistical analysis and variography;
Block modelling and grade interpolation;
Resource classification and validation;
Assessment of “reasonable prospects for economic extraction” and selection of appropriate cut-
off grades; and
Preparation of the Mineral Resource Statement.
13.3 Resource Database
The drill hole database used to estimate the mineral resources presented in this report contains 241
drill holes including 53,252 m of core. The drill hole database contains descriptive information and
assay grades from exploration drilling carried out by Southern Arc and Newmont. The database was
provided to SRK as an ACCESS database that includes the following tables:
Drill hole collar information such as location and length;
Down hole survey information such as direction and dip;
Lithology information including rock group codes and interpreted geology;
Mineralisation information including mineral types;
Geotechnical data, RQD and recovery data;
Vein counts and types of veins;
Alteration information including alteration type;
Down hole magnetic susceptibility data;
Down hole specific gravity measurements; and
Chemical analytical (assay) records.
The supplied mineral resource database was imported into Gemcom‟s GEMSTM
6.5 software and
validated by checking for inconsistencies in naming conventions, analytical units, duplicate entries,
length, distance values, sample intervals less than or equal to zero, blank or zero-value assays, out-
of-sequence intervals, intervals or distances greater than the reported drill hole length, inappropriate
collar locations, and missing interval and coordinate fields. A few minor inconsistencies were noted
and corrected by SRK. No other significant validation errors were noted in the supplied database.
13.4 Solid Body Modelling
Solid models were created to provide spatial limits for each of the mineralisation domains within the
West Lombok deposits. Separate geological models were generated for each of the prospect areas
estimated. Domains were created by interpretation of the drill hole lithology and assay data from the
drill holes.
13.4.1 Raja Deposit – Pelangan Prospect
The gold mineralisation at the Raja Deposit is generally associated with quartz veins within wider
quartz breccia zones. The gold is associated with a high sulphidation epithermal quartz vein system.
Two parallel vertical veins have been identified within the Raja Deposit area. The veins have been
explored by drilling over a strike length of 1,000 m and to a vertical depth of 250 m (Figure 13.1).
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 76
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Wireframes were constructed on 20 m spaced sections using a 1.5 m minimum horizontal thickness
and a 0.15 g/t nominal cut off. A digital model of the topography was also generated and the vein
wireframes were clipped against the digital surface topographic model. No surface was generated for
overburden, but little or no overburden occurs over the vein areas.
Note: Grid is 200 by 200 m
Figure 13.1: Planveiw of Raja wireframes
13.4.2 Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits – Mencanggah Prospect
The gold mineralisation at Bising and Tibu Serai is generally associated with quartz breccia zones.
The gold is associated with a high sulphidation epithermal quartz vein system. Two parallel vertical
veins have been identified within the Bising Deposit area and a single high grade vein has been
identified at Tibu Serai so far. The veins have been explored by drilling over a strike length of 700 m
at Bising and 200 m at Tibu Serai (Figure 13.2).
Geological modelling was completed by SRK using Gemcom GEMSTM
version 6.5. Wireframes were
constructed on 20 m spaced sections using a 1.5 m minimum horizontal thickness and a 0.15 g/t
nominal cut off. A wireframe of the topography was also generated and the vein wireframes were
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 77
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
clipped against surface topography. No surface was generated for overburden, but little or no
overburden occurs over the vein area.
Figure 13.2: Planview of Bising and Tibu Serai wireframes (Note: Grid is 500 by 500 m)
13.4.3 Selodong Deposit – Selodong Prospect
The copper-gold gold mineralisation at Selodong is associated with structural zones within altered
diorite. Two main porphyry zones have been identified by drilling and extend for about 1,500 m in a
north-south direction (Figure 13.3).
Geological modelling was completed by SRK using Gemcom GEMSTM
version 6.5. Wireframes were
constructed on 50 m spaced sections using a 0.2 g/t copper equivalent. A wireframe of the
topography was also generated and the vein wireframes were clipped against surface topography.
No surface was generated for overburden, but little or no overburden occurs over the vein area.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 78
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Figure 13.3: Planview of Selodong wireframes (Note: Grid is 500 by 500 m)
13.5 Compositing
All assay data were composited to a fixed length prior to estimation. SRK evaluated the assay
lengths for each of the resource areas and selected the most appropriate composite length for each
area.
13.5.1 Raja Deposit – Pelangan Prospect
An evaluation of sample lengths indicated that 92% of assay lengths within the mineralised zones
were 1 m or less (Table 13.1). For this reason, SRK decided to composite the assay data to a fixed
1 m length within the wireframes starting from the drill hole collars. Any composites that were less
than 0.5 m in length after the compositing routine were added to the previous interval to assure that
no composites were less than 0.5 m or greater than 1.5 m.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 79
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Table 13.1: Comparison of sample length and average gold grade for Raja Deposit
Assay Length (m) Sample Count Average Au Grade
(g/t) Cumulative %
<=0.25 44 3.38 4.72
0.25-0.50 324 5.06 39.44
0.50-0.75 281 3.18 69.56
0.75-1.00 213 2.34 92.39
1.00-1.50 62 1.24 99.04
1.50-2.00 9 1.96 100.00
Grand Total 933
13.5.2 Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits – Mencanggah Prospect
An evaluation of sample lengths indicated that 92% of assay lengths within the mineralised zones
were 1.5 m or less (Table 13.2). For this reason, SRK decided to composite the assay data to a fixed
1.5 m length within the wireframes starting from the drill hole collars. Any composites that were less
than 0.75 m in length after the compositing routine were added to the previous interval to assure that
no composites were less than 0.75 m or greater than 2.25 m.
Table 13.2: Comparison of sample lengths and average gold grade for the Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits
Assay Length (m) Sample Count Average Au Grade
(g/t) Cumulative %
<=0.25 23 1.69 2.4
0.25-0.50 365 1.37 41.4
0.50-0.75 85 1.15 50.5
0.75-1.00 292 0.69 81.6
1.00-1.50 96 0.47 91.89
1.50-2.00 76 0.42 100
Grand Total 937
13.5.3 Selodong Deposit – Selodong Prospect
An evaluation of sample lengths indicated that 91% of assay lengths within the mineralised zones
were 3 m or less (Table 13.3). For this reason, SRK decided to composite the assay data to a fixed
3 m length within the wireframes starting from the drill hole collars. Any composites that were less
than 1.5 m in length after the compositing routine were added to the previous interval to assure that
no composites were less than 2.25 m or greater than 4.5 m.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 80
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Table 13.3: Comparison of sample lengths and average gold grade for the Selodong Deposit
Assay Length (m) Sample Count Average Au Grade (g/t)
Average Cu Grade (%) Cumulative %
<=1.5 54 0.5 0.28 2.1
1.5-2.0 1439 0.38 0.23 59.2
2.0-2.5 224 0.38 0.25 68.1
2.5-3.0 582 0.39 0.26 91.2
3.0-3.5 127 0.33 0.23 96.2
3.5-4.0 47 0.26 0.16 98.0
4.0-4.5 15 0.35 0.23 98.6
4.5-5.0 33 0.26 0.17 100
Grand Total 2521
13.6 Evaluation of Outliers
Grade capping analysis was conducted on the domain-coded sample assay data in order to limit the
influence of extreme assay values during estimation.
Block grade estimates may be unduly affected by high grade outliers. Therefore, assay data were
evaluated for high grade outliers and capping was determined from decile and probability plot
analyses.
13.6.1 Raja Deposit – Pelangan Prospect
Because of the high variation in raw assay lengths from 0.2 m to 1.5 m, SRK evaluated the assay
average grades of different sample lengths to determine if shorter sample lengths were associated
with high grade sections of the deposits and to evaluate if compositing prior to capping was
appropriate. Some correlation between sample lengths and assay values was apparent, with shorter
sample lengths having higher average grades than longer sample lengths. Based on the analysis,
SRK decided to carry out the capping on 1 m composites, not the assay data. Table 13.4
summarises the capping data for the Raja Deposit.
Table 13.4: Capping Level for Raja Deposit
Zone Maximum Value (g/t)
Cap Value (g/t)
Mean Au (g/t) Number Capped
Lost Metal* (%) Average Average
Capped
Raja 92 30 2.99 2.67 8 12
*Lost metal is (Average - Averaged Capped)/Average*100 where Average is the average grade of the assays before capping and Average Capped is the average grade of the assays after capping.
13.6.2 Bising and Tibu Serai deposits – Mencanggah Prospect
SRK evaluated the assay data for the Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits to determine if capping was
required. Capping analysis was carried out on 1.5 m composites and the capping level was set at
5 g/t gold based on the change of slope on a cumulative probability plot (Figure 13.4).
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 81
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
13.6.3 Selodong Deposit – Selodong Prospect
SRK evaluated the gold assay data for the Selodong Deposit to determine if capping was required.
Because of the longer composite length of 3 m used for Selodong and because of the lack of
apparent higher average grade associated with shorter composites (Table 13.3), SRK decided to
cap the gold assay data prior to compositing to 3 m lengths. Capping levels were set to 4 g/t. SRK
decided that copper did not require capping as no significant grade outliers seemed to exist for
copper.
Figure 13.4: Capping level for Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits
13.7 Statistical Analysis and Variography
13.7.1 Raja Deposit – Pelangan Prospect
A basic statistical analysis was carried out on assay and composited data. A summary of the
samples located within the mineralised envelope is presented in Table 13.5.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 82
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Table 13.5: Statistics for gold assays and gold composites – Raja Deposit
Assay Data 1 m Composite Uncap 1 m Composite Cap
Number of Data 933 614 614
Mean 2.89 2.99 2.67
Minimum 0 0 0
Maximum 130 92 30
Upper Quartile 2.89 2.79 2.79
Median 1.23 1.28 1.28
Lower Quartile 0.55 0.64 0.64
Variance 100 50.85 19.87
Standard Deviation 10.01 7.31 4.46
CV 2.85 2.38 1.67
Because of the narrow nature of the mineralised domain at Raja, experimental correlograms and
models could not be generated from the existing data set. A simple omni directional exponential
variogram was designed from the grade times thickness (GT) data using Sage2001TM
software.
13.7.2 Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits – Mencanggah Prospect
A basic statistical analysis was carried out on assay and composited data. A summary of the
samples located within the mineralised envelope is presented in Table 13.6.
Table 13.6: Basic statistics for assays and composited data – Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits
Assay Data 1.5 m Composite Uncap 1.5 m Composite Cap
Au (g/t) Au (g/t) Au (g/t)
Number of Data 1140 680 680
Mean 1.19 0.89 0.68
Minimum 0 0 0
Maximum 89.0 42.8 5
Upper Quartile 0.72 0.27 0.27
Median 0.39 0.42 0.42
Lower Quartile 0.24 0.67 0.67
Variance 25.1 6.9 0.77
Standard Deviation 5.0 2.64 0.88
CV 4.19 2.96 1.28
13.7.3 Selodong Deposit – Selodong Prospect
A basic statistical analysis was carried out on assay and composited data. A summary of the
samples located within the mineralised envelops is presented in Table 13.7.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 83
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Table 13.7: Basic statistics for gold and copper assays and composites – Selodong Deposit
Assay Data 3 m Composite Cap Assay Data 3 m Composite
Au (g/t) Au (g/t) Cu (%) Cu (%)
Number of data 2544 2073 2544 2073
Mean 0.376 0.37 0.23 0.23
Minimum 0 0 0 0
Maximum 8.6 3 1.62 1.59
Upper Quartile 0.45 0.45 0.30 0.30
Median 0.27 0.27 0.19 0.19
Lower Quartile 0.45 0.17 0.11 0.11
Variance 0.17 0.11 0.03 0.03
Standard Deviation 0.41 0.33 0.17 0.17
CV 1.1 0.31 0.76 0.13
Spatial continuity of gold and copper was evaluated with correlograms developed using SAGE
2001 TM
version 1.08. The correlogram measures the correlation between data values as functions of
their separation distance and direction. The distance at which the correlogram is close to zero is
called the “range of correlation” or simply the range. The range of the correlogram corresponds
roughly to the more qualitative notion of the “range of influence” of a sample or composite.
Variographic analysis was completed for gold for the Raja, Bising, Tibu Serai and Selodong Deposits
and for copper for the Selodong Deposit. Directional correlograms were generated for composited
data at 30 degree increments along horizontal azimuths. For each azimuth, correlograms were
calculated at dips of 0, 30 and 60 degrees. A vertical correlogram was also calculated. Using
information from these 37 correlograms, Sage determines the best fit model using least square fit
method. The correlogram model is described by the nugget (Co), two nested structure variance
contributions (C1, C2), ranges of the variance contributions and the model type (spherical or
exponential). After fitting the variance parameters, the algorithm then fits an ellipsoid to the 37
ranges from the directional models for each structure. The final models of anisotropy are given by
the lengths and orientations of the axes of the ellipsoids.
Correlograms were developed on composited assay data except for the Raja Deposit where
correlograms were developed on grade times thickness (GT) because of the narrow nature of the
mineralisation at Raja. Table 13.8 summarises the correlogram parameters used for each of the
deposit areas estimated.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 84
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Table 13.8: Au and Cu exponential correlogram parameters by deposit
Deposit Metal Nugget
C0
Sill
C1, C2
Gemcom Rotations (RRR rule) Ranges a1, a2
around Z around Y around Z X-Rot Y-Rot Z-Rot
Raja Au 0.1 0.9 0 0 0 40 40 40
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Bising Au 0.27
0.507 79 60 -118 20 65 15
Tibu Serai 0.223 79 60 -118 150 100 20
Selodong Au 0.16 0.83 12 37 20 177 135 51
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Selodong Cu 0.1 0.81 12 37 16 117 67 43
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
13.8 Block Model and Grade Estimation
Mineral resources for the West Lombok Project were estimated in three separate block models; one
representing each of the main prospect areas (Figure 13.5).
Block modelling was carried out in Gemcom GEMSTM
6.5 software by Dr. Gilles Arseneau, Associate
Consultant with SRK.
Block estimates were carried out in 10 x 10 x 5 m blocks for the Raja, Bising and Tibu Serai Deposits
and a 10 x 10 x 10 m for the Selodong Deposit. A percent model was used to weight partial blocks
situated at zone boundaries. Block model parameters are defined in Table 13.9.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 85
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Figure 13.5: Plan view of the three block model areas on the West Lombok Project (Note: Grid is 2 km x
2 km)
Table 13.9: Block model setup parameters
Model Model Origin
(WGS 84) Block Size
(m) No of Blocks
Raja
Easting 384,200 10 120
Northing 9,027,800 10 140
Elevation 400 5 125
Bising – Tibu Serai
Easting 387,900 10 110
Northing 9,023,530 10 170
Elevation 510 5 88
Selodong
Easting 390,600 10 100
Northing 9,020,800 10 200
Elevation 240 10 75
The Gemcom block model origin is defined at minimum X and Y and maximum Z value.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 86
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
13.8.1 Grade models
Grades were estimated by Ordinary Kriging with a minimum of two samples for Raja, four samples
for Selodong and five samples for Bising –Tibu Serai deposits. To estimate block grades a maximum
of twelve composites were used in the Raja and Bising –Tibu Serai deposits and a maximum of nin
to twelve composites were used in the Selodong Deposit. Grade interpolations were carried out in
three passes, with each successive pass using a larger search radius than the preceding pass and
only estimating the blocks that had not been interpolated by the previous pass. Table 13.10
summarises the search parameters for each interpolation pass.
Table 13.10: Search parameters by deposit and metal
Metal Deposit Pass Rotation Search Ellipse Size
Number of Composites
Max. Samples per DDH
Z Y Z X (m) Y (m) Z (m) Min. Max.
Au Raja 1 15 20 0 20 60 50 2 12 1
Au Raja 2 15 20 0 20 75 75 1 12 1
Au Raja 3 15 20 0 10 20 20 1 12 12
Au Bising 1 60 60 -49 75 50 14 5 12 4
Au Bising 2 60 60 -49 150 100 14 3 12 2
Au Bising 3 60 60 -49 20 20 14 2 12 12
Au Tibu Serai 1 50 60 -49 75 50 14 5 12 4
Au Tibu Serai 2 50 60 -49 200 100 14 3 12 2
Au Tibu Serai 3 50 60 -49 20 20 14 2 12 12
Au Selodong 1 12 37 20 50 50 20 4 9 2
Au Selodong 2 12 37 20 100 100 40 4 12 3
Au Selodong 3 12 37 20 177 135 50 4 12 3
Au Selodong 4 12 37 20 25 25 10 3 12 12
Cu Selodong 1 12 37 20 50 50 20 4 12 2
Cu Selodong 2 12 37 20 100 100 40 4 12 2
Cu Selodong 3 12 37 20 177 135 50 4 12 2
Cu Selodong 4 12 37 20 25 25 10 3 12 12
13.8.2 Bulk density model
There are 1,408 bulk density measurements in the West Lombok database with an average of 2.58.
SRK is of the opinion that while these are sufficient to estimate a mineral resource, the amount of
bulk density data is too limited for estimation by kriging. For this reason, SRK used a simple average
to estimate the model block densities. Bulk density data used for the resource estimate is
summarised in Table 13.11.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 87
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Table 13.11: Bulk density used for resource estimation
Deposit Average SG Count
Raja 2.51 141
Bising 2.55 277
Tibu Serai 2.48 127
Selodong 2.56 863
Default waste rock 2.60 NA
13.9 Model Validation and Sensitivity
13.9.1 Validation of Raja model
The Raja block model was validated by comparing the interpolated block grades against the
composited cap grades on section and plan views (Figure 13.6). Overall, the comparison showed
that the estimated blocks agreed reasonably well with the composite grades from which they were
derived.
Figure 13.6: Comparison of block grades and composite grades, block model Level 58 (110 m above
sea level) (Note: Grid is 200 x 200 m)
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 88
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Additional validation of the Raja model was provided by re-estimating the mineral resources using
inverse distance squared (ID2) estimation. The ID
2 estimation was carried out using the same search
criteria as for the Ordinary Kriging run, but 1 m composited gold assays were used directly to
estimate gold grades instead of using grade times thickness. The two estimation procedures
returned very similar results. The Ordinary Kriging model returned slightly more tonnes at a lower
grade than the ID2 model, but the two models contained similar metal content (Figure 13.7).
Figure 13.7: Metal content of Ordinary Kriged and Inverse Distance Squared models at various grade
cut-offs
13.9.2 Validation of Bising – Tibu Serai model
The Bising and Tibu Serai block model was validated by comparing the interpolated block grades
against the composited cap grades on section and plan views (Figure 13.8). Overall, the comparison
showed that the estimated blocks agreed reasonably well with the composite grades from which they
were derived.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Conta
ined o
unces
Cut-off Au (g/t)
OK oz
ID2 Oz
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 89
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Figure 13.8: Plan view of Bising Deposit comparing block and composite gold grades, block model
Level 25 (345 m above sea level) (Note: Grid is 200 x 200 m)
Additional validation of the Bising and Tibu Serai model was carried out by comparing well informed
blocks with composites contained within those blocks, and comparison of average assay grades with
average block estimates along different directions – swath plots.
Figure 13.9(a) shows a comparison of estimated gold block grades, with borehole composite assay
data contained within those blocks, within the mineralised domains for the Bising deposit.
Figure 13.9(b) shows the same for the Tibu Serai deposit. On average, the estimated blocks are
similar to the composite data, although there is a large scatter of points around the x = y line. This
scatter is typical of smoothed block estimates compared to the more variable assay data used to
estimate those blocks. The thick white line that runs through the middle of the cloud is the result of a
piece-wise linear regression smoother. Comparison for Tibu Serai is very limited because of the
small size of the deposit and available data.
Figure 13.9: Comparison of well-informed blocks for Bising (a) and Tibu Serai (b)
Estim
ate
s
Composites
Domain 201
.1 1. 10.
.1
1.
10.Nb. of data 203
X Var: mean 0.692std. dev. 0.734minimum 0.001maximum 5.000
Y Var: mean 0.673std. dev. 0.464minimum 0.181maximum 2.937
correlation 0.659rank corr. 0.596
Reg: smoothed Y
Estim
ate
s
Composites
Domain 301
.1 1. 10.
.1
1.
10.Nb. of data 40
X Var: mean 0.975std. dev. 1.046minimum 0.001maximum 5.000
Y Var: mean 0.989std. dev. 0.810minimum 0.055maximum 2.854
correlation 0.746rank corr. 0.853
Reg: smoothed Y
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 90
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
As a final check, average composite grades and average block estimates were compared along
different directions. This involved calculating de-clustered average composite grades and
comparison with average block estimates along east-west, north-south, and horizontal swaths.
Figure 13.10 shows the swath plots in the mineralised zone at Bising and Figure 13.11 shows the
swatch plot for the mineralised zone at Tibu Serai. The average composite grades and the average
estimated block grades are quite similar in all directions. The composite data display slightly more
variability than the block grades as a result of the smoothing effect due to the Ordinary Kriging
estimation. Overall, the validation shows that the current resource estimate is a good reflection of
drill hole composited data. Comparison of the Tibu Serai data is of limited use because of the small
data set used to prepare the block model.
Figure 13.10: Swath plot of composite and block grades for Bising
Figure 13.11: Swath plot of composite and block grades for Tibu Serai
13.9.3 Validation of Selodong Model
The Selodong block model was validated by comparing the interpolated block grades against the
composited cap grades on section and plan views (Figure 13.12). Overall, the comparison showed
that the estimated blocks agreed reasonably well with the composite grades from which they were
derived.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 91
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Figure 13.12: Plan view of Selodong model comparing copper equivalent block grades and corresponding composite grades, block model Level 22 (25 m above sea level)( Note: Grid is 200 x 200 m)
Additional validation of the Selodong model was carried out by comparing well informed blocks with
composites contained within those blocks, and comparison of average assay grades with average
block estimates along different directions – swath plots.
Figure 13.13 shows a comparison of estimated gold block grades with borehole composite assay
data contained within those blocks in all mineralised domains of the Selodong deposit. Figure 13.14
shows the same for copper. On average, the estimated blocks are similar to the composite data,
although there is a large scatter of points around the x = y line. This scatter is typical of smoothed
block estimates compared to the more variable assay data used to estimate those blocks. The thick
white line that runs through the middle of the cloud is the result of a piece-wise linear regression
smoother.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 92
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Figure 13.13: Comparison of well-informed blocks with composite gold grades for Selodong model
(Note: Refer to Figure 13.3 for Selodong mineralised domain location)
Figure 13.14: Comparison of well-informed blocks with composite copper grades for Selodong model
As a final check, average composite grades and average block estimates were compared along
different directions. This involved calculating de-clustered average composite grades and
comparison with average block estimates along east-west, north-south, and horizontal swaths.
Figure 13.15 shows the gold swath plots in the mineralised zones at Selodong and Figure 13.16
shows the copper swath plots. The average composite grades and the average estimated block
grades are quite similar in all directions. The composite data display slightly more variability than the
block grades as a result of the smoothing effect due to the Ordinary Kriging estimation. Overall, the
validation shows that current resource estimate is a good reflection of drill hole composited data.
Estim
ate
s
Composites
Domain 400
.001 .01 .1 1. 10. 100.
.001
.01
.1
1.
10.
100.Nb. of data 437
X Var: mean 0.309std. dev. 0.242minimum 0.005maximum 1.390
Y Var: mean 0.314std. dev. 0.214minimum 0.008maximum 1.326
correlation 0.940rank corr. 0.911
Reg: smoothed Y
Estim
ate
s
Composites
Domain 401
.001 .01 .1 1. 10. 100.
.001
.01
.1
1.
10.
100.Nb. of data 341
X Var: mean 0.432std. dev. 0.355minimum 0.010maximum 1.813
Y Var: mean 0.444std. dev. 0.324minimum 0.019maximum 1.762
correlation 0.887rank corr. 0.861
Reg: smoothed Y
Estim
ate
s
Composites
Domain 400
.001 .01 .1 1. 10. 100.
.001
.01
.1
1.
10.
100.Nb. of data 437
X Var: mean 0.197std. dev. 0.123minimum 0.002maximum 0.655
Y Var: mean 0.198std. dev. 0.109minimum 0.004maximum 0.576
correlation 0.927rank corr. 0.918
Reg: smoothed Y
Estim
ate
s
Composites
Domain 401
.001 .01 .1 1. 10. 100.
.001
.01
.1
1.
10.
100.Nb. of data 341
X Var: mean 0.283std. dev. 0.207minimum 0.003maximum 1.365
Y Var: mean 0.283std. dev. 0.188minimum 0.011maximum 1.240
correlation 0.939rank corr. 0.909
Reg: smoothed Y
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 93
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(a)
(b)
Figure 13.15: Swath plots for gold grades for Selodong for domain 400 (a) and domain 401 (b)
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 94
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(a)
(b)
Figure 13.16: Swath plots for copper grades for Selodong for domain 400 (a) and domain 401 (b)
13.10 Mineral Resource Classification
Block model quantities and grade estimates for the West Lombok Project were classified according
to the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (December 2005) by
Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P.Geo. (APEGBC); an appropriate independent qualified person for the
purposes of National Instrument 43-101.
Mineral resource classification is typically a subjective concept. Industry best practices suggest that
resource classification should consider both the confidence in the geological continuity of the
mineralised structures, the quality and quantity of exploration data supporting the estimates, and the
geostatistical confidence in the tonnage and grade estimates. Appropriate classification criteria
should aim at integrating both concepts to delineate regular areas at similar resource classification.
SRK is satisfied that the geological modelling honours the current geological information and
knowledge. The location of the samples and the assay data are sufficiently reliable to support
resource evaluation. The sampling information was acquired primarily by core drilling on sections
spaced between 25 and 50 metres depending on the deposit modelled.
Generally, for mineralisation exhibiting good geological continuity, and investigated at adequate drill
hole spacing with reliable assay data, SRK considers that blocks estimated during the first estimation
run can be classified in the Indicated category within the meaning of the CIM Definition Standards for
Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. However, SRK is of the opinion that the mineralisation at
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 95
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
the West Lombok Project is best classified as Inferred Mineral Resource because of the widely
spaced drilling and relatively poor grade continuity at the current drill spacing.
SRK is of the opinion that the confidence in the estimate is insufficient to allow for the meaningful
application of technical and economic parameters or to enable an evaluation of economic viability.
13.11 Mineral Resource Statement
CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (December 2005) defines a
mineral resource as:
“(A) concentration or occurrence of diamonds, natural solid inorganic material, or natural solid
fossilized organic material including base and precious metals, coal, and industrial minerals in or on
the Earth’s crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has reasonable
prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and
continuity of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological
evidence and knowledge”.
The “reasonable prospects for economic extraction” requirement generally implies that the quantity
and grade estimates meet certain economic thresholds and that the mineral resources are reported
at an appropriate cut-off grade, taking into account extraction scenarios and processing recoveries.
In order to meet this requirement, SRK considers that major portions of the deposits on the West
Lombok Project may be amenable for open pit extraction. In order to determine the quantities of
material offering “reasonable prospects for economic extraction” by an open pit, SRK used a pit
optimizer and reasonable mining assumptions to evaluate the proportions of the block model
(Inferred blocks) that could be “reasonably expected” to be mined from an open pit.
Open pit parameters were selected based on experience and benchmarking against similar projects
(Table 13.12). The reader is cautioned that the results from the pit optimization are used solely for
the purpose of testing the “reasonable prospects for economic extraction” by an open pit and do not
represent an attempt to estimate mineral reserves. There are no mineral reserves on the West
Lombok Project. The results are used as a guide to assist in the preparation of a mineral resource
statement and to select an appropriate resource reporting cut-off grade.
Table 13.12: Assumptions considered for conceptual open pit optimization
Parameter Value Unit
Gold Price 1,500 US$ per ounce
Copper Price 3.56 US$ per pound
Silver Price 25 US$ per ounce
Exchange Rate 1:1 $US/$CDN
Mining Cost 1.50 US$ per tonne mined
Processing 5.00 US$ per tonne of feed
General and Administrative 1.00 US$ per tonne of feed
Overall Pit Slope 50 Degrees
Gold Process Recovery 76 Percent
Copper Recovery 86 Percent
Silver Recovery 0 Percent
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 96
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
SRK considers that the blocks located within the conceptual pit envelope satisfy the “reasonable
prospects for economic extraction” and can be reported as a mineral resource. Tables 13.13 to
Table 13.16 summarise the mineral resources for the West Lombok Project.
Table 13.13: Mineral Resource Statement*, Raja Deposit, West Lombok Project, Indonesia, SRK Consulting, July 13, 2013
Classification Tonnage
(tonnes)
Grade
Cap Au (g/t)
Grade
Ag (g/t)
Contained Metal
Gold Ounces
Contained Metal
Silver Ounces
Inferred 3,898,000 2.63 14 329,700 1,821,000
* Reported at a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t gold equivalent inside a Whittle pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. All numbers have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Gold equivalent is calculated using US$1500 per ounce of gold and US$25 per ounce of silver and 100% metal recoveries for both metals Gold was capped at 30 g/t. Silver grades were not capped.
Table 13.14: Mineral Resource Statement*, Bising Deposit, West Lombok Project, Indonesia, SRK Consulting, July 13, 2013
Classification Tonnage
(tonnes)
Grade
Cap Au (g/t)
Contained Metal
Gold Ounces
Inferred 6,908,000 0.88 195,550
* Reported at a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t gold inside a Whittle pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. All numbers have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Gold was capped at 5 g/t.
Table 13.15: Mineral Resource Statement*, Tibu Serai Deposit, West Lombok Project, Indonesia, SRK Consulting, July 13, 2013
Classification Tonnage
(tonnes)
Grade
Cap Au (g/t)
Contained Metal
Gold Ounces
Inferred 977,000 1.36 42,570
* Reported at a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t gold inside a Whittle pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. All numbers have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Gold was capped at 5 g/t.
Table 13.16: Mineral Resource Statement*, Selodong Deposit, West Lombok Project, Indonesia, SRK Consulting, July 13, 2013.
Classification Tonnage
(tonnes)
Grade
Cap Au (g/t)
Grade
Cu (%)
Contained Metal
Gold Ounces
Contained Metal
Copper Pounds
Inferred 66,750,000 0.43 0.27 922,800 397,324,000
* Reported at a cut-off grade of 0.25% copper equivalent inside a Whittle pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. All numbers have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Gold was capped at 4 g/t. Copper equivalent is calculated using US$1500 per ounce of gold and US$3.56 per pound of copper and 100% metal recoveries for both metals.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 97
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
13.12 Grade Sensitivity Analysis
The mineral resources of the West Lombok Project are very sensitive to the selection of the reporting
cut-off grade. This is especially true in the Bising deposit. To illustrate this sensitivity, the global
model quantities and grade estimates are presented in Tables 13.18 to Table 13.21 at different cut-
off grades. The reader is cautioned that the figures presented in this table should not be
misconstrued with a Mineral Resource Statement. The figures are only presented to show the
sensitivity of the block model estimates to the selection of cut-off grade. Figures 13.17 to Figure
13.20 present this sensitivity as grade tonnage curves. The steep decline in tonnage with increasing
cut-off grade is indicative of the high susceptibility of the deposit to cut-off selection.
Table 13.17: Global block model quantities and grade estimates*, Raja Deposit, West Lombok Project, at various cut-off grades
Cut-off Grade Quantity Grade Metal Content
Gold (g/t) (tonnes) Gold (g/t) Gold (ounces)
5.0 415,650 5.89 78,700
4.0 527,000 5.57 94,400
3.0 1,192,500 4.39 168,200
2.0 2,605,000 3.30 276,300
1.5 3,182,000 3.02 308,700
1.0 3,674,600 2.79 329,000
0.5 4,028,400 2.61 338,000
*The reader is cautioned that the figures in this table should not be misconstrued with a Mineral Resource Statement. The figures are only presented to show the sensitivity of the block model estimates to the selection of cut-off grade.
Table 13.18: Global block model quantities and grade estimates*, Bising Deposit, West Lombok Project, at various cut-off grades
Cut-off Grade Quantity Grade Metal Content
Gold (g/t) (tonnes) Gold (g/t) Gold (ounces)
2.0 101,600 2.26 7,370
1.5 534,000 1.78 30,600
1.0 1,947,000 1.37 86,000
0.5 6,908,000 0.88 195,550
*The reader is cautioned that the figures in this table should not be misconstrued with a Mineral Resource Statement. The figures are only presented to show the sensitivity of the block model estimates to the selection of cut-off grade.
Table 13.19: Global block model quantities and grade estimates*, Tibu Serai Deposit, West Lombok Project, at various cut-off grades
Cut-off Grade Quantity Grade Metal Content
Gold (g/t) (tonnes) Gold (g/t) Gold (ounces)
2.0 183,200 2.28 13,400
1.5 407,000 1.99 26,000
1.0 614,000 1.74 34,400
0.5 977,000 1.36 42,570
*The reader is cautioned that the figures in this table should not be misconstrued with a Mineral Resource Statement. The figures are only presented to show the sensitivity of the block model estimates to the selection of cut-off grade.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 98
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Table 13.20: Global block model quantities and grade estimates*, Selodong Deposit, West Lombok Project, at various cut-off grades
Cut-off Grade Quantity Grade Metal Grade Metal
Copper Eq (%) (tonnes) Gold (g/t)
Gold (ounces) Copper (%)
Copper (pounds)
1.0 4,055,000 1.02 133,000 0.58 51,851,000
0.50 27,530,000 0.63 557,600 0.37 224,565,000
0.40 40,856,000 0.54 709,300 0.33 297,238,000
0.30 58,508,000 0.46 865,300 0.28 361,166,000
0.25 66,750,000 0.43 922,800 0.27 397,328,000
0.20 73,960,000 0.40 951,200 0.25 407,635,000
0.10 81,855,000 0.38 1,000,000 0.24 433,102,000
*The reader is cautioned that the figures in this table should not be misconstrued with a Mineral Resource Statement. The
figures are only presented to show the sensitivity of the block model estimates to the selection of cut-off grade.
Figure 13.17: Grade tonnage curve for the Raja Deposit, West Lombok Project
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Ave
rage
Gra
de
Au
(g/
t)
Ton
nes
(0
00
)
Cut-off grade Au (g/t)
Tonnes Gold (g/t)
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 99
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Figure 13.18: Grade tonnage curve for the Bising Deposit, West Lombok Project
Figure 13.19: Grade tonnage curve for the Tibu Serai Deposit, West Lombok Project
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Ave
rage
gra
de
Au
(g/
t)
Ton
nes
(0
00
)
Cut-off grade Au (g/t)
Tonnes
Gold (g/t)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Ave
rage
gra
e A
u (
g/t)
Ton
nes
(0
00
)
Cut-off grade Au (g/t)
Tonnes
Gold (g/t)
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 100
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
Figure 13.20: Grade tonnage curve for the Selodong Deposit, West Lombok Project
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Ave
rage
gra
de
Au
(g/
t) C
u (
%)
Ton
nes
(0
00
)
Cut-off grade Cu Eq (%)
Tonnes
Gold (g/t)
Copper (%)
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 101
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
14 Adjacent Properties This section is taken from Campbell, 2010. The author of the report has been unable to verify the
information contained in this section and the information presented in this section of the report is not
necessarily indicative of the mineralisation on the West Lombok Project that is the subject of this
technical report.
Adjoining the western property boundary is a 5,000 hectare concession held by PT. Bintang
Sumberdaya under a IUP exploration license. Field inspections in this locality reported intense
porphyry style alteration over a width of 50+ m, with at least 850 m of strike length. Secondary
copper oxides (malachite, azurite and lesser chrysocolla) are prolific in the western part of the area
and are currently being mined by local artesian miners. Host rocks comprise magnetite-epidote-
silicic altered diorite porphyry intrusives, with some later phyllic overprinting. Strong northwest
structural control of mineralisation is evidenced by intense fracturing, fault slickensides and sharp
contact boundaries on porphyry stockwork veining. Overlying and peripheral to the stockwork zone
are intermixed argillic and advanced argillic assemblages, hosting limited or no stockworking.
A single grab sample of porphyry veining material being mined by local artesian miners assayed
0.62 g/t Au and 0.36% Cu.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 102
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
15 Other Relevant Data and Information There is no other relevant data available about the West Lombok Project.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 103
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
16 Interpretation and Conclusions
The West Lombok Property hosts an early stage copper gold project situated on the west side of
Lombok Island in Indonesia and covering a northwest trending 13 km by 7 km wide mineralised
structural corridor.
Mineralisation on the property has been separated into three main prospect areas: from north to
south, the Pelangan, the Mencanggah and the Selodong Prospects. Each prospect consists of
several mineral targets or showings; many of which have been the subject of exploration by diamond
drilling that host both porphyry copper-gold and epithermal gold mineralisation.
Work carried out by Southern Arc has included geophysical and geochemical surveys as well as
geological mapping and diamond drilling. In total, Southern Arc has drilled 201 holes totalling
47,750 m. The drilling programs resulted in the identification of inferred mineral resources for the
Raja, Bising, Tibu Serai and Selodong Deposits as presented in Section 13 of this report.
The mineral resources at West Lombok have been classified as Inferred Mineral Resources by SRK.
An Inferred Mineral Resource has the lowest level of confidence as defined by CIM (Figure 16.1).
For this reason, a certain risk is associated with the tonnage and grade estimates presented in this
report. Additional drilling is required to upgrade the mineral resource class from Inferred to Indicated
or Measured.
Readers are cautioned that there are no guarantees that additional drilling will result in additional
mineralisation being defined or that the classification will improve if the drilling is not successful in
better defining the geological knowledge of the deposits. Furthermore, additional drilling may change
the geological interpretation of the deposit which could result in a reduction or increase in the deposit
size.
SRK is not aware of any other significant risks and uncertainties that could be expected to affect the
reliability or confidence in the early stage exploration information discussed herein.
Figure 16.1: Classification of mineral resources and mineral reserves
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 104
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
All deposits identified so far are still open at depth and along strike and further drilling could discover
additional mineralisation, especially at Raja where the possibility of finding mineralisation that could
be amenable to underground mining seems very good.
The West Lombok Property contains several other mineral occurrences and only a small portion of
the favourable ground has been drill tested to date. SRK is of the opinion that the untested mineral
occurrences represent a significant opportunity to locate additional mineralisation.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 105
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
17 Recommendations SRK recommends that Southern Arc continue to explore the West Lombok Property. SRK
recommends a two phase exploration program (Phase 3A and Phase 3B) including 4,010 m of
drilling at Raja and Bising. Phase 3B is contingent on receiving positive results from phase 3A of
exploration.
17.1 Pelangan
SRK recommends that Southern Arc drills an additional eight holes for 1,420 m in the Raja Deposit
as part of the next exploration phase (Phase 3A) (Table 17.1). The drilling is targeted to infill around
previously identified higher grade mineralised shoots and to test the down dip extension of the
mineralised zone and, if results are positive, upgrade the mineral resources from inferred to
indicated (Figure 17.1). If the results of the first drilling phase are encouraging, SRK recommends an
additional five drill holes (Phase 3B) for the Raja Deposit to evaluate the down dip potential of the
mineralisation.
Table 17.1 Proposed drilling for Raja Deposit
PDH No Section Line Proposed Depth Phase
PDH01-A SE200 165 3A
PDH02-A SE355 115 3A
PDH03-A SE290 320 3A
PDH04-A SE158 135 3A
PDH05-A SE320 150 3A
PDH06-A SE595 100 3A
PDH07-A SE680 260 3A
PDH08-A SE890 175 3A
Total A = 1,420 3A
PDH01-B SE225 165 3B
PDH02-B SE284 165 3B
PDH03-B SE290 350 3B
PDH04-B SE705 325 3B
PDH05-B SE890 200 3B
Total B = 1,205 3B
Total A+B = 2,625 3A + 3B
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 106
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
(Source Southern Arc, 2013)
Figure 17.1 Planview of proposed Phase 3A and 3B drilling for Raja Deposit
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 107
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
17.2 Mencanggah
SRK recommends an additional eight drill holes for the Bising deposit (Phase 3A) to help upgrade
the resource classification from inferred to Indicated. The drill holes are mainly designed to infill
between existing drill holes to help confirm the continuity of grades between drill holes within the
mineralised unit (Table 17.2).
Table 17.2 Proposed Phase 3 drill holes for Bising Deposit
PDH NO SECTION LINE Proposed Depth (m) Phase
PDH01-A ESE-652 170 3
PDH02-A ESE-565 170 3
PDH03-A ESE-904 165 3
PDH04-A ESE-852 145 3
PDH05-A ESE-800 180 3
PDH06-A ESE-747 145 3
PDH07-A ESE-695 225 3
PDH08-A ESE-422 185 3
Total Phase 1 = 1,385 3
No additional drilling is recommended at this stage for the Selodong Deposit. SRK recommends that
Southern Arc continues geological mapping in the Tibu Serai and Selodong areas and that drill core
samples be taken from the Raja and Bising deposits for preliminary metallurgical testing and
characterization. Approximately 4,000 m of exploration drilling is recommended to test other undrilled
targets at Mencanggah including Tibu Serai, Mahoni and several other localities with highly
anomalous surface geochemistry. Drill testing is also recommended for the Lala structure on the
Palagan Prospect area where highly anomalous surface values are located 350 m east of Raja along
an 800 m parallel trend.
Table 17.3 summarises the costs of the recommended exploration program.
Table 17.3 Estimated cost for the exploration program proposed for the West Lombok Project
Description Units Total Costs (CDN$)
Phase 3A Program
Diamond drilling (all inclusive) 2,805 m $561,000
Geological mapping 30 days $15,000
Metallurgical program 4 samples $120,000
Sub-total Phase 3A $696,000
10% contingency $69,600
Total Phase 3A Program $765,600
Phase 3B Program
Diamond drilling (all inclusive) 1,205 m $241,000
Exploration Drilling 4,000 m $800,000
Preliminary Economic Assessment $180,000
Sub Total Phase 3B $1,221,000
Total Phase 3A & 3B $1,986,600
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 108
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
SRK is unaware of any significant factors and risks that may affect access, title, or the right or ability
to perform the exploration work recommended for the West Lombok Project.
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 109
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
18 Acronyms and Abbreviations Distance Other
µm micron (micrometre) oC degree Celsius
mm millimetre oF degree Fahrenheit
cm centimetre Btu British Thermal Unit
m metre cfm cubic feet per minute
km kilometre elev elevation above sea level
” inch masl m above sea level
in inch hp horsepower
‟ foot hr hour
ft foot kW kilowatt
Area kWh kilowatt hour
m2 square metre M Million
km2 square km mph miles per hour
ac acre ppb parts per billion
ha hectare ppm parts per million
Volume s second
l litre s.g. specific gravity
m3 cubic metre usgpm US gallon per minute
ft3 cubic foot V volt
usg US gallon W watt
lcm loose cubic metre Ω ohm
bcm bank cubic metre A ampere
Mbcm million bcm tph tonnes per hour
Mass tpd tonnes per day
kg kilogram mtpa million tonnes per annum
g gram Ø diam
t metric tonne Acronyms
Kt kilotonne BLEG
lb pound CH rock channel sample
Mt megatonne CIM Canadian Institute of Mining
MPa megapascal CoW Contract of Work
Pressure CSAMT
psi pounds per square inch DGPS Digital Global Positioning System
Pa pascal GPS Global Positioning System
kPa kilopascal IP induced polarization
mPa megapascal IUP Indonesian mining business license
Elements and Compounds MSB mineralised structural breccia
Au gold NI 43-101 National Instrument 43-101
Ag silver NSR net smelter return
Cu copper SRK SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.
Fe iron RC rock chip sample
S sulphur RF rock float sample
CN cyanide SIC Selodong Intrusive Complex
NaCN sodium cyanide XRD
Conversion Factors
1 tonne 1 tonne
1 oz 1 oz
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 110
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
19 References Allen, J.M., 1990. Petrology of Quartz Vein Samples from the Pelangan Prospect, South Lombok,
Indonesia: A Polymetallic Au-Ag-Cu-Te-Se-As-Sb-Pb-Bi Deposit. CMS Petrology Report No. 353.
Campbell, H.J., 2010. Technical report on Exploration activities (2005-2010) at the West Lombok
Project of southern Arc Minerals Inc., Lombok Island, West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia,
110p.
Clode, C.H. and Pratama, B., 2002. Application of PIMA Technology in Defining Gold and Copper
Exploration Targets in Island Arc Settings: A Case Study from Sumbawa and Lombok, Indonesia.
Proceedings of the 31st Annual Convention of Indonesian Association of Geologists, Vol. 1, pp. 954-
967.
Garwin, S., 2002. The Geologic Setting of Intrusion – Related Hydrothermal Systems near the Batu
Hijau Porphyry Copper-Gold Deposit, Sumbawa, Indonesia, Society of Economic Geologist –
Special Publication 9, Chapter 15, p333-366.
Hamilton, W.B., 1979. Tectonics of the Indonesian region. US Geological Survey Professional
Paper, 1078, 345pp.
Norton Rose Fulbright, 2012. New Indonesian mining regulations. Web Site Publication:
http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/64444/new-indonesian-mining-
regulations, March 2012.
Pieters, P.J., 2004. Remote Image Study of the Indotan Inc SIPP area, South Lombok, Nusa
Tenggara. Peter Pieters Consulting.
Rontek, R.B., 1985 Pemboran Inti Endapan Bijih Timah Hitam P. Lombok Pada K.P Eksplorasi DU
59/NUSBAR. Pusat Pengembangan Teknologi Mineral, Direktorat Jenderal Pertambangan Umum.
Rowe, A.J., 2008. Surface Evaluation and First Phase Drilling at the Selodong Prospect, December
2008.
Rowe, A.J., 2008. Surface Evaluation of the Mencanggah Prospect, December 2008.
Van Bemmelen, R.W., 1949. The Geology of Indonesia. Vol. 1A. General Geology. Government
Printing Office, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands.
White, P.J., 1998. Petrology of 40 samples from Pelangan Prospect, Lombok for PT. Jasa Prima
Raya. Sinclair Knight Merz Petrology Report No. M1180
2CS032.000 – Southern Arc Minerals Inc. Independent Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project, Lombok, Indonesia Page 111
GA / MN Lombok_2CS032.000_NI 43-101_GA_MN_20130822 August 23, 2013
20 Date and Signature Page This technical report was written by the following “Qualified Persons” and contributing authors. The
effective date of this technical report is July 11, 2013
Qualified Person Signature Date
Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P. Geo. “original signed” August 23, 2013
Reviewed by
Original signed
Marek Nowak, P.Eng.
Project Reviewer
All data used as source material plus the text, tables, figures, and attachments of this document
have been reviewed and prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering
and environmental practices.
SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.
Suite 2200 - 1066 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, BC V6E 3X2
T: +1.604.681.4196
F: +1.604.687.5532
www.srk.com
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON
To accompany the report entitled: Technical Report for the West Lombok Gold and Copper Project,
Lombok, Indonesia, August 23, 2013.
I, Dr. Gilles Arseneau, residing in North Vancouver do hereby certify that:
1) I am an Associate Consultant with the firm of SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (“SRK”) with an office at Suite 2200, 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
2) I graduated with B.Sc. in Geology from the University of New Brunswick, 1979; a M.Sc. in Geology from the University of Western Ontario, 1984 and a Ph.D. in Geology from the Colorado School of Mines, 1995. I have been involved in mining since 1979 and have practised my profession continuously since 1995. I have been involved with exploration projects and consulting covering a wide range of mineral commodities in Africa, South America North America and Asia including deposits similar to West Lombok Project in North and south America. I have over ten years of experience in resource estimation using Gemcom software;
3) I am a Professional Geoscientist registered with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia;
4) I have personally inspected the subject project Lombok on December 6 through 9, 2011 and on April 23 to 26, 2013;
5) I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 and certify that by virtue of my education, affiliation to a professional association and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 and this technical report has been prepared in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1;
6) I, as a qualified person, I am independent of the issuer as defined in Section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101;
7) I am the author of this report and responsible for all sections of the report and accept professional responsibility for all sections of this technical report;
8) I have had no prior involvement with the subject property;
9) I have read National Instrument 43-101 and confirm that this technical report has been prepared in compliance therewith;
10) SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. was retained by Southern Arc Minerals Inc. to prepare a technical report and mineral resource estimate for the West Lombok project. The preceding report is based on a site visit, a review of project files and discussions with Southern Arc Minerals Inc. personnel;
11) I have not received, nor do I expect to receive, any interest, directly or indirectly, in the West Lombok Property or securities of Southern Arc Minerals Inc.; and
12) That, as of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, this technical report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the technical report not misleading.
Vancouver, B.C. August 23, 2013
[“signed and sealed”] Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P. Geo. Associate Consultant, SRK Canada
APPENDIX A Mineral Tenure Information
1 ANEKA TAMBANG TBK, PT TAPANULI UTARA 214/21/KPPT/TAHUN 2010 12.580,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS 25/Feb/10
2 ANEKA TAMBANG TBK, PT TAPANULI UTARA 215/21/KPPT/Tahun 2010 20.680,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS DMP 25/Feb/10
3 ANEKA TAMBANG TBK, PT TAPANULI UTARA 216/21/KPPT/ Tahun 2010 6.492,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS 17/Jun/09
4 ANEKA TAMBANG , PT KARO 540/335/Tamben/2009 8.176,00 EKSPLORASI LOGAM DASAR 30/Dec/09
5 X DAREH, CV DHARMASRAYA 189.1/134/KPTS‐BUP/2009 198,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 3/Jul/2009
6 BARA MITRA SEJAHTERA, PT INDRAGIRI HULU 13/IUP/545‐02/V2010 4.327,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 28/Apr/2010
7 SELUMA PRIMA COAL, PT SAROLANGUN 37 Tahun 2009 2.000,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 8/Jun/2009
8 BANGUN WAHANA LINGKUNGAN LESTARI, PT BATANG HARI 503/59/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 1.945,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Jul/2010
9 BANGUN WAHANA LINGKUNGAN LESTARI, PT BATANG HARI 503/58/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 1.945,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Jul/2010
10 BANGUN WAHANA LINGKUNGAN LESTARI, PT BATANG HARI 503/60/IUPEKSPLORASI/BPTSP/2010 1.945,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Jul/2010
11 BANGUN WAHANA LINGKUNGAN LESTARI, PT BATANG HARI 503/53/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 1.625,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Jul/2010
12 BANGUN WAHANA LINGKUNGAN LESTARI, PT BATANG HARI 503/54/IUPksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 1.625,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Jul/2010
13 BUMI BARA MAKMUR MANDIRI, PT BATANG HARI 503/56/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 1.945,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Jul/2010
14 BUMI BARA MAKMUR MANDIRI, PT BATANG HARI 503/55/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Jul/2010
15 BUMI BARA MAKMUR MANDIRI, PT BATANG HARI 503/57/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 1.945,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Jul/2010
16 BUMI MAKMUR SEJATI, PT BATANG HARI 503/93/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 1.880,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 10/Nov/2010
17 BUMI MAKMUR SEJATI, PT BATANG HARI 503/64/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 1.800,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 28/Sep/2010
18 EKSANUSA, PT BATANG HARI 503/66/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 14/Oct/2010
19 GLOBALINDO ALAM LESTARI, PT BATANG HARI 503/100/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 580,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 13/Dec/2010
20 KASONGAN MINING MILLS, PT BATANG HARI 503/98/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 22/Nov/2010
21 KURNIA ALAM INVESTAMA, PT BATANG HARI 503/61/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 1.945,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Jul/2010
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
PENGUMUMAN KE‐DUA REKONSILIASI IUP
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
22 KURNIA ALAM INVESTAMA, PT BATANG HARI 503/62/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Jul/2010
23 MUARO AIR MAS, PT BATANG HARI 503/63/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 1.800,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 28/Sep/2010
24 NAN RIANG, PT BATANG HARI 503/94/IUPEksplorasi/BPTSP/2010 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 10/Nov/2010
25 ARGO MAKMUR PT MUARO JAMBI 71 TAHUN 2010 954,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 6/Apr/2010
26 BUMI BORNEO INTI, PT MUARO JAMBI 94 TAHUN 2010 1.000,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 20/Apr/2010
27 GEA LESTARI, PT MUARO JAMBI 08 TAHUN 2010 1.000,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 11/Jan/2010
28 GLOBALINDO ALAM LESTARI, PT MUARO JAMBI 14 TAHUN 2010 1.800,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 9/Feb/2010
29 ITIKURIH HASTARI, PT MUARO JAMBI 102 TAHUN 2010 1.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 20/Apr/2010
30 ITIKURIH HASTARI, PT MUARO JAMBI 103 TAHUN 2010 1.800,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 20/Apr/2010
31 SINAR MEGA SELARAS, PT MUARO JAMBI 08 A TAHUN 2010 6.258,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Jan/2010
32 SUMBER LAUT PERKASA, CV MUARO JAMBI 91 TAHUN 2010 1.500,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 20/Apr/2010
33 SUMBER LAUT PERKASA, CV MUARO JAMBI 92 TAHUN 2010 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 20/Apr/2010
34 TIRAMANA, PT MUARO JAMBI 97 TAHUN 2010 2.527,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 20/Apr/2010
35 TIRAMANA, PT MUARO JAMBI 98 TAHUN 2010 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 20/Apr/2010
36 TIRAMANA, PT MUARO JAMBI 99 TAHUN 2010 2.600,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 20/Apr/2010
37 TRIADAT QUANTUM, PT MUARO JAMBI 93 TAHUN 2010 1.000,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 20/Apr/2010
38 UTOMO KOSTRINDO, PT MUARO JAMBI 07 A TAHUN 2010 6.278,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Jan/2010
39 BARA HARMONIS BATANG ASAM, PT BUNGO 247/DESDM TAHUN 2010 172,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 23/Apr/2010
40 BUNGO BARA UTAMA, PT BUNGO 341/DESDM TAHUN 2009 1.301,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 9/Jul/2009
41 BUNGO BARA UTAMA, PT BUNGO 250/DESDM TAHUN 2010 199,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 23/Apr/2010
42 KARYA CEMERLANG PERSADA, PT BUNGO 350/DESDM TAHUN 2009 143,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 22/Jul/2009
43 KUANSING INTI MAKMUR 2, PT BUNGO 252/DESDM TAHUN 2010 199,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 23/Apr/2010
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
44 TANJUNGBELIT BARA UTAMA, PT BUNGO 249/DESDM TAHUN 2010 198,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 23/Apr/2010
45 ANEKA TAMBANG, TBK, PT TEBO 138/ESDM/2010 4.959,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 10/Mar/2010
46 ANUGERAH ALAM ANDALAS, PT TEBO 196/ESDM/2010 199,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 12/Apr/2010
47 GLOBALINDO ALAM LESTARI, PT TEBO 162/ESDM/2010 970,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 11/Mar/2010
48 HASWI KENCANA INDAH, PT TEBO 26/ESDM/2010 199,60 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 8/Feb/2010
49 HASWI KENCANA INDAH, PT TEBO 225.B/ESDM/2011 1.289,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 31/May/2011
50 BATUBARA BUKIT KENDI. PT PROV. SUMATERA SELATAN 305/KPTS/DISTAMBEN/2010 881,70 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 30/Apr/2010
51 BUKIT ASAM(PERSERO) TBK. PT PROV. SUMATERA SELATAN 304/KPTS/DISTAMBEN/2010 3.300,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 30/Apr/2010
52 BUANA MINERA HARVEST, PT OGAN KOMERING ULU 04/K/IUP‐I/XXVII/2009 9.579,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 27/Sep/2009
53 TAMBANG SEJAHTERA BERSAMA, PT MUSI RAWAS 12/KPTS/DISTAMBEN/2009 5.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 15/Aug/2009
54 ADI COAL RESOURCES, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1106 Tahun 2009 5.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Aug/2009
55 ANUGERAH BARA MUSTIKA, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1280 Tahun 2009 2.994,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
56 ARTHA INDO ENERGI, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1265 Tahun 2009 1.602,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
57 BUANA BARA EKAPRATAMA, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1104 Tahun 2009 4.686,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 9/Jul/2009
58 BUANA INTI CITRAPRIMA, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1103 Tahun 2009 4.999,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 11/Aug/2009
59 BUMI ANDALAS PERKASA, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1108 Tahun 2009 3.493,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Aug/2009
60 CITRA ALAM CAHAYA, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1248 Tahun 2009 1.073,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
61 CITRA ALAM CAHAYA, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1249 Tahun 2009 5.541,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
62 DIKA KARYA LINTAS NUSA, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1089 Tahun 2009 5.422,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Aug/2009
63 KARYA PERINTIS SEJATI, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1276 Tahun 2009 5.531,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
64 MAKARYA EKAGUNA, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1257 Tahun 2009 4.972,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
65 MANOLO, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1113 Tahun 2009 398,50 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Aug/2009
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
66 MASINDO ARTHA RESOURCES, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1267 TAHUN 2009 4.400,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
67 MASINDO ARTHA RESOURCES, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1268 TAHUN 2009 5.475,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
68 NUSA INDAH PERMAI, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1255 Tahun 2009 4.500,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
69 PASIFIC GLOBAL RESOURCES, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1260 Tahun 2009 3.360,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
70 PERSADA MAKMUR JAYA, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1099 Tahun 2009 2.500,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Aug/2009
71 RACHMAT KELANTAN SAKTI, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1388 Tahun 2009 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 15/Oct/2009
72 RIMBA SUBUR LESTARI, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1253 Tahun 2009 4.902,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
73 SAKTI GLOBAL PERSADA, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1261 Tahun 2009 4.940,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
74 SUAR HARAPAN BANGSA, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1277 Tahun 2009 4.978,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
75 SWADAYA HUTANI ALAM, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1254 Tahun 2009 4.000,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
76 TALANG UBI COAL, PT MUSI BANYUASIN 1271 Tahun 2009 7.936,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Sep/2009
77 MBH MINING RESOURCES,PT BANYUASIN 598.a Tahun 2009 11.380,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 12/Aug/2009
78 MITRA BISNIS HARVEST, PT BANYUASIN 515 Tahun 2009 18.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 14/Jul/2009
79 INDOMAS MINERAL UTAMA, PT OGAN KOMERING ULU SELATAN 20/KPTS/Tamben/2009 7.533,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI DMP 10/Dec/2009
80 INDOMAS MINERAL UTAMA, PT OGAN KOMERING ULU SELATAN 002/KPTS/TAMBEN/2011 5.706,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI DMP 12/May/2011
81 SEMEN BATURAJA, PT OGAN KOMERING ULU SELATAN 205/KPTS/TAMBEN/2010 1.577,00 EKSPLORASI BATU KAPUR 19/Jul/2010
82 LAHAT PULAU PINANG BARA JAYA, PT EMPAT LAWANG 540/75/KEP/TAMBEN/2010 2.029,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Mar/2010
83 ANEKA TAMBANG, PT BENGKULU UTARA 224 TAHUN 2011 4.738,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS DMP 30/Apr/2011
84 ANEKA TAMBANG, PT BENGKULU UTARA 226 TAHUN 2011 3.945,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS DMP 30/Apr/2011
85 TIUH MAS, PT LAMPUNG TENGAH 540/008/IUP/D.17/II/2010 1.028,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS DMP 8/Jul/2010
86 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/420/Tamben/2011; 10 Mei 2011 1.294,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 10/May/2011
87 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/461/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 322,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
88 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/466/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 713,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
89 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/467/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 738,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
90 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/464/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 1.839,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
91 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/462/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 9.919,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
92 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/465/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 466,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
93 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/463/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 6.839,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
94 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/460/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 558,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
95 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/452/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 407,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
96 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/451/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 3.862,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
97 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/449/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 853,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
98 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/453/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 531,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
99 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/450/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 8.790,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
100 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/457/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 207,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
101 TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK, PT BANGKA 188.45/454/Tamben/2010; 27 April 2010 15.147,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 27/Apr/2010
102 PAMIN KANAAN, PT BELITUNG 017/IUP‐OP/DPE/2010 199,99 OPERASI PRODUKSI BAUKSIT 17/Mar/2010
103 TIMAH.PT(PERSERO) TBK BELITUNG 106/IUP‐OP/DPE/2010 815,70 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH PUTIH 21/Jul/2010
104 TIMAH.PT(PERSERO) TBK BELITUNG 109/iup‐op/dpe/2010 3.612,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH PUTIH 10/Mar/2003
105 TIMAH.PT(PERSERO) TBK BELITUNG 110/IUP‐OP/DPE/2010 2.606,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH PUTIH 10/Mar/2003
106 ALAM DAMAI MAKMUR, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/95.A/DPE/2010 1.019,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 25/Feb/2010
107 ARTHA PRIMA NUSA JAYA, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/49.B/DPE/2010 1.135,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 10/Feb/2010
108 ARTHA PRIMA NUSA JAYA, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/228.A/DPE/2010 3.097,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 30/Apr/2010
109 BANGKA PRIMA TIN, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/57/DPE/2010 498,60 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 15/Feb/2010
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
110 BANGKA PRIMA TIN, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/56/DPE/2010 11,79 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 15/Feb/2010
111 BANGKA PRIMA TIN, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/54/DPE/2010 58,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 15/Feb/2010
112 BANGKA PRIMA TIN, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/53/DPE/2010 102,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 15/Feb/2010
113 BANGKA PRIMA TIN, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/52/DPE/2010 29,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 15/Feb/2010
114 BANGKA PRIMA TIN, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/51/DPE/2010 23,56 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 15/Feb/2010
115 BANGKA SERUMPUN, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/312/DPE/2009 4.838,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 31/Dec/2009
116 BARANUSA PRATAMA, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/248/DPE/2009 1.181,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 31/Dec/2009
117 BARANUSA PRATAMA, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/247/DPE/2009 988,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 31/Dec/2009
118 BOSTIN INDONESIA, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/219/DPE/2009 2.401,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 23/Dec/2009
119 BOSTIN INDONESIA, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/220/DPE/2009 3.413,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 23/Dec/2009
120 GALIAN RAYA, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/221/DPE/2009 3.156,33 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 23/Dec/2009
121 MEGA INTI ARDANA, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/222/DPE/2009 562,40 EKSPLORASI BIJIH TIMAH 23/Dec/2009
122 TIMAH, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/221/DPE/2010 3.155,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BIJIH TIMAH 30/Apr/2010
123 TIMAH, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/222/DPE/2010 360,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BIJIH TIMAH 30/Apr/2010
124 TIMAH, PT BANGKA SELATAN 188.45/225/DPE/2010 4.403,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BIJIH TIMAH 30/Apr/2010
125 TIMAH TBK, PT BANGKA BARAT 188.45/067/2.03.02/2010 1.277,83 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 28‐Apr‐2010
126 TIMAH TBK, PT BANGKA BARAT 188.45/068/2.03.02/2010 11.600 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 28‐Apr‐2010
127 TIMAH TBK, PT BANGKA BARAT 188.45/069/2.03.02/2010 7.275,23 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 28‐Apr‐2010
128 TIMAH TBK, PT BANGKA BARAT 188.45/070/2.03.02/2010 1.088,21 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 28‐Apr‐2010
129 TIMAH TBK, PT BANGKA BARAT 188.45/071/2.03.02/2010 2.567,19 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 28‐Apr‐2010
130 TIMAH TBK, PT BANGKA BARAT 188.45/072/2.03.02/2010 280,24 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 28‐Apr‐2010
131 TIMAH TBK, PT BANGKA BARAT 188.45/073/2.03.02/2010 833,21 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 28‐Apr‐2010
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
132 TIMAH TBK, PT BANGKA BARAT 188.45/074/2.03.02/2010 1.060,46 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 28‐Apr‐2010
133 TIMAH TBK, PT BANGKA BARAT 188.45/075/2.03.02/2010 1.409,52 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 28‐Apr‐2010
134 ALLIED MINERALS, PT BELITUNG TIMUR 503/092/OP‐BL/BPPT/2010 115,50 OPERASI PRODUKSI KAOLIN 30/Apr/2010
135 BINTAN MINERAL RESOURCE, PT BELITUNG TIMUR 503/070/OP‐L/BPPT/2010 159,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI HEMATITE 27/Dec/2007
136 BINTAN MINERAL RESOURCE, PT BELITUNG TIMUR 503/071/OP‐L/BPPT/2010 199,80 OPERASI PRODUKSI HEMATITE 27/Oct/2007
137 BINTAN MINERAL RESOURCE, PT BELITUNG TIMUR 503/072/OP‐L/BPPT/2010 193,90 OPERASI PRODUKSI HEMATITE 12/Jun/2007
138 CAHAYA BARU, CV BELITUNG TIMUR 503/093/OP‐BL/BPPT/2010 130,80 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR KUARSA 30/Apr/2010
139 CHANDRA SAKTI, CV BELITUNG TIMUR 503/027/OP‐BL/BPPT/2010 12,92 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR KUARSA 16/Feb/2010
140 EKA MAKMUR ALAM SEJAHTERA, PT BELITUNG TIMUR 503/075/OP‐L/BPPT/2010 47,60 OPERASI PRODUKSI HEMATITE 30/Apr/2010
141 HANJAYA BELTIM, CV BELITUNG TIMUR 503/013/OP‐L/BPPT/2009 176,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 15/Dec/2009
142 HANJAYA BELTIM, CV BELITUNG TIMUR 503/014/OP‐L/BPPT/2009 192,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI TIMAH 15/Dec/2009
143 KEDAUNG BAHTERA, PT BELITUNG TIMUR 503/015/OP‐BL/BPPT/2011 24,5 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR KWARSA 15/Apr/2011
144 MULTIDINAMIK BINASEJAHTERA, PT BELITUNG TIMUR 503/009/OP‐BL/BPPT/2009 170,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR KUARSA 15/Dec/2009
145 BERKAH PUGER SEJAHTERA, PT JEMBER 541.3/056/411/2010 20,70 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATU KAPUR 27/Apr/2010
146 DWI JOYO, CV JEMBER 541.3/024/411/2010 10,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATU KAPUR 15/Apr/2010
147 GUNUNG KELABAT CITRA ABADI, PT JEMBER 541.3/043/411/2010 7,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATU KAPUR 22/Apr/2010
148 IMASCO PASIFIC MINERALS, PT JEMBER 541.3/027/411/2010 30,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI MANGAAN 15/Apr/2010
149 KARTIKA CHANDRA, CV JEMBER 541.3/035/411/2010 10,14 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATU KAPUR 20/Apr/2010
150 KARYA NUSANTARA, CV JEMBER 541.3/039/411/2010 5,19 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATU KAPUR 21/Apr/2010
151 KOPERASI SERBA USAHA GRENDEN JEMBER 541.3/037/411/2010 6,80 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATU KAPUR 20/Apr/2010
152 KSU PUGER RAHAYU JEMBER 541.3/052/411/2010 5,83 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATU KAPUR 26/Apr/2010
153 MADA KARYA, CV JEMBER 541.3/030/411/2010 6,70 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATU KAPUR 16/Apr/2010
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
154 SARI HUTAN, CV JEMBER 541.3/012/411/2010 9,03 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATU KAPUR 12/Apr/2010
155 WIDYA UTAMA, CV JEMBER 541.3/022/411/2010 9,98 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATU KAPUR 14/Apr/2010
156 ANTAM TBK, PT SUMBAWA 506 Tahun 2010 11.320,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS 9/Apr/2010
157 ANEKA TAMBANG TBK, PT PONTIANAK (Kabupaten) 163 Tahun 2010 5.898,00 EKSPLORASI BAUKSIT 22/Oct/2010
158 ANEKA TAMBANG, TBK SANGGAU 02 Tahun 2010 36.410,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BAUKSIT 4/Jan/2010
159 ANEKA TAMBANG, TBK LANDAK 544.2/284/HK‐2009 20.710,00 EKSPLORASI BAUKSIT 23/Dec/2009
160 JANGKAR PRIMA,PT BARITO SELATAN 532 Tahun 2009 4.148,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 28 Des 2009
161 ADHIDAYA KARYA MANUNGGAL 1, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/222/2010 1.285,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 3/Mar/2010
162 AFIAT WAHYUNI LESTARI, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/463/2009 4.514,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 21/Dec/2009
163 ALAM BAHTERA BARITO RAYA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/4.a/2010 1.787,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 14/Jan/2010
164 ANDORA NINDIA MAKMUR, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/90/2010 1.874,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 4/Mar/2010
165 AR COAL MINING 2, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/87/2010 1.116,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 1/Mar/2010
166 ARSY NUSANTARA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/38/2010 4.833,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 29/Jan/2010
167 ARTHA WIGUNA SEMBADHA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/370/2010 3.557,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 22/Mar/2010
168 AXINDO ARTHAMAS, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/421/2010 3.039,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 31/Mar/2010
169 BARITO ALAM RAYA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/41/2010 5.756,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 7/Jan/2010
170 BARUTA ABADI, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/404/2009 5.042,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 14/Nov/2009
171 BATARA RESOURCES. PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/497/2010 2.741,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Feb/2010
172 BERSAMA MEMBANGUN NEGERI, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/129/2010 3.679,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 24/Mar/2010
173 BORNEO BANGUN BANUA, CV BARITO UTARA 188.45/479/2009 3.918,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 29/Dec/2009
174 BUANA ALAM TEGUH, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/473/2009 1.795,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 28/Dec/2009
175 BUMI ENERGI JAYA. PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/417/2010 4.172,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 31/Mar/2010
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
176 BUMI KARUNIA PERTIWI, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/438/2009 4.188,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 16/Dec/2009
177 BUMI MULIA SEJATI, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/323/2010 5.477,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11/Jan/2010
178 BUNDA KANDUNG, CV BARITO UTARA 188.45/47/2010 3.930,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 1/Feb/2010
179 CAKRA ANDATU SUKSES, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/483/2009 781,30 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 30/Dec/2009
180 DANA BUANA ASIA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/35/2011 4.885,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 8/Mar/2011
181 DANI SUMBER RISKI, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/205/2010 9.278,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 23/Apr/2010
182 DAYA PRATAMA MANDIRI, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/221/2010 4.796,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 12/Apr/2010
183 DUTA SEJAHTERA 1, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/455/2009 4.912,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 17/Dec/2009
184 ERAMITRA SUKSES MANDIRI, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/419/2010 2.167,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Feb/2010
185 HARFA TARUNA MANDIRI, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/216/2010 4.131,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 24/Apr/2010
186 MINERAL TAMBANG WAHANA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/406/2009 5.051,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 14/Nov/2009
187 RIZKI TAMBANG SELARAS, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/443/2009 5.061,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 16/Dec/2009
188 SARANA TAMBANG UTAMA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/405/2009 5.046,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 14/Nov/2009
189 SINAR KHATULISTIWA ENERGI JAYA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/418/2010 2.950,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2/Feb/2010
190 SINOMAST MINING, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/96/2010 4.834,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 17/Mar/2010
191 SKYLAND ENERGY POWER, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/84/2010 3.978,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 1/Mar/2010
192 SUMBER REJEKI EKONOMI, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/410/2010 5.000,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 21/Oct/2010
193 SYSTEM TATA ANUGRAH RESOURCES, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/85/2010 3.998,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 1/Mar/2010
194 TAMTAMA PERKASA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/37/2010 9.540,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 29/Jan/2010
195 TRISULA KENCANA SAKTI 2, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/208/2010 4.959,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 26/Apr/2010
196 TRISULA KENCANA SAKTI, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/207/2010 4.748,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 26/Apr/2010
197 BERKAT MOJANG RAYA.PT SERUYAN 19 TAHUN 2009 3.056,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS DMP 20/May/2009
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
198 BUMI NIAGA KENCANA. PT SERUYAN 15 TAHUN 2009 6.400,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 20/May/2009
199 DAYA BAMBU SEJAHTERA. PT SERUYAN 16 TAHUN 2009 7.202,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS DMP 20/May/2009
200 DEWO PUTRA. PT SERUYAN 343 TAHUN 2010 1.300,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 4‐NOV‐2010
201 ALAM PERSADA NUSANTARA, PT LAMANDAU Ek.540/02/IX/2009 6.641,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 17/Sep/2009
202 ANUGRAH PETRA SEJAHTERA, PT LAMANDAU Ek.540/14/IX/2009 5.090,00 EKSPLORASI BAUKSIT 25/Sep/2009
203 BAOLY MINERAL, PT LAMANDAU Ek.540/08/IX/2009 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 25/Sep/2009
204 BLANTIKAN PRIMA RAYA, PT LAMANDAU Ek.540/09/IX/2009 7.550,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 25/Sep/2009
205 BORNEO LAMANDAU ORE, PT LAMANDAU Ek.540/06/IX/2009 4.503,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 25/Sep/2009
206 KATINGAN INDONESIA, PT LAMANDAU Ek.540/07/IX/2009 3.000,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 25/Sep/2009
207 LAMANDAU PUTRA, PT LAMANDAU Ek.540/15/IX/2009 3.000,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 25/Sep/2009
208 LAWIN MAKMUR ABADI, PT LAMANDAU Ek.540/10/IX/2009 443,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 25/Sep/2009
209 MILLENNIUM MINING & RESOURCES, PT LAMANDAU Ek.540/12/IX/2009 5.923,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 25/Sep/2009
210 MILLENNIUM MINING & RESOURCES, PT LAMANDAU Ek.540/11/IX/2009 7.003,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 25/Sep/2009
211 PERSADA MAKMUR SEJAHTERA, PT GUNUNG MAS 22/DPE/III/III/2011 6.200,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 9/Mar/2011
212 SURYA KALIMANTAN SEJATI, PT GUNUNG MAS 24/DPE/III/III/2011 6.800,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 9/Mar/2011
213 SURYA KALIMANTAN SEJATI, PT GUNUNG MAS 23/DPE/III/III/2011 10.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 9/Mar/2011
214 BERLIN I RAHU PULANG PISAU 194 TAHUN 2011 5,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR SUNGAI 18/May/2011
215 DORIS HAMID PULANG PISAU 193 TAHUN 2011 2,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR SUNGAI 18/May/2011
216 GENLI EROWANTO PULANG PISAU 186 TAHUN 2011 5,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR URUG 18/May/2011
217 HAMRANI PULANG PISAU 179 TAHUN 2011 5,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI SIRTU 18/May/2011
218 SYAMSURI PULANG PISAU 192 TAHUN 2011 2,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR URUG 18/May/2011
219 AFRIAN TRADE, PT BARITO TIMUR 479.a TAHUN 2009 3.018,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 30/Oct/2009
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
220 AGRA ANEKA MINERAL, PT BARITO TIMUR 193A TAHUN 2010 1.748,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 13/Apr/2010
221 AMANAH ANUGERAH ADI MULIA, PT BARITO TIMUR 597 Tahun 2009 5.111,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 31/Dec/2009
222 BARITO TIMUR ENERGI, PT BARITO TIMUR 654 Tahun 2009 710,30 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 31/Dec/2009
223 BATU GUNUNG HARUYAN, PT BARITO TIMUR 624 Tahun 2009 100,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 16/May/2009
224 BERKAH KERJA BERSAMA, CV BARITO TIMUR 601 Tahun 2009 937,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 31/Dec/2009
225 DUTA CITRA KARINDO, PT BARITO TIMUR 598 Tahun 2009 358,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 31/Dec/2009
226 GUNUNG EMAS ABADI, PT BARITO TIMUR 576 Tahun 2009 1.531,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 14/Aug/2009
227 INDO BESI ENERGI UTAMA, PT BARITO TIMUR 462 Tahun 2009 9.987,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 16/Oct/2009
228 LION MULTI RESOURCES, PT BARITO TIMUR 582 Tahun 2009 19.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 25/Mar/2009
229 PAJU EPAT RAYA, PT BARITO TIMUR 425 Tahun 2009 5.911,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 30‐Okt‐2009
230 SENAMAS ENERGINDO MINERAL, PT BARITO TIMUR 516 Tahun 2009 2.000,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 8/Dec/2009
231 SINAR BARITO GLOBAL, PT BARITO TIMUR 575 Tahun 2009 1.056,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 31/Jan/2009
232 SUMBER DAYA ENERGI, PT BARITO TIMUR 653 Tahun 2009 14.730,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 25/Mar/2009
233 TANTRA ENERGY, PT BARITO TIMUR 655 Tahun 2009 746,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 31/Dec/2009
234 TANTRA MINING RESOURCES, PT BARITO TIMUR 574 Tahun 2009 324,30 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 19/Apr/2008
235 ALAM BHANA LESTARI, PT BERAU 704 Tahun 2009 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 9/Dec/2009
236 ALAM BHANA RAYA, PT BERAU 703 Tahun 2009 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 9/Dec/2009
237 ANUGRAH RIZKIE TABALAR, PT BERAU 84 Tahun 2010 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 18/Feb/2010
238 BERKAT BUANA COAL, PT BERAU 256 Tahun 2010 2.089,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 29/Apr/2010
239 BUKIT MUTIARA HITAM, PT BERAU 186 Tahun 2010 2.129,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 31/Mar/2010
240 CIRIA PUTRA ENERGY, PT BERAU 364 Tahun 2009 714,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 1/Jul/2009
241 DIRA GLEBOVA ADITYA, PT BERAU 373 Tahun 2009 4.770,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 3/Jul/2009
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
242 ENERGY PERSADA NUSANTARA, PT BERAU 295 Tahun 2010 4.973,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 30/Apr/2010
243 GINDOJAYA MITRA ABADI, PT BERAU 465 Tahun 2009 4.951,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 20/Aug/2009
244 MAHA RESOURCES PERSADA, PT BERAU 261 Tahun 2010 3.482,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 29/Apr/2010
245 MAHKOTA MEGAH ABADI, PT BERAU 336 Tahun 2009 1.747,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 19/Jun/2009
246 NAGA BORNEO ENERGI, PT BERAU 249 Tahun 2010 3.369,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 28/Apr/2010
247 NARWASTU SUMBER KASIH, PT BERAU 297 Tahun 2010 4.651,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 30/Apr/2010
248 PERSADA BORNEO REOSURCES, PT BERAU 433 Tahun 2009 2.311,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 4/Aug/2009
249 PITU BABBANA BINANGA, PT BERAU 302 Tahun 2010 4.919,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 30/Apr/2010
250 PRATAMA SUMBER BUMIBARA, PT BERAU 320 Tahun 2009 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 16/Jun/2009
251 RATNA UTAMA KARYA, PT BERAU 292 Tahun 2010 5.010,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 30/Apr/2010
252 SATRIA PERKASA COAL, PT BERAU 258 Tahun 2010 2.028,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 29/Apr/2010
253 SINAR BARA NUSANTARA, PT BERAU 558 Tahun 2009 2.337,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 15/Oct/2009
254 SURYA SERUNI, PT BERAU 766 Tahun 2009 4.633,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 31/Dec/2009
255 SYAHID BERAU BESTARI, PT BERAU 294 Tahun 2010 2.070,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 30/Apr/2010
256 DUAMERAH, PT PENAJAM PASER UTARA545/22 ‐ IUP EKS/DISTAM/V/2011
775,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA06‐Mei‐11
257 PIPIT MUTIARA JAYA, PT TANA TIDUNG 503/118/K‐IV/2010 3.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 20/Apr/2010
258 SANTY PERMATASARI, PT TANA TIDUNG 503/15/K‐II/2010 3.138,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 23/Feb/2010
259 SINAR MAKMUR CEMERLANG, PT BANGGAI 541.15/56/DISTAMBEN 5.000,00 EKSPLORASI NIKEL 28/Jan/2011
260 TIGA SAMUDRA PERKASA, PT MOROWALI 540.2/SK.030/DESDM/II/2010 10.100,00 EKSPLORASI NIKEL DMP 25/Feb/2010
261 DILA ADI SAPUTRA, PT KEPULAUAN SELAYAR 237/I/TAHUN 2010 10.000,00 EKSPLORASI NIKEL 5/Jan/2010
262 NIAGA MAJU PASIFIK, PT KEPULAUAN SELAYAR 238/I/TAHUN 2010 5.652,00 EKSPLORASI PASIR BESI 5/Jan/2010
263 NIAGA MAJU PASIFIK, PT KEPULAUAN SELAYAR 239/I/TAHUN 2010 13.000,00 EKSPLORASI PASIR BESI 5/Jan/2010
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
264 ALAM MITRA MANDIRI, PT BUTON 406 TAHUN 2011 400,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI ASPAL 10/Jun/2011
265 ALAM MITRA MANDIRI, PT BUTON 684 TAHUN 2011 280,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI ASPAL 18/Aug/2011
266 ALAM MITRA MANDIRI, PT BUTON 683 TAHUN 2011 251,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI ASPAL 18/Aug/2011
267 BUMI NIAGA LESTARI, PT BUTON 688 TAHUN 2011 196,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI ASPAL 18/Aug/2011
268 EXPERTINDO SOLUSI PRATAMA, PT BUTON 290 Tahun 2011 635,00 EKSPLORASI ASPAL 25/Apr/2011
269 INTI BUMI SELARAS, PT BUTON 690 TAHUN 2011 801,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI ASPAL 18/Aug/2011
270 INTI BUMI SELARAS, PT BUTON 691 TAHUN 2011 773,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI ASPAL 18/Aug/2011
271 KARUNIA ALAM INDONESIA, PT BUTON 686 TAHUN 2011 1.751,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI ASPAL 18/Aug/2011
272 ANEKA TAMBANG, PT MAMASA 540.1/KPTS‐138.C/XI/2009 888,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS 30/Nov/09
273 FAJAR BHAKTI LINTAS NUSANTARA, PT HALMAHERA TENGAH 540/KEP/253/2011 854,30 OPERASI PRODUKSI NIKEL 7/Jul/2011
274 FAJAR BHAKTI LINTAS NUSANTARA HALMAHERA TENGAH 540/KEP/113.a/2010 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI NIKEL 29/Mar/2010
275 ANEKA TAMBANG TBK, PT HALMAHERA TIMUR 188.45/540‐04/2010 39.040,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI NIKEL 11/Jan/2010
276 GARIS EMAS SELARAS, PT TELUK BINTUNI 100 TAHUN 2009 12.553,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 17/DES/2009
277 FAJAR MINERAL ALAMI INTERNATIONAL, PT TANAH BUMBU 545/006/IUP‐OP/D.PE/2010 749,2 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 05‐Jan‐10
278 TAWABU MINERAL RESOURCES, PT KUTAI TIMUR 540.1/K.15/HK/1/2010 6.205,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 14‐Jan‐10
279 SEMESTA ALAM BARITO, PT MURUNG RAYA 188.45/176/2010 5.105,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 20‐Apr‐10
280 PENTA DHARMA KARSA, PT BANGGAI 541.15/653/DISTAMBEN 1.220,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI NIKEL 27/MEI/2011
281 MILLENIUM MINING & RESOURCES, PT KUTAI TIMUR 540.1/K.2/HK/1/2010 3.248,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 22‐Jan‐10
282 HENGJAYA MINERALINDO, PT MOROWALI 540.3/SK.001/DSDM/VI/2011 6.249,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI NKEL 16‐Jun‐11
283 HANSON ENERGY, PT OGAN KOMERING ULU TIMUR 302 TAHUN 2009 4.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 21‐Nop‐09
284 SUN INDO BARA BAHANA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/507/2010 863,8 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 15‐Feb‐10
285 SARIPRATAMA INDORESOURCES, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/511/2010 3.237,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 20‐Feb‐10
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
286 SINAR INTI BERSAMA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/509/2010 8,27 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 11‐Feb‐10
287 TAMBANG INDRAPURI JAYA, PT ACEH BESAR 545/115/IUP/2011 538,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BIJIH BESI DMP 4‐Apr‐11
288 GEBE SENTRA NICKEL, PT HALMAHERA TENGAH 540/KEP/347/2011 1.354,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI NIKEL 5‐Dec‐11
289 HARUM SUKSES MINING, PT HALMAHERA TENGAH 540/KEP/327/2009 990,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI NIKEL 28‐Dec‐09
290 DAHLIA BIRU, PT BARITO SELATAN 527 TAHUN 2009 5.000,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 23‐Dec‐09
291 GALA RAYA SENTOSA, PT BARITO SELATAN 47 TAHUN 2010 5.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 5‐Feb‐10
292 FARIS MOTOR, CV TANAH LAUT 545/26‐IUP.OP/DPE/2011 126,86 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 19‐Aug‐11
293 BILLY INDONESIA, PT LUWU TIMUR 540/02/DESDM/TAHUN 2011 3.756,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BESI LATERIT 7‐Feb‐11
294 GANE PERMAI SENTOSA, PT HALMAHERA SELATAN 54 TAHUN 2010 1.128,83 OPERASI PRODUKSITEMBAGA, EMAS
DMP22‐Mar‐10
295 ARTHA TUNGGAL MANDIRI, PT BERAU 559 TAHUN 2011 2.993,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 13‐Oct‐11
296 RENCANA MULIA BARATAMA, PT KUTAI KARTANEGARA 540/014/IUP‐OP/MB‐PBAT/I/2011 3.993,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 18‐Jan‐11
297 BUKIT TAMBI, PT BATANG HARI 503/65/IUPEKSPLORASI/BPTSP/2011 4.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 14‐Dec‐11
298 BUMI LESTARI JAYA, PT KAUR 1230 TAHUN 2009 34.060,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS DMP 22‐Dec‐09
299 MAG ENERGY PACIFIC BARITO UTARA 188.45/532/2010 5.004,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 18‐Mar‐10
300 MIFA BERSAUDARA ACEH BARAT 117.b TAHUN 2011 3.134,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 30‐Mar‐11
301 GROUP RAHMAT BERSAMA, PT TANAH LAUT 545/34‐IUP.OP/DPE/2011 197,47 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 24‐Oct‐11
302 SUCHAI KRISH INTERNATIONAL, PT MUARA ENIM 737/KPTS/TAMBEN/2009 4.489,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 30‐Dec‐09
303 MULTI KREASI PERSADA, PT MUARA ENIM 555/KPTS/TAMBEN/2009 780,6 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2‐Oct‐09
304 ENIM ENERGY, PT MUARA ENIM 736/KPTS/TAMBEN/2009 402,6 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 30‐Dec‐09
305 BUBUHAN MULTI SEJAHTERA, PT BATANG HARI 503/99/IUPEKSPLORASI/BPTSP/2010 1.805,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 30‐Nov‐10
306 BUBUHAN MULTI SEJAHTERA, PT BATANG HARI 503/64/IUPOP/BPTSP/2011 2.000,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 28‐Sep‐11
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
307 BUBUHAN MULTI SEJAHTERA, PT BATANG HARI 503/20/IUPEKSPLORASI/BPTSP/2011 1.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 6‐May‐11
308 BUBUHAN MULTI SEJAHTERA, PT BATANG HARI 503/22/IUPEKSPLORASI/BPTSP/2011 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 6‐May‐11
309 BUBUHAN MULTI SEJAHTERA, PT BATANG HARI 503/21/IUPEKSPLORASI/BPTSP/2011 2.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 6‐May‐11
310 ALASJAYA NATURAL RESOURCES, PT ACEH TENGGARA 543/106/2009 28.710,00 EKSPLORASI TIMAH HITAM 7‐Jul‐09
311 ALASJAYA NATURAL RESOURCES, PT ACEH TENGGARA 543/107/2009 10.260,00 EKSPLORASI TIMAH HITAM 7‐Jul‐09
312 BILLY INDONESIA, PT LUWU TIMUR 540/03/DESDM/TAHUN 2011 3.793,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BESI LATERIT 21‐Feb‐11
313 INDO BUMI NICKEL, PT HALMAHERA TIMUR 188.45/152‐540/2009 2.117,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI NIKEL 7 des 09
314 BUMI PANGKEP SUMBER SEJAHTERA, PT PANGKAJENE KEPULAUAN 540.11/20‐IUP/DPE/V/2009 21,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI MARMER 18‐May‐09
315 ANUGRAH KUARI ABADI, PT PANGKAJENE KEPULAUAN 540.11/19‐IUP/DPE/V/2009 21,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI MARMER 18‐May‐09
316 PERSADA MAKMUR SEJAHTERA, PT GUNUNG MAS 21/DPE/III/II/2011 10.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 9‐Mar‐11
317 KEMANG MITRASWADAYA, PT KUTAI KARTANEGARA 540/0777/IUP‐ER/MB‐PBAT/IV/2010 4.653,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 13‐Apr‐10
318 WAHANA ALAM LESTARI, PT TEBO 197/ESDM/2010 195,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 12‐Apr‐10
319 BLORA MARMER KUSUMA, CV GROBOGAN 503/662/IUP.E/V/2011 5,00 EKSPLORASI MARMER 1‐May‐11
320 GEOLAVA MANUNGGAL TEKNIK UTAMA, PT MOJOKERTO 188.45/267/HK/416‐012/2010 219,52 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR URUG 8‐Apr‐10
321 GUNUNG BALE, PT MALANG 180/421/KEP/421.013/2011 6,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI PIROFILIT 31‐May‐11
322 IMAASKOJAYA BHUMIPERSADA, PT PASURUAN 545/328/424.077/2010 315,71 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR URUG 23‐Apr‐10
323 KARYACITRA MITRASEJATI, PT MOJOKERTO 188.45/266/HK/416‐012/2010 445,14 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR URUG 8‐Apr‐10
324 WIRA BHUMI SEJATI, PT JAWA TIMUR 188.4/01/119/IUP‐OP/2010 299,24 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATU GAMPING 27‐Apr‐10
325 WIRA BHUMI SEJATI, PT PASURUAN 545/327/424.077/2010 74,45 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR URUG 23‐Apr‐10
326 WADUK MAS PERSADA, PT TOJO UNA‐UNA 188.45/370/DISTAMBEN 9.053,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI DMP 10‐May‐11
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
327 BANUA SANGGAM LESTARI, PT HALMAHERA SELATAN 29 TAHUN 2011 12.740,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI MANGAN 3‐Mar‐11
328 HALMAHERA SENTRA MINERAL, PT HALMAHERA UTARA 540/123/HU/2011 1.500,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI PASIR BESI 23‐Jun‐11
329 INDO SNL, PT SERUYAN 233 TAHUN 2010 5.000,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 3‐Jul‐10
330 INDO MINERAL PRIMA, PT SERUYAN 235 TAHUN 2010 1.479,00 EKSPLORASI GALENA DMP 3‐Jul‐10
331 MULIA ANUGERAH SAWITINDO, PT KOTA TIDORE KEPULAUAN 7.5 TAHUN 2012 8.304,00 EKSPLORASI NIKEL 26‐Jan‐12
332 MULIA ANUGERAH SAWITINDO, PT KOTA TIDORE KEPULAUAN 7.4 TAHUN 2012 4.000,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 26‐Jan‐12
333 BERKAT ANUGERAH MAJU ABADI (1), PT KOTA TIDORE KEPULAUAN 7.2 TAHUN 2012 1.468,00 EKSPLORASI PASIR BESI 26‐Jan‐12
334 BERKAT ANUGERAH MAJU ABADI (2), PT KOTA TIDORE KEPULAUAN 7.3 TAHUN 2012 5.033,00 EKSPLORASI PASIR BESI 26‐Jan‐12
335 SHANA TOVA ANUGERAH, PT KOTA TIDORE KEPULAUAN 7.1 TAHUN 2012 9.063,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS 26‐Jan‐12
336 INDOTAN LOMBOK BARAT BANGKIT, PT LOMBOK BARAT 02/09/DISTAMBEN/ 10.088,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS DMP 5‐Jan‐11
337 BERINGIN JAYA ABADI, PT KUTAI KARTANEGARA 540/123/IUP‐OP/MB‐PBAT/VI/2011 376,40 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 22‐Jun‐11
338 INTAN BUMI PERSADA, PT KAPUAS 362/DISTAMBEN TAHUN 2011 5.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 14‐Sep‐11
339 PIRANTI JAYA UTAMA, PT KAPUAS 363/DISTAMBEN TAHUN 2011 4.800,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 14‐Sep‐11
340 SARANA PUTRA PERDANA, PT BARITO TIMUR 579 TAHUN 2009 1.563,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 31‐Dec‐09
341 BUMI LESTARI JAYA, PT HALMAHERA TENGAH 540/KEP/147.A/2009 8.457,60 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 15‐Apr‐09
342 BUMI SENTOSA JAYA, PT HALMAHERA TENGAH 540/KEP/317.A/2009 16.590,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA DMP 14‐Dec‐09
343 RIYANTA JAYA, PT KAPUAS 164/DISTAMBEN TAHUN 2011 5.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2‐May‐11
344 PELITA INDAH, CV KAPUAS 165/DISTAMBEN TAHUN 2011 9.117,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2‐May‐11
345 MARIOGI KHARISMA JAYA, PT KAPUAS 163/DISTAMBEN TAHUN 2011 10.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 2‐May‐11
346 BUMI LESTARI JAYA, PT BENGKULU SELATAN 05 TAHUN 2010 10.030,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS DMP 11‐Jan‐10
347 SYNERGY MINING GAYO LUES 540/155/IUP‐EKSPLORASI/2010 15.610,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS DMP 17‐Mar‐10
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
348 BINTANG SINAR PERKASA, PT MOROWALI 540.2/SK.058/DESDM/IV/2010 2.163,00 EKSPLORASI NIKEL DMP 30‐Apr‐10
349 KEMUNING TAMBANG SENTOSA, PT INDRAGIRI HILIR 02/DPE‐PU/I/2010 615,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 16‐Jan‐10
350 KERITANG BUANA MINING, PT INDRAGIRI HILIR 03/DPE‐PU/I/2010 965,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 16‐Jan‐10
351 ARTA USAHA BAHAGIA, PT BARITO UTARA 188.45/56/2010 3.211,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 16‐Feb‐10
352 BUKIT ASAM (PERSERO), PT MUARA ENIM 2402 K/30/MEM/2011 4.500,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 10‐Oct‐11
353 BUKIT ASAM (PERSERO), PT SUMATERA SELATAN 751/KPTS/DISPERTAMBEN/2010 7.621,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 29‐Oct‐10
354 DUA RAJAWALI PROENERGI, PT MOROWALI 540.2/SK.014/DESDM/XII/2010 5.041,00 EKSPLORASI KROMIT DMP 30‐Dec‐10
355 ANEKA TAMBANG, Tbk, PT PEGUNUNGAN BINTANG 540/2876/SET TAHUN 2010 49.740,00 EKSPLORASIEMAS, PERAK,
TEMBAGA, SENG25‐Aug‐10
356 ANEKA TAMBANG, Tbk, PT PEGUNUNGAN BINTANG 540/2892/SET TAHUN 2010 49.830,00 EKSPLORASIEMAS, PERAK,
TEMBAGA, SENG25‐Aug‐10
357 PUTRA DEWA JAYA, PT KUTAI KARTANEGARA 540/072/IUP‐OP/MB‐PBAT/V/2011 1.057,00 OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA 10‐May‐11
358 DIVA DUNIA INTERNASIONAL, PT BOMBANA 126 TAHUN 2009 3.230,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS 24‐Apr‐09
359 KAYAN RESOURCES, PT SUKAMARA 545/260/HUK/2010 6.055,00 EKSPLORASI BAUKSIT 17‐Apr‐10
360 BORNEO METALINDO SENTOSA, PT SUKAMARA 545/172/HUK/2010 5.000,00 EKSPLORASI BIJIH BESI 15‐Jan‐10
361 KILAUAN KEBAHAGIAAN INTI TAMBANG, PT SUKAMARA 545/274/HUK/2010 7.482,89 EKSPLORASI BAUKSIT 14‐Apr‐10
362 NUSANTARA MEGAH UTAMA TAMBANG, PT SUKAMARA 545/273/HUK/2010 8.969,00 EKSPLORASI BAUKSIT 14‐Apr‐10
363 GEMA KARYA KILAUAN MINERAL, PT SUKAMARA 545/275/HUK/2010 6.770,39 EKSPLORASI BAUKSIT 14‐Apr‐10
364 INDOTAN SUMBAWA BARAT, PT SUMBAWA BARAT 602 TAHUN 2010 31.204,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS 9‐Jul‐10
365 SUMBER ENERGI JAYA, PT MINAHASA SELATAN 87 TAHUN 2010 822,30 OPERASI PRODUKSI EMAS 4‐Jun‐10
366 ANEKA TAMBANG, Tbk, PT MERANGIN 178/ESDM/2010 14.910,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 24‐May‐10
367 BINTANG BIMASAKTI INDONESIA, PT MOROWALI 540.2/SK.008/DESDM/V/2010 25.550,00 EKSPLORASI NIKEL 18‐May‐10
368 ANEKA TAMBANG, Tbk, PT PEGUNUNGAN BINTANG 540/2884/SET TAHUN 2010 49.920,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS 25‐Aug‐10
369 ANEKA TAMBANG, Tbk, PT PEGUNUNGAN BINTANG 540/2883/SET AHUN 2010 49.830,00 EKSPLORASI EMAS 25‐Aug‐10
NAMA PERUSAHAAN KABUPATEN / KOTA NO DAN TAHUN SKLUAS WILAYAH
(HA)NO
TAHAPAN KEGIATAN
KOMODITAS TANGGAL SK
370 SUMBER ENERGI JAYA, PT MINAHASA TENGGARA 130 TAHUN 2011 836,10 OPERASI PRODUKSI EMAS 10‐Oct‐11
371 ANUGERAH PANCARAN BULAN, PT KUTAI KARTANEGARA 540/2552/IUP‐Er/MB‐PBAT/IX/2010 5.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 28‐Sep‐10
372 ANUGERAH PANCARAN BULAN, PT KUTAI KARTANEGARA 540/2551/IUP‐Er/MB‐PBAT/IX/2010 5.000,00 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 28‐Sep‐10
373 PRAFA COAL MINING, PT TANAH LAUT 545/09‐IUP.EKS/DPE/2011 158,90 EKSPLORASI BATUBARA 16‐Mar‐11
(insignia)
CLEAR AND CLEAN CERTIFICATE
Number: 685/Min/06/2013
has been granted to
Name : PT INDOTAN LOMBOK BARAT BANGKIT
Address : Graha Sentana, 4th floor
Jl. Buncit Raya No.2
Jakarta Selatan 12760
Decision Letter : Regent of Lombok Barat, Nusa Tenggara Barat
Number : 02/09/DISTAMBEN/2011
Phase : Exploration
Commodity Type : Metal Mineral, Gold
Ratified in Jakarta
on: 25 March 2013
Director General of Mineral and Coal,
(stamp and signature)
Dr. Ir. Thamrin Sihite, ME.
At the time of issuance of this certificate the company has met the
following requirements:
1. Administration:
a. Not Overlapping
b. Permits documents
2. Technical:
a. Exploration report
b. Feasibility study report
c. Environmental documents approval
3. Financial obligations:
a. Fixed fee
b. Royalty
Note:
In the event of error during the issuance of this certificate, revision is to
be done in accordance with the prevailing statutory regulations.
The above has been translated from Bahasa Indonesia into English by:
Sylvia Longdong – Sworn Translator
SK.GUB.DKIJAYA No. 3064/2003
Jakarta, August 20th, 2013
Sylvia Longdong
STAMP