H I G H W A Y
RESEARCH
NUMBER 38
General Report on
Road Research Work Done
In India during 2010-11
IRC HIGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD
Price ` 80.00 (Packing &
Postage Extra)
RECORD
Note:
This complete document is 184 pages long. Pages that are not relevant to the testing of SoilTech Mk. III Stabilizers have been purposely removed.
The complete document can be found at;
https://www.scribd.com/document/95128440/Highway-Research-Record-No-38-2010-11
(i)
CONTENTSPage No.
INTRODUCTION 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
I. PAVEMENT ENGINEERING & MATERIALS 9
1. FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS 9
SUMMARY 9
A. PROJECTS REPORTED FOR THE FIRST TIME 10
1. Development of Fly Ash –Waste Plastic Composite for Construction of 10
Bituminous Roads
2. Laboratory Study to Determine the Suitability of Fly Ash and Marble Dust as 10
Mineral Filler in Micro-Surfacing Mixture
3. Laboratory Evaluation of Warm Mix Additives 12
4. Feasibility Study on Use of RoadCem for Use in Situ Stabilization of Soil 12
5. Zyco Soil Nanotechnology Multilayer Waterproofing Treatment of Soil and 13
Asphalt Concrete in Road Construction
6. Zycosoil Nanotechnology Application in Leh Road, BRO 14
7. Evaluation of Bituminous Layers Bond Strength 14
8. Penetrative Preservation Installation Project NH8 Beawar to Gomti 15
9. Use of Fly Ash in Construction of Bituminous Road Surfacings 16
B. ON-GOING / COMPLETED PROJECTS 16
1. Use of Coir Geotextiles in Road Construction 16
2. Resource Mapping of Road Construction Materials in Kerala - Phase II 17
Pathanamthitta District
3. Study on the Use of Waste Plastic for Road Construction in Urban Areas 17
4. Development of Cold Mix Technology for Structural Layers of Flexible Pavement 18
in Different Climates
5. Performance Evaluation of Bituminous Concrete Surfacing Laid with SBS 19
Modified Bitumen (PMB-40) on NH-1, Near Delhi
6. Repair of Potholes and Patching using Jetpatcher and Infrared Recycling Patcher 20
7. Laboratory and Field Evaluation of Asphalt Mixes and Performance Evaluation of 20
Shell Thiopave Test Sections
8. Development of Methodology for Commissioning and ‘Site Acceptance Test (SAT)' 21
of ‘Heavy Vehicle Simulator (HVS)’ Type of APTF
ISSN 0970-2598
(ii)
9. Development & Design of Thin Stone Matrix Asphalt (TSMA) Mixes as Preventive 21
Maintenance Treatment
10. Development of Improved Quality Bituminous Binders through Polymer 22
Incorporation, Laying and Monitoring of Test Sections
C. R & D ACTIVITY REPORT BY CONSULTANCY FIRMS/CONTRACTORS/ 23
CONCESSIONAIRES
1. Design & Construction of Sub-Grade & Base Pavement Layers with Soil Stabilized 23
Base Course (SSB) for Lighter and Durable Highway Crust for Township Road at
M/s. Sasan Power Limited, Sasan, Madhya Pradesh (2nd Year)
2. Nano Polymer Base Stabilization of NH-1 Stretch on Panipat-Jhalandhar Section 29
from km 96.000 to km 387.000 in the State of Haryana & Punjab,
3. Village Road to Jhenjhari Joining State Highway Road of Durg to Dhamda under 31
PMGSY, Chhattisgarh
2. RIGID PAVEMENTS 36
SUMMARY 36
A. PROJECTS REPORTED FOR THE FIRST TIME 37
1. Technical Feasibility Studies on Geopolymer Based Building Blocks/Pavers 37
2. Study on Suitability of Synthetics Fiber Reinforced Concrete for the Construction 37
of Concrete Pavements
B. ON-GOING / COMPLETED PROJECTS 38
1. R & D Studies on Performance Evaluation of Rigid Pavements on High Density 38
Traffic Corridors Using Instrumentation Supported by Laboratory Tests
2. Effect of Bottom ash from Thermal Power Stations as an alternate to Fine Aggregate 38
in Cement Concrete
3. A Study on Dry Lean Concrete Containing Portland Pozzolana Cement 39
3. PAVEMENT EVALUATION AND PERFORMANCE 40
a. PAVEMENT EVALUATION 41
SUMMARY 41
A. PROJECT REPORTED FOR THE FIRST TIME 42
1. Evaluation of Master Plan Roads (60 m & 45 m ROWs) in Dwarka and Needed 42
Remedial and Improvement Measures
2. Design, Construction and Performance Evaluation of New Materials and Mixes 43
Towards Development and Upgradation of Standards / Specifications
3. Evaluation of Kosi- Nandgaon-Barsana-Govardhan Road and Needed Remedial 43
Measures
GENERAL REPORT ON
ROAD RESEARCH IN INDIA 2010-2011
INTRODUCTION
Highway Research Record No.38 describes the General Report on Road Research Work done in India during the year
2010-2011. This document has been prepared by compiling the progress of research work reported by 16 Research
Organisations and Academic Institutions in the country. The names of reporting organizations have been listed at the
end of the report. As the General Report on Road Research is intended to provide information on research works
carried out under various research projects, works reported on routine investigations and laboratory/ field testing have
been omitted from the document.
As per the classification, the entire material has been divided into four sections, namely, Pavement Engineering
& Paving Materials; Geotechnical Engineering; Bridge Engineering and Traffic & Transportation Engineering. The
projects in each section are further classified in to two broad categories namely (i) Projects Reported First Time, i.e.,
New Projects and (ii) Ongoing Projects/ Completed Projects. The research works carried out as a part of Master and
Doctoral thesis in the Academic Institutions have also been reported separately in Section V of the report.
The research work in each section has been reported as per the standard Proforma for the three broad categories of
projects. The proformae alongwith other related information are given in Appendix.
Each sectional report begins with a brief overview in the form of summary followed by a few salient points towards
channelising the discussions during the presentation of the report in the IRC Annual session.
2 GENERAL REPORT ON
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In the General Report on Road Research Work done in India for the year 2010-2011, published as Highway Research
Record No. 38, the research work done by 16 organisations on various aspects has been reported. The report has
been compiled by CRRI. The R&D work reported under the following five major areas and the research work done
in Academic Institutions related to the thesis work is reported under Section V:
1. Pavement Engineering and Paving Materials
2. Geotechnical Engineering
3. Bridge Engineering
4. Traffic & Transportation Engineering
1. Pavement Engineering and Paving Materials
In this chapter projects related to “Flexible Pavements,
Rigid Pavements, Pavement Evaluation, Pavement
Performance and Instrumentation” have been
reported.
1.1 Flexible Pavements
This subsection deals with projects reported in the
Flexible Pavement area related to design, construction
and materials. CSIR-Central Road Research Institute
reported twelve projects. The significant projects
pertain to use of flyash in construction of bituminous
road surfacing, development of cold mix technology for
structural layers of flexible pavement, performance of
bituminous concrete surfacing laid with SBS modified
bitumen, repair of potholes and patching using different
techniques/machines, evaluation of asphalt mixes
containing thiopave. The developments and design of
thin stone matrix asphalt for maintenance of flexible
pavements, and warm mixes for bituminous road
construction. Guidelines have been developed for
bituminous Macadam, Semi dense bituminous concrete
and Mix seal surfacing using cationic bitumen emulsion.
Studies on use of chemical additives for improvement of
engineering properties of sub grade are also reported
by different organisations.
National Transport Planning and Research Center
reported findings of studies on coir jute geotextile
and plastic waste in road construction. The resource
mapping of available road construction materials in
Kerala is also reported as a ongoing project. Feasibility
study on use of Road Cem for insitu stabilization of
soil has been completed. From the durability test, it
is concluded that the resistance to effect of water on
strength is enhanced by use of 0.1 percent additive
in cement stabilization. Two projects related to water
proofing treatment of bituminous pavement are
reported. Studies indicated significant improvement in
properties of soil as well as bituminous mixes. Studies
have been carried out on performance of crumb rubber,
SBS and EBA modified bitumen. Laboratory studies
on warm mix additives indicates that the addition of
0.5 percent additive by weight bituminous mix can
lower the mix laying temperature by 40°C to 50°C.
Successful installation and field calibration of State-
of-Art Accelerated Pavement Testing Facility, Heavy
Vehicle Simulator is also reported by CSIR-CRRI.
1.2 Rigid Pavements
Research works reported in the area of Rigid Pavements
relate to technical feasibility studies on Geopolymer
based building blocks/ pavers, R&D studies on the
performance evaluation of rigid pavements on high
density traffic corridors using instrumentation supported
by laboratory tests ( in continuation of the earlier
work reported), study on the properties of concrete
incorporating bottom ash/pond ash as a replacement
of fine aggregate, study on suitability of synthetics fiber
reinforced concrete for the construction of concrete
pavements, study on dry lean concrete containing
portland pozzolana cement and suitability of oil well drill
cuttings (Assam assets) for road making.
1.3 Pavement Evaluation
Research works reported in this area include projects
on structural and functional evaluation of pavements
and pre-mature distress / failure investigations for road
and airfield pavements. Completed projects include
Investigation to determine and ascertain the causes
of distress and suggest remedial measures for runway
pavement at Jaipur Airport.
On-going projects include Development of National
Document /Guideline on the Use of Weigh-In-Motion
System for Axle Load Monitoring. Development of
ROAD RESEARCH IN INDIA 2010-11 9
I. PAVEMENT ENGINEERING & MATERIALS
1. FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS
SUMMARY
Research work reported under the area of Flexible Pavement includes studies to find out the possible utilization of fly
ash, marble dust and waste plastics as filler and fine aggregate in bituminous mixes. Laboratory and field performance
studies pertaining to the cold mixes, warm mixes additives for soil stabilization and use of nanotechnology based
materials in pavement layers have been also reported. Some of the reported studies includes performance of use of
coir and jute geotextile. Studies on use of plastic waste are also reported. Long term performance studies on use
of SBS modified bitumen on heavily trafficked roads have been completed. Laboratory studies on thin stone matrix
asphalt are also reported.
There are nine projects which have been reported first time. Twelve projects are reported under the ongoing and
completed project category.
SALIENT POINTS FOR DISCUSSION
1. Utilization of fly ash, waste plastic and marble dust in bituminous mixes
2. Use of warm mixes in bituminous road construction
3. Use of thin SMA for preventive maintenance of flexible pavement
4. Use of jute and coir based geotextile in pavements
5. Use of chemical additives include nanotechnology for stabilization of soil
6. Performance of polymer modified bitumen
7. Sustainable technologies for pothole repair & patching
ROAD RESEARCH IN INDIA 2010-11 23
Further Findings/Conclusions/Supporting Data
Based on the field observations, deflection data,
roughness data & subsequent laboratory analysis of
core samples, it was concluded that 25 mm SDBC
overlay constructed with Polymer and Crumb Rubber
modified binders sustained for three years more
than the conventional SDBC under the similar traffic
and and environmental conditions on SH-57.The
comparative performance was in the following order:
SBS>CRMB=EBA.
Recommendations for further Work
Thin PMB/CRMB overlays for State Highways catering
medium traffic.
Reports/Publications
● Development of Improved Quality Bituminous
Binders Through Polymer Incorporation , Laying
and Monitoring of Test Sections (SSP 4409)
Submitted in Jan, 2011
● Use of polymers/waste rubber in road network
in Uttarakhand, Kamal Kumar, and Singh (IIP),
Dr. Sangita, M.N. Nagabhushana, M.P. Singh
& Shivani (CRRI) 10th - 12th November, 2010
presented at Uttarakhand State Council for Scince
and Technology, Dehradun.
Further information/copy of report can be obtained from
Dr. P.K. Jain, Chief Scientist & Head, Flexible
Pavement Division, Central Road Research Institute,
New Delhi – 110 025.
Mobile 99101 13992 Phone 011-2631 1117,
2692 1833, 2692 1835 Fax +91 2684 5943,
e-mail ID: [email protected]
C. R & D ACTIVITY REPORT BY CONSULTANCY
FIRMS/CONTRACTORS/CONCESSIONARIES
1. Design and Construction of Sub-Grade and
Base Pavement Layers with Soil Stabilized
Base Course (SSB) for Lighter and Durable
Highway Crust for Township Road at
M/s. Sasan Power Limited, Sasan, Madhya
Pradesh (2nd Year)
Date of Starting and Duration: 02 Sep 2011
Date of Completion (Actual/Targeted) : 02 Sep 2011
i. Sasan Power Limited, Madhya Pradesh
(SPL)(I)
ii. Kaveri Unltra Polymers, Bangalore
Scope and Objectives
● To assess the suitability of SSB Layer with Nano
Polymer base “SoilTech MK-III” for Road, Runway,
Hard Strand Construction by comparing their
Physical, Engineering, Financial and Execution
time properties with those already implemented
vide IRC Codes, MORTH, MORD, NNRDA and
State PWD’s specifications by detailed Laboratory
investigations.
● To correlate design procedure with IRC:37;
as per the Pavement Crust Catalogue frizzed
in IRC:37, though; how the crust derived in
catalogue not detailed but formulas are given
for Layer Theory of Crust Design. Considering
the same formula but different E-module value
of higher strength Layer like SSB, design
establishment has been derived for failure of
Rutting and need to be endorsed.
● Design of Pavement Cross Section using
SoilTech MK-III, considering the actual traffic
to be stimulated over design life and site
condition.
● Geotechnical Laboratory and field investigation
to evaluate the suitability ofmaterial/design mix/
product application for real time construction.
● Quality execution and control assurance, guideline
and its implementation at site.
● Monitoring of performance of Constructed Road
over a period of time including monsoon which
includes DCP Test and APTF simulates.
Design, Drawing and Execution Methodology
Design of Road and Concept
As per IRC:37-2001, trail pavement design are to
be analyzed using linear elastic layered theory and
maximum vertical strain on sub-grade and maximum
tensile strain at the bottom of bituminous layer are
computed for a standard load. Design thickness
combination is so selected that the computed critical
strain values, which correspond to the initial condition
of the pavement, are less than the limiting strain
values given by the performance criteria adopted in
the guidelines. Limiting strain criteria have been given
in IRC:37 for two distresses: - rutting along wheel
paths and fatigue cracking in bituminous layers. No
separate criterion is available for rutting in bituminous
layers. The criteria for rutting and fatigue cracking
in bituminous layers are given in Equations 1 and 2
respectively.
24 GENERAL REPORT ON
Ta
ble
A A
lte
rna
te P
av
em
en
t D
es
ign
as
pe
r IR
C:
37
ROAD RESEARCH IN INDIA 2010-11 25
Thereafter the highway stretch had been constructed
with an over strength Nano Polymer Base Liquid called
SoilTech MK-III, as a composite SSB (Soil Stabilized
Base) Layer. While calculating the stress/strain failures
in Layer Theory formulated in IRC:37 for this crust, it was
found the reduced crust itself is more than enough to
take 5 CBR & 4 msa design over a period of 10 years.
Table B- Cross-Section Overview
CONVENTIONAL CRUST
PMC 20 mm
BM 50 mm
WMM 250 mm
GSB 250 mm
SUB GRADE 500mm
POLYMAR STABILIZED ROAD
SEAL COAT 10 mm
BM 40 mm
SOIL STABILIZED BASE 150 mm
GSB 125 mm
SUD GRADE 200 mm
Execution Methodology
● At first the selected borrow soil was spread over
the Sub-grade top layer.
● The additional blending of Aggregates for SSB
layer as per Design/requirement was spread over
the borrow soils for 150 mm thickness layer and
the aggregates mixed thoroughly with borrow soils.
● OMC of the material to be stabilized was
calculated as per lab. Thereafter SoilTech MK-III
@ 0.5 percent of the weight of Soil to be stabilized
was added to the water in the water tanker.
● This water mixed with Soil Tech was spread over
uniformly on the desired layer.
● Pulverization on the SSB layer after applying the
SoilTech MK-III.
● After proper mixing, the surface was graded to the
required camber and compacted to 98 percent of
MDD.
● On completion of stabilization , a diluted mix of
SoilTech + Water was sprinkled on treated road
surface in order to avoid dust during its usage by
the villagers and as the wearing course had be
done after 7 days.
Situations of Constructions
In this particular project the borrow/In-situ material
available in the entire stretch was plastic soil. Then,
additional 15 percent of 0 - 40 mm size aggregate
blended with this soil and then Soil Tech MK-III used. The
outcome is excellent with CBR more than 90 percent,
UCS 2918 KPa and Resilient Modulus 4578 MPa.
Performance of Such New Materials/Technology
The product had been invented long 13 years back
and being used extensively in South Africa, Australia,
Middle East, Europe and Far East Countries. Before
India Polyroads launched it commercially in India,
extensive trials were conducted in many places and
the outcomes are evaluated by Premier Authorities like
Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi, Indian
Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, Council
for Scientific Industrial Research, South Africa etc.
Annexed Tabular Reports are the fact finding results:
Table C
Sr. No.
Description Test Type
IIT, Kharagpur Test Results IPPL, GurgaonCSIR, South Africa
Test ResultsSasan Power Ltd Township Road
Natural Soil
With 0.5% SoilTech MK-III
by weight of Soil
Natural Soil
With 0.5% SoilTech MK-III by weight of
Soil
Natural Soil
With 0.5% SoilTech MK-III by weight
of Soil
Natural Soil
With 0.5% SoilTech MK-III by weight of
Soil
A. Physical Properties of Natural Soil
1 Gradation
Gravel (%) 17.00 12.00 24.00 4.3
Sand (%) 62.00 34.50 52.00 72.2
Silt & Clay (%) 21.00 53.50 24.00 23.5
2 Liquid Limit (%) 25.00 33.50 28.00 26.67
...Contd.
26 GENERAL REPORT ON
3 Plastic Limit (%) 13.00 19.60 18.00
4 Plasticity Index (%) 12.00 13.90 10.00 10.44
15%
Aggregate
Blending
materials
B. Laboratory Output results with Soil Tech MK-III
5 C.B.R. (%) 16.80 30.80 7.60 28.50 28.00 101.00 12.90 40.57
6 U.C.S. (KPa) 790 3871 378 1465 386 1100 (soaked) 2918
7 Resilient Modulus (MPa) 154 8016 268 6895 4578
C. Field Testing & Visual Observation
8 C.B.R. (%)
IIT & CRRI Laboratory Test Only
90
9 R.I.(mm/km) 1706
10 Rutting Not Found
11 Actual Traffic Stimulation 3,000 ESAL
Looking to Table C and Layer Theory of Highway
Design (IRC:37); it is now understood that once, we
are replacing Base /Sub-base Layer with SSB Layer,
the impact of wheel load or failure of Fatigue & Rutting
minimize substantially.
The most significant and impotent point in this road to be
noted that the Soil Stabilized Base (SSB) Layer which
is the top surface now has not been salted with the
designed Bituminous Layer. Already 2nd monsoon period
is going to get over and movement the earth moving
equipments such as dumpers, Tripper and 110 Transit
Mixture Machine on the bed of SSB layer is intact with
no Rutting, Porthole or any other failure.
Evaluation Report (Half Yearly) and Performance under
real traffic is regularly submitted to IRC and all other
premium Government Organisation.
Interim Conclusion
● The usage of Nano Polymer base SoilTech MK-
III has been optimized at 0.5 to 0.55 percent by
weight of Mix to be stabilized for cost effective
SSB Layer. In case, soil criteria don’t suit, then
additional blending of material recommended.
● The Geotechnical Characteristics, Laboratory
results and field in-situ results of many type of
soil stabilization are available. It is now time
to evaluate the standard of each based on
Strength, Durability and Ease of Application.
The outcome results of SoilTech MK-III is
substantially higher than any other stabilizer
and as it is used in OMC Ratio with water to be
pulverized, the ease of application and misuse
in this case is zero.
● Performance of real time traffic stimulation for
last twelve month shows that; this SSB Layer in
construction enhances the pavement life and also
minimizes the maintenance cost of pavement.
● Alternate composite design and pavement save
Time and enable first construction.
Connotation and Utilization Potential
● Substantially increases the Soil strength over
300 percent.
● Stabilized Base Layer has E- modulus of more
than 3000 MPa.
● Road can be designed with reduced Bituminous
and Base Layers.
● Thus; Reduction in Quarry/ Mining of Aggregate
is Substantial
● Reduction in Crust Layers Hence; reduction in
Construction time.
● Resulting in Lower Costs – Less equipment wear
and tear.
● Stabilization process simple- No Specialization
required.
● Exceeding AASHTO structural load bearing axle
capacity
● Environmental friendly and a green product, (Much
less CO2 emission than other stabilizers)
● Toxicity effect is Zero.
Contd. from prev. page...
ROAD RESEARCH IN INDIA 2010-11 27
Application of SoilTech MK-III on the SSB Stretch
SSB stretch after SoilTech used
Pulverization on the Compaction with 10 ton VibroProfile and Grading the top surface of SSB Layer Roller on the Stretch
Projects and Execution Photographs:
Before Soil Tech used
Additional R&D/works required in this Area
It may be excellent to stimulate the alternately designed
crust with HVS machine in CRRI campus or in any
project to know the life of road.
Further information/copy of report can be obtained
from
Kaveri Ultra Polymer P. Ltd, MultiTech Centre, 113B, Bommasandra Indl AreaHosur Road, BangaloreE: [email protected]: +91 80 4166 3444Cell: +91 988 602 8888
28 GENERAL REPORT ON
Ta
ble
A A
lte
rna
te P
av
em
en
t D
es
ign
as
pe
r IR
C:
37
ROAD RESEARCH IN INDIA 2010-11 29
2. Nano Polymer Base Stabilization of NH-1
Stretch on Panipat-Jhalandhar Section from
km 96.000 to km 387.000 in the State of
Haryana & Punjab
Date of Starting and Duration : 17 Dec 2010
Date of Completion (Targeted): 23 Dec 2011
Scope and Objectives
● To assess the suitability of SSB Layer with Nano
Polymer base stabilizer “SoilTech MK-III” for
Road, Runway, Hard Strand Construction by
comparing their Physical, Engineering, Financial
and Execution time properties with those already
implemented vide current specifications by
detailed Laboratory investigations.
● To correlate design procedure with IRC:37; As per
the Pavement Crust Catalogue frizzed in IRC:37.
● Design of Pavement Cross Section using
Nano Polymer base stabilizer ‘SoilTech MK-III’
considering the actual traffic to be stimulated over
design life and site condition.
● Geotechnical Laboratory & field investigation to
evaluate the suitability of material/design mix/
product application for real time construction
● Monitoring of performance of Constructed Road
over a period of time including monsoon which
includes DCP Test and APTF simulates.
Design, Drawing & Execution Methodology
a) Design of Road and Concept
As per IRC:37-2001, trail pavement design are to
be analyzed using linear elastic layered theory and
maximum vertical strain on sub-grade and maximum
tensile strain at the bottom of bituminous layer are
computed for a standard load. Design thickness
combination is so selected that the computed critical
strain values, which correspond to the initial condition
of the pavement, are less than the limiting strain
values given by the performance criteria adopted in
the guidelines. Limiting strain criteria have been given
in IRC: 37 for two distresses: - rutting along wheel
paths and fatigue cracking in bituminous layers. No
separate criterion is available for rutting in bituminous
layers. The criteria for rutting and fatigue cracking
in bituminous layers are given as Equations 1 and 2
respectively.
Thereafter the highway stretch had been constructed
with an over strength Nano Polymer.
Base Liquid called SoilTech MK-III, as a composite
SSB (Soil Stabilized Base) Layer. While calculating
the stress/strain failures in Layer Theory formulated in
IRC: 37 for this crust, it was found the reduced crust itself
is more than enough to take 10 CBR & 10 msa design
over a period of 15 years.
Table B- Cross-Section Overview
CONVENTIONAL CRUST
BITUMINOUS CONCRETE
DENSE BITUMINOUS
WET MIX MACADAM 250 mm
GRANULAR SUB BASE 200 mm
SUB GRADE 500mm
POLYMAR STABILIZED ROAD
BITUMINOUS CONCRETE
SOIL STABILIZED BASE 150 mm
GRANULAR SUB BASE 150 mm
SUB GRADE 300 mm
b) Quantity & Resource’s Comparison
(Conventional Crust vs Alternate Crust)
Special Situations / Problems faced during
Investigations/ Constructions
In this particular project Panipat – Jhalandhar, NH-1,
Six Laning - the Borrow/ In-situ material available in
the entire stretch was less than 2µ particle size sandy
and non-plastic soil. The stabilization of the same was
not cost effective as coating area of SoilTech MK-III was
more and grading was not proper.
Then, additional 40 percent of 0 – 40 mm size aggregate
blended with this soil and then SoilTech MK-III used.
The outcome is excellent with CBR more than 218, UCS
1868 KPa and Resilient Modulus 1887 MPa.
Performance of Such New Materials/Technology
The product Nano Polymer base stabilizer had been
invented long 13 years back and being used extensively
in South Africa, Australia, Middle East, Europe and Far
East Countries. Before India Polyroads launched it
commercially in India, extensive trials were conducted in
30 GENERAL REPORT ON
many places and the outcomes are evaluated by Premier
Authorities like Central Road Research Institute, New
Delhi, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West
Bengal, Council for Scientific Industrial Research, South
Africa, Bhilai Institute of Technology, Durg, Chhattisgarh,
etc.
Annexed Tabular Reports are the fact finding results:
Table C Premium Organisation Investigation and Performance Report
Sr.
No.
Description Test
Type
IIT, Kharagpur Test
ResultsIPPL, Gurgaon
CSIR, South Africa
Test Results
IPPL-Panipat-Jh-
halandhar (NH-1)
Natural
Soil
With 0.5%
SoilTech
MK-III by
weight of
Soil
Natural
Soil
With
0.5%
SoilTech
MK-III by
weight of
Soil
Natural
Soil
With 0.5%
SoilTech
MK-III by
weight of
Soil
Natural
Soil
With 0.5%
SoilTech
MK-III by
weight of
Soil
A. Physical Properties of Natural Soil
1 Gradation
Gravel (%) 17.00 12.00 24.00 3.00
Sand (%) 62.00 34.50 52.00 62.00
Silt & Clay (%) 21.00 53.50 24.00 35.00
2 Liquid Limit (%) 25.00 33.50 28.00 20.00
3 Plastic Limit (%) 13.00 19.60 18.00 NA
4Plasticity Index
(%)12.00 13.90 10.00
NP 40% Ag-
g r e g a t e
B lend ing
materials
B. Laboratory Output results with SoilTech MK-III
5 C.B.R. (%) 16.80 30.80 7.60 28.50 28.00 101.00 12.00 46.00
6 U.C.S. (Kpa) 790 3871 378 1465 3861 1 0 0
(soaked)423 1868
7Resilient Modulus
(Mpa)154 8016 268 6895 154 3264
C. Field Testing and Visual Observation 7 Days 6 Months
8 C.B.R. (%)
IIT & CRRI
Laboratory Test Only
90 218
9Resilient Modulus
(Mpa)1448 1887
10 R.I. (mm/km) 1436 1232 1265
11 BBD Test (mm) 0.071 0.477
12 Rutting Not Found New Not Found
13 Fatigue Not Found New Not Found
14Actual Traffic
Stimulation1.80 MSA
Looking to Table C and Layer Theory of Highway
Design (IRC:37); it is now understood that once, we
are replacing Base /Sub-base Layer with SSB Layer,
the impact of wheel load or failure of Fatigue & Rutting
minimize substantially.
In Table C, it has been observed that after six months
report 1.80 MSA Real stimulation of traffic, there is no
major failure or deviation from the original construction
made.
ROAD RESEARCH IN INDIA 2010-11 31
Interim Conclusion
● Substantially increases the Soil strength over
300 percent.
● Road can be designed with reduced Bituminous
and Base Layers.
● Performance of real time traffic stimulation for
last six months shows that; this SSB Layer in
construction enhances the pavement life and also
minimizes the maintenance cost of pavement.
● Alternate composite design and pavement save
time and enable fast construction.
● Reduction in Quarry/ Mining of Aggregate is
Substantial
● Reduction in Crust Layers Hence; reduction in
Construction time.
● Environmental friendly and a green product, (Much
less CO2 emission than other stabilizers)
● Toxicity effect is Zero.
Further information/copy of report can be obtained
from
3. Village Road to Jhenjhari joining State
Highway Road of Durg to Dhamda under
PMGSY, Chhattisgarh
Date of Starting and Duration : 09 June 2010
Date of Completion (Actual/Targeted) :
09 June 2010
i. Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana,
Chhattisgarh (PMGSY) (I)
ii. Bhilai Institute of Technology, Durg (BIT) (I)
iii. BSBK Private Limited Contractor Bhilai,
Chhattisgarh (BSBK) (I)
iv. Kaveri Ultra Polymers P. Ltd, Bangalore
Scope and Objectives
● To assess the suitability of SSB Layer with
Nano Polymer base “SoilTech MK-III” for
Road, Runway, Hard Strand Construction
by comparing their Physical, Engineering,
Financial and Execution t ime properties
with those already implemented vide IRC
Codes, MORTH, MORD, NRRDA and State
PWD’s specifications by detailed Laboratory
investigations.
● To correlate design procedure with IRC:37; as per
the Pavement Crust Catalogue frizzed in IRC:37,
though; how the crust derived in catalogue not
detailed but formulas are given for Layer Theory
of Crust Design. Considering the same formula
but different E-module value of higher strength
Layer like SSB, design establishment has been
derived for failure of Rutting and need to be
endorsed.
● Design of Pavement Cross Section using Soil
Tech MK-III, considering the actual traffic
to be stimulated over design life and site
condition.
● Geotechnical Laboratory & field investigation
to eva luate the su i tab i l i ty o f mater ia l /
design mix/product application for real time
construction.
● Quality execution and control assurance, guideline
and its implementation at site.
● Monitoring of performance of Constructed Road
over a period of time including monsoon which
includes DCP Test and APTF simulates.
Design, Drawing & Execution Methodology
a) Design of Road and Concept
As per IRC:37-2001, trail pavement design are to
be analyzed using linear elastic layered theory and
maximum vertical strain on sub-grade and maximum
tensile strain at the bottom of bituminous layer are
computed for a standard load. Design thickness
combination is so selected that the computed critical
strain values, which correspond to the initial condition
of the pavement, are less than the limiting strain
values given by the performance criteria adopted in
the guidelines. Limiting strain criteria have been given
in IRC:37 for two distresses: - rutting along wheel
paths and fatigue cracking in bituminous layers. No
separate criterion is available for rutting in bituminous
layers. The criteria for rutting and fatigue cracking in
bituminous layers are given as Equations 1 and 2,
respectively.
Kaveri Ultra Polymers P. Ltd, MultiTech Centre113B, Bommasandra Indl AreaHosur Road, BangaloreE: [email protected]: +91 80 4166 3444
32 GENERAL REPORT ON
Ta
ble
A A
lte
rna
te P
av
em
en
t D
es
ign
As
pe
r I
RC
:SP
-72
ROAD RESEARCH IN INDIA 2010-11 33
Alternate Pavement Design as per IRC: SP-72 (Layer
Theory of Crust)
Table B Cross-Section Overview
CONVENTIONAL CRUST
PMC 20 mm with Seal Coat
WBM 225 mm
GSB 100 mm
Sub Grade 150 mm
POLYMAR STABILIZED ROAD
PMC 20 mm with Seal Coat
SOIL STABILIZED BASE 125 mm
Sub Grade 100 mm
The reduced crust itself is more than enough to take
3 CBR & 400,000 ESAL design over a period of 10 years.
b) Execution Methodology
● At first the selected borrow soil was spread over
the Embankment top layer.
● The additional blending of Aggregates for SSB
layer as per Design/requirement was spread over
the borrow soils for 100 mm thickness layer and
the aggregates mixed thoroughly with borrow
soils.
● OMC of the material to be stabilized was
calculated as per lab. Thereafter SoilTech MK-III
@ 0.5 percent of the weight of Soil to be stabilized
was added to the water in the water tanker.
● This water mixed with SoilTech was spread over
uniformly on the desired layer.
● Pulverization on the SSB layer after applied the
SoilTech MK-III.
● After proper mixing, the surface was graded to the
required camber and compacted to 98 percent of
MDD.
● On completion of stabilization, a diluted mix of
SoilTech + Water was sprinkled on treated road
surface in order to avoid dust during its usage by
the villagers and as the wearing course had be
done after 7 days.
Situations of Constructions
In this particular project the borrow/ In-situ material
available in the entire stretch was plastic soil. Then
SoilTech MK-III used in the borrow soil. The outcome
is excellent with CBR more than 66, UCS 1866 KPa &
Resilient Modulus 1708 MPa.
Performance of Such New Materials/Technology
The product had been invented long 13 years back
and being used extensively in South Africa, Australia,
Middle East, Europe and Far East Countries. Before
India Polyroads launched it commercially in India,
extensive trials were conducted in many places and
the outcomes are evaluated by Premier Authorities like
Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi, Indian
Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, Council
for Scientific Industrial Research, South Africa, Bhilai
Institute of Technology, Durg, Chhattisgarh etc.
Annexed Tabular Reports are the fact finding results:
Table C Premium Organisation Investigation & Performance Report
Sr.
No.
Description Test
Type
IIT, Kharagpur Test
Results
CRRI, New Delhi, Test
Results
CSIR, South Africa
Test Results
PMGS&Y Road
Durg to Dhamda
Natural
Soil
With 0.5%
SoilTech
MK-III by
weight of
Soil
Natural
Soil
With 0.5%
SoilTech
MK-III by
weight of
Soil
Natural
Soil
With
0.5%
Soil
Tech
MK-III by
weight
of Soil
Natural
Soil
With
0.5%
Soil
Tech
MK-IIIby
weight
of Soil
A. Physical Properties of Natural Soil
1 Gradation
Gravel (%) 17.00 6.00 24.00 27.40
Sand (%) 62.00 88.60 52.00 51.40
....Contd.
34 GENERAL REPORT ON
Silt & Clay (%) 21.00 17.40 24.00 21.20
2 Liquid Limit (%) 25.00 34.00 28.00 31.85
3 Plastic Limit (%) 13.00 21.30 18.00 21.13
4Plasticity Index
(%)12.00 12.70 10.00
10.72
B. Laboratory Output results with SoilTech MK-III
5 C.B.R. (%) 16.80 30.80 4.80 34.00 28.00 101.00 10.40 43.69
6 U.C.S. (Kpa) 790 3871 3684 4 4
(soaked)386
1 1 0 0
(soaked)468 1866
7Resilient Modulus
(Mpa)154 8016 172 6254 268 6895 282 7568
C. Field Testing & Visual Observation 7 Days 1 Year
8 R.I. (mm/km)
IIT & CRRI
Laboratory Test Only
1638 1708
9 C.B.R. (%) 57 66
10 Rutting NewNot
Found
11Actual Traffic
Stimulation
1 0 , 0 0 0
ESAL
Looking to Table C and Layer Theory of Highway
Design (IRC:37); it is now understood that once, we
are replacing Base /Sub-base Layer with SSB Layer,
the impact of wheel load or failure of Rutting minimize
substantially.
The most significant and important point in this road is
to be noted that the Soil Stabilized Base (SSB) Later
which is the top surface now has not been sealted with
the designed Bituminous Layer. Already 2nd monsoon
period is going to get over and the bed of SSB layer
is intack with no Rutting, Porthole or any other failure
(Average Rainfall 1136 mm).
Evaluation Report (Half Yearly) and Performance under
real traffic is regularly submitted to IRC and all other
premium Government Organisation.
Interim Conclusion
● The usage of Nano Polymer base SoilTech MK-
III has been optimized at 0.5 to 0.55 percent by
weight of Mix to be stabilized for cost effective
SSB Layer. In case, soil criteria don’t suit, then
additional blending of material recommended.
● The Geotechnical Characteristics, Laboratory
results and field in-situ results of many type of
soil stabilization are available. It is now time
to evaluate the standard of each based on
Strength, Durability and Ease of Application.
The outcome results of SoilTech MK-III is
substantially higher than any other stabilizer
and as it is used in OMC Ratio with water to be
pulverized, the ease of application and misuse
in this case is zero.
● Performance of real time traffic stimulation for
last twelve month shows that; this SSB Layer
in construction enhances the pavement life
and also minimizes the maintenance cost of
pavement.
● Alternate composite design and pavement save
Time and enable first construction.
Connotation and Utilisation Potential
● Substantially increases the Soil strength over
300 percent.
● Stabilized Base Layer has E- modulus of more
than 3000 MPa.
● Road can be designed with reduced Bituminous
and Base Layers.
● Thus; Reduction in Quarry/ Mining of Aggregate
is Substantial
● Reduction in Crust Layers Hence; reduction in
Construction time.
● Resulting in Lower Costs – Less equipment wear
and tear.
● Stabilization process simple- No Specialization
required.
Contd. from Previous page ....
ROAD RESEARCH IN INDIA 2010-11 35
Pulverization on the SSB stretch after Soil Tech used surface of SSB Layer Profiling and grading the top
Compaction with 10 ton Vibro. Roller on the Stretch Surface of SSB Layer Finished
● Exceeding AASHTO structural load bearing axle
capacity
Projects & Execution Photographs
● Environmental friendly and a green product, (Much
less CO2 emission than other stabilizers)
● Toxicity effect is Zero.
Spreading the Borrow Soil at Site SoilTech MK-III on the SSB Stretch
Additional R&D / works required in this area
It may be excellent to stimulate the alternately designed
crust with HVS machine in CRRI campus or in any
project to know the life of road.
Further information/copy of report can be obtained
from
Kaveri Ultra Polymers P. Ltd, MultiTech Centre, 113B, Bommasandra Indl AreaHosur Road, BangaloreE: [email protected]: +91 80 4166 3444
ROAD RESEARCH IN INDIA 2010-11 163
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Highway Research Board (HRB) of the Indian Roads Congress (IRC) expresses thanks to
Dr. S. Gangopadhyay, Director, Central Road Research Institute (CRRI), New Delhi for preparation
of the General Report on Road Research Work Done in India during 2010-2011. The report
was prepared, compiled and edited by Shri T.K. Amla (Head, Information, Liaison & Training),
S/Shri R.C. Agarwal (Sr. Technical Officer (3)) and M.K. Meena (Scientist), Information, Liaison &
Training Division, CRRI with inputs from the scientists of the various R&D Divisions of CRRI viz.
Dr. P.K. Jain, Chief Scientist & Head (FPD), Dr. Renu Mathur, Senior Principal Scientist & Head
(RPD), Shri S.P. Pokhriyal, Senior Principal Scientist (PED), Dr. P. Lakshmy, Senior Principal Scientist
& Head (BAS), Shri R.K. Swami, Principal Scientist (GTE), Dr. S. Velmurugan, Principal Scientist
(TES) and Dr. K. Ravinder, Senior Scientist (TPE).
The useful suggestions received from the scientists of R&D Divisions in compilation and editing of the
report are gratefully acknowledged. The Board also expresses its gratitude to the various research
organizations and Institutes for providing research progress reports.