+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: anastasia-shepherd
View: 219 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
35
Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi , Harvard Law School Oct 2009
Transcript
Page 1: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Indian JudiciaryNamita Wahi , Harvard Law School

Oct 2009

Page 2: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Indian Judiciary

Features

Page 3: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Indian Judiciary

Features

Structure

Page 4: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Indian Judiciary

Features

Structure

Supreme Court

Page 5: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Indian Judiciary

Features

Structure

Supreme Court

Phases

Page 6: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Unified Judiciary

Features of the Indian Judiciary

Page 7: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Unified Judiciary

Features of the Indian Judiciary

Power of Judicial Review

Page 8: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Unified Judiciary

Features of the Indian Judiciary

Power of Judicial Review

Judicial Independence

Page 9: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Supreme Court

Structure of the Indian Judiciary

Page 10: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Supreme Court

Structure of the Indian Judiciary

High Courts

Page 11: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Supreme Court

Structure of the Indian Judiciary

High Courts

District Courts

Page 12: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Structure

Page 13: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Supreme Court of India

Page 14: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Original

Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Page 15: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Original

Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Appellate

Page 16: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Original

Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Appellate

Advisory

Page 17: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

Original

Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Appellate

Advisory

Special Leave to Appeal (SLP)

Page 18: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1950-1970

Three phases of the Supreme Court

Page 19: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1950-1970

Three phases of the Supreme Court

The period from 1970-1980

Page 20: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1950-1970

Three phases of the Supreme Court

The period from 1970-1980

The period from 1980-2009

Page 21: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1950-1970

Land Reform CasesKameshwar Singh v. State of Bihar (1952)

Page 22: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1950-1970

Land Reform CasesKameshwar Singh v. State of Bihar (1952)

Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967)

Page 23: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1970-1980

Before the Emergency

Basic Structure Case: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

Page 24: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1970-1980

Before the Emergency

Basic Structure Case: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

The Case That Shook IndiaState of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Narain (1975) (Allahabad High Court)

Page 25: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1970-1980Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha

Page 26: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1970-1980

During the Emergency

Review of the Basic Structure Case (1975)

Page 27: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1970-1980

During the Emergency

Review of the Basic Structure Case (1975)

Election Case: Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)

Page 28: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1970-1980

During the Emergency

Review of the Basic Structure Case (1975)

Election Case: Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)

Habeas Corpus Case: ADM Jabalpur v. Shiv Kant Shukla (1976)

Page 29: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1970-1980Justice H.R. Khanna

Page 30: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1980-2009

Public Interest Litigation

Page 31: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1980-2009

Public Interest Litigation

Social Rights

Page 32: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1980-2009

Public Interest Litigation

Social Rights

Policymaking and Legislative power

Page 33: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1980-2009

Public Interest Litigation

Social Rights

Policymaking and Legislative power

Complete power over judicial appointments

Page 34: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1980-2009

Public Interest Litigation

Social Rights

Policymaking and Legislative power

Complete power over judicial appointments

Lack of coherent public policy

Page 35: Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School Oct 2009.

The period from 1980-2009

Public Interest Litigation

Social Rights

Policymaking and Legislative power

Complete power over judicial appointments

Lack of coherent public policy

Lack of transparency


Recommended