Indiana Steel Environmental Group June 29, 2010 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner IN...

Indiana Steel Environmental Group

June 29, 2010

Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP CommissionerIN Department of Environmental Management

1

2

IDEM’s MissionWe Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment

IDEM is responsible for protecting human health and the environment while providing for safe industrial, agricultural, commercial and governmental operation vital to a prosperous economy.

How Does IDEM Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment?

Develop regulations and issue permits to restrict discharges to the environment to safe levels.

Inspect and monitor permitted facilities to ensure compliance with the permits.

Use compliance assistance and/or enforcement when people exceed their permit levels or violate regulations.

Educate people on their environmental responsibilities.

3

4

Performance Metrics Mar 2010Quality of Hoosiers' Environment Result Target Comments

% of Hoosiers in counties meeting air quality standards 100% 100% 80%

% of CSO Communities with approved programs to prevent the release of untreated sewage 94.4% 100% 20% 93+9 (102) out of 98+9

(108)

% of Hoosiers receiving water from facilities incompliance with safe drinking water standards 99.3% 99% 95%

Permitting Efficiency Total calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute

Land 18,333 66,565 86,864

Air 40,825 207,000 385,000

Water 23,563 48,000 200,000

* Places emphasis on back logged permits

Compliance Total percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards

Inspections 97.76% 97% 75%

Self reporting 97.21% 99% 95%

Continuous monitoring (COM) 99.84% 99.90% 99%

* Tracks observations and not just inspections

5

Performance Metrics June 2005Quality of Hoosiers' Environment Result Target Comments

% of Hoosiers in counties meeting air quality standards 61% 100% 80% 12 counties & 2,408,571 of

6,195,643 above standard

% of CSO Communities with approved programs to prevent the release of untreated sewage 4% 100% 20% 75% by 2007 is goal

Permitting Efficiency Total calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute

Land 100,013 66,565 86,864

Air 511,000 207,000 385,000

Water 301,000 48,000 200,000

* Places emphasis on back logged permits

Compliance Total percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards

Inspections 95.46% 97% 75%

Self reporting 97.11% 99% 95%

Continuous monitoring (COM) 99.19% 99.90% 98.95%

* Tracks observations and not just inspections

Organizational Transformation Budgetary agency dollars spent on key outside contracts for core agency functions.

Dollars spent on outside services per year $6,179,367 $0 $3,447,017

Discussion Topics

• Potential Regulatory Issues• NAAQS Air Quality Issues• Antidegradation• NPDES Permit Issuance• Green House Gas Regulations?• Budget Issues and Fees.

6

Potential Regulatory Issues--Air• New 75 ppb 1 hour SO2 Air Quality Standard.

• New 100 ppb short term NOx Air Quality Standard.• EPA reconsideration of 0.075 ozone standard and

15 microgram/cubic meter PM2.5 Air Quality Standards.

• EPA inaction on redesignation requests.

7

June 6, 2010: U.S. EPA Announced a New

SO2 Standard set at 75 ppb

SO2 Design Values Based on 2007-2009

Monitoring Data

Standard at 75 ppb

G

G

G

G

!

!

!!

G

G

!

!

!

G

G

G

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

RushParke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Newton

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

FountainHamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

TippecanoeTipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Hancock

Crawford

Bartholomew

Fayette Union

Floyd

Switzerland

Hunt

ingt

on

Dearborn

Verm

illio

n

Ohio

Vander-burgh

Blackfo

rd

µLegend

Values posted are in units of ppb.! SO2 Design Value(s) Less Than 76 ppb.G SO2 Design Value(s) Greater Than Or Equal To 76 ppb.

County With SO2 Design Value(s) Less Than 76 ppb Or No Data.County With SO2 Design Value(s) Greater Than Or Equal To 76 ppb.

Mapped By: A. Bukarica, Office of Air Quality

Date: 06/11/2010

Non Orthophotography Data - Obtained from the State of Indiana GeographicalInformation Office Library and Office of Air Quality

Map Projection: UTM Zone 16 N Map Datum: NAD83

0 5025 mi

0 5025 km

ID# 18-109-1001 (1)110

ID# 18-163-1002 (1)28

ID# 18-045-0001 (1)158

Gary - IITRI64

ID# 18-173-0002 (1)84

Indpls. - E. 16th St. 92

New Albany152

ID# 18-177-0006 (1)93

ID# 18-051-0002 (1)97

ID# 18-027-0002 (1)124

ID# 18-125-0005 (1)13

ID# 18-167-1014 (1)137

ID# 18-127-0011 (1)65

ID# 18-073-0002 (1)66

ID# 18-091-0005 (1)26

Notes: - Based on 2007 - 2009 SO2 data.(1) - Source-oriented Monitor.

ID# 18-063-0002 (1)32

January 22, 2010:U.S. EPA Announced a

New NO2 Standard set at 100 ppb

NO2 Design Values Based on

2007-2009 Monitoring Data

!

!

!

!

!

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion

Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Newton

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

FountainHamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

TippecanoeTipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Hancock

Crawford

Bartholomew

Fayette Union

Floyd

Switzerland

Hunt

ingt

on

Dearborn

Verm

illio

n

Ohio

Vander-burgh

Blackford

Mapped By: A. Bukarica, Office of Air Quality

Date: 06/18/2010



Legend! NO2 Design Value Less Than 101 ppb.

G NO2 Design Value Equal to or Greater Than 101 ppb.

Attainment/Unclassifiable

µ0 25 5012.5 km

0 25 5012.5 mi

Gary - IITRI50

Indpls. - E. 16th St.44

S. Bend - Shields Dr.32

Evansville - Buena Vista35

ID# 18-063-0002 (1) (2)40

Notes:(1) - Site discontinued March in 2009.(2) - Source-oriented monitor.- Values posted are in units of parts per billion.- Based on 2007-2009 data.

March 12, 2008:U.S. EPA Announced a

New Ozone Standard set at 0.075 ppm

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

Fountain Hamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

Tippecanoe Tipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Hancock

Crawford

DearbornBartholomew

FayetteUnion

Floyd

SwitzerlandOhio

Verm

illio

n

Legend

Values posted are in units of ppm.Ozone Design Value Less Than 0.076 ppm.

Ozone Design Value Greater Than Or Equal To 0.076 ppm.

County With Ozone Design Value(s) Less 0.076 ppm or no data.

County With Ozone Design Value(s) Greater Than Or Equal To 0.076 ppm.

Mapped By:B. Callahan, OAQ Date: 06/14/2010

Sources: Non-Orthophotography Data Obtainedfrom the State of Indiana Geographical InformationOffice and Office of Air Quality.


0 5025 mi

0 5025 km

Indpls - Harding St.0.070

St. Philips0.072

Flora0.068

Fortville0.074

Potato Creek St. Park0.066

Whiting - HS0.070

Charlestown St. Park0.077

Gary - IITRI0.068

Dayville0.064

Leopold0.072

Evansville - Buena Vista0.073

Brownstown0.070

Noblesville - 10th St.0.076

Sandcut0.066

Indpls - E. 16th St.0.070

Indpls - Ft. Harrison0.077

Fort Wayne - Beacon St.0.071

Leo0.069

Boonville0.072

New Albany0.073

Trafalgar0.073

Fairland0.075

Emporia0.069

Albany0.069

Roanoke0.066

Bristol0.070

Inglefield0.076

Lynnville0.069

Plummer0.074

Terre Haute - Lafayette Ave.0.064

Monrovia0.074

Avon0.072

Whitestown0.075

LaPorte - E. Lincolnway0.068

Valparaiso0.068

Ogden Dunes0.073

Hammond 141st St.0.070

S. Bend - Shield Dr.0.061

Michigan City - 4th St.0.066

Granger0.071

Based on 2007 - 2009 ozone data.

Washington Park0.067

Note: Indpls - Washington Park monitor based on 1-yr of data.

VanderburghCounty

Ozone Design Values Based on 2007-2009

Monitoring Data

Standard at 0.075 ppm

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

Fountain Hamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

Tippecanoe Tipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Hancock

Crawford

DearbornBartholomew

FayetteUnion

Floyd

SwitzerlandOhio

Verm

illio

n

Legend








0 5025 mi

0 5025 km


St. Philips0.072

Flora0.068

Fortville0.074


Whiting - HS0.070


Gary - IITRI0.068

Dayville0.064

Leopold0.072


Brownstown0.070


Sandcut0.066




Leo0.069

Boonville0.072

New Albany0.073

Trafalgar0.073

Fairland0.075

Emporia0.069

Albany0.069

Roanoke0.066

Bristol0.070

Inglefield0.076

Lynnville0.069

Plummer0.074


Monrovia0.074

Avon0.072

Whitestown0.075


Valparaiso0.068

Ogden Dunes0.073




Granger0.071




VanderburghCounty

January 6, 2010:U.S. EPA Announced

Reconsideration of Ozone NAAQS

(Proposed range of 0.060-0.070 ppm)


Monitoring Data


Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

Fountain Hamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

Tippecanoe Tipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Hancock

Crawford

DearbornBartholomew

FayetteUnion

Floyd

SwitzerlandOhio

Verm

illio

n

Legend








0 5025 mi

0 5025 km


St. Philips0.072

Flora0.068

Fortville0.074


Whiting - HS0.070


Gary - IITRI0.068

Dayville0.064

Leopold0.072


Brownstown0.070


Sandcut0.066




Leo0.069

Boonville0.072

New Albany0.073

Trafalgar0.073

Fairland0.075

Emporia0.069

Albany0.069

Roanoke0.066

Bristol0.070

Inglefield0.076

Lynnville0.069

Plummer0.074


Monrovia0.074

Avon0.072

Whitestown0.075


Valparaiso0.068

Ogden Dunes0.073




Granger0.071




VanderburghCounty


Monitoring Data





Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

Fountain Hamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

Tippecanoe Tipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Hancock

Crawford

DearbornBartholomew

FayetteUnion

Floyd

SwitzerlandOhio

Verm

illio

n




0 5025 mi

0 5025 km


St. Philips0.072

Flora0.068

Fortville0.074


Whiting - HS0.070


Gary - IITRI0.068

Dayville0.064

Leopold0.072


Brownstown0.070


Sandcut0.066




Leo0.069

Boonville0.072

New Albany0.073

Trafalgar0.073

Fairland0.075

Emporia0.069

Albany0.069

Roanoke0.066

Bristol0.070

Inglefield0.076

Lynnville0.069

Plummer0.074


Monrovia0.074

Avon0.072

Whitestown0.075


Valparaiso0.068

Ogden Dunes0.073




Granger0.071




VanderburghCounty

Legend

Ozone Design Value Less Than 0.061 ppm.

Values posted are in units of ppm.


County With Ozone Design Value(s) Less 0.061 ppm.


County With Ozone Design Value(s) Less Than 0.061 ppm or no data.


Monitoring Data





March 15, 2010: U.S. EPA Proposed a Revised

PM2.5 Standard with a range of 11-14 µg/m3

!

!!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!!!!

! !

!

!! !

!

!!

!

!

!!!

!

!

!

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion

Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Newton

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

Fountain Hamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

TippecanoeTipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Huntington

Hancock

Crawford

DearbornBartholomew

FayetteUnion

Floyd

Switzerland

Ohio

Verm

illio

n

Vander-burgh µ

Mapped By: A. Bukarica, Office of Air QualityDate: 06/15/2010



0 5025 mi

0 5025 km

Evansville - U. of E.13.1

Lafayette - Greenbush St.11.8

Mechanicsburg11.7

Griffith12.0

Hammond - Clark HS12.3

Charlestown St. Park (2)12.1

Dale12.6

Jeffersonville - Walnut St.14.6


Bloomington - Binford (1)10.6

Terre Haute - Devaney12.3

Kokomo12.0

Indpls - West 18th St.14.3

Indpls - E. Michigan St.13.8

Gary - Madison St.13.0


Jasper - Post Office13.2

New Albany13.1

Anderson - W. 5th St.12.3

Muncie - Central HS12.0

Elkhart - Prairie St.12.6

Evansville - Post Office12.9

Oakland City (2)11.2

Southwest Ag Center12.3


Hammond - Purdue13.8

Ogden Dunes12.0

East Chicago - Franklin Sch.12.6

S. Bend - Shields Dr.11.8

Michigan City - Marsh Elem.11.2

Indpls - Washington Park13.6

S. Bend - Nuner Sch.11.6

Notes:(1) - Site began operation in 2009.(2) - Site began operation in 2008.- Values posted are in units of ug/m3.- Based on 2007-2009 data.

Legend! PM2.5 Design Value Less Than 15.1 ug/m3

G PM2.5 Design Value Equal to or Greater Than 15.1 ug/m3

Attainment

Nonattainment

Redesignation Pending

PM2.5 Design Values Based on 2007-2009

Monitoring Data

Standard at 15 µg/m3

March 15, 2010: U.S. EPA Proposed a Revised PM2.5 Standard with a range

of 11-14 µg/m3

G

G

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!!!!

! !

!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!!!

!

!

!

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion

Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Newton

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

Fountain Hamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

TippecanoeTipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Huntington

Hancock

Crawford

DearbornBartholomew

FayetteUnion

Floyd

Switzerland

Ohio

Verm

illio

n

Vander-burgh µ




0 5025 mi

0 5025 km



Mechanicsburg11.7

Griffith12.0



Dale12.6





Kokomo12.0






New Albany13.1









Ogden Dunes12.0







Legend! PM2.5 Design Values Less Than 14.1 ug/m3

G PM2.5 Design Values Equal to or Greater Than 14.1 ug/m3

Attainment

Nonattainment



Monitoring Data


March 15, 2010: U.S. EPA Proposed a Revised

PM2.5 Standard with a range of 11-14 µg/m3


Monitoring Data


G

GG

G

G

G

GG

G

G

G

G GGGGGG G

G

GGGG

G

GG

G

G

GGG

G

G

G

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion

Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Newton

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

Fountain Hamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

TippecanoeTipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Huntington

Hancock

Crawford

DearbornBartholomew

FayetteUnion

Floyd

Switzerland

Ohio

Blackfo

rd

Verm

illion

Vander-burgh µ




0 5025 mi

0 5025 km



Mechanicsburg11.7

Griffith12.0



Dale12.6





Kokomo12.0






New Albany13.1









Ogden Dunes12.0







Legend! PM2.5 Design Value Less Than 11.1 ug/m3

G PM2.5 Design Value Equal to or Greater Than 11.1 ug/m3

Attainment

Nonattainment


Climate Change & GHG• Indiana joined the litigation challenging the

endangerment finding.• Indiana believes that the tailoring rule is

fundamentally legally flawed.• The current federal administration firmly

believes that the science supports the opinion that the earth is warming due to human GHG emissions.

17

Climate Change & GHG• An alternative way to frame the discussion is

to compare the costs and benefits of deep reductions in GHG emissions with the projected costs and benefits of not making those reductions.

• Some strategies (i.e. wasting less energy) make sense without the GHG drive and should be encouraged.

18

GHG Air Permits

• All permits issued after 1/1/2011 requiring PSD review that also increase GHG emissions by at least 75,000 tpy need GHG BACT.

• All permits issued after 6/30/2011 that increase GHG emissions by 75,000 tpy need GHG BACT and all sources with GHG emissions of at least 100,000 tpy need operating permits

19

GHG Air Permits

• IDEM will use the expedited rule making process and emergency rule making to obtain the legal authority to issue the federally required GHG permits

20

Potential Regulatory Issues--Water• Antidegradation Regulations. • Algae issues and nutrient regulations.

– Great Lakes, Gulf of Mexico, Ohio River, Indiana lakes, rivers and reservoirs.

• Pharmaceuticals and other trace pollutants.• IDEM action on the final five extended permits.• More attention to the Great Lakes.

21

Antidegradation• Second Notice Comment Period closed

January 30, 2010—31 different commenters• We are still evaluating the comments and

preparing a revised draft rule for possible preliminary adoption

• There will be a third notice on the rule as preliminarily adopted

22

Antidegradation• Major Issues Raised

– Trigger for Antidegradation Review– What pollutants should be covered (Pollutant of

concern)– BADCT– Level of deminimis– Exemptions

23

• NPDES Permit Backlog Reduction– 2005: 263 backlogged permits– 2010: 5 backlogged permits– List includes:

• US Midwest. Ready for Public Notice.• Arcelor Mittal Burns Harbor. Under EPA review—301g• Arcelor Mittal Indiana Harbor East. Drafting• Arcelor Mittal Indiana Harbor West. Drafting.• Hoosier Merom. Compliance Schedule Under EPA Review

Office of Water QualityPermits

Potential Regulatory Issues--Land• RISC Guidance and Regulations implementing

HB1162.• Coal combustion waste regulations.• EPA to speed up review of pollutant risk

evaluations.

25

Potential Regulatory Issues• Increased EPA emphasis on enforcement to

improve environmental quality.• EPA reevaluation of permitting decisions made

during the past eight years.• IDEM Outdoor Hydronic Heater Rule restart.• Increased scrutiny of all coal related activities.• Transparency.

26

Indiana State Budget Challenges• Indiana’s most recent revenue forecast is $1.88

Billion below the budgeted amount for the FY 2010-2011 biennium.– State Agencies reduced by 20+%– Higher Education reduced by 6%– K-12 Education reduced by 3%– Budget surplus will need to be spent

27

Response to Reduced State Income• Eliminated 2009 & 2010 raises.• Strategic Hiring Review—Using attrition to

reduce spending.• Reduce/eliminate grants, contracts, etc.• Restrictions on travel and purchasing.• Will maintain essential State services.

28

New IDEM Budget Actions• Returning staffing to January 2005 levels

through attrition.• Moving most of Shadeland staff to IGCN and

renegotiating the lease.• Canceling or renegotiating a number of

service contracts.• Voluntary unpaid leave program.

29

IDEM Staffing Levels

YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Current 2010 Target

Actual FTE 895 918 915 927 954 950 891 902

30

NorthwestIndianaRegion

LakeLaporte

Porter

Mapped By: B. Callahan, OAQDate: March 16, 2010

Map Projection: UTM Zone 16 NMap Datum: NAD83

0 5025 mi

0 5025 km

Carbon Monoxide1-Hour Maximum CO

Lake & Porter Counties - 1979-2009

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

Monitoring Values 1-Hour Standard Trend Line

Carbon Monoxide8-Hour Maximum CO


0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

Monitoring Values 8-Hour Standard Trend Line

LeadLead Maximum Values


0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

Con

cent

ratio

n (u

g/m

3)

Monitoring Values Lead Standard 2009 Lead Standard Trend Line

Nitrogen Dioxide NO2 Annual Average

Lake & Porter Counties 1980-2009

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

Monitoring Values Annual Standard Trendline

OzoneOzone Maximum Values

Lake, LaPorte & Porter Counties 1979-2009

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

1- Hour Monitoring Values 1-Hour Ozone Standard (.12) 8-Hour Monitoring Values

8-Hour 1997 Standard (.085) 8-Hour 2008 Standard (.075) Trend Line

Changing Particulate Standards

Particulate Matter TSP Maximum 24-Hour Value


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

Year

Con

cent

ratio

n (u

g/m

3)

24-Hour TSP Standard (260 ug/m3-Revoked in 1987) Monitoring Values Trend Line

Particulate MatterTSP Maximum Annual Value


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

Year

Con

cent

ratio

n (u

g/m

3)

Annual TSP Standard (75 ug/m3-Revoked in 1987) Monitoring Values Trend Line

Particulate MatterPM 10 Maximum 24-Hour Values


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

Conc

entra

tion

(ug/

m3)

Monitoring Values 24-Hour PM 10 Standard (150 ug/m3) Trend Line

Particulate MatterPM 10 Maximum Annual Values


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

Con

cent

ratio

n (u

g/m

3)

Monitoring Values Annual PM 10 Standard (50 ug/m3--Revoked in 2006) Trend Line

Particulate MatterAnnual PM 2.5


0.00

2.004.00

6.008.00

10.0012.00

14.0016.00

18.00

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

Conc

entra

tion

(ug/

m3)

Annual Arithmatic Mean Annual PM 2.5 Standard (15.0 ug/m3) Trend Line

Particulate MatterDaily PM 2.5


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

Conc

entra

tion

(ug/

m3)

98% Value 1997 Daily PM 2.5 Standard (65 ug/m3)2006 Daily PM 2.5 Standard (35 ug/m3) Trend Line

Sulfur Dioxide 24-Hour Maximum Sulfur DioxideLake & Porter Counties 1979-2009

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

SO2 24hr Readings SO2 24hr Standard Trend Line

Sulfur Dioxide Annual Sulfur Dioxide


0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0.04

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Year

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

SO2 Annual Average SO2 Annual Standard Trend Line

Thank You

Tom EasterlyCommissioner

Indiana Department of Environmental Management317-232-8611

[email protected]

46

mailto:[email protected]

Date post:	17-Jan-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	margery-copeland
View:	219 times
Download:	0 times

Indiana Steel Environmental Group June 29, 2010 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner IN...

Documents