Indicators for Community Safety Partnership Performance ...

Report author: Daniel James, research and analysis officer, Service Support and Improvement Team: [email protected], 0208 227 5040.

Indicators for Community Safety Partnership Performance Call Over - May 2014Crime

Indicator Performance RAG Rating

Direction of Travel (Performance)

Summary report on page

1 MOPAC 7: Violence with Injury RED 172 MOPAC 7: Personal Robbery GREEN 183 MOPAC 7: Residential Burglary GREEN 194 MOPAC 7: Criminal Damage AMBER 205 MOPAC 7: Theft from the Person GREEN 216 MOPAC7: Theft of Motor Vehicle GREEN 227 MOPAC7: Theft from Motor Vehicle GREEN 23

Domestic Violence


Direction of Travel(Performance)


8 Domestic Violence Offences GREY 249 MARAC: Number of repeat referrals GREEN 2510 IDAP (Probation): No. of B&D residents on the

programme GREEN 2611 IDAP (Probation): Total successfully completing the

programme GREEN 2712 The number of sexual offences including rape GREY 28

Youth Offending (Barking and Dagenham)




13 Serious Youth Violence GREEN 29

mailto:[email protected]


Proven Re-offending (all cohorts)




14 Rate of Proven Re-offending See summary report 30

ASB




15 The number of calls to the police reporting ASB GREEN 3116 The % of victims who are satisfied with the way their

ASB complaint was dealt with AMBER 32

Alcohol and Drugs




17 Alcohol –attributable recorded crimes: Crude rate per 1,000 population GREEN 33

18 The rate of hospital admissions per 100,000 population GREEN 34

19 The % of offenders who complete an Alcohol Treatment Requirement (ATR) successfully TBC 35

20 The number and % of individuals successfully completing drug treatment GREEN 36

21 The % of offenders who complete a Drug Rehabilitation Requirement (DRR) successfully TBC 37

Victim Support Commissioned Services




22 Victim Support: Safer Homes – No. of homes visited and secured GREEN 38



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014MOPAC 7: Violence with injury Source: IQuanta

Definition Violence with Injury How this indicator works

What good looks like

We are looking for a decrease in this figure, and would normally compare with the same period in the previous year, as crime is (broadly) seasonal.

2014/15 Target: Reduction on last years figures

Why this indicator is important

Violent crime is a priority crime identified by the 2013 Crime and Disorder Strategic Assessment

It is a MOPAC 7 priority crime type

History with this indicator

2013/14 = 1,693 (+6%)2012/13 = 1,600 (+16%)2011/12 = 1,897 (-5%)

Any issues to consider

Interpretation of what an injury is: Injury now includes pain regardless of whether it is visible or lasting pain this will now be recorded as ABH - thus putting it in VWI. This is a change in MPS Interpretation regarding crime classification

Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 138 158

Year to date 138 296% change from previous year +6% +14%

Rolling 12 month fig 1,701 1,730

Per 1,000 Res (rolling 12

month)8.926 9.079

Rank (MET / MSG)

28of32 / 12of15

29of32 / 12of15

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar80

180

2014/15

2013/14

Performance Overview

RAG Rating: R

Recorded violence with injury crime has continued to increase YTD at May 2014 there were 37 more violence with injury crimes reported compared to May 2013 (up 14%). In comparison the average across the MET is up 17%.

Actions to Sustain or Improve Performance

The rise in Domestic Violence offences is impacting on the Violence with Injury figures. MOPAC 7 group have tasked a piece of analysis on this area separating out VWI offences those taking place in public spaces and those that are taking place in non public spaces. Analysis is currently being undertaken and results will help to inform partnership responses.

Benchmarking We are currently ranked 29 out of 32 CSP across the Metropolitan Police Force with 9.079 crimes per 1,000 residents compared to the Metropolitan Police force average of 7.235 per 1,000 residents. Our positioning amongst our Most Similar Group (MSG) remains unchanged (12/15 or 3rd highest) and therefore above the MSG average of 7.508 per 1,000 residents.



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014MOPAC 7: Personal Robbery Source: IQuanta

Definition Personal Robbery is the use of threat or force in a theft from a person.

How this indicator works

As described



2014/15 Target:

5% decrease from previous year


Serious Acquisitive Crime is a CSP priority and personal robbery makes up a section of SAC


2013/14: 492 offences (-21%), 2.58 crimes per 1,000 residents (14of32 / 14of15)2012/13: 619 offences ( -41%) 1.44 crimes per 1,000 residents (16of32 / 14of15)2011/12: 931 offences (+7%) 1.25 crimes per 1,000 residents 2010/11: 868 offences


Personal Robbery will not include crimes such as theft from a person e.g. bag dipping. There has to be that threat of violence present.

Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 32 30Year to date 32 62% change from previous year -14% -25%

Rolling 12 month fig for use below

487 471

Per 1,000 Res 2.556 2.472Rank (MET / MSG)

14of32 / 14of15

14of32 / 14of15


40

60

80

2014/15

2013/14


RAG Rating: G

YTD at May 2014 there was 62 personal robbery offences reported. This is 21 fewer offences reported compared to the same period last year (-25%). In comparison the MET average was -24%.


Recent arrest and conviction of a male for a series of 18 robberies and snatches in the Barking area around bus stops has contributed to continued reduction

BenchmarkingCurrently the borough is 14 out of the 15 areas in our most similar group with 2.472 crimes per 1,000 residents. This has remained unchanged for the most part of the previous financial year. Barking and Dagenham are considerably above the average for our Most Similar Group (1.283 per 1,000 residents). However, the borough is below the Metropolitan Police force average (3.049 per 1,000 populations). Barking and Dagenham are currently ranked 14 out of the 32 CSPs in the Metropolitan Police Force.



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014MOPAC 7: Residential Burglary Source: IQuanta

Definition Entering any residential building as a trespasser with the intent to steal or cause unlawful damage.

How this indicator

works

As described


Good performance would be achieving a lower number of residential burglaries and a higher number of attempted burglaries which indicates that homes in the borough are becoming secure.

2014/15 Target:

Reduction on last years figures

Why this indicator is

important

Serious Acquisitive Crime is a CSP priority and residential burglary makes up a section of SAC

History with this

indicator

2013/14: 1,470 Offences (-20%) 21.10 per 1,000 residents2012/13: 1,835 Offences (+7%) 26.334 per 1,000 residents2011/12: 1,710 Offences (+9%) 24.54 per 1,000 residents2010/11: 1,573 Offences


This would exclude areas such as commercial property, sheds, outbuildings etc. Residential burglary typically increases in the winter months November to March showing a strong correlation with shortening of daylight hours.

Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 83 90Year to date 83 173% change from last year -45% -40%

Rolling 12 month fig 1,402 1,355

Per 1,000 HH 20.120 19.45Rank (MET / MSG)

28of32 / 14of15

27of32 / 14of15


RAG Rating: G

YTD in May 2014 there was a decrease of 115 offences reported (-40%) compared to the same period in the previous year. The MET average over the same period was -18%.


Proactive and High Visible patrols concentrating on the RM8 postcode linked in with cross border work with Redbridge has seen significant reductions.

The recent identification of a Romanian male from a series of 18 offences where blood was left at the scene of burglaries around North London and Home Counties (6 in B+D) - remanded in custody

The arrest of a Romanian male who was re-entering the country at Gatwick who was wanted for numerous offences across NE London - remanded in custody In both the above offences conspiracy evidence is now being put together to look at potential associates

BenchmarkingBarking and Dagenham now has the 2nd highest amount of residential burglary offences out of our most similar group with 19.45 per 1,000 residents (15/15). The average for the most similar group is 11.42 per 1,000 residents. Looking across the Metropolitan police force Barking and Dagenham now has the 6th highest rate per 1,000 population for residential burglary (27/32). The MET average is 16.26 per 1,000 residents. This is a significant improvement on previous performance where we where the highest in both the MSG and the MET.



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014MOPAC 7: Criminal Damage Source: IQuanta

Definition How this indicator

worksWhat good

looks likeWe are looking for a decrease in this figure, and would normally compare with the same period in the previous year, as crime is (broadly) seasonal

2014/15 Target:



important

History with this

indicator

2013/14: 1,552 (-2%)2012/13: 1,583 (-17%)2011/12: 1,928 (-14%)


Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 115 124Year to date 115 239% change from previous year

-3% +4%


1,549 1,561

Per 1,000 8.129 8.192Rank (MET / MSG)

31of32 / 3of15

31of32 / 3of15


110

120

130

140

150

2014/15

2013/14


RAG Rating: AYTD at May 2014 there was an increase of 9 offences reported compared to the same period in the previous year (+4% on the previous year)


BenchmarkingBarking and Dagenham now has 8.19 crimes per 1,000 residents. Our rank amongst our most similar group is 3 / 15. The average for the most similar group is 10.83 per 1,000 residents. Looking across the Metropolitan police force Barking and Dagenham has the 2nd highest rate per 1,000 population for Criminal Damage (31/32). The MET average is 6.44 per 1,000 residents.



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014MOPAC 7: Theft from the person Source: IQuanta

Definition How this indicator

worksWhat good

looks likeWe are looking for a decrease in this figure, and would normally compare with the same period in the previous year, as crime is (broadly) seasonal

2014/15 Target:



important

History with this

indicator


Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 25 22Year to date 25 47% change from previous year

-36% -30%


335 329

Per 1,000 1.758 1.726Rank (MET / MSG)

9of32 / 13of15

9of32 / 13of15


10

20

30

40

2014/15

2013/14


RAG Rating: GYTD at May 2014 there was a decrease of 20 offences reported compared to the same period in the previous year (-30% on the previous year)


Benchmarking Barking and Dagenham has 1.72 crimes per 1,000 residents. Our rank amongst our most similar group is 13 / 15. The average for the most similar group is 4.84 per 1,000 residents. Looking across the Metropolitan police force Barking and Dagenham is ranked (9/32). The MET average is 1.24 per 1,000 residents.



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014MOPAC 7: Theft of Motor Vehicle Source: IQuanta

Definition This is when a Motor Vehicle is taken without consent from the owner or a lawful authority.

How this indicator

works

As described


We are looking for a decrease in this figure, and would normally compare with the same period in the previous year, as crime is (broadly) seasonal

2014/15 Target:

5% Decrease from previous year


important

Serious Acquisitive Crime is a CSP priority and theft of a motor vehicle makes up a section of SAC


2013/14: 773 offences (-5%), 4.06 crimes per 1,000 residents2012/13: 811 Offences (-21%) 4.336 crimes per 1,000 residents.2011/12: 1,106 Offences (-3%) 5.92crimes per 1,000 residents.2010/11: 1,146 Offences.


Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 64 64Year to date 64 128% change from last year

-18% -18%

Rolling 12 month total 759 745

Per 1,000 Res 3.983 3.910

Rank (MET / MSG)

32of32 / 15of15

32of32 / 15/15


65

85

2014/15

2013/14


RAG Rating: G

YTD at May 2014 there was 128 offences reported. This is a 18% decrease (down 28 offences) on the offences reported in the same period last year.


This is being monitored closely. Awareness raising campaigns are taking place across the borough in targeted areas. The focus is burglary but will include advice on removing valuables or keeping goods out of sight when leaving your vehicle.

Benchmarking B&D rate per 1,000 population = 3.91, MET average = 2.54, MSG average = 1.76. This places B&D at 32of32 in the MET and 15 of 15 in our Most Similar Group



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014MOPAC 7: Theft from a Motor Vehicle Source: IQuanta

Definition The number of thefts from a motor vehicle. This includes thefts of removable items both inside and on the outside of the vehicle. Examples include but are not limited to, theft of radios, sat nav’s, handbags / bags, petro / diesel siphoning, exhausts, alloy wheels, theft of number plates and badges from vehicles.


As described. These are published monthly on IQuanta. Below shows the monthly and accumulative year to date figure.


We are looking for a decrease in this figure, and would normally compare with the same period in the previous year, as crime is (broadly) seasonal

2014/15 Target:



important

Theft from a Motor Vehicle has increased during 2013/14 and is affecting our performance under serious acquisitive crime. A one page performance summary on this crime type was requested by the Police and Community Safety to keep track of the situation.


2013/14: 1,595 offences (-4%), 8.37 per 1,000 residents (22of32 / 14of15)2012/13: 1,659 offences (0%) 8.87 per 1,000 residents (20 of 32 / 14 of 15)2011/12: 1,655 offences (-3.4%)2010/11: 1,714 offences


Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 113 107Year to date 113 220% change from last year -30% -31%Rolling 12 month fig for use below 1,546 1,494Rate Per 1,000 residents 8.113 7.840Rank (MET / MSG)

21of32 / 14of15

21of32 / 14of15


100

120

140

160

180

2014/15

2013/14


RAG Rating: G

YTD at May 2014 there was 220 offences reported. This is a 31% decrease (down 101 offences) on the offences reported in the same period last year. In comparison the average across the Metropolitan Police Service is -14% at May 2014.


Culmination of a long running decoy car operation in London Road Car Park led to the arrest of an offender who was charged with a series of 20 offences

Benchmarking B&D rate per 1,000 population = 7.84, MET average = 7.528, MSG average = 5.328. This places B&D at 21of32 in the MET and 14 of 15 in our Most Similar Group



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014Domestic Violence Source: Local Police Figures

Definition

Any incident of threatening behaviour, violence, or abuse (psychological, physical, sexual, financial or emotional) between adults who are or have been intimate partners or family, regardless of gender.


Simple monthly and YTD count of offences reported. Rate per 1,000 residents is used to compare against other areas. For the rate per 1,000 population we use rolling 12 month figures against the 2011 Census figure for all individuals residing in the borough (187,029). This is consistent with Iquanta.


For monitoring. DV is likely to be an under reported crime. An increase in offences could show that more people recognise domestic abuse as a crime and report it rather than the situation getting worse.

2013/14 Target:

Generally an increase in crimes reported is considered a good thing. If crimes reported is going down it should prompt services to ask ‘what are we not doing?’


DV was a Community Safety Partnership priority for 2012/13

History of this indicator

2013/14: 1,991 Offences, 10.65 crimes per 1,000 residents2012/13: 1,588 Offences, 8.49 crimes per 1,000 resident2011/12: 1,706 Offences 2010/11: 1,790 Offences


Potential under reporting of crimes to the Police. Since Summer 13 the age of the victim changed so that offences involving 17 year olds within the family or in relationships were included within the figures.

Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 172 109Year to date 172 281Rolling 12 months (for use below)

2,023 2,046

Rate per 1,000 10.82 10.94

Rank (MET Police) 32 of 32 32 of 32


RAG Rating: None

There were 23 more crimes of DV reported in May 2014 compared to May 2013 (+ 16.3%).

Using YTD totals there was an increase of 55 crimes reported between April 2014 to May 2014 compared to April 2013 to May 2013 (281 vs 336 or +19.6%)


Partnership responses include: Operation Dauntless which is an MPS wide response to improving performance in this area Improved our emergency response times to Domestic Abuse Calls Positive action regarding suspects who are at the scene or have recently left the scene is being monitored as

there is a correlation between successful detection against time to arrest We are piloting a new Crime Advisor (Detective Sergeant) working within a Emergency Response Patrol

Team 24/7 IDVA Support ensuring victims are supported through court process ( victim attrition long standing issue in

B+D) As of 1/4 we are able to use restorative approach for youth VWI where appropriate. Each team is being

enhanced with a rolling programme of attachments for ERPT officers being attached to the Community Safety Unit for a month a time, with the ambition to expose all officers to seeing enhanced victim care and investigative process.

Children’s services have appointed a DV coordinator. A young person’s IDVAS and a children’s IDVAS posts are now in place as part of the IDVAS contract

Benchmarking

% Change compared to same time in the previous year (YTD at May 14 vs YTD at May 13): B&D = Up by 19.6% London average =up by 20.0% *Rate per 1,000 Residents (rolling 12 months): B&D = 10.94, Metropolitan Police Average = 7.09, this places B&D 32 / 32 or the highest in London.



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014 MARAC: Number of repeat referrals to MARAC Source: MARAC

Definition If domestic abuse continues after the first MARAC then they can be re referred and have their situation re examined.

How this indicator

works

As described


We would be looking for lower numbers compared to previous months and previous years.

2014/15 Target: 28%


important

History with this

indicator

2013/14: 90 (25%)2012/13: 82 (21%)2011/12: 68 (22%)


Referral activity has to be considered alongside Domestic Violence Offences reported to the police.

Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 0 9Year to Date 0 9


5

10

15

2014/15

2013/14


RAG Rating: G

At May 2014 there were 9 repeat referrals to MARAC. This works out as 20% of all MARAC referrals for the month which is within the 28-40% range recommended by CAADA.

Please note there was no MARAC meeting in April 2014.


Previous performance was discussed at a MARAC Steering group meeting with Coordinated Action Against Domestic Abuse (CAADA). CAADA stated that although there has been an increase from the previous year the level of repeat referrals is seen as healthy and within the limits they would have expected.

Benchmarking Some benchmarking data is available from CAADA on the level of repeat referrals to MARAC. The latest data is for 1st April 2013 – 31st March 2014 where there averages for London, our Most Similar Group (MSG) and national was 19%, 25% and 24% respectively.



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014 Total number of Barking and Dagenham Residents on the Programme - Integrated Domestic Abuse Programme (IDAP) Source: Probation (Emma Eddy)

Definition IDAP is a group work programme for men who have abused their wives, partners or ex-partners and is a court order.

How this indicator

works

As described


We would be looking for the number of residents on the programme to decrease in line with a decrease in the amount of domestic violence incidents.

2013/14 Target: This is the first full year monitoring this programme. Future targets will be to see improvements year on year in the number and % successfully completing the programme.


important

History with this

indicator

N/A Any issues to consider

Figures are currently taken as a snapshot of the caseload at that particular time. The figures therefore only reflect those currently active on the caseload when the report was run for that month.

DATA Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14Number currently on programme

68 30 22 28


20

40

60

80

2013/14


RAG Rating: G

At March 2014 there were a total of 28 Barking and Dagenham Offenders active on DV programme.

Figures are produced quarterly hence 2013/14 figures are shown here. Qtr 1 figures for 2014/15 will be included in June’s data which is available in late July 2014.


Figures provided by probation are a snapshot of the active caseload. It is difficult to get total number of individuals who have been on the programme for the year.

Benchmarking



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio March 2014 Total Successfully Completing Programme of Total Discharges - Integrated Domestic Abuse Programme (IDAP) Source: Probation (Emma Eddy)

Definition The amount of people that have been discharged from their IDAP and the amount of those that successfully completed their course

How this indicator

works

As described.


We would be looking for an increased majority of successful completions on discharge.

2013/14 Target: This is the first full year monitoring this programme. Future targets will be to see improvements year on year in the number and % successfully completing the programme.


important

History with this

indicator

N/A Any issues to consider

Figures are currently taken as a snapshot of the caseload at that particular time. The figures therefore only reflect those currently active on the caseload when the report was run for that month.

DATA Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14Monthly 1 2 1 0 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 1 3


5

10

15


RAG Rating: G

This is the first year of monitoring this programme.

For a period of time from November 2013 Probation stopped running IDAP. During this time two other ‘Local Domestic Violence Groups’ were run and the figures have been used to populate the later months. At March 2014 a total of 8 individuals have successfully completed Local Domestic Violence Perpetrator programmes.


Benchmarking N/A - Figures are produced quarterly hence 2013/14 figures are shown here. Qtr 1 figures for 2014/15 will be included in June’s data which is available in late July 2014.



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014The number of Sexual offences Including Rape Source: IQuanta

Definition All offences of rape, sexual activity involving a child under 13, sexual assault, causing sexual activity without consent, sexual activity with a person with a mental disorder, abuse of children through prostitution, pornography or trafficking.


Only offences reported to the police within the period are counted.


Achieving a lower number of offences than in 2010/11 (263) Reducing our ranking from 3rd highest in the most similar group (MSG) 13/15.

2013/14 Targets

Generally an increase in crimes reported is considered a good thing. If crimes reported is going down it should prompt services to ask ‘what are we not doing?’


The Strategic Assessment highlighted an increase in sexual offences in 2009 /2010. Sexual offences have increased in Barking and Dagenham with a higher number of reports compared with the London average.


2013/14: 292 Offences (+16%), 1.53 per 1,000 residents. MSG 10/15, MET 22/322012/13: 252 Offenses (-8%) 1.35 per 1000 residents. MSG 11/152011/12: 274 Offences (+7%), 1.47 per 1,000 residents MSG = 12/152010/11: 263 Sexual Offences, MSG = 3rd Highest (baseline) = 13/15


Offences could have taken place some weeks, months or even years before being reported to the Police.

Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 27 33YTD 27 60

% change since last year +69% +43%

Rolling 12 months (for use below) 303 310

Rate Per 1000 Population 1.590 1.627

Ranking MET / MSG 24of32 / 10of15

25of32 / 10of15

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

10

20

30

40

2014/15

2013/14


RAG Rate: None

YTD at May 2014 there have been 60 sexual offences reported in the Borough. This is an increase of 18 offences (+43%) on the same period in the previous year. The London average is up 17%.


Increases in sexual offences reported are being attributed to national media coverage of sexual abuse and more victims coming forward to report crimes. This is reflected in the increases seen across London in addition to a sharp rise in calls to the NSPCC24 hour advice line.

BenchmarkingAt May 2014 Barking & Dagenham had 1.62 sexual offences per 1,000 residents and is ranked (25/32) in London. Against our Most Similar Group (MSG) Barking and Dagenham is ranked 10 of 15. Our MSG average is 1.391 per 1000 residents and the Metropolitan Police force average is 1.373.



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014 Serious Youth Violence (Barking & Dagenham) Source: Local Police Figures

Definition Serious Youth Violence is defined by the MPS as 'Any offence of most serious violence or weapon enabled crime, where the victim is aged 1-19.'

How this indicator

works

We use the following formula using the latest rolling 12 month figures and the 2011 Census figure for individuals aged 1-19 in the borough (55,021).



2014/15 Target: Reduction on last years figures


important

Serious Youth Violence (SYV) is a CSP priority. The 2011 Strategic Assessment showed that it constitutes the next most significant element of the violence that occurs, after Domestic Violence. Analysis of robberies shows that it is part of a growing pattern of gang-related violence.


2013/14: 176 offences (+21%), 2.73 crimes per 1,000 residents2012/13: 145 offences, (-40%), 2.64 crimes per 1,000 residents2011/12: 236 offences (+14%), 2010/11: 207 offences, 3.76 per 1,000 residents


The good performance in 2012/13 needs to be considered against current comparisons to the previous year.

Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 12 11Year to date 12 33% change compared to previous year

+20% -26%

Rolling 12 months (for use below)

178 168

Rate per 1,000 Res (1-19 yrs) 3.24 3.05

Rank (MET) 12 of 32 17 of 32


20

40

2014/15

2013/14


RAG Rating: G

Using YTD figures (176 at May 2014) there has been an overall decrease of 8 SYV incidents reported (-26%) on the 23 reported at the same period last year. The London average is -7%. The average number of offences for London is 31.


Consideration needs to be given to our good performance in 2012/13.

Benchmarking% Change compared to same time in the previous year (using YTD figures): B&D = Down by 26%, London average = Down by 7%Rate per 1,000 Residents: B&D = 3.05 This places B&D 17 / 32 in the London Rankings



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014 Rate of Proven Re-offending (All cohorts) Source: www.gov.uk

Definition Proven re-offending is defined as any offence committed in a one year follow up period where the offender has received a court conviction, caution, reprimand or warning.

How this indicator

works

The Ministry of Justice’s methodology tracks the proven re-offending rate of the identified offenders over a one year period. Offenders are defined as all offenders in any one year who received a caution (for adults), a final warning or reprimand (for juveniles), a non-custodial conviction, or were discharged from custody. A proven re-offence is defined as committing an offence or receiving a court conviction, caution, or reprimand in a one year follow-up period. Following this one year period, a further six months is allowed for cases to progress through the courts. This means that the latest data refers to a cohort that originally offended at least 18 months ago.


We are looking for consistent decreases in this figure over time.

2014/15 Target: Decrease on last years figures


important

Reducing re-offending is a CSP priority.


The first release of these figures was produced in October 2011. The figures for the latest cohort (July 2011 to June 2012) were released in April 2014.


From October 2014 it will not be possible to produce drug misusing and PPO breakdowns. The latest reports unfortunately do not have these breakdowns. PPO will be replaced with IOM and the MOJ will no longer be able to produce drug misusing offending data as DIP no longer exists in a number of areas. The latest figures at a borough level are presented below and were released in April 2014.

Performance overview Overall for adults and Juveniles combined the Cohort size continues to decrease. However, the % of offenders who reoffend has not changed at 28%. We are getting closer to the England and Wales reoffending rate of 26.9% which is positive but still shows some room for improvement.

All adults & Juveniles Adults only Drug misusers PPO (All ages) YOS (Juveniles only)Latest cohort identified between July 2011–June 2012 & tracked for 18 months (released April 2014)

(Barking and Dagenham)B&D* E&W* B&D* E&W* B&D* E&W* B&D* E&W* B&D* E&W*

Cohort Size 2,722 586,620 2,412 521,002 N/A N/A N/A N/A 310 65,618

Previous average no. of offences per offender 8.03 11.91 8.76 13.09 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.35 2.54

% of offenders who reoffend whilst being tracked 28.2% 26.2% 26.3 25.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 42.6% 35.3%

No. of offenders who reoffend whilst being tracked 767 153,927 635 130,732 N/A N/A N/A N/A 132 23,195

Total no. of re-offences committed whilst being tracked 2,081 448,290 1,707 381,461 N/A N/A N/A N/A 374 66,829

Av. number of re-offences committed per offender 2.66 2.91 2.69 2.92 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.83 2.88

Benchmarking England Averages – percentage change from July 2011 to June 2012

Cohort Size 2,909 632,294 2,568 548,911 N/A N/A N/A N/A 341 83,383

Previous average no. of offences per offender 7.83 11.12 8.55 12.43 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.40 2.44

% of offenders who reoffend whilst being tracked 28.1 26.9 26.2 25.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A 42.5 36.0

No. of offenders who reoffend whilst being tracked 817 169,991 672 130,732 N/A N/A N/A N/A 145 30,050

Total no. of re-offences committed whilst being tracked 2,176 490,346 1,764 381,461 N/A N/A N/A N/A 412 86,620

Av. number of re-offences committed per offender 2.66 2.88 2.63 2.92 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.84 2.88



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014 The number of calls to the Police reporting Anti-social Behaviour Source: Local Police

Definition Anti social behaviour includes Abandoned Vehicles, Vehicle Nuisance, Rowdy/Inconsiderate Behaviour, Rowdy/Nuisance Neighbours, Malicious/ Nuisance Communications, Street Drinking, Prostitution Related Behaviour, Noise, Begging.


As defined, it is a count of all calls reported to the police.


Ideally we would see a year on year reduction in ASB calls reported to the Police.

2013/14 Target TBC


ASB is a CSP priority and the police generally receive the highest amount of calls for ASB in the bough.


2013/14: 7,541 calls (-2.8% on previous year)2012/13: 7,717 calls (-18% on previous year)2011/12: 9,455 calls


None

Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Monthly 468 598

YTD 468 1066


500

600

700

800

900

1000

2014/15

2013/14


RAG Rate: G

YTD at May 2014 there have been 1,066 calls to the police reporting Anti-Social Behaviour. This is a decrease of 11% on the same period last year (1,183)


Maintain current action to sustain good performance.

Benchmarking Not applicable



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014 The number and % of victims who were satisfied with the way their ASB complaint was dealt with Source: Council ASB Team – Katherine Gilcreest

Definition Anti social behaviour includes Abandoned Vehicles, Vehicle Nuisance, Rowdy/Inconsiderate Behaviour, Rowdy/Nuisance Neighbours, Malicious/ Nuisance Communications, Street Drinking, Prostitution Related Behaviour, Noise, Begging.



Ideally we would see a year on year reduction in ASB calls reported to the Police.

2014/15 Target For monitoring


ASB is a CSP priority and the police generally receive the highest amount of calls for ASB in the bough.

History with this indicator 2013/14: 20 surveys returned, 19 satisfied (95%)


None

Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 YTDTotal returned

surveys 0 2 2

Very Satisfied 0 1 1Fairly Satisfied 0 0 0

Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied 0 1 1

Fairly dissatisfied 0 0 0Very dissatisfied 0 0 0

Overall % satisfied 0% 50% 50%


RAG Rate: A

YTD at May 2014 there have been 2 ASB Satisfaction surveys returned to the council ASB team. 1 of which have been satisfied with the way their ASB complaint was dealt with (50%). The other was neither satisfied or dissatisfied.


Maintain current action to sustain good performance.




Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014 Alcohol Attributable recorded crimes: Crude rate per 1,000 population Source: LAPE

Definition

A crude rate of alcohol recorded crimes per 1,000 populations. This indicator is calculated using the former UK Prime Minister’s Strategy Units alcohol-attributable fractions2 and applying them to the total number of recorded crimes. The alcohol-attributable fractions were taken from the Home Office New English and Welsh Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring System arrestee survey (1999-2001) and were based on urine tests of arrestees.


The crime types used in the calculation are: Violence against the person, Sexual offences, Robbery, Burglary, Theft of a motor vehicle, Theft from a motor vehicle.

Numerators were multiplied by the relevant alcohol-attributable fraction to obtain the number of alcohol-attributable crimes, and results presented as crude rates. For more information please see: http://www.lape.org.uk/downloads/Lape_guidance_and_methods.pdf


To achieve a lower rate per 1,000 populations than last year (12.98 crimes per 1000 population).

2012/13 Targets

Reduction on baseline


Barking and Dagenham has the sixth highest rate of alcohol related crime and violent crime in the country and the fifth highest in London per 1,000 population (using 2009/10 figures). Substance misuse reoffending is a CSP priority in the borough.


Barking and Dagenham: 2011/12 rate per 1,000 population = 12.982010/11 rate per 1,000 population = 13.912009/10 rate per 1,000 population = 15.372008/09 rate per 1,000 population = 15.43


Figures for this indicator are released annually from LAPE. The latest data available is for the 2012/13 period which was released in May 2014.

Annual rate per 1000 residents

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Barking and Dagenham 13.89 14.00 12.45 11.70 10.53London 10.49 10.38 9.98 9.53 9.02England 7.31 6.92 6.54 6.12 5.74

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-139.00

14.00

19.00

Barking and Dagenham Rate per 1,000 population London rate per 1,000 population


RAG Rate: GBarking and Dagenham’s overall rate of alcohol-related recorded crime continues to fall and has dropped from 11.70 in 2011/12 to 10.53 in 2012/13.


Benchmarking 2012/13 performance (10.53) ranks Barking and Dagenham as the 10th highest in the country and is higher than the regional average of 9.02 and the England Average of 5.74Barking and Dagenham is has is ranked25 of 32 (or 9th highest) in London for alcohol related crime.


http://www.lape.org.uk/downloads/Lape_guidance_and_methods.pdf

http://www.nwph.net/alcohol/lape/LAProfile.aspx?reg=h

http://www.nwph.net/alcohol/lape/LAProfile.aspx?reg=h


Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014 Alcohol related hospital admissions and rate per 100,000 population Source: LAPEDefinition People who have attended hospital in relation to alcohol related harm and

have stayed overnight and occupied a bed spaceHow this indicator works

Figures are counted and analysed by the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES).


Good performance would be to have fewer hospital admissions than the baseline.

2012/13 Targets

Reduction on baseline Why this indicator is important

Alcohol-attributable conditions has shown a 8% rise on the previous year (2010-11), resulting in a doubling over a decade. On a national level general health has decreased due to an increase in alcohol consumption since 2004.


2011/12 = 3206 alcohol related hospital admissions (+7%)2010/11 = 2996 alcohol related hospital admissions (+12.3%) 2009/10 = 2667 alcohol related hospital admissions (+9.7%)2011/12= 2425 Rate per 100,000 population (+ 6%) 2010/11= 2287 Rate per 100,000 population (+12%) 2009/10= 2045 Rate per 100,000 population (+9%)


The lasted data available is for the full 2011/12 period and was released in August 2012

Provisional figures up to 2012/13 Qtr 4 were released in October 2013.

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13Barking &

Dagenham 2413.59 (n) / 1872.66 (rate) 2667.91 (n) / 2045.79 (rate) 2996.40 (n) / 2287.36 (rate) 3206.85 (n) / 2425.81 (rate) 3048.20 (n) / 2308.57 (rate)

London 1574.73 (rate) 1778.25 (rate) 2006.92 (rate) 2116.91 (rate) 2147.50 (rate)National 1654.34 (rate) 1812.78 (rate) 1968.93 (rate) 2032.25 (rate) 2031.76 (rate)

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/132300

2800

3300

3800

4300

B&D No. of admissions

2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/131500

2000

2500

3000

B&D London England

Rate per 100,000 population


RAG Rate: G

On average Barking and Dagenham has seen a 10% increase in alcohol-related admissions over the past 9 years (since 2002/3). In comparison the average for London and England was 12% and 10% respectively.

However, the official 2012/13 data shows the number of hospital admissions for the borough has starting to decrease 3048 (-5%) whilst the London average shows a 2.9% increase and the England average shows a 0.93% increase.


Maintain current activity which includes: Continued training of FY ½ junior doctors at fortnightly teaching

sessions, Continued training of 5 hospital Alcohol champions and the

development of multi agency care plans Improving communication with neighbouring hospitals including

Newham and Waltham Forest to improve referrals for B&D residents Further develop the tri borough approach to alcohol liaison work.

Benchmarking The end of 2012/13 results above places Barking and Dagenham as the borough with the 71 highest alcohol related admissions in England and the 13th highest in London which is an improvement on last year (52 highest and 7th highest respectively).



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014The % of offenders who complete an ATR requirement successfully Source: Probation

Definition A successful completion of an Alcohol Treatment Requirement (ATR) as recorded on the Probation case management system. A successful completion is defined an ATR running its full course or has been revoked early by the court for good progress.


Count of individuals successfully completing an ATR divided by the total number of individuals who had their ATR terminated.


Good performance is measured by achieving the set targets.

2014/15 Targets 24 individuals, 70% success rate


This indicator is used by London Probation and the local Substance Misuse Strategy Team to monitor how well the current provision is working.


2013/14: 33 individuals, 62% success rate across B&D and Havering (85% of target)2012/13: 20 individuals, 67%success rate (target 18 individuals, 70%)2011/12: 47 individuals, 70% success (Barking, Dagenham and Havering total)


With the Transforming Rehabilitation process and the transfer of cases across the National Probation Service (London) and the Community Rehabilitation Company (London), Probations reporting structures have significantly changed and was officially implemented on June 1st when they separated into the NPS and CRC. April and May 2014 reports should be available mid July 2014

Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Terminations

monthNot

availableNot

availableSuccessful

terminationsNot

availableNot

availableTotal terminations

YTDNot

availableNot

availableTotal successful terminations YTD

Not available

Not available

% Successful (YTD) Not available

Not available


RAG Rate:

With the Transforming Rehabilitation process and the transfer of cases across the National Probation Service (London) and the Community Rehabilitation Company (London), Probations reporting structures have significantly changed and was officially implemented on June 1st when they separated into the NPS and CRC.

April and May 2014 reports should be available mid July 2014


The Substance Misuse Strategy Team has worked with local treatment providers and probation to resolve any issues. Data has been provided which confirms that the borough level targets for Barking and Dagenham are on track to be achieved and therefore the area of poor performance is with Havering.

Local data shows year to date there have been a total of 20 ATR completions; with another 5 expected to complete by the end of March. This would put us in-line to meet the yearly target.

Benchmarking



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014 The % who successfully complete treatment for drug misuse Source: Substance Misuse Strategy Team

Definition

Successful completions are either classed as ‘Treatment Completed: drug free’, ‘Treatment Completed: alcohol free’ or ‘Treatment Completed: occasional user not heroin or crack’. The indicator measures the proportion of individuals who successfully completed treatment.


This indicator measures the successful completion rate of those individuals who have entered into structured drug treatment in Barking and Dagenham.


The achievement of the yearly target is considered good performance. In 2012/13 there was a target of 65% completion rate.

2014/15 Targets 65% successful completion rate.


The effectiveness of a treatment system is measured by the successful completions that it produces. Public Health England monitor areas on successful completions as a proportion of the overall case load. This ensures that areas are not holding on to a case load of clients for years.

History with this

indicator

2013/14 Barking and Dagenham 72% (286 397) 2012/13 Barking and Dagenham 71% (238 of 335) 2011/12 Barking and Dagenham 63% 2010/11 Barking and Dagenham 57%


Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Monthly 19 TBC

YTD 19 TBCPercentage 83% TBC


10

20

30

40

2014-15

2013-14


RAG Rate: G

The successful completion rate in Barking and Dagenham for April is very good and above the target and performing above the National average (42%) for all service users.


None

BenchmarkingBarking and Dagenham have the fourth highest successful completion rate for OCUs (63%) and the highest for all drug users (83%) out of the 33 London boroughs. Barking and Dagenham are performing in the top quartile (according to Quarter 4 DOMES report) for both opiate and non-opiate successful completions as a proportion of those in treatment.



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014 The % of offenders who successfully complete a DRR (Probation) Source: Probation

Definition

The Drug Rehabilitation Requirement (DRR) is a court order designed to reduce offenders' abuse of drugs and their associated crimes. This indicator measures the percentage of offenders successful completing a DRR out of the total DRRs terminated within the period.


This indicator measures the successful completion rate of those offenders on a Drug Rehabilitation Requirement (DRR)

What good looks like Good performance is measured by achieving the set target for 54.

2014/15 Targets 24 individuals (Barking and Dagenham only)


Crime and substance abuse was identified as a priority area in the 2005 Crime and Disorder Audit and has continued to be an area of focus to date in the borough.


2013/14: 61% (57 people). Target= 54% (38 people) B&D and Havering2012/13: 41% (11 people). Target = 54% (23 people)2011/12: 51% (24 people). Target = 54% (26 people)2010/11: 51% (23 people). Target = 50% (26 people)



April and May 2014 reports should be available mid July 2014Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15

Terminations (month) Not available Not available

Successful terminations Not available Not available

Terminations YTD Not available Not available

Successful terminations

YTDNot available Not available

% Successful (YTD) Not available Not available


RAG Rate: G


April and May 2014 reports should be available mid July 2014


Benchmarking



Community Safety & Public Protection Services / Crime, Justice & Communities Portfolio May 2014 Victim Support Number of Homes Visited and Secured Source: Victim Support

Definition Normally this is provided to the victims of burglaries. This involves visiting the home and providing measures to secure the property against burglary.

How this indicator

works

As described


The more homes that are visited the more properties that should be secure against burglary in the future.

2013/14 Target: Monitoring – Activity should reflect local trends in burglary figures


important

The number of homes visited and secured makes them less likely to be burgled or re-burgled.

History with this

indicator

2013/14: 9882012/13: 1,1172011/12: 1,200


The amount of work produced by the number carpenters employed by the Victims Support Safer Homes Scheme. The number of repeat call outs to premises shows how effective the scheme is.

Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15Month 40 64Year to Date 40 104


50

70

90

110

2014/15

2013/14


RAG Rating: G

In May 2014 the service visited and secured 64 properties. This is in comparison to 105 in May 2013.

Using YTD totals the service has visited and secured 104 fewer properties compared to last year (104 vs 208). However, activity is in line with the decrease in residential burglaries (Down 115 offences or -40%).


No remedial action required



Date post:	05-Dec-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times

Indicators for Community Safety Partnership Performance ...

Documents