Q E T AVE.

Basic Education

Services

Instructional

Leadership

(40%)

1.1. achieves an

Increase of at least

2% proficiency level

in National

Achievement Test in

five core subjects of

Grade 3,6, & 9

SY 2014-2015

Grade 3 ____

Grade 6/9 ____

Ave. ____

Target SY 2015-

2016

Grade 3 ____

Grade 9 ____

Ave. ____

5

Quality

5- 5% and above increase of

proficiency level in core subjects in

National Achievement Test

4- 4% increase of proficiency level

in core subjects in National

Achievement Test

3- 2% increase of proficiency level

in core subjects in National

Achievement Test2- 1% increase of

proficiency level in core subjects in

National Achievement Test

1- no increase of proficiency level in

core subjects in National

Achievement Test

RATING SCORE

Rating Period: January 2015 - December 2015

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

WEIGHT PER

OBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE INDICATORSACTUAL RESULT

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:

Division: Laguna Date of Review:

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Efficiency

5- 61 above of the students reached

the average learning

4- 51-60 % of the students reached

the average learning

3-31-50% of the students reached

average learning

2- 21-30% of the students reached

average learning

1- 10-20 % of the students reached

average learning

1.2 Achieves 60%

proficiency level in

EPP/TLE,MAPEH

and ESP

5

Quality

5- 81% and above increase of

proficiency level in EPP/TLE,

MAPEH and ESP.

4-60-80% increase of proficiency

level in EPP/TLE, MAPEH and ESP.

3- 50-59% increase of proficiency

level in EPP/TLE, MAPEH and ESP.

2-40-49% increase of proficiency

level in EPP/TLE, MAPEH and ESP.

1-39% and below increase of

proficiency level in EPP/TLE,

MAPEH and ESP.

Efficiency

5 – 75% and above are average

performing (51-60)

4. - 60% - 74% are average

performing (51-60)

3 - 50% - 59% are average

performing (51-60)

2 - 40% - 49% are average

performing (51-60)

1 -39% and below are average

performing (51-60)

2.Conducts

Instructional

Supervision

(Classroom

observations, On

the Spot Test,

Checking of

DLL/DLP, etc) to

100% of the

teachers every

month for small

school / 90% for

medium school/

75% for big school.

School Category:

Small School – 20

teachers and below

Medium School – 21

– 49 teachers

Big School – 50

teachers and above

10 Quality

5- always give feedback to teachers

observed/supervised, make follow

up and give recognition

4- always give feedback to teachers

observed/supervised and make

follow up

3-always give feedback to the

teachers observed/supervised

2- seldom give feedback to the

teachers observed/supervised

1- No feedback to the teachers

observed/supervised

Efficiency

5- Conduct Instructional Supervision

( 130% for small school / 100% for

medium school / 85% for big school

)4- Conduct Instructional Supervision

(120% for small school / 110% for

medium school

/ 95% for big school

3- Conduct Instructional Supervision

( 100% for small school / 90% for

medium school / 75% for big school)

2- Conduct Instructional Supervision

( 80% for small school / 70% for

medium / 40% for big school)

1- Conduct Instructional Supervision

( 60% for small school / 50% for

medium school /20% for big school)

Timeliness

5- Submit report on supervision

every 3rd day of succeeding month

4- Submit report on supervision

every 5th day of succeeding month

3- Submit report on supervision

every 7th day of succeeding month

2 Submit report on supervision every

10th day of succeeding month

1- Submit report on supervision

every 15th day of succeeding

month

3. Check and

monitor 80% of

teachers’ records

monthly/quarterly

such as

2.1 class record

2.2 Form 137

2.3 Form 138

2.4. Modified SFs

10 Quality

5- check teachers’ records

monthly/quarterly such as class

records, form 137, form 138,

Modified SFs, give feedback and

recognize performance

4- check teachers’ records

monthly/quarterly such as class

record, form 137, form 138 ,

Modified SFs and give feedback

3- check teachers' records

monthly/quarterly such as class

record, form 137, form

138 and Modified SFs.

2- take note of names of teachers

who have records such as class

record, form 137, form 138 and

Modified SFs monthly/quarterly

1- does not take note nor check

teachers records monthly/quarterly

such as class record, form 137, form

138 and Modified SFs

Efficiency

5- check 100% of the teachers’

records monthly such as class

records, form 137, form 138,

Modified SFs

4- check 90% of the teachers’

records monthly such as class

record, form 137, form 138 and

Modified SFs

3-check 80% of the teachers’

records monthly such as class

record, form 137, form 138 and

Modified SFs

2- check 70% of the teachers’

records monthly

such as class record, form 137, form

138 and Modified SFs

1 - check 60% of the teachers’

records monthly

such as class record, form 137, form

138 and Modified SFs4. Recommend

localized curriculum

instruction

10 Quality

5-30% of the teacher initiated,

implemented and shared

4-30% of the teacher initiated,

implemented

3-30% of the teacher initiated

localized curriculum instruction with

proposal

2-30% of the teacher initiated,

localized curriculum intervention

without proposal

1-No teacher initiated localized

curriculum instruction

Efficiency

5-50% and above

4-40-49%

3-30-39%

20-29%

1-1-19% utilized by the teacher

Timeliness

5-75% of the teacher utilized

localized curriculum initiated at the

end of the 2nd quarter

4-75% of the teacher utilized

localized curriculum initiated at the

end of the 3rd quarter

3-75% of the teacher utilized

localized curriculum initiated at the

end of the 4th quarter

2-50% of the teacher utilized

localized curriculum initiated at the

end of the 4th quarter

1--20% of the teacher utilized

localized curriculum initiated at the

end of the 4th quarter

Learning

Environment

(10%)

1. Enhances

stakeholders'

awareness and

supported the

implementation and

sustainability of

Child Protection

Policy (DEPED

Order #40 s. 2012)

throughout the

school year with the

following

mechanisms such

as school policy,

reports, information

materials, advocacy

activities, regular

meetings, inventory.

4 Quality

5- All mechanisms are present

supported by the evidences

4- All mechanisms are present

except for some minimal

requirements

3-All mechanisms are present but

without evidences

2-Incomplete mechanisms and

absence of reports

1-Mechanisms and reports are

missing

Efficiency

5-100% stakeholders' awareness

was enhanced, supported and

sustained the implementation of

DepEd Order No. 40 s., 2012.

4-85-99% stakeholders' awareness

was enhanced, supported and

sustained the implementation of

DepEd Order No. 40 s., 2012.

3-75-84% stakeholders' awareness

was enhanced, supported and

sustained the implementation of

DepEd Order No. 40, s. 2012

2-60-74% stakeholders' awareness

was enhanced, supported and

sustained the implementation of

DepEd Order No. 40, s. 2012

1-59 % stakeholders' awareness

was enhanced, supported and

sustained the implementation of

DepEd Order No. 40, s. 2012

TIMELINESS

5 – two days before the due

date(Date:_______)

4 – one day before the due date

(Date:_______)

3 – due date (Date:_______)

2 – one day after the due date

(Date:_______)

1 - two days after the due date 2.Implemented the

Disaster Risk

Reduction

Management

(DRRM )

mobilization plans to

stakeholders the

whole year round.

3 QUALITY

5 – has DRRM mobilization plan and

religiously implemented with

complete documentation

4 – has DRRM mobilization plan and

occassionaly implemented with

complete documentation

3 – has DRRM mobilization plan and

occassionaly implemented with

incomplete documentation

2 – has DRRM mobilization plan and

poorly implemented with incomplete

documentation

1 – has DRRM mobilization plan but

no evidence of implementation.

EFFICIENCY

5 - 100% of the stakeholders were

involved in the implementation of

mobilization plan

4 - 85-99% of the stakeholders were

involved in the implementation of

mobilization plan

3 - 75-84% of the stakeholders were

involved in the implementation of

mobilization plan

2 - 60-74% of the stakeholders were

involved in the implementation of

mobilization plan

1 - 59% and below of the

stakeholders were involved in the

implementation of mobilization planTIMELINESS

5 – two days before due

date(Date:_______)

4 – two days before due date

(Date:_______)

3 – due date as indicated in the

mobilization plan

2 – one month after the due date

(Date:_______)

1- None

3. Evaluated and

submitted reports of

the school plant,

physical facilities

such as ICT. H.E.,

Canteen, Classroom

buildings,comfort

rooms,worshop

rooms,school

fences as to their

fitness, safety and

sufficiency assisted

by the LGU /

concerned citizen as

learning support

system within the

school year.

3QUALITY

5 - high improvement/maintenance

are evident.

4- moderate

improvement/maintenance are

evident.

3-improvement/ maintenance are

evident.

2- improvement/ maintenance are

less evident.

1- not improved/maintained physical

facilities

EFFICIENCY

5- 100% of the physical facilities are

safe, fitted and efficient as evaluated

4- 85-99% of the physical facilities

are safe, fitted and efficient as

evaluated.

3- 75% - 84% of the physical

facilities are safe, fitted and efficient

as evaluated.

2- 60% -74% of the physical

facilities are safe, fitted as evaluated

1-59% and below of the physical

facilities are safe and fitted as

evaluated

TIMELINESS

5- Evaluated the school

plant,physical facilities,safety and

sufficiency wih the assistance of

proper authorities/specialist

quarterly.

4- Evaluated the school

plant,physical facilities,safety and

sufficiency wih the assistance of

proper authorities/specialist twice a

year.

3- Evaluated the school

plant,physical facilities,safety and

sufficiency wihout the assistance of

proper authorities/specialist two

times a year.

2- Evaluated the school

plant,physical facilities,safety and

sufficiency wihout the assistance of

proper authorities/specialist at once

a year

1- No evaluation of school

plant,physical facilities was done.Parents’

Involvement

and

Community

Partnership(10

%)

1.Conduct PTA

Meetings to

confer/inform about

school policies,

programs , projects

and

accomplishments in

a year

4 Quality

5 -81-100% of the PTA officers

participated /attended the meeting

4-61-80% of the PTA officiers

participate/attended the meeting

3-41-60% of the PTA officiers

participate/attended the meeting

2-21-40% of the PTA officiers

participate/attended the meeting

1-20% of the PTA officiers

participate/attended the meeting

Efficiency

5-Conducted 5 PTA meetings in a

year

4-Conducted 4 PTA meetings in a

year

3 - Conducted 3 PTA meetings in a

year

2 - Conducted 2 PTA meetings in a

year

1-Conducted 1 PTA meetings in a

yearTimeliness

5-Conducted PTA Meeting before

the beginning of School year and

before every end of the quarter of a

school year

4-Conducted PTA Meeting at the

beginning of School year and before

every end of the quarter of a school

year

3-Conducted PTA Meeting at the

beginning of School year and every

end of the quarter of a school year

2-Conducted PTA Meeting at the

beginning of the school year and

anytime of the year.

1-Conducted PTA Meeting without

following the schedule

2.Establishes

sustainable

linkages/partnership

with two

sectors:,agencies,L

GU’s,NGO’s based

on SIP/AIP

implementation

through MOA/MOU

using adopt-a

school program

policies.

3 Quality

5-Effectively implement the

MOA/MOU ,deed of donation with

stakeholder in a year

4-Executed 3 Implement the

MOA/MOU ,deed of donation with

external stakeholder in a year

3-Executed MOA/MOU ,deed of

donation with external stakeholder in

a year

2-Verbal Agreement with external

stakeholder in a year

1-Partner/s were just identifiedEfficiency

5-Four linkages establish

sustainable partnership in a year

4-Three linkages establish

sustainable partnership in a year

3- Three linkages establish

sustainable partnership in a year

2-Two linkages establish

sustainable partnership in a year

1-One linkage establish sustainable

partnership in a year

Timeliness

5-Partnership was done before the

beginning of school year

4-Partnership was done at the

beginning of school year3-

Partnership was done in the first

quarter of school year

2- Partnership was done in the

second quarter of school year

1- Partnership was done in the third

quarter of school year3.Promote the

image of the school

using different

strategies such as:

SOSA, Learners’

projects exhibit,

academic meetings,

cultural shows,etc.

in a year

3 Quality

5-81-100% of the

parents/community participated in

the promotion of the image of the

school

4-61-80% of the parents/community

participated in the promotion of the

image of the school

3-41-60% of the parents/community

participated in the promotion of the

image of the school

2-21-40% of the parents/community

participated in the promotion of the

image of the school

1-20% of the parents/community

participated in the promotion of the

image of the school

Efficiency

5-Conducted 5 activities to promote

the image of the school

4-Conducted 4 activities to promote

the image of the school

3-Conducted 3 activities to promote

the image of the school

2-Conducted 2 activities to promote

the image of the school

1-Conducted 1 activity to promote

the image of the schoolTimeliness

5-All activities were done as

scheduled

4-85% of the activities were done as

scheduled

3-75% of the Activities were done as

scheduled

2-65% of the activities were done as

schedules

1-55% of the activities were done as

scheduled

School

Leadership

and

Management(2

0%)

1.Manage school

funds such as

MOOE, canteen

funds and other

funds based on the

SIP,AIP and APP

5 Quality

5-100% of the funds allocated for

the month were utilized based on the

needs and priorities stated in the

AIP, APP

4-85% of the funds allocated for the

month were utilized based on the

needs and priorities stated in the

AIP, APP

3-75% of the funds allocated for the

month were utilized based on the

needs and priorities stated in the

AIP, APP

2-65% of the funds allocated for the

month were utilized based on the

needs and priorities stated in the

AIP, APP

1-50% of the funds allocated for the

month were utilized based on the

needs and priorities stated in the

AIP, APPEfficiency

5-No deficit in any of the school

funds during the year

4-one instance of deficit during the

year

3-two instances of deficit during the

year

2-three instances of deficit during

the year

1-four instances of deficit during

the year

Timeliness

5-Liquidate and submit financial

reports 5 days before the due date

4-Liquidate and submit financial

reports 2 days before the due date

3-Liquidate and submit financial

reports on the due date

2-Liquidate and submit financial

reports 2days after the due date

1-Liquidate and submit financial

reports 5 days after the due date2.Assign

appropriate

personnel to

manage school

operation such as

canteen manager,

school property

custodian,

inspection officer,

guidance

counsellor,

subject/year level

coordinators based

on qualifications

5 Quality

5-100% of the school personnel

were appropriately designated

based on their qualifications

5-85% of the school personnel were

appropriately designated based on

their qualifications

5-75% of the school personnel were

appropriately designated based on

their qualifications

5-65% of the school personnel were

appropriately designated based on

their qualifications

5-50% of the school personnel were

appropriately designated based on

their qualifications

Efficiency

5-Perfrom assigned functions

promptly

4-One instance of delayed

submission throughout the year

3-two instances of delayed

submission throughout the year

2-three instance of delayed

submission throughout the year

1-more than three instance of

delayed submission throughout the

yearTimeliness

5-Assignment of personnel prepared

a month before the start of the

school year

4-Assignment of personnel prepared

three weeks before the start of the

school year

3-Assignment of personnel prepared

two weeks before the start of the

school year

2-Assignment of personnel prepared

one weeks before the start of the

school year

1-Assignment of personnel prepared

at the start of the school year

3. Prepares and

consolidates reports

monthly, quarterly

and annually

(observation of

classes, adopt-a-

school program,

canteen report etc.)

5 Quality

5-100% of the consolidated reports

were submitted using the prescribed

format/template

4-85% of the consolidated reports

were submitted using the prescribed

format/template 3-75% of

the consolidated reports were

submitted using the prescribed

format/template

2-65% of the consolidated reports

were submitted using the prescribed

format/template

1-50% of the consolidated reports

were submitted using the prescribed

format/templateEfficiency

5-100% of the consolidated reports

submitted accurately

4- 85 of the consolidated reports

submitted accurately

3- 75 of the consolidated reports

submitted accurately

2- 65% of the consolidated reports

submitted accurately

1-50% of the consolidated reports

submitted accurately

Timeliness

5-Submit required reports two days

before the due date

4-Submit required reports a day

before the due date

3-Submit required reports on the

specified due date

2-Submit required reports one day

after the due date

Submit required reports 2 days

after the due date4. Organizes

appropriate class

programs, ADM,

flexible learning

options as stop-gap

measures

5 Quality

5-Organized excellent appropriate

and effective class program,ADM,

flexible learning options as stop-gap

measures

4-Organized very appropriate and

effective class program,ADM,

flexible learning options as stop-gap

measures

3-Organized appropriate and

effective class program, ADM,

flexible learning options as stop-gap

measures

2-Organized appropriate class

program, ADM, flexible learning

options as stop-gap measures

1-Organized effective class program

, ADM, flexible learning options as

stop-gap measures

Efficiency

5- Zero Drop-out Rate

4- 0.2% Drop-out Rate

3- 0.5% Drop-out Rate

2 - 1% Drop-out Rate

1 – 2% and above Drop-out Rate Human

Resource

management

and

development(1

0%)

1.Provide technical

assistance to

teachers thru

conduct of LAC

session, INSET

and research

4 Quality

5- 100% technical assistance were

provided

4-85% technical assistance were

provided

3-75% technical assistance were

provided

2-65% technical assistance were

provided

1-55 % technical assistance were

providedEfficiency

5-100% of the teachers were

provided technical assistance with

required documents

4-85% of the teachers were

provided technical assistance with

required documents

3-75% of the teachers were provided

technical assistance with required

documents

2-65% of the teachers were provided

technical assistance with required

documents

1-50% of the teachers were provided

technical assistance with required

documents

Timeliness

5-before the target date

4-due date

2-one week late

1-none2. Monitors

learning resources

of teachers such as

- instructional

materials

- LM

- TG

-Curriculum Guide

-test item bank

-students portfolio

etc.

3 Quality

5- 100% availability of learning

resources

4-85% availability of learning

resources

3-75% availability of learning

resources

2- 65%availability of learning

resources

1-50%availability of learning

resourcesEfficiency

5-100% of the teachers monitored

regarding their learning resources

4-85% of the teachers monitored

regarding their learning resources

3-75% of the teachers monitored

regarding their learning resources

2-65% of the teachers monitored

regarding their learning resources

1-50% of the teachers monitored

regarding their learning resourcesTimeliness

5-before the target date

4-due date

2-one week late

1-none

3. Practices

equitable

distribution of

workloads based

on qualifications

3

Quality

5-100% of teachers given standard

workload based on their qualification

4-85% of teachers given standard

workload based on their qualification

3-75% of teachers given standard

workload based on their qualification

2-65% of teachers given standard

workload based on their qualification

1-50% of teachers given standard

workload based on their qualification

Timeliness

5-before the target date

4-due date

2-one week late

1-nonePLUS

FACTOR

10%

TOTAL 100%