75
Individual Vessel Performance Dialogue November 2009 Performance Individual Vessel Performance Dashboards and Action Plans December 29 th , 2009
Individual Vessel Performance DialogueNovember 2009 Performance
Individual Vessel Performance Dashboards and Action PlansDecember 29th, 2009
Session Owner Time
Team’s Updates Team1330 – 1415
Individual Vessel Performance – Own Fleet
Own Fleet & Oversight1415 – 1445
VESSEL PERFORMANCE DIALOGUE AGENDA
Individual vessel performance – Charter Fleet Charter1445 – 1530
2
Session Owner Time
Team’s Updates Team1330 – 1415
Individual Vessel Performance – Own Fleet
Own Fleet & Oversight1415 – 1445
VESSEL PERFORMANCE DIALOGUE AGENDA
Individual vessel performance – Charter Fleet Charter1445 – 1530
3
OVERVIEW PROSES EVALUASI KINERJA KAPAL (YTD NOVEMBER 2009)
81714,84814,031
-5.5%
�������������� ��
1,908
11620136
13,895
-99%
OT BBM
OT Crude
Slow Pumping
8771010412
Operation (BOC)
Charter, Own Fleet, Oversight
Operation (OT)*
� ��� �� � � ��� � �� �� � �� � �
4Source : PMS Team Analysis, OT, BOC, K&A
4,370 3,852
10,47810,179
Actual Un-Classified
Well Documented
2,939
Evaluated
3,720
Un-Claimable
6,159
Claimable
9,879
Un-Evaluated
-23%
156
1,908
11,96712,123-14%
Slow Speed/Over Bunker
R2 Loss
1176390270
ClaimableIn ProgressUn-Claimable
To Be Clarified
Not Yet Received
5,889
11041913323
� � �� � � � �! ��� � �� � � � " ! "
# � $ % & � ��
�� �' �& � �
��(& �
� �� $ ���( '
��(& �
���()($ ��(�
* ������+ �����
�& , �� � �& � �
DETAIL OVERVIEW KELENGKAPAN DOKUMEN, EVALUASI, DAN PENINGKATAN KINERJA KAPAL (YTD NOVEMBER 2009)
- . - / - 0 - 1
41%Avg
97%M/C
11%TTS
Target 42.0
-47%
Target 100.0%
-11%OT BBM & BBK ����2# �� # (�3 % �( 4 ����& � �5 ��24 �� 3 ���6 �, ��
* ������7
����� � � �� � � � �� ���� � � �� � �� �
����� ��� �� � � � ����� � � � � � � �
����� � ����
����� � �� � �
5
11%TTS
14%L/A
38%Avg.
88%M/C
16%TTS
8%L/A
22.1Avg.
29.6SSOB
36.3R2 Loss
0.4Slow Pump
89.0%Avg.
76.7%SSOB
97.0%
Slow Pump 93.3%
R2 Loss
OT Crude, Black, & Petrochemical
� �� �� � �� � � � �� ! " �# �$ $ % �& � ��
�� �� � ����� # ��� �� ��' � ��(�� �� ��& � �� � ��
) � �� �� ' �� # ��� �� ��� ' � � ��' � ��(� �� �& � ��
� � � *�� � � �� � �
�(� *��� � �� ��� � + ��
��� *��� � , � ���� � �� & � � �
- (� � *�- � � �� + � ��� ' �
Source : PMS Team Analysis, OT, BOC, K&A, Kehand. Kapal
����� � �� � �
������ � ��
� � ���6 ���, �3 ��� 6 ( ��8�
UNTUK MENDUKUNG PENINGKATAN KINERJA KAPAL, TIM TELAH MENYUSUN JADWAL KEGIATAN ANTAR FUNGSI SETIAP BULAN BERJALAN YANG SALING TERINTEGRASI
1 – 5 (Stretch)1 – 7 (Base)
Fungsi
Pengisiandata VMIS
OT
ISP AnalisaKinerja Kapal
28
PelaksanaanVPD
26 – 27
PersiapanMateri
15 – 2614 – 15 13 (Next Month)
EvaluasiProses
AnalisaOperasional
Monitor Operasional Kapal danPenyimpanan Data/Dokumen
6Source : PMS Team Analysis; Interview
BOC
Charter
Own Fleet
Oversight
AnalisaPotensi Klaim
PembuatanAction Plan
PembuatanAction Plan
PembuatanAction Plan
SindikasiPerhitungan
KlaimPemanggilan
Owner
ProsesKlaim
PerbaikanKapal
PerbaikanKapal
1. VPD Improvement Process ISP2. Implementasi New Master Cable BOC, OT3. Klaim slow pumping terintegrasi dengan VMIS BOC4. Monitoring Klaim Out Operation BOC5. Review Jadwal Docking Oversight/OF
Initiatives Departement
TIM LINTAS FUNGSI TELAH MERUMUSKAN BEBERAPA INISIATIF YANG AKAN DILAKSANAKAN DI TAHUN 2010 SEBAGAI UPAYA LANJUTAN UNTUK MENDUKUNG PENINGKATAN KINERJA KAPAL
7
5. Review Jadwal Docking Oversight/OF6. Review Fixture Note Oversight/OF7. Penerapan Planned Maintenance System Oversight/OF8. Pembuatan Database Rekapitulasi Klaim Charter9. Support Pembuatan Database Klaim IT – SSA10.Online Dokumen Operasional IT – SSA
Seluruh inisiatif tersebut akan dievaluasi pelaksanaannya dalam rapat bulanan yang dilaksanakansetiap tanggal 13 dikoordinasikan oleh fungsi Implementasi Strategi Perkapalan.
Source : PMS Team Analysis; Interview
Original Plan
Revised plan (delayed)
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
Identification
• Identify VMIS system improvement (parameter, report interface).
• Identify process, data flow, SOP, and priority for improvement.
• Update VMIS System (calculations &
Activity
• Update process flow, data flow,master cable
System Update
VMIS IMPROVEMENT UPDATEVMIS – Suwandi & Team Revised plan (accelerated)
• �������� � �� ��������� ���
�� �������������������� �� ���
������� ����
Achievements
�������� ����� �������
12/29/09
• Set up new VMIS system
• Trial run, getting feedback and update
• Revise SOP if needed
Trial Run and Ongoing
• Update VMIS System (calculations & Algorithms)
• Link to MySAP process
• Remapping required information in theVMIS that need to link
• Upgrade data from old VMIS to new VMIS.
Link to MySAP
8
������ ��
! ���� � �������� ����� �������
����"���#�������
• ������������� �����$��������
%& '()
• *����� ��#�� �����
• +���������� �������'���
Help needed
Source : VMIS Team
Session Owner Time
Team’s Updates Team1330 – 1415
Individual Vessel Performance – Own Fleet
Own Fleet & Oversight1415 – 1445
VESSEL PERFORMANCE DIALOGUE AGENDA
Individual vessel performance – Charter Fleet Charter1445 – 1530
9
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –OWN BL
OWN BL NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
S190
85
80
75
70
Average= 87
1 / (Age of vessel)
Poor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 S1 PANDAN
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
10*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000
70
65
60
55
50
Average= 11,448
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –OWN SM I
OWN SM I NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
S6
S1
S2
S3S4S5
100
95
90
85
80
75
Average= 87
1 / (Age of vessel)
Poor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 S1 MANGUN JAYA
S2 MELAHIN
S3 MENGGALA
S4 MERBAU
S5 MINAS
S6 MUNDU
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
11*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000
75
70
65
60
55
50
Average= 9,495
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT MELAHIN
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 55.96
Comm. Days
65.70
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: LUWUK• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – OWN SM I
9353.068442.09
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM I (OWN)Flag: INDWT: 3,500 LTYOB (Age): 1985 (24 years)Safety Ranking: Bunker Type: MDOCargo Type: WO
Programmer : PUTU D.(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: M(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
5
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HARRIE SETIARDJO
12
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
4792.84 9353.067476.67 8442.09
0
0
0
1
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(30.77)
Fleetave.
(11.0)
00
16
73
632
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD -
10 11 12MelahinR2 Loss : Berdasar data VMIS 8 call di atas 0,1%. Setelah di cek terhadap data SPR tidak terdapat loss di atas 0,1%. Setelah dibandingkan data VMIS dengan SPR, angkanilai SFAL pada VMIS sama dengan angka BL, sedangkan pada SPR tidak. Action Plan : perbaikan data, kirim nota pemberitahuan bila terjadi loss.
OT BBMBOCFleet Supp.
Vessel Speed : Berdasar data VMIS 8 call tercatat slow speed. Setelah dibandingkandengan data SPR untuk call tersebut memang terjadi slow speed. Pelayaran pada saatperiode tersebut berada di line timur dengan kondisi angin 4 skala beaufort. Action Plan : monitor pergerakan kapal.
OT BBMTech. FleetFleet Supp.
Activity Responsible
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
13
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –OWN SM II
OWN SM II NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
A8
S1
S4
S5
S2
S6
S7100
95
90
85
80
75
Average= 84
1 / (Age of vessel)
Poor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 S1 KATOMAS
S2 KETALING
S3 KLASOGUN
S4 KLAWOTONG
S5 KRASAK
S6 KUANG
S7 KURAU
A8 PLAJU
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
14*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
S3
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000
75
70
65
60
55
50
Average= 10,409
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT KETALING
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 0.00 31.58 91.53 77.05
Comm. Days
74.19
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: TELUK SEMANGKA -
DEPOT• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – OWN SM II
45897.9510842.2
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM II (OWN)Flag: PADWT: 6,500 LTYOB (Age): 1998 (11 years)Safety Ranking: Bunker Type: MDOCargo Type: BO
Programmer : ABIDIN S.(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: M(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
3
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:LUKITO WIBOWO
15
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3226.67 45897.9514422.5310842.2
0
0
0
3
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(40.74074)
Fleetave.
(16.10113)
00
74
3
2034
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD -
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT KLASOGUN
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
94.28 90.91 23.66 4.91 61.25
Comm. Days
65.88
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: BENOA• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – OWN SM II
45897.957467.92
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM II (OWN)Flag: PADWT: 6,500 LTYOB (Age): 1999 (10 years)Safety Ranking: Bunker Type: MDOCargo Type: WO
Programmer : HARI NUNU G. B.(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: M(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
4
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:FERRY F.
16
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3226.67 45897.9514422.537467.92
0
0
0
1
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(40.74074)
Fleetave.
(16.10113)
02
11
141328
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD -
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT PLAJU
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 92.65 0.00 76.10 82.27
Comm. Days
79.56
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: KENDARI• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – OWN SM II
3226.67 45897.9510466.83
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM II (OWN)Flag: PADWT: 6,500 LTYOB (Age): 2004 (5 years)Safety Ranking: Bunker Type: MDOCargo Type: AVTUR
Programmer : ASEP S.(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: M(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
9
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:DWI M. ABDU
17
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3226.67 45897.9514422.5310466.83
0
0
0
2
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(40.74074)
Fleetave.
(16.10113)
00
8
64
1129
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD -
121110Activity
IT – SSABOCTech. FleetFleet Supp.
Vessel Speed : Berdasar data VMIS terdapat 5 call slow speed. Setelah di cek dengandata SPR untuk voyage tersebut memang terjadi slow speed namun dalam nilai yang sangat kecil. Pada data VMIS terjadi slow speed yang sangat besar akibat perbedaanjarak yang dicatat pada VMIS dengan SPR.
VMIS SPRttm - cam 184 195cam - twi 40 105
IT – SSAOT CrudeBOCOversight
Klasogun
Vessel Speed : terjadi slow speed yang besar saat perjalanan dari CLC ke DUM denganwaktu tempuh mencapai 3 hari (jarak tempuh CLC-DUM 997 Mil).Action Plan : perlu dicek kemungkinan terjadinya error jarak tempuh; analisa ulang dankirim pemberitahuan apabila masih terjadi slow speed.
BOCOversight
R2 Loss : terdapat 1 call dengan loss 0.97% saat bongkar cargo MFO di BTM (voy 29).Action Plan : akan dikirimkan nota pemberitahuan terjadinya loss.
KetalingResponsible
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
BOCOversight
Vessel Speed : akibat masalah pada M/E cylinder liner.Action Plan : Saat ini Cylinder Liner telah diganti pada bulan Dec. 09 di TTW.
Plaju
OT BBMBOCTech. FleetFleet Supp.
Pumping Rate : Berdasar data VMIS terdapat 2 kejadian slow pump yaitu pada saatmelakukan pembongkaran di benoa dan ampenan karena kondisi tanki darat di benoatinggi dan jauh.Action Plan : Monitor kegiatan bongkar cargo di Benoa; koordinasi dengan Port danMarine untuk tindak lanjut perbaikan slow pump di Benoa.
cam - twi 40 105bno - amp 45 56Action Plan : Perbaikan data jarak dalam VMIS; cek ulang call yang mengalami slow speed setelah dilakukan perbaikan jarak dan kirimkan nota perbaikan.
18
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –OWN GP
OWN GP NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
S3
S4
S2S5
S6
100
95
90
85
80
75
Average= 85
1 / (Age of vessel)
Poor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 S1 PALU SIPAT
S2 PALUH TABUHAN
S3 PEGADEN
S4 PELITA
S5 PEMATANG
S6 PUNGUT
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
19*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
S1
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
75
70
65
60
55
50
Average= 8,112
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT PALU SIPAT
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 0.00 41.67 0.00 100.00
Comm. Days
70.72
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: BALIKPAPAN• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – OWN GP
12181.763631.04
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): GP (OWN)Flag: INDWT: 17,674 LTYOB (Age): 2000 (9 years)Safety Ranking: Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: BO
Programmer : ABIDIN S.(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: M(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
6
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:LUKITO WIBOWO
20
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3320.48 12181.766247.57
0
0
0
0
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(55)
Fleetave.
(15.59555)
006
112
1434
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD -
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT PEGADEN
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 0.00 58.61 84.73 100.00
Comm. Days
82.83
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: TANJUNG WANGI• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – OWN GP
12181.764766.23
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): GP (OWN)Flag: INDWT: 17,500 LTYOB (Age): 1988 (21 years)Safety Ranking: Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: WO
Programmer : KAMIL(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: M(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
7
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HERU HUTOMO
21
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3320.48 12181.766247.574766.23
0
0
0
0
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(55)
Fleetave.
(15.59555)
00
9
41
519
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD -
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT PELITA
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 0.00 0.00 77.54 100.00
Comm. Days
74.92
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: TANJUNG WANGI• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – OWN GP
12181.76
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): GP (OWN)Flag: INDWT: 17,723 LTYOB (Age): 1981 (28 years)Safety Ranking: Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: BO
Programmer : ABIDIN S.(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: M(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
8
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:LUKITO WIBOWO
22
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
12181.766247.573320.48
0
0
0
0
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(55)
Fleetave.
(15.59555)
004
8
6
1129
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD -
12109 11Activity
PegadenR2 Loss : terdapat 2 call dengan loss tinggi yaitu 0.80% saat bongkar cargo Premium di TTM (voy 28) dan 0.85% saat bongkar cargo Pertamax di SMR (voy 29)Action Plan : akan dikirimkan nota pemberitahuan terjadinya loss.
Pumping Rate : terjadi slow pump akibat posisi tanki darat yang tinggi menyebabkanBack pressure, namun dari sisi tekanan sudah mencapai standar (9 kg/cm2). Action Plan : monitor kegiatan kapal di pelabuhan.
BOCOversight
Pelita
Responsible
BOCOversight
Vessel Speed : slow speed terjadi akibat adanya masalah di Main Engine.Action Plan : akan dilakukan perbaikan saat melaksanakan dry dock.
OT BBMBOCOversight
BOCOversight
R2 Loss : 1 call dengan loss sebesar 0.78% saat bongkar MFO di BPP (voy 19).Action Plan : akan dikirimkan nota pemberitahuan terjadinya loss.
Palu Sipat
R2 Loss : Berdasar data VMIS terdapat 3 call dengan loss lebih dari 0,1%. Setelahdilakukan check terhadap data SPR ternyata tidak terdapat loss lebih dari 0,1%. Loss
OT Crude
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
OT CrudeBOCTech FleetFleet Supp.
dilakukan check terhadap data SPR ternyata tidak terdapat loss lebih dari 0,1%. Loss lebih dari 0,1% kemungkinan disebabkan kesalahan input pada data VMIS, dimanaangka SFAL sama dengan BL. Action Plan : perbaikan data, kirim nota pemberitahuan bila terjadi loss.
BOCFleet Supp.
Vessel Speed : Berdasar data VMIS terdapat 4 call slow speed. Setelah dibandingkanterhadap data SPR memang terdapat slow speed untuk call tersebut. Sudah dilakukankonfirmasi pada OS bahwa memang slow speed terjadi karena penggumpalan kotorandi economizer sehingga aliran gas buang tidak lancar.Action Plan : Saat ini sedang dilakukan proses pembersihan hanya saja belum optimal mengingat kapal sangat mobile untuk memenuhi kebutuhan operasi
23
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –OWN MR
OWN MR NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
S3
S2
S5
S7
S6
R1
90
85
80
75
70
Average= 80
1 / (Age of vessel)
Poor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 R1 CENDRAWASIH
S2 ENDURO
S3 FASTRON
S4 SANGA-SANGA
S5 SELE
S6 SEPINGGAN
S7 SERANG JAYA
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
24*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
S4
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000
70
65
60
55
50
Average= 3,406
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT SANGA-SANGA
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 91.79 0.00 40.11 50.00
Comm. Days
66.48
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: BALIKPAPAN• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – OWN MR
4179.23
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): MR (OWN)Flag: INDWT: 29,944 LTYOB (Age): 1983 (26 years)Safety Ranking: Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: WO
Programmer : HARIS A. S.(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: M(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
10
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HERU HUTOMO
25
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
1902.87 4179.232840.01 2944.71
0
0
0
2
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(70.45454)
Fleetave.
(19.80107)00
6
46217
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD -
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT SELE
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 94.95 44.23 0.00 79.48
Comm. Days
75.33
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: BALONGAN• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – OWN MR
4179.232240.88
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): MR (OWN)Flag: INDWT: 29,990 LTYOB (Age): 1983 (26 years)Safety Ranking: Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: WO
Programmer : HARIS A. S.(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: M(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
11
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HERU HUTOMO
26
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
1902.87 4179.232840.012240.88
0
0
0
3
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(70.45454)
Fleetave.
(19.80107)00
5
161627
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD -
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT SEPINGGAN
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 89.75 20.98 0.00 92.56
Comm. Days
75.52
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: SURABAYA• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – OWN MR
4179.23
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): MR (OWN)Flag: INDWT: 29,941 LTYOB (Age): 1982 (27 years)Safety Ranking: Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: WO
Programmer : HARIS A. S.(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: M(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
12
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HERU HUTOMO
27
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
1902.87 4179.232840.01 4037.57
0
0
0
2
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(70.45454)
Fleetave.
(19.80107)00
2
132
926
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD -
117 8 9 10 12
BOCFleet Supp.Tech. Fleet
Activity Responsible
OT BBMBOCFleet Supp.Tech. Fleet
Sanga-SangaVessel Speed : terdapat 1 call yang mengalami slow speed saat perjalanan dari BAL keSBY dengan waktu tempuh hingga 5 hari dari yang seharusnya hanya +1 hari. Action Plan : perlu dilakukan pengecekan data VMIS, kemungkinan terjadi salah input; Namun bila terjadi slow speed, perlu dicek penyebab keterlambatan kapal.Pumping Rate : terdapat 3 call yang mengalami slow pump, antara lain saat bongkardi SBY cargo Solar dan BAL cargo Naptha (voy. 30), di JKT cargo Solar (Voy. 31).Action Plan : dicek data historis disch kapal Sanga-sanga dan akan dicari penyebabnya.SeleVessel Speed : Berdasar data VMIS terdapat 5 call slow speed. Berdasarkan data SPR hanya satu kali terjadi slow speed pada awal bulan dengan selisih yang tidak terlalu jauhdari target. Problem pada gyro repeater sehingga kemudi harus digerakkan manual.Action Plan : Akan segera dilakukan perbaikan Gyro repeater.
BOCFleet Supp.Tech. Fleet
Pumping Rate : dari data VMIS terdapat 3 kejadian slow pump. Berdasarkanpada SPR tidak terjadi kejadian slow pump. Kemungkinan pencatatan slow pump karena request
Fleet Supp.
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
tidak terjadi kejadian slow pump. Kemungkinan pencatatan slow pump karena request pihak darat yang lebih rendah dan adanya temporary stop. Action Plan : meningkatkan kinerja kapal melalui koordinasi dengan Master kapal; monitor pergerakan kapal.
Tech. FleetOT BBM
Sepinggan : Vessel Speed : Berdasar data VMIS tercatat 4 call slow speed, setelah dibandingkanterhadap data SPR terdapat perbedaan jarak yang signifikan antara VMIS dengan SPR :clc - sby � data VMIS : 556 mil sedangkan SPR : 582 milxpn - ttw � data VMIS : 882 mil sedangkan SPR : 958 milAction Plan : perbaikan data jarak; apabila terdapat loss speed, akan dikirimkan nota pemberitahuan terjadinya slow speed.
IT PKPOT BBMBOCFleet Supp.
Pumping Rate : Berdasar data VMIS terdapat 2 kejadian slow pump. Setelah dilakukancheck terhadap data SPR tidak terdapat kejadian slow pump. Perbedaan kemungkinandisebabkan karena adanya perbedaan jumlah kargo yang dibongkar. Action Plan : konsolidasi data VMIS dan SPR untuk mencari perbedaan dan penyebabslow pumping; monitor pergerakan kapal.
OT BBMBOCFleet Supp.
28
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –OWN LR
OWN LR NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
R2
90
85
80
75
70
65
1 / (Age of vessel)
Poor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 R1 GEBANG (FSO)
R2 GEUDONDONG
S3 GUNUNG KEMALA
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
29*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
R1
S3
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000
65
60
55
50
45
40
Average= 1,790
Average= 62
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT GUNUNG KEMALA
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 100.00 0.00 66.86 0.00
Comm. Days
57.02
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: DUMAI• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – OWN LR
7826.41
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): LR (OWN)Flag: INDWT: 86,962 LTYOB (Age): 1986 (23 years)Safety Ranking: Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: WO
Programmer : DACHLAN H.(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: M(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
2
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:SISWOYO
30
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
1429.67 7826.413838.23 7826.41
0
0
0
0
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(20)
Fleetave.
(20.18072)00
1
31
510
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD -
9 10 11 12
OT CrudeBOCFleet Supp.
Bunker Cons : dari total 3 call di bulan November 2009, 2 call data bunker ROB ATA danATD-nya masih belum terisi.Action Plan : lengkapi data ROB bunker, kirim nota pemberitahuan perbaikan apabila adaover consumption bunker.
ActivityGunung KemalaVessel Speed : Berdasar data VMIS terdapat 2 call slow speed. Kemungkinan karena adaperbedaan jarak standar dengan jarak aktual kapalAction Plan : koreksi angka jarak yang tercantum di VMIS; kirimkan pemberitahuan bilatetap terjadi kasus slow speed.
IT PKPBOCFleet Supp.
Responsible
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
31
Session Owner Time
Team’s Updates Team1330 – 1415
Individual Vessel Performance – Own Fleet
Own Fleet & Oversight1415 – 1445
VESSEL PERFORMANCE DIALOGUE AGENDA
Individual vessel performance – Charter Fleet Charter1445 – 1530
32
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –CHARTER BL
CHARTER BL NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
S9
S10S11 S1
S2
S3
S4
S7
S12
S13
S15
S16
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
Average= 77
Days to go before charter party expiry/renewalPoor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 S1 ADHITAMA X
S2 CINTA BANGSA
S3 DUTA SELATAN
S4 HAIYIN III
S5 L. SINAR
S6 LAUTAN - I
S7 PELUMIN SATU
S8 PRIMA TANKER
S9 PUTERI DEWI SUB PUTERI JELITA
S10 PUTERI DUA
S11 PUTERI JELITA
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
33*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
S17S5
S8
S6
S14
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
Average= 18,569
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
S12 PUTERI JUWITA
S13 SANTANA
S14 SATRIA SATU
S15 SOECHI CHEMICAL V
S16 TOWO ARYO
S17 TRIAKSA 15
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT L. SINAR
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 51.93 0.00 100.00 20.23
Comm. Days
61.44
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: TANJUNG GEREM \
BOJONEGARA• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER BL
27298.9
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): BL (CHARTER)Flag: INDWT: 1,418 LTYOB (Age): 1992 (17 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: HSDCargo Type: WO
Programmer : HARRY T.(If charter) Owner: LAUTAN TERANG(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: 18/Apr/10
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
16
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:FERRY F.
34
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
10830.29 27298.918569.9 21624.77
6
0
0
2
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(39.74)
Fleetave.
(12.16)
00
64
4
924
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: 18/Apr/10(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 40,500
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT LAUTAN - I
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 70.92 0.00 97.92 19.82
Comm. Days
63.05
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: PEKANBARU• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER BL
27298.9
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): BL (CHARTER)Flag: INDWT: 1,100 LTYOB (Age): 1981 (28 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: HSDCargo Type: WO
Programmer : A. WENAS(If charter) Owner: LAUTAN TERANG(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
17
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:FERRY F.
35
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
10830.29 27298.918569.9
3
0
0
1
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(39.74)
Fleetave.
(12.16)
00
9
63
927
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 31,800
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT SATRIA SATU
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
77.67 56.97 0.00 100.00 0.00
Comm. Days
47.86
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: AMBON• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER BL
27298.9
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): BL (CHARTER)Flag: SIDWT: 1,857 LTYOB (Age): 1997 (12 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: WO
Programmer : PUTU D.(If charter) Owner: BUT. SATRIA
SAMUDRA(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC3
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
25
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HARRIE SETIARDJO
36
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
10830.29 27298.918569.9 24525.38
7
16
0
3
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(39.74)
Fleetave.
(12.16)
0
75
53
822
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC3(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 54,755
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT TOWO ARYO
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 43.72 28.10 100.00 46.52
Comm. Days
71.07
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: DUMAI• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER BL
27298.9
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): BL (CHARTER)Flag: INDWT: 1,530 LTYOB (Age): 1996 (13 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: HSDCargo Type: WO
Programmer : A. WENAS(If charter) Owner: PELUMIN PT.(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC2(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
28
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:FERRY F.
37
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
10830.29 27298.918569.9
5
0
0
2
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(39.74)
Fleetave.
(12.16)
00
13
72
1234
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 71,700
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT TRIAKSA 15
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 59.33 0.00 100.00 19.14
Comm. Days
61.91
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: DUMAI• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER BL
27298.9
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): BL (CHARTER)Flag: INDWT: 1,501 LTYOB (Age): 1993 (16 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MDO HSDCargo Type: WO
Programmer : A. WENAS(If charter) Owner: TRIDARMA WAHANA
PT.(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC2
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
29
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:FERRY F.
38
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
10830.29 27298.918569.9 24939.14
7
0
0
2
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(39.74)
Fleetave.
(12.16)
00
10
73
930
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC2(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/May/10(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 66,000
76 12111098L. SinarVessel Speed : terdapat 8 call mengalami slow speed; data sudah dianalisa namunbelum dapat diverifikasi dengan dokumen Master Cable.Action Plan : akan dilakukan verifikasi dan kemudian dikirimkan ke K&A.
BOCK&A/Pengad.
Bunker Cons : terdapat 13 call mengalami over bunker; data sudah dianalisa namunbelum dapat diverifikasi dengan dokumen Master Cable.Action Plan : akan dilakukan verifikasi dan kemudian dikirimkan ke K&A.
Lautan – I
Activity Responsible
Direncanakan akan dilakukan pemanggilan pada minggu 2-3 Januari 2010(sambil menunggu klarifikasi dari BOC)
BOCK&A/Pengad.
Bunker Cons : terdapat 9 call mengalami over bunker; data sudah dianalisa namunbelum dapat diverifikasi dengan dokumen Master Cable.Action Plan : akan dilakukan verifikasi dan kemudian dikirimkan ke K&A.
BOCK&A/Pengad.
Vessel Speed : terdapat 9 call mengalami slow speed; data sudah dianalisa namunSatria Satu
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
Direncanakan akan dilakukan pemanggilan pada minggu 4 Desember 2009 atauawal tahun 2010 (sambil menunggu klarifikasi dari BOC)Towo AryoR2 Loss : Voy 74 rute TUB-PLB kargo ADO berpotensi R2 loss.Action Plan : saat ini dalam proses kalkulasi dan pengajuan klaim.
BOCK&A/Pengad.
Bunker Cons : telah dianalisa dan terdapat potensi 11 call mengalami over bunker.Action Plan : akan dilakukan check Master Cable dan kemudian dikirimkan ke K&A.
BOCK&A/Pengad.
Direncanakan akan dilakukan pemanggilan pada minggu 2-3 Januari 2010(sambil menunggu klarifikasi dari BOC)
BOCK&A/Pengad.
Bunker Cons : terdapat 9 call mengalami over bunker; data sudah dianalisa namunbelum dapat diverifikasi dengan dokumen Master Cable.Action Plan : akan dilakukan verifikasi dan kemudian dikirimkan ke K&A.
BOCK&A/Pengad.
Vessel Speed : terdapat 9 call mengalami slow speed; data sudah dianalisa namunbelum dapat diverifikasi dengan dokumen Master Cable.Action Plan : akan dilakukan verifikasi dan kemudian dikirimkan ke K&A.
39
109876 1211
Triaksa 15
Bunker Cons : terdapat 15 call mengalami over bunker; data sudah dianalisa namunbelum dapat diverifikasi dengan dokumen Master Cable.Action Plan : akan dilakukan verifikasi dan kemudian dikirimkan ke K&A.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Activity Responsible
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
40
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –CHARTER SM I
CHARTER SM I NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
S1
S10
S13
A8T2
R20
S11
A19A7
S9
S14
S3
S4
S15S16
S17
S18 A21
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
Average= 78
Days to go before charter party expiry/renewalPoor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 S1 ANGELIA XVI
T2 ASIAN OIL I
S3 CAMAR MAS
S4 CAMAR SAKTI
S5 CITRA BINTANG EX PAN OIL IX
S6 DASA SAMUDERA
A7 DEWA YANI
A8 DEWI SRI
S9 EASTERN BRIGHT VI
S10 KERTA DUA
S11 LAJU PRAKARSA IV
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
41*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
A8
S5
S6
S12
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
Average= 14,323
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
S11 LAJU PRAKARSA IV
S12 LAJU PRAKARSA V
S13 PAN CORAL
S14 PATRIA 68
S15 PATRIA 88
S16 PRIBUMI
S17 PUTERI ELOK
S18 SERENA II
A19 SHINTA
R20 SILVIA XII
A21 SOECHI PRESTASI
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT ASIAN OIL I
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 31.85 42.40 0.00 82.02
Comm. Days
69.25
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: TANJUNG PRIOK• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER SM I
19222.23
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM I (CHARTER)Flag: SIDWT: 4,879 LTYOB (Age): 1991 (18 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MDOCargo Type: NBBM
Programmer : ASEP S.(If charter) Owner: BUMI PERKASA
BAHTERA(If charter) Charter Type: TC
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
5
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:DWI M. ABDU
42
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
9343.03 19222.2314323.44 15533.8
3
0
20
1
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(43.78)
Fleetave.
(10.9)
00
6
141
728
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: 10/Apr/10(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 97,500
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT CITRA BINTANG EX PAN OIL IX
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
79.71 53.89 42.49 0.00 17.50
Comm. Days
46.28
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: MERAUKE• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER SM I
19222.2314323.44
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM I (CHARTER)Flag: INDWT: 2,472 LTYOB (Age): 1981 (28 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: HSDCargo Type: WO
Programmer : PUTU D.(If charter) Owner: PAN MARITIM WIRA
PAWITRA(If charter) Charter Type: TC
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
7
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HARRIE SETIARDJO
43
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
9343.03 19222.2314323.4415207.58
2
9
1
3
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(43.78)
Fleetave.
(10.9)
0
6741
1022
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Jan/10(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 34,434
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT DASA SAMUDERA
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 12.69 10.30 0.00 0.00
Comm. Days
41.26
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: TANJUNG UBAN• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER SM I
19222.23
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM I (CHARTER)Flag: PADWT: 3,500 LTYOB (Age): 1998 (11 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MDO HSDCargo Type: WO
Programmer : ASEP S.(If charter) Owner: HUMPUSS
INTERMODA TRANS(If charter) Charter Type: TC
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
8
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:DWI M. ABDU
44
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
9343.03 19222.2314323.44 16182.57
6
0
5
3
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(43.78)
Fleetave.
(10.9)
00
13
72728
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 105,012
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT DEWA YANI
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 13.92 45.52 38.58 82.26
Comm. Days
72.42
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: CILACAP• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER SM I
19222.2316191.33
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM I (CHARTER)Flag: PADWT: 3,542 LTYOB (Age): 1998 (11 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MDOCargo Type: AVTUR
Programmer : ASEP S.(If charter) Owner: DEWAYANI MARITIME
Pte Ltd.(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC4
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
9
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:DWI M. ABDU
45
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
9343.03 19222.2314323.4416191.33
9
0
4
1
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(43.78)
Fleetave.
(10.9)
00
6
102
1633
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC4(If charter) Charter Expiry: 2/Feb/10(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 119,791
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT DEWI SRI
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 41.94 15.37 5.29 82.80
Comm. Days
67.88
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: BENOA• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER SM I
19222.2314715.68
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM I (CHARTER)Flag: PADWT: 3,542 LTYOB (Age): 1999 (10 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MDO HSDCargo Type: AVTUR
Programmer : ASEP S.(If charter) Owner: DEWI SRI MARITIME
Pte Ltd.(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC4
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
10
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:DWI M. ABDU
46
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
9343.03 19222.2314323.4414715.68
8
0
7
1
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(43.78)
Fleetave.
(10.9)
00
8
102
1030
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC4(If charter) Charter Expiry: 24/Apr/10(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 117,991
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT PATRIA 68
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 58.19 67.70 0.00 64.25
Comm. Days
70.23
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: AMBON• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER SM I
19222.23
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM I (CHARTER)Flag: INDWT: 2,125 LTYOB (Age): 1980 (29 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MDO HSDCargo Type: WO
Programmer : PUTU D.(If charter) Owner: SUMBER KENCANA
PATRIA PT.(If charter) Charter Type: TC
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
20
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HARRIE SETIARDJO
47
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
9343.03 19222.2314323.44 18132.8
2
0
2
2
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(43.78)
Fleetave.
(10.9)
004
71
1628
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: 10/Jan/10(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 43,200
14323.44
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT SHINTA
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 50.21 33.57 85.50 51.19
Comm. Days
71.94
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: BALIKPAPAN• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER SM I
19222.23
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM I (CHARTER)Flag: INDWT: 3,642 LTYOB (Age): 1997 (12 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MDO HSDCargo Type: AVTUR
Programmer : ASEP S.(If charter) Owner: APOL CEMERLANG(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC3(If charter) Charter Expiry: 28/Feb/10
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
27
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:DWI M. ABDU
48
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
9343.03 19222.2314323.44 18894.73
7
0
1
2
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(43.78)
Fleetave.
(10.9)
00
952
1128
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: 28/Feb/10(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 116,550
96 7 10 11 128
Direncanakan akan dilakukan pemanggilan pada minggu 3-4 Desember 2009 atau awal Januari 2010 (sambil menunggu klarifikasi dari BOC)
Pumping Rate : telahdilakukan analisa yaitu terdapat 3 call potensi klaim slow pump, namun belum dapat diajukan karena masih butuh data pendukung.Action Plan : akan dilakukan pemberitahuan ke Marine Unit via fax.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Vessel Speed : telah diverifikasi, terdapat 5 call yang mengalami slow speed.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
Citra Bintang Ex Pan Oil IX
Asian Oil IR2 Loss : Voy 31 CLC-TPK cargo HVI 160S dan Voy 31 CLC-TPK cargo HVI 60terdapat potensi loss.Action Plan : saat ini dalam proses checking Master Cable
ResponsibleActivity
Pumping Rate : telah dianalisa dan terdapat 4 call yang potensi klaim slow pump. BOC
BOCK&A/Pengad
BOCK&A/Pengad.
Vessel Speed : telah diverifikasi, terdapat 2 call yang mengalami slow speed.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
BOCK&A/Pengad
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
Vessel Speed : telah dilakukan analisa dan terdapat 5 call mengalami slow speed.Action Plan : akan diajukan sebagai klaim slow speed.
Shinta
Direncanakan akan dilakukan pemanggilan pada minggu 1-2 Januari 2010(sambil menunggu klarifikasi dari BOC)
Direncanakan akan dilakukan pemanggilan pada minggu 3-4 Januari 2010(sambil menunggu klarifikasi dari BOC)
Pumping Rate : telah dianalisa dan terdapat 4 call yang potensi klaim slow pump. Namun belum dapat diajukan klaimnya karena masih butuh data Pendukung.Action Plan : akan dilakukan permintaan data ke Marine Unit.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Pumping Rate : telah dilakukan kajian, terdapat 6 call berpotensi klaim.Action Plan : telah dikirimkan permintaan data pendukung ke Marine Unit.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Bunker Cons : telah diverifikasi, terdapat 4 call yang mengalami over bunker.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Patria 68
BOCK&A/Pengad
49
11 127 8 9 106
BOCK&A/Pengad
Dasa SamuderaR2 Loss : Voy 9 CLC-BNO Avtur berpotensi loss.Action Plan : saat ini dalam proses checking Master Cable
BOCK&A/Pengad.
Vessel Speed : telah diverifikasi, terdapat 5 call yang mengalami slow speed.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.Pumping Rate : telahdilakukan analisa yaitu terdapat 2 call potensi klaim slow pump, namun belum dapat diajukan karena masih butuh data pendukung.Action Plan : akan dilakukan pemberitahuan ke Marine Unit via fax.Bunker Cons : telah diverifikasi, terdapat 5 call yang mengalami over bunker.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.Dewa YaniR2 Loss : Voy 39 rute CLC-BNO Avtur dan Voy 41 Call 3 rute AMP-KUP berpotensiklaim R2 loss.Action Plan : dalam proses ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Vessel Speed : telah dianalisa dan terdapat 5 call yang potensi klaim slow speed. BOC
BOCK&A/Pengad
BOCK&A/Pengad
ResponsibleActivity
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
Dewi Sri
Vessel Speed : telah dianalisa dan terdapat 5 call yang potensi klaim slow speed. Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Pumping Rate : telahdilakukan analisa yaitu terdapat 7 call potensi klaim slow pump, namun belum dapat diajukan karena masih butuh data pendukung.Action Plan : akan dilakukan pemberitahuan ke Marine Unit via fax.
R2 Loss : Voy 30 Call 1 dan 2 CLC-BNO-AMP Avtur dan Voy 31 CLC-BNO Avturterdapat potensi Loss . Adapun Data Disch Voy 32 CLC-BNO Avtur belum diinput.Action Plan : dalam proses pengajuan klaim, check Master Cable; input data padaVoy 32.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Vessel Speed : telah dilakukan analisa dan terdapat 7 call mengalami slow speed.Action Plan : akan diajukan sebagai klaim slow speed.
OT CrudeBOCK&A/Pengad
BOCK&A/Pengad
Pumping Rate : telahdilakukan analisa yaitu terdapat 5 call potensi klaim slow pump, namun belum dapat diajukan karena masih butuh data pendukung.Action Plan : akan dilakukan pemberitahuan ke Marine Unit via fax.
BOCK&A/Pengad
50
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX – CHARTER SM I & SM II LPG
CHARTER SM I & SM II LPG NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
G1
G4
G3
G2G6
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
Average= 76
Days to go before charter party expiry/renewalPoor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 G1 ASIAN GAS
G2 ASIAN GAS II
G3 DEAUVILLE
G4 GAS INDONESIA
G5 GAS KALIMANTAN
G6 GAS MALUKU
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
51*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
G5
G2
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
Average= 24,662
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT ASIAN GAS II
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 0.00 97.63 0.00 80.66
Comm. Days
72.24
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: BALONGAN• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER SM I Gas
35034.48
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM I Gas (CHARTER)
Flag: MIDWT: 2,610 LTYOB (Age): 1995 (14 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: GAS
Programmer : AGUS P.(If charter) Owner: PERTAMINA(If charter) Charter Type: TC
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
4
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:DWI M. ABDU
52
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
16637.19 35034.4824662.26 29098.34
0
0
8
1
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(14.29)
Fleetave.(0.3)
00
14
70
1233
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 187,500
7 8 9 10 1211Asian Gas IIR2 Loss : terdapat 1 call pembongkaran di MKS cargo LPG sebesar.4.02% (voy 6). Action Plan : Perlu diteliti adanya kemungkinan kesalahan pengisian Master Cable.
OT Crude/BOCK&A/Pengad
Pumping Rate : telah dilakukan analisa dan terdapat 3 call slow pumping.Action Plan : masih terjadi dispute karena kekurangan data pendukung, tapi hinggasaat ini belum ada respon dari dari Marine Unit setempat.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Activity Responsible
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
53
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –CHARTER SM II
CHARTER SM II NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
S11
S8 S1
S2
S5
T10A4
100
95
90
85
80
75
Average= 76
Days to go before charter party expiry/renewalPoor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 S1 ANDHIKA ASHURA
S2 ASIAN OIL II
S3 BUDI MESRA
A4 DUTA BANGSA
S5 GOLDEN PEARL XIV
A6 JAYNE I
S7 JULIA I
S8 PELITA SAMUDRA
S9 SAPTA SAMUDRA
T10 SOECHI CHEMICAL VII
S11 SOECHI LESMANA
S12 SURYA CHANDRA
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
54*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
A6
S7 S9
S12
S3
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000
75
70
65
60
55
50
Average= 11,559
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
S12 SURYA CHANDRA
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT JAYNE I
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 56.87 0.00 43.34 12.26
Comm. Days
53.06
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: MANOKWARI• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER SM II
16299.1
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM II (CHARTER)Flag: PADWT: 6,500 LTYOB (Age): 1999 (10 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: AVTUR
Programmer : PUTU D.(If charter) Owner: PT. BUMI
INTERNATIONAL TANKERS(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC4
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
13
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HARRIE SETIARDJO
55
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
8053.37 16299.111559.87 14461.64
27
0
6
8
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(39.66)
Fleetave.
(8.23)
005
95
1433
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC4(If charter) Charter Expiry: 12/Jan/10(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 159,120
11559.87 14461.64
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT JULIA I
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 0.00 26.62 10.02 70.08
Comm. Days
62.02
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: TERNATE• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER SM II
16299.1
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM II (CHARTER)Flag: PADWT: 6,755 LTYOB (Age): 1998 (11 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MDO HSDCargo Type: WO
Programmer : PUTU D.(If charter) Owner: LAYAR SENTOSA
SHIPPING(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC4
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
15
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HARRIE SETIARDJO
56
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
8053.37 16299.111559.87 14126.94
14
0
12
3
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(39.66)
Fleetave.
(8.23)
003
93
1429
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC4(If charter) Charter Expiry: 8/Jan/10(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 159,120
11559.87 14126.94
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT SAPTA SAMUDRA
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 59.03 94.68 0.00 22.35
Comm. Days
62.26
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: PULAU SAMBU• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER SM II
16299.1
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): SM II (CHARTER)Flag: PADWT: 6,500 LTYOB (Age): 1994 (15 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: BO
Programmer : ABIDIN S.(If charter) Owner: HUMPUSS
INTERMODA TRANS(If charter) Charter Type: TC
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
24
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:LUKITO WIBOWO
57
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
8053.37 16299.111559.87 14833.45
1
0
16
6
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(39.66)
Fleetave.
(8.23)
002
40
1017
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 162,000
11559.87
12987 10 11
BOCK&A/Pengad
Bunker Cons : telah diverifikasi, terdapat 10 call yang mengalami over bunker.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
Julia I
BOCK&A/Pengad
Pumping Rate : terdapat 8 potensi klaim slow pumping; telah dilakukan kajiannamun belum dapat diklaim karena belum terdapat data pendukung yang akurat.Action Plan : akan menghubungi Marine Unit untuk verifikasi klaim tersebut ini.
Vessel Speed : telah diverifikasi, terdapat 10 call yang mengalami slow speed.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
Jayne I
Direncanakan akan dilakukan pemanggilan pada minggu 3-4 Desember 2009 atau awal Januari 2010 (sambil menunggu klarifikasi dari BOC)
BOCK&A/Pengad
Activity
BOCK&A/Pengad
Responsible
Vessel Speed : telah diverifikasi, terdapat 7 call yang mengalami slow speed.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
BOCK&A/Pengad
R2 Loss : Voy 27 Call 2 BTG-TNT, kargo Premium berpotensi klaim R2 Loss.Action Plan : saat ini dalam proses check data Master Cable dan kalkulasi klaim.
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
Bunker Cons : telah diverifikasi, terdapat 4 call yang mengalami over bunker.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
Pumping Rate : terdapat 2 potensi klaim slow pumping; telah dilakukan kajiannamun belum dapat diklaim karena belum terdapat data pendukung yang akurat.Action Plan : akan menghubungi Marine Unit untuk verifikasi klaim tersebut ini.
BOCK&A/Pengad
BOCK&A/Pengad
Direncanakan akan dilakukan pemanggilan pada minggu 3-4 Desember 2009 atau awal Januari 2010 (sambil menunggu klarifikasi dari BOC)
Telah dilakukan diskusi dengan owner tanggal 23 Nov. ’09 untuk perbaikankinerja kapal. Saat ini sedang dilakukan monitoring untuk mengetahuiprogress perbaikan.
BOCK&A/Pengad
K&A/PengadAction Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.Pumping Rate : terdapat 6 potensi klaim slow pumping; telah dilakukan kajiannamun belum dapat diklaim karena belum terdapat data pendukung yang akurat.Action Plan : akan menghubungi Marine Unit untuk verifikasi klaim tersebut ini.
Sapta Samudra
58
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –CHARTER GP
CHARTER GP NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
R2
S11R6
R15
S10S14
R4
S5
S7
S9
S12S17
S1
R3
100
95
90
85
80
75
Average= 84
Days to go before charter party expiry/renewalPoor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 S1 AE PIONER
R2 ANDHIKA ADINUGRAHA
R3 ANDIKA ARSANTI EX BUMI NUSANTARA
R4 ASTA SAMUDRA
S5 BUDI JASA
R6 ETERNAL OIL I
S7 ETERNAL OIL II
S8 GRIYA ASMAT
S9 NEW GRACE
S10 OCEAN SEAL
S11 ONTARI
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
59*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
R2
A16
S7
S8
S13
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
75
70
65
60
55
50
Average= 8,601
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
S11 ONTARI
S12 PRANEDYA TRITYA
S13 PROVIDENCE
S14 SAMUDERA BIRU
R15 SHARON
A16 SINAR EMAS
S17 TEMASEK
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT ANDHIKA ADINUGRAHA
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 90.37
Comm. Days
73.46
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: BALIKPAPAN• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER GP
12630.07
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): GP (CHARTER)Flag: PADWT: 17,998 LTYOB (Age): 1998 (11 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: CO
Programmer : JISMAN S.(If charter) Owner: ADNYANA LINES PT.(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC3(If charter) Charter Expiry: 15/Jul/12
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
2
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:SISWOYO
60
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3484.8 12630.078601.26 10076.4
51
0
29
2
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(24.06)
Fleetave.
(10.06)
00
5
94
1330
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: 15/Jul/12(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 400,956
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT BUDI JASA
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 42.50 91.84 7.35 96.27
Comm. Days
81.03
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: BALIKPAPAN• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER GP
12630.07
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): GP (CHARTER)Flag: MADWT: 11,970 LTYOB (Age): 2006 (3 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO HSDCargo Type: WO
Programmer : KAMIL(If charter) Owner: INDO MEGA MARITIM
PT.(If charter) Charter Type: TC
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
6
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HERU HUTOMO
61
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3484.8 12630.078601.26 12630.07
2
0
14
0
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(24.06)
Fleetave.
(10.06)
00
6
110
825
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 378,000
8601.26
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT ETERNAL OIL II
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 0.00 74.53 0.00 100.00
Comm. Days
74.68
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: SURABAYA• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER GP
12630.07
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): GP (CHARTER)Flag: SIDWT: 18,500 LTYOB (Age): 1997 (12 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: BO
Programmer : ABIDIN S.(If charter) Owner: BUMI PERKASA
BAHTERA(If charter) Charter Type: TC
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
11
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:LUKITO WIBOWO
62
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3484.8 12630.078601.26 9496.74
9
0
37
0
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(24.06)
Fleetave.
(10.06)
00
10
91
1031
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 410,250
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT PROVIDENCE
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
62.14 95.87 0.00 87.02 89.11
Comm. Days
68.39
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: BITUNG• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER GP
12630.07
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): GP (CHARTER)Flag: SIDWT: 16,839 LTYOB (Age): 1986 (23 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO HSDCargo Type: WO
Programmer : KAMIL(If charter) Owner: CAKRA BAHANA Ltd.(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
21
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HERU HUTOMO
63
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3484.8 12630.078601.26 9038.15
35
125
2
1
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(24.06)
Fleetave.
(10.06)
0
11
2
5
3
414
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 205,058
9 12111087 Responsible
BOCK&A/Pengad
Andhika AdinugrahaVessel Speed : telah diverifikasi, terdapat 4 call yang mengalami slow speed.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Pumping Rate : terdapat 3 call mengalami slow pump; data sudah dianalisanamun belum diverifikasi dengan dokumen pendukung.Action Plan : akan menghubungi Marine Unit untuk verifikasi klaim tersebut ini.
OT BBM/BOCK&A/Pengad
Pumping Rate : terdapat 4 call berpotensi klaim namun belum ada info dariMarine Unit. Action Plan : melakukan koordinasi dan pemberitahuan ke unit via fax.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Eternal Oil II
Budi Jasa
R2 Loss : Voy 32 Call 2 TPK-SBY IFO dan Voy 33 Call 4 MKS-TTM IDO, adapotensi klaim R2 Loss.
BOC
R2 Loss : Data Disch Avtur Voy 32 BPP-SBY belum dimasukkan.Action Plan : lakukan input data ke dalam VMIS; klaim bila terdapat loss.
Activity
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
Vessel Speed : telah diverifikasi, terdapat 6 call yang mengalami slow speed.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Direncanakan akan dilakukan pemanggilan pada minggu 2-3 Februari 2010(sambil menunggu klarifikasi dari BOC)
potensi klaim R2 Loss.Action Plan : saat ini dalam proses cek Master Cable dan kalkulasi klaim.
K&A/Pengad
Pumping Rate : terdapat 2 call mengalami slow pump; data sudah dianalisanamun belum diverifikasi dengan dokumen pendukung.Action Plan : akan menghubungi Marine Unit untuk verifikasi klaim tersebut ini.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Providence
64
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX – CHARTER GP & MR LPG
CHARTER GP & MR LPG NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
G1
G4
G2
G3
G5
100
95
90
85
80
75
Average= 90
Days to go before charter party expiry/renewalPoor performing high cost vessels
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining VesselPMS Score *On a scale of 100 G1 ERATAN EX HEBRIS
G2 MAHARSHI LABHATREYA
G3 MAHARSHI SHIVATREYA
G4 NAVIGATOR ARIES
G5 NAVIGATOR GEMINI
Poor performing low cost vessels
65*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000
75
70
65
60
55
50
Average= 15,960
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –CHARTER MR
CHARTER MR NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
R4
S3
S5
R1
S2
S8
R10
R12
R9S14
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
Average= 72
Days to go before charter party expiry/renewalPoor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 R1 AGIASMA
S2 AKAMAS
S3 ALISA XVII
R4 DURGANDINI
S5 GANDARI
S6 GANDINI
R7 JELITA
S8 KAMPOS
R9 MARTHA PETROL
R10 MUTIARA
S11 MUTIARA MAS I
R12 OPAL
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
66*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
S15
R1
S6
S11
R13
R7
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
Average= 6,170
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
R12 OPAL
R13 QUITO JAYA EX IBNU
S14 SUKSES XI (new)
S15 VIJAYANTI
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT AGIASMA
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 86.84 38.74 100.00 12.04
Comm. Days
67.52
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: MISOOL• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER MR
8957.86
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): MR (CHARTER)Flag: INDWT: 29,996 LTYOB (Age): 1989 (20 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: CO
Programmer : JISMAN S.(If charter) Owner: MULTI JAYA
SAMUDRA(If charter) Charter Type: TCB
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
1
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:SISWOYO
67
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3027.57 8957.866170.65 8300.14
23
0
0
18
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(48)
Fleetave.
(10.75)
003
52
1121
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: TCB(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 399,000
6170.65
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT JELITA
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 98.43 90.34 0.00 21.29
Comm. Days
65.54
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: CILACAP• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER MR
8957.86
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): MR (CHARTER)Flag: PADWT: 29,516 LTYOB (Age): 1987 (22 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO HSDCargo Type: NAPTHA
Programmer : HARIS A. S.(If charter) Owner: EMMA MARITIME
SERVICES PT.(If charter) Charter Type: TC
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
14
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:HERU HUTOMO
68
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3027.57 8957.866170.65
2
0
44
10
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(48)
Fleetave.
(10.75)
00
8
140
1032
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 292,500
6170.65
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT QUITO JAYA EX IBNU
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 72.76 0.00 21.22 1.15
Comm. Days
49.08
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: CILACAP• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER MR
8957.86
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): MR (CHARTER)Flag: INDWT: 35,601 LTYOB (Age): 1993 (16 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO MDOCargo Type: CO
Programmer : JISMAN S.(If charter) Owner: ALTUS LINES
INDONESIA(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
22
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:SISWOYO
69
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
3027.57 8957.866170.65 7748.74
37
0
30
15
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(48)
Fleetave.
(10.75)
004
92
924
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: LTTC(If charter) Charter Expiry: 1/Dec/09(If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 473,250
6170.65 7748.74
6 1210987 11
BOCK&A/Pengad
AgiasmaVessel Speed : telah dilakukan verifikasi, terdapat 4 call mengalami slow speed.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Activity
BOCK&A/Pengad
BOCK&A/Pengad
Responsible
Bunker Cons : terdapat 4 call mengalami over bunker; data sudah dianalisa namunbelum diverifikasi dengan Master Cable/Log Abstract.Action Plan : dikoordinasikan bersama OT untuk verifikasi dengan Master Cable.
Bunker Cons : telah dilakukan verifikasi terdapat 4 call mengalami overbunker. Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
Pumping Rate : terdapat 3 call mengalami slow pump; data sudah dianalisa namunbelum diverifikasi dengan dokumen pendukung.Action Plan : menghubungi Marine Unit untuk verifikasi kejadian slow pumping ini.
Jelita
Telah dilakukan diskusi dengan owner tanggal 17 Nov. ’09 untuk perbaikankinerja kapal. Saat ini sedang dilakukan monitoring untuk mengetahui progress perbaikan.
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
Pumping Rate : terdapat 4 call potensi claim slow pumping; masih dispute karenaDibutuhkan data pendukung tambahan.Action Plan : koordinasi dengan Marine Unit untuk permintaan data tambahan.
Telah dilakukan diskusi dengan owner tanggal 23 Nov. ’09 untuk perbaikankinerja kapal. Saat ini sedang dilakukan monitoring untuk mengetahui progress perbaikan.
Telah dilakukan diskusi dengan owner tanggal 19 Nov. ’09 untuk perbaikankinerja kapal. Saat ini sedang dilakukan monitoring untuk mengetahui progress perbaikan.
Bunker Cons : telah dilakukan verifikasi, terdapat 5 call yang mengalami over bunker.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
BOCK&A/Pengad
Action Plan : dikoordinasikan bersama OT untuk verifikasi dengan Master Cable.
Vessel Speed : telah dilakukan verifikasi, terdapat 5 call yang mengalami slow speed.Action Plan : akan ditindaklanjuti ke dalam bentuk klaim.
Quito Jaya Ex Ibnu
BOCK&A/Pengad
BOCK&A/Pengad
70
PRELIMINARY
VESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –CHARTER LR
CHARTER LR NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
R190
85
80
75
70
65Average= 65
Days to go before charter party expiry/renewalPoor performing high cost vessels
PMS Score *On a scale of 100 R1 BRAMANI
R2 MAGNITUDE SUB AGATE
R3 VALIANT SUB KOURION
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining Vessel
Poor performing low cost vessels
71*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
R2
R3
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000
65
60
55
50
45
40
Average= 3,587
= 65
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT MAGNITUDE SUB AGATE
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 72.07 0.00 0.53 58.50
Comm. Days
62.03
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: CILACAP• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER LR
4242.41
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): LR (CHARTER)Flag: NRDWT: 93,136 LTYOB (Age): 1992 (17 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFOCargo Type: CO
Programmer : DACHLAN H.(If charter) Owner: NUR SALY PRATAMA(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry:
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
18
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:SISWOYO
72
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
2725.55 4242.413587.35 3794.09
77
0
33
13
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(52.94)
Fleetave.
(21.29)00
4
84
1027
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 630,000
VESSEL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTMT VALIANT SUB KOURION
PMS ScoreOn a scale of 100
Vessel cost per day vsaverage in vessel classIDR/LT/Day
100.00 0.00 20.22 56.52 2.21
Comm. Days
48.46
R2 loss
Vessel speed
Pump rate
Bunker cons.
Vessel particulars
NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
Specific vessel characteristics:• Op. area: PULAU SAMBU• Op. area characs:
-• Special design characs:
-
•
POOR PERFORMING VESSEL DASHBOARDS – CHARTER LR
4242.41
PRELIMINARY
Type (& Ownership): LR (CHARTER)Flag: LIDWT: 96,136 LTYOB (Age): 1992 (17 years)Safety Ranking: -Bunker Type: MFO HSDCargo Type: CO
Programmer : DACHLAN H.(If charter) Owner: VALIANT HOLDING
CORPORATION MONROVIA(If charter) Charter Type: TC
Score >= 8050<= Score < 80Score < 50
Vessel
MarketAverage
30
Customer feedback
Budget
PIC:SISWOYO
73
Vessel utilizationDays
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Frequency of delay**Percent
Extent of delay*Percent
Vessel delays vs fleet average
* Extent of delays is computed by dividing total actual sea time by total allowed sea time** Frequency of delays is competed by dividing total number of delays by total number of calls Source: VMIS; charter parties; UKTs; Team analysis
Total Potential claims incurredUSD Thousands
2725.55 4242.413587.35
41
0
20
20
Slow Speed
Over Bunker
Off Hire
Slow Pumping
Fleet ave.(52.94)
Fleetave.
(21.29)00
3
62
920
Sea delay
Port delays
Sea Psg
Port time
Days avail.
Off-hire
Not accou-nted
Sea delays
Port delays
Not accounted
(If charter) Charter Type: TC(If charter) Charter Expiry: (If charter) Mnth Chart. Rate: - USD 690,000
9 121110Activity ResponsibleMagnitude Sub Agate
Pumping Rate : data belum dapat dianalisa karena masih kurang data pendukung.Action Plan : menghubungi Marine Unit untuk klarifikasi kejadian slow pumping ini.
Vessel Speed : terdapat 4 call mengalami slow speed; data sudah dianalisa namunbelum dapat diverifikasi dengan dokumen Master Cable.Action Plan : akan dilakukan verifikasi dan kemudian dikirimkan ke K&A.
BOCK&A/Pengad
BOCK&A/Pengad
BOCK&A/Pengad.
Vessel Speed : terdapat 4 call mengalami slow speed; data sudah dianalisa namunbelum dapat diverifikasi dengan dokumen Master Cable.Action Plan : akan dilakukan verifikasi dan kemudian dikirimkan ke K&A.
Valiant Sub KourionR2 Loss : Voy 16 rute DUM-DUM, kargo Duri dan Sumatra belum diinput.Action Plan : data R2 Loss akan dilengkapi.
OT CrudeBOC
Bunker Cons : terdapat 4 call mengalami over bunker; data sudah dianalisa namunbelum dapat diverifikasi dengan dokumen Master Cable.Action Plan : akan dilakukan verifikasi dan kemudian dikirimkan ke K&A.
BOCK&A/Pengad
ACTION PLANDeadlinePrevious Month
Direncanakan akan dilakukan pemanggilan pada minggu 3-4 Februari 2010 (sambil menunggu klarifikasi dari BOC)
Action Plan : akan dilakukan verifikasi dan kemudian dikirimkan ke K&A.
74
PRELIMINARYVESSEL COST PERFORMANCE MATRIX –CHARTER VLCC
CHARTER VLCC NOVEMBER 2009 PERFORMANCE
No Vessel Name
R1
90
85
80
75
70
Average= 84
Days to go before charter party expiry/renewalPoor performing high cost vessels
S-
R-
S&D Vessel
Refining VesselPMS Score *On a scale of 100 R1 LYSAKER SUB KOLOSSI
75*PMS score is a weighted average of CD days, bunker consumption, speed loss, pump speed, R2 loss**Operating costs = [Daily Charter Rates + (Other op costs – dry dock costs – owed port chgs)] / (DWT * CD days)Source : November 2009 PMS scores; SAP; fleet procurement; charter team; team analysis
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600
70
65
60
55
50
Average= 1,280
Operating costs**IDR/LT/day
