+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Individualized OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Lower Limb … · Figure 1) • Primary specialty...

Individualized OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Lower Limb … · Figure 1) • Primary specialty...

Date post: 16-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
To view a video of Dr. Alberto Esquenazi discussing these data, please follow the link below: https://vimeo.com/300659002/a702fbb848 Individualized OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Lower Limb Spasticity Resulted in High Patient and Clinician Satisfaction in the ASPIRE Study Alberto Esquenazi, 1 Ganesh Bavikatte, 2 Wolfgang H. Jost, 3 Daniel S. Bandari, 4 Michael C. Munin, 5 Simon Fuk Tan Tang, 6 Joan Largent, 7 Aleksej Zuzek, 8 Anand Patel, 9 Gerard E. Francisco 10 1 MossRehab Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Elkins Park, PA, USA; 2 The Walton Centre, Liverpool, UK; 3 University of Freiburg, Department of Neurology, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; 4 Multiple Sclerosis Center of California, Newport Beach, CA, USA; 5 University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 6 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; 7 IQVIA, Cambridge, MA, USA; 8 Allergan plc, Marlow, UK; 9 Allergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA; 10 University of Texas McGovern Medical School and TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX, USA
Transcript
Page 1: Individualized OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Lower Limb … · Figure 1) • Primary specialty of clinicians: 59.5% Physiatry, 40.5% Neurology ̶Average 15.7 years treating spasticity

To view a video of Dr. Alberto Esquenazi discussing these data, please follow the link below:

https://vimeo.com/300659002/a702fbb848

Individualized OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Lower Limb Spasticity Resulted in High Patient and Clinician Satisfaction in the ASPIRE StudyAlberto Esquenazi,1 Ganesh Bavikatte,2 Wolfgang H. Jost,3 Daniel S. Bandari,4 Michael C. Munin,5 Simon Fuk Tan Tang,6 Joan Largent,7 Aleksej Zuzek,8 Anand Patel,9 Gerard E. Francisco101MossRehab Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Elkins Park, PA, USA; 2The Walton Centre, Liverpool, UK; 3University of Freiburg, Department of Neurology, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; 4Multiple Sclerosis Center of California, Newport Beach, CA, USA; 5University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 6Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; 7IQVIA, Cambridge, MA, USA; 8Allergan plc, Marlow, UK; 9Allergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA; 10University of Texas McGovern Medical School and TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX, USA

melissatropeano
Sticky Note
Marked set by melissatropeano
melissatropeano
Sticky Note
Marked set by melissatropeano
melissatropeano
Sticky Note
Marked set by melissatropeano
melissatropeano
Sticky Note
Marked set by melissatropeano
Page 2: Individualized OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Lower Limb … · Figure 1) • Primary specialty of clinicians: 59.5% Physiatry, 40.5% Neurology ̶Average 15.7 years treating spasticity

59%

19% 16% 16% 15%9% 6%

Equinovarusfoot

(n=429)

Flexedknee

(n=138)

Stiffextended

knee(n=119)

Flexedtoes

(n=118)

Adducted thigh

(n=107)

Hitchhikertoe

(n=65)

Flexedhip

(n=44)

60

40

20

0

80

100

Patie

nts

who

rece

ived

≥1

ona

botu

linum

toxi

nAin

ject

ion

over

the

2 ye

ars

(%)

This study was sponsored by Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland. We would like to thank the participants and investigators who took part in this study. Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Karen Pemberton, PhD, of Evidence Scientifi c Solutions, Inc, and funded by Allergan plc. All authors met the ICMJE authorship criteria. Neither honoraria nor payments were made for authorship. Financial arrangements of the authors with companies whose products may be related to the present report are listed below, as declared by the authors. AE consulted for Allergan, Ipsen, and Merz, and received research grants from Allergan and Ipsen; GB has served on a steering committee as a consultant for Allergan; WHJ is a speaker and consultant for Allergan, Ipsen, and Merz; DSB is a consultant and/or speaker for Accorda, Biogen, EMD-Serono, Genentech, Genzyme, Mallinckrodt, and Teva, and has received research support from Allergan, Biogen, Genentech, Genzyme, and Med-day; MCM received research support from Allergan and Ipsen, and has consulted with Merz; SFTT none reported; JL is a full-time employee of IQVIA (formerly QuintilesIMS), the contract research organization responsible for the management of this study, and a former full-time employee of Allergan; AZ and AP are full-time employees of Allergan; GEF has consulted for, and received research grants from, Allergan, Ipsen, and Merz.

IN

TRO

DU

CTI

ON

M

ETH

OD

S

INDIVIDUALIZED ONABOTULINUMTOXINA TREATMENT FOR LOWER LIMB SPASTICITY RESULTED IN HIGH PATIENT AND CLINICIAN SATISFACTION IN THE ASPIRE STUDYAlberto Esquenazi,1 Ganesh Bavikatte,2 Wolfgang H. Jost,3 Daniel S. Bandari,4 Michael C. Munin,5

Simon Fuk Tan Tang,6 Joan Largent,7 Aleksej Zuzek,8 Anand Patel,9 Gerard E. Francisco10

1MossRehab Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Elkins Park, PA, USA; 2The Walton Centre, Liverpool, UK; 3University of Freiburg, Department of Neurology, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; 4Multiple Sclerosis Center of California, Newport Beach, CA, USA; 5University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 6Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; 7IQVIA, Cambridge, MA, USA; 8Allergan plc, Marlow, UK; 9Allergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA; 10University of Texas McGovern Medical School and TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX, USA

Patient Demographics and Clinical Characteristics• Patients were, on average, 53.6 years of age (range=18.5–93.2 years)• Sex was nearly evenly distributed (female: n=380, 52%; male:

n=350, 48%)• Majority of patients were white (n=562, 77%)• 461 patients (63%) were continuing botulinum toxin treatment for

spasticity• Stroke was the most frequently reported etiology (56%) (Figure 2)

Background• OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment for spasticity

is variable, as treatment is individualized and dependent on numerous factors

Objective• To explore real-world patterns of

onabotulinumtoxinA utilization in patients with lower limb spasticity from the ASPIRE study, over 2 years

IN

TRO

DU

CTI

ON

IN

TRO

DU

CTI

ON

IN

TRO

DU

CTI

ON

M

ETH

OD

S

MET

HO

DS

M

ETH

OD

S

DIS

CLO

SUR

ES

ASPIRE provides valuable, real-world data on dosing, injection

guidance, and muscle targeting over 2 years, that may help guide

clinical strategies

This study captured the individualized nature of onabotulinumtoxinA utilization

for spasticity, while demonstrating consistently high satisfaction

These results add to the body of evidence on the

safety and effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA

for spasticity

SUM

MA

RY

Study Disposition• The ASPIRE study was conducted at 54 sites, by 74 clinicians, across

7 countries and 3 continents (Figure 1)• Primary specialty of clinicians: 59.5% Physiatry, 40.5% Neurology

Average 15.7 years treating spasticity 62% had >10 years of experience using onabotulinumtoxinA to treat

spasticity• 730 patients received ≥1 onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for spasticity

during the 2-year study• 397 patients (54%) completed the 2-year study

OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment Utilization• The most commonly treated lower limb spasticity presentation was

equinovarus foot (Figure 3) Data on onabotulinumtoxinA dosing, localization method, and muscle

targeting for each lower limb spasticity presentation are shown below

RES

ULT

S

Figure 2. Distribution of patient etiology of spasticity

Figure 3. Lower limb spasticity presentations treated with onabotulinumtoxinA

SUM

MA

RY

Figure 1. Study disposition

NOTE: Percentages were calculated using naive, non-naive, and total populations as the denominator, in the respective stratifi cations, where more than 1 response was allowed.aIncludes ischemic, hemorrhagic, or embolic stroke.bOther includes hereditary spastic paraparesis, stroke during aneurysm clipping, Chiari malformation, and hydrocephalus.CP = cerebral palsy; MS = multiple sclerosis; SCI = spinal cord injury; TBI = traumatic brain injury.

HCPs = healthcare professionals

NOTE: N refers to number of patients; T refers to number of treatment sessions.Tx = treatment.

NOTE: T refers to number of treatment sessions.

Safety• Overall, 197/530 patients (37.2%) reported 643 adverse events (AEs)

21 AEs in 18 patients (3.4%) were considered treatment-related The most common treatment-related AE was muscular weakness

(n=6, 1.1%)• A total of 67/530 patients (12.6%) reported 138 serious AEs• 3 serious AEs in 2 patients (0.4%) were considered treatment-related

Muscular weakness, dysphagia, slow speech• No new safety signals were identifi ed

OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment Satisfaction• Majority of patients and clinicians were satisfi ed that

onabotulinumtoxinA helped manage spasticity and had sustained benefi t of treatment (Figure 5) The majority of patients and clinicians also indicated that they would

continue onabotulinumtoxinA treatment to manage spasticity

OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment Information • Treatment strategies often changed between treatment sessions

(Figure 4)

Figure 5. Patient and clinician satisfaction

Figure 4. Lower limb spasticity treatment information

60

40

20

0

80

100

Patientsatisfaction

(T=908)

Cliniciansatisfaction(T=1626)

Trea

tmen

t ses

sion

s (%

)

OnabotulinumtoxinA treatmenthelped manage spasticity

60

40

20

0

80

100

Patientsatisfaction

(T=908)

Cliniciansatisfaction(T=1626)

Trea

tmen

t ses

sion

s (%

)

OnabotulinumtoxinA has sustained benefit of treatment

60

40

20

0

80

100

Patientsatisfaction

(T=908)

Cliniciansatisfaction(T=1626)

Trea

tmen

t ses

sion

s (%

)

Continue onabotulinumtoxinA treatment to manage spasticity

Extremely dissatisfied/definitely not

Dissatisfied/probably not

Neither satisfied nordissatisfied/undecided

Satisfied/probably yes

Extremely satisfied/yes, definitely

• ASPIRE is a prospective, observational registry conducted at select sites in North America, Europe, and Asia (NCT01930786)

• Adult patients across multiple etiologies were treated with onabotulinumtoxinA for focal spasticity, including patients non-naive to botulinum toxins

• Treatments were determined by the participating, treating clinician

• Financial support was not provided to the patients for any treatment/treatment-related costs

• Utilization was assessed at each treatment visit, clinician satisfaction at each following visit, patient satisfaction at 5 ± 1 week post-treatment, and follow-up visit approximately 12 weeks after the fi nal visit

real-world data on dosing, injection nature of onabotulinumtoxinA utilization

Number of participating patients

6640

23

30

44388

40

Number of participating HCPs

35

76

4

9

5

8

Number of participating sites

26

6

5

4

4 2

7

USA Germany UK France Spain Italy Taiwan

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

80

90

100

Patie

nts

(%)

Strokea

(N=411)MS

(N=119)CP

(N=77)Otherb

(N=72)TBI

(N=45)SCI

(N=42)

60%54% 56%

14%18%16%

9%12%11% 9%10%10%

7% 6% 6% 7% 5% 6%

Naive (N=269)Non-naive (N=461)Total (N=730)

Top

3 re

ason

s w

hy (%

)(m

ore

than

1 re

spon

se a

llow

ed)

Que

stio

n(%

)

Dose adjusted from last Tx

Better controlspasticity

Presentation changed (additional

spastic muscles)

Presentation changed (fewer spastic muscles)

Not enough effect inprevious muscles treated

Increased number ofmuscles treated

Other

Tx2 (N=417) Tx3 (N=353) Tx4 (N=303) Tx5 (N=230) Tx6 (N=165) Tx7 (N=120) Tx8 (N=38) Overall (T=2105)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

42%36%39%

32%38%

30%32%

37%

45%32%33%

22%24%

21%29%32%

51%49%

45%60%

48%58%

67%51%

40%38%

46%37%

48%33%

67%41%

22%22%26%

21%15%

33%25%

22%

40%43%

37%37%

28%36%

27%39%

31%29%

33%35%35%

16%36%

31%

18%16%16%

31%15%16%

27%18%

Muscles treatedchanged from last Tx

Flexed knee (138 patients, 450 treatment sessions)

6040200

80100

Gastrocnemius Lateralhamstrings

Medialhamstrings

OtherTrea

tmen

t ses

sion

s(%

)

Muscles targeted

11%

44%

72%

22%2%

Tensorfascialata

Dose, UMean (SD)Mode (Min, Max)

Localization, n (%)AnatomicalE-stimEMGUltrasound

154 (103)100 (12, 1000)

212 (47) 26 (6)254 (56) 54 (12)

Flexed toes (118 patients, 292 treatment sessions)

6040200

80100

Trea

tmen

t ses

sion

s(%

)

Muscles targeted

81%

35%14%

Flexor digitorumlongus/brevis

Flexor hallucislongus

Other

Dose, UMean (SD)Mode (Min, Max)

Localization, n (%)AnatomicalE-stimEMGUltrasound

68 (54) 50 (10, 400)

120 (41)118 (40)147 (50) 55 (19)

Hitchhiker toe (65 patients, 179 treatment sessions)

6040200

80100

Extensor hallucislongus

OtherTrea

tmen

t ses

sion

s(%

)

100%

1%

Muscles targetedDose, UMean (SD)Mode (Min, Max)

Localization, n (%)AnatomicalE-stimEMGUltrasound

43 (23)50 (10, 100)

45 (25)63 (35)74 (41)57 (32)

Stiff extended knee (119 patients, 364 treatment sessions)

10%

6040200

80100

Trea

tmen

t ses

sion

s(%

)

Muscles targeted

66%

29% 29% 25%

Rectusfemoris

Vastuslateralis

Vastusmedialis

Vastusintermedius

Other

Dose, UMean (SD)Mode (Min, Max)

Localization, n (%)AnatomicalE-stimEMGUltrasound

138 (123)100 (24, 1100)

126 (35) 79 (22)175 (48) 74 (20)

Adducted thigh (107 patients, 373 treatment sessions)

6040200

80100

Trea

tmen

t ses

sion

s(%

)

Muscles targeted93%

2% 7%

Adductorlongus/brevis/

magnus

Gracilis Other

Dose, UMean (SD)Mode (Min, Max)

Localization, n (%)AnatomicalE-stimEMGUltrasound

162 (101)100 (20, 550)

213 (57) 36 (10)153 (41) 42 (11)

Flexed hip (44 patients, 116 treatment sessions)

604020

0

80100

Trea

tmen

t ses

sion

s(%

)

Muscles targeted

10%29%

53%

22%

Iliacus Psoas Rectusfemoris

Other

Dose, UMean (SD)Mode (Min, Max)

Localization, n (%)AnatomicalE-stimEMGUltrasound

93 (66)100 (15, 400)

51 (44) 6 (5) 68 (59) 15 (13)

Equinovarus foot (429 patients, 1609 treatment sessions)Dose, UMean (SD)Mode (Min, Max)

Localization, n (%)AnatomicalE-stimEMGUltrasound

220 (131)200 (15, 900)

556 (35)435 (27)807 (50)398 (25)

6040200

80100

Trea

tmen

t ses

sion

s(%

)

Muscles targeted

21%8%

79%70%

48%

13%

Flexordigitorum

longus

Flexorhallucislongus

Gastro-cnemius

Soleus Tibialisposterior

Other

NOTE: Localization methods were not mutually exclusive and may have been infl uenced by availability of equipment at the site. EMG = electromyography; E-stim = electrical stimulation; SD = standard deviation.

• Primary study objectives included: Evaluation of onabotulinumtoxinA

treatment utilization in adult patients with spasticity Assessment of patient and clinician

satisfaction with onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for spasticity

• Data were summarized using descriptive statistics

P3.17

To view a video of Dr. Alberto Esquenazi discussing these data or obtain a PDF of this poster:• Scan the QR code

OR • Visit www.allergancongressposters.com/545064Charges may apply. No personal information is stored.

Presented at TOXINS 2019, the 4th International Congress of the International Neurotoxin Association (INA); January 16–19, 2019; Copenhagen, Denmark


Recommended