+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear...

Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear...

Date post: 09-May-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
20
5 th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin, USA, 5-7 Sept. 2011 Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaks V.S. Marchenko , Ya.I. Kolesnichenko, and S.N. Reznik Institute for Nuclear Research, Kyiv, Ukraine
Transcript
Page 1: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin, USA, 5-7 Sept. 2011

Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaks

V.S. Marchenko, Ya.I. Kolesnichenko, and S.N. Reznik

Institute for Nuclear Research, Kyiv, Ukraine

Page 2: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Outline

•  Introduction •  Motivation of the present work •  Low frequency IAE in hybrids with trapped

energetic ions •  Alfvén cascades with downward frequency

sweeping •  Summary

Page 3: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Introduction

•  “Infernal” modes are pressure-driven MHD instabilities that can occur in tokamaks well below high-n ballooning stability limit

•  They occur for equilibria in which

•  First predicted by Zakharov (1978) and investigated numerically by Manickam et al. (1987)

•  For m/n=1, this mode is related to the quasi-interchange described by Wesson (1986)

•  Theory: Hastie & Hender (1988); Waelbroeck & Hazeltine (1988)

•  Hypothesis: below “infernal” stability limit there are low-n Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes (IAE), which can be excited by energetic ions

Page 4: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Motivation Low-frequency modes in hybrid shots on JT-60U

[N. Oyama et al., Nucl. Fusion 49, 065026 (2009)]

Page 5: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Motivation (cont’d) Alfvén cascades with downward sweeping on JET [I.G. Abel et al., Phys. Plasmas 16, 102506 (2009)]

Page 6: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

m = n = 1 IAE in hybrids •  Under assumptions (ω0/ωA)2<< γsβ, q0-1~ε, β~ε2,

minimization of the energy functional yields (Crew & Ramos, 1983)

Page 7: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

m = n = 1 IAE (cont’d)

•  Solution in the inner region

•  In the outer region

Page 8: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

m = n = 1 IAE dispersion relation

Page 9: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,
Page 10: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

IAE excitation

•  Sideband equation in the vicinity of the Alfvén resonance

•  Threshold

Page 11: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Eigenmodes with m = n > 1

• These eigenmodes suffer from higher continuum damping because Alfvén resonances of the sideband harmonic are located closer to the low-shear core • This is consistent with experiment on JT-60U, where multi-mode excitation has been observed only at highest NBI power

Page 12: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Multi-harmonic excitation in JT-60U [N. Oyama et al., NF 49, 065026 (2009)]

Page 13: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Alfvén cascades with downward frequency sweeping

Ware & Haas, 1966

Page 14: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,
Page 15: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Dispersion relation

Page 16: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,
Page 17: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Spectrum of IAEs with n = 1 – 4 in the lab frame for m/n = 2, q0= 2 + δq, ε = 1/3, (ωG / ωA)2 = 0.016βp , ωrot / ωA = 0.025, and λ = 10 .

Page 18: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Comparison with “quasi-modes”

•  Continuum damping of the IAE

•  Radiative damping of the “quasi-mode” [I.G. Abel et al., PoP 18, 040701 (2009)]

Page 19: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Summary: m = n = 1 IAE •  In contrast to the cylindrical GAE, the novel IAE has eigenfrequency well

below the minimum of the Alfvén continuum, and can exist in plasmas with VA (r) = const.

•  The properties of this mode are consistent with observations in hybrid discharges with high plasma pressure on the JT-60U tokamak

•  With FLR taken into account, eigenfrequency is slightly up-shifted

•  Ion Landau damping is weak

•  The analysis is restricted to plasmas slightly below the ideal MHD stability limit. The general case requires several complications, such as geodesic compression. Although study of such BAE would be interesting, for q0~1 these modes should be suppressed by strong ion Landau damping (consistent with experiment )

Page 20: Infernal Alfvén Eigenmodes in Low-Shear Tokamaksw3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/iaeapi/talks/a2-2-marchenko-v-pi-talk.pdf · 5th IAEA TM on “Theory of Plasma Instabilities” Austin,

Summary: downward cascades •  IAE can resolve the problem with interpretation

of the AC with downward frequency sweeping, observed in JET exclusively in shots with almost flat q-profile in the wide central region

•  IAE frequency lies below the Alfvén continuum •  Consistent with experiments, the obtained

frequency spectra are almost degenerate in the plasma frame

•  Continuum damping of the IAE is at least an order of magnitude lower than radiative damping of the “quasi-modes”

•  In contrast to “quasi-modes”, IAE occupy the whole low-shear core


Recommended