+ All Categories
Home > Business > Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Date post: 01-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: franklin-matters
View: 905 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
This document is being used in the EPA information sessions on the proposed storm water regulations to affect Bellingham, Franklin and Milford. Thanks to Mark Voorhees of the EPA for providing the copy of the document.
Popular Tags:
37
Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 Draft Storm Water General Permit for Draft Storm Water General Permit for Residually Designated Discharges Residually Designated Discharges Charles River Charles River Watershed Watershed ~310 square miles ~310 square miles 35 communities 35 communities Flows from Flows from Hopkinton to Hopkinton to Boston harbor Boston harbor
Transcript
Page 1: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Information Meeting – August 3, 2010Information Meeting – August 3, 2010Draft Storm Water General Permit for Draft Storm Water General Permit for

Residually Designated DischargesResidually Designated Discharges

Charles River Charles River Watershed Watershed ~310 square miles~310 square miles 35 communities35 communities Flows from Flows from

Hopkinton to Hopkinton to Boston harborBoston harbor

Page 2: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Charles Residual Charles Residual Designation Draft General Designation Draft General

PermitPermit Who is coveredWho is covered Designated discharges must obtain Designated discharges must obtain

permitspermits EPA has recently published a draft permitEPA has recently published a draft permit

Permit is on website and EPA welcomes Permit is on website and EPA welcomes comments on it until midnight on comments on it until midnight on September 30, 2010September 30, 2010

Page 3: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

What has been What has been designated as needing designated as needing storm water permitstorm water permit Storm water dischargesStorm water discharges

From properties with impervious surfaces From properties with impervious surfaces equal to or greater than 2 acresequal to or greater than 2 acres

Contiguous properties under common Contiguous properties under common ownership or properties with common ownership or properties with common structures aggregatedstructures aggregated

Certain land uses excepted: single family Certain land uses excepted: single family residential; government properties residential; government properties otherwise regulated by permits; specified otherwise regulated by permits; specified land uses such as recreational camps, land uses such as recreational camps, mobile home parks, etc.mobile home parks, etc.

Page 4: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

What has been What has been designated, cont.designated, cont.

Designation covers Milford, Designation covers Milford, Bellingham and FranklinBellingham and Franklin

Covers only discharges to the Covers only discharges to the Charles River watershedCharles River watershed

Plan to designate rest of watershed Plan to designate rest of watershed laterlater

Page 5: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Municipal Storm water Municipal Storm water PermitsPermits

North Coastal permit published, public North Coastal permit published, public comment period has closed, EPA intends to comment period has closed, EPA intends to issue by year’s endissue by year’s end

The North Coastal municipal permit covers The North Coastal municipal permit covers all cities and towns in Charles watershedall cities and towns in Charles watershed

Requires Municipalities to enhance the Requires Municipalities to enhance the work they were required to do under 2003 work they were required to do under 2003 permit permit

Requires municipalities to develop a Requires municipalities to develop a Phosphorus Control Plan (PCP) in four (4) Phosphorus Control Plan (PCP) in four (4) yearsyears

Requires municipalities to complete Requires municipalities to complete implementation of PCP within ten (10) yearsimplementation of PCP within ten (10) years

Page 6: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Relationship between Relationship between Reducing Phosphorous Reducing Phosphorous

Discharge (RD) and Discharge (RD) and municipal storm water municipal storm water

permitspermits Municipalities required to reduce Municipalities required to reduce phosphorus discharges by approx 50%phosphorus discharges by approx 50%

Municipalities can achieve reductions Municipalities can achieve reductions from any sources, not just muni from any sources, not just muni propertyproperty

Reductions in phosphorus achieved at Reductions in phosphorus achieved at private sites will be credited to towns private sites will be credited to towns

Page 7: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Municipal Phosphorus Municipal Phosphorus ProgramProgram

Draft Reducing Phosphorous Discharge (RD) Draft Reducing Phosphorous Discharge (RD) permit encourages municipalities to develop permit encourages municipalities to develop phosphorus control programs (such as utility)phosphorus control programs (such as utility)

Designing a municipal-wide storm water Designing a municipal-wide storm water strategy superior to lot-by-lot approachstrategy superior to lot-by-lot approach

Some properties will be able to reduce Some properties will be able to reduce phosphorus discharges more efficientlyphosphorus discharges more efficiently

Draft RD permit provides flexibility in Draft RD permit provides flexibility in forming municipal programsforming municipal programs

Page 8: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Next Steps for EPANext Steps for EPA

EPA will accept written commentsEPA will accept written comments Comment period open until Comment period open until

September 30, 2010September 30, 2010 EPA will issue final permit, final EPA will issue final permit, final

residual designation, and response residual designation, and response to significant comments, probably by to significant comments, probably by end of yearend of year

Page 9: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Next Steps for Next Steps for PermitteesPermittees

Permit becomes effective (Effective Permit becomes effective (Effective Date)Date)

Notice of Intent (NOI) due to EPA Notice of Intent (NOI) due to EPA within 180 days of the Effective Date within 180 days of the Effective Date

EPA reviews Notice Of Intent (NOI)EPA reviews Notice Of Intent (NOI) EPA responds with an authorization EPA responds with an authorization

letter letter Official start of permit coverage on date Official start of permit coverage on date

of receipt of EPA authorization letterof receipt of EPA authorization letter

Page 10: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Draft PermitDraft PermitOverview of Pollution Reduction Overview of Pollution Reduction

RequirementsRequirements

Two categories of Two categories of requirements requirements

Storm Water Management Plan (SMP) & Baseline

Performance Standards

Phosphorus Reduction

Requirements

Page 11: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Compliance Timeline for Compliance Timeline for Major Permit RequirementsMajor Permit Requirements

2 years

3 years

4 years

5 years

X X

* Receipt of EPA Authorization Letter = Year 0 (YR 0)

Permit Effective Date

Draft Permit Output Requirements YR 0 YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 …Figure 1 - Compliance Timeline for Major Output Requirments of Draft Permit

If BMPs at DD Site - Construct and inspect BMPs

Participation in a CMPP would eliminate or delay these requirements at the DD Site

If participation in CMPP - Annual certification of participation

Phos

phor

us R

educ

tion

Requ

irem

ents

SMP

and

Base

line

Perf

orm

ance

St

anda

rds

DD Site Owners submit Notice of Intent (NOI ) to EPA

DD Site Owners receive EPA Authorization Letter *

Develop Storm Water Management Plan

Implement Storm Water Mangement Plan

Develop Preliminary Phosphorus Reduction Plan and submit to municipality

Develop Final Phosphorus Reduction Plan and submit to municipality

If BMPs at DD Site - Prepare design plans and obtain permits

30 days

180 days

Page 12: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Baseline Performance Baseline Performance StandardsStandards

for all Designated for all Designated Discharge (DD) SitesDischarge (DD) Sites

Implementation begins Implementation begins 30 days30 days after after permit coverage is authorizedpermit coverage is authorized

Good housekeeping and pollution Good housekeeping and pollution prevention practicesprevention practices

Also: Also: Form SW

Mgmt Team

Illicit Discharge

Elimination &

Detection

Operation & Maintenance of SW system

Spring & Fall

sweeping

Organic waste and leaf litter collection

Page 13: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Phosphorus Reduction Phosphorus Reduction RequirementsRequirements

Achieve the equivalent of a 65% Achieve the equivalent of a 65% reduction in phosphorus load from the reduction in phosphorus load from the developed portion of the DD Site developed portion of the DD Site through implementation of any one or through implementation of any one or combination of the following:combination of the following:

1. Enhanced non-structural Best Management Practice (BMPs) at

the DD Site

3. Participation in a Certified Municipal Phosphorus Program (CMPP)

2. Structural BMPs (e.g., impervious area disconnections, infiltration practices, rain gardens, filtering systems, etc. at the DD Site

65% Reductio

n in annual

Phosphorus Load

Page 14: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Summary of Individual Summary of Individual Phosphorus Reduction Phosphorus Reduction

RequirementsRequirementsPreliminary Phosphorus

Reduction Plan submitted to municipality – 2 years

Final Phosphorus Reduction Plan submitted to municipality – 3 years

BMPs at the DD Site and/or Participation in a Certified Municipal Phosphorus

Program (CMPP)Implementation of Final

Phosphorus Reduction Plan – 5 years

Page 15: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Summary of Preliminary Phosphorus

Reduction PlanSubmit to municipality by

Year 2Site

Suitability Analysis

Site Engineeri

ng

Statement of intent how

permittee intends to comply with

phosphorus load reduction

requirements

Page 16: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

One Inch Storm Water One Inch Storm Water Control Provision Control Provision Draft Permit App. D II(C)Draft Permit App. D II(C)

The capture and no discharge of one (1) inch of rainfall from impervious surfaces at the DD Site could eliminate permit requirements for DD Site engineering analyses

Page 17: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Enhanced Non-Structural BMPs Enhanced Non-Structural BMPs Eligible for Phosphorus Reduction Eligible for Phosphorus Reduction

CreditsCredits Enhanced non-Enhanced non-

structural Best structural Best Management Practice Management Practice (BMPs)(BMPs) Enhanced sweeping programEnhanced sweeping program Semi-annual catch basin Semi-annual catch basin

cleaningcleaning No application of fertilizers No application of fertilizers

containing phosphorus containing phosphorus Weekly leaf litter and organic Weekly leaf litter and organic

debris collection programdebris collection program

Attachment 2 to App. D to Permit provides methodology for calculating default phosphorus reduction credits for enhanced non-structural BMPs

Page 18: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Structural BMPs for Structural BMPs for Phosphorus Reduction Phosphorus Reduction

CreditCredit Infiltration practices Infiltration practices

are required when are required when feasiblefeasible Surface infiltration Surface infiltration

(e.g., basins, swales, (e.g., basins, swales, rain gardens)rain gardens)

Subsurface Subsurface infiltration (e.g., infiltration (e.g., trench and trench and chambers)chambers)

Excellent for phosphorus and bacteria removal and replenishing ground water aquifers

Page 19: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Structural BMPs for Structural BMPs for Phosphorus Reduction Phosphorus Reduction

Credit (continued)Credit (continued) When Infiltration practices are not When Infiltration practices are not

feasible, other practices are feasible, other practices are acceptable. Some examples include:acceptable. Some examples include: Biofiltration systemsBiofiltration systems Filter systemsFilter systems Gravel wetlandsGravel wetlands Commercial or proprietary treatment Commercial or proprietary treatment

systemssystems Permeable pavementsPermeable pavements Etc.Etc.

Attachment 3 to App. D to the Permit provides a methodology to calculate

phosphorus removal credits for several structural BMPs based on physical

storage capacity

Page 20: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Phosphorus Reduction Phosphorus Reduction Requirements (continued)Requirements (continued)

municipality by municipality by year 3year 3Final

Phosphorus Reduction Plan

details how permittee will

achieve phosphorus load

reductionsSubmit to

municipality by Year 3

Implement BMPs

at the DD Site

and/or

Participate in a CMPP

Page 21: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Phosphorus Reduction Phosphorus Reduction Requirements (continued)Requirements (continued)

municipality by municipality by year 3year 3Implementation of Final Phosphorus Reduction

Plan Complete by

Year 5

Construct, operate, and inspect structural BMPs by year 5

If participation in a CMPP, begin annual certification by year 5

If structural BMPs at DD Site, complete construction plans and obtain permits by year 4

Page 22: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Certified Municipal Certified Municipal Phosphorus Program Phosphorus Program

(CMPP)(CMPP) Utility?Utility? Cost effectiveCost effective Optimal BMP location and sizeOptimal BMP location and size Inter-related with Municipal storm Inter-related with Municipal storm

water permitswater permits

Page 23: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Examples

Small Office Complex (site meeting One Inch Storm Water

Control Provision (Appendix D, Part 2.C))

Condo Development Shopping Plaza Car Dealership

Page 24: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Example – Small Office Complex

(Site meeting One Inch Storm Water Control Provision)

Page 25: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Example – Small Office Complex

(Site meeting One Inch Storm Water Control Provision)

3.5 acre site 2.0 acres impervious 0.5 acres managed pervious 1.0 acres unmanaged pervious

1” runoff volume from impervious surfaces: 7,260 ft3

Existing SW BMPs Parking lot sweeping (as needed) Semi-annual catch basin cleaning Infiltration basin

7,500 ft3 capacity Treats 100% of stormwater runoff from impervious areas on site Soil infiltration rate: 1.02 in/year Cumulative phosphorus load reduction: 97%

One Inch Storm Water Control Provision found in Appendix D

Page 26: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Example – Condominium Development (pre-retrofit)

Page 27: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Example – Condominium Development (post-retrofit)

Discontinue application of

fertilizer containing

phosphorus on all

managed pervious

areas

Page 28: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Example – Condominium Development

PRE-RETROFIT Land Use: High Density

Residential 18 acre site

5.8 impervious 9.3 managed pervious 2.9 unmanaged pervious

Infiltration rate: Excellent Current SW mgmt

Street/Parking lot runoff collection in catch basins - discharged into tributary

Rooftop runoff unmanaged SW BMPs in place

Catch basin cleaning Street sweeping

From Appendix D, Attachment 1: Phosphorus Load

15.45 lb/year Required Reduction

10.04 lb/year

RETROFITS Porous asphalt

2.1 acres of parking lot space Bioretention cell

Treating rooftop runoff from 7 of 9 buildings

Gravel wetland Treatment of catch basin

collected runoff Phosphorus-free fertilizer

application On all managed pervious area

Using Appendix D, Attachments 2 and 3, total annual phosphorus reduction credit from structural and non-structural BMPs: 12.51 lb/yr

Page 29: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Example – Shopping Plaza (pre-retrofit)

Page 30: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Example – Shopping Plaza (post-retrofit)

Curb cuts

Curb cuts

Infiltration trench

Discontinue application of

fertilizer containing

phosphorus on all managed

pervious areas

Bioretention cell

Enhanced organic waste and leaf litter

collection program on all

impervious areas

Page 31: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Example – Shopping Plaza PRE-RETROFIT Land Use: Commercial 5.5 acre site:

5.02 acres impervious 0.25 acres managed pervious 0.24 acres unmanaged pervious

Infiltration rate: Good Current SW mgmt:

Street/Parking lot runoff collection in catch basins, discharged into municipal storm drain system

Rooftop runoff directly connected to storm drain system

SW BMPs in place: Catch basin cleaning Street sweeping

Using Appendix D, Attachment 1:` Phosphorus Load:

11.26 lb/year Required Reduction:

7.32 lb/year

RETROFITS Curb cuts and bioretention on nine

existing parking islands Close off catch basins Allow infiltration of stormwater

Infiltration Trenches Treating stormwater runoff from

site’s storm drain system prior to discharge to municipal system

Disconnect rooftop runoff Allows longer residence time and

some capture by bioretention Phosphorus-free fertilizer

application On all managed pervious areas

Enhanced organic waste and leaf litter collection program

On all impervious areas, 1/week, April 1 through December 15

Using Appendix D, Attachments 2 and 3, total annual phosphorus reduction credit from structural and non-structural BMPs: 12.51 lb/yr

Page 32: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Example – Car Dealership (pre-retrofit)

Page 33: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Example – Car Dealership (post-retrofit)

Porous pavement Tree filter boxes (bioretention system)

Page 34: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Example – Car Dealership

PRE-RETROFIT Land Use: Industrial 2.02 acre site

0.01 acres managed pervious 2.01 acres impervious

Infiltration rate: Extremely poor

Current SW mgmt: runoff collection in catch

basins, discharged into municipal storm drain system

SW BMPs in place: None

Using Appendix D, Attachment 1: Phosphorus Load:

3.58 lb/year Required Reduction:

2.33 lb/year

RETROFITS Ten (10) tree filter boxes

(bioretention systems) Allow infiltration of storm

water Collect storm water from

portion of site and treat prior to discharge to municipal system

Pervious pavement on more than 50% of site

Treating stormwater runoff from majority of site prior to discharge to municipal system

Using Appendix D, Attachments 2 and 3 total annual phosphorus reduction credit from structural and non-structural BMPs: 3.16 lb/yr

Page 35: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Examples (disclaimer) The examples presented are meant only to

demonstrate the general principles and process a permittee might take to calculate phosphorus loading from the site, estimate the phosphorus reductions required, and identify needed BMPs.

The purpose is only to provide an illustration for clarification purposes.

The particular facts or calculations in the hypotheticals should not be relied upon, and each permittee must conduct an evaluation for its property as described in the permit.

Page 36: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Information and Contact Information and Contact

Permit Documents are located online at:Permit Documents are located online at:http://www.epa.gov/ne/npdes/charlesriver/index.html http://www.epa.gov/ne/npdes/charlesriver/index.html

Contact Information: Contact Information: Mark VoorheesMark Voorhees

US EPA Region IUS EPA Region I

5 Post Office Sq.Suite1005 Post Office Sq.Suite100

Mail Code OEP06-4Mail Code OEP06-4

Boston, MA 02109-3912Boston, MA 02109-3912

Phone: (617) 918-1537 Phone: (617) 918-1537

Email: [email protected]: [email protected]

Page 37: Information Meeting – August 3, 2010 - Handout

Questions and Questions and DiscussionDiscussion


Recommended