Information Society Technologies (IST) KA1 Systems and Services for the Citizen 6th Call,...

Information Society Technologies (IST)Information Society Technologies (IST)KA1 Systems and Services for the CitizenKA1 Systems and Services for the Citizen

6th Call, Information Day - Friday 2nd February, 2001GENERAL INFORMATION

DG Information Society DG Information Society European CommissionEuropean Commission

M. Richonnier

2

IST -KA1 - Info Day - 02.02.2001IST -KA1 - Info Day - 02.02.2001

DISCLAIMERDISCLAIMER

Aspects of these presentations interpret Aspects of these presentations interpret legal documents.legal documents.

It is the legal documents and not the It is the legal documents and not the presentations that are legally binding.presentations that are legally binding.

M. Richonnier

3

Objectives of the Information DayObjectives of the Information Day

To help you make a better proposal To receive quality proposals To answer any questions To allow you to network

The slides will be on Cordis The participants list will be published on Cordis (if no

objections)

M. Richonnier

4

Agenda: MorningAgenda: Morning

09h15 – 09h45 Objectives/focus of 6th Call- M. Richonnier 09h45 – 10h05 Preparing a Proposal - W. Van Puymbroeck 10h05 - 10h25 Overview of areas

HEALTH - J-C HealyPERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS - H. HaglundADMINISTRATIONS - G. Santucci

10h25 - 10H40 Presentation of Protool - A. Burgueno 10h40 – 11h00 Questions and Answers 11h00 - 11h30 Coffee Break + move to parallel sessions 11h30 – 13h00 Parallel sessions by area

M. Richonnier

5

Agenda: AfternoonAgenda: Afternoon

13h00 - 14h00 Lunch

14h00 - 16h30 Ad-Hoc meetings by area* Partnering, marriage brokerage.. * Discussions with Commission staff* ...

16h30 - 17h00 Parallel sessions by area* Final discussion

M. Richonnier

6

Vision of the IST programmeVision of the IST programme

””CCreate an reate an ambient intelligenceambient intelligence landscape landscape

(for seamless delivery of services and applications)(for seamless delivery of services and applications)

in Europe relying also upon testbeds andin Europe relying also upon testbeds and

open source softwareopen source software, develop , develop user-friendlinessuser-friendliness,,

and develop and converge the and develop and converge the networking infrastructurenetworking infrastructure in Europe to in Europe to

world-class"world-class"

http://www.cordis.lu/ist/

istag.htm

M. Richonnier

7

Vision of the IST - KA1Vision of the IST - KA1“Ambient intelligence”“Ambient intelligence”

Beyond “ the screen and keyboard interface”Beyond “ the screen and keyboard interface” A knowledge society for ALLA knowledge society for ALL ““Our surrounding is the interface” to IST Our surrounding is the interface” to IST

applications and servicesapplications and services Multi-sensorial interfaces supported by computing Multi-sensorial interfaces supported by computing

and networking:and networking:– everywhereeverywhere– in everyday objects in everyday objects – offering natural interactions (voice, gesture etc.)offering natural interactions (voice, gesture etc.)

M. Richonnier

8

IST KA1 R&D paradigmsIST KA1 R&D paradigms

From From data telematicsdata telematics (3rd FP) to (3rd FP) to multi-media multi-media telematicstelematics (4th FP) to (4th FP) to ambient intelligenceambient intelligence (5th FP) (5th FP)

Ambient intelligence = Ambient intelligence = ubiquitous computing + ubiquitous computing + ubiquitous ubiquitous communication + intelligent interfacescommunication + intelligent interfaces which which will allow...will allow...

The realisation of The realisation of innovative,innovative, user-friendly, intelligent and user-friendly, intelligent and communicating application systems communicating application systems that will that will

improveimprove delivery of delivery of services to usersservices to users..

M. Richonnier

9

Reminder on ISTReminder on IST

Visible part of integrationVisible part of integration: Cross Programme Actions and : Cross Programme Actions and

Integrated Application Platforms (12% of budget) = Integrated Application Platforms (12% of budget) =

““the tip of the iceberg”the tip of the iceberg” Application R&D (+/- 50% of the budget) combines both Application R&D (+/- 50% of the budget) combines both

technology research and system integration technology research and system integration Genuine industrial participationGenuine industrial participation with a view to with a view to

exploitation of results exploitation of results

M. Richonnier

10

Key Action 1: ObjectivesKey Action 1: Objectives

Exploit the potential offered by progress in “ambient Exploit the potential offered by progress in “ambient intelligence” through RTD in intelligence” through RTD in new new application systems application systems for making general interest services user-friendly, for making general interest services user-friendly, dependable, cost-effective and interoperable.dependable, cost-effective and interoperable.

improve competitiveness & meet user demands

M. Richonnier

11

1.1. Innovative Innovative application systems, application systems, i.e. systems that will be new at the end of the project i.e. systems that will be new at the end of the project

2. That have significant 2. That have significant exploitationexploitation potential potential

Key Action 1:AimKey Action 1:Aim

- - progress wrt state of the artprogress wrt state of the artInnovative integrationInnovative integration

New IST componentsNew IST components

M. Richonnier

12

Key Action 1:Key Action 1:FocusFocus

Improving impact:Improving impact:– Critical mass: Critical mass:

• Open to larger projects - no “one size fits all”Open to larger projects - no “one size fits all”

– Concentration on strategic issues Concentration on strategic issues

Focus on the vision of “ambient intelligence”Focus on the vision of “ambient intelligence” Fostering longer-term and/or high-risk effortFostering longer-term and/or high-risk effort Reinforcing the eEurope momentum beyond 2002Reinforcing the eEurope momentum beyond 2002

M. Richonnier

13

Key Action 1 in Call 6Key Action 1 in Call 6(First call in 2001)(First call in 2001)

Open: January 27, 2001Open: January 27, 2001 Deadline: April 25, 2001 Deadline: April 25, 2001

– do not wait until the last minute!do not wait until the last minute!– pre-register your proposal!pre-register your proposal!

Evaluation: 13 -19 May 2001Evaluation: 13 -19 May 2001 Evaluation Summary Reports: before May 30Evaluation Summary Reports: before May 30 Negotiation: June - July (one month if good “technical Negotiation: June - July (one month if good “technical

Annex” / good consortium!)Annex” / good consortium!) Signature: September for first contract to start on Signature: September for first contract to start on

October 1st October 1st

M. Richonnier

14

KEY Action 1 in Call 6 (indicative budget range )KEY Action 1 in Call 6 (indicative budget range )

HealthHealth 30 -35 30 -35 MEuroMEuro

(including +/- 5 (including +/- 5 MEuroMEuro for best practice and trials)for best practice and trials)

Persons with Special NeedsPersons with Special Needs 17 - 20 17 - 20 MEuroMEuro

AdministrationsAdministrations 3 - 5 3 - 5 MEuroMEuro

(Best Practice and Trials only)(Best Practice and Trials only)

TOTAL 55 TOTAL 55 MEuroMEuro M. Richonnier

15

Attract RTD proposals with critical mass, strategic Attract RTD proposals with critical mass, strategic

impact impact and real economic value, e.g. an average and real economic value, e.g. an average

EU funding EU funding

of of 2.0 M€2.0 M€

KEY Action 1:KEY Action 1: Our goals Our goals

M. Richonnier

GOAL 1

16

Attract Consortia that are manageable and where all Attract Consortia that are manageable and where all

partners have a clear role and a significant task in partners have a clear role and a significant task in

contributioncontribution, , e.g.:e.g.: Consortia of not more than 6 partners is idealConsortia of not more than 6 partners is ideal No partner with microscopic input (such as 15000 € No partner with microscopic input (such as 15000 €

per year!) per year!)


M. Richonnier

GOAL 2

17

In order to avoid cost on your and our side, only high In order to avoid cost on your and our side, only high

quality proposals should be submitted, e.g.:quality proposals should be submitted, e.g.: Over-subscription not more than a factor of 4Over-subscription not more than a factor of 4


M. Richonnier

GOAL 3

18

KA1: KA1: Lessons from 4th CallLessons from 4th Call

RTD KA2 KA3 KA1 KA1TARGET6th Call

Average duration(months)

27 23 31 30+ months

Average #participants

7 8 10 7-

Average EUfunding (MEuro)

1.8 1.7 2 2+Meuros

AverageOversubscription

6+ 3 4.1 4.0

M. Richonnier

19

KA1: KA1: Cluster managementCluster management

HealthHealth– Intelligent systems for the citizen (open)Intelligent systems for the citizen (open)– Intelligent systems for the patient (open)Intelligent systems for the patient (open)– Intelligent systems for the Healthcare professional (open)Intelligent systems for the Healthcare professional (open)

Persons with Special NeedsPersons with Special Needs– Intelligent assistive systems (open)Intelligent assistive systems (open)– Intelligent systems for independent living (open)Intelligent systems for independent living (open)

AdministrationsAdministrations– e-e-democracydemocracy– smart government (Take-up open)smart government (Take-up open)

M. Richonnier

20

KA1: Cluster ManagementKA1: Cluster Management

Make sure your proposalMake sure your proposal

fits well with the open clustersfits well with the open clusters

does not duplicate existing projectsdoes not duplicate existing projects

(Look at Cordis!)(Look at Cordis!)

M. Richonnier

21

KA1: KA1: 6th Call6th Call

GOOD LUCK!GOOD LUCK!

M. Richonnier

22

Call for Proposals & EligibilityCall for Proposals & Eligibility

Guide for Proposals & Evaluation CriteriaGuide for Proposals & Evaluation Criteria

Feedback from previous EvaluationsFeedback from previous Evaluations

Some further opportunitiesSome further opportunities

Final concluding remarksFinal concluding remarks

Proposal PreparationProposal Preparation

W. Van Puymbroeck

23

Call for ProposalsCall for Proposals published on 27th January published on 27th January

It defines:It defines: the Action Lines that are openthe Action Lines that are open

Reference to the Reference to the Workprogramme 2001Workprogramme 2001 the Type of Actions called forthe Type of Actions called for

See See Guide for ProposersGuide for Proposers the deadline and method of delivery of a proposalthe deadline and method of delivery of a proposal refers torefers to Manual of Proposal Evaluation Procedures Manual of Proposal Evaluation Procedures

Proposals have to be in Brussels Proposals have to be in Brussels

on 25 April 2001 before 17:00on 25 April 2001 before 17:00

Call for Proposers and EligibilityCall for Proposers and Eligibility

24

A proposal has 3 parts:A proposal has 3 parts: Part A: Administrative, budgetary information (Forms A0-A4)Part A: Administrative, budgetary information (Forms A0-A4) Part B: Description of contribution to scientific/technical Part B: Description of contribution to scientific/technical

objectives and workplanobjectives and workplan Part C: Description of EC policies, Economic development, Part C: Description of EC policies, Economic development,

management and participantsmanagement and participants There are 5 blocks of Evaluation CriteriaThere are 5 blocks of Evaluation Criteria::

Scientific/technological quality and innovationScientific/technological quality and innovation Community added value and contribution to EC policiesCommunity added value and contribution to EC policies Contribution to Community social objectivesContribution to Community social objectives Economic development and S&T prospectsEconomic development and S&T prospects Resources, Partnership and management Resources, Partnership and management

Guide for Proposers - Evaluation CriteriaGuide for Proposers - Evaluation Criteria

25

Guide for Proposers -Evaluation CriteriaGuide for Proposers -Evaluation CriteriaCont’dCont’d

Part B of ProposalPart B of Proposal

B1 Title pageB2 Content listB3 ObjectivesB4 Contribution to programme Key Action objectivesB5 InnovationB6 Project Workplan

Evaluation Criteria 1Evaluation Criteria 1Scientific Technological Scientific Technological

quality and innovationquality and innovation

(incl. Workpackage list, deliverables list, workpackage description)

For RTD proposals For RTD proposals

this part this part

needs to be needs to be

anonymousanonymous

26

Guide for Proposers - Evaluation CriteriaGuide for Proposers - Evaluation CriteriaCont’dCont’d

Part C of ProposalPart C of Proposal

C1 Title pageC2 Content listC3 Community added value

and contribution to EC policies

C4 Contribution to Community social objectives

Evaluation Criteria 2Evaluation Criteria 2Community added value Community added value

and contribution to EC policiesand contribution to EC policies

Evaluation Criteria 3Evaluation Criteria 3Contribution to Community social objectivesContribution to Community social objectives

27

Guide for Proposers - Evaluation CriteriaGuide for Proposers - Evaluation CriteriaCont’dCont’d

Part C of Proposal Part C of Proposal cont’dcont’d

C5 Project managementC6 Description of the consortiumC7 Description of the participants

C8 Economic development and scientific and technological prospects

Evaluation Criteria 4Evaluation Criteria 4Economic development and S&T prospectsEconomic development and S&T prospects

Evaluation Criteria 5Evaluation Criteria 5Resources, partnership and managementResources, partnership and management

28

Criteria Weight (1) Threshold (2)

Scientific/Technological Qualityand innovation 4 >= 3Community Added Valueand contribution to EU policy 1 >= 2Contribution to Comm. Social objectives 1 -Economic Dev; S&T prospects(range of applications, exploitation, strategic impact, dissemination) 2 >= 3Resources, Partnership, Management 2 >= 2

1) Weight on a scale of 10 (sum 10)2) Threshold with respect to score 0-5


For RTD

29


Evaluation criterion 1Evaluation criterion 1::

Scientific/Technological quality and innovation (for RTD)Scientific/Technological quality and innovation (for RTD) Quality Quality Innovation and riskInnovation and risk AdequacyAdequacy Evaluation criterion 2Evaluation criterion 2: :

Community added value and contribution to EC policies (for Community added value and contribution to EC policies (for RTD)RTD)

European Dimension of the problemEuropean Dimension of the problem European Added ValueEuropean Added Value EU policyEU policy

30



Contribution to Community social objectives (for RTD)Contribution to Community social objectives (for RTD) Quality of Life and Health and SafetyQuality of Life and Health and Safety EmploymentEmployment Preserving and/or enhancing the environmentPreserving and/or enhancing the environment


Economic development and S & T prospects (for RTD)Economic development and S & T prospects (for RTD) Usefulness and range of applications, exploitations plansUsefulness and range of applications, exploitations plans Strategic impactStrategic impact Dissemination strategiesDissemination strategies

31



Management and resources (for RTD)Management and resources (for RTD)Quality of management and project approachQuality of management and project approachQuality of partnership, involvement of users and other Quality of partnership, involvement of users and other

actorsactorsAppropriateness of resourcesAppropriateness of resources

32

Only RTD i.e. research, demonstration and combined research and Only RTD i.e. research, demonstration and combined research and demonstration projectsdemonstration projects

When the contract hasWhen the contract has– A cost of more than 250 000 Euros for the first 12 month period of the A cost of more than 250 000 Euros for the first 12 month period of the

project, the audit certificate to be provided with first interim cost statementproject, the audit certificate to be provided with first interim cost statement– A total project cost exceeding 250 000 Euros for the final consolidated cost A total project cost exceeding 250 000 Euros for the final consolidated cost

statement, the audit certificate to be provided together with the final statement, the audit certificate to be provided together with the final consolidated cost statement, also for those that have provided audit consolidated cost statement, also for those that have provided audit certificates with their first interim cost statementcertificates with their first interim cost statement

Eligible costsEligible costs– Community financial contribution shall not exceed 4000 Euros per audit Community financial contribution shall not exceed 4000 Euros per audit

certificatecertificate

Guide for Proposers:Guide for Proposers:Audit certificatesAudit certificates

NEW!

33

Some Evaluation FeedbackSome Evaluation Feedback

Evaluators consider all aspects of the proposal and have Evaluators consider all aspects of the proposal and have different backgroundsdifferent backgrounds– Experts in IST, knowledgeable in application area, understand Experts in IST, knowledgeable in application area, understand

business issuesbusiness issues

Proposers have to make convincing case of innovation Proposers have to make convincing case of innovation and present very clear objectivesand present very clear objectives– Your strategic objectives matter mostYour strategic objectives matter most

Proposal has to be realistic and “exciting” at the same timeProposal has to be realistic and “exciting” at the same time Make the case for Community fundingMake the case for Community funding

– i.e. both European level and need for public moneyi.e. both European level and need for public money

34


All partners must have a clear role and the consortium All partners must have a clear role and the consortium has to reach “critical mass”has to reach “critical mass”– importance of “Consortium engineering”importance of “Consortium engineering”

Carefully consider “release” level of deliverablesCarefully consider “release” level of deliverables– note e.g. the objective to foster the development and use of note e.g. the objective to foster the development and use of

open source softwareopen source software

Management has to consider all issues e.g.Management has to consider all issues e.g.– risk managementrisk management– handling of conflicthandling of conflict– communication strategycommunication strategy

35


The proposal may not have a weak point The proposal may not have a weak point – thresholds and weightingthresholds and weighting– each evaluation criteria discussed on its own meritseach evaluation criteria discussed on its own merits

Avoid easy criticismAvoid easy criticism– ask colleagues to critique early versionsask colleagues to critique early versions

Proposals which are “incontournable” have up to now Proposals which are “incontournable” have up to now always been fundedalways been funded

Evaluators evaluate what is written, not what is in your Evaluators evaluate what is written, not what is in your mindmind

Evaluators look more for content than styleEvaluators look more for content than style

36

Some Evaluation FeedbackSome Evaluation Feedback Call 3 Evaluation resultsCall 3 Evaluation results

Area 1.Received 2.Ranked 3.Selected 4.Reserve 1/3

Best practice inhealthcare (I.1.4)

21 5 4 1 5.2

Health (I.1.1, I.1.2,I.1.3)

98 19 18 1 5.4

Intelligentassistive systems(I.2.1)

32 8 7 1 4.6

Systems andservices forindependent living(I.3.1)

42 13 11 2 3.8

Total 193 45 40 5 4.8

37

Further opportunities:(AL VIII.1.6)Further opportunities:(AL VIII.1.6)Proposals for extension with NAS partnersProposals for extension with NAS partners

All IST project types can be extendedAll IST project types can be extended New WP’s or inclusion in existing WP’sNew WP’s or inclusion in existing WP’s Extension should be useful: minimum 1 yearExtension should be useful: minimum 1 year New partners/work should add valueNew partners/work should add value Submitted by co-ordinator of existing project together with all existing and Submitted by co-ordinator of existing project together with all existing and

new NAS partnersnew NAS partners Large majority of extension budget to new NAS partnersLarge majority of extension budget to new NAS partners Include existing Annex IInclude existing Annex I Proposals indicate VIII.1.6 and AL of existing projectProposals indicate VIII.1.6 and AL of existing project Extension proposal will be evaluated as a new proposalExtension proposal will be evaluated as a new proposal Only projects can be extended - not actions in negotiation!Only projects can be extended - not actions in negotiation! Implemented through contract amendmentImplemented through contract amendment Appendix in Guide for ProposersAppendix in Guide for Proposers

NEW!

38

Further opportunities:Further opportunities: The European IST prize The European IST prize

The most distinguished prize for innovative products in the field The most distinguished prize for innovative products in the field of information technologyof information technology

20 Winner Prizes of each 5000 Euros each, 3 grand prizes of 20 Winner Prizes of each 5000 Euros each, 3 grand prizes of 200 000 Euros each.200 000 Euros each.

Total amount awarded:Total amount awarded: 700 000 Euros700 000 Euros Benefits: public recognition, widespread PR, enhancement of the Benefits: public recognition, widespread PR, enhancement of the

visibility, credibility and the prospects of the Winner companiesvisibility, credibility and the prospects of the Winner companies Open to Open to 31 countries31 countries Deadline for applications: 15 May 2001Deadline for applications: 15 May 2001

More info: www.it-prize.orgMore info: www.it-prize.org

39

Further opportunities:Further opportunities: CPA’s - focus CPA’s - focus

Address topics common to several Key ActionsAddress topics common to several Key Actions– Themes of strategic natureThemes of strategic nature– Bringing together fragmented areasBringing together fragmented areas– Supporting aspects of integration and convergenceSupporting aspects of integration and convergence

Provide an addition perspective to proposersProvide an addition perspective to proposers Defined by Action Lines in the WorkprogrammeDefined by Action Lines in the Workprogramme

– Section 5 of the WorkprogrammeSection 5 of the Workprogramme

Resources available … +/- 12% of the IST budgetResources available … +/- 12% of the IST budget

40

Further opportunities:Further opportunities: CPA’s - Action Lines CPA’s - Action Lines

Home environmentsHome environments Multi-sensorial, multi-modal and multilingual interactionMulti-sensorial, multi-modal and multilingual interaction GISGIS DependabilityDependability Smart CardsSmart Cards Next Generation NetworkingNext Generation Networking Socio-economic impact and indicatorsSocio-economic impact and indicators eeLearning for youth in the digital ageLearning for youth in the digital age Grid computing and challenging applicationsGrid computing and challenging applications Regional pilot actions and demonstrations for the new economyRegional pilot actions and demonstrations for the new economy Nanotechnology and applications in health, environment, …Nanotechnology and applications in health, environment, … Applications Service ProvisionApplications Service Provision Advanced Digital Signal Processing and applicationsAdvanced Digital Signal Processing and applications

Not all open this Call !

41


Importance of innovation

Exploitation potential

Consortia composition

European and beyond

What is new at the end of the project?

Project 100% in line with business interest

42

Important details - keep up to date !Important details - keep up to date !

IST helpdeskIST helpdeskFax : +32 2 296 83 88Fax : +32 2 296 83 88E-Mail : [email protected] : [email protected]

http://www.cordis.lu/ist/

- Official Journal (call text)- Official Journal (call text) - Workprogramme- Workprogramme - Guide for Proposers- Guide for Proposers - Evaluation manual- Evaluation manual

43


In order to help us, In order to help us, – please pre-register your proposal please pre-register your proposal – please submit the full proposal in good time and ensure please submit the full proposal in good time and ensure

all forms are duly completed and signedall forms are duly completed and signed– ensure that budget figures add upensure that budget figures add up– use Pro-Tool use Pro-Tool – if available use your registration number with the IST if available use your registration number with the IST

ProgrammeProgramme

44

AnnouncementsAnnouncementsArea meetings (starting at 11:30):Area meetings (starting at 11:30):

- Health- Health S3S3

- Persons with Special Needs- Persons with Special Needs S4S4

- Administrations- Administrations S1S1Please do not forget to return the participant Please do not forget to return the participant

questionnaire to Commission staff at the end of questionnaire to Commission staff at the end of the Information Daythe Information Day

Many thanksMany thanks

45

55th Framework Programme (1998 - 2002) Framework Programme (1998 - 2002) Information Society TechnologiesInformation Society Technologies

Key Action 1: Key Action 1: Systems and Services for the Citizen Systems and Services for the Citizen

Applications Relating to HealthApplications Relating to Health

Jean-Claude Healy , Head of Unit

46

Health domain: Area OverviewHealth domain: Area Overview

Vision Vision

Scope of the CallScope of the Call

Overview of the rationaleOverview of the rationale

Results from previous callsResults from previous calls

Key messagesKey messages

47

VisionVision(Continuity of Care)(Continuity of Care)

Integrated intelligent citizen-centered health Integrated intelligent citizen-centered health delivery system that contributes to the improvement delivery system that contributes to the improvement of quality, access, and efficiency of healthcareof quality, access, and efficiency of healthcare

48

Applications Relating to Health : Rationale Overview

2.2:2.2: worldwideworldwide telemedicinetelemedicine SPECIFIC DEMANDS: 1st medical advice 2nd medical opinion

4:4: INDUSTRIALINDUSTRIAL AFFAIRS AFFAIRS - standards - implementation plans - certification centre

2.1:2.1: homehome carecareSPECIFIC DEMANDS:best hometreatment

2:2: PATIENTSPATIENTS SOCIETAL DEMAND: “ Safe, cheap, efficient, follow-up & treatment”

JCH/FL/II/FV - fl-5ftpflower-0f-2-fonce..ppt - 01/03/00 page 1/4

1.2:1.2: healthhealth appliancesappliances SPECIFIC DEMANDS: at home, at work,abroad, at leisure, ensure the citizen can manage his own health

1.1:1.1: health supporthealth support servicesservices SPECIFIC DEMANDS:- health promotions- support to health-related industries

1:1: CITIZENSCITIZENS SOCIETAL DEMAND: “Stay HEALTHY”

3.2:3.2: hc managershc managersSPECIFIC DEMANDS:- effectiveness- hc policies- resource management

3.1:3.1: hc providershc providersSPECIFIC DEMANDS:- quality - integration- user friendliness- more mobility

3: HC PROFESSIONALS3: HC PROFESSIONALS SOCIETAL DEMAND: “optimisation of human, financial & infrastructure resources”

49

Scope of the CallScope of the Call

Action line I.1.1Action line I.1.1 Intelligent environment for Intelligent environment for citizencitizen centeredcentered health management health management

Action line I.1.2Action line I.1.2 Intelligent collaborative environments Intelligent collaborative environments supporting supporting continuity of carecontinuity of care

Action line I.1.3Action line I.1.3 Best practice and trials in Best practice and trials in e-Healthe-Health

50

Results from previous callsResults from previous calls

From the 1st Call to the 6th CallFrom the 1st Call to the 6th Call

Results of Calls: Proposals received and Results of Calls: Proposals received and selectedselected

Clustered ApproachClustered Approach Coverage of the WorkPlan: Need for Coverage of the WorkPlan: Need for

reinforcement of citizen clusterreinforcement of citizen cluster eeEurope Initiative/Europe Initiative/eeHealth Action PlanHealth Action Plan

51

1ST call ofProposals

2ND call ofProposals

3RD call ofProposals

ExploratoryAwards &CRAFTprojects

TOTAL

Nb of Proposalssubmitted

202 24 118 344

Nb of retainedProposals

(including CPAs)

29 (4) 3 (0) 25 (1) 7 64

Projects Funding(in €, including

CPAs)

54,249,091(8,761,000)

3,371,990 40,111,508(2,500,000)

1,500,840 99,233,429(11,261,091)

5TH FP: 1998-2002 - IST Programme 5TH FP: 1998-2002 - IST Programme KA1 - APPLICATIONS RELATING TO HEALTHKA1 - APPLICATIONS RELATING TO HEALTH

52

Highly innovative projects (integration, components, Highly innovative projects (integration, components, application) leading to tangible results (pre-products)application) leading to tangible results (pre-products)

Improve competitiveness of the European Health Telematics Improve competitiveness of the European Health Telematics IndustryIndustry

Promote the uptake of e-Health servicesPromote the uptake of e-Health services

Support to EU policiesSupport to EU policies

Key MessagesKey Messages

53

Health Applications Web-site Health Applications Web-site

www.cordis.lu/ist/ka1/health/home.htmlwww.cordis.lu/ist/ka1/health/home.html

Key Action 1Persons with special needs,

including the disabled and the elderly

Information Society Technologies (IST)Information Society Technologies (IST)

DG Information Society

European Commission

Mr. Karl Henry HaglundHead of Unit

IST Information Day 2 February 2001

55th Framework Programme (1998 - 2002) Framework Programme (1998 - 2002) Information Society TechnologiesInformation Society Technologies

DISCLAIMERDISCLAIMERAspects of these presentations interpret

legal documentsIt is the legal documents and not the presentations that are legally

binding DG Information Society DG Information Society

European CommissionEuropean Commission

56

Henry Haglund, Henry Haglund, Head of Unit,Head of Unit,

Vision Vision Scope of the CallScope of the CallResults from previous callsResults from previous callsKey messagesKey messages

Disabled and Elderly: Area OverviewDisabled and Elderly: Area Overview

57

Disabled and Elderly:Scope of the CallDisabled and Elderly:Scope of the Call

IST2001.I.2.1 Intelligent assistive systems for social inclusion

Objectives: To improve IST-based application systems offering new possibilities for full participation in society, including work opportunities by all persons with special needs.

Types of actions addressed: Research and Development, Demonstration and Combined projects

Links with WP2000: Adaptation of Action Line IST 2000 - I.2.1

58

6th IST Call6th IST Call

I.2.1 Intelligent assistive systems for social inclusion:

Focus:

• “Senior-friendly” applications providing convenient access to services for independent living

• Intelligent IST-based systems which can support the integration of disabled or disadvantaged persons in the workplace

59

Cross programme themesCross programme themes

6th IST Call - RTD, Take-up and Support Measures

• IST 2001 - V.1.1 CPA1 Home Environments (RTD only)

• IST 2001 - V.1.5 CPA5 Smart Cards

60

Results of previous calls

5FP Action Lines, projects and funding: 5FP Action Lines, projects and funding: IST-1999-I.3.1 Independent Living IST-1999-I.3.1 Independent Living

IST-2000-I.2.1 Intelligent assistive systems & interfacesIST-2000-I.2.1 Intelligent assistive systems & interfaces

IST-1999-CPA3 Design-for-All IST-1999-CPA3 Design-for-All

Projects CostProjects Cost EC EC

fundingfunding Independent Living Independent Living 14 14 39.1 M€ 39.1 M€ 23.7 M€23.7 M€

Assistive Systems 6 14.2 M€ Assistive Systems 6 14.2 M€ 9.9 M€ 9.9 M€

Design-for-All Design-for-All (incl. 2 AMs)(incl. 2 AMs) 3 3.5 M€ 3 3.5 M€ 2.9 M€ 2.9 M€

Accompanying Measure 1 1.5 M€Accompanying Measure 1 1.5 M€ 1.5 M€ 1.5 M€59 M€ 38 M€Total 24

(Approx. figures)

61

Disabled and Elderly: Disabled and Elderly: Key MessagesKey Messages

Innovative, intelligent systems for social inclusion Industrial involvement, market development In-depth user involvement Well-developed and realistic exploitation plans Supporting EU policy, eEurope

IST KA1 Information DayIST KA1 Information Day

Action Line I.3.2Action Line I.3.2

Friday 2Friday 2ndnd February, 2001 February, 2001

Key Action 1Administrations

63

Which aims? Which aims?

Objectives:Objectives:

• dissemination, early exploitation and adoptiondissemination, early exploitation and adoption

• administrations in the EU and associated statesadministrations in the EU and associated states

Focus:Focus:

• adoption/deployment of up-to-date technologies adoption/deployment of up-to-date technologies and systemsand systems

• upgrading and extension of existing systemsupgrading and extension of existing systems

64

Who is concerned? Who is concerned?

Telematics Applications Programme Telematics Applications Programme (TAP/FP4) projects(TAP/FP4) projects

Successfully completedSuccessfully completed

Support public administrationsSupport public administrations

65

Policy objectivesPolicy objectives

Research results into practiceResearch results into practiceAccelerated uptake of ICT innovationAccelerated uptake of ICT innovation Impact of Impact of eeEurope on other EU policiesEurope on other EU policiesSupporting EU EnlargementSupporting EU EnlargementFostering SME take-up of new digital Fostering SME take-up of new digital

technologiestechnologies

66

Overview of TAP sectors...Overview of TAP sectors...

… … with main impact on Public Administrationswith main impact on Public Administrations

Telematics for Services of Public InterestTelematics for Services of Public Interest AdministrationsAdministrations TransportTransport

Telematics for Improving Employment and Quality of LifeTelematics for Improving Employment and Quality of Life Telematics for Urban and Rural AreasTelematics for Urban and Rural Areas Telematics for HealthcareTelematics for Healthcare Telematics for Disabled and Elderly PeopleTelematics for Disabled and Elderly People Telematics for the EnvironmentTelematics for the Environment

67

Scope of Call for ProposalsScope of Call for Proposals

Indicative budget: 3 M EURIndicative budget: 3 M EURLimitations imposed by budgetLimitations imposed by budget

– Significant relevance to and measurable Significant relevance to and measurable impact on impact on eeEurope Action Plan 2002Europe Action Plan 2002

– Involvement of Accession candidate countriesInvolvement of Accession candidate countries– Critical number of sites (EU added value)Critical number of sites (EU added value)– Industrial involvement (SMEs) Industrial involvement (SMEs)

68

Commission expectationsCommission expectations

Put research results into practicePut research results into practice

Test and demonstrate value of researchTest and demonstrate value of research

Extend results’ benefits to candidate countriesExtend results’ benefits to candidate countries

Gain experience for future actionsGain experience for future actions

69

Electronic preparation and submission of FP5 proposals

Augusto Burgueño ArjonaEC Information Society DG

[email protected]

70

Contents

•3 alternative ways to prepare and

submit a proposal

•Electronic submission process

•Trends in electronic submission

•Future actions

•How to get started

71

3 alternative ways to prepare and submit a proposal

• Participants download the forms in PDF format and fill them in by hand or using PDF Writer.The proposal has to be submitted on paper.

• Participants download and install PROTOOL, fill in the data, print out the filled-in forms, and submit the proposal on paper.

• Participants download and install PROTOOL, fill in the data, request an Electronic Certificate and submit the proposal electronically.

Data Data

USER CA CE Proposers DB Proposals DB Evaluation

CERT Request

Acknowledgement ofreception with instructions

8 pages doc

CERT

Submission

Acknowledgement ofreception (unique id)

Confirmation of contentsStorage

Storage

Notification and Transfer

Evaluation confirmation

Electronic submission process

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Month

Pe

rce

nta

ge

IST % 11% 7% 8% 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% 6% 13% 16%

FP5 % 7% 4% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 2% 4% 4% 6%

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

2nd IST call deadline17/1/00

3rd IST call deadline15/6/00

4th IST call deadline31/10/00

Trends in electronic submission Jan - Nov 2000

74

Future actions

• Mandatory presentation of the electronic submission system

• All Commission documentation presents the electronic submission as the preferred option

• A strengthening of collaboration with the National Contact Points

• Training on ProTool for the Project Officers (POs)• Reinforcement of the ProTool Helpdesk• Ensure evolutionary maintenance• Launch a study to review existing work and to propose

future strategy

75

How to get started

• Read the tutorialhttp://www.cordis.lu/fp5/protool/tutorial

• Install ProTool and request a certificatehttp://www.fp5-csp.org

• Contact the helpdesksProTool: [email protected]

Electronic certification: [email protected]

Date post:	30-Dec-2015
Category:	Documents
Upload:	griffin-houston
View:	217 times
Download:	1 times

Information Society Technologies (IST) KA1 Systems and Services for the Citizen 6th Call,...

Documents