dning
iannn
Replcementdwell sa
tar
a
pplemen yPlSu
t isonstexen
nt eenBelhe Gri
tgDocumen
i lprasaitliS i btusana yAp
toripnSi lnaF co gRep
lounsoas
iv
tr
iannn
taB
Pl gSer ces
h& No hE tS meretC ci
December2007
1 Itrod cn ution 1-3
tsC tonen
2 SEA/SA Process andmethodology 4
3 Identifyingrelevant policies, plans andprogrammes, and 5-10 sustainabilityobjectives
4 Baseline Information 11-16
5 IdentifyingSustainabilityIssues andProblems 17
6 EA/SA Objectives FrameworkandAppraisalMatrix 18-21
7 The next steps 22
8 Proposedstructure for the SA report for the Replacement 23 Dwellings andExtensions inthe GreenBelt SPD
edReview ofPolies andPlAppendixA: Detail ic ans
in fAppendixB: Basel e inormationReview
i ita onsbrAb ev
AA Appropriate Assessment
DCLG Department ofCommunities andLocalGovernment
DPD Development PlanDocuments
EIA EnvironmentalImpact Assessment
LDD LocalDevelopment Documents
LDF LocalDevelopment Framework
LPA LocalPlanningAuthority
ODPM Office ofthe DeputyPrime Minister
PPS PlanningPolicyStatement
SA SustainabilityAppraisal
SEA StrategicEnvironmentalAssessment
SPD SupplementaryPlanningDocument
RSS RegionalSpatialStrategy
i
Det sofco
opingreport has beensubmittedto the consutationbodies withThe sc l
ia
ombe-jones@bath k: ceo_newc nes.gov.u
il lenvironmentalresponsib ities. These consutationbodies are:
n lo E gishHeritage
o Environment AgenycE gand
l ittnsu a on
N ral latuo n
Pl icn
Other appropriate stakeholers have beenc ted. These inldd ontac cu e:
e fo Government Offic or the SouthWest
o Highways Agenyc
l d ac tFurther andwider consutationwithstakeholers willtake pl e whenthe draf
SustainabityAppraisalReport is made avail l ongwiththe drafil abe al t SPD.
The Guidane1 states that LPAs shoudallow 5 weeks fc l or this stage of
c l onsutationwas runningover the summer hol ayonsutation. However, as this c l id
season, the Cou c h idedto extendthe consutationperiodto 7 weeks.nil as dec l
The consutationwas c rom 31st Jll arriedout f uyto 17thSeptember 2007.
Contac
Ceo Newcombe-Jl onesan ingPolyOfficPl n ic er
an ingServ esBath&NorthEast Somerset Cou cnilTrimbridge House, Trim StreetBath, BA1 2DP
Telephone: 01225 477617
l
t:
Email l
:ksitonC l ittonsu a onQues sa ed
Q1 Are there anyother plans ofprogrammes relevant to the SPD that have not
beenincludedwithinthis review (includingAppendixA)?
Q2 Is the baseline data (includingAppendixB)appropriate to the SPD?
Q3 Is there anyother relevant baseline data?
Q4 Are there anyinaccuracies or anomalies inthe data?
Q5 Do youagree that these are the keyissues for the SPD?
Q6 Do youhave anycomments about the SA Framework?
Q7 Do youhave anycomments about the proposedtimetable?
Q8 Do youhave anycomments about the proposedstructure ofthe SA report?
Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Spatial Strategies and Local Development Frameworks (ODPM Nov2005)
ii
1
1.Introduction
1.1 P e ourpos ft srhi ep tor
il1.1.1 The purpose ofthis Sustainab ityAppraisal(SA)is to ensure that
, socenvironmental ialandeconomicconsiderations have beenintegratedinto
the preparationofthe Rep cementDwell s& E en isontxingla si he Grnt een
BeltS emen yPl gDoiannntarlpup cument(SPD). This scopingreport sets
out the SA f hwillbe usedto test the SPD objecrameworkwhic tives and
options andhel ythe most sustainabe options avail lp to identif l abe. The
sc so identifopingreport al ies the issues that Bath&NorthEast Somerset is
h lseekingto address throughthis SPD inorder to acieve sustainabe opment inthe Districdevel t.
1.2 Leg e b ck dgrounail itsa v
1.2.1 Sustainab ityAppraisal uingpl nil s are now anintegralpart ofprod c an ing
docments under the Pl n l h t 2004 (the Ac .u an ingandCompusoryPurcase Ac t)
WhenpreparingSPDs l alauthorities must aloc so meet the requirements of
tive2 ”onthe assessment ofthe effec ans andthe EuropeanDirec ts ofcertainpl
lprogrammes onthe environment‘ commonyknownas the Strategic
EnvironmentalAssessment (SEA)Direc tive was transposedtive. The SEA Direcinthe UKbythe EnvironmentalAssessment ofPlans andProgrammes
uations 20043 applingto pl n icReg l y ans andprogrammes witha sig ifant
environmentaleffec
al onentrates more specic
t. The SEA process is aimedat providingstrategic
ternatives andc c ifallyonthe environmentalissues of
ilsustainab ity.
1.2.2 The mainpurpose ofSEA is to provide f evelofprotecor a highl tionofthe
environment andto contribute to the integrationofenvironmental
onsiderations into the preparationandadoptionofplc ans andprogrammes
withview to promotingsustainabe devel ll opment (Artice 1 ofthe SEA
tive)Direc .
1.2.3 Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Spatial Strategies and Local Development
ommendeda cFrameworks (ODPM Nov2005)has rec ombinedassessment
approac hwillsatisfhintegratingSEA andSA whic ythe requirements ofthe
tive andintegrate sustainab ityissues witha highlSEA direc il evelof
tionona strategicbasis. For ease, the cenvironmentalprotec ombined
approac yref chis simpl erredto as SA throughout this S opingReport.
ssitpropra1.3 Ap e As es ment(AA)
1.3.1 I t the integrityofEuropeansites, Locnorder to protec alAuthorities are
l edto c an ingobig arryout anAppropriate Assessment (AA)as a part ofthe pl n
process under the Habitats Direc tiveltive. Europeansites are collec ytermed
ialAreas fNatura 2000sites andcomprise Spec or Conservation(SACs)and
ialProtecSpec tionAreas (SPAs)together withRamsar sites. There are several
Natura 2000sites inB&NESandthe Cou c ipates undertakinganilantic
reeningproc c gy icsc ess acordin l. The AA is basedona rigorous applationof
the prec c e andtherefautionaryprin ipl ore requires those undertakingthe
exerc anwillnot have a sig ifant impacise to prove that the pl n ic t onthese
onservationobjecc tives.
0 42/C2 20 1/ E3 SI1633
1
hwiththeir ownl1.3.2 AA andSA are two separate processes eac egalrequirements.
AA willbe c onju c ommendedbythearriedout inc ntionwiththe SA as rec
cGuidane.
1. tiabl o4 Susan e Develpment
1.4.1 This S opingReport identifc ies the issues that Bath&NorthEast Somerset is
h lseekingto address throughthis SPD inorder to acieve sustainabe
opment inthe Districdevel t.
1.4.2 The most widel c in l opment is:yacepteddef itionofsustainabe devel
”Development whichmeets the needs of the present without compromising
the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.4‘
1.4.3 The UKGovernment Sustainable Development Strategy (March2005)sets out
c es ofsustainabe develkeyprin ipl l opment:
l§ Livingwithinenvironmentalimits;
§ Ensuringa strongheal yandjust socth iety;
h l§ Acievinga sustainabe economy;
§ Promotinggoodgovernane;c§ Usingsoundsc c l.iene responsiby
1.4.4 The sustainabe devel ic fu cl opment strategies andpoles that willhave aninlene
ease see AppendixA f s.onthe SPD are reviewed. Pl or more detail
5Breffrt lcementDwelln t insi he Gr tSPD1. i o he Repa igs& Exenso nt eenBel
ac t SPD willset out1.5.1 The Repl ement Dwellings andExtensions inthe GreenBel
detail an ingguidane to suppl icedpl n c ement polies HG.14 andHG.15 inthe
Bath&NorthEast Somerset Local Plan ( .including minerals and waste)
.POLICYHG14
ope ofpolies HG.4 and6 permissionwillonybe givenfOutside the sc ic l or:
i) the rebuilding or replacement ofexisting dwellings where the
replacement or reconstructed dwelling and ancillary buildings
wouldnot be materiallylarger, andwouldnot have a materially
greater impact on the countryside or to the openness ofthe
GreenBelt, thanthat to be replaced;and
ii) the creationor extension ofanyresidentialcurtilage wouldnot
detract from ruralcharacter nor conflict withthe purposes ofthe
GreenBelt.
.POLICYHG15
s to extenda dwellinginthe GreenBel nessProposal t willbe permittedu l
l:theywoud
i) represent a disproportionate additionover andabove the size of
the originaldwelling;or
dCommissiononEnvironment andDevel4 Adoptedbythe Worl opment in1987.
2
ontribute to a deteriorationinrural h ter as a resut oftheii) c carac l
u l t ofdwellingextensions.cmuative effec
1.5.2 Dwellings inthe GreenBel edto the same permitteddevelt are entitl opment
sewhere (providedpermitteddevelrights as dwellings el opment rights have
not beenremoved)andtheref nilannot core the Cou c c ontrolallextensions
that are c construted.
t is the remit ofoc an ingpolyto ensure that anyapplations f1.5.3 I l alpl n ic ic or
inappropriate devel l c opmentopment woudnot be inacordance withthe Devel
Pl alpl n ic l l hthat l alpl nan. Loc an ingpolyshoudmake cear the approac oc an ing
ationto extensions to dwellings inthe GreenBelauthorities willtake inrel t
andthe c u hrepl ement dwellings are aceptabe.ircmstances under whic ac c l
ac t1.5.4 The purpose ofthe Repl ement Dwellings andExtensions inthe GreenBel
l alPl ic. The SPD cSPD is to provide detailandcarityLoc anpoly annot be used
to f l an ingpoly annot be usedtoormuate new pl n ic. Furthermore, the SPD c
h t or alloc t l d cmake boundarycanges to the GreenBel ate GreenBel an . One
adoptedbythe Cou c cnilthe SPD willbe a materialonsiderationinthe
determinationofpl n ican ingapplations.
l opment Appraisalwas undertakenf1.5.5 A Sustainabe Devel or the Bath&North
East Somerset Loc aninld icalPl cu ingpolies HG.14 andHG.15. However this
was producedunder the ”ol‘ system as a disc ild retionarySustainab ity
opment Appraisalanddoes not meet the requirements ofSecDevel tion39(2)
ofthe Planning &Compulsory Purchase Act,2004. Theref uore a fll
Sustainab ityAppraisalwillbe undertakenfil or this SPD.
i a l o he SPDTmetbe frt
Replacementdwellings& extensionsinthe GreenBeltSPD
Evidence gathering
ScopingReport Consultation
June 2007
Julyœ Sep 2007
PublicparticipationonDraft SPD anddraft SA
report (Reg.17)
April-May2008
Adoption Sep2008
3
2.SEA/SA processandmethodology
2.1 OverallMet yh d lo oog
ogyf opedinacordance with2.1.1 The methodol or this appraisalwas devel c
guidane pu l .c bishedbythe ODPM (now DCLG)5
2.1.2 I arryout the SA proc tivelnorder to c ess effec yinanintegratedmanner, the
n il as estabishedthe SA Group. This Group c ers withCou c h l onsists offic
spec isedexpertise to c , Soc ts.ial over Economic ialandEnvironmentalaspec
The SA Group workis l an ingPolyTeam andSA workshops willedbythe Pl n icrunparallelto the SPD process inorder to appraise SPD objectives and
options.
2.1.3 The methodol ollows inTabe 1. For the purposes ofthis scogyis as f l oping
report, Stage A ofthe methodologyhas beenundertaken.
e 1: KeyT sfrS bi yApp i lrasasitlitusanaokaslT ba
Stage A: Setting the context and objectives, establishing the baseline and
decidingthe scope
TaskA1: Identifyingother relevant plans, programmes andsustainability
objectives
TaskA2: Collectingbaseline information
TaskA3: Identifyingsustainabilityissues andproblems
TaskA4: Developingthe SA Framework
TaskA5: Consultingonthe scope ofthe SA
Stage B: DevelopingandRefiningOptions andassessingeffects
TaskB1: Testingthe SPD objectives against the SA framework
TaskB2: Developingthe SPD options
TaskB3: Predictingthe effects ofthe draft SPD
TaskB4: Evaluatingthe effects ofthe draft SPD
TaskB5: Considering ways ofmitigating adverse effects and maximising
beneficialeffects
TaskB6: Proposing measures to monitor the significant effects of
implementingthe SPD
Stage C: Preparingthe SustainabilityAppraisalReport
TaskC1: PreparingSA Report
Stage D: Consultingondraft SPD andSA Report
TaskD1: Publicparticipationonthe SA Report andthe draft SPD.
TaskD2: Assessingsignificant changes
TaskD3: Makingdecisions andprovidinginformation
Stage E: Monitoringthe significant effects ofimplementingthe SPD
TaskE1: Finalisingaims andmethods for monitoring
TaskE2: Respondingto adverse effects Sourc il alDevele: Sustainab ityAppraisalofRegionalSpatialStrategies andLoc opment Frameworks (ODPM Nov 2005)
5 Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Spatial Strategies and Local Development Frameworks (ODPM Nov 2005)
4
l
3.Identifyingrelevantpolicies,plansandprogrammes,andsustainable
developmentobjectives(TaskA1)
1 KeyPoi i r l el a ot3. lcyRevew diectyr ev ntt he SPD
3.1.1The LPA must take acount ofrel icc ationships betweenthe SPD andother poles,
ans, programmes andsustainab ityobjecpl il tives. The purpose ofthis review is
to hig l h fu c ordshig t the keyinlenes onbothSPDs andthe SA. Appendix A rec
the detail ic ans undertakenfedreview ofpolies andpl or the SA.
lci r l el a otTabe 2: KeyPoi esdiectyr ev ntt he SPD
lcyKeyPoi al el ot lnandSADetisofr evance t he pa
ner ainalPoiI t n to lcy The aim ofthe Habitats Directive is to
olcreate a coherent Europeanec ogical § EUDirec 409/Etive 79/ E Conthe
0 . Inetworkknownas Natura 20 0 t requires onservationofWilc dBirds member states to take necessarymeasures
EuropeanCommission to maintain/restore habitats andspecies‘ § EUDirective onthe Conservation lpopuations, maintainSpecialProtection
ofNaturalHabitats ofWildFauna Areas (SPAs)andSpecialAreas of andfora (the Habitats Direcl tive Conservation(SACs)at f lavourabe status 1992) anddevelop nationalbiodiversitystrategy.
§ The ConventiononBiol alogicAppropriate Assessments must be carried
Diversity, Rio de Janeiro 1992 or anypl tlout f anor project not direc y
§ ManagingNatura 2000sites The connectedwithor necessaryfor the
provisions ofArtice 6 ofthelmanagement ofthe sites b t lelu ik yto have
tive 92/ E C”Habitats‘ Direc 43/E n ica sig ifant effect thereon, either
individuallyor incombinationwithother
pl lans or projects, shoudbe subject to
appropriate assessment ofits implationsic
for the site inview ofthe site‘s conservation
objective.
The aim ofthe Habitats Directive is to
olcreate a coherent Europeanec ogical
0 . Inetworkknownas Natura 20 0 t requires
member states to take necessarymeasures
/to maintainrestore habitats andspecies‘
lpopuations, maintainSpecialProtection
Areas (SPAs)andSpecialAreas of
Conservation(SACs)at f lavourabe status
anddevelop nationalbiodiversitystrategy.
NainalPoito lcy ic lNationalPoly(suchas UKSustainabe
Development Strategy, DEFRA Rural iv l§ PPS1: DeleringSustainabe
iv lStrategy, PPS1 DeleringSustainabe opment (andsupplDevel ement to
opment, PPG15 Pl nDevel an ingandthe this)
HistoricEnvironment, PPG16 Archaeology§ PPG2: GreenBelts
andPl n g an ingfan in , PPG 17 Pl n or Open § Town&CountryPl nan ingGreen
Space, Sport andRecreation)aims to Belt Direction(ODPM, 2005)
bal cane socialprogress andeconomic § PPS3: Housing
development withthe protectionofthe § PPS7: Sustainabe Devell opment in
naturalandb ilu t environment. RuralAreas
§ PPG15: Pl nan ingandHistoricEnvironment CommunityandLocal
5
Government
§ PPG 16: Arcaeol an ingh ogyandPl n
CommunityandLocalGovernment
an ingf§ PPG 17 Pl n or OpenSpace,
Sport andRecreationand
Assessingneeds and
opportunities: a companionguide
to PPG17
in alDevel§ Streaml ingLoc opment
lFrameworks (DCLG Consutation
Draft November 2007)
an ingf l§ Pl n or a Sustainabe FutureWhite Paper (2007)DCLG (forc lonsutation)
§ Changes to Permitted
tPPG2: GreenBelssets the general
intentions ofgreenbel ic, reaffirms thet polyif cu inglspecicpurposes ofinld andingreen
bel if or the use oflts, spec ies objectives f and
inGreenBel f tsts andconirms that GreenBel
must be protectedas far as canbe seen
ahead.
PPG2 maintains the presumptionagainst
inappropriate development withinGreen
Bel ints andref es the categories ofopment, inldappropriate devel cu ingmaking
provisionf uor the fture ofmajor existing
opedsites andrevisingpolyonthedevel ic
re-use ofb ilin s.ud g
Part 3 ofPPG2 ou intles the presumption
against inappropriate devel inopment, def es
whenthe constructionofnew b ilin s isud g
cu ingalnot inappropriate (inld terationor
u d gextensionto existingb ilin s)andgives
detail ud gs ofwhere the re-use ofb ilin s is
not inappropriate.
PPS7: Susan l o ntiabe DevelpmentirlArRu a eas
PPS7 ou intles ofgovernment‘s objectives
evant to sustainabe develrel l opment inrural
areas.
so ou in icPPS7 al tles the government polyin
rel an ingfationto pl n or housinginrural
areas, the re-use ofb ilin s intheud g
ac ud gcountryside andrepl ement ofb ilin s in
the countryside
PPG17Plnnn o ra igfrOpenSpace,Spo t
toandRecreain
PPG17 asks LPAs to proactivel anfypl or the
uprotectionandenhancement ofvaled
cu inggreenspace intowns andcities, inld
efficient andeffective countryside.
an ingf lPl n or a Sustainabe Future Annex
ced lB: S h ue ofGovernment Responses to
the Barker Report -Recommendation9.
States that the government is committedto
c es ofthe GreenBelthe prin ipl t andwill
make no fn amentalchange to polyinu d ic
ic orm.this area incurrent polyref
The White Paper also suggests the removal
l k or SA fofthe ban et requirement f or SPDs.
Aims to encourage the residentialtake-up of
6
Devel lopment. Consutation
Paper 1:PermittedDevelopment
Rights f dor HouseholerMicrogeneration
§ Changes to Permitted
Devel lopment. Consutation
Paper 2:PermittedDevelopment
Rights f dor Householers
microgenerationinorder to meet a
n ic usig ifant proportionofour fture energy
needs.
The consutationpaper onPermittedl
opment Rights f dDevel or Householers
suggests that extensions are the most
commontype ofhouseholer develd opment
bothinterms ofwhat is permitted
opment anddeveldevel opment which
requires pl n ican ingapplation.
Considers the current system to be
uatingdevelreg l opment that has no impact
beyondthe host property. I sot is alic yacknowl gexplitl ed edthat the current
f drameworkofhouseholer PD rights isubasedonarbitrarysize andvolme based
approach, anomalous interms ofimpact as
to what is andis not permitted.
The consutationpaper proposes 12 ll imitsor extensions relf atingto criteria suchas:
depthofextension;eaves, ridge androof
pitchheight ofextension;maximum
coverage ofgardenarea;use ofmaterials
andvisib ityofextensionfil rom highwayorrom prin ipl evation.f c e el
The consutationpaper all so states that roof
extensions are the secondmost common
type ofhouseholer develd opment andare
uarl ent inurbanareas.particl ypreval
Changes to the GDPO relatingto roof
extensions androofal soterations are al
suggested.
l soChanges to Artice 4 directions are al
suggested.
iP loi lonaReg cy Poly16 ofthe J acic oint Repl ement Structure
§ J ac anoint Repl ement Structure Pl
§ RPG10
anreaffirms the purpose ofthe BristolPl -
BathGreenBelt whichare to: (1)checkthe
unrestrictedsprawlofthe Bristol
conurbationandBath;(2)assist in
saf ueg ardingthe surroundingcountryside
from encroachment;(3)prevent
neighbouringtowns from merginginto one
another;(4)preserve the settingand
specialcharacter ofvillages, towns and
historiccities &(5)Assist inurban
regeneration.
ic fPolySS.4 ofRPG10conirms that Green
Bel l ufts inthe regionshoudcontinue to flil
the purposes set out inPPG2.
7
t RegionalSpatialStrategyf§ Draf or
the SouthWest (March2007)
lcyLocalPoi
§ Bath&NorthEast Somerset Local
Pl cu ingmineralaninld s andwaste
Adopted2007
§ Bath&NorthEast Somerset - City
ofBathWorldHeritage SiteManagement Plan(2003-2009)
d§ Cotswols Area ofOutstanding
NaturalBeautyManagement Plan
The draft RSSstates that the regions
l dan scape, countryside, historic
environment andcoast have categories
inwhichdef e the character ofthe South
. The draf soWest (para 1.6.15) t RSSal
states that development inopen
uarlcountryside, particl yofhousing, willbe
tlstric ycontrolledinaccordance with
nationalguidance andother polies intheict RSS(para 3.4.3)draf .
The LocalPl in ocandef es some keyl al
polies:ic
§ The settl l ic or theement cassifationfdistrict inld or ruralsettlcu ingf ements
ic .(polySC.1)
§ Polyinrelic ationto the re-use ofrural
ud g .b ilin s (ET.9)
§ Polyinrel crtilic ationto residentialu ages
(HG.11).
§ Polyinrel acic ationto repl ement dwellings
(HG.14).
§ Polyinrel dic ationto householer
opment inthe GreenBel .devel t (HG.15)
evant GreenBel ic§ Rel t polies (GB.1 &
GB.2).
Mainaims ofthe CityofBathWorldHeritage
Site Management Plan(2003-2009)are to:
l§ Promote sustainabe management ofthe
WorldHeritage Site;
§ Ensure that the u iq e q aln u u ities and
outstandinguniversal ales ofthe Worlv u d
Heritage Site are understoodandare
sustainedinthe fture;u
§ Sustainthe outstandinguniversal alesv u
dHeritage Site whstofthe Worl ilmaintainingandpromotingBathas aiv itslingandworkingcitywhichbenefrom the status ofthe Worlf dHeritage
Site;
§ Improve physicalaccess andinterpretation, encouragingallpeople to
enjoyandunderstandthe WorldHeritage
Site;
mprove pu l§ I bicawareness ofand
v vinterest andin olement inthe heritage
h ommonl alofBath, acievinga c oc ,
nationalandinternationalownership of
WorldHeritage Site management. The Cotswol andAONBmanagement pl
tles the visionf an ingandou in or pl n
8
(under review - Jluy2007)
§ Mendip Hills AONBManagement
Plan2004 œ 2009
§ ”BE: Better for Everyone - The
CommunityStrategyfor Bath&
NorthEast Somerset 2004 and
beyond‘
§ Bath&NorthEast Somerset‘s
Statement ofCommunity
Iv vn olement Adopted2007
§ HousingStrategy2005 œ 2010
B&NES
§ BathCity-wide Character Appraisal
SPD, 2005 (supplementaryto the
BathLocalPlan) § ‘RuralLandscapes ofBath&North
East Somerset œ A Landscape
Character Assessment‘ (2003)SPG
opment/devel the historicenvironment and
iv an scape inthethe lingandworkingl d
Cotswol orces fdAONB, f or change and
icobjectives andpolies.
The Mendip AONBmanagement plan
provides a snapshot, a vision, objectives
andpolies fic or Mendip AONB.
alGovernment AcThe Loc t 2000requires
oceveryl alauthorityto prepare a
CommunityStrategy. Community
Strategies are designedto improve the
q al le ofoc cu ityofif l alommunities byin ingthe ac nill k tions ofcou cs withthose
bic u taryofother pu l, private andvoln
sector organisations.
Ou intl es how Bath&NorthEast Somerset
willc l iatedonsut onSPDs andassoc
Sustainab ityAppraisalil s. Must be readin
onju cc ntionwiththe Town &Country
Planning ( ELocal Development)(ngland)
Regulations, 2004. This SCIhas not yet
beenadopted.
evant strategicobjectives fRel rom the
HousingStrategyare:
(1) lAffordabe Housing: To maximise the
suppl lyofaffordabe housingto meet the
needs ofl alpeoploc e;promotingand
l anedmaintainingsustainabe bal c
communities;andrecognisingthe support
u s f istrequirements ofindivid al or specialaccommodation.(2)Pl nan ing&EmptyHomes: Makingbest
oc an inguse ofthe l alandstrategicpl n
y lgandprocess;identifingassembin
orwardandsuitabe develbringingf l opment
ocsites to meet l alneeds across alltenures;
andmakingthe best use ofexisting
resources inldcu ingemptyor under-used
housingandother property.
Bath&NorthEast Somerset has a rich
anddiverse range ofan scl d apes.
Aims to identif h fycaracter andinorm
decisions followingthe Bathcity-wide
character appraisal.
Overarchingobjective ofmaintainingand
enhancingl d ocan scape character andl al
distinctiveness.
9
i3.2 KeyMes esf m ohtrosag err ev tpel loan cies
eangClmae Ch
3.2.1 Followingthe Kyoto Protoc , the Government has set a target to reduce carbonol
dioxide emissions by20% bel evel imate Changeow 1990l s by2010. The Cl
lProgramme willtake the UKcoser to this domestictarget, andensure that the UK
canmake realprogress by2020towards the Government‘s l gon -term ambitionto
reduce carbondioxide emissions bysome 60% byabout 2050. UKtarget for
lrenewabe is 10% ofUKenergyconsumptionby2010.
nsigningthe Nottingham Decaration, the Councilhas made a commitment to3.2.2 I l
iv lcontributingtowards the deleryofthe UKcimate change programme. This has
a l g evelon -term target ofreducingCO2 emissions by60% by2050over 1990l s
withrealprogress by2020, and, untilrecen ytl, hada short-term target ofa 20%
reductionby2010.
l3.2.3 The cimate change issue, bothmitigationandadaptationis an
overarchingissue f l opment theref icor sustainabe devel ore the implations of
lcimate change must be consideredthroughalltopicareas.
ti
ble C ct
3.2.4 Nationalandregionalpolies inrel l evantic ationto sustainabe constructionare rel
considerations to this SPD. Bath&NorthEast Somerset Cou c‘s Positionnil
Statement onEnvironmentalSustainab ity(2006)conirms the Cou c‘sil f nil
commitment to movingtowards a low carboneconomyandavoidingunnecessary
energyconsumption. See AppendixA f icor summaries ofthese polies.
iontonsruS itusana
Ho iusng
3.2.5 StrategicHousingPolicyObjectives inPPS3 include ”achievinga wide choice of
highqualityhomes, bothaffordable andmarketinghousing, to address the
requirements ofthe community‘. It also states that 60% ofadditionalhousing
to be providedonpreviouslydevelopedlandor throughconversions.
3.2.6 DeliveringSustainable Development (PPS1)makes it clear that gooddesignis
a keyelement inachievingsustainable development andthat it is indivisible
from goodplanning.
iitnoStrongerC mmu es
3.2.7 The B&NESCommunityStrategycontains five sharedambitions settingout how
the Councilplanto workwitha wide range oforganisations andmake links with
their plans:
§ BE:distinctive Promotinga ”sense ofplace‘ so people identifywithandtake pride
inour communities.
§ BE:inclusive Celebratingthe contributions people from different backgrounds and
withdifferent experiences canmake, andpromotingequalityofopportunity.
§ BE:creative Sharingresources, workingtogether, andfindingnew ways ofdoing
things
§ BE:safe Buildingcommunities where people feelsafe andsecure.
§ BE:sustainable Takingresponsibilityfor our environment andnaturalresources,
now andover the longterm.
3.2.8 DeliveringSafer &Stronger Communities is centralto what the LocalArea
Agreement is tryingto achieve for the communities ofB&NES.
10
4.Baseline Information(TaskA2)
4.1.1 Baseline data gives a picture ofthe current situationandprovides the basis
for predictingandmonitoringthe effects ofthe SPD. It also helps to identify
sustainabilityissues andalternative ways ofdealingwiththem. Baseline data
has beencollectedfor the criteria requiredbythe SEA Directive andthe UK
SEA Regulations. Informationcollectedwas primarilyfocusedonthe social,
environmentalandeconomiccharacteristics ofthe area that relate to the
issues to be tackledinthe SPDs. Baseline informationincludes data influenced
bya number offactors beyondspatialpolicies.
4.1.2 The keybaseline review relevant to the SPD is shownbelow. Please see
AppendixB for more information.
Gr teenBel
/athGreenBel ouestershire4.1.3 The BristolB t was designatedin1966 inthe Gl c
andSomerset CountyDevel ans. The f cu esopment Pl ormer Avonarea inld
60,760hec t l dtares ofdesignatedGreenBel an , over 57% ofthe totalGreen
Bel or the whol tares ofthis ist designatedf e ofthe SouthWest. 21,440hecwithinthe B&NESarea.
Map1: GenerlExentof he Gr ti t rhEastSomereta t t eenBel nBah& Not s
lu a ia chaeooCut rlHertge,Ar lgyandLandscape
4.1.4 Thirtysevenseparate conservationareas have beendesignatedinB&NES
since 1968. The totalarea coveredbyconservationarea status amounts to
some 2,310hectares. The entire cityofBathwas designatedbyUNESCO as a
WorldHeritage site in1987. B&NEShas approximately6,400listedbuildings
andstructures inits area ofwhich5000lie withinthe CityofBath.
4.1.5 Manyofthe settlements withinthe GreenBelt also containconservation
areas;there is significant overlap ofthese designations.
11
12
BatheastonBatheastonBatheastonBatheastonBatheastonBatheastonBatheastonBatheastonBatheaston
BathamptonBathamptonBathamptonBathamptonBathamptonBathamptonBathamptonBathamptonBathampton
BathfordBathfordBathfordBathfordBathfordBathfordBathfordBathfordBathford
ClavertonClavertonClavertonClavertonClavertonClavertonClavertonClavertonClaverton
Monkton CombeMonkton CombeMonkton CombeMonkton CombeMonkton CombeMonkton CombeMonkton CombeMonkton CombeMonkton Combe
South StokeSouth StokeSouth StokeSouth StokeSouth StokeSouth StokeSouth StokeSouth StokeSouth Stoke
FreshfordFreshfordFreshfordFreshfordFreshfordFreshfordFreshfordFreshfordFreshford
Hinton CharterhouseHinton CharterhouseHinton CharterhouseHinton CharterhouseHinton CharterhouseHinton CharterhouseHinton CharterhouseHinton CharterhouseHinton Charterhouse
BathBathBathBathBathBathBathBathBath
Upper SwainswickUpper SwainswickUpper SwainswickUpper SwainswickUpper SwainswickUpper SwainswickUpper SwainswickUpper SwainswickUpper Swainswick
CharlcombeCharlcombeCharlcombeCharlcombeCharlcombeCharlcombeCharlcombeCharlcombeCharlcombe
WellowWellowWellowWellowWellowWellowWellowWellowWellow
Combe HayCombe HayCombe HayCombe HayCombe HayCombe HayCombe HayCombe HayCombe Hay
SaltfordSaltfordSaltfordSaltfordSaltfordSaltfordSaltfordSaltfordSaltford
EnglishcombeEnglishcombeEnglishcombeEnglishcombeEnglishcombeEnglishcombeEnglishcombeEnglishcombeEnglishcombe
CorstonCorstonCorstonCorstonCorstonCorstonCorstonCorstonCorston
North StokeNorth StokeNorth StokeNorth StokeNorth StokeNorth StokeNorth StokeNorth StokeNorth Stoke
NewtonNewtonNewtonNewtonNewtonNewtonNewtonNewtonNewtonSt LoeSt LoeSt LoeSt LoeSt LoeSt LoeSt LoeSt LoeSt Loe
RadstockRadstockRadstockRadstockRadstockRadstockRadstockRadstockRadstock
TimsburyTimsburyTimsburyTimsburyTimsburyTimsburyTimsburyTimsburyTimsbury
KeynshamKeynshamKeynshamKeynshamKeynshamKeynshamKeynshamKeynshamKeynsham
KelstonKelstonKelstonKelstonKelstonKelstonKelstonKelstonKelston
Chew MagnaChew MagnaChew MagnaChew MagnaChew MagnaChew MagnaChew MagnaChew MagnaChew Magna
PaultonPaultonPaultonPaultonPaultonPaultonPaultonPaultonPaulton
Queen CharltonQueen CharltonQueen CharltonQueen CharltonQueen CharltonQueen CharltonQueen CharltonQueen CharltonQueen Charlton
WoollardWoollardWoollardWoollardWoollardWoollardWoollardWoollardWoollard
Stanton DrewStanton DrewStanton DrewStanton DrewStanton DrewStanton DrewStanton DrewStanton DrewStanton Drew
PensfordPensfordPensfordPensfordPensfordPensfordPensfordPensfordPensford
Hinton BlewettHinton BlewettHinton BlewettHinton BlewettHinton BlewettHinton BlewettHinton BlewettHinton BlewettHinton BlewettWest HarptreeWest HarptreeWest HarptreeWest HarptreeWest HarptreeWest HarptreeWest HarptreeWest HarptreeWest Harptree
East HarptreeEast HarptreeEast HarptreeEast HarptreeEast HarptreeEast HarptreeEast HarptreeEast HarptreeEast Harptree
Chew StokeChew StokeChew StokeChew StokeChew StokeChew StokeChew StokeChew StokeChew Stoke
Compton MartinCompton MartinCompton MartinCompton MartinCompton MartinCompton MartinCompton MartinCompton MartinCompton Martin
UbleyUbleyUbleyUbleyUbleyUbleyUbleyUbleyUbley
Conservation Areas
Bath World Heritage Site
Bath World Heritage Site and Conservation Areas
Map 2: City of Bath World Heritage Site and Conservation Areas in Bath & North East Somerset
4.1.6 Bath & North East Somerset‘s Sites and Monuments Record (SMR) is a
cumulative record of all known archaeological sites, monuments and historic
landscape features in B&NES. There are over 5,000 entries in the database
relating to monuments and sites, and over 2,000 entries relating to
archaeological investigations carried out over the past 100 years.
4.1.7 84 sites are protected as Scheduled Ancient Monuments under the Ancient
Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act, 1979.
4.1.8 Landscape Character Appraisals has been carried out following landscape
assessments and landscape character areas have been identified.
Map 3: Landscape Character Areas in Bath & North East Somerset
F r inainso estofAvonandAONBDesg to
4.1.9 Part ofthe Mendip Hills AONBandthe Cotswol so ldAONBal ie withinthe
distric l t is AONBdesignatedhowever moret. Ony37% ofthe GreenBeln ic tl t.sig ifan y82% ofthe AONBis withinthe GreenBel
4.1.10The Mendip Hills AONBwas designatedin1972. Characteristicofthe Mendips
an sc opes anda rou hyis the openl d ape comprisingsteep, usuallywoodedsl g l
u d l ateau. The hills are ofCarbon erous ln uatingpl if imestone originandthin,
drysoil t f orestrydominating. Withinthes restric armingwithpasture andf
Distric arp sl ht are the steep, northernsc opes andthe upper reaces ofthe
River Chew al l dongthe Chew ValleyandBag onLakes.
d4.1.11 The Cotswols AONBwas designatedin1966. Designationofthe southern
extensionwas approvedin1990andsurrounds Bathto the north, east and
argel ollowingthe GreenBel ts outstandingl d apesouthl yf t boundary. I an sc
q al uar arc itecu ities are its visualunity, its unique vernacl h ture, its reputation
as a ruralidyllandits immense scenicdiversity.
4.1.12 The Forest ofAvonis one of12 CommunityForests inE gan .n l d Whenit was
estabishedinthe earll y1980s the boundarywas drawnto encompass Bristol
rin e‘. I overs 221 square milanda wide swathe of”urbanf g t c es inandaround
. nB&NESthe boundarywas extendedin2006 to inld e ofBristol I cu e the whol
t except f dthe Distric or those parts designatedas Mendip Hills andCotswols
AONBs.
Map4: ForestofAvonandAONBDesignationsinBath& NorthEastSomerset
Bidieriyo v st
t are designatedf
important wille an / ial
4.1.13 A number ofsites inthe Distric or their internationally
dif dor habitat;these are additionallySites ofSpec
c icIterest (SSSs)S ientif n I .
13
4.1.14 Chew ValleyLake Spec tionArea is recognisedfialProtec or its international
c or migratingbirds andNatural n l ieda 'uimportane f E gandhas identif b ffer'
c gyarea aroundthe Lake acordin l.
4.1.15 Combe DownandBathamptonMines f form part ofthe ”Bath&Bradord-on-
AvonBats SAC‘. ComptonMartinOcre Mine is a ch omponent site ofthe North
Somerset andMendip Bats SAC. SpecialAreas ofConservation(SACs)are
areas whic ialprotec 'hhave beengivenspec tionunder the EuropeanUnions
tive. Greater Horseshoe Bats are a primaryreasonf ecHabitats Direc or sel tion
ofbothsites together withBecsteins bats f fh or the Bath&Bradord-on-Avon
SACandLesser Horseshoe Bats for the NorthSomerset andMendips Bats
SAC. These bats are protec aw andEuropeanDirectedunder UKl tive.
I E gandandare ofnationalimportane f4.1.16 SSSs are designatedbyNatural n l c or
their fora, f n ogic u tl Il au a or geol alinterest. There are crren y22 SSSs within
the District.
Map5: SSSIsi t rhEastSomeretnBahandNo t s
o fel oBr wni dDevelpment
y opedl d tenc f dl d andthat was4.1.17 Previousl-devel an , of alledbrowniel an , is l
devel ant or derelt, andl u tlopedbut is now vac ic andcrren yinuse withknown
potentialor redevelf opment.
l4.1.18 The nationaltarget is that 60% ofadditionalhousingshoudbe providedon
previousl opedl on ersions ofexistingb ilin s byydevel andandthroughc v u d g
2008. The SouthWest regionRPG10sets a target of50% for BathandNorth
East Somerset whic c alPl .his inorporatedinthe B&NESLoc an(1996-2011)
n2005/6, 55% ofadditionalhousingwas b il ydevel
an . Cumuativel, 49% ofthe dwellings c etedduringthe period1996-
4.1.19 I 0 u t onpreviousl oped
l d l y ompl
ydevel an .2006 have beenprovidedonpreviousl opedl d
4.1.20Withregardbrowniel opment, ref lf ddevel erence shoudbe made to PPS23
regardingthe needfor appropriate assessment /remediationrequirements of
opments to ensure the protec cpotentialdevel tionof ontrolledwaters.
14
Topogrphy and Dria anage
t is drainedprimaril4.1.21 The Distric ybythe river Avonandits tributaries the River
ourses have foodplChew andthe Cam andWellow Brooks. These waterc l ains
whic t to foodrisk. The river valleys are a sig ifant chare subjec l n ic omponent
ofthe distric an sc h ter, providinganimportant resourc ort‘s l d ape carac e f
nature conservationandrec hhistoric utureationandhave ric alandcl ral
associations.
Map 6: Topogrphyand Dria anage
4.1.22 There is a gap in data on flooding. The Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) will provide further information. The SFRA will be completed in December 2007 therefore data relating to flooding will be reconsidered following the findings of the SFRA.
h & Norh EastSom e re t ood PliMap 7: Bat t s : Fl an Map
15
De ve l e xtopm e ntManage m e ntCont
u an ingapplations rel
to repl ement dwellings andextensions inthe GreenBel hof
4.1.23 To give animpressionofthe crrent number ofpl n ic ating
ac t a searc
an ingapplations over a year period(fpl n ic rom 1st April2006 œ 23rdMarch
2007)was undertaken. Repl ement dwellings inthe GreenBel onstitutedac t c
2563)ofallpl n ic il1% (22/ an ingapplations inthat period, wh e extensions in
the GreenBel onstitutes 5% (121/ an ingapplations inthist c 2563)ofallpl n icsame period.
y s betweenDecember 1996 andMarc4.1.24 Ananalsis ofallrecordedappeal h2007
shows that 8% ofallappealases rel acc ate to repl ement dwellings and
t (i.e. 71/ s)extensions inthe GreenBel 926 appeal .
s 20% rel l s4.1.25 Ofthese appeal atedto Bathandony3% to Keynsham. The appeal
were predominan yrel actl atedto repl ement dwellings andextensioninthe
t inruralareas. Usingthe settl l ic or ruralGreenBel ement cassifationf
ements estabishedinLoc anpolySC.1: 34% ofappeal atedtosettl l alPl ic s rel
R1 settl ements and41% to R3 settlements, 3% to R2 settl ements.
s were dismissed(76%) th4.1.26 The majorityofthese appeal , al ough24% ofthese
appeals were allowed.
16
5.Ide ntifying Sustainability Issue s and Proble m s (Task A 3 )
5.1.1 The SEA Direc l iedandtive requires that environmentalprobems be identif
y canalsedinanEnvironmentalReport. This is inorporatedwithinthis SA.
The keysustainab ityissues the inrelil ationto the SPD withinBath&North
East Somerset has beenidentif ic iniedas part ofthe polyandbasel e
review.
ac t SPD will5.1.2 The Repl ement Dwellings andExtensions inthe GreenBel
provide detailandcarityto suppl alPl icl ement existingLoc anpolyin
rel ac t withtheationto extensions andrepl ement dwellings inthe GreenBel
aim ofprotec t against inappropriate develtingthe GreenBel opment and
acitate appropriate develf il opment.
5.1.3 The mainsustainab ityissues inrel acil ationto the Repl ement Dwellings and
Extensions inthe GreenBel ollows:t SPD are as f
§§§§ Preservingthe settingandspec caracialh ter ofthe CityofBath, the
townofKeynsham andthe manyvillages inthe ruralareas ofBath&
NorthEast Somerset
§§§§ Protec caractingruralh ter
c an sc h ter andl al§§§§ Maintainingandenhaningl d ape carac occdistintiveness
§§§§ Maintainingthe openness ofthe GreenBelt
§§§§ Maintainingandenhaningenvironmental u ity, andwillec q al dif
interest inthe GreenBelt
§§§§ Promotingthe effic ydevel f d andient use ofpreviousl oped(browniel)l
§§§§ Facitatingappropriate residentialdevel til opment inthe GreenBel
(solyinterms ofextensions andrepl ement dwellings)whicel ac h
meets the needs ofresidents
§§§§ Makingthe best use ofexistingresources inldcu ingemptyor under-
usedhousing.
ts of l h§§§§ The needto mitigate andto adapt to the effec cimate cange.
c§§§§ Consideringthe needto improve existingsubstandardacess onto
cthe trukroadnetwork.
17
6.EA /SA O bje c tive s Fram e w ork and A ppraisalM atrix (Task A 4 )
6. opi am e w or1 De ve l ng the SA Fr k
rameworkprovides a wayinwhic il ts c
described, analsedandc ess ofundertakinga SA
6.1.1 The SA f hsustainab ityeffec anbe
y ompared. The proc
v v ic il d ators whicin oles the identifationofsustainab ityobjectives andin ic h
are usedto measure andmonitor the success ofthe SPD.
6.1.2 The Sustainab ityAppraisalFrameworkhas beendevelil opedto assess the
t ofthe draf il hig t issues thatimpac t SPD onsustainab ityissues, to hig l h
needaddressinginthe SPD. The appropriate in ic opedd ators willbe devel
to measure the effectiveness ofthe SPD.
2 Sustai ly O bj ii6. nabit e c tve s
6.2.1 The Sustainab ityAppraisal or the Core Strategywas usedil s Frameworkf
or draf tives fas the mainstartingpoint f t objec or the SPD. The Framework
c ic inwas reassessedacordingto the reviews ofthe polies, basel e
f ilinormationandkeysustainab ityissues.
6.2.2 Tabe 5 willbe usedto assess the rel ormance ofeacl ative perf hoptionand
tive usingpositive, negative or neutralsymbol lobjec s, thenpossibe
mitigationmeasures willbe proposed. I lt shoudbe notedthat some ofthe
il tives maynot be f l ac insustainab ityobjec easibe due to a l kofbasel e data
(theref ut)andother objecore makingmonitoringdifficl tives maybe
opedduringthe workshop andc ldevel onsutationstage.
18
ie 3 Sustai ly A pprai am e w orTabl nabit salFr k
Plan O bje c tive s and O ptions
SEA /SA O bje c tive s 1 2 3 4 e tc
Objective 1 Improve accessibilityto communityfacilities andlocalservices
Objective 2 Improve the healthandwell-beingofallcommunities
Objective 3 Meet identifiedneeds for sufficient andhighqualityhousing
Objective 4 Increase availabilityofaffordable andspecificneeds housing
Objective 5 Promote stronger andmore cohesive communities
Objective 6 Reduce anti-socialbehaviour, crime andthe fear ofcrime
Objective 7 Improve the availabilityandprovisionoftraining
Objective 8 Ensure communities have access to a wide range of
employment opportunities
Objective 9 Enable localbusinesses to prosper
Objective 10 Promote vibrant city, town, localandvillage centres
Objective 11 Increase availabilityoflocalproduce andmaterials
Objective 12 Ensure everyone has access to highqualityandaffordable
publictransport andpromote cyclingandwalking
Objective 13 Reduce the needanddesire to travelbycar
Objective 14 Protect andenhance localdistinctiveness
Objective 15 Protect andenhance the district‘s historicenvironment
Objective 16 Encourage andprotect habitats andbiodiversity.
Objective 17 Protect andenhance the district‘s culturalassets
Objective 18 Reduce pollutionandgreenhouse gas emissions
Objective 19 Encourage sustainable construction
Objective 20 Ensure the development ofsustainable and/or localenergy
sources andenergyinfrastructure
Objective 21 Reduce vulnerabilityto, andmanage floodrisk
Objective 22 Encourage carefulandefficient use ofnaturalresources
Objective 23 Promote waste management accordance withthe waste
hierarchy(Reduce, Reuse andRecycle)
19
Table 4 Some notes to assist SA Objectives
Sustainability A ppraisalO bje c tive s Explanation ofthe de taile d que stion (w he re notobvious)
Objective 1 Improve accessibilityto community
facilities andlocalservices.
Accessibility: includes the provisionoffacilities
andgeographicalaccessibility. Community
facilities: includingeducationalestablishments,
libraries, GP surgeries, shops andart /leisure
facilities.
Objective 2 Improve the healthandwell-being
ofallcommunities.
This objective includes the promotionofhealthy
exercise suchas walkingandcyclingandthe
provisionofGreenspace.
Objective 3 Meet identifiedneeds for sufficient
andhighqualityhousing
Identifiedneeds: accordingto RSSandother
housingstudies.
Highqualityhousing: measuredagainst the
government guidelines.
Objective 4 Increase availabilityofaffordable
andspecificneeds housing.
Objective 5 Promote stronger andmore
cohesive communities.
Promotinga culture ofrespect andunderstanding
betweencommunities witha commonsense of
belonging.
Objective 6 Reduce anti-socialbehaviour, crime
andthe fear ofcrime.
Objective 7 Improve the availabilityand
provisionoftraining.
Objective 8 Ensure communities have access to
a wide range ofemployment
opportunities.
Range ofemployment opportunities: Building
upona diversityofemployment sectors to provide
jobs requiringa range ofskills inthe localarea.
Objective 9 Enable localbusinesses to prosper. Throughprovisionofappropriate employment
space, supportinganactive labour market.
Objective 10 Promote vibrant city, town, local
andvillage centres.
Centres withhighfootfalllevels andengaged
citizens, attractedby, for example, provisionof
requiredservices.
Objective 11 Increase availabilityoflocal
produce andmaterials.
Support the abilityoflocalproducers to compete
inaninternationalmarket.
Localas in: low intransportationmiles or
producedregionally.
Objective 12 Ensure everyone has access to high
qualityandaffordable public
transport andpromote cyclingand
walking.
Highquality: frequency, compliant to accessibility
standards andclean.
Alter the car /cyclist /pedestrianpriority
relationship.
Objective 13 Reduce the needanddesire to
travelbycar.
Goodaccess to localservices andemployment,
improve other modes oftransport as feasible
alternatives.
Objective 14 Protect andenhance local
distinctiveness.
Localdistinctiveness: the character and
appearance ofruralandurbanareas.
(Landscape/townscape)
Objective 15 Protect andenhance the district‘s
historicenvironment.
Objective 16 Encourage andprotect habitats and
biodiversity.
Biodiversity: The number andvarietyof
organisms foundwithinour geographicregion.
Objective 17 Protect andenhance the district‘s
culturalassets.
Objective 18 Reduce pollutionandgreenhouse
gas emissions.
Pollution: contaminationofair, water or soilby
substances harmfulto livingorganisms, light from
built up areas emittedinto the atmosphere at
20
night, continuous noise loudenoughto be
annoyingor physicallyharmfulandheat from hot
water dischargedinto waterways andlakes from
industrialbuildings endangeringaquaticlife.
Components ofthe atmosphere that contribute to
the greenhouse effect includingwater vapour,
carbondioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and
ozone.
Objective 19 Encourage sustainable construction. Includingresponsible sitingandorientationof
buildings, choice ofmaterials, generationand
handlingofwaste.
Objective 20 Ensure the development of
sustainable and/or localenergy
sources andenergyinfrastructure.
Objective 21 Reduce vulnerabilityto andmanage
floodrisk
Objective 22 Encourage carefulandefficient use
ofnaturalresources
Naturalresources;include land, water and
minerals.
Minimise consumption, collect andreuse water.
Bymaintaininglongterm reserves ofstone and
encouragingthe salvagingandrecyclingofBath
stone andother localstones suchas lias
Encourage re-use ofexistingbuildings and
adaptable architecture
Objective 23 Promote waste management
accordance withthe waste
hierarchy(Reduce, Reuse and
Recycle)
21
7.The nextsteps
71 The nextsa he SA. tgesoft
7.1.1 One anyamendments have beenmade to the sc ilc ope ofthe sustainab ity
ig t ofanyc ommene onappraisalinthe l h omments received, workwillc c
Stages B, CandD ofthe appraisalprocess.
SA Stage Tasks Timetable
Stage A
Evidence gathering
ConsultationonScopingReport June 2007
Stage B
Developingand
refiningoptions and
assessingeffects
B1: Testingthe SPDs‘ objectives
against the SA framework
B2: Developingthe SPDs‘ options
B3: Predictingthe effects the SPDs
B4: Evaluatingthe effects ofthe SPDs
B5: Consideringways ofmitigating
adverse effects andmaximising
beneficialeffects.
B6: Proposingmeasures to monitor
the significant effects ofimplementing
the SPDs
July- Sep 2007
Stage C:
Preparingthe
Sustainability
AppraisalReport
C1: Preparingthe SA Report. March 2008
Stage D:
Consultingonthe
preferredoptions of
the SPD andSA Report
D1: Publicparticipationonthe draft
SPD andthe SA Report.
D2: Assessingsignificant changes
D3: Makingdecisions andproviding
information
April-May2008
State E
Monitoringthe
significant effects of
implementingthe
SPDs
Adoption Sept 2008
22
8.ProposedStructure ofthe SEA/SA ReportforReplacementDwellings
andExtensionsinthe GreenBeltSPD
1 P edS ct eurtruropos.
l ow suggests a struture f S c c8.1.1The tabe bel c or the SEA/A report inacordane
withrel cevant guidane.
Structure ofrep tor I fnormaitontoincldu e
1.Summaryando tucomes 1.1 Non-technicalsummary
1.2 Outcome Statement
1.3 How to comment onthe report
2.Back dgroun 2.1 Purpose ofthe SA andthe SA Report
2.2 Planobjectives andoutline ofcontents
2.3 Compliance withthe SEA
Directive/Regulations
3.Ap i lprasa Meth d lo oogy 3.1 Approachadoptedto the SA
3.2 Whenandwho carriedout the SA
3.3 Who was consulted, whenandhow
3.4 Difficulties encounteredincompiling
informationor carryingout the assessment
4.S itusanabilityobjectives,
baseline andco tn ext
4.1 Links to other strategies, plans and
programmes andsustainabilityobjectives
4.2 The baseline characteristics
4.3 Mainsustainabilityissues andproblems
identified
4.4 The SA Framework
5.SPD issuesando itp ons 5.1 Mainstrategicoptions consideredandhow
theywere identified
5.2 Comparisonofthe sustainabilityeffects of
the options
5.3 How sustainabilityissues were consideredin
choosingthe preferredoption
5.4 Other options consideredandwhythese
were rejected
5.5 Proposedmitigationmeasures
6.DrfatSPD objectives 6.1 significant sustainabilityeffects ofthe
preferredobjectives
6.2 How sustainabilityproblems were considered
indevelopingthe planobjectives
6.3 Proposedmitigationmeasures
6.4 Uncertainties andrisks
7.Implemen itta on 7.1 Links to other tier ofplans andprogrammes
andthe project level
7.2 Proposals for monitoring
7.3 Next Steps
23
8