+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Date post: 26-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: michael-kollar
View: 113 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
The Owl Fund's Energy Sector initiated coverage of FTI on September 15, 2014 rating the stock a "Buy."
Popular Tags:
12
INITIATING COVERAGE REPORT William C. Dunkelberg Owl Fund September 15, 2014 Michael Kollar Lead Analyst [email protected] Nathan Eisenberg Associate Analyst [email protected] COMPANY OVERVIEW FMC Technologies, Inc. (FTI) is an oil and gas equipment & services company that provides a wide array of production systems and services to upstream energy companies. FTI has three distinct segments: subsea, surface and energy infrastructure. The Subsea Technologies segment is the largest (66.3% of revenue); followed by Surface Technologies (25.4% of revenue) and Energy Infrastructure (8.7% of revenue). FTI’s subsea and surface systems work with offshore and onshore explorers & producers (E&Ps) to develop, boost, and process production fields. Revenue by geographic region is allocated: United States (27.2%), Norway (17.1%), Brazil (9.7%), Angola (7.2%), Australia (6.5%) and all other countries (32.3%). INVESTMENT THESIS FTI is currently trading at a 16.8% discount to its historical 1 year average EV/EBITDA multiple and a 25.1% discount to its one year historical peer group average EV/EBITDA multiple. Shares have also underperformed the average return of the S&P 500 Oil & Gas Equipment & Service Index by 13% over the last 12 months. FTI first became undervalued in October 2013 when the company reported cost overruns and execution problems in its premier segment, Subsea, which led to a 2Q2013 margin drop from ~13% guidance to 10.8% reported. Since then, FTI’s management has improved execution which is evident in margin expansion and earnings growth. FTI’s top line has been growing at a 4 year CAGR of 14.6% while diluted EPS has been growing at a 4 year CAGR of 8.2%. With FTI’s economic moat of size & scope, dominant market share in the subsea market (~40%), positive industry outlook for the remainder of 2014, FTI’s discount is a buying opportunity. We expect 14% multiple expansion from 12.6x to 14.4x over the next 12 months which corresponds to FTI’s one year historical average. With anticipated NFY EBITDA of $1.3B we have a target price of $73.59, indicating an expected return of 27.9%. Energy Oil & Gas Equipment & Services FMC Technologies, Inc. Exchange: NYSE Ticker: FTI Target Price: $73.59 Current Price: $56.69 Sector: Outperform Recommendation: BUY All prices current at end of previous trading sessions from date of report. Data is sourced from local exchanges via CapIQ, Bloomberg and other vendors. The William C. Dunkelberg Owl Fund does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Key Statistics Price Projected $73.59 52 wk High $63.92 Return 28% 52 wk Low $47.58 Shares O/S (mm) 239 Yield N/A Market Cap (mm) $1,331 EV (mm) 1,424 $ P/E 25.3 Beta 1.12 Date EPS Est % Surp Δ Price 3Q2013 $ 0.53 $ 0.58 -5.3% -8.6% 4Q2013 $ 0.72 $ 0.65 7.0% -3.2% 1Q2014 $ 0.57 $ 0.50 7.2% 4.2% 2Q2014 $ 0.72 $ 0.63 9.0% 3.1% Earnings History $- $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00 $- $0.20 $0.40 $0.60 $0.80 $1.00 $1.20 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Diluted EPS & Consensus 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Year Period 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1Q $ 0.32 $ 0.41 $ 0.43 $ 0.57 $ 0.75 2Q $ 0.39 $ 0.49 $ 0.48 $ 0.72 $ 0.85 3Q $ 0.50 $ 0.41 $ 0.53 $ 0.73 $ 0.87 4Q $ 0.41 $ 0.57 $ 0.79 $ 0.79 $ 0.97 Year $ 1.62 $ 1.88 $ 2.23 $ 2.81 $ 3.44 Earnings Per Share ( $) for Fiscal Year 5 year chart
Transcript
Page 1: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

INITIATING COVERAGE REPORT

William C. Dunkelberg Owl Fund September 15, 2014

Michael Kollar Lead Analyst

[email protected]

Nathan Eisenberg Associate Analyst

[email protected]

COMPANY OVERVIEW FMC Technologies, Inc. (FTI) is an oil and gas equipment & services company that provides a wide array of production systems and services to upstream energy companies. FTI has three distinct segments: subsea, surface and energy infrastructure. The Subsea Technologies segment is the largest (66.3% of revenue); followed by Surface Technologies (25.4% of revenue) and Energy Infrastructure (8.7% of revenue). FTI’s subsea and surface systems work with offshore and onshore explorers & producers (E&Ps) to develop, boost, and process production fields. Revenue by geographic region is allocated: United States (27.2%), Norway (17.1%), Brazil (9.7%), Angola (7.2%), Australia (6.5%) and all other countries (32.3%).

INVESTMENT THESIS FTI is currently trading at a 16.8% discount to its historical 1 year average EV/EBITDA multiple and a 25.1% discount to its one year historical peer group average EV/EBITDA multiple. Shares have also underperformed the average return of the S&P 500 Oil & Gas Equipment & Service Index by 13% over the last 12 months. FTI first became undervalued in October 2013 when the company reported cost overruns and execution problems in its premier segment, Subsea, which led to a 2Q2013 margin drop from ~13% guidance to 10.8% reported. Since then, FTI’s management has improved execution which is evident in margin expansion and earnings growth. FTI’s top line has been growing at a 4 year CAGR of 14.6% while diluted EPS has been growing at a 4 year CAGR of 8.2%. With FTI’s economic moat of size & scope, dominant market share in the subsea market (~40%), positive industry outlook for the remainder of 2014, FTI’s discount is a buying opportunity. We expect 14% multiple expansion from 12.6x to 14.4x over the next 12 months which corresponds to FTI’s one year historical average. With anticipated NFY EBITDA of $1.3B we have a target price of $73.59, indicating an expected return of 27.9%.

E

ne

rgy

Oil

& G

as

Eq

uip

me

nt

& S

erv

ice

s

FMC Technologies, Inc. Exchange: NYSE Ticker: FTI Target Price: $73.59 Current Price: $56.69

Sector: Outperform Recommendation: BUY

All prices current at end of previous trading sessions from date of report. Data is sourced from local exchanges via CapIQ, Bloomberg and other vendors. The William C. Dunkelberg Owl Fund does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports.

Key StatisticsPrice Projected $73.59 52 wk High $63.92

Return 28% 52 wk Low $47.58

Shares O/S (mm) 239 Yield N/A

Market Cap (mm) $1,331 EV (mm) 1,424$

P/E 25.3 Beta 1.12

Date EPS Est % Surp Δ Price

3Q2013 $ 0.53 $ 0.58 -5.3% -8.6%

4Q2013 $ 0.72 $ 0.65 7.0% -3.2%

1Q2014 $ 0.57 $ 0.50 7.2% 4.2%

2Q2014 $ 0.72 $ 0.63 9.0% 3.1%

Earnings History

$- $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00

$-

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Diluted EPS & Consensus

 1Q  2Q  3Q  4Q  Year

Period 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

 1Q $ 0.32 $ 0.41 $ 0.43 $ 0.57 $ 0.75

 2Q $ 0.39 $ 0.49 $ 0.48 $ 0.72 $ 0.85

 3Q $ 0.50 $ 0.41 $ 0.53 $ 0.73 $ 0.87

 4Q $ 0.41 $ 0.57 $ 0.79 $ 0.79 $ 0.97

 Year $ 1.62 $ 1.88 $ 2.23 $ 2.81 $ 3.44

Earnings Per Share ( $) for Fiscal Year

5 year chart

Page 2: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Fall 2014

T h e W i l l i a m C . D u n k e l b e r g O w l F u n d

Page 2

CATALYSTS Future subsea tree orders FTI’s leading market share (~40%) in the subsea tree market should allow the company to win a significant amount of orders in 2015. These contracts are won based on competitive bidding, but only if companies have the capacity available to complete the projects. FTI has been able to process the large amount of orders it received from Petrobras last year, and IR states that FTI’s backlog is at a comfortable level to accept more orders -- different from that of two of its main subsea competitors, Aker and GE Oil & Gas, who may not have the capacity given their recent backlog growth. Increasing Supply of Rigs Many new drillships and semi-submersible rigs are scheduled for delivery in the next few years. The increasing rig fleet will provide a much larger base for FTI to market its higher-margin, service business. Deepwater E&P Capex Shift According to Douglass-Westwood’s Deepwater Market Forecast, deepwater capital expenditures should total $260 B from 2014 to 2018 (A 130% increase over the prior five year period), with an even great focus on depths > 1,000m. FTI’s subsea products rated at these depths are the best in the industry and should be able to capture significant market share in this category. Margin Expansion In the near term, FTI is expecting to see margin expansion in its leading segments, subsea and surface. Subsea margins will be helped by more profitable contracts being converted out of FTI’s backlog as a result of better pricing. Because surface margins are mainly driven by volumes, the continued growth of onshore production in North America will allow FTI to drive incremental margins in the segment.

Industry Move to Standardization FTI recently announced the securitization of Joint Development Agreements (JDAs) with four major deep-water operators – Anadarko, BP, ConocoPhillips, and Shell. This sort of agreement had never been made before and marks operators’ shift away from reducing costs via independently aggressive bidding on projects to sharing costs to achieve greater returns overall. FTI is the only subsea equipment manufacturer to reach an agreement like this and will be the first in the industry to bring a standardized design to market. Despite the JDA, FTI will still be able to sell these systems to other E&Ps. The timeline for these project orders is 2016, however additional agreements with other operators and/or earlier than expected project order could benefit FTI shares.

ECONOMIC MOAT

Innovation: FTI is the global leader in subsea

innovation. Subsea separation and rigless well

intervention are two areas of subsea production

that FTI is advancing through value-added new

systems. Cutting-edge equipment and processing

systems are helping operators access more reserves,

cut operating costs, increase production and

lengthen the life of each well.

Scale: FTI leads the subsea services industry, with

a 40% market share in global tree awards. FTI’s

size allows it to compete globally for almost all new

awards by the world’s largest E&Ps. Leveraging

this market dominance, FTI has developed

important partnerships and customer relationships

that help it continually grow its backlog.

RISKS

Commodity: Volatility in the price of energy

commodities (oil, natural gas, etc.) could have

detrimental effects to future operations, especially

in the offshore space. This volatility is a reflection

of supply (reserves discovered) and demand

(consumption trends), geopolitical turmoil and

production efficiency.

Regulatory Environment: Changes to

environmental laws and regulations impacting

exploration and development of drilling for crude

oil and natural gas could have a material impact on

the equipment, systems and services FTI provides.

Compliance would likely have an adverse financial

impact on operational efficiency.

Backlog Disruption: Long lead times are required

on many of FTI’s contracts. Delayed delivery upon

this project backlog could affect profitability as

customer relationships, which could negatively

affect future tree awards.

FX Risk: As a global company, FTI recognizes

revenue in a number of currencies and adverse

fluctuations in exchange rates can impact revenue

and earnings. FTI does employ derivatives to hedge

this risk.

Page 3: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Fall 2014

T h e W i l l i a m C . D u n k e l b e r g O w l F u n d

Page 3

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

Disclosure: Industry data discussed below was sourced from Douglas-Westwood’s 2014 Deepwater Intervention Forum which took place on

August 14, 2014. Douglas-Westwood (DW) is a leading provider of market research and consulting services to the energy industry worldwide

and has completed over 1,000 projects for clients in 70 countries.

Offshore / Deepwater / Subsea FTI’s main business segment Subsea (66% of FY2013 revenue), provides services and highly specialized products and

systems which aide in the extraction of oil & gas from wells below the ocean’s surface. As such, the company is

materially impacted by the capital expenditures of large international oil companies (IOCs) and national oil companies

(NOCs). For perspective, these NOCs are so large that many

have annual capex budgets greater than the total market

capitalizations of many E&Ps in the S&P 500 index. Some of

these are Saudi Aramco, Gazprom, National Iranian Oil Co.,

PetroChina, Royal Dutch Shell, Petrobras, and Pemex. As

onshore and shallow offshore reserves are depleted, operators

will need to shift production to deep-water discoveries.

Projected oil demand in 2020 will require an additional 56

million barrels of oil to be produced per day, and 36% of these

additional barrels will be produced from deep-water wells not

currently tapped.

Oil Prices & Operator Focus on ROC International oil companies (IOCs) and national oil companies (NOCs) possess the majority of global proved oil

reserves and service the majority of demand. These massive companies’ multi-billion dollar annual capex budgets greatly

influence demand for oil & gas equipment & service providers. In short, as oil demand has grown, these companies

ratcheted up production and consequently, saw their reserves depleted more and more quickly. The race was on to

discover and claim new reserves wherever possible. The need to replace oil & gas reserves resulted in innovations in oil

& gas exploration technology and led to the discovery of billions of barrels of oil in many challenging locations around

the planet. Global capex has shifted away from exploration

spending to production spending, with the goal of driving

efficiencies to extract the commodity more economically.

Production costs ballooned due to the need for more advanced

drilling technology, IT infrastructure, global positioning systems,

raw materials, and the need for highly skilled workers. The

combination of aggressive capex projects and oil price fluctuations

have material effects on cash flows and can pose liquidity risks on

highly levered IOCs and NOCs. ROC is now the chief concern for

operators and oil & gas equipment & servicers able to drive

marginal costs down will see a long runway for future earnings.

DETAILED COMPANY OVERVIEW

Revenue Streams

Products

FTI’s product-based revenue accounted for 80.3% ($5.7B) of total revenue in FY2013 and provided a 20.3% gross

margin.

Services

FTI’s service-based revenue accounted for 19.6% ($1.4B) of total revenue in FY2013 and provided a 28.0% gross

margin.

Page 4: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Fall 2014

T h e W i l l i a m C . D u n k e l b e r g O w l F u n d

Page 4

Business Segments

Subsea

FTI’s largest business segment is Subsea (FY2013 revenue of $4.7 billion, 66%

of total), where the company markets products and services relating to the

production, or extraction, of oil from wells on the sea floor. FTI’s offshore

product portfolio includes subsea wellheads, drilling systems (not actual drills),

both topside, shallow water and deep water processing systems, separation

systems (to separate oil, gas, sand, and water), tie-in & flowlines, chokes & flow

modules, manifold pipeline systems, remote operated vehicles (ROVs)

(unmanned submersibles to install and check subsea equipment),

controls and data management, and well access systems. Well

operators employ these products to extract oil and natural gas from

wells in both shallow and deep water environments. Deep water

products are rated to depths of 10,000 ft. deep and must withstand

hydrostatic pressures (pressure exerted on an area due to the

cumulative weight of water above it) of up to 15,000 psi and

temperatures up to 200 degree Fahrenheit. Because of the intense

working conditions for this equipment, quality and reliability are

crucial to maintain uptime (the time a well is fully operational and

problem-free) and overall returns for their operators.

Surface

FTI markets onshore equipment through its Surface segment (FY2013 revenue of $1.8B, 25% total revenue), specific to

hydraulic fracturing production In order to expand this segment, FTI acquired Pure Energy Services Ltd. (TSX:PSV) for

$285 million in FY2012, a leading provider of frac flowback and wireline services in Canada. With help from the

acquisition, the Surface segment saw top line growth of 13% YOY in 2013. FTI’s onshore product portfolio supports

upstream hydraulic fracturing and includes well testing, well production, and instrument equipment such as flowlines,

well service pumps, pumps, compact valves, analytic instruments, flow measurement meters, conventional and drill-

through wellheads, well service pumps, casing heads, spools, hangers, seals, valves & actuators, and thermal equipment.

Energy Infrastructure

FTI’s last business segment Energy Infrastructure (FY2013 revenue of $617 million, 9% of total), markets measurement

solutions, loading systems, material handling solutions, separation systems, and automation control systems.

Measurement solutions uses advanced technology and electronics to measure oil, gas, and other fluids for the purpose of

defining ownership, revenue, and tax obligations for manufacturers in the lubricant, petroleum, fuel blending, and

chemical industries. Loading systems include both land- and sea-based fluid loading and transfer systems used by the oil

& gas and chemical industries to move crude oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) and other refined products. These

systems can be installed while vessels are in port or even in open water. Material handling includes bulk conveyors for

the utility and mining industries. Separation systems aide in the separation of oil, gas, sand, and water and are available

for above water, or top-side, applications, as well as subsea. Automation and control provides two software products for

the control of systems and flows of fluids through terminals. The Energy Infrastructure segment grew 7.5% YOY from

strength in the North American oil & gas control systems and a

loading project with Shell.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Revenue

FTI derives its revenues from the design, manufacture and service

of systems used by E&P oil companies to produce oil and natural

Page 5: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Fall 2014

T h e W i l l i a m C . D u n k e l b e r g O w l F u n d

Page 5

gas. Revenue has grown at a CAGR of 14.64% since 2010 with fairly consistent percentage increases each year.

However, revenue in 2010 was down 6.35% from 2009 as a result of the drilling moratorium on the Gulf of Mexico and

global weak energy demand and subsequent decrease in backlog, an industry-wide trend that affected most international

energy companies.

Subsea Technologies: Grew at a 14.70% CAGR since 2010 driven by increased demand and offshore well

development (such as the pre-salt region). Expectations are for E&P demand in such regions as the Gulf of

Mexico and the pre-salt region to contribute mid, single-digit percentage growth moving forward.

Surface Technologies: Grew at a 17.30% CAGR since 2010 driven by growth in North American oil and gas shale

activity and the Middle East. Management expects this shale activity and international growth to drive high,

single-digit percentage growth in this segment.

Energy Infrastructure: Grew at a 7.96% CAGR since 2010 driven by FTI’s measurement solutions business

keeping up with the strength of North American oil and gas custody and control.

Moving forward, revenue is expected to grow at a 6.14% CAGR through 2016. FTI’s ability to maintain top-line growth

is dependent upon its ability to win new project awards, efficiently process its backlog and on commodity prices.

Margins

FTI was able to increase margins in 2013 after slight declines in 2011 and a stagnant 2012. Gross margin in 2013 was

23.45% vs. 22.22% in 2012, EBITDA margin was 15.39% vs. 13.84% and net margin was 8.64% vs. 7.04%. This decline

in margins is a result of increased spending along FTI’s Surface Technologies segment due to the expanding North

American shale market.

Subsea Technologies: Margins in the first half of FY 2014

reached 14.6%. This is a 1.3% increase YOY as FTI sees

subsea margins increase due to improved execution of

project backlog.

Surface Technologies: Margins in the first half of FY 2014

reached 17.0% vs. 13.3% the year before. Surface margins

are expected to grow as volume growth in the North

American fluid control and international surface wellhead

business grow.

Energy Infrastructure: Margins in the first half of FY 2014 reached 11.44%, down slightly from 11.57% the year

before. This level remains a marked improvement from the 9% margins in FY 2012. Margins should remain in

the low double digits as expansion in the loading systems and separation systems businesses continues.

Moving forward, margins are expected to expand slightly as management has said it’s focused on maintaining subsea

margins around 14% and has seen faster-than-average growth in its surface segment, a result of the shale market boom

(over 60% of FTI surface segment operates in North America).

EBITDA

FTI’s EBITDA has grown at a CAGR of 10.86% since 2010, with

a 27.5% increase in 2013 alone. FTI is expected to reach an

EBITDA of $1.67B in 2016, which would represent 20.28%

growth during since 2013. We believe FTI is positioned to see

EBITDA appreciation as it benefits from higher demand in the

subsea segment and shale production in the surface segment,

improving margins and the recent period of reinvestment into the

Page 6: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Fall 2014

T h e W i l l i a m C . D u n k e l b e r g O w l F u n d

Page 6

business to allow growth.

Earnings

FTI has missed earnings three times in the last two years, the most recent in Q3 2013. However, earnings have grown at

an 8.24% CAGR since 2010 and are expected to grow at a CAGR of 12.55% through 2016. Faster growth is expected

as E&P demand drives backlogs higher in both deep-water and onshore projects as well as an expansion in margins. We

expect volatility in earnings’ releases to continue as the market struggles to accurately project complex aspects of FTI’s

business like tree awards and backlog conversion.

Capital Expenditures/Depreciation

Capital expenditures grew at a CAGR of 29.26% since 2010. This growth tapered off in 2013 to just 7.42%.

Depreciation grew at a CAGR of 17.91% since 2010. FTI’s management gave guidance of $400 million in capex for

2014 and less in 2015 as it transitions from a period of investment, to a period of FCF generation.

Subsea Technologies: Capex grew 41.63% from 2011 to 2012 as FTI

needed to reinvest capital to expand its subsea segment’s

manufacturing capabilities to support higher backlog levels. Capex

decreased 8.88% from 2012 to 2013.

Surfaced Technologies: Capex grew 38.14% from 2011 to 2012 as FTI

integrated an acquisition and built out it pressure pumping and flow

product lines. Capex decreased 36.33% from 2012 to 2013.

Energy Infrastructure: Unchanged 2011 to 2012, decreasing 19.42%

2012 to 2013.

FTI‘s CAPEX to depreciation ratio has averaged over 2.5 since 2010. This

investment in long-term assets indicates FTI’s growth expectations along its

subsea and surface segments. CAPEX decline across all three segments in

2013 is in line with management’s plan to boost FCF going forward.

Free Cash Flow

Free cash flow has fluctuated since the revenue slump 2010, with 2011 and 2012 reporting negative FCF. 2013 returned

a positive $481.3M FCF. The negative FCFs in 2011 and 2012 are alarming, but can be attributed to large increases in

CAPEX and the effect of commodity price volatility. FCF is expected to increase at a CAGR of 19.65% through 2016 as

backlog increases and margins expand. CFFO have grown at a CAGR of 42.06% since 2010 and is expected to grow at a

CAGR of 11.26% through 2016. FTI now has a CFFO/CAPEX of 2.53x as CAPEX increases have come down, and

are expected to stay down, allowing for FCF growth to continue.

Debt & Liquidity

Page 7: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Fall 2014

T h e W i l l i a m C . D u n k e l b e r g O w l F u n d

Page 7

By the end of FY2013, FTI had a debt-to-equity ratio of 58.74% and a debt-to-capital ratio of 37.00%. Both leverage

ratios have fluctuated around their current levels and are markedly higher than their comps average D/E of 25%. Long-

term debt represents 63.3% of the company’s total debt. The next principal of about $300M is due in 2017. FTI’s

interest coverage ratio of 22.6x, a credit revolver of $1.5B, and growth in operating cash flows will allow FTI to meet its

short and long-term debt obligations.

Backlog

FTI’s backlog currently stands at a record high $7.84B, growing

at a CAGR of 13.81% since 2010. Approximately 85% of the

backlog is allocated to the subsea segment, with the surface

segment making up the rest of the backlog. While each project is

on a case-by-case completion basis, the average contract spends

two years in the backlog before completion. Likely tree awards

through 2015 look promising, with FTI expected to compete for

21 out of the 24 anticipated new contracts. FTI hopes its

attempts at equipment standardization across operators will help

improve backlog conversion moving forward.

Backlog-to-Multiple

FTI’s multiple has not followed the trend of increasing with

an increasing backlog. We believe investors have aggressively

discounted the company based on tepid expectations on the

future of the subsea and deepwater industry as a whole – and

as revenue from FTI’s backlog is realized, investors will rotate

back into this undervalued stock.

Book-to-Bill Ratio

FTI’s Book/Bill ratio for 2013 was 1.26x, and has been above 1.0x every year since 2010. This represents the greater

number of orders coming into the backlog than completed orders leaving the backlog. Thus, order backlog is growing,

which indicates FTI’s ability to grow.

DuPont Analysis / ROE

FTI has the highest ROE in its peer group, and has maintained this position for over five year, as seen in the chart to the

right This is derived largely from a higher Asset Turnover ratio, indicating that FTI possesses more operational

efficiency than any of its peers.

DuPont Analysis

Company

EV/

EBITDA

Tax

Burden

Interest

Burden

Operating

Margin

Asset

Turnover

Leverage

Ratio ROE

ROE

(Bloomberg)

FTI US Equity 12.3 67.02 1.06 0.10 1.18 0.03 24.8% 28.7%

DRQ US EQUITY 12.3 74.39 1.00 0.26 0.65 0.01 13.9% 15.0%

CAM US EQUITY 11.8 72.81 0.90 0.11 0.77 0.02 11.2% 12.6%

OII US EQUITY 8.9 68.60 1.00 0.17 1.13 0.02 19.5% 19.7%

BHI US EQUITY 8.2 63.31 0.87 0.09 0.84 0.02 6.3% 7.2%

HAL US EQUITY 9.8 72.98 0.90 0.14 1.05 0.02 20.9% 19.4%

NOV US EQUITY 7.8 69.62 0.98 0.15 0.68 0.02 10.8% 11.9%

Page 8: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Fall 2014

T h e W i l l i a m C . D u n k e l b e r g O w l F u n d

Page 8

PEER GROUP IDENTIFICATION

This peer group includes the other members of

the S&P 500 Oil & Gas Equipment & Services index

which were chosen based on related business operations

and geographic distribution.

Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ)

Cameron International Corp. (NYSE:CAM)

Oceaneering International, Inc. (NYSE:OII)

Halliburton Co. (NYSE:HAL)

Baker Hughes, Inc. (NYSE:BHI)

National Oilwell Varco (NYSE:NOV)

TARGET PRICE

After deriving price targets using historical average

valuation, implied relative valuation, and DCF valuation,

we opted for the most conservative of our results:

Historical Valuation.

Historical Average Target Price = $73.59

Target Multiple EV/EBITDA = 14.4x

NTM Consensus EBITDA = $1,278.5mm

Projected Capital Return: 27.9%

Bloomberg 12M TP Consensus: $72.35

VALUATION

Undervaluation The oil & gas equipment and services sub industry has seen a great deal of investment in the past two years, lured by the

boom in demand from natural gas and tight oil production, as well as deepwater discoveries. FTI’s foothold in a high-

growth niche market had earned it a high valuation in the sector, however, FTI’s EV/EBITDA multiple has recently

declined substantially. Currently, FTI’s 12.2x EV/EBITDA multiple represents a 16.8% discount to its 1-year average,

and a 25.1% discount to an index of oil & gas equipment &

service peers. This is partly because of the recent sell off across

the energy sector, but also due to investor’s uncertainty about

FTI’s ability to post new subsea orders and grow its backlog in

the face of increased competition and more stringent customers.

New market entrants and increased competition has reduced the

amount of E&P spending previously available and thus easy

revenue growth. Additionally, rising well costs

and flat commodity prices will continue to

force oilfield operators to become more

disciplined in their search for return on capital.

An observable decrease in competitor multiples

over the last few quarters is evidence of this

trend. We are convinced investors’ current

devaluation of FTI is overblown and they have

failed to fully appreciate the company’s

competitive advantage and economic moat in

the subsea market. Strategic partnerships, a

focus on standardized products, margin

improvement, expected FCF growth, and

continued market leadership in subsea tree

orders should drive FTI’s multiple back to its 1-

yr average of 14.3x.

Page 9: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Fall 2014

T h e W i l l i a m C . D u n k e l b e r g O w l F u n d

Page 9

Comparable Analysis FTI can be considered a pure play on subsea energy production, however, developing a representative peer group for

comparable analysis proved difficult. General Electric, a diversified industrial company, has one segment (GE Oil &

Gas) that competes directly with FTI. Aker Solutions, a Norwegian company, is also a direct competitor with FTI’s

subsea business; however, its domicile in a foreign country, differing foreign exchange risks, and placement on another

exchange makes direct comparison ineffective. That being said, FTI is classified in GICS as a diversified oilfield servicer.

This sub-industry includes a broad array of oil & gas equipment & service companies. We expanded FTI’s subsea peer

group of DRQ, CAM, and OII to include three other companies within the GICS Diversified Oilfield Service

classification who also market equipment and services relating to the production of oil & gas: Halliburton Company

(HAL), Baker Hughes Incorporated (BHI), and National Oilwell Varco (NOV). Expanding the peer group provided

transparency as to why FTI is valued at a premium. FTI’s most notable metrics are its leading Return on Equity (29%),

above average ROIC/WACC (1.53), one year revenue growth (16%), and its competitive net profit margin (11%).

FMC Technologies, Inc. Comparable Analysis *Data from Bloomberg Database

Company Ticker Mkt Cap (B) P/E

NFY

P/E

EV/

EBITDA

EV/ NFY

EBITDA

Gross

Margin

Operating

Margin

Net

Margin

Debt/

Equity ROE ROA

ROIC/

WACC

1-Yr Rev

Growth

FMC Technologies, Inc. FTI 13.3$ 22.1 16.47 13.36 9.46 24% 13% 11% 49% 29% 10% 1.53 16%

Average 18.90 13.29 10.58 7.45 26% 17% 12% 25% 14% 9% 1.15 11%

Median 19.71 13.08 10.41 6.95 24% 16% 11% 20% 14% 9% 1.16 11%

Dril-Quip, Inc. DRQ 3.8$ 21.14 15.65 14.75 9.59 46% 30% 22% 0% 15% 13% 1.29 4%

Cameron International Corp. CAM 14.4$ 20.07 13.78 11.23 8.95 25% 12% 8% 55% 13% 5% 0.93 20%

Oceaneering International OII 7.1$ 17.83 14.13 10.57 7.09 24% 17% 12% 4% 20% 13% 1.76 13%

Halliburton Company HAL 56.0$ 19.34 12.38 10.24 6.8 16% 15% 10% 54% 19% 10% 1.21 10%

Baker-Hughes, Inc. BHI 28.9$ 20.91 11.88 8.88 5.57 20% 12% 6% 25% 7% 5% 0.58 8%

National Oilwell Varco NOV 34.7$ 14.11 11.94 7.8 6.69 28% 17% 12% 15% 12% 7% 1.10 12%

APPENDIX

Supplemental Subsea Industry Data

Page 10: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Fall 2014

T h e W i l l i a m C . D u n k e l b e r g O w l F u n d

Page 10

Market Share

Discounted Cash Flow

FYE December 31, Projected FYE December 31, (a)

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Net Sales $5,099.0 $6,151.4 $7,126.2 $7,838.8 $8,701.1 $9,397.2 $9,867.0 $10,360.4 $10,878.4 $11,422.3

% Growth - - 20.6% 15.8% 10.0% 11.0% 8.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0%

EBITDA (a) $562.4 $648.0 $776.4 $1,095.3 $1,215.8 $1,313.0 $1,378.7 $1,447.6 $1,520.0 $1,596.0

Margin 11.0% 10.5% 10.9% 14.0% 14.0% 14.0% 14.0% 14.0% 14.0% 14.0%

EBIT $670.2 $794.2 $986.2 $1,326.1 $1,472.0 $1,589.7 $1,669.2 $1,752.7 $1,840.3 $1,932.3

Margin 13.1% 12.9% 13.8% 16.9% 16.9% 16.9% 16.9% 16.9% 16.9% 16.9%

Net Income $399.8 $430.0 $501.4 $881.2 $978.3 $1,054.9 $1,106.6 $1,160.9 $1,217.8 $1,277.7

Margin 7.8% 7.0% 7.0% 11.2% 11.2% 11.2% 11.2% 11.2% 11.2% 11.2%

EPS $1.66 $1.78 $2.10 $3.72 $4.18 $4.54 $4.80 $5.08 $5.38 $5.69

Growth Rate - - 7.7% 17.5% 77.3% 12.3% 8.8% 5.8% 5.8% 5.8% 5.8%

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis - Growth Method

A + B = C

Discounted (a) PV of Terminal Value at a

Cash Flows Perpetual Growth Rate of (b) Firm Value Equivalent Terminal EBITDA Mult.

Discount Rate (2014-2020) 4.8% 5.30% 5.8% 4.8% 5.3% 5.8% 4.8% 5.3% 5.8%

9.36% $6,860.9 $21,873.5 $24,685.2 $28,287.0 $28,734.4 $31,546.1 $35,147.9 19.9 22.4 25.79.86% $6,754.8 $19,153.8 $21,355.9 $24,100.6 25,908.6 28,110.7 30,855.4 17.9 20.0 22.5

10.36% $6,651.3 $16,940.0 $18,703.0 $20,852.8 23,591.3 25,354.3 27,504.1 16.3 18.0 20.1

10.86% $6,550.3 $15,106.1 $16,543.4 $18,264.8 21,656.4 23,093.7 24,815.1 15.0 16.4 18.1

11.36% $6,451.7 $13,564.9 $14,754.4 $16,157.8 20,016.6 21,206.1 22,609.6 13.8 15.0 16.5

- D + E = F Present Value of

Terminal Value as a % of

Net Debt LT Invest. Total Equity Value Equity Value per Share (c) Firm Value

Discount Rate 4.8% 5.3% 5.8% 4.8% 5.3% 5.8% 4.8% 5.3% 5.8%

9.4% ($352.8) $44.3 $29,131.5 $31,943.2 $35,545.0 $68.06 $74.63 $83.05 76.1% 78.3% 80.5%9.9% ($352.8) $44.3 $26,305.7 $28,507.8 $31,252.5 $61.46 $66.61 $73.02 73.9% 76.0% 78.1%

10.4% ($352.8) $44.3 $23,988.4 $25,751.4 $27,901.2 $56.05 $60.17 $65.19 71.8% 73.8% 75.8%

10.9% ($352.8) $44.3 $22,053.5 $23,490.8 $25,212.2 $51.53 $54.89 $58.91 69.8% 71.6% 73.6%

11.4% ($352.8) $44.3 $20,413.7 $21,603.2 $23,006.7 $47.70 $50.47 $53.75 67.8% 69.6% 71.5%

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis - EBITDA Multiple Method

A + B = C

Discounted (a) PV of Terminal Value as a

Cash Flows Multiple of 2020 EBITDA (b) Firm Value Equivalent Perpetual Growth Rate

Discount Rate (2014-2019) 14.50x 15.00x 15.50x 14.5x 15.0x 15.5x 14.5 15.0 15.5

9.36% $6,860.9 $15,956.1 $16,506.3 $17,056.5 $22,816.98 $23,367.19 $23,917.40 3.2% 3.4% 3.6%9.86% $6,754.8 $15,504.5 $16,039.2 $16,573.8 $22,259.34 $22,793.98 $23,328.62 3.7% 3.9% 4.1%

10.36% $6,651.3 $15,067.7 $15,587.3 $16,106.9 $21,719.03 $22,238.61 $22,758.19 4.1% 4.3% 4.5%

10.86% $6,550.3 $14,645.1 $15,150.1 $15,655.1 $21,195.43 $21,700.44 $22,205.44 4.6% 4.8% 5.0%

11.36% $6,451.7 $14,236.2 $14,727.1 $15,218.0 $20,687.94 $21,178.85 $21,669.75 5.1% 5.3% 5.5%

- D + E = F Present Value of

Terminal Value as a % of

Net Debt LT Invest. Total Equity Value Equity Value per Share (c) Firm Value

Discount Rate 14.5x 15.0x 15.5x 14.5x 15.0x 15.5x 14.5 15.0 15.5

9.36% ($352.8) $44.3 $23,214.1 $23,764.3 $24,314.5 $54.24 $55.52 $56.81 69.9% 70.6% 71.3%9.86% (352.8) $44.3 $22,656.4 $23,191.1 $23,725.7 $52.94 $54.18 $55.43 69.7% 70.4% 71.0%

10.36% (352.8) $44.3 $22,116.1 $22,635.71 $23,155.3 $51.67 $52.89 $54.10 69.4% 70.1% 70.8%

10.86% (352.8) $44.3 $21,592.5 $22,097.5 $22,602.5 $50.45 $51.63 $52.81 69.1% 69.8% 70.5%

11.36% (352.8) $44.3 $21,085.0 $21,575.9 $22,066.9 $49.26 $50.41 $51.56 68.8% 69.5% 70.2%

Page 11: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Fall 2014

T h e W i l l i a m C . D u n k e l b e r g O w l F u n d

Page 11

Operator Project Location No. of Trees

Cobalt Cameia Angola 6

Husky Liwan Phase 2 China 5

ENI Block 15/06 - East Hub Angola 11

Chevron Agbami Phase 3 Nigeria 6

ENI Bahr Eslam Phase 2 Libya 12

Reliance R-Series India 9

Woodside Browse Australia 18

ENI Mamba Mozambique 21

ENI Sankofa Ghana 16

ENI Etan Nigeria 11

Anadarko Prosperidade Mozambique 18

Wintershall Maria Norway 6

BP Mad Dog Phase 2 GOM 12

Shell Bonga South West Nigeria 48

Inpex Abadi Indonesia 5

Shell Appomattox GOM 20

Statoil Johan Sverdrup Norway 11

ExxonMobil Greater Hadrian GOM 6

GdF Suez Bonaparte Australia 8

Wooside Greater Western Flank Phase 2 Australia 8

Murphy Rotan Blk H Malaysia 7

Total Zinia Phase 2 Angola 9

Statoil Johan Castberg Norway 38

CNOOC Liuhua 16-2 China 12

*As of June 30, 2014 323

Potential $150M+ Subsea Production System

Projects in the next 15 months

Name Age Notable Past Experience Current Board Memberships

John T. Gremp 65

Joined FTI as a financial analyst in 1975 and has

been with the company since, holding positions of

CEO, COO, President, EVP, General Manager

Petroleum Equipment Suppliers Association

American Petroleum Institute

Offshore Technology Conference

Clarence P. Calazot, Jr. 62

Retired CEO of Marathon Oil Corp.

Previous President of Worldwide Production

Operations of Texaco

Baker Hughes, Inc.

Spectra Energy Corp.

Eleazar de Carvalho Filho 56CEO of Unibanco, a Brazilian Investment Bank

Consultant, BHP BillitonBrookfield Renewable Energy Partners L.P.

C. Maury Devine 63

President, ExxonMobil Norway

15 years with the U.S. Government including:

White House, US Embassy (Paris), D.O.J.

Fellow at Harvard University Belfer Center for

Science and International Affairs

Technip

Claire S. Farley 55General Partner, KKR & Co. L.P. (Energy)

Advisory Director, Jefferies & Co.

EnCana Corp.

LyondellBasell Industries

Thomas M. Hamilton 70

Co-owner, Medora Investments, LLC

CEO EEX Corp.

EVP, Pennzoil

Director, BP Exploration

Hercules Offshore, Inc.

Peter Mellbye 64 30 years at Statoil ASA

Oz (Aker Well Service AS)Axis Offshore Pte. Ltd

Energy Ventures

Half Wave ASOcean Installer A/S

Suretank Ltd.

Joseph H. Netherland 67Previously CEO & Chairman of the Board, FTI

President, FMC Corp.

Newfield Exploration Company

Director, Petroleum Equipment Suppliers Association

Former Director, Spectra Energy Corp.

Richard A Pattarozzi 70

VP, Shell Oil Company

CEO, Shell Deepwater Development, Inc.

CEO, Shell Deepwater Production, Inc.

Stone Energy Corp.

Tidewater, inc.

Mike R. Bowlin 71 CEO, COO, EVP, Atlantic Richfield Co. (ARCO)Former Chairman of the Board, American Petroleum

Institute

Edward J. Mooney 72 CEO, Nalco Chemical Company

FMC Corp

The Northern Trust Corp.

Cabot MicroElectronics Corp

James M. Ringler 68 Chairman of the Board, Teradata Corp. Dow Chemical Company

FMC Technologies, Inc. Board of DirectorsSource: FTI Form DEF 14A

Page 12: Initiating Coverage - FMC Technologies, Inc.

Fall 2014

T h e W i l l i a m C . D u n k e l b e r g O w l F u n d

Page 12

DISCLAIMER

This report is prepared strictly for educational purposes and should not be used as an actual investment guide.

The forward looking statements contained within are simply the author’s opinions. The writer does not own any

FMC Technologies, Inc. stock.

TUIA STATEMENT

Established in honor of Professor William C. Dunkelberg, former Dean of the Fox School of Business, for his

tireless dedication to educating students in “real-world” principles of economics and business, the William C.

Dunkelberg (WCD) Owl Fund will ensure that future generations of students have exposure to a challenging,

practical learning experience. Managed by Fox School of Business graduate and undergraduate students with

oversight from its Board of Directors, the WCD Owl Fund’s goals are threefold:

Provide students with hands-on investment management experience

Enable students to work in a team-based setting in consultation with investment professionals.

Connect student participants with nationally recognized money managers and financial institutions

Earnings from the fund will be reinvested net of fund expenses, which are primarily trading and auditing costs

and partial scholarships for student participants.


Recommended