Parth Vaishnav
Innovating For Emerging MarketsNovel business models to supply energy to the rural poor
Globally, 1.5 billion people do not have access to electricity• Investmentsof$30-40billionperyearareneededto
provideuniversalgridaccessby2030(TheEconomist2010)
• Traditionalalternativesareexpensive,hazardousandpolluting(Adkins etal.2010;Mills2005;Schultzetal.2008;Pecketal.2007)
• Moresustainablealternativescanbeeconomicallyviable• e.g.,cheaperthankerosene,dieselorgridextension
(Chakrabarti &Chakrabarti 2002;Miller2010)
Can entrepreneurs implement such alternative solutions? How?
How do organizations seek to deliver - in an environmentally and economically sustainable way - energy services to the poor, rural populations that do not have access to the electric grid?
Methods and Theory
• Casestudies (Yin1981;Yin2003)• Whenboundarybetween phenomenon andcontext isblurred• Multiple casestudies: analytical generalization• Centralquestions oftheresearch identified beforehand
• Marketingandmanagement strategyliterature(Prahalad2009)• MarketingtotheBoP:Product,Place,Price,Promotionà Product,
Accessibility, AffordabilityandAwareness• Socialandinstitutional entrepreneurship
• Creationofsocial andeconomicvalue:Sustainability (Dacin etal.2011)
• Collaboration (Spear2006;SánchezandRicart 2010;Seelos andMair2007)
• Multi-level institutional work:Macro,Meso,Micro(Traceyetal.2011)
The central questions
Forty seven organizations were studied…
…and their business models analysed
Over 500 news articles, 25 previous case studies, 4 interviews with founders
Marketing innovations
Product Affordability Accessibility Awareness Sustainability
Enabletheuseofmultipleenergy
sources(12of47)
Reduceupfrontcost:through
productmodularityand
CDM(29of47)
Createnetworkoflocal
entrepreneur-franchisees(16of 47)
Engage,anddemonstrateproductto,
communitiesandcustomers(4of47)
Ensurepayments(bypeerpressureorpre-payment)
(9of 13)
Ruggedize(8of47)
EnableaccesstofinancethoughMFIorotherloansorbychannellingsubsidies(whetherloansmakeproductsaffordableormerelyaccessible canbedebated)
(32of47)
Usecelebrities,sportand
entertainment(4of47)
Teach localstomanagetechnical&commercialaspectsofenterprise(7of47)
Tailorproducttospecifictasks(4of47)
Promoteincomegeneration(7of47)
Piggybackonexistingnetworks
(MFIs,postoffice,NGOs)(7of47)
Engageconsultants(3of 47)
Facilitatereplicationofthe
model(2of47)
Collaborations
Macro Meso Micro
Channeltocustomers,orcollect,subsidiesandfunding
fromgovernmentsandinternationalorganizations
(14of47)
Partnerwithorganizationstofinance(throughloansor
subsidies)customerpurchases(24of47)
Engagemicroentrepreneurstoproduce,promote,distributeormaintain
products.(10of47)
EarncreditsundertheCDMmechanism(11of47)
Partnerwithorganizationstopromoteordistribute
products(10of47)
Organizecustomerstogenerateincomefrom,or
operateproduct.(7of47)
Lobbyfor,identify,andexploitbeneficial
governmentregulationsorinternationalprogrammes
(8of47)
Partnerwithfirmsoruniversitiestogainaccessto
keytechnologies(10of47)
Buybiomassfuel,labourorproducefromcustomers.
(5of47)
How much do customers pay? • Allalternatives cheaper
thankerosene• TheSunKing solar
lanterncosts$17,andhasalifeof3years:families spend$2-4onkerosene permonth
• Previousresearch inothermarketshasshownthatthepoorpaymore• Caplovitz 1965• ChungandMeyers1999• Prahalad&Hammond
2002
Product WattsHoursperDay
LifeinYears
Totaloutpu
t(kWh)
Price($) $/kWh
TERI'sLightUpaBillionLives,India Solarlantern 3 6 0.02 0.1 3.69
SunKingsolarlantern Solarlantern 1.4 4 3 6.1 17 2.71NobleEnergy,AndhraPradeshandMaharashtra,India
Solarlanterns 3 6 5 26 35 1.18
ProkaushaliSangsad,Bangladesh
Solarhomesystem 20 6 10 438 280 0.75
Sunlabobmonthlyrental,Laos
Solarhomesystem 20 6 3.7 2.8 0.76
Unmeteredtariffforruralareasforsupplyupto1kW,Bihar,India
Gridpowertovillages 30 7 6.5 2 0.31
HuskPowerSystemsmonthlycharge,Bihar,India Powerfrom
biomass
30 7 6.5 1.8 0.27
SaranRenewableEnergy,Bihar,India
0.18-0.27
KutirJyotiScheme, Bihar,India
Gridpowertovillages 30 7 6.5 0.8 0.13
Meteredtariffinurbanareas,Bihar,India
Gridpowerincities 0.08
Contribution
• Intensedebateaboutdoingbusiness atthebaseofthepyramid(BoP)• Fortune (Prahalad 2004;Christensen etal2001)vs.mirage
(Karnani 2007;Warnholz 2007)• Munir etal.2010
• Datasupport the‘mirage’hypothesis• Noteadditionality requirement forCDM
Withoutthecontributionofcarboncredits,d.Light won’tbeabletosubstantiallypenetratetheverylargemarketopportunityforprovidinglightingtofamiliesearninglessthan$2perdaybecausethecostofmakinganddeliveringlightingtothosemarketsisjusttoohighotherwise.Withoutaccesstothatmarket,wecouldnotprojectareturnthatwouldmeetourthreshold.(d.Light Design2006)
• Notealsothatthese investorswouldbe“comfortablewith…returns of6-8%”(Karunakaran 2009).
Further research
• Whatdothelowestrungsoftheenergyladderlooklike?Howisenergyconsumed?“InourBlueprintsscenario,themostoptimistic scenariowepublishedin2007,wesawChina’scarbonintensity fallingbyover14%between2005and2020.Amorerecentassessment suggeststhatChinaisontracktoreacha32%reductionforthatperiod,despitestrongerGDPgrowthandhigheroverallenergy-usethanwehadassumed.”(Voser 2010)
• Impactonincomegenerationanddevelopment• Peoplecanworklongerà theyshouldearnmore(?)• Replicateethnographicworkdoneinmicrofinance