+ All Categories
Home > Documents > INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on...

INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on...

Date post: 20-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
90
______________________________________________________________________________________________________ INNOVATION REVIEW ISSUE 11, JUNE 2012 SUSTAINABLE BUILDING DESIGN AND REFURBISHMENT IN SCOTLAND THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY CONFERENCE FLEXIBLE SOLAR CELLS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT OF DOMESTIC LAUNDERING LOW TECHNOLOGY - HIGH PERFORMANCE ARCHITECTURE HOUSING INNOVATION SHOWCASE KATIES COTTAGE BY ROOTS DESIGN WORKSHOP
Transcript
Page 1: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

INNOVATION REVIEW ISSUE 11, JUNE 2012

SUSTAINABLE BUILDING DESIGN AND REFURBISHMENT IN SCOTLAND

THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY CONFERENCE

FLEXIBLE SOLAR CELLS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT OF DOMESTIC LAUNDERING LOW TECHNOLOGY - HIGH PERFORMANCE ARCHITECTURE

HOUSING INNOVATION SHOWCASE KATIE’S COTTAGE BY ROOTS DESIGN WORKSHOP

Page 2: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

2

CONTENTS Page

ABOUT CIC START ONLINE AND EDITORIAL 4-5

PAST CONFERENCES

Green Deal and Sustainable Refurbishment of Traditional Buildings 6-7

VIDEO RECORDINGS 8-15

FORTHCOMING WEBINARS 16-19

CIC START ONLINE IN LONDON

Innovations for Sustainable Building Design and Refurbishment in Scotland 20-21

CONFERENCES

The Circular Economy: New Opportunities in Design and Construction in Scotland 22-23

ZEMCH 2012 24-25

SUPPORT

Charting Professional Knowledge: Technology Enhanced Professional Learning, Caledonian Academy 26-33

The Soft Landings Core Principles by BSRIA 34-36

Illustrated Guide to Mechanical Building Services by BSRIA 37

EDUCATION

Glasgow Caledonian University wins CIOB National Student Challenge 38-39

RESEARCH

Flexible Solar Cells, John Wilson, Heriot Watt University 40-45

The thermal performance of the fabric of house built with j.Pods, John Barr (John Barr Architects) and Chris Sanders, Glasgow Caledonian University 46-57

Environmental Assessment of Domestic Laundering – Research Challenges and Opportunities, Colin Porteous, Mackintosh School of Architecture 58-67

Towards Low Technology - Higher Performance Architecture: Potentials of Alternative Construction in West Scotland, Bianca-Daniela Ion, University of Strathclyde Glasgow 68-75

BEST PRACTICE

Housing Innovation Showcase 76-81

Katie's Cottage by Roots Design Workshop 82-89

ENGAGEMENT 90

Page 3: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

CONTENTS…

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

3

The keynote speaker: Dame Ellen MacArthur.

Breakfast, lunch and a wine reception will be

provided.

Pages 22-23

Flexible Solar Cells Pages 40-45

j.Pod Timber System Pages 46-57

Environmental Assessment of Domestic Laundering

Pages 58-67

Towards Low Technology – Higher Performance Architecture

Pages 68-75

Housing Innovation Showcase Pages 68-71

Katie’s Cottage Pages 82-89

Page 4: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

What is CIC Start Online?

A three-year project of seven Scottish universities funded

by European Regional Development Fund and Scottish Government’s SEEKIT programme

AIM: To embed sustainable building design and refurbishment into practice

OBJECTIVE: To support academic/industry collaboration in developing and testing innovations, and to disseminate the outcomes in order to facilitate the application of innovations in practice

WHY? o To reduce CO2 emissions and other negative

environmental impacts from buildings o To reduce fuel poverty and improve indoor climate o To create jobs and support competitiveness of

Scottish construction industry through innovation o To remove the barriers to the application of

innovation in practice

HOW? o Through competitions for academic/industry

feasibility studies and for 10-days free academic consultancy on sustainable building design and refurbishment

o By testing innovations at the testing facilities of the project partners’ institutions

o By publishing guidelines for the application of innovations in practice

o By developing and publishing database of design solutions for sustainable refurbishment

o By providing assistance and advice on sustainable building design and refurbishment to Scottish small to medium sized enterprises

o By disseminating the project outcomes through the project website, seminars, interactive webinars, webcasts and three whole-day online events that will include an exhibition, a conference and networking facilities

o By publishing information on products and services for sustainable building design and refurbishment offered by Scottish small to medium sized businesses registered with CIC Start Online.

BENEFITS OF FREE MEMBERSHIP

Publish information on your company’s products or services for sustainable building design and refurbishment

Receive a set of headphones with a microphone, monthly E-News and quarterly Innovation Review

Ask for advice/assistance Please click here to access the registration page at the project website

www.cicstart.org

PROJECT PARTNERS

FUNDED BY

4

Page 5: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

EDITORIAL…

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

5

Welcome to the eleventh issue of Innovation Review!

We are happy to announce that the membership of CIC Start

Online has reached over 1,550 members from 40 countries.

Our conference on Green Deal and Sustainable Refurbishment

of Traditional Buildings, sponsored by Historic Scotland,

attracted over 110 delegates and four exhibitors, see pages

6-7.

Information on the published video recordings of our recent

webinars is available on pages 8-15 and on the forthcoming

webinars on pages 16-19.

Innovations developed with support through CIC Start Online

will be presented at a seminar at London South Bank University

on 18th June, see pages 20-21.

Dame Ellen MacArthur will be the key note speaker at the next

live conference, The Circular Economy: New Opportunities in

Design and Construction in Scotland, hosted at the University

of Strathclyde Glasgow on 1ST

June 2012, see pages 22-23.

Glasgow School of Art will host the conference ZEMCH 2012

on 20-22 August 2012, see pages 24-25.

Researchers of Caledonian Academy are explaining how

technology can be used to enhance professional learning on

pages 26-33. Information on BSRIA’s recently published Core

Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide to Mechanical

Building Services is available on pages 34-37.

In the previous issue we informed that a team of four quantity

surveying students from Glasgow Caledonian University had

won the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) Student

Challenge (Scotland). Since then they have also won CIOB

National Student Challenge, see pages 38-39.

Prof. John Wilson of Heriot Watt University writes on flexible

solar cells whose application on textiles for buildings will be

explored by technologists and architects, see pages 40-45.

The summary of the academic consultancy on The thermal

performance of the fabric of house built with j.Pods, provided

by Dr Chris Sanders of Glasgow Caledonian University, is

presented on pages 46-57. Prof. Colin Porteous’ article on

environmental assessment of domestic laundering informs on

the challenges and opportunities of the research undertaken

in collaboration with the University of Strathclyde Glasgow

and Glasgow Caledonian University, see pages 58-67. Low

technology, but higher performance architecture is the theme

of research summarised by Bianca-Daniela Ion of the

University of Strathclyde on pages 68-75.

Technologies and participants of the Housing Innovation

Showcase are presented by Bill Banks of Kingdom Housing

association on pages 76-81. Roots Design Workshop, a

mobile, accessible architectural and environmental design

practice who travel to rural and isolated communities that do

not usually have access to professional design services,

present their first completed project on pages 82-89.

.

We look forward to receiving articles on other sustainable

building design and refurbishment projects in Scotland. You

are welcome to send the articles to me by 15th August for the

next edition.

We hope that you will enjoy the variety and range of articles

in this issue!

Page 6: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

06

Green Deal and Sustainable Refurbishment of Traditional Buildings

Held on 29th February 2012 at Glasgow Caledonian University

Sponsored by Historic Scotland and attended by over 110 delegates

Page 7: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

PAST CONFERENCES …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

07

Page 8: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

08

Energy efficiency retrofit cost-benefit calculator

David Jenkins, Heriot Watt University

Robert Barnham, Changeworks

This webinar explores the development of a retrofit analysis tool by Changeworks, in partnership with the Urban

Energy Research Group in the School of Built Environment at Heriot-Watt University, and with support through

CIC Start Online funding. The tool is designed to inform future decision making strategies to target hard-to-treat

housing, so that energy efficiency standards, climate change targets and fuel poverty can be addressed cost

effectively. Unlike other tools this allows the input of actual data rather than generic dimensional data to provide

accurate savings and costs for measures such as solid wall insulation.

Please click on the image to access the video recording.

Page 9: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

VIDEO RECORDINGS …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluating and improving a model for reducing fuel poverty

Julio Bros-Williamson, Edinburgh Napier University

Leanne Evans, Solas Scotland Ltd

This report is the final product of the consultation provided to Solas Scotland Ltd which evaluates and analyses a

scheme focusing on the reduction of Fuel Poverty in Scotland called Local Energy Saving Scheme (LESS). This

academic consultation has examined the methodology, outcomes and possible improvements of the LESS model

to eradicate fuel poverty in Scotland.

This report has created an awareness of the LESS model pointing out similar schemes around Britain and also a

review of the current community engagement which has been so successful in areas where the model is in

operation.

.

Please click on the image to access the video recording.

09

Page 10: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

10

Developing Homegrown Natural Fibre Insulation Products

Dr Paul Baker, RICH Centre, Glasgow Caledonian University

Bruce Newlands, Kraft Architecture

The work has involved identifying appropriate fibres, trialling production and testing a variety of waste streams

including wool, cotton, wood, cellulose, denim & feathers.

The aim of this study was to test the thermal conductivity of a variety of natural fibres formed using a non-woven

bonding process at different densities to see whether this had an impact on their performance.

Please click on the image to access the video recording.

Page 11: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

VIDEO RECORDINGS …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Implications of installation of Solar Photovoltaic Panels on Properties of Fairfield Housing Co-operative

Tariq Muneer (Edinburgh Napier University), Masa Noguchi (Glasgow School of Art) and Anila

Ahmed (Fairfield Housing Association)

In October 2011 FHC applied for the approval of a feasibility study to CIC-Start Online to explore the potential of a

10 kW-peak PV facility for one of their Fairfieldbased properties. As a result two Scottish higher education

institutions were engaged to complete the above task, i.e. Glasgow School of Art and Edinburgh Napier University.

This webinar presents the results of those findings.

It is worth mentioning that FHC have obtained a quote from a local PV installer, Sidey who have offered a 41-

module installed facility for a total price of £26,316, including 5% VAT. The present study proposes a triple-string

installation with 14 modules in each string. The total number of modules thus required would be 42. It has been

assumed that the Sidey price quote would remain unchanged.

.

Please click on the image to access the video recording.

11

Page 12: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

16

Benefits and options for the retrofit of an 18th Century traditional Scottish House using the PassivHaus standard

Julio Bros-Williamson, Edinburgh Napier University

John Stephen, SA Estates

This webinar explored the application of the Passive House standard which has been implemented in many new

build properties in central Europe, particularly Germany and Austria and which has also explored the possibility of

applying such standard to the retrofit and upgrading of buildings.

The feasibility study explored retrofit possibilities using the standard and how best it would integrate into a hard to

treat property selected as the case study. The dwelling is located in the village of Cellardyke in Fife, Scotland. It‘s

a traditional typical coastal village home which has had some renovations and attachments to it that haven’t been

all to its favour without addressing any ecological and energy efficiency alternatives.

Please click on the image to access the video recording.

Page 13: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

VIDEO RECORDINGS …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Life-cycle Costing of Novel Board Material

Dr Charles Russell (Glasgow Caledonian University) and David McBeth (Duncryne Ltd)

Econicboard is non toxic and free from formaldehyde, benzenes, solvents and oil based chemicals. It is

manufactured using high quality raw materials consisting of magnesium oxide, magnesium chloride, perlite,

recycled soft wood and water bound together with a fibrous mesh to create a durable and versatile board with the

following UKAS tested and approved attributes.

A Life Cycle Analysis of the carbon emissions associated with Econicboard was carried out by Glasgow

Caledonian University and funded through the CIC Start programme. The results of the assessment process were

presented including a comparison with equivalent use products such as OSB, Plywood and MDF.

.

Please click on the image to access the video recording.

13

Page 14: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Retrofit Solar PV for Housing: Case studies from three Housing Associations

Julio Bros-Williamson (Edinburgh Napier University), John McMorrow (Easthall Park Housing Co-operative Ltd), Michael Hui (Malcolm Homes Ltd) and Wendy Farmer (Port of Leith Housing

Association)

This webinar will bring together three feasibility studies related to the adequate sizing and economic viability of

solar photovoltaic technology onto current housing stock belonging to three housing associations. Various

housing types were analysed for their adequate orientation and roof restrictions together with the appropriate

economic calculations for viable pay back periods in line with technology capital cost, government funding and

maintenance costs.

The reports have been adapted to the recent changes in legislation and government funding by analysing the

economic pay back periods and the variation of tariffs. These reports were conducted at different stages from

summer 2011 and the start of 2012 where variations of tariffs have been applied impacting accordingly to the

results.

.

14

Please click on the image to access the video recording.

Page 15: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

VIDEO RECORDINGS …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

15

Achieving Higher Heat Pump COP through the use of roof-top thermal solar collectors

Prof. Tariq Muneer, Edinburgh Napier University

Paolo Buoni, European Energy Centre

This webinar presented the results which may be divided into four main development areas; an investigation into

the on-site solar and ground energy resource, an analysis on the influence of the solar collector in achieving

higher heat pump COP, a development of a simulation tool for the identification of the optimum solar collector area

and an annual energy consumption using the heat pump. A collection of manufacturers’ data from various heat

pumps and solar collectors was carried out in order to test the performance of the different technologies.

Please click on the image to access the video recording.

Page 16: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Reduction and Eradication of Fuel Poverty via Renewable Energy Technologies

Wednesday 13th June 2012

16

This feasibility study has been approved by CIC-Start Online with the view to support Solas Scotland in their endeavour to explore the energetic, economic, and environmental (Triple "E") potential of solar PV installations for domestic properties. In the year 2011 the UK Government introduced a healthy support for feed-in Tariff (FIT) but seems to have quickly retracted the rate of support from 43.3- to 21p/kWh. The argument put forward by the Government for the above rapid retraction is that the cost of PV modules is in the process of dropping quite sharply.

This report presents solar PV design related information that will undertake the user to carry out the triple "E" analysis for building integrated systems. A number of examples have been introduced within this report as a means of facilitating the above-mentioned design and analysis process.

Speakers:

Prof Tariq Muneer, Edinburgh Napier University Graham McLennan, Solas Scotland Ltd Leanne Evans, Solas Scotland Ltd

Page 17: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

FORTHCOMING WEBINARS …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

17

Energy efficiency retrofit cost-benefit calculator

– Phase 2

Tuesday 12th June 2012

The webinar will describe the further development of Changeworks stock analysis tool which is being made available ahead of the Green Deal. The calculator models improvement options for housing portfolios, and the respective capital costs, carbon savings, energy reduction, compliance with standards in particular the Scottish Housing Quality Standard and its impact on fuel poverty. This webinar will report on further development of the calculator funded under a second CIC Start academic award.

This work has extended the calculator’s functionality, including modelling variability issues based on householder heating patterns, provision of an enhanced Green Deal analysis, additional cost information and better outputs related to carbon savings. This will include details of case studies

Speakers:

David Jenkins, Heriot Watt University Robert Barnham, Changeworks

Page 18: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Assessment of the choice of a Renewable Energy Source for Re-Tek

Wednesday 20th June 2012

18

The project sought to define the practicality of incorporating low carbon technologies and mitigation measures into the RE-Tek UK industrial unit in order to make the business more sustainable as well as to keep up the company’s green credentials that are key to the progress and nature of the business.

The inclusion of these low carbon technologies could contribute to lowering the buildings environmental footprint which will lead eventually to lowering the buildings thermal performance and enhance its operational scores when issuing new Energy Performance Certificates (EPC's) for commercial, industrial and office buildings. By installing and no longer depending fully on grid connected energy supply the business is positioned as a safer and individually operational company that will withstand future energy shortages but will ultimately be in a more stable financial form by the reduction of energy bills.

The project evaluated a wide spread of technologies suited to the building type, location and other constrains. Feasibility studies into the financial viability and the cost effective sizing were evaluated bringing a wide range of optimum solutions. The work presented is a stepping into making an industrial unit as sustainable as possible.

Speakers:

Julio Bros-Williamson, Edinburgh Napier University Kevin Culligan, Re-Tek

Page 19: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

WEBINARS …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

19

Live Attendees Downloads

Hybrid Solar Thermal Mass System for Housing 25 88

Improving energy and carbon performance of housing 24 56

Embedding Simplified POE in the Design Process 21 23

Tenement Flat Carbon Reduction Shopping List 52 46

Novel Solar Thermal Collector Design 38 24

Adoption of Low-Carbon Technologies by Scottish HA 72 25

POE for Low Carbon Innovative Housing Projects 51 37

Verification of a Climate Based worldwide Index 27 13

Solar wall Systems for Domestic Heating 48 25

Assessment of Zero Carbon Building in Scotland 57 33

Optimisation of “Triple E” savings in buildings - 39

Synergy of Fabric and Energy Conservation in Older Historic Properties

59 26

Insulation of Masonry and Lath walls in Existing Domestic Scottish Construction

95 58

Energy Efficiency Improvements in Tenements in Bellshill 79 27

Environmental Design Teaching Model 58 21

Energy Efficiency Retrofit Cost-benefit Calculator 82 26

Evaluating and Improving a Model for Reducing Fuel Poverty 49 9

Developing Homegrown Natural Fibre Insulation Products 58 18

Solar PV on Fairfield Housing Cooperative 45 14

Refurbishment of 18thC Traditional Scottish House using the PassivHaus Standard

100 35

Life Cycle Carbon Analysis of Novel Board Material 39 8

Retrofit Solar PV for Housing: 3 Case Studies 56 19

Achieving Higher Heat Pump COP through the use of Roof-top thermal solar collectors

73 6

1208 676

SUMMARY STATISTICS OF WEBINAR VIEWINGS

Page 20: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

20

INNOVATIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE BUILDING DESIGN AND REFURBISHMENT IN SCOTLAND

Seminar at the Innovation and the Built Environment Academy, South Bank University

London, 18th June 2012

SEMINAR HOST

The Innovation and the Built Environment Academy (IBEA) is a

non-profit organisation and holds conferences each autumn

(September-October), alternating in various locations around

the world. It also organises seminars for professionals involved

in research and practice in the built environment. Dr Mahtab

Akhavan Farshchi, the founder of IBEA, is a Senior Lecturer at

Department of the Built Environment, London South Bank

University.

Dr Mahtab Akhavan Farshchi

SPEAKER: Dr Branka Dimitrijevic Dr Branka Dimitrijevic is a Director of Construction Improvement Club (CIC) Start Online.

Branka gives invited lectures at postgraduate level on sustainable development, urban

planning, building design and refurbishment at the University of Strathclyde Glasgow, the

Polytechnic University of Bari and the University of Basilicata in Potenza, Italy. Her recent

international research collaborations include the research on condition assessment of

historic reinforced concrete structures and their potential sustainable repair and retrofit

with the University of Basilicata and the research project Spatial, Environmental, Energy

and Social Aspects of Developing Settlements and Climate Change – Mutual Impacts with

the Institute of Architecture and Urbanism of Serbia.

Branka is a member of the Board of the Architecture and Design Scotland, the Board of

Scottish Sustainable Development Forum, the Built Environment sub-group of 2020

Climate Group and the Energy Utilisation in Buildings sub-group of the Energy

Technology Partnership.

Dr Branka Dimitrijevic

I look forward to meeting the

seminar attendees and

presenting the innovations

developed through CIC Start

Online! See you in a few

weeks.

Branka

Page 21: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

FORTHCOMING EVENTS …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

21

SEMINAR SUMMARY

This seminar will present innovations for sustainable building design and refurbishment developed through collaboration of

researchers at Scottish universities and small to medium size companies in Scotland within the project Construction

Improvement Club (CIC) Start Online. It will provide an overview of a range of innovative products and processes whose

potential application has been demonstrated through 50 feasibility studies and 20 academic consultancies.

The context for the project is the need to develop innovations that will enable construction industry to respond to the Scott ish

Government aims to reduce carbon emissions in Scotland by 80% by 2050 as outlined in the Climate Change (Scotland) Act

2009. Regarding carbon emissions from buildings, A Low Carbon Building Standards Strategy for Scotland – Sullivan Report

2007 recommends future revisions to the CO2 target reductions within the Building Regulations as follows: 2010 – CO2 savings

of 30% more than 2007 building standards; 2013 – CO2 savings of 60% more than 2007 building standards; 2016/17 – net zero

carbon buildings (i.e. space/water heating, lighting & ventilation).

CIC Start Online started in September 2009 and will close at the end of February 2013. It is funded by European Regional

Development Fund and Scottish Government. When the initiated studies are completed, they are disseminated through free

interactive online webinars. Video recordings of the webinars are saved on the project website www.cicstart.org. The project has

attracted over 1,500 members to date, nationally and internationally from 39 countries.

The seminar will provide an overview of innovations developed for decision making, planning, design, construction,

refurbishment and performance testing for more sustainable built environment by using the examples of delivered outcomes.

Information on the planned future project for development and testing of innovations for the integration of sustainable

infrastructure into existing building estates will also be presented.

BOOKING

Please click on the image to access the IBEA website and book places

.

Page 22: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

22

The Circular Economy: New Opportunities in Design and Construction in Scotland

Conference at the University of Strathclyde Glasgow, Friday 1st June

This one-day conference will explore opportunities for Scottish SMEs involved in the design and construction industry around a new economy that is emerging based on design and innovation. The circular economy is a generic term for an industrial economy that is, by design or intention, restorative and in which materials flows are of two types, biological nutrients, designed to re-enter the biosphere safely, and technical nutrients, which are designed to circulate at high quality without entering the biosphere.

The term encompasses more than the production and consumption of goods and services, including a shift from fossil fuels to the use of renewable, and the role of diversity as a characteristic of resilient and productive systems. In broader terms, the circular approach is a framework that takes insights from living systems. It considers that our systems should work like organisms, processing nutrients that can be fed back into the cycle – whether biological or technical - hence the “closed loop” or “regenerative” terms usually associated with it.

Dame Ellen MacArthur, The Ellen MacArthur Foundation

Page 23: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

FORTHCOMING CONFERENCES … ______________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

23

The Circular Economy: New Opportunities in Design and Construction in Scotland

Conference at the University of Strathclyde Glasgow, Friday 1st June

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation

is an independent

charity with the aim

of inspiring a

generation to re-

think, re-design &

build a positive

future through the

vision of a circular

economy

Page 24: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

24

ZERO-ENERGY MASS CUSTOM HOME (ZEMCH) CONFERENCE 2012

In collaboration with CIC Start Online, IEA SHC/ECBCS Task 40/Annex 52 ‘Net Zero Energy Solar Buildings’ joint programme, and ZEMCH Network, The Glasgow School of Art (GSA) is currently organising ‘ZEMCH 2012 International Conference’ that will be held at GSA from 20th to 22nd August 2012. The conference has been sponsored by Glasgow City Council, South Ayrshire Council, BRE, and NRGStyle. The registration is open to anyone who is interested in learning ZEMCH design, production and marketing principles. For more information about the programme, please visit the conference’s dedicated website at

www.zemch2012.org

Page 25: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

FORTHCOMING CONFERENCES …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

ZEMCH 2012

Housing is a system of energy and environment and required to accommodate wants and needs of individuals and

society, which are usually considered to be diverse and dynamic. The 'needs' factor often reflects minimum quality of

end-user products (i.e. housing) and may embrace 'adequacy' being prescribed in conventional codes, while the 'wants'

may be satisfied only if they are defined clearly by stakeholders (e.g. house-users and builder/developers) at the design

decision making stage. 'Mass customisation' is an oxymoron or, perhaps, a paradigm case of a systems approach to

identifying the aforementioned wants and needs that should be incorporated into the design of end-user products (or

homes). Albeit increasing market demands for achievement of social, economic and environmental sustainability in

housing today, conventional homebuilders (and housing manufacturers alike) who are often reluctant to spending extra

time, money and effort for information gathering of new products and services are still barely able to adopt recently

emerging innovations including mass custom design approaches to the delivery of sustainable affordable homes.

ZEMCH 2012 aims to establish an intellectual forum of interactive discussion on design, production and marketing

issues surrounding the delivery of low to zero energy/CO2 emission mass-customisable homes being built in developed

and developing countries. The conference is open to any stakeholders who are involved in housing research, business,

teaching, and policy making.

Conference Chairs

Prof. Antonio Frattari, University of Trento, Italy

Prof. Colin Ripley, Ryerson University, Canada

Dr. Tim Sharpe, MEARU, The Glasgow School of Art, UK

Keynote Speakers

Prof. Seona Reid, CBE, FRSA, Director of The Glasgow School of Art

Mr Chic Brodie MSP for the Scottish National Party (Biographical Sketch)

Prof. Avi Friedman, McGill University (Biographical Sketch)

Prof. Mitsuhiro Udagawa, Kogakuin University (Biographical Sketch)

Prof. Tariq Muneer, Edinburgh Napier University (Biographical Sketch)

Mr Sandy Murray, Chief Executive, Tenants First Housing Co-operative (Biographical Sketch)

25

Page 26: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

26

CHARTING COLLECTIVE KNOWLEDGE: TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING

Allison Littlejohn, Colin Milligan and Anoush Margaryan

Caledonian Academy, Glasgow Caledonian University

The workplace is an environment where powerful, deep and effective learning takes place through non-formal workplace

learning, as well as through formal training and education. This article describes a mechanism to enhance learning at work by

capitalising on collective knowledge within an organisation. Two scenarios are presented illustrating how individual and group

learning and performance may be improved. These scenarios are based on empirical data of knowledge work practices within

a multinational organization.

Page 27: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

SUPPORT …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

27

The value of connected knowledge

In the current economy, the main source of competitive

advantage for organisations is knowledge. Successful

companies are those that can rapidly create new knowledge,

contribute it to the knowledge pool of the organisation, and

locate, collect, consume and connect relevant knowledge to

solve complex problems. This mandates a faster and more

effective cycle of knowledge creation and action based on new

knowledge. Knowledge-based industries are characterised by a

continuous redefinition of organisational goals along with

radical and discontinuous change. Increasingly organisations

need employees to able to respond to emerging needs by

taking more responsibility for their own learning and

development. Rapid adaptation to these emerging needs

requires effective talent management and, critically, a reduction

in time to competence. ‘New crew’ must be capable of getting

up to speed quickly through self-regulating their own learning.

They should be able to discover and integrate knowledge from

many different sources in order to gain key competencies. They

must be able to draw on the collective knowledge of experts

and peers in groups or networks, using relevant technologies.

In this sense, collective knowledge can be defined as the

aggregation of knowledge in people, practices, and machines.

There is a direct correlation between an organisation’s potential

for problem-solving and the way in which it uses its collective

knowledge base. The organisational knowledge needed to

solve key challenges is no longer solely in the mind of one

individual or even one team. Increasingly, solving work

problems depends on the complex and evolving collective

knowledge. Employees have to be able to use, create and

share knowledge within their organisation to maintain the

quality of this collective knowledge and to ensure the long-term

competitiveness of the organisation. Individuals need the

appropriate skills and tools to consume, connect and contribute

to the collective knowledge and to draw upon the collective

knowledge for learning.

There are several issues affecting an organisation’s ability

to connect knowledge for collective learning. Firstly, the

fragmentation of knowledge is increasing. Knowledge is

subject to more and more division and dispersion, arising

from increasing specialisation, division of labour and

diffused sources of innovation. In multinational companies,

fragmentation can be exacerbated by the variety of

disparate local processes, systems and tools for knowledge

sharing. Fragmentation of knowledge can have dangerous

consequences – inefficiency, duplication, insufficiently

informed decisions. The knowledge needed to solve a

problem may exist, but may not be visible and available to

the right people in the right place at the right time.

Therefore it is important for organisations to be able to

connect knowledge residing in systems and individuals, by

integrating and organising fragmented, diffused and thinly-

dispersed knowledge. Central to connecting knowledge is

the ability of organisations to leverage the power of formal

and informal networks and communities through strategies,

processes, as well as technological tools that support

retrievable, reflective and embedded communication

around knowledge creation and consumption. The IBM

Global Human Capital Study (2008) surveyed 400 HR

executives from 40 different countries representing private,

public and not-for-profit organisations across a variety of

industries and geographic locations. The study revealed

that only a small minority (13%) believed their companies

were “very capable” of identifying specific expertise within

organisation – many companies - recognise that they

cannot yet systematically locate expertise. The majority of

those companies that rated themselves as “very effective”

at locating experts use some form of employee directory

that includes information about an employee location,

contact info, reporting chain, skills and credentials, and

pointers to others within an individual’s personal network.

One challenge is that these methods of ‘expertise location’

require that individuals maintain their own information.

Page 28: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

28

In the IBM survey, only 15% of surveyed organisations reported

using technology that enables automatic profiling of skills,

expertise and personal networks. Yet organizations and

individuals have to find effective ways to source and consume

knowledge from an increasingly wide range of resources and

services, through searching or using, based on the actions of

others. Typically, individuals will use simultaneously formal

resources (Open Educational Resources, articles, e-books,

podcast videos or audio resources) along with dynamic,

informal resources (wikis – such as Wikipedia, blogs, Twitter

feeds and so on).

Secondly, individuals must be able to connect and collaborate

with others to innovate, solve problems, and create and share

knowledge. It is not lack of technology that inhibits knowledge

sharing and collaboration. In the IBM global survey, only 28% of

the companies saw lack of technology as the issue. It is

organisational silos (42%), time pressure (40%), and

misaligned performance measures (37%) that were considered

to be impeding organisations ability to connect knowledge.

Thirdly, organisations experience difficulties in identifying and

tapping into external sources of knowledge, building external

expert networks and leveraging external communities.

Organisations have been experimenting with radically new

forms of tapping into the collective knowledge that exists

outside the organisation. A few prominent models have

emerged: ‘crowdsourcing’ and ‘ideagoras’, which have also

been termed the “eBay for innovation”; prosumption, a process

of harnessing consumer communities through co-innovation

simultaneously placing consumers as producers; open source

R&D and precompetitive knowledge commons. There are just

some of the approaches companies have been using to

enhance their ability to use collective knowledge (Tapscott and

Williams, 2008).

Fourthly, organisational and cultural barriers impact the ways

knowledge is used.

Educational systems and many cultures and societies train

individuals from an early age to be dependent on authority

figures (teachers, parents, experts, managers) to direct

them in their learning and work. Social technologies

decentralise and democratise communication, sharing and

production of knowledge – however work practices in many

organisations pose barriers to critical thinking, innovation

and collaboration. Individuals need to take control of their

learning and work, but organisations must give up some

control too. Organisations should support different models

of work and individual skills development, which enable - or

at least do not hamper - creative thinking, innovation,

peering and sharing. The concept of wirearchy

(http://www.wirearchy.com/) is emerging as an alternative

form of organisation based on increasingly horizontal

communications and interaction between people, made

possible by use of new technologies for communication and

collaboration.

Some organisations are already addressing these key

issues by adopting radically new approaches to learning

that empower and equip individuals to draw upon and feed

into the ‘collective conscious’ distributed across the

organisation and beyond. Similarly, individuals must

develop new habits and behaviours in learning, networking

and knowledge sharing to become better, self-regulated

knowledge workers.

Page 29: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

SUPPORT …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

29

Charting collective knowledge

Through empirical research, we have proposed a mechanism

for connecting individuals to others with similar goals and

development needs, creating networks of people who may

support each other in work and learning (Littlejohn, Milligan and

Margaryan, 2011). We term this mechanism ‘charting’. Charting

enables an individual to manage his or her interactions with

relevant people and networks, make sense of data, information

and knowledge that he/she requires to achieve his/her learning

goals, and create and contribute knowledge. Charting

incorporates four key activities/processes:

1. Consuming knowledge created by others;

2. Connecting with other people to network, collaborate and

find knowledge and experiences necessary to achieve

one’s learning goals. This activity is concerned with

networking. Connecting knowledge (eg resources, personal

reflections) to create an individually tailored view of the

knowledge and understanding they possess about a given

topic and how different topics interrelate within their

personal world-view;

3. Creating new knowledge and

4. Contributing this knowledge to the collective.

These four components represent a set of intertwined activities

rather than discrete linear steps. They represent the primary

mechanisms by which an individual employee interacts with the

collective to attain their goals.

Charting can be implemented as a web-based platform that

allows integration of and with an individuals’ existing tools

learning (Littlejohn, Margaryan and Milligan, 2009). The

charting platform is underpinned by powerful algorithms, data

mining mechanisms and analytics that allow social and

semantic search, recommendations, personalisation and other

mechanisms for connecting with relevant others and finding,

filtering, evaluating and assessing knowledge.

Although charting is fundamentally personal learning, in the

sense that it is individually-initiated and individually-

motivated (the organising principle for charting is

individual’s learning goals), it is not an individual learning

process. Charting aims to create“ common capital (e.g., re-

usable knowledge) via the selective accumulation of shared

by-products of individual activities motivated, initially, by

personal utility.” (Convertino et al, 2010, p.15). While

individuals may use a charting system to fulfil their personal

learning goals, at the same time the system would “enable

the accumulation of critical by-products” such as detailed

interaction traces and individual contributions (e.g., a wiki

page, a bookmark). When aggregated, these become a

resource for the community” (ibid).

Imagine if a new employee setting her learning goals could

dynamically look up another individual’s plan and see how

they reached their learning goals. Charting would facilitate

this since it is both individually focused and collaboratively

enabled allowing individuals to use other peoples’

knowledge and experience to refine and achieve their

personal goals. Goals and motivations are continually

reviewed as the stages of self-regulated learning

(forethought, performance and self-reflection) are carried

out simultaneously. Individuals would benefit from seeing

how others with similar goals achieved them and their

reflections on the process.

Charting draws upon the metaphor of the ‘wisdom of the

crowds’ (Surowiecki, 2004) the idea that large groups of

connected people are better able to solve problems and

foster innovation. In this metaphor the individual is

recognised as a key contributor to the wealth of collective

knowledge – not just explicitly in terms of contributing

discrete resources, but also implicitly through emergent

patterns and information in the system such as ratings and

usage data, to provide additional cues as to quality and

utility of resources.

Page 30: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

30

Over time, the knowledge held by the collective is enriched by

the contributions of the collective, and individual members learn

from each other’s reflective practice; and benefit from seeing

how other’s solved problems, the resources they used and the

routes they took to learn. Figure 1 illustrates how an individual

might consume knowledge from various sources, connect with

others within and beyond their workplace and how they might

create new knowledge and contribute it back to the collective.

Alongside these activities, each individual can chart the

collective knowledge needed to attain their learning goals.

Charting involves the combined operations of consuming,

connecting and contributing to collective knowledge

How an individual might chart collective knowledge: a usecase Sally is an experienced drilling engineer in a global energy

company where she has worked for several years.

Typically, Sally works in multi-disciplinary project based

teams where she is expert in her particular discipline. Over

her time with the company Sally has developed a strong

network of contacts with different skills and experience.

These networks consist of other employees in her

company, contractors who are affiliated to the company on

a project by project basis, and professional contacts who

work for external organizations (for example product

suppliers, who will have precise technical knowledge of

their own products).

Figure 1: Charting and collective learning

Page 31: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

SUPPORT …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

31

Sally also has a network of her own professional contacts

drawn from colleagues from past projects, along with external

colleagues from her membership of other communities. Sally’s

work is heavily knowledge based and a large proportion of her

time is spent accessing and interpreting existing knowledge

held within and outside her company, as well as working in

project teams to create new knowledge in the form of design

specifications and research reports. As her work is heavily

dependent on collaborating with others, the tools she uses must

not only fit her own needs, but also interface with tools used by

others. For the whole team, the range of tools used should fit

closely with each individual’s own working habits, to ensure that

sharing within the group does not become an extra, unnatural

task.

A key component of Sally’s work environment is the ‘Charting

System’ she uses to organize her work and learning. The

charting system connects Sally to others through her work

goals. As teams come together to collaborate, goals can be

negotiated and refined, and shared. The system allows Sally to

structure her work around her current work tasks, linking to

others who share those tasks. Sally can constantly refine and

re-prioritise her actions to ensure she effectively achieves her

goals. As time passes, completed tasks are lost from view,

replaced by current priorities.

Sally also uses the Charting tools, to agree a set of personal

learning goals for the year with her manager. Some of these

goals will relate to explicit tasks and projects and may be

clearly defined. Others will relate to longer term career

development goals and will be (initially) less well defined. Sally

and her manager identify an initial set of resources and people

that will be relevant to achieving these goals and these are

recorded within the charting tools. Sally continues to engage

with this process throughout the year, utilising internal and

external resources (websites, wikis, directories, indexes and

knowledge sharing fora) to help her achieve her goals.

The Charting system allows Sally to manage her work and

learning through four complementary sub-activities of

charting:

Consuming knowledge Sally uses search tools to

find resources which have been created and used by

others who were involved in similar tasks. Recommender

tools can be used to identify new resources (those who

read x, also found y useful) whilst rating tools can be used

to fine-tune these recommendations (did you find this

resource helpful?).

Connecting to others with whom Sally shares task

goals or similar skills and interests. The charting tool allows

comparison of Sally’s own skills (recorded initially via a

skills audit then dynamically updated as new skills are

acquired) and task goals with those of her peers and

colleagues. For her own personal development, Sally can

identify the next steps for her own development by seeing

how others have achieved similar goals.

Creating new knowledge by combining and

extending sources (people and resources and personal

reflections etc) to create a dynamic, faithful and individually

focused view of the knowledge and understanding Sally

possesses about a given topic, and how different topics

inter-relate within her personal world-view. This sense-

making process is continual, and ensures that the

knowledge space evolves with the ideas of the individual,

their network and the whole collective.

Contributing new knowledge to the collective -

create evidence which is relevant to specific tasks and (in

the future) to the whole collective. As Sally works, her

outputs automatically become part of the knowledge held

by the collective. Newly created resources are

automatically tagged and augmented with secondary usage

metadata as the resources are viewed and utilised by

others.

Page 32: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

32

How project teams might chart collective knowledge:

a usecase

Project teams bring together groups of experts with a requisite

range of skills. The Charting system can bring teams together

through their use of collective knowledge. The ‘My Network’

section of the Charting system shows all the members of the

team and how they are connected to her current network (using

degrees of separation similar to LinkedIn), recommending

connections with new contacts. Team members share the

overall goals for the project but may be involved in only a

subset of the activities defined. The Charting system reflects

this, showing each team member a personal view of the key

activities they are involved in.

The system allows the team to connect through their work and

learning goals, suggesting similarities with previously

completed tasks (by semantic analysis of the wording of tasks

for example). When each individual does some work related to

a particular task, the resources created are automatically

tagged and made available to the other team members.

Integrated collaborative spaces provide a locus for co-working

as follows:

Idea tools encourage team members to capture ideas as

notes attached to resources: capturing new thoughts (tacit

knowledge) and integrating them with established (explicit)

knowledge.

Communications tools capture asynchronous and

synchronous conversations in the context of the resources

that they relate to.

Value boxes allow each viewer a simple way of

highlighting useful resources for themselves or others.

Search tools enable discovery of new ideas using an

algorithm which takes into account these ratings, the tags,

and temporal indicators (how long since a resource was

created or last viewed).

Each individual maintains a personalized view of the team’s

collective knowledge. The system can alert team members

to new items may be relevant based on tagging or origin.

The system can highlight people who may be useful to work

with. This stimulates creativity within the team by widening

perspectives and stimulating reflection on work tasks and

goals.

Conclusions

Charting collective knowledge is a way of supporting

personal and collaborative learning by allowing employees

to make better use of the collective knowledge emerging

through work practices. In this conception of learning, the

individual is recognised as a key contributor to the wealth of

collective knowledge – not just in terms of discrete

resources, but also through reflection, gaining experience,

developing reputation, forming trust based relationships,

and benefitting from emergent patterns and information in

the system such as ratings and usage data, to provide

additional cues as to quality and utility of resources. Over

time, the knowledge held by the collective is enriched by

the contributions of the collective, and individual members

learn from each other’s reflective practice; and benefit from

seeing how other’s solved problems, the resources they

used and the routes they took to learn.

A Charting environment requires an open architecture

connecting advanced Web 2.0 services including charting

services, accessible via a variety of interconnected devices.

A prototype interface is currently being tested at Glasgow

Caledonian University.

Page 33: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

33

References Convertino et al (2010). Collective intelligence in organisations: Towards a research agenda. Paper presented at CSCW 2010,

February 6–10, 2010, Savannah, Georgia, USA. ACM 978-1-60558-795-0/10/02. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/connect/CSCW 10/docs/p613.pdf

IBM (2008) IBM Global Human Capital Study. Retrieved May 13, 2010 http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/bus/pdf/g510-6647-00.pdf

Littlejohn, A, Margaryan, A and Milligan, C. (2009). Charting collective knowledge: Supporting self-regulated learning in the workplace. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) 2009. Retrieved May 13, 2010 http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/anoush/documents/Littlejohn-Margaryan-Milligan-ICALT-FINAL180309.doc

Littlejohn, A, Milligan, C., & Margaryan, A. (2012). Charting collective knowledge: Supporting self-regulated learning in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(3). http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1366-5626&volume=24&issue=3&articleid=17010279&show=abstract

Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few. London: Abacus. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. (2008). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. London: Atlantic Books.

The Caledonian Academy is a centre for research in technology enhanced professional learning at Glasgow Caledonian University, UK http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/ Professor Allison Littlejohn is the Director of the Caledonian Academy and Chair of Learning Technology at Glasgow Caledonian University Bio: http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/people/littlejohn.html Blog: http://littlebylittlejohn.com Twitter: @allisonl Dr. Colin Milligan is a Research Fellow in the Caledonian Academy Bio: http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/people/milligan.html Blog: http://flavors.me/bicameral Twitter: @cdmilligan Dr Anoush Margaryan is Senior Lecturer in Learning Technology in the Caledonian Academy Bio: http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/people/margaryan.html Blog: http://chartingthelabyrinths.wordpress.com Twitter: @anoush

Page 34: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

34

CORE PRINCIPLES FOR SOFT LANDINGS

www.bsria.co.uk

Twelve Core Principles that define a Soft Landings project

have been published by the research and consulting

organisation, BSRIA. The Soft Landings Core Principles

have been developed by BSRIA working with the BSRIA

Soft Landings User Group1. They have been written for

construction clients and their professional teams to inform

Soft Landings project processes.

Soft Landings is the cradle-to-occupation process for the

graduated handover of a new or refurbished building,

where a period of professional aftercare by the project team

is planned for at project inception and carried out for up to

three years post-completion.

The Soft Landings Framework2 was published by BSRIA in

2009 as a free-to-use, open-source method to help deliver

truly sustainable buildings. It has become widely accepted

for new and refurbishment building projects. The adoption

of Soft Landings work steps can earn credits in the

sustainable management section of BREEAM for New

Construction, and is in the process of being adopted for

government procurement policy.

“BSRIA has produced these Core Principles largely for

clients who may have heard of Soft Landings but need to

know how to do it,” said BSRIA’s Soft Landings manager,

Roderic Bunn. “Construction firms also need to know what

is and is not essential to a Soft Landings project.”

The Core Principles stress the importance of adopting all

stages of the Soft Landings process, from the inception

stage onwards, not just the aftercare elements.

“While we don’t wish to stop clients from introducing Soft

Landings on projects already underway – a graduated

handover can be beneficial in itself – a true Soft Landings

project is a cradle-to-occupation process, “ added Bunn. “A

soft take-off is more likely to result in a soft landing, where

extra attention has been paid in the early stages to designing

for manageability and usability, and in properly defining the

building’s performance targets, such as energy use,” he said.

“Even on projects that adopt Soft Landings from the outset,

cherry-picking of the Core Principles may introduce risks and

fragilities,” explained Bunn.

Page 35: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

SUPPORT …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

35

“We believe the risks of under-performance will increase

proportionately as Core Principles are weakened or

abandoned. Clients need to appreciate

this, so we’re hoping that architects, engineers and

builders who are keen on Soft Landings give their clients a

copy of the Soft Landings Core Principles and make sure

they understand what’s needed.”

The 12 Core Principles are:

1. Adopt the entire process

2. Provide leadership

3. Set roles and responsibilities

4. Ensure continuity

5. Commit to aftercare

6. Share risk and responsibility

7. Use feedback to inform design

8. Focus on operational outcomes

9. Involve the building managers

10. Involve the end users

11. Set performance objectives

12. Communicate and inform

The 8-page BSRIA publication provides detail on each of

the principles, with guidance on how to interpret and apply

them to real projects.

Dr Bill Bordass of the Usable Buildings Trust3 and co-

author of the Soft Landings Framework said “With growing

financial and environmental constraints, we can no longer

afford the large discrepancies that so often occur between

predicted and in-use performance of new buildings.

Clients, designers and builders must focus on actual

outcomes. They can start tomorrow by adopting the Soft

Landings Core Principles.”

Gary Clark, chairman of the Soft Landings User Group said

“The Core Principles are a timely addition to the growing

catalogue of Soft Landings supporting documents by BSRIA.

They aim to articulate in clear and concise terms what

fundamental actions are required by clients and project teams

to deliver consistently better buildings.”

“In this age of austerity, Soft Landings is vital for helping to

deliver lower carbon buildings within constrained capital and

operating budgets,” added Clark. “The Soft Landings Core

Principles offers the construction industry a blueprint of doing

more with less, without adding layers of unnecessary and

wasteful bureaucracy.”

BSRIA believes that clients and building teams could express

the Core Principles in a Soft Landings Code of Conduct for a

project. “This could be similar to the Considerate Contractors’

Scheme, to which all parties would be willing signatories,” said

Roderic Bunn. “This would require statements to encourage

people to aim high and improve product delivery.”

Clients are not advised to make the Core Principles a

contractual requirement in themselves, rather to use them to

inform their requirements in each section of the project

documentation. The Core Principles can be added as an

appendix, but ideally each principle should also be inserted at

relevant points in the project tender documentation. The Core

Principles can then be referenced in the chosen form of

appointment for the designers, and in the construction contract

for the builder.

Construction companies are urged to support the Soft Landings

Core Principles, and are invited to do so via the Soft Landings

website4 when they download the PDF version.

Page 36: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

36

Soft Landings is a cradle-to-occupation process for a

graduated handover of a new or refurbished building,

where a period of professional aftercare by the project team

is planned for at project inception and carried out for up to

three years post-completion.

The new BSRIA Soft Landings Level 1 training course,

being launched on 28th June 2012, will inform the industry

about this process that aims to help project teams deliver

design ambitions in actual building performance.

There are often huge differences between the performance

of new buildings in design and their performance in reality,

particularly in terms of their energy consumption, occupant

satisfaction and general building usability. One way of

closing the performance gap is the Soft Landings process

of graduated handover and aftercare. Soft Landings has

touched a nerve with the construction industry as clients

are increasingly keen for their buildings to be truly

sustainable. This means that project teams need to fully

understand Soft Landings processes and resources.

BSRIA’s new Soft Landings Level 1 training course will

provide this knowledge to anyone in a project team.

Soft Landings is gaining momentum in the industry by:

being increasingly specified by clients

providing a means of earning credits in BREEAM for New

Construction

being in the process of adoption for government

procurement policy

assisting project teams deliver lower carbon buildings

within constrained budgets.

This course will be of value to professionals involved in the

design, construction and operation of the built environment.

This includes building owners, building services consultants

and contractors, architects, cost consultants, project

managers, principal contractors and facilities managers.

Delegates will be provided with a free copy of the BSRIA Soft

Landings Framework (BG 04/2009) and Soft Landings Core

Principles (BG 38/2012) documents, together with a copy of

all the slides presented.

For more information visit

www.bsria.co.uk/goto/sf1

BSRIA LAUNCHES SOFT LANDINGS TRAINING COURSE

Page 37: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

SUPPORT …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

37

Illustrated Guide to Mechanical Building Services

www.bsria.co.uk

This publication is an update to one of our best-selling

guides, AG 15/2002 and will be available from 23rd April.

As with the previous edition, it provides basic reference

information on mechanical building services systems for

construction clients and professionals in other areas of the

construction industry.

This guide covers the key areas of heating, ventilation, air

conditioning and controls and in the new edition,

information has been added on:

· pumps

· pressurisation

· low-carbon heat sources

· MVHR systems

· commissioning, handover and project evaluation.

For construction clients, the guide provides a simple insight

into the main system options discussed during the briefing

process. It can also help clients to identify and raise

technical questions which they feel are relevant to their

organisation's specific needs. For construction

professionals, the guide provides a quick reference to

building services systems and can assist their working

knowledge of the subject. For those new to the industry and

non-experts, this guide provides a valuable introduction to

the basics of building services systems.

To ensure the guide is simple and quick to use, a brief

overview of each system is provided, followed by a list of

key points. Photographs and simple drawings are used to

help explain the appearance and operation of each system.

It is acknowledged that the design team’s role includes

assessing and recommending appropriate design solutions

for a given project. This guide does not aim to provide a route

for system selection other than to point out typical

applications for many of the systems covered.

Contact:

Bookshop: +44 (0)1344 465529

Email: [email protected]

Web: www.bsria.co.uk/bookshop

Page 38: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

38

Glasgow Caledonian University wins CIOB National Student Challenge

Halbert Mills, Glasgow Caledonian University

Craig Whyte, Halbert Mills (Lecturer), Lauren Brown, Eve Mallon and Lauren Brown

For the second year in a row students from Glasgow Caledonian University have won the Chartered Institute of Building

(CIOB) National Student Challenge Final held at Ascot in Berkshire.

Page 39: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

EDUCATION …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

39

The team of four quantity surveying students, Lauren Brown,

Lauren Meldrum, Eve Mallon and Craig Wright are in their final

year.

This year’s challenge saw the students propose a design and

build brief for a hypothetical new terminal at Manchester Airport

– Terminal 4.

The teams were asked to create an ‘Intelligent Airport’ that

considers the whole life cycle of the building. There had to be

recognition of the current construction improvement agenda

relating to Building Information Modelling and the wider use of

digital technologies, the importance of quality design and the

pivotal role of sustainability.

The exercise involved preparing a bid proposal document in 2½

hours followed by a PowerPoint presentation after lunch.

Teams had access to a number of published documents in the

CIOB library and also internet access throughout the day.

Dr Sarah Peace from the CIOB said, “This year’s challenge

produced some really innovative and considered solutions.

What impressed the Judges the most was the passion and

awareness all the student teams showed throughout the event.

But for us Glasgow gave the most complete and creative set of

solutions that displayed a real insight for airport building.”

The Judging Panel included David Haimes from Manchester

Airports Group, Gavin Maxwell-Hart from Laing O’Rourke,

Danny Kearney from Xtratherm and Dr Sarah Peace the

CIOB’s Scholarship and Research Manager.

Other teams to reach the final included: University of

Greenwich, City of Sunderland College, Mid Kent College,

University of Salford, University of the West of England,

Pencoed College, Leeds Met University and a team from SDC

Construction Group each of which had won a heat within their

geographical area.

Construction works should go ahead

adjacent to Terminal 3

Reasons:

Interlinked

Minimum disruption

Boost the UK economy

Reduced site specific costs due to

proposed location

LCC has been considered and although

we project high capital costs the

building is more sustainable in the long

term

Sustainable materials and utilising

renewable energy sources contribute to

achieving the client’s business

objectives.

This development is viable

The Client will see a return on investment

Innovative solutions and features will be

used in the construction

The Airport users needs have been

satisfied

Local jobs have been created and

ultimately an intelligent airport will have

been formed.

Page 40: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

40

FLEXIBLE SOLAR CELLS

Prof. John Wilson

School of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University Power Textiles Limited

1. Introduction

Perhaps the title should be “inflexible solar cells” because

that is the common perception of most available photovoltaic

(PV) modules on the market today (Fig. 1) . These extremely

visible additions to buildings around the world are not beloved

of architects or planners, despite their environmental

credentials. Even when a building is designed with an

integrated PV array there is a limited choice of system. To

appreciate this we should understand the manner in which

PV modules convert sunlight into electricity, which requires

certain features in common across all photovoltaic devices.

We may then be able to realise the restrictions placed on PV

scientists and engineers in developing new types of solar cell,

and critically appraise suggestions for novel designs.

Certainly there is a need for truly flexible modules, whether

this is to assist in transporting and mounting them or whether

it is to enable fixing to non-rigid structures.

Fig. 1 - Solar Century PV roof shingle

Page 41: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

41

2. Sunshine to electricity: the photovoltaic conversion

process

Solar cells absorb sunlight to generate electrical current

directly by the photovoltaic effect, without a thermal or

mechanical mediator. To do this effectively they must be

optically dense for much of the solar spectrum, which

explains their dark blue or black appearance (Fig. 2 and 3).

The three features that all solar cells possess are: an optical

absorber that converts light to electrical charge; an in-built

electrical field that separates these pairs of positive and

negative electrical charges before they are lost by

recombination; electrical contacts that deliver these charges

to the external work load. The first two of these features are

provided by a semiconducting material, commonly silicon,

which has the ability of controlled electrical conductivity by

the addition of very small amounts of selected impurities. In

this manner, two types of semiconductor are formed; p-type

and n-type, which together generate an electrical field at any

p-n junction without the addition of an external power supply.

As with any power conversion device, the conversion will be

less than 100% efficient, determined by unavoidable losses

and ultimately set by thermodynamics. Solar cell output

power is the product of electrical current and voltage, which

can be optimised only by a compromise between generating

maximum current and maximum voltage. The current

depends on the particular semiconductor chosen from a

diverse family of elements and compounds but it is also

directly dependent on the illuminated area – the reason for

most solar panels being as large as possible. The voltage is

dependent on the p-n junction structure, and its magnitude is

the same for all cell areas, but also ultimately depends on the

particular semiconductor. Without introducing too many

concepts, we should appreciate that the solar spectrum

encompasses ultraviolet through to infrared wavelengths, and

that a semiconductor has a threshold wavelength for optical

absorption, above which it will be transparent: to absorb most

of the solar spectrum would require a material with an

infrared threshold wavelength.

Fig 2. Polycrystalline Si PV module

Fig 3. Single crystal Si PV module

Unfortunately this means that its p-n junction field is weak,

giving an unavoidably low output voltage. Semiconductors

that give the best combination of voltage and current have

a threshold wavelength just into the infrared end of the

visible spectrum, which means that they are opaque to

visible light. The remainder of the absorbed energy merely

heats up the cells.

How we select a suitable semiconductor for solar cells

requires scientific consideration, of course, but must also

factor in such economic issues as the processing of the

basic material into p-n junctions and the abundance or

scarcity of the materials required.

Page 42: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

42

In contrast, thin-film cells are generally more sparing in their

use of semiconductor material but may be less perfect in

structure than the traditional bulk crystalline materials,

hence giving a lower performance. The first of this type to

gain a significant market share used amorphous silicon

films, currently having efficiencies of ~10% from a thickness

only one 200th of a standard silicon cell. More efficient thin-

film solar converters use compound semiconductors such

as those based on combinations of copper, indium, gallium,

and selenium (“CIGS” cells), attaining almost 20%

efficiency whilst still saving on the use of material. Currently

the lowest thin film module price is around 62 euro cents

per watt.

3. Solar cell operational considerations

Regardless of the type of solar cell, it is necessary to connect

them in series and parallel arrangements, much as is done

for conventional batteries. Each cell typically generates only

half a volt, thus it is essential to connect several in series to

produce a useful voltage, and this is true for modules which

themselves may produce only low voltage outputs. Whereas

the voltage increases only slowly with intensity, the output

current is directly dependent on the illumination intensity (and

as noted above depends on the collection area). This has an

immediate consequence for real installations, as the solar

input will change according to the time of day, the season,

and the weather. Temperature changes also impact on solar

cell performance, with current increasing somewhat with

temperature, and voltage decreasing at a rate of ~0.4% per

oC rise. If the generated power is to be fed into the electrical

grid, then an inverter (to be added to the installation cost) will

convert the generated DC power into 50Hz AC and will take

care of synchronisation and timing issues required by supply

network regulations, as well as ensuring that the electrical

load is matched to the generated current and voltage to the

greatest effect.

This matter of variation in illumination becomes a planning

consideration when the question of the orientation and

inclination of an array of modules is to be decided. For the

highest output, the solar cells should be normal to the rays of

the Sun, but to avoid frequent adjustments (solar tracking is

essential for optical concentrators) it is usual to select an

orientation close to south-facing in the northern hemisphere,

and compromise with a fixed inclination several degrees less

than the angle of latitude (around 36o in the UK). However,

building regulations may override this, by requiring that

modules are within a few degrees of the roof angle.

Fig. 4. PV solar cell operation and output characteristics

Page 43: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

43

Shadowing of all or part of a solar cell array will also have

considerable effects on the output power. If local topography or

adjacent structures will cause shadowing of part of an array at

any time, it may be effective to divide the array into separate

sectors, each having its own inverter, to prevent the shadowed

components from reducing the generated current: whilst this

increases capital costs, new developments in micro-inverters

afford a solution for each module to have its own inverter.

Valuable guidance on designing and installing solar modules

(including safety, testing and commissioning) is provided by the

DTI Guide to the Installation of PV Systems (“Photovoltaics in

Buildings”). This is required guidance for installers to gain

certification for the Microgeneration Installation Standard (MIS

3002 for PV), which is essential for any householder to apply for

the UK Feed in Tariff. The second edition of 2006 requires

installers to supply an estimate of performance based on the

Standard Assessment Procedure for Energy Rating of Dwellings

(SAP 2005), which provides a simple formula for the energy

produced per year according to the installed peak power rating,

orientation, tilt and shadowing. The new third edition will provide a

more accurate and detailed model, which is closer to the models

employed by many installers today. This estimate will be of

interest to anyone wishing to know the financial payback period.

Another payback period should be considered by those

concerned with energy accounting, namely the pay-back period

for solar cells to deliver the energy embedded in them during their

manufacture and installation. Cells based on single-crystalline

materials such as conventional silicon cells have the longest pay-

back time, of several years, depending on the actual location.

Thin-film cells repay their lower energy consumption in less than

a year, again depending on location, and also have around half

the lifecycle CO2 emissions of crystalline cells.

4. Novel developments

Given these restrictions on economically improving the

performance of existing photovoltaic module types, are there any

new concepts to be investigated?

Fig. 5 Luminescent collector Image by Lindsay Wilson, PhD Heriot-Watt University 2012

Whilst the fundamental rules of physics cannot be broken,

new materials and technologies may offer some hope. The

arrival of nanotechnology has offered new structures for

better transparent conducting contacts (e.g. silver

nanowires and graphene layers) and for enhanced optical

absorption of thin-film cells (e.g. by plasmonic light-

trapping).

The sunlight spectrum may be converted to a wavelength

range that is more strongly absorbed by the cell’s

semiconducting material, by using luminescent materials:

for instance, these may collect UV and blue light, and emit

orange light (Fig. 5). These colourful components may be

incorporated into a plastic covering sheet for solar cells or

else the solar cells may be attached around the edge of a

thick plastic sheet which captures the incoming light,

changes its colour, and guides it to the cells. This would

present the user with a different coloured solar array than

the ubiquitous blue or black, albeit with lower power

conversion efficiency, and the option of collecting PV

electricity from a window rather than a wall or opaque roof.

Page 44: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

44

Multiple quantum wells, extremely thin layers, of different

semiconductors are another nanotechnology option for

increasing the utilisation of the solar spectrum but the

fabrication method is expensive and so these cells are more

suitable for optical concentration, with which they have

achieved 27% efficiency.

In contrast to these largely inorganic materials, solar cells are

being developed with organic molecules and polymers. The

oldest type is the dye-sensitized cell (or Graetzel cell) which

combines elements of nanotechnology, organic chemistry

and luminescent materials in a liquid-based photochemical

device having an efficiency of ~11% at present. The dye that

absorbs the sunlight is coated on nanoparticles of transparent

titanium dioxide (the anode) immersed in a liquid electrolyte

along with a second electrode of platinum. Electrons are

freed from the dye, flow into the TiO2 and pass into the

external load; the circuit is completed by electrons flowing

through the load and back via the platinum cathode into the

electrolyte and thence into the dye. The key feature is the

photo-active dye, which must be protected from UV which

tends to degrade it.

Polymer-based solar cells are true photovoltaic devices that

use solid state materials only. They are potentially capable of

large scale production using a liquid process to coat a

suitable substrate. Polymer synthesis is rather a specialised

science and the combinations that have been studied are not

readily available. Best efficiencies to date are ~8% but their

stability is still an issue, as the materials are sensitive to air

and moisture.

5. Flexible solar cells

Aside from increasing the performance of photovoltaic

modules there is a market interest in foldable, rollable and

otherwise flexible arrays. A typical thin-film amorphous silicon

product is the series of low power rollable arrays on polyester

made by Iowa Thin Film Technologies, which are suitable for

leisure and marine activities.

Similar technology is used by the equally established Uni-

Solar modules, but with triple-junction amorphous silicon

solar cells. Each of these products costs several euros per

watt. Global Solar and others produce thin-film CIGS arrays

for building integrated installation. Another compound

semiconductor that is capable of making thin-film solar cells

is cadmium telluride, CdTe. This uses high temperature

synthesis and so can only be put on to metal foils or

polymers such as polyimide (e.g. Kapton).

It would be appropriate for building integrated PV on flat

roofs or facades because its performance does not drop off

as much as silicon when heated. Although there were

health worries about CdTe, fire and leaching tests have

shown that these were needless. EMPA in Switzerland has

produced 13.5% efficient CdTe cells on polyimide but one

of the biggest manufacturers of CdTe modules on glass,

First Solar, has recently scaled back production as its

market share has fallen. At an earlier stage of development

are the organic-based tandem cells produced by Heliatek in

Germany on a polyester sheet, but with the intention of

producing building-integrated arrays.

Our own research is into flexible solar cells that are added

directly on to polymer textiles. Without going into

technological details, the fabrication uses low temperature

vacuum-based synthesis of thin-film silicon from gases, in a

similar manner to that used for amorphous silicon (which is

actually an alloy of hydrogen and silicon). Most compound

semiconductors must use high temperature vacuum

processes, which prohibits any common polymer substrate.

We are able to use polyester, a polymer that is widely

available in continuous sheet or woven forms but any

substrate that can withstand a temperature of ~200oC

would be possible. Although these cells will not have the

performance of equivalent cells on glass or metal sheet,

they target different applications, such as awnings and

tensile architecture fabrics.

Page 45: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

45

In order to demonstrate this use, we must move from a small area

batch coating process to a continuous roll-to-roll process, still

some way off, but much of that technology already exists in other

industries.

6. Concluding remarks

I have given a brief guide to how solar cells work and what cell

types are currently available, as well as a flavour of newer

developments. Any PV array will require consideration of site-

specific factors and I have indicated how the output energy is

determined which is a necessary part of estimating financial and

energy payback times. Each of these outlines is overly brief and

so a few references for further reading are added below. Finally I

have tried to show that developments in materials offer a solution

to the somewhat stark appearance of conventional PV modules,

with the prospect that architects may have greater flexibility in

designing PV into their new buildings.

Bibliography

“Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 38)”, M A Green, K

Emery, Y Hishikawa, W Warta, and E D Dunlop, Progress in

Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 19, 565-572

(2011).

“Photovoltaics in Buildings, Guide to the installation of PV

systems” 2nd Edition, 2006. [3rd

edition in draft]

“Will we exceed 50% efficiency in photovoltaics?”, A Luque,

J. Appl. Phys. 110, 031301 (2011).

Solar market research and analysis:

http://www.solarbuzz.com/

Fig. 6 Solar cells on textile

Page 46: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

46

j.Pod Timber System

John Barr, John Barr Architects

Chris Sanders, Glasgow Caledonian University

Image1.

Since 2004 John Barr Architects has been engaged in an ongoing programme of design, research and development of low-cost,

low-carbon, sustainable construction systems. Regional factors are critical. Research began in Japan, and initial work addressed

the particular circumstances there. The ongoing programme addresses other regions of the world. The following is a synopsis of

progress to date.

Issue

Small, affordable houses were formerly commonplace in Japan

but, since the 1980’s, they have been disappearing rapidly to be

replaced by developers’ apartment blocks. Seen as backward

and structurally unsafe in earthquake conditions there has been

little interest in saving them, no policy of refurbishment by

government and no attempt to find a modern equivalent. The two

houses in Image.1 are all that remain of a once-vibrant

community just to the north of Osaka station. Japanese house-

building companies are amongst the most advanced in the world

but they offer products for the affluent. For the young, the old and

the impoverished the choice has been stark: hold out against the

steamroller of ‘improvement’ and become marooned in an aging

and potentially unsafe house or take one of the apartments on

offer.

The starting point for this programme of R&D was the search for

a modern and safe equivalent of the traditional small, affordable,

Japanese house. Other issues addressed were:

Sustainability: The use of sustainable materials, sustainably

sourced and manufactured.

Flexibility: The traditional Japanese house could be small

because of the flexibility of internal planning, the ability to

expand or contract spaces and for one space to have multiple

functions.

Buildability: Construction should not require specialised plant,

processes or skills.

Page 47: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

47

Programme

Sustainability: Japan is over 70% forest but its timber has

fallen into disuse as a construction material, being

replaced by steel frame, reinforced concrete and timber

imported from North America. In collaboration with teams

from Kyoto University the architects investigated the use

of native forest thinnings, promoting carbon capture,

reducing carbon miles and stimulating both the local

forestry and manufacturing industries.

Flexibility: In order to achieve total flexibility of internal

planning it was important that the structure should be

capable of resisting earthquake and wind loads without

resort to structural partitions or structural facades.

Rigorous, full-scale testing was carried out at Fukuyama

University to prove the structural design and ensure

approval from the Japanese government for use in

construction.

Buildability: The structural design of the system is

sophisticated but the architects worked with

manufacturers to develop simple production methods,

requiring no specialised plant or manufacturing skills. The

system is ideal for off-site manufacture, with the attendant

benefits in quality control, health-and-safety and speed of

construction on site. Whilst developed as a volumetric

system it possesses advantages not shared by other

volumetric systems:

The simplicity of construction allows it to be

manufactured locally rather than at centralised,

specialised facilities.

It can be delivered to site in either volumetric or flat-

pack form.

Results

The result is an innovative construction system for which

there was no precedent in the Japanese building codes.

Images 2 and 3 illustrate a project for twenty units of

community housing, which encapsulates every aspect of

the original concept. Timber from the region was used, the

system manufactured by a local company and the housing

constructed by a local contractor in a reduced time. The

result is affordable housing for the local community that is

modern, flexible and safe. The local authority that

commissioned the project is now planning a second

scheme of twice this size. Although the initial driver for the

program was the lack of affordable housing, projects

completed to date also include classrooms, research

facilities and offices, some of which are illustrated in

Images 4 to 8. (For more examples visit

http://www.jpod.uk.com/)

Image 2.

Page 48: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

48

Image 3.

Image 4.

Image 5.

Image 6.

Image 7.

Page 49: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

49

Image 8.

Full Circle

In 2008 the team received funding from the Japanese

government to carry out further development and testing of the

system for use in the construction of earthquake shelters and in

the stabilisation of existing timber structures. Approval to use

the system in this way was granted in 2009 and it is now being

used by local authorities to stabilise old housing stock and allow

the refurbishment of neighbourhoods that would previously

have been demolished as being potentially unsafe. Images 9 to

12 illustrate the first such project to be completed and were

taken a few hundred yards from the photograph shown in

Image.1. This neighbourhood has been saved, but the

developer blocks from previous clearances can be seen

looming in the background.

Image 9.

Page 50: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

50

Image 10.

Page 51: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

51

Image 11.

Image 12.

Page 52: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

52

Further Developments

Following the successful implementation of the system in Japan,

the architect undertook a similar programme of design, testing

and development in the U.K., utilising local timber. Like Japan,

the U.K. has a requirement for affordable housing and large areas

of under-utilised forest. The potential benefits are similar and the

research programme was supported by funding from the Scottish

Government. This work, carried out in conjunction with

Strathclyde University and Buro Happold, established the viability

of the system for structural use using native, C16 timber. J.Pod

Holdings Ltd was established to develop and commercialise the

system in the UK and opened discussions with housebuilders and

construction companies. However, in order to utilise the system in

the UK, analysis and quantification of its thermal performance

was necessary. As the system adopts innovative construction

techniques, the values that are required in order to complete SAP

calculations and obtain a Building Warrant did not exist and had

to be modelled and calculated. With the aid of CIC Start funding,

j.Pod Holdings approached Glasgow Caledonian University and,

in particular, Dr. Chris Sanders, a leader in this field, with a

request to carry out the required modelling and analysis. Below

are extracts from his report, which demonstrates the excellent

thermal performance of the system.

1.0 Introduction

This report covers the analysis of the thermal performance of an

innovative building system, the j.Pod, developed by John Barr

Architects. The j.Pod is based on modules constructed with

timber ribs, with a high level of insulation between the ribs. A

number of modules can be put together, side by side, end to end

or stacked vertically to form larger buildings.

The report discusses the factors that affect heat loss through:

the plane areas: the walls, floor, roof and doors and

windows, which are characterised by their area and U-

value, and

the joints between the plane areas: corners, wall-

roof and wall-floor junctions and the window

surrounds which are characterised by their length

and ψ-value and are also areas with a higher risk

of mould growth

The thermal performance parameters are calculated for

the details of a j.Pod building and assembled to assess

their contribution to the total heat loss from the building.

2.0 Fabric Heat Loss

The total fabric heat loss from a building is made of:

a) Heat flow through the plane areas: the walls,

floor, roof, and the doors and windows. These

are characterised by an area in m2 and a U-value

in W/m2K.

b) Heat flow through the joints between these areas:

the eaves, corners wall/floor junctions and the

jamb, lintel and sill of the windows and doors.

There are characterised by a length in metres

and the linear thermal transmittance or ψ-value in

W/mK.

The total fabric heat loss is made up from:

Hf = ΣA·U + ΣL·ψ W/K.

2.1 Plane area U-values

The U-values of plane areas that are composed of simple

parallel planes of material (e.g. a brick - cavity – block

wall) can be simply worked out by adding the

contributions of the individual layers. The methodology

for this is defined in the BRE document, BR

443,‘Conventions for U-value calculations’ and the

associated software package, the BRE U-value

calculator.

However, when a structure includes significant repeating

elements which cross the insulation, such as the studs in

a timber framed wall or the ribs in the j.Pod, the

calculation is more complex.

Page 53: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

53

Reasonable approximations have been developed for common

constructions, however these will not apply to the j.Pod. The U-

value can be calculated by modelling a representative section

of the wall or roof and calculating the heat flow through it. If the

calculated heat flow through the model is Q Watts, with a

temperature difference of ΔT across it, the U value is given by

WLΔT

QU W/m

2K

Ground floors are more complex, as the heat loss through them

depends as much on the size and shape of the house as the

amount of insulation present. The procedure for calculating the

U-value is specified in BS EN ISO 13370:1998 ‘Thermal

performance of buildings – Heat transfer via the ground –

Calculation methods’; this involves calculating the thermal

resistance of the insulated floor deck, using the method

described above, and then inserting this into the BS 13370

equations.

2.2 Thermal Bridges

Thermal bridges are areas of the building fabric, where,

because of the geometry or the presence of high conductivity

materials, heat flows are higher than elsewhere. Besides

increasing energy demand in the building, thermal bridges also

cool the internal surface and are common sites for

condensation and mould growth.

Two parameters, which are described in more detail in BRE

Information Paper IP 1/06 ‘Assessing the effects of thermal

bridging at junctions and around openings’, are used to

characterize the performance of thermal bridges.

The surface temperature is assessed by the f-value or

temperature factor,

f = (Ts – Te) / (Ti – Te)

where: Ts, Ti and Te are the surface, inside air and outside air

temperatures.

IP 1/06 specifies that the f-value should be greater than

0.75 to prevent mould growth. In other words, with

internal and external temperatures of 20°C and 0°C,

respectively, the surface temperature should be greater

than 15°C.

The heat loss is characterized by the linear thermal

transmittance or ψ-value in W/mK; this represents the

extra heat loss at a junction over and above the heat loss

through the adjacent plane areas, the walls and floors

etc. The ψ-value is found by constructing a model of the

junction – for example the roof eaves. The model is

extended far enough away from the junction so that the

heat flow is unaffected by the presence of the junction,

about 1metre is usually sufficient. The ψ-value is then

calculated from:

rrww ULULWΔT

QΨ W/mK

Where:

Q is the heat flow through the model in W

ΔT is the temperature difference across the model in °C

W is the width of the model in m

Lw and Lr are the lengths of the wall and roof in m

Uw and Ur are the U-values of the wall and roof in W/m2K

IP1/06 gives a table of default ψ-values for a range of

junctions. These values are used as the default values in

the SAP 2005 and sBEM software. It is recommended in

IP1/06 that Σl.ψ, the sum of the products of the lengths

and ψ-values of all the thermal bridges, is less than 0.08

times the external area of the house. This will be easily

achieved if the default ψ-values are used. If the ψ-value

of one of the thermal bridges is slightly higher than the

default value it is possible to trade off this value against

the other lower values, especially if the length of the

bridge is relatively short, such as a window sill or lintel.

Page 54: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

54

2.3 Analysis methods used

The analysis was carried out with the thermal analysis software

package TRISCO, supplied by Physibel of Belgium. This

software is fully compatible with the relevant standard

referenced in the Building Regulations: BS EN ISO

10211:2007: Thermal bridges in building construction - Heat

flows and surface temperatures – Detailed calculations’

The models were constructed using the conventions specified

in the guidance document ‘Conventions for calculating linear

thermal transmittance and temperature factors’, BR497 by Tim

Ward and Chris Sanders published by BRE on behalf of the

DCLG.

Fig. 1. Cross section of materials in TRISCO model

Fig. 2 . Cross section of temperatures calculated with TRISCO

Fig. 3. Internal surface temperatures calculated with TRISCO

Figs.1 to 3 and Table.1 illustrate the thermal images and

results produced for one junction, based on the use of

mineral wool as the primary insulating material.

Page 55: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

55

Wall Type

Added insulation

Tmin

°C

f-value

Q W

Lw

m Uw

W/m2K

Lc

m Uc

W/m2K

Ψ-value

W/mK

Wall A None 18.66 0.933 43.248 1.333 0.138 4.568 0.153 0.0185

Wall B None 18.63 0.932 43.276 1.333 0.139 4.568 0.153 0.0187

Wall A2 Minwool 18.43 0.921 42.688 1.333 0.138 4.568 0.153 0.0068

Wall B2 Minwool 18.48 0.924 42.649 1.333 0.139 4.568 0.153 0.0056

Wall A3 PIR 18.38 0.919 42.519 1.333 0.138 4.568 0.153 0.0033

Wall B3 PIR 18.46 0.923 42.455 1.333 0.139 4.568 0.153 0.0016

Table 1. Summary of calculation parameters for the side wall - roof junction

3.0 Summary

The U-values calculated with TRISCO are shown in Table 2.

Those for the walls and roof apply to any size of building. In

Table 3, battens 'offset' or 'inline' refers to internal battens

creating a service zone behind the internal wall-lining and

‘additional insulation’ refers to insulation placed within this

zone at junctions. The U-value of the ground floor is

calculated from the thermal resistance of the floor deck

derived from TRISCO and entered into the BRE U-value

calculator and depends on the dimensions of the building.

For a single pod 7.5m by 5.5m, giving a floor area of 41.25m2

and a perimeter of 26m, the U-value is 0.142 w/m2K.

If the building was doubled in size by putting two pods

together side by side, the dimensions would be 7.5m by 11m,

giving a floor area of 82.5m2 and a perimeter of 37m, giving a

lower ground floor U-value of 0.137 W/m2K. All of these are

based on the use of mineral wool as the primary insulating

material.

Tables 3, 4 and 5 summarise the calculated f-values and ψ-

values from each of the junctions. Also included, where

possible, are the default ψ-values from IP1/06 and the

calculated ψ-value as a percentage of the IP1/06 values.

All the calculated f-values are well above the 0.75 limit for

mould growth, most of them above 0.90.

U W/m2K

Side Wall Option A 0.138

Side Wall Option B 0.139

Roof 0.153

End Wall 0.146

Ground Floor Varies – max. 0.142

Table 2 – Calculated U-values

This means that that there is no risk of mould growth even

in extreme internal conditions.

Almost all the ψ-values are below the IP1/06 default values;

many of them substantially below.

Page 56: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

56

Wall type Additional insulation f-value

Ψ-value W/mk

IP1/06 W/mK

Ψ as % of IP1/06

Side Wall/roof

battens in line None 0.933 0.019 0.24 7.7

battens offset None 0.932 0.019 0.24 7.8

battens in line Minwool 0.921 0.007 0.24 2.9

battens offset Minwool 0.924 0.006 0.24 2.4

battens in line PIR 0.919 0.003 0.24 1.4

battens offset PIR 0.923 0.002 0.24 0.7

Side wall/ Intermediate Floor

battens in line None 0.934 0.010 0.07 14.1

battens offset None 0.935 0.010 0.07 14.2

battens in line Minwool 0.925 -0.010 0.07 -14.8

battens offset Minwool 0.924 -0.013 0.07 -18.2

battens in line PIR 0.923 -0.017 0.07 -23.8

battens offset PIR 0.921 -0.020 0.07 -28.7

Side Wall/ Ground floor

battens in line None 0.914 0.018 0.16 11.0

battens offset None 0.905 0.018 0.16 11.3

battens in line Minwool 0.905 0.006 0.16 3.6

battens offset Minwool 0.891 0.005 0.16 3.0

battens in line PIR 0.903 0.002 0.16 1.4

battens offset PIR 0.888 0.001 0.16 0.4

Table 3 – Summary of calculated f-values and ψ-values for side wall junctions

f-value Ψ-value W/mk

IP1/06 W/mK

Ψ as % of IP1/06

Side Wall/End Wall 0.939 0.044 0.09 48.5

End wall/ Roof 0.932 0.034 0.06 55.9

End wall /Intermediate floor 0.969 0.043 0.07 55.9

End wall/Ground floor 0.932 0.012 0.16 7.4

Window Jamb – Internal 0.949 0.029 0.05 58.0

Window Jamb – External 0.840 0.045 0.05 90.4

Window Lintel – Internal 0.959 0.230 0.05 7.7

Window Lintel – External 0.844 0.049 0.30 16.2

Window Sill – Internal 0.965 0.030 0.04 74.2

Window Sill – External 0.879 0.043 0.04 106.7

Table 4 – Summary of calculated f-values and ψ-values for end wall junctions

Page 57: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH … ________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

57

Junction of pods end to end

f-value Ψ-value W/mk

Side wall/Side wall : battens in line 0.972 0.0086

Side wall/Side wall : battens offset 0.973 0.0089

Roof/Roof 0.976 0.0109

Junction of pods side to side

End wall/End wall: cavity open 0.951 0.039

End wall/End wall: cavity filled 0.950 0.033

Roof/Roof: cavity open 0.946 0.025

Roof/Roof: cavity filled 0.948 0.010

Table 5 – Junctions between pods

There is a significant difference between the results from the

window surrounds depending on the positioning of the frame

relative to the wall. Positioning the frame on the inside of the

wall gives much better f-values and ψ-values compared to

positioning it on the outside. The window sill with the frame

on the outside is the only case where the calculated ψ-value

exceeds the IP1/06 values. The relatively small length of this

junction means that it will make a small contribution to heat

loss.

Table 6 shows the different components of the fabric heat

loss from a typical 7.5 by 5.5 m two storey house built with

j.Pods, using the U-values and ψ-values calculated and

summarised above. The windows are assumed to be in the

end walls with a single door in one of the side walls. A high

performance triple glazing system with PVC frame, low-e

glass and krypton fill, giving a glazing U-value of 1.7 W/m2K

is assumed.

The table shows that the thermal bridging makes up only 6%

of the total heat loss, compared to about 10% for a typical

modern house. The low fabric U-values mean that the

widows and door make up more than half the total fabric loss,

despite their high performance specification.

Plane areas Area U-

value AU % of total

side walls 79.5 0.138 10.97 15.1

end walls 38.57 0.147 5.67 7.8

Roof 41.25 0.153 6.31 8.7

ground floor 41.25 0.142 5.86 8.0

Windows 19.73 1.7 33.54 46.0

Door 3.45 1.7 5.87 8.0

All plane areas 68.22 93.6

Joints Length ψ-

value Lψ

side wall eaves 15.0 0.019 0.28 0.4

gable wall eaves 10.8 0.034 0.37 0.5

side wall internal floor 15.0 0.010 0.15 0.2

gable wall internal floor 10.8 0.043 0.46 0.6

corner 21.2 0.044 0.92 1.3

side wall ground floor 15.0 0.018 0.26 0.4

gable wall ground floor 10.8 0.012 0.13 0.2

Window & door jamb 26.2 0.045 1.18 1.6

Window & door lintel 12.5 0.052 0.65 0.9

Window sill 5.8 0.045 0.26 0.4

All Joints 4.67 6.4

Total 72.89 100.0

Table 6 – Components of the fabric transmission of a

typical house

Page 58: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

58

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF DOMESTIC LAUNDERING – RESEARCH CHALLENGES AND

OPPORTUNITIES

Colin D A Porteous, Mackintosh School of Architecture

Introduction

‘Environmental Assessment of Domestic Laundering’ is

the formal title of a multi-disciplinary, 3-year research

project funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences

Research Council (EPSRC), which was completed earlier

this year.

The Mackintosh Environmental Research Unit (MEARU),

within the Mackintosh School of Architecture at The Glasgow

School of Art, led the project in conjunction with two other

research units – Research on Indoor Climate and Health

(RICH) at Glasgow Caledonian University and Energy

Systems Research Unit (ESRU) at the University of

Strathclyde.

Page 59: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

59

Respectively the roles were investigative architectural fieldwork,

laboratory work associated with moisture in air and materials,

and advanced computer modelling, the last again with moisture

to the fore. The emphasis on moisture is understandable –

laundering is inescapably a wet process – and moisture has

implications for indoor air quality (IAQ) and health, due

principally to mould spores, dust mites and chemicals (used in

laundering and released from materials and furnishings). IAQ in

turn relates to energy consumption for space heating, with

control of ventilation playing an increasingly crucial role in

limiting fossil fuel consumption and carbon emissions.

All laundering appliances consume electricity, but drying,

whether by machine or not, may also exert a considerable

influence on thermal energy for space heating; while washing

machines require quantities of heated water, which is then

discarded as ‘grey’ liquid waste; and steam irons, as modest

consumers of electricity, also add moisture and chemicals to

the air and are quite labour intensive.

This already indicates that the scope of the study was complex,

and this article intends to briefly chart some of the challenges

and opportunities involved. It also serves to introduce ‘Healthy

Low Energy Home Laundering’, a Design Guide by Rosalie

Menon and the present author, which is a key publication

arising from the study and now available free-online at

www.homelaundrystudy.net.

This is of relevance to all involved in housing procurement and

refurbishment from those that devise and improve building

standards – statutory and best practice – to those who develop

and design. In a nutshell, the guide suggests relatively simple,

but important, changes to standards, which offer significant

improvements to quality of life, wellbeing and health. In other

words, if implemented as recommended, they signify

considerable beneficial economic impact.

Opportunities

Certain opportunities arising from research projects of this

nature may be regarded as ‘planned’. All research is based

on an underpinning hypothesis or a series of related

hypotheses, which allows the necessary methodology to be

scoped in advance. In this case, the interactive

environmental nature of the study, briefly summarised

above in the introduction, dictated the lines of enquiry. It

was known in advance that the environmental impacts were

likely to be significant in terms of energy, and previous

studies had indicated that it was likely that subtler ‘quality-

of-life’, wellbeing and health issues would also be found.

Intrinsically, multi-disciplinary, collaborative research

provides more scope for new knowledge than a single

discipline within one institution; and accordingly also tends

to open up funding opportunities. Other opportunities that

we may regard as ‘unplanned’ fall into two sub-categories –

unplanned in the sense of chance, and unplanned in the

sense that the precise nature of analytical outcomes can

never be known in advance, if a research project is to add

new insights to a body of knowledge. Both occurred in this

instance, and have indeed led to significant findings.

One ‘chance’ opportunity in particular, which was not

planned at the time the research bid was formulated, was

employing a microbiologist on the MEARU survey team

who had also had previous research experience involving

the built environment in general and housing in particular.

This provided the capability to analyse air samples from

each of the main spaces in twenty-two case studies; a

capability that had not been envisaged in the original

research protocol. For example, aspergillus fumigatus, was

present in 25% of cases. This “causes invasive allergenic

disease” where immune systems are vulnerable (Cramer et

al, 2011), and “can be very dangerous” (University of

Cambridge, 2011).

Page 60: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

60

Moreover, both aspergillus, present in all the dwellings

sampled, and penicillium, present in all but one (95%),

“contaminate indoor spaces biologically” and “are important

sources of allergens” (Haas et al, 2007). However, although

the opportunity to acquire this knowledge was unexpected

at bid stage, the relevance in terms of potential health

impacts would depend partly on vulnerability of occupants

and partly on concentrations.

A less expected finding with health implications arising from

this opportunity was a strong association between the

overall concentration of mould spores and the presence of

passive indoor drying. Spore concentration is measured in

‘colony forming units’ per unit volume (CFU/m3). The living

rooms and bedrooms in the group that predominantly

passively dried indoors averaged over three times a limit

value used in Finland – 500 CFU/m3 for airborne fungal

spores for indoor air in urban areas in winter (Ministry of

Social Affairs and Health, 2003 (Finland); cited in ‘WHO

guidelines for indoor air quality: dampness and mould’,

2009). The Finnish standard is same value used in earlier

Danish research (Reponen et al, 1992). It is estimated that

6-10% of the population and 15-55% of atopics (those

vulnerable to hay fever, asthma and eczema) are sensitized

to fungal allergens (Institute of Medicine, 2000, p165). Even

the group that predominantly used tumble dryers averaged

nearly one third more than 500 CFU/m3, but very few of the

households did not dry passively indoors to some extent,

and control of ventilation was found to be generally poor.

There were, as one might expect, many potentially

confounding variables to the evident association between

passive indoor drying and spore concentration. However,

statistical analysis showed none of these to be significant.

The other aspect of a research opportunity such as this,

unforeseen at the planning stage but yielding an apparently

significant result, is that it becomes necessary to conduct a

literature search in this field. This in turn identified a larger

survey in the north of France, which had anticipated such an

association, but had not found it (Roussel et al, 2008). The

problem then is to find a rationale to explain why or how a

study in Glasgow can indicate a strong statistical association

between two variables, while one in France does not. This is

where a research opportunity starts to present itself as a

research problem! Suffice to say that a possible rationale was

found (Porteous et al, 2012).

In general, the widening or furthering of a literature review

during the course of a research project should be regarded as

an opportunity, even if un-planned or at least not fully planned

at the outset. An example of this for the laundering study was

that initial data collected from 100 dwellings by means of

face-to-face questionnaire included use of fabric softeners

and type of detergent – i.e. biological (with enzymes) or non-

biological. It was not known at planning stage whether or not

this information would prove particularly relevant, especially

since the sample envisaged was entirely urban and

connected to a main sewage system. However, it was found

that approximately half used biological detergents exclusively,

and that would have had significance for septic tanks or reed-

bed systems commonly associated with rural contexts. It was

also found that approximately half used fabric softeners, and,

when put together with the prevalence of indoor passive

drying and poor ventilation control, this statistic merited a

further review of literature to ascertain any potential harmful

effects on indoor air quality (IAQ).

Page 61: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

61

Work by Steinemann (2009) found that a typical scented liquid detergent emitted five chemicals listed in the USA as toxic or hazardous.

In this instance it was work on the west coast of North America

that proved to be of interest. A team in Seattle had recently

found that one chemical by-product of unregulated fragrances

in fabric softeners is acetaldehyde, classified as a ‘harmful

substance and carcinogenic’ (Steinemann et al, 2008); while

another team in Vancouver had pointed out 22 years previously

that the rate of off-gassing of volatile organic compounds

(VOCs) increases for those that are water-soluble, such as

aldehydes, proportionately with relative humidity (Arundel et al,

1986). In other words, applied to the situation found in Glasgow

where a symptom of poor IAQ was high humidity, it seemed

that fabric softeners could be at least as significant as use of

building materials or furnishing products that contained

formaldehyde. Work by Caress and Steinemann (2009) has

also indicated ‘fragrance sensitivity’ in the American population,

with significant proportions reporting either adverse health

effects or irritation. This brings in many scented household

products, including washing detergents. Again, work by

Steinemann (2009) found that a typical scented liquid detergent

emitted five chemicals listed in the USA as toxic or hazardous.

Such findings indicate a need for epidemiological research to

ascertain whether there is any evidence that such products do

indeed have a negative health impact on occupants, and

whether there is any evidence that branded ecological products

are safer in this regard.

Another opportunity, which was planned from the outset, was to

gain insights into occupancy patterns as well as IAQ by means

of measuring CO2 as an indicator, and thence to attempt to

match concentrated periods of occupation with moisture

increases. The aim of this relative to laundering was to isolate

periods of passive indoor drying in the absence of occupants,

and thereby to identify the impact of the drying material on

humidity levels. However, in terms of representing a research

‘opportunity’, this proved to be quite challenging, among several

other factors associated with collected data.

Challenges

In practice, with regard to the issue raised immediately

above, such isolation of passive indoor drying from other ‘wet’

aspects of occupancy, or ingress of moist ambient air, proved

arduous for a number of reasons. Sample size is perhaps the

key one with which to start. On the one hand, a reasonable

sample size is required in order to establish categories of

difference; while on the other, the larger the sample, the more

variables occur and the more a research team finds itself at

risk of being overwhelmed by the sheer quantity of data –

‘finding a needle in haystack’ and ‘not seeing the wood for the

trees’ spring to mind. A primary reason that the contributors to

humidity level were of interest is that a body of research by

others has established limits (relative humidity as a function

of temperature, and absolute humidity) above which excess

populations of dust mites is likely to be problematic (Arlian

and Veselica, 1981; Platts-Mills and De Weck, 1989;

Cunningham, 1998; Niven et al, 1999). Since a causal

association between dust mites and incidence of asthma has

also been established for well over a decade (Institute of

Medicine, 2000, p5, p144), any contribution to humidity in

dwellings by laundering processes is important; and in turn

this sets of a considerable search in the data for explanations

of moisture surges, particularly prolonged ones.

The original research bid envisaged 100 dwellings to be

initially surveyed, with some spot measurements of key

environmental conditions (temperature, relative humidity and

CO2), and a fairly comprehensive questionnaire to cover

specific and contextual issues related to domestic laundering.

From this sample, it was planned to closely monitor at least

10% (i.e. ten dwellings) over fortnightly periods. Although

identifying and visiting 100 volunteer households over a

reasonable demographic and architectural range proved

harder than expected, this task was fulfilled over a period of

approximately one full calendar year.

Page 62: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

62

It was also decided, since air-sampling and analysis was

possible and useful, that the number of monitored

households should increase, and 22 volunteers were

identified from the cohort of 100; again with monitoring

taking place during all seasons, although with proportionally

fewer winter cases than was the case for the initial surveys.

Apart from measuring the three key environmental

conditions continuously over daily cycles, the aim was to

directly measure power used by as many of the washing

machines and tumble dryers as possible – in practice, for a

number reasons, the former proving easier than the latter.

In addition the volunteer householder was asked to keep a

diary of key events associated with laundering, this on a

prepared pro forma for each day that any laundering activity

took place during the monitoring period. Similar to the

original questionnaire, this included contextual as well

direct information – for example, heating and ventilation

measures adopted. The human element inherent in the

diary recordings introduced the issue of quality into an

otherwise quantitative process of data collection. However,

it proved invaluable in the quest to isolate the moisture

impact of events such as passive indoor drying. Masking of

this activity by the presence of occupants, and their own

output of moisture along with that produced by other ‘wet’

activities, proved to be the norm. Migration of moisture from

space to space and occasional marked ingress of humid

ambient air through open windows were added

complications. Nevertheless, careful sifting of all available

data in all 22 of the case studies did yield a positive result.

In terms of challenge, what this involves is not simply

identifying averages, maxima and minima, from spreadsheets

of data, but getting into the specifics of family habits and

doing a great deal of cross-referencing from the available

sources. In this regard, the initial questionnaires of all 100

households and the detailed day-to-day diaries of the 22

monitored case studies were initially compared with each

other for consistency, and thereafter correlated with

measured tabular data and graphs. In addition, appliances

had to be checked with manufacturers’ sources. For example,

a householder’s assertion that the tumble dryer was of the

condensing type was found to be false when large hikes in

relative humidity corresponded with tumble drying; the

explanation being that the dryer was in fact a simple venting

type, but with no venting taking place other than directly into

the host room. By contrast, data for other vented dryers

indicated much more modest increases in humidity during

drying cycles, these consistent with some backdraught

ingress of moisture through windows held ajar to facilitate

venting of a flexible hose. Again, this involved some

painstaking cross-referral of diaries and measurement, and

the work also yielded different results for householders who

were using condensing dryers – i.e. with no perceptible rise in

indoor humidity. Other cross-checking for consistency

included entries in the original questionnaire as to rooms

used for passive indoor drying, and related habits concerning

heat and ventilation, with corresponding entries in the diary

during monitoring.

Page 63: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

63

This process of ‘digging’ into relevant habits of the 22 ‘case

study’ households, essentially in order to identify a narrative of

similarity and difference between them, ultimately constituted

the core of the MEARU technical report – a ‘quarry’ from which

outputs such as The Design Guide and technical papers were

excavated. The linked comparative analytical process, began

by contrasting a household where all drying was done by a

communal tumble-drying facility to one where it was all done

passively indoors; and ended with a pair with contrasting

demographics, seasons, construction type and heating

systems, but the same approach to indoor drying. There were

no short cuts – all 22 case studies were thoroughly examined,

even though the quality of diary keeping varied considerably.

Summary tables and key observations follow the set of

individual sections on each household. In turn, data from all 100

households surveyed is examined, again including summary

tables and observations. References conclude the report after

appendices – e.g. measured ironing experiments and statistical

analysis – and the two sets of observations are synthesised as

conclusions in the initial executive summary.

Some conclusions were initially provisional as the entire survey

and monitoring process by MEARU related to partly parallel and

partly sequential lines of investigation by RICH and ESRU.

Aside from the analysis of air samples, the role of RICH was to

investigate and quantify the moisture behaviour of particular

building materials; this information along with that of MEARU

then enabling enhanced modelling by ESRU. On the one hand

the latter was concerned with quantifying the energy and

environmental impacts of passive drying in rooms, using

scenarios derived from the MEARU case studies, but with the

ability to systematically control key variables. On the other

hand, the modelling also focussed on testing the viability of a

specific potential solution – passive drying but in a small

‘quarantined’ heated and ventilated space. This included testing

various lining materials and ventilation control protocols.

The underlying design strategy of such modelling was that

what could work for a minimal drying cupboard could work in

larger dual-purpose spaces such as utility room or sun-

porches, always providing the exhaust air is prevented from

circulating within the other parts of the dwelling. One driver

for this particular line of the research was the key finding

arising from the air-sampling opportunity – “a strong

association between the concentration of mould spores and

the presence of passive indoor drying” – and the potential

heath implications immanent in this finding. The other drivers

were that passive drying indoors tended to be inherently

energy profligate, as well as adding to risk of increased dust

mite populations; while the primary energy consumption of

electricity for tumble dryers was high, older appliances

involved further detriment in terms of added space heating

demand and added humidity. Moreover, it was commonly

agreed by respondents that tumble drying was not

satisfactory for all types of material, and tended to be

associated with a greater incidence of ironing; this activity

possibly adding to the issues of VOCs associated with

unregulated fragrances.

The science itself proved quite challenging. There was an

expectation at project-planning stage that hygroscopic

(moisture-absorbent) linings to ‘wet’ rooms would help to

moderate humidity peaks; in other words act as a ‘moisture

buffer’, this based on a considerable body of work by others

(Salonvaara et al, 2004; Rode et al, 2005; Mortensen et al,

2005); later augmented during the course of the project

(Janssen and Roels, 2009; Vereeken et al, 2011). Laboratory

work by RICH confirmed that particular materials such as

untreated clay board would absorb considerably more

moisture than more usual materials such as painted

plasterboard at high ranges of humidity. However, simulations

by ESRU of minimal drying cupboard revealed that the small

area of lining material would only be marginally useful in

reducing such peaks, whereas the systems of ventilation and

their rates of exhaust were influential (Kelly et al, 2012).

Page 64: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

64

In other words, the holistic linkages were complex. In

addressing all of the above under the sub-heading

‘challenges’, the aphorism of Gregory Bateson (1979)

seems apposite: “Science probes; it does not prove.” And in

such a probing quest, the words of renowned architect

Serge Chermayeff and his colleague Alexander Tzonis

(1971) also have resonance: “Rationality as a system of

procedure in problem solving does not inhibit inspiration.

Inspiration is a special moment in a rational process, which

acts as an accelerator on the path towards the desired

goal.”

In this instance metaphoric braking and gear changing

curtailed such acceleration. For example, the lack of any

coherent association between concentration of airborne

spore and visible evidence of mould growth was initially

puzzling as there was apparent logic behind such a link

(although the same absence was also found in the work of

other researchers). The association that was found may not

have been inspirational, but, given all the other potential

influences, it was relatively unexpected and quite an

exciting moment in the lengthy research endeavour. Again,

although the statistical analysis is a validated formulaic

software process, with averages as the starting point, there

was a collateral process of finding the logic behind specific

outliers in the ‘box plots’.

Another line of investigation that proved more challenging

than expected was one of a ‘what if?’ nature. Specifically, if

the Passivhaus standard were achieved for space heating

and a commensurate standard for water heating, what would

be the proportion left within the overall primary energy limit for

power, and what proportion of this would be consumed by

laundering appliances? This proved to be another major line

of enquiry, involving a further review of relevant literature,

notably that relating to the Market Transformation Programme

of DEFRA1, which was progressing at the same time as the

Glasgow laundering investigation. In this quest, even the

overall efficiency of grid electricity from its various generating

sources to its metered consumption in homes is not as

straightforward to acquire as one might imagine (DEFRA,

2011). However, setting the issue of primary energy

consumption to one side, it suffices to say here that the

Glasgow survey indicated consumption for laundering

appliances was below DEFRA’s estimated UK average,

especially for tumble-drying. Even so, the amount consumed

by them was significant and the overall Passivhaus standard

very hard to achieve, especially for small floor areas.

And if such findings represented view-points along the

research journey, there was one significant set-back or

metaphoric breakdown at a critical stage close to the

destination – a fire seated in the heart of ESRU’s domain,

with consequent problems of cleaning computers, recovering

data, re-running simulations and so forth. Fires are of course

commonly caused by human frailty, but errors are not

confined to such dramatic and infrequent events. For

example, it can occur relatively easily in transcribing data

from spreadsheets – e.g. wrong address, wrong room, or

wrong variable – and, even within a single table, transposition

into the wrong row or column can occur. And not all recorded

data is reliable – e.g. if an indoor sensor is placed on a wall,

which can be in the path of direct sunlight, it will give

erroneous readings for key environmental parameters.

Page 65: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

65

Moreover, the adage ‘rubbish in, rubbish out’ remains a human

risk regardless of the mathematical sophistication of a dynamic

simulation programme. Knowing an approximate answer in

advance is useful, but back-of-envelope calculations can also

be misleading – e.g. where a short time-step influence such as

evaporative cooling in a confined space is involved.

Concluding thoughts

The above ruminations of opportunities and challenges serve to

emphasise the continuity of research – one finding leading to

another in ever widening circles rather like the ripples of a

stone, or perhaps a series of stones, landing in still water. A

clear case has been made that domestic laundering is

environmentally significant, and that part of that significance

relates to public health, which in turn implies a need for a

specific lines of new epidemiological research. The combined

implications for energy efficiency and health imply a high level

of socio-economic impact. A related area could be the issue of

chemical contaminants in grey waste water; this in turn raising

issues such as water management and conservation, and heat

recovery from waste water. Another part of the significance is

the need for relatively minor, but important, changes to both

statutory standards and best practice. This is the main

message of the Design Guide: Healthy Low Energy Home

Laundering. However, other aspects of the guide are aimed

more at cultural changes and business opportunities. For

example, putting both together, there are opportunities for

reverting to more communal laundering facilities, but ones that

take advantage of modern technology – e.g. using the heat

from combined heat and power (CHP) generation to offset

drying energy. Other more esoteric papers to be published in

journals will be of interest to more specialised spheres of

research and knowledge transfer.

In general terms, the fit of this research project lies within two

overlapping regions of interest – firstly, energy efficiency

(ranging from fuel poverty to global warming), secondly, public

health (with various allergic reactions and respiratory ailments

to the fore).

A key energy-health mediator is indoor air quality (with mould

spores, mites and VOCs in the frame). Back in the 19th and

first two thirds of the 20th century, health held sway. Now we

need to find workable ways of reconciling health and energy

efficiency. At present we seem to be too complacent about

the efficacy of technical solutions – e.g. mechanical heat

recovery ventilation – where there are evident pitfalls, some

technical design issues, some technical quality control issues,

some human control issues. We say “seal tight, ventilate

right” and we now commonly achieve the former, but rarely

the latter. Above all, it is the vagaries of all such factors in

combination, creating such a complexity of interactive

variables that it seems we must rely more on theories of

probability and fuzzy logic. Whatever scientific approaches

are used to analyse, synthesise and enlighten, ultimately it is

primarily our democratically elected representatives and their

officials that we must rely on to initiate appropriate action,

and, even more essential, to follow though on it.

Notes

1) DEFRA = Department of Environment, Food and Rural

Affairs; with logo versions of the acronym used such as ‘defra’

or ‘Defra’.

Acknowledgements

The financial support of the Engineering and Physical

Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Contract:

EP/G00028X/1, is gratefully acknowledged, as is the

unstinting support of all colleagues associated with the

project in MEARU, RICH and ESRU (full list in Design Guide),

all the housing associations and individual householders who

cooperated with the surveys and monitoring, and finally the

invaluable library support at The Glasgow School of Art.

Page 66: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

66

Drying on balconies or verandas is reasonably convenient, perfectly healthy, and consumes no energy.

Page 67: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

67

REFERENCES Arlian, L. G. and Veselica, M. M. (1981) ‘Re-evaluation of the humidity requirements of the house dust-mites

Dermatatophagoides farinae’, Journal of Medical Entomology, Vol 18, 351. Arundel, A. V., Sterling, E. M., Biggin, J. H. and Sterling, T. D. (1986) ‘Indirect Health Effects of Relative Humidity in Indoor

Environments’, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 65, 351-361. Bateson, G. (1979) Ch. 1, Introduction, in Mind and Nature, A Necessary Unity, Wildwood House, London, UK, 30. Caress, M S. and Steinemann, A. C. (2009) ‘Prevalence of Fragrance Sensitivity in the American Population’, Journal of

Environmental Health, Vol 71, No. 7, 46-50. Chermayeff, S. and Tzonis, A. (1971) Ch. 8, Hierarchy of Community, in Shape of Community, Realization of Human Potential,

Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK, 179. Cramer, R. A., Rivera, A. and Hohl, T. M. (2011), ‘Immune responses against Aspergillus fumigatus: what have we learned?’,

Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 24, 315-322. Cunningham, M. J. (1998). ‘Direct measurements of temperature and humidity in dust mite microhabitats, Clinical and

Experimental Allergy, Vol 28, 1104-1102. DEFRA (2011) 2011 Guidelines to Defra/DECC’s GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting: Methodology Paper for

Emission Factors, www.defra.gov.uk, 14 & 17. Haas, D., Habib, J, Galler, H., Buzina, W., Schlacher, R., Marth, E, and Reinthaler, F. F. (2007) ‘Assessment of indoor air in

Austrian apartments with and without visible mold growth’, Atmospheric Environment, 41, 5192-5201. Institute of Medicine (2000) ‘Executive Summary’ and Ch 5 ‘Indoor Biologic Exposures’, in Clearing the Air, Asthma and Indoor

Exposures, National Academic Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp5 in 1-18 & 144, 165 in 105-222. Janssen, H. and Roels, S. (2009) ‘Quantitative and qualitative assessment of interior moisture buffering by enclosures’, Energy

and Buildings, 41, 382-394. Kelly, N. J. K., Markopoulos, A. and Strachan, P. A. (2012) EPSRC Research Project EP/G00028X/1 Environmental Assessment

of Domestic Laundering Final Modelling Report, ESRU, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2003) Health Protection Act, Instructions regarding physical, chemical and biological factors

in housing, Guidebook No 1, Finland (Finnish). Mortensen, L. H., Rode C. and Peuhkuri, R. (2005) ‘Full scale tests of moisture buffer capacity of wall materials, in Proceedings

of 7th Nordic Symposium on Building Physics, Reykjavik, Iceland, 662-669.

Niven, R. McL., Fletcher, A. M., Pickering A. C., Custovic, A., Sivour, J. B., Preece, A. R., Oldham, L. A. and Francis, H. C. (1999) ‘Attempting to control mite allergens with mechanical ventilation and dehumidification in British houses’, Journal of Allergy Clinical Immunology, May 1999, 756-762.

Platts-Mills, T. A. E. and De Weck, A. L. (1989) ‘Dust mite allergens and asthma – A worldwide problem’, Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Vol 83, 416-427.

Porteous, C. D. A., Sharpe, T. R., Menon, R., Shearer, D., Baker, P. H., Sanders, C., Strachan, P. A., Kelly, N. J., Markopoulos, A. and Musa, H. (2012) EPSRC Research Project EP/G00028X/1 Environmental Assessment of Domestic Laundering, Technical Report Project Module 1, MEARU, The Glasgow School of Art, Glasgow.

Reponen, T., Nevalainen, A., Jantunen, N, Pellikka, M. and Kalliokoski, P. (1992) ‘Normal Range Criteria for Indoor Air Bacteria and Fungal Spores in a Subarctic Climate, Indoor Air, Vol 2, 26-31.

Rode C., Peuhkuri, R., Hansen, K. K., Time, B., Svennberg, K., Arfvidsson, J, and Ojanen, T. (2005) ‘Nordtest Project on Moisture Buffer Value of Materials, in Proceedings of AIVC Conference ‘Energy performance regulation’, Brussels, Belgium.

Roussel, S., Reboux, G., Bellanger, A-P, Sornin, S., Grenouillet, F., Dalphin, J-C, Piarroux, R and Millon, L. (2008) ‘Characteristics of dwellings contaminated by moulds’, Journal of Environmental Monitoring, No 10, 724-729.

Salonvaara, M., Ojanen, T., Holm, A., Kunzel, H. M. and Karagiozis, A. N. (2004) ‘Moisture Buffering Effects on Indoor Air Quality – Experimental and Simulation Results’, in Proceedings of Buildings IX (THERM) International Conference, Clearwater, Florida.

Steinemann, A. C., Gallagher, L. G., Davis, A. L. and MacGregor, I. C. (2008) ‘Chemical Emissions from Residential Dryer Vents During Use of Fragranced Laundry Products’, Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1SSN 1873-9318.

Steinemann, A. C. (2009) ‘Fragranced consumer products and undisclosed ingredients’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 32-38.

University of Cambridge (2011) ‘Fungi and Lichens’, Map of Life, http://www.mapoflife.org/browse/category_30_fungi-and-lichens/

Vereeken, E., Roels, S. and Janssen, H. (2009) ‘In situ determination of the moisture buffer potential of room enclosures, Journal of Building Physics, 34(3), 223-246.

WHO Regional Office for Europe (2009) WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: dampness and mould, 40, ISBN: 7989289041683.

Page 68: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

68

Towards Low Technology - Higher Performance Architecture:

Potentials of Alternative Construction in West Scotland

Bianca-Daniela Ion, University of Strathclyde Glasgow

Considering current problems in matters of sustainability that

holistically affect economic, social, political and environmental

concerns, numerous reasons suggest a change of mindset in

design and construction approaches to be beneficial and

necessary in order to tackle building impact. The construction

industry is highly correlated to the emergence and

sustainment of these problems; over 50% of the planets’

resources are transformed into construction materials and

building operation alone is responsible for 42% of the final

energy consumption and 35% of all green house gas

emissions in the EU. Furthermore, the construction industry is

one of the biggest contributors to the provision of employment

and a stable economy. With this overall impact on

environment and human lives, the sector is largely

accountable to the reduction biodiversity and causing

environmental deprivation, however, as such it also has great

potential to contribute to long‐term sustainability.

The notion of Low Technology in architecture provides a

holistic response to all this problems. It is based on the

principles of simple function, ease of manufacture, ease of

use, robustness and ease of maintenance. The concept has a

history of at least 3000 years, during which knowledge of

nature and climate has been passed on from generation to

generation ensuring building suitability to site, local weather

conditions, long lifecycles and good levels of comfort. In

contrast to the popular notion of High Tech, which relies on a

strategy of compensation aiming to balance out inner climate

conditions with intelligent building technology, Low Tech

interacts directly with site and climate in order to minimise

energy demand by taking advantage of material properties

combining these with architectural and constructive

measures.

A direct dialog between indoor and outdoor climate is

achieved by using simple but strategic design and

regionally available natural materials such as earth, straw

or hemp.

The question of locality as a response to the mitigation of

global warming has been prevailing since the 1992 UN

Conference on Environment and Development and the

presentation of the Agenda 21, which states that the

solutions to global problems are individually tailored local

approaches. For developed countries, which use

disproportional amounts of resources to their population

size, this requires a major swift towards energy

conservation in building design. However, the whole extent

of the industry also plays an important part within this

process starting with the utilisation of local, indigenous and

benign materials. In Scotland, due to the climate with a

yearly average relative humidity of 82%1 and strong winds,

the use of regional materials is challenging on all levels –

from extraction to construction. However, a growing

industry-wide interest suggests potential of alternatives to

common materials as it is realised that technology cannot

provide the ultimate solution to a problem it has caused.

In order to test the potentials of natural materials in the

climate of west Scotland, a building site in Glasgow (Figure

1) was chosen as a basis for examination of performance,

strategic building orientation and overall suitability of natural

materials in a residential context. It is estimated that

approximately a quarter of the total building total stock will

be new build by 2050.

Page 69: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

69

Figure 1. Project Site

To date, the residential sector is responsible for a yearly

amount of 25 to 27% of the total economy carbon emissions

and deep emission cuts are hence an imperative if the

government set targets of 80% emission reduction by 2050

as well as the 2016 zero carbon policy for new build homes

are to be achieved.

The current poor performance of buildings throughout the

U.K. however, are limiting new property carbon emissions

allowances to a minimum2 while stricter regulations make

building increasingly unaffordable - potentially kindling a

housing crisis and inherent social problems3.

Page 70: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

70

Figure 2. Project Structure

Accordingly, housing urgently requires innovation, thus a

building model of semi-detached house was developed for

research purposes. The building complies with current

Scottish Building Regulations and was tested in a whole-

building computer simulation using WUFI software for

hygrothermal building modelling. The program ensures

realistic results as it is validated through laboratory as well

as field testing by the renowned Fraunhofer Institute of

Building Physics. It includes output of inner temperatures,

inner relative humidity, mould growth conditions, heat gain

and loss as well as operational energy requirements for

achieving a set comfort profile. Accordingly, building

performance was investigated in passive scenarios as well

as including HVAC and operational cost effectiveness.

Environmental sustainability was evaluated via a calculation

of embodied energy and embodied carbon.

Six natural materials categorised in thermal mass

(Rammed Earth and Cob), insulation (Straw Bale and

Hemp-Lime) and hybrid construction (Light Clay and Adobe

Hybrid), were tested against a Timber Frame Base Case in

two case studies with east and south main facade

orientation (Figure 2). Timber frame is currently the most

popular construction method in Scottish new housing with

67.8%1 despite the country’s comparatively low account of

woodland – 19% compared to EU average of 42%4 - thus

rendering ecological aspects of timber construction rather

moot.

However, research findings highlighted an overall good

performance of materials and the Low Tech approach and

thus adequacy of alternative materials to the Scottish

climate.

Page 71: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

71

Figure 3. Thermal Transmittance (U-Value)

U-values of the case-dependent wall assemblies directly

indicating their thermal properties (Figure 3). The Timber

Frame Base Case marks the current standard set by the 2011

Scottish building regulations at 0.25 W/m²K. The simulation

showed that bare thermal mass assemblies consisting of

solely Rammed Earth or Cob are unable to perform to current

requirements, however, the insulation and hybrid construction

Straw Bale, Hemp-Lime, Light-Clay and Adobe Hybrid not

only over-perform but also achieve the much stricter

Passivhaus requirements for thermal transmittance of 0.15

W/m²K.

On this basis, the influence of strategic building orientation

was examined. In order to do so, all material scenarios had to

be investigated for achievable passive conditions – excluding

HVAC. The whole-building simulation attained overall higher

mean temperatures, lower relative humidity and fewer heat

loss with a south facing main facade as opposed to an east

facing front. Accordingly, the essential challenge to test the

potentials of solar gains in Glasgow’s rainy climate has

exposed the existence of potentials to be expanded upon.

However, the simulation further showed that a building

constructed entirely from natural materials would not

significantly benefit from the heat storage capacity of

internal building elements such as floors and separating

walls (Figure 4). A hybrid construction of common building

elements and external walls from Straw Bale, Hemp-Lime

or Light Clay achieves the highest inner temperature.

However, compared to industrial materials, all natural

materials majorly benefit from their moisture regulative and

natural desiccation properties, which is especially important

for humid climates. According to findings of the Fraunhofer

Institute of Building Physics the ideal relative humidity in

enclosed spaces is between 30 and 70%. The maintenance

of the ideal humidity is not only important for material

performance but moreover for occupant’s health and

comfort. Hydration of the building material can impair

insulative properties and lead to irreversible damage to

occupants’ health caused by mould growth.

Figure 4. Passive Inner Climate

Page 72: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

72

Figure 5. Favourable Conditions for Mould Growth

There is generally accepted connection between poor housing

and ill health; however, studies conducted in Glasgow6 show

that the highest risk to health in housing is attached to cold,

damp and mouldy conditions suggesting a direct link between

cold and excess mortality rates. Typically, there are 20,000

more deaths recorded between January and March than

average U.K. yearly rates, which is correlated to respiratory

conditions as a main cause and found two to three times more

likely to occur with patients living in damp homes. Furthermore,

dampness within or around building elements influences their

thermal performance due to conductivity changes and can

cause damage to the construction via mechanical forces such

as contraction, expansion or stress. However, the research

findings for a passive building showed that the insulation

models Straw Bale and Hemp-Lime perform best and keep

inner relative humidity to around 65%; the Base Case however,

with results around 70%, would require dehumidification to

safeguard from moisture induced damage. Figure 5 further

details the invaluable moisture regulative properties of natural

materials.

The holistic building performance simulation in WUFI

calculates typical hygrothermal effects - such as moisture

sources and sinks inside a room and moisture input from

the envelope – thus exposing mould growth potential with a

building.

Accordingly, the total risk of fungal growth is significantly

higher in the mixed construction building models than in the

buildings, which are exclusively built from natural materials.

The indication that mould is more likely to develop within

the inorganic substrate might seem unorthodox however, is

explicable considering Glasgow’s extremely humid climate

and the fact that most materials are capable of sustaining

mould growth if the conditions for desiccation do not exist.

A constant combination of substrate, nutrients such as

debris from dust and skin-cells, and humidity will develop

fungi between 24 hours and 10 days of the provision of the

growing conditions7. Accordingly, Figure 5 shows the

continuous hours of mould growth allows an accurate

conclusion of mould growth risk within the different

constructions. The graph reveals that the buildings from

predominantly natural materials are at the lowest risk of

developing fungi due to their moisture regulating properties

that make substrates unsuitable for mould thus ensuring

lasting prevention. Common materials often use biocides,

which work for limited time only and often cause allergic

reactions and other health issues. Reasonably, adding

reactive Ventilation and Air Conditioning systems (HVAC)

that balances out harmful climate preconditions eliminates

mould growth potential. The system keeps relative humidity

to an ideal of 52 to 55% indifferent of the construction

however with highly varying requirements of operative

energy and therefore cost.

Page 73: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

73

A calculation of energy cost from energy requirements

according to WUFI directly compares cost effectiveness of

alternatives to the majority of current Scottish construction in

timber frame. The average energy consumption for space

heating in U.K. dwellings built after 2000 is about 140 kWh

per square metre per year (kWh/m²a) according to BRE

estimates. The continuous tightening of building regulations

over the years however, show their positive effect in the Base

Case (0), which only minimally surpasses the EU definition of

Low Energy Buildings that is a use of 40 to 60 kWh/m²a for

space heating. Straw Bale, Hemp-Lime and Light Clay

however match the requirements in all scenarios (Figure 6).

However, to put energy efficiency in monetary terms, it was

assumed that all energy demand is covered by standard

electricity at a rate of £0.1125 per kWh excluding annual fixed

cost. Hemp‐ Lime (Case 4) is the most cost-effective with

monthly costs of £54.43 (£653.16 a year) for a 88.5 m²

house. Operational cost of Light Clay (5), Straw‐ Bale (3) and

Adobe Hybrid (6) are lower than the Base Case (0) running

cost of £61.56 a month, however compared to the heating

cost of Cob and thus the existing U.K. housing stock, all afore

mentioned cases are approximately twice as energy and cost

effective (Figure 7).

Figure 6. Operational Energy per square metre

Figure 7. Operational Cost

Page 74: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

74

Finally, regional appropriateness of alternative materials is a

question of environmental sustainability. It has to be pointed out

that this is a particularly ambivalent endeavour that will

probably never be fully convertible and comparable in numbers.

However, for research purposes, a calculation of Embodied

Energy (EE) and Embodied Carbon (EC) per square meter was

undertaken.

Transport to site can often make a significant contribution the

overall EE and EC values, therefore a close comparison

especially within a regional context is important. Available data8

for EE and EC gives numbers for energy use from material

extraction to factory gate (‘cradle to gate’). Accordingly, the

average distance to site was included to the cradle‐to‐gate

results by adding energy use data of 2.19 MJ per km and

carbon emissions of 1.12 kgCO2 per km9. Due to lorry capacity,

limits on transportation are either imposed by maximum weight

or volume, resulting in U.K. average hauling distances of 242.6

miles (390.42 km) by volume and 106.8 miles (171.9 km) by

weight.

There is an ambiguity within the topic of local materials and

transport. The U.S. green building certification system LEED for

example, defines material sourcing within a radius of 500 miles

(805 km) as local. The paradox within the topic of natural

materials however are the high gauges of around 500 mm

necessary for basic assembly, but shorter average

transportation distance for high density materials, which is

clearly derived from industrial practice. Despite the fact that

subjecting earth for instance, to a 172 km drive to site sounds

absurd, assembly width alone would suggest that reasoning

according to common practice is questionable in this case. It is

generally possible to source materials locally from farms or the

site itself as many completed Low Tech projects have shown.

Accordingly, both, the application of haulage as well as

disregarding transport emissions have a rationale in a

discussion on alternative construction - the former for

consideration of large-scale developments, which might

include prefabricated components, and the latter for one-off

projects and self-build.

In terms of sustainability however, the thermal mass

models Rammed Earth and Cob, which proved unfit for

purpose and climate, are among the most sustainable.

Including transport, Cob has the lowest EE in all scenarios.

Despite their 500 mm thick walls, this suggests that further

investigations and development of the material has grounds

for adaptation of material to fit the Scottish climate.

However, excluding transport and despite its thick walls, the

Straw Bale model has the overall lowest EE per m² in all

Scenarios. In comparison, the Timber Frame Base Case

has an EE of approximately 720 MJ/m² higher than the

Straw Bale construction although its walls measure only

200 mm compared to 340 mm in Straw Bale.

Generally, the research found evidence supporting an

alternative to industrial construction methods without

compromising comfort standards. The hygrothermal

computer simulation in WUFI gave the overall best results

for the insulation models Hemp‐Lime and Straw Bale,

followed by the hybrid models Light Clay and Adobe Hybrid,

which combine insulation and thermal mass. Despite their

basic assembly, these cases performed comparably to the

Timber Frame Base Case, thus to current building

regulations, and at times even to Passivhaus standard.

Page 75: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

RESEARCH …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

75

Growing interest in these alternatives motivated by the

realisation that building efficiency targets are increasingly

difficult to reach with industrial construction methods in an

economy‐ driven world, suggests that the market demand will

be rapidly growing as well. However, current developments

further indicate that the implementation of local materials and

construction methods are necessary for construction to move

towards a circular economy10

, which is based on a

transformation of the familiar linear model – ‘take, make,

dispose’ – into a cyclical model. Construction has to focus on

using goods more intensively and materials to their full

potential, extending life-cycles and designing for eventual

dismantling in order to achieve government aims such as

Scotland’s Zero Waste Plan.

In summary, natural material construction benefits from a high

sustainable and thermal performance while being potentially

cheaper than industrial construction. Drawbacks are currently

resulting from a lack of research especially in Scotland, local

suppliers and experienced planners and labour force. This

creates major hurdles towards a wider acceptance as the

U.K. construction industry is rather generally suspicious

towards innovation and will most likely only be persuaded by

an economic argument.

However, it is only logical that prevailing technological

solutions in material resourcing, production and building

operation cannot provide sustainable, long-term solutions and

while it has to be highlighted that the performance of the best

cases is not significantly better than Base Case results, they

proved to be at the least comparable despite their simple

assembly while surpassing in environmental, economic and

health concerns. In order to ensure continuing survival on the

planet society must strive to become more sustainable as a

whole. As such, sustainability has to be addressed in a

holistic manner considering every aspect of human lives.

Accordingly, Low Tech provides many basic answers to

today’s conundrums.

Figure 8. Embodied Energy and Embodied Carbon per Square metre

_______________________________________ 1 www.meteonorm.com

2 Boardman 2007. Home Truths: A Low-Carbon Strategy to Reduce UK

Housing Emissions by 80%by 2050. Oxford: University of Oxford’s Environmental Change Institute. 3 Barker 2004. Delivering Stability: Securing our Future Housing

Needs. Review of Housing Supply.Final Report-Recommendations.

London: Crown. 4 UK Timber Frame Association: www.uktfa.com

5 EuroStat 2010. Environmental statistics and accounts in Europe:

2010 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 6 Wilkinson 1999. Poor Housing and Ill Health – A Summary of

Research Evidence. The Scottish Office Central Research Unit 7 Sedlbauer 2001. Vorhersage von Schimmelpilzbildung auf und in

Bauteilen. Thesis (PhD). Lehrstuhl für Bauphysik, Universität Stuttgart. 8 Hammond and Jones 2008. Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE).

University of Bath. 9 Vanek and Campbell 1999. UK road freight energy use by product: trends and analysis from 1985 to 1995. Transport Policy. Volume 6, Issue 1, p 236-246. 10

The work will be presented at the conference “The Circular Economy: New Opportunities for Design and Construction in Scotland" to be held at the University of Strathclyde on the 1st June 2012. For information see pages 22-23 of this issue of Innovation Review.

Page 76: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

76

Fife Housing Innovation Showcase

Bill Banks, Kingdom Housing Association

Fig. 1 Site masterplan

Owned and managed by Kingdom Housing Association, Dunlin Drive, Dunfermline, was chosen as the site for a five phase

master plan to build 121 new affordable homes. The showcase element is the first phase of 27 new homes for social rent.

Fig. 1. Site perspective

Page 77: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

BEST PRACTICE …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

77

Main Aims and Objectives

The main objective of the showcase is to develop different

forms of Modern Methods of Construction, which demonstrate

design flexibility and have the ability to be integrated into

larger developments. They must also have the capabilities to

be mainstreamed across larger affordable housing

programmes.

The main aims of the showcase are to:

Test and demonstrate different house systems and

renewable technologies.

Test the cost, energy performance and flexibility of a

number of new systems.

Trial and promote sustainable housing products.

Let the construction industry itself showcase new and

innovative products.

Deliver wider Community Benefits across the

showcase.

Promote affordable housing in Fife.

Showcase sustainable housing methods.

Partnership

The showcase is a partnership between Kingdom Housing

Association, Fife Council and 10 different House System

Providers / Developers. The project is also supported by Fife

Construction Forum and Green Business Fife Network.

Training opportunities for the showcase are being progressed

through Fife Works and Opportunities Fife and educational

activities are also being progressed with the local primary

schools, Carnegie, Adam Smith and Elmwood Colleges and

St Andrews and Napier Universities.

Funding

The Showcase cost is £3.5 million and funding assistance

has been provided by the Scottish Government, Fife Council

2nd

Homes Council Tax Fund and private finance through

Kingdom Housing Association.

Page 78: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

78

House System Providers We initially received over 150 registrations of interest from which 10 different house systems were selected.

House System

Provider House System Description

Powerwall Space Frame Systems / Assist Architects

Powerwall Volumetic Space Frame

A structural steel frame Volumetic System can be designed to meet any client/architectural design.

The system achieves high performance in thermal, acoustic and air-tightness specification up to 22 storeys high.

Campion Homes Ltd / Scotframe

Scotframe Val-U-Therm

A closed panel system which uses injected polyurethane insulation to fully fill every millimetre within each panel.

A suite of thermal solution options are available which can produce a U value as low as 0.08W/m2K if required.

Stewart Milne Construction

Sigma II Build System

Higher levels of prefabrication, to reduce build process and materials waste.

A fabric 1st approach to carbon compliance, resulting in easy to use, comfortable and

low maintenance affordable housing.

Campion Homes Ltd / Porotherm

Porotherm Block System

A precision engineered clay block structural walling system.

Offers a modern construction method with the reassuringly traditional values of clay.

CUBE RE:treat Structural Insulated Panels

A Cost effective, environmental and energy efficient solution.

Constructed by assembling pre-manufactured panels that are heavily insulated, removing the need for additional insulation.

Campion Homes Ltd / Scottish Passive House Centre

1 x Passive House

1 x Standard Timber Frame House

A semi-detached 2 storey house accredited as built to Passive House standards.

The remaining semi-detached unit will be constructed to current standards providing a control against which the effectiveness of the enhanced Passive House standards can be measured.

Future Affordable Closed Panel Wall System

A K2 wall system, designed to minimise cold bridging and be pre-fabricated from small section Scottish timber, each of the 3 houses being built will be constructed using different building regulations i.e. 2010, 2013 & 2016.

Thermobond insulation quilt, manufactured from recycled textiles sourced primarily from Scottish woollen mills.

Lomond Homes Lomond Breathing Wall

A high performance, cutting-edge construction technology.

Highly insulated, timber-framed, external wall construction, using dynamic insulation to recover and recycle heat energy which would otherwise be lost to the outside air.

CCG OSM IQ (Off Site) Building System

An IQ System to deliver closed panel, timber frame, wall, roof and floor cassette panels for domestic and non-domestic buildings using off-site construction.

Can deliver low energy, low carbon, zero carbon and Passivhaus building performance levels, using a multitude of building components, from natural, breathable & hygrgroscopic, through to high performance, hi-technology methods.

Bobin Developments Beco Wall Form Integrated Concrete Formwork

Block components lock together to provide a formwork system into which concrete is poured.

Upon setting, the concrete becomes a high strength structure and the form work remains in place as thermal insulation.

Page 79: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

BEST PRACTICE …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

79

Fig. 2 Infrastructure Works Start

Infrastructure Works

Campion Homes, one of Kingdom Housing Association’s

framework contractors is carrying out the main infrastructure

works on the site, installing services and providing serviced

plots for the house system providers.

Framework Consultants

The following Framework Consultants have also been

appointed to work on the Showcase. These Consultants will

also be appointed for the other phases on the Showcase;

Hardies – Employers Agent / CDM Co-ordinator

Oliver & Robb – Architects

Scott Bennett Associated – Engineers

Renewables

Various types of renewable technologies are being

incorporated into the properties. Some of the renewables

were integrated into the original house type design as they

are required to meet current building regulations.

Enhanced renewables have also been incorporated into

some of the units.

Programme

The infrastructure work started on site in September 2011

and the first house building began in November 2011. The

properties were completed at the end of April 2012.

Exhibition

An Exhibition to showcase the products, services and

technologies, related to the properties, was held from 15th

May until 31 May 2012.

It included a week long programme of media visits, technical

tours, seminars and visits from education groups, followed by

a further period of two weeks for organised tours and open

viewings. This was also an opportunity for other consultants,

contractors and suppliers to showcase their own sustainable

products and services.

Monitoring and Evaluation

The monitoring and evaluation programme is also being

progressed in conjunction with Napier University and other

key partners.

The monitoring and evaluation programme will proved and

analysis of performance outputs and include a post

occupancy study.

Fig. 3 Works on site

Page 80: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

80

Block 2 –Scotframe Val.U-Therm System

Block 4 - Porotherm System

Block 5 - Structural Insulated Panels

Block 6 Passive House, Kingdom Control House

Block 3 - Sigma II Build System

Block 10, Beco Wall Form System

Page 81: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

BEST PRACTICE …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

81

Block 7 – Future Affordable, Closed Panel System

Block 8 - Lomond Breathing Wall System

Block 1 - Powerwall Volumetic Space frame

System, being manufactured in the factory

Block 9 – IQ, Off-site Building System

Page 82: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

82

KATIE’S COTTAGE

Chris Hall & Micheal Holliday

Roots Design Workshop

Introduction

This article marks an important moment for Roots Design

Workshop: the completion of the practice’s first built project.

Although Katie’s Cottage sunroom extension is a relatively small

building this article will use the project as a case study to explore

issues which are common across the work of the practice: how

Roots receive commissions, approach design, and strive to

create buildings which are part of an evolving rural condition.

Roots Design Workshop

Roots Design Workshop (Roots) formed as part of a Masters

project at the University of Strathclyde in the summer of 2009

where the author’s recognised the lack of employment

opportunities in the recession and chose to set up a

hypothetical business as a student project. The business

would either fail spectacularly, which would lead to interesting

academic conclusions, or would succeed and leave the Part 2

student team with something to build upon when graduating.

Page 83: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

BEST PRACTICE …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

83

As part of this student project the team turned their focus away

from the university studio and decided to put themselves in a

position which academic studies hadn’t prepared them: working

with real people on real projects. The team set themselves up

as ‘architectural designers in residence’ on the Isle of Tiree,

where one of the authors was from. The team hosted ‘design

workshops’, in collaboration with an Environmental Engineering

student, where members of the public could approach the team

for advice on building projects which they had. This approach

was a success, leading to a number of direct commissions.

The process was documented by an independent film-maker

who was commissioned by SUST [4] and led to a Masters with

Distinction for the team members. The team built upon this

momentum and formally incorporated the practice in early 2010

with a business model that was informed by the student project;

Roots Design Workshop is therefore a mobile, accessible

architectural and environmental design practice who travel to

rural and isolated communities that do not usually have access

to professional design services.

This business model has led to Roots gaining Part 3

accreditation, winning the Shell LiveWIRE ‘Young Entrepreneur

of the Year’ - Scotland 2010, attending MacKay-Lyons

Sweetapple Architects ‘Ghost 13’ conference in Nova Scotia.

and being invited to present at the international Shetland Power

of Place conference and the Royal Society of Architects in

Wales annual conference.

This business model has also led to a number of commissions

across the country which allow Roots to work with community

groups and individuals on a varied range of projects. Roots’

accessible approach to the Architect-Client relationship is

informed by William Isaacs statement that “...dialogue is a

conversation in which people think together in relationship.

Thinking together implies that you no longer take your own

position as final. You relax your grip on certainty and listen to

the possibilities that result simply from being in a relationship

with others - possibilities that might not otherwise have

occurred” [2].

This approach has led to Roots learning much from residents

of rural communities who intuitively understand the

relationship between people, vernacular architecture,

contemporary design, the landscape and the climate. This

has evidently been the case on the Isle of Tiree, where the

student project first started and where Katie’s Cottage is

situated.

The Project

Isle of Tiree

The Isle of Tiree has been described as “Rìoghachd barr fo

thuinn; the Kingdom whose summits are lower than the

waves” [3]. This name, which still appears in romantic tales

indicates the natural topography of the island, which is

perhaps one of the lowest and flattest landscapes in Scotland.

This means that buildings feature prominently in the

landscape and views of the distinctive settlement patterns can

be seen from afar. Tiree is a Special Built Environment Area

within Argyll & Bute and the local Planning Department’s

‘Sustainable Design Guide’ states this requires that “the

island’s built form manifests for the most part a balanced and

unified historical and cultural tradition which new development

needs to respect” [1].

Roots have developed a deep understanding of these needs;

one of the Directors grew up there while the practice have

taken an active role in researching the vernacular thatched

houses, blackhouses and white houses. This understanding

allows Roots to make cogent proposals about alterations to

existing buildings or new-build projects.

Page 84: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

84

Katie's Cottage - Existing before the extension

Katie’s Cottage

Roots were invited to make one such proposal for a new extension

to the south gable of Ian and Elspeth Gillies’ existing white house

cottage on the Isle of Tiree following a successful introduction at

one an early ‘design workshops’. The brief was to create an

alternative living space to those in the cottage: one with more

natural light, greater views out and a contemporary language that

respected the existing building. Roots chose to acknowledge the

existing lean-to porch, which the Client had proudly built

themselves, by referencing its form and use of materials. In this way

the new extension would continue the evolutionary tradition of

adding to the building to suit modern circumstances, but in a way

which produced a coherent small building cluster.

The extension therefore takes on the form of a traditional lean-to,

but one made from a series of wall and roof planes that slide past

and over one another. This creates an internal space which can be

completely enclosed or open, made possible by three primary

design features: corner openings with a moveable glass wall, sliding

external shutters and an over-hanging standing seam zinc roof.

Ground Floor Plan

Section A

Page 85: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

BEST PRACTICE …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

85

Section B

Original Concept Sketch

Corner Openings with Moveable Glass Wall

A pair of cantilevered corner openings allow uninterrupted

views to three points of the compass, including the length of

Balephetrish Beach. This was made possible by David

Narro Associates (the project Structural Engineers) solution

of inter-locking edge beams with bat angle brackets and

holding down straps to the back span of the beam. Roof

joists were fixed to this and the gable wall on hangers. This

created cantilevered corner openings suitable for the

installation of the moveable glass wall.

View out towards Balephetrish Beach

A Sunparadise Monoslide 60 slide-and-stack system of

modular thermally broken aluminium panels created a

moveable glass wall in the South West corner opening. These

panels run on a single track and flush-close frames naviagate

the corner before being parked remotely. A Sunparadise

Supetherm 80 Fixed Panel and Single Door in the South East

corner provide an alternative access entrance (depending on

which direction the wind is blowing). Integrated venetian

blinds on a magnetic track provide shading while interlocking

EPDM seals and an additional protective coating finish

provide a weather rating suitable for the exposed maritime

site.

Page 86: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

86

Junction between moveable glass wall, timber cladding, sliding

shutters, zinc roof and existing wall

A Sunparadise Monoslide 60 slide-and-stack system of

modular thermally broken aluminium panels created a

moveable glass wall in the South West corner opening. These

panels run on a single track and flush-close frames naviagate

the corner before being parked remotely. A Sunparadise

Supetherm 80 Fixed Panel and Single Door in the South East

corner provide an alternative access entrance (depending on

which direction the wind is blowing). Integrated venetian blinds

on a magnetic track provide shading while interlocking EPDM

seals and an additional protective coating finish provide a

weather rating suitable for the exposed maritime site.

The installation of this system required close liaisons

between the Main Contractor, John MacKinnon Builders

Ltd, and the Sunparadise installation team, who hadn’t

worked on a remote Scottish island before. Tolerances of

within ±5mm were achieved on all structural openings so

the moveable glass wall, fixed unit and glass door were fully

installed in three working days to suit the ferry timetable

(not a normal concern for mainland projects but vital on an

island with limited transport connections).

Sliding Shutters

In order to protect the glazing from the worst of the winter

weather sliding external timber shutters were integrated into

the design. The were made by John MacKinnon Builders

Ltd using a solid larch frame and 19mm vertical tongue and

groove larch cladding, supplied by Russwood. This was

chosen to compliment the horizontal tongue and groove

cladding on the porch which the Client had proudly built and

stained with Beaumont Blue Cuprinol to match.

The shutters are hung using the Coburn Straightaway

700SS series. The top stainless steel channel (with

additional guides to avoid the shutters rattling in the wind)

are rebated into a frame which is concealed by a larch

fascia while the morticed bottom roller runs on a discrete

stainless steel track. The shutters are bottom hung to

reduce the load on the cantilevered corners which meant

the concrete haunch was laid to tolerances of ±3mm.

Standing Seam Zinc Roof The shallow-pitch roof was designed to compliment the

porch and to respect the original white house by ensuring it

did not protrude above the eaves line of the existing roof.

This was finished with pre-weathered graphite grey

standing seam zinc by Rheinzink to compliment the planar

nature of the windows and timber cladding.

Page 87: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

BEST PRACTICE …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

87

View from Balephetrish Beach with the extension completely open

Page 88: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

88

Although there were previously no standing seam zinc roofs on

the island Argyll & Bute Planning Department complimented

the contemporary design move during pre-application

discussions and encouraged a high level of quality and control.

Zinc fascias, verges, rainwater goods and step coverings were

also specified to achieve consistency through a limited palette

of materials. All zinc work was installed by HL Metals, who

undertook additional site visits before work started to ensure a

suitable substrate and to offer constructive suggestions to how

key details could be improved.

Construction Process

The authors are aware that this is not the first article to be

published in these pages which deals with the challenges

thrown up by this type of construction project but would

suggest that a build like this was ambitious as a first project to

go on-site immediately upon graduating. The clear channels of

communication established at the earliest ‘design workshops’,

on-going encouragement from the Client, and experience of

the local Contractor combined to ensure a smooth construction

process

Completion

The success of this project is down to an understanding by the

Client, Contractor and Consultants of how the extreme climate

effects buildings on Tiree; and the ability to integrate specialists

sub-contractors with no experience of these conditions.

There is a traditional Gaelic saying on Tiree: "An Iar's an ear

an dachaidh as fhearr - cul righri gaoith agus aghaidh ri ghrein"

which translates as "To east and west the house that's best -

back to the wind, face to the sun". Roots follow the advice in

this proverb on most projects in spite of modern technology.

However, the views from this site demanded openings on

three sides, which was satisfied by cantilevering corner

openings. Sliding timber shutters were added here to

protect from the worst of the winter weather. These

shutters also provide the occupants with control of their

environment; by being able to completely open or shut the

extension this passive approach to sustainability should

ensure the extension can be used year round rather than

only when the sun is out.

The Client encouraged a contemporary architectural

language which Roots were delighted to pursue. Upon

completion the Client has added a ground-mounted PV

array and has proposals for timber decking. In this way, the

sunroom extension quietly becomes subsumed in the latest

chapter of an evolving rural building cluster.

Conclusion

Roots Design Workshop formed following a student project

which explored whether Part 2 students could run a practice

in the current economic climate. Roots have proven this to

be possible and now have a sustainable business with a

number of live commissions. This is not because a mobile

office working in rural communities is intrinsically better

than other business models but rather because the model

perfectly suits the practice’s Directors and Clients; spending

time in communities, speaking with local people and

learning about place have each informed the practices

modus operandi.

This article has focussed on one project on the Isle of Tiree

but the practice have proactively applied these techniques

to projects or workshops in Shetland, the Uists, Inverness,

Coll, Mull and Iona. This has led to recognition, invitations

to lecture and Part 3 accreditation.

Page 89: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

BEST PRACTICE …

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

89

Roots are pleased to have successfully delivered their first

building on-site and to have worked with such a supportive

team who bought into the original concept and embraced the

attention to detail required. Roots are also pleased with the

reaction of the Client to the completed building, who

commented:

“We are more than satisfied with the work undertaken by the

Roots Directors, Christopher Hall and Micheal Holliday. From

initial conceptual ideas and sketches, to full planning

consents, building warrant, tendering and project

management, the Directors have demonstrated a meticulous

attention to detail, extremely effective communication skills,

and above all, a keen awareness and appreciation for our

requirements as their clients. The completed project is

everything that we hoped for, and fully mirrors the initial draft

sketches and drawings.”

Although this article represents the completion of the first

building on-site the practice are excited about working with

similarly encouraging teams on further commissions on Tiree

and beyond.

This will allow for a continued examination of how to find

work in a recession, further learning from local people and

traditions, and a deeper understand of how the weather

affects life in remote climates. Roots want to explore not

only what it means to create contemporary rural architecture

or new rural clusters - but what it means to be modern rural

people.

References

1. Argyll & Bute Council. Isle of Tiree Sustainable Design

Guide

2. Issacs, W. Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together.

Doubleday: New York; 1999

3. McColl, Rev A., 1791. The Old Statistical Account,

number 29, p393

4. www.youtube.com/rootsdesignworkshop

The extension drew on the language of the existing porch

Page 90: INNOVATION REVIEW - CIC Startcicstart.org/newsletter/2012-06-Innovation_Review.pdfInformation on BSRIA’s recently published Core Principles for Soft Landings and Illustrated Guide

SPONSORSHIP AND SERVICES...

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Subscription

To subscribe to free quarterly Innovation Review and monthly CIC Start Online E-News, please register by accessing the project website at www.cicstart.org or the following link Registration, Benefits of free registration also include the following:

Publish information on products and services for sustainable building design and refurbishment offered by your business (free for Scottish small to medium size enterprises).

Receive a free headset with a microphone to listen to forthcoming CIC Start Online webinars.

Free information on sustainable building design and refurbishment for Scottish small to medium size enterprises.

Marketing

To advertise products or services for sustainable building design, construction or refurbishment by companies registered in Scotland, please contact [email protected] for the full price list.

Articles

Submission deadline for the articles for the next issue of Innovation Review is 15th August 2012. To discuss the article that you would like to submit, please contact us by email or telephone on the contact details provided below.

Innovation Review is published by CIC Start Online project.

Contact: [email protected], +44 (0)141 273 1408

90

Details of some building facades at Scotland’s Housing Expo Two connected long houses on Shetland

CIC Start Online Webinar Sponsorship

The outcomes of our feasibility studies are documented in a final report, and disseminated by means of a seminar which is also broadcast online as an interactive webinar. You can sponsor a webinar with one of three packages: Webinar Sponsorship Description PRICE

Webinar Basic Sponsorship

Company logo on email communications for webinar

Company logo on screen during webinar

Single slide shown at beginning and end of webinar containing company logo, brief description of services, and a website link

250.00

Webinar Personal Sponsorship

As above PLUS:

Opportunity to promote your products/services IN PERSON at the beginning of the webinar (2-3 minutes)

350.00

Bespoke Webinar Sponsorship

As above PLUS:

Working with you to produce of a short video to promote your products/services – to be shown during the webinar and also for your own use on your website and marketing

450.00+

We also offer our webinar service to businesses to promote their products and services. You will lead the entire presentation; there are various options for inviting delegates (physical and online) and managing the event.

Our webinars are watched by over 1,550 members of CIC Start Online in 40 countries.

Member to Member Description PRICE

Bespoke Webinar Day Webinar for promoting your business 450.00+

Our bespoke packages are priced after discussion of your requirements.


Recommended