+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Innovative integrated methodology for the use of decontaminated river sediments in plant nursing and...

Innovative integrated methodology for the use of decontaminated river sediments in plant nursing and...

Date post: 16-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: treyton-willett
View: 221 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
13
Innovative integrated methodology for the use of decontaminated river sediments in plant nursing and roadbuilding Activity of partner UniFi
Transcript

Innovative integrated methodology for the use of decontaminated river

sediments in plant nursing and roadbuilding

Activity of partner UniFi

Activities done:

Dissemination – done

Sediment monitoring (BioTox) – done

Microbial diversity analysis (in progress)

Dissemination:

• SICA Winter School – Piacenza, Feb., 2014

• Workshop REMIDA – ARPA Umbria, Terni, Oct., 2013

• Proceedings of the REMIDA workshop Mar 2014

• Presentation at the UniFi institution – Mar., 2014

Sediment toxicity monitoring: BioTox test

The sediments toxicity analysis is assayed with the BioTox test (Aboatox Oy, Turku, Finland) according to the ISO standard method (ISO 11348e3, 1998). Bio-indicator: Vibrio fischeri, a luminescent marine bacterium. 

_ Sensitivity to contaminants N sample bacteria_ Luminescence amount of contaminants

Advantages: _ Standardization _ Many kind of substances (soils and sediments; liquids or solids) _ Economical and rapid _ Correlation with the effects on higher organisms (Qureshi et Al., 1998)

BioTox test: analysis procedure

• Suspension of 2 g of sieved (<2 mm) sediments in 8 ml of 2% NaCl• Shake for 5min by hand and settling for 30min• Adjustment of pH and conductivity• Reconstituition freeze-dried V. fischeri cells• Addition of 300 ml of the bacterial suspension to 300 ml of samples (solid/supernatant)• Measure of bioluminescence• Calculation of the inhibition of bioluminescence index (INH%) after 15 or 30 minutes

< 20%

INH%

> 20%

BioTox test: preliminary results

Untreated sediments dredged in November, 2013: pore water (toxicity of lecheates) and sediment slurry

Legend 1: Incile 2: Sandy; low contamination3: Sandy-clay; middle contamination4: Clay-silty; middle contamination

1 2 3 40

10

20

30

40

50

60

Untreated sed-iments - slurry

Sediment

slurry1 2 3 4

Mean INH%

51.66 20.88 0 0

Pore water

1 2 3 4

Mean INH%

0 0 0 0

Toxic!

BioTox test: preliminary results

Untreated sediments dredged in November, 2013: dilituition series on 1 and 2 samples

Legend 1: Incile 2: Sandy; low contamination

1:1

1:2

1:4

1:8

1:1

61:3

21:6

41:1

28

1:1

1:2

1:4

1:8

1:1

61:3

21:6

41:1

28

1 2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Untreated sedi-ments: diluition

series

11:1 1:2 1:4 1:8 1:16 1:32 1:64

1:128

29 21 17 20 22 7 0 0

21:1 1:2 1:4 1:8 1:16 1:32 1:64

1:128

0 0 19 17 11 1 0 0

BioTox test: preliminary resultsTreated sediments sampled in November 28, 2013: torbid samples

None samples showed toxicity!

Legend

1: Paspalum vaginatum + Eisenia foetida

2: Tamarix gallica + Paspalum vaginatum + Eisenia foetida

3: Spartium junceum + Paspalum vaginatum + Eisenia foetida

4: Nerium oleander + Paspalum vaginatum + Eisenia foetida

5: Phragmites australis + Paspalum vaginatum + Eisenia foetida

6: No plants used as control area

1 2 3 4 5 6Mean INH%

0 0 0 0 0 0

BioTox test: preliminary results

Treated sediments sampled in January 28, 2014: pore water (toxicity of lecheates) and sediment slurry

The last sampling confirmed the non toxicity of the treated sediments!

Torbid samples1 (0-30cm) 2 (0-30cm) 3 (0-30cm) 4 (0-30cm) 5 (0-30cm) 6 (0-30cm)

0 0 0 0 0 01 (30-60cm) 2 (30-60cm) 3 (30-60cm) 4 (30-60cm) 5 (30-60cm) 6 (30-60cm)

0 0 1.90 7.75 0 0

Pore water1 (0-30cm) 2 (0-30cm) 3 (0-30cm) 4 (0-30cm) 5 (0-30cm) 6 (0-30cm)

0 0 0 0 0 01 (30-60cm) 2 (30-60cm) 3 (30-60cm) 4 (30-60cm) 5 (30-60cm) 6 (30-60cm)

0 0 0 0 0 0

Conclusions• The solid phase of untreated sediments (samples 1 and 2) is toxic

• The pore water is not toxic, indicating that contaminants are strongly retained by the solid phases

• Phytoremediated sediments are non toxic either the solid phase and the lecheates

• There is no difference between 0-30 cm (high plant root colonization) and 30-60 cm (low plant root colonization)

• Microbial activity seems the main factor in de-toxification of treated sediments

Microbial diversity analysis… in progress

Two aims:

1) Understanding the progress of microbial diversity

2) Amend phytoremediated sediments with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)

Additional activities

Test the performance of phytoremediated sediments as a suitable substrate in real plant nursery companies

Thanks for your attention!


Recommended