Meeting Details----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: Parkade Plaza, USDA Training Room, Suite # 232 601 Business Loop, 70 West, Columbia, MO 65203-2546 Time: 9:30am to 3:00pm Date: Thursday, March 7, 2019 Agenda -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9:30 am Registration 10:00 am Welcome J.R. Flores, NRCS, State Conservationist Brent Hampy, FSA, State Executive Director 10:15 am Farm Bill - Conservation Programs Update NRCS, FSA 10:25 am Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) George Henshaw, NRCS EQIP FY18 Overview EQIP FY19 and 2020 Update and Discussion 11:15 am Farm Service Agency Update Allen Powell, FSA 11:45 am – 12:45 pm Lunch on your own 12:45 pm Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) George Henshaw, NRCS CSP FY 18 Overview CSP FY 19 and 2020 Update, Discussion 1:30 pm Regional Conservation Partnerships Program Karen Brinkman, NRCS Conservation Innovation Grants Outreach and Technical Assistance Grants 1:45 pm Agricultural Conservation Easement Program Chris Hamilton, NRCS Update and Ranking Discussion 2:05 pm Watershed Initiatives and Readiness Study Updates Steve Hefner, NRCS 2:25 pm Seed Source Geography Nate Goodrich, NRCS 2:35 pm Open Discussion 3:00 pm Adjourn USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Insert Title Here Insert Subtitle Here State Technical Committee, Natural Resources Subcommittee Meeting
Transcript
Meeting Details-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Location: Parkade Plaza, USDA Training Room, Suite # 232
601 Business Loop, 70 West, Columbia, MO 65203-2546 Time: 9:30am to 3:00pmDate: Thursday, March 7, 2019Agenda --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9:30 am Registration
10:00 am Welcome J.R. Flores, NRCS, State Conservationist Brent Hampy, FSA, State Executive Director
10:15 am Farm Bill - Conservation Programs Update NRCS, FSA
10:25 am Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) George Henshaw, NRCSEQIP FY18 Overview EQIP FY19 and 2020 Update and Discussion
11:15 am Farm Service Agency Update Allen Powell, FSA
11:45 am – 12:45 pm Lunch on your own
12:45 pm Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) George Henshaw, NRCS CSP FY 18 OverviewCSP FY 19 and 2020 Update, Discussion
1:30 pm Regional Conservation Partnerships Program Karen Brinkman, NRCS Conservation Innovation GrantsOutreach and Technical Assistance Grants
1:45 pm Agricultural Conservation Easement Program Chris Hamilton, NRCSUpdate and Ranking Discussion
2:05 pm Watershed Initiatives and Readiness Study Updates Steve Hefner, NRCS
2:25 pm Seed Source Geography Nate Goodrich, NRCS
2:35 pm Open Discussion
3:00 pm Adjourn
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
Conservation Overview• Strengthens and expands support to producers who address significant natural resource
concerns through adoption of conservation practices and activities.• Ensures that voluntary conservation programs balance farm productivity with conser-
vation benefits so the most fertile and productive lands remain in production while land retired for conservation purposes favors more environmentally sensitive acres.
• Supports conservation programs that ensure cost-effective financial assistance for im-proved soil health, water and air quality, and other natural resource benefits.
• Encourages entry into farming through increased access to land and capital for young, beginning, veteran, and underrepresented farmers.
Environmental Quality Incentives Program• Adds potential resource concerns related to beneficial cost-effective operation changes.• Raises cap for organic producers to $140,000 over six years.• New enrollment option through incentive contracts to address priority resource concerns.• Requires advance payment option be offered to historically underserved producers.• Authorizes direct program assistance to irrigation districts, including acequias and other
entities, for purposes of improving water use efficiencies.Conservation Stewardship Program
• Increases payment rates for adoption of cover crop rotations and advanced grazing man-agement activities.
• Authorizes contract extensions to facilitate renewal under new program authority.• Transforms funding mechanism for program contracts, authorizing specified annual fund-
ing levels.• Provides specific support for organic and transitioning to organic production activities.• Includes special grassland conservation initiative for certain producers who have main-
tained cropland base acres.Agricultural Management Assistance Program
• Maintains support for conservation practices that reduce crop risk.
Natural Resources Conservation Service
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
What’s New: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and the 2018 Farm Bill
Agricultural Conservation Easement Program• Authorizes assistance to partners who pursue ‘Buy-Protect-Sell’ transactions.• Requires a conservation plan for highly erodible land that will be protected by an agricul-
tural land easement.• Increases flexibility for partners to meet cost-share matching requirements.• Identifies water quality as a program purpose for enrollment of wetland reserve ease-
ments.• Expands wetland types eligible for restoration and management under wetland reserve
easements.Healthy Forests Reserve Program
• Expands enrollment options for Indian tribes.Regional Conservation Partnership Program
• Simplifies funding authorities for program implementation.• Authorizes Regional Conservation Partnership Program contracts rather than requiring
enrollment through other program authorities.• Expands flexibility for alternative funding arrangements with partners.• Expands availability of watershed program authorities to projects outside critical conser-
vation areas.Other Farm Bill Programs
Strengthens conservation assistance framework through support for—
• Agriculture Conservation Experienced Services Program• Conservation Innovation Grants• Technical Service Providers• Veteran Farmers• Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program• Conservation Compliance for Highly Erodible Lands and Wetlands• Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program• Emergency Watershed Protection Program
nrcs.usda.gov
Natural Resources Conservation Service
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
What’s New: NRCS and the 2018 Farm Bill
1
Missouri NRCSEnvironmental Quality Incentive Program
(EQIP) Programmatic OverviewGeorge Henshaw
Assistant State Conservationist for Programs
• Program Purpose• Highlights• FY18 EQIP Fund Distribution • FY19 State Conservationist Decisions • FY19 EQIP Update• Input for FY20• Open Discussion
EQIP Purpose
• The purpose of EQIP is to incentivize farmers, ranchers and land stewards to address resource concerns by installing conservation practices on eligible land.
• NRCS provides financial and technical assistance to eligible producers.
2
FY18 EQIP Top Practices Planned(all fund pools)
Practice Obligation Extent Planned
Cover Crop $16,209,016 250,977 ac
Fence $2,322,623 1,654,372 ft
Terrace $2,266,334 740,041 ft
Underground Outlet $1,528,329 387,431 ft
High Tunnel System $1,484,116 393,750 sq ft
Livestock Pipeline $1,415,211 675,998 ft
Forage and Biomass Planting $1,247,966 8,858 ac
Waste Transfer $1,097,013 7,035 ft
Building Envelope Improvement $1,075,353 83 ea
Forest Stand Improvement $540,320 4,293 ac
National Water Quality Initiative (NWQI) PilotLamar Lake Watershed – Barton County
3
$16.2 million in obligations for cover crops exceed all other individual practices in 2018
StrikeForce Initiative – 4.5 Million in Funding in 46 countiesEnergy,
High Tunnels, Organic
4
Emergency Drought Initiative
$4.1 million to producers impacted by the drought to plant cover crops for grazing and haying. Emergency Drought Initiative
FY18 EQIP Year-End General Fund Distribution$34.7 million
25%
21%
15%
12%
10%
7%4% 3%
2% 1%
Soil Health Cropland (25%)
Pasture/Hayland (21%)
Cropland (15%)
Emergency Drought (12%)
Animal Feeding/Waste (10%)
Energy (7%)
High Tunnel (4%)
Forestland (3%)
Wildlife (2%)
Organic, Agroforesty, Soil HealthPasture (1%)
5
FY18 EQIP Initiatives Year-End Fund Distribution$5.3 million
79%
16%5%
MRBI (79%)
NWQI (16%)
Monarch (5%)
Mississippi River Basin Initiative
FY18 RCPP EQIP Year-End Fund Distribution$5.8 million
23%
27%14%
9%
7%
7%7% 4%
2%
Cover Crops for Soil Health (23%)
Our Missouri Waters (27%)
NW MO Water Quality (14%)
Mid-South Water Stewardship (9%)
Glades Woodlands (7%)
Grassland Birds (7%)
Conservation Ranching (7%)
NW MO Urban Rural Farmers (4%)
Working Lands for Monarchs (2%)
6
FY18 EQIP Summary(Includes RCPP-EQIP)
Contracts: 1,675
Obligations: $45.8 Million
Contract Acres: 232,780
Review of FY19 State Technical Committee
Recommendations
7
Topic: Priority Resource Concerns
STC Decision/Implementation:
In FY 2019, the five priority resource concerns at the state level will continue to be:
• Soil Erosion
• Soil Quality
• Water Quality
• Degraded Plant Condition
• Inadequate Habitat – Fish and Wildlife
Topic: EQIP Recommendations for ranking questions
STC Decision/Implementation:
Comments received from committee members results in improvements to the ranking questions. Examples of improvements include:• Re-allocation of points to promote the relative importance of targeted resource
concerns
• Edits to confusing language
• Edits to or removal of questions that may lead to contract management problems
• Continue to include ranking questions that give additional points for planting of native grasses.
8
Ephemeral Gully Control on Highly Erodible Land EQIP Pilot Project
New pilot project to be implemented in FY19 in Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and Oregon
FY19 General EQIP Fund Distribution
Estimated $20.4 million
Funding % of Subaccounts are not finalized as NRCS is awaiting final 2018 Farm Bill guidance
9
FY19 EQIP Initiative Fund DistributionEstimated $17.4 million
$10,000,000.00$4,500,000.00
$2,500,000.00$300,000.00 $100,000.00
HEL Pilot
StrikeForce
MRBI
Monarch
NWQI
FY19 RCPP EQIP Fund DistributionEstimated $961,000
$473,000
$278,000
$210,000
Conservation Ranching
Glades Woodlands
Fox River
10
FY-20 EQIP Discussion
• Proposed Subaccounts
• Resource Concerns
• Ranking Questions
• Practices Offered
FY20 EQIP Proposed Subaccounts
• General EQIP: Cropland, Soil Health Crop, Soil Health Pasture, Pasture/Hayland, Animal Waste, Wildlife, Forestry, Agroforestry, Organic, Energy, High Tunnel (Strikeforce)
• Program Initiatives: Monarch, HEL Pilot
• Landscape Initiatives: MRBI, NWQI
11
FY20 EQIP Resource Concern Priorities
• Soil Erosion
• Soil Quality Degradation
• Water Quality Degradation
• Degraded Plant Condition
• Fish and Wildlife Inadequate Habitat
• Excess Water
• Air Quality Impacts
• Insufficient Water
• Inefficient Energy Use
• Limited Livestock Production
12
Thank You
Open Discussion
1
Missouri NRCSConservation Stewardship Program
(CSP) Programmatic Overview
• CSP Purpose• FY18 CSP Summary• Input for FY-20• Open Discussion
CSP Purpose
• Encourage producers to address resource concerns and improve their conservation by – improving, maintaining, managing existing conservation activities on
eligible land, and
– installing and adopting additional conservation activities
• “Reward” farmers, ranchers and land stewards for their past, current conservation
• “Inspire” them to go above and beyond.
2
Together We Can Do More
Conservation Planning
How is CSP’s purpose accomplished?
• Entire agricultural or Nonindustrial Private Forestland operation evaluated.
• 5 year contract length (with option to renew).
• Combination of eligibility and ranking determine priority for funding.
• Payments for existing conservation and additional conservation activities.
3
FY18 CSP Update
CSP Renewals: 59,586 acres• 102 contracts
CSP General: 194,811 acres• NIPF – 4,851 acres• Ag Land – 189,960 acres• 1381 Applications received• 539 Contracts
RCPP-CSP: 28,605 acres• DU’s Rice Stewardship• NFWF’s Working Lands for Wildlife• Total 183 applications received for RCPP• 84 Contracts
$19.4 Million - Amount of funds leveraged by partners
2018 Farm Bill contains improvements to make RCPP more efficient and effective. Impediments are removed, enabling NRCS and partners to better manage funding throughout the duration of the projects.
$2.4 Million in cover crops (36,000 ac. planned)
$685,000 in terraces (216,000 ft. planned
$507,000 for shallow water development (7,650 ac.)
$304,000 of conservation cover planned
$287,000 supporting forage and biomass plantings (986 Ac. Planned)
FY18 RCPP Accomplishments
4/10/2019
2
Conservation Innovation Grants (CIG)
FY18 competitive Conservation Innovation Grant to determine economic impacts of selected riparian best management practices. Univ. of Missouri. Expires September 2021.
FY18 competitive Conservation Innovation Grant to determine optimum cover crop termination dates for soil health benefits. Univ. of Missouri. Expires September 2021.
FY18 competitive Conservation Innovation Grant to determine effectiveness of hack and squirt chemical control methods on selected tree species. Matts Healthy Woods. Expires December 2020.
Conservation Innovation Grants (CIG) is a voluntary program intended to stimulate the development and adoption of innovative conservation approaches and technologies while leveraging Federal investment in environmental enhancement and protection, in conjunction with agricultural production.
Current CIG in Missouri
New CIG announcement coming soon
Conservation Technical Assistance Grants
Missouri NRCS has a total of 64 ongoing Grants and Agreements with partners as of 11/18
Ongoing Grant announcement. USDA-NRCS-MO-19-01 Feb 7 – April 15, 2019
March 20, 2019 grant partners webinar to discuss proposals
Missouri NRCS annually requests proposals to leverage USDA funding and advance delivery of technical and financial assistance and conservation partnerships. Projects selected develop a grant or agreement, to implement the project or activities proposed.
Priority areas for funding are determined by the State Conservationist with input from the Leadership Team. Categories to apply have included:1) Delivery of Technical Assistance2) 2) Outreach to Historically Underserved producers3) Organic and Specialty Crop Production4) Water Quality and or/ Drainage Management Workshops 5) Easement Monitoring6) Soil Health Workshops
4/10/2019
3
Questions?In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; fax: (202) 690-7442; or email: [email protected].
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
4/10/2019
1
Tracey Wiggins
Easement Specialist
Water Resources and Easements Staff
March 7, 2019
ACEP is 1 program with 2 components
◦Wetland Reserve Easements (WRE)
◦ Agricultural Land Easements (ALE)
4/10/2019
2
4/10/2019
3
Interim regulation & policy will be deployed by the beginning of FY 2020
Authorizes NRCS to implement ACEP in FY 2019 following policy & regulation in the 2014 Farm Bill
ACEP funding increased
Announce application cut-off dates
Awaiting notification of annual funding allocations
New Enrollments
Continue management and monitoring of existing easements
4/10/2019
4
No changes to the ranking criteria
2014 Farm Bill policy defines three categories of considerations: Environmental Benefit Considerations Economic Considerations Special Considerations
Ranking form is available on the Missouri NRCS website at:
Ranking Criteria:◦ Environmental Benefit Considerations: Restoration T/E Species Proximity to other “protected” habitats Flood water retention, water quality improvements, ground water
recharge
◦ Economic Considerations: Per acre cost of easement Per acre cost of restoration
Ranking Criteria:◦ Special Considerations (state criteria): Conservation Opportunity Areas (COAs) Unique wetland features Species of state concern Water quality target areas Creation of contiguous wetland areas
4/10/2019
6
No changes to the ranking criteria
2014 Farm Bill policy defines ranking criteria and considerations: Threat of Conversion Environmental Benefit Address Resource Concerns
Ranking form is available on the Missouri NRCS website at:
Ranking Criteria: Adverse changes in the total acres of farm and ranch land Adverse changes in the total acres of permanent grassland, pasture,
and rangeland Population growth Population density Proximity to other protected land Proximity to other ag operations and infrastructure Prime, unique, or state important soils Grasslands of Special Significance T/E Species Historical, archaeological, social or economic benefit Value to the community
4/10/2019
8
By Appraisal Only
Area Wide Market Analysis◦ Geographic Rate Caps (GARCs)◦ Reliable estimate of the easement compensation at the
beginning of the enrollment
4/10/2019
9
ACEP-WRE Compensation
Approved GARC is limited to easements less than or equal to 315 acresApplication Acres = 400 acresAppraised Value = $2,200,000 ($5,500 per ac)Calculated GARC Value = $2,090,000 ($5,225 per ac)Landowner Offer = none
Easement Compensation must be the lower of: 1) Fair Market Value, 2) GARC, 3) Landowner Offer1) $5,500 per acre2) $5,225 per acre3) No LO offer = FMV $5,500
Easement Compensation (offer) will be $5,000 per acre
4/10/2019
10
Bird MonitoringWetland Reserve Easements
Missouri
Noppadol Paothong
4/10/2019
11
OBJECTIVES
Survey selected wetland easements using transect-
line protocol over two rounds (migration and
breeding season)
Document all bird species seen & heard
Record vegetation type & water coverage on transects
Record height at Water Control Structures
SURVEY SITES
Site Selection in process
Sites are chosenby NRCS Wetland
Emphasis Teams
4/10/2019
12
ADDITIONAL GOALS: 2019-2020
Model water level data for management feedback
Model species & guild occupancy across properties
Sustain yearly surveys to track density changes and bird response to restorations/continued management
4/10/2019
13
4/10/2019
1
Watershed Initiatives and Readiness Updates
Steven HefnerNatural Resources SpecialistUSDA‐NRCS
4/10/2019
2
Watershed Selection
• CCBI – HLS Model (USDA) considers high risk acres for nps & past treatment
• Other models (e.g. SPARROW)
• Future and existing NRCS work load (unfunded applications)
• 303D impairment and TMDLs
• Existing water quality monitoring (USGS and/or DNR)
• USDA Staff input & Partner input
NRCS Area‐wide Planning Watershed Assessments
• Includes a watershed inventory
• Resource Analysis
• Used to fortify our conservation planning efforts
• Help prioritize contract applications for certain programs
• Helps identify vulnerable landscapes
OBJECTIVE: Identify Vulnerable Acres
4/10/2019
3
Inventory & Analysis
• Channel Classification
• Riparian Corridor
• Stream Visual Assessment Protocol (SVAP2)
• Streambank Erosion
• STEPL Model ‐ Load Reduction Scenarios
• Agricultural Conservation Practice Framework (ACPF)
Aerial Photos
• Useful to observe historical changes of the stream position and the condition of riparian corridors.
• Digitized streams for each year.
• Limitations
– Leaf‐on vs. leaf‐off
– Processing errors between years
4/10/2019
4
Riparian Corridor Classification
Assessment determined by stream order and based on the NRCS 391‐Riparian forest Buffer standard.
Moderate PoorGood
Watershed Survey – Validate Electronic Observations with Field Observations
Livestock Exclusion + Alternative Water 2.0 4.1 6.1 8.1 10.2
Livestock Exclusion + Alt Water + Prescribed Grazing + Forest Buffer
3.4 6.9 10.3 13.7 17.1
Lamar Lake Watershed, Barton County, Missouri ‐ 2018
Land Use‐Cover, Soils Considerations
• Highest Priority
Crops and Highly Erodible Soils
Poor Riparian Corridor
• High
Other Cropland
Pasture & Highly Erodible Soils
Moderate Riparian Corridor
• Moderate
Other Pastureland
• Low
Forrest
Good Riparian Corridor
4/10/2019
7
Agriculture Conservation Planning Framework
• Provides an inventory of opportunities for placement of conservation practices for the treatment of agricultural runoff.
• ARCGIS Toolbox Version 3– Porter, S.A., M.D. Tomer, D.E. James, J.D. Van Horn, and K.M.B. Boomer. 2018.
Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: ArcGIS Toolbox User’s Manual, Ver 3. USDA Agricultural Research Service, National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames Iowa. Available: http://northcentralwater.org/acpf/
– Tomer, M.D., S.A. Porter, D.E. James, K.M.B. Boomer, J.A. Kostel, and E. McLellan. 2013. Combining precision conservation technologies into a flexible framework to facilitate agricultural watershed planning. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68:113A‐120A. http://www.jswconline.org/content/68/5/113A.full.pdf+html
ACPF Modeling Approach
• Input Layers
– Digital Elevation Model
– NASS Crop Layer (for landuse –crop history)
– NRCS Soils gSSURGO Layer
– FSA Common Land Unit Boundaries (for field boundaries)
• Prepare the DEM
• Develop the Stream Network using flow accumulation
Develop a “Stream Network”• Practitioner classifies streams
– Perennial, Streams of Interest, Intermittent, Urban
4/10/2019
9
Field CharacterizationBy‐Field Slope Runoff Risk Assessment
(75% Percentile) (slope * distance to stream)
Middle Apple Creek, Perry County, MO ‐ 2019
Grass Waterways
• Used to reduce risk of concentrated flow erosion. ACPF uses the stream power index to estimate.
Photo Hillshade Grass Waterway Suggestion
4/10/2019
10
Contour Buffer Strips
• Perennial vegetation planted along topographic contours to intercept flow.
Photo Hillshade Buffer Strip Suggestion
Water & Sediment Control Basins
• Small embankment built perpendicular to a flow‐path in an agricultural field.
Photo Hillshade WASCOB Suggestion
4/10/2019
11
Incorporating the Assessment into Local Ranking Component
Evaluation Method Ranking Points Percent of Ranking
National Set of Questions 250 25%
State Set of Questions 400 40%
Local Set of Questions 250 25% ***
Cost Efficiency Multiplier 100 10%
Local component will be comprised of three factors:• Which management zone? 100 points• Which priority area? 100 points• What is the runoff rating? 50 points
USDA now requiring a watershed assessment for conservation initiatives
4/10/2019
12
Questions?
USDA is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer
4/10/2019
1
Seed Source GeographyConservation Practice Standard 645 Upland Wildlife Habitat Management
Seeding Specifications
NOTE: Seed for native species of grasses, forbs, or legumes used for wildlife plantings will be genetic seed source and grown in (production) for the seed source geography identified in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The seed tag must identify the county and state where the genetic seed source was collected and county and state where it was grown. Seed should be Certified Source Identified Class when possible.
4/10/2019
2
MISSOURI STATE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Natural Resource Subcommittee Parkade Plaza, Columbia, Missouri March 7, 2019 Please address comments/remarks by March 29th, 2019 to: USDA/Natural Resource Conservation Service USDA/Farm Agency J. R. Flores, State Conservationist Brent Hampy, State Executive Director 601 Business Loop 70 West 601 Business Loop 70 West Parkade Plaza Suite 250 Parkade Plaza Suite 225 Columbia MO, 65203 Columbia MO, 65203 Phone: (573) 876-0901 Phone: (573) 876-0925 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.mo.nrcs.usda.gov/ Website: http://www.fsa.usda.gov/mo MO State Technical Committee: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/mo/technical/stc/
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender
USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Natural Resources Conservation Service
United States Department of Agriculture
NRCS Commonly Used Acronyms
CY: Calendar Year
FY: Fiscal Year
Subaccount: Funding pools developed for similar program applications by land use,
geographic, or applicant specific parameters.
RFP: Request for Proposals
Current Programs and Initiatives
ACEP: Agriculture Conservation Easement Program
ALE: Agricultural Land Easement
WRE: Wetlands Reserve Easement
CSP: Conservation Stewardship Program
CSP – Reinvention: describes updated program logic adopted with FY-2017
General sign-up.
CIG: Conservation Innovation Grant
EQIP: Environmental Quality Incentives Program
CIG: Conservation Innovation Grants
MRBI: Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative
![The Honorable [ Insert Name Insert “Chairman” or “Ranking ... · Insert “Chairman” or “Ranking Member”] [Insert name of applicable committee] [Insert address] ... of](https://static.documents.pub/doc/80x56/5ed77454c58fb527332037d0/the-honorable-insert-name-insert-aoechairmana-or-aoeranking-insert-aoechairmana.jpg)
![[INSERT SPEAKER’S NAME] [INSERT TITLE] [INSERT DATE]](https://static.documents.pub/doc/80x56/56649d0a5503460f949dcfac/insert-speakers-name-insert-title-insert-date.jpg)
