+ All Categories
Home > Documents > INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii...

INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii...

Date post: 30-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 11 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
165
CIO 'AD-A204 620 INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM PHASE l-CONFIRMATION/QUANTIFICATION STAGE 1 For Minot Air Force Base Minot, North Dakota Prepared By: FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC. 530 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10036 October 1988 Volume 2 of 3 Appendices A Through F PPROT) FOR PlIILIC RELEASE: DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED Prepared For. HEADQUARTERS STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND COMMAND SURGEONS OFFICE (HO SAC/SGPS) ELEC BIOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DIVISIO4 OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE. NEBRASKA 68113 r 1 3 F E 3 9 And UNITED STATES AIR FORCE OCCUPATIONAL , ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LABORATORY (USAFOEHL) TECHNICAL SERVICES DIISION (TS) BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS 78235-5501 2 9
Transcript
Page 1: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

CIO 'AD-A204 620

INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAMPHASE l-CONFIRMATION/QUANTIFICATION

STAGE 1

For

Minot Air Force BaseMinot, North Dakota

Prepared By:

FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.530 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10036

October 1988

Volume 2 of 3

Appendices A Through F

PPROT) FOR PlIILIC RELEASE: DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED

Prepared For.

HEADQUARTERS STRATEGIC AIR COMMANDCOMMAND SURGEONS OFFICE (HO SAC/SGPS) ELECBIOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DIVISIO4

OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE. NEBRASKA 68113 r1 3 F E 3 9AndUNITED STATES AIR FORCE OCCUPATIONAL ,ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LABORATORY (USAFOEHL)TECHNICAL SERVICES DIISION (TS)BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS 78235-5501

2 9

Page 2: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM

PHASE II - CONFIRMATION QUANTIFICATION

STAGE 1

APPENDICES TO THE FINAL REPORTFOR

MINOT AIR FORCE BASEMINOT, NORTH DAKOTA

HEADQUARTERS STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND ,COMMAND SURGEON'S OFFICE (HQ SAC/SGPB)BIOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION

OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE, NEBRASKA 68113

October 1988 Aceession Forti S GRA I

Prepared by: DTIC TABUnannounced C

Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc. Just$tation

530 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10036 By

Distribution/USAF CONTRACT No. F33615-84-D-4404 Availability Codes

Delivery Order No. 0008 . Ava'and/or

USAF Technical Program Manager: DIst Special

ILt Franz J. Schmidt

Prepared For:

United States Air Force Occupationaland Environmental Health Laboratory (USAFOEHL)

Technical Services Division (TS)Brooks Air Force Base, Texas 78235-5501

(CL50608/0528N)

Page 3: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

LIST OF APPENDICES

A. Definitions, Nomenclature and Units of Measure

B. MAFB Task Description/Statement of Work

C. Well Numbering System

D. Geological Logs

D.1 HART Test Boring Logs

D.2 Boring Logs for USGS Test Borings Completed in theVicinity of MAFB

E. Field Raw Data

F. Field Analytical Procedures, Sample Identification CrossReference and Dates of Sample Analyses

F.1 Field Analytical Procedures

F.2 Sample Identification Cross Reference and Dates of SampleAnalyses

G. Chain of Custody Forms

H. Laboratory Analytical Results Reports

H.1 Aromatic and Halogenated Volatile Organic Analyses Resultsfor Water Samples

H.I.a Aromatic and Halogenated Volatile Organic AnalysesResults for PTL Job No. 86GW3506 Water Samples

H.l.b Aromatic Volatile Organic Analysis Results for PTLJob No. 86GW3523 Water Samples

H.1.c Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis Results forPTL Job No. 86GW3523 Water Samples

H.I.d Aromatic Volatile Organic Analysis Results for PTLJob. No. 86GW3538 Water Samples

H.1.e Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis Results forPTL Job No. 86GW3538 Water Samples

(CL5061B/0536N)

Page 4: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

LIST OF APPENDICES (Continued)

H.2 Aromatic and Halogenated Volatile Organic Analyses Resultsfor Soil and Sediment Samples (and a Trip Blank Sample)

H.3 Acid and Base/Neutral Extractable Priority PollutantOrganic Analyses Results for Water Samples

H.3.a Acid Extractable Priority Pollutant OrganicAnalysis Results for PTL Job No. 86GW3506 WaterSamples

H.3.b Base/Neutral Extractable Priority PollutantOrganic Analysis Results for PTL Job No. 86GW3506Water Samples

H.3.c Acid Extractable Priority Pollutant OrganicAnalysis Results for PTL Job No. 86GW3523 WaterSamples

H.3.d Base/Neutral Extractable Priority PollutantOrganic Analysis Results for PTL Job No. 86GW3523Water Samples

H.3.e Acid Extractable Priority Pollutant OrganicAnalysis Results for PTL Job No.86GW3538 WaterSamples

H.3.f Base/Neutral Extractable Priority PollutantOrganic Analysis Results for PTL Job No. 86GW3538Water Samples

H.4 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analysis Results for WaterSamples

H.5 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analysis Results for Soil andSediment Samples

H.6 Priority Pollutant Metals Analyses Results for Water Samples

H.7 Priority Pollutant Metals Analyses Results For Soil andSediment Samples

H.8 Common Anion and Total Dissolved Solids Analyses Resultsfor Water Samples

(CL5061B/0536N)

Page 5: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

LIST OF APPENDICES (Continued)

,H.9 PTL QC Data

H.9.a Laboratory Methodology Summary

H.9.b Priority Pollutant Metals, Common Anions and TotalDissolved Solids Duplicate and Matrix SpikeAnalyses Results for Water Samples

H.9.c Halogenated Volatile Organic Duplicate and MatrixSpike Analyses Results for Water Samples

H.9.d Laboratory Chronicles

H.1O J&L Testing Company Results for Grain Size Analysis ofMAFB Subsurface Soil Samples

H.11 J&L Testing Company Results for Triaxial PermeabilityAnalysis of MAFB Subsurface Soil Samples

I. Correspondence with Federal, State and/or Local RegulatoryAgencies

J. References

K. Biographies of Key Personnel

L. Technical Operations Plan and Site Safety Plan

M. Technical Literature Review

(CL5O61B/0536N)

Page 6: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

APPENDIX A

DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE

(CL5O6OB/0528N)

Page 7: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

A-I

DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE

Most of the following are derived from theAmerican Geological Institute (1976) Glossary.

Term Definition

Aquifer Stratum or zone below the surface of the earth capableof producing a significant amount of water as from awell.

Flow Velocity The rate a moving fluid travels. Measured in distancetraveled over a given period of time.

Gradient Slope of a stream or land surface.

Ground Water That part of the subsurface water which is in the zoneof saturation.

Hydraulic Ratio of flow velocity to driving force for viscous flowConductivity under saturated conditions of a specified liquid in a

porous medium.

Lithology The physical character of a rock.

Permeability The capacity of a rock or sediment for transmitting afluid. Degree of permeability depends upon the sizeand shape of the pores, the size and shape of theirinterconnections, and the extent of the latter. It ismeasured by the rate at which a fluid of standardviscosity can move a given distance through a giveninterval of time.

Potentiometric Surface to which water in an aquifer would rise bySurface hydrostatic pressure under atmospheric pressure.

Porosity The ratio of the void volume of a rock or soil to itstotal volume.

Recharge a.) Intake. The processes by which water is absorbedand is added to the zone of saturation, either directlyor indirectly by way of another formation.

b.) The quantity of water that is added to the zone ofsaturation.

Saturated The interval of rock or soil which is saturated with re-Thickness spect to water if all its interstices are filled with

water.

Sediment Solid material settled from suspension in a liquid.

(CL506OB/0528N)

Page 8: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

A-2

DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE (CONTINUED)

Term Definition

Specific A constant indicating the discharge expressed as a rateCapacity yield per unit of drawdown.

Specific Yield The ratio of the volume of water which a rock or soil,after being saturated, will yield by gravity to its ownvolume.

Stratigraphy That branch of geology which deals with the formation,composition, sequence and correlation of the stratifiedrocks as parts of the earth's crust.

Transmissivity The ease with which water moves through a unit width ofaquifer.

Water Table The upper surface of a zone of saturation, except wherethat surface is formed by an impermeable body.

Zone of A subsurface zone in which all the interstices areSaturation filled with water under pressure equal to or greater

than that of the atmosphere.

(CL5O6OB/0528N)

Page 9: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

A-3

DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE (CONTINUED)

Abbreviation/Unit of Measure Definition

A Area

AD Air Division

ADCOM Aerospace Defense Command

ADI Acceptable Daily Intake

ADL Above Detection Limits

AFB Air Force Base

AVO Aromatic Volatile Organics

AWQC Ambient Water Quality Criteria

BMW Ballistic Missile Wing

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation andLiability Act.

CFR Code of the Federal Register

CLP Contract Laboratory Program

cm centimeter

cm/sec centimeters per second

COE United States Army Corps of Engineers

DEQPPM Defense Environmental Quality Program Policy Memorandum

DOD Department of Defense

DOH Department of Health

EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

ESE Environmental Science and Engineering

et al. and others

EOD Explosive Ordnance Disposal Area

FR Federal Register

(CL5060B/0528N)

Page 10: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

A-4

DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE (CONTINUED)

Abbreviation/Unit of Measure Definition

ft feet

FTA Firefighting Training Area

ft/day feet per day

ft2/day squared feet per day

gpm gallons per minute

HART Fred C. Hart Associates Inc. (USAF consultant)

HVO Halogenated Volatile Organics

I gradient (slope of the water), where Q - KIA; V - KI/p

ID inside diameter

IN inch

IRP Installation Restoration Program (of USAF)

K permeability, where Q - KIA; V - KI/p

MAFB Minot Air Force Base

MCL Maximum Concentration Level

MDL Minimum Detection Limit

mg/kg milligrams per kilogram

mg/l milligrams per liter

min minutes

-m millimeters

msl mean sea level (feet above)

NA not analyzed

ND no data; not detected

NDWQS North Dakota Water Quality Standards

(CL5O6OB/0528N)

Page 11: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

A-5

DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE (CONTINUED)

Abbreviation/Unit of Measure Definition

NIPDWS National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards

NP not performed

NR not reported

NSDWS National Secondary Drinking Water Standards

OVA Organic Vapor Analyizer

p porosity, where V - KI/p

PP Priority Pollutant

ppb parts per billion

PPCL Preliminary Protective Concentration Limit

ppm parts per million

PTL Princeton Testing Laboratory (HART consultant)

PVC polyvinyl chloride (well casing)

Q discharge rate

QA quality assurance

QC quality control

RCRA Resource Recovery and Conservation Act

RMCL Recommended Maximum Contaminant Levels

SAC Strategic Air Command

Sec seconds

SLA Sanitary Landfill Area

SMW Strategic Missile Wing

SNARL Suggested No-Adverse Response Level

SOW Statement of Work

(CL5060B/0528N)

Page 12: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

A-6

DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE (CONTINUED)

Abbreviation/Unit of Measure Definition

SPF Strategic Protection Force

TDS Total Dissolved Solids

TOC top of casing

UCR unit cancer risk

ug/gm micrograms per gram

ug/l micrograms per liter

USAF United States Air Force

USAFOEHL United Sates Air Force Occupational & EnvironmentalHealth Laboratory

USGS United States Geological Survey

V velocity

VOA volatile organic analysis

VOC volatile organic compound

(CL5O6OB/0528N)

Page 13: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

APPENDIX B

MAFB TASK DESCRIPTION/STATEMENT OF WORK

(CL5O6OB/0528N)

Page 14: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

35 JUN i

INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAMPHASE II - CONFIRMATION/QUANTIFICATION (STAGE 1)

MINOT AFB ND

I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK

- The overall objective of the Installation Restoration Program (IRP) PhaseII investigation is to assess potential contamination at past hazardous wastedisposal and spill sites on Air Force installations. A series of staged fieldinvestigations may be required to meet this objective.

The purpose of this task is to undertake a field investigation at MinotAFB ND to: (1) confirm the presence or absence of contamination within thespecified areas of investigation; (2) if possible, determine the extent anddegree of contamination and the potential for migration of those contaminantsin the various environmental media; (3) identify public health andenvironmental hazards of migrating pollutants based on State or Federalstandards for those contaminants; and (4) delineate additional investigationsrequired beyond this stage to reach the Phase II objectives. 7 . 1

The Phase I IRP Report (mailed under separate cover) incorporates the -

background and description of the sites/zones for this task. To accomplishthis survey effort, the contractor shall take the following actions:

A. General Requirements - The general requirements are applicable to allsites unless modified by the site specific work in Section I.B.

1. Monitor the ambient air during all well drilling and soil boringwork with a photoionization meter or equivalent organic vapor detector toidentify the generation of potentially hazardous and/or toxic vapors or gases.Include air monitoring results in the boring logs. If soil encountered duringborehole drilling is suspected to be hazardous because of abnormal discolora-tion, odor or air monitoring levels, containerize the soil cuttings in new,unused drums. Enter into the boring logs the depth(s) from which suspectedcontaminated soil cuttings were collected for containerization. Take acomposite sample from the contents of each drum. Collect a maximum of 10composite samples and test them for EP Toxicity (metals). Use RCRA criteriato determine if soil cuttings must be classified as hazardous waste (40 CFR261.24).

2. Determine the exact location of all monitor wells and soil boringsduring the planning/mobilization phase of the field investigation. Consultwith base personnel to minimize disruption of base activities, to properlyposition wells with respect to exact site locations, and to avoid undergroundutilities. Direct the drilling and sampling and maintain a detailed log ofthe conditiop4 and materials penetrated during the course of the work. Do notdrill boreholes or position wells in actual landfill areas; install wells atthe landfill perimeter.

3. Determine the areal extent of the sites by reviewing historical

and current panchromatic and infrared aerial photography.

Page 15: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

4. Installation of Ground Water Monitoring Wells

a. Comply with the U.S. EPA Publication 330/9-SI-002, NEIC Manualfor Ground Water/Subsurface Investigations at Hazard Waste Sites formonitoring well installation.

b. All well drilling, development, purging, sampling methods, andother activity pertaining to this effort must conform to state and otherapplicable regulatory agency requirements. Cite references in an appendix tothe Final Report.

c. Install wells at a sufficient depth to collect samples repre-sentative of aquifer quality and to intercept contaminants if they arepresent.

d. Avoid, when possible, installing wells in depressions or areas

subject to frequent flooding and standing water. If wells must be installedin such areas, design the wells such that standing water does not leak intothe top of the casing or cascade down the annular space.

e. Drill all monitoring wells using the following specifications:

(1) Drill all wells using hollow-stem auger techniques. Acenter stem, plug, and bit attached to the stem may be inserted into the augerfor use while drilling. This will prevent material from entering into thehollow stem of the auger.

(2) Take lithologic samples at five-foot intervals andprepare borehole log descriptions. Include pilot boring logs and wellcompletion summaries in the Final Report (Item VI, below).

(3) Drill a maximum of 16 wells. Total footage for all wellsin this task shall not exceed 500 linear feet. Refer to the site specificdetails in Section I.B.

(4) Construct each well with two-inch inside diameter (I.D.)Schedule 40 PVC casing. Use threaded screw-type joints, glued fittings arenot permitted. Flush thread all connections. Screen each well using two-inch

I.D. casing having up to 0.020 inch slots; slot size may vary based uponborehole geology. Screen material must be the same as that of the casing.Cap the bottom of the screen.

(5) Unless specified differently in Section B, Site SpecificWork, screen all wells so as to collect floating contaminants and to allow foryearly fluctuations of the water table. Screen all wells a maximum of tenfeet.

f. Complete all monitoring wells using the followingspecifications:

2

Page 16: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

(1) Once the casing is installed, allow the soil formation tocollapse around the well screen. Supplement the natural gravel-pack withwashed and bagged rounded silica sand or gravel with a grain size distributioncompatible with the screen and soil formation. Place the pack from the bottomof the borehole to two feet above the top of the screen. Tremie a five footbentonite pellet seal above the sand/gravel pack. Ensure the bentonite formsa complete seal. Grout the remainder of the annulus to the land surface witha Type I Portland cement/bentonite slurry.

(2) Check with the base point of contact (POC) to determinewhether wells shall be completed flush or project above the ground surface:

(a) If well stick-up is of concern in an area, completethe well flush with the land surface. Cut the casing two to three inchesbelow land surface, and install a protective locking lid consisting of a cast-iron valve box. Center the lid assembly in a three foot diameter concrete padsloped away from the valve box. Ensure free drainage is maintained within thevalve box. Also, provide a screw-type casing cap to prevent infiltration ofsurface water. Maintain a minimum of one foot clearance between the casingtop and the bottom of the valve box. Clearly mark the well number on thevalve box lid.

(b) If an above ground surface completion is used,extend the well casing two or three feet above land surface. Provide an end-plug or casing cap for each well. Shield the extended casing with a steelguard pipe which is placed over the casing and cap, and seated in a two-footby two-foot by four-inch concrete surface pad. Slope the pad away from thewell sleeve. Install a lockable cap or lid at the casing. Install three,three-inch diameter steel guard posts if the Base POC determines the well isin an area which needs such protection. The guard posts shall be five feet intotal length and installed radially from each wellhead. Recess the guardposts approximately two feet into the ground and anchor with concrete. Do notinstall the guard posts in the concrete pad placed at the well base. Paintthe protective steel sleeve and clearly number the well on the sleeveexterior.

(c) Provide locks for both flush and above-ground wellassemblies. Turn over the master keys to the Base POC following completion ofthe field effort.

(3) As soon as practical after completion, develop each wellwith a submersible pump, bailer, and/or airlift method. Continue welldevelopment until the discharge water is clear and free of sediment to thefullest extent possible. Measure the rate of water produced, the pH, specificconductance and water temperature during well development and include thisinformation in the Final Report.

a (4) Determine by survey the elevation of all newly installed

monitoring wells to an accuracy of 0.01 foot. Notch the top of the risercasing where well elevations are established. Horizontally locate the newwells to an accuracy of 1.0 foot and record the position on both project andsite specific maps. Bench marks used must have previously been establishedfrom and be traceable to a USCGS or USGS survey marker.

3

Page 17: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

(5) Measure water levels at all monitoring wells as feetbelow the ground surface or below the top of casing elevation to the nearest0.01 foot. Report in terms of mean sea level (MSL). Measure static waterlevels in wells prior to well development and before all well purging whichprecedes sampling events.

5. Recommend candidate well abandonment method(s) or technique,including costs, which are applicable to the type of monitoring wellsinstalled and geological conditions. Consider that these wells will beabandoned at some future date after the study objectives have been met andthere is no longer a need for the wells. The actual process of wellabandonment is not a part of this task order. Assure that the recommendedmethod(s) meets state and/or local well abandonment guidelines or regulations.

6. Complete permits, applications, and other forms which may berequired by local and/or state regulatory agencies for the installation ofmonitor wells. File these documents with appropriate agencies &nd pay allpermitting and filing fees.

7. Soil Borings

a. Conduct five soil borings not to exceed a total of 200 linearfeet. Accomplish the borings using hollow-stem auger techniques. Obtainsplit-spoon samples using ASTM Method D-1586. Refer to the site specificdetails, Section I.B., for the soil sample collection depths.

b. During the boring operations, describe lithologies encounteredand prepare stratigraphic logs. Place special emphasis on field identifica-tion of contaminated soils encountered.

c. Scan all split-spoon soil cores with a photolonization meteror equivalent organic vapor detector. Include monitoring results in theboring logs.

d. Whenever possible, measure water levels in all boreholes afterthe water level has stabilized. Examine the water surface for the presence ofhydrocarbons. Include the information In the boring logs.

e. Tremie-grout all boreholes to the surface with a bentonite/cement grout. It is especially Important to insure they are adequatelyresealed to preclude future migration of contaminants.

f. Permanently mark each location where soil borings aredrilled. Record the location on a project map for each specific site or zone,whichever is applicable.

8. gell and Borehole Cleanup

Remove all well/borehole cuttings and clean the general areafollowing the completion of each well/borehole. Containerize and storecuttings according to paragraph I.A.1. of this task order. Transport these

• . m | l I I I4

Page 18: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

drums to a location on Minot AFB designated by the Base POC. The base is

responsible for ultimate disposal of contaminated soils using base resources.

9. Field Sampling

a. Strictly comply with the sampling techniques, maximum holdingtimes, and preservation of samples as specified in the following references:Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th Edition(1985), pages 37-44; ASTM, Section 11, Water and Environmental Technology;Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846,2nd Edition (USEPA, 1984); Methods for Chemical Analysis of Waters and Wastes,EPA Manual 600/4-79-020, pages xiii to xix (1983); and Handbook for Samplingand Sample Preservation of Water and Wastewater, EPA Document 600/4-82-029(1982).

b. Allow wells to stabilize after development for a minimum ofseven days before sampling.

c. Prior to purging the wells, examine the surface of the watertable for the presence of hydrocarbons and take water level measurements tothe nearest 0.01 foot with respect to the established survey point on top ofthe well casing. If applicable, measure the thickness of the hydrocarbonlayer and collect a sample of the hydrocarbons. Analyze the samples forpetroleum hydrocarbons (Attachment 1 includes an allowance for these samples).

d. Purge the well using a submersible pump, bailer, or otherpertinent method. Purge until a minimum of three well volumes (based onborehole diameter) of water have been displaced and the pH, temperature,specific conductance, color, and odor of the discharge have stabilized usingthe following criteria: pH ± 0.1 unit, temperature ± 0.50C, and specificconductance t 10 umhos. Include the final measurements In the Results sectionof the report.

e. Collect water samples with a Teflon bailer. However, tocollect representative aquifer samples where floating hydrocarbons arepresent, use a "thief sampler" or similar device to minimize the influence ofthe free product.

f. If the well(s) cannot be sampled due to well development, wellcharacteristics, or other reason(s), indicate the reason(s) in the report asspecified in Item VI below.

g. Permanently mark the location where surface water or sedimentsamples are collected. Record the location on a project map for each site orzone, whichever applies.

h. Split all water and soil samples. Analyze one set andimmediately deliver the other set (the same collection day) to the Base POC.The Base POC will select 10% of the split samples, package the selections withappropriate forms, and deliver them to the contractor within 24 hours ofreceipt. Supply all packing and shipping materials to the Base POC forpackaging the split samples. Immediately ship (within 24 hours) the POCselected samples through overnight delivery to:

5

Page 19: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

USAFOEHLISABldg 140Brooks AFB TX 78235-5501

For all split samples sent to the USAFOEHL, complete an AF Form 2752A

"Environmental Sampling Data" and/or an AF Form 2752B "Environmental SamplingData - Trace Organics", (working copies have been provided under separatecover) with the following information:

(1) Date and time collected

(2) Purpose of sample (analyte and sample group)

(3) Installation name (base)

(4) Sample number (on containers)

(5) Source/location and depth of sample

(6) Contract Task Numbers and Title of Project

(7) Method of collection (bailer, suction pump, air-lift pump,

split-spoon, etc.)

(8) Volumes removed before sample taken

(9) Special Conditions (use of surrogate starfdard, etc.)

(10) Preservatives used

(11) Collector's name or initials

In addition, label each sample container with a permanent ink pen (laundry

marker) to reflect the data in (1), (2), (3), (4), (10) and (11) above.

i. For every 10 field samples collected, take one additional

sample (a field duplicate) for quality control purposes. Attachment 1

provides a 10% allowance for these additional analyses. Duplicates shall be

indistinguishable from other analytical samples so personnel performing the

analyses are not able to determine which samples are duplicates.

J. For every 20 field water samples collected, prepare and submit

for analysis one additional field blank for all parameters analyzed in water.

A minimum of one field blank for each parameter is required. Allowances for

these additional analyses are included in Attachment 1.

k. Maintain chain-of-custody records for all samples, fieldblanks, and quality control samples.

10. Chemical Analyses

6

, , i i I I I

Page 20: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

a. Analyze water and soil samples collected as specified inSection B below, Specific Site Work. The analytical parameters are summarizedin Attachment 1 along with the required methods. Archive all raw data,including QA/QC and standards data for not less than five years after projectcompletion. Supply this data to the USAFOEHL/TS upon request.

b. All analyses shall meet the required limits of detection forthe applicable method identified in Attachment 1.

c. For those methods which employ gas chromatography (GC) as theanalytical technique (E601, SW8010 and SW8020) positive confirmation ofidentity is required for all analytes having concentrations higher than theMethod Detection Limit (MDL). Conduct positive confirmation by second-columnGC; however, gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) can be used forpositive confirmation if the quantity of each analyte to be confirmed is abovethe detection level of the GC/MS instrument. Analytes which cannot beconfirmed will be reported as "Not Detected" in the body of the report, butresults of all second-column GC or GC/MS confirmational analyses are to beincluded in the report appendix along with other raw analytical 4ata. Basethe quantification of confirmed analytes upon the first column analysis. Themaximum number of second-column confirmational analyses shall not exceed fiftypercent (50%) of the actual number of field samples (to include duplicates).The total number of samples for each GC method listed in Attachment 1 includesthis allowance. If GCMS, or a combination of second-column GC and GC/MS, isused, the total cost of all such analyses for a particular parameter shall notexceed the funding allowed for positive confirmation using only second-columnGC.

d. All chemical/physical analyses shall conform to state and

other applicable Federal and local regulatory agency legal requirements. If aregulatory agency specifies that a type of analysis be performed in acertified laboratory, assure compliance with the requirement and furnishdocumentation showing laboratory certification with the first analytical datasupplied to the USAFOEHL.

11. Decontamination Procedures:

a. Decontaminate all sampling equipment, including internalcomponents, prior to use and between samples to avoid cross contamination.Wash equipment with a laboratory-grade detergent followed by drinking qualitywater, solvent (methanol), and distilled water rinses. Allow sufficient timefor the solvent to evaporate and the equipment to dry completely.

b. Dedicate for each well the monofilament line or steel wireused to lower sampling equipment into the well; do not use a line in more thanone well. Decontaminate the calibrated water level probe for measuring wellvolume and water level elevation before use in each well.

c. Thoroughly clean and decontaminate the drilling rig and toolsbefore initial use and after each borehole completion. As a minimum, steamclean drill bits after each borehole is Installed. Drill from the "least" tothe "most" contaminated areas, if possible.

7

Page 21: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

12. Conduct a literature search of local hydrogeologic conditions tocomplement the Phase I Report (mailed under separate cover). Use this data todetermine optimum well locations. Include the pertinent literature searchinformation in an appendix of the Final Report. Develop the literature searchdata using the following guideline:

a. Topographic data

b. Geologic data

(1) Structure

(2) Stratigraphy

(3) Lithology

c. Hydrogeologic data

(1) Location of all existing and abandoned wells, including

observation wells, and springs, natural ponds and seepages, that occur on oroff the installation within a one-mile radius of sites to be investigated

(2) Groundwater table and piezometric contours

(3) Depth to groundwater

(4) Surface and groundwater quality

(5) Recharge, discharge and contributing areas

(6) Geologic setting, yield and hydrographs of springs andnatural seepages

d. Data on all existing and abandoned wells, to include

observation holes,on or off the installation and within a one-mile radius ofsites to be investigated.

(1) Location, depth, diameter, types of wells, and logs

(2) Static and pumping water levels, hydrographs, yield andspecific capacity

(3) Present and projected groundwater development and use

(4) Corrosion, incrustation, well interference, and similaroperation and maintenance problems

(5) Observation well networks

(6) Existing water sampling sites

8

Page 22: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

e. Aquifer data

(1) Type, such as unconfined, artesian, or perched

(2) Thickness, depths, and formational designation

(3) Boundaries

(4) Transmissivity, storativity, and permeability

(5) Specific retention

(6) Discharge and recharge

(7) Ground and surface water relationships

(8) Aquifer models

f. Climatic data

(1) Precipitation (total and net)

(2) Evapotranspiration

B. Specific Site Work

Attachment 3 is a base map showing the site locations. In addition toitems delineated in I.A. above, conduct the following specific actions at thesites listed below:

1. Sanitary Landfill

a. Install nine shallow (approximately 20 feet deep) well around

the perimeter of the landfill. Approximately locate the wells (SW 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 6, 7, 8 and 9) as shown on Attachment 4.

b. Perform three soil borings to a depth of 100 feet to determinelithology and geology around the landfill. Grout the lower 50 feet of eachboring with a bentonite/cement grout and convert the boreholes to deep(approximately 50 feet) wells. Screen a maximum of 10 feet of the deepwells. Approximately locate the wells (DW 1, 2, and 3) as shown on Attachment4 and as follows:

(1) One well collocated with the shallow well installed onthe north edge of landfill.

.(2) One well collocated with the shallow well on the eastedge of the landfill in the drainage channel.

(3) One well collocated with the shallow well installedbetween the sewage lagoon and the landfill.

9

Page 23: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

C. Collect a groundwater sample from each of the 12 new wells andfrom the four existing groundwater monitoring wells in the landfill (16 watersamples).

d. Collect a maximum of four surface water samples from anystanding water in the landfill or from the landfill drainage channel whichflows off base. If the water is flowing in the drainage channel, take adischarge measurement.

e. Analyze water samples for petroleum hydrocarbons, aromaticvolatile organics, halogenated volatile organics, 13 priority pollutantmetals, extractable priority organic pollutants (GC/MS), total dissolvedsolids (TDS), and common anions.

2. Firefighter Training Area (FTA).

a. Install four wells (approximately 30 feet deep) equally spacedaround the perimeter of the FTA.

b. Perform one soil boring in the center of the fire trainingarea to a depth of 30 feet. Collect four soil samples for chemical analysisfrom the boring, based on HNU or OVA meter readings, odor, discoloration orother indicators of contamination.

c. Collect three sediment samples for chemical analysis in theditch draining the FTA. Take samples to a depth of one foot at the followinglocations: the effluent side of the culvert in the ditch near the FTA, justinside the base boundary where the ditch leaves the base, and at a point ofsuspected contamination selected in the field.

d. Collect a groundwater sample from each well.

e. Analyze those soil/sediment samples selected for chemicalanalysis for petroleum hydrocarbons, aromatic volatile organics, halogenatedvolatile organics, and lead.

f. Analyze water samples for petroleum hydrocarbons, aromatic

volatile organics, halogenated volatile organics, and lead.

3. Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Area.

a. Perform one 20 foot soil boring in a location specified by theBase POC. Collect two soil samples during boring based on HNU or OVA meterreadings, odor, discoloration or other indicators of contamination.

b. Analyze the soil samples for petroleum hydrocarbons and 13priority pol~utant metals.

4. Background Sampling

a. To determine background water quality, sample the existingCorps of Engineers well once. Analyze the sample for halogenated and aromatic

10

Page 24: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

volatile organics, petroleum hydrocarbons, 13 priority pollutant metals, total

dissolved solids, and common anions.

C. Health and Safety

Comply with USAF, OSHA, EPA, state and local health and safetyregulations regarding the proposed work effort. Use EPA guidelines fordesignating the appropriate levels of protection at study sites. Prepare awritten Health and Safety Plan for the proposed work effort and coordinate itdirectly with applicable regulatory agencies prior to commencing fieldoperations. Provide an information copy of the Health and Safety Plan to theUSAFOEHL after coordination with regulatory agencies. The Health and SafetyPlan is specified in Sequence No. 7, Item VI below.

D. Technical Operations Plan

Immediately after the Notice To Proceed (NTP) for the delivery order,develop a Technical Operations Plan (TOP) based on the technical requirementsspecified in this task description. (See Sequence No. 20, Item VI, below).Follow the TOP format (mailed under separate cover). Provide the TOP to theUSAFOEHL within two weeks of the NTP.

E. Data Review

1. Tabulate field and analytical laboratory results, including fieldand laboratory parameters and QA/QC data, as they become available andincorporate them into the next monthly R&D Status Report (Sequence No. 1, ItemVI below) forwarded to the USAFOEHL. In addition to the results, report thefollowing:

a. the time and dates for sample collection, extraction (ifapplicable) and analysis;

b. the method used and Method Detection Limits achieved;

c. the Chain-of-Custody forms;

d. a cross-reference of laboratory sample numbers to field samplenumbers; and

e. a cross-reference of field sample numbers to wells, boreholes,sites, etc.

2. Upon completion of all analyses, tabulate and incorporate allresults into an Informal Technical Information Report (Sequence No. 3, ItemVI, below) and forward the report to USAFOEHL for review a minimum of twoweeks prior o submission of the draft report. Provide as a minimum theinformation specified in I.E.1. above.

3. Immediately report to the USAFOEHL Program Manager or hissupervisor via telephone, data/results generated during this investigationwhich indicate a potential health risk (for example, a contaminated drinking

11

Page 25: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

water aquifer). Follow the telephone notification with a written noticewithin three days; attach a copy of the laboratory raw data (i.e.,chromatogram).

F. Reporting

1. Prepare a draft report delineating all findings of this fieldinvestigation and forward it to the USAFOEHL (as specified in Sequence No. 4,Item VI, below) for Air Force review and comment. Strictly adhere to theUSAFOEHL report format (mailed under separate cover). The format is anintegral part of this delivery order. Draft reports are considered "drafts"only in the sense that they have not been reviewed and approved by Air Forceofficials. In all other respects, "drafts" must be complete, in the properformat, and free of grammatical and typographical errors. Include adiscussion of the regional/site specific hydrogeology, well and boring logs,data from water level surveys, ground water surface and gradient maps, waterquality and soil analysis results, available geohydrologic cross sections, andlaboratory and field QA/QC information. Follow the USAFOEHL supplied format(mailed under separate cover). For states requiring the field work ortechnical effort be supervised by a state registered geologist, engineeringgeologist or professional engineer, insert this information in the report toinclude registration numbers, certificate and seals (as appropriate).

2. Review the IRP Phase I report. Integrate the Phase I informationwith the investigative work done at each site to date so the report reflectsthe total cumulative information for each site studied in this effort.

3. In the results section, include water and soil analyses resultsand field quality control sample data. Report all internal laboratory qualitycontrol data (lab blanks, lab spikes, and lab duplicates), and laboratoryquality assurance information in an appendix of the report. Provide second-column confirmation results and quantities, and include which columns wereused, instrument operating conditions and retention times. Summarize in theappendix the specific collection technique, analytical method (StandardMethods, EPA, etc.), holding time, and limit of detection for each analyte.

4. Make estimates of the magnitude, extent and direction whichdetected contaminants are moving. Identify potential environmentalconsequences of discovered contamination based upon state or Federalstandards.

5. Plot and map all field data collected for each site according tosurveyed positions.

6. In the recommendation section, address each site and list them bycategory:

a. Category I consists of sites where no further action(including remedial action) is required. Data for these sites are consideredsufficient to rule out unacceptable public health or environmental hazards.

12

Page 26: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

b. Category II sites are those requiring an additional Phase Ii

effort to determine the direction, magnitude, rate of movement and extent ofdetected contaminants. Identify potential environmental consequences ofdiscovered contamination, where known.

c. Category III sites are those that will require remedial

actions (ready for IRP Phase IV). In the recommendations for Category IIIsites, include any possible influence on sites in Categories I and/or 1I due

to their connection with the same hydrological system. Clearly state anydependency between sites in different categories. Include a list of candidateremedial action alternatives, including Long Term Monitoring (LTM) as remedialaction, and the corresponding rationale that should be considered in selecting

the remedial action for a given site. List all alternatives that couldpotentially bring the site into compliance with environmental standards. Forcontaminants that do not have standards, EPA recommended safe levels fornoncarcinogens (Health Advisory or Suggested-No-Adverse-Response Levels) and

target levels for carcinogens (1 x 10-G cancer risk level) may be used.Unless specifically requested, do not perform comprehensive cost analyses, or

cost/benefit review for remedial action alternatives. However, in thosesituations where field survey data indicate immediate corrective action isnecessary, present specific, detailed recommendations.

For each category above, summarize the results of field data,

environmental or regulatory criteria, or other pertinent informationsupporting conclusions and recommendations.

7. Provide cost estimates by line item for future efforts recommended

for Category II sites and LTM Category III sites. Submit these estimates

concurrently with the approved Final Report in a separate document. Only the

cost requirements outlined in Sequence No. 2, Item VI, need be submitted.

a. For Category II sites, develop detailed site-specific

estimates using prioritized costing format (i.e., cost of conducting therequired work on: the highest priority site only; the first two highestpriority sites only; the first three highest priority sites only; etc., untilall required work is discretely costed) for the proposed work effort. The Air

Force determines the priority of sites from contractor recommendations.Consider the type of contaminants, their magnitude, the direction and rate of

their migration, and their subsequent potential for environmental and health

consequences when developing recommendations for site prioritization.

b. For Category III sites slated for long-term monitoring,

develop site-specific estimates which detail the costs associated with: (1)permanent installation of monitoring wells; (2) ground water sampling

interface equipment, including permanent installations of pumps and samplinglines; and (3) four quarterly (1 year period) sample collections andlaboratory chemical analyses of ground water, etc.

8. Provide an inventory of all on-base wells, to include production,irrigation, monitoring, etc. If the well has been abandoned, then state thereason.

13

Page 27: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

9. Reference in an appendix any local, state and/or Federalregulations which require specific well drilling techniques, materials, welldevelopment, purging, and sampling methods for work specified in this effort.

G. Meetings

The contractor's project leader shall attend three meeting(s) to takeplace at a time to be specified by the USAFOEHL. Each meeting shall takeplace at Minot AFB for a duration of one eight-hour day.

II. SITE LOCATION AND DATES:

Minot AFB NDDate to be established

III. BASE SUPPORT:

A. Prior to any contractor digging or drilling, the Base Civil EngineerPOC will locate underground utilities and issue digging permits..

B. The Base Civil Engineer will assign accumulation points within theinstallation for the contractor to use to deliver any drill cuttings or wellinstallation/development fluids generated from the required work which aresuspected to be hazardous.

C. The Base Civil Engineer will take custody of any drill cuttings orwell installation/development fluids suspected to be hazardous and properlydispose of the material according to applicable state/Federal regulations.

D. The Base will provide the contractor with existing engineering plans,drawings, diagrams, aerial photographs, etc., to evaluate sites underinvestigation.

E. The Base POC will select 10% of the split samples provided by thecontractor, package them, and ensure they are picked up by the contractorwithin 24 hours of sample receipt by the POC. See paragraph I.A.9.h.

F. The Base will arrange for and have available prior to the start-up offield work, the following services, materials, work space, and items ofequipment to support the contractor conducting the survey:

1. Personnel identification badges and vehicle passes and/or entrypermits.

2. A staging area for storage of equipment and supplies.

3. supply (i.e., fire hydrant) for large quantities (up to amaximum of 1,000 gallons) of potable water to be used in equipment cleaning,etc.

4. A household-type refrigerator having approximately two cubic feet

of freezer space for storage of blue ice.

14

Page 28: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

IV. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: None

V. GOVERNMENT POINTS OF CONTACT:

1. USAFOEHL Program Monitor 2. Base Point of Contact (POC)

Capt Patrick N. Johnson Capt David DeMayUSAFOEHL/TSS USAF Regional Hosp Minot/SGPBBrooks AFB TX 78235-5501 Minot AFB ND 58705-5300(512) 536-2158 (701) 727-3398AV 240-2158/2159 AV 344-33981-800-821-4528

3. MAJCOM Monitor 4. Base Civil Engineer POC

Lt Col John Pontier Mr John L. BoucherHQ SAC/SGPB 91st CSG/DEEVE

Offutt AFB NE 68113-5001 Minot AFB ND 58705-5300(402) 294-4651 (701) 727-3691AV 271-4651 AV 344-3691

VI. In addition to sequence numbers 1, 5 and 11 listed in Attachment 1 to thecontract, and which apply to all orders, the sequence numbers listed below areapplicable to this order. Also shown are dates applicable to this order.

Sequence No. Para No. Block 10 Block 11 Block 12 Block 13 Block 14

20 (TOP)* I.D. OTIME 86SEP26 86SEP29 15

7 (Health & I.C. OTIME 86SEP26 865EP27 3Safety)

3 (Prelim I.E.2 OTIME *1 3Data)

4 (Tech. I.F. ONE/R 87JAN30 87FEB13 87NOV13 '

Rpt)

2 (Cost I.F.7. OTIME 87FEB13 87NOV13

Data)

14 MONTHLY 860CT14 86OCT31 3

15 MONTHLY 860CT14 860CT31 3

*The Technica Operations Plans (TOP) required for this stage is due within

two (2) weeks of the Notice to Proceed (NTP).

**Upon completion of the total analytical effort before submission of the

first draft report.

15

Page 29: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

***Two draft reports (25 copies of each) and one final report (50 copies plusthe original camera ready copy) are required. Incorporate Air Force commendsinto the second draft and final reports as specified by the USAFOEHL. Supplythe USAFOEHL with an advance copy of the first draft, second draft, and finalreports for acceptance prior to distribution. Distribute remaining 24 copiesof each draft report and 49 copies of the final report as specified by theUSAFOEHL.

****Submit cost estimates (five copies) in a separately bound document withthe Final Report only. Provide estimates for only those sites recommended foradditional Phase II work (Category II) or Phase IV, Long Term Monitoring,(Category III).

*****Submit monthly hereafter.

16

Page 30: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

Attachment I

Analytical Methods, Detection Limits, and Number of Samples

DETECTIRN NO. OF TOTALPARAMETER METHOD LIMIT SAMPLES QA1 SAMPLES

Halogenated SW5030/SW8010 a 7 soil 1 soil 12 soilVolatileOrganics EPA 601 a 25 water 4 water 45 watere

Aromatic SW5030/8020 a 7 soil 1 soil 12 soilfVolatileOrganics SW5030/8020 a 25 water 4 water 45 water g

ExtractablePriorityPollutants(GC/MS) EPA 625 a 20 water 3 water 23 water

Petroleum SW3550/EPA 418.1 1 mg/kg 9 soil 1 soil 10 soilHydrocarbons

EPA 418.1 1 mg/L, 50 water 8 water 58 waterwater

Total Dissolved EPA 160.1 10 *g/L, 21 water 3 water 24 waterSolids (TDS) water

Priority EPA 200.7 c 21 water 3 water 24 waterPollutant SW 3050/SW6010 c 2 soil I soil 3 soilMetals (13 ea.) EPA 245.1 (Hg) c 21 water 3 water 24 water

SW7471 (Hg) c 2 soil 1 soil 3 soilEPA 206.2 (As) c 21 water 3 water 24 waterSW3050/SW7060(As) c 2 soil 1 soil 3 soilEPA 270.2 (Se) a 21 water 3 water 24 waterSW3050/SW7740(Se) a 2 soil 1 soil 3 soil

Lead 5W3050/7120 10 mg/kg 7 soil 1 soil 8 soil

E239.2 0.002 mg/L 4 water 2 water 6 water

Common Anions A429 0.1 mg/L 21 water 3 water 24 water

pH (Field Test) -- 25 water -- 25 water

Temperature -- 25 water 25 water(Field Test)

Conductance -- 25 water 25 water(Field Test)

Ep Toxicity SW Manual b 10 soil 3 soil 13 soil(Metals)

Page 31: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

a. Detection limits as specified by the applicable EPA or Standard Method; report

results in ug/L for water samples and mg/kg for soil samples.

b. Metal mg/L leaching solution

As 0.002Ba 0.1Cd 0.005Cr 0.05Pb 0.1Hg 0.0002Se 0.002Ag 0.01

DETECTION LIMITC. Metal Water(mg/L) Soil/Sedlment(mg/kg)

Sb 0.032 3.2As 0.001 0.1Be 0.0003 0.03Cd 0.004 0.4Cr 0.007 0.7Cu 0.006 0.6Pb 0.042 4.2Hg 0.0002 0.1Ni 0.015 1.5Se 0.002 0.2Ag 0.007 0 7TI 0.040 4.0Zn 0.002 0.2

d. Total of 12 includes second column confirmation for 50% of the samples (4).

e. Total of 45 includes second column confirmation for 50% of the samples (15).

f. Total of 12 includes second column confirmation of 50% of the samples (4).

g. Total of 45 includes second column confirmation of 50% of the samples (15).

h. Report results of all soil sample analyses as mg/kg of dry soil. Report the soilmoisture content of each sample.

i. QA includes a 10% increase for field duplicates and a 5% increase for field blanks(water samples only).

18

Page 32: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

Attachment 2

Sampling and Analytical RequirementsMinot AFB SD

Soil

0 0

00 a 0$ s 0 a

FTA 7 7

EOD2 2

Total 7 7 9 2 7

19

-- ,- -, , i l a 0

Page 33: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

Attachment 2

Sampling and Analytical RequirementsMinot AFB SD

Water

C. 0

o go A..M00 CO. -0

ccC M j t 0 0 0 OC4 zW0 x 0 0 1.

Sani taryLandf il 1U 20 20 40 20 20 20 20 20 20

FTA O4 i 4 8 4 4

C/E Well 1 1 2 1 1 I

Total 25 25 20 50 21 21 21 25 25 25

20

Page 34: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

APPENDIX C

WELL NUMBERING SYSTEM

(CL5O6OB/0528N)

Page 35: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

C. Well Numbering System

A well numbering system was used to identify each well constructedduring the on-site remedial investigation. A unique number was assigned

to each well and listing of well numbers was maintained by the HART fieldteam leader. The system is described below.

Well Identification

Each well was identified by a two-letter identifier code, with thefollowing prefix:

SW - Shallow Well (less than 30 feet in depth)

DW - Deep Well (greater than 30 feet in depth)

A numerical suffix unique to each prefix follows.

Example

SW-l. Shallow monitoring well No. 1.

(0528n-8)

Page 36: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

APPENDIX D

GEOLOGICAL LOGS

(CL5O6OB/0528N)

Page 37: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

APPENDIX D.1

HART TEST BORING LOGS

(CL5O6OB/0528N)

Page 38: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

.1 -1

PROJECT NAME: 1EAF-4AFB - -_- " .

DATE DRILLED: L0/15/86 BORING NU 1E: SA:DRILLING LOCATION Landfill - 2REDLE .3A:; 1-.:1 .-2. -

ON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. eVi::ezi J. vol. TILLING COJPANY: T,:- 'it Test:-

DRILLING METhOD: Holow Flignt Auger , '. 'NTALzED: -

jSample'Sample Sample; Met:.c J ?is Recov. I..

Number! Depth Depth ' ' per In, PM ePec , n : Ec Sample S° cf e a

WM-1 4_, St

..DW2-i2 .. ....... . . -0.6: sandy . pi: ;. . .. . .. ... .. . ..... ... .. . ... ... . . .. .. ... .. ...y ... .. ... 0. -- 6- tr:wn-gray- s.syt

.....-....-............................... . . . . ... -.. .

; 2 .i 7 :±ay wifn trace c sano

.. ... ........... ....... : 5: gray-tr r si ty ay;

B , 8 ' . -i 8: i t.: c,,wr, san.: an:S.. . .. . .... ................ .......... ....... ... . .... .... ........ ......... ......... ...... .......... ..... ...... ........ . .... ....... ............ ........ ...... ...... . .. . . . ... . ... .. ..... - 9 - . w "a n -n

gave. w:tr trace :' ::stDk -- 8U - .. 0 ' i ' f rown sandy silt;

i I I ens of med. to fn... -.....-. . - - --..... . a+ 0 .2.

: :-s - i + '. 2;+r.- - - + ;T

..... . ....... .... -..: z... san: L s tt me:. E

.... . ..... .... . ... . .. . . .i brown sanc , ra .

<i(') s rs. sane an: gravel.""C ij 4! 1.0 -7: orange-orcwn SC.

..... ,a ; ,. .,. s.. .y

S ' : t : ay . : :-. sane: pecois...W - .... ... ... ... ..... - . , a w i t. .

I .. , = s : t: S an: peoties......... .... ... ... . .. ... ..- " " w i t

4,

71 ' I - -r

.1K:-U( " : ' ,' I -0.4: c gqray sy ay;

• • • n nn I I I I I

Page 39: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-2

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/9/86 BORING NUMBER: SW3

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1638.07 ft. isiON S!TE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-3

Sample:Sample Sample: Method: Blows Recov.: O.V.A.: FNumber: Depth Depth: of : per Ft.: ppm e

:Begin End Sample: 6' of eFt. Ft. :Collect: Drive : t Visual Classification

SW3-1: 0: 2: SS: 2, 31 0.5: 0; [ML] Brown to dark brown topsoil.' I I I 4 : i I

a a a 41 a a 4 I

SW3-2: 5: 7: SS: 4: 1.8: 0: 5 Pion silty clay, with

S5: i occasional orange mottlinga8: and pebbles.

12: iI7

_W33 : .. . 12. SS: 41 .6; 10 Same as above.

SW3-2; 7:11 11. : a : 0 5 Soe asi clyv w

........ " .... i ... ..... .... .... .... .. .._: .....L _ _ .... .... .... .i .... ........ .... ..... .... .....

S 8: :0 0; 0 S a

a a I L i a , a

aW-6 24 a S 7; NM a, a2 a cly a bo e wt

.... ........ .. ........ .. ....... ...... . ...... -- ... ... .. ............ ..... ............ I.. .....- 1... .......... ....... .. .. I3

a SW3a... .....

5-4: 10, 12, SS, 4, 2.0 :. . . O 10 Same as above.

a aa o a n s e a a aS. . . .a .. a.a.a

. . . . C t u . a ext a

a a a a *a aaa5 a I

a a a a a a a a a a [a a a a a a a.aa.. 1

, a a a a a a a

. . . .1 17 SS 61 .0 a : 15SmasboeIW- ; " 4 a S 7 N'I' a a a a; a e c a b v , w ta..... . . . . a.. . a_ a . ....... ... .... ........ ... a.. .......... .... ... ...... a 1.. ... .... ...... .. .. ..... ... .... . ....... ...a , a a a a a a a c a ~ n l s n e s s

aLa a ant5nuad an aex aa

. .. . . aI ~ ~ a a aI I I aI aI aI Ia

Page 40: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-3

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/9/86 BORING NUMBER: SW3

DRILLING LOCATION Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1638.07 ft. islON SITE GEOLOGIST V. DeViIlez/ J. Yolz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-3

Sample:Sample Sample: Method: Blows Recov. O.V.A. FNumber: epth Depth of : per Ft. pp e

Begin End Saple: 6' of: eFt. Ft. :Collect: Drive : t Visual Classification

I 171 23

5:25

. . .. .. .. ....... . . . . ..------ .n.. ..................... 2 5I I I I===Now

Page 41: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-4

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/17/86 BORING NUMBER: SW5

DRILLING LOCATION Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1632.54 ft. aslON SITE GEOLOGIST B. Macke/ J Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger NELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-5

Sample:Sample Sample! Method: Blows Recov.1 O.V.A.: FNumber! Depth Depth : of 1 per : Ft. 1 ppm I e

Begin End 1 Sample ' of : eFt. Ft. ICollect: Drive : : : t Visual Classification

SW5-I: 0! 2: SS: 4, 12: 1.5: o : [ML] 0 -0.6: dark brown topsoil.i 14: 1 I 0.6 -1.5: gray, medium sand

1 141 ' . I and gravel.SW5-2: 2: 4: SS: 6: 1.3: i : 1 O 2 0 -1.2: brown, medium to

6: : 1 : coarse sand and pebbles._ _i 4_ i 1 1 __ 3 1.2 -1.3: It. gray clayeyS* I 4: 1 silt.

SW5-3: 41 6: SS: 3i 1.6: o 01 4 0-0.1:brn silt; 0.2-0.3:brn6: : i silty sand; 0.3-0.7:brn silty

I i 5: 5 clay; 0.7-0.9:fn silty sand;

7 0.9-1.6: sandy silt.SU5-4: 65 8l SS. 21 2.01 1 11 01 6 Lt gray silty clay with

5: : : : orange mottling, traceI6: : ____ 7 of pebbles and a few micro-it: i sand lenses.

Su5-5: 8: 10 SS: 51 1.8: 0 ; 0: 8 0 -0.2: same clay as above;4: : : : 1 1 0.2 -0.7: fn. brn. sand with61 i : : 9 trace of silt; 0.7 -1.8: brn.

i 9 9: : I sit clay w/ tr sand & pebblesSW5-6: to: 12: SS: 3: 2.0: : 1 O! t0 Same clay as above.

I : 1 : : : : 1

SWS-7 121 14: SS: 3: 2.01 : 1 0 12 0 -0.7: fn brown sand with:i i 4; little silt.

7: : : I : 13 0.7 -2.0: brown silty clay.1 9 I 8l : : _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _

SW5-8: 14: 161 SS: 3: 2.01 o: 0O 14 (CL] Dark brown to gray silty9 7: : : 1 clay with trace of sand

____ 8: : : :15 and pebbles.i 13: :

SW5-9: 16: is: SS: 4: 2.0: o: 16 Same as above.

6:: i 8: 17

S 9 I 1: : : : 18

m 9 m I m I.9

Page 42: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-5

PROJECT NAME: USAF-NAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/16/86 BORING NUMBER: SW6

DRILLING LOCATION Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1643.41 ft. eslON SITE GEOLOGIST B. Macke/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger VELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-6

Sasple!Sample 1 Sample: Method, Blows Recov. O.V.A.1 FNumber! Depth 1 Depth 1 of : per Ft. ppm : e

Begin 1 End 1 Sample: 6' of eFt. : Ft. :Collect: Drive 1 t Visual Classification

SW6-1: o: 21 SS: 2, 7: 0.5: O! [ML] Dark brown to black topsoil.a 6 I (hit rock)

* 17:SW6-2: 2: 4: SS! 2! 1.1 01 2 0 -0.7: same as above.

i 1: i :0.7 -1.1: dark brown clayey2: i i 3 silt with root material.

5u6-3: 4: 6: SS: 1: 1.3: 0! 4 0 -0.5: same as above.S: 0.5 -1.3: It. gray clay with2: 5 trace of silt.

S56-4: 6: 8! SS: 2! 1.6: : : o: 6 Same clay as above; aa a a : 2: : a white, medium to coarse sand

i : 4: : i 7 lens at 1.5.

5W6-5: 81 10: SS: 31 2.0: : 0: 8 Medium gray clay with littlei 4: : . : silt and sand.

: : : 8: :

SW6-6: 10i 12: SS: 21 2.0: ' : o: 1O Same as above.

* : * a: * * a 11

SW6-7: 121 14: Ss: 4 1.6: I : 0.5: 12 Same as above with traces of5: i lignite and orange mottling

S 1: * ___ __0__ 13 in places.

i 12:a aaSW6-81 14: 161 SS: 41 2.0: * : : O: 14 Same clay as above.

to: 15: : 5

a a a a 12:SW6-9: 16! 181 SS: 3: 2.0. 01 16 Same clay as above with more

i 6a a silt in places.

a a a 9: a 17

SW6-10L 18: 20: SS: 5: 2.0 O 18 CLI Dark gray silty clay withSa a8a trace of sand and pebbles.

a a a 12: 19I I I 131

I l l l21

a a 2 : : a2

Log Continued on Next Page

Page 43: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-6

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/16/96 BORING NUMBER: SW6

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1643.41 ft. islON SITE GEOLOGIST : B. Mackel J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLFD: SW-6

Sample:Sample : Sample! Method: Blows 1 Recov. : O.Y.A.: FNumber: Depth 1 Depth : of : per Ft. : pp. e

:fBegin : End 1 Sample! of: : of eFt.Ft. t. :Collect: Drive t Visual Classification

SW6-11: 23: 25: SS: 5 2.0 : 0: 23 ,- Dark gray silty clay withSi 8: i . , trace of sand and pebbles.i 8: i : 24I I I0I .

25 /,/,

I I I2S ,-I.I. ..6I III I I.. ..

I I I 27I I I I"

SWI-2: 28: 301 SS: 7I 2.01 iO 28 Same as above.

I I I . . .

to: 29.

I I I I . ,

I I I 0 .

I I I I ...- ,

I I I 32..//

SW6-13 33: 35 SS: 2 2.0: 0 33 Same as above.

I II ."/"

S 8I 34 /

i 35,..

I I I I .. 29

i i _ 3610... ,.

11I I , ....

S I 37 ....3

* I I I I I I , ,, .

SW6-14I 381 401 SS: 3: 2.01 0;O_ 38 Same as above.

I I 8 I I I 39 .. .I I 3I I I....... •.

I I I I I I 4 ... .... ..

I I I I I I .- .- .

I I I I I .... ....

S I I I 42

I I I I I I I ....I....... ,

SW6-15! 43: 45: SS: 4 1.6: i O! 43 Same as above.

I I I I LI I I I II... -

S1 I4 I I

II I I I4I I I I II ..............

]. I ,[ I I ; I I I I I.... ..... ..

Log Continued on NexI Page

I II I I I 3

Page 44: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-7

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/16/86 BORING NUMBER: SW6

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1643.41 ft. aslON SITE GEOLOGIST : B. Mackel J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-6

SamplelSample Sample! Method: Blows Recov.: O.V.A.: FNumber: Depth Depth of : per Ft. ppm : e

Begin End Sample: 6' of I eFt. Ft. ICollect: Drive i t Visual Classification

: 47 ..

I I I.....I ,. I I

SW6-16: 49,' so: SS! 5: 2.01 0 : 48 ..... .1 Same as above; 1.7 -2.0:

: : : 1: :: : ..... . . dark brown to black, medium

: 101 ,: 49 ./ to coarse sand with someSI 211 i lignite.

: : : : : : : : 50 /

* , , I I m

Page 45: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-8

PROJECT NAME: USAF-NAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/22/86 BORING NUNBER: SW7

DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: Not SurveyedON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: None

Sample!Sasple Sample. flethod: Blows Recov.: O.V.A.: FNumber: Depth Depth of : per Ft. 1 pp.1 e

:Begin: End lSampe 6" of 1 I eFt. 1 Ft. :Collect; Drive i i t Visual Classification

SW7-11 O: 21 SS: 3, 5: 0.81 0: [ML] 0 -0.5: dk brn silty topsoil;i i 41 1 0.5 -0.8: It brn silty clay.

597-2: 51, 71' SS: 2: 0.9: 1251 5 Brn silty clay with trace of3! sand and pebbles and small

: : : 6: 6 ((.1') lenses of fn. to med.i 8! sand; sand, and in some cases

: : : 7 clay, is stained black & has2a distictive odor.

a7-3, t0: 121 SS" 21 1.8! 300: to Same (clay & sand) as above;

a 3: sand is at 1.6; sample

a6: i It has same discoloration and

Sa aodor as above.

: 12

: : 13

SV7-4: 15: 171 SS: 3: 2.01 o 15 Brown silty clay with tracea a a 31 : : of sandand pebbles

: : : 51 i 16

: : : l 17

a a a a :1

S a a a : 6(1) d19

597-5: 20: 22: SS: 2: 2.01 O: 20 ["CL] Dark gray silty clay withS a 2: : a trace of sand and pebbles.

S51 21: : l : 6 :

: : : : : : 22

Log Continued on Next Page

a a a a a a I

Page 46: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-9

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFO PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/22/86 BORING NUMBER: S97

DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: Not SurveyedON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger VELL(S) INSTALLED: None

Sample:Sample Sample: Method! Blows Recov.: O.VA. FNumber: Depth Depth I of : per Ft. ppm e

Begin End : Samplel V of eFt. Ft. !Collect! Drive I t Visual Classification

1 24

SW7-61 25: 271 SS. 3 1.8 ol 25 Sate as above.I I I I : :/ .. /.

i 7" .- 26

S27 I I

Page 47: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D. -10

PROJECT MANE: USAF-AF8 PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/23/86 BORING NUMBER: SWB

DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1651.33 ft. mslON SITE GEOLO6ST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMlPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-8

,SaspleiSample ' Sample. Methodl Blows Recov.. O.V.A.4 FNumber! Depth 1 Depth 1 of 1 per Ft. * ppm e

fBegin End 1 Sample! 6' of : eFt. Ft. !Collect! Drive t Visual Classification

Sw8-i: o: 2: SS: 3, 5: 0.8: 0: (ML] Lt. to dk. brown silty4: 1 topsoil with trace of pebbles5: i and organic matter.

I I I I2

SW8-21 5: 71 SS" 2,' 1.41 Nfli 5 Lt. brown silty clay withi 4: i trace of sand and pebbles.

:4 6 : 7

SW9-31 7: 9: SS: 31 2.0: i N" 7 Same as above.

i i 5: i i

SW8-4: 9: 11: SS: 5: 2.01 NMI, 9 Same as above.I I I 5: i

S I-5: It: 131 SS. 41 1.01 NM: It Same as above with some

6 : i i orange mottling.

I 81 1 12 II

SW8-6: 13: 151 SS: 41 2.0. NN: 13 Lt. brown silty clay with: : : : 5: trace of sand and pebbles.

I I I I I I 14

SW8-7: 15: 17i SSi 51 2.01 H M 15 0 -1.0: same as above;i 8: i 1.0 -2.0: clay is grading to

I 11 121 16 a gray clay.

SWD-8: 17: 19: SS: 41 2.0: NN: 17 Gray silty clay with traceI 7: i i of sand and pebbles and

el i le 8 : 1 orange mottling.I I I I 12 :

SU8-g2 19i 21: Ss: 3 2.0: NM: 19 CL t Dk. gray silty clay with* 1, 4 * trace of sand and pebbles.

: 9:: 9 : 20

I I I0I

:2i:2 5 2

Log Continued on Next Page

* I

Page 48: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.-i

PROJECT MANE: USAF-MAFI PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00

DATE DRILLED: 10/23/86 BORING NUMBER: SWB

DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1651.33 ft. asiON SITE GEOLOGIST ; V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SM-B

Saeple:Sample Sample: Method: Blows :Recov.: : O.V.A.: FNumber.'Depth ieptn. of 'per Ft. ppam e

Begin: End :Sample 6'of: : :Ft. Ft. !Collect: Drive i t Visual Classification

SUB-101 24: 261 SS" 4' 2.0, i NM: 24 ., same as above.

7: 1

264 4 I 4I 4 IX

* 4 I 4 I 4 2 7

sws-ii: 28: 30: ss: 4: 2.0: : NM: 28 Same as above.

10:4 30

Page 49: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-12

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFD PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/23/86 BORING NUMBER: SW9

DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. B9REHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1650.22 ft. as1ON SITE 6EOLO6IST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLINC COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: 3W-9

Sample:Sample 1 Sample: Method! Blows 1 Recov.: O.V.A.i FNumber: Depth : Depth 1 of 1 per Ft. 1 ppm : e

:Begin : End ! Sample: 6' of eFt. 1 Ft. :Collect: Drive 1 i t Visual Classification

sW9-l: o: 2: SS: 4, 10: 1.51 : [MLI 0 -0.5:dk brn silty topsoil;a: : * : i 1 0.5 -1.5: It brn silty clay

i 7: i with trace of sand & pebbles;i : : : : 2 lens of fine, brown sand* I I I I I II from 0.8 -1.0.

i i i 3

* ~~ 4

SW9-21 5: 7: SS: 21 1.5: i >1000: 5 Lt. brown silty cloy withi 4: : a trace of sand and pebbles; Ii 41 i 1 6 cobble and tip of spoon

61 : : had black stained sand.SW9-31 7: 9: SS: 2: 1.9 : 800: 7 Same (silty clay) as above;

1 41' :1 : sand increases from trace* 5: 1 * 8 to some in patchy areas.

* ::: 8SW9-4; 9: It: SS: 4: 2.0: >O00: 9 Same as above.

I I I Al I I II0

i i; toaI

i 9: *I

Sw9-5: 11: 13: SS: 6i 2.01 :1 90: 11 Same as above with more9: 9 : : cobbles.12: i : 12

1 : : : 27: : iSW9-6: 13: 15: Ss: 4 2.0; i 1 1-2: 13 Lt. brn. fn. silty sand with

4 : i 4: : silty clay layers at 1.25 to5i ___ 14 1.4 and 1.85 to 1.9.

SW9-7: 15: 17: SS: 31 2.01 3: 15 Non-uniform alternating ofi 41 : silty fine sands and silty

a a : _ 16 clays with pebbles and Ia 13: : : large cobble.

SW9-8: 17: 19: SS: 61 1.61 9i 17 Lt. brown, silty, fine sandsa a 8a * a8* with some pebbles & cobbles.

i 14: : : 18* 14:

SW9-9: 19: 21; SS: 7: 2.0: : o: 19 0 -0.4:fn. to med. silty brn.a a : : : sand with some pebbles;

5 : 20 0.4 -2.0: brn. silty clay* : : : 6: : : with some sand and pebbles.

SW9-10: 21: 23: ss8 3: 1.5: O: 21 Lt. brown to gray silty clay4: : with some sand and trace of

i 7: : 22 pebbles.a * a 7C : o N age

Log Continued on Next Page

Page 50: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-13

PROJECT NAME: USAF-IAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/23/86 BORING NUMBER: SW9

DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1650.22 ft. IslON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLIN6 METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-9

Sasple:Sample : Sample: Method: Blows : Recov.: O.V.A.: FNumber! Depth Depth 1 of : per : Ft. : : ppm: e

8egin. End I Sampie. 6' oi e1 Ft. 1 Ft. :Collect: Drive : : : : t Visual Classification

SW9-11: 23: 251 SS: 41 21 1 7-8, 23 . (CL] Dark gray silty clay with6: : . " trace of sand and pebbles.

______ ; l3 : : : 25

Page 51: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-14

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/7-8/86 BGRIN6 NUMBER: DW(see note on D. 1-18)

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1632.21 ft mslON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Mud Rotory WELL(S) INSTALLED: Dg-I, SW-2

Sample:Sample : Samplel Method: Blows : Recoy.: : O.V.A.: FNumber! Depth : Depth 1 of 1 per 1 Ft. a a pps 1 e

Begin 1 End 1 SapIl: 6' of 1 : e: Ft. ! Ft. !Collect! Drive 1 t Visual Classification

DW-I: O! 21 SSI 2, 31 0.7: : : Ol (ML] Gray-tan silty clay_ _ _ _ _41 w__ I with black organic layer

6! i from 0.2 -0.4

DWI-21 51, 7: SS" 3: 1.71 : O 5 Light brown to gray silty: : : : 41 , clay; mottled.

OWI-31' 101, 12', SS, 5: 1.7: i i 0: 10 grown silty clay with: G:: 6: orange mottling; slightly

13.1 it : 1 moist; trace of: 12: : pebbles (01/49).

: : : 12

,, : , : : : 14

DWI-4'. 15: 1711 SS: 5: 2.0,' 0 : 15 7- CL] Dark gray silty clay with7 1 minor orange mottling and

*101 i 1. trace of large pebbles

: : : 121 0 .. (19.

a a a I I I : ..

: : : : : : : 18 ..

DO-1 20. 221 SS 3 1' 1.1 ii 2 aea boe rc fsn

I I I I I I a a ..

DM1-I 50 22: ss: 31 1.7:O: 2 ... Light abon t rayeo silty

61c . and pebbles.9: 21/

:~~~ i 22 ,

Log Continued on Next Page

Page 52: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-15

PROJECT NANE: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/7-8/86 BORING NUMBER: DWl (see note on D.1-18)

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1632.21 ft eslON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Tvin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Mud Rotory WELL(S) INSTALLED: OW-I, SW-2

SamplelSample : Sample: Method: Blows Recov : I O.V.A.: FNumbers Depth Depth I of : per Ft. ppm e

1 Begin End : 5aplel 6" of 1 eFt. Ft. !Collect: Drive 1 t Visual Classification

____ ___ ____ ____ 23 / .4

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 24 " .I I a a I I I / i

DI-6I 25: 271 SS1 41 1.5. : 0: 25 Sate as above.

___ __ __ __ __ ___ __ __ __ __ __ 26 /I /l / /Z

8i: i 26a

27 /',

a a a a a a a a 28 .

a a a : a a 29

DWI-71 301 32: SSI 4. 1.5: 0 30 ", Same as above.l ~ 1 7,

i 14: : : 31I ~~~~141 II I I,' J/

_____________32_./"/'_. Drillers believe they hit-" 'sand and gravel' layers

a .. a . a : 33 , between 32' and 35'

a a a a a a a I a a 34

DWI-8: 35: 37: SS: 5: 1.60 : a 0: 35 Same as above; trace of9: a a a a lignite fragments.14a a a a a 3616a a a a a

a a a a a 37

S ! : a a a a

to a. aorl aote asaaanda 3i 1 41 len fro 0. --0,.9.,

a a a a a 39 - . ! _ -

17 Z I I.. 'DW1-9t 40: 42: 55: 5, 1.4: : : 0: 40 Same as above with a med.Lo8: g a a . to crs,, poorly sorted sand

a 13ia: 41 .o .. ,| lens from 0.8 -0.9.

17: : : a a 2 ," ',.

ai-~ a5 a7 aS al a.8 a. a a al 4 -" - S n a o e

, a

aoa aoatanaea an aex ag3

a a a a a a I

Page 53: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-16

PROJECT NAME: USAF-HAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/7-9/86 BORING NUMBER: D1(see note on D. 1-18)

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1632.21 ft asiON SITE 6EOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Tvin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hud Rotory YELL(S) INSTALLED: DiY-I, SI-2

SamIleSaple Sample: Method! Blows : Recov. : O.V.A.: FNumber, Depth Depth 1 of 1 per Ft. ppm 1 e

Begin End 1 Sample: ' of :eFt. 1 Ft. :Collect! Drive 1 t Visual Classification

14 1 ib 46

o 0 : : 50 S'v 5a : 9 : :."/ t

5 a * * 47 ,., ,

Dil-l 50 52 aS 9I l.a a 5a ar. amas bvet 5 .

.1: 271, 1 .1 1/1 change to silty fine sand,: :28: i 5 1 ,./- slightly moist to moist.: : : ~241 ://",

I l l l l 52 " -

__ __ __-__ 853 , / ,1

l : I I 54 z '

a a a a a a a a a a 49 ."....,.

DI-12i: 55: 57: SSI 8i 1.5: O: 55 ,' Dark gray silty clay ith

13: trace of sand and pebbles;23,: 55 h alternating fine sand and

25: i i i ., clay from 0.5 -1.5.l I l 57 ""

,. IZ

I .

a a a a 2 : a a 51 . ..

DI-13: 601' 62: SS: 6: IX4 OI 0! 0 / // Dark gray silty clay ith9: // trace of lignite.

131 I 61 . . .1 21 /Z.a

l l 62 / i

32,'~~ i 6sad

a a 53 . ,

a a 54 . .a a a.a.a.

oi-14: 55: 57: SS: 8: 2.0: : : : O: 55 ,"", Dark gray silty clay wth 5'a a 139 : a a ...., trcnes oan oande pees

S a a a 30 : I"a/56: : : 67 " / 1

L aoata u : N .ag a

aaaa a a aIaaI

Page 54: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1 -17

PROJECT NAME: USAF-KAFD PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 1017-8186 BORING NUMBER: DWI(see note on D. 1-18)

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1632.21 ft slON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Mud Rotory WELL(S) INSTALLED: Di-i, SW-2

SampleiSample Sample: Method: Blows Recov.1 : O.V.A,1 FNumber: Depth: Depth : of ' per Ft. a I ppe e

:Begin End 1 Sample! 6' of a eFt. Ft. !Collect! Drive a a a t Visual Classificationa a a a a 68

aa a a a aa 69

DWI-151 701 721 SS: 121 0.81 0 a 70 Dark gray silty clay

a a a a 17: a a a a changes to fine sanda a 231 a a a a 71 (saturated).

a a a a 25 1 a a a aa a a a a a aa 72

a a a a a a aa 73

S a a a a a a a a 74

DWI-16: 75: 77: SS: 7: 1.0: 0: 75 Dark gray silty clay;a aa 11 a a a a very dense.a a 151 a a a 76a a a a 2 1 1 a a a aa a a a a a a 77

: : f : : I 79

DWa-17: 80: 82: SS: 51 0.51 i i Oi 80 Same as above.

: i 151 81

: : : : : : 82

: : : : 83

: : : : 84

DWI-i 851 871 SSi 61 1.7: 0 as Same as above.

: : : : ~101 :, "

Log Continued on Next Page

Page 55: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-18

PROJECT InE: USAF-NIPI PROJECT NUNDER: 01071-0001TE DRILLED: 10/7-6/86 8OI3 UD(ER: DVl*

DRILLING LOCATIOI : Landfill iORiOLe GRID ILIV.: 1632.21ON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Vol DRILLING CONPHT: Win City Testing

DRILLING NEIHOD: Nod Rotory VILL(S) INSTALLED: DWI, S12

SamplelSample I Samplel Methodl Blows I ecov.l I I I O.1.1.1 Iluberl Depth lDepthl of I Per I Ft.I I I I pp.l e

I Begin I End I Saplel 6' of I I I I I I eI ft. I Ft. ICollectl Drive I I I I I I t Visual Classification

I I I I I,' (ICLII I I I I88

I l l I I I I 1 89 ,,/I I I I IIII I

DVi-111 901 521 SSI 6I 0.61 1 1 1 01 90 ,7, Same as above.I I I SI I II1 . -,

, , I 1 I I911 I 321 I 1 1 1 1

! I 92 /"I I I I I I I I /'

S I I 93 ,<.

I I I I I I I I 1 94I I I

DV1-201 951 971 SSl 371 1.21 1 1 01 95 /1 Silty fine sand to sandyI I I I 541 silt.

I 461 1 1 96 1/I I I I I I I ."I I

I I I I I I I 1 97

* A monitoring well was not installed in this100 Ft. boring; a new boring for well installationwas drilled a short distance (less than 5 Ft) fromthis boring to the appropriate depth for wellinstallation.

Page 56: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.-19

DATE DRiLLED: 10/9-ii!26 NR UB DDNILLING LOCATIGN -ndfii: BONEHOLE GfND EV. -'E4 C 4

.N .. 'A ' ..... ... t -e~ :

Am~er" Deptn 23ePtn er .

t Ft. Co1 iect Dr,.ve~ a 5 xas;ct

.* .... .. ................ Yr~ ~,c~yt:~

-.langes to gray slity clay W/

ae:sanC anc et i es.71

... ....... ..- .... ... .. . ....

........-. ..

... .. ... .... -CJ.. gray s-ty c-ay W:tm

I orange and Ojack motthng;..... I .. ... ~ :t. -o~wn, silty

-i 2 ii ;ra.:e of sanc... ............... .. . ars p e O e s.

as~:7i gr aveL,

o. ... ... .. I

-~~ -~ ~ . ark a-:ve ., ::,cr4

a E ae; 7 .. E ES

Page 57: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-20

PROJECT NAME- USAF-MAFB ?--KjE"' NUMBER: Vi:7-uDATE DRILLED: 10Ii-4i86 BRNu 'uMBER: OK"

DRILLINE LA2N:Landfil BC'D-E r 0L E 13R ND EEV :4. m.~ON SITE GEOLOGIST :V. DeVillez/ Vc. DPILL:N 11 A:Tin>yTs

DR7LLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WE;!(S).' :NSTALEO: SW-1

;Nuaber! Depth Depth of :per In. 2Begin iEnd Sample 6 of e

.t .t ........ . .

.~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ .. .... ... ...... ... ... . ........

F . . .... ..... .. ... ............ . .. ..- ......... . ..... ..... ...

.... .. .... .... ... ...... ..

-.- . ..- ~ ~ ~ . ... . . . . . . - . ... .....- --. ..

S~l-E ~ . I Wet sandy silt to 0.2;U . - . Cary. gray'

...... .... ..... . ... ......... .. y l y

.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -... .. ..... . ... .... .... .....

SW'-9 40: 2,s 7: "L~ U.o: , silty sand;- 12I ii-~* ' 6ark gray, C-Ity

S-. 4-ay; tnE nEa' Of the

~~~~~. . . . . . . . . . ..... .. ... .. . . . . .... ...- ..

Page 58: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-21

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/14/86 BORING NUMBER: DN3

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1648.57 ft. eslON SITE GEOLOGIST : DeVillez/ Macke/ Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Holow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: OW-3

SamplelSample : Sample: Method! Blows Recov.: O.V.'' r

Number: Depth Depth of per Ft. : ppm e: Begin :End Sample: 6' of : e

Ft. Ft. :Collect! Drive 1 : :t Visual Classification

DW3-1: 0: 2: SS! 2, 1: 0.9; : 0: I[ML 0 -0.1: dk. brn peat;___________3: __ 1 0.1 -0.9: dk. brown clayey

3: : si!t wl some organic debris.

S___ 2

a i I I

Da3-2: 5: 7: SS: 2; 1.1! i 0: 5 Park gray and brown mottled4: silty clay; a silty sand

i i : : 4: 6 lens at 0.6; trace of: : : : 6: pebbles throughout.

DW3-3: I0: 12: SS: 3: 1.9: i 0: i5 Lt to dk. brown and gray6: mottled silty clay with71a i i traces of sand and pebbles.

: 12:I LI aa12

: 14

DW3-4a 15; 17: SS: 5 1.6: 0: 15 Same as above.

: i : II i16a4 i a:

', : :17

: :: 19

D3-5 a 201 251 SS 3a 1.71 0 a : 20 Same as above.

: i 9 : 21

: i : 13 :: : : :22

Log Continued on Next Page

a a a l a a a |

Page 59: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D. 1-22

PROJECT NAME: USAF-HAFD PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/14/86 BORING NUMBER: DW3

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1648.57 ft. aslON SITE GEOLOGIST : DeVillez/ Macke/ Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Holow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-3

Sasple:Saiple Sample: Method: Blows Recov.1 O..A. FNumber Depth Depth 1 of ! per Ft. 1 ppm 1 e

fBegin End : Sample! 6' of eFt. Ft. !Collect! Drive * t Visual Classification

i 24

DN3-6: 25,' 271 Ssi 6,' 2.01 O101 25 I'.,.CL] Dark gray silty clay with

9! .. . some patchy brown areas and

: 17: i i 9 / ,- .1 27 .. ..

0W3-7* 30; 32: SS: 51 1.3i 3 0 30 . "Dark gray silty clay with

...... trace of sand and pebbles.

3 I3 I 3 , ...

: : i 0: J 31 ...'...

: : ~14: i ..."3 3 32

3 3 33

i 34:

3I 3 3 3 3 3 .... ,

I I I 3 I I ... . ,

DW3-8: 35: 37: SS 6: .0 0: 25 ... IX arSame as above.

* ...-. . "

9: : some.patch..bro.n.area...n__ _ _ 14: i _ _ 26 ta ofa anpbe

37 ... ..: 4 : : . .....

3 II I I a 38 ....

39 ..i 13: 41 " " ....

DW3-7: 30: 32: SS: 5; 1.5: :0O 30 Darkgra.sity laywit

3 3 13: * 3trae o.snd.nd ebbe.

17: : 31

I : : :~ 42 ' '...

14: 43

1 44

* I 3 I ... • "..

DW3,IO; 451 471 SS .0__1L. .... .......L: O 45 .. . ...,. Same as above.

Log Continued an Next Page

3 l l I 3 3 I

Page 60: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D. 1-23

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/14/86 BORING NUMBER: DW3

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1648.57 ft. aslON SITE GEOLOGIST : DeVillez/ Macke/ Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Holow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-3

Sample:Sample Sample: Method! Blows : Recov.: i i O.V.A.4 FNumber: Depth: Depth : of : per 1 Ft. ppe e

Begin End : Sample: 6' of :e eFt. Ft. :Collect! Drive : : : : t Visual Classification

121 : : 46

14: : : 47i 47

Page 61: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-24

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/17-21/86 BORING NUMBER: DM4 (see note on D. 1-28)

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1633.50 ft. slON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. Devillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-4, SW-4

Sample;Sample 1 Sample, Method! Blows Recoy.: a O.V.A.: FNumber' Depth Depth of : per Ft. i ppm e

Begin End Sample: 6' of eFt. Ft. :Collect! Drive 1 t Visual Classification

DO4-1: 0 2: SS: 6, 6: 0.8: : O (ML] Dk brown to blk topsoil;a I : 6:: 1 sandy silt with trace of

i 7: pebbles.DW4-2: 2: 4: SS: 2: 1.4 0: 2 0 -0.8: dk. brn. sandy silt;

S2: 0.8 -1.4: dk. brown silty

S5: 3 sand and gravel.: : : : 7:

DW4-3: 4: 6: SS: 6: 2.0: : : : o: 4 0 -0.2: dk. brn. sandy silt;

8: I I I 0.2 -2.0: It. brown, mediumI : : : 1i1: : : _ : _ 5 sand with some pebbles.

DW3-4: 6: 8: SS: 9: 1.7 : : o: 6 0 -1.0: same as above;

i 14: i I 1.0 -1.7: It. gray, fine to15: : : : : : 7 medium sand with some pebblesto : and silt.

DW4-5 8: 10: SS: 5: 0.6: : 01 8 Lt. brown medium sand withi 5: some silt and pebbles; plug

I 71 i a 9 in head of spoon was brown* . I clay.

DM4-6: 10: 12 SS: I: o: : : 0: 10 No recovery.

* * : * 4: ::.1

DM4-7: 12: 14: SS: 2: 1.7: : : 0: 12 Brown and gray mottled silty3: : : : : : clay with trace of sand,

______ 5: : : : : 13 pebbles and lignite.

DW4-8: 14 16: SS: 21 L.: : : 0 14 0 -0.4: brown silty clay witha a a Al I a a a :trace of sand and pebbles.

: j: 6: : : : : 15 . CL] 0.4 -1.8: Dk. gray silty claya 8: *; w/ trace of sand and pebbles.

0W4-9 : !8! SS: 3: 2.0: : : o: 16 Dark gray silty clay with: a a I a trace of sand and gravel.

S a a a 8: aa 17a I I i0a a

DW4-lO: 18: 20 SS: 3: 0.2: : O: 18 Same as above.

S a a 7: : : 19

a a aa20

a a a21

Log Continued on Next Page

nI a m m n m inue a mm m aE m nana

Page 62: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D. 1-25

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/17-21/86 BORING NUMBER: DN4 (see note on D. 1-28)

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1633.50 ft. islON SITE 6EOLO6IST : V. Devillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-4, SW-4

Sample:Sample : Sample: Method: Blows : Recov. O.V.A.: FNumber; Depth 1 Depth of : per Ft. ppm e

:Begin :End :Sample: 6" of eFt. Ft. Collect: Drive i I t Visual Classification

DW4-11: 23: 251 SS" 31 2.0 : 0: 23 Same as above.

I I I I 5 I .... ....

I I ".//

:6: i: 2471 i I 2 "

QW-2 291 30 S..." 4..... 1-:o.2aeasaoe

I I 1 .... .I..31

I I I I I I." .."" ..

I I 32 .

DW4-13: 33 35 s 3 1.5 0: 8 Same as above. w a

: : : 5 ... -.. silty, gray sand lens from7 34 .0.9 -.0; also, tip of

: i i 9: i .-o.. spoon and some sand.

4: , : *,*I I t I I I 5 " ....... .....

a:: : : : 30 .

i i i 36 . .

DW4-141 381 40: SS: 121 1.9: o: 38 0 -0.4: fine to medium, gray: ] 15: silty sand with some pebbles;

S 16: J 39 Z, 0.4 -1.9: fine, gray, silty

: 21: sand.: : : 40

: 41

: : : : 42

DW4-15: 43: 45: SS: 7: 1.51 o: 43 0 -0.3: medium, gray, silty

: ; : to : sand with some pebbles.: : : It :: 44 0.3 -1.5: dk. gray, silty

i 17: clay with some pebbles.: l : : : 45 2 very small sand tenses

Log Continued on Next Page

* I I

. . .. ...... ... . . . . . I I m Iu I

Page 63: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-26

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFD PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/17-21/86 BORING NUMBER: DW4 (see note on D. 1-28)

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1633.50 ft. isiON SITE SEOLOGIST : V. Devillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-4, SW-4

Sample:Sample Sample: Method: Blows 1 Recov. O.V.A.: FNumberf Depth Depth 1 of : per Ft. 1 ppm : e

:Begin End ! Sample: 6' of eFt. Ft. :Collect: Drive : t Visual Classification

(<.05') at l and 1.4.a aa ii 46I

: : : : : : 47

DW4-16.' 481 so: SS: 7! 1.7: 0 : 48 Dark gray silty clay withit: trace of sand and pebbles and

S; 13; 49 small sand lenses it ISa 18: and 1.4.

i :i 52

DW4-17; 531 55,' SS" 141 2.0; i 53 Fine to med, gray sand,

: 29: fairly well sorted t rounded,: : 35: : 54 and some silt; lens of dark

: : 50. 1: gray, sandy silt with some! :: 55 pebbles at 1.7 -1.8.

: : :: : : 56

: : :: : : 57

0W4-18: 58: 60: SS: 20: IX4 0iO 58 Same as above.

ii 301 i ii 40: i i 59

*~~ ~ 6 I06

a I I I 6 I62

DW4-191 63: 65: SS: 20: 1.5: :0: 3 Lens of pebbles from 0 -0.2;

: i : 22: 0.2 -1.5; same sand as above.37: 64

Sr o a a pbn43:d

: __ __ __ * 13 : : : G9smlsnlesst

* I I::: : : : and .4

I I I I I I7

Log Continued on Next Page

a 6 a a i a

Page 64: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-27

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/17-21/86 BORING NUMBER: DN4(see note on D. 1-28)

DRILLINS LOCATION : Landfii] BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1633.50 ft. as]ON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. Devillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-4, S-4

Saeple:Sample ; Sample! Method: Blows 1 Recov. : O.V.A, FNumber: Depth 1 Depth: of : per Ft. ppm e

: Begin : End :Sample: 6' of : e: Ft. : Ft. :Collect: Drive : t Visual Classification

DW4-201 Sal 70: SS: 251 1.: 10 0: 68 0 -0.8: saze sand as above;33: : : :. 0.8 -1.O: dark gray, silty21: 69 clay with trace of sand33, and pebbles.

I * * I I ____ _ .70I I I I I . .- .

i 72 ... .- .

DW4-211 73: 751 SS: 251 1.7: 0;O 73 ..."-/ 0 -1 1: fn,-med, silty sand;29; i 1.1 ,. ~ -1.3: sed-crs sand;241 i i 74 / 1.3 -1.7: alternating silty26: i ,., clay and fine sand with

i75 trace of pebbles.

: : ~ ~i 76 ... ...

i 77

0W4-22: 781 80.1 SS" 251 1., i 0: 78 z" .. . Fine silty sand.

: : i 35 i. , ..i 42 : 79 ... ,.- ..

i 55i g i iI I I I 80I.... "

I I I I I I... ..

i 82 .....

D04-231: 3: 75: SS: 22: 1.7: : : 8 73 . ery fine silty sand

: : ~~~31: :...../i 0 : i . ..

____ ____ ____ ___ ____ _ __ ____ ___ ____ ____ __... 7 '....

I I I I . .. .

i 8 7

Log Continued on Next Page

I I I i 42: I II: 7

Page 65: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D. 1-28

PROJECT NME: USAF-NAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE KILLED: 10117-21/86 BORING NUMBER: DiW4*

DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEY.: 1633.50 ft. asON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeillezI J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Tvin City Testing

DRILLING ETHOD: Hollov Flight Auger NELL(S) INSTALLED: D1-4, SI-4

SaspleISasple Samplel Method! Blovs 1 Recov. : : 1 O.V.A.: FNumber: Depth Depth : of 1 per Ft. ppm e

Begin1 End 1 Sample! 6' of e1Ft. I Ft. Collect: Drivet Visual Classification

(CLID04-24: Be: 901 SS: 24: 1.3: O 88 0 -0.4: fine sand;

i lo: 0.4 -1.3: dark gray, silty271 I I 89 clay vith trace of pebbles.

1 : : 42:: 1 90I I i .. I I I I I Il I 9 0

l l ' ,l l91

a a I I i'i I I I 9 2

D__-25: 93: ,9,§1 SS. 501 0.6-1 _ _11 93 Fine sand vith a lens of

1 100/414' coarse sand.

I l ' lI i I I I I i i. I ' 9

i I : : , t , 95

* I a a a

*II a a a a I

D4-26: 98 1001 SS:1 171 0n 1 1 0 1 98 Lenses of fine, gr4y sand and1 10 271 : 1 dark gray silty clay.

11: 35,1 Is 1 . .. 99

: ] : : It 100

*A monitoring well was not installed in this100 Ft boring; a new boring for well installation

was drilled a short distance (less than 5 Ft) from

this boring to the appropriate depth for wellinstallation.

a a a I i I S I I

Page 66: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1 -29

PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/22/86 BORING NUMBER: TBI

DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: Not SurveyedON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillezl J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: None

Sample:Sample Sample! Method! Blows Recov, O.V.A. FNumberl Depth Depth 1 of : per 1 Ft. : a ppm 1 e

: Begin :End : Sample: 6' of : eFt. Ft. :Collect: Drive i I i t Visual Classification

TBI-1: 0: 2: SSI 3, 5: 0: 0 201 (ML] No sample recovery; gravel_ _ _ _ _3_ _ _ _ _ _ _ and silty/sandy fill;

3: Isoil is visibly contaminated_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _2 and has a strong odor.

TBI-21 5: 71 55: l 1.31 1 10-201 5 fireenish-gray clayey silt.

i : : 7

T81-3: to: 12: SS., 2: 1.5: 300: 10 Lt. brown clayey silt; someS 4: black staining strong odor.

S 6:

: : :12

: : : :13

: : : :14

TBI-4: 15: 17: S5: 21 1.81 i 6001, 15 grownish-green clayey silt;: 31 strong odor.

8 : i 16

i 17

i 19 1 l

TBI-5: 20: 22; SS: 4: 1,8: i 3: 20 Lt. brown clayey silt;i 9: slight odor.

: : 91 21

Log Continued on Next Page

a a a | a I

Page 67: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.1-30

PROJECT NAME: USAF-NAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/22/86 BORING NUMBER: TBI

DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: Not SurveyedON SITE GEOLO6IST : V. DeViIlez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: None

Sample:Sample Sample! Method: Blows Recov. O.V.A. FNumber! Depth: Depth : of : per: Ft. ppm e

:Begin: End 1 Sample! 6' of ::eFt. Ft. fCollect: Drive i t Visual Classification

i i 23

* a 24

TBI-6: 25: 27 Ss: 6: 1.7: i : 0: 25 [CL] Dark gray silty clay with9: : trace of pebbles; sand

i : a: : 26 lens at 0.3.a a a 11 : :

S a a a a a a27

TBI-7: 28: 30 SS: 6: 1.6: : 28 Same as above, no sand.a a : :

1 a a 9i 29

3 a a P::a

a a a a a aai3

Page 68: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

.1-31

PROJECT NME: ISAF-NAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/24186 BORING NUMBER: TB2

DRILLING LOCATION E.O.D. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: Not SurveyedON SITE GEOLOGIST :V. DeVillez, .!. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing

DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: None

fample:Sample Sample; Method: Blows Recov.; O,V.A.J FNumber: Depth Depth of :per Ft. p. e

Begin End Sample! 6" of eFt. Ft. :Collect: Drive t ViSLal Classification

T82-1; 0; 2: SS: 2, 2: 0.5, 0; I ML Dark brown silty topsoil.

KB-2 L ; 7... .... 3. ... 2.0............... 5 Lt. brown silty clay with

41 white and orange mottling.

TB2- 10 12 55; ; 20; ~i1 Saue as above.

12

14

TB2-; i; 1715s Same as above.

61

I I I EI I 17

T.- 8 .0 ...... 4 . ..... .. .... ......... ......... 18 Same as above.7 :II

..... . ..... .. ... ........ q ....0 ... ........ ... ... ...; .... ;.. .;.. .. 1...9

I I i ; ; ;; 20.I.. . . . ..... ... ...I ..... ..I.. . - ... ... .... ....... ..... .. .I. . .......I ...

Page 69: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

APPENDIX D.2

BORING LOGS FOR USGS TESTBORINGS COMPLETED IN THE VICINITY OF MAFB

(CL506OB/0528N)

Page 70: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D. 2-1

c6

za

0IC)L

<Cl

[ I zI 0 (3

coc

LI---

[LL V)j< __ I

Z Ir

-c-oCdN

Page 71: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.2-2

Renvitle County TEST HOLELOCATION: 158-83-35.d U.S. Geol. Survey DATE DRILLED: 1947

ELEVAtION; 1,610 feet DEPTH: 165 feetabove sea level

0

04 a.

wZ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w 0

0 O-1 soil. 0

1-7 Sand, fine, and gravel withacne yeLuov clay. *00

.

25. 7-56 Clow, sandy, gray, with aome 0

gravel. 0

0

.0'00.

* 0100

50 ,,

%58 Gravel.*00

, 0

0 a

0.

00

$4 0a

ci8

: ij 1971 UISGS TEST BORING A

~SOURCE:

FePettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971

FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.

C 0 ! I

Page 72: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.2-3

Ward County TEST HOLE 2366

LOCATION: 157-83-8ccc DATE DRILLED: July 15, 1965

CLEVATION- 1,710 feet DEPTH: 210 feetabove sea level

0 MATERIAL OESCRIPTION c 0

0 9 0-27 Till, silty and sandy,yellow-brown.

.0*00-"6

2527-UT Till, silty and sandy, ;°p-oo

olive-gpay; few thinLayers of sand and "<pgr l. *0

50,

*0

4o

117-124 Sand, fine to medium.

124-194 Til, sily and sandy, olive-

125- gray; few thin layers of"-sand and gravel.

000

150-

04 000-

S175 n

.0 0

194-196 Lignite, blac.196-210 Clay, sandy, olive-gray.

*0

00

-25-

2751971 USGS TEST BORING BSOURCE:

L1300LJPettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971

FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.

• • ii ii0I

Page 73: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.2-4

Ward County TEST HOLELOCATION1 157-83-9ccc U.S. Ge.ol. Survey-'/ DATE DRILLED-. j U,

ELEVATION: 1,687 feet DEPTH: 210 feet

above so- levelo 20-x

m.a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ,"0 -1 soil. 0o

0?boo0

1-4 Clay, yellow, with sce graveland fine sand.

25. 4-10 Clay, yellow, with some gravel.

10-13 Clay, sandy, yellow, with stripsof fine sand. 0.01

13-17 Sand, fine.

17-28 Clay, sandy, gray. 000,00

28-34 Clay, sandy, gray, with strips 00 0

of fine sand. 0 o

- .r 34-4o sand, fine.-oO ,4U 40-54 Clay, sandy, gray, with thin4 4 strips of gravel and fine sand. .o.

54-58 Clay, sandy, gray, with some 0 0

100- gravel. Jo 0 6

58-60 Sand, fine and gravel.oO O

60-63 Clay, sandy, gray, with thin oo !strips of gravel. .00

125" 63-81 Clay, sandy, gray, with sme oO

gravel and some thin strips oof gravel.

81-82 Gravel and fine sand.

82-84 Clay, sandy, gray, with thinstrips of gravel. a:C %,

<3 €0

o84-85 Gravel and fine sand. 0%'

85-91 Clay, sandy, gray, with thin"75 strips of gravel.

-o0

91-94 Sand, fine, and gravel with -

s me lignite fragents. 0.'00

200 94-121 Clay, sandy, gray, with thin °0strips of gravel and lignitefragnents.

a 121-162 Clay, sandy, gray, with gravel0 and fine sand and thin strips2 of gravel.4

162-163 Boulders.163-178 Clay, sandy, gray, with thin

strips of gravel and fine sand.

250- 178-190 Clay, sandy, gray, with some

gravel.

190-1096 Clay, sandy, gray, with stripsof fine sand and gravel. 1971 USGS TEST BORING C

275 196-210 Sand, capact, gray.

SOURCE:Pettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971

300" / Froo LaRocque and others, 1963.

181FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.

Page 74: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.2-5

Ward County TEST HOLE

,OCATION: 157-83-3Obbb U.S. Geol. Surveyl- DATE. DRILLED: July 31, 19.7ELEVATION: 1,760 feet DEPTH: 245 feet

above sea levelU

oo~J 4-a.

WZ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION c

o 0-3 Soil.

3-12 Clay, yellow.

12-46 Clay, gray, with some gravel.

25 00

46-56 Clay, sandy, gray, with somestrips of fine sand and gravel.

56-60 Sand and gravel.

60-64, Clay, sandy, gray. =

7 64-87 Sand, fine, and gravel.75-

87-220 Clay, sandy, gray, with sne .

gravel and lignite fragnents.

oo000'0.

5 0

oOO

oOo0

0"00oo

525 00

-. 1 .4e

oo0

42 oo4

420 06

20 000

m 215"- -- oo

-2000

z O4

... , •50000

oeO

of

-225° 0000

000

00

275- 197 USG TETBRN

FRE C.HRTASCITSIC

o 575 00

o#Oo?0

2' 0004

0'04

00 O

I.

0

.,

275 1971 USGS TEST BORING DSOURCE:Pettyjohn and Hutchinson. 1971

l0o _ 1_/ Frre LeRocque and others, 1963.

__________________________________________ FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES. INC.

Page 75: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.2-6

Ward County TEST HOLE II' "I

LOCATION' 157-8-33-' c DATE DRILLED: ,wptemIber 22,

ELEVATION; 1,645 feet DEPTH: 1 99.) fretabove sea lev.'

0o-jI-&a, z MATERIAL DESCRIPTION M 00-:) 0 j

0 0-28 Till, yellov-gray, andfine to coarse gravel. 00

m 00

• 0

28-59 Till, gray, and fine tomedium gravel.

a040 .

006

so, p5! .60a

59-61 Gravel, fine. 00-0

S 61-190 Till, gray, and fine tomedlum gravel.

.75. - o

0.

()0 0

.00 Ooco

@ o

.-25 -

ao

00

of0*06

1-4 . 000o

15 -

N 0~0!

199.5 Clay, sad, 0ray.0-

-200 o

-2250

250-

-25.1971 USGS TEST BORING E

SOURCE:

' Pettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971

4- WFRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.

,.0 . I I oI

Page 76: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.2-7

Wnrd County TEST HOLE 324,IL

LOCATION: 157-82-11bhhb 0ATL DRILLED: July 29, 1%

ELEVATION: 1,602 feet DEPTH: 200 feetabove sea level

u2

0 x

LaZ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION POTENTIAL(MV) c o RESISTANCE (OHMS)

0 0-20 Till, silty and sandy,yellow-brown; few

-pebbles.

20-55 Till, silty d sandy,-25. olive-gray; few thin layers

of gravel.

.50.

4 55-75 Sand, medium to coarse,and fine gravel.

7 75-151 Till, silty and sandy,olive-gray; few boulders

o and thin layers of sandand gravel.

100

HI'IO __ 151-200 Shale, silty and sandy,

0 olive -gray.

00

-175-'

0~

.200 -

Observation well, depth 71 feet.

225

250-

-ZT5. 1971 USGS TEST BORING FSOURCE:

S 15 0Pettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971

0FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES INC.

-- 0 ,

Page 77: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

D.2-8

Ward County TEST HOLE

,OCATION: 157-82-28ddd U.S. Geol. Survej DATE DRILLED: August 1, 1947

CLEVATION: 1,619 feet DEPTH: 210 feetabove sea level

o 0.

0; MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0

o-2 Soil. 0

2-17 Clay, yellow, with some gravel. --

17-23 Clay, sandy, brown, with 00ame gravel. G0

25.023-28 Clay, sandy, gray, with Sam

gravel. 0.

28-31 Gravel.

50, 31-35 Clay, sandy, gray, with stripsof gravel. :-f

4 35-40 Gravel. .011

0-46 Clay, sandy, gray, with god75. strips of gravel. '.

6-47 Gravel.

7-83 Clay, sandy, gray, with sme 4

gravel. - -*too OGG

83-91 Clay, sandy, gry, with t a?..strips of gravel and lignite 00fragments.o

91-94 Gravel, with strips of gray " -*04125- sandy clay and lignite

fragments. •0

94-00 Clay, sandy, gray, gravel, oolwith thin strips of lignite .__fragments.

150- - - _--o 100-119 Clay, sandy, gray, with gravel

and fine sand and thin stripsc of lignite fragments.0

119-130 Clay, sandy, gray, with thinITS- strips of fine sand, gravel,

and lignite fragments. --

130-132 Clay, sandy, gray, with sme -

gravel and boulders. --

2 132-142 Clay, sandy, gray. -

142-144 Gravel, with strips of gray -_:-sandy clay.

1 -197 Clay, sandy, gray..25

197-201 Shale.

201-210 Clay, sandy, gray.

250

1971 USGS TEST BORING G275.

SOURCE:Pettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971

"300 I/ From LaRocque and others, 1963.

FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.

Page 78: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

APPENDIX E

FIELD RAW DATA

(CL5O6OB/0528N)

Page 79: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

01 A_ _ IN L I I IL.1" V%

E- 1

J03 INFORMATI-9JN:

Project 4:___________ L -3c V Io n: A4-g e/,A7

:lient: Li,1fq: Dates of Report: o -,.p3F'Itel Team Leader: __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

DAILY FIELD ACTIVETIES

1. Date:/6.6

HART Personnel On-site: ~C~,nkzJ/L ~-

Suocoritractors On-s i~e: WA4~M. ~p

-/Y"a 76C.469iclleWork Accomplisned: Al

Problems Encountered:___________________________

2. Date: ,0 2.4? esnn,? On si-e: ____________________________

Subcontractors Jn-site: ___1_________________________

?roolens Encountered: __________________________

Page 80: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

E-2

3. Date: /1 9.8AHA RT Personnel Oni-sit:_________________________

Subcontractors ~ ~ /Y Lnst::/ 1,k~

Problems Encountered: 7b/i$.~-J

HART Pers&onnel On-site:/D s

Subconltraictors On-site:

W4ork Accomnplishe~d: r,:k/5C4~ L2_a}/. AAA

)[)I~ernS Encuntere~i: ___________________ __________

Page 81: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

E-3J03 INFORMATIOri:

Project 4: i,,?-1a -- Lacaion: / __, __,___n,_,_

1iient: /.il. oates of Reourt: ,11-10./3.e6Fieli Team Leader: __-

DAILY FIELD ACTIVITIES

1. Date: /6.//. Z

HART Personnel On-site: ,j-

Suor.on tractors On-site: 1,G/W/: A/.r A/.7:.

Work Accomplisted: Ai ,/-PiA-/ 1 S- -

Problems Encountered: do,/k -"

2. Date: /p-/3-'' A T Personnpe, On-si!e: &_71

Subcontractors On-site: w I 4'j 4 A. 7

?r 0 r ems Encou n ter ed: dozdwqc6!t 16, g z

-l26 'e11J Z-

Page 82: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

JO1 I :. "-~:*1 E-4

~~ojec: ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1-ca-ion: rAP, '7~ 0 .At

I_____ Dates of Rep~ort: /~/ ?A a'-y~ a '~ e d e 2 V 4jv / &

DAILY F:--'- ACTDh1TIES

2. Dato? /(7 _ _ __ _ __

Sut,-,Nntract )rs On-site:

~~d'W4 7;CC.,,p 4 c e: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Page 83: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

3. D at -: E--/5-E5

HA'R T aersonne I 'in-1 - TT~ 3 i :e

Problems Encountered:

4. Date: /0-14 -7

HART Personnel On-site: , K, ( ,'

Problems Encountered:

(r/

D % _s_,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __,-w_ _ _

Page 84: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

W.-LKLY K:LU LUG

E-6

JU3 IFORMATION:

Project 4: N6100.a "J'.cvion: TVJJ71f

lient: _______________ Dates of Report:

FHela Team Leader: /{$/e Z

DAILY FIELD ACTIVITIES

1. Date: /,6'2O80HART Personnel On-site: kYJT.O1.TV

Subcontractors On-site: 7w'/Al Ct A 17A.7

Work Accomplisied: 0_wZW~ Z~'-~o4'pwg

Problems Encountered: ~-~ k

2. Date: 1, 92/g 4?Mf erso)nnz On-siwe: ____________________________

Subcontractors On-s ite: : #.i ),7 '

?r')rtIerrs Enco~un tered:

Page 85: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

E -7

HkRT 3ersonnel 3n-si*.e: fI QJV

WorK Accompflsned: A/

.&Ion t kV 04 AjiVA~Problems Encountered: Wp 1a L ir-w~ -~tV7 .i-i

4. Date: Id .Zi.

HART Personnel On-site: J V

Sutc.-ntractors On-s--e: 7i&) 1T M .

Work Accomplished: AQ-~ AVf7 S f 't> M /n$'~O

Probl1ems Encountered: ~~~am/

---- --- --- ---- --- --- --- ---- --- --- ---- --- --- --- ---- --- --- ---

/,

H.wo r o; j ie d:m ~ ________________________________

Page 86: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

rWtLY :i U LUG£

E-8

J03 INF)R"AT I.JI:

P'oject #: 01671-,96-W6b -oD Lca on: A'Af ?A0',A7.,-

I ient: _ _ __ Dates of Repjrt: /O.2S-/A' /.2j'Fie1 Team Leader: .

DAILY FIELD ACTIVITIES

1. Date: /07jr"- ____

HART Personnel On-site: k .D jV

Suoconitractors On-site: JIAi{,t.7

Work Accomplished: -/ d e L2, 76-x- ,.L;.&/

Problems Encountered:

2. Date: __ ____'I /

Suocontractors On-site: WIA' 76 , el-

A:)r - c c-O, ',n i ;;1e 1:

-on,;ern:J Encjuntered:

Page 87: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

3. Date: -' .gE-HARI' :ersonnel Jn-si:e: _________________________

Work AccompIi sled: .4 '

Problems Encountered: __________________________

4. Date: /0_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

HART Personnel On-site: _________________________

Subcontractors On-site: _________________________

Work Accorp Ii §hect:

Problems Encountered:____________________________

WorK Acconp 1i S :ed: "i7Z /A) 1W7 A L1A.ZA

ProoDiems Enc.ountere-I: ___________ ___________

Page 88: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

E-1OJ03 PIF]RMATOl:

Project Z _ __ _ __ __ _ _ oca.'on: _______________A1

" __________________________Dates of Reort: 1d2/-.* ,6

~It j Team Leader: ___________

DAILY FIELD ACTIVITIES

1. Date: 10/

HART Personnel On-site: __._ __ _ _ _/_

Suocontractors On-si te:

Work AccomplIi sned: i77ze~ ACoW_ &4

Problems Encountered: t 1i

2. Date: //"1"4

Subcontractors On-site:

A,r n) i -3,u e ed

D-_o;,2rs Enicountered: ___________________________

Page 89: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

.3. 'Date: 11-7,149 E-11

HAR7F Dersornn& Jn-sice: vi

WorK Accomp1i sned: ~ St~.'.L ~ 4 J r L

Problems Encountered: ___________________________

4. Date: ____________

HART Personnel On-sitz:_________________________

Subcontractors On-site: _________________________

WorK Accomnpl ished: _____________________________

Problems Encountered: ___________________________

HART -)erson'ilelIQ - ___________________________________

AWor,, Accomnp i sned: _____________________________

pr ro , E :ncouritere.- ____________________________

Page 90: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

E-12

- -

.~ P12

)- .~:%

cVJ

tN. r6

.,. I J

kf.)

N:Z

Page 91: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

E-13

I(J

NC q-

Page 92: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

E -14

-41

~QZT% c.v4

-31Z.

~ 0-i

I I

~IIlJ)

Page 93: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

E-15

I

*~-;- It

r~~4 C-A

Page 94: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

APPENDIX F

FIELD ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES, SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONCROSS REFERENCE AND DATES OF SAMPLE ANALYSES

(CL506OB/0528N)

Page 95: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

APPENDIX F.1

FIELD ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

(CL506OB/0528N)

Page 96: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.1-1

FIELD ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

Chemical Data

Procedures for Field Measurement of pH. The pH measurement of

water samples was obtained from a portion of the sample retained

in a clean glass jar. The measurement was made immediately

following sample collection and the pH meter was allowed to

stabilize for several minutes prior to recording the

measurement. The pH meter was calibrated daily to a range of

laboratory-prepared pH buffer solutions. The users manual for

the pH meter (Corning Model 3 pH Meter) was available to field

personnel.

* Procedures for Field Measurement of Electrical Conductivity. The

electrical conductivity measurement of water samples was obtained

from a portion of the sample retained in a clean glass jar. The

measurement was made immediately following sample collection and

the conductivity meter was allowed to stabilize for several

minutes prior to recording the measurement. The conductivity

meter was calibrated daily to a laboratory-prepared standard of

known conductivity. The users manual for the electrical

conductivity meter (Markson Model 800-525-5114 Conductivity

Meter) was available to field personnel.

* Procedures for Field Measurement of Temperature. The temperature

of water samples was measured with a standard thermometer for a

portion of the sample retained in a clean glass jar. The

temperature measurement was made immediately following sample

collection and the thermometer was allowed to stabilize for

several minutes prior to recording the measurement.

(CL5060B/0528N)

Page 97: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.1-2

Procedures for Field Measurement of Volatile Organics (Headspace

Analysis). Approximately 20 milliliters (ml) of soil from each

sampling location was placed in 40-ml VOA vials. The vials were

stored on ice in the field until headspace analysis could be

performed. Prior to withdrawal of headspace vapors, each vial

was placed in a 40"C hot water bath for twenty minutes. An

aliquot of air from the headspace within the vial was then

withdrawn by syringe for direct injection into the OVA.

Hydraulic Data

" Procedures for Measurements. An M-scope (Slope Indicator Co.,

Model 51453) was used to measure the water levels in each well

under static conditions. The north side of the top of the PVC

well casing (2" diameter) was marked and used as a reference

point for measurements. Water level measurements were obtained

to an accuracy of 0.01 ft.

Soil Boring Data

* Soil Sampling. Split-spoon samples were collected at each test

boring location. Split-spoons were 2-foot long, 2-inch outside

diameter and were constructed of stainless steel. Sample depth

was monitored by the subcontractor (driller) under the

supervision of the on-site HART hydrogeologist. As discussed in

Chapter III of the technical report, split-spoons were

decontaminated before and after use at each sampling depth.

Samples were described in the field by a HART hydrogeologist and

a portion of the sample was retained as a visual record.

* Blow Counts. Split-spoon samples were driven by a 130-lb hammer

falling 30 inches. Soil density was determined by recording the

number of blows necessary for the split-spoon to penetrate six

inches of soil.

(CLS060B/0528N)

Page 98: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.1-3

SAMPLE NUMBERING SYSTEM

A sample numbering system was used to identify each sample taken

during the on-site field investigation. The numbering system provides a

tracking procedure to allow retrieval of information about a particular

site and assure that each sample is uniquely numbered. A listing of

sample numbers was maintained by the HART field team leader. Each sample

number consisted of four parts, as described below.

Project Identification

The designation MAFB was used to identify the Minot Air Force Base.

Site Identification

Each sampling site was identified by an identifier code, with one of

the following prefixes:

COE - Corps of Engineers well;

DW - Deep well;

MW - Monitoring well (not installed by HART);

SD - Sediment sample;

SW - Shallow well (number after indicates a shallow well sample

number);

SW - Surface water (letter after indicates a surface water sample

number); and

TB - Test boring.

Numerical or alphabetical suffixes unique to each prefix follow the

identifier codes listed above.

(CL5060B/0528N)

Page 99: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.1-4

Sequence Number

A code was used to identify the type of sample collected, such as:

GW - Ground water sample;

S - Surface water or sediment sample (definition of which type

of sample is in previous qualifier of sample number); and

SS - Subsurface soil sample.

Sample Depth

The depth or depth interval from which the sample was collected, if

appropriate.

Split Sampling

Where two sets of samples were collected, the labels HART, for Fred C.

Hart Associates, Inc., and USAFOEHL were used to differentiate between

samples to be sent to the USAFOEHL laboratory and samples to be sent to

HART's subcontracted laboratory (Princeton Testing Laboratory).

Examples

Examples of sample numbers are:

MAFB, TB-i, SS-5, 20'-22', HART 004. Minot Air Force Base; test

boring #1; subsurface soil sample #5; collected from a depth of

20 to 22 feet below the surface; retained by HART; 4th soil

sample collected and sent for chemical analysis.

* AFB, SWD, S , HART 026. Minot Air Force Base; surface water

Sample D; retained by HART; first surface water sample collected

at this site; 26th water sample obtained for chemical analysis.

(CL5060B/0528N)

Page 100: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.1-5

MAFB, DW-3, GW-1, HART 013. Minot Air Force Base; Deep

Monitoring Well No. 3; first ground water sample collected from

this well; retained by HART; 13th water sample collected and sent

for chemical analysis.

Blanks, Knowns, Spikes, Splits and Duplicates

QC blank and duplicate samples, sent to the USAFOEHL laboratory and

the HART subcontractor, Princeton Testing Laboratory, were given sample

numbers similar to those for original samples. The identity of QC

duplicate samples was recorded in field log books, but was not marked in

any way on the sample containers.

USAFOEHL Samples

Samples sent to the USAFOEHL laboratory were accompanied by the

following information:

1. Purpose of sample (analyte);

2 Installation name (base);

3. Sample number (on container);

4. Source/location of sample;

5. Contract task number and title of project;

6. Method of collection (bailer, suction pump, air-lift pump, etc.);

7. Volumes removed before sample taken;

8. Special conditions (use of surrogates, filtering, etc.); and

9. Preservatives used, especially nonstandard types.

SOIL SAMPLING (For Laboratory Chemical Analyses)

A portion of the soil sample, collected from the least disturbed areain the center of the split-spoon, was placed in appropriately labeled VOA

vials for OVA headspace analysis, as described previously in this

Appendix. The remaining portions of the soil samples were placed in

properly labeled, laboratory-prepared glass Jars and VOA vials. The VOA

(CLSO60B/0528N)

Page 101: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.1-6

vials retained for OVA headspace analysis were analyzed in the field for

the presence of volatile organic compounds and the results were recorded.

Based on OVA screening results and other criteria, soil samples were

selected for submittal to the laboratories for further analyses.

GROUND WATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING

Ground Water Level Measurements

Following completion of well installations, the ground water levels in

all wells were measured within a 24-hour period, thus constituting a

single round of ground water level measurements. The instrument probe

(N-scope: Slope Indicator Co., Model 51453) was lowered down the well and

the depth to water was measured from the top of the PVC casing at the

marked reference point. When the electrode of the M-scope came into

contact with water, an audible signal was emitted. A properly cleaned

surveyors tape was used to sound the bottom of the well.

Ground Water Sampling

In order for valid, representative ground water samples to be

collected from the monitoring wells, it was important to properly prepare

the well prior to sample collection. This preparation entailed removing

all the water which was standing in the casing and grabbing the sample

from water which had recently been recharged from the aquifer. To

accomplish this, the depth to water from the top of the PVC casing was

measured. This value was used in conjunction with the total casing length

to determine the height of the water column. The volume of water standing

in the well was then calculated. At least three times this volume was

removed or the well was bailed dry, except for the COE well where limited

access prevented bailing.

(CL5060B/0528N)

Page 102: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.1-7

Once the well was adequately evacuated, sample collection was then

accomplished by lowering a stainless steel, bottom loading bailer with a

teflon check valve into the well. Each bailer was fitted with a dedicated

piece of polypropylene rope. A decontaminated bailer was used in each

well. If the bailer had not been used for well evacuation, the first bail

of water was discarded to rinse off any cleaning agents which may still

have been present on the bailer. The samples were poured directly from

the bailers into clean sample Jars for temperature, pH and specific

conductance measurements and into laboratory-prepared sample bottles and

VOA vials for subsequent laboratory analyses.

Samples bottles were placed in a cooler at 4C. Coolers were sealed

and shipped overnight to the designated laboratory. Duplicates of ten

percent of the samples were obtained and shipped to USAFOEHL. Proper

chain-of-custody procedures were followed when transferring the samples

from the field to the laboratory. In addition, accurate records were kept

of all sampling activities and included the following information: date,

time, location, sample number, depth to water measurement, method and

volume of water evacuation and sampling techniques.

(CL5060B/0528N)

Page 103: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

APPENDIX F.2

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONCROSS REFERENCE AND DATES OF SAMPLE ANALYSES

(CLS060B/0528N)

Page 104: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-1

LU

I- u

LUI.

L LI x

LI

-

C;U0pi- .i .

tc - - rr

o u*I. JJ D

LU (A

LUI- :

CA gI- .0. 00

U) ~ ~ ~ : 5~0J~

I- 0

U-~ ~ 41 2-I-J -C 0K 0W

cm 0l 401

(A .J ZA 0nLA

0D CDC,0)n

0)

-~c IxI4.

LU 0

Page 105: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-2

u j bz gj 0

-C j

£0

.0w

w-

u w-

.0 0 )4)0.

C

z CA

co w sOf 0

-C--0 4)

CA 0 410 0 .

Co ,F dl

a. 0 CL X0 x4)z4- £L £01 (A( A )U

C~a3t0o7 : I m :

C a I.- nj I- w cI0. ; T - 1c

u3J (3 z ~ > 0 'Ea 2 0 1 1 1 w I it w 10 i 1.

Page 106: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F .2-3

L JU 1.- 91

U co

ad

LL

LU

5 U

0 ui

co -0 -1

L- U W-

- - I.- -A

0 51

u. iI- -l

Pn m

aa.

4,

(AZ:Al0 C

-l0 C02 0 L)C7 5- Z1 1 0

Page 107: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-4

LU-i

Coj-

LU

-C I

UU rA)4 4 )4

iI-. 5

UU

LU

LUU

.0 .0

2; 2;.

Co -

IC m~5

cm cm onm' mCIa

of -f '-i- W,4 zW

I.- ~ I.

z

Co .0

0. ccc Owcac o)

0)1 z a'

Page 108: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-5

Lu

-C

U,0 z

Li

-C U

UZ

LU

to L

Li 4.

LU

W ~

Qii 4 o 2222222

LiU

0.

U OW atC>- , D

9-4 2l P

C-4 Me -C -C 0

Page 109: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-6

wi

i

U

9

LU

LU I

LUU

ad - i N

c 201 -1 0 A Ai

Li U

uU)

-' I.- ID0 W

m In4, R

Li Li L-U

* 2 41

wc U)1

WC (4 0D

LU Li ( 1 ).2(2

C4 0i O2 t-E

L.M WL0

)- 2

0.0.2 , w00w m U

Page 110: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-7

TABLE F.2.2

METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FORAROMATIC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF

WATER SAMPLES (ug)

Compound MDL(1) PQL(2) CRDL(3) PTLMDL(4)

Benzene 0.2 2 5 1Toluene 0.2 2 5 1Chlorobenzene 0.2 2 5 1Ethylbenzene 0.2 2 5 11,3-dichlorobenzene 0.4 4 10 11,2-dichlorobenzene 0.4 4 10 11,4-dichlorobenzene 0.3 3 10 1

Notes:

(1) Method Detection Limits, from: "Methods forOrganic Chemical Analysis of Municipal andIndustrial Wastewater: Method 602 - PurgeableAromatics," 49 CFR 43250, October 26, 1984.

(2) Practical Quantitation Limits, from: "TestMethods for Evaluating Solid Waste (SW846):Method 8020 - Aromatic Volatile Organics."

(3) Contract Required Detection Limits, from:"USEPA Contract Laboratory Program, Statementof Work for Organics Analysis," July, 1987.

(4) Method Detection Limits as reported byPrinceton Testing Laboratory.

Legend:

ug/l - micrograms per liter

(CL514OA/7)

Page 111: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-8

TABLE F.2.3

METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FORHALOGENATED VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF

WATER SAMPLES (ug/1)

Compound MDL(I) PQL(2) CRDL(3) PTLMDL(41

Chloromethane 0.08 0.8 10 20Bromomethane 1.18 11.8 10 10Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.81 18.1 NA 5Vinyl chloride 0.18 1.8 10 2Chloroethane 0.52 5.2 10 2Methylene chloride 0.25 2.5 5 5Trichlorofluoromethane NA NA NA 5I,I-Dichloroethene 0.13 1.3 5 11,1-Dichloroethane 0.07 0.7 5 1Trans-1,2-dichloroethene 0.10 1.0 5 1Chloroform 0.05 0.5 5 21,2-Dichloroethane 0.03 0.3 5 11,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.03 0.3 5 2Carbon tetrachloride 0.12 1.2 5 2Bromodichloromethane 0.10 1.0 5 21,2-Dichloropropane 0.04 0.4 5 1Trans-1,1-dichloropropene 0.20 2.0 5 5Trichloroethene 0.12 1.2 5 2Dibromochloromethane 0.09 0.9 5 21,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.02 0.2 5 5Cis-1,3-dichloropropene 0.34 3.4 5 52-Chloroethylvinylether 0.13 1.3 NA 5Bromoform 0.20 2.0 5 101,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.03 0.3 5 10Tetrachloroethene 0.03 0.3 5 2

Notes:

(1) Method Detection Limits, from: "Methods for Organic ChemicalAnalysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater: Method 601 -

Purgeable Halocarbons," 49 CFR 43250, October 26, 1984.

(2) Practical Quantitation Limits, from: "Test Methods for EvaluatingSolid Waste (SW 846): Method 8010 - Halogenated Volatile Organics."

(3) Contract Required Detection Limits, from: "USEPA Contract Laboratory

Program, Statement of Work for Organics Analysis, July, 1987.

(4) Method Detection Limits as reported by Princeton Testing Laboratory.

Legend:

ug/l - micrograms per literNA - Not Applicable

(CL5140A/7)

Page 112: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-9

C-J

-

- SCD

o- -J a, C> *~N CoL C o0 .

LaJ4J

-Jj

ot

-0-

ov Go 0 l

(V~S 04- A S

u 3.- c S-14 4--

(/) r.- V)-.%A $

Eu0

=. 0S.- tv

Li.. 4 ' .

.4- M .. 4-

-0 -beLU0 S- *

-q) (1 'U 4-) 0 > 4I- cr -D .4-1. 0-) + a)

4-.4E S--CL

4-0 4UJ = 0W0 (#u u u ww 4 4.1 t

1 r- U --. 0C.. C)0 oL

o W.. *4-O' V~ W0..X:Im

06 1~ (v ~ .O

4-)~00 m + m -

4-4 wq... 'U S-

Page 113: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-1O

C-

-he

I-

LL--

I-c

Z CL. w4 JC

U- %JDu-'44i~

C -J 0 -

-4 L) (A -D -4- D- >C l-- - Dm- DCM UJC3 -

-i a-J >

CD -JJ V "--ICO COC)Cl-1-4C M - DC

30 C; C; C ; C ;C ;c ;c C

0 0V~0 4U 000 0(~- 00C C00wQLI.J~ Ii

-4 =~ a)~ w0s- ) C 0 c% J-

FE 0 0 0 0 4 S- 06

o ~ ooooooO W cuMI JM041c

S- == = 0 - W0 r-0) 0 S ao 0 L-4-J J C 4-. $- E 6- c a$- w

a 0 ) W W 00 CLU W 0

- W a 0. 0 v S-0 - c S = c Sea r I+ S- U - S-a S S- S-0 +- 0 Q t 0~

= M-0 M - 0 0 U4J r 0 W -- 4J 4="a -- W " -r- W m 0 -- M r_ 1a

+J 43 - -= - = -4JU= -S U S-1 0

oU S. S L S. S JCO ccci cU040.~ U

Page 114: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-11l

: 000

30-i Ul, In Ul

>

cn cm- CP>- -he 0

-i -.% C..

cn Vfl) cr 0 0- a) 0 10D U)L4L u .U 0OcnC C o .0 4.) 0=C -40 _j toC Lfl M~ m- 0 cr_- =~ J C3- U~ 0A 1- t

... 0 -

a~ OL J in 4-JI

In 1-.CE) m

C J ri. I J R 4-) 4J_j I- jw to co a - (AaL LOC4l Cl cl C-! 4-1 LI. OCO w

*U ocol 'r) C-co CD0iI -W C- l -

I- ~ C~ I-~> 04-) U)

o U (A a. .

=CU 1, c S. ~ >-~~~C C)CE) 01 ~).

m0401 .01 00c m .J 44A

(AS4-J 2 0

4-) 0 CC 4-0- 4-) $-0) ' e.

S- tv 11) C304

0 -1- S-ES

C 0 0 -- 0 2 41- 0 (v(0) 04

r_ 4J4 u. to) to= Q) 0-C 4) 0 0 S-0.

>~ 00 V.) o:24.0cc -1.. ) 04- UD 00r

.C0 04-0 00 0 S-UC

4-) 0)S- '0 'a cc .s-.< -441 0 O..o S- d 0 2=

,a 0o - = CE-C 4J 4. =C 4.)C - o 1 C%1. 4-J'04- 4.) 4J00j 0C4 -U Q) 05-0( 0.4-) 01

01 0 ,- C%! CO ) 0 4-Z (-)(AIO -a4 EC . V I. LA

0 Sf Wa 0 -C"J mE f 0)~(.

Page 115: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-12

TABLE F.2.6

METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FORACID AND BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE

PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC ANALYSES OFWATER SAMPLES (ug/l)

Compound MDL(I) PQL(2) CRDL(3) PTLMDL(4)

Acenaphthene 1.9 19 10 10Acenaphthylene 3.5 35 10 10Anthracene 1.9 19 10 10Benzidine 44.0 440 NA 100Benzo(a)Anthracene 7.8 78 10 10Benzo(a)Pyrene 2.5 25 NA 10Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 4.8 48 10 10Benzo(ghi)Perylene 4.1 41 NA 10Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 2.5 25 NA 10Bis-(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane 5.3 53 10 10Bis-(2-Chloroethyl)Ether 5.7 57 10 10Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether 5.7 57 10 10Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 149.0 25 10 104-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether 1.9 19 10 10Butyl Benzyl Phthalate 2.5 25 10 102-Chloronaphthalene 1.9 19 10 104-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether 4.2 42 10 10Chrysene 2.5 25 10 10Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene 2.5 25 NA 101,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.9 19 10 101,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.9 19 10 101,4-Dichlorobenzene 4.4 44 10 103,3-Dichlorobenzidine 16.5 165 20 20Diethyl Phthalate 1.9 19 10 10Dimethyl Phthalate 1.6 16 10 10Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 2.5 25 10 102,4-Dinitrotoluene 5.7 57 10 102,6-Dinitrotoluene 1.9 19 10 10Di-n-Octylphthalate 2.5 25 10 101,2-Diphenylhydrazine NA NA NA 10Fluoranthene 2.2 22 10 10Fluorene 1.9 19 10 10Hexachlorobenzene 1.9 19 10 10Hexachlorobutadiene 0.9 9 10 10Hexachlorocyclopentadiene NA NA 10 10Hexachloroethane 1.6 16 10 10Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 3.7 37 NA 10Isophorone 2.2 22 10 10Naphthalene 1.6 16 10 10Nitrobenzene 1.9 19 10 10

Table continued on next page;Legend and notes appear on last page of table.

(CL5140A/7)

Page 116: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-13

TABLE F.2.6 (Continued)

METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FORACID AND BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE

PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC ANALYSES OFWATER SAMPLES (ug/l)

Compound MDL(1) PQL(2) CRDL(3) PTLMDL(4)

N-Nitrosodimethylamine NA NA NA 10N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine NA NA 10 10N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1.9 19 10 10Phenanthrene 5.4 54 10 10Pyrene 1.9 19 10 101,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.9 19 10 102-Chlorophenol 3.3 33 10 102,4-Dichlorophenol 2.7 27 10 102,4-Dimethylphenol 2.7 240 10 104,6-Dinitro-2-Cresol NA NA 50 502,4-Dinitrophenol 42.0 420 50 502-Nitrophenol 3.6 36 10 104-Nitrophenol 2.4 24 50 504-Chloro-3-Cresol NA 30 10 10Pentachlorophenol 3.6 36 50 50Phenol 1.5 15 10 102,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2.7 27 10 10

Notes:

(1) Method Detection Limits, from: "Methods for Organic ChemicalAnalysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater: Method 625 -Base/Neutrals and Acids," 49 CFR 43250, October 26, 1984.

(2) Practical Quantitation Limits, from: "Test Methods for EvaluatingSolid Wastes (SW 846): Method 8250 - Semivolatile Organics."

(3) Contract Required Detection Limits, from: "USEPA Contract LaboratoryProgram, Statement of Work for Organic Analysis," July, 1987.

(4) Method Detection Limits as reported by Princeton Testing Laboratory.

Legend:

ug/l - micrograms per literNA - Not Applicable

(CL514OA/7)

Page 117: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F .2-14

S- 0o0u

CC

-j-

04)4

a) 41

CD 44.-%C% C J~O co 4.-

U--C

LAJ wo- c

M 0

44 C 0LU -a) - 4J 0

(A 4-J-

- CC m)

Ci-) c-) 41

co -) CL U S

-% m% 0 4). qd P to) f) ) LOr-lOOO foo 0 .0 ) C.

cd) Co. C>0 O .. O 0 0 CoC 4-WC >C C c Dm oC --. 0 > C> 0>4-)>oC>C, DC>C > A a

~~~~ I+000000S- >)

o'C w (-.$I = U 4-)

Z~ E*0 06

.~~~~~4' .. 0 .. ..-- (U.-.. '""-U O f.r P -rC

cma 4j-~

C)))4- 4-)

- 'U.CL) Io~~~c c'>.,~J w

o 0 wl .-*

C-) m) 0- r D4-- 'a'S. S.C >,0 - -+

W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -4 co=oW.0S -0 lM LJL.) .) -J 1* CC n V) X r

Page 118: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-15

u,__j

o0 -J4 - DC DCo -lC

U) a

-J

0 IU)c

CoCLoCLDC 0 )C C 0C0.0 - % * nkDk r-~ -* 1 0

t7C 4- % n" m(Dr-I-c )COc

LlJ

C)

4J +j

>1 cS- 0

( C3 S) (v 0O0OC OO C 0 0.

0 M 0 U) 0 S 1 MWrU)J L.) -. r4C0nV I-M0 )

I-P

0 0~

4--) ~01

=01

Page 119: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-16

TABLE F.2.9

METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FOR TOTAL PETROLEUMHYDROCARBON ANALYSIS (EPA 418.1) OF WATER SAMPLES

HARTSampleNumber SOWMDL (mg/l)(1) PTLMDL (mg/l)( 2)

001 1 0.5003 1 0.5004 1 0.5005 1 0.5006 1 0.5007 1 0.5008 1 0.5009 1 0.5010 1 0.5Ol 1 1.o(3)012 1 0.5013 1 2.0(3 )014 1 0.5015 1 0.5017 1 0.5018 1 0.5019 1 0.5020 1 4.0( 3 )021 1 0.5022 1 0.5023 1 0.5024 1 0.5025 1 0.5026 1 0.5027 1 0.5

Notes:

(1) Detection Limit applicable to the analytical method specified in theUSAF MAFB IRP Phase II Statement of Work (EPA 418.1).

(2) Method Detection Limits as reported by Princeton Testing Laboratory.(3) Higher detection limits due to the lesser volume of sample available

for analysis.

Legend:

mg/l - milligrams per liter

(CL5056B/20)

Page 120: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-17

TABLE F.2.10

METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FOR TOTAL PETROLEUMHYDROCARBON ANALYSIS (EPA 418.1)OF SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES

SOWMDL(I) PTLMDL(2 )

I mg/kg 10.0 mg/kg

Notes:

(1) Detection Limit applicable to the analytical method specified inthe USAF MAFB IRP Phase II Statement of Work.

(2) Method Detection Limits as reported by Princeton Testing Laboratory.

Legend:

mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram

(CL5056B/20)

Page 121: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-18

C;i C

U- a) '

A-

va)4z *DU

oD u4 - ---

o3 m

o ~o v

CD 1 0L 4n -" C1 -4w-4m

0- w LrC;0- w'0i 0o M CDM.0C

en 4J

S-I. 4.o 4-0 a

U)- C 4..4.

~~r_ U

o0 >)L>. 4-C .00

41 CLM- CL. atoS-

CD to Cos. 4.) # - o&=1 a,-. 5-= 1 - J 0 4I- o = . = 0 = 0m

U) CO. u0.co 0

a~~a, S.. 5

0 .0r

I-~~4 4-J , 0 4-) a,

O~~ ~ w LLr.,.r

o~~~~4 0 OS-S.U 40 O 09- 0 .C. 0 V 0 )

Page 122: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

U *.' cI -G P-- P - -8 P- "M r" -I P" F-

i

C.0 CAo% to wo wo to to wo to to wo wo % to to

V) J 04 C-4 CMJ 0) 0 0D CM 0 r-4 - - C~i C-J 1-M P- 1 4 - . 4 -4 -4

o i I - -4 V- - -d 4 -.

1I to to to to w to to to %D to to to to to

cc La. m1 0 co - 0 0 D -4 0" 0D 0 D 0CD'I.- m).. 081 en. en N.. m. N. m. m. M. en. M. e. . n.V)'- OU. 0m 0 0 0- 0i 0 0- 0% '1- 1- 0- 0- 0

w ca u m CD) D~ ~ CD) C> ( CD Co) C>) r) CD) CD) C>00 C c - r- r4 .- 4 1 .*4 4 - -

00

VC to to to to to to to to %0 to to to to to081 0. im 0 0 0D 0% 0 01 0% > D a%

m.8 r" C1 e. M 04. c% V) CV C1 cm C14 en. Mj c44 CD N.D N.D CD C51 N.D Co CD N. N ND.

C C

0 0 c0u 0 0 w1 w w1 81w 18 180+j3 413 4.) 4.) 4) .- .1 4.3 41 4.3 41 4.3 4.3 41 c

EU E) -0 - 0 M -0 V -0 -0 0 i540 4- 0~

CLES 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0~

CA to cm (a co c a ca to CI m oL.. . w Lo wui C0

c -

4a) CJ

E E Co- CD) > C> Qo Co 0 0) 0 -- 1 e'J i) 4 mn 9- ifIV ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . -DJ 0C DC C C lC DCW)

Page 123: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-20

4 r CCm cn M~ *-' '- - - -

-4 -4 -4 - 1- 1" 1- -4 -

LiJJ

-o - to to to to to 40 t o o t=) CC w O m O m O m O w O w t U to o

-% 0LL- > 4 m 1"- -4 4 - 4

cm U0 Co -o 40 Co Co CD --00 N N . N . N N .0) ev I-- 44 1- 1-4 1-4 -4 -4 -4

CD:

Do C) C.0

w. co to co c o t to to Lw u 00 C> CO Co C> Co CD to 1-1 to- to

CA tm N. C. Co* N. Cp C> -- 1 16 -4 -1" L ~ 0J O -4 --4 -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 . . N

s-s- 00. 0 0- 0 0 w 0) a) a)-

4Ji 4-~0) 0 . ) 4- -) 4, .- I to t

~- 00

CS:~e ru tot t o o t

C0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S- S- S- S.4 CD C.D C CD c'7 C) rv' e'4 (V

C, u. 0o 0 0o 0 "0 "0 .u '10

0 4 . 4 ~ 4-4

S.. 1- S.-0-.S.- S- S.. S. S.- S.- ) 0) 0I--

E - I C c CI C> Cn Cc 0O %0

~-A D C) CD Co 40 Co C) C> Co C>

Page 124: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-21

1" -- - -

4- to to to

0C( M j (A c j c. co ctj oa c4LW E >. - -, - I I- -- I

-I a S., Lfl Lt) Lf Lfl

::- 'UW- (A4-

-j ) .9o. o o 0 o o c -

-1 >1>111 1- . 11c

LUU

-/ 4 - 4 4 4 -1 -

9-4 mO D4-

LL. W'- 1-L m - ~l c l

C/ 3 w0 >.,I U) 1 -LI >- .0 0 Co Co CD Co Co Co to a

o~ --Ic c c cc c c c c

cc

e %.0 to t0 to k0 k0 t0 ko0w cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc

OiL C14 C'J CJ csJ C) C/ ' C)a0.. 4..1a) Co \ ~ ' % ' 'J C~ .

(U, N N.. .. N. * .63 4J 4-3. (0r 0 0 0 0 0o

CL

4-' 4-- 4-' %4. w w w-CD - S- - S- C C C C

a) - E9 4- ) a a )0M, ' ad' Sfl V) S- CL

V) tn an) tn V) Ln (4 tvU 0 L Li ) Cd) Cd) /) 0(U (U U (U

WE U) U) UO Co CD 4- 4D C> aDI)-

to/o)C CO C>) (/) Co CD) Co (V U

Page 125: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-22I0

**0I- 4 .6114 -

f.) a. x4 W E ~ v

E 0l

C=

41fC

0i1.* -- co co G E E o CE) to Go G o co Go GoLno C. w u 4JN -4 9-' - . W- Z; -" '. -04EV cct JM t o - .0 - n - nL n w

w o . 1 11 - - - 11 11 11 ~

*0 co to Go co Go co co to to co co to Go Go

MLL S. m M. %n %n C$ n %n %- cn CV m c

L& Lj1 - - 1 4. 4 4 - 84 .4 - .4Cl. .0 CD - C' Cl CDJ (%C) J - C.J CJ .- D CDJ Co

0j 1- W 4 -MI- - 14 -4 -4 -4 1-4 94 4

-

%D 0.0 to to 0 00 o to .0 to 0 to to t

co C* CDi e. n In - - ~ n C~I In In .j In In In In m

4= 0D 40 C0 DI CD CD D- -4 -4 -4 - - 4 4 -0i -4 944 "4 1-4 1" 14 -q 9I. -

mC cc- cc t to o tto m go cc t to to t) ta to

*~I00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0mG4.1 S- S- S- S- S- S.. S- I- L. . S- L. en N

V)-5. Lo) Lo CD) LO C.0 to) LD) Lo) ca) to) Lai Lo ) Lo L L -A

0 = O.0 P- 0 0 0 0 0 0toi = 0) 0D - CD C> CD r4 1" 4 94 -4 -4 9-i i .

C) 0 0 CD CD CD Co CD 0 0 D 0 40 CD

Page 126: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-23

.9- m, (n -% -%C>

0 'a

(A

S m

-4;) r-0

S.-5.-LU 04- to

.9 - C. -

-i 0 4

LUI

toI to

'o LU O 4-' -

C UL Coe

4-

< cm m Lfl to to0 U31 00 4.LL 05- -- 1-1 S. S.. S.

= 0D ca +_3 -4 -4 -4 -u 0D x -4 -6 -4 -4 - -4

-j LA - LM

On.

IV .- - e m m-

0-0-

4-a co to #0 to 4.o to

0 - 0 4- -. . ", 1-- 11-1

M- 0-5- (l) COi CO(0( 4

-

0- rc m m t

+ O 0 S- s., S- S. S.

0.- = CO C~J C%J C4j c'J e'cn -I S.. C. C) 40 Co C

Page 127: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

o 1 F. 2-24

I- -

t oto to to,a 3G to 03 %o Go 00 0o t0 c3 to

ON WO S.. t .. t to N to

. .~ . .-. . .. . . .r- - I--4

-4--4-

4- N -I u M. (A u a a u a a) a a a utU .~ . f . ft . ^ . .00

Zc IV.0S- m a 0$-O m .LO U)m -m w.0 L.O m w mS. m

4- 0I to to to tD to0 -S Go ~ co, cococ

.-- / Lj W ~ 4A e -1 -4 '-

CDJ CU an -, I--- 'S. SO. 0-.- - Co 0C0>CM1-4 -4--

In (-n

Cl 3c

-i =U- kot t

co C CDJ -0 to to to to to

Li 3j > cc .. C') CD" Co) (>V-) ~ EU -' cc 0 0

U.0 0I 0o 0D 0Co

--i

-- o0 to to to to to

Li) ~ 0 Co-'O 0CD1 1

aU. CD) C> CDJ w'

M0coI

"a "a V 0

o 0 0 00.) 4-a 4- CL

0 -I CCo C C) Co m0 wOCt4 04 0Cocu

Page 128: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

m cx I,- 0 - w w 0 0o 04 r- c0 t- Go

=0 40 40 4 0 4 0

Go 0 D C0 0 0 0D O 0 %0 c0 k c0 %00 Go 0 N. 1 N. ~ N. 1 OD Go Go. N

ON 40 %.0 %0 t0 %0a . 40 N 0 Nm,- &n 0 In qw -4 qr 0w C3 n o In 0Do S* N. N. S~ . N. N. %. %%. N. .

-4 - - - - - -

V -- a C C a-. -

V) tv >1 .00 a;~ 00'C 00 a a V) L A a a atao

9 4,cv 0.010 .0.m. .0 4;0.s S c 0;.s01-4 0;.0;5.0aw a V 0 41 a. 0. 0.. 0l. coUL cnlL w c(0i cV in

4- 0 -.0 to 40 to to to to to-0'- 0 0o Go Go 0 Go Go Go

11 N .1 1- '%- 1- N, .N.- JV)~e 0Y '4(4 -4 "~ P-4 - '

.j LaJ 4JO 0j CD CD 4 m ' m ' en enC

C -

In CL. I "C4 0:L t o o t ot

CD X4i. a~ 40 40 4o 40 Go 40 Go 4CI 00 , V4 00 C0 0l 0 0

u. ^ UJ - m " M nC-l 1 >- U.0 CD 0) 0 0 0

o to -1 00-w 4 -4 - 4

0C

0 ot o t 0t

Go) Go 0 Go 00 0 Go Go

E* 041 at. at. CD ..- L . .

4.)4. 4.) 4.) 41 .1 4.) 4.) m0

3C 3: 3 9C m 93

0-IC C C C CO0. c C0

m S.. S.. S.- S-0 L. %-. a t

S.- -%

C;0 L. v

IV 4E 4-0 CD 0 . 4 m 0 C..V)l Co 0 0l 0 40 40 0D 0l t-v

Page 129: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

I F.2-26

Go to Go % o %0 o w t o toS4% 0 0 01

SN to ~ . t * to '-. tz 0 to .D to z

CI *4 -c r, t- - * 2- f - -

-05- - L- C -05- -W.S- -0. LM S- -

* a u ea a w ea V) a. a ( a a (A a- a ao (A

V1 Go co 6 Csc. C. Go Go

-js maw .Oo .C m .n~. 0a0 -j aa a an aD a D aD a2 aCoaaaa

w= -0 =o 0.000 0.5Z .10) 00-) 0050 .5a.14 :I_ 0UEL 0U ~ 0 f ~ ~ n ) ~

41 Cou

I ct o Go to Go toU- c 4.'- 0 m 0- 0 0

&0 UJI No .S.. m. e nM n.LU u to) O i 0 1-1 %-"4-.. j P".J Ow- -. qV) zi) zi' zi)Cc co -j w4 m

Go Goco oG

cm (n2 (nI

41 41 5-f to +o )o to totoJ 00 iv0 v m 0v 00 01

LV Lul 05 .N. -. NLA. U) 4E 01 -t- 4 4"4

>% 0 E z c

w0-j o

Eu.-~~~ C4i Co Y V C)C)'Os-~~~s N.N 4 . .N.

o 00 0% 0 06.1" 1-4 CM "4i "4 k

V) C CD C C 4 gm

Page 130: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-2 7

.9- >c- -4 F% c r L W n lt L w L9j - 'a

N o to to to 00

4.) > I I ~ I I I I~- IOr- U) (n W 0) ql 0> Rr 0o W 0

- -4 r- -4 -4

-b Cr- C A r...) C- LO-> 11. (4 (. a-V)t

x) c 0 - .0 S .0 S- tm .0W s-t .0 S-w' w l U aocn(V) a V) ( ca Ln (i m (4 f

z Cto-0 to to to to to

0.J.a coa 0o 0o 00 0o

a -i w U N.1 *-v Co oC 1 c a1 -'. 1-1

CD w

-nQ

*v CDi. CDi tV o Go to co co. La- w~,~ w . N.1 N.1 N..LL- LJ +j-S. > e 0 0n m 0nL. LJV) 000 M. N.. N.. m N C

6-4 ->. U.0 0l -4-4-tuJ j3 w .4 -- 1 -4-

C) <

0-a) to to to MD tow u "I. 1-- 1%.*N

U)~C C>), ~ iC. Cl.

w) 4-) 4J M4

0 u x 0

0.(4-- 4- 4- 4- 4-Ca>02F 0 S.- .S-S-

5- C

aen

Cr>

I-- a-

S~ .0@ O)= 0~ .J %J ..)c'.. C'.) 0

CMD 0cP 0 00 09-

Page 131: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-28E

u '-

to~

~0 ~ cl

4- _ W.0 S-

a '-.

CM ->--

0-4

4LU co--S- C

z C

cn 4- W .

~~~F ...0a 4n)

>1 0. EV $- U

o to

S. (A o 4

4v Li- WaRii

w. C'> .0 LE e) -jtv 0. ( (

V) m

Page 132: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-29

4J

-o to %D to to to to to to63 01 n 0n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0

CoN .. coo Co Co CD N. .

14 0 0o %0 0o 0o 0 0 0

aw - -V - 4 - ~ C 4 -4j

co LU

to il

-i cn

tO i01 to to to to to wo to to- C -- Q 4J Go 0 o 0 o Go 0 0 ca 0

4- S-Z 04.3 I- FN N, N N N< * C'j C%J CsJ cli C'J cJ C..j

LL 0C 3 v .m. N. N1 %1- N. .LL..mQq cc. 0 0 0> 0 C> 0D 0o 0>

i 0 00l I= -j -4 -4 -.4 - - -

VI) I

4OI t0 w to to to 4.0 to 403S Go0 o 0 0 o c0 o 0

L ~ C43 1-r- t. - 11-1.. f-00 0 CoJ 0. CJ ( CJ ( CoJ CD C 4

06 c

03 o cct o o t to oS.. - 0D u a) 0 0 0 a

0 0 r- 0 .r- vw (A 4- 4- N4- 4

C r N." SN. L. S- N. 0) (A N0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0

CL0.0

V 0 0D 0> 0> C . 4.3 Co. 4.o

Page 133: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2- 30

43-4

,a 00, 0o c) 0o 0) 0

w O N to % toD- W CD -It C> to r COD

~ -- 4 -4-

-C4 ~ 4L~C4SO

-% LU

43 I 4) 14-)4U'X-' 4 4V

~c c0

43 b 01 to to toC 0 41i C OC

o O-~ 4 N.N.r%0) CU -t- CO CO

C J LU.1 -4 LL

-a O-a. tn-j C) S-Icc 0D>- "a l tow to to

~....J 4 4~ > O CC O

w430 CIJ CVJ 2--

m43 0 0 0- 0 r4 S__ tn w 4CO -

'CI- =. __ - -4

Vf) - rJ M

w~~~ 43'L t .

41 to 00 00L CP43 w O CO Wtu -J1"

04 00 0>0.% ~~CA -S -.-

S_~ aS

M2 L

S - 43c

0) %.. -0 cau -C4- 4 - r- -O6-0 1-e

01 4) (14 > CD O h 0

Page 134: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-31

TABLE F.2.17

SAMPLE CHRONOLOGIES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES

HART Type Date ActualSample of Date Received by Date HoldingNumber Sample Collected Laboratory Analyzed Time (days)

001 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

003 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

004 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20

005 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20

006 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20

007 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

008 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

009 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20

010 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20

011 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20Equipment Blank

012 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20

013 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

014 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

015 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20Equipment Blank

017 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

018 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

019 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

Table continued on next page.

(CL514IA/7)

Page 135: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-32

TABLE F.2.17 (Continued)

SAMPLE CHRONOLOGIES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES

HART Type Date ActualSample of Date Received by Date HoldingNumber Sample Collected Laboratory Analyzed Time (days)

020 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

021 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

022 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19

023 Surface Water 11/02/86 11/03/86 11/20/86 18

024 Surface Water 11/02/86 11/03/86 11/20/86 18

025 Surface Water 11/02/86 11/03/86 11/20/86 18

026 Surface Water 11/02/86 11/03/86 11/20/86 18

027 Surface Water 11/02/86 11/03/86 11/20/86 18

(CL5141A/7)

Page 136: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-33

TABLE F.2.18

SAMPLE CHRONOLOGIES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON ANALYSISOF SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES

HART Date ActualSample Type of Date Received by Date HoldingNumber Sample Collected Laboratory Analyzed Time (days)

001 Subsurface 10/22/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 15Soil

002 Subsurface 10/22/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 15Soil

003 Subsurface 10/22/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 15Soil

004 Subsurface 10/22/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 15Soil

005 Surface 10/23/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 14Sediment

006 Surface 10/23/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 14Sediment

007 Surface 10/23/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 14Sediment

008 Surface 10/23/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 14Sediment

009 Subsurface 10/24/86 10/27/86 11/19/86 26Soil

010 Subsurface 10/24/86 10/27/86 11/19/86 26Soil

011 Subsurface 10/24/86 10/27/86 11/19/86 26Soil

(CL5141A/8)

Page 137: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-34

CC - -I

4- O , qV C% ONCoJ' C..C.C. " e-tm N4D C)C)J W mC

o - I O(D OO Ot~ -- S V . >C 4- N o C, D.D'.DIm No -I -. -"I-. '

r_. (D C -1 -4 C J ) c ) 0 - - 4 % -qe ~ 0 -q 4 0-pC > r 4 4 r-4 r %J

C 0 -1-4 q 4 - r-OO4 -4- 4 -4 - 00 -44 -4 -4 -4 .4Ln-- -- - ---

C-,

U)00 00 00

CD 4-) 4-2 4-) 4- 4-) 4-3

- c +j 4) (cc4 0) -a)) (1 a a 03330 0 " 3(1 D( 03 U30010 tv 0) ( ) )a "aal )

uj a N 4- -* '0 - - 4j4 j -.C4.) 4-)4- - -C4-ONh C)-j 0 >- CO 'U- - -C t V-.- - L. v t '- -.- L0fu

X- C- S- S- EO )4- S-S F 0o4- - S-Er=0 0 0m 2 c o54- - 0 -0 . 4-, . 0 -o. 4- -o,-

u V-) r- r J3U 4-Q.f CLW - 6 ) C-0 Uc.04- C 4

LA- A4LL S.-IJ

CDC30 0o to 0o

C> to 1-4 - '-

CU 0 110 "10 IN,(1) ccU (D l

-O

0 D 0D 0>

(1)

S.- S- Sa) a) Q)

CLCmW E 0 C>. I c- S- 0

4--%

0-z-

E E-4

-0) tv -4C>C)

=E -n Co- C> D

Page 138: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-35

SI

t 5t

uMCQ "C-iCJ"c~ C%l~C

tv .- en oC> 0--f-4 C*J m en > -> C~j M n > >-4 -4 CQ

C>0-f-0- ~-4 - ~ 00> - 4 -1 - -4 - -- 4 -------- ---- -0 -----

MCC C C

C.)00 00 00

S -- S- s- s-S-r

4J I J 4304- 0304- +334

C~ ~~~ w.' 43J 000003 3330W 4)034300014-~ LJ CJ Nr Ir =-r+.C4J -6J"O 4 - =4J -1 "V - .C 4-J

40 0-1 0 V .- S--0. 0. cc-..-- S- S- 0L.0 c .-.- 5- S-0C. C1- 5- 0O0 (A4- S- S- E0 0 W4- S -S00W4

c MZ CO 4 -).0 -0. 0 -0. 4. 0 -0

~ .V) u 0C4-.U m CAC-.0 U4- M (A C .0 U 4--C06V

CMJ

LL LL. L.

LW CD D' 0 to IO 0-1 0 W CL)4-1I coco

a) 0-5 0 0n en

03.0 0 0cl -J -4

LJ-J

031) co. s.. 00

4-0 Q) alh 0

0 C0 0D 0

a)) 4-)

0) Cl.

L = 0 0 a3.-

4-' 4 X

CLI sC

col = > 0 0 CV)-2= Co C Co0

Page 139: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-36

4J V) to1 L-- a- C-o - -.,-,- -- 4 -'G 0 - - ,n ,"o ,>-4

.) I . . . .-

.UD %o t o o t otot t toto t ot of0

>1 ClC m- mC o - -4M R Ch MCQ\M J C%JC.JC'J

M M1 CDP C> ,- M-,, ( 0 1 CoC C3

C r_

00 0

4.) 4J OO4OO -)4-., Ob~ 41V O bQ-A

"." I .J -0 O 4 = +- 04 4J 4 0 - *-=4J

. .. oj • • ,, .. I

4J D - 0 I C ---- S- --v-- S5- tv - - --- M Ir_ = - - . 0- - o4 S-S- 0 w- S-S- E 00---

e-) CD < CC-. .= = -- %= =S

LD C to

-6j co 00 0

-. 0 4 C>C

0i~3 3c CCCC 0 C

'cC ~a).) aa)4C~t (/ I 0 00 0 J W 00 W 0~ ZLJ C I C 4.)--.C.) .- ~.C4-

4.) -1 >.I 0--L I. 0. 0 I- 3 0.0 0r-... .. .C>C Z~ *.--I S.LE~cn4 I....E0u~4 S-S-E04-'4

0 ~ CO 0r-~r- LO

0'~to-, O~VJ

Page 140: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-37

CV CY e C4%I C'JC%j CY

41 en f"~0 0C 00 c c e c 40

cm 0 O~~~~ zi OO~ ir -- 0P)C)0~44CJ W0-4 -4C~ V- ""

C 00~4 44 -44 - "-- w-4 00-4-- 14

LaJ

P-1

vw www 0 0 w.64 00- 00 001-J J4b .1b4

c 0 .r- L - s -f 4-4.

m J0 4 00- 00

4o 6& CL CA 4.4Jr c0r 4-'4 Q- CL0 -- u.4. 4- L %A-

* LA-.

0- U-

-1 0 W 4-)I cocGca -01 EU.-S 0 -(aJ -". . .8-1

0.4J co Go G

4J w C

C EL

0 0

CL sU 0

CC

0= W) 40 CD

Page 141: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2- 38

to - 4.tG iO 4 4- c nC .).- l i lC >-

4-39- Co r-4 l00-4 M MCDC M C 400 -cV c'c>C% CJCJC% rC'JC-%1C-'J > - 1 4CDC r4- r4r-

C) 00 .4-- 00 - -- 00- - -

U.41

4n 0J0 0 4A4J 0 0 04 J0

L) 0n c 4-(+ L(4- C A C . 4-Cal cc.--*9 9 9

a)cCm) CCa CaUI WW4- .0+ ~ a4.

C " UI WS)O 'W WW V E a -aG'V

(D C .U-0 C .Ud-.f C.L~d0

- LLI

CJ

U7 4') I

ton eo Vol )-J 0o C>)-J

0 .rL.) - -4

(-.)3

4- 3

Z aC I 0. '0

4 O4

0- CD) C C)

Page 142: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2- 39

mlm

w- N

to -- M C- ~LO C 4C D oC > C -- I~O l%O1CJ CD (D 4 4 A- -- "- F- 4 -4-

-cI 0000I 0000OO~

4-4C Ob1 c4-1 '-4 4-A'-

o 5-.. L.C V t -S Lr o- S - c-- - .1 0 - S. - r 4 0 04- - sl- r4 o 0 V4-

---- 4-r - 4---4.4O - 4--- --

-

Z LC CD CCotot.- A WaD w - W o0

(l 00 0 00

0w~1~ 4J4 4J 414J m cu *U*

0~CA C. (n 4~0-0 -4n ),'0

c-cz

CS-eU..

I- =- SW en-;=J cc>l --.- -

o1 CD0 *-

Page 143: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F .2-40

+j. >1 0% r-4 Co en -WO -4c awr-oo 0% " l 0 o CU a 1 -.I- - -- , - --- - -- 4-l % N.% 11 1

r_-0- 4rI- "- - - rIr4 rf14rI"4rI- -

4J ~ ~ -j 0 1 C - --- --IV-- -r5Mt o- -- - C-

-D - s----= - --- - -S..- -

-

CC CD 0 t k-A CDw0 00 co c

co -1 41 > -

C~ Col 01 C>O~ 0 0 0 0 W 0~

C ~- -- I 1--004- 33-ooS - S-L 0t)4

00 uZ CuJ4~.Z0 -~0 ~t CQU40.f CC.U40 .) to 0 4-.f

II LJ CA

toiL = -ILL. =1 C>I CO Co

Page 144: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-41

Mow~

Do to to to to ko to to to% to t ot ok ot ot ot

C ~ ~ Nv P- F- -C~ >C ~4 - 4 ~.4 --4 -- 4 -- mnIlLlIlI

-JCDu0 a >C oC C oC >CO C lC

-a

~J 0 wa. to f.0 w-.- tot*t-.wt- t o otot o otot I

LUw 04J CD0 % %C % D.u% DDZ C mC C .

0"e QCje nc ne * c nc nMC lC pC.0 ClC >CUCC DC DC C o C DUJ .l- 4- 4- 4- . 4- 4 . 4r 4- 4-

L.- L.S-L .S . - r.s . S-M 4 )W QW WWWWDUOW WW)4++--

0,4-J4JfV-O f f J+ 4a4)+)+b4J4)M MCM0 CC O9 CM+ M C~O M M CC 3 M 39 39

IV0 000O0~00000O0000000 CS.LJCsJ

m w=nt Or- C .t n .. 0 ~ 0 n.4 0 0oo C) ol c oo C >C o 4- - 4-- 0 0 .-. q.4. CM'"

f^ 10. Co - -- -C-- -- 0 C> CD -DC 2 DC DQ lC C C

Page 145: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-42TABLE IV-F.2.21

COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA TOPTL DETECTION LIMITS FOR EPA METHOD 601/602: AROMATIC AND

HALOGENATED VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSES

Detection LimitsAvailable Water

Parameter Water Soil Quality Criteriaug/T ug/kg ug/h

Halogenated Volatile OrganicsChioromethane 20 800 0.19(e)Bromomethane 10 400 0.19(e)Dichiorodifluoromethane 5 200 0.19(e)Vinyl Chloride 2 80 2.0(a);0(k);1(l)Chloroethane 2 80 No established levelMethylene Chloride 5 200 150(h)Trichlorofluoromethane 5 200 0.19(e)1,1-Dichloroethene 1 40 0.03(a);7.O(k);7.0(1)1,1-Dichloroethane 1 40 No established levelTrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 40 270(g);70(c)Chloroform 2 40 0.19(a);100(f)1,2-Dichloroethane 1 40 0.94(a);0(k);5.0(1)1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2 80 18,400(d);1,000(i);200(k);200(1)Carbon Tetrachloride 2 80 0.4(a);20(g);0(k);5.0(1)Bromodichioromethane 2 80 0.19(e); 100(f)1,2-Dichloropropane 1 40 6(c)Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5 200 87(d)Trichloroethene 2 80 2.7(a);0(k);5.0(1);2,000(j)Dibromochloromethane 2 80 100(f)1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 200 0.6(a)Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5 200 87(d)2-Chloroethylvinylether 5 200 No established levelBromoform 10 400 0.19(e);100(f)1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10 400 1.7(a)Tetrachioroethene 2 80 0.8(a);20,000(k)

Aromatic Volatile OrganicsBenzene 1 40 0.66(a);0(k);5.0(1)Toluene 1 40 14,300(d);2,000(c)Chlorobenzene 1 40 No established levelEthylbenzene 1 40 1,400(d);680(c)1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 40 400(d)1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 40 400(d);620(c)1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 40 400(d);750(k);750(l)

Legend appears on next page.

(C L5141 A/5)

Page 146: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-43

TABLE F.2.21 (Continued)

COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA TOPTL DETECTION LIMITS FOR EPA METHOD 601/602: AROMATIC AND

HALOGENATED VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSES

Legend:

(a) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria corresponding to an incrementalincrease in lifetime cancer risk of 10-6; Federal Register, Vol. 45, No.231, 11/28/80.

(b) National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards: Maximum ContaminantLevel; USEPA 40 CFR 141.

(c) Proposed Recommended Maximum Contaminant Level: NIPDWS, Federal Register,Vol. 50, No. 219, 11/13/85.

(d) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria based upon human health effects;Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.

(e) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for total Halomethanes correspondingto an incremental increase in lifetime cancer risk of 10- 6 ; FederalRegister, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.

(f) National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standard for totalTrihalomethanes; USEPA 40CFR141.

(g) Suggested No Adverse Response Level for ten day drinking water exposure;EPA, Vol. 3, No. 17, 4/30/82.

(h) Suggested No adverse Response Level for long-term drinking waterexposure; EPA, Vol. 3, No. 17, 4/30/82.

(i) Suggested No Adverse Response Level for chronic drinking water exposure;EPA, Vol. 3, No. 17, 4/30/82.

(j) Suggested No Adverse Response Level for one day (child) drinking waterexposure; EPA Vol. 3, No. 17, 4/30/82.

(k) National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards; Recommended MaximumContaminant Level; USEPA 40 CFR 141.

(1) Proposed Maximum Contaminant Level; NIPDWS, Federal Register, Vol. 50,No. 219, 11/13/85.

ug/l - micrograms per literug/kg - micrograms per kilogram

(CL5141A/5)

Page 147: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-44

TABLE F.2.22

COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA TOPTL DETECTION LIMITS FOR EPA METHOD 625: ACID AND BASE!NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC ANALYSES

Detection Limit Available WaterParameter (Water) Quality Criteria

ug/h ug/1

Acenaphthene 10 20(a);0.0028(b)Acenaphthyl ene 10 0.0028(b)Anthracene 10 0.0028(b)Benzidine 100 0.00012(c)Benzo(a)Anthracene 10 0.0028(b)Benzo (a) Pyrene 10 0.0028(b)Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 10 0.0028(b)Benzo(ghi)Peryleie 10 0.0028(b)Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 10 0.0028(b)Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane 10 No established levelBis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether 10 0.03(c)Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether 10 34.7(d)Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 10 No established level4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether 10 No established levelButyl Benzyl Phthalate 10 No established level2-Chloronaphthalene 10 0.0028(b)4-Chiorophenyl Phenyl Ether 10 No established levelChrys ene 10 0.0028(b)Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene 10 0.0028(b)1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10 40(c);620(e)1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10 40(c)1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10 40(c);750(f);750(g)3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 20 0.0103(c)Diethyl Phthalate 10 350,000(d)Dimethyl Phthalate 10 313,000(d)Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 10 34,000(d)2,4-Dinitrotoluene 10 0.11(c)2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10 No established levelDi-n-Octylphthalate 10 No established level1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 10 0.0422(c)Fl uoranthene 10 42(d)Fl uorene 10 0.0028(b)Hexachlorobenzene 10 0.00072(c)Hexachlorobutadiene 10 0.447(c)Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 10 206(d);1.0(a)Hexachl oroethane 10 1.9(c)Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 10 0.0028(b)Isophorone 10 5,200(d)Naphthal ene 10 No established levelNi trobenzene 10 19,800(d);30,000(a)N-Nitrosodimethylamine 10 0.0014(c)N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine 10 No established level

Table continued on next page;Legend appears on next page.

(C L5141 A/5)

Page 148: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-45

TABLE F.2.22 (Continued)

COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA TOPTL DETECTION LIMITS FOR EPA METHOD 625: ACID AND BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC ANALYSES

Detection Limit Available WaterParameter (Water) Quality Criteria

ug/l ug/l

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 10 4.9(c)Phenanthrene 10 0.0028(b)Pyrene 10 0.0028(b)1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10 No established level2-Chlorophenol 10 0.1(a)2,4-Dichlorophenol 10 3,090(d);0.3(a)2,4-Dimethylphenol 10 400(a)4,6-Dinitro-2-Cresol 50 No established level2,4-Dinitrophenol 50 70(d)2-Nitrophenol 10 No established level4-Nitrophenol 50 No established level4-Chloro-3-Cresol 10 No established levelPentachlorophenol 50 1,010(d);30(a);220(e)Phenol 10 3,500(d);300(a)2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 10 1.2(c)

Legend

(a) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria based upon organoleptic data; Federal;Register, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.

(b) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbonscorresponding to an incremental increase in lifetime cancer risk of 10-6;Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.

(c) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria corresponding to an incrementalincrease in lifetime cancer risk of 10-6, Federal Register, Vol. 45, No.231, 11/28/80.

(d) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria based upon human health effects;Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.

(e) Proposed Recommended Maximum Contaminant Level; NIPDWS, Federal Register,Vol. 50, No. 219, 11/13/85.

(f) National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards; Recommended MaximumContaminant Level; USEPA 40 CFR 141.

(g) Proposed Maximum Contaminant Level; NIPDWS, Federal Register, Vol. 50,No. 219, 11/13/85.

ug/l - micrograms per liter

(CL5141A/5)

Page 149: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-46

TABLE F.2.23

COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA TO

PTL ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES AND DETECTION LIMITS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS,

CO140M ANIONS. TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS A10 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON ANALYSES

PTL DetectionAnalytical Procedures Limits AvailabLe Water

Parameter Water Soil Water SoiL QuaLity Criteria

mg/L mg/kg m/LPriority PoLlutant

Metals

Beryllium EPA 210.1 SW 7090 0.05 2.5 3.7X10-6 (a)

Cadmium EPA 213.1 SW 7130 0.005 0.5 0.01(b);0.01(f,i);0.005(h)

Chromium EPA 218.1 SW 7190 0.02 1.0 170(c);0.O5(d,f,i);O.12(h)

Copper EPA 220.1 SW 7210 0.02 1.0 1.O(e);1.0(g);1.3(h);O.05((i)

Nickel EPA 249.1 SW 7520 0.01 2.0 0.0134(b)

Lead EPA 239.1 SW 7420 0.02 1.0 0.05(b,f,i);0.02(h)

Zinc EPA 289.1 SW 7950 0.02 0.5 5.0(e,g);1.0(i)

Arsenic EPA 206.2 SW 7060 0.01 0.5 2.2X10-6(a);0.05(f,h,i)

Silver EPA 272.1 SW 7760 0.01 0.5 0.05(bf)

Antimor EPA 204.1 SW 7040 0.10 10.0 0.146(b)

Selenium EPA 270.2 SW 7740 0.01 0.5 0.01(bf,i);0.045(h)

ThaLLium EPA 279.1 SW 7840 0.01 5.0 0.013(b)Mercury EPA 245.1 SW 7470 0.001 0.10 1.44X10"4(b);0.002(f);0.003(h)

Common AnionsChloride SM 407A NA 1.0 NA 250(g);100(i)

Flouride EPA 340.1 NA 0.1 NA 2.0(f)

Bromide SN Part406 NA 0.1 NA None

Nitrate EPA 352.1 NA 0.1 NA 10(f,h);1.0(i)

Nitrite SM 419 NA 0.01 NA 1.0(h)

Phosphate EPA 365.2 NA 0.1 NA 0.1(i)

SuLfate EPA 375.4 NA 1.0 NA 250(g,i)

Total Dissolved

Solids EPA 160.1 NA 2.0 NA 500(g)

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons EPA 418.1 EPA 418.1 0.5 10.0 None

Legend(a) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria corresponding to an incremental increase in Lifetime

cancer risk of 10-6; Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.

(b) EPA Ambient Water Quality based upon human health effects; Federal Register, Vol. 45, No.

231, 11/28/80.

(c) Same as (b) for Chromium 11.

(d) Same as (b) for Chromium IV.

(e) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria based upon organoteptic data; Federal register, Vol.

45, No. 231, 11/28/80.

(f) National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards: Maximum Contaminant Level; USEPA

40 CFR 141.

Legend continued on next page.

(CL5141A/5)

Page 150: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-47

TABLE F.2.23 (Continued)

COMPARISON OF WATER OUALITY CRITERIA TO

PTL ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES AND DETECTION LIMITS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS.

COM4ON ANIONS, TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AND TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON ANALYSES

(g) National Secondary Drinking Water Standards; USEPA 40CFR143.(h) Proposed Recommended Maximum Contaninant Level; Federal Register, Vol.

50, No. 219, 11/13/85.

(i) North Dakota Water Quality Standards; North Dakota Department of Health

Rule 33-16-02, Section 06.

mg/L - miLligrams per Litermg/kg - miLligrams per kilogram

(CL5141A/5)

Page 151: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-48

TABLE F.2.24

BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSES

SURROGATE RECOVERY DATA FOR PTL JOB NO. 86GW3538 WATER SAMPLES

Percent Recovery Results For SurrogateSpike Compounds

Suurogate MethodCompounds Blank 023 024 025 026 026

2-Fluorophenol 132 111 109 91 117 95

D5-phenol 71 67 70 69 67 57

D5-Nitrobenzene 39 39 41 36 29 34

2-Fluorobiphenyl 50 47 52 41 36 41

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 219 230 171 310 164 151

(CL5056B/28)

Page 152: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-49

TABLE F.2.25

BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSES

SURROGATE RECOVERY DATA FOR PTL JOB NO. 86GW3506 WATER SAMPLES

Percent Recovery Results For SurrogateSpike Compounds

SurrogateCompounds 004 005 006 012 015

2-Fluorophenol 70 99 86 76 78

D5-Phenol 69 71 61 49 49

D5-Nitrobenzene 53 42 35 35 26

2-Fluorobiphenyl 86 78 40 34 31

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 100 161 212 174 173

(CL5056B/30)

Page 153: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-50

TABLE F.2.26

BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSES

SURROGATE RECOVERY DATA FOR PTL JOB NO. 86GW3523 WATER SAMPLES

Percent Recovery Results For Surrogate Spike CompoundsSurrogate MethodCompounds Blank 001 003 007 013 014 017 018 019 020 021

2-Fluorophenol 44 119 118 125 176 86 38 35 80 111 76

D5-Phenol 37 67 67 71 150 52 22 26 44 74 45

D5-Nitrobenzene 25 48 42 48 41 44 36 46 30 36 49

2-Fluorobiphenyl 45 55 53 59 55 51 43 56 38 45 60

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 161 213 192 190 177 230 198 144 218 158 217

(CL5056B/31)

Page 154: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2- 51

w > 0 tD ChI Ch -q -4 0.. 0% a-. m to0 G C C 0% 0% 00 - CO % ON

S-

0) cc: (%J O C Cp) 0o 0> CoJ Co0

vsn i -. ~ n ini ~

3c V) I-L O LO L O LOi l C

(A n a,

o-

C 9 I! . 3

(ni 0D0U 0LLI >- co-r D 4 4C

lfie

c~co

0 <Z:; c n

t-

mf U)) rQ vI 4J -v co

m.4f ' Co) m J Co 0 - C . m m I

~~~C 0 0 0 0 0 0D 0. 0 0.U) UL ** Z

~~C14

LLJ3 s-s 1

+3 S- C Co c ( c S

0o L..3) (\J 0J CJ- ( (

Page 155: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2- 52

0

W-E

-I

CC

Ca w 93co LA

-- CDO

ccJX w

Cl))

4a

W-~ 4Et

0o CA'=/ C7 0 ) w

C..) ..0 a

- LsW

w u~ a4'0- 5- (v w ~ j

CV w.+=

WJ0 CCL * = wcc w r-j u - 1

S-* > C 0 a)0 .

.- O. 0) 4- 0 - "a)

r)--. W 0. 0- 41 > eIV 4-) m- 0)0

s0 Ce v f 4-314J r- NS->~ ~ U000-

cm u . -%

ca.0 0) ap-u-a *- ~0- 4) CU

a go:4.it0 0

Page 156: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F .2-53

4-J

a) _ 0.I rO 4d, C) Go 0 -4 -d toj (n co 0)r CW-4 &n co -W4 - -4 -4 c m C

CA ~0 0o C C 0 0 0 D 0 C 4 >

a--u

m) x

ca t

V) a- <49I 9 4C~J . 4 .L - co W* .

U) Ioc)a

(nLA U-J

(, - _tW -cm 0 Co m C m C0m m C

(A

w C 0 0 0 0 000 O

0.1

00

LL 4-) 4

I- i-

0-06

Li)n

40 06 - 1) > WuLS- 0 0 06 40 0- 0 0rd0 0

Q) a 4) ea0 S-0

-ji f- C ) ) I

Page 157: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-54

-4

0

CCLn CD Cl

coi CD0

LLL- --

LL CL

~ 0- a)

)(L4J -04-

U.1U

C0 to0 0'

04- -LLII I)~ w wU

Xe Ox a S)

-~r C>) UI3 to 0LO)

gopC/

O a)--"'- ~ 3

Page 158: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F .2-55

S..

cn V.- co 0 tO -4 -d inU) -% - -e C) -o m I- 0

(A AU a.* . . . V! 0-w 41) 40 0 0 D 0 D 0 D Co 0 o 0

0.0<J CL 0 D 0 o )

on 41S.

-9

Ln1 C". Cl cc e.c0j 0- 0o 0 0 ini

o- -i C, - C%

0- C)

LUU

ca x

i010. cm a. s .o . . . 0. 4

tv >)~ 0 1-. d V ~ u ) > w )-J 06tv atOS

CO- ~ ) Ll

Page 159: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-56

C -

0i

c LU 0

gy,

co L"

>- a

)

4J* o

w ~ 0J cc -

S- w~

4-1-

.9- 0 3-c0 4-J >-

0: ~ ~ ~ cc N 4J4 4-c LW.9 o

'D-a

414- cccc elL

4) IM I C-.)9 cm a- 5EW*0 C'2w.0

Page 160: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2-57

4.)

S--

uo- -n 0)

-S.

.he

V)) 04 a) 0 ~

U) to 4J. V~

co C>

0-

U) ) 0 04C

>- cc w)0

~04- U) o

U) x

~~S w-C%CL) w m w00

4.- 0r 4 a

on co 3t % 0

5- ~0 LO a -j(

I- -

C V- S vU

~~ 0 to~ Eo04- LO I-S >c .0*

m. CD -'1 1- cn. =S W 41/) C> CD 40. 0W 'V4JUL

Lr- >- en)

a) cu-0 000 to 4

04 4) i-O

m 0 v Cm 0 O S- S - )0. oLS-) 4--- +3 4- )4- cm . r- -.-. w. 3~ U) ~ .~0 CJ- 02'

Page 161: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F. 2- 58

4-

Q0 w

u 4-

V) ~ U Li-adL

(n 0D 02 0 CD) C>)-.4-J -WJ CD 0> 0 Co wco4 0. C- . -C; 0.uS

U.)

on CD 4cwc! ) 3mC <a

cl zi- f 4- 4 4- -1C

-0 0 V.00 r-

C C) co0

XLJ~ rm.) If 0004

0i LJO0 Lni CD) -4 '' 'x

Co 4-) '

m CD C)

0 - 41 Co 0 o WS 0 IfO r-_ 0 If) 0 l 4- C 3

5-) m 0i to co o

U) C C V

Cal.- w - I= .4 be0.CL %- a,.. - )

0O Li w wU)I S->>1 cI CII C pC - > - C w =0

cina~~0 CD 40 4 o 0 co C o'

4- -0 00 r 0w4. 'o 4-0) CM C- tM=-Vc)

mi o4. 0 EO S.- -*- 1=. LoS-- U) of 4-, +J 4-) .4-)0 to - 0t- =- C') S--4 ' C3 0 0 CI,-C. u 0- co m V. . i R-4ce-

Page 162: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-59

41

u)> 0 h 0 0 C C

Wa, - a

S -

0 0

to ~ U C

CA ~ co cn C"! U) V)

I= V)

cn in x . -

V) ~ ~ U aa c 0>0.. J . ui V) Co0 ) 4 ca -E

0 W C q L o 0 0.0>

V) I- 0C C'! C ) W0

C/) 0 0o w 0LiOw. cne I )

C! - C )

m# In3 0000

-. Wito 0l

u Ki a- f- C0= I ~__j V) C!-

-cm0.C' ' *0 ~ ).

Li! V-- 0 0O CD co C> to C'.

0 4

r- = x .' wO

4- '-m V-

evI S-4 C (I C

u 4- 4.) a, C n . 34- Cn (V) 0 to IS-.IOC/) C 0to to 0 VO

0)- w, - w" 0 0.

o~~~t o- 0 4) r

S- (D 4.3 cc 0 1-

CC S- ca 0 WUa)4m~~~, o) s-S- - )r. v m

o -~ ) 4J 4--) 0 (n m*-* u.

m r- S-4)a- C mo-C L. L.L C") (A ! C- EC 0 *

Page 163: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-60

TABLE F.2.33

LABORATORY RESULTS FOR REPLICATE SAMPLES

Sample IdentifiersHART Identifier - MAFB,DW-4,GW-1,HART014* MAFB,DW-5,GW-1,HART021PTL Identifier - SN014 SN021

mg/l mg/lParameter

Priority Pollutant MetalsBeryllium ND NDCadmium ND NDChromium ND NDCopper ND NDNickel ND NDLead ND NDZinc 0.07 0.03Arsenic ND NDSilver ND NDAntimony ND NDSelenium ND NDThallium ND NDMercury ND ND

Common AnionsChloride 30 35Fluoride 0.99 0.87Bromide ND 0.90Nitrate ND 0.13Nitrite ND NDPhosphate 0.18 0.14Sulfate 4500 4800

Total Dissolved Solids 5036 4848Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons NYAromatic Volatile Organics NO- ND?Halogenatic Volatile Organics NDI NDI

Acid Extractable PriorityPollutant Organics ND1 NDI

Base/Neutral Extractable PriorityPollutant Organics NDI NDI

LEGEND

* Indicates actual Sample Identifier

ND Not Detected1 Analysis in ug/l

Table continued on next page.

(CL5022B/4)

' ' ' I IA

Page 164: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-61

TABLE F.2.33 (CONTINUED)

LABORATORY RESULTS FOR REPLICATE SAMPLES

Sample IdentifiersHART Identifier - MAFB,SWA,S1,HART023* MAFB,SWE,S1,HART027PTL Identifier - SN023 SN027

mg/l mg/lParameter

Priority Pollutant MetalsBeryllium ND NDCadmium ND NDChromium ND NDCopper 0.03 0.04Nickel 0.016 0.014Lead ND NDZinc 0.03 0.22Arsenic ND NDSilver ND NDAntimony ND NDSelenium ND NDThallium ND NDMercury ND ND

Common AnionsChloride 400 380Fluoride 1.5 1.5Bromide 2.8 6.8Nitrate 0.25 1.05Nitrite 0.08 0.10Phosphate 0.10 0.20Sulfate 2400 2400

Total Dissolved Solids 4460 4761Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons NY NDAromatic Volatile Organics ND1 NDI

Halogenated Volatile Organics ND1 NDI

Acid Extractable PriorityPollutant Organics ND1 NDI

Base/Neutral Extractable PriorityPollutant Organics NDI ND1

LEGEND:

* Indicates actual sample identification

ND Not DetectedI Analysis in ug/l

Table continued on next page.

(CL5022B/4)

Page 165: INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM l-CONFIRMATION ... · installation restoration program phase ii -confirmation quantification stage 1 appendices to the final report for minot air

F.2-62

TABLE F.2.33 (CONTINUED)

LABORATORY RESULTS FOR REPLICATE SAMPLES

Sample IdentifiersHART Identifier - MAFB,SW-9,GW-1,HARTO09* MAFB,SW-9,GW-2,HART00PTL Identifier - SNO09 SNOIO

ug/ ug/lParameter

Aromatic Volatile Organics ND NDHalogenated Volatile Organics

1,2 dichloroethane NO 11 ug/l1,1,1-trichloroethane ND 11 ug/lbromodichloromethane ND 3 ug/ltrichloroethane ND 4 ug/ltetrachloroethane ND 2 ug/lAll Others ND ND

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 0.51 NDI

Lead ND1 ND1

Sample IdentifiersHART Identifier - MAFB,Tb-2,SS-5,HART010* MAFB,Tb-2,SS-5,HART011PTL Identifier - HART010 HART011

mg/l mg/lParameter

Priority Pollutant MetalsBeryllium ND NDCadmium ND 1.73Chromium 1.39 1.46Copper 12.8 12.70Nickel 10.3 11.50Lead 5.03 3.93Zinc 60.01 59.10Arsenic ND NDSilver 1.43 0.58Antimony ND NDSelenium ND NDThallium ND NDMercury 0.10 0.16

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND ND

LEGEND:

* Indicates actual sample identifier.

ND Not detectedI Analysis in mg/l

(CLS022B/4)


Recommended