DR.DALIP KUMARPG.GOVT. COLLEGE FOR GIRLS

SECTOR-42,CHANDIGARH dalipchd@yahoo.co.in

INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS BY WAY OF RUSA

INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE• RUSA Mission Authority• Project Approval Board • Techincal Support Group• Project Directorate (in MHRD)

National Level

• State Higher Education Council• Project Directorate (in State Government)• Technical Support Group

State Level

• Board of Governors• Project Monitoring Unit

Institutional Level

RESOURCE ALLOCATION

MHRD will follow a norm and

performance-based approach to allocate

funds

Overall allocation will be made on the

basis of student population (18-23

Age group)

Additional weight age will be made keeping in view of

weak socio-economic and health

indicators

Funding under RUSA over a period of 10

years would follow a two cycle plan

process

RESOURCE ENVELOPE

Uncommitted Unspent Balance

GOI Allocation proposed for the year

State Share Contribution due for the year

INSTITUTION DEVELOPMENT PLANS IDP depicts the resource requirements at

Institutional Level as well as at its sub units for program implementation in terms of

IDP must provide an overall budget required for the Institution to execute various activities

Infrastructure

Human Resource Procurement

FIVE-YEAR PERSPECTIVE PLANCurrent scores on norms

Scores set for the current year

Target scores for the end of five-year plan

Revisions in the targets

Assessment of its progress against the five-year plan targets

Course corrections and major strategies adopted to achieve the plan targets

SNAPSHOT OF THE ANNUALPLANIdentifies 6-7 priority areas that it needs to

work on

Strategy must mention

Thrust areas of the coming year

Highlight the key initiatives which will

undertake to tackle weak areas

Highlight what the institution hopes to achieve from these

initiatives

INSTITUTIONAL PLAN TEMPLATE

1. INSTITUTIONAL BASIC

INFORMATION 1.1 Institutional Identity:

• Name of the Institution • Is the Institution approved by

regulatory body?

• Furnish approval no. • Type of Institution

• Status of Institution

: : Yes/No : : Govt. funded/Govt. aided/Private unaided/

Autonomous/Other : Autonomous Institute as declared by

University / Non-autonomous / Deemed University / Constituent Institution

NAME OF THE HEAD OF THE INSTITUTION Head and Nodal Name Phone Mobile Fax E-mail

Officer   Number Number Number Address           

Head of the Institution          

(Full time appointee)                     

RUSA Institutional          

coordinator                     

Nodal Officers for:                     

Academic Activities                     

Civil Works including          

Environment          

Management                     

Procurement                     

Financial aspects                     

Equity Assurance Plan          

Implementation                     

ACADEMIC INFORMATION

S. Title of Level Duration Year of Sanctioned Total

No Programs (UG, PG, (Years) starting Annual student

    PhD)     Intake strength             

             

             

ACCREDITATION STATUS Accreditation Status

of UG programs:

T itle o f U G Whether Whether Whether “Applied for” programs eligible for accredited as as on

being offered accreditation or on 31st March 31st March 2013 not? 2013

• Accreditation Status of PG programs:

Title of PG Whether eligible Whether Whether “Applied for” programs for accreditation accredited as on as on

Being or not? 31st March 2013 31st March offered 2013

FACULTY STATUS ( REGULAR/CONTRACT )

(AS ON MARCH31ST 2013)

BASELINE DATA

INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• PAST PERFORMANCE • KEY INITIATIVES• MAIN CHALLENGES FACED

• ANY RELAVANT ISSUE

SWOT ANALYSIS

Methodology used

Analysis and information and

data as collected

Inferences derived with respect to

strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats

METHODOLOGY USED TEAMWORK AND STAKEHOLDER

PARTICIPATION

A core team of facilitators were constituted; the team comprised

identified key stakeholders of the

college .

The team met several times and had consultations /

brainstorming sessions in

participatory mode.

Core committee and sub committees

were constituted. Both the committees

have interactive sessions with diverse

groups like technological departments,

support departments, administrative

sections, library and other central

facilities, students, alumni, guardians

and others.

This helped to bring out information, determine the

Strengths, Weaknesses,

Opportunities and Threats, and

prioritize the actions.

ANALYTIC FRAMEWORK 

The Initial draft copy of the SWOT

Analysis at the institutional end is circulated to all the

departments

The rigorous review comment on the

draft SWOT is obtained from all the departments

based upon which the Institutional SWOT analysis is

prepared

SWOT KEY FEATURES

Brain storming session with all constituent members

SWOT feedback from the students  

Email communication with the alumni

STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR THE INSTITUTIONS

Strategic planning is a process in which future aims are determined together with the stakeholders and responsibilities and resources are allocated in accordance with these future aims.

It is a process between the points an institution stands presently and the points it tries to reach in a certain period of time.

The concept of strategic planning is closely related with the concept of foresight

The aim of strategic planning is to produce planned facilities, embody the appointed policies, follow the application efficiently and take the initiative and provide for effective participation.

In the process of strategic planning, some of the fundamental questions are needed to be answered. Those are “Where are we?”, “How can we reach our desired goal? And “How can we evaluate our success?

Institutions are expected to make a Strategic Plan to gain a better perception of ongoing quest for quality education and fulfilling its mission and realizing its vision.

SALIENT POINTS As a medium of administration, SWOT analysis is used in making a plan, defining a problem and also identifying a solution for it, making a strategy and giving an analytical decision.

It is a tool for auditing an institution and its environment.

It is a first stage of planning which helps to focus on key issues.

The role of SWOT analysis is to take the information from the environmental scan and separate it into internal and external issues.

SWOT analysis determines if the information indicates something that will assist the institution in accomplishing its objectives or if it indicates an obstacle that must be removed or minimized to achieve desired results.

SWOT analysis is scalable, collaborative, integrateable, simple and cost efficient.

SWOT ANALYSIS - STRENGTHSExcellent

infrastructure resource

ICT facilities and smart

class rooms

Diversity in the academic

courses at UG/PG

Excellent reputation

Geographical location

Scholarships and awards

Active and supportive

Alumni Association

Quality teaching

Diverse faculty in terms of

ethnicity and gender

Placement record

Dedicated and experienced support staff

Community outreach activities

SWOT ANALYSIS- WEAKNESS

Shortage of faculty

Low emphasis on

research

Lack of appreciation & recognition

of faculty work

Relatively slow

responding curriculum

process

Web site not responsive to user needs

Inadequate facilities

Aging technology

and equipment

No enrolment control

Faculty load inequities

Non skilled supportive

staff

SWOT ANALYSIS- OPPORTUNITIES

Community interest in academic programmes provide opportunity for quality inputs

Ability to secure cutting edge funding from UGC/other agencies

Broad – based disciplinary bases of the curriculum provide opportunities for cross curricular synergies to connect and develop partnerships with the community and

diverse array of agencies

Long-term realignment of the placement office with different companies provides an opportunity for better placements services

Diverse faculty with international linkage can be used to develop student study abroad opportunities

Geographic location to develop new courses opportunities

Opportunity to use its reputation for quality education

SWOT ANALYSIS- THREATS/CHALLENGES

*Political pressures*Competition from other colleges with diverse academic opportunities and resources for students*Limited number of qualified applicants for faculty positions.*External pressure to cope up with growing students numbers*low salary of faculty members*Limited funding

*State-of art facilities of other institution amplify the aging facilities*Misperception and myths what the college does in terms of academic and scholarly activities*Changing demographics of students making difficult to fill allocated seats*Commercialization of education*Economic and socio-cultural factors

SWOT ANALYSIS

Based on SWOT analysis provide

the Strategic Plan for IDP

How the key activities

proposed in the IDP are linked

with the results of SWOT Analysis

OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED RESULTS OF IDP

Institutional strengthening

Improvements in employability

Improvements in learning outcomes of graduates

Objective and results should be linked to the

SWOT analysis

STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN FOR INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Strategic plan

Critical activities Link to SWOT Validation and verification method

Link to budget perposal

Design new PG courses and revise existing PG course curriculum

Update structure & Syllabus to make it more demand driven

New PG programme with relevance

Introduce new technologies to curriculum

Changed curriculum to address multi-displinary education

Improve quality of students` project

Address obsolescent courses

Strength

Opportunity

Opportunity

Opportunity

Weakness

Threat

Official Report

Availability of course structure in website

University approval

Link / part of the Budget proposal

ACTION PLAN Improving employability of graduates Increased learning outcomes of the students Obtaining autonomous institution status within 2

years Achieving the targets of 60% of the eligible UG

and PG programs accredited within two years of joining the Project

100% accreditation obtained and applied for by the end of the Project of the eligible UG and PG programs

Implementation of academic and non- academic reforms

Improving interaction with industry Enhancement of research and consultancy

activities

Action plan for organizing a Finishing School and for improving the academic

performance of SC/ST/OBC/academically weak students through

innovative methods such as

***remedial and skill development classes for increasing the transition rate ***pass rate with the objective of improving their employability.

ACTION PLAN FOR ORGANIZING FINISHING SCHOOL

Confidence Building Protocol &

Business etiquette

Positive Thinking & Motivation

Social Skills

Character Building

Career Planning &

Goal Setting

EffectiveCommunicatio

nSkills

Health & Fitness

Personal Grooming

Leadership Skills

Effective Interpersonal

Skills and team

Importance and Effective

usage of Visual Aids

Team Building Skills

Importance of Voice

ModulationTime

ManagementAudience Handling

FACULTY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FIRST 18 MONTHS FOR IMPROVING THEIR TEACHING, SUBJECT AREA AND RESEARCH COMPETENCEBasic and advanced pedagogy trainingSubject / domain knowledge enhancement Attendance in activities such as workshops, seminars, etc.Improvement in faculty qualifications. Improving research capabilities

Training Need Analysis (TNA) Criterion

1. Teaching methodology

2. Competencies and Professional Development

3. Assessment of learning outcomes

4. Training Methods

5. Communication Excellence imparting training in the following areas: Practical skill development Training

Special Skill Orientation Training

Nature of training

Department Number of staff

phase1

phase2

phase3

phase4

phase5

phase6

Basic and advanced pedagogy training

physics 4 1 1 1 1

Subject/domain knowledge enhancement

Activities like workshops/seminars

Improvement in faculty qualification

Improving research capabilities

ACTION PLAN FOR TRAINING TECHNICAL AND OTHER STAFF IN FUNCTIONAL AREAS

DEPARTMENT AREA OF TRAINING NAME OF STAFF

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

TECHNICAL STAFF Office automation

TECHNICALAND OFFICE STAFF COMPUTER TRAINING

LIBRARY STAFF

DIGITISATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF DIGITAL LIBRARY

SUPPORTING AND HOSTEL STAFF

COMMUNICATION SKILL

HELPINGSTAFF

TRAINING FOR IMPROVEMENT OF DAILY WORKING SKILL

RELEVANCE OF INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL

Relevance and Coherence of I D

P with

State’s Industrial/Economic Development

Plan

RELEVANCE AND COHERENCE OF INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL WITH STATE’S

INDUSTRIAL / ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Autonomy and Accountability

Network cluster among institutions for resource sharing

Research centered education

Public Private Partnership

Expansion of access to Higher Technical Education

Equity and Inclusion

Academic and Administrative Reforms

Quality and Excellence in Education

The key policy objectives of the State, inherent in the States’ vision statement can be represented as:

INDUSTRIAL PLANChandigarh Administration earmarked 1475 acres of land for Industrial Area, Phase-I & II which came into existence during the year 1970.

The Administration has also developed Industrial Area, Phase-III in Mauli Jagraon for which an area of 152 acres of land has been earmarked.

Chandigarh has nearly 2100 small scale industrial units including one large and 7 medium scale units located on the outskirt and separated with a green belt.

These units manufacture a wide variety of products with an annual turn over of nearly 1430 crores.

20 units are exporting their products worth about Rs. 151 crores. The Industrial Area in Chandigarh has been given the name of CHANDIGARH INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK.

INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL PREPARATION

Participation of Departments/facul

ty in the IDP preparation of the

institution

PARTICIPATION OF DEPARTMENTS / FACULTY IN THE PROPOSAL PREPARATION

DIRECTORHIGHER

EDUCATION

PRINCIPAL

DEANVICE

PRINCIPALFACULTY

RUSACOORDINATO

R

NODAL OFFICER FOR DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES

STUDENTS

STATENODAL

OFFICER

INSTITUTIONAL PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

Institutional project

implementation

arrangements with faculty

and staff

INSTITUTIONAL PROJECT IMPLÉMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

PROJECT MONITORING

UNIT

RUSACOORDINATOR

ACADEMIC ACTIVITY

COMMITTEECIVIL WORK COMMITTEE

PROCUREMENT

COMMITTEEFINANCIAL

COMMITTEEEQUITY

ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE

TRAINING RESEARCH COMMITTEE

TOTAL OUTLAY OF THE SCHEME

12TH PLAN OUTLAY

12TH PLAN OUTLAY

THANKS