+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Institutional Improvement Plan Progress Reportwvw.ufh.ac.za/files/Institutional Improvement Plan...

Institutional Improvement Plan Progress Reportwvw.ufh.ac.za/files/Institutional Improvement Plan...

Date post: 30-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
30
1 UNIVERSITY OF FORT HARE Institutional Audit May 2008 Institutional Improvement Plan Progress Report Submitted to the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC), July 2011 Progress Report on the Institutional Improvement Plan of the University of Fort Hare Institutional Audit by the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC). This report details the actions taken in response to the recommendations of the Audit Panel, highlighting what has been achieved and what is still outstanding.
Transcript

1

UNIVERSITY OF FORT HARE

Institutional Audit May 2008

Institutional Improvement

Plan Progress Report

Submitted to the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC), July

2011

Progress Report on the Institutional Improvement Plan of the University of Fort Hare Institutional Audit

by the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC). This report details the actions taken in response to

the recommendations of the Audit Panel, highlighting what has been achieved and what is still

outstanding.

2

Contents

Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 4

1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5

1.1 Preamble ............................................................................................................................................. 5

1.2 Format and Structure of the Institutional Improvement Plan Progress Report ................................. 5

1.3 Development and adoption of the IIP Progress Report ...................................................................... 5

1.4 Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................................................. 5

2. Strategic objectives (Category One) ..................................................................................................... 6

2.1 Recommendations and Improvement Actions ............................................................................. 6

2.1.1 Recommendation 1 ................................................................................................................... 6

2.1.2 Recommendation 9 .................................................................................................................. 8

3. Transformation and Institutional Culture (Category Two) ................................................................. 11

3.1 Recommendations and Improvement Actions ........................................................................... 12

3.1.1 Recommendation 4 ................................................................................................................. 12

3.1.2 Recommendation 6 ................................................................................................................. 13

3.1.3 Recommendation 6 (continued) ............................................................................................ 14

3.1.4 Recommendation 7 ................................................................................................................. 14

4. Teaching, Learning and assessment (Category Three) ....................................................................... 16

4.1 Recommendations and Improvement Actions ................................................................................. 16

4.1.1 Recommendation 3 ................................................................................................................. 16

4.1.2 Recommendation 10 ............................................................................................................... 17

4.1.3 Recommendation 11 ............................................................................................................... 17

4.1.4 Recommendation 12 ............................................................................................................... 18

4.1.5 Recommendation 16 ............................................................................................................... 18

4.1.6 Recommendation 17 ............................................................................................................... 18

4.1.7 Recommendation 19 ............................................................................................................... 19

5. Community Engagement (Category Four) .............................................................................................. 21

5.1 Key Findings and Recommendations ................................................................................................ 21

5.1.1 Recommendation 22 ............................................................................................................... 21

6. Research (Category Five) ........................................................................................................................ 23

6.1 Recommendations and Improvement Actions ................................................................................. 23

6.1.1 Recommendation 5 ........................................................................................................................ 23

3

6.1.2 Recommendation 20 ...................................................................................................................... 23

6.1.3 Recommendation 21 ...................................................................................................................... 24

7. Non-Academic Operational and Corporate Support Services (Category Six) ......................................... 25

7.1 Key Findings and Recommendations ................................................................................................ 25

7.1.1 Recommendation 2 ........................................................................................................................ 25

7.1.2 Recommendation 13 ...................................................................................................................... 25

7.1.3 Recommendation 8 ........................................................................................................................ 26

7.1.4 Recommendation 14 ...................................................................................................................... 26

7.1.5 Recommendation 15 ...................................................................................................................... 28

7.1.6 Recommendation 18 ...................................................................................................................... 28

8. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... 29

Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. 30

Appendix 1: Report to the Minister of Higher Education on the Infrastructure Funding

Appendix 2: Library Report

Appendix 3: Strategic Research Plan

Appendix 4: Integrated Transformation Plan

Appendix 5: University of Fort Hare Statute

Appendix 6: The Grounding Programme / LKA Pilot Report

Appendix 7: The Curriculum Development and Review Policy

Appendix 8: New Programme Accreditation Application Form

Appendix 9: Research Ethics Policy

4

Acronyms

CAPC Central Academic Planning Committee

CE Community engagement

CFO Chief Financial Officer

DHET Department of Higher Education and Training

DST Department of Science and Technology

ERP Enterprise Resource Planning

FET Further Education and Training

GP Grounding Programme

HEQC Higher Education Quality Committee

HEQF Higher Education Qualification Framework

ICT Information Communication Technology

IIP Institutional Improvement Plan

ITP Integrated Transformation Plan

ITS Integrated Tertiary System

LKA Life, Knowledge, Action

Manco Management Committee

MIS Management Information System

NRF National Research Fund

PMS Performance Management System

QMA Quality Management and Assurance

SANReN South African National Research and Education Network

TLC Teaching and Learning Centre

UFH University of Fort Hare

VC Vice Chancellor

5

1. Introduction

1.1 Preamble

The University of Fort Hare (UFH) was audited by the Higher Education Quality Committee

(HEQC) in May 2008 and the Final Audit Report was released to the University in

April 2009. In September 2009 the UFH submitted its Institutional Improvement Plan (IIP). Since

that time the UFH has been addressing the tasks it identified in its action plan and this Progress

Report provides an account of what has been achieved to date, what actions are still

outstanding and what actions are proposed for the future.

1.2 Format and Structure of the Institutional Improvement Plan Progress Report

The structure of the progress report is guided by the IIP that was submitted. Issues are dealt

with in categories and are aligned to the recommendations of the institutional audit and

dovetailed to the institutional strategic plan and operational plan. These categories are:

• Strategic objectives

• Transformation and Institutional Culture

• Teaching and Learning

• Community Engagement

• Research

• Non-academic operational and corporate support services

With each section the IIP Progress Report cites the Institutional Audit recommendations and

then explains the actions taken by the University in dealing with the issues raised.

1.3 Development and adoption of the IIPProgress Report

The development of the report was under the auspices of the Quality Management and

Assurance (QMA) Unit as guided by a Senate resolution adopted relating to this project. The

effect of the resolution was that goal owners would write quarterly progress reports which would

be submitted to the QMA Unit for consolidation and reporting to the institutional Quality

Assurance Committee (IQAC), and Senate quarterly. Practice was, however, not totally aligned

to the resolution. Given the outlined scenario, the resolution was reviewed and it was resolved

that the goal owners would be interviewed as a means of collecting the data needed for the

writing of the report. With data collected, a draft report was then circulated for validation by the

goal owners. The Draft Report was tabled at Senate on 21 June 2011 for approval in principle.

The final report was tabled at the Management Committee (Manco) meeting for

recommendation to submit to HEQC and later ratification by Senate at its next sitting. The

adopted report was then submitted to the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC).

1.4 Monitoring and Evaluation

The goals identified in the IIP are aligned to the UFH Strategic Plan 2009 – 2016. Progress

against the IIP will continue to be monitored through the various University committees and

updates provided to the IQAC, then Senate and finally Council.

6

2. Strategic objectives (Category One)

2.1 Recommendations and Improvement Actions

2.1.1 Recommendation 1: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare revisit its

view of future role and strategic development of the campuses with a view to ensure that the overall

quality of the educational experience offered to students and staff in the Alice campus is not

compromised by plans for growth of the East London campus.

Improvement Actions

In relation to Recommendation 1, there has been progress in aligning East London and Alice

campuses. This is made possible through a planning tool developed to assess viability and strategic

nature of programmes and modules. This tool has been utilized in the academic review process that

started last year (2010). The preliminary report of that review is currently being discussed. The

Bhisho campus is still hosting the programmes aimed at building capacity in the public sector. The

programmes in Bhisho are mainly short courses although it also offers post-graduate programmes

in public administration. The Bhisho Campus generates sufficient funding to be sustainable. The

Academic Reviews conducted in 2009 and 2010 showthe academic areas that need focus, but

there is substantial alignment in most departments. Pertaining to consistency in quality of service

provision by service providers on all campuses, there are challenges. The University might have to

amend its sub-strategic vision for different campuses. The Institutional Strategic Plan has, amongst

others, an objective to ensure equivalence between the campuses.

Support services are physically represented in both the Alice and East London campuses. This is

evidenced by the following departments or Units:

• Academic support (both examinations and admissions departments)

• Finance

• Human Resources

• Information Communication Technology (ICT) Services Division

• Internal Audit

• Operations Department

• Planning

• Quality Management and Assurance (QMA) Unit and

• Student Affairs

Overall there is equitable distribution, provision of and access to services across campuses to

ensure service equivalence. The arrangement is such that the head of a section is in the one

campus and the deputy in the other. In instances where there is one incumbent, for example, the

Operations Contracts Manager, this incumbent is in Alice for 3 days and in EL for 2 days in a week.

Furthermore, within current bandwidth constraints, there is optimal utilization of technology to speed

up turn- around time for activities. The new institutional organogram is a product of the review of the

organizational structures with a view of aligning to a decentralized multi–campus model. Bhisho

7

campus is deemed as not being big enough to have dedicated teams from the various support

service departments. It does however have ICT support services staff on campus.

Relating to the strategic development of the multi-campuses, the received funding from the DHET

has been assigned to strategic priorities. Please refer to the attached report to the Minster of Higher

Education, Appendix 1, for full details on this deliverable. In the main the following have been

achieved:

ALICE CAMPUS

o 2010 to 2012 infrastructure funding for Alice spent on upgrading undergraduate laboratories

in the Faculty of Science and Agriculture, providing modernized updated equipment.

o Similar upgrading for post-graduate studies for staff and students to enhance research.

o A new plan for the Alice Library has been designed.

o In Alice, five of the residences in most need of maintenance and repair have been upgraded.

Work is in progress for renovating a 6th residence. This has resulted in improvement of the

quality of student life.

o Improvement of storm water drainage around the residences.

o There has, however, been no funding available to provide for ICT services to the residences.

Initial provision is to be made out of institutional Capital funding during 2011 to provide for

minimal connectivity to all residences. This will only provide for a single wireless access

point and a single telephone to each residence both in Alice and East London.

The next funding, expected in mid-2011 is targeted for use for the following projects:

o Large Agricultural Lecture theatre.

o An Animal Production Unit as part of the research development project.

o Only Information Communication Technology (ICT) basic infrastructure is being provided for

in the Agriculture lecture theatre which includes wireless capability for all students with

available wireless technology. Video and Audio equipment is not catered for in the current

funding.

• EAST LONDON CAMPUS

o Acquisition of Gasson Centre and upgrading thereof which is ongoing.

o Nursing, Education and Law to move to the Centre since the vacation by the Provincial

Department of Agriculture. The move is planned to be completed by end of May 2011.

o Lower ground floor labs and classrooms have been improved.

o An open access computer lab with 192 laptop computers has been installed.

o Administration section has also moved in to new offices and a one stop section for the

students located in the Gasson Centre has been developed.

o Main teaching complex has been developed; this will be ready for use in July 2011.

o Plans are afoot to purchase more property for further extension.

o Renovation and expansion of the East London Library has been completed. Please refer

also to Appendix 2 for a detailed report on the Library improvements.

8

o The Gasson Centre building will be the first East London building to provide full geographic

wireless coverage but still requires the wireless density to be brought up to the required

norm.

• BHISHO CAMPUS

o General repairs have been undertaken

o Upgrading of roofing except for Block D. The latter is seriously compromised and the matter

is taken up with the original contractor through the legal route.

o UFH is in discussion with the Department of Works regarding further development of the

campus for possible use by government and generation of income by UFH.

The review of the organisational structure and aligning it with a decentralised model has taken place

resulting in a new organogram being developed.

Regarding network communication between campuses, the availability of bandwidth at the Alice

campus has always been a problem. The Department of Science and Technology (DST) has a plan

in place to provide for South African National Research and Education Network (SANReN)

connectivity to all sites by the end of 2011. The intercampus connectivity has been upgraded from 5

Megabits per second to 155 Megabits per second by replacing the old wireless network

infrastructure. This has improved services between campuses and Alice campus network traffic is

routed over this upgrade link through the East London high speed network. The solution to the

network problems will however only be provided by the delivery of the SANReN connectivity to Alice

and Bhisho as well as the Alice network upgrade completion which is scheduled for September

2011.

A document management system is critical resource that will facilitate document management

across campuses. Both the hardware and software are available but the support human resources

within ICT services are scheduled to be employed during 2012.

2.1.2 Recommendation 9: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare develop

and implement a comprehensive academic plan taking into account the implications that this

plan would have for implementation of the forthcoming teaching and learning policy.

Improvement Actions

Academic reviews of the following departments took place during 2010:

FACULTY SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Education N/A Department of Education: Alice

Department of Education:

East London

Law N/A N/A

FACULTY SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Management and Commerce Business and Enterprise Accounting

FACULTY SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Business Management

Economics

9

Industrial Psychology

Information Systems

Public Management and

Development

Development Studies

Public Administration

Science and Agriculture Agriculture Agricultural Economics and

Extension

Agronomy

Livestock and Pasture Science

Biological and Environmental

Sciences

Biochemistry and Microbiology

Botany

Geography and Environmental Science

Geographical Information Systems and

Remote Sensing

Zoology and Entomology

School of Health Sciences Human Movement Studies

Nursing Science

School of Physical and

Computational Sciences

Chemistry

Computer Science

Geology

Mathematics and

Applied Mathematics

Physics

Statistics

FACULTY SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Social Sciences and

Humanities

Humanities African Language

Afrikaans

English Language and

Comparative Literature Studies

Fine Arts

History

FACULTY SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Social Sciences and

Humanities (Continued)

Humanities Music

Philosophy

Theology and Religion

Social Sciences Communication

Criminology

Library and Information Science

Political Science

Psychology

Social Work and Social

Development

Sociology and Anthropology

10

In addition to the above mentioned academic departments, the following entities were also

reviewed:

• Institutes

o Agricultural and Rural Development Research Institute

o Fort Hare Institute of Socio-Economic Research

o Fort Hare Institute of Technology

o Nelson Mandela Institute for Rural Education and Development

• Centres

o Eastern Cape Audio Visual Centre

o Centre for Enterprise Development and Sanlam Chair in Entrepreneurship

o Centre for Health Promotion

o Centre for Leadership Ethics in Africa

o Community Business Development Centre

o National Heritage and Cultural Studies Centre

o Psychological Services Centre

o Teaching and Learning Centre

o Telkom Centre for Excellence

• Agencies

o Public Finance Services Agency

o Transversal Training Management Agency

o Rural Enterprise Advancement Agency

• Programmes

o Life Knowledge Action / Grounding Programme

o Rural Enterprise Advancement Programme

• Clinic

o Legal Aid Clinic

• Chairs

o Oliver Tambo Chair of Human Rights and

• Research Farm

o Research Farm

The review process engaged external peers. The latter reviewed the self-evaluation reports that had

been produced by the different departments and entities reviewed. The self-evaluations focused on

teaching and learning, research and community engagement.A detailed institutional report has been

produced and disseminated to the internal stakeholders and the University Council. The Central

Academic Planning Committee (CAPC) has helda special meeting to deal with the report and

recommend it to Senate, subject to small variations in June 2011 for approval and recommendation

to Council. The process moving forward will be guided by the resolutions of Senate on this matter.

A Strategic Research Plan based on the research review was developed. Some elements of the

plan entail the following:

• Appointment of post-doctoral fellows.

• Putting incentives in place for accredited research outputs.

• Conducting of research seminars and colloquia.

11

• Establishment of international research partnerships including exchange agreements.

• Integration of research and community engagement.

• Nurturing a research culture among students and under graduate level by integrating

discipline-specific research into under graduate programmes.

• Increase bursaries / scholarships supporting priority areas.

• Enhance UFH research profile nationally and internationally.

• Development of policies relating to ethics and

• Establishment of a school of postgraduate studies

A number of the above outlined elements have been fully implemented. Some examples to illustrate

this assertion are the Senate approved policies on ethics and the setting up of a functional Ethics

Committee; seminar series continue and on an average of two seminarsbeing coordinated per

academic month; academic writing workshops are conducted and already a sizeable number of

publications are tangible outcomes of these.Other goals are partially achieved and are an ongoing

activity. To cite a few, the appointment of post-doctoral fellows where four have been appointed;

exchange agreements between UFH and the University of Utrecht which is in place and one

exchange student is on campus. Further details are outlined in Appendix 3.

Furthermore, the institution is undertaking the HEQF alignment exercise. This is on track with the

given HEQC time-lines. This is ongoing and will result in complete alignment of qualification

structures.

3. Transformation and Institutional Culture (Category Two)

12

3.1 Recommendations and Improvement Actions

3.1.1 Recommendation 4: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare develop a

comprehensive human resources strategy which takes into account its equity targets as well as the

urgent need to develop an appropriate succession plan for an ageing cohort of academics,

particularly at both senior and middle level.

Improvement Actions:

Subsequent to implementation of the Performance Management System (PMS), succession

planning will be implemented. The University has also been engaged in a restructuring process

which necessitated creation of new posts and the abolition of some old ones. Currently the

University is matching and placing personnel and the succession planning can only be dealt with

once the placement is finalized. Furthermore, relating to succession planning, the implementation of

PMS will provide and encourage line managers and staff to engage in discussions for Career

Aspirations. This will ensure reduction of staff turnover due to dissatisfaction with careers followed.

As is, the absence of a PMS results in delays in any career pathing or succession planning as skills

and competencies must first be established for succession planning to take place.

Regarding the recruitment, retention, promotion and succession planning aligned to equity targets,

the University Competency Project will be launched as soon as the Match and Place is complete.

This exercise will determine the critical competencies for each role which will inform the attraction

as well as ensure that we recruit right individuals to right roles. This will be the initial step towards

the development of a competency management framework

The institutional Employment Equity Plan has been submitted to the Department of Labour and

subsequent to Restructuring; this plan will be revised and be submitted afresh.Each Line Manager

will be measured on Employment Equity targets.

Pertainingto retention and talent management strategy, the Human Resource Division is to work

with Faculties in the identification and recruitment of students as tutors.

Furthermore, HR is in discussions with ITS Holdings regarding the configuration of the ITS system

in preparation for the HR Management Information System (MIS) /Dashboard.

Faculties, on the other hand, have taken various positions relating to how they handle to issue of

succession planning. As a whole, the notion of succession planning is viewed positively by leaders

of faculties. All embrace the notion of providing a nurturing environment for young academics to

grow and prepare them for taking up leadership positions. This is achieved by, for example,

appointing junior academics to serve in Faculty committees so that they can learn from senior

academics; pairing them with other colleagues so that they can understudy these senior colleagues.

Other Faculty leaders use the equity targets in making new appointments and bear in mind issues

of race and gender. There is an effort to change the demographics and have a mix of colleagues

from different cultures. This must reflect across campuses.These collective efforts are designed to

develop a new generation of young academics. The challenge is for the University to take actions to

13

prepare for South Africans to move into senior positions. Some Deans are dealing with this issue

through targeted marketing.

The University has been undergoing some restructuring, resulting in a new organogram that has

already been referred to. In this organogram a number of senior academic positions have been

created. Much as this creates space for new academics to come into these spaces, a critique is that

because these are placed at the senior level, this in itself becomes a challenge in retaining young

academics who cannot be appointed and grow and develop within the academia. The unintended

outcome could be the defeating of succession planning within the institution. This is probably an

area that must be re-visited by the institution.

Further, four post-doctoral fellows have been appointed in strategic areas so as to mentor emerging

researchers. Furthermore, the Vice-Chancellor awards excellence in Teaching and in Research for

experienced and developing teachers and researchers respectively.

A related environmental factor for the University is its rural location of the Alice campus with limited

accommodation and other amenities to attract young academics.

Regarding management and leadership development, an Institutional Summit is being organised

and is scheduled to take place in July 2011.

3.1.2 Recommendation 6: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare investigate

the extent of xenophobia among and between staff and students across the institution, and, in the

light of its findings put in place (i) interventions to prevent the occurrence of xenophobic activities,

and (ii) mechanisms that increase tolerance and respect for persons whatever their nationality;

Improvement Actions

An Integrated Transformation Plan (ITP) was developed and all stakeholders were represented in

this intervention. The ITP deals with the issues of discrimination in general and also includes

xenophobic tendencies. For more details please refer to Appendix 4. The ITP has already been

submitted to both the UFH Council as well as the DoHET, and Ministerial comment on the plan is

expected.The ITP proposes a number of interventions around the issue of xenophobia and also

elaborate on interventions that could be undertaken by the institution towards increased tolerance

and respect for persons of all origins forming part of the University community. The following are

some of interventions alluded to in the plan:

i) Host Indaba on racism and xenophobia: This all-encompassing initiative is aimed at building

a sense of conscience throughout the University community about racism and xenophobia.

Most importantly the outcomes that emanate from this Indaba would help craft a response

towards complete eradication of xenophobia and racism within our institutions.

ii) We will also engage with the Human Rights Commission, in particular, to work on proven

programmes that will assist us deal with xenophobic and racist tendencies within the

institution.

iii) The institution will also initiate cultural events that will educate and popularize different

cultures, customs and beliefs. We believe this will go a long way in creating a sense of

14

awareness and tolerance amongst different cultural groups including international persons

working and studying at the University of Fort Hare.

In addition, the University had also proactively developed a Charter of Ethical Principles and Values

which covers similar issues, amongst others.

3.1.3 Recommendation 6 (continued): The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare

(iii) resources the Internationalization Office in such a manner that it can provide better service to

international students and play a meaningful role in helping to manage xenophobic behavior in

campus.

Improvement Actions

Progress has been slow in resourcing the Internationalisation Office. This is work in progress.

Currently, all foreign students except for those coming from the SADC region are charged a

foreign levy.

Another reason for the slow progress can be attributed to the institutional re-structuring process.

In the new organogram this Office has been given a more prominent profile. However, proper

structures have still to be put in place. These have been categorized to be set in the short term

and others in the medium to long term.

On the other hand, the UFH has taken cognizance of the need to manage xenophobic behavior

by developing strategies as detailed in the ITP, referred to previously, which is attached as

Appendix 4.

3.1.4 Recommendation 7: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare clarify

and strengthen the role of the Institutional Forum so that it functions effectively in accordance

with the University of Fort Hare Statute

Improvement Actions

The University statute was revised and has already been gazetted. It is attached as Appendix 5.

The first step is to re-constitute the Institutional Forum in line with the new Statute. Once it is re-

constituted there will be an induction process to ensure all members understand their roles and

functions in such a forum. This will avoid the Forum being used for sectoral interests but for the

good of the University as a whole.

The University in partnership with the institutional forum (IF) will work towards achieving these key

strategic objectives:

i) Assist the University achieve its objectives as envisioned within the University’s mission

statement

ii) The IF will promote and advance programmes that will assist the University to enhance its

financial sustainability

iii) The IF and the University will coordinate programmers that will advance the interest of the

institution with the wider stakeholders including the alumni; business, government; non-

governmental organizations and civil society including Unions and political parties.

15

iv) The IF and the University will encourage ongoing review of programmes and curricula to

specifically address the ongoing demand of a democratic state.

v) The IF and the University will work on programmes and plans to expand access and make

the University more equitable in all its facets and most importantly develop a new breed of

graduates that have a high sense of patriotism engendered on principles of honesty and

integrity.

vi) The IF and the University will advance all the programmes and activities articulated in the

Integrated Transformation Plan of the institution.

Pertaining to the appointment of a change management officer, the University has adopted a

strategic position that this post will be within the transformation Unit in the office of the Deputy Vice-

Chancellor for Institutional Support. The latter is a new appointment and is charged with driving,

amongst others, the issues raised in this recommendation. The change management officer will be

responsible for managing change. A transformation workshop has already taken place.

Furthermore, a student governance workshop is already scheduled with the purpose of

strengthening governance of student leadership.

16

4. Teaching, Learning and assessment (Category Three)

4.1 Recommendations and Improvement Actions

4.1.1 Recommendation 3: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare ensure that

the pedagogic purpose and the curriculum design of the Grounding Programme help in improving

the success rate of students and the quality of graduates produced by the University, and that the

required range of resources (financial, human as well as operating systems) needed for its

successful implementation be made available.

Improvement Actions

In response to this recommendation the UFH embarked on the development of a macro strategic

plan and this has been completed. The new organogram has a new centre of Trans-disciplinary

Studies and the Grounding Programme will be hosted therein. The funding implementation plan has

been adopted and actioned.

Relating to Curriculum development and design, the 1st and 2nd cycles have been completed. The

3rd cycle and continuous review are ongoing.

The Workbooks/ Readers/ Materials have been developed, printed and are in use.

The quality management and assurance processes of the programme have been developed and

are implemented. Student facilitators are selected and appointed on an annual basis.A Pilot report

for the GP (now called the Life, Knowledge, Action – or LKA – programme) has been

completed(Appendix 6). Course evaluations are also done annually. In these, that is the report and

course evaluations, student indicates satisfaction and further say that the GP has contributed to

their academic development and the GP is of value to them.In particular they highlight the

development of their self-confidence, world view, engagement with issues and a keen sense of

responsibility towards self and others. In the 2010 course evaluation questionnaire, 92% of students

assert that the GP contributes to their academic development. The facilitator reports also confirm

the cited trends.

Further, there is 1 PhDdedicated studying the GP/ LKA. It is through this doctoral study, the pilot

report and course evaluations that the GP was researched, monitored and evaluated.

Regarding resource allocation, the context of expenditure in the University in the last two years

has been that of cutting costs and having minimalistic allocation. The GP /LKA operated within

this context. There are no dedicated offices for the GP / LKA in Alice. However, in the new

organogram there are budgetary resources allocated. From this one can deduce that the

importance of the GP/ LKA is acknowledged. The GP / LKA will be hosted by a new Centre of

Trans-disciplinary Studies.

17

4.1.2 Recommendation 10: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare develop,

finalise and consolidate the policies and procedures that affect the quality of teaching and learning

at the university, and set up structured mechanisms for their implementation and monitoring.

Improvement Actions

This recommendation is in line with the University strategic plan of excellence in teaching and

learning, research as well as community engagement. The Curriculum Development and Review

Policy was developed and adopted by Senate as per the outlined recommendation (See Appendix

7).

Systems are in place as governed by the Faculty Standing Orders, with the various committees

monitoring and reporting to Faculty Board and finally to Senate.

Bi-annually, faculties report the pass rates of different courses to the Senate Teaching and Learning

Committee. Deans of Faculties do develop strategies of how to support those courses where the

pass rates are below accepted levels. Some of the intervention strategies are supplemental

instruction or having academic staff work with the TLC on pedagogical strategies, when requested.

4.1.3 Recommendation 11: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare creates

the appropriate mechanisms for academics to give effect to the goals of teaching and learning in

the development of curriculum and in all activities pertaining to teaching and learning, as a way

of improving the quality of student experience at the institution. This should include the

improvement of the experiential learning component in those programmes which require such a

learning component, particularly attention should be given to ensure that there is a functioning

system to record, monitor and assess the content and progress of the student’s learning

experience in the workplace.

Improvement Actions

In response to this recommendation, the University developed a Curriculum Development and

Review Policy as alluded to under the improvement actions in Recommendation 10. There are

mechanisms in place to monitor implementation. The institution undertook an academic review

during 2010. This is going to give more effect to the re-designing of the curriculum.

Relating to programme alignment to the HEQC, programmes accredited as of 2009 are aligned to

the HEQF. Other institutional programmes are being scrutinized and aligned as per the HEQF

Implementation Plan.

There is discussion on the proposed level descriptors by SAQA. When nationally adopted, these will

be used in curriculum development, teaching and assessment.

Pertaining to the development of a system to record, monitor and assess content, progress of

student learning in the workplace, there are systems in place and are implemented by the

concerned academics. However, there is need to get this into the ITS database. This is work in

progress.

18

4.1.4 Recommendation 12: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare

undertake a review of its committees dealing with teaching and learning and develop an

effective and efficient committee structure that avoids dual processes and overlaps and focus

clearly and decidedly on the improvement of the quality of teaching and learning core function at

the institution.

Improvement Actions

The University embarked on revising terms of reference of committees dealing with teaching and

learning. The revised terms were then approved by Senate. Committees are now viewed as being

streamlined to Senate and Council. They are structured and operationally snychronised and the

dates are reflected in the University General Prospectus. Challenges occur when these dates are

changed by colleagues.

4.1.5 Recommendation 16: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare finalise

its Guidelines and Framework for Programme Design and the accompanying Curriculum

Development together with Review Policy, and ensure that the programme development

resulting from this review process is implemented consistently across the institution with

appropriate monitoring mechanisms in place.

Improvement Actions

The Guidelines and Framework for Programme Design have been finalised and are incorporated in

the Curriculum Development and Review Policy which is attached as Appendix 7. Further, the

programme development process is consistently applied for all our formal qualifications for both

accreditation purposes of new programmes as well as reviewing of amendments to programmes.

As indicated previously in this report, the University took a decision to conduct an institutional

academic review focusing on teaching and learning, research as well as community engagement.

From the data collected, which constitute the baseline study, the University will develop criteria for

identifying programmes for review.

4.1.6 Recommendation 17: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare ensures

that there is participation by external stakeholders, such as industry experts, professional bodies

and academic peers from other universities in the development and review process of its

programmes where appropriate.

Improvement Actions

This recommendation has been met by amending the New Programme Accreditation template to

cater for input from the different stakeholders. The template is attached as Appendix 8.

Further probing into practice confirms that this is being adhered to. The following are some of the

examples from the different faculties:

• All the faculties work with their academic peers and participate in both regional and national

Deans Fora and deliberate on issues of programme equivalence and views and needs of

professional bodies and other stakeholders. Each institution learns from the other. For example,

the University of Fort Hare Law Faculty and that of the Western Cape University on an exchange

19

externally funded basis 2 to 4 lecturers to visit each other’s faculty. These exchanges have gone

beyond teaching, into research and other peer related activities. It has proven a very enriching

experience.

• Some external peers serve as members of the various Advisory Boards for some programmes,

for example the Faculty of Science and Agriculture for Biochemistry. The same applies for the

Faculty of Management and Commerce, Business Management, Accounting; Information

Systems departments have Advisory Boards. Other departments are following. Advisory Boards

are consulted on all academic issues including new programmes.

• Meetings are held with some stakeholders with the view of scrutinizing the relevance, currency

and overall adequacy of the syllabi of some programmes. For example, for the past three years

the Director of Legal Education of the Law Society to attend Faculty Board meeting and has

been very pleased with his attendance; the Faculty of Education is in constant communication

with the DHET, SACE, SADTU; the Faculty of Management and Commerce liaise constantly with

SAICA on curriculum related matters.

• Some departments have memoranda of understanding with some of the local Further Education

and Training (FET) Colleges, for example, the Faculty of Social Science and Humanities Music

Department and the Lovedale FET Collage agreement.

• Some faculties have formed strategic partnerships with local authorities and regional government

departments. For example, the Law Faculty has forged relationships with SALGA. From this

relationship, a new programme has been developed and submitted for consideration for

accreditation by the HEQC. This could be a flagship programme for the Faculty. Already there

are enquiries on the programme from the Northern Cape.

4.1.7 Recommendation 19: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare review

its various policies and procedures for assessment to ensure that the principles of assessment

are observed and that all aspects of assessment are covered. The institution would then need to

put in place adequate mechanisms to ensure consistent implementation and monitoring of

assessment policies and procedures.

Improvement Actions

The University policies and processes on assessment are in place and are detailed in the

University and individual faculty prospectuses. Every Module Learning Guide contains details of

assessment for the said module and every student receives this at the beginning of each

semester.

Staffmembers areencouraged toimprove their assessment competencies by registering for an

Assessor training course offered by the TLC. At policy level, it is a promotion requirement that

one must have completed the assessor training course to be considered.

20

Cross-campus assessment equivalence is partially achieved with most departments offering

courses on more than one campus sharing the same test and examination papers. Where this is

not the norm, the Deans are working hard to have this goal achieved.

Regarding the monitoring of implementation of assessment policies, Senate is charged with

oversight responsibilities. Further, the institutional Internal Audit Committee reviews audit

reports conducted by the internal auditor. The QMA Unit with the internal auditor is charged with

following up on recommendations made.

All faculties receive examination reports from external examiners and moderators. These are

shared and deliberated on by staff. The external moderator’s reports are used to improve or affirm

current practice. For example, in the Faculty of Education the reports for Masters and Doctoral

candidates are collated and used as part of the future agenda to improve supervision. In the Law

Faculty there is an academic charged with focusing on academic programmes. One of the

responsibilities of this person is to retrieve the external examiners’ report at the end of each

examination, scrutinise them for suggested improvements by the moderators and bring these to the

fore and reflection at the Faculty Board. Moderators do get an opportunity of commenting on the

courses at different stages of their execution of their role. For instance, when appointed they are

given the question papers as well as the learning guides and memorandum of marking, thus in the

end they get an opportunity to examine the course. These are the different opportunities for giving

feedback. Although lack of feedback can be viewed negatively, it can also be interpreted as

meaning that the moderator is satisfied with what goes and thus lack of comments is not

necessarily a negative stance. Another safety valve is that policy provides for the changing of

external moderators.

Although only illustrations from these two faculties have been cited, overall, all faculties report that

they use moderation and examination feedback for the betterment of the examination processes. It

becomes apparent that the institution has an opportunity of learning amongst different faculty

practices and standard these, if deemed necessary.

21

5.Community Engagement (Category Four)

5.1 Key Findings and Recommendations

5.1.1 Recommendation 22: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare should

develop a conceptual framework to guide the implementation of a vast array of community

engagement activities in order to facilitate both the quality assurance of these activities and the

appropriate integration of community engagement into the curriculum.

Improvement Actions

The initial steps taken by the University in response to this recommendation was to commence,

at the end of 2009, an institutionalization and formalization process of community engagement

(CE). This involved the appointment, of an Acting Director of CE, and, subsequently in 2011, a

Senior Administrator1. A new organogram for CE was approved in 2011, which would provide

CE presence in both Alice and EL campuses2. Appropriate office space was provided in Alice,

and next month the CE Unit will be relocated into new offices in EL.

Granted the CE Unit receives minimal funding for running costs from UFH, but fortunately it

received substantial external funding from the NRF for CE-related research in the UFH

context3.Another source of funding has been the teaching and learning grant, which has been

used to engage faculty and student bodies in debates and discussions around CE, its purpose,

meanings, and integration into teaching and learning (curriculum). The funds have also

assisted with the purchase of CE resources (books and videos); a CE resource centre will be

located on Alice and EL campuses for academic and student access.

A Senate Community on CE was established with membership going beyond academic staff

and students to include community stakeholders. The committee has already instigated a

review of the CE policy; development of a policy around a VC’s award for CE; development of a

CE-related ethical review process; provided a platform for sharing CE experiences, and devising

CE strategic thinking and planning. The Director: CE is also a member of all key committees,

including the extended management team.

With the NRF grant, 5 colloquia have been hosted to date, resulting in a growing discourse

around CE; a website has been established; CE newsletters published; two community open

days hosted on Alice and EL campuses (some 30 academic departments displayed their CE

activities and programmes); postgraduate bursaries allocated to students undertaking CE-

related research at UFH; a Postdoctoral Fellow appointed; and an international CE link made

with Syracuse University, USA. Later this year, UFH will be hosting4 a CE conference. The

NRF grant also enabled the design and development of an on-line database of CE projects and

programmes; this is currently being populated.

1These appointments being temporary until the conclusion of the UFH restructuring process

2The appointments can only be made after the completion of the restructuring process - the aim is to complete the

recruitment process by the end of 2011 3The NRF research team is headed by the SARCHI Chair: Social Change and includes the HOD Sociology, Director: CE and the Postdoctoral Fellow in CE. 4The CE Conference is co-hosted with Rhodes University, NRF, HSRC and SAHECEF.

22

Some faculties assert that the conceptualisation of community engagement is a topical matter

and an area of concern. Indeed, it can be ascertained that there are tensions and contestations

as to what CE is, and/or should be about, and how individuals and/or faculties define CE.

Though the database is already revealing that all Faculties are involved in CE activities, in one

form or another, there are also a number of individual students and student societies involved in

CE; an issue that had not featured until now. The data also indicates that there is no dominant

form of CE at UFH, rather a combination of service learning, community outreach, and

volunteerism.

Through the CE Unit, UFH took part in the HSRC study that sought to map university interaction

with external social partners. The preliminary findings were presented in the colloquium at the

beginning of 2011, and the dataset recently provided to the CE Unit, which will enable further

analysis and reporting.

As stated above, the CE Unit held conversations with faculties and students on the

conceptualization of CE in the UFH context, as well as various other platforms for dialogue.

Drawing from this data and from all the other CE-related research that has been undertaken to

date, a new conceptual framework and revised policy will be completed this year.

The university will need to make strategic decisions around resources (human and financial) for

the CE office for 2012 and beyond, and faculty related CE activities, whilst taking into

consideration the rural-urban dynamics, for example, Alice where the lack of a developed public

transport system and agencies for student placement (for service learning programmes)

compound CE quality issues. It should be iterated here that this is further exasperated by the

fact that the national level funding formula is general and does not address situatedness issues.

Also, deeper discussions need to take place with faculties around curriculum review; it is

anticipated that the revised policy will assist in triggering this process. Finally, a process to

focus on university-community partnerships needs to be undertaken; for example, some

academic departments have advisory bodies comprising of industry specialists, but their voices

are on the whole confined within the particular department they serve, and primarily focused on

curriculum related issues. How can these relationships be expanded to incorporate CE-related

issues? How can the university benefit from these voices? Similarly, how can community

groups (private, public, not-for-profit and civic) better access UFH? What role could they play in

the achievement of UFH’s vision and mission? In turn, how can UFH better serve these

communities?

23

6. Research (Category Five)

6.1Recommendations and Improvement Actions

6.1.1 Recommendation 5: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare explore ways

to recruit and retain South African students at the postgraduate level

All faculties report giving this recommendation their special attention and have adopted a

number of strategies to address this concern. Amongst others the following have been used:

• Identification of students for Masters and PhDs at honours and masters’ level respectively.

• A conscious effort to improve the South African intake of postgraduate students. This has

resulted in the presence of South African graduates at Masters and Doctoral degrees in

some faculties where previously at these levels graduates were in the mainforeign students.

• Targeted funding has been allocated for Student bursaries through the Research budget.

• Special meetings of the South African students are called to have discussions on prospects of

funding at postgraduate level and other opportunities like being tutors, all an attempt at retaining

the students for post graduate studies.

• Final year undergraduate students are invited to seminars and conferences in which

postgraduate students participate.

6.1.2 Recommendation 20: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare develop an

institutional strategy to embed a research culture and which includes clear criteria for the

identification and development of niche areas, and that the necessary resources to support these

niches are made available.

Improvement Actions

In dealing with this recommendation, different faculties have made resolutions on how to deal with

this matter. For example, the Faculty of Law has Research integrated into undergraduate studies. In

2009 it was resolved that one assignment task is research based at 3rd and 4th year level. In

addition to this, at 4th year level there is a Legal Research Methodology course offered which

grounds students on legal writing. Other faculties report that through projects students get

opportunities of learning how to do research. Some faculties, like the Social Sciences and

Humanities report that their students are exposed to an undergraduate module on research.

All faculties have identified their research niche areas and students get opportunities to work with

academics on these as a means of embedding a research culture. These are duly funded through

both internal and external funding. Extreme diligence is applied in selecting appropriate supervisors

for research topics and students.

24

The Govan Mbeki Research Development Centre has begun a process of holding research

seminars and workshops where academics and students are engaged in the conversion of

dissertations and theses into publications. Incentives have been improved for research output and

targets have been set on the number of units to be achieved as research output. As a result of this

the UFH research trajectory has shown a steep upward slope in the last two years.

6.1.3 Recommendation 21: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare as a matter of

urgency develop a comprehensive policy on research ethics in order to protect the reputation of

institution in this area

Improvement Actions

A Research Ethics Policy was developed and adopted by Senate. The institutional ethics

committee is functional. See Appendix 9. The Research Ethics Committee has begun to sit.

25

7.Non-Academic Operational and Corporate Support Services (Category Six)

7.1 Key Findings and Recommendations

Communication and Marketing

7.1.1 Recommendation 2: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare give attention

to the area of communication at all levels of the institution in order to galvanise staff, students and

other stakeholders into action around the institution’s strategic plan.

Improvement Actions

Initiatives have been undertaken to address this recommendation. However, it is still work in

progress that is being addressed at both internal and external level. There is proactive

communication in the institutional website and the media.

Progress has been slow in this area. At the time of the institutional audit the University did not have

a Director for Communication. This position was subsequently relocated in the Directorate for

Institutional Advancement during the restructuring process. The Acting Director currently fulfills the

communication function. The Institutional Advancement Directorate also incorporates the functions

of marketing and advancement. Applications have been received for the Director’s post and

shortlisting will be done this month (June 2011) with the intention to fill the post by July/August

2011.The rest of the posts are to be filled through the matching and placing but if there are no

suitable candidates the positions will be advertised externally.

Student Affairs

7.1.2 Recommendation 13: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare take urgent

steps to ensure a safe and secure residence environment that is supportive of a quality learning

experience at its campuses.

Improvement Actions

Phase 1 of the maintenance and renovation of residences has been completed. Details of this are

available in Appendix 1 of the report.Maintenance is a challenge as there is no comprehensive

maintenance plan. Maintenance is planned on a year to year basis. There is an urgent need to re-

think this strategy. One of the steps that have been taken to deal with this is to get a private-public

partnership. A feasibility study was conducted for this option and was positive. This is still being

consulted through with relevant stakeholders including the labour union and students. The Council

of the University has approved the approach in principle but has allowed for consultations to be

held.

The University has ensured that students with disabilities have been catered for in accessing

facilities by building ramps, wherever possible, refurbished buildings are modified to provide

access to the physically disabled. This is work in progress.

Provision of adequate security measures is still an issue although we have a service provider

appointed. A pilot is underway on access control in the residences, and lessons will be used for a

roll-out of the system. R5m has been budgeted for fencing in of the Alice campus.

26

An inclusion policy has been developed which sets out the criteria for admissions to residences.

This serves as an attempt to make residence space available to new students and students with a

profile of succeeding in their studies.

Information Technology

7.1.3 Recommendation 8: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare ensure that the

relevant staff be properly trained on Integrated Tertiary System (ITS) so that the system can be

used to generate management reports and other institutional data that would enhance planning and

facilitate decision making at all levels

Improvement Actions

The UFH has taken a position that staff be released to attend ITS modules that are relevant for their

work. This will increase the utilization of the system and afford the institution data that will enhance

planning and facilitate decision making at all levels.

7.1.4 Recommendation 14: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare develop

an Information and Communication Technology policy that addresses the use of Information

Technology facilities that includes disaster recovery, adequate internet access in the

residences, effective use of the Integrated Tertiary System as a management information

system, and equitable access to Information Technology facilities for all students across

campuses, and ensure that such provision is systematically monitored and evaluated. This

process could involve an investigation on the viability of integrating appropriate technologies

into the teaching and learning strategy to improve overall quality of the support provided to

students

Improvement Actions

The ICT services Human Resource requirements are severely hampered by low levels of skill and

experience within an organizational structure that is only two thirds occupied. Capacity to perform

the required functions acceptably is estimated at around 30 – 40 percent overall. The ICT

equipment has evolved over the past few years to become extremely complicated and requires high

skill levels to manage and maintain.

• Disaster recovery planning

A disaster recovery plan is in the approval process. It needs only to be approved by Council. Many

other actions to improve the success of disaster recovery have been implemented. This is directed

at improving the business continuity of the institution. The primary Enterprise Resource Planning

(ERP) system used to function on a single server platform. Server failure resulted in ERP system

failure.

The ERP system has now been installed into a virtualized environment where there is immediate

business continuity support in the event of server failure. The Storage Area Network or disk failure

is being addressed but requires considerable funding to achieve the type of business continuity that

is required. A second set of DRP servers has been installed and runs 30 behind the production

servers. The other essential servers cannot be replicated until hardware resources are made

27

available. A request has been submitted to the Department of Higher Education and Training

through the CFO requesting this funding. It is to be noted that this is both financially and human

resource dependent.

• Manage bandwidth

The bandwidth issue depends primarily on the provisioning of the DST’s SANReN connectivity to

Alice and Bhisho. The upgrading of the intercampus bandwidth from 5 Megabytes per second to

155 Megabytes per second has lessened the need to manage the bandwidth as this would have

required additional hardware, software and human resources.

• Increased access to electronic resources

The University of Fort Hare has embarked on a student laptop initiative that requires students to

have a “netbook” by the end of 2013. The network is being upgraded to introduce wireless

technology to support this requirement and to provide for the required network speeds.

• ICT Training.

[Human resources confirm thatICT Training is now being included in the Annual Training Report to

DoL to necessitate the attraction of the specialised grant funding.

• Establishment of the ICT Governance Committee of Council

The ICT governance committee of council has been functional for the past year and has provided

the required governance. The ICT governance maturity level is still low and plans are being

formulated to address the matters.

• Full utilization of purchased ITS modules

A plan is in place that is currently rolling out to ensure that all ITS modules deliver on their intended

capacity and contribute to the better, more efficient and effective running of the institution. The

leave system is now on-line and functioning for the past 6 months. The Finance on-lone module is

to be implemented before the end of 2011. Other modules such as the lecturing time- table module

require significant resources to redesign the academic structure to be able to make use of an on-

line system.

• Standardisation of ICT at all campuses according to ICT Strategic Plan

The overall funding requirement of R 20 million per year for the next two years includes the cost of

providing similar resources across the campuses. The move from providing computer labs with

machines in them for students to the provision of a powered and wireless venue for students to

connect their netbooks, will assist in resolving the technology issue for students.

• Online registration and results for students

The pilot on-line registration for students was successfully run at the beginning of 2011. There is

however a substantial investment in terms of time and money required redesigning the academic

structure. Student results are available on-line and by SMS

28

Academic Administration

7.1.5 Recommendation 15: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare institute

procedures at all phases of the examination, certification and related processes to minimise errors

and inaccuracies in published examination results

Improvement Actions

This is ongoing and is done annually. Staff in the academic administration division is aware of

the related policies and processes.

All faculties have service level agreements with the academic administration departments.

Degree certificates are now produced from on-line data thus minimizing the possibility of error

and improving the accuracy and existence of data in the ITS system.

Human Resource Management

7.1.6 Recommendation 18: The HEQC recommends that the University of Fort Hare strengthen

the Human Resource function in the institution and develop and implement mechanisms to measure

its effectiveness.

Improvement Actions

In response to this recommendation the University conducted a comprehensive review of policies,

with the aim of improving processes so that they are aligned to best practice, legislation, and culture

and UFH strategy. The policies are under review and as soon as the process is finalised, the Staff

Handbook will be developed. All HR Processes have been reviewed accordingly and the new HR

structure is aligned to the New Processes.

The recruitment process and turnaround between advertisement of vacancy and appointment will

be corrected through implementation of the new Organisational structure as approved by Council.

The implementation of the Competency Framework will also improve the recruitment process.

The Management Information function is planned into the organizational structure for ICT services

as it does not currently exist. Management Information requirements are dealt with in an ad-hoc

manner until the positions planned for on the organizational chart are filled. This is planned to

commence in 2012 and be completed by 2014.

All staff were trained in 2010 on the crafting of Key Performance Indicators including Personal

Development Plans. The Performance Management System (PMS) for all staff will be rolled out.

Advice is offered to all Faculties and Deans within the scope of PMS.

Regarding Improvement of recruitment process and turn-around between advertisement of vacancy

and appointment, this will be corrected through implementation of the new Organisational structure

as approved by Council. The implementation of the Competency Framework will also improve the

recruitment process.

29

8. Conclusion

This report has given details of actions undertaken in addressing and resolving the issues

contained in the Institutional Audit Report recommendations. There has been uneven progress

in resolving these matters and the University is continuously working on all the areas to ensure

full resolution of outstanding matters as per our project plan.

30

Appendices

Appendix 1: Report to the Minister of Higher Education on the Infrastructure Funding

Appendix 2: Library Report

Appendix 3: Strategic Research Plan

Appendix 4: Integrated Transformation Plan

Appendix 5: University of Fort Hare Statute

Appendix 6: The Grounding Programme / LKA Pilot Report

Appendix 7: The Curriculum Development and Review Policy

Appendix 8: New Programme Accreditation Application Form

Appendix 9: Research Ethics Policy


Recommended