Integrity Leadership for Africa Course (ILAC)Strathmore University, Nairobi, 29 April – 4 May 2013
London / Amman / Bishkek / Jakarta / East Jerusalem / Nairobi / Ramallah / Yerevan
Competence and Leadership
© Integrity Action 2013
and the Fix-Rate
Community Integrity Building
Kenyan experiences
© Integrity Action 2013
Specific integrity-related problems resolved to the satisfaction of the core stakeholders.
Definitions: What is a Fix?
© Integrity Action 2013
Percentage of problems resolved.
Definitions: The Fix-Rate
© Integrity Action 2013
Fix-rate can be measured as a percentage of•problems resolved•solutions proposed, or•complaints, grievances submitted
Definitions: The Fix-Rate
© Integrity Action 2013
The Challenge: Think of fixes from an average person’s perspective
Identifying Fixes
© Integrity Action 2013
Then think of fixes from a poor, marginalized community’s Perspective
Identifying Fixes
© Integrity Action 2013
Then at fixes from a local government perspective
Identifying Fixes
© Integrity Action 2013
The MethodHow might one go about it?
Identifying Fixes
© Integrity Action 2013
Who Defines the Fix? At What Level? 1.Project-level fixes2.Sub-project fixes3.Upstream: Budgets, policy level
The Fix-Rate: Distinctions
Who Achieves the Fix?1.Community Monitor with Contractor2.CM, JWG, with NGO3.CM, JWG with Local Government4.CM,JWG, with Provincial, National Government
© Integrity Action 2013
Sustainability1.Is the fix sustainable?2.Is it being scaled up? 3.How cost-effective is the intervention?4.Are the skills used to fix other problems? 5.Is the fix-rate going up?6.Is it self-funding?
The Fix-Rate: Externalities
© Integrity Action 2013
The Fix-Rate: Externalities (2)
Closing the Loop1.Is there an intelligent response? 2.Does the system fight back? How are we dealing with spoilers?
© Integrity Action 2013
Competence
© Integrity Action 2013
The IPADE case study
© Integrity Action 2013
The ATM case
© Integrity Action 2013
1. Ability to identify and name an integrity
problem.2. Knowledge of the legislation, codes, standards
related tothese problems. 3. Able to identify
solutions.
Ethical Competence: 3 Elements
© Integrity Action 2013
Leadership
© Integrity Action 2013
“Leaders with Integrity”
vs.Integrity Builders
vs.
“Toxic Leaders”
© Integrity Action 2013
Selected Integrity Builders
Irakli Rekaashvili, Georgia Dora Akunyemi, Nigeria
SK Mendiratta, India Aruna Roy, India
Tarun Tejpal, IndiaK Afari-Gyan, Ghana
Carla Del Ponte, SwitzerlandEva Joly, Norway/France
John Githongo, Kenya Monica Macovei, Romania
Nuhu Ribadu, Nigeria Alina Mungiu Pippidi, Romania
Abdul Tejan-Cole, Sierra Leone Oby Ezekwesili, Nigeria
Antonio di Pietro, Italiy Dora Akunyemi, Nigeria
Baltazar Garzon, Spain Cory Aquino, Philippines
Luis Moreno Ocampo, ArgentinaLee Kwan Yew, SingaporeElliott Spitzer, USAJulian Assange, AustraliaElizabeth Filkin, UKAnna Hazare, India
Cynthia Cooper (Worldcom)Coleen Rowley (FBI), USA Sherron Watkins (Enron), USAHaider Abdel Shafi, Palestine
© Integrity Action 2013
What distinguishes
Integrity Builders?
© Integrity Action 2013
1. Commitment to Public Good
5. Competence
2. Incorruptibility
6. InstitutionalIntelligence
Core Characteristics of Integrity Builders
4. Experimentation 3. Consistency of goals
© Integrity Action 2013
Commitment to Public Good
Incorruptibility
Core Characteristics of Integrity Builders
+
=Virtue
© Integrity Action 2013
1. Commitment to Public Good
5. Competence
2. Incorruptibility
6. InstitutionalIntelligence
4. Experimentation
Core Characteristics of a “Toxic Leader”
3. Consistency of goals
© Integrity Action 2013
1. Commitment to Public Good
5. Competence
2. Incorruptibility
6. InstitutionalIntelligence
4. Experimentation
Popular, Self-Serving Politician
3. Consistency of goals
© Integrity Action 2013
1. Commitment to Public Good
5. Competence
2. Incorruptibility
6. InstitutionalIntelligence
Core Characteristics of Integrity Builders
4. Experimentation 3. Consistency of goals
© Integrity Action 2013
Revisiting the Spoilers
© Integrity Action 2013
Thank you.
