+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: justin-joseph-griffith
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
14
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2
Transcript
Page 1: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Intellectual Property

Boston College Law School

March 5, 2007

Patent – Infringement 2

Page 2: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Doctrine of Equivalents

• Tests– Substantially same function, way, result– Insubstantial differences

• Evidence– Circumstances, purpose, prior art– Would PHOSITA have viewed interchangeable?

• Details– All-elements rule– Measured at time of infringement

Page 3: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Patent No. 5,205,473

Page 4: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Patent No. 5,205,473

• “What is claimed is:– 1. A recyclable, insulating beverage

container holder, comprising:• a corrugated tubular member comprising

– cellulosic material and at least a first opening therein for receiving and retaining a beverage container, said corrugated tubular member comprising

• fluting means for containing insulating air; said fluting means comprising fluting adhesively attached to a liner with a recylable adhesive

Page 5: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Doctrine of Equivalents

• Limitations– Claim on prior art– Prosecution history estoppel– Disclosed but not claimed

Page 6: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Warner Jenkinson

pH

9.08.07.06.05.0

BoothHilton

OriginalHilton

Amended Warner

?

Page 7: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Festo

• Two issues– What kinds of amendments trigger estoppel?– Does estoppel apply to all equivalents based on

the amendment?

Page 8: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Doctrine of Equivalents

Claims

Prior Art

ProsecutionHistoryEstoppel

Equivalentsfor PioneerInvention

Equivalentsfor MinorInvention

Page 9: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Patent No. 5,205,473

Page 10: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Patent No. 5,205,473

• “What is claimed is:– 1. A recyclable, insulating beverage

container holder, comprising:• a corrugated tubular member comprising

– cellulosic material and at least a first opening therein for receiving and retaining a beverage container, said corrugated tubular member comprising

• fluting means for containing insulating air; said fluting means comprising fluting adhesively attached to a liner with a recylable adhesive

Page 11: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Patent No. 5,425,497

Page 12: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Problem 3-11• “1. A pocket toothbrush having an exterior structure

resembling a traditional fountain pen case comprising– a. a removable cylindrical end cap cover,

– b. a main cylindrical body shaft over at least one end of which said end cap cover fits …,

– c. said cylindrical body shaft having one end which contains toothbrush bristles …,

– d. said cylindrical body shaft including an interior passage extending into said bristle end and having at least one termination opening in the area at the base of said bristles,

– e. a movable plunger extending into said cylindrical body shaft in said main cylindrical body shaft,

– f. said body shaft including an interior space for the accommodation of a charge of toothpaste to be fed to said bristles by operation of said movable plunger …”

Page 13: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Administrative

• Assignment for next class– Finish IV.C – Infringement

• No class this Friday– Will reschedule

Page 14: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2.

Patent Scope

Claims

Prior Art

ProsecutionHistoryEstoppel

Equivalents

Reverse Doctrineof Equivalents


Recommended