+ All Categories
Home > Education > INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Date post: 12-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: namitha-m-r-aec-ri-kumulur-tnau
View: 983 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
56
Protection in Biotechnology, Protection of Other Biological Materials, Convention on Biological Diversity, International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and National Biodiversity Protection Initiatives NAMITHA M R 2015664502 M.Tech. in Land and Water Management Engineering AEC & RI, Kumulur TNAU
Transcript
Page 1: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Protection in Biotechnology, Protection of Other Biological Materials,

Convention on Biological Diversity, International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources

for Food and Agriculture and

National Biodiversity Protection Initiatives

NAMITHA M R2015664502

M.Tech. in Land and Water Management EngineeringAEC & RI, Kumulur

TNAU

Page 2: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY

• Encompasses a range of research tools used by scientists to

understand and manipulate the genetic make-up of

organisms for use in agriculture (crops, livestock, forestry and

fisheries).

Page 3: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Genetic Engineeringcloning

bioinformatics

tissue culture

micro propagation

artificial insemination

embryo transfer

AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY

Page 4: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Major benefits of Biotechnology Research

1. Overcome production constraints that are more difficult or

intractable with conventional breeding.

2. Create crops that resist pests and diseases, replacing toxic

chemicals that harm the environment and human health.

3. Provide diagnostic tools and vaccines that help control

devastating animal diseases.

4. Create new products for industrial uses

Page 5: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

5. Can offer both direct and indirect health benefits:

– Direct benefits: Improving the nutritional quality of foods

(e.g. Golden Rice), reducing the presence of toxic compounds

(e.g. cassava with less cyanide) and reducing allergens in

certain foods (e.g. groundnuts and wheat).

– Indirect benefits: Reduced pesticide use, lower occurrence of

mycotoxins (caused by insect or disease damage), increased

availability of affordable food and the removal of toxic

compounds from soil.

Page 6: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Economic Implications of BT and GMO

• Biotechnology have economic impacts on

farmers, consumers and society as a whole

Page 7: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Economic impacts of transgenic crops

• Overall economic impacts of transgenic crops will depend on

factors like:

– Impact of the technology on agronomic practices and yields

– Consumers’ willingness to buy foods and other products

derived from transgenic crops

– Regulatory requirements and associated costs.

– Industry concentration in the production and marketing of

transgenic crop technology

Page 8: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…• Transgenic crops will only be widely adopted if they provide

economic benefits for farmers

• Technologies that are embodied in a seed, such as transgenic

insect resistance, may be easier for small-scale, resource-poor

farmers to use than more complicated crop technologies

• On the other hand, some biotechnology packages, particularly in

the livestock and fisheries areas, require a certain institutional

and managerial environment to function properly

Page 9: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Socio-Economic Issues

• Types of decisions that governments have to make relating

to the socio-economic issues are:

– whether to import GM ingredients, or manufacture foods

and products containing GM ingredients;

– whether to allow GM seeds to be planted commercially;

Page 10: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

– policy on research in agricultural biotechnology - setting a

balance between public and private investment.

– appropriate laws and regulatory mechanisms to ensure

GM food products cannot harm the health of people,

animals, environment or pollinate non-GM crops; and

– whether food containing GM produce should be labeled.

Page 11: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

The EU/US Dispute

• US is the world’s largest grower of GM crops.

• GM crop activity in EU member states is minimal, partly

because the EU only ended a six-year moratorium on growing

GM crops in 2003

• Individual applications to import GM seeds into the EU need

the approval of all 25 member states.

• Some EU member states such as Austria, Germany and Italy,

remain strongly opposed to growing GM crops.

Page 12: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

V/s

• Europe’s approach is based on the precautionary principle.

• Though commercial GM crops are banned, processed food in

the EU is allowed to contain GM ingredients, but any food

product whose GM content exceeds 0.9 per cent needs to be

labelled.

• This is because of another principle underlying EU policy –

that the general public should be able to choose whether to

consume GM food or not.

Page 13: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• Many large European supermarkets have chosen to remove

GM ingredients from their products.

• Campaigners in Europe want even stronger legislation to

ensure that GM produce is kept separate from non-GM

produce at every stage of production

• They can accept the ‘co-existence’ of GM with non-GM

products as long as they are clearly separated.

Page 14: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• US policy-makers believe that the precautionary principle is a

hindrance to technology development and, ultimately, to

trade.

• They claim: that the EU ban is a barrier to trade costing US

farmers several hundred million dollars a year in potential

exports to Europe; that it has no scientific basis; and that it is

preventing the development of an industry that could benefit

the world’s poorest people.

Page 15: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Biosafety Procedures in India

• India has acceded to the Biosafety Protocol on 17th January

2003. GMOs are regulated in India under the purview of the

1986 Indian Environment (Protection) Act.

• Ministry of Environment and Forests has notified the Rules

for the Manufacture, Use, Import, Export and Storage of

Hazardous Microorganisms/Genetically Engineered

Organisms or Cells under this act.

Page 16: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• Presently, there are six competent authorities.

– Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RDAC),

– Institutional Biosafety Committees (IBSC),

– Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM)

– Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC),

– State Biotechnology Coordination Committee (SBCC)

– The District Level Committee (DLC)

Page 17: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• RCGM established under the Department of Biotechnology

supervises research activities including small scale field trials

• GEAC, established under the Ministry of Environment and

Forests gives approvals for large scale releases and

commercialization of GMOs

• IBSC oversees the researches and to interface with the RCGM

in regulating it.

Page 18: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• Bt. Cotton is the first and only transgenic crop approved

by GEAC for commercial cultivation in 6 States namely

Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh,

Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu.

Page 19: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

IPR Issues in Biotechnology

• R & D in biotechnology is extremely time consuming and

requires huge investment

• There are, however, no internationally accepted

guidelines for the management of IPR

Page 20: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Legislative Framework

• TRIPS excludes biological processes for the production of

plants or animals as a patentable subject matter, but

patents can be granted to the microorganisms, non-

biological, and microbiological processes used in the

production of plants and animals.

Page 21: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• IPR protection is granted only for invention and not for

discoveries

• In biotechnology innovations, it is difficult to say whether

the new life form in the form of gene, DNA, cell etc. is a

scientific discovery or a technological invention.

Page 22: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• Consideration of industrial application is yet another obstacle

for securing patents for inventions in biotechnology

• However, in India there are several ethical issues too related

to patenting of life forms, the most important being extent of

private ownership that could be extended to life forms

• Idea of profit making by exploiting any common heritage of

civilization or culture is unacceptable to lots of people and

communities

Page 23: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• Hence, there is an urgent need for developing countries

like India to define clear policies for IPR in case of

scientific and technological innovations.

• World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is now

developing guidelines to protect traditional and

indigenous knowledge systems.

Page 24: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Trait-Genetic Use Restriction Technology (T-GURT)

• New trait-genetic use restriction technology (T-GURT) is

being employed as a part of biotechnology by means of

terminator and traitor genes.

• It restricts unauthorized copying of patents and monopoly

in the international marketing

Page 25: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
Page 26: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• But farmers cannot save seeds of their crops at the end of

the crop season

• It may therefore pose a potential threat to our food security

• (CGIAR) has decided not to incorporate T-GURT in

forthcoming plant breeding programs of international

institutions

Page 27: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Indian Proprietary Agricultural Technology Profile

• ICAR is the IP leader with over 60 granted patents in the field

of plant and animals sciences, including biotechnology, diary

technology, animal disease diagnostics, and therapeutics,

engineering and post harvest processing, and environmental

science

• Other patentees in agriculture include universities, IITs, and

other research organizations like CSIR, DRDO etc.

Page 28: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• A few patents have been granted to individual inventors for

inventions such as: An improved agriculture harrow disk,

Tractor mounted multipurpose deep trencher, a

preparation for enhancing yield in agriculture and

horticulture, a composition for enhancing nitrogen fixation

in legumes etc.

Page 29: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• According to the Indian Patent Act 1970 and subsequent

amendments, patents could be applied mainly for

agricultural tools and machinery or the processes for the

development of agricultural chemicals

• Any new plant variety, arising out of an innovative use of

conventional techniques or modern biotechnological

methods, is not patentable subject matter.

Page 30: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• Since 2005 inventions related to agrochemicals as

products could be patented according to the Patent

(Amendments) Act, 2005

Page 31: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 1993

• A multinational treaty which expressly provided for the rights

of indigenous communities (Article 8 (i) of the CBD), and the

International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources (IUPGR)

has provided defined farmers’ rights (CBD 1994, FAO 1983)

inter alia affirm that “the past, present and future

contributions of farmers in conserving, improving and making

available the genetic resources is the basis of farmer’s rights”.

Page 32: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

CBD contd…

• The Convention has three main goals:

– conservation of biological diversity (or biodiversity);

– sustainable use of its components; and

– fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from

genetic resources.

Page 33: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

CBD contd…

• The Convention was opened for signature at the Earth Summit

in Rio de Janeiro on 5 June 1992 and entered into force on 29

December 1993

• The year 2010 was the International Year of Biodiversity

• Importantly, the Convention is legally binding; countries that

join it ('Parties') are obliged to implement its provisions.

• The convention sets out a philosophy of sustainable use of

natural resources.

Page 34: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

• Supplementary agreement adopted by CBD on

29 January 2000

• The protocol became international law in September 2003

and has since been ratified by more than 100 countries

excluding USA.

• India has acceded to the Biosafety Protocol on 17th January

2003.

Page 35: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Scope of Cartagena Protocol

• The Protocol seeks to protect from the potential

risks posed by Living Modified Organisms (LMOs)

resulting from modern biotechnology intended for

direct use for food, feed or processing.

• It incorporates procedure for import of LMOs with

respect to Food, Feed and Product.

Page 36: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Risk Management

• Risk management measures include food labeling,

conditions on marketing approvals, post marketing

monitoring and development of methods to detect or

identify foods derived from modern biotechnology.

Page 37: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Salient features of the protocol

i) Precautionary principle: similar to the idea of ‘safety first’

ii) Advance Informed Agreement (AIA)

iii) Traceability: Importer of LMOs should be able to trace

back the original exporter

iv) Liability and Redress: what would happen if the trans-

boundary movement of living modified organisms (LMOs)

has caused damage.

Page 38: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

v) Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH): to facilitate

the exchange of information on living modified

organisms and to assist countries in the

implementation of the Protocol.

Page 39: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Nagoya Protocol

• Supplementary agreement to the CBD

• Adopted at the 2010, 10th Conference of Parties (COP) to the

CBD on 29th October in Nagoya, Japan and enter into force

on 12 October 2014

• It has been ratified by 53 states and the European Union

• On 22 December 2010, the UN declared the period from

2011 to 2020 as the UN-Decade on Biodiversity

Page 40: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• It provides a transparent legal framework for the effective

implementation of one of the three objectives of the CBD:

the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of the

utilization of genetic resources thereby contributing to the

conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.

Page 41: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Scope of Nagoya Protocol

• The Nagoya Protocol applies to genetic resources that are

covered by the CBD, and to the benefits arising from their

utilization.

• It also covers traditional knowledge (TK) associated with

genetic resources that are covered by the CBD and the

benefits arising from its utilization.

Page 42: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA)

• Popularly known as the International Seed Treaty, it is a

comprehensive international agreement in harmony with

the Convention on Biological Diversity, which aims at

guaranteeing food security through the conservation,

exchange and sustainable use of the world's plant genetic

resources for food and agriculture (PGRFA), as well as the

fair and equitable benefit sharing arising from its use.

Page 43: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• The treaty has implemented a Multilateral System (MLS)

of access and benefit sharing, among those 64 countries

that ratify the treaty, of some of the most important food

and forage crops essential for food security and

interdependence.

Page 44: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• Basic function is to promote the full implementation of the

Treaty, including the provision of policy guidance on the

implementation of the Treaty

• Governing Body elects its Chairperson and Vice-

Chairpersons, in conformity with its Rules of Procedure.

They are collectively referred to as "the Bureau"

Page 45: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

ITPGRFA sessions

First Session

Second Session

Third Session

Fourth Session

Fifth Session

In Madrid in June 2006

In Rome in Oct/Nov 2007

In Tunis in June 2009

In Bali, Indonesia in March 2011

In Muscat, Oman in September

2013.

Page 46: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

National Biodiversity Authority (NBA)

• NBA is a statutory autonomous body under the MoEF, Govt

of India established in 2003 to implement the provisions

under the National Biological Diversity Act, 2002, after India

signed CBD in 1992

• In 2012, NBA organized the first ever National Biodiversity

Congress (NBC) at Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

• NBA with its headquarters in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, delivers

its mandate through a structure that comprises of the

Authority, Secretariat, SBBs, BMCs and Expert Committees.

Page 47: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Status of India’s Biodiversity

Accounts for 7-8 per cent of the recorded species of the world

One of the 17-mega biodiversity countries

46,000 species of plants and 81,000 species of animals have been recorded

Acknowledged centre of crop diversity

Harbors many wild relatives and breeds of domesticated animals and fish

Millions of microbial diversity, insects and other species.

Page 48: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Implementation Structures of Biodiversity Act, 2002

• A three tiered structure has been established under the Act:

– At the local level Biodiversity Management Committees

(BMCs)

– At the state level State Biodiversity Boards (SBBs)

– At the national level National Biodiversity Authority (NBA)

• Each of these structure are required to be connected for

decision making processes on various issues, including on issues

of access and benefit sharing (ABS).

Page 49: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Current Status of Biotechnology Research

• Genetic modification technology in agriculture first appeared

in the mid 1990s in the US

• Cultivation of genetically modified plants worldwide also

increased in 2013

• 79 % of world production of soybean is achieved with GM

soy and this figure is 32 % in the case of maize

Page 50: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• With the adoption of Bt cotton, India’s GM crop production

almost tripled from 500,000 hectares in 2004 to 1.3 million

hectares in 2005

• India has the largest biotechnology research program in the

developing world, with 14 public-sector laboratories carrying

out research on GM cabbage, cauliflower, chickpeas, citrus,

eggplants, mung beans, melon, mustard, potatoes, rice,

tomatoes and cotton, among many other crops

Page 51: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Contd…

• Just four varieties of GM crops – soybean, maize, cotton and

canola (rapeseed) – occupy 99 per cent of commercial

plantings.

• The most widely used GM technologies involve herbicide

tolerance (HT) applied in soybean and canola, and insect

resistance, based on genes isolated from Bacillus

thuringiensis (Bt), applied in maize and cotton

Page 52: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Upcoming biotech innovations

• GENE SCISSORS Imagine being able to ‘cut-and-paste’ any genetic sequence at will, even in living organisms.

Page 53: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

• SMART SHOES

What if you could tell your phone your next destination and let your shoes lead the way?

Page 54: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

• HEALING NANOGELS

Forget bandages and silicon dressings: nanogels might be the future of wound healings

Page 55: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

• POLYMER TOOTH SPRAY

A Taiwanese company called Tooth film Biofilm Innovation has developed a breath freshener from chitosan, which is extracted from the exoskeleton of crustaceans

Page 56: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

THANK U!!!


Recommended