+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: mikkel
View: 28 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure. An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools. First of all. I’m a wannabe …and not a scientist …not yet a philosopher either …I also smell like elderberries when the weather is moist - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
20
An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate and have it taught in American schools. Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure
Transcript
Page 1: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

An institute trying to pretend creationism is scientifically legitimate

and have it taught in American schools.

Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Page 2: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

First of all

• I’m a wannabe• …and not a scientist• …not yet a philosopher

either• …I also smell like

elderberries when the weather is moist

• …and if you can’t understand my accent, then fluergee-guergy-gurr

Page 3: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

What is evolution?

• Dembski doesn’t know:•“According to Darwinism, undirected natural causes are solely responsible for the origin and development of life.”•“Darwinism is hopelessly entangled with naturalism.”•“Darwinism rules out the possibility of God or any guiding intelligence playing a role in life's origin and development.”

Bad, Dembski! Bad!

Page 4: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

What I think evolution is

• Darwinian evolution by natural selection

• Those organisms or genes least likely to die in a given environment will therefore be the ones most likely to reproduce and eventually become quantitatively dominant.

Page 5: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure
Page 6: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Irreducible Complexity

• “A single system which is composed of several interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, and where the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning.”

The man behind the Colgate smile is Michael Behe

Page 7: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

An Important Concept

Page 8: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Mammals that can’t produce vitamin C

Guinea pigs and us!

What d’ye mean, rum don’t cure scurvy? ‘course it does.

Page 9: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

3 ways evolution can produce “Irreducible Complexity”

• An arch bridge is Irreducibly complex

• But, of course, it’s not made all at once

Page 10: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

1. Scaffolding2. Improbable but possible happenstance3. ?

3 ways evolution can produce “Irreducible Complexity”

Page 11: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

• Suppose an adaptive ability requires two (or more) mutations in order to function and either mutation alone is useless. As long as mutation A confers no disadvantage it could still be acquired through neutral drift without mutation B, priming the organism for advantage if B should turn up later.• Already proven by Richard Lenski when some of his e-coli mutated to thrive on citrate.

Page 12: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

1. Scaffolding2. Improbable but possible happenstance3. Cooption or exaptation

3 ways evolution can produce “Irreducible Complexity”

Page 13: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

To the left: Type III secretory system used for pooping. To the right: flagellar motor used for pretending to be a speedboat.

Page 14: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Complex Specified Information

• What is it?• Nobody knows. No, really• Well, Dembski does• …maybe.

Page 15: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Argument From Ignorance

Page 16: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Inference to Best Explanation?• One white swan, two white swans,

three white swans…• Therefore all swans are white.• Only works if you count all the

swans• Evolution fails; therefore all

natural explanations fail; therefore supernatural explanation; therefore God

• Only works if evolution and God are the only possible explanations.

• “Explanation”?

Page 17: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Is it an explanation?

• Fire generally causes smoke.• Intelligence generally causes flagella?

Well, is it informative?

Is there a generalised connection?

• The house is smoking because there is a smoke-producing event going on inside

• The flagellum was produced by a flagellum-producing intelligence

Page 18: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

Intelligent DesignVs.

Platonic AssemblyDunn-dunn-duuuunn!

Page 19: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure
Page 20: Intelligent Design’s Abject Failure

www.SketchSepahi.com

Questions?


Recommended