Intensive In-Home Services Annual Report...221 West High Street Broadway Building Jefferson City, MO...

Intensive In-Home Services

Annual Report Fiscal Year 2017

Missouri Department of Social Services Research and Data Analysis

221 West High Street Broadway Building

Jefferson City, MO 65102

RELAY MISSOURI

FOR HEARING AND SPEECH IMPAIRED

1-800-735-2466 VOICE • 1-800-735-2966 TEXT PHONE

An Equal Opportunity Employer, services provided on a nondiscriminatory basis.

TIM DECKER, DIRECTOR

CHILDREN’S DIVISION

P.O. BOX 88 • JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65103-0088

WWW.DSS.MO.GOV • 573-522-8024 • 573-526-3971 FAX

ERIC R. GREITENS, GOVERNOR • STEVE CORSI, Psy.D., ACTING DIRECTOR

irectorIRECTOR

Dear Reader: The Children's Division is pleased to present the Intensive In-Home Services Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2017. Material in this report covers the activities during July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. This report has been designed to provide information about Intensive In-home Services in Missouri. It includes information regarding children and families referred, served, and exiting the program. We hope the information will be useful to all who are interested in the accomplishments of the Intensive In-home Services program in Missouri. Every graph or chart reflects a Missouri family or child served through this program. It demonstrates Missouri's commitment to keeping children safely at home. We want to thank all staff, both public and private, who make this program work. Any questions about the report should be directed to the Children's Division or the Research and Data Analysis Unit, both located within the Department of Social Services.

Table of Contents

Families and Children Referred and Served ................................................................ 1

Table 1. Families Referred for IIS ........................................................................... 2 Table 2. Reasons At-Risk Children Not Accepted ................................................... 4 Table 3. Families and Children Accepted ................................................................ 6 Table 4. Families Accepted by Referral Source Code ............................................. 8 Table 5. Families and Children Accepted by Month ............................................ 10 Table 6. Reasons At-Risk Children Not Accepted Percentages ............................ 10 Table 7. Family Contacts Prior to IIS Intervention ............................................... 11 Table 8. Duration of IIS Intervention by Site ........................................................ 11 Table 9. Families Exiting IIS by Exit Status ........................................................... 12 Notes: Families and Children Referred and Served Tables .................................. 14

Heads of Household Served ..................................................................................... 17 Table 10. Head of Household Age for Families Accepted .................................... 18 Table 11. Head of Household Gender for Families Accepted .............................. 20 Table 12. Head of Household Race for Families Accepted .................................. 22 Table 13. Head of Household Employment for Families Accepted ..................... 24 Table 14. Head of Household Income for Families Accepted .............................. 28 Table 15. Head of Household Problems Addressed for Families Accepted ......... 30 Notes: Heads of Household Served Tables .......................................................... 31

At-Risk Children Served ........................................................................................... 33 Table 16. Age of At-Risk Children Accepted ......................................................... 34 Table 17. Gender of At-Risk Children Accepted ................................................... 36 Table 18. Race of At-Risk Children Accepted ....................................................... 38 Table 19. At-Risk Children Accepted by Special Education Category .................. 40 Table 20. At-Risk Children Accepted by Planned Placement Prevented ............. 44 Table 21. At-Risk Children Problems Addressed for Families Accepted .............. 48 Notes: At-Risk Children Served Tables ................................................................. 49

Outcomes for At-Risk Children Exiting Intensive In-Home Services ........................... 51 Table 22. Checking for 1st Substantiated CA/N Report for At-Risk Children ........ 52 Table 23. At-Risk Children Exiting IIS who were listed as victims of a Substantiated Child Abuse/Neglect Report within 48 months of their exit ... 52 Table 24. Checking for 1st Entry into Legal Status 1 for At-Risk Children ............ 53 Table 25. At-Risk Children Exiting IIS who entered LS1 within 48 months of their exit ...................................................................................................... 53 Notes: Outcomes Tables ...................................................................................... 54

Families and Children Referred and Served

Missouri Children's Division Intensive In-Home Services Annual Report for FY 2017 - 1 -


SITE COUNTY TOTALSITE 731 JACKSON 145 67.8% 63 29.4% 6 2.8% 214 * SITE TOTAL * 145 67.8% 63 29.4% 6 2.8% 214

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 253 71.9% 99 28.1% 0 0.0% 352 ST LOUIS CITY 165 77.5% 48 22.5% 0 0.0% 213 * SITE TOTAL * 418 74.0% 147 26.0% 0 0.0% 565

SITE 733 BOONE 34 61.8% 21 38.2% 0 0.0% 55 CALLAWAY 23 79.3% 6 20.7% 0 0.0% 29 COLE 17 73.9% 6 26.1% 0 0.0% 23 HOWARD 10 76.9% 3 23.1% 0 0.0% 13 RANDOLPH 23 41.1% 33 58.9% 0 0.0% 56 * SITE TOTAL * 107 60.8% 69 39.2% 0 0.0% 176

SITE 734 ANDREW 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 5 ATCHISON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 BUCHANAN 20 29.9% 46 68.7% 1 1.5% 67 CALDWELL 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 7 CLINTON 3 42.9% 4 57.1% 0 0.0% 7 DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 DE KALB 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 GENTRY 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 HOLT 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 LIVINGSTON 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 4 NODAWAY 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 WORTH 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 46 44.2% 57 54.8% 1 1.0% 104

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 CRAWFORD 8 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 DENT 3 30.0% 7 70.0% 0 0.0% 10 HOWELL 13 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 IRON 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 MARIES 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 4 OREGON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 PHELPS 24 77.4% 1 3.2% 6 19.4% 31 PULASKI 19 50.0% 10 26.3% 9 23.7% 38 REYNOLDS 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 SHANNON 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 TEXAS 5 38.5% 3 23.1% 5 38.5% 13 WAYNE 5 33.3% 10 66.7% 0 0.0% 15 * SITE TOTAL * 91 61.1% 36 24.2% 22 14.8% 149

SITE 736 BATES 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 0 0.0% 7 BENTON 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 CAMDEN 9 42.9% 12 57.1% 0 0.0% 21 DALLAS 5 55.6% 4 44.4% 0 0.0% 9 HENRY 5 26.3% 14 73.7% 0 0.0% 19 HICKORY 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4 LACLEDE 22 50.0% 21 47.7% 1 2.3% 44 MILLER 13 68.4% 6 31.6% 0 0.0% 19 MONITEAU 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 MORGAN 11 84.6% 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 13 POLK 7 70.0% 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 10 ST CLAIR 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 WEBSTER 19 43.2% 24 54.5% 1 2.3% 44

* SITE TOTAL * 100 50.5% 96 48.5% 2 1.0% 198

SITE 737 BARTON 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 CEDAR 8 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 DADE 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 JASPER 39 41.1% 56 58.9% 0 0.0% 95 MCDONALD 8 38.1% 13 61.9% 0 0.0% 21 NEWTON 16 42.1% 22 57.9% 0 0.0% 38 VERNON 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6

* SITE TOTAL * 82 46.9% 93 53.1% 0 0.0% 175

SITE 738 BARRY 12 57.1% 9 42.9% 0 0.0% 21 CHRISTIAN 16 57.1% 11 39.3% 1 3.6% 28 DOUGLAS 12 60.0% 8 40.0% 0 0.0% 20 LAWRENCE 7 38.9% 11 61.1% 0 0.0% 18 OZARK 1 20.0% 4 80.0% 0 0.0% 5 STONE 8 42.1% 11 57.9% 0 0.0% 19 TANEY 49 62.0% 30 38.0% 0 0.0% 79 WRIGHT 16 39.0% 25 61.0% 0 0.0% 41 * SITE TOTAL * 121 52.4% 109 47.2% 1 0.4% 231

Table 1. Families Referred for IIS During FY 2017

ACCEPTED NOT ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED FOR

SCREENING



SITE COUNTY TOTAL

Table 1. Families Referred for IIS During FY 2017

ACCEPTED NOT ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED FOR

SCREENING

SITE 739 GREENE 124 59.3% 85 40.7% 0 0.0% 209 * SITE TOTAL * 124 59.3% 85 40.7% 0 0.0% 209

SITE 740 CHARITON 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 GRUNDY 6 50.0% 6 50.0% 0 0.0% 12 HARRISON 7 58.3% 5 41.7% 0 0.0% 12 LINN 5 55.6% 3 33.3% 1 11.1% 9 MERCER 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 PUTNAM 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 SULLIVAN 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 3 * SITE TOTAL * 28 58.3% 19 39.6% 1 2.1% 48

SITE 831 LINCOLN 11 36.7% 19 63.3% 0 0.0% 30 MARION 14 63.6% 7 31.8% 1 4.5% 22 MONROE 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4 PIKE 8 42.1% 11 57.9% 0 0.0% 19 RALLS 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 ST CHARLES 47 54.7% 39 45.3% 0 0.0% 86 * SITE TOTAL * 84 50.6% 81 48.8% 1 0.6% 166

SITE 931 ADAIR 16 34.0% 31 66.0% 0 0.0% 47 CLARK 8 47.1% 9 52.9% 0 0.0% 17 KNOX 2 25.0% 6 75.0% 0 0.0% 8 LEWIS 6 46.2% 6 46.2% 1 7.7% 13 MACON 19 70.4% 8 29.6% 0 0.0% 27 SCHUYLER 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 6 SCOTLAND 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 SHELBY 8 66.7% 4 33.3% 0 0.0% 12 * SITE TOTAL * 64 48.1% 68 51.1% 1 0.8% 133

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 15 68.2% 7 31.8% 0 0.0% 22 FRANKLIN 28 96.6% 1 3.4% 0 0.0% 29 GASCONADE 8 88.9% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 9 JEFFERSON 74 74.7% 25 25.3% 0 0.0% 99 MONTGOMERY 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 10 OSAGE 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 WARREN 16 88.9% 2 11.1% 0 0.0% 18 * SITE TOTAL * 151 80.3% 37 19.7% 0 0.0% 188

SITE 933 CASS 26 86.7% 4 13.3% 0 0.0% 30 COOPER 10 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 JOHNSON 10 52.6% 9 47.4% 0 0.0% 19 LAFAYETTE 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 PETTIS 14 70.0% 6 30.0% 0 0.0% 20 SALINE 10 83.3% 2 16.7% 0 0.0% 12 * SITE TOTAL * 75 77.3% 22 22.7% 0 0.0% 97

SITE 934 CARROLL 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 CLAY 7 38.9% 10 55.6% 1 5.6% 18 PLATTE 3 21.4% 11 78.6% 0 0.0% 14 RAY 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 * SITE TOTAL * 21 47.7% 22 50.0% 1 2.3% 44

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 11 47.8% 12 52.2% 0 0.0% 23 CAPE GIRARDEAU 38 40.0% 54 56.8% 3 3.2% 95 MADISON 8 47.1% 8 47.1% 1 5.9% 17 MISSISSIPPI 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 4 PERRY 13 72.2% 5 27.8% 0 0.0% 18 ST FRANCOIS 44 73.3% 11 18.3% 5 8.3% 60 STE GENEVIEVE 5 62.5% 3 37.5% 0 0.0% 8 SCOTT 12 42.9% 15 53.6% 1 3.6% 28 WASHINGTON 16 61.5% 9 34.6% 1 3.8% 26 * SITE TOTAL * 148 53.0% 120 43.0% 11 3.9% 279

SITE 936 BUTLER 32 18.0% 146 82.0% 0 0.0% 178 DUNKLIN 15 34.9% 28 65.1% 0 0.0% 43 NEW MADRID 10 55.6% 8 44.4% 0 0.0% 18 PEMISCOT 15 50.0% 15 50.0% 0 0.0% 30 RIPLEY 13 19.4% 54 80.6% 0 0.0% 67 STODDARD 19 44.2% 24 55.8% 0 0.0% 43 * SITE TOTAL * 104 27.4% 275 72.6% 0 0.0% 379

STATE TOTAL 1,909 56.9% 1,399 41.7% 47 1.4% 3,355


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 2. Reasons At-Risk Children Not Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 MISSING TOTALSITE 731 JACKSON 10 3 0 13 32 2 3 5 1 0 0 3 9 6 0 27 114 * SITE TOTAL * 10 3 0 13 32 2 3 5 1 0 0 3 9 6 0 27 114

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 4 4 0 35 43 11 30 5 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 29 198 ST LOUIS CITY 3 0 4 15 36 10 10 3 0 0 0 15 0 21 0 7 124 * SITE TOTAL * 7 4 4 50 79 21 40 8 0 0 0 15 0 58 0 36 322

SITE 733 BOONE 0 14 0 4 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 12 42 CALLAWAY 0 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 COLE 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 15 HOWARD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 RANDOLPH 3 24 3 0 5 0 6 15 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 59 * SITE TOTAL * 3 56 8 5 5 0 8 26 1 0 0 6 0 5 0 12 135

SITE 734 ANDREW 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 ATCHISON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BUCHANAN 27 12 0 6 10 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 71 CALDWELL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 CLINTON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 DAVIESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DE KALB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 GENTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOLT 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 LIVINGSTON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 NODAWAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WORTH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * SITE TOTAL * 30 12 0 6 17 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 88

SITE 735 CARTER 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 CRAWFORD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 14 HOWELL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IRON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MARIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OREGON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHELPS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 PULASKI 0 7 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 13 REYNOLDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SHANNON 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 TEXAS 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 WAYNE 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 * SITE TOTAL * 10 8 1 1 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 48

SITE 736 BATES 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 BENTON 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 CAMDEN 0 9 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 16 DALLAS 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 HENRY 0 22 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 HICKORY 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 LACLEDE 1 14 4 1 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 MILLER 0 13 0 0 1 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 MONITEAU 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 MORGAN 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 POLK 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 ST CLAIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WEBSTER 10 19 0 0 4 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 41

* SITE TOTAL * 11 99 9 2 11 1 2 17 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 3 163

SITE 737 BARTON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CEDAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DADE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JASPER 0 2 0 6 0 2 6 44 3 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 67 MCDONALD 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 9 NEWTON 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 26 VERNON 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

* SITE TOTAL * 1 4 0 6 5 2 6 55 3 0 0 0 18 3 0 0 103

SITE 738 BARRY 0 9 5 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 CHRISTIAN 1 8 0 1 7 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 DOUGLAS 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 LAWRENCE 0 6 10 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 22 OZARK 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 STONE 0 9 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 18 TANEY 9 18 1 12 6 3 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 10 75 WRIGHT 5 27 0 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 51 * SITE TOTAL * 18 80 18 17 36 3 4 26 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 21 228

Reason Not Accepted Codes


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 2. Reasons At-Risk Children Not Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 MISSING TOTAL

Reason Not Accepted Codes

SITE 739 GREENE 2 11 1 2 22 0 6 34 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 12 93 * SITE TOTAL * 2 11 1 2 22 0 6 34 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 12 93

SITE 740 CHARITON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRUNDY 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 HARRISON 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 14 LINN 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 MERCER 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 PUTNAM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 SULLIVAN 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 * SITE TOTAL * 0 24 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 31

SITE 831 LINCOLN 3 8 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 23 MARION 3 9 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 MONROE 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 PIKE 3 8 4 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 RALLS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 ST CHARLES 0 12 0 0 5 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 36 * SITE TOTAL * 9 38 5 2 7 0 0 31 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 3 100

SITE 931 ADAIR 18 0 0 0 2 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 37 CLARK 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 KNOX 1 7 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 LEWIS 8 1 0 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 MACON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 SCHUYLER 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 SCOTLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 SHELBY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 8 * SITE TOTAL * 31 13 0 0 7 0 0 37 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 95

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 0 2 2 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 16 FRANKLIN 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 GASCONADE 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 JEFFERSON 2 5 0 11 27 0 1 3 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 5 58 MONTGOMERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 OSAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WARREN 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 * SITE TOTAL * 2 10 3 11 32 0 1 6 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 10 82

SITE 933 CASS 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 COOPER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JOHNSON 0 2 0 2 2 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 20 LAFAYETTE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 PETTIS 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 SALINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * SITE TOTAL * 1 2 0 8 2 0 3 23 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 45

SITE 934 CARROLL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLAY 1 3 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 14 PLATTE 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 RAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * SITE TOTAL * 4 4 0 0 5 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 24

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 0 5 0 4 1 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 34 CAPE GIRARDEAU 0 8 0 4 7 0 6 42 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 72 MADISON 0 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 18 MISSISSIPPI 0 2 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 PERRY 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 3 17 ST FRANCOIS 2 24 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 33 STE GENEVIEVE 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 SCOTT 0 5 0 0 1 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 16 36 WASHINGTON 0 16 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 19 * SITE TOTAL * 2 73 2 19 10 5 9 71 0 0 0 6 0 14 0 30 241

SITE 936 BUTLER 162 1 0 2 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 235 DUNKLIN 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 17 NEW MADRID 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 14 PEMISCOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 26 RIPLEY 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 85 STODDARD 20 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 30 * SITE TOTAL * 256 5 0 3 5 0 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 127 407

STATE TOTAL 397 446 51 145 279 34 82 365 7 6 0 38 33 116 0 320 2,319


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 3. Families and Children Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY

TOTAL

FAMILIES

ACCEPTED

TOTAL

CHILDREN

ACCEPTED

AVERAGE #

OF CHILDREN

PER FAMILY

AT-RISK

CHILDREN

ACCEPTED

AVERAGE #

OF AT-RISK

CHILDREN

PER FAMILY

SITE 731 JACKSON 145 413 2.85 343 2.37 * SITE TOTAL * 145 413 2.85 343 2.37

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 253 624 2.47 551 2.18 ST LOUIS CITY 164 422 2.57 380 2.32 * SITE TOTAL * 417 1,046 2.51 931 2.23

SITE 733 BOONE 34 97 2.85 82 2.41 CALLAWAY 23 55 2.39 42 1.83 COLE 18 44 2.44 38 2.11 HOWARD 10 18 1.80 16 1.60 RANDOLPH 23 62 2.70 53 2.30 * SITE TOTAL * 108 276 2.56 231 2.14

SITE 734 ANDREW 3 9 3.00 9 3.00 ATCHISON 2 3 1.50 3 1.50 BUCHANAN 20 42 2.10 34 1.70 CALDWELL 6 20 3.33 14 2.33 CLINTON 3 8 2.67 5 1.67 DAVIESS 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 DE KALB 3 5 1.67 5 1.67 GENTRY 2 6 3.00 6 3.00 HOLT 2 14 7.00 13 6.50 LIVINGSTON 2 2 1.00 2 1.00 NODAWAY 2 4 2.00 4 2.00 WORTH 1 3 3.00 3 3.00 * SITE TOTAL * 46 116 2.52 98 2.13

SITE 735 CARTER 8 21 2.63 18 2.25 CRAWFORD 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 DENT 3 7 2.33 7 2.33 HOWELL 12 29 2.42 21 1.75 IRON 2 6 3.00 4 2.00 MARIES 2 6 3.00 3 1.50 OREGON 2 10 5.00 7 3.50 PHELPS 24 57 2.38 47 1.96 PULASKI 19 43 2.26 34 1.79 REYNOLDS 4 15 3.75 8 2.00 SHANNON 4 6 1.50 5 1.25 TEXAS 5 22 4.40 16 3.20 WAYNE 5 13 2.60 12 2.40 * SITE TOTAL * 90 235 2.61 182 2.02

SITE 736 BATES 4 17 4.25 13 3.25 BENTON 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 CAMDEN 9 22 2.44 18 2.00 DALLAS 5 18 3.60 12 2.40 HENRY 5 10 2.00 9 1.80 HICKORY 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 LACLEDE 22 59 2.68 53 2.41 MILLER 13 28 2.15 27 2.08 MONITEAU 5 13 2.60 13 2.60 MORGAN 11 37 3.36 31 2.82 POLK 6 14 2.33 10 1.67 ST CLAIR 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 WEBSTER 16 49 3.06 46 2.88

* SITE TOTAL * 97 268 2.76 233 2.40

SITE 737 BARTON 5 11 2.20 7 1.40 CEDAR 8 16 2.00 14 1.75 DADE 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 JASPER 40 92 2.30 88 2.20 MCDONALD 8 14 1.75 10 1.25 NEWTON 14 34 2.43 23 1.64 VERNON 5 14 2.80 11 2.20

* SITE TOTAL * 81 182 2.25 154 1.90

SITE 738 BARRY 12 31 2.58 28 2.33 CHRISTIAN 14 29 2.07 24 1.71 DOUGLAS 12 31 2.58 30 2.50 LAWRENCE 7 16 2.29 13 1.86 OZARK 1 3 3.00 2 2.00 STONE 8 14 1.75 10 1.25 TANEY 49 108 2.20 94 1.92 WRIGHT 16 47 2.94 43 2.69 * SITE TOTAL * 119 279 2.34 244 2.05


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 3. Families and Children Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY

TOTAL

FAMILIES

ACCEPTED

TOTAL

CHILDREN

ACCEPTED

AVERAGE #

OF CHILDREN

PER FAMILY

AT-RISK

CHILDREN

ACCEPTED

AVERAGE #

OF AT-RISK

CHILDREN

PER FAMILY

SITE 739 GREENE 125 306 2.45 272 2.18 * SITE TOTAL * 125 306 2.45 272 2.18

SITE 740 CHARITON 5 13 2.60 9 1.80 GRUNDY 6 12 2.00 11 1.83 HARRISON 7 17 2.43 15 2.14 LINN 6 10 1.67 10 1.67 MERCER 2 6 3.00 5 2.50 PUTNAM 2 5 2.50 2 1.00 SULLIVAN 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 * SITE TOTAL * 29 64 2.21 53 1.83

SITE 831 LINCOLN 10 28 2.80 27 2.70 MARION 14 39 2.79 37 2.64 MONROE 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 PIKE 8 12 1.50 11 1.38 RALLS 4 9 2.25 8 2.00 ST CHARLES 48 120 2.50 101 2.10 * SITE TOTAL * 84 208 2.48 184 2.19

SITE 931 ADAIR 16 32 2.00 23 1.44 CLARK 8 19 2.38 14 1.75 KNOX 2 4 2.00 3 1.50 LEWIS 6 12 2.00 12 2.00 MACON 19 50 2.63 48 2.53 SCHUYLER 3 6 2.00 4 1.33 SCOTLAND 2 5 2.50 5 2.50 SHELBY 8 13 1.63 13 1.63 * SITE TOTAL * 64 141 2.20 122 1.91

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 16 35 2.19 27 1.69 FRANKLIN 28 67 2.39 52 1.86 GASCONADE 7 15 2.14 13 1.86 JEFFERSON 72 170 2.36 145 2.01 MONTGOMERY 9 24 2.67 19 2.11 OSAGE 2 3 1.50 3 1.50 WARREN 16 47 2.94 42 2.63 * SITE TOTAL * 150 361 2.41 301 2.01

SITE 933 CASS 26 52 2.00 46 1.77 COOPER 10 25 2.50 16 1.60 JOHNSON 10 20 2.00 18 1.80 LAFAYETTE 5 12 2.40 12 2.40 PETTIS 14 30 2.14 28 2.00 SALINE 10 23 2.30 21 2.10 * SITE TOTAL * 75 162 2.16 141 1.88

SITE 934 CARROLL 5 15 3.00 9 1.80 CLAY 7 31 4.43 16 2.29 PLATTE 3 9 3.00 5 1.67 RAY 6 16 2.67 16 2.67 * SITE TOTAL * 21 71 3.38 46 2.19

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 11 25 2.27 17 1.55 CAPE GIRARDEAU 36 95 2.64 62 1.72 MADISON 8 17 2.13 15 1.88 MISSISSIPPI 1 4 4.00 4 4.00 PERRY 13 41 3.15 28 2.15 ST FRANCOIS 43 106 2.47 85 1.98 STE GENEVIEVE 5 9 1.80 5 1.00 SCOTT 12 23 1.92 20 1.67 WASHINGTON 16 35 2.19 30 1.88 * SITE TOTAL * 145 355 2.45 266 1.83

SITE 936 BUTLER 32 82 2.56 70 2.19 DUNKLIN 17 46 2.71 37 2.18 NEW MADRID 9 16 1.78 16 1.78 PEMISCOT 15 49 3.27 40 2.67 RIPLEY 13 41 3.15 32 2.46 STODDARD 18 40 2.22 36 2.00 * SITE TOTAL * 104 274 2.63 231 2.22

STATE TOTAL 1,900 4,757 2.50 4,032 2.12


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 4. Families Accepted by Referral Source Code During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY

FAMILY/

FRIEND SELF

IN-

PATIENT

DMH

CPS

OUT-

PATIENT

DMH

CPS

DSS

CD

DSS

DYS

PRIVATE

MENTAL

HEALTH

SCHOOL

SYSTEM

LAW

EN-

FORCE-

MENT COURT

DSS

FSD

JUVENILE

OFFICER OTHER MISSING TOTALSITE 731 JACKSON 0 0 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 145 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 145

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 0 34 0 0 189 0 18 10 0 1 0 1 0 0 253 ST LOUIS CITY 0 10 0 0 132 0 21 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 164 * SITE TOTAL * 0 44 0 0 321 0 39 10 0 1 0 2 0 0 417

SITE 733 BOONE 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 CALLAWAY 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 COLE 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 HOWARD 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 RANDOLPH 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108

SITE 734 ANDREW 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 ATCHISON 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 BUCHANAN 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 20 CALDWELL 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 CLINTON 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 DAVIESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DE KALB 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 GENTRY 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 HOLT 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 LIVINGSTON 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 NODAWAY 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 WORTH 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 46

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRAWFORD 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 DENT 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 HOWELL 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 IRON 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 MARIES 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 OREGON 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 PHELPS 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 PULASKI 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 19 REYNOLDS 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 SHANNON 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 TEXAS 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 WAYNE 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 90

SITE 736 BATES 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 BENTON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAMDEN 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 DALLAS 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 HENRY 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 HICKORY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LACLEDE 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 MILLER 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 MONITEAU 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 MORGAN 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 POLK 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 ST CLAIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 WEBSTER 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16

* SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 97

SITE 737 BARTON 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 CEDAR 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 DADE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 JASPER 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 MCDONALD 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 NEWTON 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14 VERNON 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

* SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 81

SITE 738 BARRY 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 CHRISTIAN 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 DOUGLAS 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 LAWRENCE 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 OZARK 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 STONE 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 TANEY 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 49 WRIGHT 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 119


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 4. Families Accepted by Referral Source Code During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY

FAMILY/

FRIEND SELF

IN-

PATIENT

DMH

CPS

OUT-

PATIENT

DMH

CPS

DSS

CD

DSS

DYS

PRIVATE

MENTAL

HEALTH

SCHOOL

SYSTEM

LAW

EN-

FORCE-

MENT COURT

DSS

FSD

JUVENILE

OFFICER OTHER MISSING TOTALSITE 739 GREENE 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125

SITE 740 CHARITON 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 GRUNDY 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 HARRISON 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 LINN 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 MERCER 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 PUTNAM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 SULLIVAN 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29

SITE 831 LINCOLN 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 MARION 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 MONROE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PIKE 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 RALLS 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 ST CHARLES 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84

SITE 931 ADAIR 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 CLARK 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 KNOX 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 LEWIS 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 MACON 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 SCHUYLER 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 SCOTLAND 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 SHELBY 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 64

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 16 FRANKLIN 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 GASCONADE 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 JEFFERSON 0 2 0 0 69 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 MONTGOMERY 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 OSAGE 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 WARREN 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 16 * SITE TOTAL * 0 3 0 0 144 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 150

SITE 933 CASS 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 COOPER 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 JOHNSON 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 LAFAYETTE 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 PETTIS 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 14 SALINE 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 75

SITE 934 CARROLL 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 CLAY 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 PLATTE 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 RAY 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 CAPE GIRARDEAU 0 0 0 0 29 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 MADISON 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 8 MISSISSIPPI 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 PERRY 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 13 ST FRANCOIS 0 0 0 0 38 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 43 STE GENEVIEVE 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 SCOTT 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 WASHINGTON 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 16 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 1 119 0 12 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 145

SITE 936 BUTLER 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 DUNKLIN 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 NEW MADRID 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 PEMISCOT 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 RIPLEY 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 STODDARD 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104

STATE TOTAL 0 47 0 1 1,755 0 51 11 0 6 0 29 0 0 1,900



Table 5. Families and Children Accepted by Month During FY 2017

FAMILIES AT-RISK CHILDREN NOT AT-RISK

CHILDREN TOTAL CHILDREN

July 2016 134 265 42 307

August 2016 171 388 45 433

September 2016 153 331 65 396

October 2016 155 296 70 366

November 2016 154 332 62 394

December 2016 163 375 64 439

January 2017 171 373 58 431

February 2017 145 310 46 356

March 2017 203 441 93 534

April 2017 160 338 52 390

May 2017 136 278 53 331

June 2017 155 305 75 380

State Total 1,900 4,032 725 4,757

Table 6. Reasons At-Risk Children Not Accepted During FY 2017

No Opening in IIS-Child at Home 446 19.2%

No Immediate Likelihood of Placement 397 17.1%

Child`s Safety Cannot be Assured 365 15.7%

Missing 320 13.8%

Caretaker Unwilling to Participate 279 12.0%

Primary Caretaker Unavailable 145 6.3%

Caretaker Unable to Participate 116 5.0%

Unable to Contact Family 82 3.5%

No Opening in IIS-Child will be Placed 51 2.2%

Referral Source Did Not Follow Through 38 1.6%

Child Unwilling to Participate 34 1.5%

Court Not in Agreement 33 1.4%

Child is Physically Assaultive 7 0.3%

Therapist`s Safety Cannot be Assured 6 0.3%

State Total 2,319 100.0%



Table 7. Family Contacts Prior to IIS Intervention During FY 2017

Dept of Social Services Children's Division 1,755 78.1%

Adult Law Enforcement 168 7.5%

Juvenile Court 124 5.5%

Adult Criminal Court 92 4.1%

Dept of Mental Health 55 2.4%

Dept of Social Services Division of Youth Services 52 2.3%

2,246 100.0%

Table 8. Duration of IIS Intervention by Site for Families Accepted During FY 2017

Total Weeks of Intervention Average Weeks of

Intervention Site

Total <1 Wk 1 Wk

2 Wks

3 Wks

4 Wks

5 Wks

6 Wks

7 Wks

8+ Wks

Site 731 5 7 8 11 24 13 40 7 30 7.34 145

Site 732 10 18 22 25 21 29 213 25 54 5.49 417

Site 733 6 4 4 7 10 9 51 9 8 5.10 108

Site 734 3 5 6 3 3 4 21 1 0 4.15 46

Site 735 4 8 5 5 9 18 26 4 11 5.67 90

Site 736 2 1 10 5 17 17 26 5 14 7.16 97

Site 737 0 3 5 6 4 9 43 9 2 6.54 81

Site 738 0 4 7 4 4 26 52 9 13 5.94 119

Site 739 4 16 8 9 3 8 70 4 3 4.82 125

Site 740 0 1 1 1 3 6 14 1 2 5.34 29

Site 831 4 7 6 4 4 9 41 4 5 5.64 84

Site 931 4 3 6 1 5 6 29 7 3 5.00 64

Site 932 8 6 5 8 6 9 68 13 27 7.39 150

Site 933 2 2 6 7 9 15 29 4 1 4.80 75

Site 934 0 2 2 1 1 6 9 0 0 4.62 21

Site 935 4 3 6 4 27 30 6 1 64 15.49 145

Site 936 4 5 8 2 3 3 51 16 12 6.26 104

State Total 60 95 115 103 153 217 789 119 249 6.61 1,900


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 9. Families Exiting Intensive In-Home Services by Exit Status During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY

FAMILIES

EXITINGSITE 731 JACKSON 100 83.3% 17 14.2% 3 2.5% 120 * SITE TOTAL * 100 83.3% 17 14.2% 3 2.5% 120

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 220 86.6% 32 12.6% 2 0.8% 254 ST LOUIS CITY 138 86.3% 19 11.9% 3 1.9% 160 * SITE TOTAL * 358 86.5% 51 12.3% 5 1.2% 414

SITE 733 BOONE 18 51.4% 16 45.7% 1 2.9% 35 CALLAWAY 16 72.7% 6 27.3% 0 0.0% 22 COLE 14 77.8% 3 16.7% 1 5.6% 18 HOWARD 9 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 RANDOLPH 19 76.0% 5 20.0% 1 4.0% 25 * SITE TOTAL * 76 69.7% 30 27.5% 3 2.8% 109

SITE 734 ANDREW 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 ATCHISON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 BUCHANAN 14 73.7% 5 26.3% 0 0.0% 19 CALDWELL 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 5 CLINTON 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 DE KALB 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 GENTRY 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 2 HOLT 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 LIVINGSTON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 NODAWAY 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 WORTH 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 32 74.4% 10 23.3% 1 2.3% 43

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CRAWFORD 5 71.4% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 7 DENT 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 HOWELL 6 60.0% 4 40.0% 0 0.0% 10 IRON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 MARIES 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 OREGON 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 PHELPS 17 73.9% 5 21.7% 1 4.3% 23 PULASKI 16 94.1% 1 5.9% 0 0.0% 17 REYNOLDS 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 SHANNON 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 4 TEXAS 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 WAYNE 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 * SITE TOTAL * 63 75.9% 19 22.9% 1 1.2% 83

SITE 736 BATES 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 BENTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CAMDEN 4 57.1% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 7 DALLAS 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 HENRY 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 HICKORY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 LACLEDE 17 85.0% 3 15.0% 0 0.0% 20 MILLER 9 81.8% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 11 MONITEAU 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 MORGAN 6 66.7% 3 33.3% 0 0.0% 9 POLK 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 6 ST CLAIR 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 WEBSTER 14 73.7% 5 26.3% 0 0.0% 19

* SITE TOTAL * 70 77.8% 19 21.1% 1 1.1% 90

SITE 737 BARTON 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 CEDAR 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 DADE 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 JASPER 32 74.4% 11 25.6% 0 0.0% 43 MCDONALD 4 50.0% 4 50.0% 0 0.0% 8 NEWTON 13 81.3% 3 18.8% 0 0.0% 16 VERNON 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 4

* SITE TOTAL * 65 77.4% 18 21.4% 1 1.2% 84

SITE 738 BARRY 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 6 CHRISTIAN 11 91.7% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 12 DOUGLAS 13 92.9% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 14 LAWRENCE 5 62.5% 3 37.5% 0 0.0% 8 OZARK 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 STONE 6 66.7% 3 33.3% 0 0.0% 9 TANEY 40 85.1% 6 12.8% 1 2.1% 47 WRIGHT 13 92.9% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 14 * SITE TOTAL * 92 82.9% 18 16.2% 1 0.9% 111

FAMILY INTACT

FAMILY NOT

INTACT OTHER


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 9. Families Exiting Intensive In-Home Services by Exit Status During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY

FAMILIES

EXITINGFAMILY INTACT

FAMILY NOT

INTACT OTHERSITE 739 GREENE 98 74.8% 29 22.1% 4 3.1% 131 * SITE TOTAL * 98 74.8% 29 22.1% 4 3.1% 131

SITE 740 CHARITON 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 GRUNDY 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 HARRISON 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 LINN 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 MERCER 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 PUTNAM 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 SULLIVAN 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 26 92.9% 2 7.1% 0 0.0% 28

SITE 831 LINCOLN 7 58.3% 4 33.3% 1 8.3% 12 MARION 8 66.7% 4 33.3% 0 0.0% 12 MONROE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 PIKE 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 7 RALLS 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 4 ST CHARLES 42 85.7% 7 14.3% 0 0.0% 49 * SITE TOTAL * 65 77.4% 18 21.4% 1 1.2% 84

SITE 931 ADAIR 14 82.4% 3 17.6% 0 0.0% 17 CLARK 6 75.0% 2 25.0% 0 0.0% 8 KNOX 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 LEWIS 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 7 MACON 10 71.4% 2 14.3% 2 14.3% 14 SCHUYLER 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 SCOTLAND 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 SHELBY 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 10 * SITE TOTAL * 51 82.3% 9 14.5% 2 3.2% 62

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 11 78.6% 2 14.3% 1 7.1% 14 FRANKLIN 23 92.0% 2 8.0% 0 0.0% 25 GASCONADE 7 77.8% 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 9 JEFFERSON 49 80.3% 12 19.7% 0 0.0% 61 MONTGOMERY 9 90.0% 0 0.0% 1 10.0% 10 OSAGE 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 WARREN 10 58.8% 6 35.3% 1 5.9% 17 * SITE TOTAL * 110 80.3% 24 17.5% 3 2.2% 137

SITE 933 CASS 13 54.2% 9 37.5% 2 8.3% 24 COOPER 10 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 JOHNSON 7 70.0% 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 10 LAFAYETTE 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 PETTIS 8 66.7% 4 33.3% 0 0.0% 12 SALINE 9 81.8% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 11 * SITE TOTAL * 52 72.2% 18 25.0% 2 2.8% 72

SITE 934 CARROLL 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 CLAY 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 PLATTE 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 RAY 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 * SITE TOTAL * 20 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 20

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 12 92.3% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 13 CAPE GIRARDEAU 27 87.1% 4 12.9% 0 0.0% 31 MADISON 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 MISSISSIPPI 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 PERRY 7 77.8% 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 9 ST FRANCOIS 7 77.8% 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 9 STE GENEVIEVE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 SCOTT 8 72.7% 2 18.2% 1 9.1% 11 WASHINGTON 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 64 84.2% 11 14.5% 1 1.3% 76

SITE 936 BUTLER 23 69.7% 9 27.3% 1 3.0% 33 DUNKLIN 11 78.6% 3 21.4% 0 0.0% 14 NEW MADRID 6 60.0% 4 40.0% 0 0.0% 10 PEMISCOT 9 64.3% 5 35.7% 0 0.0% 14 RIPLEY 11 84.6% 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 13 STODDARD 13 81.3% 3 18.8% 0 0.0% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 73 73.0% 26 26.0% 1 1.0% 100

STATE TOTAL 1,415 80.2% 319 18.1% 30 1.7% 1,764



Notes: IIS Families and Children Referred and Served Tables Tables are based upon families accepted or referred to Intensive In-Home Services during the fiscal year July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2017. Table 1 Families Referred for IIS During FY 2017

Includes families referred for Intensive In-Home Services with referral dates during the fiscal year by the status of the referrals at the time of this report. The decision date to accept or not accept a referral may fall outside of the fiscal year; especially when referrals are received towards the end of the fiscal year. For example, a referral made on June 30th may not be processed until the next fiscal year beginning on July 1st. Therefore, the total number of accepted family referrals may not equal the total number of accepted families with IIS open dates during the fiscal year as found in Table 3.

Families are unduplicated on Table 1. If a family has more than one referral during the fiscal year, then a referral that was accepted is selected. If there are no accepted referrals for the family, then a referral that was not accepted is selected.

Table 2 Reasons At-Risk Children Not Accepted During FY 2017

Reasons Not Accepted Codes – o 10 No Immediate Likelihood of Placement o 11 No Opening in IIS - Child At Home o 12 No Opening in IIS - Child will be Placed o 13 Primary Caretaker Unavailable o 14 Caretaker Unwilling to Participate o 15 Child Unwilling to Participate o 16 Unable to Contact Family o 17 Child`s Safety Cannot be Assured o 18 Child is Physically Assaultive o 19 Therapist`s Safety Cannot be Assured o 20 Child Does Not Meet Age Requirement o 21 Referral Source Did Not Follow Through o 22 Court Not in Agreement o 23 Caretaker Unable to Participate o 24 Referral was Done in Error

Table 3 Families and Children Accepted into Intensive In-Home Services During FY 2017

Each family is only counted once during the fiscal year. If a family is involved in multiple IIS interventions, the earliest intervention for the fiscal year was used.

Total Families Accepted is an unduplicated count of families who have an IIS open date during FY 2017.

Total Children Accepted includes the count of At-Risk and not At-Risk children from the accepted families.

Table 7 Family Contacts Prior to IIS Intervention for Families Accepted into IIS during FY 2017

Each family can have up to six prior contacts listed.



Notes: IIS Families and Children Referred and Served Tables (continued)

Table 9 Families Exiting Intensive In-Home Services by Exit Status During FY 2017

Family Intact includes Family Intact (10)

Family Not Intact includes: o Child Ran Away (12) o Child Moved Out of Home (Not Placed) (13) o Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Not Court Ordered) (14) o Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Court Ordered) (15) o In Foster Home or Group Home (16) o In Residential (17) o With Division of Youth Services (18) o In Juvenile Justice (19) o In In-Patient Psychiatric (20)

Other includes missing data and the following: o Can`t Locate Family (11) o Information Not Available (21)



Heads of Household Served


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 10. Head of Household Age for Families Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY TOTALSITE 731 JACKSON 9 6.2% 57 39.3% 51 35.2% 17 11.7% 5 3.4% 6 4.1% 0 0.0% 145 * SITE TOTAL * 9 6.2% 57 39.3% 51 35.2% 17 11.7% 5 3.4% 6 4.1% 0 0.0% 145

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 5 2.0% 52 20.6% 110 43.5% 47 18.6% 27 10.7% 9 3.6% 3 1.2% 253 ST LOUIS CITY 2 1.2% 61 37.2% 64 39.0% 25 15.2% 8 4.9% 2 1.2% 2 1.2% 164 * SITE TOTAL * 7 1.7% 113 27.1% 174 41.7% 72 17.3% 35 8.4% 11 2.6% 5 1.2% 417

SITE 733 BOONE 1 2.9% 10 29.4% 12 35.3% 7 20.6% 1 2.9% 3 8.8% 0 0.0% 34 CALLAWAY 0 0.0% 5 21.7% 9 39.1% 7 30.4% 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23 COLE 1 5.6% 9 50.0% 7 38.9% 0 0.0% 1 5.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18 HOWARD 1 10.0% 2 20.0% 3 30.0% 2 20.0% 1 10.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 10 RANDOLPH 0 0.0% 10 43.5% 7 30.4% 6 26.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23 * SITE TOTAL * 3 2.8% 36 33.3% 38 35.2% 22 20.4% 5 4.6% 4 3.7% 0 0.0% 108

SITE 734 ANDREW 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 ATCHISON 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 BUCHANAN 1 5.0% 8 40.0% 9 45.0% 1 5.0% 1 5.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 20 CALDWELL 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 CLINTON 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 DE KALB 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 GENTRY 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 HOLT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 LIVINGSTON 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 NODAWAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 WORTH 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 2 4.3% 19 41.3% 16 34.8% 4 8.7% 3 6.5% 2 4.3% 0 0.0% 46

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CRAWFORD 0 0.0% 3 37.5% 4 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 DENT 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 HOWELL 1 8.3% 4 33.3% 4 33.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 12 IRON 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 MARIES 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 OREGON 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 PHELPS 0 0.0% 15 62.5% 6 25.0% 2 8.3% 0 0.0% 1 4.2% 0 0.0% 24 PULASKI 0 0.0% 6 31.6% 7 36.8% 5 26.3% 1 5.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 19 REYNOLDS 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 SHANNON 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 TEXAS 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 WAYNE 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 * SITE TOTAL * 1 1.1% 43 47.8% 29 32.2% 10 11.1% 4 4.4% 3 3.3% 0 0.0% 90

SITE 736 BATES 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 BENTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CAMDEN 0 0.0% 4 44.4% 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 9 DALLAS 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 4 80.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 HENRY 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 HICKORY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 LACLEDE 3 13.6% 11 50.0% 4 18.2% 2 9.1% 0 0.0% 2 9.1% 0 0.0% 22 MILLER 0 0.0% 4 30.8% 7 53.8% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 13 MONITEAU 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 MORGAN 0 0.0% 2 18.2% 7 63.6% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 POLK 0 0.0% 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 ST CLAIR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 WEBSTER 1 6.3% 7 43.8% 5 31.3% 0 0.0% 2 12.5% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 16

* SITE TOTAL * 4 4.1% 40 41.2% 35 36.1% 7 7.2% 5 5.2% 6 6.2% 0 0.0% 97

SITE 737 BARTON 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 CEDAR 1 12.5% 2 25.0% 4 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 8 DADE 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 JASPER 0 0.0% 13 32.5% 16 40.0% 4 10.0% 6 15.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.5% 40 MCDONALD 0 0.0% 5 62.5% 2 25.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 NEWTON 0 0.0% 3 21.4% 6 42.9% 4 28.6% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 VERNON 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5

* SITE TOTAL * 1 1.2% 28 34.6% 32 39.5% 11 13.6% 7 8.6% 1 1.2% 1 1.2% 81

SITE 738 BARRY 0 0.0% 6 50.0% 5 41.7% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 CHRISTIAN 0 0.0% 5 35.7% 7 50.0% 2 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 DOUGLAS 0 0.0% 5 41.7% 1 8.3% 4 33.3% 2 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 LAWRENCE 0 0.0% 3 42.9% 4 57.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 OZARK 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 STONE 0 0.0% 3 37.5% 3 37.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 8 TANEY 1 2.0% 17 34.7% 18 36.7% 7 14.3% 4 8.2% 2 4.1% 0 0.0% 49 WRIGHT 0 0.0% 6 37.5% 5 31.3% 3 18.8% 2 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 1 0.8% 45 37.8% 44 37.0% 18 15.1% 8 6.7% 3 2.5% 0 0.0% 119

>= 70<= 19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 10. Head of Household Age for Families Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY TOTAL>= 70<= 19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69SITE 739 GREENE 2 1.6% 36 28.8% 58 46.4% 17 13.6% 5 4.0% 4 3.2% 3 2.4% 125 * SITE TOTAL * 2 1.6% 36 28.8% 58 46.4% 17 13.6% 5 4.0% 4 3.2% 3 2.4% 125

SITE 740 CHARITON 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 GRUNDY 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 HARRISON 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 4 57.1% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 LINN 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 MERCER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 PUTNAM 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 SULLIVAN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 1 3.4% 7 24.1% 15 51.7% 5 17.2% 1 3.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 29

SITE 831 LINCOLN 0 0.0% 3 30.0% 5 50.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 MARION 0 0.0% 5 35.7% 7 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 MONROE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 PIKE 0 0.0% 3 37.5% 3 37.5% 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 RALLS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 ST CHARLES 0 0.0% 6 12.5% 26 54.2% 10 20.8% 3 6.3% 2 4.2% 1 2.1% 48 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 17 20.2% 44 52.4% 13 15.5% 7 8.3% 2 2.4% 1 1.2% 84

SITE 931 ADAIR 0 0.0% 3 18.8% 6 37.5% 5 31.3% 1 6.3% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 16 CLARK 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 3 37.5% 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 2 25.0% 0 0.0% 8 KNOX 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 LEWIS 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 MACON 0 0.0% 6 31.6% 8 42.1% 4 21.1% 1 5.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 19 SCHUYLER 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 SCOTLAND 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 SHELBY 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 2 25.0% 4 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 8 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 14 21.9% 25 39.1% 17 26.6% 3 4.7% 5 7.8% 0 0.0% 64

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 1 6.3% 5 31.3% 7 43.8% 0 0.0% 3 18.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 FRANKLIN 1 3.6% 7 25.0% 16 57.1% 3 10.7% 1 3.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 28 GASCONADE 0 0.0% 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 JEFFERSON 1 1.4% 12 16.7% 42 58.3% 15 20.8% 1 1.4% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% 72 MONTGOMERY 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 5 55.6% 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 OSAGE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 WARREN 1 6.3% 3 18.8% 6 37.5% 5 31.3% 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 4 2.7% 32 21.3% 81 54.0% 24 16.0% 7 4.7% 2 1.3% 0 0.0% 150

SITE 933 CASS 0 0.0% 8 30.8% 10 38.5% 7 26.9% 1 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 26 COOPER 0 0.0% 2 20.0% 8 80.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 JOHNSON 1 10.0% 3 30.0% 4 40.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 10 LAFAYETTE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 PETTIS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 57.1% 4 28.6% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 14 SALINE 0 0.0% 2 20.0% 3 30.0% 4 40.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 * SITE TOTAL * 1 1.3% 15 20.0% 36 48.0% 18 24.0% 3 4.0% 1 1.3% 1 1.3% 75

SITE 934 CARROLL 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 CLAY 0 0.0% 3 42.9% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 7 PLATTE 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 RAY 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 * SITE TOTAL * 1 4.8% 5 23.8% 8 38.1% 5 23.8% 1 4.8% 1 4.8% 0 0.0% 21

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 1 9.1% 2 18.2% 5 45.5% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 11 CAPE GIRARDEAU 0 0.0% 11 30.6% 16 44.4% 5 13.9% 3 8.3% 1 2.8% 0 0.0% 36 MADISON 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 2 25.0% 2 25.0% 3 37.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 MISSISSIPPI 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 PERRY 0 0.0% 4 30.8% 5 38.5% 4 30.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 ST FRANCOIS 0 0.0% 10 23.3% 21 48.8% 6 14.0% 4 9.3% 2 4.7% 0 0.0% 43 STE GENEVIEVE 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 SCOTT 1 8.3% 6 50.0% 2 16.7% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 12 WASHINGTON 1 6.3% 4 25.0% 8 50.0% 2 12.5% 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 3 2.1% 40 27.6% 60 41.4% 24 16.6% 12 8.3% 6 4.1% 0 0.0% 145

SITE 936 BUTLER 3 9.4% 13 40.6% 10 31.3% 2 6.3% 2 6.3% 2 6.3% 0 0.0% 32 DUNKLIN 0 0.0% 2 11.8% 9 52.9% 2 11.8% 4 23.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 17 NEW MADRID 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 3 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 PEMISCOT 0 0.0% 2 13.3% 7 46.7% 4 26.7% 2 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 15 RIPLEY 1 7.7% 3 23.1% 7 53.8% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 STODDARD 1 5.6% 5 27.8% 5 27.8% 4 22.2% 2 11.1% 1 5.6% 0 0.0% 18 * SITE TOTAL * 5 4.8% 28 26.9% 41 39.4% 13 12.5% 14 13.5% 3 2.9% 0 0.0% 104

STATE TOTAL 45 2.4% 575 30.3% 787 41.4% 297 15.6% 125 6.6% 60 3.2% 11 0.6% 1,900


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 11. Head of Household Gender for Families Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY TOTALSITE 731 JACKSON 128 88.3% 17 11.7% 145 * SITE TOTAL * 128 88.3% 17 11.7% 145

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 219 86.6% 34 13.4% 253 ST LOUIS CITY 153 93.3% 11 6.7% 164 * SITE TOTAL * 372 89.2% 45 10.8% 417

SITE 733 BOONE 27 79.4% 7 20.6% 34 CALLAWAY 17 73.9% 6 26.1% 23 COLE 15 83.3% 3 16.7% 18 HOWARD 6 60.0% 4 40.0% 10 RANDOLPH 18 78.3% 5 21.7% 23 * SITE TOTAL * 83 76.9% 25 23.1% 108

SITE 734 ANDREW 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 ATCHISON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 BUCHANAN 16 80.0% 4 20.0% 20 CALDWELL 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 6 CLINTON 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 DE KALB 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 GENTRY 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 HOLT 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 LIVINGSTON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 NODAWAY 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 WORTH 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 39 84.8% 7 15.2% 46

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CRAWFORD 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 8 DENT 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 HOWELL 8 66.7% 4 33.3% 12 IRON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 MARIES 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 2 OREGON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 PHELPS 21 87.5% 3 12.5% 24 PULASKI 17 89.5% 2 10.5% 19 REYNOLDS 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4 SHANNON 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4 TEXAS 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 WAYNE 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 * SITE TOTAL * 77 85.6% 13 14.4% 90

SITE 736 BATES 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 BENTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CAMDEN 8 88.9% 1 11.1% 9 DALLAS 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 HENRY 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 HICKORY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 LACLEDE 18 81.8% 4 18.2% 22 MILLER 11 84.6% 2 15.4% 13 MONITEAU 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 MORGAN 9 81.8% 2 18.2% 11 POLK 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 6 ST CLAIR 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 WEBSTER 15 93.8% 1 6.3% 16

* SITE TOTAL * 85 87.6% 12 12.4% 97

SITE 737 BARTON 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 CEDAR 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 8 DADE 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 JASPER 30 75.0% 10 25.0% 40 MCDONALD 8 100.0% 0 0.0% 8 NEWTON 12 85.7% 2 14.3% 14 VERNON 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 5

* SITE TOTAL * 66 81.5% 15 18.5% 81

SITE 738 BARRY 10 83.3% 2 16.7% 12 CHRISTIAN 12 85.7% 2 14.3% 14 DOUGLAS 10 83.3% 2 16.7% 12 LAWRENCE 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 7 OZARK 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 STONE 6 75.0% 2 25.0% 8 TANEY 43 87.8% 6 12.2% 49 WRIGHT 14 87.5% 2 12.5% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 103 86.6% 16 13.4% 119

FEMALE MALE


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 11. Head of Household Gender for Families Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY TOTALFEMALE MALESITE 739 GREENE 109 87.2% 16 12.8% 125 * SITE TOTAL * 109 87.2% 16 12.8% 125

SITE 740 CHARITON 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 GRUNDY 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 6 HARRISON 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 LINN 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 6 MERCER 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 2 PUTNAM 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 SULLIVAN 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 23 79.3% 6 20.7% 29

SITE 831 LINCOLN 7 70.0% 3 30.0% 10 MARION 13 92.9% 1 7.1% 14 MONROE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 PIKE 6 75.0% 2 25.0% 8 RALLS 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4 ST CHARLES 38 79.2% 10 20.8% 48 * SITE TOTAL * 68 81.0% 16 19.0% 84

SITE 931 ADAIR 13 81.3% 3 18.8% 16 CLARK 6 75.0% 2 25.0% 8 KNOX 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 LEWIS 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 6 MACON 16 84.2% 3 15.8% 19 SCHUYLER 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 SCOTLAND 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 SHELBY 8 100.0% 0 0.0% 8 * SITE TOTAL * 51 79.7% 13 20.3% 64

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 12 75.0% 4 25.0% 16 FRANKLIN 24 85.7% 4 14.3% 28 GASCONADE 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 JEFFERSON 56 77.8% 16 22.2% 72 MONTGOMERY 7 77.8% 2 22.2% 9 OSAGE 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 WARREN 16 100.0% 0 0.0% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 123 82.0% 27 18.0% 150

SITE 933 CASS 21 80.8% 5 19.2% 26 COOPER 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 10 JOHNSON 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 10 LAFAYETTE 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 PETTIS 9 64.3% 5 35.7% 14 SALINE 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 10 * SITE TOTAL * 61 81.3% 14 18.7% 75

SITE 934 CARROLL 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 CLAY 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 7 PLATTE 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 RAY 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 6 * SITE TOTAL * 17 81.0% 4 19.0% 21

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 9 81.8% 2 18.2% 11 CAPE GIRARDEAU 29 80.6% 7 19.4% 36 MADISON 8 100.0% 0 0.0% 8 MISSISSIPPI 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 PERRY 13 100.0% 0 0.0% 13 ST FRANCOIS 33 76.7% 10 23.3% 43 STE GENEVIEVE 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 SCOTT 9 75.0% 3 25.0% 12 WASHINGTON 14 87.5% 2 12.5% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 121 83.4% 24 16.6% 145

SITE 936 BUTLER 31 96.9% 1 3.1% 32 DUNKLIN 13 76.5% 4 23.5% 17 NEW MADRID 9 100.0% 0 0.0% 9 PEMISCOT 13 86.7% 2 13.3% 15 RIPLEY 12 92.3% 1 7.7% 13 STODDARD 16 88.9% 2 11.1% 18 * SITE TOTAL * 94 90.4% 10 9.6% 104

STATE TOTAL 1,620 85.3% 280 14.7% 1,900


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 12. Head of Household Race for Families Accepted During FY 2017







* SITE TOTAL * 89 91.8% 3 3.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 5.2% 97


* SITE TOTAL * 76 93.8% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 3 3.7% 81


UNABLE TO

DETERMINEWHITE

AFRICAN

AMERICAN

NATIVE

AMERICAN ASIAN

NATIVE

HAWAIIAN/PACIFIC

ISLANDER MULTI-RACIAL


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 12. Head of Household Race for Families Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY TOTAL

UNABLE TO

DETERMINEWHITE

AFRICAN

AMERICAN

NATIVE

AMERICAN ASIAN

NATIVE

HAWAIIAN/PACIFIC

ISLANDER MULTI-RACIALSITE 739 GREENE 115 92.0% 6 4.8% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 2 1.6% 125 * SITE TOTAL * 115 92.0% 6 4.8% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 2 1.6% 125









STATE TOTAL 1,403 73.8% 418 22.0% 3 0.2% 5 0.3% 1 0.1% 4 0.2% 66 3.5% 1,900


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 13. Head of Household Employment For Families Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTYSITE 731 JACKSON 8 5.5% 9 6.2% 6 4.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% * SITE TOTAL * 8 5.5% 9 6.2% 6 4.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.7%

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 14 5.5% 36 14.2% 7 2.8% 0 0.0% 4 1.6% ST LOUIS CITY 19 11.6% 12 7.3% 7 4.3% 0 0.0% 3 1.8% * SITE TOTAL * 33 7.9% 48 11.5% 14 3.4% 0 0.0% 7 1.7%

SITE 733 BOONE 10 29.4% 1 2.9% 1 2.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CALLAWAY 3 13.0% 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% COLE 2 11.1% 1 5.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.6% HOWARD 1 10.0% 3 30.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% RANDOLPH 6 26.1% 3 13.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 22 20.4% 10 9.3% 2 1.9% 0 0.0% 1 0.9%

SITE 734 ANDREW 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% ATCHISON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% BUCHANAN 4 20.0% 2 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.0% CALDWELL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% CLINTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DE KALB 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% GENTRY 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% HOLT 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% LIVINGSTON 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% NODAWAY 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% WORTH 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 9 19.6% 2 4.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 6.5%

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CRAWFORD 2 25.0% 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DENT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% HOWELL 4 33.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% IRON 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MARIES 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% OREGON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% PHELPS 3 12.5% 4 16.7% 1 4.2% 0 0.0% 1 4.2% PULASKI 4 21.1% 3 15.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% REYNOLDS 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% SHANNON 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% TEXAS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% WAYNE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 16 17.8% 11 12.2% 4 4.4% 0 0.0% 2 2.2%

SITE 736 BATES 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% BENTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CAMDEN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DALLAS 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% HENRY 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% HICKORY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% LACLEDE 5 22.7% 2 9.1% 1 4.5% 0 0.0% 1 4.5% MILLER 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MONITEAU 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MORGAN 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% POLK 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% ST CLAIR 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% WEBSTER 5 31.3% 2 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

* SITE TOTAL * 17 17.5% 9 9.3% 5 5.2% 0 0.0% 1 1.0%

SITE 737 BARTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CEDAR 2 25.0% 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DADE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% JASPER 11 27.5% 7 17.5% 1 2.5% 0 0.0% 1 2.5% MCDONALD 3 37.5% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% NEWTON 2 14.3% 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% VERNON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

* SITE TOTAL * 18 22.2% 8 9.9% 4 4.9% 0 0.0% 1 1.2%

SITE 738 BARRY 1 8.3% 3 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CHRISTIAN 0 0.0% 2 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DOUGLAS 4 33.3% 1 8.3% 2 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% LAWRENCE 3 42.9% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% OZARK 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% STONE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% TANEY 4 8.2% 7 14.3% 2 4.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% WRIGHT 5 31.3% 1 6.3% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 18 15.1% 15 12.6% 7 5.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

UNEMPLOYED FULL-TIME

LESS THAN

FULL-TIME

TEMPORARY

EMPLOYMENT

STUDENT NOT

EMPLOYED



SITE COUNTY TOTALSITE 731 JACKSON 1 0.7% 14 9.7% 0 0.0% 27 18.6% 79 54.5% 145 * SITE TOTAL * 1 0.7% 14 9.7% 0 0.0% 27 18.6% 79 54.5% 145

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 2 0.8% 3 1.2% 0 0.0% 59 23.3% 128 50.6% 253 ST LOUIS CITY 1 0.6% 6 3.7% 0 0.0% 39 23.8% 77 47.0% 164 * SITE TOTAL * 3 0.7% 9 2.2% 0 0.0% 98 23.5% 205 49.2% 417

SITE 733 BOONE 2 5.9% 5 14.7% 0 0.0% 1 2.9% 14 41.2% 34 CALLAWAY 0 0.0% 1 4.3% 0 0.0% 3 13.0% 14 60.9% 23 COLE 0 0.0% 2 11.1% 0 0.0% 3 16.7% 9 50.0% 18 HOWARD 0 0.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 40.0% 10 RANDOLPH 1 4.3% 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 2 8.7% 9 39.1% 23 * SITE TOTAL * 3 2.8% 11 10.2% 0 0.0% 9 8.3% 50 46.3% 108

SITE 734 ANDREW 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 3 ATCHISON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 2 BUCHANAN 1 5.0% 1 5.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.0% 10 50.0% 20 CALDWELL 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 6 CLINTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 3 DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 DE KALB 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 3 GENTRY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 HOLT 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 LIVINGSTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 2 NODAWAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 WORTH 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 2 4.3% 2 4.3% 1 2.2% 1 2.2% 26 56.5% 46

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CRAWFORD 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 37.5% 8 DENT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 3 HOWELL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 8.3% 5 41.7% 12 IRON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 MARIES 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 OREGON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 PHELPS 0 0.0% 1 4.2% 0 0.0% 5 20.8% 9 37.5% 24 PULASKI 1 5.3% 1 5.3% 0 0.0% 6 31.6% 4 21.1% 19 REYNOLDS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 SHANNON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 4 TEXAS 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 80.0% 5 WAYNE 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 5 * SITE TOTAL * 1 1.1% 5 5.6% 0 0.0% 16 17.8% 35 38.9% 90

SITE 736 BATES 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 4 BENTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CAMDEN 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 4 44.4% 9 DALLAS 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 5 HENRY 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 5 HICKORY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 LACLEDE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 4.5% 11 50.0% 22 MILLER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 10 76.9% 13 MONITEAU 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 5 MORGAN 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 63.6% 11 POLK 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 6 ST CLAIR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 WEBSTER 1 6.3% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 6 37.5% 16

* SITE TOTAL * 4 4.1% 4 4.1% 0 0.0% 6 6.2% 49 50.5% 97

SITE 737 BARTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0% 5 CEDAR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 50.0% 8 DADE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 JASPER 0 0.0% 3 7.5% 0 0.0% 2 5.0% 15 37.5% 40 MCDONALD 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 3 37.5% 8 NEWTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 14.3% 9 64.3% 14 VERNON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0% 5

* SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 3 3.7% 0 0.0% 5 6.2% 42 51.9% 81

SITE 738 BARRY 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 58.3% 12 CHRISTIAN 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 4 28.6% 7 50.0% 14 DOUGLAS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 8.3% 4 33.3% 12 LAWRENCE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 42.9% 7 OZARK 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 STONE 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 4 50.0% 8 TANEY 0 0.0% 3 6.1% 1 2.0% 4 8.2% 27 55.1% 49 WRIGHT 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 7 43.8% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 2 1.7% 5 4.2% 1 0.8% 11 9.2% 59 49.6% 119

DISABLED NOT IN

LABOR FORCE OTHER UNKNOWN MISSING

HOMEMAKER NOT

IN LABOR FORCE



SITE COUNTY UNEMPLOYED FULL-TIME

LESS THAN

FULL-TIME

TEMPORARY

EMPLOYMENT

STUDENT NOT

EMPLOYEDSITE 739 GREENE 20 16.0% 8 6.4% 4 3.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% * SITE TOTAL * 20 16.0% 8 6.4% 4 3.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.8%

SITE 740 CHARITON 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% GRUNDY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% HARRISON 0 0.0% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% LINN 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MERCER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% PUTNAM 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% SULLIVAN 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 3 10.3% 6 20.7% 1 3.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 831 LINCOLN 3 30.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MARION 4 28.6% 0 0.0% 2 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MONROE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% PIKE 3 37.5% 3 37.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% RALLS 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% ST CHARLES 2 4.2% 4 8.3% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 14 16.7% 9 10.7% 3 3.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 931 ADAIR 1 6.3% 2 12.5% 2 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CLARK 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% KNOX 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% LEWIS 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MACON 3 15.8% 2 10.5% 1 5.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% SCHUYLER 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% SCOTLAND 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% SHELBY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 6 9.4% 8 12.5% 4 6.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 4 25.0% 2 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 6.3% FRANKLIN 4 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% GASCONADE 0 0.0% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% JEFFERSON 8 11.1% 11 15.3% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MONTGOMERY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% OSAGE 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% WARREN 4 25.0% 3 18.8% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 21 14.0% 18 12.0% 3 2.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.7%

SITE 933 CASS 5 19.2% 5 19.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% COOPER 0 0.0% 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% JOHNSON 2 20.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% LAFAYETTE 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% PETTIS 0 0.0% 3 21.4% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% SALINE 2 20.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 10 13.3% 16 21.3% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 934 CARROLL 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CLAY 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% PLATTE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% RAY 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 2 9.5% 1 4.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 1 9.1% 2 18.2% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CAPE GIRARDEAU 2 5.6% 9 25.0% 3 8.3% 0 0.0% 1 2.8% MADISON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% MISSISSIPPI 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% PERRY 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% ST FRANCOIS 5 11.6% 4 9.3% 1 2.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% STE GENEVIEVE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% SCOTT 0 0.0% 2 16.7% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% WASHINGTON 3 18.8% 4 25.0% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 12 8.3% 22 15.2% 7 4.8% 0 0.0% 2 1.4%

SITE 936 BUTLER 2 6.3% 3 9.4% 2 6.3% 1 3.1% 0 0.0% DUNKLIN 1 5.9% 2 11.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% NEW MADRID 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% PEMISCOT 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% RIPLEY 2 15.4% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% STODDARD 3 16.7% 1 5.6% 1 5.6% 0 0.0% 1 5.6% * SITE TOTAL * 9 8.7% 7 6.7% 6 5.8% 1 1.0% 1 1.0%

STATE TOTAL 238 12.5% 207 10.9% 71 3.7% 1 0.1% 21 1.1%



SITE COUNTY TOTAL

DISABLED NOT IN

LABOR FORCE OTHER UNKNOWN MISSING

HOMEMAKER NOT

IN LABOR FORCESITE 739 GREENE 4 3.2% 2 1.6% 1 0.8% 15 12.0% 70 56.0% 125 * SITE TOTAL * 4 3.2% 2 1.6% 1 0.8% 15 12.0% 70 56.0% 125

SITE 740 CHARITON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 GRUNDY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 5 83.3% 6 HARRISON 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 57.1% 7 LINN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 6 MERCER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 2 PUTNAM 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 2 SULLIVAN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 1 3.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 6.9% 16 55.2% 29

SITE 831 LINCOLN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 30.0% 2 20.0% 10 MARION 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 50.0% 14 MONROE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 PIKE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 8 RALLS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 4 ST CHARLES 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 8.3% 35 72.9% 48 * SITE TOTAL * 1 1.2% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 7 8.3% 48 57.1% 84

SITE 931 ADAIR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 10 62.5% 16 CLARK 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 4 50.0% 8 KNOX 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 LEWIS 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 6 MACON 2 10.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 57.9% 19 SCHUYLER 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 3 SCOTLAND 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 2 SHELBY 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 62.5% 8 * SITE TOTAL * 3 4.7% 4 6.3% 0 0.0% 3 4.7% 35 54.7% 64

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 18.8% 6 37.5% 16 FRANKLIN 1 3.6% 1 3.6% 1 3.6% 1 3.6% 20 71.4% 28 GASCONADE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 71.4% 7 JEFFERSON 1 1.4% 3 4.2% 0 0.0% 17 23.6% 30 41.7% 72 MONTGOMERY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 88.9% 9 OSAGE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 2 WARREN 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 43.8% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 2 1.3% 5 3.3% 1 0.7% 21 14.0% 77 51.3% 150

SITE 933 CASS 2 7.7% 1 3.8% 0 0.0% 4 15.4% 9 34.6% 26 COOPER 1 10.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 1 10.0% 4 40.0% 10 JOHNSON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 60.0% 10 LAFAYETTE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 5 PETTIS 0 0.0% 2 14.3% 0 0.0% 2 14.3% 6 42.9% 14 SALINE 0 0.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 2 20.0% 4 40.0% 10 * SITE TOTAL * 3 4.0% 5 6.7% 0 0.0% 9 12.0% 30 40.0% 75

SITE 934 CARROLL 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 5 CLAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 4 57.1% 7 PLATTE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 3 RAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 6 * SITE TOTAL * 1 4.8% 1 4.8% 0 0.0% 2 9.5% 13 61.9% 21

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 5 45.5% 11 CAPE GIRARDEAU 1 2.8% 3 8.3% 0 0.0% 5 13.9% 11 30.6% 36 MADISON 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 5 62.5% 1 12.5% 8 MISSISSIPPI 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 PERRY 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 4 30.8% 7 53.8% 13 ST FRANCOIS 0 0.0% 3 7.0% 0 0.0% 7 16.3% 21 48.8% 43 STE GENEVIEVE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 5 SCOTT 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 16.7% 6 50.0% 12 WASHINGTON 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 2 12.5% 5 31.3% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 2 1.4% 10 6.9% 0 0.0% 28 19.3% 59 40.7% 145

SITE 936 BUTLER 2 6.3% 5 15.6% 0 0.0% 2 6.3% 14 43.8% 32 DUNKLIN 0 0.0% 4 23.5% 0 0.0% 2 11.8% 8 47.1% 17 NEW MADRID 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 4 44.4% 9 PEMISCOT 0 0.0% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 3 20.0% 9 60.0% 15 RIPLEY 0 0.0% 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 3 23.1% 4 30.8% 13 STODDARD 1 5.6% 1 5.6% 0 0.0% 3 16.7% 6 33.3% 18 * SITE TOTAL * 3 2.9% 14 13.5% 0 0.0% 16 15.4% 45 43.3% 104

STATE TOTAL 36 1.9% 95 5.0% 4 0.2% 276 14.5% 938 49.4% 1,900


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 14. Head of Household Income for Families Accepted During FY 2017




SITE 734 ANDREW 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 ATCHISON 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 BUCHANAN 11 55.0% 2 10.0% 2 10.0% 3 15.0% 1 5.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.0% 20 CALDWELL 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 6 CLINTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 DE KALB 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 GENTRY 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 HOLT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 ##### 2 LIVINGSTON 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 NODAWAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 WORTH 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 19 41.3% 5 10.9% 3 6.5% 10 21.7% 5 10.9% 0 0.0% 4 8.7% 46



* SITE TOTAL * 46 47.4% 20 20.6% 21 21.6% 7 7.2% 1 1.0% 2 2.1% 0 0.0% 97


* SITE TOTAL * 18 22.2% 17 21.0% 9 11.1% 20 24.7% 13 16.0% 4 4.9% 0 0.0% 81


$50,000 >< $5,000 $5,000-$9,999 $10,000-$14,999 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$34,999 $35,000-$49,999


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 14. Head of Household Income for Families Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY TOTAL$50,000 >< $5,000 $5,000-$9,999 $10,000-$14,999 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$34,999 $35,000-$49,999SITE 739 GREENE 35 28.0% 20 16.0% 27 21.6% 20 16.0% 17 13.6% 5 4.0% 1 0.8% 125 * SITE TOTAL * 35 28.0% 20 16.0% 27 21.6% 20 16.0% 17 13.6% 5 4.0% 1 0.8% 125









STATE TOTAL 480 25.3% 401 21.1% 286 15.1% 351 18.5% 223 11.7% 90 4.7% 69 3.6% 1,900



Parenting Skills Problems 1,516 79.8%

Parent/Child Conflict 882 46.4%

Communication 874 46.0%

Child Neglect 764 40.2%

Mental Health Problems 734 38.6%

Emotional Problems 511 26.9%

Drug Abuse 358 18.8%

Severe Financial Problems 319 16.8%

Transportation 290 15.3%

Physical Abuse 265 13.9%

Medical Illness/Disability 223 11.7%

Marital Conflict 184 9.7%

School Problems 152 8.0%

Physical Violence 148 7.8%

Shelter 143 7.5%

Homelessness 143 7.5%

Alcohol Abuse 100 5.3%

Developmental Disability 69 3.6%

Criminal Behavior 61 3.2%

Sexual Abuse 59 3.1%

Delinquent Behavior 40 2.1%

Pregnancy 34 1.8%

Suicide Attempts 27 1.4%

Runaway 20 1.1%

Prostitution 4 0.2%

Table 15. Head of Household Problems Addressed for Families Accepted During FY 2017



Notes: Heads of Household Served Tables Tables are based upon families accepted to Intensive In-Home Services during the fiscal year unless otherwise stated. Table 15 Head of Household Problems Addressed for Families Accepted into Intensive In-Home Services During FY 2017

Percent is the percentage of total heads of households. Percent total is greater than 100 because a head of household may have up to four problems addressed.



At-Risk Children Served


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 16. Age of At-Risk Children Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY TOTAL

SITE 731 JACKSON 50 14.6% 113 32.9% 132 38.5% 48 14.0% 343 * SITE TOTAL * 50 14.6% 113 32.9% 132 38.5% 48 14.0% 343

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 39 7.1% 126 22.9% 240 43.6% 146 26.5% 551 ST LOUIS CITY 43 11.3% 115 30.3% 148 38.9% 74 19.5% 380 * SITE TOTAL * 82 8.8% 241 25.9% 388 41.7% 220 23.6% 931

SITE 733 BOONE 7 8.5% 22 26.8% 31 37.8% 22 26.8% 82 CALLAWAY 2 4.8% 14 33.3% 14 33.3% 12 28.6% 42 COLE 9 23.7% 10 26.3% 15 39.5% 4 10.5% 38 HOWARD 3 18.8% 7 43.8% 3 18.8% 3 18.8% 16 RANDOLPH 3 5.7% 17 32.1% 29 54.7% 4 7.5% 53 * SITE TOTAL * 24 10.4% 70 30.3% 92 39.8% 45 19.5% 231

SITE 734 ANDREW 1 11.1% 4 44.4% 3 33.3% 1 11.1% 9 ATCHISON 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 3 BUCHANAN 8 23.5% 9 26.5% 14 41.2% 3 8.8% 34 CALDWELL 2 14.3% 4 28.6% 4 28.6% 4 28.6% 14 CLINTON 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 5 DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 DE KALB 1 20.0% 4 80.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 GENTRY 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 HOLT 0 0.0% 4 30.8% 7 53.8% 2 15.4% 13 LIVINGSTON 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 NODAWAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 WORTH 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 * SITE TOTAL * 16 16.3% 33 33.7% 37 37.8% 12 12.2% 98

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CRAWFORD 0 0.0% 7 38.9% 8 44.4% 3 16.7% 18 DENT 2 28.6% 3 42.9% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 7 HOWELL 1 4.8% 6 28.6% 12 57.1% 2 9.5% 21 IRON 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 MARIES 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 OREGON 0 0.0% 2 28.6% 5 71.4% 0 0.0% 7 PHELPS 8 17.0% 12 25.5% 21 44.7% 6 12.8% 47 PULASKI 3 8.8% 12 35.3% 14 41.2% 5 14.7% 34 REYNOLDS 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 4 50.0% 2 25.0% 8 SHANNON 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 5 TEXAS 1 6.3% 6 37.5% 5 31.3% 4 25.0% 16 WAYNE 1 8.3% 4 33.3% 3 25.0% 4 33.3% 12 * SITE TOTAL * 19 10.4% 56 30.8% 79 43.4% 28 15.4% 182

SITE 736 BATES 1 7.7% 5 38.5% 2 15.4% 5 38.5% 13 BENTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CAMDEN 2 11.1% 5 27.8% 7 38.9% 4 22.2% 18 DALLAS 1 8.3% 3 25.0% 6 50.0% 2 16.7% 12 HENRY 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 4 44.4% 3 33.3% 9 HICKORY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 LACLEDE 15 28.3% 17 32.1% 16 30.2% 5 9.4% 53 MILLER 2 7.4% 11 40.7% 11 40.7% 3 11.1% 27 MONITEAU 0 0.0% 4 30.8% 7 53.8% 2 15.4% 13 MORGAN 1 3.2% 8 25.8% 15 48.4% 7 22.6% 31 POLK 3 30.0% 5 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 20.0% 10 ST CLAIR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 WEBSTER 4 8.7% 17 37.0% 18 39.1% 7 15.2% 46

* SITE TOTAL * 29 12.4% 77 33.0% 86 36.9% 41 17.6% 233

SITE 737 BARTON 3 42.9% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 7 CEDAR 3 21.4% 5 35.7% 4 28.6% 2 14.3% 14 DADE 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 JASPER 6 6.8% 21 23.9% 43 48.9% 18 20.5% 88 MCDONALD 4 40.0% 1 10.0% 2 20.0% 3 30.0% 10 NEWTON 2 8.7% 8 34.8% 8 34.8% 5 21.7% 23 VERNON 2 18.2% 1 9.1% 6 54.5% 2 18.2% 11

* SITE TOTAL * 20 13.0% 39 25.3% 64 41.6% 31 20.1% 154

SITE 738 BARRY 4 14.3% 10 35.7% 11 39.3% 3 10.7% 28 CHRISTIAN 3 12.5% 7 29.2% 12 50.0% 2 8.3% 24 DOUGLAS 3 10.0% 8 26.7% 10 33.3% 9 30.0% 30 LAWRENCE 3 23.1% 1 7.7% 4 30.8% 5 38.5% 13 OZARK 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 STONE 1 10.0% 2 20.0% 5 50.0% 2 20.0% 10 TANEY 12 12.8% 28 29.8% 40 42.6% 14 14.9% 94 WRIGHT 4 9.3% 17 39.5% 19 44.2% 3 7.0% 43 * SITE TOTAL * 31 12.7% 73 29.9% 102 41.8% 38 15.6% 244

< 1 1-5 6-12 >= 13


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 16. Age of At-Risk Children Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY TOTAL< 1 1-5 6-12 >= 13SITE 739 GREENE 30 11.0% 71 26.1% 117 43.0% 54 19.9% 272 * SITE TOTAL * 30 11.0% 71 26.1% 117 43.0% 54 19.9% 272

SITE 740 CHARITON 1 11.1% 2 22.2% 4 44.4% 2 22.2% 9 GRUNDY 3 27.3% 1 9.1% 5 45.5% 2 18.2% 11 HARRISON 2 13.3% 4 26.7% 8 53.3% 1 6.7% 15 LINN 0 0.0% 6 60.0% 1 10.0% 3 30.0% 10 MERCER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 5 PUTNAM 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 SULLIVAN 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 8 15.1% 13 24.5% 21 39.6% 11 20.8% 53

SITE 831 LINCOLN 1 3.7% 8 29.6% 14 51.9% 4 14.8% 27 MARION 4 10.8% 10 27.0% 19 51.4% 4 10.8% 37 MONROE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 PIKE 2 18.2% 2 18.2% 4 36.4% 3 27.3% 11 RALLS 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 5 62.5% 1 12.5% 8 ST CHARLES 5 5.0% 19 18.8% 49 48.5% 28 27.7% 101 * SITE TOTAL * 12 6.5% 41 22.3% 91 49.5% 40 21.7% 184

SITE 931 ADAIR 3 13.0% 2 8.7% 7 30.4% 11 47.8% 23 CLARK 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 5 35.7% 7 50.0% 14 KNOX 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 LEWIS 2 16.7% 3 25.0% 7 58.3% 0 0.0% 12 MACON 3 6.3% 21 43.8% 13 27.1% 11 22.9% 48 SCHUYLER 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 4 SCOTLAND 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 5 SHELBY 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 8 61.5% 4 30.8% 13 * SITE TOTAL * 10 8.2% 30 24.6% 44 36.1% 38 31.1% 122

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 2 7.4% 8 29.6% 12 44.4% 5 18.5% 27 FRANKLIN 5 9.6% 14 26.9% 16 30.8% 17 32.7% 52 GASCONADE 2 15.4% 3 23.1% 6 46.2% 2 15.4% 13 JEFFERSON 5 3.4% 27 18.6% 70 48.3% 43 29.7% 145 MONTGOMERY 1 5.3% 4 21.1% 6 31.6% 8 42.1% 19 OSAGE 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 WARREN 6 14.3% 13 31.0% 12 28.6% 11 26.2% 42 * SITE TOTAL * 22 7.3% 70 23.3% 123 40.9% 86 28.6% 301

SITE 933 CASS 4 8.7% 16 34.8% 15 32.6% 11 23.9% 46 COOPER 1 6.3% 4 25.0% 5 31.3% 6 37.5% 16 JOHNSON 2 11.1% 9 50.0% 3 16.7% 4 22.2% 18 LAFAYETTE 0 0.0% 1 8.3% 8 66.7% 3 25.0% 12 PETTIS 3 10.7% 3 10.7% 15 53.6% 7 25.0% 28 SALINE 2 9.5% 5 23.8% 9 42.9% 5 23.8% 21 * SITE TOTAL * 12 8.5% 38 27.0% 55 39.0% 36 25.5% 141

SITE 934 CARROLL 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 4 44.4% 3 33.3% 9 CLAY 2 12.5% 7 43.8% 5 31.3% 2 12.5% 16 PLATTE 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 RAY 2 12.5% 4 25.0% 7 43.8% 3 18.8% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 6 13.0% 15 32.6% 17 37.0% 8 17.4% 46

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 0 0.0% 5 29.4% 6 35.3% 6 35.3% 17 CAPE GIRARDEAU 6 9.7% 13 21.0% 29 46.8% 14 22.6% 62 MADISON 1 6.7% 5 33.3% 4 26.7% 5 33.3% 15 MISSISSIPPI 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 PERRY 2 7.1% 5 17.9% 15 53.6% 6 21.4% 28 ST FRANCOIS 12 14.1% 16 18.8% 37 43.5% 20 23.5% 85 STE GENEVIEVE 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 5 SCOTT 4 20.0% 8 40.0% 6 30.0% 2 10.0% 20 WASHINGTON 4 13.3% 4 13.3% 13 43.3% 9 30.0% 30 * SITE TOTAL * 30 11.3% 60 22.6% 112 42.1% 64 24.1% 266

SITE 936 BUTLER 7 10.0% 30 42.9% 27 38.6% 6 8.6% 70 DUNKLIN 3 8.1% 7 18.9% 19 51.4% 8 21.6% 37 NEW MADRID 1 6.3% 6 37.5% 6 37.5% 3 18.8% 16 PEMISCOT 3 7.5% 13 32.5% 16 40.0% 8 20.0% 40 RIPLEY 1 3.1% 9 28.1% 14 43.8% 8 25.0% 32 STODDARD 3 8.3% 12 33.3% 15 41.7% 6 16.7% 36 * SITE TOTAL * 18 7.8% 77 33.3% 97 42.0% 39 16.9% 231

STATE TOTAL 419 10.4% 1,117 27.7% 1,657 41.1% 839 20.8% 4,032


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 17. Gender of At-Risk Children Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY TOTALSITE 731 JACKSON 161 46.9% 182 53.1% 343 * SITE TOTAL * 161 46.9% 182 53.1% 343

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 266 48.3% 285 51.7% 551 ST LOUIS CITY 177 46.6% 203 53.4% 380 * SITE TOTAL * 443 47.6% 488 52.4% 931

SITE 733 BOONE 35 42.7% 47 57.3% 82 CALLAWAY 21 50.0% 21 50.0% 42 COLE 23 60.5% 15 39.5% 38 HOWARD 11 68.8% 5 31.3% 16 RANDOLPH 26 49.1% 27 50.9% 53 * SITE TOTAL * 116 50.2% 115 49.8% 231

SITE 734 ANDREW 5 55.6% 4 44.4% 9 ATCHISON 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 BUCHANAN 14 41.2% 20 58.8% 34 CALDWELL 9 64.3% 5 35.7% 14 CLINTON 1 20.0% 4 80.0% 5 DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 DE KALB 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 5 GENTRY 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 6 HOLT 4 30.8% 9 69.2% 13 LIVINGSTON 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 2 NODAWAY 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 4 WORTH 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 * SITE TOTAL * 43 43.9% 55 56.1% 98

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CRAWFORD 6 33.3% 12 66.7% 18 DENT 2 28.6% 5 71.4% 7 HOWELL 15 71.4% 6 28.6% 21 IRON 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 MARIES 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 OREGON 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 7 PHELPS 25 53.2% 22 46.8% 47 PULASKI 17 50.0% 17 50.0% 34 REYNOLDS 2 25.0% 6 75.0% 8 SHANNON 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 TEXAS 9 56.3% 7 43.8% 16 WAYNE 8 66.7% 4 33.3% 12 * SITE TOTAL * 95 52.2% 87 47.8% 182

SITE 736 BATES 7 53.8% 6 46.2% 13 BENTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CAMDEN 5 27.8% 13 72.2% 18 DALLAS 6 50.0% 6 50.0% 12 HENRY 2 22.2% 7 77.8% 9 HICKORY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 LACLEDE 28 52.8% 25 47.2% 53 MILLER 11 40.7% 16 59.3% 27 MONITEAU 6 46.2% 7 53.8% 13 MORGAN 14 45.2% 17 54.8% 31 POLK 6 60.0% 4 40.0% 10 ST CLAIR 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 WEBSTER 23 50.0% 23 50.0% 46

* SITE TOTAL * 109 46.8% 124 53.2% 233

SITE 737 BARTON 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 7 CEDAR 9 64.3% 5 35.7% 14 DADE 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 JASPER 40 45.5% 48 54.5% 88 MCDONALD 7 70.0% 3 30.0% 10 NEWTON 15 65.2% 8 34.8% 23 VERNON 5 45.5% 6 54.5% 11

* SITE TOTAL * 81 52.6% 73 47.4% 154

SITE 738 BARRY 10 35.7% 18 64.3% 28 CHRISTIAN 12 50.0% 12 50.0% 24 DOUGLAS 11 36.7% 19 63.3% 30 LAWRENCE 5 38.5% 8 61.5% 13 OZARK 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 STONE 8 80.0% 2 20.0% 10 TANEY 50 53.2% 44 46.8% 94 WRIGHT 20 46.5% 23 53.5% 43 * SITE TOTAL * 118 48.4% 126 51.6% 244

FEMALE MALE


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 17. Gender of At-Risk Children Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY TOTALFEMALE MALESITE 739 GREENE 127 46.7% 145 53.3% 272 * SITE TOTAL * 127 46.7% 145 53.3% 272

SITE 740 CHARITON 4 44.4% 5 55.6% 9 GRUNDY 7 63.6% 4 36.4% 11 HARRISON 5 33.3% 10 66.7% 15 LINN 5 50.0% 5 50.0% 10 MERCER 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 5 PUTNAM 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 2 SULLIVAN 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 24 45.3% 29 54.7% 53

SITE 831 LINCOLN 13 48.1% 14 51.9% 27 MARION 14 37.8% 23 62.2% 37 MONROE 7 63.6% 4 36.4% 11 PIKE 4 50.0% 4 50.0% 8 RALLS 45 44.6% 56 55.4% 101 ST CHARLES 83 45.1% 101 54.9% 184 * SITE TOTAL * 58 40.8% 84 59.2% 142

SITE 931 ADAIR 10 43.5% 13 56.5% 23 CLARK 10 71.4% 4 28.6% 14 KNOX 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 LEWIS 7 58.3% 5 41.7% 12 MACON 15 31.3% 33 68.8% 48 SCHUYLER 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 SCOTLAND 0 0.0% 5 100.0% 5 SHELBY 7 53.8% 6 46.2% 13 * SITE TOTAL * 52 42.6% 70 57.4% 122

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 10 37.0% 17 63.0% 27 FRANKLIN 24 46.2% 28 53.8% 52 GASCONADE 8 61.5% 5 38.5% 13 JEFFERSON 68 46.9% 77 53.1% 145 MONTGOMERY 11 57.9% 8 42.1% 19 OSAGE 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 WARREN 19 45.2% 23 54.8% 42 * SITE TOTAL * 141 46.8% 160 53.2% 301

SITE 933 CASS 20 43.5% 26 56.5% 46 COOPER 9 56.3% 7 43.8% 16 JOHNSON 8 44.4% 10 55.6% 18 LAFAYETTE 4 33.3% 8 66.7% 12 PETTIS 14 50.0% 14 50.0% 28 SALINE 11 52.4% 10 47.6% 21 * SITE TOTAL * 66 46.8% 75 53.2% 141

SITE 934 CARROLL 4 44.4% 5 55.6% 9 CLAY 7 43.8% 9 56.3% 16 PLATTE 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 5 RAY 9 56.3% 7 43.8% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 22 47.8% 24 52.2% 46

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 7 41.2% 10 58.8% 17 CAPE GIRARDEAU 34 54.8% 28 45.2% 62 MADISON 3 20.0% 12 80.0% 15 MISSISSIPPI 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 4 PERRY 6 21.4% 22 78.6% 28 ST FRANCOIS 44 51.8% 41 48.2% 85 STE GENEVIEVE 0 0.0% 5 100.0% 5 SCOTT 8 40.0% 12 60.0% 20 WASHINGTON 19 63.3% 11 36.7% 30 * SITE TOTAL * 122 45.9% 144 54.1% 266

SITE 936 BUTLER 32 45.7% 38 54.3% 70 DUNKLIN 17 45.9% 20 54.1% 37 NEW MADRID 9 56.3% 7 43.8% 16 PEMISCOT 14 35.0% 26 65.0% 40 RIPLEY 16 50.0% 16 50.0% 32 STODDARD 21 58.3% 15 41.7% 36 * SITE TOTAL * 109 47.2% 122 52.8% 231

STATE TOTAL 1,912 47.4% 2,120 52.6% 4,032


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 18. Race of At-Risk Children Accepted During FY 2017







* SITE TOTAL * 203 87.1% 6 2.6% 2 0.9% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 3 1.3% 18 7.7% 233


* SITE TOTAL * 131 85.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 7.1% 12 7.8% 154


UNABLE TO

DETERMINEWHITE

AFRICAN

AMERICAN

NATIVE

AMERICAN

NATIVE

HAWAIIAN/PACIFIC

ISLANDER MULTI-RACIAL ASIAN


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 18. Race of At-Risk Children Accepted During FY 2017

SITE COUNTY TOTAL

UNABLE TO

DETERMINEWHITE

AFRICAN

AMERICAN

NATIVE

AMERICAN

NATIVE

HAWAIIAN/PACIFIC

ISLANDER MULTI-RACIAL ASIANSITE 739 GREENE 222 81.6% 22 8.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 16 5.9% 11 4.0% 272 * SITE TOTAL * 222 81.6% 22 8.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 16 5.9% 11 4.0% 272









STATE TOTAL 2,669 66.2% 985 24.4% 7 0.2% 10 0.2% 2 0.0% 95 2.4% 264 6.5% 4,032


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 19. At-Risk Children Accepted By Special Education Category During FY 2017

SITE COUNTYSITE 731 JACKSON 340 99.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

* SITE TOTAL * 340 99.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 537 97.5% 6 1.1% 2 0.4% 1 0.2% 1 0.2%ST LOUIS CITY 376 98.9% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0%* SITE TOTAL * 913 98.1% 7 0.8% 2 0.2% 2 0.2% 1 0.1%

SITE 733 BOONE 74 90.2% 2 2.4% 1 1.2% 1 1.2% 0 0.0%CALLAWAY 41 97.6% 0 0.0% 1 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%COLE 36 94.7% 0 0.0% 1 2.6% 1 2.6% 0 0.0%HOWARD 16 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%RANDOLPH 52 98.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%* SITE TOTAL * 219 94.8% 2 0.9% 3 1.3% 2 0.9% 0 0.0%

SITE 734 ANDREW 9 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%ATCHISON 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%BUCHANAN 31 91.2% 1 2.9% 1 2.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%CALDWELL 14 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%CLINTON 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%DE KALB 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%GENTRY 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%HOLT 11 84.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%LIVINGSTON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%NODAWAY 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%WORTH 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%* SITE TOTAL * 93 94.9% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%CRAWFORD 16 88.9% 0 0.0% 1 5.6% 1 5.6% 0 0.0%DENT 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%HOWELL 21 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%IRON 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%MARIES 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%OREGON 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%PHELPS 46 97.9% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%PULASKI 34 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%REYNOLDS 8 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%SHANNON 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TEXAS 16 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%WAYNE 12 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%* SITE TOTAL * 179 98.4% 1 0.5% 1 0.5% 1 0.5% 0 0.0%

SITE 736 BATES 13 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%BENTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%CAMDEN 18 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%DALLAS 11 91.7% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%HENRY 9 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%HICKORY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%LACLEDE 50 94.3% 2 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%MILLER 27 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%MONITEAU 13 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%MORGAN 31 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%POLK 10 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%ST CLAIR 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%WEBSTER 46 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%* SITE TOTAL * 229 98.3% 3 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 737 BARTON 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%CEDAR 14 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%DADE 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%JASPER 88 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%MCDONALD 9 90.0% 0 0.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%NEWTON 23 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%VERNON 11 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%* SITE TOTAL * 153 99.4% 0 0.0% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 738 BARRY 27 96.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%CHRISTIAN 24 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%DOUGLAS 30 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%LAWRENCE 13 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%OZARK 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%STONE 10 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TANEY 94 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%WRIGHT 40 93.0% 2 4.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%* SITE TOTAL * 240 98.4% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

NONE MULTIPLE CATEGORIES

LEARNING DISABLED

CLASS

BEHAVIORALLY

DISABLED CLASS

EMOTIONALLY

DISABLED CLASS



SITE COUNTY TOTALSITE 731 JACKSON 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.6% 343 * SITE TOTAL * 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.6% 343

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 1 0.2% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.4% 551 ST LOUIS CITY 0 0.0% 2 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 380 * SITE TOTAL * 1 0.1% 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.2% 931

SITE 733 BOONE 2 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2.4% 82 CALLAWAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 42 COLE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 38 HOWARD 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 RANDOLPH 1 1.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 53 * SITE TOTAL * 3 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.9% 231

SITE 734 ANDREW 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 ATCHISON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 BUCHANAN 1 2.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 34 CALDWELL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 CLINTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 DE KALB 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 GENTRY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 HOLT 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 LIVINGSTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 NODAWAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 WORTH 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 * SITE TOTAL * 3 3.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 98

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CRAWFORD 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18 DENT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 HOWELL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 21 IRON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 MARIES 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 OREGON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 PHELPS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 47 PULASKI 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 34 REYNOLDS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 SHANNON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 TEXAS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 WAYNE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 182

SITE 736 BATES 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 BENTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CAMDEN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18 DALLAS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 HENRY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 HICKORY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 LACLEDE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.9% 53 MILLER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 27 MONITEAU 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 MORGAN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 31 POLK 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 ST CLAIR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 WEBSTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 46

* SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.4% 233

SITE 737 BARTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 CEDAR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 DADE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 JASPER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 88 MCDONALD 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 NEWTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23 VERNON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11

* SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 154

SITE 738 BARRY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.6% 28 CHRISTIAN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 24 DOUGLAS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 30 LAWRENCE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 OZARK 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 STONE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 TANEY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 94 WRIGHT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 43 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 1 0.4% 244

DEVELOPMENTALLY

DISABLED CLASS ENRICHMENT CLASSES

PHYSICALLY DISABLED

CLASS SUMMER SCHOOLOTHER



SITE COUNTY NONE MULTIPLE CATEGORIES

LEARNING DISABLED

CLASS

BEHAVIORALLY

DISABLED CLASS

EMOTIONALLY

DISABLED CLASSSITE 739 GREENE 263 96.7% 3 1.1% 1 0.4% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 263 96.7% 3 1.1% 1 0.4% 1 0.4% 0 0.0%









STATE TOTAL 3,935 97.6% 33 0.8% 19 0.5% 9 0.2% 1 0.0%



SITE COUNTY TOTAL

DEVELOPMENTALLY

DISABLED CLASS ENRICHMENT CLASSES

PHYSICALLY DISABLED

CLASS SUMMER SCHOOLOTHERSITE 739 GREENE 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.7% 1 0.4% 272 * SITE TOTAL * 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.7% 1 0.4% 272

SITE 740 CHARITON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 GRUNDY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 HARRISON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 15 LINN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 MERCER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 PUTNAM 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 SULLIVAN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 53

SITE 831 LINCOLN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 27 MARION 0 0.0% 1 2.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 37 MONROE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 PIKE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 RALLS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 ST CHARLES 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 101 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 2 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 184

SITE 931 ADAIR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23 CLARK 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 KNOX 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 LEWIS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 MACON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 48 SCHUYLER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 SCOTLAND 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 SHELBY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 122

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 27 FRANKLIN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 52 GASCONADE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 JEFFERSON 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 145 MONTGOMERY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.3% 19 OSAGE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 WARREN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 42 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.7% 301

SITE 933 CASS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 46 COOPER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 JOHNSON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18 LAFAYETTE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 PETTIS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 28 SALINE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 21 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 141

SITE 934 CARROLL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 CLAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 PLATTE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 RAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 46

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 17 CAPE GIRARDEAU 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 62 MADISON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 6.7% 15 MISSISSIPPI 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 PERRY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 28 ST FRANCOIS 2 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 85 STE GENEVIEVE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 SCOTT 1 5.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 20 WASHINGTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 30 * SITE TOTAL * 3 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.8% 266

SITE 936 BUTLER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 70 DUNKLIN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 37 NEW MADRID 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 PEMISCOT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.5% 40 RIPLEY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 32 STODDARD 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 36 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.4% 231

STATE TOTAL 12 0.3% 6 0.1% 1 0.0% 2 0.0% 14 0.3% 4,032


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 20. At-Risk Children Accepted by Planned Placement Prevented During FY 2017

SITE COUNTYSITE 731 JACKSON 0 0.0% 12 3.5% 247 72.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 12 3.5% 247 72.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0%

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 13 2.4% 38 6.9% 408 74.0% 8 1.5% 0 0.0% ST LOUIS CITY 5 1.3% 14 3.7% 275 72.4% 3 0.8% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 18 1.9% 52 5.6% 683 73.4% 11 1.2% 0 0.0%

SITE 733 BOONE 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 75 91.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CALLAWAY 1 2.4% 1 2.4% 40 95.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% COLE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 35 92.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% HOWARD 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 62.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% RANDOLPH 1 1.9% 7 13.2% 38 71.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 2 0.9% 9 3.9% 198 85.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 734 ANDREW 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% ATCHISON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% BUCHANAN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 32 94.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CALDWELL 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 13 92.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CLINTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DE KALB 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% GENTRY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% HOLT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 53.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% LIVINGSTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% NODAWAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% WORTH 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 89 90.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CRAWFORD 0 0.0% 3 16.7% 7 38.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DENT 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% HOWELL 0 0.0% 1 4.8% 19 90.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% IRON 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MARIES 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% OREGON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% PHELPS 0 0.0% 4 8.5% 29 61.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% PULASKI 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 25 73.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% REYNOLDS 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 2 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% SHANNON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% TEXAS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% WAYNE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 12 6.6% 101 55.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 736 BATES 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 76.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% BENTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CAMDEN 1 5.6% 0 0.0% 15 83.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DALLAS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% HENRY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 88.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% HICKORY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% LACLEDE 0 0.0% 3 5.7% 49 92.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MILLER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MONITEAU 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MORGAN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 28 90.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% POLK 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 70.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% ST CLAIR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% WEBSTER 0 0.0% 1 2.2% 38 82.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

* SITE TOTAL * 1 0.4% 4 1.7% 199 85.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 737 BARTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CEDAR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DADE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% JASPER 1 1.1% 3 3.4% 75 85.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MCDONALD 0 0.0% 1 10.0% 9 90.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% NEWTON 0 0.0% 1 4.3% 21 91.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% VERNON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 72.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

* SITE TOTAL * 1 0.6% 5 3.2% 135 87.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SITE 738 BARRY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23 82.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CHRISTIAN 0 0.0% 1 4.2% 21 87.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DOUGLAS 0 0.0% 2 6.7% 20 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% LAWRENCE 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 10 76.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% OZARK 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% STONE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% TANEY 0 0.0% 2 2.1% 69 73.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% WRIGHT 0 0.0% 1 2.3% 39 90.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 7 2.9% 194 79.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

PSYCHIATRIC

HOSPITAL RESIDENTIAL FOSTER HOME EMERG SHELTER DETENTION



SITE COUNTY TOTALSITE 731 JACKSON 60 17.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23 6.7% 343 * SITE TOTAL * 60 17.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23 6.7% 343

SITE 732 ST LOUIS COUNTY 78 14.2% 4 0.7% 1 0.2% 1 0.2% 551 ST LOUIS CITY 78 20.5% 5 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 380 * SITE TOTAL * 156 16.8% 9 1.0% 1 0.1% 1 0.1% 931

SITE 733 BOONE 6 7.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 82 CALLAWAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 42 COLE 3 7.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 38 HOWARD 1 6.3% 5 31.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 RANDOLPH 5 9.4% 2 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 53 * SITE TOTAL * 15 6.5% 7 3.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 231

SITE 734 ANDREW 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 ATCHISON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 BUCHANAN 2 5.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 34 CALDWELL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 CLINTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 DE KALB 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 GENTRY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 HOLT 6 46.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 LIVINGSTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 NODAWAY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 WORTH 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 * SITE TOTAL * 8 8.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 98

SITE 735 CARTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CRAWFORD 8 44.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18 DENT 5 71.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 HOWELL 1 4.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 21 IRON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 MARIES 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 OREGON 6 85.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 PHELPS 14 29.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 47 PULASKI 6 17.6% 1 2.9% 1 2.9% 1 2.9% 34 REYNOLDS 4 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 SHANNON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 TEXAS 12 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 25.0% 16 WAYNE 6 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 * SITE TOTAL * 62 34.1% 1 0.5% 1 0.5% 5 2.7% 182

SITE 736 BATES 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 23.1% 13 BENTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CAMDEN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 11.1% 18 DALLAS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 HENRY 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 HICKORY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 LACLEDE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.9% 0 0.0% 53 MILLER 9 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 27 MONITEAU 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 MORGAN 3 9.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 31 POLK 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 ST CLAIR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 WEBSTER 7 15.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 46

* SITE TOTAL * 22 9.4% 1 0.4% 1 0.4% 5 2.1% 233

SITE 737 BARTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 CEDAR 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 DADE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 JASPER 8 9.1% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 88 MCDONALD 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 NEWTON 1 4.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23 VERNON 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 2 18.2% 11

* SITE TOTAL * 9 5.8% 2 1.3% 0 0.0% 2 1.3% 154

SITE 738 BARRY 0 0.0% 1 3.6% 0 0.0% 4 14.3% 28 CHRISTIAN 2 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 24 DOUGLAS 2 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 20.0% 30 LAWRENCE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 15.4% 13 OZARK 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 STONE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 TANEY 17 18.1% 2 2.1% 0 0.0% 4 4.3% 94 WRIGHT 3 7.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 43 * SITE TOTAL * 24 9.8% 3 1.2% 0 0.0% 16 6.6% 244

DSS DYS DMH MISSINGRELATIVE CARE



SITE COUNTY

PSYCHIATRIC

HOSPITAL RESIDENTIAL FOSTER HOME EMERG SHELTER DETENTIONSITE 739 GREENE 0 0.0% 4 1.5% 241 88.6% 8 2.9% 0 0.0% * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 4 1.5% 241 88.6% 8 2.9% 0 0.0%









STATE TOTAL 35 0.9% 178 4.4% 3,118 77.3% 22 0.5% 0 0.0%



SITE COUNTY TOTALDSS DYS DMH MISSINGRELATIVE CARESITE 739 GREENE 11 4.0% 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 6 2.2% 272 * SITE TOTAL * 11 4.0% 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 6 2.2% 272

SITE 740 CHARITON 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 GRUNDY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 HARRISON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 15 LINN 0 0.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 MERCER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 PUTNAM 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 SULLIVAN 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 * SITE TOTAL * 0 0.0% 2 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 53

SITE 831 LINCOLN 2 7.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 27 MARION 6 16.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 37 KNOX 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 PIKE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 RALLS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 ST CHARLES 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 101 * SITE TOTAL * 8 4.3% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 184

SITE 931 ADAIR 6 26.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23 CLARK 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 KNOX 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 LEWIS 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 MACON 5 10.4% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 48 SCHUYLER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 SCOTLAND 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 SHELBY 7 53.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 * SITE TOTAL * 19 15.6% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 122

SITE 932 AUDRAIN 5 18.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 27 FRANKLIN 2 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 5.8% 52 GASCONADE 4 30.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 JEFFERSON 49 33.8% 6 4.1% 0 0.0% 4 2.8% 145 MONTGOMERY 1 5.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 19 OSAGE 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 WARREN 15 35.7% 1 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 42 * SITE TOTAL * 77 25.6% 7 2.3% 0 0.0% 7 2.3% 301

SITE 933 CASS 10 21.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 8.7% 46 COOPER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 JOHNSON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18 LAFAYETTE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 PETTIS 1 3.6% 1 3.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 28 SALINE 6 28.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 21 * SITE TOTAL * 17 12.1% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 4 2.8% 141

SITE 934 CARROLL 6 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 CLAY 3 18.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 PLATTE 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 RAY 12 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 * SITE TOTAL * 23 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 46

SITE 935 BOLLINGER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 17 CAPE GIRARDEAU 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 62 MADISON 0 0.0% 2 13.3% 0 0.0% 2 13.3% 15 MISSISSIPPI 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 PERRY 0 0.0% 1 3.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 28 ST FRANCOIS 0 0.0% 3 3.5% 0 0.0% 2 2.4% 85 STE GENEVIEVE 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 SCOTT 3 15.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 20 WASHINGTON 0 0.0% 2 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 30 * SITE TOTAL * 3 1.1% 9 3.4% 0 0.0% 4 1.5% 266

SITE 936 BUTLER 4 5.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 70 DUNKLIN 14 37.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 37 NEW MADRID 9 56.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 PEMISCOT 7 17.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 40 RIPLEY 4 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 32 STODDARD 5 13.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 36 * SITE TOTAL * 43 18.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 231

STATE TOTAL 557 13.8% 45 1.1% 4 0.1% 73 1.8% 4,032



Parent/Child Conflict 1,554 38.5%

Child Neglect 1,475 36.6%

Communication 1,333 33.1%

Parenting Skills Problems 947 23.5%

Mental Health Problems 903 22.4%

Emotional Problems 817 20.3%

School Problems 653 16.2%

Physical Abuse 368 9.1%

Delinquent Behavior 314 7.8%

Transportation 201 5.0%

Medical Illness/Disability 197 4.9%

Homelessness 194 4.8%

Physical Violence 186 4.6%

Shelter 142 3.5%

Severe Financial Problems 139 3.4%

Drug Abuse 135 3.3%

Developmental Disability 135 3.3%

Sexual Abuse 127 3.2%

Runaway 87 2.2%

Suicide Attempts 53 1.3%

Criminal Behavior 34 .8%

Alcohol Abuse 25 .6%

Marital Conflict 24 0.6%

Pregnancy 13 0.3%

Prostitution 3 0.1%

Table 21. At-Risk Children Problems Addressed for Children Accepted During FY 2017



Notes: At-Risk Children Served Tables Tables are based upon at-risk children accepted to Intensive In-Home Services during the fiscal year unless otherwise stated. Each at-risk child is only counted once. If an at-risk child is involved in multiple IIS interventions, the earliest intervention for the fiscal year was used. Table 19 At-Risk Children Accepted by Special Education Category During FY 2017

NONE includes at-risk children who did not have a special education category code selected.

MULTIPLE CATEGORIES includes at-risk children who had more than one category of special education selected.

LEARNING DISABLED CLASS includes at-risk children who had only the learning disable category selected.

BEHAVIORALLY DISABLED CLASS includes at-risk children who had only the behaviorally disable category selected.

EMOTIONALLY DISABLED CLASS includes at-risk children who had only the emotionally disable category selected.

OTHER includes at-risk children who had only the other category selected.

DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CLASS includes at-risk children who had only the developmentally disable category selected.

ENRICHMENT CLASSES includes at-risk children who had only the enrichment category selected.

PHYSICALLY DISABLED CLASS includes at-risk children who had only the physically disable category selected.

SUMMER SCHOOL includes at-risk children who had only the summer school category selected.

Table 21 At-Risk Children Problems Addressed for Families Accepted into Intensive In-Home Services During FY 2017

Percent is the percentage of total at-risk children. Percent total is greater than 100 because an at-risk child may have up to four problems addressed.



Outcomes for At-Risk Children Exiting Intensive In-Home Services



Table 22. Checking for 1st Substantiated Child Abuse/Neglect Report for At-Risk Children

Exiting Intensive In-Home Services

(Based on 1st Substantiated CA/N Report During or After IIS Exit)

Fiscal Year No CAN During IIS

0<=3 Mths

3<=6 Mths

6<=12 Mths

12<=24 Mths

24<=36 Mths

36<=48 Mths

At-risk Children Exiting

FY 2013 3,185 62 71 66 88 107 62 54 3,695

FY 2014 3,553 60 87 68 94 134 64 0 4,060

FY 2015 3,490 44 69 66 85 108 0 0 3,862

FY 2016 3,617 39 84 49 63 0 0 0 3,852

62

71 66

88

107

62

54 60

87

68

94

134

64

44

69 66

85

108

39

84

49

63

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

During IIS 0<=3 Mths 3<=6 Mths 6<=12 Mths 12<=24 Mths 24<=36 Mths 36<=48 Mths

Table 23. At-Risk Children Exiting Intensive In-Home Services who were listed as victims of a Substantiated Child Abuse/Neglect Report within 48

months of their exit

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016


Table 24. Checking for 1st Entry into Legal Status 1 for At-Risk Children

Exiting Intensive In-Home Services

(Based on 1st Entry into LS1 During or After Exit)

Fiscal Year No OOH During IIS

0<=3 Mths

3<=6 Mths

6<=12 Mths

12<=24 Mths

24<=36 Mths

36<=48 Mths

At-Risk Children

Exiting

FY 2013 2,634 207 204 171 128 176 95 80 3,695

FY 2014 2,970 256 228 141 146 211 108 0 4,060

FY 2015 2,949 230 245 119 174 144 1 0 3,862

FY 2016 3,108 221 276 111 136 0 0 0 3,852

207 204

171

128

176

95

80

256

228

141 146

211

108

230

245

119

174

144

221

276

111

136

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

During IIS 0<=3 Mths 3<=6 Mths 6<=12 Mths 12<=24 Mths 24<=36 Mths 36<=48 Mths

Table 25. At-Risk Children Exiting Intensive In-Home Services who entered Legal Status 1 within 48 months of their exit

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016



Notes: Outcomes During FY 2017

At-Risk children who exited IIS during fiscal years 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were checked to see if they had entered CD custody or if they were listed as a victim of a substantiated CA/N report during IIS intervention up to 48 months of exiting IIS. These past fiscal years were used to give children exiting enough time to see if the events had occurred. FY 2013, FY 2014, FY 2015 and FY 2016 have follow-ups of 36, 24 and 12 months, respectively.

Table 22 Families and At-Risk Children Exiting IIS During Fiscal Years 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016

Each family and at-risk child are counted only once. If a family or child were involved inmultiple IIS interventions, the exit associated with the earliest intervention for the fiscalyear was used.


Date post:	16-Oct-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	6 times
Download:	0 times

Intensive In-Home Services Annual Report...221 West High Street Broadway Building Jefferson City, MO...

Documents