+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Date post: 25-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: lavonn
View: 36 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures. N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä. IHY – ISWI Regional meeting on Heliospheric Phenomena and Earth’s Environment September 7 – 13, 2009 Šibenik, Croatia. Large-Scale Structures. CMEs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
20
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä SWI Regional meeting on Heliospheric Phenomena and Earth’s Environme er 7 – 13, 2009 Šibenik, Croatia
Transcript
Page 1: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä

IHY – ISWI Regional meeting on Heliospheric Phenomena and Earth’s EnvironmentSeptember 7 – 13, 2009 Šibenik, Croatia

Page 2: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Large-Scale Structures

• CMEs• Coronal Holes • Global Field of the Sun• Heliospheric Current Sheet

Page 3: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

CME Interactions

• Non-radial motion of CMEs during the minimum phase

• CME – CME interactions during solar maximum

• CME – Coronal hole interaction during the declining phase

• CMEs tend to align with the heliospheric current sheet: CME rotation

Page 4: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Non-radial motion: Toward Equator

20 km/s

42 km/sS30

Filippov et al., 2001Gopalswamy and Thompson, 2000

Gopalswamy et al., 2003 ApJ

Page 5: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Other Observations

Plunkett et al., 2001

F ~ A/r Cremades et al. 2006

White-light prominences (CME cores):offset similar to Gopalswamy et al. 2003

Cremades et al. 2006 considered only equatorward and poleward deflections

Page 6: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Consequence of Equatorward Deflection: More Magnetic Clouds during Solar Minimum

Phase Lat (N) Lat (S) CMDRise: 25.6 -24.2 5.3 Max: 12.6 -20.0 9.7 Decl: 8.2 -13.8 1.8 All: 14.5 -19.7 6.1

Gopalswamy, 2006

Outstanding question:Is the deflection due to coronal-hole open field or theglobal dipolar field?

Page 7: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Why driverless shocks from disk center?

The limb sources are normal (geometrical reason), but the disk-center sources are anomalous

The anomaly seems to be due to the presence of coronal holes near the source region

MAX

DECLINING

Page 8: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

The Solar Source of a “Driverless” Shock

Compact AR 0588 to the south of a large coronal holeproduced a 1368 km/s CME from S18E15. CMEs from such disk-center location result in shock+ICME at Earth. In this event only the shock arrived. Why?

AR 0588

CH

8

Page 9: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

SHEATH

S1 S2 CME1

CME2

Disk-center CMEs, but onlyshocks at 1 AU (S1, S2) and no ejecta (No depressed Tp) 9

Page 10: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Open Field Lines on the Sun: 2004/04/06

Red: Negative

Blue:Positive

CME

Coronal hole immediately to the north of AR 10588

The coronal hole (CH) influence parameter (CHIP), viz., B2A/r2 = 26 G2

along PA = 137o due to the NW CH [B = average photosphericfield inside CH; A = area of CH; r = Distance of CH to the eruption region]. CHIP is a vector pointing from the CH centroid to the eruption region

The smaller CH in thesouth contributed verylittle: the CHIP wasonly 0.75 G2

The central position angle ofthe CME was 167o, which isclose to the direction of theCH influence 10

Page 11: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

CH

AR 0588S18E15

From: http://www.lmsal.com/forecast/TRACEview/images courtesy: M. DeRosa & K. Schrijver

Purple:OpenWhite:Closed

MDI Magnetogram with extrapolated field lines

Based on the east-west orientation of the neutral line and the location of the large coronal hole to the north, we expect the northern leg of the flux rope is negative, as is the coronal hole. No reconnection is possible between the CME leg and the CH field lines. The CH influence parameter has a value of 26 G2 which pushes the CME below the ecliptic, so the flux rope is not observed at Earth. The northern flank of the shock is observed rendering it a “driverless” shock

2004/04/06 10:46 UT SOHO magnetogram

11

Magnetogram: white = +; black = -

Page 12: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Coronal Hole Influence Parameter

F = ∑ fi fi = Ai<Bi>/ri2

F

MPA

(Open field lines only shown)

ri

Ai

MPA

Gopalswamy et al., 2009 JGRF = 14 G pointed along the PA (FPA) of 234o.

Page 13: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

The CME direction roughly coincides with the direction of F

Page 14: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Shocks with ICMEs

CH have minimal effect:CHs smaller and/or farfrom the eruption

CH deflect CMEs towardSun-Earth line

F generally small (2.5 G vs.5.8 G for driverless)

Page 15: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Deflection

Observer

Sun

Open field lines from coronal hole

Shock ahead of thedeflected CME

Shock

Why ‘driverless’ shocks from disk-center CMEs?

+

Page 16: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

EUV Wave Reflection from CH: Higher Alfven Speed in the CH

Gopalswamy, Yashiro, Temmer et al., 2009 ApJL

Page 17: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

CME1 839 km/s

CME 21507 km/s

Two CMEs from the same region AR

CME Cannibalism

Page 18: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Only one shock and a merged ICME

CME interaction most common during the maximum phase

Page 19: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

HCS affecting an ICMECoronal field maps calculated for CR2006 with CCMC/PFSS (top and middle) and MAS models (bottom).

Panels a, b and c show maps for source surface radius of 1.6 R, d and e show maps at 2.5 R, while panel f shows MAS map at 16.5 R,. The thick black contour is the coronal neutral line.

The red oval represents the halo CME on Aug 14, 2003, which was aligned with the coronal neutral line at 1.6 R.

Magnetic topology has changed further outward from the solar surface so that the neutral line rotated by approx. 50 deg. Yurchyshyn, 2008

Page 20: Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures

Summary

• CME propagation can be affected by global solar field (min), CME interaction (max), and coronal hole deflection (declining)

• The presence of coronal holes near the eruption regions seem to make the CMEs behave like limb CMEs

• When magnetic topology changes outward from the solar surface, the neutral line seems rotated and so does the CME axis.


Recommended