+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

Date post: 02-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: banyan
View: 37 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Partner logo. Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand 2° Partners meeting - Barcelona, 13 th January 2010. Sampling site : “5 Avenues”?. 5 avenues : somewhere here. Urban background station. Sampling site : “5 Avenues”?. Why an urban background site?. Objective of APICE… - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
27
Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand 2° Partners meeting - Barcelona, 13 th January 2010 Partner logo
Transcript
Page 1: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

Intercomparison campaignUniv. Provence

N. Marchand2° Partners meeting - Barcelona, 13th January 2010

Partner logo

Page 2: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

2

Sampling site : “5 Avenues”?

5 avenues : somewhere here

Urban background station

Page 3: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

3

Sampling site : “5 Avenues”?

Page 4: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

4

Why an urban background site?

-Objective of APICE… « quantify the influence of harbor and harbor related activities on city air quality »

Are we able to apportion these sources among other sources in urban air?

-Logistical reasons.. -Historical and reference station of ATMOPACA (most instrumented station (PM10, PM10 FDMS, PM2.5, PM2.5FDMS..) -Previous projects in this site (ESCOMPTE, FORMES etc..)

What if there is no industrial events?

Page 5: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

5

Eastern Docks : cargo (fruit and vegetables, RORO, containers), ship repair (industrial and pleasure craft), logistics and passengers (cruises, Corsica

ferries and international).

Western Docks : Crude Oil and oil

products, solid bulk and containers.

Marseille

East Harbour

West Harbour

Sampling site

1rst harbour in France 1rst harbour of the Mediterranean Sea

4th harbour in Europe 3rd harbour in the world for Crude oil and oil products

Marseille2nde city in France ~ 1.6 million of inhabitants

A huge harbour Total traffic of about 100 Mt/yr (including >60% of crude oil and oil products)

Image Google Earth

~ 40 km

Page 6: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

6

Refinery and petro chemical industryof Lavera

Refinery and petro chemical industry of Berre

MarseilleA huge industrial area

Image Google Earth

Marseille

East Harbour

West Harbour

Sampling site

Refinery of Fos

Refinery of «la Mede»

Lavera

4 Refineries : ~30 Mt/year~30% of the french refining capacity

Page 7: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

7

Sollac (Steel Industry)

Refinery and petro chemical industryof Lavera

Refinery and petro chemical industry

MarseilleA huge industrial area

Industrial area (various activities)

Image Google Earth

Marseille

East Harbour

West Harbour

Sampling site

Refinery of Fos

Industrial area (various activities)Airport

Sollac (Steel Industry)

Refinery of «la Mede»

Page 8: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

8

Mistral« Land » and sea breezesNocturnal Urban breeze

Composition of land/sea breezes and mistral Transit time of the air masses above the mediterranean sea increases during the day

Urban breeze occuring most of the nights

(hot spot of Marseille)

Marseille : 3 characteristic meteorological conditions

Evol

utio

n du

ring

the

day

Marseille is most of the time downwind industrial areas and

harbours

Page 9: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

9

Composition of sea breeze with mistral

Evol

utio

n du

ring

the

day

When the sampling site was directly downwind of industrial area, intense particle events associated with SO2 are observed.

Particle number [cm-

3]

What is the industrial influence on particle components?

Mistral

Page 10: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

10

Jul. 9 Jul. 7

Jul. 5 Jul. 4

dN/dlnDp

Industrial particles events..

Page 11: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

11

Page 12: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

12

Date

6/29/08 7/3/08 7/7/08 7/11/08 7/15/08

Sum

PA

H (

ng/m

-3)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Sum PAH (n=12)

Date

6/29/08 7/3/08 7/7/08 7/11/08 7/15/08

Sum

PA

H,

Pb

(ng

/m-3

)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Sum PAH (n=12)Pb

Date

6/29/08 7/3/08 7/7/08 7/11/08 7/15/08

Sum

PA

H, P

b (n

g/m

-3)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Cs

(ng/

m3 )

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Mo

(ng/

m3 )

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fe

(ng/

m3 )

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Sum PAH (n=12)Pb Cs Mo Fe

PAHs and Metals

Temporal trend of total PAHs concentration shows intense pics

… and is very well correlated with those of Pb, Cs, Mo, Fe and also La, V, Zn, Ni, Co..

For all these samples the receptor site was downwind from the western industrial area…

Steel plant of Sollac and/or heavy fuel combustion

Page 13: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

13

(El Haddad, ACPD 2010a)

OC

[µg

m-3

]

0

2

4

6

8

10

vehicular emissionstotal industrialbiomass burningvegetative detritus

CMB-SOC

30/06/08 04/07/08 08/07/08 12/07/08

Primary source contributions

OC

[µg

m-3

]

0

2

4

6

8

10

vehicular emissionstotal industrialbiomass burningvegetative detritus

CMB-SOC

30/06/08 04/07/08 08/07/08 12/07/08

CMB results

Primary sources only contribute to 22% of the total OC vehicular emissions dominated primary OC contributing for 17% of total OC industrial emissions contributed only for 2.3 % of total OC

Page 14: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

14

(d’anna et al., 2010 in prep)

Primary source contributions

AMS/PMF Factor 4 vs. CMB industrial OM

29/06/08 03/07/08 07/07/08 11/07/08 15/07/08

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8AMS/PMF Factor 4AMS/PMF Factor 4 (12h-avg)CMB Industrial OM

ind

us

tria

l OM

g m

-3]

Good agreement between the CMB and AMS estimation, validating our choice of industrial markers and source

profiles in the CMB

Page 15: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

15

Marseille field campaign (Jul. 2008)

CMB vs. AMS/PMF (d’anna et al., 2010 in prep)

industrial SOA0

20

40

60

80

100

con

trib

uti

on

toO

M[%

]

fossil fuelcombustion

1216

2 4

8680

fossil fuelcombustion

biomassburning

SOA

con

trib

uti

on

toO

M[%

]

0

20

40

60

80

CMBAMS/PMF

100

LV

-OO

A (

40)

SV

-OO

A (

40)

The two models attributed more than 80% of the OA to secondary sources

Page 16: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

16

30/06/08 04/07/08 08/07/08 12/07/08

0

10

20

30

40

vehiculartotal industrialbiomass burningvegetative detritusother OMsecondary sulfatesecondary nitratesecondary ammonium

total measured PM2.5PM

2.5

[µg

m-3

]Source apportionment PM2.5

Total industrial/harbor activities contribution 7.1%

(El Haddad, ACPD 2010a)

Page 17: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

17

https://sites.google.com/a/univ-provence.fr/apice/

Page 18: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

18

Instrumentation

Page 19: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

19

Schedule : Expected date for final data

Page 20: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

20

APICE Intercomparison campaign

Ptot 10.186 kW

InstrumentLaboratory/organization

Outside/Inside

Flow rateDimension (LxWxH)

Electrical Power (W)

Number of electrical

SlotObservation/Specific needs

MASSALYA PlateformSMPS (10-1000 nm) LCP-IRA In 0,3 l/min 0,75x0,75x1 700 2 Mobile labPTR-MS LCP-IRA In 0,5 l/min 1,5x1,5x1 750 3 Mobile labAMS LCP-IRA In 0,08 l/min 2x2x1 726 2 Mobile labMAAP5012 LCP-IRA In 16L/min 19'' rack 500 1 Mobile lab (PM1)Catalyseur PTRMS LCP-IRA In 1000

HiVOL sampler LCP-IRA Out 30 m3/h 1.5x0.6x1.60 1000 1 PM2,5+denuderHYPRA mono 32 A

Hi-vol sampler IDAEA-CSIC Out 500 l/min 0,9x0,58x0,6 1000 1 1000 when start, 500 during normal operationHi-vol sampler IDAEA-CSIC Out 500 l/min 0,9x0,58x0,6 1000 1 1000 when start, 500 during normal operationOptical counter IDAEA-CSIC Out 1 l/min 0,5x0,2x0,7 100 1

Grimm Environcheck 1.07 UNIGE Out 1,2 l/min 0.40x0.30x0.80 100 1 OPC - 31 bins between .25 - 18 mmTecora Skypost UNIGE Out 2,3 m3/h 0.55x0.60x0.80 500 1 PM2.5Aethalometer UNIGE In 2 l/min 0.30x0.50x0.40 200 1 2 l - IR and UV

Low Vol sampler (Derenda LVS3,1/PNS15) ETL/UOWM Out 3,5m3/h 300x400x250mm 240 1 PM2,5+PM10

Equipped FIAT VanPAS2000 ARPAV-ORAROut 2.0 l/min 19'' rack 35 1 Surface PAH 10-1000 nmDataRAM 4000 ARPAV-ORAROut 1.0 to 3.0 l/min 0.35 D x 0.18W x 0.13H 50 1 PM2.5 continuous particle sizing monitor / Dual Wavelength NephelometerHandheld 3016IAQ six classes OPCARPAV-ORAROut 2.83 l/min 6.35 x 12.7 x 22.23cm 350 1 IF AVAILABLE Channel Sizes: 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 μmLoVOL sampler ARPAV-ORAROut 16.67 l/min PM10; 38.33 l/min PM2.5 575 1 PM2.5 or PM10Air conditioning system ARPAV-ORAR 800

GuestsDRI PSI Out 0.7x1 300 1

Nephelometer LA Out 5l/min170 x 700 x 215 mm 60

Aethlo 7l LA Out 5l/min 200 1

?

?

Nano Moudi (UNIGE?)

Page 21: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

21

Page 22: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

22

ARPA Veneto van.

Page 23: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

23

Schedule : Instrumentation/people?

Who, when people arrived and leaved?

Page 24: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

24

a) Data will be shared during the field phase as soon as it is available This is done with the understanding that data is not fully calibrated/corrected/etc.,

b) Field data from other groups can only be used by people participating in the campaign, and CANNOT be shown or shared with people outside the campaign unless you have the permission of the data owners.

c) Data should also be made available to all participants during the data analysis phase. Data from other groups cannot be used in presentations or publications without the permission of the data owners, and coauthorship should be offered to the data producers (which are then free to accept or decline the offer).

Policy for sharing data and circulate it among the campaign participants (Ex : Daure project)

Page 25: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

25

Establish a data format

Data specificationsFile name conventionExample: 20090310_PTRMS_BCN_rev2.txt– Date is last day of measurements included in the file– Revision starts at 0, incremented when data is changed (not when data isadded)File format conventionDate_Time Species1 Species210/03/2009 12:50:49 12341 1233- Pay attention to the exact format for the date and time- tab-delimited (not space-delimited)- Only one carriage return (ASCII code 13 or chr(13)) at end of the lineOn the top of each data file- Contact person email and phone number- Local time or standard time or UTC or GMT- When reporting μg m-3- Specify conditions of m3: recommend either STP (273.15K & 1 atm) or localconditions (local T & P). Others are OK but please specify- Specify what you are reporting for missing data (we recommend -999)

Page 26: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

26

New data versions Original file:20090310_AMS_MRS_rev0.txt20090311_AMS_MRS_rev0.txt- added measurements- data up to the 10th have not changed20090312_AMS_MRS_rev1.txt- means that some data have been revised- andA single file that keeps increasing the revision number at the end of thecampaign, e.g.:20090327_AMS_MRS_rev0.txt20090327_AMS_MRS_rev1.txt20090327_AMS_MRS_rev2.txt

Establish a data format

Page 27: Intercomparison campaign Univ. Provence N. Marchand

27

Be carefull with electrical plugs..


Recommended