Date post: | 01-Apr-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | bella-bussey |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
International Center for Leadership in Education
Dr. Willard R. Daggett
Preparing Students for the 21st Century
Components of School ExcellenceComponents of School Excellence
1. Create a Culture to Support RR & RFor ALL Students
Today’s Youth
• Technologically literate
Timeliner
Behaviors
Item Trophy Generation Adults
InformationMultiple sources;Process quickly
Individual sources;
Process methodically
Multitask Parallel process Sequential
Documents Graphics first Text first
Work Peer groups Individual
Delays NoneHappy when technology
works
FlexibilityAdaptable, comfortable
with uncertaintyResists change; learns to cope with change
Today’s Youth
• Technologically literate
• Trophy generation
Positive Reinforcement
Today’s Youth
• Technologically literate
• Trophy generation
• Claim independence but return home
• Increasingly bored with school
Percentage of 12th-graders who express various opinions about their school experience.
40%
35%
51%
36%
29%
47%
31%
24%
41%
21%
39%
28%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Meaningful InterestingImportant in
Later Life
Student Survey PercentagesStudent Survey Percentages
Survey Statement Total Male Female
I enjoy being at school 50.2 47.4 53.2
Teachers make school an exciting place to learn 33.0 32.9 32.6
School is boring 45.5 49.9 41.5
Teachers have fun at school 38.5 39.8 37.6
Learning can be fun 63.5 59.0 69.3
Student Survey PercentagesStudent Survey Percentages
Survey Statement Total Male Female
At school I am encouraged to be creative 58.8 56.4 61.3
My classes help me understand what is happening in my everyday life 39.8 39.3 40.9
I learn new things that are interesting to me at school 66.3 63.8 69.9
“Do you Know Me?”Student Survey & Faculty Survey
Successful Practices NetworkSuccessful Practices Network
“Do you Know Me?”
• Perceptions of learners about your school and the value placed on student engagement and student aspirations
• Do they align with yours?
Obedientvs.
Motivated
Cities with 1 Million PeopleCities with 1 Million People
• United States 9
Cities with 1 Million PeopleCities with 1 Million People
• United States
• Europe
9
36
Cities with 1 Million PeopleCities with 1 Million People
• United States
• Europe
• China (2006)
9
36
100 +
Cities with 1 Million PeopleCities with 1 Million People
• United States
• Europe
• China (2006)
• China (2020)
9
36
100 +
160 +
Computer Sales
Dell
Sony
Compaq
HP
IBM Think Pad
Apple
NEC
Gateway
Toshiba
Quanta
Wispron
Asustek
Compal
Inventec
90 %
Oil
The United States consumes one-quarter of the world’s oil.
Source: Sydney Morning Herald
Price of Oil
2004: $33 per barrel
2008: $135 per barrel and could rise as high as $200 per barrel
Source: SFGate.com
Oil Production
2004: 83 Million barrels per day (M b/d)
2008: 85 M b/d (and has barely moved since 2005)
2030: 100 M b/d maximum.
Source: SFGate.comTransport & Logistics News
Current Production
2004 20302008 2012 2020
125
100
75
50
25
Mill
ion
Bar
rels
/Day
(M
b/d)
85 Mb/d
Maximum Future Production
2004 20302008 2012 2020
125
100
75
50
25
Mill
ion
Bar
rels
/Day
(M
b/d) 100 Mb/d
2004 U.S. Demand
2004 20302008 2012 2020
125
100
75
50
25
Mill
ion
Bar
rels
/Day
(M
b/d)
2008 U.S. Demand
2004 20302008 2012 2020
125
100
75
50
25
Mill
ion
Bar
rels
/Day
(M
b/d)
Projected U.S. Demand
2004 20302008 2012 2020
125
100
75
50
25
Mill
ion
Bar
rels
/Day
(M
b/d)
2004 U.S. / China Demand
2004 20302008 2012 2020
125
100
75
50
25
Mill
ion
Bar
rels
/Day
(M
b/d)
2008 U.S. / China Demand
2004 20302008 2012 2020
125
100
75
50
25
Mill
ion
Bar
rels
/Day
(M
b/d)
Projected U.S. / China Demand
2004 20302008 2012 2020
125
100
75
50
25
Mill
ion
Bar
rels
/Day
(M
b/d)
2004 World Demand
2004 20302008 2012 2020
125
100
75
50
25
Mill
ion
Bar
rels
/Day
(M
b/d)
Rest of World
2008 World Demand
2004 20302008 2012 2020
125
100
75
50
25
Mill
ion
Bar
rels
/Day
(M
b/d)
Projected World Demand
2004 20302008 2012 2020
125
100
75
50
25
Mill
ion
Bar
rels
/Day
(M
b/d)
Gas – Price Per GallonJune 1, 2008
U.S. $ 3.96
Japan $ 5.77
Great Britain $ 8.31
France $ 9.66
Germany $ 11.49
Source: Energy Information Administration; Oil Information Center; AP Reporting
Savings RateSavings Rate
1.1. India -- 25%India -- 25%
2. Japan -- 28%2. Japan -- 28%
3. Korea -- 30%3. Korea -- 30%
4. China -- 50%4. China -- 50%
5. United States -- (-4%)5. United States -- (-4%)
Federal BudgetFederal Budget
• 2008 Deficit --- $2.5 Trillion2008 Deficit --- $2.5 Trillion
• Total Deficit --- $57.3 TrillionTotal Deficit --- $57.3 Trillion
• Deficit per Household --- $500,000Deficit per Household --- $500,000
Source: Atlantic Monthly
Federal, State & Local Federal, State & Local BudgetBudget
• Total Deficit --- $61.7 TrillionTotal Deficit --- $61.7 Trillion
• Deficit per Household --- $531,472Deficit per Household --- $531,472
• Family Debt --- $125,000Family Debt --- $125,000
1946
WW
1964
Japan
1983
Nation-At-Risk
Japan
1968
Vietnam
1972
China
1992
China
2008
China
2020
Vietnam
PanamaBrazil
Argentina
Indonesia
U.S. – 2nd Half of 20th Century
• Only Superpower
• Highest per Capita Income
• 1st in Economic Growth
• 5% of Population > 24% of Consumption
Source: National Academy of Science 2007
Challenges
• Globalization
• Technology
Information TechnologyInformation Technology
• ProcessingProcessing
• CommunicationsCommunications
SPOTSPOT
• MicrosoftMicrosoft– CitizenCitizen– FossilFossil– SuuncoSuunco
SPOTSPOT
• Integrated ProjectionIntegrated Projection
• Projection KeyboardProjection Keyboard
Projection KeyboardProjection Keyboard
Projection Keyboard and ProjectorProjection Keyboard and Projector
Language TranslationLanguage Translation
Emotiv
• 16 embedded sensors
• Detect facial expressions and emotions
• Push, pull, lift, and drop
http://emotiv.com/INDS_3/inds_3.html
Semantic Web
• Web 1.0 = Information based
• Web 2.0 = Communication based (tagging, social networks, etc.)
• Web 3.0 = Organize data and draw conclusions
Source: A Smarter Web
Evolution of the WebEvolution of the Web
Web 1.0 (1990-2000)Web 1.0 (1990-2000) Web used as an information Web used as an information
sourcesource
Web 1.0 Challenges
• Different language
• Different cultures
• Different business sectors
Web 1.0
• XML– Road system– Different Sign– Different management system
• Feline.com
Evolution of WebEvolution of Web
Web 2.0 (2000 - 2010)Web 2.0 (2000 - 2010)
• Web used as a communication Web used as a communication sourcesource
Web 2.0
• All data tagged by Ontologies
– Zip code
– Postal code
• Dewey Decimal System
Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0
Web 1.0 Web 2.0Reading Writing
Companies Communities
Home Pages Blogs
Wires Wireless
Netscape Google
Dialup Broadband
Hardware Costs Bandwidth Costs
Directories (taxonomy) Tagging (folksonomy)
Client-server Peer-to-peer
Web 3.0
• Web will transform from a network of separate applications to a seamless whole.
Web 3.0
• GPS read road sign and drive car
Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 vs. 3.0Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 vs. 3.0Web 1.0 Web 2.0 Web 3.0Reading Writing Tables/charts
Companies Communities All information
Home Pages Blogs
Wires Wireless
Netscape Google
Dialup Broadband
Hardware Costs Bandwidth Costs
Directories (taxonomy)
Tagging (folksonomy)
Client-server Peer-to-peer
SPN Database - Demographics
Grade Levels Community Type School Type
9-12 Urban – Large City Comprehensive
10-12 Urban – Small City Magnet, Choice
7-12 Suburban Charter
K-12 Rural Private
Other Other
Student Population 2007-08
Total Students
White Students
African-American Students
Hispanic Students
Asian American Students
Native American Students
1650
22
24
SPN Database – Student Achievement Data
Meeting AYP - ELA 2006-2007 2007-08
Yes No Exempt Yes No Exempt
All Students
Students w/ Disabilities
English Language Learners
Students in Poverty
African-American Students
Hispanic Students
Asian-American Students
Male Students
Female Students
Other
Consequences
• What is literacy ?
• Know, do, be like
Hunting vs. Grazingfor Information
Bio TechnologyBio Technology
• Biological ScienceBiological Science
• Practical ApplicationPractical Application
Nano TechnologyNano Technology
• Atom UpAtom Up
• Memory
Nanotechnology
Credit: J. J. Yang, HP Labs
Nanotechnology
• Memory
• Clothes that clean themselves
• Self-cleaning, oil-repellant materials
• Self-cleaning, fog-free windshields
Nano Tech Suits
• Morph into Camouflage
• Fabric Stiffens for use as a Splint
• Reproduce light to make the soldier nearly invisible
Source: NewScientist.com
Info TechInfo Tech
Nano TechNano Tech
Bio TechBio Tech
20002000
Info TechInfo Tech
Nano TechNano Tech
Bio TechBio Tech
20082008
20122012Info TechInfo Tech
Bio TechBio Tech
Nano TechNano Tech
Elementary Schools6 Years Integrated Science
Biology / Chemistry Grade 7
Biology / Physics Grade 8
Physics / Chemistry Grade 9
Integrated Science Grades 10 - 12
Source: Ed Week 6/6/07
Chinese Science
Challenges
• Technology
• Globalization
• Demographics
• 1910 3.0 / 100
Demographics / Economic
• 1946 4.6 / 100
• 2000 1.4 – 1.8 / 100
Demographics
• In 2016, 25% of the U.S. workforce will be over the age of 55.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
U.S. Population Percent Disabled
5-20 years old 6.5%
21-64 years old 13.0%
65+ years old 41.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Modern medicine is less able to promote healthy aging.
• The average 21st century American will spend more years caring for parents than children.
Robbins, John. (2006) Healthy at 100. Random House. p. xvii
More Ethnically Diverse
Caucasians are becoming less dominant as a consumer target…
65%
Teens
82%
Silent Generation
Caucasian
AA/Black
Hispanic
Asian
Source: Born to be Wired; Yahoo & Carat Interactive
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
• 2005 – 14%
• 2030 – 30%
U.S. Population, Hispanic
Challenges
• Technology
• Globalization
• Demographics
• Values / Beliefs
Students
• Technologically literate• Find information
Be Not Afraid
Literacy Skills
• Prose vs. document and quantitative
• Hunt vs. graze
On-Line Learning• Trophy Generation
– Technology– Feedback/Awards
• Customized
• Time
• Cost
Schools vs. World
• Customization vs. standardization
1587 Route 146
Rexford, NY 12148
Phone (518) 399-2776
Fax (518) 399-7607
E-mail - [email protected]
www.LeaderEd.com
International Center for Leadership in Education, Inc.