International civil protection and risk reduction Functional Center

1

International Civil Protection and Risk Reduction Functional Center

Shkoder - November 2016 ,17th

Riccardo Cocozza IKRAN SERVICES Chief Innovation Officer Holistic Program Working Group Member

2

>>FrameworkandgoalsWhat

An international risk functional center creation proposal, in the Adriatic area.

Why Defining common work and strategy on risk prevention and management

How MoliseRegioncreatedaworkinggroup,commi8edtodrawupapreliminaryanalysisonrisktechnicalstrategiesandforecastmanagement,throughtheinterna>onalriskfunc>onalcenter.

Workinggroupdecidedtofocusitsworkonmari-meandlandmigra-onstoo.Thistopicisreallyactualandcri>cal,bothforinvolvedsecurityproblemsandEUbordercontrollingsocialimpact.

3

>>Preliminaryworks

According to MEP Ivan Jakovcic’s EUSAIR Report, approved by European Parliament, Molise Region was going to start with a strong sensitization and design process, promoting a first study on “Civil Protection Systems of the Adriatic and Ionian Countries”. This report was written to describe the actual situation, about civil protection systems and regulatory laws, in the target area.

4

>>Summary>Civilprotec-onsystemsoftheadria-candioniancountries.Areview>Forecas>ngriskinkeycountries:

–  SeismicRisk–  WildFirerisk

–  VolcanoandSeaquakerisk–  Clima>cchangerisk

>Riskmanagementinkeycountries:

–  Technology&Solu>ons

5

>>Civilprotec-onsystemsoftheadria-candioniancountries.Areview

Basedontheprinciplesofsubsidiarityandcomplementarity,civilprotec>oncoopera>onprovedtoenhancetheoverallcapacitytocopewithawiderrangeofhazards,since‘80s.

Morethanthirtyyearslater,improvingsynergiesamongEuropeanCPauthori>esiss>llontheEUagenda.

>Stateoftheart

6

>>Civilprotec-onsystemsoftheadria-candioniancountries.Areview>CPPOpportuni-es

ThedevelopmentofanintegratedCivilProtec-onPolicy(hereaWerCPP)representsanopportunity:

to boost the sustainability and resilience of Civil

Protection systems at EU level

to enable the self-improvement of enlargement countries’ capabilities

and action as well as their closer integration within the EU

to identify a convergence criteria for future cross-border and trans-national cooperation

7

>>Civilprotec-onsystemsoftheadria-candioniancountries.Areview>CPPOpportuni-es

Thecrea>onofaregionalcentreforthestrategiccoordina-onofna-onalandregionalCPsystemsintheAdria>c-Ionianregioncanreallycons>tutearelevantaddedvalueintheEuropeanStrategyfortheAdria>c-IonianMacro-Region.

to enhance capacity building, on which the

centre could rely

8

>>Civilprotec-onsystemsoftheadria-candioniancountries.Areview>EUroleinthefieldofCP

•  Suppor>ng•  Coordina>ng•  Supplemen>ng

the actions of EU Member States

9

>>Civilprotec-onsystemsoftheadria-candioniancountries.Areview>EUroleinthefieldofCP(ar-cle196oftheTFEU)

“toencouragecoopera>onbetweenMemberStatesinordertoimprovetheeffec>venessofsystems..

forprotec>ngpeople,environmentandproperty,includingculturalheritage,againstnaturalorman-

madedisasters;

topromoteconsistencyininterna>onalCP;

tosupplementMemberStates’effortsandtraintheirpersonnel;

tosupportandcomplementpreparednessandpreven>onthrougha

rangeofac>vi>es,suchastrainingcourses,exchangesofexpertsandgood

prac>ces,simula>onexercisesanddifferenttypesofcoopera>onprojects.

10

>>Civilprotec-onsystemsoftheadria-candioniancountries.Areview>EUroleinthefieldofCP(ar-cle222oftheTFEU)

(So-called“solidarityclause”)

to “act jointly in the spirit of solidarity”, including the mobilisation of hard military resources aimed at addressing modern threats from non-state entities or natural or man-made disasters

11

>>Civilprotec-onsystemsoftheadria-candioniancountries.Areview>Posi-veeffectsofCPCpoten-alcandidatecountries

Facilitation of the integration and gradual association with the European Civil Protection System

Major role of the EU in enabling and boosting cooperation in the Macro-regional Strategy Countries and Regions

Increase of CP capacities in the area Risk reduction

12

>>Civilprotec-onsystemsoftheadria-candioniancountries.Areview>Adria-c-Ioniancountriesandregionsconvergingpriori-es

Assessmentofindividualinten>ons/capaci>estoconvergencetowardsthecommonobjec-veofpoolingexper>se,competencesandresourcesinthefieldofCP

The feasibility of the centre should be based on a wide consultation of all stakeholders

(Public administrations, universities, research institutions and enterprises)

Equalcomprehensionofna-onalauthori-es’roleintheestablishmentofaregionalcentrefordisasterpreparedness

13

>>SummaryCivilprotec>onsystemsoftheadria>candioniancountries.Areview

>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:–  SeismicRisk–  WildFirerisk




14

>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:SeismicRisk>SeismicHazardPredic-onandPreven-on

Thepredic-onofanearthquake’soccurrencewithinalimitedintervalof>me,spaceandmagnitudeisnotpossibletoday

itispossibletoforecastinacertainintervalof>me,spaceandmagnitudeaseismiceventwithaprobabilitygreaterthantheaverage(seismicprecursors)

Theiden>fica>onofseismogenicareas,thestudyoftheirhistoricalandrecentseismicity,tectonicandgeologicalstructureallowtodefinetheseismichazard,onwhichbasetotakeappropriatepreven-vemeasuresthatcanreducetheeffects.

EUSAIR Seismic Hazard maps yellow to orange colours indicate moderate hazard areas and red colours indicate high hazard areas

15

>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:SeismicRisk>Preven-onmeasures

Thedesignandconstruc>onofthenewbuildings(andtheadapta>onoftheexistentones)toseismicresistancetechnicalstandards

The above is of particular relevance for PSB Public Strategic Building: hospitals, fire stations, power plants, Civil Protection operational rooms )

16

>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:SeismicRisk>Recommenda-ons

Theover-memonitoringofthebuildingsdynamicbehaviorwithrespecttolocalseismicac>vity

–  permanentinstalla>onofaccelerometersandmicrotremors

–  periodicfastsurveyscarriedoutbytemporaryseismicsta>ons

EUSAIRriskfunc-onalcenter–  set-upofacommondefini>onofSPB;–  set-upofcommonsystemsofSPB

monitoring,seismicvulnerabilityassessmentanddevelopmentofsuggestedinterven>ons;

–  Set-upofacommonemergencycommunica>onradionetwork

17


>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:–  SeismicRisk

–  WildFirerisk–  VolcanoandSeaquakerisk–  Clima>cchangerisk



18

>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:Wildfirerisk>theriskforforestfiresandthevulnerabilityofforests

-  Climate change, -  increasing number of tourists, of

road and railway infrastructures -  human settlements

a level of risk beyond which further burning would seriously endanger these ecosystems

and their sustainable management

Satellite image showing a large number of fires in the Adriatic region on August 30th 2012

19

>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:Wildfirerisk>Jointmanagementpoliciesforcontrolofwild-firerisk

CPCsupporttoAdria>candIoniancountries

set-up of a common system of wildfire risk calculation and alerting;

set-up of common systems of wildfires’ monitoring, surveillance, early warning and evacuation (especially for the coastal touristic settlements);

standardisation and harmonisation of procedures for joint fire-fighting management particularly in cross-border fires;

standardisation of protocols for cross-border cooperation in fire-fighting including terrestrial and aerial fire-fighting;

20

>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:Wildfirerisk>Jointmanagementpoliciesforcontrolofwild-firerisk


definition of standard protocols in protection of vulnerable natural and man-made resources;

development of efficient procedures of prevention and control of wildfires in the wildland-urban interface areas;

set-up of a common Virtual Research Centre on wildfires, establishing a network of scientific and research institutions of the Adriatic and Ionian region; the Centre should promote investigation on wildfires fuel and development of reliable wildfire propagation simulators that can support the firefighters crews and aerial vehicles in the wildfire control and suppression activities.

development of a regional Web based system for information exchange concerning fire-fighting activities

21






22

>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:Volcanoandseaquakerisk>Direc-ve“Vesuvio”anitalianexempleofstandardiza-onandplanning

Theinterna>onalscien>ficcommunityhasindicatedtheVesuviusareaamongthemostdangerousintheworldduetovolcanicac>vity.

Vesuvius eruption. March 1944

About2millionpeoplepoten-allyatrisk..

Four levels of alert •  baselevel(green),•  alevelofa8en>on(yellow),•  apre-alarmlevel(orange)•  analarmlevel(red)

23

>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:Volcanoandseaquakerisk>DPCM14February2014

Twoplansforthetwoareas•  Redandyellowzoneof"VesuviusPlan”,•  Redandyellowzoneofthe"CampiFlegrei

Plan”,•  Thetwinningbetweenthetownsofthered

zoneandtheRegionsandtheAutonomousProvinces

24

>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:Volcanoandseaquakerisk>DCDPC31march2015

Opera>onalinstruc>onsthatcomponentsandopera>onalstructuresoftheNa>onalServiceshouldfollowtoupdatetheiremergencyplansincaseevacua>onoftheredzone:

–  Technicalcorps

–  PublicAdministra>ons

–  Twinnedregions

25

>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:Volcanoandseaquakerisk>VesuvioandCampiFlegreistatus

Vesuvio

CampiFlegrei

26



–  VolcanoandSeaquakerisk

–  Clima-cchangerisk>Riskmanagementinkeycountries:


27

>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:Clima-cchangerisk>Theclima-cchanges

The Mediterranean basin and the Balkan are two of the most vulnerable regions in the world, due to the impacts of Climatic Change interrelated consequences

VolumeofMediterraneanseamasseswhilehavinganindirectimpactonprecipita>ons,habitats,andassociatedecosystems.

The expected growth of the average annual temperature in the Mediterranean region will be slightly higher than that of the world level

LATEST NEWS from Marrakech Climatic Change Conference According to UN Meteorological Agency, 2016 world temperature is 1,2°C higher than pre-

industrial levels. 2016 is one of the 16 hottest years in known temperature history.

28

>Jointmanagementpoliciesforcontrolofclima-cchangerisk>>Forecas-ngriskinkeycountries:Clima-cchangerisk


set-up of a common system of climatic risk calculation and alerting;

set-up of common system of monitoring, surveillance, early warning and evacuation (especially for the coastal touristic settlements);

standardization and harmonization of procedures for joint management of emergency, particularly in cross-border floods

improvement of weather monitoring, through the installation of new weather monitoring stations and X-band weather radars in not adequately monitored areas, especially in those with the highest tourist density, and in those at high risk of more floods and landslides

improvement of weather monitoring respect to heat waves in urban areas more densely populated.

29

>>Mari>meandlandmigra>ons


set-up of common system of monitoring, surveillance, early warning and rescue;

standardization and harmonization of procedures for joint management of emergency, particularly in cross-border flows

Central management of operative and technical structures

30





–  Technology&Solu-ons

31

>ManageResiliencewithInnova-veTechnology

>>Riskmanagementinkeycountries:Technology&Solu-ons

Theanatomyofacityiscomplexasitconsistsofdifferentelements.Theseare:

Society (individuals, groups of people, government..)

Services and Infrastructures that contribute to the welfare of citizens

Interactions

32

Technology solutions and capabilities are able to cover the different risk domains: Weather-hydrogeological, Forest Fire, Environmental, Seismic, Volcanic, Tsunami, Migration & Border Control



33



Such system(s) must support the the Managers who will be in charge for managing both the “cross layer” and the “Silo” during day by day activities and immediately before, during and post the critical event.

34

>Fromdatagathering..>>Riskmanagementinkeycountries:Technology&Solu-ons

35

>..toinforma-onvisualiza-on..>>Riskmanagementinkeycountries:Technology&Solu-ons

Events management

Standard sensors

UAS

Radar

Hyperspectral Opticalsensors

Events/Alarms list Events correlation

Events/Alarms description Workflow Physical resources localization

2D and satellite mapping TVCC

Satellite ……..

36

>…todecisionsupport>>Riskmanagementinkeycountries:Technology&Solu-ons

37

Riccardo Cocozza IKRAN SERVICES Chief Innovation Officer Holistic Program Working Group Member

@ [email protected] Ph. +39 331 19 73 404

On behalf of the working group, composed of: Dott. Nicola Pavone – Molise Region & Working Group Leader Avv. Mario Ialenti - Molise Region Dott.ssa Maria Luisa Esposito - MA in Comparative and European Studies Dott. Gino Verrocchi - European Project Expert Prof. Marco Marchetti - Molise University Prof. Massimiliano Fazzini - Camerino University Dott. Antonio Cardillo - Civil Protection Service, Molise Region Ing. Giorgio Mosca – Head of Strategies and Solutions, Leonardo Finmeccanica

Thank you for your attention

Date post:	25-Jan-2017
Category:	Government & Nonprofit
Upload:	riccardo-cocozza
View:	115 times
Download:	0 times

International civil protection and risk reduction Functional Center

Government & Nonprofit