+ All Categories
Home > Documents > International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Date post: 12-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: ashley
View: 37 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
The use of the Cito Monitoring and Evaluation System for school self-improvement in The Netherlands. International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013 Henk A. Moelands Director Cito International Cito, The Netherlands. Quality Assurance. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
32
International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013 Henk A. Moelands Director Cito International Cito, The Netherlands The use of the Cito Monitoring and Evaluation System for school self- improvement in The Netherlands
Transcript
Page 1: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

International Forum“EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE”

Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Henk A. MoelandsDirector Cito International

Cito, The Netherlands

The use of the Cito Monitoring and Evaluation System for school self-improvement

in The Netherlands

Page 2: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Quality Assurance

• Internationally– PISA– ESLC– …….

• Nationally– PPON (NAEP)– School leaving exams– …….

Page 3: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Quality Assurance

• Internationally– PISA– ESLC– …….– …….

• Nationally– PPON (NAEP)– School leaving exams– …….– …….

League tables

Accountability

Page 4: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Quality Assurance

• Internationally– PISA– ESLC– …….– …….

• Nationally– PPON (NAEP)– School leaving exams– …….– …….

SchooI improvement

Page 5: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Quality Assurance

• Internationally– PISA– ESLC– …….– …….

• Nationally– PPON (NAEP)– School leaving exams– …….– …….

SchooI improvement

Monitoring and Evaluation System

Page 6: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

A tool for teacher and school to monitor in a

reliable and systematic way:

Purpose

- the progress of individual learners throughout their (primary) school career

- (aspects of) the quality of the school

Recently

Provide school boards with information about the learning outcomes of their schools

Page 7: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Consists of:- a coherent set of nationally standardized

tests (paper based and computer based) for longitudinal assessment of a pupil’s achievement throughout primary education

- a system for manual or automated registration of pupil progress

Content

Page 8: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Instruments

Page 9: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Diagnostic component• collecting additional data• identifying specific problems• drawing up remedial plan

Testing component• administration• marking and interpretation

Working procedure

Remedial component• carrying out remedial plan• evaluating remedial plan

Page 10: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

The Dutch education system

Page 11: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

11

Monitoring at individual level

Grade 1

Grade 2

Grade 8

Grade 3

common scale

e.g. length

Page 12: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Allows:

• Test results that differ in content, difficulty

and number of items can be compared

• Monitoring over years with different tests

• Position of pupil on scale to be compared

with national reference group

Measuring technique (IRT)

Page 13: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Reporting

Manually or with the help of a

computer program

- For each individual- For each class- For the school as a whole

Page 14: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

PMS: Classroom related

Page 15: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Pupil Report

Page 16: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013
Page 17: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Ability scale Mathematics

Page 18: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

PMS: School related

Page 19: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

• School Improvement

School self-evaluation

• Accountability

- Inspectorate

- Publications of results in school plan e.g.

Page 20: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Cross section

Page 21: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Trend analysis (cohorts)

Page 22: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Trend analysis (grades)

Page 23: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

PMS: School board related

Page 24: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

Monitor

Page 25: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

School board overview of testing period

Page 26: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

School board trend overview

Page 27: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

In conclusion (1)

Cito’s Monitoring and Evaluation System is:•A practical tool for teachers and schools to systematically monitor the quality of education. Recently also for school boards•A system for (automatic) registration and reporting on 4 levels:

• Individual pupil• Grade or cohort• School• Across schools

Page 28: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

In conclusion (2)

• 95% of the Dutch primary schools use at least one of the tests of the system for purposes of self-evaluation

• Head teachers in the Netherlands regard self-evaluation as a useful and instructive undertaking

• But: accompanying process take a lot of time and causes many to hesitate when it comes to actually carrying out a self-evaluation.

Page 29: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

In conclusion (3)

Please be aware:

Purposes may change over time

Page 30: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013
Page 31: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

In conclusion (3)

Please be aware:

Purposes may change over time

Page 32: International Forum “EURASIAN EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE” Yaroslavl (Russia), April 17-19, 2013

спасибо ([email protected])


Recommended