International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
34
Bank Characteristics and Profitability of Commercial Banks in Kenya
ANTHONY MAINA WAMBUGU
MBA Student, Kenyatta University
DR. JEREMIAH KOORI
Lecturer, Department of Accounting and Finance
School of Business, Kenyatta University
ABSTRACT
The profitability of commercial banks in Kenya has generally been on a declining trend from 20
percent in 2012, to 16percent in 2013, to 12.1 percent in 2014, to negative 5.3 percent in 2015,
with the profitability being 10 percent in 2016. Beyond the intermediation role performed by
commercial banks, the profitability of commercial banks has critical implications for growth and
economic well-being of a nation. The research work reviewed did not consider inflation and its
controlling impact on the conducted studies the characteristics of bank on commercial banks
performance. This research study filled these gaps by determining the relationship between bank
characteristics and commercial bank’s profitability in Kenya. Specific objectives of the study were
to establish the effect of characteristics namely; size of the bank, quality of the asset and capital
adequacy on profitability of the commercial banks in Kenya and the moderating/regulating effects
of inflation on the bank characteristics relationship with profitability of commercial banks in
Kenya. Market power theory and efficiency structure Theory were used to explain the
interrelationship between variables. The study adopted a census sampling design where causal
research design was used. The study made use of panel data and panel regression model was
utilized. Diagnostic tests for multi-collinearity and normality was carried out before making
inferences. The study obtained complete financial data from 35 commercial banks. This accounted
for 81.3 per cent of the targeted population. The descriptive results presented that the average
capital adequacy was 22.35 per cent for the year 2013 to 2017. The descriptive findings indicated
that the average asset quality was 0.1094. The findings on bank size indicated that average bank
size (natural logarithm of total assets) was 10.6042. The banks average net income was 0.98166
billion for period 2013 to 2017. The multicollinearity test indicated that there was no possibility
of multi-collinearity between variables thus regression analysis could be done to show the
relationships between the dependent and independent variables. The results on analysis of variance
established that the regression analysis equation was significant in explaining the relationship
between the variables. The results on regression coefficients indicated that indicated that the
relationship between capital adequacy and net income was not significant and was negative. The
findings indicated that the correlation between asset quality and profitability of the bank was
insignificant abut positive. However, the relationship between size of the bank and profitability of
commercial banks was found to be positive and significant. The moderating effect of inflation was
tested and the results showed that its effects was insignificant on bank characteristics effect on
profitability of commercial banks in Kenya. The study concluded that the moderating effect of
inflation on bank characteristics effect on profitability of commercial banks in Kenya was
insignificant. The study recommended that, commercial banks in Kenya increase total assets which
will help in increasing the level of revenue. The study period was five years hence further research
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
35
can be done on longer periods to examine the effect of bank characteristics on profitability of
commercial banks in Kenya. The study used total capital to total risk weight as a measure of capital
adequacy hence it recommends for further study use of other measures of capital adequacy to
examine their relationship with profitability.
INTRODUCTION
Globally, commercial banks perform a very vital economic role in developing the nations for they
widely control the supply of money in circulation and greatly are the major economic progress
stimuli (Mohana&Tekeste, 2012).The banking system is a vital part of a nation’s financial system.
The financial intermediation role of commercial banks cannot be overemphasized. They link
surplus unit’s agents (depositors) and deficit unit agents (borrowers) together for the purpose of
productive activities which in turn enhances the economic growth of a country (Olweny & Shipho,
2011). Therefore, the health of a country’s economy is directly related to the stability of its banking
system.
In Kenya, commercial banks largely dominated the financial sector which implies that any at large
any failure of the financial institutions in Kenya has got an enormous effects on the survival of the
country’s economy. This is attributed to the reasoning that any insolvency that may occur in the
banking sector a domino and multiplier effect which can lead to problem in the economy, bank
runs and overall economic and financial crisis (Meshak & Nyamute, 2016).
The profitability of banks is of vital importance for all stakeholders, these stakeholders are
investors, owners of the banks, managers of various banks, government agents, regulators,
depositors and the public in general (Podder, 2012). This is because banks’ profitability gives a
snapshot of the commercial banks performance which are the backbone in giving directions to the
stakeholder’s thus enabling them make important decisions. It also a source of direction to the
investors and debtors on whether to or not invest in a particular bank. It gives proper directions to
the managers of the banks whether make improvements or retain a certain strategy and regulatory
bodies are also interested in the profitability financialperformance for the regulation purposes
(Ongore, 2013).
The profitability of financial institutions especially the banks is mostly affected by factors from
within the banks for instance internal factors (bank characteristics) and factors outside the banks
also known as external factors (macroeconomic). The internal factors are bank characteristics
specific to a particular bank that impacts on its profitability. Bank characteristics are influenced
by internal decision made by banks’ management and its board. On the other hand, the external
factors are country or sector wide factors which affect profitability and are beyond the control of
bank management (Ognore, 2013). This study aims to determine the effects of bank characteristics
(internal factors) on the commercial bank profitability and effects of inflation (external factor)
moderator on bank characteristics relationships with commercial bank profitability in Kenya.
Bank Characteristics
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
36
Internal factor considered i.e bank characteristics, bank characteristics are specific to a bank with
bank management control within it (Kajuju, 2016). Bank characteristics include size of the bank,
capital adequacy and quality of assets. Bank size is a bank specific variable that accounts for
diseconomies and economies of scale. There are two views concerning the relationship between
bank size and profitability. The “too big to fail” hypothesis is the first view advocates a negative
relationship between bank size and profitability. Conversely, the second hypothesis supports a
positive relationship between bank size and profitability (Kajuju, 2016). In this study, bank size
was measured using bank total asset.
The quality of asset in a bank is another bank characteristic that impacts on banks’ profitability.
The main source of income of commercial banks is interests charged on loans (Dietrich &
Wanzenried, 2011). Therefore, loans are the major assets of commercial banks from which income
is generated. The profitability of banks is determined by the quality of these loan portfolios. There
is a direct bearing of loan portfolio quality on profitability of banks. The losses derived from
delinquent loans constitute the highest risk faced by banks (Dang & Uyen, 2011). Therefore, the
current study adopted ratio of loans not performing to total bank loans as a proxy for asset quality.
Hence, low non-performing loans to total loans ratio indicates a good quality of the bank asset as
the lower the ratio the better the profitability of banks (Sangmi & Tabassum, 2010).
Inflation
A continual increase in price level of all goods and services over a certain period of time in the
market is known as the inflation. This was measured using the inflation rate, which is defined as
the percentage change in the monthly consumer price index (CPI) (Buyinza, 2010). A rise in
general price level signals a fall in the purchasing power of the currency. Implying that there is a
rise the general price level, a given money unit can afford lesser and lesser goods and services.
The inflation effects may not be distributed evenly which may result in costs which are hidden to
some and benefits to some others from the decline in the power of purchasing.
Profitability
One way to determine the performance of banks is by determining their profitability. Profitability
is the financial institutions’ ability to generate income by earning more money that exceeds the
yearly expenses and taxes incurred in every financial year (Kwakwa, 2014). Banks generate profits
from the interests levied on assets and the fees charged for services offered. Conversely, the main
expense incurred by financial institutions lies on the paid interest every financial year on their
liabilities. Therefore, the profitability of the commercial bank is represented by the positive
differences between increased earnings and the reduced expenses. The only asset of the
commercial banks that attract more revenue are bank loans which may be advanced to persons,
entities and other institutions.
The indicator of commercial banks profitability is gross profit margin, profit before tax, net profit
margin, and profits attributable to shareholders. The current study adopt net income as a measure
of profitability. Commercial banks profitability in Kenya is on a declining trend in years 2012 to
2016.
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
37
Table 1.1 Trends in Profitability of Commercial Banks in Kenya
Figure 1.1 presents the trend in profitability of commercial banks in Kenya as indicated by their
profit before tax.
Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Profitability(PBT change in percent ) 20.1 16
12.1 (5.3) 10
Source: World Bank (2017)
The trend depicted in Table 1.1 indicates a generally declining pattern of commercial banks’
profitability as shown by their profit before tax (PBT). The PBT stood at 20.1 percent as at
2012which declined to 16 percent in 2013. Furthermore, the decline extended to 12.1 percent in
2014, negative 5.3 percent in 2015 and 10 percent in 2016. Kenyan banks’ total profit before tax
in 2018 clocked a record high of 152.3 billion shillings which surpassed the 2016 profit before tax
peak which was reported before the introduction of controls on interest rate. The trend has not been
consisted since the pre-tax profit for 2017 was Kshs. 136 billion and that of 2016 was Kshs. 150
billion. Over the profit that the banks made in the year 2017 the lenders earnings increased by
12.3% (Central Bank of Kenya report, 2018).
Commercial Banks in Kenya
Currently in Kenya there are 43commercial banks which comprise of both locally and foreign
owned and are regulated by the Central Bank of Kenya. 7 of the commercial banks are listed at
NSE while 36 are non-listed. These banks offer services which range from retail services, corporate
services to investment banking (Meshak & Nyamute, 2017).
Table 1.1: Classification of Commercial Banks in Kenya
Peer Group (Size) Market share No. of institutions
Large 49.90percent 6
Medium 41.70percent 16
Small 8.40percent 21
Total 100percent 43
Source: CBK (2017)
The large banks category comprise of 6 bank which account for 49.90percent of the market share,
the medium banks category comprise of 16 banks which account for 41.70percent of the market
share and while the small size banks category is made up of 21 banks accounting for 8.40percent
of the market share.
According to Kenya Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC) forensic audit report 2015, two banks
Dubai Bank and Imperial Bank were indicted for Loans frauds, bad loans provision inadequacy
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
38
and omissions, low cash ratio and capital inadequacy. This led to the banks being put under
receivership. Further the CBK noted that non-performing loans trend was increasing and there is
need to curtail loopholes that would result to further collapse. Therefore, one of the objectives of
the research work was establish the effects of asset quality on commercial bank profitability in
Kenya.
Statement of the Problem
The profitability of Kenyan banks has experienced a deteriorating trend as indicated by the
declining profit before tax. The PBT stood at 20.1 percent as at 2012 which declined to 16 percent
in 2013. Furthermore, the decline extended to 12.1 percent in 2014, negative 5.3 percent in 2015
and 10 percent in 2016. This in turn has generated debates by scholars and professionals. This is
because Kenya is a bank driven economy and therefore the failure of the banking sector will have
a multiplier effect on the economy as a whole. Understanding the bank characteristics and their
effect on profitability of banks remains crucial to the banks’ management and other stakeholders
who include the CBK, the government among others (Kimande, 2017).
Empirical studies on bank characteristics and profitability were mostly focused on developed
countries and other countries other than Kenya. Furthermore, these studies are characterized by
mixed results.
For instance, studies by Liu (2011); Olweny and Shipho (2011); Ogilo (2012); Ezra (2013);
Macharia (2013),Ongore and Kusa (2013); Echeboka et al., (2014);Uzhegova (2015); investigated
the effect of bank size, asset quality and capital adequacy on financial performance. Some of these
scholars found a significant effect of these bank characteristics on performance of bank while the
others found insignificant effect of these bank characteristics of performance.
Additionally, all the above empirical studies conducted never considered moderating effects of
inflation on bank characteristics relationship with performance of commercial banks. Therefore,
this study aimed at bridging the gap on the effects of bank characteristics namely; size of the bank,
quality of the asset and capital adequacy on Commercial Bank’s profitability in Kenya and the
moderating/regulating effect of inflation on the bank characteristics effects on profitability of
commercial banks in Kenya.
Objectives of the Study
General Objective
The main purpose the study was to find out the effect of bank characteristics on commercial’
bank’s profitability in Kenya.
Specific Objectives
The study determined the following the specific objectives.
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
39
i) To establish the relationship between size of the bank and commercial bank’s
profitability in Kenya.
ii) To determine the relationship between asset quality and commercial bank’s
profitability in Kenya.
iii) To establish the Capital adequacy relationship with commercial bank’s profitability in
Kenya.
iv) To ascertain the moderating effect of inflation on the relationship between bank
characteristics and commercial bank profitability in Kenya.
Research Hypotheses
The study sought to test the following hypotheses:
H01: There is no significant relationship between bank size and commercial bank’s
profitability in Kenya.
H02: There is no significant relationship between asset quality and commercial bank’s
profitability in Kenya.
H03: There is no significant relationship between capital adequacy andcommercial bank’s
profitability in Kenya.
H04: There is no significant moderating effect of inflation in determining the relations
between bank characteristics and commercial bank’s profitability in Kenya.
Significance of the Study
The study findings helped the management of commercial banks in carrying out operations that
enhanced profitability in the banking sector. The findings will help the managers understand the
interrelationship between the reviewed bank’s characteristics on profitability. The findings also
helped the Kenyan government on commercial banks and financial institutions on policy
formulations. Furthermore, the study educated the members of public in general on the effect
commercial banks characteristics on profitability. The study was of importance to academicians
as it provided important insight on effects of bank characteristics on bank’s profitability and helped
researchers who wish to embark on a related study topic.
Limitations of the Study
The study used secondary data which was sourced from the internet. The secondary data had a
limitations in that different sources in the internet have numerous and different data. The researcher
reduced this challenge by comparing data from different sources and getting the averages from the
credible sources such as Central Bank of Kenya and Cynton investment reports.
Project Organisation
The following is the proposal organization; the first Chapter (Chapter one) presented the
background information, the motivation problem, measurable study objectives, study’s
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
40
significances, limitation’s and the study’s scope covered. The next chapter, Chapter two includes
the reviews on empirical and theoretical literature. The third chapter includes the research study
methodologies to be used. The fourth chapter presents the findings, presentation and data
interpretations. The summary of the study, conclusions and recommendations based on the specific
objectives were presented in chapter five.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Theoretical literature review, review on empirical, literature review summary and the conceptual
framework was presented in this chapter.
Theoretical Review
In carrying out the study, Market Power Theory and Efficiency Structure Theory was used to
underpin the study.
Market Power Theory
This theory was proposed by Bhagwati in 1965. The market power theory proposes that a
firm/institution can influence the market prices of goods and services by demand or supply control
exercise or both. A zero market power can only be experienced under perfect competition, thus all
the firms must accept the prevailing market price without the ability to control or change over it
(Kamande, 2017). According to Bhagwati, the increase in market external forces will result to
improved financial performance. Additionally, the theory hypotheses that only institutions with
well differentiated assets and large market share was able to win against their competitors and earn
monopolistic incomes (Flamini et al., 2009).
In support of the current study, market power theory argues that the size of banks can positively
impact on their profitability. This can be through various channels, bearing in mind that banks
larger in size enjoy the economies of scale benefits and powers to control the market share which
will facilitate in generating profits which are abnormal. The size of the bank may be used to arrest
the economies of scale or banking sector diseconomies of scale (Karkrah & Ameyaw, 2010).
Mostly large banks have shown improved profitability and the incomes has been positive,
however, due to the bureaucratic and agency costs, the effects could be negative especially for
large banks with the reported enormous asset base (big size) (Goddard, Molyneux& Wilson, 2004).
Hence, the banks’ size results to the economies of scale and hence the market power. The current
study supports the asset quality and capital adequacy who are the indicators of bank characteristics
in explaining their relationship with profitability of commercial banks in Kenya.
Efficiency Structure Theory
The propositions of Efficiency Structure Theory are that improved efficient managerial scale
results to improved concentration and then to improved incomes. Efficiency in itself indicates the
desirable improved profitability of financial institutions more so the commercial banks. The theory
on the efficiency structure presents that firm’s performance is positively correlated to firm’s
efficiency. According to Ayano (2016) the improved profits are as a results of increased efficiency.
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
41
The two hypotheses that is X efficiency and scale efficiency are also included in efficiency
structure theory. The first hypothesis (X efficiency) posits that commercial banks with good
managers practices cost controls and raises the level of incomes, moves the commercial banks
closer to the best customer care practices and lowers the bound cost curve. On the other hand the
scale efficiency posits that many of the commercial banks attain improved operation scale thus
lowering costs (Kimande, 2017).
Empirical Review
This section comprises of the review of empirical review relating to bank characteristics and
profitability.
Bank Size and Profitability
Musyoka (2017) studied the bank size effects on performance of commercial banks in Kenya. The
study adopted a descriptive analysis and data was collected from 42 banks in Kenya. The study
found bank size relationship with commercial banks returns on asset was negative and and
significant. Babalola (2013) findings concurred with Musyoka findings on a study on the effects
of bank size in determining revenue levels. The study found that banks size is very key in
determining its relationship with both internal and external environment and larger banks are stable
and have capability to generate huge revenues due to different products they offer as well as the
market coverage.
Asset Quality and Profitability
Shipho and Olweny (2011) studied the impact of commercial bank’s specific contributors on
commerrcial bank’s financial performance in Kenya. Explanatory method was employed by the
use of panel research design. The study was interested in the periods 2002 to 2008 where financial
statements of 38 commercial banks in Kenya were obtained from the CBK and commercial bank
survey data for 2009. A method on multiple regression was employed to present the correlation
between variables and to show the direction of change of dependent variable as a result of change
of independent variables. The study found asset quality has got a very significant negative effects
on commercial bank’s financial performance in Kenya. However, the study did not conduct
diagnostics tests before carrying out inferential analysis. In addition, the above study failed to
include the moderating effects of inflation in the relationships between the variables sought.
Musyoka (2017) studied the bank size effects on performance of commercial banks in Kenya. The
results revealed that there is a negative and insignificant relationship between assets quality and
commercial banks in Kenya financial performance. This is an indication that there is no significant
relationship between commercial banks in Kenya financial performance and assets quality. Jeanne
and Svensson (2014) however suggest that asset quality is a key determinant of future earnings
and, therefore, capital generation or erosion. The author argued that bank’s asset is loans and they
determine a greater percentage of the firms income hence the quality of the loans is key.
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
42
Capital Adequacy and Profitability
Musyoka (2017) studied the bank size effects on performance of commercial banks in Kenya.
.indicated that the average capital adequacy for the banks was 23.16% which above the regulatory
value of 14.5%. The study found that on average the asset quality was 0.09909 whereas the average
liquidity was 0.40795 while the average value of management quality was 4.03326. The study
found that capital adequacy relationship with the returns on assets in commercial banks was
negative and significant.
A study was done to assess the impact of camel models variables that is capital adequacy liquidity
management earnings and sensitivity on profitability of commercial banks in Chinese (Liu, 2011).
The focus of the study was periods 2008 to 2011. The study was interested in 13 banks quoted in
stock exchange of Shangai, China. Multiple linear regression methods predicted the relationship
between variables of the study. The inferential statistics indicated that capital adequacy and strong
and significant effect on Commercial Bank financial performance. The focus of this study was on
Commercial banks in Chinese something financial performance while the current study will focus
on banks in Kenya and all Factor the inflation rate is the moderating effect on the relationship
between the profitability of commercial banks and the capital adequacy.
Inflation and Profitability
Buyinza (2010) assessed the effects of bank characteristics on commercial bank’s profitability in
Sub-Saharan African countries. The scope of the study considered 23 commercial banks. The
periods of interests was 1999 to 2006 and the study captured the profitability for these periods in
Sub-Saharan Africa. The analysis was done with the help of panel regression model. The finding
of the study presented there is a significant positive effects of inflation on commercial banks
profitability. Buyinza’s study was a cross country analysis study while this study focused on
Kenyan commercial banks thus specific findings affecting the local banks.
Ajayi and Atanda (2012) studied the effects of instruments of controlling money supply on
Commercial bank’s financial performance in Nigeria. The study periods of interest were years
1980 to 2008. The study utilized Engle-granger two step co-integration method. The study found
that the rate of inflation had a positive in-significant effects on Nigerian. The study revealed th
banks financial performance. However, the study did not conduct diagnostic tests in Nigeria before
carrying out inferential analysis. The current study conducted diagnostics tests for panel regression
before conducting inferential analysis and conclusions.
Assessment of the effect of global crisis and profitability of commercial banks in Kenya was done
by Macharia (2013). The study was interested in banks’ (commercial) that offer secured loans
financing. The effect of inflation was found to be strongly and negatively correlated to the bank's
profitability. The study by Macharia concentrated on inflation’s direct effects profitability levels
of the banks. This research paper will focus on Kenyan 43 banks’ profitability and also factored in
the inflation’s moderating effects on the relationships between bank characteristics and
commercial bank’s profitability.
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
43
Kiganda (2014) analysed the effects of macro-economic factors on commercial bank’s profitability
in Kenya. The study employed a case study and Equity’ Bank in Kenya was considered. The
independent considered included GDP, rate of exchange and rate of inflation while the dependent
variable was the bank’s profitability. The periods of interest was years 2008 and 2012 and data for
the period was collected. A multiple regression model was utilized to determine the relationship
between variables. The paper found that the rate of inflation effects on profitability of commercial
banks (Equity Bank) were positive and insignificant. The study focused on a single bank in Kenya
out of the 43 commercial banks and therefore such analytical findings may not be generalized to
the remaining 42 banks (commercial). This research paper focused on Kenyan 43 banks’
profitability and also factored in the inflation’s moderating effects on the relationships between
bank characteristics and commercial bank’s profitability.
Profitability of Commercial Banks
A Study in Ethiopia before the period of ten years that is 2002 to 2013 was examined by Alemu
(2015) on Commercial banks profitability. To analyse data the study used a linear regression and
a fixed effect regression models. The study found that capital adequacy bank size and gross
domestic product is a significant positive relationship with the bank's profitability the findings of
this study indicated that the operational efficiency bank sector development funding costs and
liquidity had negative statistical significance with the bank’s profitability. The study found that
relationship between efficiency of employees’ management efficiency and inflation and rate of
exchange ad are insignificant statistical relationship with the performance of commercial Banks.
A study by Abebe (2014) on the effect of internal external factors on profitability of commercial
banks in Ethiopia. The study collected data which were panel data for the period of 2002 to period
of 2013. The study also used the fixed effects regression models the results of the inferential
statistics indicated that diversification of income structure of the capital cost of operations and
negative significant correlations with the performance of the banks. The study also indicated that
the size of the bank and profitability had significant and positive relationship. This study also
established that microeconomic variables and insignificant correlations with the return on assets
of commercial banks considered in Ethiopia. The study used the return on asset is the indicator of
the financial performance. The study was done in Ethiopia while the current study will be carried
out in Kenya
Summary of Literature Review and Research Gap
The following is the reviewed research gaps from the above empirical literature.
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
44
Table : Summary of Empirical Review and Research Gap
Authors
Context and
Focus
Major Findings Gaps Identified Current study
Focus
Musyoka
(2017)
Bank size and
financial
performance of
commercial banks
The relationship
between bank size
and return on
assets was
negative and
significant.
Descriptive
analysis was
used.
Both descriptive
and exploratory
was used.
Musyoka
(2017)
Asset and financial
performance of
commercial banks
The relationship
between asset
quality and return
on assets was
positive and
significant.
Descriptive
analysis was
used.
Both descriptive
and exploratory
was used.
Ifeacho
and
Ngalawa
(2014)
The
macroeconomic
variables and bank
specific variables
and their effects on
financial
performance of
South Africa’s
banking sector.
The study found
that asset quality
has a significant
negative effects
on ROE.
The study made
use of annual data
on the four largest
banks in South
Africa which are
ABSA, Nedbank,
First National
Bank and
Standard Bank for
the period 1994
and 2011.
The current
proposed research
problem seeks to
fill the gap
(contextual gap)
as it focused on
commercial
bank’s financial
performance in
Kenya.
Kwakwa
(2014)
Contributors of
Ghana’s
commercial bank
financial
performance.
The study found
that inflation had
a positive
insignificant
effects on
commercial
bank’s financial
performance
Cross country
analysis was
used.
The current
proposed research
study sought to
fill the gap
(contextual gap)
as it focused on
commercial
bank’s financial
performance in
Kenya.
Kiganda
(2014)
Analysed the
effects of macro-
economic factors
on commercial
bank’s profitability
in Kenya.
The paper found
that the rate of
inflation effects
on profitability of
commercial banks
(Equity Bank)
Study focused on
a single bank in
Kenya out of the
43 commercial
banks and
therefore such
This research
paper focused on
Kenyan 43 banks’
profitability and
also factored in
the inflation’s
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
45
were positive and
insignificant.
analytical
findings may not
be generalized to
the remaining 42
banks
(commercial).
moderating
effects on the
relationships
between bank
characteristics and
commercial
bank’s
profitability.
Ezra
(2013)
The contributors of
profitability of
commercial banks
in sub-Sahara
Africa
Bank size had a
negative
significant effects
on commercial
bank profitability.
Capital Adequacy
has a positive
significant effects
on commercial
bank’s
profitability.
Cross country
analysis was
used.
This study
focused on local
analysis hence the
results was
Kenyan specific
findings.
Okoth and
Gemechu
(2013)
Contributors of
financial
performance of of
commercial banks
in Kenya.
Capital adequacy
had a positive
significant effects
on commercial
banks financial
performance.
The study did not
conduct
investigative tests
to establish the
correctness of
data before
conducting
inferential
analysis.
The current study
conducted
investigative tests
to establish the
correctness of
data before
conducting
inferential
analysis.
Jha and
Hui (2012)
Financial
characteristics
relationship
performance of
different
ownership
structured
commercial banks
in Nepal
Capital adequacy
ratio has a
positive
significant effects
on Nepal’s
commercial banks
financial
performance
The banks
considered were
from Napal
Kenyan
commercial banks
were considered
in the current
study.
Buyinza
(2010)
Sub-saharan
countries
Commercial
bank’s profitability
Size of the bank
has a positive
significant effects
on bank’s
profitability.
Cross country
analysis was
used.
This study
focused on local
analysis hence the
results was
Kenyan specific
findings.
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
46
Source: Researcher’s Literature Review (2018)
Conceptual Framework
The framework provided a visual relationship of the study variables. The independent variables of
the study were bank characteristics while the dependent variable constitutes the profitability of
commercial banks as measured by PBT. The bank characteristics (bank size, asset quality and
capital adequacy) were proposed to predict the profitability of banks. Similarly, the moderating
variable of the study was inflation which was proposed to affect the relationship between bank
characteristics and profitability.
Independent Variables
Dependent Variable
Figure 2.1: Conceptual Framework
Source: Researcher (2019)
Ho4
Moderating variable
Ho3
Ho2
Ho1
Bank Characteristics
Bank Size
Log of total assets
Capital Adequacy
CAR = Equity/
Total assets.
Asset Quality
Non-Performing
Loans / total
loans
Inflation
Inflation Rate
Profitability
PBT
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
47
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Chapter three presented the study methodologies. It presented the study research design,
units/elements targeted by the researcher, instruments used to collect data and methods of
analysing data.
Research Design
A study research design presents the outline for gathering data, measurement used and data
estimation by the researcher (Cooper & Schindler, 2009). The current study adopted causal
research design. The current focuses on the causal effects of bank characteristics on commercial
bank’s profitability in Kenya hence causal design was appropriate.
Target Population
A target population refers to a collection of units or elements LED videos in which the researcher
will use to make various influences. The 43 Commercial banks in Kenya will be considered as the
target population. The banks considered worthy commercial banks which were in operation for the
period of consequently, the unit of observation of the study comprised of the published financial
statements of the 43 commercial banks.
Empirical Model
In conducting the analysis of the study, panel regression model based on a panel data was adopted.
Therefore, profitability (PBT) was expressed as a function of bank size, asset quality and capital
adequacy.
Yit = β0 + β1X1it + β2X2it + β3X3it + єit……………………………………………………….3.1
Where:
Y it - Profitability
β0 - Constant
X1it – Bank Size
X2it – Asset Quality
X3it – Capital Adequacy
β1 – β3 are co-efficients of the multiple variables and indicate the changes of the dependent
variable as a result of changes in the independent variables.
Єit= The model Error Term, It presents any uncaptured variable in the model
The two models presented below tested the moderator (inflation) and its contribution on the effects
of commercial bank characteristics on level of profitability.
Yit = β0 + β1Xit+ ε……............................................................................................................3.2
Yit = β0 + β1Xit + β2M0it + β3 Xit * M0it + ε......................................................................3.3
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
48
Where; Yit = Profitability
Xit = Bank Characteristics
M0it = Inflation (The moderator)
Xit * M0it = Interaction term
β1, β2, and β3 = Beta coefficients
ε = Error term
According to Whisman and McClelland (2005) in the case of the overall effects moderation, the
test moderation effect focused specifically on determining whether the interaction term co-
effecients was empirically be different from zero.
Operationalisation and Measurement of Variables
The independent variables of the study were bank characteristics (bank size, asset quality and
capital adequacy). Consequently, the dependent variable of the study was profitability which was
measured in terms of profit after tax. Furthermore, the moderating variable of the study was
inflation which was measured using inflation rate in percentage. The Operationalization and
measurement of the study variables were presented in the table below (Table 3.1)
Table 3.1: Operationalisations and Variable Measurement
Variable Type Operationalisation Measurements
Profitability
Dependent
Variable
Return on
shareholders’ wealth
PAT in billions
Inflation Moderating
Variable
Inflation Rate
Percentage inflation rate
Bank Size Independent
Variable
Total Assets Log of total assets
Asset Quality Independent
Variable
Non-Performing Loans Non-Performing
Loans/total loans in
percentage
Capital Adequacy Independent Variable Level of capital
required
Capital Adequacy Ratio
= Core capital/ Total
assets
Source: (Researcher, 2019)
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
49
Sampling Design
The 43 commercial bank’s data was included in this study and therefore a census sampling study
was appropriate. The data was collected from the banks who existed in years 2013 to 2017.
According to Mugenda and Mugenda census sampling design can be applied when the population
is of manageable size or when it desirable to incorporate the total target population. In addition,
Kothari (2011) put forward that the use of census sampling eliminates type I and type II errors in
the study.
Data Analysis and Presentation
Data analysis was conducted in every empirical research to enable making of inferences and
conclusions. Therefore, inferential analysis and descriptive statistics was used to analyse the
findings. After the collection of research data, the data was analyzed. The annual panel data was
analysed by the use of panel’ regression’ analysis. Descriptive analysis provided the descriptions
of the study variables presented. The descriptions included parameters such as the mean,
minimum, maximum observations and standard deviations. The data was presented in tables which
aided in the analysis.
Diagnostic Tests
These tests are important as they show whether stochastic properties are met. The study will test
multicollinearity using Variance inflation factor (V.I.F) test. The test for Heteroscedasticity was
Breusch Pagan Godfrey test, and normality was tested using Skewness and kurtosis tests.
Multicollinearity Test
Multicollinearity occurs when independent variables are correlated either moderately or highly.
The Variance inflation factor (V.I.F) was used to test this aspect. The V.I.F should not exceed 10
for it to be tolerated.
Normality Test
These are tests used to determine whether the data is normally distributed, with some tolerance
level. Tests on kurtosis and skewness are very appropriate when using descriptive statistics as they
show the distribution of a variable from normal distribution, (Jeeshim, 2013).
RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS
The chapter presented the findings on the effects of bank characteristics on profitability of
commercial banks in Kenya. The study targeted all the 43 commercial banks in Kenya and data on
their capital adequacy, asset quality, bank size and net income were presented.
4.2 Descriptive Statistics
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
50
The target population was 43 commercial banks in Kenya as at 31st December 2017. The study
obtained complete financial data from 35 commercial banks. This accounted for 81.3 per cent of
the targeted population. This according to Mugenda and Mugenda (2009) was sufficient to carry
out the study.
Table. Descriptive Statistics
Capital Adequacy Asset Quality Bank Size Net Income
N 175 175 175 175
Mean 0.2235 0.1094 10.6042 .9817
Max 0.73 0.62 11.77 19.704
Min 0.024 0.00 9.30 (1.153)
Std Deviation 0.0909 0.1016 0.5945 23.7838
Skewness 0.361 0.5685 (1.541) 1.7881
Kurtosis 0.699 1.543 1.611 1.9231
The study used mean, maximum, minimum, skewness, kurtosis and standard deviation to analyse
the findings. The variables considered were capital adequacy, asset quality, bank size and net
income. Capital adequacy was measured by ratio of shareholders’ funds to total assets. Asset
quality was the ratio of gross non-performing loans to the total loans. Bank size was measured by
the log of total assets of the commercial banks while net income was measure in billions of Kenyan
shillings. The study obtained data for the years 2013 to 2017 on the commercial banks net income,
capital adequacy, asset quality and net income and the results summary presented in the table 4.1.
The total number of observations (N) were 135 (5 years * 35 banks)
Correlation Analysis
The study sought to establish the correlation between variables. Table 4.2 presented the results
obtained.
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
51
Table.Correlation Matrix
Capital
adequacy Net Income
Asset
Quality
Log of Total
assets
Capital adequacy Pearson
Correlation 1 -.
Sig. (2-tailed)
N 175
Net Income Pearson
Correlation .092 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .225
N 175 175
Asset Quality Pearson
Correlation -.211** -.122 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .005 .109
N 175 175 175
Bank Size Pearson
Correlation -.193* .227** -.249** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .010 .002 .001
N 175 175 175 175
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-
tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-
tailed).
The findings indicate that the correlation between capital adequacy and net income was weak and
positive (r= 0.092 p=0.225). The correlation between asset quality and capital adequacy and the
correlation between asset quality and net income were found to be weak and negative(r= -0.211,
p=0.005) and (r= -0.122, p=0.109) respectively. The study also found that the correlation between
log of total assets and capital adequacy was weak and negative (r= -0.193, p= 0.010), the
correlation between log of total assets and net income was weak and positive (r=0.227, p=0.002)
while the correlation between log of total assets and asset quality was negative and weak (r= -
0.249, p= 0.001). The findings concurred with Ifeacho and Ngalawa (2014) on assessment of the
effects of macroeconomic variables and specific variables of the bank on South Africa’s banking
sector performance. The study considered the following independent variables: asset quality,
earnings, capital adequacy and liquidity. Financial performance of commercial banks was the
dependent variable. The indicator of financial performance was ROE. The findings showed that
capital adequacy and bank size had a positive significant effect on ROE.
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
52
Testing Multicollinearity
The study sought to investigate whether two or more independent variables have a high correlation
with each other. The findings were presented in Table 4.4
Table. Multi-Collinearity Coefficientsa
Model
Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance VIF
1 Asset Quality .822 1.217
Log of Total assets .789 1.267
Inflation Rate .980 1.020
Capital adequacy .823 1.215
a. Dependent Variable: Net Income
Source: Research Data (2019)
Testing the Moderating Effects of Inflation Rate
The study sought to investigate the moderating effects of inflation rate on bank characteristics
effects on profitability.
Moderated Model Summary
Table. Moderated Model Summary
Model R
R
Square
Adjusted
R Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
Change Statistics
R
Square
Change
F
Change df1 df2 Sig.
1 .155a .024 .007 23.6997138 .024 1.412 3 171 .241
a. Predictors: (Constant), BSMO, AQMO, CAMO
Moderated Coefficients
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
53
Table. Moderated Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig. B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 2.138 14.343 .149 .882
CAMO 236.467 300.642 .061 .787 .433
AQMO -445.033 256.747 -.133 -1.733 .085
BSMO -1.960 19.563 -.008 -.100 .920
a. Dependent Variable: Net Income
The findings in table 4.8 show a change in R2 by -0.044 indicating that the moderating effects
decreased by 4.4 per cent. The change of adjusted R2 from 0.051 to 0.007 indicating a decrease in
profitability was as a results on inflation rate which was insignificant (P=0.241). The effects of
inflation moderating the effect of bank characteristics (Capital adequacy, asset quality and Bank
size) was insignificant (all the P- values are greater than 0.05). Therefore the study accepted the
fourth hypothesis (H04) that there is no significant moderating effects of inflation in determining
the relations between bank characteristics and commercial bank’s profitability in Kenya.
The study findings showed that there was a negative and insignificant relationship between capital
adequacy and profitability of commercial banks in Kenya. This indicates that the relationship
between profitability and capital adequacy of commercial banks was not significant and that capital
adequacy change does not significantly explain the changes in profitability of commercial banks
in Kenya. According to Olalekan (2013) adequate capital is one of the important parameter used
by the CBK and other stakeholders to evaluate the stability of the commercial banks in Kenya.
The study found that there was a significant and positive relationship between the size of the bank
and profitability of commercial banks in Kenya. This an indication that a positive change in bank
size will result to a positive change in the profitability of commercial banks in Kenya and that
negative change in bank size will result to a negative change in the profitability of commercial
banks in Kenya. The findings concurs with Babalola (2013) finding that bank size is key in
determining the relationship between internal and external environment factors and that majority
of larger banks have the capability of generating huge profits due to the market coverage level and
ability to offer and support more products.
The study indicated that there was insignificant and negative relationship between the quality of
the assets and profitability of Kenyan commercial Banks. This indicates that the relationship
between asset quality and profitability of commercial banks is not significant and that asset quality
change does not significantly explain the changes in profitability of commercial banks in Kenya.
However, according to Jeanne and Svensson (2014) asset quality or the bank loans quality is a
greater determinant of the firms’ income. The moderating effect of inflation was tested and the
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
54
results showed that its effects was insignificant on bank characteristics effect on profitability of
commercial banks in Kenya.
CONCLUSIONS, SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The chapter provides the summary on the study findings, conclusions and recommendations based
on the findings in chapter four. The chapter presents also the limitations and suggestions for further
studies.
Summary of the Study
The study sought to determine the effect of bank characteristics on profitability of commercial
banks in Kenya. The independent variables of the study were bank size, asset quality and capital
adequacy. The moderating variable was inflation rate and the dependent variable was profitability
of commercial banks measured by the net income. The study targeted all the Kenyan 43
commercial banks. Secondary data on net income, capital adequacy, asset quality, and bank size
and inflation rate was collected for periods 2013 to 2017. The Multicollinearity test indicated that
there was no possibility of Multi-collinearity between variables thus regression analysis could be
done to show the relationships between the dependent and independent variables.
The descriptive results presented that the average capital adequacy for the studied commercial
banks was above the regulatory requirements for the period under consideration. The correlation
findings indicated that the correlation between capital adequacy and net income was weak and
positive. The results on regression coefficients indicated that indicated that the relationship
between capital adequacy and net income was negative and insignificant.
The descriptive findings indicated that the average asset quality was ratio was low an indication
that there was a low non-performing loans in the commercial banks for period 2013 to 2017. The
correlation between asset quality and capital adequacy and the correlation between asset quality
and net income were found to be weak and negative. The results also showed the relationship
between asset quality and profitability of the bank was positive and insignificant.
The findings on bank size was presented and indicated that there was a high variation on average
bank size (natural logarithm of total assets).The correlation between size of the bank and capital
adequacy was weak and negative. The correlation between bank size and net income was weak
and positive while the correlation between size of the bank and asset quality was negative and
weak. The banks average net income generally increased for the period under study. However, the
relationship between bank size and profitability of commercial banks was found to be positive and
significant.
Conclusions
Based on the findings, the study concluded that capital adequacy relationship with net income was
negative and insignificant. The study concluded that relationship between asset quality and
profitability of the bank was positive and insignificant. The study concluded that the relationship
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
55
between bank size and profitability of commercial banks was positive and significant. The study
concluded that the moderating effect of inflation on bank characteristics effect on profitability of
commercial banks in Kenya was insignificant.
5.4 Recommendations
Based on the conclusion that the there was a positive and significant relationship size of the bank
and profitability of commercial banks, the study recommended that commercial banks in Kenya
should invest on more asset for the size in terms of increased bank total assets will help in
increasing the level of revenue generation.
Based on the conclusion that the relationship between capital adequacy and net income was
negative and insignificant. The study recommended that commercial bank in Kenya should ensure
that regulatory requirements on capital adequacy is met and that much effort be concentrated in
increasing the bank size in terms of total assets.
Based on the conclusions that there was positive and insignificant relationship between
profitability of banks and quality of assets, the study recommended commercial banks should keep
an average low ratio between non-performing loans and total loans and finally based on the
conclusion that the moderating effect of inflation on bank characteristics effect on profitability of
commercial banks in Kenya was insignificant, commercial banks should advance loans, increase
their investment on total assets and improve their capital adequacy despite the levels of inflation
rate.
REFERENCES
Akani, H. W, Nwanna, I and Mbachu, A (2016) Effect of Selected Macroeconomic Variables on
Commercial Banks Performance in Nigeria. IARD International Journal of Banking
and Finance Research ISSN 2406-8634Vol. 2 No.3 2016 www.iiardpub.org
Cooper, D. & Schindler, P. (2009).Business Research Methods.9th edition. McGraw Hill
Companies.
Dang,&Uyen. (2011). The CAMEL Rating System in Banking Supervision: a Case Study of
Arcada University of Applied Sciences, International Business.
Dietrich, A., &Wanzenried, G. (2011). Determinants of bank profitability before and during the
Crisis: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of International Financial Markets,
Institutions and Money, 21, 307ı327.
Ifeacho C. & Ngalana, H., (2014). Performance of the South African Banking Sector since 1994.
Journal of Economic and Sustainable Development, 5(2):46-56
Kiganda E. O. (2014). Effects of macroeconomic factors on Commercial Banks, profitability in
Kenya: Case of Equity Bank Limited. Journal of Economic and Sustainable
Development, 5(2):46-56
Kimande, E.G (2017). The Effect of Bank Specific Factors on Financial Performance of
Commercial Banks in Kenya
Kimani J. (2013). Assessment of effect of monetary policies on lending behaviour of Commercial
Banks in Kenya. Unpublished research project. KU
International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management
Vol.3 Issue 6 Nov-Dec. 2019
www.ijrbem.com
56
Kwakwa, O. M (2014) Determinants of Performance of Commercial Banks In Ghana. A Thesis
Submitted To the Department Of Mathematics Institute Of Distance Learning Kwame
Nkrumah University Of Science and Technology
Macharia, E. (2013) .The effects of global financial crisis on the financial performance of
commercial banks offering mortgage finance in Kenya. International journal of
economics and finance, Vol.1, Issue 2, 2013
Macharia, J. N. (2012). The relationship between the level of nonperforming loans and the
financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya.
Meshak, K. M &Nyamute, W (2016).The Effect of Monetary Policy on Financial Performance of
the Commercial Banks Listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange. International
Journal of Finance and Accounting ISSN xxxx-xxxx (Paper) ISSN 2520 -
0445(Online) Vol.1, Issue 1 No.7, pp 74 - 87, 2016
Mohana, K., &Tekeste, B. (2012). „Determinants of profitability of Commercial Banks in
developing country‟, Evidence from Ethiopia. International Journal of Accounting
and Finance, Vol.2 (Issue 3).
Mugenda, O. &Mugenda, P (2011).Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. Kenya.
Okoth,V, & Gemechu,B. (2013). Determinants of Financial Performance of Commercial Banks in
Kenya”. International Journal of Economics and Financial, Issues Vol. 3, No.1.
Olweny, T., Shipho, T. M. (2011).Effects of banking Sector Factors on the Profitability of
Commercial Banks in Kenya. Economics and Finance Review. 1(5), 1-30.
Ongore, V. and Kusa, G. (2013) Determinants of Financial performance of Commercial Banks
Sangmi, &Tabassum, N. (2010).Analyzing Financial Performance of Commercial Banks in India:
Application of CAMEL Model. Pakistan Journal Commercial Social Sciences.
Suka, J.N. (2012). The impact of capital adequacy on the financial performance of commercial
banks quoted at the Nairobi Stock Exchange. Unpublished MBA Project: School of
Business, University of Nairobi