32
International Software & Productivity Engineering Institute Today’s and Tomorrow’s ALM Solutions Vladimir L Pavlov, INTSPEI Chairman and Chief Strategy Officer http://www.intspei.com
International Software & Productivity Engineering Institute
Today’s and Tomorrow’s ALM Solutions
Vladimir L Pavlov, INTSPEI Chairman and Chief Strategy Officer
http://www.intspei.com
2http://www.intspei.com
Agenda
Global Demand for Productivity
• How does it impact software companies?
INTSPEI P-Modeling Framework
• INTSPEI P-Modeling Framework integrated with MSF
G500 Rank Company Name Revenue (USD B) Profit (USD B) Employees (K) Impact (K) Productivity (K)
1 Wal-Mart 351 11 1900 185 6
2 Exxon Mobil 347 40 106 3264 371
5 General Motors 207 -2 280 741 -7
6 Toyota 205 14 299 684 47
11 General Electric 168 21 319 528 65
12 Ford 160 -13 283 566 -45
14 Citigroup 147 22 332 442 65
39 Verizon 93 6 242 385 26
41 HP 92 6 156 588 40
42 IBM 91 9 356 257 27
87 Boeing 62 2 154 400 14
95 Vodafone 60 -10 66 906 -155
108 CNP Assurances 56 1 3 17118 443
119 Nokia 52 5 68 753 79
139 Microsoft 44 13 71 624 177
143 Motorola 44 4 66 663 55
183 Intel 35 5 94 376 54
184 PepsiCo 35 6 168 209 34
232 Cisco Systems 28 6 50 571 112
285 Coca-Cola 24 5 71 339 72
431 EnCana 17 6 5 3651 1208
4http://www.intspei.com
Let’s Benchmark
Average in Global 500
Revenue , B USD 41.8
Profit , M USD 700
Employees , K 104
Impact, K USD 1160
Productivity, K USD 59
5http://www.intspei.com
Global 500 Companies
2005 2006 20070
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
Average Impact, USD
2005 2006 20070
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
Average Productivity, USD
29%21%
6http://www.intspei.com
Ideally …
People should focus on three key things:Making decisions
Innovating
Expressing themselves emotionally and artistically
All the rest should be "outsourced" to computers
http://www.intspei.com
Productivity Strategies for a Software Company
Partner Ecosystem’s Productivity
Clients’ Productivity
Employees’ Productivity
7
Decrease Spending
Increase Outcome
http://www.intspei.com
Three Types of SDLCs
Agile• XP• SCRUM• MSF-Agile
Semantics-focused• P-Modeling
Framework
Formal• SSADM• RUP• MSF-CMMi
8
9http://www.intspei.com
INTSPEI P-Modeling Framework
The most important decisions (and most expensive mistakes) are done at the beginning of the project
The initial amount of quality control is minimal and then grows as development moves forward.
This results in a costly rework (often hidden) on the late stages of the project
INTSPEI P-Modeling Framework addresses this problem. We enable our clients to reduce delays between bug insertions and bug fixes
With INTSPEI P-Modeling Framework, engineers start discovering and fixing critical mistakes virtually immediately - when introduced - not at the late phases where they are the most expensive to resolve
Requirements
Requirements
Architecture
Architecture Detailed Design
Detailed Design
• Construction
Construction
Maintenance
Phase That a Defect is Corrected
Phase That a Defect is Created
Cost to Correct
Cost to correct a defect greatly depends on how early it was introduced and revealed
23http://www.intspei.com
Next Steps
http://www.umljokes.com
http://www.bayviewinnovations.com
Research software development projects
Baylor I5 project
http://www.vlpavlov.com
International Software & Productivity Engineering Institute
http://www.intspei.com
29%Thank You
International Software & Productivity Engineering Institute
This presentation was delivered on October 18, 2007, in Yalta (Ukraine) on the Microsoft Academic Days conference. It is
available for download from http://www.vlpavlov.com
http://www.intspei.com
Backup Slides
Country GDP (B USD) Population, M Labor Force M GDP Per Capita, K USD Impact, K USDArmenia 7 3.0 1.2 5.7 5.5Australia 645 20.4 10.7 33.3 60.5Austria 310 8.2 3.9 34.6 79.9Belarus 29 9.7 4.3 8.1 6.7Belgium 370 10.4 4.9 33.0 75.6
Brazil 967 190.0 96.3 8.8 10.0Canada 1088 33.4 17.6 35.6 61.9China 2518 1321.9 798.0 7.7 3.2
Denmark 257 5.5 2.9 37.0 88.4Finland 199 5.2 2.6 33.7 76.0France 2149 63.7 27.9 31.1 77.1
Germany 2872 82.4 43.7 31.9 65.8India 804 1129.9 509.3 3.8 1.6
Ireland 204 4.1 2.1 44.0 96.4Japan 4883 127.4 66.4 33.1 73.5
Netherlands 613 16.6 7.6 32.1 80.6Poland 337 38.5 17.3 14.3 19.5
Portugal 177 10.6 5.6 19.8 31.7Romania 80 22.3 9.3 9.1 8.6
Russia 734 141.4 73.9 12.2 9.9Sweden 373 9.0 4.6 32.2 81.3Ukraine 82 46.3 22.3 7.8 3.7
UK 2346 60.8 31.1 31.8 75.4USA 13210 301.1 151.4 44.0 87.3
IBM Rational Unified ProcessPhases
ManagementEnvironment
Business Modeling
Implementation
Test
Analysis & Design
Preliminary Iteration(s)
Iter.#1
Disciplines
Iterations
Iter.#2
Iter.#n
Iter.#n+1
Iter.#n+2
Iter.#m
Iter.#m+1
Deployment
Configuration Mgmt
Requirements
Elaboration TransitionInception Construction
Microsoft Solutions Framework
eXtreme Programming
Itera
tive
Dev
elop
men
t
Tra
ceab
ility
Man
agem
ent
32http://www.intspei.com
SDLC Fine Tuning: The Process
Defining Scope Of Work Client and INTSPEI agree on the scope of service2-4 hours, pre-audit interviews with the key stakeholder(s)
Improvement Design We design improvement proposals for client’s SDLC to make it more efficient1 +day(s), individual work
Improvement Implementation• W
e teach client’s staff how to eliminate bottlenecks identified on the first stage
• 2-7 or more days, training/coaching for the key people
