www.sec.or.th
Appointment of SEC Secretary-General
The Cabinet on October 4 appointed
Mr. Vorapol Socatiyanurak as SEC
Secretary-General, succeeding
Mr. Thirachai Phuvanatnaranubala,
effective from October 17, 2011.
Mr. Vorapol obtained a bachelor’s degree
in Science from Chulalongkorn University, Thailand, and MBAs
from the National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA),
Thailand and Syracuse University, USA. He also has a master’s
and a doctorate degree in Finance from the Wharton School,
University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Prior to the appointment, he was executive directors of NIDA
Center for Enhancing Competitiveness and University Business
Incubators.
He also held positions in various public agencies related to economy,
financial and capital markets; for instance, Vice Chairman of the
National Economic and Social Advisory Council, Chairman of the
Advisory Committee to the Council of Ministers on the Negotiation
of the Thai-US Free Trade Area Agreement, expert member of
the Committee for the Consideration of Government Bond Issuance
of the Ministry of Finance, members of the Ad-hoc Committee for
the Consideration of the Draft Bank of Thailand Act and the Ad-hoc
Committee for the Consideration of the Draft Securities and
Exchange Act, the National Legislative Assembly, and expert
members of the SEC Accounting and Corporate Governance
Steering Group and the Takeovers Sub-committee.
Securities and Exchange Commission, Thailand Quarterly Newsletter Issue No.30 (October 2011)
International Updates
ASEAN Capital Markets Integration
In September, the SEC hosted the 15th ASEAN Capital Markets Forum
(ACMF) Meeting in Bangkok. The second meeting of the year was the
venue for chairpersons from ASEAN securities regulators to discuss
policy issues and key initiatives toward an integrated capital market
by 2015 as indicated in the ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint.
The highlight was the joint achievement of Malaysia, Singapore and
Thailand in harmonizing the ASEAN equity and plain debt securities
disclosure standards. This is another critical step following the 2009
announcement on the adoption of the ASEAN Disclosure Standards
and Plus which facilitate fund raising activities for the issuers. The
success also brought the ACMF closer to the creation of a single
prospectus framework in ASEAN.
Other streams of work also progress according to plan including
(1) the facilitation of cross-border offering of plain debt securities and
mutual funds to non-retail investors by mid 2012 and to the general
public under the mutual recognition regime by the year’s end, (2) the
framework to expedite the reviewing process for dual listing, and
(3) the development of the methodology to rank corporate governance
practices of ASEAN PLCs. The ranking, to be conducted by an
independent group of CG experts, is expected to start in 2012 and
contribute to the overall plan to establish the ASEAN brand in
the global capital market.
ACMF WG-DREM Meeting The SEC hosted the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on Dispute
Resolution and Enforcement Mechanism (WG-DREM) – a forum for ACMF
and legal experts from ASEAN Ministries of Justice (MOJ) to discuss
potential mechanisms for better protecting investors engaging in
cross-border investment transactions.
Headed by Mr. Wisit Wisitsora-at, Director-General of the Legal Execution Department, the Thai Ministry of Justice, the WG-DREM holds regular meetings and reports work progress to the ASEAN Finance Ministers through the ACMF.
For more information, please visit the ACMF website at www.theacmf.org.
1
www.sec.or.th
IFIAR Meeting
The SEC, as a member of the International Forum of Independent
Audit Regulators (IFIAR) since September 2010, hosted the 10th
IFIAR Plenary Meeting during September 26-28 in Bangkok. More
than 100 participants from 30 independent audit regulators came
to share their views and experiences pertaining to audit market
environment, global audit regulatory developments, and audit
regulatory activities as well as to enhance collaboration on
regulatory activities and matters related to audit profession.
The SEC’s active participation in global audit regulatory developments
would enhance investor confidence on financial reporting and
further strengthen the effectiveness and robustness of the audit
regulatory environment in Thailand. This would also help to increase
international recognition in terms of the SEC’s independence and
Thailand’s internationally accepted audit oversight system.
For more information about IFIAR, please visit https:www.ifiar.org.
ASEAN Audit Regulators Working Group
The SEC hosted the 3rd ASEAN Audit Regulators Working Group
Meeting in concurrent with the IFIAR Plenary Meeting on
September 29. The topics of discussion were common audit
inspection findings and ways to promote initiatives for audit
quality improvement.
Established in November 2010 under the collaboration of the SEC,
the Malaysia Audit Oversight Board, and the Singapore Accounting
and Corporate Regulatory Authority, the Working Group aims to
enhance collaborative efforts among audit regulators to promote
audit quality among the ASEAN countries, exchange technical
training development, address the challenges to audit oversight in
the global economy, and bring about collective opinion of ASEAN
countries from both regulators and practitioners in the
international arena.
International Updates (cont’d)
Anti-Corruption Measures In a concerted effort to move Thailand up the clean scale, the SEC
and market related parties have initiated measures for using the
capital market as an anti-corruption mechanism. The country has
scored lower than 5 on the scale of 1 (highly corrupted) to 10 (very
clean) based on the Worldwide Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)
published by the Transparency International.
One of the first measures is to support the private sector’s creation
of the Coalition against Corruption, which includes listed companies’
establishment of anti-corruption policy and code of conduct. Another
initiative to tackle corruption is in the form of corporate social
responsibility (CSR) with the drafting of the “Guidelines for Social
Responsibility” and the “Guidelines for CSR Report” being underway
and expected to be completed by the end of this year in time for
the official Year of CSR Implementation and Report in 2012 and the
launch of CSR Report Dissemination and Assessment in 2013.
Companies complying with the Guidelines for CSR Report will be
endorsed by the SEC and the SET.
In addition, earlier this year, the “Anti-Corruption Network” was
launched to create social awareness of the impacts of corruption
and to unite efforts in combating and suppressing corruption.
A member of the network, the SEC has actively supported
anti-corruption activities to urge listed companies’ participation
in the mission.
The SEC management
and staff joined the
“Anti-Corruption Network
Walk” on September 25
to stimulate public
awareness and fight
against corruption.
2
Regulatory Updates
The SEC has reviewed its regulatory regime to maintain the standards
of financial markets by increasing fairness and flexibility for the private
sector’s business undertaking and enhancing investor protection.
Revisions of rules and regulations in Q3/2011 are as follows:
Derivatives Dealing The SEC has expanded the scope of derivatives dealing business.
Starting from September 16, 2011, licensees - previously permitted
to provide services exclusively for institutional investors - are allowed
to enter into over-the-counter plain vanilla derivatives transactions
with juristic persons for hedging purpose only.
The SEC, with the Cabinet’s approval, has prescribed 14 additional
goods and variables under the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003).
Associated regulations are therefore revised to lessen business
operators’ burdens and provide alternative channels for better
managing risks related to derivatives transactions. Earlier, commercial
banks were allowed to provide over-the-counter derivatives transactions
for clients, partially non-institutional investors, for hedging purpose.
Acquisition or Disposal of Securities The SEC has revised the rules on reporting of acquisition or disposal
of securities to ease reporting burdens and provide more information
to investors. Details are as follows:
(1) Every 5 percent trigger point report requirement applies
only to listed securities on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET);
(2) Compulsory submission of a hardcopy of report to the SET
is lifted; only the online report via the SET electronic system is still
required;
(3) The following cases or persons are exempted from filing of
every 5 percent trigger point report:
- borrowers and lenders in securities borrowing and
lending (SBL) transactions and collateral placement for SBL
transactions;
- acquisition of right offerings;
- Thai NVDR Co., Ltd. and Siam DR Co., Ltd. (SIAMDR);
(4) Scope of every 5 percent trigger point report requirement
has been extended to cover financial instruments issued by others
that entitle holders to convert or demand delivery of securities
issued by listed companies, e.g., derivatives warrants;
(5) Any person having an increase or decrease in number of
related juristic person* or concerted party*, which results in every
5 percent increase or decrease of securities holding in a listed
company, must file with the SEC a report of changes in securities
holding in the group.
The revised regulation became effective on September 23, 2011.
Notes: *Related juristic person refers to (i) a juristic person that is a shareholder
of the person with the duty to file every 5 percent trigger point report or (ii) a
juristic person in which the person with such duty is a shareholder, providing
that shareholding by or in the juristic person, as the case may be, exceeds
30 percent of the total number of the voting rights (More information on
Section 258 of the Securities and Exchange Act).
**Concerted party refers to a person having the intention to exercise
voting rights in the same direction or permit other persons to exercise such rights
with a view to jointly control voting rights or business, providing that such person
has a specific relationship or behavior as prescribed by the CMSB. (More information
in the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorChor. 7/2552).
International Updates (cont’d)
IOSCO Visit SEC senior executives, led by Mr. Pravej Ongartsittigul,
Mrs. Tipsuda Thavaramara and Mrs. Praoporn Senanarong,
welcomed Mr. Greg Tanzer, Secretary-General of the International
Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), on his visit to
the SEC Office in September. On this occasion, he presented an
overview of current issues for securities regulation covering
lessons from the global financial crisis, IOSCO’s current technical
work, and future implications for securities supervision to the SEC
management and staff.
Debt Securities Underwriting To boost liquidity in the secondary market, the SEC has now
allowed debt securities underwriters, co-underwriters, parent
companies and subsidiaries (“group”) to subscribe debt securities
under their underwriting services under the specified conditions,
such as:
The allocations to underwriters and their group must not
exceed the average allocation to institutional investors
involved in book building process;
Underwriters’ bidding price in book building process must
be non-competitive;
Such subscriptions and conditions must be disclosed in the
prospectus; and
They must comply with the preventive measures on conflicts
of interest while performing as financial advisor and managing
portfolio investment.
The revised regulation became effective on September 16, 2011.
Tender Offer Price The SEC has revised tender offer regulation to ensure fair tender
offer price and fair exit for investors. If a tender offer is not filed
timely, the offer price must not be lower than the higher price
between (1) the highest price of the acquired securities during
90 days prior to the due date with the duty to file a tender offer
plus financial costs arising from such delayed tender offer filing,
and (2) an average weighted market price of such securities
during five business days prior to the filing of such tender offer.
The revised regulation became effective on September 23, 2011.
3
Provident Fund Growth - Thailand’s provident fund industry has shown a
continuous growth. In the first half of 2011, the total NAV was
595,228 million baht (3.8 percent rise over year-end 2010)
with 10,806 employers setting up funds (8.3 percent rise over
year-end 2010) with a total of 2.2 million members (3.7 percent
rise over year-end 2010). Since the revision on the Provident
Fund Act in 2008, 2,189 members who reached retirement age
or left their career for other reasons have requested to keep
their money in the system worth a total of 3,013 million baht
(20.9 percent surge over year-end 2010). This is a positive sign
that members are giving a higher priority to retirement savings
through the PVD system.
In addition, the SEC has continually supported companies in setting
up provident funds with employee’s choice and encouraged fund
members to choose investment policies suitable for their risk
profiles. In the first half of 2011, there were 86 funds offering
different investment policies (14.7 percent rise over year-end 2010),
while 2,465 employers provided employee’s choice program
(39.7 percent increase over year-end 2010).
Investment - The SEC has revised provident fund rules in line
with international pension fund standards to support provident
funds in providing employee’s choice while better serving the
needs of fund members and preventing them from investment
risks on their retirement savings. Matters concerning fund
members are:
(1) Suitability test: It is imperative that fund members
understand the investment policies they choose, particularly for
investment in high risk investment policy (investing in securities
that are not bank deposits and debt instruments without currency
exchange) higher than 50 percent of one’s investment portfolio.
In case of employee’s choice where fund members wish to invest
in high risk investment policy, the management company must
run a suitability test and provide suitable advice according to each
member’s risk profile;
(2) Alternative investment (AI): To increase investment
flexibility by providing more alternatives with risk diversification
in line with international pension fund standards, the SEC has
reclassified asset classes by adding alternative investment (AI)
class. This will allow provident funds to invest in more products,
such as commodity funds, infrastructure funds, or other assets,
in the future, provided that investment in all AI products must
not exceed 15 percent of the NAV or each investment policy as
the case may be, etc.
The revised regulation will take effect on January 1, 2012.
Asset Management Updates
Mutual Fund Prospectus – The SEC has revised the format of mutual fund
prospectus to comprise three sections: (1) key information section:
a clear, concise and comprehensive summary prepared in a standard
format to allow easy comparison of funds. The prospectus and unit
subscription forms must be distributed to all investors; (2) detailed
information section: clear details of fund in Q&A format, available
at the point of sale or distributed to those interested in investing
in the fund; and (3) certification of information: confirmation made
by asset management company that such disclosed information
is true, correct, and not misleading.
The revised regulation will take effect by the end of this year.
Investment - The SEC has revised regulations on diversification
of fund investment to allow reduction of protected deposit and
alternative investment in sukuk and Islamic deposit.
The Deposit Protection Agency’s gradual reduction of protected
deposit to 50 million baht on August 11, 2011 and 1 million baht
on August 11, 2012 may have impact on mutual funds, private
funds, and provident funds investing in deposits of financial
institutions. To protect investors, the SEC has therefore revised
company limit for fund investment in deposits including other
instruments issued by and transactions with financial institutions
by taking into account credit rating of instruments or financial
institutions. This will allow the funds to diversify investment risk
relatively to quality of such instruments or financial institutions.
As such, they can invest not exceeding 5 percent of the net asset
value in deposits, instruments or transactions with any particular
financial institution with non-investment grade or no credit rating.
Such 5 percent of the NAV, when combined with other assets with
non-investment grade or no credit rating, must not exceed 15 percent
of the NAV.
In addition, the funds will be provided with investment alternatives
in sukuk and Islamic deposits. Investment limit in sukuk and Islamic
deposits will be similar to that in debt instruments and deposits of
financial institutions. Prior to investment decision-making, management
companies must prudently consider risks associated with investment
and disclose such risks in the prospectuses.
The revised regulations became effective on August 1, 2011.
Product Development
Oil Futures In August, the SEC approved contract specification of oil futures to be traded on the Thailand Futures Exchange (TFEX) starting from
October 17, 2011. The reference price is based on Brent crude oil price in London market. An important commodity product with high
volatility but low correlation with stock prices, oil futures is an alternative investment and risk diversification tool for investors while
helping entrepreneurs to manage their energy related cost of the manufacturing or production process.
Oil futures also joins the night session trading of precious metal derivatives (19.30 - 22.30 hrs.). According to the Futures Industry Club
(FI Club)’s standards of business conduct, initial margin rate of oil futures for retail clients is 26,600 baht per contract, and maintenance
margin 18,620 baht per contract.
4
Dialogue and Activities with Industry Liberalization and Capital Market Development
By Mrs. Tipsuda Thavaramara
SEC Senior Assistant Secretary-General
Published in The Nation newspaper
September 7, 2011
In the past five years, the SEC has clearly communicated its policy
of progressive liberalization in several aspects, from pricing (fully
negotiated brokerage commissions from 2012) to entry (no cap
on the number of securities licenses from 2012), to products
(allowing new types of securities to increase investor choice), to
investment abroad (which is now permitted up to a ceiling, and
later will include foreign offering in the Thai market). The aim is
to give investors more choices as well as to urge Thai securities
firms to adapt and prepare for competition worldwide.
Shortly after announcing our liberalization policy came the global
financial crisis that shook the world. The Thai market, even with
very little direct exposure, felt the impact. Developed countries
learned from the crisis and passed law amendments requiring
tighter regulation. Questions arose whether we were sure we
wanted to continue with our liberalization plan, a move that seemed
to be in the opposite direction from the rest of the world.
Let me say first that the term "liberalization", which basically
means less regulation, is broad. There are many objectives of
regulation. We need to differentiate between regulations which
are meant to protect investors and the financial system (such as
setting standards for public offering or for brokers' financial standing
and conduct) and those which exist to protect the industry (such
as restricting the number of licenses or having a commission floor).
Above all we must not forget that capital markets exist primarily
to serve the financing needs of businesses and the investment
needs of savers, rather than securities businesses as an end in
itself, although having a strong and competitive securities industry
will certainly help the market in fulfilling its function. The question
therefore is not simply about whether or not to liberalize, but rather
about how to facilitate capital mobilization and investment, how to
protect investors and our financial system, and how to strengthen
the securities industry.
In the policy formation process, the SEC has considered several key
trends which are expected to take place in the next 10-20 years,
namely (1) the rise of emerging Asia as a major contributor to world
economic growth, although the question remains as to how much
Thailand can benefit from this opportunity; (2) increasing global
connectedness among financial markets, which brings opportunities
as well as risks; (3) environmental problem and scarcity of resources,
resulting in the need to manage these risks and opportunities for
products that address this need; and (4) an aging trend worldwide
and in Thailand, which can have impact on productivity, and which
implies that we need to strengthen our social safety net for our
growing number of people in retirement.
With the above trends in mind, the SEC is adopting a policy mix of
liberalization in some areas, tighter regulation in others, along with
an increased emphasis on public education.
Regulations should be streamlined to facilitate capital raising, not
only for local businesses and infrastructure projects crucial to our
national competitiveness, but also for leading enterprises in other
countries, for example in Indochina, so Thailand could stand a chance
to play a regional role.
Securities firms should have more freedom to offer products and
services to their clients, in terms of product variety, currency
denomination, and distribution channel, so that they can compete
with foreign counterparts. Enabling firms to compete is better than
protecting them by inhibiting competition from new entrants or
foreign firms (since the latter has the effect of restricting customer
choice and reducing industry's incentive to improve its own competitive
ability).
On the other hand, regulations can be tightened for intermediaries
and market professionals. When the SEC plays less and less role
in screening products for the public, some other mechanisms must
be in place to ensure adequate investor protection. Financial advisors,
fund managers and brokers are expected to perform due diligence
and undertake thorough analysis before making investment decisions
or recommendations to their clients. And securities firms should be
required to have a good risk management system and adequate
capital as a cushion against external impact.
Requiring higher standards and level of accountability for intermediaries
and market professionals is not inconsistent with promoting competition
and investor choice.
Finally, there is a nation-wide problem of poor financial literacy.
A large portion of our population still lacks the skills to manage their
own money. Nor do they see the need to invest for old age. Given
the fact that Thailand is now an aging society, poor financial literacy
will lead to the problem of poverty and burden to the government
in the long run. Low financial literacy is also a major obstacle to
capital market development. This is why the SEC has begun to
put a great emphasis on building financial literacy in addition to
the above liberalization plan.
5
Securities Offerings (Jan 1 – Sep 30, 2011) Equities
Type of offerings No. of company
Q1 Q2 Q3
Initial public offerings (IPO) – stocks 2 2 2
Public offerings (PO) – stocks 3 2 4
Public offerings (PO) – warrants 0 0 0
Total 5 4 6
Note: Some have not started the offering process.
Debt securities
Type of securities Offering value (million baht)
Q1 Q2 Q3
Short-term debt securities 310,462.64 243,104.35 182,856.36
Long-term debt securities 68,436.00 51,861.08 13,340.00
Other debt securities* 11,055.04 1,088.09 925.16
Total 389,953.68 296,053.52 197,121.52
Note: *Including convertible debentures, structure notes and securitization bonds.
Preparation for the Next Decade Advertorial published in The Nation newspaper on August 1, 2011
The SEC and the Federation of Thai Capital Market Organizations
(FETCO) held a workshop entitled “Thailand’s Capital Market in
the Year 2020” bringing together leading participants and experts
in the Thai financial market to brainstorm and exchange
viewpoints on how the Thai capital market can become more
responsive to needs of real sector, capital market as well as the
general public amidst dynamic global changes in the next
10-20 years.
The participants emphasized that the Thai capital market must be
prepared and re-define forward looking strategies to focus on how
to seek benefit from Asian economic growth and also cope with
challenges and obstacles to outstand or at least be on par with
others. The workshop came up with the conclusion below.
Enhancing real sector’s capability
The Thai capital market must have a crucial role in facilitating
resiliency and enhancing competitiveness of the real sector to
serve domestic and regional needs. Convenient fund raising
channel through the Thai capital market must be made available
particularly for middle and small enterprises. Creation of infrastructure
fund, as a vehicle to help push forward development of the country
and lessen burden on government budget, must also be supported
and accessible for investment of the general public. Meanwhile,
new derivatives products should also be introduced as tools for
risk management available for business enterprises to deal with
risks associated with oil prices, exchange rates or agricultural
product prices.
Another important issue in discussion was corruption that has
been known to be an impediment to Thai business development.
The participants reached a consensus that capital market can and
should serve as a mechanism of anti-corruption. Measures to combat
corruption should focus on “the payer,” to make corruption harder
to commit. The measures could be taken on persuasive as well as
supervising and monitoring sides; setting up CSR Anti-corruption
guideline and randomly auditing the company’s payment, for instance.
The roadmap on anti-corruption is expected to be announced
within this year.
Strengthening competitiveness
Establishing the Thai capital market’s outstanding role in the
region is considerably essential. It was strongly reaffirmed that,
to achieve the goal, demutualization of the Stock Exchange of
Thailand (SET) should be hasten as it will equip the bourse with
structure responsive to customers’ needs and more competitive in
the global arena. Importantly, Thailand should now aim to become
a fund mobilization hub for Indochina’s leading businesses and
ultimately for the region. Together with the upcoming liberalization
of securities business, local firms need to be prepared for more
intense competition with expected newcomers from overseas.
Responding to needs of general public and society
The Thai capital market should have more roles in lessening
economic and social inequality by promoting better understanding
among the general public on personal finance both in terms of
financial basics and investment know-how. Participants
acknowledged necessity in founding an organization responsible
for giving the general public knowledge and advice in connection
with proper personal finance management. In the meantime,
coverage of retirement savings system which has been insufficient
should be expanded countrywide.
The workshop was regarded as a crucial step to establish a more
active role of the Thai capital market in serving as a vital driving
mechanism for the country’s economy. The outcome will be
developed and proposed to the new government. Last but not
least, it is worth emphasizing that all the aforesaid cannot be
achieved without support and cooperation from public and
private sectors.
6
Dialogue and Activities with Industry (cont’d)
Enforcement
Administrative Sanctions and Others In Q3/2011, the SEC imposed administrative sanctions on ten investor
contacts for their misconduct as summarized below:
Type of
approved persons
Misconduct Name Penalty
Investor
contacts
Interfering with client assets
1. Amnaj Kurakaew 1-month suspension, starting Aug 10, 2011
2. Jindawad Jongsukklang 3-month suspension, starting Sep 1, 2011
3. Jitarpa Sarunwong 3-month suspension, starting Sep 14, 2011
breaching
telephone recording
requirement
4. Wanida Soythong 3-month suspension, starting Sep 1, 2011
5. Wachira Duangpanya
Public reprimand
Sending
improper trading order
6. Wuttipong Raunggitvanit
Interfering with client assets
7. Watana Tantiwarun
8. Srisupaluk Rodari
9. Surat Boonrat
10. Surasak Churabao
Auditors Breach of duty
11. Jadesada Hungsapruek
1-year revocation
of approval, starting Sep 22, 2011
Note: More details in SEC releases No. 75, 84, 86 and 89/2011.
The SEC also ordered the following companies to rectify their financial
statements due to non-compliance with generally accepted accounting
principles:
Mandarin Hotel Plc. (MANRIN), Chiang Mai Ram Medical
Business Plc. (CMR), Ramkhamhaeng Hospital Plc. (RAM),
and Sikarin Plc. (SKR) to rectify their Q1/2011 financial
statements and submit them to the SEC by August 17, 2011;
Scan Global Plc. (SCAN) and SMC Power Co., Ltd. to rectify
their Q3/2010 and 2010 financial statements and submit them to
the SEC by August 28, 2011;
Yarnapund Plc. (YNP) to rectify its Q3/2010 and 2010 financial
statements and submit it to the SEC by September 29, 2011.
Note: More details in SEC releases No. 63, 82, and 83/2011.
Fine Settlement The Settlement Committee imposed a respective fine of Bt5,363,120.64,
Bt1,296,010.44, and Bt3,723,416.40 on Phaibul Chalermsaphayakorn,
Pongchalerm Chalermsaphayakorn, and Chaiwat Cruecha-em for using
undisclosed information they had obtained by virtue of their positions to
sell shares and warrants of Unique Mining Services Plc. (UMS) and also
imposed a fine of Bt333,333.33 on Patra Chalermsaphayakorn for aiding
and abetting. More details in SEC Releases No. 76/2011.
Criminal Complaints The SEC in cooperation with the Royal Thai Police - Economic
Crime Division (ECD) of the conducted a raid on Master Business
Consult Co., Ltd. and filed a criminal complaint against the
company and its management - Wittaya Phanrungrat and
Pinit Ratanajarurak - for undertaking derivatives business
without license in violation with the Derivatives Act B.E.
2546 (2003).
More details in SEC Releases No. 74/2011.
Court Judgment The Southern Bangkok Criminal Court on August 2, 2011
convicted OLT Enterprise Co, Ltd., Kittikorn Sirilertsuwan, and
Warunrat Sirilertsuwan for undertaking derivatives business
without license in contravention of Sections 16 and 125 of the
Derivatives Act in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code.
The three defendants were fined 20,000 baht each while
Kittikorn and Warunrat, also were sentenced to a six-month
imprisonment. The jail term, however, was suspended for
two years.
More details in SEC Releases No. 74/2011.
Enforcement Summary (Jan 1 – Sep 30, 2011) Administrative sanctions and others
Category Probation/
Public
reprimand
Suspension Revocation
Investor contacts 6 6 4*
Auditors - - 2
Financial advisors/supervisors 2 - -
Executives of asset
management companies - -
Executives of securities
companies - - 1*
Total 8 6 7*
Note: *Simultaneously revoked from serving as investor contact as well as executive of securities and derivative business operator for the same period of time.
Criminal sanctions
Fine settlement Criminal complaint
No. of cases
No. of persons
Fine payment (baht)
No. of cases
No. of persons
105 69 169,620,385.03 11 24
Disclaimer: This newsletter is for information purposes only. The analysis, opinion or conclusion presented herein are those of the editorial team. There shall be no legal binding to the SEC Thailand.
Corporate Affairs Department
Securities and Exchange Commission, Thailand
16th Floor, GPF Witthayu Tower, 93/1 Wireless Road,
Lumpini, Patumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Tel: (66) 2695 9503-5 Fax: (66) 2256 7755
Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.sec.or.th
Tell us what you think of Capital Thailand
• What is useful to you?
• What do you want more of?
• What do you want less of? Email: [email protected]
7