Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | xiomara-swaby |
View: | 236 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Internet2 Update
Gathering of State Networks 2005
Heather Bruning, Program Manager, Network Services
Heather Boyles, Director, Member and Partner Relations
9 February 2005
2
Abilene Upgrade – Completed!
3
Abilene Community – 4 levels
Connectors – Regional aggregators of Internet2 traffic.
Primary Participants – Internet2 members, including research universities and collaborating U.S. federal and corporate research labs.
Sponsored Participants – Collaborating partners of Internet2 university members (e.g., small laboratories, museums, clinical research centers) requiring access to advanced networking.
Sponsored Education Group Participants (SEGPs) – Aggregations of state education networks connecting the K-12 community, baccalaureate and community college networks, and libraries.
4
Abilene – February 2005
IP-over-DWDM (OC-192c) backbone42 direct connections (OC-3c 10-Gbps)
• 2 10-Gbps (10 Gig Eth) connections– OC-192 SONET also supported
• 6 OC-48c connections & 3 Gig Eth connectors• 25 connected via at least OC-12c (622 Mbps)
233 participants – research universities & labs• All 50 states, District of Columbia, & Puerto Rico• U.S. Census Bureau and World Bank most recent additions;
Library of Congress coming soon!
Expanded access• 119 sponsored participants and 34 state education networks
5
Purpose and Goals
6
Sponsored Education Group Participants as of February 2005
7
Approved SEGPs by State (34)
• Alabama • Maryland • Oklahoma• California • Massachusetts • Oregon• Connecticut • Michigan • Pennsylvania• Georgia • Minnesota • Rhode Island• Hawaii • Missouri • South Carolina• Illinois • Nebraska • Texas• Indiana • New Jersey • Utah• Iowa • New Mexico • Virginia• Kansas • New York • Washington• Kentucky • North Carolina • Wisconsin• Louisiana • North Dakota • Maine • Ohio
8
SEGP Inquiries by State (6)
• Alaska• Colorado• Delaware• Nevada• New Hampshire• Tennessee
K20 Initiative Update
10
K20 Initiative – Goals 2005
Continue to expand and refine the biannual SEGP Connectivity Survey. Work with SEGP connectors to gather more granular usage data for the 2006 survey.
Review K20 Initiative Advisory and Executive Committee structures for shaping the direction of the K20 Initiative.
Continued development of a multi-faceted communications strategy designed to communicate innovative programmatic activities across the broadest education community and beyond to critical stakeholders (e.g., K20 Initiative website).
Engagement of various communities of interest in workshops to explore how advanced networks and applications will impact education.
11
Internet2 K20 Connectivity Survey – September 2002 vs. May 2004 comparison data
12
SEGP Connectivity Survey ResultsMay 2004
Survey Goals•Provide a high level view of the connectivity and enabling technologies within each SEGP as well as an aggregate view of the entire SEGP program.
• Identify contacts at each SEGP for pursuing additional information.
•Not intended to be a detailed site survey as this is too resource intensive and difficult to maintain.
13
SEGP Connectivity Survey ResultsMay 2004
84% of the state education networks can access the Internet2 backbone network at >155 Mbps
As of May 2004, there were 32 state k12/k20 networks participating connecting about 27,000 K20 institutions –
• 23,392 k12 schools (86% of total)• 2,360 public libraries (9% of total)• 594 community colleges (2% of total)• 852 four-year colleges and universities (3% of total)• 74 museums, zoos, aquariums, and science centers (1% of
total)For more information:
http://k20.internet2.edu/connect_survey_index.php
14
K20 Initiative Contact Information
On the Web• http://k20.internet2.edu/
Email• Louis Fox: [email protected]• James Werle: [email protected]
Phone• (206) 685-4745• (206) 616-8155
15
Corporate Research Sites –Connection Options
Sponsored Participation – Abilene CoU allows small for-profit entities and government agencies that require routine collaboration on instructional, clinical, and/or research projects, services, and content with Primary Participants or with other Sponsored Participants to become Sponsored Participants.
• Contact Heather Bruning [email protected] for application.
Corporate Membership with Collaboration Site status – Corporate research labs seeking connection to Internet2 are encouraged to pursue Corporate Membership with Collaboration Site status and Abilene Primary Participation.
Collaboration Site Process – An updated list of procedures will soon be available at: http://members.internet2.edu/Collabsite.html
FiberCo, NLR, & the Regionals
17
Current Landscape
Initiatives like NLR are motivating others to build facilities-based networks
Combination of a distressed telecom industry and recent technological advancements have enabled the emergence of the RONS
• Already passed the nadir in fiber prices • New optical equipment is easier deploy and manage• Optical equipment market is still under pressure, keeping
prices low
Because of this, the time for taking advantage of this unique opportunity is quickly coming to an end.
18
Leading & Emerging Regional Optical Networks
Arkansas California (CALREN) Colorado (FRGP/BRAN) Connecticut (Conn. Education Network) Florida (Florida LambdaRail) Georgia (Southern Light Rail) Great Plains Network* Indiana (I-LIGHT) Illinois (I-WIRE), Univ. of Illinois* Louisiana (LONI)* Maryland, D.C. & northern Virginia (MAX) Michigan (MiLR) Minnesota New York + New England region
(NEREN, NYSERNet, Cornell)
*RONs with RFx’s issued or in process of acquiring fiber
North Carolina (NCLambdaRail) New Mexico* Ohio (Third Frontier Network) Oklahoma (OneNet) Oregon Pacific Northwest (Lariat –supported by
NIH, PNNL) Rhode Island (OSHEAN) Southeast (SURA Crossroads, ORNL) Tennessee (OneTN) Texas (LEARN)* Utah Virginia (MATP) Wisconsin (WEROC) Wyoming
(RONs in red have made dark fiber acquisitions through FiberCo)
Courtesy of Steve Corbato
19
FiberCo supporting project
Dark fiber holding company• Operates on behalf of U.S. higher education and affiliates – the Internet2
membership• Patterned on success of Quilt commodity Internet project• Assignment vehicle for the regionals and NLR• Fundamentally, a dark fiber market maker for R&E
Project designed to support optical initiatives• Regional (RONs)• National (NLR)
Not an operational entity• Will not light any of its fiber
Concept was a spin-off from NLR governance discussions• Internet2 took responsibility for organizational formation• National R&E Fiber Co. incorporated in Delaware• First acquisition of dark fiber through Level 3
– 2,600 route miles (fiber bank) – 3/2003
20
FiberCo assignment progress (route mileage)
Level 3 Genuity Total
Indiana U 241 - 241
U Wyoming 178 - 178
No. Carolina 208 - 208
NLR, Inc. 1,705 - 1,705
Florida 900 592 1,492
Michigan 963 - 963
PNNL 554 - 554
Internet2 321 - 321
TOTAL 5,070 592 5,662
21
Seattle
Portland
D enverSan Francisco
San Diego Phoenix
Santa Theresa
Las Vegas
Kansas City
Dallas
A ustin
Fort W orth
St. Louis
Nashville
Washington D.C.Baltim ore
Boston
Buffalo
Toronto
M ontreal
Louisville
Cincinnati
Detroit
Richm ondNorfolk
New YorkW eehawkenStam ford
Houston
Om aha
MinneapolisGreen Bay
M ilwaukee
C hicago
San Antonio
Sacram ento
Los Angeles
New Orleans
Tam pa
Miam i
AtlantaBirm ingham
Mem phis
Raleigh
Durham
Charlotte
Orlando
San Luis Obispo
San Jose
PhiladelphiaW ilm ington
ClevelandS alt Lake City
H artford
Jacksonville
OaklandIndianapolis
Mobile
Pittsburgh
Irvine
Syracuse
Colum bus
Newark
Tulsa
Oklahom a City
A lbany
W hite Plains
Available fiber topology
What’s next?and how does it relate to state and regional networks?
23
Abilene Timeline
October 2007 – End of recent 1-year extension to Abilene transport MoU with Qwest
• The time frame for both next generation architecture finalization & decision on transport partner(s) is ~12-13 months from now early spring 2006
24
Internet2 Network Infrastructure Futures
Time is now for architecture evaluation and planning
• Need to have a good idea of the next generation architecture by the end of 2005
• We are at an inflection point in network architecture• HOPI design team and testbed will evaluate potential
architectures• Coordinating with the RON build-outs and NLR time table will
be a critical task
Good news: lots to evaluate, ponder & discuss• We need your input: [email protected]
25
Regional Networks
The fundamental nature of regional networking is changing
• The GigaPoP model based on provisioned, high-capacity services steadily is being replaced – on the metro and regional scales
A model of facility-based networking built with owned assets – Regional Optical Networks (RONs) – has emerged
• Notably, this change increases the importance of regional networks in the traditional three-level hierarchy of U.S. R&E advanced networking
26
Regional and state networks: and future national network infrastructure
The development of Regional Optical Networks (RONs) is the most critical and persistent infrastructure activity in which the higher education advanced networking community is currently engaged
Both affected by and affects how we architect next generation national backbone
• Sparse topology: NLR facility and even 2nd gen. Abilene• Services: hybrid services out to the campus
27
Regional and State Networks
Internet2 needs your input
Looking at interaction with state and regional networks across Internet2 organization
• Abilene gigapop coordinators group• QUILT• Joint Techs program• With partners: Educause GOSN
28
Contact Us
www.internet2.edu abilene.internet2.edu/ www.fiberco.org/ [email protected]
• Steve Cotter, Director, Network Services– [email protected]
• Heather Bruning, Program Manager,Network Services
– [email protected]• Heather Boyles, Director, Member and
Partner Relations– [email protected]
29