+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Interpretation of corneal tomography · toric pathway –Regular astigmatism –Even bow tie...

Interpretation of corneal tomography · toric pathway –Regular astigmatism –Even bow tie...

Date post: 03-Mar-2019
Category:
Upload: lynhi
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
36
The University of Sydney Page 1 Interpretation of corneal tomography Presented by Chameen Samarawickrama - Westmead Hospital - Liverpool Hospital - University of Sydney - University of New South Wales
Transcript

The University of Sydney Page 1

Interpretation of corneal

tomography

Presented by

Chameen Samarawickrama- Westmead Hospital

- Liverpool Hospital

- University of Sydney

- University of New South Wales

The University of Sydney Page 2

Financial disclosures

– Early Career Research Fellowship (Westmead Charitable Trust)

The University of Sydney Page 3

Uses of corneal tomography

– Cataract

– Toric IOL insertion

– Lens densimetry

– Post-refractive IOL calculations

– Limbal relaxing incisions

– Cornea/refractive

– Ectasias

– Intra-corneal ring segments

– Corneal graft planning

– Ocular surface diseases

– Pterygia

– Scars

– Salzman nodules

– Glaucoma

– Anterior chamber depth

– Angle estimation

The University of Sydney Page 4

Torics at Westmead

– Westmead Hospital Audit

Aug – Oct 2016

– 22 ophthalmologists

– 5 registrars

– 2 fellows

– 22 toric IOL

– Pre-op cyl: 1.61 ± 0.9

– Post-op cyl: 1.23 ± 0.23

Pre-op cyl Post-op cyl Change

4.25 -1.75 -6

-3.50 -1.25 2.25

-1.5 -1 0.5

2.5 0 -2.5

2.25 -1 -3.25

-3 -1.75 1.25

-1.25 -3 -1.75

1.75 -0.75 -2.5

3.5 -3.25 -6.75

1 -0.50 -1.5

2 -0.50 -0.25

1.25 -1.0 -2.25

2 -1.0 -3

2.25 -0.75 -3

1.25 -0.5 -1.75

1 -1 -2

The University of Sydney Page 5

Introduction of a

toric pathway

– Regular astigmatism

– Even bow tie pattern

– Axis of astigmatism

– Match within 15 deg

– Power of astigmatism

– Match within 0.5D

The University of Sydney Page 6

Power of appropriate utilization of tomography

– Feb – April 2018

– 29 torics (25 followed pathway)

– By 1 month

– 26 of 29 had uncorrected vision of 6/12 or better

– 21 (78%) had SER within 0.5D of target

Mean preop versus postop cylinder

Available

data n = 34 Preoperative

1 Month Postoperative

P-value

Refractive Cylinder (D)

Mean ± SD Range

2.77 ± 1.48 1.75 to 5.12

0.89 ± 0.96 0 to 1.75

0.006

The University of Sydney Page 7

Aims

1. Understand differences between tomography and topography

2. Reference plane and standardized settings

3. Systematically read tomography maps

4. Examples of common pathologies

5. Specific maps that are useful for diagnosis of ectasia

The University of Sydney Page 8

1. Methods to assess cornea

Red reflex

Retinoscopy

Keratometry

Keratoscopy

Topography*

Tomography☨

* Topography: 2-dimensional surface mapping☨Tomography: 3-dimensional modelling

The University of Sydney Page 9

Topography

– 2-dimensional mapping of surface contours

– Accuracy and data acquisition affected by:– Working distance

– Disc size

– Alignment with cornea

– Focusing of rings (increased difficulty with peripheral cornea)

– No central corneal data

– Susceptibility to error due to corneal irregularity

– Anterior surface data only

– Data from 60% of corneal surface (limitations with peripheral ectasias)

The University of Sydney Page 10

Effect of misalignment

– Misalignment of corneal apex with reference axis

Danger of

misdiagnosis if

only looking at

curvature!

The University of Sydney Page 11

Tomography is different

– 3-dimensional digital rotating Scheimpflug ELEVATION based system

– Rotating camera takes optical cross-sectional images

– Reconstructs complete anterior segment

The University of Sydney Page 12

Theodore Scheimpflug

Scheimpflug principle

The University of Sydney Page 13

Scheimpflug principle

The University of Sydney Page 14

Advantages of a Scheimpflug system

– Camera rotates around fixation point– Minimises artifacts generated by small

movements

– More accurate image registration

– Huge number of data points– Up to 138,000 analyzable data points

per map

– Accurate anterior and posterior surface data

– Cross-sectional data allows accurate pachymetry

– Reconstructions based on elevation data (not curvature)

– Not dependent of reflectionsIrregular surfaces

Corneal opacities

Post-op posterior surface

Corneal apex

The University of Sydney Page 15

Difference between topography and tomography

The University of Sydney Page 16

2. Importance of reference plane

Chimborazo Everest Mauna Kea

Equador Nepal Hawaii

A. 6,268m 8,848m 4,205m

B. 4,118m 4,650m 10,200m

C. 6,384km ~4,000km ~3,500km

The University of Sydney Page 17

Reference plane for tomography

The University of Sydney Page 18

Understanding the best fit sphere

The University of Sydney Page 19

Standard settings for BFS

– Diameter of 8mm

– Not too flat, not too steep

– Most maps will contain only valid data

– Missing data is usually not an issue except in markedly abnormal corneas

– Standardized interpretation

– Belin and Ambrosio screening indicies are set to BFS Dia=8mm

– Float setting

– Allows software to move the reference BFS radius to best match the individual cornea

– Elevation scale

– Set to -75 microns to +75 microns

– Standardized colour scheme

The University of Sydney Page 20

3. The 4 map refractive display

The University of Sydney Page 21

A. Check quality of scan

The University of Sydney Page 22

B. Look at the pictures

Front

elevation

Back

elevation

Thickness

Curvature

The University of Sydney Page 23

Interpretation order

2

13

4

The University of Sydney Page 24

Keratoconus

The University of Sydney Page 25

4

3

2

1

Normal elevation values

Back elevation Front elevation

Normal <6µm <8µm

Suspect 6 - 15µm 8 - 17µm

Pathological >15µm* >17µm

The University of Sydney Page 26

C. Detailed numbers - shape

Anterior and posterior corneal

surface data

K1 and K2 – simulated K’s

representing calculated power of

surface

Km – mean K within 3mm zone

Axis – axis of astigmatism (note if set

for flat or steep)

Astig – amount of astigmatism

(difference between K1 and K2)

The University of Sydney Page 27

Detailed numbers - thickness

Pachymetry data

Pachy apex = corneal apex

Thinnest local may defer in KCN

- Normal > 500 µm

- Suspect 480 – 500 µm

- Pathology < 480 µm

Kmax data

Steepest K on anterior cornea

KPD

Anterior K – true net K

Influence of posterior corneal K

The University of Sydney Page 28

4. With the rule astigmatism

The University of Sydney Page 29

Regular vs irregular astigmatism

Regular astigmatism Irregular astigmatism

The University of Sydney Page 30

Keratoconus

The University of Sydney Page 31

5. Belin Ambrosio Display (BAD)

The University of Sydney Page 32

Understanding the BAD

The University of Sydney Page 33

Compare 2 maps

The University of Sydney Page 34

Myopic refractive surgery

The University of Sydney Page 35

Post LASIK ectasia

The University of Sydney Page 36

Summary

– Tomography is different to topography

– Newer generation of scanning technology

– Powerful tool to aid in diagnosis and management of many common conditions

– Best results are achieved with standardizing the settings and displays

– Using a systematic method of interpretation it is possible to consistently diagnose many corneal pathologies

– Pattern recognition!


Recommended