2009
Intersections:
Intercultural Learning
Modules
Module 2: Building Cultural Knowledge
H U M A N R I G H T S , C I T I Z E N S H I P A N D M U L T I C U L T U R A L I S M E D U C A T I O N F U N D
2
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Module 2: Building Cultural Knowledge
Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................... 3
Module 2 Outcomes:........................................................................................................... 3
General Learning Outcome:............................................................................................ 3
Specific Learning Outcomes:.......................................................................................... 3
What is cultural knowledge?............................................................................................... 4
Task 1: Observe .......................................................................................................... 5
Stereotypes and Generalizations ......................................................................................... 6
Task 2: Identifying Stereotypes .................................................................................. 7
Cultural Values ................................................................................................................... 8
Task 3: Contrasting Values......................................................................................... 8
Cultural Values: Individualism and Collectivism............................................................. 10
Task 4: Self Assessment ........................................................................................... 11
Figure 1: National Culture variation for Individualism / Collectivism..................... 12
Task 5: Community Assessment............................................................................... 12
Individualism, Collectivism and Volunteer Processes.................................................. 13
Task 6: Examining Expectations .............................................................................. 13
Cultural Values: Power Distance: Hierarchical and Egalitarian....................................... 14
Task 7: Self Assessment ........................................................................................... 14
Figure 2: National Culture variation for Power Distance ............................................. 15
Task 8: Community Assessment............................................................................... 15
Power Distance and Volunteer Processes ..................................................................... 16
Task 9: Examining Expectations .............................................................................. 16
Additional Resources ........................................................................................................ 17
Module 2 Assessment…..……………………………………………………..…………18
3
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Introduction
In module 1 we explored the larger context of building inclusive and welcoming
organizations. First, we introduced the theoretical framework (DMIS) that is guiding the
design and delivery of these modules, the one day workshop and the subsequent working
groups. The supposition is that welcoming and inclusive organizations are supported by
individual and organizational intercultural competence. Second, the large context is
impacted by the issue of change from the perspective of individuals and communities in
general and for immigrants in particular. This macro level look is important to help
understand how to align the process of adaptation, and the needs and motivations
associated with the different stages of adaptation, to the systems that exist in Alberta
communities and more specifically in nonprofit/voluntary sector organizations.
In this module we will focus in a bit closer and examine how values and behaviours are
influenced by culture and some of the culture general knowledge frameworks that can
help make sense of how we organize and make sense of things. Culture general
knowledge is necessary for creating increasingly complex lens to view and notice cultural
difference (remember the wine connoisseur). We will explore two cultural value
orientations in particular and examine how they might impact certain aspects of volunteer
management.
Module 2 Outcomes:
General Learning Outcome: To develop a more detailed understanding of the role of intercultural competence in the
development of welcoming and inclusive nonprofit/voluntary sector organizations
through the examination of key culture general knowledge frameworks.
Specific Learning Outcomes: In this module participants will:
1. Build culture general knowledge and explore ways to build culture specific
knowledge.
2. Identify the difference between stereotypes and generalizations
3. Recognize the connection between values, behaviour and culture through two key
cultural dimensions: individualism/collectivism and power distance.
4
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
What is cultural knowledge?
Cultural knowledge is made up of culture general and culture specific knowledge.
Learning specific things about a culture will serve you well but learning culture general
frameworks will serve you even better.
Culture general knowledge: General categories facilitate our exploration of values, beliefs, and behaviours in any
culture and provide a perspective for comparing and contrasting cultures. Culture general
categories are tools to increase your ability observe and interpret (remember the
Reflective Intercultural Learning Cycle) with a more complex lens. Like the wine
connoisseur!
Example: Nonverbal behaviour, Communication style, Cognitive style, Cultural values
and language use (pragmatics)
Culture specific knowledge: Culture specific knowledge builds on culture general knowledge with deeper and subtler
interpretations of cultural patterns within a specific culture.
Example: Many Canadians greet each other with a handshake (non-verbal behaviour:
eye contact, touching, conversational distance, facial display etc.) There is a pattern to the
length of time it takes and how firm it needs to be. (Three pumps on average and firm but
not too strong, definitely not weak) The firmness of the handshake results in
interpretations of things like character or trustworthiness. The handshake will vary
depending on gender, how well the two people know each other, age etc. There are also
rules for eye contact in this situation.
5
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
There are many unwritten rules at
play during an interview for a new
volunteer. We apply these
unwritten cultural rules to assess
the interviewee, their performance
and these “fit”.
Task 1: Observe Try this little exercise the next time you go to your local coffee shop. People in cultures
all over the world drink coffee. Culture impacts the “unwritten rules” for how this is
done. Observe and uncover the unwritten cultural rules for ordering a cup of coffee in a
coffee shop in your community. Then find out how these rules are similar or different in
another culture. What used to be a mundane trip to get a cup of coffee can turn into a
fascinating ethnographic experience!
What are the rules for:
• Standing in line? (how much space is there between people)
• Using eye contact? (do people use eye contact to send messages?)
• Responding to an error? (What is said? What is unsaid?)
• Choosing a place to sit? (If the coffee shop is full or when there are a lot of seats
available)
• How long is it acceptable to be kept waiting? Why?
• Do you get annoyed if someone gets into the
line in front of you? Why?
6
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Stereotypes and Generalizations
Before diving into culture general frameworks it is always important to
approach with an awareness of stereotyping. Stereotypes, described below,
are limiting and can restrict us in the observation and interpretation stage of
the Reflective Intercultural Learning Cycle introduced in module one.
Culture general frameworks are places to start. We call them broad generalizations.
Cultures around the world that have been studied are often identified using culture
generalizations and help teach culture specific information. For example people from
country A tend to be more individualistic than people from country B when it comes to
their behaviour in certain situations. Starting with this knowledge can help when we are
trying to make sense of our “something’s up” moments. Then it is up to us to find out if
our interpretation is accurate or not. As we meet more people from a particular region or
culture we can fine tune our observations and interpretations. It is always good practice to
consult cultural informants to get some perspective.
Cultural Generalization The tendency of a majority of people in a cultural group to hold certain values and
beliefs, and to engage in certain patterns of behaviour
Cultural Stereotype The application of a generalization to every person in a cultural group; or, generalizing
based on only a few people in a group
Characteristics of Stereotypes Cultural Generalizations
• Often lie below the level of
consciousness
• A way of categorizing
• The mental organization of your
experience of others
• Simplistic
• Learned from parents, relatives, and
friends
• Learned from limited exposure or
experience
• Learned through the media
• Can evolve out of fear
• Are problematic when we put people
into the “wrong category”
• Broad characterizations
• Useful as a general guide to
anticipating and discussing cultural
reactions, attitudes, and behaviours in a
neutral way
• Helpful in analyzing cultural patterns
• Will never apply to everyone in a
culture because individual personalities
and backgrounds always play a role in
how people think and act
• Used as a shorthand way to make non-
judgmental cross-cultural comparisons,
not to oversimplify or deny the
complexity of social interaction
• Flexible and open to new information
7
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Task 2: Identifying Stereotypes
1. What are some stereotypes of people from Canada, from your community, from your
family?
2. What are some stereotypes of volunteers? Volunteer managers? Coordinators?
3. What are some stereotypes of other volunteer organizations?
4. What are the limitations of each?
Intercultural development is about eliminating interpretations and
behaviours based on cultural stereotypes and developing
interpretations and behaviour based on culture general
generalizations and frameworks.
8
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Cultural Values
There are many additional cultural value dimensions that make up the complex ways that
our culture helps us make sense of the world. Learning these invisible aspects of culture
is challenging and sometimes frustrating if members of the “host” culture don’t
necessarily know how to talk about them. They are just “the way things are done”. When
you are part of a culture, you can act and respond automatically; knowing what the
boundaries of acceptable behaviour are. It is not uncommon for people in a new culture to
shut down or hold back until they figure out the rules or become comfortable with the
risks and consequences. This can sometimes be misinterpreted as lacking in confidence,
shyness.
Task 3: Contrasting Values
Look at the following table.
1. Which of the contrasting descriptions do you identify with?
2. Which descriptions characterize your parents’ culture?
3. Culture A descriptions are closer to the tendencies of mainstream Canadians.
Think of the people you know who have immigrated to Canada from other parts
of the world. Can you think of an example or story when you have noticed
contrasting way of doing something related to the value sets below?
Aspects of Culture Culture A:
Values and Behaviours
Culture B
Values and Behaviours
1 Sense of Space Informal
Handshake
Formal
Hugs, bows, handshakes
2 Communication and
language
Explicit, direct
communication Emphasis
on content – meaning found
in words
Implicit, indirect
communication
Emphasis on context –
meaning found around
words
3 Dress and appearance “Dress for success” ideal
Wide range in accepted
dress
Dress seen as a sign of
position, wealth, prestige
Religious rules
4 Food and eating habits Eating as a necessity – fast
food
Dining as a social
experience
Religious rules
5 Time and time
consciousness
Linear and exact time
consciousness
Value on promptness-time
= money
Elastic and relative time
consciousness
Time spent on enjoyment of
relationships
6 Relationships, family,
friends
Focus on nuclear family
Responsibility for self
Value on youth, age seen as
handicap
Focus on extended family
Loyalty and responsibility
to family
Age given status and
9
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
respect
7 Values and norms Individual orientation
Independence
Preference for direct
confrontation of conflict
Group orientation
Conformity
Preference for harmony
8 Beliefs and attitudes Egalitarian
Challenging authority
Individuals control their
destiny
Gender equity
Hierarchical
Respect for authority and
social order
Individuals accept their
destiny
Different roles for men and
women
9 Mental processes and
learning style
Linear, logical, sequential
Problem solving focus
Lateral, holistic,
simultaneous
Accepting of life’s
difficulties
10 Work habits and
practices
Emphasis on task
Reward based on individual
achievement
Work has intrinsic value
Emphasis on relationships
Rewards based on seniority,
relationships
Work is a necessity of life
Adapted from Gardenswartz and Rowe, 1998, Managing Diversity Chapter 4 pg.67
10
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Cultural Values: Individualism and Collectivism
Let’s take a look at two cultural values dimensions in particular and how they relate
specifically to various aspects of volunteer management. Each description includes a
short self assessment, a figure to show variation between national cultures1 and examples
of how the dimension might show up in volunteer management practices.
The first, individualism/collectivism, is one of the major dimensions of cultural
variability used to explain differences and similarities in communication across cultures.
This dimension of culture is about how individuals define their identity. Managing this
dimension presents a significant adaptation challenge for individuals and families from
more collectivist cultures as they adapt to a more individualistic Canadian society.
Individualism is defined as the tendency to be more concerned about one’s behavior for
one’s own interests, goals, and needs. Collectivism is defined as a tendency to be more
concerned about the consequences of one’s behavior for in-group members and to be
more willing to sacrifice personal interests for the attainment of harmony and collective
interests.2
1 The information in these figures is from work by Geert Hofstede Dimensions of Organizational Culture
www.geert-hofstede.com. 2 Triandis, H.C. (1988). Collectivism vs. individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-
cultural social psychology. In G. Verma & C. Bagley (Eds.), Cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes,
and cognition (pp. 60-95). London: Macmillan.
11
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Task 4: Self Assessment3 Look at the identifiers for Individualistic and Collectivist orientations.
1. Which characteristics do you feel are more reflective of you? Check the box.
2. How do you experience this orientation?
3. In which situations do you tend to act on this orientation?
4. Which influences or experiences have shaped your preference?
Individuals with an INDIVIDUALISTIC
orientation frequently:
Individuals with an COLLECTIVISTIC
orientation frequently:
Discuss themselves and their
motivation and interests
Require meeting to process
information and make decisions
Emphasize the first person singular
when proposing ideas (e.g. “I think…”)
Do not determine an action quickly or
by themselves.
Act and make decisions without
informing or preparing others
Seek feedback from others
Decrease their interest in and
contribution to activities when the
personal benefits become less obvious
to them.
Feel personally offended when the
group or organization is criticized.
Do not display consideration of the
impact of their decisions and actions on
others.
Show great concern for the impact of
decisions and events on the
group/organization.
View teams as a temporary collection
of individuals
Use the first person plural when
referring to business processes,
accomplishments and goals.
Resist and object to predetermined
structures and processes
Defend decisions made by their
group, even if they personally had no
roles in that decision
Maintain a loose relationship to others
in their larger social environment.
View themselves as a permanent
extension of a group/organization and
expect security from the organization
while offering loyalty in return.
INDIVIDUALISTIC COLLECTIVISTIC
• Where do you think you, your community, Canada in general fall on a continuum
between individualistic and collectivist?
• Think of someone you know from a culture different than your own. Where do you
think they fall on the continuum?
3 This task is adapted from Schmitz J, Cultural Orientations Guide: The Roadmap to Building Cultural
Competence 3rd
Ed. Princeton Training Press, 2003 pg. 69-72
12
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Figure 1: National Culture variation for Individualism / Collectivism
Country Ind/Coll
Value
Country Ind/Coll
Value
Country Ind/Coll
Value
Canada Total 80 Greece 35 Russia 39
Canada Quebec 73 Guatemala 6 El Salvador 19
Arab Countries 38 Hong Kong 25 Singapore 20
Argentina 46 Hungary 80 Slovakia 52
Australia 90 India 48 Slovenia 27
Austria 55 Indonesia 14 South Africa
(White)
65
Bangladesh 20 Iran 41 Spain 51
Belgium Flemish 78 Ireland 70 Sweden 71
Belgium
Walloon
72 Israel 54 Switzerland
French
64
Brazil 38 Italy 76 Switzerland
German
69
Bulgaria 30 Jamaica 39 Taiwan 17
China 20 Japan 46 Thailand 20
Colombia 13 Korea (South) 18 Trinidad 16
Costa Rica 15 Luxembourg 60 Turkey 37
Croatia 33 Malaysia 26 United States 91
Czech Republic 58 New Zealand 79 Uruguay 36
Denmark 74 Norway 69 Venezuela 12
East Africa 27 Pakistan 14 Vietnam 20
Ecuador 8 Panama 11 West Africa 20
Estonia 60 Peru 16 Malta 59
Finland 63 Philippines 32 Mexico 30
France 71 Poland 60 Morocco 46
Germany 67 Portugal 27 Netherlands 80
Great Britain 89 Romania 30
100 = Highly Individualistic
1 = Highly Collectivist
Task 5: Community Assessment
Highlight the countries represented by immigrants to your community. Compare those
numbers to the numbers for Canada.
13
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Individualism, Collectivism and Volunteer Processes This cultural dimension impacts volunteer processes and communication in the volunteer
context in a variety of ways. Consider these examples:
Example Individualist Culture Collectivist Culture
Motivation
Prioritizing goals according to
individual goals, needs, desires
(personal development / growth)
Individual success.
Personal priorities align with in-
group priorities. Group success.
Joining a group:
What
assumptions do
we have about
how people join
groups?
People tend to belong to many
groups and are accustomed to
joining groups. Relationships
tend to be more superficial and
limited to a specific group. It is
easy to make friends and it is not
uncommon to join new groups.
People tend to have only a few
general ingroups (e.g. work
groups, universities, family,
community, etc.) that influence
their behaviour across situations.
This membership can impact
behaviour broadly and in many
aspects of a person’s life.
Different values standards are
applied to members in the group,
compared to people who are not
in the group.
Providing
support
What is
considered
supportive?
What can I do to support the
individual
Supporting the individual means
supporting the broader in-group
i.e. family.
Including
volunteers as
equal members
Allowing volunteers to choose
what they want to contribute
Equality comes from perception
of choice
Equality comes from shared
responsibility to contribute till it
is done…beyond, my part
Interviewing
Expect interviewee to sell
themselves, promote own
accomplishments
Will tend to describe
accomplishments in terms of
group effort rather than
individual effort
Task 6: Examining Expectations
Consider how these different orientations affect or impact volunteer recruitment and
placement, supervision, evaluation and recognition in your nonprofit/voluntary sector
organization.
Can you see your expectations reflected in the above list?
14
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Cultural Values: Power Distance: Hierarchical and Egalitarian
Some cultures are high power distance cultures, or hierarchical. In these cultures, some
people have more power and influence than others and this power, which people accept,
is often emphasized. For example titles such as boss, teacher, professor rather than first
names. Those with power are expected to look after those beneath them and workers
called subordinates, expect to be closely supervised. They are not expected to take
initiative.
Other cultures are low power distance cultures, or egalitarian. In these cultures power
tends to be deemphasized by those who have it. For instance the boss may insist on being
called by his or her first name. Subordinates tend to be called co-workers, and are
rewarded for taking initiative. They do not like to be supervised too closely (micro-
managed). Power distance is also reflected in how formal or informal communication and
other behaviours are in the workplace.
Task 7: Self Assessment Put a mark along each continuum that best represents your views. Find out if your value
orientation toward power tends to be more hierarchical or more egalitarian. Remember all
cultures will have elements of both.
Low Power Distance
Egalitarian
High Power Distance
Hierarchical
I believe that all people are
basically equal and should be
treated the same.
I believe that people should
be treated differently
according to their place in
society.
I believe that power should be
shared throughout the society.
I believe that power should be
concentrated at the top.
I believe that followers should
question their leader when in
disagreement.
I believe that followers
should obey their leader
without questions.
I believe that a person’s
influence should be based
primarily on one’s ability and
contribution.
I believe that a person’s
influence should be based on
the authority of one’s
position.
15
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Figure 2: National Culture variation for Power Distance
Power
Distance
Power
Distance
Power
Distance
Canada Total 39 Greece 61 Russia 93
Canada Quebec 55 Guatemala 95 El Salvador 66
Arab Countries 80 Hong Kong 68 Singapore 74
Argentina 50 Hungary 47 Slovakia 104
Australia 36 India 77 Slovenia 71
Austria 11 Indonesia 78 South Africa
(White)
49
Bangladesh 80 Iran 60 Spain 57
Belgium
Flemish
63 Ireland 28 Sweden 31
Belgium
Walloon
67 Israel 13 Switzerland
French
70
Brazil 69 Italy 54 Switzerland
German
26
Bulgaria 70 Jamaica 46 Taiwan 58
China 80 Japan 54 Thailand 64
Colombia 67 Korea (South) 60 Trinidad 49
Costa Rica 35 Luxembourg 40 Turkey 66
Croatia 73 Malaysia 104 United States 40
Czech
Republic
58 New Zealand 22 Uruguay 61
Denmark 18 Norway 31 Venezuela 81
East Africa 64 Pakistan 56 Vietnam 70
Ecuador 78 Panama 95 West Africa 77
Estonia 45 Peru 64 Malta 57
Finland 33 Philippines 94 Mexico 81
France 68 Poland 68 Morocco 70
Germany 35 Portugal 63 Netherlands 38
Great Britain 35 Romania 90
100 = High Power Distance (Hierarchical)
1 = Low Power Distance (Egalitarian)
Task 8: Community Assessment
Highlight the countries represented by immigrants to your community. Compare those
numbers to the numbers for Canada.
16
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Power Distance and Volunteer Processes Look at the following comparison of hierarchical and egalitarian behaviours in a work
environment. From the above figure 2 we can see that Canada tends more toward an
egalitarian (or low power distance) orientation toward power.
Compared with hierarchical people,
EGALITARIAN people tend to:
Compared with egalitarian people,
HIERARCHICAL people tend to:
• Be empowered
• Provide infrequent updates to their
managers
• Make decisions without consulting their
managers
• Stop asking questions and are ready to
leave before hierarchical people
consider that they have been given
sufficient direction
• Prefer open-ended assignments
• Prefer general instructions and the
freedom to choose one’s own approach
• Prioritize tasks and responsibilities
based on urgency and importance
• Take extensive initiative; make
decisions and implement them without
checking with their managers first
• Feel relatively comfortable disagreeing
with their boss
• Be obedient
• Provide frequent updates to their
managers
• Ask more questions
• Keep asking questions after egalitarian
people consider that they have been
given sufficiently clear directions
• Ask their managers to make decisions
• Ask permission for small decisions,
such as leaving early for lunch or taking
office supplies from the supply room
• Prefer close-ended assignments
• Prefer detailed instructions and will
follow those instructions completely
• Prioritize tasks and responsibilities
based on the position and title of the
delegating person
• Report frequently to their managers and
verify that their managers concur with
their suggested direction
• Rarely, if ever, disagree with their boss
Task 9: Examining Expectations
Consider how these different orientations affect or impact volunteer recruitment and
placement, supervision, evaluation and recognition in your nonprofit/voluntary sector
organization.
Can you see your expectations for volunteer communication and behaviours reflected in
the above list?
17
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Additional Resources
For more information on other cultural values dimensions check out these great
resources:
Fantino, Ana Maria., Cultures at Work: Intercultural Communication in the Canadian
Workplace The Muttart Foundation, 2006
Toolbox of Ideas for Smaller Centres: Attracting, Welcoming &Retaining Immigrants to
Your Community Resource Handouts 3-9
Laroche L. and Rutherford D. (2007). Recruiting, retaining and promoting culturally
different employees. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Hofstede.com
Storti C. (1999) Figuring Out Foreigners: A Practical Guide Intercultural Press, INC.
“I had a hard time
explaining what
volunteering is to my
parents (from China)”
Immigrant focus group participant
18
Intersections: Intercultural Learning Modules Module 2
Module 2 Assessment How long did it take you to complete this module? __________ hours
Please return the following to Volunteer Alberta
(#217 10113-104 St., Edm., AB T5J 1A1, fax (780) 482-3310 or email
• Module 2 Assessment (please use the back of this sheet if necessary)
• Responses (individually or from a group) to any 3 of the tasks in this module - please include
any recorded discussions, pictures, answers or interesting thoughts they may have invoked.
1. Overall impression Disappointed Very Satisfied
1 2 3 4
What were the topics and tasks you found most useful?
What were the topics and tasks you found least useful?
2. Usefulness
Not useful Very useful
1 2 3 4
From this module, the ideas most useful for my work in nonprofit/voluntary organizations are:
Skills/information I want to learn more about:
3. Module layout / Process
Need much improvement Excellent
1 2 3 4
Please provide comments for improvement and comments about what helped you
complete this independent study module.
4. What three questions are you left with after completing this module? 1.
2.
3.